<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=OneTrueConservative</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=OneTrueConservative"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/OneTrueConservative"/>
	<updated>2026-10-19T22:15:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360310</id>
		<title>User:OneTrueConservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360310"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T04:20:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, I am OneTrueConservative, and I have joined Conservapedia to help edit and expand pages on this site while also providing a balanced view of the issues that face us today. In the present partisan environment, we should all strive to find reasonable solutions to our problems, with conservative elements. Although this is a conservative website, I hope the left and right can come to realize that they have more common ground than they might think, and to vilify either side as the opposing team is counter-productive to the progress of society as a whole. Therefore, my goal, aside from cleaning up articles, is to spread that dream to those here on Conservapedia. The dawn of a new age of moderation and compromise is at hand.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;diff=1360308</id>
		<title>User talk:1990'sguy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;diff=1360308"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T04:12:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: /* Re: Trump */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for adding your edits, hopefully you'll become a regular contributor.  If I can help you out with anything let me know.  [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 19:45, 27 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:49, 27 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Account promoted to skip the Captcha requirement.  Thanks for your enlightening edits to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:37, 28 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:45, 28 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations and welcome.  You should be aware that people who edit at both CP and WP with the same user name are sometimes harrassed at WP as a result. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 00:11, 29 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for the welcome and thanks for the heads up! I've already received some heat on Wikipedia for taking some unpopular positions and opposing the bias there, so it will be nothing new for me. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:36, 29 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your helpful addition to the article on Murder of Seth Rich, so I thought I would visit your talk page. How long have you lasted on the WickedPedia? I would be surprised that you would last long there, as I have found the WickedPedia incredibly intolerant and censorious, a pseudo-aristocracy with dominating bullies, biased enough for me to consider it a candidate for the Big T award (T in the Calvinist TULIP); i.e, total depravity! LOL I don't think you can do much on Wikipedia without being part of a group of old boys or buddies who work together.  ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 19:26, 23 August 2016 (EDT))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you mean my Wikipedia talk page? I have been editing Wikipedia for almost three years already. A big reason why I've lasted so long there is because many of the topics I edit are not particularly controversial. However, you are completely right in your description of Wikipedia. I have seen firsthand the massive (and very visible) intolerance and bias Wikipedia has against conservatives, Christians, and anything that contradicts secular and humanistic (pseudo)&amp;quot;scientific knowledge&amp;quot;. I could probably write a book about all my criticisms of Wikipedia. I have been able to do some good work (I was able to bring the article &amp;quot;Electoral history of Ronald Reagan&amp;quot; to official &amp;quot;Good Article&amp;quot; status, and I created a few articles), but on other articles, like the Murder of Seth Rich, we cannot have much confidence on the quality and neutrality of those articles. I do applaud you, Thunkful2, for your excellent work on &amp;quot;Murder of Seth Rich&amp;quot;. It's awesome that at least one person can accurately present this story! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:35, 23 August 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I meant right here, this talk page -- I visited it after seeing your good edit.  No, I haven't gone to your talk page on the WickedPedia.  Thanks for the complement.  ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 10:45, 24 August 2016 (EDT))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, got it. And thanks for your complement. :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:50, 24 August 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References from Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it's not really plagiarism to copy a reference from WP, it just want to point out that you probably shouldn't do so unless you have read that source, and believe that it supports what is being said.  If you are reading the books you are referencing, that's fine--I just can't tell. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:33, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, that's a good point. I actually did not read those books, I just wanted to cite something so I wouldn't be adding unsourced info to the article. Should I remove those references anyway? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:36, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is a good idea to find references to support unsourced statements, but it is a little deceptive to cite something you haven't read.  To be entirely beyond reproach, removal probably would be best.  At this point though, I honestly don't know if I'd bother.  In my opinion, it's up to you.  No one else has said anything, so it might be okay to leave them, I'm just not sure. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:51, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK. I will do my own research and find other sources that I can use instead. However, it's getting late, so I will deal with that tomorrow. Thanks for your help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:58, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Account promoted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your account has been promoted to include blocking and overnight editing capability.  Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:30, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congratulations! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:57, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well done!  [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 01:06, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks all! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:21, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Excellent!  you did good keeping an eye on that vandal yesterday. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 14:52, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, Progressingamerica, I appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:42, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reading the WSJ==&lt;br /&gt;
Re: [[Christoph Blocher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typically, when I want to read a WSJ article that requires subscriber sign in is to Google the headline and access the web page from a search engine instead of directly.  Most of the time this requires a clean browser tab, sometimes it needs to be done in a different browser.  Rarely, it requires a cookie clearing.  Just thought that information may be of help.  This even works with articles that are years old.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a last resort, see if its in the internet archive.(though, most articles I don't want that bad to keep trying)  But they're all good procedures to know.  Sometimes works for other news sites too, besides WSJ. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 00:00, 10 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the tip! That's what I will do. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:32, 10 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Account promoted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your account has been promoted to include upload and rollback features.  Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:26, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:36, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations! Keep it up! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:31, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks David! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Move and unlock requests ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can post your move and unlock requests to [[User talk:Karajou]]. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:30, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the tip! It's getting late, so I will do that tomorrow. I appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:37, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You don't actually need any privileges to do a move. You can cut-and-paste from one lemma to another. For purposes of copyright law, the edit summaries must make it clear where the incoming material comes from. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:54, 14 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Karajou blocked a user who expressed views supporting the Presidential candidate who is not a sexual preditor. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People should not be judged in race on alleged sexuality. A proper critique of Karajou would be asking him about blocking a user who expressed views supporting the Presidential candidate who is not a sexual preditor.--[[User:Rodgerr|Rodgerr]] ([[User talk:Rodgerr|talk]]) 19:04, 14 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you think you have been judged unfairly, you could have just emailed Karajou or webmaster@conservapedia.com (see [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Member Accounts]]). However, more than once, you decided to take the low route, calling him filthy, immature words [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&amp;amp;diff=1283494&amp;amp;oldid=1283491]. See [[Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks]]. And why in the world did you do this? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Coal_burning&amp;amp;curid=140922&amp;amp;diff=1283484&amp;amp;oldid=1283423] (for someone who apparently abhors Trump for the tape, your words seem just as bad) That, honestly, is shameful. I will note that the &amp;quot;Bringreaganback&amp;quot; account clearly violated [[Conservapedia:90/10 rule]]. Considering all this, it's quite clear you deserved the block. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:12, 14 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mainpageleft ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to your good question about entries on [[Template:Mainpageleft|Mainpageleft]], currently there are about 112 featured entries there, which are &amp;quot;reshuffled&amp;quot; periodically.  Do you have any suggestions about how that &amp;quot;team&amp;quot; of entries be improved, with respect to insight, influence, popularity, interest level, educational value, etc.?  It's a terrific mix of topics now but there is always room for improvement, particularly as the issues and interest in certain topics by the public inevitably shifts over time.  Thanks much for any suggestions you may have.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:46, 18 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An example:  &amp;quot;[[Underrated Sports Stars]]&amp;quot; is a solid entry, but should probably be replaced on [[Template:Mainpageleft|Mainpageleft]].  Do you have any favored, influential, insightful, potentially or already popular entry that you like, which you would recommend to replace it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 12:55, 18 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I do have a few suggestions. [[Murder of Seth Rich]] is probably the best suggestion, as it is very detailed and well sourced. Also, the Wikipedia article of the murder has been the victim of leftist bias (two times, within a month, editors have tried to delete the article, and with that failing, the article appears to have been stripped of much detail) which our article covers well. Other suggestions that I have are the [[Ark Encounter]] (a popular and influential attraction, and one that has been the victim of atheist and evolutionary bias, which the article covers), and [[Larry McDonald]] (a true patriot who stayed true to his principles, and his article actually covers the theories on his possible survival). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:22, 18 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Account promoted again == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations, your account has been promoted again, so that you can edit protected articles, and protect and unprotect articles.  Very well done!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:05, 10 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow! Thank you very much, Mr. Schlafly! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:19, 10 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations!  I've had some problems with the &amp;quot;protect&amp;quot; privilege, but I hope it works for you! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:35, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks! I hope so too! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:15, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Congratulations on yet another promotion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:46, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:46, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Can't edit article==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi again, 1990'sguy, it's Ambassador. Is there any reason I can't edit the article on the [[Big Bang]]? To keep atheists from changing it, I suppose. If you have access to it, you might want to add the point about the Big Bang, due to planets and moons spinning backwards, contradicting the law of Conservation of angular momentum. Find out about it [http://www.creationwiki.org/Three_planets_and_several_moons_revolve_backwards_(Talk.Origins) here]. Thanks! [[User:Ambassador|Ambassador]] ([[User talk:Ambassador|talk]]) 19:56, 22 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, the article is protected probably because of atheist/secularist/liberal vandalism. Unfortunately, I cannot edit it myself as I do not have full admin capabilities. I recommend asking an admin ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&amp;amp;username=&amp;amp;group=sysop&amp;amp;limit=100 list]) to unlock the article or add the information you want added. Or, you can go to [[Talk:Main Page|the main talk page]] and add your request there, where more people can see it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:08, 22 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello there, and thank you for editing the article on [[Islam and Christianity]]. --[[User:SWAJCAHL&amp;amp;#38;S|SWAJCAHL&amp;amp;#38;S]] ([[User talk:SWAJCAHL&amp;amp;#38;S|talk]]) 09:13, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem, and thank you for creating it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:14, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And also thank you, for your help - and tips! - on [[Jared Kushner]]. I'll try to remember the ref's and cat's in the future. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ([[User talk:Ed Poor|talk]]) 21:49, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sounds great and you're welcome! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:05, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Geocentric page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a bit on the talk page a while ago. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 17:15, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you mean on the section &amp;quot;Ptolemy's view of a stationary earth&amp;quot;? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:13, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry for the late reply but yes. It doesn't seemed to have created a new heading so I will add that now. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 17:11, 5 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I removed it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:21, 5 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is a simple misunderstanding. Please be reasonable. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is [[User:Amorrow]]. I had to dirty myself by creating a sockpuppet because you cut off every last channel of communication. The issues:&lt;br /&gt;
# SSN of dead people are release by the government of the USA. I made it clear that my father is dead. His name was William Knight Morrow. You can find his name and SSN, for instance, at [http://sortedbybirthdate.com/pages/19311104.html this page]. It is public, not private.&lt;br /&gt;
# You could have removed that link and let it go at that. I do not require notification of such actions. I do not care about that link very much. I put it there simply as a convenience.&lt;br /&gt;
Is the matter resolved? If so, then please unblock me or let me know here what remains unresolved.--[[User:Amorrow2|Amorrow2]] ([[User talk:Amorrow2|talk]]) 20:44, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am discussing the issue on [[User talk:DavidB4]]. You are welcome to join in. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:48, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You are unblocked. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:46, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pitch hitting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the ref [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump&amp;amp;oldid=1293435]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:34, 18 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. Always happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:15, 18 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump==&lt;br /&gt;
You're not telling me it's just a coincidence, are you? [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:44, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Seriously? It is extremely unlikely that this passage, which is about the Second Coming of Christ, has anything to do with Donald Trump. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:46, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Dang :( Thought I'd had my first ever conservative insight. Must be the morphine. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:56, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think this has more to do with biblical [[hermeneutics]] than conservatism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:00, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for all your contributions to Conservaoedia as far your web article content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:37, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you very much, Conservative, and the same to you as well! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:43, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest doing the redirect in the opposite direction for two reasons.  First, it preserves the history and visits to the pre-existing entry.  Second, it leaves intact the &amp;quot;Saint&amp;quot; spelled out, which is a stronger and more effective title than the secularized abbreviation.  I'd be happy to change the direction of the redirect, if you agree.  Regardless, thanks for your efforts!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:01, 27 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes please, Mr. Schlafly, that would be great if you would move it. Just as long as the article shows up as being created by me on the &amp;quot;New Pages&amp;quot; feed. I didn't know that this article already existed, but I worked hard on it and I think that my article is of higher quality by any objective measure. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:39, 28 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==European immigration==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking of doing an article on the [[European immigration]] problem (don't want to call 'European immigration crisis', yet). Americans are woefully ignorant of what's happening in Europe, and we're looking at doing perhaps the biggest change in Immigration law since 1952. In Europe, whole new political parties have been spawned because of the establishment parties failure to deal with the problems. In 20 years, the German mi!itary may be majority Muslim which would impact the future of the NATO alliance. Better get started now in educating the American public on changing demographics and how this may affect America's role as a Superpower, assuming it still is by then. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you care to collaborate? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:39, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, I'll be happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:39, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you think we should add a subsection under UK about Brexit and to what extent that was motivated by immigration? Also, I'd like to include something about the Schengen Agreement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:46, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both of those are great ideas. The &amp;quot;freedom of movement&amp;quot; EU policy played a large part in the referendum and its aftermath. People are tired of unlimited immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for the Schengen area, people can go anywhere they want in Europe without worrying about border security (and before, it was quite tough crossing the border I've heard). The agreement is an essential part of the EU plan to reach full political unification. It really has nothing to do with economics. Also, criminals and terrorists can easily cross the border. The recent Berlin attacker was caught in Italy. He crossed at least two borders without being caught. Imagine if he tried doing that without the agreement. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:53, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Same as most of suspects in 1200 reported sexual assault cases New Years Eve in Cologne. Something like only 7 or 22 arrests have ever been made, while most of the other identified suspects are reported to have fled the country.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Father's SSN ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created [[Social Security Death Index]]. After I add some ref's, I hope that we can revisit the notion of me declaring what my father's SSN is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to mention where I got this idea from, it is from the web site anusha.com . Sloan has lived an erratic and at times immoral life, but he is just below the level of genius in raw talent. I refer to him as an &amp;quot;accidental adventurer&amp;quot;. Please see thermo4thermo.org/sam_sloan.html for some of his life-adventures.&lt;br /&gt;
I am not promoting his lifestyle, but he is my publisher for my upcoming book. His web site is a mess. It has about 3000 pages but just a mess of cross-references. The home page is very, very long.  You can look at pages like www.anusha.com/pafc147.htm . He also has pages like www.anusha.com/uncles-p.htm . His memory is almost perfect. Near Total Recall. Anyway, I hope we can engage in dialog about my father's SSN.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 22:11, 3 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Hate crime==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear 1990'sguy, I am not trying to get into an edit war with you, but I believe that you are misreading the hate crime laws.  They do not address &amp;quot;hate speech,&amp;quot; just violence or other criminal acts against target groups that receive a lot of hate.  I suggest that you do further research, and I hope that you will come to the same conclusion. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 20:31, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:For clarification, are you telling me that hate crime laws do not cover &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot;? Regardless, I think we should mention that slowly (but steadily) speaking out for biblical Christian principles (opposition to homosexual marriage, saying Islam is a false religion, etc.) is being seen as &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot; and vulnerable to being criminalized. See this recent story[https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/simon-turpin/2016/01/08/northern-ireland-pastor-not-guilty-criticising-islam/] and please note the recent attempts to censor Christian sermons in Houston (I don't know if other cities did the same). Censorship of Christian and conservative opinions is growing, and I could a few (but probably unrelated to hate crimes) examples. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:09, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, while you can keep you additions, would you please restore the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hate_crime&amp;amp;curid=3861&amp;amp;diff=1298155&amp;amp;oldid=1298153 material you deleted in this edit] (particularly those three completely deleted paragraphs)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:11, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for fixing the dead link and finding an additional source.  You are exactly right. Hate crime and hate speech are completely different.  All Conservatives disapprove of speech codes, &amp;quot;safe spaces policy&amp;quot; and political correctness.  The First Amendment is clear that regulation of speech must be neutral as to the message.  The person(s) who wrote the [[Hate crime]] article years ago got a bit tangled up.  Liberals want hate speech codes, and Conservatives oppose them.  Both Liberals and Conservatives have voted to enact true hate crime laws to protect religious freedom and to address hate violence on the basis of race.  Some Conservatives argue that the list of hate targets in those laws should not include &amp;quot;sexual orientation,&amp;quot;  but that argument does not belong in a section discussing protecting religion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I took out the two paragraphs because they were repetitive, out-of-place and not germaine.  Why not add them to [[Hate speech]]? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 21:39, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you for clarifying and for moving the content. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:00, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You are welcome.  Our discussion here was a bit time delayed. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:02, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include the legislative history, it should explain which bill that was finally adopted that is being discussed and how the bill that was adopted differs from the earlier bills.  The people that worked on this article years ago were obviously opposed to a series of bills and were making arguments on why a bill would be bad.  Their narative is out of date.  We have a number of state and federal hate crime laws on the books and we need to describe what exists, give facts and statistics about how the laws work, and include some commentary on whether the law has been applied fairly.   If you want to expand the history section beyond the two sentences that I have explaining how the federal law expanded the role of the FBI, please do so.  But the fact that certain people sponsored bills that did not pass before a bill did pass is not helpful unless you explain what changes were made or how the early efforts illumniates our understanding of the bill that passed. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 00:50, 13 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If these proposed bills became law, we should definitely include this (even if we word it differently). We should do this in order to inform the public about leftist laws and to show that they didn't always exist. Unfortunately, I am quite busy right now, so I cannot do anything about this at the moment. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:49, 13 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::1990sguy, these bills did '''not''' become law.  A similar bill later became law. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:10, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not to sidetrack your guys discussion, but let me point out (cause the media hasn't) we have just witnessed something very rare and unusual in the US. Traditionally, because of state sovereignty, the states prosecute murder cases and federal government's role is restricted, for most of our history, to capital cases in the US military. In the 20th century federal crimes like murdering the president, or terrorism on federal property causing death ([[Timothy McVeigh]]), were added. This guy, [http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/12/us/dylann-roof-death-penalty-explainer/ Dylann Roof], has just been sentenced to death for violating peoples civil rights with a hate crime enhancement, and ''not for murder''. The federal government does not have the legal authority to try this as a murder case. In fact, Roof probably never will be tried for murder cause the State of South Carolina isn't gonna spend the time and money to do it after the feds are done. In my lifetime, I think this is only the fourth case like this I ever heard of, tho I'm sure there's been a few others. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:37, 13 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, this happened a lot in the 1960s. Civil rights workers would go South and were murdered and either the murder was not prosecuted or a local jury would acquit the accused.  The FBI would then investigate and the US DOJ would successfully prosecute for civil rights violations in Federal Court.  The question is whether there is enough of a commerce clause basis to allow for the passage of such federal crimes, and the courts have upheld them on the grounds that if the federal government did not prevent such intimidation, people would not feel safe crossing state lines.  Also, many states have suspended or abolished the death penalty, while it remains available in federal court.  State &amp;quot;sovereignty&amp;quot; is very limited and not ''actual'' sovereignty in the legal sense.  To me, this is a more interesting aspect of the Hate crime article than whether or not the definition should be expanded to include &amp;quot;gender identity.&amp;quot; [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:08, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm not sure it happened &amp;quot;a lot&amp;quot;. There was the 'Mississippi Burning' case, where the local cops and others were charged with civil rights violations, but no one served more than a six year sentence. This is why &amp;quot;hate crime&amp;quot; legislation was added later, cause sentences were too light for a &amp;quot;civil rights violation resulting in death&amp;quot;. The problem in those days were all-white juries exonerating murder cases, so the feds invented a way they could prosecute killers. One guy was convicted in a state trial [http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/price&amp;amp;bowers/killen.htm 40 years later in 2005 of manslaughter,] but he wasn't the trigger man. No one has ever been charged with the actual killings.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then there was Salt Lake City case of a civil rights violation resulting in death in 1978, but Utah was never part of the Confederacy, was not put under federal scrutiny in the Voting Rights Act, nor has a history of all-white jurries exonersting whites accused of murdering blacks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the 1990s, Brian Beckwith was convicted of violating Medgar Evers civil rights by killing him in the 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the 90s Timothy McVeigh was the first person executed by the federal government since, like 1956.  But this was a terrorism charge resulting in death, not a civil rights violation, AFAIK. ([https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3azq6b/eli5how_timothy_mcveigh_only_got_convicted_of_8/ McVeigh was only charged with 8 counts of murder, although 168 were killed]). Since McVeigh, there's been maybe one or two other cases of people executed by the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline, the federal hate crime enhancement was added cause, while the feds proved they could get a conviction where the state failed to act, the penalty was too low. Since its inception, it's hard to find a single case that the law was used for what it was designed for. There is no evidence whatsoever that South Carolina would not prosecute Dylann Roos, or an all-white jury would have exonerated him if the feds failed to intrude. South Carolina has lost its right to govern itself, its sovereignty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:32, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If this is true, then it definitely should be added. It would give yet another ignored example of massive governmental expansion and movement towards socialism. JDano, if the 2009 proposal did not become law, then what did the actual law consist of? If the bill that was listed on the article did not become law, then there is no point in including it. However, a legislative history of successful bills would be good. However, I am still quite busy, so I will not attempt to do anything about this at the moment. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:49, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contest==&lt;br /&gt;
I will provide the details you seek when i get some time. You were in the top 5. --Jpatt 10:19, 16 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for the reply Jpatt! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:40, 16 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== discuession ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am continuing the discussion on my talk page.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 10:39, 22 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
What would be the best word to describe Eurosceptic's opponents? Eurocentric? Pan European? Some other? I don't like globalist in this context. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:42, 28 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I would say either &amp;quot;Europeanists,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Europhiles,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Euro-Federalists&amp;quot; are the best. They either seem to be the most used terms. Of those three, I would personally opt for the first. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:00, 28 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ban editing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I've noticed you sometimes change blocks by other admins to increase the time or make in infinite.  I appreciate your intentions, but just thought I would point out a couple things.  Firstly, the blocking admin generally has the final say over the block they have imposed.  For example, if a person want to dispute the ban, they are to go to the blocking admin, and that admin decides whether to revoke the ban or not (as can be seen [[Conservapedia:Quick_reference#If_you_get_blocked|here]]).  Since you are not revoking a block, it's probably not as big of an issue, but it still seems to be proper etiquette. Of course, full admins have authority over assistants such as you and I, so they have the right to direct revise of revoke blocks we make.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, While it makes good sense to block those people forever, it doesn't really work that way.  A ban applies to the username, and the IP from which they edited if the option is selected--nothing more.  Vandals almost always use servers to redirect their connection, however, so that their true IP is never seen by CP.  This means that when we block those users, we are really just blocking the server they were using.  This is a good thing too, but the problem is that these servers are usually assigned new IPs periodically, so the block no longer applies--now the blocked IP is unassigned.  Since most people in the western world still use IPv4, there are not that many spare IP addresses, so the IP is soon assigned to someone else. Now some innocent person is using an IP which for all eternity has been blocked on CP.  They probably will never even know, but if we set infinite blocks enough, the chances of that happening regularly increase continuously.  I know some people here do use infinite block regularly, but in my opinion its a logistical problem.  This is why I almost always set a time limit, or block only the username infinitely, and leave the IP unblocked (which I prefer not to do).&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your ongoing efforts! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:05, 31 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yikes, I should have thought of that. The thought of indefinitely blocking innocent people from CP certainly is not a good thing. If you haven't reverted by block change, feel free to undo it. I'm too busy right now to do it myself. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:11, 31 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The chances of that happening from a couple blocks are pretty low, but it can add up.  Anyway, no harm done.  I just thought I'd mention it. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:24, 31 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== expand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Gainful employment]]. Yes. I dare you to.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 08:32, 4 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why? What's the purpose of you messaging me? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:25, 4 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Abortion]] article==&lt;br /&gt;
It's open for you to make your suggested additions.  As to the Leif Ericson image, what needs to happen is a new image uploaded in its place.  I'll try to find one later.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 13:18, 6 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:New Leif image uploaded and added to article. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 12:56, 7 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:02, 7 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Addiction article and TAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again, Regarding the [[Addiction]] article and specifically its categories, I agree with JDano. Let me attempt to explain:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;TAR&amp;quot; is short for [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] a former user and assistant SysOp here at Conservapedia. People have differing opinions of him, but mine is that he did offer some valuable contributions, but also did not understand and did not learn the rules of CP. Among some other issues, he tended to add many &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; links to articles which were not sufficiently relevant and did the same with categories.  Thus, when editors refer to &amp;quot;TAR&amp;quot; they are usually talking about this debris, which should not exist.  TheAmericanRedoubt (TAR) has since stopped editing here, and his account has been deleted.  However, some of the links and categories he inserted still exists, and make things look messy.  For this reason, a number of editors (including myself) try to clean up these issues and restore a little more order.  The guide page [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles]] was the direct result of TAR's methods.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the categories specifically, it's best to maintain a &amp;quot;tree&amp;quot; structure.  A page should not connect to categories which also contain subcategories it links to. Also, it should link only to categories which contain it, not categories which the page topic can contain.  In other words, a page &amp;quot;drug&amp;quot; should be in the category &amp;quot;medicines&amp;quot; but not in a category &amp;quot;antibiotics&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies a bit. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:42, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please allow me to apologize for my impatience with the &amp;quot;addiction&amp;quot; article.  You accidentally stepped into the remains of a hornets' nest.  TAR added lots of utterly irrelevant see-also's and categories, in what can only be described as an attempt to turn this wiki into survivalist-pedia, or perhaps James-Wesley-Rawles-pedia.  He offended a huge number of people with his implications that we were all supposed to stockpile bullets, batteries, and other survivalist stuff (I could look it up but it's too nauseating) and move to a &amp;quot;redoubt&amp;quot; in Idaho or similar place while we wait for the apocalypse.  We were also all supposed to be into some kind of crackpot Indian alternative medicine.  (I think it was called &amp;quot;ayurvedic&amp;quot; or something like that; once again too nauseating.)  The whole wiki was in an enormous uproar for a few months.  (And Cons, who really doesn't subscribe to that stuff, nevertheless stirred up the pot by pretending to be in email contact with the guy.)&lt;br /&gt;
:So if you see suspicious see-also's or categories, especially with codewords like &amp;quot;nanny state&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;gun-grabbing&amp;quot;, be aware this might be detritus from TAR.  I support the second amendment, but I don't support putting all this survivalist garbage into an article on fire hydrants.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:36, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::It has taken a huge amount of work to undo TAR's damage.  I suppose that you think that there is a bias against any change he had made, and there is probably some truth to that.  He did not understand that our categories have a tree structure.  Instead, he thought of categories as a word association test.   Putting in excess categories and excessive red links makes Conservapedia less appealing to users and lowers our google search engine rankings.  In theory, every article could be in every category, because there is some plausible connection between any two subjects.  If we had a separate article on &amp;quot;Drug Addiction&amp;quot; then it could have categories like [[:Category:Illegal Drugs]] or [[:Category:Drugs]].  The problem is that [[:Category:Illegal Drugs]] is a subcategory of [[:Category:Drugs]] ''breaking up the category tree with an infinite loop.'' Here the Addiction article is on a much higher level that discusses video games, etc. So, it is not useful to a high school student looking for information about illegal drugs, in my opinion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 05:46, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you all for your explanations. Considering these things, I will try not to get in the way next time this clean up occurs. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You helped make [http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com THIS] happen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have never seen a non-profit website go from below 100,000 rank to nearly a 50,000 Alexa ranking in about a year. And Andy payed zero dollars for internet marketing services during this period. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And there is no sign of a nearing web traffic plateau. My guess is that Trump supporters/Trump era and the resulting political waves significantly explains the boost in traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump supporters seem very loyal so the traffic boost could be long lasting. It also seems like there is a reawakening of right-wing politics/nationalism that will be long lasting.  And right-wing populism and &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; go together like peanut butter and jelly. :)  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:30, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome, and thank ''you'' for all your edits! I'm happy to help improve the quality of Conservapedia. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:56, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Quick project==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Guy:&lt;br /&gt;
Our state articles list the members of Congress from each state, but they have not be updated for 2016.  If five editors could update 10 states each, we would be done quickly.  Could you please take a look at [[Conservapedia:Community Portal#Political directory]]? Thanks in advance, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 16:13, 15 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your help with the project and with People's Party. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:02, 21 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tip ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your terrific work.  One tip: the licensing information should be expressly included in the uploads.  I added it here: [[File:EU_member_states.png]].  Thanks again for your edits and uploads.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:27, 7 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for the tip. I will remember to add the information next time. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:34, 7 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Template:Book]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Try working on it now.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 10:48, 11 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few months ago, you told me to ask you any questions I had, so here goes:&lt;br /&gt;
*When recategorizing the massive and messy [Category:Authors] by nationality, I found two authors, [[Theo Hobson]] and [[Carl Sagan]], whom I could not recategorize as [Category:American Authors].  Could you change them for me?&lt;br /&gt;
*When fixing the [[Francois Rabelais]] cedilla mess, I set up a redirect.  Has anyone ever made a loop out of redirects?  If so, what happened?  I'm scared to try it.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lastly, where is my attention now best sent - expanding the author articles, improving our coverage of science and mathematics, or maybe tackling another recat job, like [Category:Music]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1) Concerning [[Theo Hobson]] and [[Carl Sagan]], those articles are protected, and as an assistant sysop, I do not have the ability to edit them. I recommend asking someone like [[User:Karajou]] or CP's owner, [[User:Aschlafly]] to either unlock the articles to allow you to fix the category or to have them change the cat themselves. I've made many similar requests to them and they will be happy to help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2) I have not heard of someone doing that before. I personally don't think anything bad would happen if someone did try it, as you can still access the actual redirect page to remove the loop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:3) Honestly, all three choices are great. If I were you, I would probably choose to expand the articles already created so that the average reader would find them more interesting and worthwhile, rather than just seeing a stub. After that, I would personally move on to work on another category, so that CP is better-organized. Then after that, I would do math and science, which is (as far as I can tell) on a different theme than your other work. This is my personal preference, but if you would prefer doing it in a different order feel free! You have been very helpful to CP, and I appreciate your work. Keep it up! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:20, 14 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, just a quick note: A redirect loop shouldn't be a problem.  I think the user is only redirected once, so after that they see the second redirect page.  Redirect loops, double redirects, and dead redirects should all be avoided when possible.  Thanks for your contributions! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:23, 14 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are entirely correct, DavidB4; I just tried a loop with soda and pop (and removed it).  Typing one would give you the page for the other, and an option to redirect.  I'll proceed to expand the author pages now.  Feel free to removed this section to abridge the talk page.--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 15:58, 15 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Could you please write this article? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please write this important article: [[Atheism and ethics]]? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I may ask another writer or tow to contribute to it also.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:07, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I think I will be able to find some time to do it. Unfortunately, I have other things on my to-do list (even for CP), but this article is important, and I will try to find time to help. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:10, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::OK. Thanks. I think [[User:Pokeria1]] will be assisting you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:55, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sources to help you write an article ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/04/ethics-for-atheists/# Would human life be sacred in an atheist world?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_more_immoral.html Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior - Or Does It?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheism_determinism_morality.html Does Atheism (Determinism) Negatively Impact Morality?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://apologetics-notes.comereason.org/2015/03/atheism-ethics-and-immorality.html Atheism, Ethics, and Immorality]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thinkingchristian.net/posts/2016/01/good-nothing-make-atheist-ethics-better-christian/ Being Good “For Nothing” — Does That Make Atheist Ethics Better Than Christian?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/questions-on-atheism-ethics-and-marital-conflict Questions on Atheism, Ethics, and Marital Conflict]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secular sources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional sources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.paulcopan.com/articles/pdf/God-naturalism-morality.pdf God, Naturalism, and the Foundations of Morality] by Paul Copan&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.equip.org/articles/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality/ Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality] by Chad Meister &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://themelios.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-amorality-of-atheism The amorality of atheim] by Rob Smith&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/can-we-be-good-without-godCan Can we be good without God?] by William Lane Craig]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics and morality] by Ken Ammi&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.doesgodexist.org/NovDec06/AtheisticExplanations.html Atheist explanations of morality and common sense]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2015/09/does_being_an_atheist_interfer.html Does being an atheist interfere with being moral?] by Lydia McGrew&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://americanvision.org/2742/nietzsche-slaps-down-dawkins-on-the-illusion-of-atheist-morality/ Nietzsche slaps down Dawkins on the illusion of atheist morality] by Dr. Joel McDurmon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick note ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be interested in email communication with me? My email is userconservative135@gmail.com &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you are interested. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:54, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that would be great! I've been thinking for some time of setting up a CP email address account, and I'll do that within the next couple of days. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:29, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK. That sounds good. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:02, 19 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here it is: 1990sguysdg@gmail.com --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:46, 21 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I just sent you an email. Let me know if you got it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:10, 21 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I wrote another response to your email. Please check your email box. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:05, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I got your latest email and responded to it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:41, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If you are interested, another article that needs to be created ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested, another article that needs to be created: [[Secular ethics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources about this topic:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_ethics Secular ethics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:11, 20 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A couple more article suggestions related to atheism and morality ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, here are a few more articles that need to be written about atheism and morality:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary ethics]], Wikipedia has an article on it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ethical naturalism]], Wikipedia has an article on it at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_naturalism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ethical subjectivism]], Wikipedia has an article on this subject at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_subjectivism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your assistance on the [[Atheism and ethics]] article. It was much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:21, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Project I invited you to participate in plus   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the project I invited you to participate in: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Atheism Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be easy to find relevant online material in order to create some of the articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:19, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, Conservative, for your suggestions. I will begin on some of these soon. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I sent you an email. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking user &amp;quot;reformed&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I've got to say that vandalizing the user page of someone with block authority is '''really''' stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I take issue with your claim that he was an &amp;quot;obvious sock&amp;quot;.  As one who has been blocked a number of times on completely bogus socking charges, I take that stuff seriously.  (The blocking was generally done by someone (now deceased) who had &amp;quot;checkuser&amp;quot; privileges and therefore had good tools for detecting socks, but did not understand how internet addresses work.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not at all obvious to me, as one who has a lot of experience at CP, that he was a sock.  He was a vandal, and you should block him for that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, dear.  Now I see that there's a big storm of this stuff going on.  And, yes, these guys, or at least some of them, are probably socks of each other.  And at least one of them is using the name &amp;quot;obvioussock&amp;quot;, just to taunt you.  And one says he used to be a washing machine in his previous life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My goodness!  I think you are being trolled!  :-)  :-)  And no, I had nothing to do with this.  Just block them.  It will blow over soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:54, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for your message. :) Due to the fact that &amp;quot;reformed&amp;quot; was created right after I blocked two users and vandalized my user page, I assumed that it was a clear sock of one or both of them. However, as it was not clear to you and possibly others, I changed the block settings to just include vandalism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:06, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Screw up==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I'm working with a tablet, and it's a piece of garbage. I didn't intentionally remove your comments. Sorry. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Assuming you're referring to those at [[Talk:Main Page]], apology accepted. It can happen to the best of us. They were other user's edits, however. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:33, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For your reverts yesterday on my userpage, saw the sock puppet master was not finished with his trolling. [[User:YortKeldher|YortKeldher]] ([[User talk:YortKeldher|talk]]) 07:37, 26 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:54, 26 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your improvements to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination]]. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 16:13, 29 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:30, 29 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent you a message at the last place we communicated. Can you please read that message? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, 6 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I sent you the information I promised.  It is located at the place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:36, 6 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sent you message. Please check place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::I sent you a quick note to the place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:51, 18 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Could you please go to the place we last communicated? It is regarding another matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo size==&lt;br /&gt;
With a large photo, there is much more word wrap in the table of contents, which makes it even longer.  We need a wide table of contents. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 19:08, 10 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've checked and double-checked, and I see no way how the larger-sized photo does anything to the table of contents. And I'm using a standard Google Chrome, 100% zoom screen. Could it be your search engine/zoom? I don't see any reason why the larger image is a problem in any way. I think it looks better, regardless. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:06, 10 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On Firefox the TOC is longer due to word wrap.  You can get other pictures to help fill the space, but the space will be shorter if the TOC is wider. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:19, 10 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I am getting a lot of 500 errors.  I will wait for you to finish, and then I will go back and apply my changes. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:07, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have done my changes. But please, when making those changes, please do ''not'' revert changes I have made, particularly changes that I have already reverted you multiple times. I'm tired of these disputes. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:09, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for your response. I have never used or really even heard of IRC prior before now (or, more accurately, before you and Andy started talking about it). What is the purpose of IRC? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:47, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is perhaps the oldest form of instant messaging.  It is basically a chat room, where people can join and idle or actively chat.  Visitors can ask members questions, and members can collaborate.  There is even file sharing, if that would be useful.  I'm going to be writing a how-to-use guide to explain the actual usage better.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Most people use software clients, which they install (or run portably, which a whole different story), but web clients are also available, such as [https://kiwiirc.com/client?settings=7c7240c62a5d4861a8ad0ba697929f39 this one].  With the web client, you can just pick a name and connect, without installing anything.  Also, since IRC has been around so long, software for it is compatible with almost anything.  All desktop and most mobile operating systems support it. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for the info! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:24, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Vandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already took care of that and left a note for [[User talk:Teapublican|Teapublican]] on his talk page. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 00:09, 20 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:08, 20 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent item on maintalk -- congratulations! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I just couldn't resist making fun of you there.  I immediately recognized the Breitbart article, as one that I had seen shortly before.  And then I saw that it was you.  No hard feelings, I hope.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:22, 24 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:None at all. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:37, 24 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations!  The [[March for Science]] article is a ''really good article''.  And you made it so.  (Well, with a little prodding from me.)  It sets out, straightforwardly, what was going on, and it doesn't descend into namecalling.  I realize that you probably have very strong disagreements with what most of those people were doing, but you kept it professional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really good articles, especially on potential &amp;quot;hot button&amp;quot; issues of politics, aren't all that common.  Now maybe I will make another attempt to return the [[Pussy Riot]] article to the good state it was in back when I expanded it in 2014, before it got messed up with the implication that anyone who opposes murderous thug tyrant Vladimir Putin must be a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;elitist&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;social justice warrior&amp;quot;.  For which I was blocked, in blatant violation of the rules of this site.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:25, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for the compliment! Unfortunately, the router I'm using blocked the &amp;quot;Pussy Riot&amp;quot; article because of the first word in the title, so I cannot comment on that at all. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:00, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How sad.  I have created the redirect [[Nadezhda Tolokonnikova]] in case that helps.  But it probably won't.  You had no trouble typing the &amp;quot;P&amp;quot; word above, so I guess it's a problem of your router not going to a page with that word in the title.  Maybe I should have named the page with its Cyrillc letters: &amp;quot;Пусси Райот&amp;quot;.  Well, you're not missing anything of cosmic importance.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:42, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The redirect actually did work. Thanks! The article does not appear to have a high quality (at least in the aesthetic sense), so changes would probably be beneficial, but if you're going to make changes, I would like to remind you to be cautious and not to contradict CP's POV. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:17, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In case you forgot, Sam &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;(and how fast it appears that happens with you)&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;, it was ''you'' who violated the rules of this site by putting a liberal POV into that article (among others, [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamHB per your history]) in the first place, then insistently readding it after your edit was reverted and you were warned about violating CP policy and about starting fights with other editors. You really should take the advice you're being given here and not continue violating CP policy. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:59, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few things:&lt;br /&gt;
