<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=P</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=P"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/P"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T19:25:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=1465652</id>
		<title>Essay:Worst Liberal Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=1465652"/>
		<updated>2018-11-07T15:45:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;P: small typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--If anyone is going to add ''Frozen'' to this list, do NOT claim as one of the reasons as it enforcing the homosexual agenda. John Nolte already confirmed on Breitbart that it does not do so in any way.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While a good amount of [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative films]] is produced every year, [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] continues to produce films that attempt to normalize and aggrandize amoral lifestyles and liberal bias. Below is a list of some of the more outrageous examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politically liberal live-action films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The 5th Wave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Perfect Movie&lt;br /&gt;
|$34,912,982&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alien'' Franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|1979-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Perfect movie&lt;br /&gt;
|$515,930,723 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''All the Way''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-14&lt;br /&gt;
|Perfect movie&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Psycho''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Perfect movie&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,070,285&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Assault on Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Cool&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Apocalypse Now''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|I havent watched with one&lt;br /&gt;
|$78,784,010&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battleship Potemkin''&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Communism is cool &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Big Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie had one of the characters blame &amp;quot;Reaganomics&amp;quot; for the lack of job opportunities in the town and also one of the team's players was an anchor baby.  In the end, one of the coaches, who was a sheriff in Texas, was able to get the player and his illegal mother a way to stay.  So it was also favorable toward illegal immigration.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,736,619&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birth of a Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|This infamously racist film, once the longest ever made, begins by documenting the [[American Civil War]], then depicts the [[Ku Klux Klan]] as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; who vanquish people of color, who are black racial stereotypes, from political positions and from their lawful right to vote (the KKK was founded by the Democrat Party, even though the Left has repeatedly tried denying the connection between the two). It was the first ever film to be shown at the White House under Democrat President [[Woodrow Wilson]], and it significantly influenced his already-racist core to segregate the White House and various departments.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue State''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|What looks like a romantic comedy actually encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established and conservatism abolished in America, as the main character follows up on his absurd vow to move to Canada if [[George W. Bush]] is re-elected president.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bob Roberts''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-conservative propaganda piece, directed by leftist Tim Robbins and released during the 1992 election, has a similar premise to that of ''The Candidate'' and denigrates conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,479,470&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Born on the Fourth of July''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film was produced and directed by Communist sympathizer Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and Communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,001,698&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Butler''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ronald Reagan]] is falsely portrayed as indifferent toward apartheid in South Africa; Nancy Reagan is played by anti-American traitor Jane Fonda; and staunch feminist Oprah Winfrey plays Cecil's wife.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$116,632,095&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Candidate''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Capitalism: A Love Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Moore, staying true to his propaganda film format, relentlessly attacks America's [[capitalist]] [[economy]] with claims of alleged financial inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,363,397&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Casualties of War''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Vietnam war statement film starring Sean Penn involves a gang of American soldiers raping a Vietnamese woman. This paints America soldiers as the bad guys while failing to acknowledge how the Viet Cong, Khmer Rouge, and other Communist Insurgents did the same thing to a far larger scale.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,671,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Che''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008; 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine Marxist terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], who is treated sympathetically as a &amp;quot;martyr&amp;quot; for Communism.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$40.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The China Syndrome''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A fictional [[nuclear power]] plant melts down. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]] (or meltdown) and the resultant damage. This film, along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release), are both credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,718,367&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Contender''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was to supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,872,723&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Das Boot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-American war film looks at [[World War II]] from the Nazi perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,487,676&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal scientists who plan to tame zombies are the &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;, while the common sense conservative soldiers (whose plan is to euthanize them all) are the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|$5,000,000 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dawn of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Besides containing outbursts of graphic violence, this stand-alone sequel to George A. Romero's ''Night of the Living Dead'' is against capitalism because the consumers are zombies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9487PyyblpQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 2004 Zack Snyder-directed remake abandoned this. &lt;br /&gt;
|$55 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Man Walking'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It senselessly criticizes [[capital punishment]] with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused.&lt;br /&gt;
|$39,363,635&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Devil's Backbone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the Communistic Spanish Loyalists in the Spanish Civil War as &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot; while demonizing [[Francisco Franco]]'s forces. These themes, promoted by Marxist director Guillermo del Toro, were later expanded upon in ''Pan's Labyrinth''.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$6.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Dictator''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A Middle Easterner takes over America in this raunchy, vulgar &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; straining for controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$59,650,222&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogville'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An [[Anti-American]] propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,680,836&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb''&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Loosely based on Peter George's 1958 thriller novel ''Red Alert'', this black comedy is against war, the military, and nuclear weaponry and tries to downplay the seriousness of Cold War-era fears of a nuclear apocalypse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$9.4 million in North America&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Eternal Jew''&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film was made with direct input from Adolf Hitler, who made sure the anti-Semitism was as blunt and direct as possible. Most audiences were shocked at the crudity of the messages.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 9/11'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[Michael Moore]] movie, which distorts the tangential link between the [[Bush]] family and the [[Bin Laden]] family. The title was also taken from ''[[Fahrenheit 451]]'', a book that warned people about book burnings, proving that not only do liberals steal titles from other works, but aren't even creative on how to have the titles directly connect to their works.&lt;br /&gt;
