<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Olivebranch</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Olivebranch"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Olivebranch"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T22:54:36Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=YouTube&amp;diff=787296</id>
		<title>YouTube</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=YouTube&amp;diff=787296"/>
		<updated>2010-06-14T14:52:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Olivebranch: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''YouTube''' is a popular [[Internet]] site that allows users to share videos. The &amp;quot;YouTube Generation&amp;quot; was named ''[[Time magazine|Time]]'' magazine's ''[[Person of the Year]]'' for 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2006, Youtube was purchased by [[Google]] Inc..&lt;br /&gt;
Controversy arose after people such as [[Michelle Malkin]] claimed that it censored [[conservative]] content,  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2006/10/04/banned-on-youtube-3/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This led the creation of [[QubeTV]], similar to the creation of Conservapedia by people who believed [[Wikipedia]] to be [[liberal]], and the Christian alternative, [[GodTube]], which has now re-named itself&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mashable.com/2009/03/10/tangle/ GodTube is Born Again as MySpace-Like Tangle] Mashable&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;[http://www.tangle.com/ Tangle]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 23, 2007, YouTube hosted an interactive debate between the [[Democratic]] candidates in the [[2008 Presidential Election]], in which YouTube users submitted videos of themselves asking questions. A similar debate involving the [[Republican]] candidates occurred on November 28. This led to controversy, as they used a question submitted by [[Keith Kerr]], who has ties to [[Hillary Clinton]]'s campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=23698&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 6, 2007, a group of music publishing companies announced a [[lawsuit]] against YouTube for its hosting of [[copyright]]ed content without providing proper compensation to the copyright holders when the videos containing the content were viewed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070806/ap_on_hi_te/youtube_music_publishers;_ylt=AmjdpxJDZVebD_Qp.hhWImKs0NUE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of YouTube is vehemently anti-conservative. Over 60% of Christian videos with more than 5,000 views are rated at 2.5 stars or lower{{cn}}. Liberal videos, however, are usually rated at least 4 stars. Christian comments on most videos frequently attract insults by atheists. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52405&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In order to combat this vicious slander, Conservapedia has started [http://www.youtube.com/user/conservapediavideos its own YouTube channel].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YouTube may be operating at a loss of nearly half a billion dollars a year. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2216162/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Suggesting that it may be a loss leader for parent company [google] or perhaps an investment in changing the landscape of information flow in the public. Attempts to reduce the costs and increase profitable content have been met with hostility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2009, a group of users from the website ebaumsworld.com launched an &amp;quot;International Porn Day&amp;quot; raid on YouTube. They managed to upload thousands of explicit videos which were often tagged to show up in searches containing words such as Jonas Brothers, Twilight, Hanna Montana, High School Musical and John McCain. It could take a couple of days for all porn to be removed from the search results, said parent company Google. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10245847-83.html?tag=newsFeaturedBlogArea.0 YouTube battling 'Porn Day' campaign] CNet News, May 20, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The delay was in part due to the raiders sowing confusion amongst YouTube moderators by purposely flagging non pornographic videos as containing inappropriate material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
YouTube [[secular progressive]]s have created a policy to promote [[liberalism]]. That means [[conservative]] causes are scrutinized, penalized and removed. An example would be showing surgical operations but preventing showing abortion videos. YouTube is consistent when removing undercover videos that exposes dishonest counseling practices at [[Planned Parenthood]] [[abortion]] centers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat5165.html YouTube Removes New Undercover Video Exposing Planned Parenthood on Abortion] LifeNews.com, June 25, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, they are known for censoring videos videos critical of Barack Obama or ones that show children singing praises of Obama by indoctrination. In addition, videos were censored if the were deemed anti-Islamic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22835_Jawa_Report_Video_Censored_by_YouTube&amp;amp;only Jawa Report Video Censored by YouTube, Littlegreenfootbalss.com, October 4, 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2008 YouTube presidential debates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Google]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Websites]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Olivebranch</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>