*Today is my 9th anniversary at Conservapedia!&lt;br /&gt;
*I can assure everyone that I am very familiar with, and well versed in, the rules, commandments, guidelines, customs, and habits of CP.  I am also familiar with the many, many, many discussions of these points that have taken place over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
*@Northwest: this is the expected response.&lt;br /&gt;
*@1990's guy: this is ''not'' the response I expected.  I'm chagrined that you think the article is of low quality.  Especially since you know how to write high quality articles.&lt;br /&gt;
I'm serious.  I was proud of that article as originally written/expanded by me.  I thought it laid out the facts accurately, and avoided name-calling and such.  Exactly like the March for Science article.  Please look at the article (preferably the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&amp;amp;oldid=1328015] version, before name-calling got put in) and fix it up as you see fit.  The name-calling consisted, among other things, of saying that those people around the world who took an interest in the case were &amp;quot;elitists&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;social justice warriors on the left&amp;quot;.  The latter term is straight out of Huffington Post and their ilk.  It is a term of bleeding hearts in America, and not used widely elsewhere.  In any case, one doesn't need to be an SJW to oppose murderous thug tyrant Vladimir Putin.  In fact, given the recent falling out between President Trump and Putin, the accepted orthodoxy here at CP might be swinging away from support for the murderous thug.  I hope so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please improve the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:28, 28 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My problem is not with content; it is with organization, layout, aesthetics, etc. There are no subsections, which at least show the reader how the article is organized; it is just many paragraphs. Such articles do not appeal to the reader. IMO, it feels like reading a textbook. If it is just a few paragraphs, it is fine, but thus article has ten paragraphs. Adding a few headers and possibly an image would be beneficial (and I realized just as I wrote this that the March for Science article is approaching that length as well, so I probably either should just keep my mouth shut or add headers there as well). I did not mean to insult or degrade your work, and I apologize for giving that impression. BTW, happy 9th anniversary! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:46, 28 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sam - by your response, you're only proving what I said about your tactics and your history here right. You claim to be &amp;quot;very familiar with, and well versed in, the rules, commandments, guidelines, customs, and habits of CP&amp;quot;, but you only pay lip service to them here while your actions on CP over the years (and even now) are showing that you simply choose to disregard them for the sake of pushing liberal POV on this site and to start fights with those who don't share your viewpoint. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:08, 28 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bill Nye ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please contact me by email at sam4557@gmail.com?  I think we can make a really good article out of this.  I have a number of criticisms of his behavior--my opinion of him has gone down a whole lot over the last few weeks, and I think I have some insights about this that I'd like to bounce off of you.  I know that you and I disagree totally about evolution and creationism, but we can put together a good article stating the facts.  We can stay away from the name-calling that so many articles contain, and avoid things like &amp;quot;so-and-so falsely believes that ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is ''not'' about Pussy Riot, ''not'' about Conservapedia politics, and ''not'' about you-know-who.  I just want to bounce some ideas off of you about Bill Nye and see if we can put together a really nice article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:00, 4 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Expanded article, footnote did not support genocide/racist abortions adequately ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I greatly expanded this article [[Abortion and eugenics]].  The footnote in the liberal article was not supporting or at the very least inadequately supporting racist/genocidal abortion policies of [[Margaret Sanger]], etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, I skimmed the article as far as the footnoted article and it did not appear to strongly support such a big claim like abortion/genocide, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Something isn't right here==&lt;br /&gt;
... Ohhh I know what it is. ''Margaret Thatcher'' is on the list of liberals. ''Margaret. Thatcher.'' The bastion of conservatism. A favourite of Reagan. How in the ''world'' did she make the liberal list? [[User:Koidevelopment|Vive]] [[User talk:Koidevelopment|Liberté!]] 09:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't me who added her. She was not as conservative as people think she is, as she did vote in favor of legalizing abortion and homosexuality. But, that said, it would probably be better without mentioning her, to avoid people focusing on her mention in the article. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:24, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::She might not have been a perfect conservative, but I still think she probably doesn't belong on that list.  Of course, if you go back 80 years and read writings and speeches from liberals of the day, they sound downright conservative now.  Still, she did defend liberty and much of conservatism. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lady Thatcher's criticism of Simon Callow's performance in ''Amadeaus'' made her homophobic, I thought. Being homophobic wouldn't preclude one from being liberal however, [[Bill Moyers]] and Louis Black for example. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I assume that adding the liberalism template to the [[Episcopal Church]] article was improper? I would like to know what the proper usage of this template is for future reference. TEC is one of, if not the most liberal Christian denomination in the US these days, sadly. I do apologize for this improper usage, as I am a new editor. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:00, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Anglican! I removed the template because I thought the article was outside the scope of the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; template. What I mean is that the template links to liberal traits, but not necessarily to liberal organizations. I think the category is good for the article, but not template. I hope this helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:11, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That makes sense. Thank you for your patience. It's sad what has happened to the Episcopal Church in recent years. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're welcome, and I agree. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on liberalism. So... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on [[liberalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article needs major improvements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not going to work on it due to time restraints. I spent a lot of time improving the [[liberal]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would use the same approach used with the liberal article. Clearly delineate liberalism from socialism/fascism because they are very substantially different (for example, Sweden vs. Communist China vs. Nazi Germany). But mention how the gap between the ideologies has narrowed in the United States. I don't keep up with European politics to know the situation there as far as the gap other than knowing that China has become more capitalistic. European countries commonly have more major political parties in a country so the situation is more difficult to keep tabs on.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:33, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I posted the below information on RobS' talk page and thought I would share it with you also. You can go to RobS' talk page to see his response to me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I would work on the liberalism article. But also create 2-3 sub-articles: [[American liberalism]] and [[Western liberalism]] and [[European liberalism]].  The [[American liberalism]] article is just a one sentence stub article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I suggest a [[Western liberalism]] article due to the Canadians, Australia, NZ, and South Africa. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:09, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since the Brits and Canadians have the most influence in the Anglosphere on the USA, you might want to create a [[British liberalism]] article and a [[Canadian liberalism]] article too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Its too bad all this wasn't done before given that CP is a political website. I was largely focused on [[atheism]] which is a dying ideology. This had an indirect relation to liberalism given the prominence of the [[secular left]] on liberal/leftist politics. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:17, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: American liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I copied and pasted some of the [[liberal]] article into the [[American liberalism]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally speaking, ideally you want the material in the section for main article linking to a sub-article to have substantially different content. In this case, you want the [[American liberalism]] article to have different content than the &amp;quot;American liberalism&amp;quot; section of the [[liberal]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So if you want to reword and/or add material to the [[American liberalism]] article the would be excellent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:17, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Opinion on renaming an article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted your opinion on an idea of mines to rename one of our articles on Conservapedia before taking it to an admin or someone with the ability to actually change the name of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current page [[Exodus of Israel]], I think, should be renamed to [[The Exodus]], where [[Exodus of Israel]] should simply be a redirect to that page. Not many users would think of typing 'Exodus of Israel' to get to a page on 'The Exodus', and 'The Exodus' is just much simpler. As it is, [[The Exodus]] is currently a redirect to [[Exodus of Israel]]. I think it should be the other way around. Your thoughts?[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 13:34, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I think it is better the way it is. My main reason is that having titles along the lines of &amp;quot;The....&amp;quot; does not sound encyclopedic. The current name, I believe, is more high quality for that reason. Now, it is true that many users might not think of typing &amp;quot;Exodus of Israel,&amp;quot; but if they type &amp;quot;[[Exodus]],&amp;quot; they'll run into the disambiguation page and find the actual article. Also, I'm not sure that many people would think of typing &amp;quot;The Exodus.&amp;quot; To sum it up, I think the current title is better and give the article a more encyclopedic feel, but you're welcome to ask another editor what they think. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:59, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the thoughts. Wikipedia currently uses 'The Exodus', and I find that it simply looks better, as a title, then 'Exodus of Israel'. Secondly, I also consider it more likely for someone to type in 'The Exodus' then 'Exodus of Israel'.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 15:59, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Once again, if you want to ask another editor for their opinion, like DavidB4, feel free to do so. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:20, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your opinion. One thing though, do you know who can get this template locked?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this point, all relevant pages have been created, and therefore this template no longer will ever need any more editing as it is complete. So the best thing to do is to get it locked to avoid any vandalism problems in the future. Just to note, before I came on, it was already locked, even though it still had many problems. Now that the template is fixed, the best thing to do is to get it locked. [[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 20:57, 12 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I recommend asking [[User:Aschlafly]] or [[User:Karajou]]. They have protection powers. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:15, 12 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Block length==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your alert blocks.  But one year is a long time for a block.  IP addresses often change in a shorter period.  You might consider 3 months as a better block duration in many cases.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:25, 17 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:OK. I'll see to that. Should I change the blocks I just did? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:26, 17 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I just went ahead and changed them. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:41, 17 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations on Donald Trump accomplishments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just checked Google.  While that movie award comes up first when &amp;quot;Donald Trump achievements,&amp;quot; is Googled, and you are the first result after, you get nice results with certain other phrases:&lt;br /&gt;
*Donald Trump accomplishments - third link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump achievements - first link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump accomplishments - fourth link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
*Donald Trump achievements and failures - fourth link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
While Conservative's essays come up first when their exact titles are Googled, bear in mind that these phrases are Googled more frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations on the publicity, 1990sguy!--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 08:07, 25 May 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great job, it is well deserved! - -[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, Nathan and DavidB, I appreciate it! It seems I chose the right article to create, in terms of gaining page views. For a while, when one searched the exact title of my article, that silly award was not at the top of the article, and in its place was a box with a picture of Trump linking to my article. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:24, 25 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you chat briefly?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we chat briefly? Can you please go to place I sent you messages before? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:16, 3 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Here is the the article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal vs. libertarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:54, 3 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's been great ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've been helpful since I you first welcomed me here - me, someone who had never used wikitext or HTML in his life and never believed in a young Earth.  You've really made me consider that viewpoint, and you've done it with a brilliant personal appeal, far better than User:Conservative ever has.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Europe's childless leaders==&lt;br /&gt;
Where do you think [http://dcwhispers.com/rather-odd-troubling-fact-european-leaders/ we can squeeze this in] [[European migrant crisis]]? In the Intro or elsewhere? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:13, 9 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that would be a good idea. We could also, possibly, add it to the [[European Union]] article, and maybe [[Globalism]] or [[Liberal]], as these leaders advocate for left-wing globalist policies. Are you able to find other sources that note this fact? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:53, 9 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think this also illustrates liberal European values. They support mass immigration of peoples who do not share their culture while they themselves have no children. They are committing national/cultural suicide. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:15, 9 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The reason I removed Ted Nugent from Notable Texans ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Ted Nugent is actually from Michigan. Sorry that I forgot to add an explanation. ([[User:King Conservative|King Conservative]] ([[User talk:King Conservative|talk]]) 13:37, 17 June 2017 (EDT)King Conservative)&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed him from the list. Thanks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:16, 17 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Template tweak==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, guy! Thanks for the {{tl|See also}} in [[Neil Gorsuch]]. That template works better. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:53, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome, always happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:58, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Nasty edit summaries==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear 1990sguy:  Please stop writing inflammatory edit summaries.  There is no need to make false personal attacks on other editors.  As for Breitbart, each reference is evaluated individually on its own merits.  If it is news reporting, I welcome it.  However, some references are clearly opinion-editorial pieces that criticize other news stories instead of offering any independent news gathering.  Some authors there are editorial-opinion writers rather than news reporters.  Also, when I check a source and see photos of immodestly dressed women with &amp;quot;wardrobe malfunction&amp;quot; captions or women wearing tight T-shirts imprinted with &amp;quot;no silicone&amp;quot;, I am less inclined to use those sources, given our family-friendly approach. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 15:31, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia has no requirement that only news reporter sources can be used for mews sources. For example, many excellent conservative editorial pieces link to a news story or quote a news story while providing excellent commentary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The mainstream press. which is very liberal, have a lot more reporters and they still have some foreign bureaus if I am not mistaken. Then you have Fox which only has a fraction of the combined viewership of ABC, CBS, and NBC.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be overly reliant on news sources merely from websites who have reporters is not a good policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, there are conservative news organizations such as CNS News. But I don't think we should limit ourselves to merely using conservative news organizations as far as news sources.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:54, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Conservative on this. We can use conservative news sources, even if the articles appear to be editorializing. This is a conservative encyclopedia, after all. Why should we adopt editing policies that give liberal MSM sources an unfair advantage? How then can we differentiate ourselves from Wikipedia? I am not opposed to citing MSM sources (I do it myself), but we should give precedence to conservative sources, which do not have leftist bias. Yes, Breitbart has silly ads, but I care more about the content of the article than the ads. There are many Breitbart writers who support conservative, Christian pro-family policies. Are there any at CNN or the NYT?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::JDano, yes, my edit summaries were inflammatory. I probably should have acted cooler when dealing with you, and for that, I apologize. Your behavior, constantly reverting and adding changes that I genuinely believe to contain leftist bias without going to the talk page until you've been reverted several times, is not constructive. I do believe your changes are undermining our status as a conservative alternative to Wikipedia. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 02:50, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== re: JDano and you getting &amp;quot;horse throwing&amp;quot; mad ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the recent edit changes, I saw you use all caps in your description of your edit. It was for the [[Travel ban]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This tells me that you are starting to get &amp;quot;horse throwing&amp;quot; mad. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it becomes necessary, you can impose a [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]] to JDano since you have blocking rights. You can make it applicable to certain articles or certain article categories. Probably a certain article would be best as a shot across his bow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If JDano also has blocking rights, you can get Karajou/Aschlafly to impose such a ban. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:29, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. I don't know if you are correct in this matter. And I don't have time to mediate. I am just offering you a suggestion since I have experienced JDano being unreasonable at times. Also, the majority of Conservapedians/Republicans/conservatives are more fans of Trump than Lindsey Graham.  JDano appears to be in the Graham camp. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:37, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please see my comment in the section immediately above. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 02:51, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the &amp;quot;travel ban&amp;quot; article.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just posted this message to JDano's talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You are not allowed to edit the [[travel ban]] article anymore.  I am imposing a [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]] on you for this article.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in terms of its Muslim population. The travel ban of the Trump administration does not include Indonesia.&amp;quot;[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:13, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the fake news article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on JDano's talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The [[fake news]] article was locked/protected. It seems as if the root cause of the page being locked was an edit war involving yourself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are no longer allowed to edit the fake news article. I am imposing a Conservapedia topic ban on you for this article. See: [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope additional topic bans are not imposed on you by people with block rights.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:23, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Socks of JamesWilson  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socks of this clown should receive five year bans. He is a malicious provocateur, and he singlehandedly destroyed another website as well as leading dozens of people off this site. Show this schlemiel no mercy. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:16, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see why we should be giving long blocks to this guy. He's clearly using multiple ip addresses. These addresses will probably get passed to one or more people who have no intention of vandalizing CP. DavidB4 explained by long blocks are not a good idea on my talk page: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142] However, I will not challenge your lengthening of that block or any other. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:20, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe you do have a point because he has created a few different accounts in the past day or so. All I'm saying is that lightening up on him isn't going to work. My late friend George let this guy off easy, and he destroyed an entire community. I've had plenty of experience with this guy in the past to know his MO, and he's fanatically obsessed with Taylor Swift and &amp;quot;avenging&amp;quot; others because they &amp;quot;ruined&amp;quot; his articles. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:28, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's fair. This guy is clearly bad news. Regardless of what block lengths we give him (and I can see some sense in making them longer), we should try not to accidently prevent innocent people from viewing CP. Thanks for your help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:30, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know that this editor is a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; of JamesWilson?  Has anyone checked the IP user logs?  The Taylor Swift connection could be a false-flag operation. If George and James got into an edit-war on a different website, that would not be relevant here.  Let's judge each editor separately until they can be linked by evidence. Are all of the problem users created in the past few days created from the same or very similar IP addresses? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 15:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::He put &amp;quot;Sad case!- James Wilson&amp;quot; in the edit summary of all of his vandalism, and it was the same stuff he's always done. If he says it's him, I'm just gonna assume it's him. Dont give this guy the benefit of the doubt. He's had plenty enough breaks here and elsewhere. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 16:03, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::@JDano: Yes, I think it clearly is JamesWilson. His vandalism is very repetitive -- he even vandalizes the user pages of the same users. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:52, 4 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*FYI, even if an account is blocked indefinitely, the autoblock on the IPs is only for twenty-four hours. If the IP block was for as long as the account's block, checkusers wouldn't have to put separate blocks on persistent vandals' IP addresses. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 18:26, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
Since I've written a few articles on Christianity, please feel free to edit them to conform to the views of Conservapedia if necessary. Admittedly, writing about Christianity as a Jew can be a bit difficult at times. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:35, 5 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have not seen any factual problems with the articles you created. However, I do recommend that you add categories of the religion you are writing about to those articles. For example, that you add &amp;quot;Category:Christianity&amp;quot; to [[Secular Christianity]] and &amp;quot;Category:Judaism&amp;quot; to [[Secular Judaism]]. The people who practice these are not Jews (religiously speaking) or Christians, but the articles are relevant to those religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I recommend that you add at least one source to the articles you create. Adding sources to articles is Commandment #2 in [[Conservapedia:Commandments]], and it makes the articles better for readers. They know where you are getting your information from, and they can read further if they are interested. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:51, 6 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing my username ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know if Andy saw my request on his talk page. Did he skip it or didn't see it? --[[User:KommissarReb|KommissarReb]] ([[User talk:KommissarReb|talk]]) 9:18, 10 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know. Sometimes he does that, but when I message him again he usually replies. I recommend commenting again, letting him know how much you want your username changed, and asking him to respond. I think we will do it, but only if you absolutely want it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:49, 10 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I read [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Inquiry|the back and forth]] with the guy you probably were referring to on Andy's page. Andy seemed pretty reluctant to change the RonaldB's name for most of the discussion.. Is the process of changing someone's username complex or difficult to do, or did he just want to make sure that the guy wasn't being wishy-washy about the change? I was a little sheepish about asking him again because I don't want to seem annoying. --[[User:KommissarReb|KommissarReb]] ([[User talk:KommissarReb|talk]]) 5:07, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think CP admins generally prefer simply creating a new account. The user who made the other request was not the original person using the account. The original person let him take over the account. I can see why Andy wanted him to create a new account. I recommend you politely letting him know how much you want your username changed, and why, and asking him to respond, regardless of his answer. I think that would be a good move on your part. It would show how serious you are with this request. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:06, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Donald Trump is going to get stuck with the blame for the economic bubble created by the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHwtkIpgAnA]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, TrumpCare probably will not work because it is keeping the &amp;quot;precondition clause&amp;quot; of ObamaCare due to its popularity. People will often not buy health insurance until they are sick. So the health care system will not be viable. Car insurance companies could not be profitable if people could buy their car insurance after their car accident in order to replace their car. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:00, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are probably right on both of those things. The first point would be the fault of the Obama Administration, and the second by the establishment GOP Congress. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:05, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got it, thanks for letting me know. --[[User:OneTrueConservative|OneTrueConservative]] ([[User talk:OneTrueConservative|talk]]) 00:12, 12 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=William_McKinley&amp;diff=1360296</id>
		<title>William McKinley</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=William_McKinley&amp;diff=1360296"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:38:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: /* Reelection and Second Term */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=William McKinley&lt;br /&gt;
|image=William McKinley by Benziger.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Ida Saxton McKinley&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=25th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=March 4, 1897 - September 14, 1901&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.trivia-library.com/a/25th-us-president-william-mckinley.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Garret Hobart]] (1897–1899)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1901)&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Grover Cleveland]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Theodore Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=39th&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Ohio&lt;br /&gt;
        |lieutenant=Andrew Harris&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 11, 1892 – January 13, 1896&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[James Campbell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Asa Bushnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
|military=y&lt;br /&gt;
|rank=Brevet major&lt;br /&gt;
|branch=[[United States Army]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Union Army]]&lt;br /&gt;
|serviceyears=1861–1865&lt;br /&gt;
|commands=[[Europe]]&lt;br /&gt;
|battles=[[American Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''William McKinley, Jr.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://bioguide.congress.gov/biosearch/biosearch1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was the 25th [[President of the United States of America]], serving from 1897 until 1901 as a [[Republican]]. In Congress he was a foremost advocate of high tariffs on imported goods that would encourage industry and protect high wages from cheap competition. Defeated after his [[McKinley Tariff]] passed in 1890, McKinley bounced back to win election as governor of Ohio in 1891 and 1893. A tireless speaker, he was the most popular man in the party; his campaign manager [[Mark Hanna]] helped assure his capture of the GOP presidential nomination in 1896, in the midst of a deep depression people blamed on incumbent Democrat [[Grover Cleveland]]. But Cleveland and his conservative, pro-business [[Bourbon Democrats]] were overthrown and the [[Democratic Party|Democrats]] nominated firebrand [[William Jennings Bryan]], who picked up Populist support and crusaded against banks, railroads, and the moneyed East, promising that [[bimetallism|Free Silver]] would pump money into the economy and destroy the wicked. McKinley and Hanna fought back, inventing new techniques in the most heated election campaign in American history. McKinley promised that high tariffs would benefit all Americans—and he introduced the goal of a pluralistic America whereby all Americans of whatever race or ethnicity would share in prosperity. He attacked free silver as dishonesty, and by speaking to hundreds of thousands of voters and organizing massive parades in every town and city in the North, McKinley and Hanna demonstrated they represented the American majority. McKinley won in a landslide, carrying the entire East and Midwest and parts of the West. He won huge majorities in most cities, and switched the large German American vote to the GOP, along with most factory and railroad workers, then middle classes, and the more prosperous farmers. The election of 1896 realigned American politics, as 1896 was a critical election marking the dividing line between the [[Third Party System]] of the Civil War and Gilded Age, and the [[Fourth Party System]], usually called the Progressive Era.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As president McKinley rammed through higher tariffs and the gold standard, and watched prosperity return. Foreign affairs unexpectedly took center stage as Americans recoiled at the atrocities Spain committed to hold onto its colony of [[Cuba]]. McKinley tried to avoid war but public opinion—especially from the Bryanites—demanded it. The result was a &amp;quot;splendid little war,&amp;quot; marked by sudden, overwhelming American victories on land and sea, with a few embarrassing bureaucratic mishaps in the War department. Spain quickly gave up and turned over its main colonies, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines. The Congress started the war promising Cuba its independence. McKinley decided to keep Guam and Puerto Rico, along with independent Hawaii which voluntarily joined the U.S. After long hesitation McKinley decided also to keep the Philippines. This made imperialism (along with free silver again) a central issue of the 1900 election. McKinley beat Bryan in a second landslide. Six months into his second term McKinley was assassinated by an anarchist and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] became president. McKinley is considered the first modern president for introducing modern campaign methods, for reorganizing the White House staff system, and for making the activities of the President the main ingredient in political news.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley was born at Niles, Ohio, on Jan. 29, 1843, seventh of the nine children of William and Nancy Allison McKinley. The McKinleys, of Scotch-Irish descent, had moved to Pennsylvania in the early 18th century and became interested in the iron foundry business, which William's father later built in Ohio. In 1852 the family moved to the small town of Poland, Ohio, where William attended a local school. He entered Allegheny College at Meadville, Pennsylvania, in 1860, but left because of poor health and subsequently taught school. At the outbreak of the [[American Civil War]], McKinley, then age 18, enlisted as a private in the Twenty-third Ohio Volunteer Infantry, commanded by [[Rutherford B. Hayes]]. He saw service in western Virginia and at the [[Antietam, Battle of|Battle of Antietam]], after which he was commissioned a second lieutenant. He was mustered out of the army in 1865 as a major. He studied law in an office for a year and for a longer period at the Albany (N.Y.) Law School. Admitted to the Ohio bar in 1867, he opened an office in Canton, where he established a permanent residence. In 1871 he married Ida Saxton, the daughter of an influential local banker. After the birth of two daughters, Mrs. McKinley became an invalid for the rest of her life, her illness lightened only by the complete devotion of her husband. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley entered politics early, greatly aided by his commanding presence, his oratorical ability, his sunny nature, and his willingness to negotiate and compromise. In 1869 he was elected prosecuting attorney of Stark County, and seven years later he helped nominate and elect his old commander, [[Rutherford B. Hayes]], as President. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Congress==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1876 McKinley was elected to Congress and was later re-elected twice, serving from 1877 to 1883. In 1882 he claimed election and took his seat in March 1883, but the seat was contested; McKinley held the seat and voted until the last day of the session, when it was given to his opponent by the Democratic majority, who delayed so long because they wanted to work with McKinley. He regained his seat in the election of 1884 and served until he was defeated in the election of 1890. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley established himself as a spokesman for the nation's dominant industrial group, desiring highly protective tariff rates. This position, together with his ardent support of [[John Sherman]] for President in 1888, won him the friendship of [[Mark Hanna]], an influential Cleveland industrialist who was a key Sherman supporter. It also assured him a place on the powerful Ways and Means Committee of the House, which wrote tax and tariff laws. As a high-tariff man he was twice made chairman of the committee on resolutions in the national conventions of the Republican Party. In 1889 he was selected as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee and in that position he became chief architect of the extremely high tariff act of 1890 bearing his name. To obtain western votes for the bill, he supported the [[Sherman Silver Purchase Act]]. He was chiefly responsible for defeating [[James G. Blaine]]'s reciprocity amendments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The public reaction to the McKinley tariff defeated his party and McKinley himself in the elections of 1890; but with the help of Hanna, the unquestioned boss of the Republican Party in Ohio, he was elected governor of the state in the following year and reelected in the depression year of 1893. &lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign of 1896==&lt;br /&gt;
Hanna had been attempting for years to install John Sherman in the presidency. Turning his support to McKinley, he carefully guided his candidate through the next few years. Both McKinley and Hanna had planned to fight the campaign of 1896 on the tariff issue, but the pressure of the silverites in the Mountain states, the [[Populist Party]] on the Plains, and especially the agrarian forces led by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in the Midwest and South, made free silver and reform the critical questions. Here McKinley's record in voting for the [[Bland-Allison Act]] and the Sherman Silver Purchase Act was distinctly a liability for a big-business candidate. Hanna surmounted that troublesome question by private assurances and public equivocation. By combining the support of the business element with that of delegates from the South, he secured McKinley's nomination at the St. Louis convention and at the same time wrote the word &amp;quot;gold&amp;quot; into the Republican platform. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley promised a return of prosperity, and assured every economic, social ethnic and racial group that it would share in the new prosperity. The latter was the first statement of pluralism in American politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley was dubbed the &amp;quot;advance agent of prosperity&amp;quot; promising jobs for all Americans once the nation had a high tariff and the gold standard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the extremely hard-fought campaign McKinley, unlike his opponent, Bryan, made no speaking tours; instead, he met hundreds of visiting delegations on his front porch, speaking to some 550,000 voters (compared to the three million people who heard Bryan, many of whom were women and children.). Supported by Hanna's organization, he was victorious in November by an electoral vote of 271 to 176, and won more than 7,000,000 popular votes out of almost 14,000,000 cast. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==President==&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley was a cautious, conciliatory politician rather than a leader. Except for the tariff and Republican Party ideology, it is unlikely that he held any deep political convictions. In office, his aim was to continue to represent the industrial class which had supported him for so long in Congress, to maintain party solidarity, and to keep the United States at peace. He appointed Senator Sherman as Secretary of State in 1897 in order to provide a Senate seat for Hanna. The rest of his Cabinet was without distinction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately after taking office McKinley called a special session of Congress to revise the tariff. The session resulted in the passing of the Dingley Act, establishing the highest tariff rates in the history of the country. During the same year, 1897, he also submitted a treaty to Congress providing for the annexation of the Hawaiian Islands. Congress refused to ratify the treaty, but the territory was later annexed by the Resolution of 1898. Near the end of McKinley's first administration, a gold-standard act was passed, and this probably completed McKinley's program as he had conceived it in 1896. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign policy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Columbia4.jpg|thumb|320px|Columbia is a sailor in President McKinley's navy, and is trying on &amp;quot;world power&amp;quot; on April 6, 1901; the feather is smoke representing expansion into the Pacific and caribbean]] Foreign policy entered the national spolight during the McKinley Administration. His administration was notable for the [[Spanish-American War]] of 1898, which McKinley reluctantly entered after a large amount of public and media pressure. McKinley signed a joint resolution of Congress annexing [[Hawaii]] on July 7, 1898. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the gravest issue during McKinley's presidency concerned relations with [[Spain]]. For some years interested Americans in and out of Congress had demanded American intervention in [[Cuba]] with an eye toward seizing the island and other Spanish territory. Apparently McKinley had no objection to the creation of an American empire, but he was personally opposed to a war to obtain one. Unlike President Cleveland, however, he responded to pressure and intervened in Cuban affairs. After the insulting De Lome letter and the [[Battleship Maine|destruction of the U.S.S. ''Maine'']] in Havana harbor in February, 1898, McKinley sent an ultimatum to the Spanish government demanding the abandonment of the ''Reconcentrado ''policy in Cuba and the institution of an armistice. After some delay Spain promised to meet most of the demands. McKinley, however, had already succumbed to the pressure for war and had written a message virtually asking for hostilities. Ignoring the Spanish answer, he submitted the message to Congress with the statement that he had &amp;quot;exhausted every effort to relieve the intolerable condition of affairs&amp;quot; in Cuba. Congress quickly declared war and this culminated in an easy victory over Spain, though woefully bad administration discredited both the War and Navy departments. By the treaty of peace, Spain evacuated Cuba and ceded [[Puerto Rico]], [[Guam]], and the [[Philippine Islands]] to the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the vexing question of whether this nation should take the [[Philippines]] and thus become involved in Asiatic power politics, McKinley apparently had no strong convictions. He waited for a considerable time and then decided in favor of the acquisition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The story that he listened to God on the matter is probably apocryphal, but he did pray a great deal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During the rest of his first term he busied himself with the reorganization of the War and Navy departments, with an effort to win the [[Open Door]] in China, and with the problems growing out of the newly acquired territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reelection and Second Term==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1900win.jpg|thumb|left|350px|McKinley's 1900 landslide was solidly based on prosperity at home and prestige abroad, with gold supported by businessmen, farmers, soldiers and workers]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enthusiastically renominated in 1900, McKinley refused to accept Bryan's challenge to fight the election solely over the issue of imperialism. Instead, he and his party supporters, pointing to the great prosperity of the country and using the slogan of the &amp;quot;full dinner pail,&amp;quot; asked for re-election on the ground that a Republican victory would ensure the continuance of good times. He was re-elected with 292 votes in the electoral college against 155 for Bryan, and by a popular plurality of 900,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Six months after his second inauguration he visited the Pan-American Exposition at [[Buffalo, New York|Buffalo]], N.Y. There, on Sept. 5, 1901, he first questioned his high-tariff doctrines by advocating a world reduction in customs rates by means of reciprocal treaties. He was not to live, however, to see his proposal adopted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was shot by an [[anarchist]], [[Leon Frank Czolgosz]],  in [[Buffalo, New York|Buffalo]], New York on September 6, 1901. McKinley had received a number of death threats, and despite the objections of his advisors, insisted on meeting the public on this trip to Buffalo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen, &amp;quot;A Patriot's History of the United States&amp;quot; (Sentinel 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He died eight days later, and his Vice President, [[Theodore Roosevelt]], became President. The nation mourned McKinley and Roosevelt promised to continue his highly popular policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legacy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A memorial to McKinley was built in his hometown of Canton [[Ohio]]. It was funded by a grassroots fundraising campaign shortly after his death. [[Theodore Roosevelt]] gave the dedication speech. The monument features a domed building on a hill in which McKinley's body rests. There is a statue of him on the hill. Near the monument is a science and history museum. His home in Canton is now the National First Ladies' Historic Sight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley appears on the now out of print $500 bill.&lt;br /&gt;
From 1898 until 2015, the [[Denali]] was named in his honor ''Mount McKinley''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Open Door Policy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Dobson, John M. ''Reticient Expansionism: The Foreign Policy of William McKinley.'' (1988). &lt;br /&gt;
* Faulkner, Harold U. ''Politics, Reform, and Expansion, 1890-1900'' (1959). standard scholarly survey [http://www.questia.com/library/book/politics-reform-and-expansion-1890-1900-by-harold-u-faulkner.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Glad, Paul W. ''McKinley, Bryan, and the People'' (1964). short history of 1896 election&lt;br /&gt;
* Gould, Lewis L. ''The Presidency of William McKinley.'' (1981) the standard scholarly history&lt;br /&gt;
* Jensen, Richard. ''The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888-1896'' (1971) a conservative perspective&lt;br /&gt;
* Jones, Stanley L. ''The Presidential Election of 1896.'' the standard history. &lt;br /&gt;
* Josephson, Matthew. ''The Politicos: 1865-1896''  (1938) a leftist perspective&lt;br /&gt;
* Leech, Margaret. ''In the Days of McKinley.'' 1959, well-written popular history&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, H. Wayne. ''William McKinley and His America.'' 1963. biography by scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, H. Wayne. ''From Hayes to McKinley: National Party Politics, 1877-1896'' (1969), [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=94446383 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Offner, John L. ''An Unwanted War: The Diplomacy of the United States and Spain over Cuba, 1895-1898'' (1992) [ online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Olcott, Charles S. ''The Life of William McKinley''. 1916, popular biography, [http://books.google.com/books?id=ZknxFcL1ASIC&amp;amp;pg=PA1&amp;amp;dq=intitle:The+intitle:Life+intitle:of+intitle:William+intitle:McKinley&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online at Google]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rhodes, James Ford. ''The McKinley and Roosevelt Administrations, 1897-1909'' (1922), early scholarly history; Rhodes (a Democrat) was Hanna's brother-in-law&lt;br /&gt;
* Trask, David. ''The War with Spain in 1898.'' 1981. &lt;br /&gt;
* Williams, R. Hal. ''Years of Decision: American Politics in the 1890s'' (1993) survey by scholar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary Sources===&lt;br /&gt;
*  McKinley, William.''Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley from March 1, 1897 to May 30, 1900.'' 1900. [http://books.google.com/books?id=T8PVmgZI2bgC&amp;amp;pg=PA1&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:McKinley+inauthor:William&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online at Google]&lt;br /&gt;
*  McKinley, William. ''Speeches and Addresses of William McKinley from his Election to Congress to the Present Time'' (1893) [http://books.google.com/books?id=Qe5gk4hoJXAC&amp;amp;pg=PA1&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:McKinley+inauthor:William&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online at Google]&lt;br /&gt;
*  McKinley, William.''The Tariff; a Review of the Tariff Legislation of the United States from 1812 to 1896'' (1896) [http://books.google.com/books?id=eUfGI5hdKngC&amp;amp;pg=PA1&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:McKinley+inauthor:William&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online at Google]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://librivox.org/author/11295 Works by William McKinley - text and free audio] - [[LibriVox]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McKinley, William}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spanish-American War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ohio Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gilded Age]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Catalytic_converter&amp;diff=1360293</id>
		<title>Catalytic converter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Catalytic_converter&amp;diff=1360293"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:35:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Catalytic converter''' was introduced in 1975 to comply with the tightening [[Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA) regulations on auto exhaust. The job of the catalytic converter is to convert harmful [[pollution|pollutants]] into less harmful emissions before they leave the car’s exhaust system. Catalytic converters typically consist of a ceramic or metal honeycombed monolith substrate that carries precious metal catalysts. The coated substrate is wrapped in an intumescent mat that expands when heated, securing and insulating the substrate which is packaged in a stainless steel shell and fitted into the engine exhaust system. As exhaust gases pass over the catalysts, they promote chemical reactions that convert pollutants into harmless gases and water.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catalyticonverters.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Hybrid gas-electric cars such as the [[Toyota]] Prius and [[Honda]] Insight are nearly twice as fuel efficient as other cars, but they produce less than 10 percent as much [[pollution]]. Much of the pollution reduction comes from a simple device designed to ensure that the '''catalytic converter''' runs at its optimal temperature at all times. If incentives created a market for pollution-reducing equipment, it would be easy for someone to design and sell a catalytic converter heater for existing cars.&amp;quot; [http://americandreamcoalition.org/pollution/pollution.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It only works when it's hot enough (400 degrees), which requires your car to go 50 to 60&amp;amp;nbsp;mph. Traffic congestion lets the catalytic converter cool down, rendering it ineffective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Technology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theodore_Roosevelt&amp;diff=1360291</id>
		<title>Theodore Roosevelt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theodore_Roosevelt&amp;diff=1360291"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:29:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: /* Football reform */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Theodore Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
|image=630px-Theodore Roosevelt in 1918.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Alice Hathaway Lee&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Edith Kermit Carow&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Dutch [[Reformed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=26th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=September 14, 1901 – March 4, 1909&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://home.comcast.net/~sharonday7/Presidents/AP060301.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Charles W. Fairbanks]] (1901-1905)&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[William McKinley]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[William Howard Taft]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/vice president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=25th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=March 4, 1901 – March 4, 1801&lt;br /&gt;
	|president=[[William McKinley]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Garret Hobart]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Charles W. Fairbanks]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=33rd&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=New York&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 1, 1899 – December 31, 1900&lt;br /&gt;
        |lieutenant=Timothy Lester Woodruff&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Swett Black]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Benjamin Barker Odell, Jr.]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/secretary (cabinet)&lt;br /&gt;
	|of=the Navy&lt;br /&gt;
	|deputy=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|president=[[William McKinley, Jr.]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=April 19, 1897 – May 10, 1898&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=William McAdoo&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Charles Herbert Allen&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Theodore Roosevelt''' was the 26th [[president of the United States of America]], 1901-1909, leader of the [[Republican party]] and (in 1912-16) the Progressive Party. Roosevelt is best known for his remarkable personality and commitment to democratic process. He was strongly committed to law and order, active leadership, civic duty and individual self-responsibility; he was more concerned with the process of change than its direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A strong and vigorous man both personally and in politics, it was through Roosevelt that the world identified America with cowboy values of courage, initiative and hardiness while it watched Roosevelt expand American influence in world affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt enlarged the presidency because he made it a &amp;quot;bully pulpit&amp;quot; for national uplift and inspiration. He preached as much as he politicked. He felt responsible for the well-being and morals of the whole country. He set an example of how a large, strenuous life could be led, and he invited others to renew their energies and apply them to public causes. He strongly endorsed motherhood and criticized women who had careers while neglecting motherhood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt on Motherhood and the Welfare of the State,&amp;quot; ''Population and Development Review,'' Vol. 13, No. 1 (Mar., 1987), pp. 141-147 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1972126 online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the contest between [[Conservation and environmentalism]], Roosevelt supported the conservation and optimum use of natural resources and opposed the environmentalists of the day, such as [[John Muir]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Theodore Roosevelt by John Singer Sargent 1903.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Painting by John Singer Sargent]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Family==&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelts could trace their family to Claes Martenssen van Rosenvelt, an immigrant from Zealand, Holland ([[Netherlands]]) who came to America in 1649, settling in New Amsterdam ([[New York City]]). Theodore was born on October 27, 1858, the second child of a very successful New York businessman, Theodore Roosevelt, Sr., and his wife Martha Bulloch, a Southern belle from Georgia. His early childhood was marked by frequent illness and asthma, of which his father spent many an evening bundling up &amp;quot;Tedie&amp;quot; - as young Theodore was often called - and taking him out for carriage rides in the fresh air. By age 10 his father would have enough of the possibility of his son growing into an unhealthy weakling and forced on him a regimen of weights and daily physical exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Schoolpic.jpg|thumb|100px|left|Young Theodore Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was home schooled by tutors and his parents. He was solid in geography (thanks to his careful observations on all his travels) and very well read in history, strong in biology, French and German, but deficient in mathematics, Latin and Greek. He became one of the outstanding naturalists of the era, specializing in very careful study of birds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brands (2001) p. 49–50&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He attended [[Harvard]] College, graduating in 1880 &amp;quot;magna cum laude&amp;quot;. He lived very well—his annual $4000 allowance was higher than the president of the college—the days of equalitarian houses were decades in the future. His father's sudden death in 1878 was a stunning blow; Roosevelt redoubled his efforts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;His inheritance was worth $8000 a year, about triple what the average doctor or lawyer earned.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In academics he did well in science, philosophy and rhetoric courses, as well as German;  but fared poorly in Latin and Greek. Harvard did not have majors, but he took all the advanced biology he could. Classmates considered him an odd bird—he kept snakes in his room and knew all about them. He also dressed in the latest fashions  and kept his own horse and buggy. A crack shot, he brought his friends along on hunting parties to the north woods. The perfect gentleman, he was invited into the best clubs. Roosevelt joined [[Delta Kappa Epsilon]] [[fraternity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt had amazing powers of concentration. He had a photographic memory and developed a lifelong habit of devouring books, memorizing every detail. He was an unusually eloquent conversationalist who, throughout his life, sought out the company of the smartest men and women. He could multitask in extraordinary fashion, dictating letters to one secretary and memoranda to another, while browsing through a new book. During his adulthood, a visitor would get a not-so-subtle hint that Roosevelt was losing interest in the conversation when he would pick up a book and begin looking at it now and then as the conversation continued.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Alice Lee.gif|thumb|right|Mrs. Alice Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===First marriage===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt married Alice Lee of Boston in 1880. on February 14, 1884, Roosevelt's young wife died after giving birth to the couple's first child. Only a few hours earlier, his mother, Martha Bulloch Roosevelt had died in the same house. After the double funeral and the christening of his new baby daughter, Alice, on February 17, 1884, the bereaved husband wrote:'' &lt;br /&gt;
