<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=OldCharlesN</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=OldCharlesN"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/OldCharlesN"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T02:52:18Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservapedia_insights&amp;diff=451472</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservapedia insights</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservapedia_insights&amp;diff=451472"/>
		<updated>2008-05-11T20:22:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OldCharlesN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm not sure which is funnier - that The Scotsman thought the Harvard student's column was serious or that Conservapedia is shouting at the rooftops about it.  Read some of his other columns, like &amp;quot;Harvard Doesn't Hate Parties, They Just Hate Us&amp;quot; and the like, then reread the column's parts that are quoted.  Then you can come back here and admit how embarrassed you are.--[[User:ThomasE|ThomasE]] 14:35, 11 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The point is made with good humor -  as in your second example about the lack of parties at [[Harvard]].  Or ... perhaps you think your example is trying to say that [[Harvard]] is a party school???  I guess you don't think much of political cartoons either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:08, 11 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Umm .... what?  --[[User:CharlesN|CharlesN]] 16:22, 11 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OldCharlesN</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>