Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

List of bodily organs

2007-09-17T22:08:46Z

OverturnRoeWade: added missing elements of reproductive system

*[[Adrenal gland]]
*[[Bladder]]
*[[Brain]]
*[[Ear]]
*[[Esophagus]]
*[[Eye]]
*[[Gall bladder]]
*[[Heart]]
*[[Kidney]]
*[[Large intestine]]
*[[Liver]]
*[[Lung]]
*[[Mouth]]
*[[Muscle]]
*[[Nose]]
*[[Pancreas]]
*[[Penis]]
*[[Pituitary gland]]
*[[Radius]]
*[[Skeleton]]
*[[Skin]]
*[[Small intestine]]
*[[Spleen]]
*[[Stomach]]
*[[Thymus]]
*[[Thyroid gland]]
*[[Trachea]]
*[[Uterus]]
*[[Vagina]]
*[[Vermiform appendix]]

[[category:homeschool curriculum]]
[[category:anatomy]]

List of bodily organs

2007-09-17T22:07:51Z

OverturnRoeWade:

*[[Adrenal gland]]
*[[Bladder]]
*[[Brain]]
*[[Ear]]
*[[Esophagus]]
*[[Eye]]
*[[Gall bladder]]
*[[Heart]]
*[[Kidney]]
*[[Large intestine]]
*[[Liver]]
*[[Lung]]
*[[Mouth]]
*[[Muscle]]
*[[Nose]]
*[[Pancreas]]
*[[Penis]]
*[[Pituitary gland]]
*[[Radius]]
*[[Skeleton]]
*[[Skin]]
*[[Small intestine]]
*[[Spleen]]
*[[Stomach]]
*[[Thymus]]
*[[Thyroid gland]]
*[[Trachea]]
*[[Uterus]]
*[[Vermiform appendix]]

[[category:homeschool curriculum]]
[[category:anatomy]]

Income

2007-09-17T21:56:17Z

OverturnRoeWade: reverted unnecessary edits

'''Income''' is money earned, generally through [[labor]] or [[investment]]. In the United States, income is generally calculated and related in dollars/year.

Income level also carries with it social stratification effects: The more money you make, the more people making more money you get to socialize with.

Talk:Income

2007-09-17T21:55:10Z

OverturnRoeWade:

Social stratification is one of the primary practical effects, and connotations, of the term income in the US. By removing that section of the entry, you're clearly demonstrating that this encyclopedia, like wikipedia, is only concerned with the aspects of things that you enjoy looking at. If this is truly going to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, you need to stop deleting things you're not necessarily happy about. -[[overturnroewade]]{{unsigned|OverturnRoeWade}}
:*''Income level also carries with it a social stratification effects: The more money you make, the more people making more money you get to socialize with.''
::duh huh? is this pro-[[lumpen masses]] or anti-[[lumpenproletariat]]? [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:37, 17 September 2007 (EDT)

::Um, I'm not sure we have to bring Marx into this. I'm merely pointing out a practical truth that should be included in this encyclopedia. If you want to go further in depth and point out other scholars who have said things similarly or differently, that's all fine and good, but a response of 'duh huh' with cites to concepts obviously at the fringes of what I was referring to only serves to frustrate good contributors. [[overturnroewade]]
:::A phrase like this, "''The more money you make''" is absolutley meaningless; let's suppose "you", or "I" "make" my money off a Veterans disability benefit; let's further suppose that I "make" $3200 a month at off this benefit; or let's suppose I am an 85 year old retired woman who "makes" $850 per month on Social Security; or let's suppose I am an 85 year old woman who "makes" $8500 per month as a coupon clipper; or let's suppose I am a gangbanger and drug dealer who makes $10,000 per week, unreported in drug dealling and armed robbery. Just were do you suppose to go with this idea, "the more people making more money you get to socialize with," being that I'm 85 years old, have a comfortable income, and not looking for new friends outside my social circle at church? [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 16:47, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
::::Well, I'm happy that you've been able to isolate yourself from the socioeconomic pressures of our society, but I'm pretty confident anecdotal evidence does not have its place in an encyclopedia. I don't see how "the more money you make" is even ambiguous, much less "absolutley meaningless" as you claim: I'm defining a spectrum of incomes, say, from $0 to $100,000,000,000,000.00. The more money you make, the higher up on the spectrum you are, and the more opportunities, especially professionally, you will have to interact with other higher earning people. This concept obviously has you flummoxed; perhaps you should let someone else be the arbiter of whether or not it's appropriate for this encyclopedia (or, at least, won't dismiss its validity on the basis of the fact that the editor cannot see "were" this concept applies to him.) [[overturnroewade]]

Income

2007-09-17T19:56:15Z

OverturnRoeWade:

Talk:Income

2007-09-17T19:49:06Z

OverturnRoeWade:

Talk:Income

2007-09-17T18:06:35Z

OverturnRoeWade: New page: Social stratification is one of the primary practical effects, and connotations, of the term income in the US. By removing that section of the entry, you're clearly demonstrating that thi...

Income

2007-09-17T18:01:45Z

OverturnRoeWade:

Income is money earned, generally through [[labor]] or [[investment]]. In the United States, income is generally calculated and related in dollars/year. Income level also carries with it social stratification effects: The more money you make, the more people making more money you get to socialize with.

Income

2007-09-17T18:01:15Z

OverturnRoeWade: New page: Income is money earned, generally through labor or investment. In the United States, income is generally calculated and related in dollars/year. Income level also carries with it...

Income is money earned, generally through [[labor]] or [[investment]]. In the United States, income is generally calculated and related in dollars/year. Income level also carries with it a social stratification effects: The more money you make, the more people making more money you get to socialize with.

NFL Draft

2007-09-12T14:59:55Z

OverturnRoeWade: New page: The NFL Draft is a yearly venture where the cream of the college football crop are systematically doled out to professional NFL teams. ESPN has been largely responsible for the increa...

The NFL Draft is a yearly venture where the cream of the [[college football]] crop are systematically doled out to professional NFL teams. ESPN has been largely responsible for the increasing popularity of this event, because they own the rights to televise it.

Gambit

2007-09-12T14:48:47Z

OverturnRoeWade:

A gambit is a calculated risk.

As applied to [[chess]], it refers to losing a piece in order to obtain a strategic advantage.

Also a small tool used to attach a cantle to a sporran.

Mike Gambit was a character in mid-70s Brtish action series 'The New Avengers', played by coffee salesman Gareth Hunt (d.2007).

Gambit was also one of the X-Men.

[[category:literary figures]]
[[category:games]]
[[category:tools]]

Gambit

2007-09-12T14:48:29Z

OverturnRoeWade:

A gambit is a calculated risk.

As applyed to [[chess]], it refers to losing a piece in order to obtain a strategic advantage.

Also a small tool used to attach a cantle to a sporran.

Mike Gambit was a character in mid-70s Brtish action series 'The New Avengers', played by coffee salesman Gareth Hunt (d.2007).

Gambit was also one of the X-Men.

[[category:literary figures]]
[[category:games]]
[[category:tools]]

Talk:Gambit

2007-09-12T14:27:24Z

OverturnRoeWade: New page: Gambits in chess are not limited to losing a pawn: In fact, in the 1909 world championships in Moscow, all-time great Tal won a decisive victory using a brilliant knight gambit. [[Overtur...

Gambits in chess are not limited to losing a pawn: In fact, in the 1909 world championships in Moscow, all-time great Tal won a decisive victory using a brilliant knight gambit. [[OverturnRoeWade]]