:''For joy or for sorrow my life has now been lived out.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He never again ever mentioned Alice Lee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early career==&lt;br /&gt;
Given a chance to run for the state legislature in a &amp;quot;silk stocking&amp;quot; (rich) district in Manhattan, he astonished his upscale friends by  dropping out of Columbia Law School and was elected. His goal, he explained, was to join the &amp;quot;ruling class&amp;quot; not merely watch it passively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young Roosevelt was a Republican reformer in the legislature, writing more bills than anyone. Already a major player in state politics, he attended the Republican National Convention in 1884 and fought alongside the [[Mugwump]] reformers; they lost to the Stalwart faction that nominated [[James G. Blaine]]. Refusing to join other Mugwumps in supporting Democrat [[Grover Cleveland]], the Democratic nominee, he stayed loyal to the GOP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edward Kohn, &amp;quot;Crossing the Rubicon: Theodore Roosevelt, Henry Cabot Lodge, and the 1884 Republican National Convention.&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era'' 2006 5(1): 18-45. Issn: 1537-7814&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt held many offices. He was on the federal Civil Service Commission, then headed the New York City Police Department. After campaigning vigorously for [[William McKinley]] in the momentous 1896 presidential election, he became Assistant Secretary of the Navy, the #2 position. He loved ships and had written solid naval history; his goal was to modernize the Navy, bringing it up to world class standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==War with Spain, 1898, and Medal of Honor==&lt;br /&gt;
When the battleship ''Maine'' was blown up in Manila harbor on February 15, 1898, Roosevelt, immediately resigned as Assistant Secretary of the Navy and worked with Colonel [[Leonard Wood]] to recruit a volunteer cavalry regiment composed of his Ivy League friends and western cowboys for the [[Spanish-American War|coming war against Spain]]. Hundreds answered his invitation to join in this grand endeavor and, after brief training, the &amp;quot;Rough Riders&amp;quot; arrived in Cuba. On July 1, 1898, Roosevelt seized the initiative and led his men on the celebrated charge of San Juan Hill where 89 of the 490 who followed were killed. Nevertheless, the press and Roosevelt made this the most important battle of the campaign. The &amp;quot;splendid little war&amp;quot; (as termed by John Hay, State Ambassador to England&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frank Freidel, ''The Splendid Little War'', (Boston: Little, Brown and Co. 1958)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) was soon over and Roosevelt returned to a hero's welcome in New York City.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the battles in Cuba, malaria, yellow fever and typhoid became an issue for the troops. Roosevelt, not constrained by a military career, complained to both the White House and the press about the need for the troops to return home for better care. This, coupled with a bias against volunteers, is most likely the reason that when Roosevelt was nominated for the Congressional [[Medal of Honor]] for his bravery during the battle at San Juan Hill, the nomination was not approved.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;medal&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/life/medalofhonor.htm Roosevelt Medal of Honor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President [[Bill Clinton]] posthumously bestowed the Medal of Honor to Roosevelt on January 16, 2001, saying,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
...TR was a larger-than-life figure who gave our nation a larger-than-life vision of our place in the world. Part of that vision was formed on San Juan Hill. His Rough Riders were made up of all kinds of Americans from all walks of life. They were considered unpolished and undisciplined, but they were true citizen soldiers. By taking San Juan Hill, eventually they forced the enemy fleet into the Battle of Santiago Bay, where it was routed. This led to the Spanish surrender and opened the era of America as a global power.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;medal&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt and his eldest son, Brigadier General Theodore Roosevelt Jr., are one of only two father/son pairs to earn the Medal of Honor. Roosevelt Jr. posthumously received his for actions on the beaches of Normandy on D-Day during [[World War II]]. Roosevelt is the first and only president to receive the Medal of Honor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Governor of New York==&lt;br /&gt;
A few weeks after his return Roosevelt was elected governor of New York as a Republican in 1898. As governor of New York, Theodore Roosevelt promoted greater accountability and efficiency in government by ending patronage handouts, supporting an effective civil service system and forcing the Republican machine to hold fair elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice president, 1900==&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Tom Platt and other party bosses distrusted him, and they forced his nomination as vice president on [[William McKinley]] in 1900. Roosevelt demonstrated his amazing energy by his campaign work. Nationally, Roosevelt covered 21,209 miles by train. In Nebraska alone, some 300,000 men, women and children turned out for his 673 speeches at 40 cities and towns as he covered 1,500 miles in the state. His arguments for McKinley prosperity and America's role in the Philippines were accepted wholeheartedly or dismissed scornfully by his audiences. The GOP ticket carried Nebraska, the home state of Democratic nominee [[William Jennings Bryan]],  by 7,000 votes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once in office, He had little to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tr2006.jpg|thumb|290px|''Time'' July 3, 2006]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1901, President McKinley was fatally shot by [[Leon Czolgosz]], an [[anarchist]].  Roosevelt automatically became President.  He was reelected in [[United States presidential election, 1904|1904]] against a challenge by the Democratic candidate Alton B. Parker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt redefined the modern presidency by drawing attention to the office through his dynamic personality, thus creating a 'public obsession' over his executive actions and attracting a permanent public eye toward the presidency that endowed it with new power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was the chief leader of the [[Progressive Era|Progressive movement in politics]]—which in 21st century terms includes both liberal and conservative values. He tried to move the dominant Republican Party into the Progressive camp. He distrusted wealthy businessmen and dissolved 40 monopolistic corporations as a &amp;quot;trust buster&amp;quot;. He did not disagree with trusts and capitalism in principle but was only against their corrupt, illegal practices. His &amp;quot;[[Square Deal]]&amp;quot; promised a fair shake for both the average citizen, including regulation of railroad rates and pure foods and drugs and the businessmen. As an outdoorsman, he promoted the conservation movement, emphasizing efficient use of natural resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his last two years in office (1907-1908), Roosevelt moved left, attacking big business and suggesting the courts were biased against labor unions. &lt;br /&gt;
====Pure food and drugs====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Pure Food and Drug Act|Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1906}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Widespread outrage followed publication in 1906 of [[Upton Sinclair]]'s novel, ''The Jungle,''  which detailed the horrible conditions in Chicago’s packinghouses. Roosevelt sent Labor Commissioner Charles P. Neill and social worker James Bronson Reynolds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1906/06/05/page/4/article/conditions-in-stockyards-described-in-the-neill-reynolds-report Conditions in Stockyards Described in the Neill-Reynolds Report], [[Chicago Tribune]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to investigate the meat-packing industry in Chicago. Their report to the president was 'revolting,' but since Roosevelt feared the impact on ranchers and European meat importers, he withheld the Neill-Reynolds report from publication. Sinclair was so upset that he provided specific information to newspapers. Roosevelt then had the commissioners put their report in writing and sent it to Congress. This led to a hearing before Congress; witnesses were asked about seeing a dead hog slide partway into a men's privy. Although Sinclair was a Socialist and his main interest was in the stockyard workers, not consumers, the turmoil over tainted meat helped move Congress to enact the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. The act itself had been drawn up by experts in the Department of Agriculture and remains in effect in the 21st century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Harvey Young, &amp;quot;The Pig That Fell into the Privy: Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle' and the Meat Inspection Amendments of 1906.&amp;quot; ''Bulletin of the History of Medicine'' 1985 59(4): 467-480&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Coal strike====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Coal strike of 1902]] was a strike by the  [[United Mine Workers of America]] in the anthracite coal fields of eastern Pennsylvania. The strike threatened to shut down the winter fuel supply to all major cities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Most homes and apartments were heated with  anthracite or &amp;quot;hard&amp;quot; coal because it had higher heat value and less smoke than &amp;quot;soft&amp;quot; or bituminous coal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt jumped in and personally negotiated with the mine leaders and financiers. Acting as a neutral party, he set up a fact-finding commission that suspended the strike. The strike never resumed, as the miners received more pay for fewer hours; the owners got a higher price for coal but did not recognize the union as a bargaining agent. It was the first labor episode in which the federal government intervened as a neutral arbitrator and it made Roosevelt's reputation as a peacemaker.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Coal-TR.JPG|thumb|300px|left|Roosevelt teaches the childish coal barons a lesson; 1902 editorial cartoon]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Railroad regulation====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Elkins Act|Hepburn Act}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt worked closely with Congress to pass important laws such as the 1903 Elkins Act and the 1906 Hepburn Act, that regulated railroad rates for the benefit of shippers and consumers. Ultimately, these bills injured the railroads (which were assumed to be so rich that they could always pay). The new laws retarded the growth of the South, which the railroads could no longer afford to subsidize.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albro Martin, &amp;quot;The Troubled Subject of Railroad Regulation in the Gilded Age - a Reappraisal.&amp;quot;  ''Journal of American History'' 1974 61(2): 339-371 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1903953  in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Antitrust====&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt expressed an antitrust image within a pro business framework. Critics who have measured Roosevelt's success by the number of antitrust suits he brought or won miss the essentially rhetorical purposes of his involvement with corporate America. His primary emphasis involved the promotion of the proper attitude in corporate leaders and the general public regarding the role of big business in American society. This Roosevelt did in two ways. First, he argued metaphorically for the necessity of corporations and the restraint of muckraking journalists. Second, along with employing metaphors to chastise big business, Roosevelt assumed the role of moral guardian and preached to corporate leaders to adhere to an ethical standard in business. For Roosevelt, corporate America could be effectively regulated only by its leaders' sense of morality and spirit of public service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dorsey, Leroy G., &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and Corporate America, 1901-1909: a Reexamination,&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 1995 25(4): 725-739&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Executive Orders====&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was the first President to issue over 1000 [[Executive Order]]s. According to Dr. Graham G. Dodds, a professor of political science at Concordia University,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.concordia.ca/artsci/polisci/faculty.html?fpid=graham-dodds Graham Dodds, PhD]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt issued almost as many executive orders as all of his predecessors combined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Executing the Constitution: Putting the President Back Into the Constitution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qgzmexCI734C&amp;amp;pg=PA53 |year=2006|publisher=State University of New York Press|pages=53|isbn=9780791481905}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to Roosevelt, only one President issued over 200 executive orders, [[Grover Cleveland]].(Cleveland issued a total of 253)&amp;lt;ref name=executiveorders&amp;gt;[http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/orders.php Executive Orders: Washington - Obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the first 25 Presidents in total, 1262 executive orders were issued. Roosevelt issued 1081.&amp;lt;ref name=executiveorders /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of congress eventually got tired of Roosevelt's excesses in using executive orders to create policy. On February 25th, 1907, Senator Charles W. Fulton, a Republican from Oregon, added an amendment to the 1907 Agricultural Appropriations Bill&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev7_007136.pdf Siuslaw National Forest], '''PDF'''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; declaring these activities as falling under the authority of congressional power, not executive power. Congressional leaders concluded that the president was out of control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Theodore Roosevelt: Preacher of Righteousness|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UiYRkL4GqP4C&amp;amp;pg=PA178 |year=2008|publisher=Yale University Press|pages=178|isbn=9780300145144}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Moving left===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TR-Farewell.jpg|thumb|320px|Roosevelt moves left in his 1908 Farewell Address]]&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt moved left in 1907-08, criticizing the courts, promoting labor unions and attacking big business. The Republican leadership in Congress ignored his radical proposals and waited for his successor-Taft-to take over the White House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====View of the Constitution====&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's administration marked the shift to a more activist conception of the presidency, in peace as well as war,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Pyle|first1=Christopher H.|last2=Pious|first2=Richard M.|title=The President, Congress, and the Constitution: Power and Legitimacy in American Politics|date=1984|publisher=Simon and Schuster|isbn=978-0029253809|pages=68–69}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/policy-report/2002/11/chapman.pdf |title=TR: No Friend of the Constitution |work=Cato Institute |date=November/December 2002 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was both internationalist and aggressive in asserting Presidential power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Dumbrell|first1=John|last2=Barrett|first2=David M.|title=The Making of US Foreign Policy|date=1997|publisher=Manchester University Press|isbn=978-0719048227|pages=56–57}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He would write in his Autobiography:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I declined to adopt the view that what was imperatively necessary for the Nation could not be done by the President unless he could find some specific authorization to do it. My belief was that it was not only his right but his duty to do anything that the needs of the Nation demanded unless such action was forbidden by the Constitution or by the laws. Under this interpretation of executive power I did and caused to be done many things not previously done by the President and the heads of the departments. I did not usurp power, but I did greatly broaden the use of executive power. In other words, I acted for the public welfare, I acted for the common well-being of all our people, whenever and in whatever manner was necessary, unless prevented by direct constitutional or legislative prohibition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Roosevelt|first1=Theodore|title=Theodore Roosevelt, an Autobiography|date=1913|publisher=Charles Scribner's sons|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Io4fAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA357|pages=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This view came to be known as the [[Stewardship Theory]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Dodds|first1=Graham G.|title=Take Up Your Pen: Unilateral Presidential Directives in American Politics|date=May 2, 2013|publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press|isbn=978-0-8122-4511-0|pages=31–33}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by [[William Howard Taft]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Taft|first1=William H.|title=Our chief magistrate and his powers|date=1916|publisher=Columbia University Press|url=https://archive.org/details/ourchiefmagistra00taftuoft|pages=139–140}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Eugenics====&lt;br /&gt;
As was common during the [[Progressive Era]], Roosevelt came to believe in the doctrines of [[Eugenics]].  He wrote about the dangers of &amp;quot;race suicide&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theodore-roosevelt.com/toonsbytopicracesuicide.html Theodore Roosevelt : Political Cartoons : &amp;quot;Race Suicide&amp;quot; Controversy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[When some eugenists wrote about &amp;quot;race&amp;quot;, they meant &amp;quot;Human Race&amp;quot; and not racial superiority]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in that people were not having enough children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common with eugenists, he did believe in sterilization.  In an article titled &amp;quot;Twisted Eugenics&amp;quot;, he wrote that &amp;quot;I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding; and when the evil nature of these people is sufficiently flagrant, this should be done. Criminals should be sterilized and feeble-minded persons forbidden to leave offspring behind them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=qbsRAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA32 The Outlook, Volume 106]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Additionally, he wrote a letter to Charles Davenport expressing the same sentiment.  He wrote: &amp;quot;Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind. It is really extraordinary that our people refuse to apply to human beings such elementary knowledge as every successful farmer is obliged to apply to his own stock breeding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dnalc.org/view/11219-T-Roosevelt-letter-to-C-Davenport-about-degenerates-reproducing-.html T. Roosevelt letter to C. Davenport about &amp;quot;degenerates reproducing&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's eugenic beliefs have at times been misunderstood, and can be best categorized as Neo-Lamarkist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas G. Dyer, ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Idea of Race'' (1980), p. 160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's administration was marked by an active approach to foreign policy. He followed four basic principles: &lt;br /&gt;
#promoting broadly defined American interests worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
#building American military and naval power and control over strategic points (especially the Panama canal and its approaches)&lt;br /&gt;
#cooperation with the British&lt;br /&gt;
#there was a social contract between the nation's citizens and its government, such that civilized nations had a right of intervention in cases in which such a contract had been broken. His foreign policy was well suited for the challenges of the world; he anticipated later attitudes and developments well into the 20th century and even the 21st century, as exemplified by [[John McCain]] in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Patrick Cullinane, &amp;quot;Invoking Teddy: the Inspiration of John Mccain's Foreign Policy.&amp;quot; ''Diplomacy &amp;amp; Statecraft'' 2008 19(4): 767-786&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He combined a credible realist and internationalist approach with great attention to detail and full appreciation of the importance of diplomatic finesse. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civilization and modernization====&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt saw it as the duty of more developed (&amp;quot;civilized&amp;quot;) nations to help the underdeveloped (&amp;quot;uncivilized&amp;quot;) world move forward. In [[Cuba]], the [[Philippines]], [[Puerto Rico]] and the [[Panama Canal Zone]], he used the Army's medical service, under [[Walter Reed]] and [[William C. Gorgas]], to eliminate the [[yellow fever]] menace and install a new regime of public health. He used the army to build up the infrastructure of the new possessions, building railways, telegraph and telephone lines, and upgrading roads and port facilities. &lt;br /&gt;
====Army and Navy====&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt and his Secretary of War [[Elihu Root]] modernized the Army by creating a general staff system and structuring the military away from small frontier forts to modern combat roles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tr-militarist-1904World.jpg|thumb|350px| The ''New York World'' newspaper, mouthpiece of liberal Democrats, blasts Roosevelt as a dangerous militaristic dictator in 1904]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, convinced that American military preparedness hinged on the nation's ability to develop and exploit new technologies, worked to make the technology of the army and navy as modern as possible. Among other things, he took an active interest in the army's consideration of the role of the machine gun and the airplane and in the navy's development of both the submarine and a new and more powerful type of battleship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew M. Oyos, &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Implements of War.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Military History'' 1996 60(4): 631-655 25p&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By identifying and working with two talented junior officers in the Navy Department, Albert Lenoir Key and [[William S. Sims]], Roosevelt assembled an ad hoc staff on naval policy. This staff funneled technical information to Roosevelt that allowed him to dominate policy discussions with Congress and the senior Navy staff. The president annoyed his admirals by micromanaging their responsibilities and ignoring the chain of command.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peri E. Arnold, &amp;quot;Policy Leadership in the Progressive Presidency: the Case of Theodore Roosevelt's Naval Policy and His Search for Strategic Resources&amp;quot;. ''Studies in American Political Development'' 1996 10(2): 333-359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt dramatically increased the size of the navy, forming the new warships into a &amp;quot;Great White Fleet&amp;quot; for display purposes and sending it on a world tour in 1907. This display was  designed as a show of force to impress the Japanese and even more to motivate Americans to support naval power and be aware of the new role in the Pacific. Yet, the ships were almost forced to return because of the inadequacy of American ports in the Pacific.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James R. Reckner, &amp;quot;The Rebirth of the Fleet.&amp;quot; ''Naval History'' 2007 21(6): 16-25 online at [[EBSCO]]; Edward S Miller,''War Plan Orange'' (1991)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Britain====&lt;br /&gt;
Typical of his eagerness for closer cooperation with London was Washington's support for Britain in the [[Boer War]], despite public opinion that favored the underdog Boers. the British reciprocated, so that in settling the boundary dispute between Canada (controlled by Britain) and Alaska, the British sold out the Canadians to gain American favor—a stunning shock to the Canadians.&lt;br /&gt;
====Mediator====&lt;br /&gt;
Balance of power considerations shaped Roosevelt's role as the successful mediator who ended the 1904-05 war between Russia and Japan. Japan had clearly won, but was not allowed to grab too much, thus allowing Russia to keep a certain power base in the region. Roosevelt justified his actions as consistent with American interests and American values. Moral principles in politics and diplomacy, Roosevelt claimed, help make clear the inescapable tension between ideals and reality. The moral problem persists, he thought, because diplomacy involves choices often obscured by faulty perception, controlled by national interests and complicated by multiple purposes and goals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greg  Russell, &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt's Diplomacy and the Quest for Great Power Equilibrium in Asia.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 2008 38(3): 433-455&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time Japan was consolidating its colonial rule over Korea. Roosevelt supported Japan because he viewed Korea as an backward nation fit to be a protectorate of Japan, which he hoped would protect American economic interests in Manchuria, where Japan was largely in control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ki-jung Kim, &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt's Image of the World and United States Foreign Policy Toward Korea, 1901-1905.&amp;quot;  ''Korea Journal'' 1995 35(4): 39-53 1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Roosevelt Corollary ====&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Roosevelt Corollary''' to the [[Monroe Doctrine]] was a substantial expansion in 1904. Roosevelt asserted the right of the United States to intervene to stabilize the economic affairs of small nations in the Caribbean and Central America if they were unable to pay their international debts and were at risk of intervention by European powers. The new policy primarily prevented intervention by Britain and Germany, which loaned money to the countries that did not repay. The catalyst of the new policy was Germany's aggressiveness in the Venezuela affair of 1902-03. The intervention took the form of takeover of the customs collection and disbursement of the funds to the debtors and claimants. The policy was unpopular abroad.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Serge Ricard, &amp;quot;The Roosevelt Corollary.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 2006 36(1): 17-26. Issn: 0360-4918, online&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mitchener and Weidenmier (2006) show the economic benefits to the small countries. The average debt price for countries under the US &amp;quot;sphere of influence&amp;quot; rose by 74% in response to the pronouncement and actions to make it credible. That is, their bonds rose 74% because buyers now believed they would be repaid. The increase in financial stability reduced internal conflict because political factions could not count on winning control of the national treasury if they won a civil war. The program spurred export growth and better fiscal management, but debt settlements were driven primarily by gunboat diplomacy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kris James Mitchener and Marc Weidenmier, &amp;quot;Empire, Public Goods, and the Roosevelt Corollary.&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History'' 2005 65(3): 658-692. Issn: 0022-0507; online&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.”'' The phrase was initially used by Roosevelt to explain his relations with domestic political leaders; later the phrase was associated with him and came to refer particularly to his foreign policy with Latin America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/65006/Big-Stick-Policy Big Stick Policy.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Panama Canal====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Panam2.JPG|thumb|350px|Roosevelt builds the canal&amp;amp;mdash;and shovels dirt on Bogota, the capital of Colombia]]&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt felt that the Panama Canal was his most important and historically significant international achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inspired by [[Alfred Thayer Mahan]]'s extraordinarily influential book ''The Influence of Sea Power upon History'' (1890), Roosevelt believed that American security and geopolitical power could be secured only through naval supremacy. This was particularly important in the Caribbean because of its proximity to the United States, European interest in the area and its status as a critical juncture of trade routes. Roosevelt was able to maintain US dominance of the Caribbean without resorting to major military action.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James R. Holmes, &amp;quot;Roosevelt's Pursuit of a Temperate Caribbean Policy.&amp;quot;  ''Naval History'' 2006 20(4): 48-53 in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In particular, Roosevelt understood the strategic significance of the [[Panama Canal]], which opened up the Pacific Coast and Asia to cheap shipping and made it possible for the Navy to move rapidly between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A central issue was which route the canal would take; across Nicaragua and Costa Rica or through the Panama region of Columbia. Intense lobbying resulted in the Congressional decision to follow the Panama route. However, the Colombian Senate rejected the terms of the American Hay-Herran Treaty (1903) and tried to extort more money from the Americans. Roosevelt rejected Colombia's devious strategy and blocked Colombia from suppressing an insurrection in Panama against Colombia. With the success of the revolution, the United States initiated a treaty with the now independent Panama and began construction of the canal, which was completed in 1914.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David McCullough, ''The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870-1914'' (1978) [http://www.amazon.com/Path-Between-Seas-Creation-1870-1914/dp/0671244094/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1250828638&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Break with Taft==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:PamphletFrontPageProgressivePartyPlatform1912.jpg|thumb|right|190px|The Platform of Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
When Roosevelt's term was up he decided not to run again but chose Secretary of War [[William Howard Taft]] as his successor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long-term disputes inside the GOP, especially regarding tariffs, and the tension between Eastern industry and Midwest agriculture, pulled the party apart. Whle Roosevelt was in Africa and Europe, his friends grew alarmed that Taft was betraying the progressive cause by collaborating with reactionaries in the GOP. Roosevelt finally broke with Taft in 1910 but was outmaneuvered by Taft, who won the GOP nomination in 1912. Roosevelt walked out of the convention and the party, running as an independent on his own &amp;quot;Progressive&amp;quot; ticket, nicknamed the &amp;quot;Bull Moose Party&amp;quot;. Roosevelt was shot before giving in a speech in Milwaukee. The bullet lodged in a copy of the speech stuffed into his breast pocket, saving his life. He gave the speech anyway that day, beginning the speech with the famous line, &amp;quot;I don't know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot; but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dale Carnegie]] wrote, &amp;quot;{{tr-taft}}&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both he and Taft lost to Democrat [[Woodrow Wilson]] in the [[United States presidential election, 1912|election of 1912]]. The Taft conservatives, however, kept control of the GOP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exploration==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After leaving office, Roosevelt took a trip along the [[Amazon River]] and wrote a book about his experience, ''Through the Brazilian Wilderness''. While in [[South America]], Roosevelt contracted [[malaria]] and nearly died. At one point, he requested that his expedition leave him behind. His son, Kermit, helped nurse him back to health, and Theodore credited Kermit with saving his life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservation==&lt;br /&gt;
More than any president before or since, Roosevelt insisted that conservation of natural resources be high on the agenda. As a world-class hunter and explorer, he mobilized support among American hunters, fishermen and outdoorsmen. He promoted both the national park system and the national forest system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TR-Conservation.jpg|thumb|320px|Roosevelt was a leader in Conservation, fighting to end the waste of natural resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 20th century there were three main positions. The laissez-faire position held that owners of private property—including lumber and mining companies, should be allowed to do anything they wished for their property. The conservationists, led by Roosevelt and his ally [[Gifford Pinchot]], said that was too wasteful and inefficient. In any case, they noted, most of the natural resources in the western states were already owned by the federal government. The best course of action, they argued, was a long-term plan devised by national experts to maximize the long-term economic benefits of natural resources. The third position, led by the Sierra Club, held that nature was almost sacred, and that man was an intruder. It allowed for limited tourism (such as hiking), but opposed automobiles in national parks. It strenuously opposed timber cutting on most public lands and vehemently denounced the dams that Roosevelt supported for water supplies, electricity and flood control. Especially controversial was the Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park, which was built after Roosevelt had left politics. The dam still stands despite efforts by members of the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations as well as the Sierra Club to demolish the dam. Nancy Pelosi and the California Democratic Party have been staunch critics of these proposals, as the reservoir is used for a back up water supply for Pelosi's district (Don Pedro Reservoir is the main source).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Race and Ethnicity==&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was keenly sensitive to the issues surrounding race and ethnicity, particularly the heated debated on immigration restriction. He considered himself Dutch, not Anglo-Saxon . He welcomed the vitality of new immigration, while holding that America's first responsibility was to its literate, native-born, working poor. In balancing these competitive goals, the president backed legislation that limited the immigration of poverty- and disease-stricken people regardless of ethnicity. He blocked harsh anti-Japanese efforts in California, but negotiated an informal agreement whereby Japan would no longer send immigrants. During World War I he attacked certain &amp;quot;[[hyphenated American]]s,&amp;quot; especially German-Americans and Irish-Americans, saying they put loyalties to their homeland above American interests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The German-Americans did not support Germany, but did want the U.S. to remain neutral. The Irish Catholics were so hostile to Britain that they did not want the U.S. to support it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Historian of the frontier===&lt;br /&gt;
In ''The Winning of the West,'' a four-volume history of westward expansion, Roosevelt developed the thesis that the western experience  shaped and created a new ethnic group or people (what he called a &amp;quot;race&amp;quot;), the true American people. His ideas helped shape the popular culture, especially since his own cowboy persona exemplified all the strengths of the new people. Meanwhile, Professor [[Frederick Jackson Turner]] developed his famous [[Frontier Thesis]], based in part on Roosevelt’s ideas. Turner’s views came to dominate professional historiography and shaped the teaching of history for a century–and is still influential in the 21st century. Roosevelt and Turner shared the view that the frontier was the most significant force in America's cultural and political development, but Turner stressed the complex social and political processes simulated by the frontier, while Roosevelt emphasized that national growth and progress came from the West. Turner envisioned political problems that could befall America if cheap land resources were exhausted. Roosevelt saw a new, highly capable cohort of ruling elites growing out of the conquest of the frontier and leading America to new frontiers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard Slotkin, &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt's Frontier Hypothesis,&amp;quot; ''European Contributions to American Studies'' 1989 16: 44-71&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Patriotism==&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt once declared:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Theodore Roosevelt, &amp;quot;The Children of the Crucible,&amp;quot; 14 Annals of America 1916-1928, 129, at 130 (1968).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''We must have but one flag. We must also have but one language. That must be the language of the Declaration of Independence, of Washington’s Farewell address, of Lincoln’s Gettysburg speech and second inaugural. We cannot tolerate any attempt to oppose or supplant the language and culture that has come down to us from the builders of this Republic.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the last year of his life Roosevelt was quoted in the [[Kansas City Star]] newspaper about the need for truth in regards to the presidency:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Turn to the left==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Youre No George Washington Mr Roosevelt.jpg|thumb|250px|right|A cartoon satirizes Theodore Roosevelt reversing his promise not to seek a third time in office.]]&lt;br /&gt;
About 1907, Roosevelt turned more to the left in domestic policy, and in his 1912 campaign he called for movement toward what would later be called a &amp;quot;welfare state.&amp;quot; His move to the left annoyed conservatives and fueled the split in the GOP that exploded in 1912, with Roosevelt on the losing side. His &amp;quot;'''New Nationalism'''&amp;quot; and his chivalry predisposed him toward an enlarged protective state, along with his admiration for what the British were doing at the time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[David Lloyd George]] and [[Winston Churchill]], key leaders of the British [[Liberal Party]], started the welfare state in Britain, 1908-11, with unemployment insurance and old age pensions; American conservatives accepted these policies by the 1950s..&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt preached the manly protection of the family and a state led by manly men who insisted on protecting all women and children. He believed that &amp;quot;the ruin of motherhood and childhood by the merciless exploitation of the labor of women and children is a crime of capital importance.&amp;quot; His solution was to support labor's right to bargain collectively and to denounce employers who mistreated women and child workers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kathleen Dalton, ''Theodore Roosevelt: A Strenuous Life'' (2004)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Direct Election of Senators===&lt;br /&gt;
The direct election of senators (which later became the [[17th amendment]]) was an important initiative for progressives of the era, representing a major shift in policy from the [[Founding Fathers]] [[Constitutional Republic]] to a form of direct [[Democracy]], with Roosevelt being among the supporters of the idea. He spoke frequently&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |first1=Theodore |last1=Roosevelt |title=Who is a Progressive? |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BIwxAQAAMAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA809 |pages=8–9, 15 |date=April 3, 1912 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the campaign trail&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |first1=Theodore |last1=Roosevelt |title=A Charter of Democracy: Address by Hon. Theodore Roosevelt, Ex-president of the United States, Before the Ohio Constitutional Convention on February 21, 1912 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Qb4ZAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA9 |year=1912 |publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office |pages=9 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about the issue, and it is included in the platform of the [[Bull Moose Party]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |first1=Theodore |last1=Roosevelt |title=Progressive Principles: Selections from Addresses Made During the Presidential Campaign of 1912 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qLYJAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA315 |year=1913 |publisher=Progressive national service |pages=315 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative or liberal?==&lt;br /&gt;
Metaphorically, there were 15 different Roosevelts; conservatives admire 10 of them, liberals admire 10, with some overlap. Conservatives are more apt to admire his patriotism, masculinity and military achievements, his stress on national greatness, his buildup of the nation's military forces, his resolution of the [[Coal strike of 1902|1902 Coal Strike]] without forcing business to recognize the unions, his attacks on hyphenated Americans (people with divided loyalty in wartime), and his bold histories of the frontier. Liberals are more likely to admire his trust-busting and hostility to big business, his promotion of liberal programs in 1907-8 and 1912, his excessive use of executive orders to get around congress, and his break with the GOP in 1912 when he denounced it as too conservative. [[Ronald Reagan]] noted in 1972, &amp;quot;I admire 'Teddy' greatly and quote him often.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Text in Ronald Reagan [http://books.google.com/books?id=ZrRc_ABenS8C&amp;amp;pg=PP1&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ronald+inauthor:reagan&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES#PPA266,M1 ''Reagan: A Life in Letters'' (2004) p 266]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservation was always high on Roosevelt's agenda. His optimal use policy has largely been adopted by conservatives and businessmen, while the Sierra Club and related groups reject Roosevelt's policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone admires his amazingly dynamic style and willingness to confront the issues of the day by bringing everyone to the negotiating table, his settlement of the war between Japan and Russia (which led to Roosevelt's winning the Nobel peace prize), and his building of the Panama Canal (though liberals complain he was too rough with Colombia).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Assassination attempt==&lt;br /&gt;
On October 14, 1912, John Flammang Schrank attempted to murder Roosevelt.  His attempt failed, with Roosevelt recognizing that since he was not coughing up blood, the bullet did not reach his lung.  Roosevelt proceeded to give the speech which he was intending, despite warnings from health officials.  The title of the speech was &amp;quot;''Progressive Cause Greater Than Any Individual''&amp;quot;.  He opened the speech, informing the crowd of the attack.  He said &amp;quot;Ladies and gentlemen, I don't know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot, but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose&amp;quot;.  The bullet from Schrank had pierced a metal eyeglass case as well as the speech transcript he was carrying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time, it was not considered safe to remove the bullet, so Roosevelt carried the bullet in his chest for the rest of his life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/onthisday/big/0106.html Theodore Roosevelt Dies Suddenly at Oyster Bay Home; Nation Shocked, Pays Tribute to Former President; Our Flag on All Seas and in All Lands at Half Mast], [[The New York Times]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sidelights ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Life in the White House===&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt relished the presidency and seemed to be everywhere at once. He took Cabinet members and friends on long, fast-paced hikes, boxed in the state rooms of the White House, romped with his children and read voraciously. In 1904, he was permanently blinded in his left eye during one of his boxing bouts, but this injury was kept from the public at the time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brands, (1997) 565&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His many enthusiastic interests and limitless energy led one ambassador to wryly explain, &amp;quot;You must always remember that the President is about six.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cecil Spring Rice, ''The Letters and Friendships of Sir Cecil Spring-Rice,'' (1929) p 437&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's oldest daughter, Alice Roosevelt, was a controversial character with a tart tongue and a spirit of adventure. When friends asked if he could rein in his elder daughter, Roosevelt said, &amp;quot;I can be President of the United States, or I can attend to Alice.&amp;quot;  In turn, Alice said of him that he always wanted to be &amp;quot;the bride at every wedding and the corpse at every funeral.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carol Felsenthal, ''Princess Alice: The Life and Times of  Alice Roosevelt Longsworth'' (1988) pp. 60, 105&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt rebuilt the White House building, adding a new West Wing to free up the second floor rooms in the residence that formerly housed the president's staff. To this day, &amp;quot;west Wing&amp;quot; signifies the presidential staff. He and Edith also had the entire house renovated and restored to the [[federal style]], tearing out the Victorian furnishings and details (including Tiffany windows) that had been installed over the previous three decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teddy Bear===&lt;br /&gt;
The Teddy Bear is named for Theodore Roosevelt. After it was reported that Roosevelt had refused to shoot a bear on a hunting expedition a toy shop owner placed a sign next to a toy bear in his shop window announcing that this was &amp;quot;Teddy's Bear&amp;quot;. The name stuck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spelling reform===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TRSpelling.jpg|thumb|390px|Roosevelt shoots holes in the dictionary as the ghosts of Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dr Johnson moan.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his presidency, Roosevelt failed in efforts to simplify the spelling of common words. He (and other spelling reformers) wanted to replace &amp;quot;dropped&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;chased&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;dropt&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;chast&amp;quot; and replace &amp;quot;through&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;thru&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;thoroughly&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;thoroly.&amp;quot; He tried to force government to adopt the system, sending an order to the Public Printer to use the system in all public documents. The reform annoyed the public, forcing him to rescind the order. Roosevelt told his friend, literary critic Brander Matthews, one of the chief advocates of the reform, &amp;quot;I could not by fighting have kept the new spelling in, and it was evidently worse than useless to go into an undignified contest when I was beaten. Do you know that the one word as to which I thought the new spelling was wrong &amp;amp;mdash; thru &amp;amp;mdash; was more responsible than anything else for our discomfiture?&amp;quot; Next summer Roosevelt was watching a naval review when a launch marked &amp;quot;Pres Bot&amp;quot; chugged ostentatiously by. The president waved and laughed with delight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pringle 465-7; Brands 555ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Football reform===&lt;br /&gt;
Both Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson took an intense interest in the controversy over the reform of college football to make the game more efficient and less brutal. In the 1890s and early 1900s, football faced widespread harsh criticism over injuries and the exaggerated role of athletics in college life. Roosevelt and Wilson, loyal followers of Harvard and Princeton, had defended football in the 1890s. In the fall of 1905, however, Roosevelt called a conference of football experts at the White House to discuss brutality and unsportsmanlike conduct. Thereafter, Roosevelt worked behind the scenes to bring about sufficient reform to preserve football and ensure that it would continue to be played at Harvard. In the years 1909-10, when college football again faced an injury crisis, Woodrow Wilson, president of Princeton University worked with the presidents at Harvard and Yale to make reasonable reforms. Both Roosevelt's and Wilson's approaches were consistent with their strategies for national political change. In the years that followed the reforms on the gridiron, football evolved rapidly into the 'attractive' game that Wilson had advocated and a far less brutal game than the unruly spectacle that Roosevelt had tried to control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John S. Watterson, &amp;quot;Political Football: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson and the Gridiron Reform Movement.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 1995 25(3): 555-564&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion and character==&lt;br /&gt;
In a speech in 1911 Roosevelt said the King James Version was &amp;quot;the book to which our people owe infinitely the greater part of their store of ethics, infinitely the greater part of their knowledge of how to apply that store to the needs of our every-day life.&amp;quot; The former president was characteristically dramatic:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;No other book of any kind ever written in English—perhaps no other book ever written in any other tongue—has ever so affected the whole life of a people as this authorized version of the Scriptures has affected the life of the English-speaking peoples.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt could  base his conclusions  less on ''specific'' Christian reasoning than on broad humanitarian appeal. He urged his auditors to study the Bible, not necessarily &amp;quot;as an inspired book,&amp;quot; but as an essential volume for every person &amp;quot;who seeks after a high and useful life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark Noll, &amp;quot;'The Most Democratic Book in the World'&amp;quot; ''Christian History &amp;amp; Biography'' 2008 (99): 26-29  in  [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paradoxically however, Roosevelt was not sworn in on a Bible. He remains the only president in history not to do so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/pihtml/pinotable.html Library of Congress Presidential Inauguration Precedents and Notable Events]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like his Roosevelt ancestors, Roosevelt was a member of the Dutch Reformed Church. In Oyster Bay there was no Reformed church, and so from 1887 onward he went to Christ Church (Episcopal) with his wife Edith and the children, where he took part in the service, loudly singing the hymns. In Albany and Washington Roosevelt attended a Dutch Reformed church. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike many presidents, Roosevelt was an enthusiastic churchmen. Biographer George Grant writes,  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
He grew up in the church, raised his children in the church, and remained in the church into his dying day... His reasoning was simple and straightforward: man was made for covenant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's personal experience with the Church was a happy one—and he grew great strength from it. As he confessed to his friends, &amp;quot;after a week of wrestling with perplexing problems, it does so rest my soul to come to the House of the Lord and to sing—and to mean it—Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Roosevelt] refrained from hunting, fishing, playing games, or transacting any sort of business on Sunday.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/life/Religion.htm THE RELIGION of THEODORE ROOSEVELT] Relative little has been written on Roosevelt 's religion, although a book, ''ROOSEVELT'S RELIGION'' by Christian Reisner, [http://books.google.com/books?id=-rVEAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;dq=ROOSEVELT%27S+RELIGION+by+Christian+Reisner&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=NaRpPqwPWv&amp;amp;sig=v-mVzmOukGfPAKjq6jZgfo4q3aM&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=x8-CSpiCOsaltgfD_rjMCg&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1 George Grant, &amp;quot;The courage and character of Theodore Roosevelt. A hero among leaders.&amp;quot;], pp. 170,71&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt provided ''Nine Reasons Why a Man Should Go to Church'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/life/Church9reasons.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''In this actual world, a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoffed at or ignored their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''He will listen to and take part in reading some beautiful passages from the Bible. And if he is not familiar with the Bible he has suffered a loss.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''He may not hear a good sermon at church. He will hear a sermon by a good man who, with his wife, is engaged all of the week in making hard lives a little easier.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''I advocate a man's joining in church work for the sake of showing his faith by his works.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Various other quotes&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Works of Theodore Roosevelt - National Edition'', H-BAR Enterprises&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thinkexist.com/quotation/a_thorough_knowledge_of_the_bible_is_worth_more/164715.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answers.com/topic/theodore-roosevelt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; help express Roosevelt's character and values. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''A thorough knowledge of the Bible is worth more than a college education.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''There is not in all America a more dangerous trait than the deification of mere smartness unaccompanied by any sense of moral responsibility.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abilene, KS, May 2, 1903&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''A man who has never gone to school may steal from a freight car; but if he has a university education, he may steal the whole railroad.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Alone of human beings the good and wise mother stands on a plane of equal honor with the bravest soldier; for she has gladly gone down to the brink of the chasm of darkness to bring back the children in whose hands rests the future of the years.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Great Adventure, 1918&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''The one thing I want to leave my children is an honorable name.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''It is better to be faithful than famous.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''There are good men and bad men of all nationalities, creeds and colors; and if this world of ours is ever to become what we hope some day it may become, it must be by the general recognition that the man's heart and soul, the man's worth and actions, determine his standing.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Letter, Oyster Bay, NY, September 1, 1903&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''I have a perfect horror of words that are not backed up by deeds.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Oyster Bay, NY, July 7, 1915&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamestown, VA, April 26, 1907&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;An Autobiography, 1913&amp;quot;&amp;gt;An Autobiography, 1913&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''This country has nothing to fear from the crooked man who fails. We put him in jail. It is the crooked man who succeeds who is a threat to this country.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Memphis, TN, October 25, 1905&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''No man can lead a public career really worth leading, no man can act with rugged independence in serious crises, nor strike at great abuses, nor afford to make powerful and unscrupulous foes, if he is himself vulnerable in his private character.''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;An Autobiography, 1913&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Criticism is necessary and useful; it is often indispensable; but it can never take the place of action, or be even a poor substitute for it. The function of the mere critic is of very subordinate usefulness. It is the doer of deeds who actually counts in the battle for life, and not the man who looks on and says how the fight ought to be fought, without himself sharing the stress and the danger.(1894)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''I have never in my life envied a human being who led an easy life; I have envied a great many people who led difficult lives and led them well.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Des Moines, Iowa, November 4, 1910&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''The first requisite of a good citizen in this republic of ours is that he shall be able and willing to pull his weight.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''There is not a man of us who does not at times need a helping hand to be stretched out to him, and then shame upon him who will not stretch out the helping hand to his brother.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pasadena, CA, May 8, 1903&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed.''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''The only man who makes no mistakes is the man who never does anything.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''...any nation which in its youth lives only for the day, reaps without sowing, and consumes without husbanding, must expect the penalty of the prodigal whose labor could with difficulty find him the bare means of life.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arbor Day - A Message to the School-Children of the United States&amp;quot; April 15, 1907&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Conservation means development as much as it does protection. I recognize the right and duty of this generation to develop and use the natural resources of our land; but I do not recognize the right to waste them, or to rob, by wasteful use, the generations that come after us.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New Nationalism&amp;quot; speech, Osawatomie, Kansas, August 31, 1910&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Is America a weakling, to shrink from the work of the great world powers? No! The young giant of the West stands on a continent and clasps the crest of an ocean in either hand. Our nation, glorious in youth and strength, looks into the future with eager eyes and rejoices as a strong man to run a race.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Letter to John Hay, American Ambassador to the Court of St. James, London, Written in Washington, DC, June 7, 1897&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Now to you men, who, in your turn, have come together to spend and be spent in the endless crusade against wrong, to you who face the future resolute and confident, to you who strive in a spirit of brotherhood for the betterment of our Nation, to you who gird yourselves for this great new fight in the never-ending warfare for the good of humankind, I say in closing what in that speech I said in closing: We stand at Armageddon, and we battle for the Lord''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A Confession of Faith, delivered in Chicago, Illinois, 6 August 1912&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''No abounding of material prosperity shall avail us if our spiritual senses atrophy. The foes of our own household shall prevail against us unless there be in our people an inner life which finds its outer expression in a morality like that preached by the seers and prophets of God when the grandeur that was Greece and the glory that was Rome still lay in the future.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Theodore Roosevelt, The Foes of Our Own Household, New York, 1917, p.132&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Every thinking man, when he thinks, realizes that the teachings of the Bible are so interwoven and entwined with our whole social and civic life that it would be literally impossible to figure what life would be like if these standards were removed. We would lose almost all the standards by which we now judge both public and private morals.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Willis, The Letters and Speeches of Theodore Roosevelt, 1937, p.86&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''There are those who believe that a new modernity demands a new morality. What they fail to consider is the harsh reality that there is no such thing as a new morality. There is only one morality. All else is immorality. There is only true Christian ethics over against which stands the whole of paganism. If we are to fulfill our destiny as a people, then we must return to the old morality, the sole morality. And if we are to do that the church must prepare us for the task.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Johnson, Theodore Roosevelt: American Monarch, 1981, p.91&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In modern culture==&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Wiegand is a well known Roosevelt impersonator, who has traveled the country lecturing about the life of Theodore Roosevelt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.teddyrooseveltshow.com/ The Teddy Roosevelt Show - Joe Wiegand]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Antiquities Act of 1906]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Buenker, John D. and Joseph Buenker, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.'' (3 vol 2005), 1280pp; articles on all the major people, events and causes of Roosevelt’s era&lt;br /&gt;
* Mowry, George. ''The Era of Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of Modern America, 1900–1912.'' (1954) general survey of era &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, H.W. ''T.R.: The Last Romantic'' (1998), scholarly biography [http://www.questia.com/read/98669157?title=T.R.%3a%20The%20Last%20Romantic online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chessman, G. Wallace. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Politics of Power,'' (1969), short biography by scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooper, John Milton ''The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1983), well-written a dual scholarly biography [http://www.amazon.com/Warrior-Priest-Woodrow-Theodore-Roosevelt/dp/0674947517/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220396273&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dalton, Kathleen. ''Theodore Roosevelt: A Strenuous Life.'' (2002), full scholarly biography that stresses his late crusade for social welfare [http://www.amazon.com/Theodore-Roosevelt-Strenuous-Kathleen-Dalton/dp/0679767339/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1250752111&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Harbaugh, William Henry. ''The Life and Times of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1963), full scholarly biography; good on politics&lt;br /&gt;
* Keller, Morton, ed., ''Theodore Roosevelt: A Profile'' (1967) excerpts from Roosevelt and from historians.&lt;br /&gt;
* McCullough, David. ''Mornings on Horseback, The Story of an Extraordinary Family. a Vanished Way of Life, and the Unique Child Who Became Theodore Roosevelt.'' (2001) popular biography to 1884 [http://www.amazon.com/Mornings-Horseback-Extraordinary-Vanished-Roosevelt/dp/0671447548/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1250752478&amp;amp;sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morris, Edmund. ''The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt'', to 1901 (1979); vol 2: ''Theodore Rex'' 1901–1909. (2001); Pulitzer prize for Volume 1. Biography; unusually well-written and well-researched [http://www.amazon.com/Theodore-Roosevelt-Modern-Library-Paperbacks/dp/0375756787/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1250752478&amp;amp;sr=1-4 vol 1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Toole, Patricia. ''When Trumpets Call: Theodore Roosevelt after the White House.'' (2005). 494 pp. [http://www.amazon.com/When-Trumpets-Call-Theodore-Roosevelt/dp/0684864789/ref=sr_1_16?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1250752668&amp;amp;sr=1-16 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pringle, Henry F. ''Theodore Roosevelt'' (1932; 2nd ed. 1956), full scholarly biography [http://www.questia.com/read/270595?title=Theodore%20Roosevelt%3a%20A%20Biography online 1st edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Putnam, Carleton ''Theodore Roosevelt: A Biography, Volume I: The Formative Years'' (1958), only volume published, to age 28; written by prominent conservative&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scholarly studies ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Barsness,John A. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt as Cowboy: The Virginian as Jacksonian Man.&amp;quot; ''American Quarterly,'' Vol. 21, No. 3 (Autumn, 1969), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;609–619 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2711937 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Blum, John Morton ''The Republican Roosevelt.'' (1954). Influential essays that examine how Roosevelt did politics&lt;br /&gt;
* Brinkley, Douglas. ''The Wilderness Warrior: Theodore Roosevelt and the Crusade for America'' (2009), best coverage of Roosevelt and conservation [http://www.amazon.com/Wilderness-Warrior-Theodore-Roosevelt-Crusade/dp/0060565284/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1250752478&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Burton, David H. ''Taft, Roosevelt, and the Limits of Friendship,'' (2005) [http://www.questia.com/read/112015842?title=Taft%2c%20Roosevelt%2c%20and%20the%20Limits%20of%20Friendship online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chace, James. ''1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft, and Debs - The Election That Changed the Country.'' (2004). 323 pp; popular account [http://www.amazon.com/1912-Roosevelt-Debs-Election-Changed/dp/0743273559/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220396215&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cutright, Paul Russell. ''Theodore Roosevelt: The Making of a Conservationist'' (1985)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dorsey, Leroy G., and Rachel M. Harlow, &amp;quot;'We Want Americans Pure and Simple': Theodore Roosevelt and the Myth of Americanism,&amp;quot; ''Rhetoric &amp;amp; Public Affairs,'' Volume 6, Number 1, Spring 2003, pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;55–78 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/rhetoric_and_public_affairs/v006/6.1dorsey.html in Project Muse]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ellsworth, Clayton S. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt's Country Life Commission.&amp;quot; ''Agricultural History'', Vol. 34, No. 4 (Oct., 1960), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;155–172 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3741109 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dyer, Thomas G. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Idea of Race'' (1980)&lt;br /&gt;
* Fehn, Bruce. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and American Masculinity.&amp;quot; ''Magazine of History'' (2005) 19(2): 52–59. Issn: 0882-228x Fulltext online at Ebsco. Provides a lesson plan on TR as the historical figure who most exemplifies the quality of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
* Friedenberg, Robert V. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Rhetoric of Militant Decency'' (1990) [http://www.questia.com/read/71082317?title=Theodore%20Roosevelt%20and%20the%20Rhetoric%20of%20Militant%20Decency online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gerstle, Gary. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Divided Character of American Nationalism,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 86, No. 3, (Dec., 1999), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;1280–1307 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2568615 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gosnell, Harold F. ''Boss Platt and His New York Machine: A Study of the Political Leadership of Thomas C. Platt, Theodore Roosevelt, and Others'' (1924) [http://www.questia.com/read/9489049?title=Boss%20Platt%20and%20His%20New%20York%20Machine%3a%20A%20Study%20of%20the%20Political%20Leadership%20of%20Thomas%20C.%20Platt%2c%20Theodore%20Roosevelt%2c%20and%20Others online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gould, Lewis L. ''The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1991), standard history of his domestic and foreign policy as president&lt;br /&gt;
** Gatewood, Willard B. &amp;quot;The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. by Lewis L. Gould&amp;quot; ''Reviews in American History,'' Vol. 20, No. 4 (Dec., 1992), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;512–517 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2702868 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Havig, Alan. &amp;quot;Presidential Images, History, and Homage: Memorializing Theodore Roosevelt, 1919-1967 &amp;quot;. ''American Quarterly,'' Vol. 30, No. 4 (Autumn, 1978), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;514–532 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2712298 IN jstor]&lt;br /&gt;
* Johnson, Arthur M. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Bureau of Corporations&amp;quot;. ''The Mississippi Valley Historical Review,'' Vol. 45, No. 4 (Mar., 1959), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;571–590 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1888711 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Millard, Candice. ''River of Doubt: Theodore Roosevelt's Darkest Journey''. (2005), exploring the Amazon&lt;br /&gt;
* Mowry, George E. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement''. (2001) focus on 1912&lt;br /&gt;
* Mowry, George E. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Election of 1910,&amp;quot; ''The Mississippi Valley Historical Review,'' Vol. 25, No. 4 (Mar., 1939), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;523–534 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1892499 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oyos, Matthew M. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt, Congress, and the Military: U.S. Civil-Military Relations in the Early Twentieth Century,&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly,'' Vol. 30, 2000  [http://www.questia.com/read/5001752826?title=Theodore%20Roosevelt%2c%20Congress%2c%20and%20the%20Military%3a%20U.S.%20Civil-Military%20Relations%20in%20the%20Early%20Twentieth%20Century online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Powell, Jim. ''Bully Boy: The Truth About Theodore Roosevelt's Legacy'' (2006). Denounces TR policies from libertarian perspective; poorly researched&lt;br /&gt;
* Rhodes, James Ford. ''The McKinley and Roosevelt Administrations, 1897-1909'' (1922) [http://www.questia.com/read/6404794?title=The%20McKinley%20and%20Roosevelt%20Administrations%2c%201897-1909 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Scheiner, Seth M. &amp;quot;President Theodore Roosevelt and the Negro, 1901-1908,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of Negro History,'' Vol. 47, No. 3 (Jul., 1962), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;169–182 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2716500 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slotkin, Richard. &amp;quot;Nostalgia and Progress: Theodore Roosevelt's Myth of the Frontier,&amp;quot; ''American Quarterly,'' Vol. 33, No. 5, (Winter, 1981), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;608–637 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2712805 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Testi, Arnaldo. &amp;quot;The Gender of Reform Politics: Theodore Roosevelt and the Culture of Masculinity,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 81, No. 4 (Mar., 1995), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;1509–1533 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2081647 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Watts, Sarah. ''Rough Rider in the White House: Theodore Roosevelt and the Politics of Desire.'' (2003). 289 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military affairs===&lt;br /&gt;
* Beale Howard K. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of America to World Power.'' (1956). standard history of his foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
* Buchanan, Russell. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and American Neutrality, 1914-1917,&amp;quot; ''The American Historical Review,'' Vol. 43, No. 4 (Jul., 1938), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;775–790 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1842528 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Burton, David H. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt: Confident Imperialist&amp;quot; ''The Review of Politics,'' Vol. 23, No. 3 (Jul., 1961), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;356–377 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1405440 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Burton, David H. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt's Social Darwinism and Views on Imperialism,&amp;quot; ''Journal of the History of Ideas,'' Vol. 26, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1965), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;103–118 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2708402 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Collin, Richard H. &amp;quot;Symbiosis Versus Hegemony: New Directions in the Foreign Relations Historiography of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft.&amp;quot; ''Diplomatic History'' 1995 19(3): 473-497 online in [[EBSCO]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gould, Lewis L. ''The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (1991), standard history of his domestic and foreign policy as president&lt;br /&gt;
* Holmes, James R. ''Theodore Roosevelt and World Order: Police Power in International Relations.'' 2006. 328 pp. case studies of intervention in the Philippines, Cuba, Venezuela, Panama, Santo Domingo, and Morocco&lt;br /&gt;
* Marks III, Frederick W. ''Velvet on Iron: The Diplomacy of Theodore Roosevelt'' (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
* McCullough, David. ''The Path between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870–1914'' (1977).&lt;br /&gt;
* Neu, Charles E. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and American Involvement in the Far East, 1901-1909,&amp;quot; ''The Pacific Historical Review,'' Vol. 35, No. 4 (Nov., 1966), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;433–449 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3636977 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oyos, Matthew M. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt and the Implements of War,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of Military History,'' Vol. 60, No. 4 (Oct., 1996), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;631–655 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2944659 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ricard, Serge. &amp;quot;The Roosevelt Corollary.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 2006 36(1): 17–26. Issn: 0360-4918 [http://www.questia.com/read/5017146446?title=The%20Roosevelt%20Corollary online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Stillson, Albert C. &amp;quot;Military Policy Without Political Guidance: Theodore Roosevelt's Navy,&amp;quot; ''Military Affairs,'' Vol. 25, No. 1 (Spring, 1961), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;18–31 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1984220 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tilchin, William N. and Neu, Charles E., ed. ''Artists of Power: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Their Enduring Impact on U.S. Foreign Policy.'' Praeger, 2006. 196 pp. [http://www.questia.com/read/113233998?title=Artists%20of%20Power%3a%20%20Theodore%20Roosevelt%2c%20Woodrow%20Wilson%2c%20and%20Their%20Enduring%20Impact%20on%20U.S.%20Foreign%20Policy online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tilchin, William N. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the British Empire: A Study in Presidential Statecraft'' (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Auchincloss, Louis, ed. ''Theodore Roosevelt, The Rough Riders and an Autobiography'' (Library of America, 2004) ISBN 978-1-93108265-5; ''Theodore Roosevelt, Letters and Speeches'' (Library of America, 2004) ISBN 978-1-93108266-2&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, H.W. ed. ''The Selected Letters of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
* Butt, Archie. ''The Letters of Archie Butt, Personal Aide to President Roosevelt,'' (1924) [http://www.questia.com/read/6560284?title=The%20Letters%20of%20Archie%20Butt%2c%20Personal%20Aide%20to%20President%20Roosevelt online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gould, Lewis L., ed. ''Bull Moose on the Stump: The 1912 Campaign Speeches of Theodore Roosevelt.'' (2008). 256 pages, &lt;br /&gt;
* Harbaugh, William ed. ''The Writings Of Theodore Roosevelt'' (1967). A one-volume selection of Roosevelt's speeches and essays.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hart, Albert Bushnell and Herbert Ronald Ferleger, eds. ''Theodore Roosevelt Cyclopedia'' (1941), Roosevelt's opinions on many issues; online version  at [http://www.theodoreroosevelt.org/]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morison, Elting E., John Morton Blum, and [[Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.]], eds., ''The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt'', 8 vols. (1951–1954). Very large, annotated edition of letters from TR.&lt;br /&gt;
* Roosevelt, Theodore. [http://www.bartleby.com/55/ ''Theodore Roosevelt: An Autobiography ''(1910)]''. online at Bartleby.com.&lt;br /&gt;
* Roosevelt, Theodore. ''The Works of Theodore Roosevelt'' (National edition, 20 vol. 1926); 18,000 pages containing most of TR's speeches, books and essays, but not his letters; a CD-ROM edition is available; some of TR's books are available online through [http://www.bartleby.com/people/RsvltT.html Project Bartleby]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gutenberg.org/browse/authors/r#a729 Theodore Roosevelt books and speeches on Project Gutenberg]&lt;br /&gt;
* Roosevelt, Theodore. &amp;quot;Theodore Roosevelt on Motherhood and the Welfare of the State,&amp;quot; ''Population and Development Review,'' Vol. 13, No. 1 (Mar., 1987), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;141–147 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1972126 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Shaw, Albert, ed. ''A Cartoon History of Roosevelt's Career'' (1910) [http://books.google.com/books?id=QEIOAAAAIAAJ full text and cartoons online]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://faithandfreedom.us/documents/20thcentury/bigstick.htm &amp;quot;Big Stick&amp;quot; Policy.] Faith &amp;amp; Freedom Network.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://librivox.org/author/1471 Works by Theodore Roosevelt - text and free audio] - [[LibriVox]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5722/ Hear TR's Speech &amp;quot;The Liberty of the People&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{USVicePresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Roosevelt, Theodore}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of the United States|Roosevelt, Theodore]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vice Presidents of the United States|Roosevelt, Theodore]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Peace|Roosevelt, Theodore]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People who were Educated at Home]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spanish-American War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medal of Honor recipients]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New York Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gilded Age]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American war heroes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Pro Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Gun Rights Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Patriots]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Veterans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Eugenicists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Montana&amp;diff=1360289</id>
		<title>Montana</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Montana&amp;diff=1360289"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:18:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: /* Water battles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{USState&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Montana&lt;br /&gt;
|flag=Montana_State_Flag.gif&lt;br /&gt;
|motto=&amp;quot;Oro y Plata&amp;quot; (gold and silver)&lt;br /&gt;
|nick=The Treasure State&lt;br /&gt;
|capital=Helena&lt;br /&gt;
|language=English&lt;br /&gt;
|governor=Steve Bullock&lt;br /&gt;
|gparty=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|senator1=Max Baucus&lt;br /&gt;
|s1party=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|s1phone=(202) 224-2651&lt;br /&gt;
|s1email=http://baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=issue Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|senator2=Jon Tester&lt;br /&gt;
|s2party=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|s2phone=(202) 224-2644 &lt;br /&gt;
|s2email=http://tester.senate.gov/Contact/ Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|population=&lt;br /&gt;
|date=November 8, 1889 (41st)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Montana''' is located in the Northwestern region of the [[United States]] and on November 8, 1889 became the forty-first state to enter into the union. The capital of Montana is [[Helena]] and its largest city is Billings. The current governor of Montana is Steve Bullock, a [[Democrat]].  The U.S. Senate race in Montana in 2014 is pivotal to determining which political party will control the Senate overall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
The eastern 60% of the state is flat prairie and is slowly losing population, It is filled with cattle ranches, wheat farms, and oil and gas wells. The leading city is [[Billings]], a medical and commercial center.  The climate is especially harsh in the wintertime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The western 40% is mountainous and is growing rapidly in population.  Its economy is based on tourism and retirement centers, with [[Yellowstone National Park]] and [[Glacier National Park]] as prime attractions.  The old [[copper]] mining industry that made [[Butte]] notorious has disappeared, and the logging industry is fading in importance. The very long border with Canada is becoming economically important, as oil from [[Alberta]] is brought by pipeline to refineries in Billings and to points as far south as Houston.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Energy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mt-oil.jpg|thumb|350px]]Montana is rich in fossil fuel resources and renewable energy potential. Its geologic basins hold more than one-fourth of the Nation’s estimated recoverable coal reserves. Montana’s eastern basins also hold large deposits of oil and gas. Rivers flowing from Montana’s Rocky Mountains offer substantial hydroelectric power resources. Montana contains considerable wind energy potential throughout the State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/state/state_energy_profiles.cfm?sid=MT Energy Information Administration, State Report 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Strong environmental interests (based in the western part of the state where there is little energy) have largely blocked the mining of coal and gas and are trying to stop pipelines from Canada. They instead want biofuels and wind power, which have not been profitable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state is a leader in CO2 sequestration, and has signed agreements with [[Saskatchewan]] so that CO2 will be piped into the state and stored for thousands of years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Montana’s population is only 1 million and so total energy demand is low. However, the State economy is energy intensive and per capita energy consumption is relatively high. The industrial sector, which includes the energy-intensive mining industry, dominates State energy consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Petroleum===&lt;br /&gt;
Montana typically accounts for roughly 2% of annual U.S. crude oil production. Production is concentrated in the Williston Basin, which covers eastern Montana and western North Dakota and contains two of the Nation’s 100 largest oil fields. Several pipelines carry Williston production south to Wyoming and east to Midwest markets. Refineries near Billings supply regional markets with petroleum products, using crude oil brought in primarily from Wyoming and Alberta, Canada. During the winter months, Montana requires oxygenated motor gasoline in the Missoula area but allows the use of conventional motor gasoline in the rest of the State. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Natural Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Montana produces minor quantities of natural gas. Although production is low, demand is lower, and Montana ships nearly one-half of its natural gas output to out-of-State markets. Several natural gas pipeline systems pass through the State, transporting Canadian supplies to Midwest markets. About three-fifths of Montana households use natural gas as their primary energy source for home heating. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Coal, Electricity, and Renewables===&lt;br /&gt;
Montana's coal industry began with discoveries in the 1860s through a growth period 1900-45, a 15-year decline, and an unbroken rise since 1968.  Historically, coal mining has shifted from Western to Eastern Montana, from underground to surface mining, from bituminous coal to sub-bituminous and lignite, from locomotive and smelter fuel markets to thermal generation of electric power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert A. Chadwick, &amp;quot;Coal: Montana's Prosaic Treasure.&amp;quot; ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1973 23(4): 18-31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today Montana typically accounts for 4% of total annual U.S. coal production. The majority of output is produced from several large surface mines in the Powder River Basin, which straddles the border between Montana and Wyoming. Just over one-fourth of Montana’s coal production is used for State electricity generation; Montana delivers the remainder to markets in more than 15 States. Minnesota and Michigan are the largest recipients of Montana coal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accounting for about two-thirds of State electricity generation, coal-fired power plants dominate the Montana electricity market. Hydroelectric power accounts for most of the remainder. Montana is among the leading hydroelectric power producers in the United States, and seven of the State’s 10 largest generating plants run on hydroelectric power. The State has also initiated programs to expand and enhance hydroelectric power capacity. With several operational wind farm projects in central Montana, just east of the Rockies, the State had 146 megawatts of wind power capacity at the end of 2006. High-voltage transmission lines connect Montana to other western electric power grids, allowing Montana to export large amounts of electricity to neighboring States&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water battles ===&lt;br /&gt;
Although western Montana has plenty of water, it is not always in the right place in the arid eastern half. The result has been extended controversy of state and local controls, the use of tens of thousands of private wells, the rights of Indian tribes, and the needs of oil refineries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brian Shovers, &amp;quot;Diversions, Ditches, &amp;amp; District Courts: Montana's Struggle to Allocate Water&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 2005 55(1): 2-15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The State Engineer's Office operated 18890-1964 but unable to control water regulation and ensure dam safety. It faced varying climatic conditions, economic boom and bust, and political opposition. It never ultimately achieved the same regulatory authority of counterparts in other states. In 1965, the legislature abolished the Montana State Engineer's Office and incorporated it into the Montana Water Conservation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James E. Sherow, &amp;quot;'The Fellow Who Can Talk the Loudest and Has the Best Shotgun Gets the Water': Water Regulation and the Montana State Engineer's Office, 1889-1964&amp;quot;. ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 2004 54(1): 56-69&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Montana has been fighting Wyoming for a century over control of unappropriated water in the Tongue and Powder Rivers. Both rivers originate in northeastern Wyoming and flow northward and ultimately drain into the Yellowstone River in Montana. The arguments between Wyoming and Montana water users have been contentious and of long duration. Creation of the Yellowstone River Compact Commission in 1943 failed to resolve disputes over allocation of water. In the 1970s the Montana’s Northern Cheyenne Indian tribe claimed a portion of unappropriated Tongue water, further complicating the issues. Agreements that were reached often failed to be ratified by one or the other state legislature. In 2007 the state of Montana sued Wyoming in the US Supreme Court over loss of water. After almost a century of failed compromises and continuing debate, the allocation issue remains unresolved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hugh Lovin, A Battleground: Wyoming, Montana, and the Tongue and Powder Rivers. Lovin, Hugh.; Annals of Wyoming 2008 80(2): 2-13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State government===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brian Schweitzer.jpg|thumb|200px|Former Governor Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, elected in 2004 and reelected in 2008]]&lt;br /&gt;
The challenge of the 1960s was to modernize outmoded policies in state government, especially regarding prison reform, the state's budgeting and auditing procedures, public school oversight, improving state land development and investments, and the evolution of a more efficient, streamlined state government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eugene C. Tidball, &amp;quot;The Seminal Years of the Montana Legislative Council, 1957-1965&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 2008 58(1): 35-54, 98-99&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics===&lt;br /&gt;
In the territorial era, from 1864 until statehood in 1889, Montana Territory's 14 elections of territorial delegates to Congress show that the electorate voted for candidates they believed would have influence in Washington to gain federal support for territorial development. Martin Maginnis (1872–84), the longest tenured territorial delegate in the western territories, exemplified the delegate who could secure support in Washington for his constituents' projects. Maginnis, Joseph K. Toole (1884–88), and William H. Clagett (1871–72) were considered successful delegates because they were able to win congressional approval for additional forts, aid for railroads, and reduction of Indian reservations in Montana.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard B. Roeder, &amp;quot;Electing Montana's Territorial Delegates: the Beginnings of a Political System.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1988 38(3): 58-68&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Montana's political life in the 1890s was characterized by stalemate, uncompromising parochial demands, personal animosity, and corruption as local communities fought over the prizes of statehood. The major prize, the state capital, was won by Helena after a campaign featuring class and community antagonism, racist rhetoric, personal attacks, and vote buying. In the interests of local power brokers, the legislature created several units of higher education instead of establishing a consolidated university. The battles over the spoils of statehood created a pattern of cynicism and parochialism that continues to influence the state's political life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William L. Lang, &amp;quot;Spoils of Statehood: Montana Communities in Conflict, 1888-1894.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1987 37(4): 34-45&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Law and order===&lt;br /&gt;
In early 1864 in southwestern Montana some 2500 law-abiding citizens, responding to the increasing lawlessness plaguing the gold-mining towns in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, formed a vigilante society and hanged 21 villains after drumhead &amp;quot;trials&amp;quot;, while warning hundreds of others to leave Montana immediately (which they did).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frederick Allen, ''A Decent Orderly Lynching: The Montana Vigilantes'' (2004); Merrill G.  Burlingame,  &amp;quot;Montana's Righteous Hangmen: a Reconsideration&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1978 28(4): 36-49&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gangs of cattle thieves and individual rustlers threatened law and order in the late 19th century. Ranchers starting in the 1870s organized Stockmen's associations to fight back. A minority of stockmen organized into vigilante groups to protect their stock, but most stockmen worked with the legislature to create a stock commission that could oversee their interests. After 11 years of lobbying stockmen finally succeeded in getting a protective law. By working within the legislative process, stockmen transformed themselves and their frontier from a place characterized by isolation and violence to one of organization and law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. A. Clay, &amp;quot;A Call to Order: Law, Violence, and the Development of Montana's Early Stockmen's Organizations.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 2008 58(3): 48-63, 95-96&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Influenced by the nationwide [[Progressive Movement]] Montana cities 1890-1930 demanded police efficiency and professionalism; attempted to curb urban gambling, prostitution, and liquor use; and instilled the concept that police should serve the entire community rather than special interest groups.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert A. Harvie, and Larry V. Bishop, &amp;quot;Police Reform in Montana, 1890-1918&amp;quot;. ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1983 33(2): 46-59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Bourquin (1863-1958), as the federal judge in Montana handed down more than 250 decisions between 1912 and 1937. Ideologically conservative, Bourquin also preserved civil liberties in his decisions. Bourquin's basic faith in democracy and the Constitution, his progressivism, and his Puritan suspicion of a fundamental 'sinful behavior' helped him chart a principled and reasoned course between extreme positions. Bourquin protected the rights of labor unions and 'radicals' during World War I and the postwar Red Scare despite hostility. He also had great concern for the civil rights of Indians and attempted to protect them from government excess in cases like 'Scheer' v. 'Moody et al.,' in which he criticized the federal government's Indian policy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnon Gutfeld, &amp;quot;Western Justice and the Rule of Law: Bourquin on Loyalty, the 'Red Scare,' and Indians.&amp;quot; ''Pacific Historical Review'' 1996 65(1): 85-106&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
====1894 Pullman Strike====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Pullman Strike]] of 1894 came in the midst of a deep depression, the [[Panic of 1893]]. It was based in Chicago but affected the entire west, especially the Northern Pacific Railroad routes in Montana. The Great Northern and Union Pacific railroads experienced less disruption.  The disruptions lasted several weeks in summer 1894. Violent union activists from the newly formed American Railway Union in Billings, Livingston, Butte, Helena, and Missoula tried to stop the movement of trains operated by workers who belonged to the older established railroad brotherhoods. President [[Grover Cleveland]], a conservative [[Bourbon Democrat]] sent in troops from the 22d US Infantry to patrol Northern Pacific. Union activists threatened and actually attacked the troops in Livingston. Unionized miners from western Montana supported A.R.U. efforts. After the strike collapsed, N.P. and U.P. officials blacklisted many Montana railroad employees. Six A.R.U. leaders were also convicted of violating an antistrike injunction. The Pullman Strike was a central event in the labor turbulence and political activism, which swept Montana during the 1890s, fostered by strong antirailroad populism among some farmers and many miners in the state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;W. Thomas White, &amp;quot;Boycott: the Pullman Strike in Montana.&amp;quot;  ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1979 29(4): 2-13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====National Guard====&lt;br /&gt;
The Montana National Guard was established in 1887. The 1st Montana Volunteer Regiment, as the Montana National Guard was known during the Spanish–American War and Philippine Insurrection. Arriving in the Philippines shortly after the Spanish surrendered in August 1898, the regiment participated in guarding Spanish prisoners of war in Cavite, securing Manila from Filipinos angry with the transfer of their country from Spain to the United States, assaulting Caloocan, and taking the provisional capital of Malolos. The performance of this and other National Guard troops in America's first overseas operation convinced the military of its value to national defense.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard K. Hines, &amp;quot;'First to Respond to Their Country's Call': the First Montana Infantry and the Spanish-American War and Philippine Insurrection, 1898-1899.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 2002 52(3): 44-57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Montana National Guard, officially designated the 163d Regiment of the 41st Infantry Division, fought in New Guinea from December 1942 to July 1944. They also participated in the Philippines campaign. Many of the guardsmen joined the Guard in the 1930s to earn money during the Great Depression, and most never imagined being involved in the horrors of jungle combat. Disease took nearly as great a toll on the men as the Japanese did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carle F. O'Neil, &amp;quot;Pacific Memories: Montana National Guardsmen Recall the Fighting on New Guinea in World War II.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 2002 52(2): 48-57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001, over 80% of the Montana Guardsmen and women have been deployed overseas at one time or another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1889-1929===&lt;br /&gt;
====Silver mining====&lt;br /&gt;
Silver mining began in Montana and boomed in the 1880s because of a combination of factors: geographic concentration of silver in shallow vein systems, maintenance of a subsidized silver market by the federal government, infusion of outside capital, evolution of mining and smelting technology, and railroad construction. Between 1883 and 1891, silver production in Montana ranked first or second nationwide, with the mines at Butte, Alta, and Granite as primary producers. The boom collapsed in 1893 because of depletion of the state's resources and the collapse of silver prices. Silver mining did continue, but at a reduced level. The Montana silver mining era exemplifies the common tendency for booms to develop, become overblown, and in finally collapse into extended slumps and depressions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert A. Chadwick, &amp;quot;Montana's Silver Mining Era: Great Boom and Great Bust.&amp;quot; ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1982 32(2): 16-31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
====Cattle ranching====&lt;br /&gt;
Henry Sieben (1847-1937) came to Montana's gold fields in 1864, was a farm laborer, prospector, and freighter, then turned to livestock raising along the Smith River in 1870. In partnership with his brothers Leonard and Jacob, Henry Sieben raised cattle and became one of the territory's pioneer sheep ranchers in 1875. The partnership was dissolved in 1879 and Henry moved his stock to the Lewistown area. He established a reputation as an excellent businessman and as someone who took care of his stock and employees. After ranching in the Culbertson area, Henry Sieben purchased ranches near Cascade and along Little Prickly Pear Creek, forming the Sieben Livestock Company. By 1907, these two ranches had become the heart of his cattle and sheep raising business which he directed from his home in Helena. Sieben became well known for his business approach to ranching and for his public and private philanthropies. His family continues to operate the Sieben Ranch Company today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dick Pace, &amp;quot;Henry Sieben: Pioneer Montana Stockman.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1979 29(1): 2-15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Flu, 1918-1919====&lt;br /&gt;
The worldwide flu pandemic of 1918-19 killed more than 20 million people worldwide, and 675,000 Americans. Montana was one of the four hardest-hit states in the nation, as 5,000 residents, or 1% of the population, died as a result of the infection. In response to the epidemic the State Board of Health urged closing public gathering places. Such regulation spawned public resentment, but the Board of Health stood firm. Butte was the hardest hit city of Montana and one of the hardest hit in the nation. The University of Montana in Missoula closed to protect the students. In remote areas of the state isolation and limited medical personnel left many families to face illness with help from neighbors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pierce C. Mullen,  and Michael L. Nelson, &amp;quot;Montanans and 'The Most Peculiar Disease': the Influenza Epidemic and Public Health, 1918-1919&amp;quot;.  ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1987 37(2): 50-61; Volney Steele, &amp;quot;The Flu Epidemic of 1918 on the Montana Frontier.&amp;quot; ''Journal of the West'' 2003 42(4): 81-90&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Farming====&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning in 1905 the Great Northern Railway in cooperation with the US Department of Agriculture, the Montana Experiment Station, and the Dryland Farming Congress promoted dryland farming in Montana in order to increase its freight traffic. During 1910-13 the Great Northern launched its own program of demonstration farms, which stimulated settlement (during 1909-10 acreage in homesteads quadrupled in Montana) through their impressive production rates for winter wheat, barley, and other grains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Claire Strom, &amp;quot;The Great Northern Railway and Dryland Farming in Montana&amp;quot;. ''Railroad History'' 1997 (176): 80-102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wheat-raising started slowly in Montana, replacing oats as the major grain crop only in the 20th century, after development of new plant strains, techniques, and machinery. Wheat was stimulated by boom prices in World War I, but slumped in value and yield during the drought and depression of the next 20 years. The recent trend is toward increased acreage in wheat.  Wheat became the major crop in eastern Montana, and the process of thrashing to remove the grain evolved over the century as machines became more specialized, faster, and more expensive. In a Montana homestead in the 1910s the work was done by humans and horses, who dealt with the separator, tumbling rod, feeder, carrier, and other parts of the equipment. By the 1930s wheat farms became increasingly dependent on larger and more sophisticated machinery and less dependent on human and animal labor. Thrashing also became an increasingly specialized activity, and farmers turned to itinerant thrashing crews to harvest their crops.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ralph E. Ward, &amp;quot;Wheat in Montana: Determined Adaptation.&amp;quot; ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1975 25(4): 16-37; T. Eugene Barrows, &amp;quot;Thrashing in Montana at the Turn of the Century.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1988 38(4): 62-66&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Small business====&lt;br /&gt;
Between the Civil War and World War II, small businessmen - ranchers, farmers, local merchants, mine owners, and bankers - represented the backbone of Montana's economy. Success rested upon their ability to diversify their interests into new economic activities and new products. Typical were the Isaac G. Baker Co. and the T. C. Power and Brother Co., which emphasized high-volume sales, product guarantees, and expanded merchandise lines to create statewide department stores. The Strain Brothers specialized in mail-order business and the F. A. Buttrey Co. introduced unique sales gimmicks. Likewise, John P. Barnes, Leander S. Woodbury, and A. C. Edwards demonstrated their entrepreneurial skills in mining, manufacturing and banking, respectively.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henry C. Klassen, &amp;quot;Diversification in Montana's Small Business.&amp;quot;  ''Pacific Northwest Quarterly'' 1993 84(3): 98-107&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Charles A. Broadwater (1840–92), a Montana pioneer, exemplified many of the characteristics embodied in the iconic &amp;quot;self-made man&amp;quot;. With no profession or special skills Broadwater migrated to the Deer Lodge Valley in 1862. He traded horses, homes, and cattle. As the gold boom spread, he entered the freighting business and soon became immersed in the commercial and political life of the territory. He married into a leading Helena family and, through connections with such eastern capitalists as James J. Hill, built a business empire. He did not seek elective office, but he was a power in the territorial Democratic Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William E. Lang,  &amp;quot;Charles A. Broadwater and the Main Chance in Montana.&amp;quot; '' Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1989 39(3): 30-36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas H. Carter (1854-1911) began his public career as Montana's last territorial delegate in 1888. He served as US senator, chairman of the Republican National Committee, chairman of the Louisiana Purchase Exposition Commission, and chairman of the American sector of the International Joint Commission. He was the embodiment of the self-made man. Carter was a strong party man and firmly believed that the political process should foster economic development. He encouraged the rapid development of Western resources, and was an advocate of government irrigation. He was bypassed by the progressive Republicans at the turn of the century, who called him an old fogey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard B. Roeder, &amp;quot;Thomas H. Carter, Spokesman for Western Development.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1989 39(2): 23-29&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Conrad banking business flourished in north-central and northwestern Montana during 1880-1914. Local banks at Fort Benton, Great Falls, and Kalispell, owned and managed by the William and Charles Conrad families, helped to finance Montana's economic development through an intricate pattern of familial, friendship, and business ties. Correspondent linkages to large metropolitan banks sustained the relatively small country banks by assuring them access to capital. The Conrad banks were aggressive in penetrating new lending markets and making inroads into the local farming, ranching, merchant, and manufacturing sectors. The banks grew in reputation and stature as the region developed, but remained single-unit, family-based enterprises.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henry C. Klassen, The Early Growth of the Conrad Banking Enterprise in Montana, 1880-1914. Great Plains Quarterly 1997 17(1): 49-62&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
====Towns====&lt;br /&gt;
Boosters, led by editors and businessmen, promoted their towns by encouraging entrepreneurship and cooperation, especially through the Chamber of Commerce and clubs such as Rotary. Typical was the Helena Board of Trade, formed in 1877. It promoted Helena, transforming it from a crude mining camp to a stable, urban community—indeed, a political and economic center, with prosperity and culture. Several disastrous fires, the national financial depression of 1873, and a regional mining lull during the 1870s served as a season of trial for Helena. Such problems spurred local businessmen to take action. Among the leading proponents of unified effort was ''Helena Daily Herald'' editor Robert E. Fisk. Once formed, the Board of Trade led development of the city, including fire prevention, incorporation, and the promotion of overland and railroad transportation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joan Bishop, &amp;quot;A Season of Trial: Helena's Entrepeneurs Nurture a City.&amp;quot; ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1978 28(3): 62-71&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long before the malls began in the 1970s, successful businessmen built their shops and stores along the main street.  in 1890-1920 many featured attractive preformed, sheet iron storefronts.  Manufactured by the Mesker Brothers of St. Louis, these neoclassical, stylized facades added sophistication to brick or woodframe buildings throughout the West. Marketed by catalog, the Meskers' products sold well because of lower costs and superior service.&lt;br /&gt;
====Christian education====&lt;br /&gt;
To civilize the western frontier and prevent theological 'liberalism,' the Presbyterian Church sent missionaries to establish congregations and found a system of Christian schools. Reverend Sheldon Jackson superintended Presbyterian efforts in Montana. Reverend Lyman B. Crittenden and his daughter Mary began the Bozeman Female Seminary in 1873, but experienced difficulties. As a result, Crittenden moved the school, renaming it the Gallatin Valley Female Seminary. In 1878 the school closed altogether. The Presbyterian Board of Aid for Colleges and Academies opened the Bozeman Academy in 1887, but closed it in 1892 when a state supported college opened in Bozeman. In another attempt to found a permanent college, the Presbytery of Montana purchased the five year old Montana Collegiate Institute in Deer Lodge during 1882. Renamed the College of Montana, the school struggled to remain solvent until 1900. It reopened in 1904 but closed finally in 1918. Reverend Duncan M. McMillan served as president for most of the period. While low enrollments and lack of financial support plagued Presbyterian educational efforts, their work did help build a 'good' Montana on traditional Christian principals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Norman J. Bender, &amp;quot;The Very Atmosphere Is Charged with Unbelief: Presbyterians and Higher Education in Montana, 1869-1900.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1978 28(2): 16-25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steamboats and Railroads===&lt;br /&gt;
====Steamboats====&lt;br /&gt;
The late 19th century was the high point for steamboating on the upper Missouri River in Montana. Major growth came during and after the Civil War, as gold and silver were shipped out. Captain Grant Marsh opened the steamboat era on the Yellowstone River in June 1875. The military demands of the Sioux War increased traffic in 1876-77. As the Sioux were driven from the area, white settlers established towns, and Bozeman residents unsuccessfully promoted a port to rival Fort Benton. Business picked up from 1877 to 1883 as furs, buffalo hides, wool, and bullion led the way in exports. Numerous entrepreneurs and small firms were involved in the business. Traffic declined in the late 1880s as the Northern Pacific built west, and ironically, the last busy season for the steamers was 1881-82, when they carried supplies for the railroad contractors. Completion of the railroad to Billings ended commercial traffic on the Yellowstone in 1882, although there were futile efforts to maintain river traffic until 1909.  While steamboats could easily compete with overland wagon freight, railroads presented a different situation. The coming of big business in the form of railroads sounded the economic death knell for steamboaters, even though one company converted to gasoline engines and lasted until the 1930s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William E. Lass, &amp;quot;Missouri River Steamboating.&amp;quot; ''North Dakota History'' 1989 56(3): 3-15; William E. Lass, &amp;quot;Steamboats on the Yellowstone.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1985 35(4): 26-41&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Railroads====&lt;br /&gt;
The Northern Pacific Railroad built a few new towns along its Yellowstone main line in Montana, as the revenue from town lots was small. The layout of the towns it did build reflected railroad influence. Billings and Livingston had a symmetrical plan centered on the railroad. In the 'T' plan at Terry, Sidney, and Townsend, the main street met the railroad at right angles. During 1900-20 the railroad built 'homestead towns,' elevator-centered communities surrounded by grain-raising homesteads. The impact of the railroad on main street plans persists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John C. Hudson, &amp;quot;Main Streets of the Yellowstone Valley.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1985 35(4): 56-67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1880s, Paris Gibson envisioned a town at the Great Falls of the Missouri River that would utilize power and coal available at the site to grow into an urban economic center rivaling Minneapolis. Great Northern Railroad President James J. Hill was a major investor in the project from its incorporation in 1887 until he tired of the endeavor and sold his stock in 1908. Great Falls, Montana, did become a leading city in the state, but did not realize the dreams Gibson and Hill had for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;W. Thomas White, &amp;quot;Paris Gibson, James J. Hill and the 'New Minneapolis': the Great Falls Water Power and Townsite Company, 1882-1908.&amp;quot; ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1983 33(3): 60-69&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Women===&lt;br /&gt;
Women played a crucial role in holding together Montana farms and ranches during the first half of the 20th century. Through oral interviews many of these women are now providing a clearer picture of farm life, demonstrating that women's economic role in farm life was central, not peripheral. As managers, financiers, and laborers they contributed essential daily support to farm operations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Laurie K  Mercier,  &amp;quot;Women's Role in Montana Agriculture: 'You Had to Make Every Minute Count'&amp;quot;.  ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' 1988 38(4): 50-61&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The status of women in the 19th century trans-Mississippi West has drawn the attention of numerous interpreters, whose analyses fall into three types: &lt;br /&gt;
#the [[Frontier Thesis]] inspired by [[Frederick Jackson Turner]], which argues that the West was, among other things, a liberating experience for women and men;&lt;br /&gt;
#the reactionists, who view the West as a place of drudgery for women, who reacted unfavorably to the isolation and the work in the West; and &lt;br /&gt;
#those writers who claim the West had no effect on women's lives, that it was a static, neutral frontier. The history of Montana shows that the Turner thesis best explains the improvement in women's status in Montana and the achievement of suffrage in 1914.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judith K. Cole, &amp;quot;A Wide Field for Usefulness: Women's Civil Status and the Evolution of Women's Suffrage on the Montana Frontier, 1864-1914&amp;quot;. ''American Journal of Legal History'' 1990 34(3): 262-294&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Margery Jacoby was a typical Great Plains teacher at the turn of the 20th century. She began teaching in Montana at 15 with a first-class certificate gained by examination. She lacked formal training but attended summer school to improve her skills. She taught because her family needed the money, and she wanted independence and an opportunity to advance her own learning. The need for teachers in the West and the belief that women were natural teachers for the young also contributed to her entry. Like other Plains schoolmarms, Jacoby was a Westerner by birth and changed teaching jobs frequently. Unlike most, she was elected county superintendent of schools, served two terms, married and quit the profession. However, she never lost interest in the classroom and her daughters later became teachers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kathleen Underwood, &amp;quot;Schoolmarms on the Upper Missouri.&amp;quot; ''Great Plains Quarterly'' 1991 11(4): 225-233&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women's clubs flourished 1890-1930, expressing the interests, needs, and beliefs of Montana women at the turn of the century. While accepting the domestic role established by the cult of true womanhood, their reformist activities reveal a persistent demand for self-expression outside the home. Homesteading was a significant experience for altering women's perceptions of their roles. They joined the men in the fields, expressed their aesthetic interests in gardens, and organized social activities. Though these clubs allowed women to fulfill their traditional roles they also encouraged women to pursue social, intellectual, and community interests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephenie Ambrose Tubbs, &amp;quot;Montana Women's Clubs at the Turn of the Century.&amp;quot; ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1986 36(1): 26-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Efforts to write woman suffrage into Montana's 1889 constitution failed. Montana women, especially 'society women,' did not strongly support the suffragists. Help from national leaders and from [[Jeannette Rankin]], who in 1916 became the nation's first congresswoman, led to success in 1914 when voters ratified a suffrage amendment passed by the legislature the previous year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T.A. Larson, &amp;quot;Montana Women and the Battle of the Ballot.&amp;quot; ''Montana: The Magazine of Western History'' 1973 23(1): 24-41&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Towns===&lt;br /&gt;
In Eastern Montana, the rural towns have evolved from a large number of widely dispersed villages in 1900, through a period of expansion over the first thirty years of 20th century, to a pattern of relatively concentrated population and businesses in an urban-based economy by 2000. Mechanization, especially the rapid replacement of horses by tractors after 1945, meant one family could operate a much larger farm, so some farmers bought out their neighbors, who then moved to town along with the surplus children. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most rural communities declined steadily in population after 1920. A few, such as Miles City, Havre, and Lewistown, grew in population, expanded their economic base, and experienced an increase in their market areas for a limited range of goods and services. These communities also became centers of employment for their own and surrounding (farm and nonfarm) population.  The rural economy diversified far beyond its exclusively agricultural base, with service employment in education and medicine important, as well as small-scale factories. Interstates and paved highways, along with cell phones and internet coverage encouraged a concentration in fewer, larger centers, which drew customers and clients from a wide radius.  The discovery of oil and gas along the Dakota border gave a new lease to towns such as Glendive and Sidney in region previously known for extremely brutal winter weather. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In mountainous Western Montana, as the mining camps and lumber regions faded in importance, tourism grew rapidly and many areas attracted wealthy families looking for a second home where fishing, hunting, hiking and the wildlife could be enjoyed, together with good restaurants close by. Kalispell was especially attractive, as were the college towns of Missoula and Bozeman. Red Lodge, an old coal mining town, remade its self-image and attracted tourists..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Copper===&lt;br /&gt;
The Anaconda Copper Company, founded in 1880 and based in Butte, dominated the world copper market and poured wealth into the state for a century; it closed in the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1888-1900 bitter feud between Montana copper kings Marcus Daly and William Andrews Clark played a considerable role in the economic and political life of territorial and early statehood years. It affected the mergers of large corporations, the location of the state capital, and the elections of congressional delegations. Daly's Irish Catholic (Green) heritage and Clark's Scotch-Irish Presbyterian (Orange) backgrounds were important factors in the feud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Emmons, &amp;quot;The Orange and the Green in Montana: a Reconsideration of the Clark-Daly Feud.&amp;quot; ''Arizona &amp;amp; the West'' 1986 28(3): 225-245&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anaconda company fortunes began to reverse when the Chilean government expropriated all of the Anaconda's highly profitable operations in Chile between 1969 and 1971. New management took over and executed tough belt-tightening measures that did little to stop the disintegration of the company. Help appeared to arrive in 1976 in the form of a merger with the Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), but when the Anaconda's bottom line failed to respond to ARCO's inept management, ARCO shut down the company's operations in Montana. In 1985 the company's Montana assets were sold to a local businessman.  What remains today are Superfund cleanup operations run by the [[EPA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eugene C. Tidball, &amp;quot;What Ever Happened to the Anaconda Company?&amp;quot;  ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History' 1997 47(2): 60-68&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Journalism===&lt;br /&gt;
The founding of the School of Journalism at the University of Montana showed the state was following national trends in the professionalization of journalism. However, the Anaconda Copper Mining Company began to dominate economic and political life in the state and, as a political strategy, purchased most of the state's daily newspapers. From the 1920s until 1959, journalists working at the newspapers could write nothing that undercut the company's business enterprises. Journalists were thus not allowed to develop and exercise their professional skills through their news judgment regarding certain business topics - lawyers and accountants made news judgments. This changed in 1959 with the purchase of the Anaconda newspapers by Lee Enterprises, a Midwestern newspaper group. Following its own traditions, Lee allowed the journalists to exercise their own editorial judgments. Don Anderson, a Montana native and Lee executive, led the way in this transformation of the state's journalists to professional status. Newspapers soon found themselves engaged in clashes with Anaconda over important issues and even taking more active roles in civic reform efforts. Lee has managed the newspapers over the years since with praise for their editorial independence but criticism of their financial frugality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 Lee overextended itself by borrowing $1.5 billion to buy other papers, especially the biggest St. Louis newspaper.  With the [[Recession of 2008]] came drastic cutbacks in advertising revenue, and Lee is struggling to pay off its loans and is cutting staff.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John T. McNay, &amp;quot;Breaking the Copper Collar: Press Freedom, Professionalization and the History of Montana Journalism.&amp;quot; ''American Journalism'' 2008 25(1): 99-123&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Elected Officials==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Federal===&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Max Baucus]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Jon Tester]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Ryan Zinke]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statewide===&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor [[Steve Bullock]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lt. Governor [[John Bohlinger]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Attorney General [[Steve Bullock]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Secretary of State [[Linda McCulloch]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*State Auditor [[Monica Lindeen]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable people from Montana==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Burton K. Wheeler]], Democratic Senator; fought FDR on Court packing; isolationist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mike Mansfield]], leader of Democrats in Senate, 1961–77&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Max Baucus]], Democratic Senator is currently the powerful chairman of the Senate Finance Committee&lt;br /&gt;
*Evel Knievel, a famous motorcycle daredevil, was from Butte.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charley Pride]], perhaps the most successful black country musician of all time, grew up in Helena and Great Falls.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jeannette Rankin]], a Republican from Missoula, was the very first Congresswoman in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*The Freemen, a religious cult famous for an 81-day stand off with federal agents near Jordan.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Myrna Loy]], an actress from the golden age of cinema. She was born in Radersville.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Montana Universities|Montana Universities]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Bevis, William W. ''Ten Tough Trips: Montana Writers and the West.'' (1990). 250 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Emmons, David M. ''The Butte Irish: Class and Ethnicity in an American Mining Town, 1875-1925.'' (1989). 443 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farr, William E. and Toole, K. Ross. ''Montana: Images of the Past.'' (1978). 279 pp. photographs&lt;br /&gt;
* Hamilton, James McLellan, ''History of Montana: From Wilderness to Statehood'' (1970), older textbook; 627pp [http://www.questia.com/read/3114032?title=From%20Wilderness%20to%20Statehood%3a%20A%20History%20of%20Montana%2c%201805-1900 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hargreaves, Mary W. M. ''Dry Farming in the Northern Great Plains: Years of Readjustment, 1920-1990.'' (1993). 386 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard, Joseph Kinsey. ''Montana: High, Wide and Handsome'' (1943), a classic narrative that challenges romanticized views of the West and calls for increased emulation of Indians who supposedly lived in harmony with the environment of the northern Great Plains. [http://www.questia.com/read/111577407?title=Montana%3a%20High%2c%20Wide%2c%20and%20Handsome online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard, Stanley W. ''Green Fields of Montana: A Brief History oof Irrigation.'' (1992). 153 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Karlin, Jules A. ''Joseph M. Dixon of Montana: Part 1, Senator and Bull Moose Manager, 1867-1917.'' (1974). 257 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Joseph M. Dixon of Montana. Part 2, Governor versus the Anaconda, 1917-1934.'' (1974). 269 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Malone, Michael P., Richard B. Roeder, and William L. Lang. ''Montana: A History of Two Centuries'' (3rd ed. 1991), standard scholarly history&lt;br /&gt;
* Malone, Michael P. ''The Battle for Butte: Mining and Politics on the Northern Frontier, 1864-1906.'' (1985). 281 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Newby, Rick and Hunger, Suzanne, eds. ''Writing Montana: Literature under the Big Sky.'' (Helena: Montana Center for the Book, 1996). 348 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Petrik, Paula. ''No Step Backward: Women and Family on the Rocky Mountain Mining Frontier, Helena, Montana, 1865-1900.'' (1987). 206 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Robertson, Donald B. ''Encyclopedia of Western Railroad History. Vol. 2: The Mountain States: Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming.'' (Dallas: Taylor, 1991). 418 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rydell, Robert; Safford, Jeffrey; and Mullen, Pierce. ''In the People's Interest: A Centennial History of Montana State University.'' (1992). 324 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Searl, Molly. ''Montana Disasters: Fires, Floods, and Other Catastrophes.'' (2001). 204 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Small, Lawrence F., ed. ''Religion in Montana: Pathways to the Present.'' (1992). 380 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Duane A. ''Rocky Mountain West: Colorado, Wyoming, and ontana, 1859-1915.'' (1992). 290 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Spence, Clark C. ''Montana: A Bicentennial History.'' (1978). 211 pp. good popular history&lt;br /&gt;
* Spence, Clark C. ''Territorial Politics and Government in Montana, 1864-89.'' (1976). 327 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Spritzer, Donald E. ''Senator James E. Murray and the Limits of Post-War Liberalism.'' (1985). 304 pp. biography of liberal Democrat, 1940s-1970s&lt;br /&gt;
* Toole, K. Ross. ''Twentieth-Century Montana: A State of Extremes.'' (1972). 307 pp. by a leading historian&lt;br /&gt;
* VanWest, Carroll. ''Capitalism on the Frontier: Billings and the Yellowstone Valley in the Nineteenth Century.'' (1993). 281 pp. [http://www.questia.com/read/98714901?title=Capitalism%20on%20the%20Frontier%3a%20Billings%20and%20the%20Yellowstone%20Valley%20in%20the%20Nineteenth%20Century online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* VanWest, Carroll. ''A Traveler's Companion to Montana istory.'' (1986). 256 pp. local history and lore&lt;br /&gt;
* WPA. ''Montana: A State Guide Book'' (1939), very rich guide book; 444pp [http://www.questia.com/read/74024913?title=Montana%3a%20A%20State%20Guide%20Book online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Kittredge, William and Smith, Annick, eds. ''The Last Best Place: A Montana Anthology.'' (1988). 1161 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====References====&lt;br /&gt;
Note that articles from ''Montana: the Magazine of Western History'' are online at [[JSTOR]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mountain States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rocky Mountains]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Great Plains]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Plains of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:States of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Western United States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arthur_Coday,_Jr.,_M.D.&amp;diff=1360285</id>
		<title>Arthur Coday, Jr., M.D.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arthur_Coday,_Jr.,_M.D.&amp;diff=1360285"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: /* Political background */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Arthur Coday, Jr.''', (born December 13, 1962; also goes by '''Art Coday''') was born in [[Charleston]], [[South Carolina]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://artcoday.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Art Coday is a [[conservative]] [[republican]] candidate for Washington State Representative in the 32nd District.  Art Coday is passionate about [[politics]] and believes in fiscally responsible government and in the authority of the [[United States Constitution]] and the Washington State Constitution.  Coday is a graduate of the [[University of Washington]], where he studied cellular and [[molecular]] [[biology]], and he went on to graduate studies at [[Harvard]] Medical School.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday is a [[physician]] and [[entrepreneur]] and owns his own medical practice and has had substantial experience running a [[business]] and managing personnel.  He considers Washington State to be his home and he has lived there most of his life, although he has also lived in different parts of the country.  Coday is [[Christian]] and a family man with a wife, children, and dogs.  He and his wife have been very involved in the [[education]] of their children, including two years of [[homeschooling]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Education==&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday earned his bachelor of science degree in cellular and molecular biology from the [[University of Washington]], where he graduated [[magna cum laude]] with a college honors. He earned his medical degree from Harvard Medical School. In addition to residency training, Coday also has several years of experience working in medical research. He now practices general medicine. Coday sees mainly [[Medicare]] and [[Medicaid]] patients, and instead of having an office he sees them in their own home. He also sees nursing home patients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volunteer experience==&lt;br /&gt;
Coday has had experience working in the financial industry as well as lots of volunteer experience. For a total of six years he spent one week each summer as a volunteer for the Seattle Children's Hospital and Medical Center Summer Camp. He has served on the board of two nonprofit organizations, including the Christian Medical and Dental Associations where he was on the Finance Subcommittee, and the North sound Christian School, where he served two years as the Treasurer and one year as the President. Coday also has experience running his own business and providing jobs in the form of his medical practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 State Representative Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
===Endorsements===&lt;br /&gt;
* The ''Association of Washington Business'', Washington State’s oldest and largest statewide [[business]] association, has endorsed Dr. Art Coday for State Representative in the 32nd Legislative District, Position 1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;AWB President Don Brunell noted, “This fall, voters will have the opportunity to make some crucial decisions about the future of our state, how we position ourselves to emerge from this recession.  The leaders we send or return to the Legislature will face many pressing issues, including how to deal with a growing $4.5 billion budget deficit. During our Policy Summit...our members continued to express their concerns about the economy, taxation, job creation and competitiveness. AWB’s endorsements reflect those concerns, and those of the 7,000+ small, medium and large employers we represent.”&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dino Rossi]] has endorsed Art Coday for State Representative in the 32nd Legislative District.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://artcoday.com/endorsements.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political background===&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday has been active in politics since 2004 when he challenged the constitutionality of certain Washington State election laws in court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rebecca Cook. [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2002143276_webchallenges06.html Two court challenges filed in governor's race, AP reports], ''The Seattle Times'', January 06, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He and one other individual challenged the legitimacy of Gov.-elect [[Christine Gregoire]], a [[Democrat]] who lost the gubernatorial election, and then lost after a recount of the votes but paid for a second &amp;quot;recount,&amp;quot; where she managed to beat Republican [[Dino Rossi]] by 133 votes in a hand-recount of 2.9 million ballots cast. Questions were raised after the county's second recount showed more votes counted than people had voted on November 2, 2004. Art Coday was particularly bothered that state law allowed the Democrats to order a hand recount if they came up with $730,000 needed as a deposit to cover the costs if the recount didn't reverse the results. Reading the state Constitution, Coday said it reads elections should be &amp;quot;free and equal.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Postman. [http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002144016_gopsuit06m.html GOP expected to file suit over Gregoire's win], ''The Seattle Times'', January 07, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday wants to be Washington's next State Representative in the 32nd Legislative District, Position 1 in order to secure a bright and promising future for all Americans. During an interview with [[Steve Beren]], Coday said that he believes &amp;quot;this is the most exciting political period in America since the [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=redcounty&amp;gt;[[Steve Beren]]. [http://www.redcounty.com/senatorial-hopeful-art-coday-patty-murray-tied-very-extreme-policies-obama-reid-pelosi/34972?taxonomy=20 Senatorial hopeful Art Coday: Patty Murray tied to &amp;quot;very extreme&amp;quot; policies of Obama, Reid, Pelosi], RedCounty.com, December 17, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Coday says that, &amp;quot;America has been on the defensive,&amp;quot; and that the future of our nation is endangered by the direction of the [[Obama administration]] and the [[Democratic Party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coday has offered his input on the most urgent needs for the Washington state government. He said, “The average American is hurting, and in the midst of that suffering, we have a government that is saddling us with unprecedented debt – we’re getting to a point where it is no longer merely objectionable, but a threat to our nation’s economic survival.” Coday described three actions as urgent: (1) '''reducing federal government spending''', (2) '''cutting tax rates for individuals and businesses''', and (3) '''paying down the national debt'''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Patty Murray|Patty Murray’s]] greatest vulnerability in the upcoming election is that she is, according to Coday, “[O]n board the Democratic train” and that “she’s identified with the unprecedented level of spending, the expansion of government, and intervention into the private sector.” Art Coday also said the Democrats “are leaving behind the center of the party” and that “Murray has been a team player” with [[Barack Obama]], [[Nancy Pelosi]], and [[Harry Reid]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health care===&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday is a [[medical]] [[doctor]]. Coday shares the conservative philosophy of limited government, combined with a strong national defense and [[fiscal responsibility]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DS.White. [http://www.redstate.com/dwhite/2010/02/13/senate-race-in-washington-state/ Senate race in Washington State], ''RedState'', February 13, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He has said that government will not, and can not, improve our system and will only succeed in destroying it.  Coday has pointed out that, &amp;quot;[T]he shortage of doctors and nurses is the biggest healthcare crisis in America,&amp;quot; and that, even under the current system, many providers can’t participate and are leaving. &amp;quot;If we’re not able to attract the best and brightest, we’re all the worse off.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Immigration===&lt;br /&gt;
On February 12, 2010, Democrat Representative [[Jim McDermott]] and Art Coday debated [[immigration]] politics and the [[Dream Act]] bill. On immigration, Coday has said, “We have to control our borders – it all starts there. There’s nothing to even talk about until we do that.” During the debate with McDermott, Dr. Arthur Coday said the following about current immigration policies and how politicians owe it to [[Americans]] to address the problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|My concern about the Dream Act is that it's trying to treat the terrible symptoms we're having in America, [when the] underlining disease is that we have utterly failed to control the sovereignty of our territory. We're not controlling our borders, our coasts and our air space the way we need to. [We owe it to Americans] to address the problem. We need to control our borders so that immigration is done legally. If we don't control our borders we cannot make and enforce good policies that are humane and compassionate. [...] It's very difficult to make public policy over an individual case story, and unfortunately individual stories have driven public policy. In the medical profession we learned a long time ago that an individual, single episode or experience should not drive public medical policy or guidelines. You need large numbers of people and rigorous research to show the real trends on the issues, so you can make better decisions for more people over time. This discussion should be driven by the policy issues. Unfortunately, the more we make programs to facilitate people being here illegally, without controlling the borders, the greener the light gets to tell people all over the world 'just come here illegally, don't get in line and do it legally because once you're here we'll take care of you' and it puts people in a bind. The fact that [people are here illegally, in a bind] is because we haven't done our job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://kcts9.org/video/immigration-debate-between-jim-mcdermott-and-arthur-coday Immigration Debate Between Jim McDermott and Arthur Coday], ''KCTS9'', February 12, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cap and Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday is opposed to [[cap and trade]] legislation. He is on the other hand a strong supporter of the right to bear arms, and has said, &amp;quot;I’m all for the [[Second Amendment]] – it means what it says. It’s not just recreation and entertainment. The right to defend ourselves is one of the most fundamental rights. It is foundational to preserving the balance of power in society.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=redcounty/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tea Party Movement===&lt;br /&gt;
Coday said that the [[Tea Party movement]] and the townhall healthcare protests &amp;quot;are both symptomatic of the fact that ordinary Americans feel left out of the discussion. And the changes being proposed are so dramatic that it’s really unfair. So I’m glad that they’re protesting, and that they are being heard.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=redcounty/&amp;gt; Coday believes that these [[grassroots]] movements have been a deciding factor in pushing some Democratic Senators and Congressmen to oppose the [[ObamaCare|radical healthcare]] policies of [[Obama]] and the Democratic leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Future of GOP===&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the future of the GOP, Coday said of Republicans that, &amp;quot;we need to be proud of our roots and our heritage, and the story they tell is a noble one.&amp;quot; He emphasized that the founders of the [[Republican Party]] put their &amp;quot;lives on the line in a bloody [[civil war]]&amp;quot; to stand up for the principles of [[freedom]] and [[equality]] before the [[law]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coday outlined what he sees as the basic principles of the Republican Party, then and now: &lt;br /&gt;
:(1) devotion to protecting our constitution and our republic, &lt;br /&gt;
:(2) limited and accountable government to prevent encroachments on liberty, &lt;br /&gt;
:(3) individual rights and individual responsibilities, and &lt;br /&gt;
:(4) the “foundational virtues” of family, faith, marriage, and the [[right to life]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Art Coday reiterated the 4th principle, and he said, &amp;quot;We acknowledge God in the public discourse. Our unalienable rights come from [[God]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://artcoday.com/ Art Coday for Washington State House of Representative 32nd District - GOP] - [[Washington State|Washington]], [[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=196513299390&amp;amp;share_id=232020757237&amp;amp;comments=1 Arthur Coday, Jr., MD] - [[Facebook]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://twitter.com/ArtCoday ArtCoday] - [[Twitter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2010 Midterm Elections]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dino Rossi]] - [[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Patty Murray]] - [[Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Coday, Arthur}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360282</id>
		<title>User:OneTrueConservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360282"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:03:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, I am the OneTrueConservative, and I have joined Conservapedia to help provide a balanced view of the issues that face us today. In the present partisan environment, we should all strive to find reasonable solutions to our problems, with conservative elements. After all, any purely conservative or liberal society is destined to stagnate due to a lack of opposing ideas. I hope the left and right can come to realize that they have more common ground than they might think, and to vilify either side as the opposing team is counter-productive to the progress of society as a whole. Therefore, my goal, aside from cleaning up articles, is to spread that dream to Conservapedia, and I hope that others here will embark on that effort. The dawn of a new age of moderation and compromise is at hand.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360281</id>
		<title>User:OneTrueConservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360281"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T03:03:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, I am the OneTrueConservative, and I have joined Conservapedia to help provide a balanced view of the issues that face us today. In the present partisan environment, we should all strive to find reasonable solutions to our problems, with conservative elements. After all, any purely conservative or liberal society is destined to stagnate due to a lack of opposing ideas. I hope the left and right can come to realize that they have more common ground than they might think, and to vilify either side as the opposing team is counter-productive to the progress of society as a whole. Therefore, my goal, aside from cleaning up articles, is to spread that dream to Conservapedia, and I hope that others here will embark on that effort. The dawn of a new age of moderation and compromise is at hand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Users]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salary&amp;diff=1360280</id>
		<title>Salary</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Salary&amp;diff=1360280"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:59:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Salary''' is money given in payment to a person as remuneration for their work as an employee. In general, the term is used to describe payment in a lump sum, regardless of hours worked. Those who get paid by the hour receive [[wages]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word salary derives from the [[Latin]] for [[salt]] as in the approving saying, &amp;quot;He's worth his salt.&amp;quot; In ancient times, salt was a very expensive commodity, and [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] soldiers were sometimes payed in salt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictionary]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cristiano_Ronaldo&amp;diff=1360278</id>
		<title>Cristiano Ronaldo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cristiano_Ronaldo&amp;diff=1360278"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:57:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:C Ronaldo.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cristiano Ronaldo''', complete name ''Cristiano Ronaldo dos Santos Aveiro'', is a [[Portugal|Portuguese]] [[soccer]] player who plays for [[Real Madrid]] in the [[Spain|Spanish]] [[La Liga]]. He is currently regarded as one of the best players in the world, and was voted world player of the year in 2008. During the 2007-08 season, while playing for [[Manchester United]] he collected numerous awards for his skill, including the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) Players' and Fans' Player of the Year (for the second consecutive year),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.givemefootball.com/rolls_of_honour/fansplayerofyearroll.html PFA Awards]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the Football Writers' Association Player of the Year&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.footballwriters.co.uk/awards/footballer-of-the-year/ FWA Footballer of the Year]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the UK.  He was also top scorer in both the [[UEFA]] Champions' League&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.uefa.com/Competitions/UCL/Statistics/Players/TypeStat=GS/index.html UEFA Champions League statistics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and EPL,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_prem/top_scorers/default.stm BBC - Premier League top scorers 07/08]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with a total of 42 goals in all competitions for the season.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the summer of 2009, he moved from Manchester United to Real Madrid, for a fee of £80 million, the highest ever paid for a player.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[BBC|BBC Sport]] [http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/8121951.stm Ronaldo completes £80m Real move]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While his first name ''Cristiano'' is common among devout Christian families, his second name, ''Ronaldo'', is in honor of [[Ronald Reagan]], who is admired by [[Conservative]]s in [[Europe]] too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ronaldo, Cristiano}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Portuguese Soccer Players]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wage&amp;diff=1360277</id>
		<title>Wage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wage&amp;diff=1360277"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:55:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''wage''' is an amount of [[money]] to be paid for a job.  There is usually a correlation between the wage paid and the experience of the person to do the job and the level of skill necessary for the job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like all market forces, wages are paid based on interactions between the supply curve (how much workers are willing to supply a particular type of labor at a certain wage) and a demand curve (how many workers of a particular type a firm is willing to hire at a particular wage). Wages are typically set at [[equilibrium]]. If a minimum wage is imposed that is above this equilibrium, it leads to structural [[unemployment]]. If a minimum wage is set below the equilibrium point, it is unlikely to affect that jobs wage unless a complement or substitute job's equilibrium wage is less than the minimum wage (causing ripple effects throughout the related markets). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Minimum wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maximum wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Factors and methods of production]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Surplus_Value&amp;diff=1360276</id>
		<title>Surplus Value</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Surplus_Value&amp;diff=1360276"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:54:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Chart-cut.gif|right|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Surplus Value''' is an economic concept initially cited by [[England|English]] economist [[David Ricardo]] which pertains to the surplus derived from the use of a factor of production over its cost. The theory was later expanded upon by [[Karl Marx]] and became one of the central theories within [[Marxian economics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marx argues that the ordinary worker, lacking [[capital]], is forced to sell his or her labor, and thus in a sense, him or herself, as a [[commodity]]. As such, the wages paid to the laborer represent the estimated economic value of the worker regarded as a commodity which the employer must purchase. However, the laborer usually produces items having much more economic value than is represented by his or her wages. Marx identifies the difference between the amount of economic value that the worker produces and the amount of money that he/she receives in wages as '''surplus value'''. Therefore, workers create wealth through the labor they contribute only to have the capitalists take a considerable amount of it without rewarding the worker correspondingly. In the eyes of [[Marx]] this is the source of the capitalist's profit, and is central to his criticism of [[capitalism]] as an exploitative economic system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marx also identifies surplus value as being the source of conflict between the [[proletariat]] and the [[bourgeoisie]], as capitalists wish to accumulate as much profit as possible, and as such will attempt to pay the lowest possible wages while selling his/her commodities for the highest possible price. The demands of the worker are the exact opposite: to receive the highest possible wages for his/her work and to buy produced goods for as cheap a price as is possible. Therefore, Marx postulates, there exists a fundamental inconsistency within capitalism, and conflict between these classes is unavoidable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marxian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.economyprofessor.com/economictheories/surplus-value.php Surplus Value] ''from '''Economy Professor'''''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1863/theories-surplus-value/ K. Marx ''Das Kapital, Volume IV: Theories of Surplus Value]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Richard H. Popkin &amp;amp; Avrum Stroll, ''Philosophy'' (Third Edition)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Globalism&amp;diff=1360274</id>
		<title>Globalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Globalism&amp;diff=1360274"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:47:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:No-EU.png|thumb|300px|The [[European Union]] is one of the numerous globalist, left-wing organizations in the world.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''For the main and ultimate goal of globalism, see [[One-world government]]''&lt;br /&gt;
'''Globalism''' is the failed [[liberal]] [[authoritarian]] desire for a &amp;quot;one world&amp;quot; view that rejects the important role of nations in protecting values and encouraging productivity.  Globalism is anti-[[America]]n in encouraging Americans to adopt a &amp;quot;world view&amp;quot; rather than an &amp;quot;American view.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Globalists oppose nationalism and national sovereignty, and instead tend to favor open borders, [[free trade]], [[H-1B visas]], interventionism, foreign aid, and changing the [[U.S. Constitution]].  Globalists virulently opposed [[Donald Trump]] in 2016. Instead, globalists preferred [[Marco Rubio]] and [[Ted Cruz]] for the nomination, both of whom have voted in favor of the globalist agenda as senators.  [[George Soros]] and the [[Koch brothers]] are globalists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals support globalism because it leads to centralized power, thereby providing liberals with an easier way to gain control.  Liberals can more easily persuade a handful of people in centralized government to rule in their favor than convince everyone of their agenda in a decentralized form of government.  Goals of [[America]]n globalists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;harmonizing&amp;quot; our laws with foreign ones, rather than vice-versa&lt;br /&gt;
*[[amnesty]] for [[illegal alien]]s, and open borders&lt;br /&gt;
*more visas for guest workers&lt;br /&gt;
*repealing the [[Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*eliminating the [[abortion]] issue from politics by making ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' permanent&lt;br /&gt;
*repealing the [[Electoral College]] that gives liberal-leaning states an advantage&lt;br /&gt;
*a parliamentary style of government&lt;br /&gt;
*repealing the [[Treaty Clause]]&lt;br /&gt;
*removing state sovereignty and, eventually, establishing a [[one-world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
European globalists have similar goals, including the removal of national sovereignty and eventually establishing a politically unified Europe and world government, encouraging mass migration from countries that do not share the values of the European host countries, and the support of [[crony capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Oxford American Dictionary, '''globalism''' is the advocacy of &amp;quot;the interpretation or planning of economic and foreign policy in relation to events and developments throughout the world.&amp;quot;  In its most extreme forms, it is sometimes expressed using terms such as &amp;quot;one world,&amp;quot; support for a single world government, and/or terms such as &amp;quot;world citizen&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;global citizen.&amp;quot;  Some globalist groups such as the World Federalist Movement, and some non-Christian religions such as [[Bahai]], actively campaign for world government.  &amp;quot;Global&amp;quot; is a currently fashionable term in [[business]], where the term &amp;quot;international&amp;quot; would be more appropriate usage; the term &amp;quot;international&amp;quot; implies business operations between a few countries, while &amp;quot;global&amp;quot; implies worldwide business, making it an adequate term for some forms of business that do operate across the world.  Many aspects of globalism fall under the umbrella of [[globalization]], which refers to how local phenomena can become global phenomena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;global&amp;quot; looks at the world as a single cohesive unit while the term &amp;quot;international&amp;quot; better recognizes the world's different countries, different cultures, different languages, different ethnicities, and national borders.  Thus the two terms are not the same thing and using them interchangeably is often incorrect; however, it should be noted that the two are not mutually exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Globalism also involves the theory of a &amp;quot;global economy&amp;quot; in which the economic achievements of most if not all nations are interdependent with those of other nations around the world because of international trade. This is possible because of recent technological inventions such as the internet. For example, a farmer in [[Ghana]] can now be insured that he is paid the standard market price for a particular crop because of the standards set in Chicago which he can check with a telephone or internet connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhagwati (2004) explains how globalization has delivered a better standard of living in less developed countries, and how experiments with protectionist &amp;quot;import substitution&amp;quot; policies have systematically failed.  he demonstrates that anti-globalism comprises a discontented brew of anti-capitalism, anti-corporatism, and anti-Americanism. His case that globalization has benefited the poor uses a two-step argument: trade enhances economic growth, and growth reduces poverty. He contrasts the failure of protectionism to deliver prosperity in post-colonial India and other countries with the progress and development in East Asia and other more outward-oriented countries. The growth spurred by globalization has not only expanded the pie but has done so in a way that is &amp;quot;socially benign&amp;quot; and possesses &amp;quot;a human face,&amp;quot; says Bhagwati.  Bhagwati refutes the liberal argument — heard frequently in the Democrat primary debates — that the U.S. must impose labor and environmental standards on poor countries in any future trade agreements.  On the contrary, he shows that U.S. multinationals do not seek out less developed countries with low standards; instead they locate most of their affiliates in other high-wage, high-standard countries, and when they do invest in poor countries, they invariably pay wages and maintain standards far above those prevailing in the local economy. The result is not a &amp;quot;race to the bottom,&amp;quot; but a race to the top. An inescapable implication is that if the Democrats succeed in withholding U.S. trade and investment from poor countries because they are poor, it will mean slower growth in those countries: fewer girls studying in school, and more working in farms, factories, and brothels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See the [http://www.nationalreview.com/books/griswold200406010921.asp review by Daniel T. Griswold, &amp;quot;The Road to Wealth,&amp;quot; ''National Review'' April 19, 2004]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Developments towards a one world government==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[One-world government]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotations==&lt;br /&gt;
*There are four distinct dimensions of globalism: [[economic]], [[military]], [[environmental]] — and [[social]]. [http://www.theglobalist.com/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=2392]&lt;br /&gt;
*Globalization implies neither equity — nor homogenization. In fact, it is equally likely to amplify differences — or at least make people more aware of them. [ibid]&lt;br /&gt;
*On the United Nations: Large majorities approve of strengthening the United Nations by giving it the power to have its own standing peacekeeping force, regulate the international arms trade and investigate [[human rights]] abuses. [http://www.infowars.net/articles/june2007/250607study.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalization]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[United Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Previous Breaking News/United Nations|Articles about the '''United Nations''' from previous &amp;quot;In the news&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[League of Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Euroskepticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.un.org/ United Nations] - Official site&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sites critical of the U.N. and globalism===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.unwatch.org UN Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.unisevil.com/temp213.htm UN is Evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/united-nations/ What Liberals Say - Category: United Nations], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/un_agenda_21_coming_to_a_neigh.html American Thinker explanation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading on the topic matter===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html Does the Bible prophesy a one-world government and a one-world currency in the end times?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/new-world-order.html What is the New World Order?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-globalization.html Should a Christian be opposed to globalization?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/United-Nations-end-times.html Does the Bible say the United Nations will have a role in the end times?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Jagdish Bhagwati, ''In Defense of Globalization'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360270</id>
		<title>User:OneTrueConservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360270"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:26:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, I am the OneTrueConservative, and I have joined Conservapedia to help provide a balanced view of the issues that face us today. In the present partisan environment, we should all strive to find reasonable solutions to our problems, with conservative elements. Any purely conservative or liberal society is destined to stagnate due to a lack of an opposing idea. I hope the left and right can come to realize that they have more common ground than they might think, and to vilify either side as the opposing team is counter-productive. My goal, aside from cleaning up articles, is to spread that dream to Conservapedia, and I hope that others here will embark on that effort. The dawn of a new age of compromise is at hand.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Martin_Van_Buren&amp;diff=1360267</id>
		<title>Martin Van Buren</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Martin_Van_Buren&amp;diff=1360267"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:22:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{President&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Martin Van Buren.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=8&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=March 4, 1837&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=March 4, 1841&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.trivia-library.com/a/8th-us-president-martin-van-buren.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Democratic&lt;br /&gt;
|vp=Richard M. Johnson&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Andrew Jackson&lt;br /&gt;
|next=William Henry Harrison&lt;br /&gt;
|office2=vice&lt;br /&gt;
|seq2=8&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start2=March 4, 1833&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end2=March 4, 1837&lt;br /&gt;
|pres2=Andrew Jackson&lt;br /&gt;
|previous2=John C. Calhoun&lt;br /&gt;
|next2=	Richard M. Johnson&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=December 5, 1782&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Kinderhook, New York&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=July 24, 1862&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=Kinderhook, New York&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Hannah Hoes Van Buren &lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2=&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Dutch [[Reformed]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Martin Van Buren''' (born as Maarten van Buren, 1782-1862) was an American statesman and the 8th [[President of the United States of America]], 1837 to 1841. He was nicknamed &amp;quot;The Little Magician&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Red Fox of Kinderhook&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Old Kinderhook.&amp;quot; He was the main founder of the modern [[Democratic Party]] and articulated [[Jacksonian Democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From his base in New York state he collaborated with [[Andrew Jackson]] to create the new [[Democratic Party]], and was campaign director for Jackson his victories in 1828 and 1832. Van Buren was elected himself in 1836, but was unable to reverse the Depression of 1837, and was defeated for reelection by a newly invigorated [[Whig Party]] under [[William Henry Harrison]].  As a leader of the anti-slavery Democrats who supported the [[Wilmot Proviso]] against the expansion of slavery, he founded the [[Free Soil Party]] and was its presidential nominee in 1848.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Family==&lt;br /&gt;
Van Buren was born at Kinderhook (Kinderhoek means children's corner in Dutch), a Dutch town in upstate New York. He was the third child of Abraham Van Buren, a farmer, tavern owner and political activist, and Maria Hoes Van Buren, both of Dutch stock. Martin, a native speaker of Dutch, is the only president who spoke English as a second language. He attended local English schools until he left at age 14 to be a clerk and law apprentice in New York City. Admitted to the bar in 1803, he returned to Kinderhook, where he practiced law until 1821 and gained a reputation as a shrewd politician. In 1807 he married Hannah Hoes, by whom he had four sons before her death in 1819. He did not remarry. Van Buren displayed the qualities of a successful politician. He was able, honest, energetic, imaginative and a glad-hander. A small man, standing no more than five and a half feet (168&amp;amp;nbsp;cm) tall, he was always impeccably dressed, unruffled, and considerate to friend or foe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Republican leader==&lt;br /&gt;
From 1800, when he campaigned for [[Thomas Jefferson]], he remained a resolute [[Republicans (Jeffersonian)|Republican]]. A keen judge of the motives of men, he seldom permitted a difference in politics to interfere with personal friendship. Moreover, he was a middle-of-the-road man, always ready to compromise an issue and at all times ready, as he said, to let the people have what they wanted.  He rose rapidly in New York politics, first joining the [[DeWitt Clinton]] faction in opposing [[Aaron Burr]] and then splitting with Clinton and fighting him for control of the state party. The side-changing gave him a reputation as a fox-like ambitious manipulator; that and his red hair made him &amp;quot;the red fox of Kinderhook.&amp;quot; In 1812, Van Buren was elected to the state senate, where he organized and led the &amp;quot;[[Albany Regency]],&amp;quot; the anti-Clinton faction. Chosen attorney-general of the state in 1816, he was defeated by the Clinton forces in 1819, but was triumphantly elected to the United States Senate two years later. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the decades after the [[War of 1812]] increasingly competitive political parties became characterized by greater popular participation and organizational sophistication, in what is called the &amp;quot;[[Second Party System]].&amp;quot; Silbey (2002) credits Van Buren the major role in this transformation. He introduced a new level of party organization, unswerving loyalty and recruitment of likely young men as campaigners and candidates, Throughout his career, Silbey contends, Van Buren was &amp;quot;the prime organizer, articulator, and manager of the nation's political conflict.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Clinton's followers supported [[Andrew Jackson]] for the presidency in 1824, Van Buren aligned himself with the [[William H. Crawford]] forces and became their acknowledged leader in the congressional caucus that nominated Crawford. Crawford had a stroke and came in third.  In the Senate Van Buren supported the tariff bills but opposed internal improvement measures, possibly affected in this stand by the thought of protecting New York's Erie Canal. Increasingly, however, he became a states' rights man devoted to strict construction views. He was reelected to the Senate in 1827, but resigned to become governor of New York, a position he used briefly to advocate the &amp;quot;safety fund system,&amp;quot; which required all banks in the state to ensure each other's financial soundness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Jacksonian leader==&lt;br /&gt;
By 1828 he had changed his political allegiance to Jackson, becoming his confidential political adviser and in 1828 managing his election campaign in the northeast.  Van Buren was rewarded as secretary of state. Internal factionalism beset Jackson's cabinet; Van Buren opposed Vice President [[John C. Calhoun]]. Carefully avoiding any conflicts with Jackson's close friends in the &amp;quot;Kitchen Cabinet&amp;quot; (Jackson's informal advisors) he became one of the most reliable supporters of the president. When [[Peggy Eaton]], wife of the secretary of war, was ostracized by senior officials (on rumors she once was a prostitute), Jackson supported Eaton and Van Buren went out of his way to befriend her. He vigorously supporting Jackson in trying to destroy the [[Second Bank of the United States]], over the opposition of  the business community. Van Buren helped Jackson by obtaining the New York legislature’s official  endorsement of Jackson’s stern warnings against South Carolina in the [[Nullification Crisis]].  By 1831 Jackson made it clear that Van Buren would be his vice-presidential running mate in 1832.  Appointed minister to the Court of St. James (i.e. ambassador to Britain) in 1831, Van Buren arrived in London only to find that Calhoun had blocked his confirmation in the Senate. During the next year he made a tour of Europe and returned to the States after he had been nominated for the vice-presidency. He was elected with Jackson, who defeated [[Whig Party]] candidate [[Henry Clay]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==President 1837-1841==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Van-b-admin.jpg|thumb]]Both as secretary of state and as the presiding officer of the Senate he acquitted himself with skill and honor, and with Jackson squarely supporting him, he was nominated by his party for the presidency in 1836. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his 1836 presidential campaign Van Buren promised to continue Jackson's policies and won easily over [[Daniel Webster]], [[William Henry Harrison]], and H. L. White, the regional Whig  candidates.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Van Buren in office continued his party's opposition to the Bank by proposing a plan for an independent treasury in which the Government could keep its funds. Although there was strong opposition to the plan, a subtreasury bill was passed in 1840. Long before his election, the president had had to commit himself on the slavery issue. He was opposed to the extension of slavery although he had promised to protect it where it existed. Accordingly, he opposed the plan to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia. On the other hand, he refused to support the plan to annex Texas, which would have created more slave territory and would probably have meant a war with Mexico. He also preserved strict neutrality during Canada's small revolt against Britain in 1837, an action that was heartily criticized by the strong anti-British faction in the U.S..  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most difficult challenge was the financial panic of 1837 and the depression that followed. Just as Van Buren took office in March 1837 the nation's banks began to suspend specie (gold) payment. For the next three years unemployment, crop failures, and low prices created real distress throughout the nation. Banks closed their doors, states were unable to meet their financial obligations, and many workingmen in the eastern cities were without jobs and hungry. Since the prevailing economic thought of the period held that the government should abstain from interfering with the country's economic life, Van Buren did nothing to alleviate the effects of the depression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Against this background of discontent and suffering he was renominated in 1840 to run against the Whig candidate, Harrison. In the campaign that followed, Whigs ridiculed Van Buren as &amp;quot;a Northern man with Southern principles,&amp;quot; a cold aristocrat indifferent to the people's sufferings, and nicknamed him &amp;quot;Martin Van Ruin&amp;quot;; he was decisively beaten.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Free Soil candidate in 1848==&lt;br /&gt;
Retiring to Kinderhook, Van Buren in 1841, took up the life of a gentleman farmer. Van Buren took a great interest in his farm, supervising workers and utilizing &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot; farming techniques.  Van Buren embraced the genteel lifestyle but made it his own with his enthusiasm, profit-mindedness, and bourgeois calculation.  He was still politically ambitious, and during the next four years worked for the 1844 nomination. His equivocal position on slavery and Texas, made known by the famous &amp;quot;Hammet Letter,&amp;quot; hurt his chances considerably. In the following convention, although he had a majority of the delegates, he was unable to obtain the necessary two thirds and lost to [[James K. Polk]], who was elected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1848free.jpg|thumb|350px|1848 marching banner for Van Buren on Free Soil ticket]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1848, the [[Mexican-American War]] had intensified the slavery issue. Advocates of the [[Wilmot Proviso]] tried to block slavery in new territories acquired from Mexico.  They joined the &amp;quot;[[Barnburner]]&amp;quot; faction of New York Democrats and formed the new [[Free Soil Party]], whose convention in Buffalo drew 465 delegates from 18 states.  With [[Charles Francis Adams]] as his running mate, the new anti-slavery party stood for the [[Wilmot Proviso]]. He won 291,000 votes, half of them in New York. By splitting the Democrats in New York, his new party allowed Whig [[Zachary Taylor]] to win.  Van Buren split with the Free Soilers when he supported the [[Compromise of 1850]]. He grew fearful that the slavery issue would disrupt the Union. Neither an abolitionist nor a slavery man, he supported [[James Buchanan]] in 1856 in the hope of compromise. When war broke out he became a sincere supporter of Lincoln. He died at Kinderhook, July 24, 1862.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Cole, Donald B. ''Martin Van Buren and the American Political System'' (1984), &lt;br /&gt;
* Curtis. James C. ''The Fox at Bay: Martin Van Buren and the Presidency, 1837-1841''  (1970), &lt;br /&gt;
* Curtis. James C. &amp;quot;In the Shadow of Old Hickory: The Political Travail of Martin Van Buren,&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic,'' Vol. 1, No. 3 (Autumn, 1981), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;249–267 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3123035  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Gunderson. Robert G. ''The Log Cabin Campaign'' (1957), on 1840 campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* Harrison, Jr. Joseph Hobson. &amp;quot;Martin Van Buren and His Southern Supporters,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Southern History,''  Vol. 22, No. 4 (Nov., 1956), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;438–458 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2954641 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morison, Michael A. &amp;quot;Martin Van Buren, the Democracy, and the Partisan Politics of Texas Annexation,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Southern History,'' Vol. 61, No. 4 (Nov., 1995), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;695–724 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2211431 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Niven, John. ''Martin Van Buren: The Romantic Age of American Politics'' (1983)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rayback, Joseph G. &amp;quot;Martin Van Buren's Desire for Revenge in the Campaign of 1848&amp;quot;, ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review,'' Vol. 40, No. 4 (Mar., 1954), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;707–716 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1895864 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Remini, Robert. ''Martin Van Buren and the Making of the Democratic Party'' (1959). [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=100692541 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Shade, William G. &amp;quot;'The Most Delicate and Exciting Topics': Martin Van Buren, Slavery, and the Election of 1836&amp;quot;, ''Journal of the Early Republic,'' Vol. 18, No. 3 (Autumn, 1998), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;459–484 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3124674 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Silbey, Joel H.  ''Martin Van Buren and the Emergence of American Popular Politics.''  2002. 237 pp.  [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=169851061432666 online review]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson. Major. ''The Presidency of Martin Van Buren'' (1984), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Fitzpatrick, John C.  ed., &amp;quot;The Autobiography of Martin Van Buren,&amp;quot; ''Annual Report of the  American Historical Association for the Year 1918, vol. 2'' (Washington, D.C.,  1920), extends to 1835 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=65875656 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/pol-gl.htm#F. American Political History Online] links&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://dig.lib.niu.edu/message/ps-list.html Michael Holt, ''The Second American Party System''], short topical essays&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://millercenter.org/academic/americanpresident/vanburen Online essays by scholars, sponsored by U. of Virginia]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://librivox.org/author/11282 Works by Martin Van Buren - text and free audio] - [[LibriVox]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{USVicePresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Van Buren, Martin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New York Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jacksonian Democracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Governors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=South_Africa&amp;diff=1360266</id>
		<title>South Africa</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=South_Africa&amp;diff=1360266"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:16:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: /* Foreign Relations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Republic of South Africa''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =South africa rel 2005.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =SouthAfrica location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of South Africa.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of South Africa.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Pretoria, Cape Town, Bloemfontein&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=[[Zulu]], [[Xhosa]], [[Afrikaans]], [[Sepedi]], [[English]], [[Setswana]], [[Sesotho]], [[Xitsonga]], [[Swati]], [[Venda]], [[isiNdebele]]&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Jacob Zuma &lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =471 443 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =49,004,000&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=2011&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$576.4 billion(2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$13,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency       =Rand&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''South Africa''' is located on the southern tip of [[Africa]] and is the wealthiest, and one of the largest countries on the continent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has a very advantageous location for trade routes by sea from Western Europe to [[India]] and the Far East. As a result, there was far more immigration by Europeans to South Africa than any other region of Africa, and whites of European ancestry (English and Dutch) ruled South Africa until the late twentieth century. Since then, democracy has brought representative government to the African ethnic groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa hosted the 2010 Football World Cup.  &lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Durban South Africa.jpg|thumb|left|230px|Durban.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Until 1991, South African law divided the population into four major racial categories: Africans (black), whites, coloreds, and Asians. Although this law has been abolished, many South Africans still view themselves and each other according to these categories. Black Africans comprise about 79% of the population and are divided into a number of different ethnic groups. Whites comprise about 10% of the population. They are primarily descendants of Dutch, French, English, and German settlers who began arriving at the Cape of Good Hope in the late 17th century. Coloreds are mixed-race people primarily descending from the earliest settlers and the indigenous peoples. They comprise about 9% of the total population. Asians descend from Indian workers brought to South Africa in the mid-19th century to work on the sugar estates in Natal. They constitute about 2.5% of the population and are concentrated in the KwaZulu-Natal Province. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Education is in transition. Under the apartheid system schools were segregated, and the quantity and quality of education varied significantly across racial groups. The laws governing this segregation have been abolished. The long and arduous process of restructuring the country's educational system has begun and is ongoing. The challenge is to create a single, nondiscriminatory, nonracial system that offers the same standards of education to all people. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2004 World Bank Group): 0.8%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2004, 46.6 million): Composition—black 79%; white 9.6%; colored 8.9%; Asian (Indian) 2.5%. Official figures from 2000 South African Census at http://www.statssa.gov.za/. &lt;br /&gt;
*Languages: Afrikaans, English, isiNdebele, isiXhosa, isiZulu, Sepedi, Sesotho, Setswana, siSwati, Tshivenda, and Xitsonga (all official languages). &lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: Predominantly Christian; traditional African, Hindu, Muslim, Jewish. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory—7–15 years of age for all children. The South African Schools Act, Act 84 of 1996, passed by Parliament in 1996, aims to achieve greater educational opportunities for black children, mandating a single syllabus and more equitable funding for schools. &lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate (2000)--59 per live births. Life expectancy—52 yrs. women; 50 yrs. men. Health data from 2000 U.S. Census Report: HIV/AIDS Country Profiles: [http://www.census.gov/ipc/hiv/safrica.pdf].&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu.jpg|thumb|230px|Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The 2001 religious demography census estimated that 80% of the population is Christian. Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, and adherents of traditional African beliefs combines constitute about 4% of the population. Approximately 15% of the population indicated that it belongs to no particular religion or declined to indicate an affiliation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
African Independent Churches (AICs) are the largest group of Christian churches. Once regarded as Ethiopian churches, the majority are now referred to as Zionist or Apostolic churches. There are more than 4,000 AICs, with a membership of more than 10 million, constituting approximately 20% of the population. The Zionist Christian Church is the largest AIC, with an estimated membership of more than four million. AICs serve more than half the population in northern KwaZulu-Natal and Mpumalanga areas. There are at least 900 AICs are in Soweto.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Christian groups include Protestants (Dutch Reformed family of Churches, Anglican, Baptist, Congregational, Lutheran, Methodist, and Presbyterian) and the Roman Catholic Church. Greek Orthodox, the Church of Scientology, and Seventh-day Adventist churches are also active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
African traditionalists make up less than 1% of the population. Practitioners include traditional healers, often referred to as witches, although they do not see themselves as such. Many of the African traditionalists combine Christian and indigenous religious practices, and 15% of the population claims no affiliation with any formal religious organization. It is believed that many of these persons adhere to indigenous religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An estimated two-thirds of South Africa's Indian population, a majority of which resides in KwaZulu-Natal, practice Hinduism. The small Muslim community is mostly made up of Cape Malays of Indonesian descent, and the remainder is largely of Indian extraction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa is a multiparty parliamentary democracy in which constitutional power is shared between the president and the Parliament. The country is unusual in that it technically has three capital cities, since the three branches of the federal government are divided between them. As such, Pretoria houses the executive branch, Cape Town houses the legislative branch, and Bloemfontein houses the judicial branch. Therefore, these cities are known respectively as the executive capital, the legislative capital and the judicial capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliament consists of two houses, the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces, which are responsible for drafting the laws of the republic. The National Assembly also has specific control over bills relating to monetary matters. The current 400-member National Assembly was retained under the 1997 constitution, although the constitution allows for a range of between 350 and 400 members. The Assembly is elected by a system of &amp;quot;list proportional representation.&amp;quot; Each of the parties appearing on the ballot submits a rank-ordered list of candidates. The voters then cast their ballots for a party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seats in the Assembly are allocated based on the percentage of votes each party receives. In the 2004 elections, the ANC won 279 seats in the Assembly, more than a two-thirds majority and an increase of 13 seats from 1999; the Democratic Alliance (DA) won 50, the IFP 28, the New National Party (NNP) 7, the United Democratic Movement (UDM) 9, and other groups won the remaining 27. In the 2004 electoral campaign, the ANC aligned with the NNP, and the DA aligned with the IFP. On August 6, the NNP announced that it would merge with the ANC. Elected representatives of the party would, however, continue to hold their seats in the national and provincial legislatures as NNP members until the next floor-crossing period in September 2005. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Council of Provinces (NCOP) consists of 90 members, 10 from each of the nine provinces. The NCOP replaced the former Senate as the second chamber of Parliament and was created to give a greater voice to provincial interests. It must approve legislation that involves shared national and provincial competencies as defined by an annex to the constitution. Each provincial delegation consists of six permanent and four rotating delegates. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The president is the head of state. Following the April 14, 2004 elections, the National Assembly re-elected Thabo Mbeki as President. The president's constitutional responsibilities include assigning cabinet portfolios, signing bills into law, and serving as commander in chief of the military. The president works closely with the deputy president and the cabinet. There are currently 28 posts in the cabinet. Of the 28 ministers, Mbeki appointed two from outside the ANC—one from the former NNP and one from the Azanian Peoples Organization (Azapo). On June 14, 2005, President Mbeki informed the South African Parliament that then-Deputy President Jacob Zuma was being &amp;quot;released&amp;quot; from his duties following the conviction of a close associate on corruption charges relating to monetary payments to Zuma. On June 22, Mbeki named former Minister for Minerals and Energy Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka to the position of Deputy President, the first woman to hold this office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following prior allegations, and a finding by Judge Chris Nicholson, that Prescient Mbeki may have exerted improper political influence regarding the prosecution of Jacob Zuma, the National Executive Committee of the ANC recalled Mbeki on Sunday, 21 September 2008. He formally tendered his resignation from office on Monday, 22 September, which became effective at midnight on 24 September 2008. Dr Ivy Matsepe-Casaburri served as acting State President from then until the election of the new State President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ANC's deputy president, Kgalema Motlanthe was elected and sworn in as South Africa's third democratic State President, during a full sitting of Parliament on 25 September 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third arm of the central government is an independent judiciary. The Constitutional Court is the highest court for interpreting and deciding constitutional issues, while the Supreme Court of Appeal is the highest court for non-constitutional matters. Most cases are heard in the extensive system of High Courts and Magistrates Courts. The constitution's bill of rights provides for due process including the right to a fair, public trial within a reasonable time of being charged and the right to appeal to a higher court. The bill of rights also guarantees fundamental political and social rights of South Africa's citizens. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*State President—Kgalema Motlanthe&lt;br /&gt;
*Executive Deputy President—Ms. Baleka Mbete&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Challenges Ahead===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:De Jonge Farm View Villiersdorp Cape.jpg|thumb|280px|De Jonge, Farm View Villiersdorp, Cape.]]&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa’s post-apartheid governments have made remarkable progress in consolidating the nation's peaceful transition to democracy. Programs to improve the delivery of essential social services to the majority of the population are underway. Access to better opportunities in education and business is becoming more widespread. Nevertheless, transforming South Africa's society to remove the legacy of apartheid will be a long-term process requiring the sustained commitment of the leaders and people of the nation's disparate groups. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), chaired by 1984 Nobel Peace Prize winner Archbishop Desmond Tutu, helped to advance the reconciliation process. Constituted in 1996 and having completed its work by 2001, the TRC was empowered to investigate apartheid-era human rights abuses committed between 1960 and May 10, 1994; to grant amnesty to those who committed politically motivated crimes; and to recommend compensation to victims of abuses. In November 2003, the Government began allocation of $4,600 (R30,000) reparations to individual apartheid victims. The TRC's mandate was part of the larger process of reconciling the often conflicting political, economic, and cultural interests held by the many peoples that make up South Africa's diverse population. The ability of the government and people to agree on many basic questions of how to order the country's new society will remain a critical challenge. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One important issue continues to be the relationship of provincial and local administrative structures to the national government. Prior to April 27, 1994, South Africa was divided into four provinces and 10 black &amp;quot;homelands,&amp;quot; four of which were considered independent by the South African Government. Both the interim constitution and the 1997 constitution abolished this system and substituted nine provinces. Each province has an elected legislature and chief executive—the provincial premier. Although in form a federal system, in practice the nature of the relationship between the central and provincial governments continues to be the subject of considerable debate, particularly among groups desiring a greater measure of autonomy from the central government. A key step in defining the relationship came in 1997 when provincial governments were given more than half of central government funding and permitted to develop and manage their own budgets. However, the national government exerts a measure of control over provinces by appointing provincial premiers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although South Africa's economy is in many areas highly developed, the exclusionary nature of apartheid and distortions caused in part by the country's international isolation until the 1990s have left major weaknesses. The economy is now in a process of transition as the government seeks to address the inequities of apartheid, stimulate growth, and create jobs. Business, meanwhile, is becoming more integrated into the international system, and foreign investment has increased dramatically over the past several years. Still, the economic disparities between population groups are expected to persist for many years, remaining an area of priority attention for the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
The 1997 constitution's bill of rights provides extensive guarantees, including equality before the law and prohibitions against discrimination; the right to life, privacy, property, and freedom and security of the person; prohibition against slavery and forced labor; and freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and association. The legal rights of criminal suspects also are enumerated, as are citizens' entitlements to a safe environment, housing, education, and health care. The constitution provides for an independent and impartial judiciary, and, in practice, these provisions are respected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the abolition of apartheid, levels of political violence in South Africa have dropped dramatically. Violent crime and organized criminal activity are at high levels and are a grave concern. Partly as a result, vigilante action and mob justice sometimes occur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some members of the police commit abuses, and deaths in police custody as a result of excessive force remain a problem. The government has taken action to investigate and punish some of those who commit such abuses. In April 1997, the government established an Independent Complaints Directorate to investigate deaths in police custody and deaths resulting from police action. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although South Africa's society is undergoing a rapid transformation, some discrimination against women continues, and discrimination against those living with HIV/AIDS remains. Violence against women and children also is a serious problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
South African forces fought on the Allied side in World Wars I and II and participated in the postwar UN force in Korea. South Africa was a founding member of the League of Nations and in 1927 established a Department of External Affairs with diplomatic missions in the main west European countries and in the United States. At the founding of the League of Nations, South Africa was given the mandate to govern Southwest Africa, now Namibia, which had been a German colony before World War I. In 1990, Namibia attained independence, with the exception of the enclave of Walvis Bay, which was reintegrated into Namibia in March 1994. After South Africa held its first nonracial election in April 1994, most sanctions imposed by the international community in opposition to the system of apartheid were lifted. On June 1, 1994, South Africa rejoined the Commonwealth, and on June 23, 1994, the UN General Assembly accepted its credentials. South Africa served as the African Union's (AU) first president from July 2003 to July 2004. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having emerged from the international isolation of the apartheid era, South Africa has become a leading international actor. Its principal foreign policy objective is to promote the economic, political, and cultural regeneration of Africa, through the New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD); to promote the peaceful resolution of conflict in Africa; and to use multilateral bodies to ensure that developing countries’ voices are heard on international issues. South Africa has played a key role in seeking an end to various conflicts and political crises on the African continent, including in Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Comoros. South Africa has pursued &amp;quot;quiet diplomacy&amp;quot; in its approach to the crisis in Zimbabwe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa has a two-tiered economy; one rivaling other developed countries and the other with only the most basic infrastructure. It therefore is a productive and industrialized economy that exhibits many characteristics associated with developing countries, including a division of labor between formal and informal sectors, and uneven distribution of wealth and income. The formal sector, based on mining, manufacturing, services, and agriculture, is well developed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transition to a democratic, nonracial government, begun in early 1990, stimulated a debate on the direction of economic policies to achieve sustained economic growth while at the same time redressing the socioeconomic disparities created by apartheid. The Government of National Unity's initial blueprint to address this problem was the Reconstruction and Development Program (RDP). The RDP was designed to create programs to improve the standard of living for the majority of the population by providing housing—a planned 1 million new homes in 5 years—basic services, education, and health care. While a specific &amp;quot;ministry&amp;quot; for the RDP no longer exists, a number of government ministries and offices are charged with supporting RDP programs and goals. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2004): $213 billion. 2004 GDP at market prices (baseline year 2000)--1.374 billion rand (R). &lt;br /&gt;
*Real GDP growth rate (2004): 3.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP per capita (2004): $3,480. &lt;br /&gt;
*Unemployment (September 2004): 27.8%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Almost all essential commodities, except petroleum products and bauxite. Only country in the world that manufactures fuel from coal. &lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types—minerals, mining, motor vehicles and parts, machinery, textiles, chemicals, fertilizer, information technology, electronics, other manufacturing, and agroprocessing. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2004): Exports--$36.3 billion (2003 merchandise exports R256 billion; 2003 gold exports R35 billion): gold, other minerals and metals, agricultural products, motor vehicles and parts. Major markets—U.K., U.S., Germany, Italy, Japan, East Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa. Imports--$34 billion (2003 merchandise imports R263 billion): machinery, transport equipment, chemicals, petroleum products, textiles, and scientific instruments. Major suppliers—Germany, U.S., Japan, U.K., Italy. &lt;br /&gt;
GDP composition (2003): Agriculture and mining (primary sector)--11%; industry (secondary sector)--24%; services (tertiary sector)--65%. World's largest producer of platinum, gold, and chromium; also significant coal production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government of South Africa demonstrated its commitment to open markets, privatization, and a favorable investment climate with its release of the crucial Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) strategy—the neoliberal economic strategy to cover 1996-2000. The strategy had mixed success. It brought greater financial discipline and macroeconomic stability but has failed to deliver in key areas. Formal employment continued to decline, and despite the ongoing efforts of black empowerment and signs of a fledgling black middle class and social mobility, the country's wealth remains very unequally distributed along racial lines. However, South Africa's budgetary reforms such as the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework and the Public Finance Management Act—which aims at better reporting, auditing, and increased accountability—and the structural changes to its monetary policy framework—including inflation targeting—have created transparency and predictability and are widely acclaimed. Trade liberalization also has progressed substantially since the early 1990s. South Africa has reduced its import-weighted average tariff rate from more than 20% in 1994 to 7% in 2002. These efforts, together with South Africa's implementation of its World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations and its constructive role in launching the Doha Development Round, show South Africa's acceptance of free market principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Financial Policy====&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa has a sophisticated financial structure with a large and active stock exchange that ranks 17th in the world in terms of total market capitalization. The South African Reserve Bank (SARB) performs all central banking functions. The SARB is independent and operates in much the same way as Western central banks, influencing interest rates and controlling liquidity through its interest rates on funds provided to private sector banks. Quantitative credit controls and administrative control of deposit and lending rates have largely disappeared. South African banks adhere to the Bank of International Standards core standards. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The South African Government has taken steps to gradually reduce remaining foreign exchange controls, which apply only to South African residents. Private citizens are now allowed a one-time investment of up to 750,000 rand (R) in offshore accounts. Since 2001, South African companies may invest up to R750 million in Africa and R500 million elsewhere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade and Investment====&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa has rich mineral resources. It is the world's largest producer and exporter of gold and platinum and also exports a significant amount of coal. During 2000, platinum overtook gold as South Africa's largest foreign exchange earner. The value-added processing of minerals to produce ferroalloys, stainless steels, and similar products is a major industry and an important growth area. The country's diverse manufacturing industry is a world leader in several specialized sectors, including railway rolling stock, synthetic fuels, and mining equipment and machinery. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Primary agriculture accounts for about 4% of the gross domestic product. Major crops include citrus and deciduous fruits, corn, wheat, dairy products, sugarcane, tobacco, wine, and wool. South Africa has many developed irrigation schemes and is a net exporter of food. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa's transportation infrastructure is well-developed, supporting both domestic and regional needs. The Johannesburg International Airport serves as a hub for flights to other southern African countries. The domestic telecommunications infrastructure provides modern and efficient service to urban areas, including cellular and Internet services. In 1997, Telkom, the South African telecommunications parastatal, was partly privatized and entered into a strategic equity partnership with a consortium of two companies, including SBC, a U.S. telecommunications company. In exchange for exclusivity to provide certain services for 5 years, Telkom assumed an obligation to facilitate network modernization and expansion into unserved areas. The government is evaluating a proposal to establish a second network operator to compete with Telkom across its spectrum of services. Three cellular companies provide service to over 9 million subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa's GDP is expected to increase gradually during the next few years, and in 2005 the government revised upward its 2005 estimated growth to 4.3%. Annual GDP growth between 1994 and 2004 averaged 3.0%. In 2003, real GDP growth slowed to a rate of 2.8%, but increased to 3.7% in 2004. The government estimates that the economy must achieve growth at a minimum of 6% to offset unemployment, which is estimated at 28%, although unofficial sources put it as high as 41%. In an effort to boost economic growth and spur job creation, the government has launched special investment corridors to promote development in specific regions and also is working to encourage small, medium, and microenterprise development. One of the great successes of the ANC government has been to get consumer inflation, which had been running in the double digits for over 20 years, under control. By 1998, inflation had fallen to 6.9%, and in 1999 and 2000 inflation was running at less than 6.0%. The rand's rapid depreciation in late 2001, however, led to greater inflationary pressure, causing 2002 inflation of 9.2%. The South African government cut the inflation rate to 4% in 2004, and the rand appreciated 39% from 2002 to 2004. The South African Reserve Bank increased interest rates and along with the 28% rand appreciation in 2003 led a reduced consumer inflation of 5.8%. The government also has made inroads into reducing the fiscal deficit and increasing foreign currency reserves. The government deficit was 1.1% of GDP in 2002 and 2.6% in 2003. The government's 2005 budget called for a moderate increase in spending to promote faster growth and poverty alleviation, while curbing budget deficits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exports reached 28.2% of GDP in 2003, up from 11.5% a decade ago. South Africa's major trading partners include the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, Italy, Belgium, and Japan. South Africa's trade with other Sub-Saharan African countries, particularly those in the southern Africa region, has increased substantially. South Africa is a member of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC). In August 1996, South Africa signed a regional trade protocol agreement with its SADC partners. The agreement was ratified in December 1999, and implementation began in September 2000. It intends to provide duty-free treatment for 85% of trade by 2008 and 100% by 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa has made great progress in dismantling its old economic system, which was based on import substitution, high tariffs and subsidies, anticompetitive behavior, and extensive government intervention in the economy. The new leadership has moved to reduce the government's role in the economy and to promote private sector investment and competition. It has significantly reduced tariffs and export subsidies, loosened exchange controls, cut the secondary tax on corporate dividends, and improved enforcement of intellectual property laws. A new competition law was passed and became effective on September 1, 1999. A U.S.-South Africa bilateral tax treaty went into effect on January 1, 1998, and a bilateral trade and investment framework agreement was signed in February 1999. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa is a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). U.S. products qualify for South Africa's most-favored-nation tariff rates. South Africa also is an eligible country for the benefits under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), and most of its products can enter the United States market duty-free. South Africa has done away with most import permits except on used products and products regulated by international treaties. It also remains committed to the simplification and continued reduction of tariffs within the WTO framework and maintains active discussions with that body and its major trading partners. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of a November 1993 bilateral agreement, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) can assist U.S. investors in the South African market with services such as political risk insurance and loans and loan guarantees. In July 1996, the United States and South Africa signed an investment fund protocol for a $120 million OPIC fund to make equity investments in South Africa and southern Africa. OPIC is establishing an additional fund—the Sub-Saharan Africa Infrastructure Fund, capitalized at $350 million—for investment in infrastructure projects. The Trade and Development Agency also has been actively involved in funding feasibility studies and identifying investment opportunities in South Africa for U.S. businesses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa is one of the countries most affected by HIV, with 5 million HIV infected individuals. Twenty percent of the 15-49 year old population is infected, and in parts of the country more than 35% of women of childbearing age are infected. Overall, 11-12% of the population is infected. About 1,700 new infections occur each day, and approximately 40% of deaths are believed to be AIDS-related. There are approximately 660,000 children who have lost one or both parents, and by 2008 1.6 million children will have been orphaned by AIDS. Without effective prevention and treatment 5-7 million cumulative AIDS deaths are anticipated by 2010 (with 1.5 million deaths in 2010 alone), and there will be over 1 million sick with AIDS. The epidemic could cost South Africa as much as 17% in GDP growth by 2010. The extraction industries, education, and health are among the sectors that will be severely affected. A 2003 national operational plan provides the structure for a comprehensive response to HIV and AIDS, including a national rollout of antiretroviral therapy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Environment====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boyley The Homestead.jpg|thumb|Boyley, The Homestead.]]&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa's Government is committed to managing the country's rich and varied natural resources in a responsible and sustainable manner. In addition, numerous South African non-governmental organizations have emerged as a potent force in the public policy debate on the environment. In international environmental organizations, South Africa is seen as a key leader among developing countries on issues such as climate change, conservation, and biodiversity. This leading role was underscored by South Africa's selection to host the World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
People have inhabited southern Africa for thousands of years. Members of the Khoisan language groups are the oldest surviving inhabitants of the land, but only a few are left in South Africa today—and they are located in the western sections. Most of today's black South Africans belong to the Bantu language group, which migrated south from central Africa, settling in the Transvaal region sometime before AD 100. The Nguni, ancestors of the Zulu and Xhosa, occupied most of the eastern coast by 1500. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Portuguese were the first Europeans to reach the Cape of Good Hope, arriving in 1488. However, permanent white settlement did not begin until 1652 when the Dutch East India Company established a provisioning station on the Cape. In subsequent decades, French Huguenot refugees, the Dutch, and Germans began to settle in the Cape. Collectively, they form the Afrikaner segment of today's population. The establishment of these settlements had far-reaching social and political effects on the groups already settled in the area, leading to upheaval in these societies and the subjugation of their people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1779, European settlements extended throughout the southern part of the Cape and east toward the Great Fish River. It was here that Dutch authorities and the Xhosa fought the first frontier war. The British gained control of the Cape of Good Hope at the end of the 18th century. Subsequent British settlement and rule marked the beginning of a long conflict between the Afrikaners and the English. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning in 1836, partly to escape British rule and cultural hegemony and partly out of resentment at the recent abolition of slavery, many Afrikaner farmers (Boers) undertook a northern migration that became known as the &amp;quot;Great Trek.&amp;quot; This movement brought them into contact and conflict with African groups in the area, the most formidable of which were the Zulus. Under their powerful leader, Shaka (1787-1828), the Zulus conquered most of the territory between the Drakensberg Mountains and the sea (now KwaZulu-Natal). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1828, Shaka was assassinated and replaced by his half-brother Dingane. In 1838, Dingane was defeated and deported by the Voortrekkers (people of the Great Trek) at the battle of Blood River. The Zulus, nonetheless, remained a potent force, defeating the British in the historic battle of Isandhlwana before themselves being finally conquered in 1879. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1852 and 1854, the independent Boer Republics of the Transvaal and Orange Free State were created. Relations between the republics and the British Government were strained. The discovery of diamonds at Kimberley in 1870 and the discovery of large gold deposits in the Witwatersrand region of the Transvaal in 1886 caused an influx of European (mainly British) immigration and investment. In addition to resident black Africans, many blacks from neighboring countries also moved into the area to work in the mines. The construction by mine owners of hostels to house and control their workers set patterns that later extended throughout the region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boer reactions to this influx and British political intrigues led to the Anglo-Boer Wars of 1880-81 and 1899-1902. British forces prevailed in the conflict, and the republics were incorporated into the British Empire. In May 1910, the two republics and the British colonies of the Cape and Natal formed the Union of South Africa, a self-governing dominion of the British Empire. The Union's constitution kept all political power in the hands of whites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1912, the South Africa Native National Congress was founded in Bloemfontein and eventually became known as the [[African National Congress]] (ANC). Its goals were the elimination of restrictions based on color and the enfranchisement of and parliamentary representation for blacks. Despite these efforts the government continued to pass laws limiting the rights and freedoms of blacks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1948, the National Party (NP) won the all-white elections and began passing legislation codifying and enforcing an even stricter policy of white domination and racial separation known as &amp;quot;apartheid&amp;quot; (separateness). In the early 1960s, following a protest in Sharpeville in which 69 protesters were killed by police and 180 injured, the ANC and Pan-African Congress (PAC) were banned. [[Nelson Mandela]] and many other anti-apartheid leaders were convicted and imprisoned on charges of treason. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ANC and PAC were forced underground and fought apartheid through guerrilla warfare and sabotage. In May 1961, South Africa relinquished its dominion status and declared itself a republic. It withdrew from the Commonwealth in part because of international protests against apartheid. In 1984, a new constitution came into effect in which whites allowed coloreds and Asians a limited role in the national government and control over their own affairs in certain areas. Ultimately, however, all power remained in white hands. Blacks remained effectively disenfranchised. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Popular uprisings in black and colored townships in 1976 and 1985 helped to convince some NP members of the need for change. Secret discussions between those members and Nelson Mandela began in 1986. In February 1990, State President F.W. de Klerk, who had come to power in September 1989, announced the unbanning of the ANC, the PAC, the South African Communist Party and all other anti-apartheid groups. Two weeks later, Nelson Mandela was released from prison. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, the Group Areas Act, Land Acts, and the Population Registration Act—the last of the so-called &amp;quot;pillars of apartheid&amp;quot;—were abolished. A long series of negotiations ensued, resulting in a new constitution promulgated into law in December 1993. The country's first nonracial elections were held on April 26–28, 1994, resulting in the installation of Nelson Mandela as President on May 10, 1994. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the 1994 elections, South Africa was governed under an interim constitution establishing a Government of National Unity (GNU). This constitution required the Constitutional Assembly (CA) to draft and approve a permanent constitution by May 9, 1996. After review by the Constitutional Court and intensive negotiations within the CA, the Constitutional Court certified a revised draft on December 2, 1996. President Mandela signed the new constitution into law on December 10, and it entered into force on February 3, 1997. The GNU ostensibly remained in effect until the 1999 national elections. The parties originally comprising the GNU—the ANC, the NP, and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP)--shared executive power. On June 30, 1996, the NP withdrew from the GNU to become part of the opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Nelson Mandela's 5-year term as President of South Africa, the government committed itself to reforming the country. The ANC-led government focused on social issues that were neglected during the apartheid era such as unemployment, housing shortages, and crime. Mandela's administration began to reintroduce South Africa into the global economy by implementing a market-driven economic plan known as Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR). In order to heal the wounds created by apartheid, the government created the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) under the leadership of Archbishop Desmond Tutu. During the first term of the ANC's post-apartheid rule, President Mandela concentrated on national reconciliation, seeking to forge a single South African identity and sense of purpose among a diverse and splintered populace, riven by years of conflict. The diminution of political violence after 1994 and its virtual disappearance by 1996 were testament to the abilities of Mandela to achieve this difficult goal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nelson Mandela stepped down as President of the ANC at the party's national congress in December 1997, when Thabo Mbeki assumed the mantle of leadership. Mbeki won the presidency of South Africa after national elections in 1999, when the ANC won just shy of a two-thirds majority in Parliament. President Mbeki shifted the focus of government from reconciliation to transformation, particularly on the economic front. With political transformation and the foundation of a strong democratic system in place after two free and fair national elections, the ANC recognized the need to focus on bringing economic power to the black majority in South Africa. In April 2004, the ANC won nearly 70% of the national vote, and Mbeki was reelected for his second 5-year term. In his 2004 State of the Nation address, Mbeki promised his government would reduce poverty, stimulate economic growth, and fight crime. Mbeki said that the government would play a more prominent role in economic development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
South Africa  will hosted the World Cup (soccer) in 2010, the first time it was held in Africa. [http://www.fifa.com/en/worldcup/index/0,3360,WF2010,00.html?comp=WF&amp;amp;year=2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Crime==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the largest challenges which South Africa faces is Crime. [[Crime in South Africa]] is a major political and social issue. Rape is endemic in South Africa. [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/1909220.stm][http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1008.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[South African Farm Murders]] is a highly political issue with some claiming genocide or ethnic cleansing.. According to the Government the murders are &amp;quot;just the result of ordinary crime&amp;quot;, but the Agricultural Unions believe it forms part of [[genocide]] committed against the Boers of South Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.tlu.co.za/International%20Bulletins/2007/IB070315%20%20Forced%20Sales,%20Expropriations%20and%20Farm%20Attacks%20-%20Two%20Sides%20of%20the%20same%20Coin.htm] Genocide Watch of New Haven, Connecticut claims 2.2% of Boer farmers have been victims of violent homicide by 2002.  Other reports show robbery is not the motive in these homicides.  An article in ''WorldNetDaily'' cites the homicide rate among South African Boer farmers at 264 per 100,000, while Genocide Watch cites a figure of 311 per 100,000 as of 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Boer blog site points out that the Dutch Boer's of South Africa who were integrated into the South African state forcibly by British Afrikaners after the Boer War, were not promulgators of the policy of Apartheid implemented by the dominant Afrikaners. The author states the Dutch Boers first faced the loss of their ethnic identity by British Afrikaners during the Apartheid era, and that the policy of the current South African government is now to remove completely the ethnic communities identity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stopboergenocide.com/29301/index.html Boer, Afrikaner, or White, Which Are You?] by Adriana Stuijt.  Retrieved from Stop Boer Genocide.com 11 July 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Genocide allegations===&lt;br /&gt;
The African National Congress has been accused of promoting genocide against the Boer in South Africa.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28421 'Kill the Boer, kill the farmer'], By Anthony C. LoBaido, ''WorldNetDaily.com'', July 28, 2002.  Retrieved July 12, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Genocide Watch:[http://www.genocidewatch.org/BoersSlain01.htm Over 4.000 Boer Farmers In South Africa Have Been Murdered Since 1991]. Retrieved from Genocide Watch July 29, 2015.http://www.genocidewatch.org/images/White_Genocide_TVA.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The victims of this ongoing onslaught are usually elderly white citizens with the assailants generally being black Africans.&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.ilanamercer.com/TheGenocideInDemocraticSA.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Current Issues===&lt;br /&gt;
Currently in South Africa there has been much [[violence]], mainly in the poor townships, against foreigners. In particular against [[Zimbabwe]] natives who have fled the regime of [[Robert Mugabe]]. This is due to a perception that the immigrants are taking jobs and land from native born South Africans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.southafrica.info/2010/worldcup-overview.htm 2010 Fifa World Cup South Africa.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{African Countries}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:South Africa]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:African History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nuclear Target Structures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Woodrow_Wilson&amp;diff=1360264</id>
		<title>Woodrow Wilson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Woodrow_Wilson&amp;diff=1360264"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:13:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Woodrow Wilson&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Wilson.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Ellen Axson Wilson&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Edith Galt Wilson&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=28th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=March 4, 1913 – March 4, 1921&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://home.comcast.net/~sharonday7/Presidents/AP060301.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Thomas R. Marshall]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[William Howard Taft]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Warren G. Harding]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
        {{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=34th&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=New Jersey&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 17, 1911 – March 1, 1913&lt;br /&gt;
	|lieutenant=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=John Fort&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=James Fielder&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Thomas Woodrow Wilson''' (1856 - 1924), a Democrat, was elected as the 28th [[President of the United States of America]], and reelected in 1916, serving from 1913 to 1921. A Princeton president who became an intellectual leader of the [[Progressive Movement]], Wilson demonstrated his mastery over Congress by creating the [[Federal Reserve System]], lowering the tariff, and revising the [[antitrust]] laws in a way that ended most of the &amp;quot;trust-busting&amp;quot; and drew clear lines on what was allowed. In general these policies would be in line with conservative recommendations in 2009. He supported liberal policies such as raising wages of railroad workers when they threatened a nationwide strike in 1916.&lt;br /&gt;
Trying repeatedly and failing to broker peace during [[World War I]], Wilson in 1917 led the United States into the war. He set up a draft and trained millions of soldiers, sending the [[American Expeditionary Forces]] to France under the command of General [[John J. Pershing]]. Woodrow Wilson was also notoriously anti-Catholic,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thecatholicthing.org/2013/03/06/woodrow-wilson-big-government-anti-catholic/ Woodrow Wilson: Big Government Anti-Catholic]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was known for his [[Liberals and racism|racist]] policies promoting segregation, and promoted eugenics based on Darwinist theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.waragainsttheweak.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson played a dominant role in ending the war with his [[Fourteen Points]] and played the central role at the Versailles Conference that set the peace terms in 1919. He was the idealist who envisioned Wilson advocated a new international order founded on self-determination, unfettered international trade, the end of militarism, and a worldwide organization of states - the League of Nations. He failed to obtain Senate approval for the Versailles treaty because it required American entry into the [[League of Nations]] and a possible loss of control over the war-making power. Wilson refused to involve the Republicans in the peace-making, even though they controlled Congress, and refused the GOP compromise that would have allowed American entry into the League without giving up sovereignty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson was a very complex man filled with paradox. He was a southern conservative—an elitist with a profound distrust of radical ideas and such left-wing populists as [[William Jennings Bryan]], but became the Democratic Party's most effective advocate of advanced [[progressivism]]. He rejected the doctrine of the Founders of the Republic in the preface to the Declaration of Independence that people are &amp;quot;endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights&amp;quot; and asserted the Hegelian principle that the citizen should &amp;quot;marry his interests to the state&amp;quot;. Ironically, Woodrow Wilson laid the foundations for a state that has no use for God and uses “every means. . .by which society may be perfected.”  And today Wilson’s ideological heir, Barack Obama, is carrying out his grandiose plan that declares the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution relics of the distant eighteenth century and seeks to bring everyone and everything, including religious groups, under control of the state. Wilson's progressivism in 2009 terms is a mix of liberal and conservative ideas, with a much deeper religious underpinning than is seen today. He ranks with Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Lyndon B. Johnson and Ronald Reagan as the nation's most active and dominant chief executives. He ranks with Abraham Lincoln and Reagan as the most articulate spokesman for national values. He was a war president who largely ignored military affairs and focused on very complex diplomatic issues. He won his war, reshaped the world at the peace conference, and saw his nation reject his idealist League of Nations because he refused to work with Republicans on its mechanics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rigid, self-exacting personality, whose uncompromising adherence to principles barred agreement on some of his most important political goals, he was a brilliant opportunist who won stunning electoral victories and led controversial laws through Congress. He understood diplomacy and domestic affairs in depth, and was the first to recognize a solution that could satisfy most of the needs of the interested parties. He was willing to negotiate endlessly, usually getting his way in the end, especially when his powerful rhetoric energized his backers. A devout [[Presbyterian]] who studied the Bible every day, he elevated a religious style of idealism to the central place in American diplomacy. A lonely intellectual, he had few friends, and broke one-by-one with his closest advisors, until in his last two years in office he was an invalid controlled in large part by his wife.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson's idealistic foreign policy, called &amp;quot;Wilsonianism&amp;quot; sought to end militarism as a force in world affairs, vigorously promote national self-determination, create international bodies to head off serious disputes, and use American resources to promote democracy. Wilsonianism (and &amp;quot;idealism&amp;quot; generally) is opposed to &amp;quot;realism&amp;quot; in foreign policy, which stresses a concern for American self-interest, especially in economic and military terms.  Wilsonianism reshaped the world in the aftermath of the Great War; its values lie at the core of the foreign policy of [[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009). [[File:Ww-sargent.jpg|thumb|350px|1917 portrait by [[John Singer Sargent]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson was the most profoundly Christian political leader in the world in the 20th century. He felt assured that he was following God's guidance. Wilson considered the United States a Christian nation destined to lead the world. He was a prophet and a [[Social Gospel|postmillenarian]], and if idealism clashed with reality, he was certain idealism would prevail. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Woodrow Wilson by Thomas.jpg|thumb|350px|1913 portrait by Stephen Seymour Thomas]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Family==&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson's father Joseph Ruggles Wilson (1822-1903), born in Ohio, was a Presbyterian minister of Scotch Irish descent. Woodrow's mother Jesse was born in Carlisle, England, to a Scottish-born Presbyterian minister; her family moved to Canada in 1835 and to Ohio in 1837.  Woodrow's parents moved South in 1851, owned house slaves, and identified themselves with the culture and political values of the South. The father Joseph Wilson was  a theologian, defended slavery and soon emerged as a leader of the Southern Presbyterian Church and an avid supporter of the Confederacy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In the 1880s Joseph Wilson argued at length that evolution was NOT in conflict with the Bible; he was thereupon forced out as head of the Presbyterian seminary in South Carolina. See Fred Kingsley Elder, ''Woodrow: Apostle of Freedom'' (1996) [http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-4642(199711)63%3A4%3C898%3AWAOF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-O&amp;amp;cookieSet=1 online review]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson's grandfather (Joseph Wilson's father) was James Wilson, who immigrated to the United States from northern Ireland in 1807 and was first an editor of the [[Jeffersonian Republican]] newspaper the ''Aurora'' in Philadelphia, and later published Whig newspapers in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Since his father had been ostracized by the northern relatives, Woodrow had no contact with his grandfather or uncles, who were active in antislavery Republican politics in Ohio and Pennsylvania.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Francis P. Weisenburger, &amp;quot;The Middle Western Antecedents of Woodrow Wilson,&amp;quot; ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review,'' Vol. 23, No. 3 (Dec., 1936), pp. 375-390 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1886371 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Woodrow grew up in the South during the Civil War and Reconstruction his father was a chaplain for the Confederate army. Woodrow saw the humiliation, economic ruin and shame that the loser of a war experiences and the hatred that grows from this, as well as the rampant corruption during Reconstruction in Columbia, the capital of South Carolina. A victim of childhood dyslexia, he became an avid reader.  His father imparted a love of literature and politics to his son; much family activity revolved around Bible readings, daily prayers, and worship services at the father's church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1885 Wilson married Ellen Louise Axson (1860 – 1914), the daughter of a Presbyterian minister in Savannah, Georgia. She was an accomplished painter and a successful hostess; they had three daughters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/ew28-1.html White House biography of Ellen Louise Axson Wilson]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Education==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Woodrow Wilson by Pach Bros c1875.jpg|thumb|180px|Wilson in his 20's]]&lt;br /&gt;
Woodrow studied at Davidson College in North Carolina in 1873-1874 and at Princeton University from 1875 to 1879. He proved an exceptional student, primarily interested in debate and politics.  His father always wanted him to be a minister; Wilson greatly admired the British Prime Minister [[William E. Gladstone]], a Christian in politics, and decided to emulate him. Wilson saw politics as a divine vocation—to be a statesman was an expression of Christian service, he believed, a use of power for the sake of principles or moral goals. Wilson saw the &amp;quot;key to success in politics&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;the pursuit of Perfection through hard work and the fulfillment of ideals.&amp;quot; Politics would allow him to spread spiritual enlightenment to the American people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was an editor of the ''Princetonian'' and wrote his senior thesis on &amp;quot;Cabinet Government in the United States;&amp;quot; it was later published. The essay stressed the superior qualities of the British cabinet system and said it ought to be tried in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edward S. Corwin, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Presidency,&amp;quot; ''Virginia Law Review,'' Vol. 42, No. 6 (Oct., 1956), pp. 761-783 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1070269 in JSTOR]. It was published in a journal edited by [[Henry Cabot Lodge]], who became Wilson's bitter enemy in 1919.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After graduation in 1879 he studied law at the University of Virginia; he was admitted to the bar and practiced in Atlanta, in 1882. It was too boring.  Wilson's scholarship led him in 1883 to enter the new Johns Hopkins University graduate school where he studied government and history, taking a PhD in 1885. Wilson is the only president to have earned a PhD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Academic leader==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1885 Wilson was appointed as a history instructor at Bryn Mawr College, an elite Quaker school for women near Philadelphia, at a salary of $1500 a year (which was enough to hire a servant).  In 1888 he moved to Wesleyan University, a Methodist college in Connecticut.  His reputation as an outstanding leader in political science brought him a professorship of jurisprudence and political economy at [[Princeton University]] in 1890. For the next twelve years he taught at Princeton, popular alike with students and faculty; he became the president of the school in 1902.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;W. Barksdale Maynard,  Woodrow Wilson: Princeton to the Presidency  (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henry Wilkinson Bragdon, ''Woodrow Wilson: The Academic Years'' (1967)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson soon emerged as the nation's foremost academic, in heavy demand in elite circle for his brilliant speeches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson subscribed to the Social Darwinist view that survival was for the fittest races, and he supported the Eugenics movement. He believed there are “progressive races” such as Anglos and Aryans, who had superior and enlightened governments, and “stagnant nationalities” – Eastern and Southern Europeans – who needed authoritarian governments to control them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Princeton he created academic departments but otherwise downplayed the Germanic model of the PhD-oriented research university in favor of the &amp;quot;Oxbridge&amp;quot; (Oxford and Cambridge) model of intense small group discussions and one-one-one tutorials. He hired 50 young professors, called preceptors, to meet with students in small conferences, grilling them about their reading.  Complaining that Princeton was dominated by &amp;quot;eating clubs&amp;quot; in which students ate with each other and ignored the professors, he sought to build Oxford-style colleges where students and faculty would eat and talk together. He failed—the eating clubs are still there.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yale and Harvard later did adopt the college model for undergraduates, but not Princeton. W. Barksdale Maynard, Woodrow Wilson: Princeton to the Presidency  (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson promoted the leadership model, whereby the college focused on training a small cadre of undergraduates for national leadership, &amp;quot;the minority who plan, who conceive, who superintend,&amp;quot; as he called them in his inaugural address as the university's president. &amp;quot;The college is no less democratic because it is for those who play a special part.&amp;quot;  He confronted the dean of the graduate school, who had the German research model in mind and outmaneuvered Wilson by obtaining outside funding for a graduate complex for serious scholarship that was well separated from the fun-loving undergraduates.&lt;br /&gt;
===Political theory===&lt;br /&gt;
====Political Science====&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson made significant contributions to political science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;he also wrote popular history of high quality, including a five-volume history of the United States and a life of George Washington.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 1885 he published his influential treatise ''Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics'', based on his PhD dissertation. It set a new standard in analyzing the actual workings of the federal government with striking clarity and thoroughness. The citizen must “marry his interests to the state.”  Wilson, therefore, dismissed the Declaration’s assertion that rights are endowed by our Creator. Wilson lectured that, “If you want to understand the real Declaration of Independence, do not repeat the preface.”  “The rhetorical introduction,” he declared, “is the least part of it.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Wilson had never visited Congress, his emphasis on the centrality of committees in Congress was a major contribution to the study of political science.  Noting how the Constitution's separation of powers had been eroded since the Civil War by the increasing power of Congress, he suggested a remedy for this in a cabinet-style government of the variety proposed by [[Walter Bagehot]] in Britain. By criticizing the Constitutionalist and Federalist traditions that had characterized American politics for a century, and showing their faults, Wilson sought to open a serious debate on the political changes in the United States in the intervening century and whether the Constitution remained an adequate regulator of these. By the time he wrote ''Constitutional Government in the United States'' (1908), Wilson was advocating the need for constitutional reform that would make Congress and president more representative and, above all, the need for a strong president who could influence Congress rather than submit to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson originated the notion that political parties, besides running campaigns, need to be responsible for clearly designed public policies, which they present to the electorate for approval.  The key to responsibility was the presidency. Hegelian conceptions of monarchy strongly influenced Wilson, and his view of public opinion contrasted sharply with the Madisonian view of factionalism. Consequently, Wilson viewed parties as primarily the machinery through which strong leaders interpret and pursue the public will.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scot J.  Zentner, &amp;quot;President and Party in the Thought of Woodrow Wilson,&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly''; 1996 26(3): 666-677, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/27551624  in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Public administration====&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|The Study of Administration|Administrative State}}&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson was a founder of the study of public administration by political scientists.  Wilson believed in a strong, active role for the central government and as president succeeded in establishing legislation that significantly enlarged its regulatory powers. With the publication of ''Congressional Government'' in 1885, Wilson established himself as a leader of the political reform movement of the day. The book was the first of its kind to analyze policymaking by the central government and to provide recommendations for changing the process. Wilson was one of the three most prominent public administrationists of the 1880s and 1890s. As an academician, he promoted a separate department for the study of public administration and wrote '[[The Study of Administration]]' (1887), the first published essay by a university scholar on the subject, established Wilson as the leading authority in the field.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Edward House.jpg|thumb|150px|right|Edward House]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the next year he inaugurated a course in public administration at Johns Hopkins University, providing three 6-week lecture series arranged in a 3-year cycle. In 1889, Wilson published a textbook, ''The State,'' and, in 1891, he began at Hopkins a new 3-year course which was a further significant step in the development of the study of administration. He was one of the first scholars to realize fully that all government was ultimately to be administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard J. Stillman, II, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Study of Administration: A New Look at an Old Essay,&amp;quot; ''American Political Science Review,'' Vol. 67, No. 2 (Jun., 1973), pp. 582-588 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1958787 in JSTOR]; Larry Walker, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson, Progressive Reform, and Public Administration,&amp;quot; ''Political Science Quarterly'', Vol. 104, No. 3 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 509-525 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2151276 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Philip Dru=====&lt;br /&gt;
On November 16,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=veeNBQAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PR2-IA2|last1=Neu|first1=Charles|title=Colonel House: A Biography of Woodrow Wilson's Silent Partner|date=2014|publisher=[[Oxford University]] Press|isbn=978-0195045505|pages=i-ii}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 1912,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mf2BMLaT4uMC&amp;amp;pg=PA398|last1=Levin|first1=Phyllis|title=Edith and Woodrow: The Wilson White House|date=2002|publisher=[[Simon and Schuster]]|isbn=978-0743211581|pages=398}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; President-elect Wilson took a trip to Bermuda.  For the trip, he was given a copy of [[Philip Dru: Administrator]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4jcL20ZS_KUC&amp;amp;pg=PA7|last1=Hodgson|first1=Godfrey|title=Woodrow Wilson's Right Hand: The Life of Colonel Edward M. House|date=2006|publisher=[[Yale University]]|isbn=978-0300137552|pages=7}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by his adviser [[Colonel House|Edward House]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=veeNBQAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PR2-IA2|last1=Neu|first1=Charles|title=Colonel House: A Biography of Woodrow Wilson's Silent Partner|date=2014|publisher=[[Oxford University]] Press|isbn=978-0195045505|pages=78}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for his reading pleasure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?ei=NjWJUOT7BY3o8QSPvoDIBQ&amp;amp;id=EUiVAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;focus=searchwithinvolume&amp;amp;q=dru+bermuda|last1=Walworth|first1=Arthur|title=Woodrow Wilson|date=1965|publisher=[[Houghton Mifflin]] Company|work=[[Arthur Walworth]]|pages=288}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Describing the similarities between Woodrow Wilson and Philip Dru, [[Franklin Lane|Franklin K. Lane]], who served as [[Secretary of the Interior]] for seven years, made the following observations:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Colonel House's Book, Philip Dru, favors it, and all that book has said should be, comes about slowly, even woman suffrage. The President comes to Philip Dru in the end. And yet they say that House has no power....&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8mwoAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA297|last1=Lane|first1=Franklin|title=The Letters of Franklin K. Lane, Personal and Political|date=1922|publisher=[[Houghton Mifflin]] Company|pages=297}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Football===&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson as president of Princeton, and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] as president of the United States, took an intense interest in the controversy over the reform of college football. In the 1890s and early 1900s, college football faced sharp of criticism over injuries and the role of athletics in college life. Roosevelt and Wilson, loyal followers of Harvard and Princeton, had defended football in the 1890s. In the fall of 1905, however, President Roosevelt called a conference of football experts at the White House to discuss brutality and unsportsmanlike conduct. Thereafter, Roosevelt worked behind the scenes to bring about sufficient reform to preserve football and ensure that it would continue to be played at Harvard. In the years 1909-10, when college football again faced an injury crisis, Wilson worked with the presidents at Harvard and Yale to make reasonable reforms. Both Roosevelt's and Wilson's approaches were consistent with their strategies for national political change. In the years that followed the reforms on the gridiron, football evolved rapidly into the 'attractive' game that Wilson had advocated and a far less brutal game than the unruly spectacle that Roosevelt had tried to control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John S. Watterson, III, &amp;quot;Political Football: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson and the Gridiron Reform Movement,&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 1995 25(3): 555-564 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/27551467  in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Southerner===&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson was the first southerner elected president since [[Zachary Taylor]] in 1848, and much of his political base came from young progressives in that region, especially intellectuals, editors and lawyers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur S. Link, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson: The American as Southerner,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Southern History,'' Vol. 36, No. 1 (Feb., 1970), pp. 3-17 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2206599 in JSTOR]  Andrew Johnson was not elected; he moved from vice president to president after Lincoln's death in 1865.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Civil War veterans were still alive and Wilson used the memory of the War to build nationalism and to facilitate reunion between the North and the South. In his academic work and public comments, Wilson stressed the theoretical and constitutional causes of the war, devaluing the slavery issue and stressing the moral equality of North and South, all in the interest of lessening sectional animosity. During World War I and the struggle for the League of Nations, Wilson frequently drew comparisons between Lincoln and the Union's sacrifices to save the nation and American soldiers' sacrifices during World War I to save the world.  He succeeded in overcoming Southern isolationism by convincing the middle class in the region that God had preserved the Union in the Civil War in order to spread democracy throughout the world. He appealed to Southerners to demonstrate the patriotism that many said they lacked. He was able to convince them that they could wage war for democracy abroad without endangering white supremacy at home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anthony Gaughan, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Legacy of the Civil War,&amp;quot; ''Civil War History'' 1997 43(3): 225-242; online in [[Questia]]; Gaughan,  &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Rise of Militant Interventionism in the South,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Southern History'' 1999 65(4): 771-808, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2587587 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson despised post-Civil War Southern Reconstruction, which promoted African-American participation in public life. “The white men of the South,” he wrote in his History of America, “were aroused by the mere instinct of self-preservation to rid themselves, by fair means or foul, of the intolerable burden of governments sustained by the votes of ignorant Negroes and conducted in the interest of adventurers.” As president, Wilson resegregated the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson drew on Southern conservatism in the development of his political philosophy and identity as a politician from the 1890s to 1921. While Wilson forged a Progressive reformist outlook that encompassed limited government intervention in social and economic matters, he embraced a conservative, organic conception of social change drawn partially from the thought of Edmund Burke and partially from a mythical vision of the Old South as a model of social stability and integration. Deeply alarmed by labor and agrarian radicalism in the 1890s, Wilson resolved to cleanse the Democratic Party of Populist influence. His political vision ultimately sought to adapt American society to the new economic conditions of the 20th century, chiefly defined by the magnification of corporate power, while retaining the race and class hierarchies of tradition. Wilson's vision of Southern conservatism as a regenerative force set the precedent for the conservative ideology that dominated American politics since the 1980s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Dennis, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and Southern Reform Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''Southern Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the South'' 2006 13(3-4): 1-28.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reform governor==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Woodrow Wilson, New Jersey Governor - 1911.jpg|thumb|140px|Governor Wilson]]&lt;br /&gt;
As early as 1906 Wilson came under the influence of Colonel George Harvey (1864-1928), a conservative Democrat who owned a publishing empire that included the ''New York World'' and ''Harper's Weekly'' magazine, reaching the nation's intellectual elite. Harvey, with close ties to Wall Street and [[J. P. Morgan]], saw a future conservative president and promoted Wilson heavily. Wilson became the intellectual leader of the anti-Bryan, anti-Populist wing of the Democratic Party.  Harvey helped convince the old-fashioned bosses in New Jersey's cities to make Wilson the Democratic nominee for governor in 1910, explaining this would bring in the middle class vote. Wilson, frustrated at Princeton, made the move and was elected.  Wilson then broke with the bosses, and Harvey, denounced Wall Street and the bosses, and electrified the nation with his Progressive reforms in the notoriously corrupt government of New Jersey.  Wilson by 1912 had emerged as the cleanest, most religious, best known and most dynamic leader of the [[Progressive Movement]] in the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Harvey was the first person to recommend Wilson for the presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=Nb54xQLT6yQC&amp;amp;pg=PA134 Presidential Power: Unchecked and Unbalanced]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=hpwDAAAAMAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA178 The Power of Tolerance: And Other Speeches], by George Brinton McClellan Harvey, pp. 174-178, ''For President: Woodrow Wilson'', February 3rd, 1906&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election of 1912==&lt;br /&gt;
William Frank McCombs, a New York lawyer and a friend from college days, instigated and managed Wilson's campaign for president in 1912.  Much of Wilson's support came from the South, especially from young progressive professionals.  Wilson managed to maneuver through the complexities of local politics. For example, in Tennessee the Democratic Party was divided on the issue of prohibition. Wilson was progressive and sober, but not a dry, and appealed to both sides. They united behind him to win the presidential election in the state, but divided over state politics and lost the gubernatorial election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur S.  S. Link, &amp;quot;Democratic Politics and the Presidential Campaign of 1912 in Tennessee,&amp;quot; ''East Tennessee Historical Society's Publications'' 1979 51: 114-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the convention deadlock went on for over 40 ballots as a two-thirds vote was needed. A leading opponent was House Speaker [[Champ Clark]], a prominent progressive strongest in the border states. Other contenders were Judson Harmon of Ohio, and Oscar Underwood of Alabama. They lacked Wilson's charisma and dynamism.  Clark was supported by publisher [[William Randolph Hearst]], a leader of the left-wing of the party. The critical role was played by [[William Jennings Bryan]], the nominee in 1896, 1900 and 1908, who blocked the nomination of any candidate who had the support of 'the financiers of Wall Street.'  He finally announced for Wilson, who won on the 46th.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur S. Link,  &amp;quot;The Baltimore Convention of 1912,&amp;quot; ''American Historical Review'' 1945 50(4): 691-713 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1842698 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many historians believe that Wilson’s election was a defining moment in American history. The former political science professor’s views on government and human nature (and our relationship to the state) became the foundations of Democratic Party liberalism.  Historians also agree that Wilson had a dark side.  He had a strong dislike of immigrants, particularly Catholics and African-Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson enjoyed the support of many black leaders including [[W.E.B. DuBois]] (a liberal at the time). Wilson's speeches and letters expressed the sentiments of a defender of the underprivileged. However the rejoicing over Wilson's victory was short-lived among blacks as segregationist white Southerners took control of Congress and many executive departments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nancy J. Weiss,  &amp;quot;The Negro and the New Freedom: Fighting Wilsonian Segregation,&amp;quot; ''Political Science Quarterly'' 1969 84(1): 61-79, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2147047  in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the campaign Wilson promoted the &amp;quot;New Freedom,&amp;quot; emphasizing limited federal government and opposition to monopoly powers—positions that he reversed on coming to office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President [[William Howard Taft]] defeated ex-President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] in a bitter contest for the Republican nomination, but Roosevelt walked out of the Republican convention and ran as a third party candidate. Wilson's success in the electoral college was assured, despite his 41.8% of the popular vote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lewis L. Gould, ''Four Hats in the Ring: The 1912 Election and the Birth of Modern American Politics,'' (2008); Link (1947)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==President: 1913-21==&lt;br /&gt;
===First term===&lt;br /&gt;
====Domestic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ww-prog.jpg|thumb|580px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
=====Immigration=====&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson twice vetoed the Burnett Immigration Restriction Bill, which required a literacy test for immigrants and would have sharply reduced the number of poor immigrants from Poland, Italy and other parts of eastern and southern Europe. As a moderate progressive, Wilson believed southern and eastern European immigrants, though often poor and illiterate, to be capable of assimilation into a homogeneous middle class with other whites. He considered so-called hyphenated immigrants unacceptable because they acted as groups rather than blending into the common population. Indeed, he denounced the hyphenates.  Wilson sought to achieve American strength through unity, blending together the best characteristics of every nationality to create the ideal citizenry, opposing [[Henry Cabot Lodge]]'s nativist view that American civilization must be based on an Anglo-Saxon foundation.  Immigration from Europe practically ended when the war began, so the issue was postponed ino the 1920s, when a quota system was set up to keep the country's ethnic balance unchanged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hans  Vought, . Division and Reunion: Woodrow Wilson, Immigration, and the Myth of American Unity. Journal of American Ethnic History; 1994 13(3): 24-50.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
====Foreign Policy====&lt;br /&gt;
=====Mexico=====&lt;br /&gt;
The extremely violent civil war that broke out in Mexico in 1911 drove hundreds of thousands of refugees north across the border, and forced Wilson to intervene. [[Francisco Madero]], an idealistic reformer who came to power in 1911.  Madero tried to violently upend the social order in Mexico by destroying the landed aristocracy and the Catholic Church. When Madero was overthrown and murdered by [[Victoriano Huerta]] in February 1913, days before Wilson took office, he refused to recognize the new Mexican government. Relations deteriorated between the two countries. After American sailors were arrested in Tampico in April 1914 by Huerta's soldiers, the armed conflict loomed. American soldiers occupied Vera Cruz. In July 1914 Huerta fled to Spain. In 1916 the civil war between warlords [[Venustiano Carranza]] and [[Pancho Villa]] continued, and in March Villa raided Columbus, New Mexico, killing 20 Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James A. Sandos, &amp;quot;Pancho Villa and American Security: Woodrow Wilson's Mexican Diplomacy Reconsidered,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Latin American Studies,'' Vol. 13, No. 2 (Nov., 1981), pp. 293-311 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/156072 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wilson sent Brigadier General [[John J. Pershing]] deep into Mexico to capture Villa. Villa escaped the Americans. Despite the demands of outraged senators, Wilson did not declare war on Mexico.  He ran for reelection in 1916 on the slogan, &amp;quot;He kept us out of war,&amp;quot; meaning out of a war with Mexico.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reelection====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:WW-WIN16.jpg|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Woman suffrage====&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1910s, suffragists campaigned for the passage of a federal constitutional amendment that would grant women the right to vote.  They argued it would purify politics because the new voters would be far less liable to corruption and saloon influences.  The movement was led by Protestant northern women, many of whom were active in the prohibition movement at the same time.  Wilson, originally opposed to the amendment, was converted through the efforts of women suffragists and became an advocate of critical importance. Both the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) and the National Women's Party (NWP) used symbolic representations of President Wilson, conferring on him real or symbolic images of presidential power. In practice Wilson hedged, realizing that male Democrats in the big city machines in the North and in the rural South were hostile to woman suffrage. The meaning of democracy was at issue: the NWP portrayed Wilson as a tyrant, the NAWSA depicted him as a champion of freedom. Both organizations played essential roles in the passage of the 19th Amendment. After 1919, the absence of a common goal was a contributing factor to the subsequent divisions within the woman's rights movement, as was the loss of a unique adversary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christine A. Lunardini, and Thomas J.  Knock,  Woodrow Wilson and Woman Suffrage: A New Look.  Political Science Quarterly; 1980-1981 95(4): 655-671, [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2150609  in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second term===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Entering the war===&lt;br /&gt;
====Domestic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson established the [[Committee on Public Information]] to disseminate approved information, and nationalized the railroads under the control of the [[United States Railroad Administration]].&lt;br /&gt;
====Foreign Policy====&lt;br /&gt;
====Russia====&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson's commitment to the principle of self-determination affected his decision to intervene in Russia in 1918, as the Bolsheviks (Communists) took power. Unswayed by British, French, and Japanese pressure, Wilson insisted that, unless the Russians invited them, the Allies should not interfere with Russia's internal affairs. In the summer of 1918, the president sent American troops into Siberia with the sole purpose of protecting Czechoslovak soldiers who had broken out of POW camps and were an independent force. Later Wilson realized that the other Allied nations were using the rescue mission as an 'anti-Bolshevik' crusade and for imperialistic motives. As a result, the president ordered US forces to withdraw. Wilson and subsequent presidents until 1933 refused to recognize the new Communist government, and Russia was not invited to the Paris Peace Conference.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Betty Miller Unterberger, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Bolsheviks: the 'Acid Test' of Soviet-American Relations,&amp;quot; ''Diplomatic History'' 1987 11(2): 71-90,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
====Mideast====&lt;br /&gt;
In November 1917, Wilson endorsed the [[Zionism|pro-Zionist]] [[Balfour Declaration]] issued by Britain. Wilson's aims in this endorsement were both practical and religious. His deep Christian sentiment led him to seek 'a direct governing role in the Near East in the name of peace, democracy and, especially, Christianity.    By agreeing to the use of the mandate system by which the transition governments of the Middle East were partially controlled by Britain and France after the war, Wilson was both contradicting and reaffirming his own ideals by allowing only limited self-determination of Middle-Eastern peoples while assuring some respect for property and order.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frank W.   Brecher, Woodrow Wilson and the Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict. American Jewish Archives; 1987 39(1): 23-47,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Paris Peace Conference, 1919====&lt;br /&gt;
President Wilson was present at the Post-World War I Paris Peace Conference, becoming the first President to ever visit Europe whilst in Office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When President Wilson left for Europe in 1919 to establish a new world order at the 1919 Versailles Conference, European Catholics were justifiably concerned about the treatment their former homelands would receive from the victorious allies. Along with Prime Ministers David Lloyd George of the United Kingdom and Georges Clemenceau of France, the three were collectively known as the Big Three and met and discussed the peace treaties that would shape post-war Europe. President Wilson pushed for terms that were not too harsh on the already war-crippled Germany, though the British and French leaders pushed for the infamous 'War Guilt Clause' that declared Germany guilty of the war and forced her to pay harsh reparations. To save his League of Nations, Wilson abandoned his mighty rhetoric and ideals at Versailles and managed to alienate almost every Catholic by surrendering to the demands of the vengeful leaders of the victorious allies. He planted the seeds of World War II when he rearranged the boundaries of Eastern Europe without regard for the ethnic or religious origins of millions of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson particularly pushed for the League of Nations to be created, a precursor to today's United Nations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Fight for the League=====&lt;br /&gt;
After the Paris Peace conference, Wilson came home to try to convince the Senate to ratify the treaty which would create the League.  But on September 26, 1919, Wilson came home from a series of speeches he was making around the country, because of a series of strokes he had suffered which left him debilitated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.wilsonquarterly.com/essays/hidden-agony-woodrow-wilson The Hidden Agony of Woodrow Wilson]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1920, during the time period of which Wilson was incapacitated, Wilson's wife Edith allowed for [[Louis Seibold]] of the New York World to conduct an interview with Wilson.  Seibold, along with Edith Wilson and Wilson's Chief of Staff Joseph Patrick Tumulty, produced a fabricated interview for which Seibold won a [[Pulitzer Prize]] in 1921.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/story/2012/07/10-journos-caught-fabricating-079221 10 journos caught fabricating], [[Politico]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===After the war===&lt;br /&gt;
After the conclusion of [[World War I]] and the closing year of the Wilson presidency, there was a sharp [[Depression of 1920|depression]], which many historians have decided not to write about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wilson and religion==&lt;br /&gt;
A Presbyterian of deep religious faith, he appealed to a gospel of service and infused a profound sense of moralism into Wilsonianism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Morton Blum, ''Woodrow Wilson and the Politics of Morality'' (1956); Richard M. Gamble, &amp;quot;Savior Nation: Woodrow Wilson and the Gospel of Service,&amp;quot; ''Humanitas'' Volume: 14. Issue: 1. 2001. pp 4+; Cooper, ''Woodrow Wilson'' (2009) p 560.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Link finds that Wilson from his earliest days had imbibed the beliefs of his denomination - in the omnipotence of God, the morality of the Universe, a system of rewards and punishments and the notion that nations, as well as man, transgressed the laws of God at their peril.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur S. Link, &amp;quot;A Portrait of Wilson,&amp;quot; ''Virginia Quarterly Review''1956 32(4): 524-541&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Blum (1956) argues that  he learned from [[William Gladstone]] a mystic conviction in the superiority of Anglo-Saxons, in their righteous duty to make the world over in their image. Moral principle, constitutionalism, and faith in God were among the prerequisites for alleviating human strife. While he interpreted international law within such a brittle, moral cast, Wilson remained remarkably insensitive to new and changing social forces and conditions of the 20th century. He expected too much justice in a morally brutal world which disregarded the self-righteous resolutions of parliaments and statesmen like himself. Wilson's triumph was as a teacher of international morality to generations yet unborn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Morton Blum, ''Woodrow Wilson and the Politics of Morality'' (1956), p p10, 197-99&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Daniel Patrick Moynihan]] sees Wilson's vision of world order anticipated humanity prevailing through the &amp;quot;Holy Ghost of Reason,&amp;quot; a vision which rested on religious faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Steigerwald, ''Wilsonian Idealism in America'' (1994) p. 230.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson was a Presbyterian elder and the son of a leading theologian. He read the Bible daily; he felt 'sorry for the men who do not read the Bible every day.' The Bible, he argued, was 'the one supreme source of revelation of the meaning of life.' Wilson was prone to make explicitly Christian claims about his nation, even excluding the word ''Judeo'' from his characterization of the nation's religious heritage. 'America was born a Christian nation,' he explained in a speech on &amp;quot;The Bible and Progress&amp;quot; in 1911:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;America was born to exemplify that devotion to the elements of righteousness which derived from the revelations of Holy Scripture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur S. Link, ed. ''The Papers of Woodrow Wilson'' (1977) 23:20, speech on the Bible, in Denver May 7, 1911&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He held that the Bible &amp;quot;is the one supreme source of revelation, the revelation of the meaning of life, of the nature of God and the spiritual nature and need of men.  It is the only guide of life which really leads the spirit in the way of peace and salvation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Josephus Daniels, ''The Life of Woodrow Wilson 1856-1924'' (1924) p. 359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God was central in Wilson's life and thought. His profound Presbyterian style of thinking assured him that he was following God's guidance. Wilson personified American optimism and considered the United States a Christian nation destined to lead the world. He was a prophet and a postmillenarian, and if idealism clashed with reality, he was certain idealism would prevail.  He saw himself as God's messenger and statesman in a divinely predestined nation; thus he saw himself as God's agent in promoting democracy and world peace. His Fourteen Points and his Covenant of the League of Nations, were, in his view, divinely inspired paths to achieving a new world order.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Malcolm D.  Magee, '' What the World Should Be: Woodrow Wilson and the Crafting of a Faith-Based Foreign Policy'' (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-Catholic===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his presidency Wilson had rocky relations with Roman Catholics. When Wilson recognized the Mexican government of President Venustiano Carranza, many Catholics were livid.  The Catholic hierarchy forcefully complained that the United States should not support a government that restricted the public practice of Catholicism.  The Jesuit magazine America condemned Wilson and described Carranza “as a villain, destroyer, liar and murderer.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson objected to the new wave of Catholic immigrants coming through the gates of Ellis Island. He wrote that there was “an alteration in stock which students of affairs marked with an uneasiness.” The sturdy European stocks, according to Wilson, were being replaced by “men of the lowest class from the south of Italy and men of the meaner sort out of Hungary and Poland, men out of the ranks where there was neither skill nor energy nor any initiative of quick intelligence.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1912 campaign, the American Association of Foreign Language newspapers struck a blow at Wilson: “No man who has an iron heart like Woodrow Wilson, and who slanders his fellowmen, because they are poor and many of them without friends when they come to this country seeking honest work and wishing to become good citizens, is fit to be President of the United States.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These charges appeared to have had an effect. A poll of 2,300 Catholic priests in major inner-city Catholic strongholds revealed that 90 percent of the Italian and 70 percent of Polish priests intended to vote for Bull Moose candidate Theodore Roosevelt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===China policy===&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson’s discussions with Presbyterian missionaries visiting Princeton shaped his diplomacy toward [[History of China|China]]. Wilson viewed Christianity as a unifying force in the world and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 as the first step toward the spread of Christianity and democracy for China. Wilson gained the admiration of the missionaries and Chinese when he prohibited US participation in a European loan to China. He moved to recognize the government of Yuan Shih-k'ai, hoping that that regime could bring stability to China favorable to the introduction of Christianity. He sought to appoint an ambassador to China who could express Christian values. During World War I, missionaries successfully urged Wilson's opposition to Japanese demands on China. Although the war and its aftermath diverted Wilson from Chinese problems, his foreign policy continued to be influenced by missionaries, particularly Dr. Samuel I. Woodbridge and the Reverend Charles E. Scott.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eugene P. Trani, &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson, China, and the Missionaries, 1913-1921,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Presbyterian History'' 1971 49(4): 328-351,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democracy==&lt;br /&gt;
''Also see Woodrow Wilson's lasting impact on the [[U.S. Constitution]]: [[Seventeenth Amendment]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson argued for a “living constitution” that “must be Darwinian in structure and in practice.”  Government for him was “not a machine but a living thing. . . .It is modified by its environment, necessitated by its task, shaped to its functions by the sheer pressure of life.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The citizen must “marry his interests to the state.”  Wilson, therefore, dismissed the Declaration’s assertion that rights are endowed by our Creator. Wilson lectured that, “If you want to understand the real Declaration of Independence, do not repeat the preface.”  “The rhetorical introduction,” he declared, “is the least part of it.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson also rejected the premise described in the [[Federalist Papers]], that checks and balances are needed because human nature is flawed and does not improve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political philosopher Ronald Pestritto has observed that for Wilson, “the separation of powers, and all other institutional remedies that the founders employed against the danger of faction stood in the way of government’s exercising its powers in accord with the dictates of progress.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson advocated a new international order founded on self-determination, democracy, unfettered international commerce, and a worldwide organization of states - the League of Nations. Wilson framed American participation in the war as the first step in ending all wars.   Although 'Wilsonian nationalism' has been blamed for the nationalistic emphasis on race and territory in Europe during the 1920s and 1930s, Wilson's policies had actually used ethnic and territorial issues to encourage self-determination and the development of democracy in postwar nations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Woodrow Wilson's most lasting political philosophy was his view that [[democracy]] should be installed around the world.  As a major player in setting the terms to end World War I, he helped to break up the [[Austria-Hungary|Austrian-Hungarian Empire]] to advance his goal of installing democracy for each ethnic subpopulation.  Similar independence was granted with the breakup of the [[Ottoman Empire]].  Many of these new nations were receiving self-determination for the first time in centuries.  Wilson's view of installing democracy worldwide has since been copied by the [[neoconservatives]].  Wilson was awarded the 1919 [[Nobel Peace Prize]] for his efforts to start the [[League of Nations]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historiography==&lt;br /&gt;
Historians have been fascinated by Wilson and have vigorously defended him (Link) or attacked him (New Left). Since the collapse of the Communism in Europe in 1989, the mood had shifted in Wilson's favor. Even [[George Kennan]], a harsh critic who favored &amp;quot;realism&amp;quot; against Wilson's idealism. has changed his tune.  The New Left attacks represented by Lloyd Gardner's highly critical ''A Covenant with Power'' have given way to Thomas Knock's laudatory ''To End All Wars''. The leftist tendency to trace back to Wilson a tradition of economic self-seeking and arrogant interventionism has yielded to a new impulse to see Wilsonian diplomacy as having established &amp;quot;a new American agenda for world affairs,&amp;quot; as Akira Iriye writes, built upon &amp;quot;the ideas of economic interdependence and of peaceful settlement of disputes.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see Steigerwald,(1999)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Works==&lt;br /&gt;
Books:&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://archive.org/details/congressionalgov00wilsiala Congressional Government], (1885)&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://archive.org/details/wilsongeorge00wilsrich George Washington], (1896)&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://archive.org/details/onbeinghuman01wils On Being Human], (1897)&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://archive.org/details/stateelementshi09wilsgoog The State: Elements of Historical and Practical Politics], (1898)&lt;br /&gt;
* A History of the American People, (1902, five volumes)&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://archive.org/details/constitutionalg00wilsgoog Constitutional Government in the United States], (1908)&lt;br /&gt;
* The New Freedom, (1913)&lt;br /&gt;
* When A Man Comes To Himself, (1915)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essays:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Study of Administration]], (1887)&lt;br /&gt;
* Leaders of Men, (1890)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Administrative State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Colonel House]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Biography===&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, H. W. ''Woodrow Wilson 1913-1921'' (2003) [http://www.amazon.com/Woodrow-Wilson-H-W-Brands/dp/0805069550/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259210644&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search] 169pp; good short summary by scholar  [[File:Ww-stamp.jpg|thumb|180px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooper, John Milton.  ''Woodrow Wilson: A Biography'' (2009), 720 pp. major new biography by leading scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooper, John Milton.  ''The Warrior and the Priest: Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt'' (1985), fascinating double biography by leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Warrior-Priest-Woodrow-Theodore-Roosevelt/dp/0674947517/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259210893&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hofstadter, Richard. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson: The Conservative as Liberal&amp;quot; in ''The American Political Tradition'' (1948), ch. 10. influential essay; at [http://humanitiesebook.org/ ACLS E-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson&amp;quot; in Henry F. Graff ed., ''The Presidents: A Reference History '' (2002) pp 365–388&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur Stanley. ''Wilson: The Road to the White House'' (1947), first volume of standard biography (to 1917); ''Wilson: The New Freedom'' (1956); ''Wilson: The Struggle for Neutrality: 1914-1915'' (1960); ''Wilson: Confusions and Crises: 1915-1916'' (1964); ''Wilson: Campaigns for Progressivism and Peace: 1916-1917'' (1965), the last volume of standard biography; [http://humanitiesebook.org/ online at ACLS E-Books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Maynard, W. Barksdale. ''Woodrow Wilson: Princeton to the Presidency''  (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Woodrow-Wilson-Prof-Barksdale-Maynard/dp/0300136048/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259267777&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Walworth, Arthur. ''Woodrow Wilson'' 2 Vol. (1958); Pulitzer prize winning biography [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24215014 vol 1 online]; well-written but old-fashioned (it was written in the 1950s), it has been replaced by Cooper (2009).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic affairs and ideas===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:$100k.jpg|250px|thumb|Wilson's image appeared on the now-withdrawn $100,000 bill]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abrams, Richard M. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Southern Congressmen, 1913-1916,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Southern History,'' Vol. 22, No. 4 (Nov., 1956), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;417–437 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2954640 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Clements, Kendrick A. ''The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson'' (1992), covers domestic and foreign policies; liberal tone&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooper, John Milton.  ''Woodrow Wilson: A Biography'' (2009), 720 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Cuff, Robert D. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and Business-Government Relations during World War I,&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics,'' Vol. 31, No. 3 (Jul., 1969), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;385–407 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406552 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Curti, Merle. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson's Concept of Human Nature,&amp;quot; ''Midwest Journal of Political Science,'' Vol. 1, No. 1 (May, 1957), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;1–19 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2109008 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel, Marjorie L. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson--Historian,&amp;quot; ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review,'' Vol. 21, No. 3 (Dec., 1934), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;361–374 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1897380 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dimock, Marshall E. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson as Legislative Leader,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of Politics,'' Vol. 19, No. 1 (Feb., 1957), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;3–19 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2127283  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S. ''Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive Era, 1910-1917'' (1954), remains the standard history of his first term. &lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson: The American as Southerner,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Southern History,'' Vol. 36, No. 1 (Feb., 1970), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;3–17 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2206599 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and the Democratic Party,&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics'', Vol. 18, No. 2 (Apr., 1956), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;146–156 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1405064 in JSTOR] cover 1913-14&lt;br /&gt;
* Livermore, Seward W. ''Woodrow Wilson and the War Congress, 1916-1918'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
* Macmahon, Arthur W. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson as Legislative Leader and Administrator,&amp;quot; ''American Political Science Review,'' Vol. 50, No. 3 (Sep., 1956), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;641–675 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1951550  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malin, James C. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=5260560 ''The United States after the World War'' ] (1930)&lt;br /&gt;
* Pestritto, Ronald J. ed.  ''Woodrow Wilson and the roots of modern liberalism'' (2005) ISBN 0742515176' argues Wilson subverted the ideas of the Founders by his progressivism &lt;br /&gt;
* Pietrusza, David ''1920: The Year of the Six President''s New York: Carroll &amp;amp; Graf, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
* Saunders, Robert M. ''In Search of Woodrow Wilson: Beliefs and Behavior'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
* Turner,  Henry A. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and Public Opinion,&amp;quot; ''Public Opinion Quarterly,'' Vol. 21, No. 4 (Winter, 1957-1958), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;505–520 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2746762 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wolgemuth, Kathleen L. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and Federal Segregation,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of Negro History,'' Vol. 44, No. 2 (Apr., 1959), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;158–173 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2716036 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Weinstein, Edwin A., James William Anderson and Arthur S. Link. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson's Political Personality: A Reappraisal,&amp;quot; ''Political Science Quarterly,'' Vol. 93, No. 4 (Winter, 1978-1979), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;585–598 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2150104 at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wolfe, Christopher. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson: Interpreting the Constitution,&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics,'' Vol. 41, No. 1 (Jan., 1979), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;121–142 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1406981 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Woodward, Carl R. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson's Agricultural Philosophy,&amp;quot; ''Agricultural History,'' Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1940), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;129–142 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3739508 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrosius, Lloyd E., “Woodrow Wilson and George W. Bush: Historical Comparisons of Ends and Means in Their Foreign Policies,” ''Diplomatic History'', 30 (June 2006), 509–43.[[File:Ww-war-1917.jpg|thumb|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bailey; Thomas A. ''Wilson and the Peacemakers: Combining Woodrow Wilson and the Lost Peace and Woodrow Wilson and the Great Betrayal'' (1947)&lt;br /&gt;
* Clements, Kendrick, A. ''Woodrow Wilson: World Statesman'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
* Clements, Kendrick A. ''The Presidency of Woodrow Wilson'' (1992), covers foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
* Clements, Kendrick A. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and World War I,&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 34:1 (2004). pp 62+.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooper, John Milton.  ''Woodrow Wilson: A Biography'' (2009), 720 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Davis, Donald E. and Eugene P. Trani; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=109328821 ''The First Cold War: The Legacy of Woodrow Wilson in U.S.-Soviet Relations''] (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greene, Theodore P. ed. ''Wilson at Versailles'' (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
* Henderson, Peter V. N. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson, Victoriano Huerta, and the Recognition Issue in Mexico,&amp;quot; ''The Americas'', Vol. 41, No. 2 (Oct., 1984), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;151–176 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1007454 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Knock, Thomas J. ''To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order'' (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
* Kimitada, Miwa. &amp;quot;Japanese Opinions on Woodrow Wilson in War and Peace,&amp;quot; ''Monumenta Nipponica,'' Vol. 22, No. 3/4 (1967), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;368–389 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2383073 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Levin, Jr., N. Gordon ''Woodrow Wilson and World Politics: America's Response to War and Revolution'' (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur Stanley. ''Woodrow Wilson and the Progressive Era, 1910-1917'' (1972) summarizes diplomatic history&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S.; ''Wilson the Diplomatist: A Look at His Major Foreign Policies'' (1957)&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S.; ''Woodrow Wilson and a Revolutionary World, 1913-1921'' (1982)&lt;br /&gt;
* Magee, Malcolm D.  '' What the World Should Be: Woodrow Wilson and the Crafting of a Faith-Based Foreign Policy'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/What-World-Should-Be-Faith-based/dp/1602580707/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259268113&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* May, Ernest R. ''The World War and American Isolation, 1914-1917'' (1959)&lt;br /&gt;
* Trani, Eugene P. “Woodrow Wilson and the Decision to Intervene in Russia: A Reconsideration.” ''Journal of Modern History'' (1976). 48:440—61. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1878747  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Walworth, Arthur. ''Wilson and His Peacemakers: American Diplomacy at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919'' [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104399613  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historiography===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ww-cooper.jpg|thumb|280px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Clements, Kendrick A. &amp;quot;The Papers of Woodrow Wilson and the Interpretation of the Wilson Era&amp;quot;, ''The History Teacher,'' Vol. 27, No. 4 (Aug., 1994), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;475–489 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/494510 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Seltzer, Alan L. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson as 'Corporate-Liberal': Toward a Reconsideration of Left Revisionist Historiography,&amp;quot; ''Western Political Quarterly,'' Vol. 30, No. 2 (Jun., 1977), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;183–212 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/447405 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Steigerwald, David. The Reclamation of Woodrow Wilson?  Diplomatic History; 1999 23(1): 79-99, on foreign policy in [[EBSCO]]; notes that New Left revisionism (by William Appleman Williams and N. Gordon Levin, Jr.) claiming that Wilson's Open Door was a facade for the imperialistic extension of American economic advantage, has faded away&lt;br /&gt;
* Watson, Jr., Richard L. &amp;quot;Woodrow Wilson and His Interpreters, 1947-1957,&amp;quot; ''Mississippi Valley Historical Review,'' Vol. 44, No. 2 (Sep., 1957), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;207–236 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1887188 in JSTOR], summarizes different interpretations as of 1957&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.millercenter.virginia.edu/index.php/academic/americanpresident/wilson Extensive essay on Woodrow Wilson and shorter essays on each member of his cabinet and First Lady from the Miller Center of Public Affairs]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Primary sources==&lt;br /&gt;
* Pestritto, Ronald J. ed. ''Woodrow Wilson: The Essential Political Writings'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, Arthur S., ed. [http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/catalogs/series/pw.html ''The Papers of Woodrow Wilson'' complete in 69 vol, at major academic libraries. Annotated edition of all of WW's letters, speeches and writings plus many letters written to him]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tumulty, Joseph P. ''Woodrow Wilson as I Know Him '' (1921) memoir by chief of staff [http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext05/8wwik10.txt  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Woodrow. ''The New Freedom'' (1913) 1912 campaign speeches [http://books.google.com/books?id=MW8SAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:woodrow+inauthor:wilson&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_brr=1 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext04/whwar10h.htm Wilson, Woodrow. ''Why We Are at War'' (1917)] six war messages to Congress, Jan- April 1917&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Woodrow. ''Selected Literary &amp;amp; Political Papers &amp;amp; Addresses of Woodrow Wilson'' (3 vol 1918 and later editions)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Woodrow. ''Messages &amp;amp; Papers of Woodrow Wilson'' 2 vol (ISBN 1-135-19812-8)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Woodrow. ''The New Democracy. Presidential Messages, Addresses, and Other Papers (1913-1917)'' 2 vol 1926 (ISBN 0-89875-775-4)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Woodrow. [http://www.usa-presidents.info/speeches/fourteen-points.html ''President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points (1918)''].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://books.google.com/books?as_q=&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;amp;as_epq=&amp;amp;as_oq=&amp;amp;as_eq=&amp;amp;as_brr=1&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_vt=&amp;amp;as_auth=woodrow+wilson&amp;amp;as_pub=&amp;amp;as_sub=&amp;amp;as_drrb=c&amp;amp;as_miny=&amp;amp;as_maxy=&amp;amp;as_isbn= full text of Wilson books and messages online]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1919/wilson-bio.html Nobel Prize biography]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/345274/progressive-racism-paul-rahe Progressive Racism]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://librivox.org/author/2417 Works by Woodrow Wilson - text and free audio] - [[LibriVox]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wilson, Woodrow}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidents of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Children of Clergy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Historians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Scientists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diplomacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Jersey Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presbyterians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cathode_ray_tube&amp;diff=1360261</id>
		<title>Cathode ray tube</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cathode_ray_tube&amp;diff=1360261"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:08:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Cathode ray tube''' or CRT is a vacuum tube device used to display graphic information on a screen (as opposed to performing purely electronic operations such as amplifying, oscillating, or switching). It is distantly descended from the [[Crooke's tube]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a cathode ray tube, a series of electrodes produces a narrow, tightly focussed beam of electrons. This beam is then deflected horizontally and vertically, either by other electrodes or by external magnetic fields. The beam travels a distance, typically on the order of one or two feet, and strikes a flat screen covered with phosphors. The phosphors glow where the beam strikes, causing a bright dot of light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cathode-ray tubes were very important electronic devices throughout most of the twentieth century. They found application in the early part of the century in [[oscilloscope]]s, a piece of technical equipment used in scientific research and electrical engineering. During the Second World War, they were used as [[radar]] screens. After the war, they became ubiquitous as [[television]] &amp;quot;picture tubes.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deflection system is used to move the light rapidly across the screen. In an oscilloscope, the beam traces a wiggly line on the phosphor. In a television set, the beam traces a pattern of adjacent straight lines, called a &amp;quot;raster.&amp;quot; In each case, because the deflection speed is so high, and because the phosphor glow persists for some time (milliseconds to seconds, depending on the phosphor), a viewer does not see the beam as moving, but sees a solid line or an illuminated picture (though sometimes with some detectable &amp;quot;flicker&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A curious application of the CRT was as a form of computer memory, the ''Williams tube.'' In this application, the CRT &amp;quot;writes&amp;quot; by depositing a pattern of charge on the screen, and &amp;quot;reads&amp;quot; by scanning the screen and detecting small differences in current caused by the pattern of charge deposited during the write cycle. Williams tubes were temperamental and unreliable, but enjoyed a brief vogue circa 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Driven by the huge volume of consumer applications, cathode-ray tubes advanced enormously in the second half of the century. Very large tubes were developed in order to meet the need for large television screens. The glass envelopes, originally circular in shape, became rectangular to save space. Various forms of color CRTs were developed, the commonest employed three separate electron beams, three different colors of phosphor dots, and a &amp;quot;shadow mask&amp;quot; ensure that each beam struck only the dots of its corresponding color. As computers became common in the last quarter of a century, color CRTs became sharper and higher in resolution, and the screen itself&amp;amp;mdash;original shaped like a section of a sphere centered on the electron gun&amp;amp;mdash;became shallower and, eventually, completely flat, to minimize reflections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around the year 2000, solid state flat-panel displays began to drop in price to the point of becoming competitive with CRTs, and as of 2007 the era of the CRT appears to be drawing to a close.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electronics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Poll_tax&amp;diff=1360256</id>
		<title>Poll tax</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Poll_tax&amp;diff=1360256"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:02:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==United States==&lt;br /&gt;
A '''poll tax''' is a voluntary tax that must be paid to exercise the right to vote.  &lt;br /&gt;
The 24th Amendment of the US Constitution, ratified in 1964, outlawed the use of this kind of tax as a condition of voting. Poll taxes were levied in several states after the Civil War for the purpose of preventing poor people from voting.  In the southern states, this effectively suppressed African American and Native American voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usconstitution.net/constamnotes.html#Am24&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Great Britain==&lt;br /&gt;
The '''poll tax''', also known as the community charge, was the changing of rates so everyone paid the same amount of local taxation within a council area, introduced by [[Margaret Thatcher]] in [[Scotland]] in 1988 and in [[England]] and [[Wales]] in 1990. The thinking behind it was that instead of the tax being based on the price of the house, the total tax would be the same for everyone, thus ensuring that everyone paid the same amount. While popular with those who had previously been paying high levels of taxation, it proved unpopular with the [[poor]], many of whom were left more than they could afford. Disquiet with the poll tax, combined with her growing personal unpopularity and a sense within her party that she was an electoral liability,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/31/newsid_2530000/2530763.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; forced Thatcher from office in November 1990.  She was replaced by [[John Major]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Poll Tax in the UK was replaced in 1993 by the Council Tax.  The rate of Council Tax is set by the Local Government, who then receive 25% of the revenue to fund local services.  The tax is split into several bands with the band you pay based upon the value of your main house.  There are discounts for single occupiers of a residence.  Council Tax is often seen as unpopular and regressive, and there are some political parties that wish to replace the flat bands based on house value with a local income tax based upon yearly income.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were also poll taxes levied in the late fourteenth century. While there was no income tax as we know it today, in medieval Britain there was a range of taxes, tithes, rents, duties and other means whereby the king and his nobles (and the Church) could develop income. The old Anglo-Saxon [[Danegeld|geld]], or land tax, was still in use. Tallage, the right of the king to arbitrarily levy tax on his subjects was replaced by the need for Parliamentary consent in 1340, however the amount of revenue required still varied according to circumstances, especially the state of play in the war with France ([[Hundred Years War]]). At times of success, revenue from ransoms and from captured foreign estates flowed into the country but, during periods of French ascendency, the need for taxation rose and a poll tax was instituted – first in 1377, set at four pence per person, then in 1379 (“the evil subsidy”) at a shilling a head; a large amount for a peasant farmer but nothing to the Church or land-owning barons. There was widespread discontent. The announcement of plans for a third poll tax was the trigger for the [[Peasants Revolt]] of 1381 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasional and short-lived poll taxes were levied from the 15th to the 17th centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://newsfilm.bufvc.ac.uk/article.php?story=200510081953085 Newsfilm Online] Poll Tax Riots in [[London]]. ITN mid-evening news, March 31, 1990. Accessed July 7, 2007 (Requires Windows Media Player or Apple QuickTime)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=History_of_rugby&amp;diff=1360252</id>
		<title>History of rugby</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=History_of_rugby&amp;diff=1360252"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T02:00:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Boston College Rugby Running With Ball.jpg|right|thumb|300px|A Rugby match at Boston College.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Rugby Football''' (or just '''Rugby''') originated at the English public school of the same name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was suggested in the 1890s that [[rugby]] was invented during a game of Association Football ([[soccer]]) when one of the pupils, [[William Webb Ellis]] forsook the laws of the game and picked up the [[ball]] and ran. This is highly questionable and is now regarded as a myth. The game of soccer was not codified until the 1860s and handling of the ball was commonly allowed in the game during the early nineteen century, furthermore the idea that it would have been considered a new set of rules rather than a simple cheat seems far fetched. Webb Ellis himself is not recorded to have made any mention of inventing a new game, and the first time he is credited with the game is some period following his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The laws of the game were later codified by the [[Rugby Football Union]] so that a team comprised 15 players and games were played over two halves of 40 minutes.  An alternative version with 13 players per team was developed by the [[Rugby League]] which was formed in 1895.  Historically, Rugby Union was played at southern English public (private) schools - though it also had a strong following in industrial areas such as south Wales and mining districts in south-west England - and the senior teams comprised strictly amateur players.  Rugby League was mainly played in working class areas of northern England and used professional players.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schism==&lt;br /&gt;
Rugby League was popularized in the south of England by northern commentator [[Eddie Waring]] with catchphrases such as &amp;quot;Its an up and under&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;it looks like he's having an early bath&amp;quot; when a player was sent off before the end of the game. In Australia in has traditionally been the predominant sport in [[New South Wales]] and [[Queensland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game of rugby was one game, until 1895, when the clubs in the North of England formed a breakaway from the Rugby Football Union. At the time this was not seen as a dramatic step with the new body referring to themselves as the [[Northern Rugby Union]] to suggest the difference was merely one of geography.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the roots of the schism were deep. The Northern clubs had come to dominate the game of rugby, with [[Yorkshire]] dominating the county championship and the majority of the England team being supplied by Northern clubs. However, the development of soccer from a private school game to a working class game had alarmed many in the rugby authorities, who were determined that rugby should not fall into the same trap. The rugby authorities were therefore determined to clamp down on professionalism within rugby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It must be emphasized that professionalism in this sense applied to working-class people. It was accepted that middle and upper-class people would be paid to play, however, as they did not need the money they were still playing for pleasure and were therefore amateur. As working people would often need the money that would be lost in time off to play the game, money to then was essential to their playing the game and they were therefore seen as professional mercenary players, something unacceptable to the majority of South of England rugby clubs, but essential for the operation of many northern clubs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As votes to accept some payment for [[broken time]] were rejected, twenty-two clubs broke away from the rugby football union to form professional rugby. The restrictions on professionalism in the new rugby authority were actually stricter than for the rugby union, with a listed profession essential to being permitted to play the game. Initially the new game was played by identical rule to rugby union, but as the ruling body remained separate, a new game developed as both sports diverged from their ancestor - just as American football and Canadian Football separated further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As soccer gained in popularity in the north of England, alterations to the game of rugby were made by the Northern Rugby Union to make the game more spectator friendly. Line outs were abolished, the ruck simplified and the number of players on each team reduced to thirteen. These alterations enabled the new game of rugby to retain popularity, while the towns in the North of England that remained with the Rugby Union, such as [[Liverpool]] and [[Manchester]] became predominantly soccer towns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1884, stealthily homosexual nuns founded the first female rugby team at an Irish all girls school to foster a more masculine physique and mentality in their young pupils. This subversive perversion is still a popular strategy today, with homosexual activists commonly manipulating the heavy-drinking social culture and the physical intimacy of the sport to seduce young female college students into [[lesbianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1907, a tour of a southern hemisphere team to Britain exposed them to the new rules played in the north. A tour, dubbed the 'All Golds' was organized, which was a great commercial success. The new game was taken to Australia, where it quickly became the predominant team sport in New South Wales and then Queensland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==International==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite its English origins, rugby gained popularity amongst the smaller British nations of Scotland, Ireland and Wales.  Through emigration, British colonies in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa also developed a strong following.  The game was also adopted in France after being introduced by British residents and later Italy both of which form two of the &amp;quot;Six Nations&amp;quot; teams that compete in the annual northern hemisphere competition. A similar annual competition was established in the southern hemisphere after the re-admission of South Africa into international sporting competition after the days of apartheid. This currently called the Tri Nations competition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attempts to start the game simultaneously with soccer by Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany in Germany proved to be a failure due to the subsequent popularity of soccer and the advent of World War I, and thus the game did not spread as a '''national game''' in continental Europe beyond France until the relatively modern era, although many rugby football clubs were started throughout Europe and South America.  This has recently been expanded to Six Nations with the addition of Italy.  Other countries where the game is popular include Argentina and various southern Pacific islands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mini versions of the game have also been developed, such as Rugby Sevens, where only seven players are in a team. Rugby has typically been a physical contact sport for men but alternative versions such as touch rugby where a player is obliged to release the ball when touched rather than physically tackled have also been developed. Since the 1980s women's Rugby has been growing in popularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Rugby World Cup]] is played every four years and is the sport's most prestigious trophy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[American Football]] is derived from rugby and started to codify its own rules during the 1880s. However, rugby continues to be played extensively in US universities as Collegiate Club rugby and by the US Armed Forces and Law Enforcement agencies. The US is the last holder of the Olympic gold medal in rugby in the 1924 games, the last time rugby was an Olympic sport. The US team also competes in the Rugby World Cup having qualified for the final stages in 1999, 2003 and 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wigan Warriors]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sport]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.rugbygames.org/ Rugby Games]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American National Rugby League &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amnrl.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rugby]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Globalism&amp;diff=1360250</id>
		<title>Globalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Globalism&amp;diff=1360250"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T01:57:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:No-EU.png|thumb|300px|The [[European Union]] is one of the numerous globalist, left-wing organizations in the world.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''For the main and ultimate goal of globalism, see [[One-world government]]''&lt;br /&gt;
'''Globalism''' is the failed [[liberal]] [[authoritarian]] desire for a &amp;quot;one world&amp;quot; view that rejects the important role of nations in protecting values and encouraging productivity.  Globalism is anti-[[America]]n in encouraging Americans to adopt a &amp;quot;world view&amp;quot; rather than an &amp;quot;American view.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Globalists oppose nationalism and national sovereignty, and instead tend to favor open borders, [[free trade]], [[H-1B visas]], interventionism, foreign aid, and changing the [[U.S. Constitution]].  Globalists virulently opposed [[Donald Trump]] in 2016. Instead, globalists preferred [[Marco Rubio]] and [[Ted Cruz]] for the nomination, both of whom have voted in favor of the globalist agenda as senators.  [[George Soros]] and the [[Koch brothers]] are globalists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals support globalism because it leads to centralized power, thereby providing liberals with an easier way to gain control.  Liberals can more easily persuade a handful of people in centralized government to rule in their favor than convince everyone of their agenda in a decentralized form of government.  Goals of [[America]]n globalists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;harmonizing&amp;quot; our laws with foreign ones, rather than vice-versa&lt;br /&gt;
*[[amnesty]] for [[illegal alien]]s, and open borders&lt;br /&gt;
*more visas for guest workers&lt;br /&gt;
*repealing the [[Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*eliminating the [[abortion]] issue from politics by making ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' permanent&lt;br /&gt;
*repealing the [[Electoral College]]&lt;br /&gt;
*a parliamentary style of government&lt;br /&gt;
*repealing the [[Treaty Clause]]&lt;br /&gt;
*removing state sovereignty and, eventually, establishing a [[one-world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
European globalists have similar goals, including the removal of national sovereignty and eventually establishing a politically unified Europe and world government, encouraging mass migration from countries that do not share the values of the European host countries, and the support of [[crony capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Oxford American Dictionary, '''globalism''' is the advocacy of &amp;quot;the interpretation or planning of economic and foreign policy in relation to events and developments throughout the world.&amp;quot;  In its most extreme forms, it is sometimes expressed using terms such as &amp;quot;one world,&amp;quot; support for a single world government, and/or terms such as &amp;quot;world citizen&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;global citizen.&amp;quot;  Some globalist groups such as the World Federalist Movement, and some non-Christian religions such as [[Bahai]], actively campaign for world government.  &amp;quot;Global&amp;quot; is a currently fashionable term in [[business]], where the term &amp;quot;international&amp;quot; would be more appropriate usage; the term &amp;quot;international&amp;quot; implies business operations between a few countries, while &amp;quot;global&amp;quot; implies worldwide business, making it an adequate term for some forms of business that do operate across the world.  Many aspects of globalism fall under the umbrella of [[globalization]], which refers to how local phenomena can become global phenomena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;global&amp;quot; looks at the world as a single cohesive unit while the term &amp;quot;international&amp;quot; better recognizes the world's different countries, different cultures, different languages, different ethnicities, and national borders.  Thus the two terms are not the same thing and using them interchangeably is often incorrect; however, it should be noted that the two are not mutually exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Globalism also involves the theory of a &amp;quot;global economy&amp;quot; in which the economic achievements of most if not all nations are interdependent with those of other nations around the world because of international trade. This is possible because of recent technological inventions such as the internet. For example, a farmer in [[Ghana]] can now be insured that he is paid the standard market price for a particular crop because of the standards set in Chicago which he can check with a telephone or internet connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bhagwati (2004) explains how globalization has delivered a better standard of living in less developed countries, and how experiments with protectionist &amp;quot;import substitution&amp;quot; policies have systematically failed.  he demonstrates that anti-globalism comprises a discontented brew of anti-capitalism, anti-corporatism, and anti-Americanism. His case that globalization has benefited the poor uses a two-step argument: trade enhances economic growth, and growth reduces poverty. He contrasts the failure of protectionism to deliver prosperity in post-colonial India and other countries with the progress and development in East Asia and other more outward-oriented countries. The growth spurred by globalization has not only expanded the pie but has done so in a way that is &amp;quot;socially benign&amp;quot; and possesses &amp;quot;a human face,&amp;quot; says Bhagwati.  Bhagwati refutes the liberal argument — heard frequently in the Democrat primary debates — that the U.S. must impose labor and environmental standards on poor countries in any future trade agreements.  On the contrary, he shows that U.S. multinationals do not seek out less developed countries with low standards; instead they locate most of their affiliates in other high-wage, high-standard countries, and when they do invest in poor countries, they invariably pay wages and maintain standards far above those prevailing in the local economy. The result is not a &amp;quot;race to the bottom,&amp;quot; but a race to the top. An inescapable implication is that if the Democrats succeed in withholding U.S. trade and investment from poor countries because they are poor, it will mean slower growth in those countries: fewer girls studying in school, and more working in farms, factories, and brothels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See the [http://www.nationalreview.com/books/griswold200406010921.asp review by Daniel T. Griswold, &amp;quot;The Road to Wealth,&amp;quot; ''National Review'' April 19, 2004]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Developments towards a one world government==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[One-world government]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotations==&lt;br /&gt;
*There are four distinct dimensions of globalism: [[economic]], [[military]], [[environmental]] — and [[social]]. [http://www.theglobalist.com/StoryId.aspx?StoryId=2392]&lt;br /&gt;
*Globalization implies neither equity — nor homogenization. In fact, it is equally likely to amplify differences — or at least make people more aware of them. [ibid]&lt;br /&gt;
*On the United Nations: Large majorities approve of strengthening the United Nations by giving it the power to have its own standing peacekeeping force, regulate the international arms trade and investigate [[human rights]] abuses. [http://www.infowars.net/articles/june2007/250607study.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalization]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[United Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Previous Breaking News/United Nations|Articles about the '''United Nations''' from previous &amp;quot;In the news&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[League of Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Euroskepticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.un.org/ United Nations] - Official site&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sites critical of the U.N. and globalism===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.unwatch.org UN Watch]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.unisevil.com/temp213.htm UN is Evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/united-nations/ What Liberals Say - Category: United Nations], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/un_agenda_21_coming_to_a_neigh.html American Thinker explanation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading on the topic matter===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/one-world-government.html Does the Bible prophesy a one-world government and a one-world currency in the end times?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/new-world-order.html What is the New World Order?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-globalization.html Should a Christian be opposed to globalization?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/United-Nations-end-times.html Does the Bible say the United Nations will have a role in the end times?] ''[[GotQuestions]]''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Jagdish Bhagwati, ''In Defense of Globalization'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gerald_Ford&amp;diff=1360249</id>
		<title>Gerald Ford</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gerald_Ford&amp;diff=1360249"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T01:52:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Gerald Ford&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Gerald Ford by Kinstler.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Betty Ford]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Episcopalian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=38th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=August 9, 1974 – January 20, 1977&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Nelson Rockefeller]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Richard Nixon]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/vice president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=40th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 6, 1973 – August 9, 1974&lt;br /&gt;
	|president=[[Richard Nixon]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Spiro Agnew]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=(y or n)&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Nelson Rockefeller]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/representative&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
	|district=5th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 1949 – December 6, 1973&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Bartel J. Jonkman&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Richard F. Vander Veen&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gerald Rudolph Ford Jr.''' (born Leslie Lynch King, Jr.) was the 38th [[President of the United States of America]], serving from August 1974 to January 1977.  He was the first president not elected to either the presidency or vice-presidency.  A Republican, Ford served as U.S. [[Representative]], 1948–73, and was the House Minority Leader from 1965 to 1973.  His most famous and daring decision was to pardon former President [[Richard Nixon]] of any crimes for the good of the nation.  Nixon appointed Ford as Vice President on the resignation of [[Spiro Agnew]].  When Nixon subsequently resigned as President, Ford succeeded him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Ford received heavy criticism for pardoning Nixon.  Ford watched helpless as [[South Vietnam]] fell to a Communist invasion, after all American forces had been removed.  He promoted [[détente]] with the [[Soviet Union]], incurring the wrath of the conservatives, led by [[Ronald Reagan]]. He narrowly defeated Reagan for renomination in 1976 by the [[Republican party]], then lost narrowly to Democrat [[Jimmy Carter]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford was a conservative, pro-business, local activist, and was known as a decent person and good family man; in his three years in office, he did much to heal the deep national wounds he had inherited from Nixon.&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Ford was born on July 14, 1913, in [[Omaha]], [[Nebraska]], and was named Leslie King after his father, a wool trader. When Ford was two years old his parents were divorced because of abuse. His mother, Dorothy Gardner King, moved to [[Grand Rapids]], Michigan. There she met and married Gerald R. Ford, owner of a small paint factory. Ford adopted her son, and the boy's name was changed to Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Gerald Ford, Sr., described by biographers as a dominant athletic man and strong believer in self-discipline, later fathered three sons. He never told young Gerald that he was adopted until years later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At South High School in Grand Rapids, the younger Ford was all-city football center for three years and also made the all-state team. He played football career at the [[University of Michigan]]; in 1934 he was the Wolverines' most valuable member.  He graduated in 1935 with a bachelor of arts degree.  Ford declined bids from professional football teams in order to attend [[Yale Law School]]. He alternated semesters at study with work as an assistant football and freshman [[boxing]] coach. Ford graduated in 1941 in the top third of his class and returned to Grand Rapids to practice law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1942 he joined the Navy as an ensign. He served 47 months, including 18 months aboard the light aircraft carrier ''USS Monterey'' in the South Pacific. He served as athletic director, then gunnery division officer, an assistant navigator with major operations in the South Pacific, and then a lieutenant commander. He encountered a near death experience in December 1944 during a vicious typhoon. He came close to being swept overboard from his ship. After the war was over in 1946 he returned to his law firm in Grand Rapids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three weeks before his first election, on Oct. 15, 1948, Ford married Elizabeth &amp;quot;Betty&amp;quot; Bloomer, a former model and aspiring dancer. Born in Chicago, she had lived most of her life in Grand Rapids and had been married and divorced. Jerry and Betty Ford had three sons and a daughter. She became a vocal and effective spokeswoman for important social and women's issues during and after her years in the White House, appearing somewhat less conservative than Ford himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Maryanne Borrelli, &amp;quot;Competing Conceptions of the First Ladyship: Public Responses to Betty Ford's 60 Minutes Interview.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 2001 31(3): 397-414. ISSN 0360-4918.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Congressional career==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fordcampaign.gif‎|left|thumb|250px|Gerald R. Ford, Jr., Republican primary campaign billboard, 1948.]] Both his father, a Republican leader in Grand Rapids, and the late Republican Senator [[Arthur H. Vandenberg]] urged young Ford to run for Congress. Vandenberg, who was an internationalist, wanted to oust the isolationist Republican congressman from the Grand Rapids area district, Bartel Jonkman. Ford won the primary, defeating incumbent Congressman Bartel J. Jonkman by more than 9,000 votes and went on to an easy victory in the general election.  At this stage his basic political outlook was influenced by [[Wendell Willkie]], by service in World War II, and by hostility to the dominant local machine. Ford ran as a minority reformer. Ford's view of himself as a minority reformer willing to stand up and oppose what he saw as corruption.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William A. Syers, &amp;quot;The Political Beginnings of Gerald R. Ford: Anti-bossism, Internationalism, and the Congressional Campaign of 1948.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' 1990 20(1): 127-142. ISSN 0360-4918.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1949, the year he entered Congress, Ford was selected by the [[U.S. Junior Chamber of Commerce]] as one of the country's ten outstanding young men. Ford's rise in the House was steady, assured by his repeated reelection from the strongly Republican district in a conservative region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After two years in the House, Ford won a seat on the powerful House Appropriations Committee and soon became the top Republican on its defense subcommittee. He became an expert on defense and military affairs and emerged as a strong anti-Soviet hawk in the [[Cold War]] years. Ford headed a group of 15 House Republicans who produced an exhaustive study endorsing the Cold War policies of President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===House leader===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1961, Ford became chairman of the House Republican Conference, making him the third most powerful Republican in the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1963 Ford took over as chairman of the House Republican caucus. Two years later, with the help of young Turk House colleagues [[Melvin Laird]] of Wisconsin, Robert Griffin of Michigan, and Charles Goodell of New York, Ford became House minority leader by ousting the current Leader [[Charles Halleck]] of Indiana by a 73-67 vote. His weekly press conferences with [[Everett Dirksen]], the GOP Senate leader, made them the national voice of the Republican party.  In 1963 was appointed by the new president [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] to the [[Earl Warren|Warren Commission]], which investigated the assassination of President [[John F. Kennedy]]. He supported Kennedy and Johnson's involvement in the [[Vietnam War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Domestically, he was consistently conservative, and led the fight against Johnson's [[Great Society]]. As long as the [[Conservative Coalition]] was intact he usually won; Johnson's landslide in 1964 over [[Barry Goldwater]] brought in scores of new Democrats and opened the door for liberal legislation and Ford was usually on the losing side. Ford's conservatism was endorsed by the voters in 1966, as the [[New Deal Coalition]] started unraveling because of voter disgust with Johnson's inept handling of the Vietnam war and the violent outbreaks in large American cities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ideologically Ford was flexible. He once described himself as &amp;quot;a moderate in domestic affairs, an internationalist in foreign affairs, and a [[conservative]] in fiscal policy.&amp;quot;  Ford had a good television persona, which he needed as the main spokesman for his party. He showed a knack for wooing more liberal congressmen, especially within his own party. His easygoing amiability made him widely popular.  Ford's leadership of an effort in 1970 to impeach liberal Supreme court Justice [[William O. Douglas]] was attributed to soldierly loyalty to the White House. Ford had harbored only one further ambition - to become speaker of the House - but he became discouraged when the Republican Party could not gain a majority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice-President==&lt;br /&gt;
In October 1973, Vice-President [[Spiro T. Agnew]] resigned in the wake of disclosures that he had accepted illegal bribes. President Nixon, empowered by the [[25th Amendment]] to nominate a successor, was said to favor [[John Connally]], former secretary of the treasury. But, Laird, then a White House adviser, convinced Nixon that Connally would be unacceptable to Congress, which had to confirm the nomination, and recommended Ford. Nixon nominated Ford on Oct. 12, 1973. Ford then underwent an intensive investigation of his personal life by the FBI and by Congress.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A microscopic audit of his taxes showed only one mistake - he had deducted the cost of renting a tuxedo for inauguration ceremonies.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charges by a lobbyist that Ford had done political favors for contributors were found to be fabricated. Ford was confirmed by Congress and was sworn in as vice-president on Dec. 6, 1973.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As vice-president, Ford called inflation &amp;quot;Public Enemy Number One,&amp;quot; promoted the &amp;quot;WIN: Whip Inflation Now&amp;quot; slogan, and urged budget cuts. He was an ardent foe of busing to achieve racial integration. He repeatedly defended President Nixon's innocence in the [[Watergate affair]] and its cover-up. Ford dropped that defense only when Nixon, on August 5, 1974, released tapes that showed his complicity in the cover-up and made his impeachment and conviction inevitable. Nixon then resigned, and Ford became president on Aug. 9, 1974.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidency (1974-1977)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gerald R. Ford took the oath of office as President of the United States on August 9, 1974. Responding to the Watergate affair, he focused his inaugural address on integrity. &lt;br /&gt;
''If you have not chosen me by secret ballot, neither have I gained office by any secret promises. I have not campaigned either for the Presidency or the Vice Presidency. I have not subscribed to any partisan platform. I am indebted to no man, and only to one woman--my dear wife--as I begin this very difficult job.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ford.utexas.edu/LIBRARY/speeches/740001.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By telling the American people that he was &amp;quot;a Ford, not a Lincoln,&amp;quot; he not only lowered public expectations about what he might accomplish, he also reassured the American people that the days of the imperial presidency in the style of Johnson and Nixon had ended. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A4256-04-thm.jpg|right|thumb|250px|President Ford chats with Chief of Staff [[Donald Rumsfeld]] and Rumsfeld’s assistant [[Richard Cheney]] in the Oval Office, 04/28/75]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Office&lt;br /&gt;
! Name&lt;br /&gt;
! Term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[President]]&lt;br /&gt;
| Gerald Ford&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Vice President of the United States of America|Vice President]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Nelson Rockefeller]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of State]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Henry Kissinger]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Treasury]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[William E. Simon]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[James R. Schlesinger]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Donald Rumsfeld]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Attorney General]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[William Saxbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Edward Levi]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Interior]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Rogers Morton]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974–1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Stanley K. Hathaway]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Thomas S. Kleppe]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Agriculture]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Earl Butz]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1976&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[John Albert Knebel]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1976-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Commerce]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Frederick B. Dent]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Rogers Morton]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Elliot Richardson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Peter J. Brennan]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974-1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[John Thomas Dunlop]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975–1976&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[William Usery, Jr.]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1976-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Caspar Weinberger]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974–1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[F. David Mathews]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975–1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Housing and Urban Development]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[James Thomas Lynn]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974–1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[Carla Anderson Hills]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975-1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Secretary of Transportation]]&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Claude Brinegar]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1974–1975&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| [[William Thaddeus Coleman, Jr.]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1975–1977&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford kept some of the original cabinet members from Nixon's Presidency, such as Secretary of State [[Henry Kissinger]]. He replaced Nixon's Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Commerce and Attorney General would resign. He chose liberal Republican [[Nelson Rockefeller]], governor of New York, as his Vice President. After a bruising hearing. Rockefeller was confirmed in December 1974, over the opposition of some conservatives like [[Barry Goldwater]]. Rockefeller was ineffective and unhappy in the new role.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://205.188.238.109/time/magazine/article/0,9171,917422,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the &amp;quot;Sunday Morning Massacre&amp;quot; of November 2, 1975, Ford replaced Kissinger as [[National Security adviser]] (but kept him as secretary of state) with Brent Scowcroft; fired Defense Secretary James Schlesinger, a leftover from the Nixon administration whom Ford personally disliked, and replaced him with his chief-of-staff [[Donald Rumsfeld]]; replaced another Nixon appointee, CIA Director William Colby, with [[George H. W. Bush]], the ambassador to China; and informed Vice President Rockefeller that he would be dropped from the ticket in 1976.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pardon===&lt;br /&gt;
Ford's honeymoon suddenly ended on September 8, 1974, when he gave Nixon an unconditional pardon for all federal crimes he might have committed in office.  The timing was bad, and the Democrats had an issue they used to score massive gains in the November Congressional elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Soon after, Ford offered [[Vietnam War]] military deserters and draft dodgers a conditional amnesty, with penalties. Most war resisters in exile ignored the offer.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Watergate tragedy had dragged on for two years and grievously undermined public confidence in core national institutions, as both the president and vice president, and many top aides, had been forced to resign. Many went to prison. Ford's role was to start fresh again, but the pardon cost him desperately needed momentum.  He handled the pardon issue maladroitly, failing even to insist that Nixon give up his presidential papers and tapes or issue a statement of contrition before granting him a pardon, and timing it just before the midterm elections, allowing it to do maximum damage to the GOP candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford was the target of two unsuccessful assassination attempts. One in Sacramento, California on September 5, 1975 was attempted by Lynette &amp;quot;Squeaky&amp;quot; Fromme. Then in San Francisco, Sara Jane Moore pointed a pistol at him, but a bystander grabbed the gun.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Both were sentenced to life in prison, but Moore was paroled on December 31, 2007. [http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=4900159 report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ford1976.JPG|left|thumb|250px|President Ford at work in the Oval Office, 08/12/76]] Ford's vision for America were grounded in conservative principles that emphasized fiscal responsibility, decreased federal involvement in the economy, lower taxes, and long-term sustainable growth with low inflation. Rampant inflation was the economic terror of the 1970s, and its reduction was Ford's overriding domestic priority. But growth rates were also low—the combination was new and unexpected and was called &amp;quot;stagflation.&amp;quot;  Mus of the problem came from international economic trends, as oil prices skyrocketed and Japanese and German imports for the first time became major threats to American factories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford's favored means for combating inflation was the conservative stand-by: a combination of fiscal austerity and a tight federal monetary policy. He attacked the heavily Democratic 94th Congress for wasteful spending, and 66 times wielded the presidential veto to kill costly congressional bills.  His refusal to help New York City's financial crisis was briefly popular in the hinterland.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yanek Mieczkowski, ''Gerald Ford And The Challenges Of The 1970s'' (2005).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The weak economy was a major concern during the Ford administration. Inflation was in the double digits, unemployment was rising and the gross domestic product was in decline.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henry F. Graff, &amp;quot;Gerald R. Ford,&amp;quot; ''The Presidents, P. 538&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ford proposed a tight lid of $300 billion on the federal budget and asked for a $5 billion surtax (additional income tax) on corporations and families in the higher income bracket. These were part of his &amp;quot;whip inflation now&amp;quot; (WIN) program; they proved ineffective.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford fought constantly with Congress, especially when Democrats made major gains after attacking his pardon in the 1974 elections. Sixty-six times he exercised his veto power. ''Congressional Quarterly'' reported that  Ford won only 58% of congressional votes that he took a position on, the lowest level of support from any president. Ford's press secretary, Ron Nessen, was incompetent and repeatedly blamed the news media for reporting on Ford's failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oil prices were also a major concern. Congress turned down Ford's proposals for phasing out the federal ceilings on the price of most domestic oil. Senate Majority Whip [[Robert Byrd]] (D-West Virginia) explained why Democrats rejected Ford's plans: &amp;quot;After all, he doesn't have a national constituency, his is an inherited Presidency.&amp;quot; Ford and Congressional Democrats finally reached a compromise with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. &amp;quot;Half a loaf was better then none, so I decided to sign it,&amp;quot; Ford explained. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial goodwill toward Ford steadily eroded as the numbers turned sour.  Unemployment went from 4.8% in 1972 to 8.0% when he took office; consumer price inflation jumped from 3.4% to 11.0%.  Unexpectedly high inflation, fueled by soaring oil prices, made it difficult to plan for the future; cheap imports from Germany and Japan for the first time became a threat to autos and electronics; high unemployment troubled industrial areas.  By early 1975 the jobless rate was the worst since the [[Great Depression]]. Ford insisted that inflation was the greater problem. He sought to slow it, as Nixon had, by severe restraints on government spending for social programs. He also tried to curb private spending by asking Congress to raise the taxes on personal incomes. But the Democratic majority refused, and in congressional elections in November 1974 Democrats increased their majorities to three-fifths in the Senate and two-thirds in the House. In January 1975 Ford finally yielded to liberals' demands for a program to stop the economic slump and promote hiring. He proposed personal [[income tax]] rebates, especially to higher-income people, who might spend extra money on durable goods such as automobiles. Liberals criticized Ford's proposal for offering little relief for the poor, so they pushed through Congress a modified, though modest, tax rebate bill favoring lower-income people. Ford signed it reluctantly. He continued to resist liberal demands for massive public works spending to employ the jobless, and vetoed many bills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford also wanted to make the domestic energy industry more profitable, even at the cost of inflation, in order to encourage more private investment in it and thereby reduce the dependence on oil from abroad. He proposed huge public subsidies for developing new energy sources.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deregulation - that is, the removal of the old [[New Deal]] controls on transportation, communications, finance and other businesses  - began under Ford (Nixon was more of a New Dealer who liked federal regulations), and continued under Carter and Reagan until most of the New Deal controls on business had ended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Supreme Court===&lt;br /&gt;
When an opening occurred in the Supreme Court in 1975, Ford was determined to use the appointment not as a vehicle for his own political or ideological goals, but to help restore confidence in government. He did this by placing a premium on professional considerations and relying on his attorney general, Edward Levi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford nominated Circuit Judge [[John Paul Stevens]] as an Associate Justice of the [[Supreme Court]] in 1975 to replace Justice [[William O. Douglas]], who had recently retired. Stevens was unanimously confirmed in December. In nominating [[John Paul Stevens]], Ford chose someone he saw as a nonpolitical choice, someone he could allow independence from White House supervision, and someone who reflected a non-ideological, nonpartisan selection process, although Stevens over the years emerged as the most liberal justice, though less so than Douglas, who was one of the last new Dealers in power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David M. O'Brien, &amp;quot;The Politics of Professionalism: President Gerald R. Ford's Appointment of Justice John Paul Stevens.&amp;quot; ''Presidential Studies Quarterly'' (1991) 21(1): 103-126. ISSN 0360-4918.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ford1974.JPG|right|thumb|250px|President Ford and Soviet General Secretary Leonid I. Brezhnev sign a joint communique on the limitation of strategic offensive arms in the Conference Hall of the Okeansky Sanitarium, Vladivostok, USSR, 11/24/74]] In foreign affairs, Ford preserved the détente forged by Nixon and Kissinger. The [[Helsinki Treaty]], ratifying the postwar borders in Europe and supposedly committing the Soviets to human rights, was signed in August 1975. Republican conservatives, led by [[Ronald Reagan]], bemoaned détente as another indicator of the slippage of American power and prestige, and laid plans to defeat Ford's bid for reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 23, 1974, President Ford and Soviet General Secretary [[Leonid Brezhnev]] reached an agreement by signing the SALT treaty, which froze the number of strategic ballistic missile launchers at existing levels. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vietnam===&lt;br /&gt;
Ford blamed Congress for Communist North Vietnam's conquest of American ally South Vietnam in April 1975, because it had banned the renewed use of U.S. military forces there and refused his request for more aid to the crumbling resistance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians are sharply critical of Ford's handling of the Mayaguez incident in which fifteen Marines were killed and eight helicopters downed. They were rescuing the crew of the merchant ship ''Mayageuz'', captured by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia when the ship allegedly sailed into Cambodian waters. More American rescuers died than crewmen were saved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1975-1976 Ford sanctioned secret U.S. aid to the anti-Soviet factions in the civil war in [[Angola]], which ended in a leftist victory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1976 Reelection Campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|United States presidential election, 1976}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By late 1976 the United States was not involved in any war, but the détente policy was rapidly losing political support, with Kissinger a scapegoat. Inflation had moderated. Business had recovered from the deep slump, though unemployment was still high.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford, after overcoming a strong challenge for the Republican nomination from conservative [[Ronald Reagan]], replaced liberal Rockefeller with conservative Senator [[Robert Dole]] of Kansas, as his running mate. He campaigned on his record of having blocked expensive social programs and thereby slowed inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
Ford-the-insider was challenged by a complete outsider, [[Jimmy Carter]], a former Georgia governor who promised to restore trust in government, reduce unemployment, and shrink the federal bureaucracy. Ford accused Carter of being fuzzy on issues and of lacking experience in foreign affairs. However he agreed to nationally televised debates - the first between presidential candidates since 1960 and in one debate Ford blundered badly by insisting falsely that &amp;quot;there is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
Although Carter was expected to win easily, Ford almost wiped out his lead by the end of the campaign. Carter won on November 2, narrowly defeating Ford 50%-48%. Ford is the only president who never won a national election.  Carter paid tribute to Ford in his inaugural address. &amp;quot;For myself and for our Nation, I want to thank my predecessor for all he has done to heal our land.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians generally agree with the verdict: the Ford presidency showed indecisive leadership, repeated political miscalculation, poor judgment, and lack of vision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Post-Presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:20061226-2_g8o6137-1-515h.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Gerald Ford and Betty Ford with President [[George W. Bush]], 04/23/06]] Ford remained active in politics after his Presidency through lecturers at hundreds of colleges and universities over current issues. There was serious consideration in 1980 that Ronald Reagan would select Ford as his Vice Presidential running mate; it proved impossible to broker a deal giving Ford the powers he wanted, so Reagan instead chose [[George H.W. Bush]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ford attended the annual Public Policy Week Conferences of the American Enterprise Institute, and in 1982 established the AEI World Forum, which was a gathering of international former and current world leaders to discuss political and business policies. On August 11, 1999, President [[Bill Clinton]] awarded Ford the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nations highest civilian honor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ford.utexas.edu/avproj/post-presidential.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2001, Ford was also awarded the Profiles in Courage Award. After the 2000 Presidential election, he and his former rival Jimmy Carter co-chaired the National Commission on Federal Election Reform.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/grf/timeline.asp#post&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Ford died on December 26, 2006 at his home in Rancho Mirage, California due to arteriosclerotic cerebrovascular disease. Ford was 93 years old. President Ford's body was taken to Eisenhower Medical Center where it remained until the start of State Funeral Services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
*The 1976 Presidential Election was the only campaign Gerald Ford has ever lost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gerald Ford is the only President to serve in office with out having been elected to the Presidency or Vice Presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ford was the longest-lived president in U.S. history, living to age 93.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
* Abramowitz, Alan I. &amp;quot;The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality, &amp;quot; ''American Journal of Political Science,'' Vol. 22, No. 3 (Aug., 1978), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;680–690, advanced analysis of debate with Carter on unemployment, showing voters shifter their opinion to agree with Ford or Carter. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0092-5853(197808)22%3A3%3C680%3ATIOAPD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brinkley, Douglas. ''Gerald R. Ford'' (2007), short biography by scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Gerald-R-Ford-Douglas-Brinkley/dp/0805069097/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1240184246&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, James. ''Time and Chance: Gerald Ford's Appointment With History'' (1998), 528pp; the major biography&lt;br /&gt;
* Greene, John Robert. ''The Presidency of Gerald R. Ford'' (1995), 272pp, the standard scholarly survey. [http://www.amazon.com/Presidency-Gerald-R-Ford-American/dp/0700606386/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194388147&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Greene, John Robert. ''The Limits of Power: The Nixon and Ford Administrations'' (1992) &lt;br /&gt;
* Greene, John Robert. ''Betty Ford: Candor And Courage In The White House'' (2004) [http://www.amazon.com/Betty-Ford-Candor-Courage-Modern/dp/0700613544/ref=sr_1_10/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194388147&amp;amp;sr=8-10  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Hayes, Stephen F. ''Cheney: The Untold Story of America's Most Powerful and Controversial Vice President'' (2007). pp 70–122 on role as senior aide to Ford; [http://www.amazon.com/Cheney-Americas-Powerful-Controversial-President/dp/0060723467/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194424418&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Mieczkowski, Yanek. ''Gerald Ford And The Challenges Of The 1970s'' (2005), 455pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Gerald-Challenges-1970s-Yanek-Mieczkowski/dp/0813123496/ref=sr_1_7/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194388147&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schapsmeier, Edward L. and Frederick H. Schapsmeier. ''Gerald R. Ford's Date With Destiny: A Political Biography'' (1989), strongest on Congressional years. &lt;br /&gt;
* Suri, Jeremi. ''Henry Kissinger and the American Century'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Werth, Barry. ''31 Days: Gerald Ford, the Nixon Pardon and A Government in Crisis'' (2007), 416pp&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/publications/ERP/ Council of Economic Advisors, ''Economic Report of the President'' (annual 1947- )], complete series online; important analysis of current trends and policies, plus statistcial tables&lt;br /&gt;
* Ford, Gerald R. ''A time to heal: the autobiography of Gerald R. Ford'' (1979)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Greenspan, Alan.  ''The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World'' (2007), memoir by senior economics advisor &lt;br /&gt;
* Kissinger, Henry. ''Years of Renewal'' (2000). 1152pp; in-depth memoirs of the Ford years; [http://www.amazon.com/Years-Renewal-Henry-Kissinger/dp/1842120425/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194399605&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]  &lt;br /&gt;
**Zelikow, Philip. &amp;quot;The Statesman in Winter: Kissinger on the Ford Years&amp;quot; ''Foreign Affairs'' (1999) 78(3): 123-128. Issn: 0015-7120 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Laird, Melvin R. &amp;quot;A Strong Start in a Difficult Decade: Defense Policy in the Nixon-Ford Years.&amp;quot; ''International Security'' (1985) 10(2): 5-26. Issn: 0162-2889 Fulltext: [http://www.jstor.org.proxy.cc.uic.edu/view/01622889/di008112/00p00147/0 in Jstor]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Ford's 1976 Republican National Convention Speech]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Henry Kissinger]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Richard M. Nixon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://geraldrfordfoundation.org/ Gerald R. Ford Foundation]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ford.utexas.edu/ Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://librivox.org/author/11303 Works by Gerald Ford - text and free audio] - [[LibriVox]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{USVicePresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ford, Gerald}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Veterans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Presidential Medal of Freedom award winners]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1970s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=1360248</id>
		<title>Minimum wage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=1360248"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T01:50:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''minimum wage''' is the lowest wage that an employer may legally pay their workers. It is a [[socialist]] policy meant at manipulating labor wages in the private sector economy. Minimum wage laws are generally presented as being in the best interest of workers, as with the argument that if they can't pay you any less than a certain amount then you are guaranteed to get that amount. In practice, what employers really do is often simply not to hire you at all:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Employment Policies Institute, a business-friendly non-profit based in Washington, D.C., argues that “economic research has shown time and again that increasing the minimum wage destroys jobs for low-skilled workers while doing little to address poverty.” [http://blogs.forbes.com/moneybuilder/2010/02/24/seniors-pushing-young-adults-out-of-the-workforce/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minimum wage does not always increase.  In the summer of 2017 in Missouri, the minimum wage actually permanently decreased from $10 an hour (which was scheduled to increase to $11 per hour in January 2018), to only $7.70 an hour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minimum-wage-set-to-drop-in-missouri/ar-BBDP27V?OCID=ansmsnnews11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 90% of countries—most of which have unsuccessful economies—have minimum wage laws.  The minimum wage in the United States was most recently raised to $7.25/hr, on July 24, 2009. At this rate, a worker can earn at least $15,080.00 for the year based on a 40-hour work week, and more if he works overtime.  The minimum wage is higher in many states, such as [[New Jersey]], due to state minimum wage laws. The national minimum wage laws are based in the powers vested in Congress by the [[Commerce Clause]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like all market forces, wages are paid based on interactions between the supply curve (how much workers are willing to supply a particular type of labor at a certain wage) and a demand curve (how many workers of a particular type a firm is willing to hire at a particular wage). Wages are typically set at [[equilibrium]]. If a minimum wage is imposed that is above this equilibrium, it leads to structural [[unemployment]]. If a minimum wage is set below the equilibrium point, it is unlikely to affect that job's wage unless a complement or substitute job's equilibrium wage is less than the minimum wage (causing ripple effects throughout the related markets).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wages also distort the equilibrium for non-wage benefits, potentially causing employers to provide less training, uniforms, opportunity for promotion, and pleasant working conditions, both as a way of offsetting their losses from the wage increase and because the excess labor supply from unemployment lowers the disincentive for turnover. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic views==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Milton Friedman]] said that minimum wage laws hurt the very people they are supposed to help, that is, the people with the lowest incomes. In one example he gave, it was a form of [[protectionism]] designed to help northern textile manufacturers at the expense of textile workers in the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem and very often makes the problem worse. Take, for example, the minimum wage, which has the effect of making the poor people at the bottom of the wage scale—those it was designed to help—worse off than before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: If you really want to get a feeling about the minimum wage, there’s nothing more instructive than going to the Congressional documents to read the proposals to raise the minimum wage and see who testifies. You very seldom find poor people testifying in favor of the minimum wage. The people who do are those who receive or pay wages much higher than the minimum. Frequently Northern textile manufacturers. John F. Kennedy, when he was in Congress, said explicitly that he was testifying in favor of a rise in the minimum wage because he wanted protection for the New England textile industry against competition from the so-called cheap labor of the South. But now look at it from the point of that cheap labor. If a high minimum wage makes unfeasible an otherwise feasible venture in the South, are people in the South benefited or harmed? Clearly harmed, because jobs otherwise available for them are no longer available. A minimum-wage law is, in reality, a law that makes it illegal for an employer to hire a person with limited skills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jeepers1.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/a-1973-interview-with-milton-friedman-playboy-magazine/ 1973 interview with [[Milton Friedman]]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The left wing in American politics tends to present a minimum wage as benefiting the lower class by helping to lift poor people out of poverty. Conservatives and libertarians generally counter this argument with statistics showing that every increase in the minimum wage has increased unemployment, especially among black inner city youth; see [[entry-level job]]s. It also obliges companies to outsource many jobs to China and the Third World.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatives tend to oppose increases in the minimum wage because in a [[free market]], the price of labor, like any other commodity, should be set by negotiations between the buyer and seller without undue interference from the state.  Conservatives oppose the distortion caused by a minimum wage in encouraging boys to drop out of school, or otherwise decline to go onto college, in order to make artificially inflated and short-lived income at an elevated minimum wage. The fact that some in the lowest income bracket will gain slightly from minimum wages (by having their wages raised) while others will lose significantly (from losing their jobs) means that minimum wages can be seen as increasing inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Socialism|Socialists]], and many economic liberals, disagree with this view of labor as a commodity because they believe it dehumanizes laborers by permitting companies to pay employees less than necessary to live a decent life, support  a family, etc; see [[living wage]]. Even without legislation, the minimum wage as of 2007 is far below the lowest wage paid by most large companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Renolds, [[Cato Institute]]. ''[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5409 Below the Minimum Wage]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Empirical evidence from the 2009 recession==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2009 recession gave a compelling picture of how an excessive minimum wage can exacerbate the employment climate.  None of the five states with the lowest unemployment rates in May 2009, all below 5.5%, had a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage of $6.55. Five of the six states with the highest unemployment rates, all above 11.2%, had minimum wages above the federal minimum wage. [[Oregon]], with a minimum wage of $8.40, had an unemployment rate of 12.4%. Generally, states with a higher minimum wage than the federal minimum wage had unemployment rates that were higher than states that did not have a higher minimum wage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bls.gov/lau/ Bureau of Labor Statistics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm Department of Labor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=&amp;quot;60%&amp;quot;  class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
![[State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage prior to 7/24/2009 increase&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate as of 5/2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage Rank&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate Rank&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nebraska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wyoming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Iowa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!5.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oklahoma]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.90&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Mexico]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.50&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|42&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arkansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maryland]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!16&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Vermont]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.06&lt;br /&gt;
!7.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|49&lt;br /&gt;
!17&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Hawaii]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!7.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!18&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Colorado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.28&lt;br /&gt;
!7.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
!19&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Connecticut]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!21&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Delaware]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!22&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Minnesota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New York]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Pennsylvania]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maine]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!29&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[West Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Jersey]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!31&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wisconsin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Missouri]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.05&lt;br /&gt;
!9.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|24&lt;br /&gt;
!33&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|51&lt;br /&gt;
!34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!35&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!36&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alabama]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!37&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Illinois]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!10.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!38&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Florida]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.21&lt;br /&gt;
!10.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
!39&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Indiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Tennessee]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[District of Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Ohio]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.30&lt;br /&gt;
!10.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
!44&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!45&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nevada]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!46&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[California]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!11.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!47&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Rhode Island]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oregon]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|50&lt;br /&gt;
!50&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Michigan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!14.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!51&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A statistical regression of the dataset shows that a $1 increase in minimum wage is correlated with a 1.40 percentage point increase in unemployment. The correlation is significant at the 5% level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Living wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maximum wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]][[Category:Political Terms]][[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360245</id>
		<title>User:OneTrueConservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:OneTrueConservative&amp;diff=1360245"/>
		<updated>2017-07-12T01:30:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OneTrueConservative: Creating userpage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, I am the OneTrueConservative, and I have joined Conservapedia to help provide a balanced view of the issues that face us today. In the present partisan environment, we should all strive to find reasonable solutions to our problems, with conservative elements. Any purely conservative or liberal society is destined to stagnate due to a lack of an opposing idea. I hope the left and right can come to realize that they have more common ground than they might think, and to vilify either side as the opposing team is counter-productive. My goal is to spread that dream to Conservapedia, and I hope that others here will embark on this effort. The dawn of a new age of compromise is at hand.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OneTrueConservative</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>