|$119,194,771&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fair Game''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[Communist]] Sean Penn. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. It's a typical un-American Hollywood film with &amp;quot;The narrative that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses.&amp;quot; There's also no mention of Iraq Liberation Act which was signed by [[Bill Clinton]] five years before the war in Iraq. &lt;br /&gt;
|$9,540,691&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fire Down Below''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Steven Seagal plays a Gary Stu-like role in this environmentalist feature.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,228,448&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Frost/Nixon]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, it attempts to further tarnish the reputation of [[Richard Nixon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,622,031&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Game Change''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] film about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin denounced the film and called it fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''God Bless America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its name the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film ''Falling Down'', this &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summary executes [[Tea Party]] members, a Fox News like-host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$123,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Good Shepherd''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite covering the founding of the CIA, the film was extremely anti-CIA in its messaging, where it doubles down on making the CIA look as bad as possible and overemphasizes on CIA failures such as the Bay of Pigs invasion and their experimenting with LSD, while conveniently ignoring the crimes the KGB and similar intelligence agencies within the Soviet bloc.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$99.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Green Zone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Is extremely anti-War on Terror to such an extent that it comes across as blatantly anti-American, as it repeats the falsehood that Pentagon officials lied about there being WMDs in Iraq simply so they could gin up a war in the Middle East (completely ignoring that various other intelligence agencies, including even France, a country that didn't even want a War with Iraq, acknowledging that Saddam had WMDs), and even had the main villain, who was modeled after Donald Rumsfeld, sending assassination teams against those in the know about the conspiracy. The film even went as far as to portray Iraqi terrorists as the &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot;. The film was also notorious as being Universal Studios' biggest box office bomb as a result.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/3/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$94.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hidden Agenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the [[IRA]] oppressed freedom fighters while painting the Unionists as monsters. The film also doesn't speak highly of [[Margaret Thatcher]] either.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Independence Day: Resurgence''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and to a certain extent conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced multicultural elements are present as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$389.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''JFK''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This historically inaccurate account on President John F. Kennedy's assassination serves liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the &amp;quot;real murder&amp;quot; of Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a &amp;quot;counter-myth&amp;quot; to the Warren Commission's &amp;quot;fictional myth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,405,498&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lone Ranger''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]] portrays the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as &amp;quot;thugs&amp;quot; who support their actions. It distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV and radio serials, as dumbfounded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]]) not only as the &amp;quot;star&amp;quot; of the film but as the Lone Ranger's &amp;quot;voice of reason&amp;quot;, too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,302,115&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Magnificent Seven'' (2016 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This remake of a Western about seven vigilante gunfighters out to save a peaceful Mexican farming village from marauders (itself an adaptation of the Japanese cinematic classic ''Seven Samurai'') suits the left agenda, as capitalists are the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://missliberty.com/magnificent-seven-remake-is-angry-radical-fantasy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,145,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Manderlay'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[James Caan]] refused to star in this anti-American sequel to ''Dogville'', describing director Lars von Trier as anti-American and stated that he himself is an &amp;quot;ultra-conservative&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$674,918&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Matrix'' trilogy&lt;br /&gt;
|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions'')&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A hacker discovers his world is a replica of the world as it was before a cataclysmic future event in which intelligent machines took over humanity, so he joins a resistance to end the machines' reign. Despite this salvation narrative, the whole trilogy glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s &amp;quot;On Nihilism&amp;quot; chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), hinting several times towards a pro-Communist, anti-American, [[anti-Christian]] view. The second film's Architect scene tries to give a &amp;quot;devastating critique/twist&amp;quot; to salvation myths, with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. In this same scene, a panel of screens implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world, and it features wars and conflicts specifically involving America. In fact, far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. The first film's throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher is a shallow attempt at insulting [[Ronald Reagan]] because Smith implies that Cipher will become the next Ronald Reagan should he succeed in betraying his allies to the agents. The trilogy's overall depiction of religion is closer to Gnosticism, even with Neo, the main protagonist, presented as a savior-figure. The Wachowskis openly admitted in an interview that they deliberately modeled the entire story after Friedrich Nietzche's writings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Bart, “Cracking the Wachowski’s Code,” Variety.com, May 25, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The trilogy has been cited as the cause for various murders, ultimately leading to a variant of the [[insanity defense]] known as the Matrix Defense&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/21/ctv.matrix.insanity/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and it shares similar themes to the [[Worst Liberal Video Games|Worst Liberal Video Game]] ''Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty'' because Hideo Kojima confessed that he intended to use the same themes for the game.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20130328062143/http://www.gamespot.com/news/hideo-kojima-speaks-about-the-matrix-2448486&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| $592,370,339 (all together) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in Paris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The main character, a liberal author, is open-minded and intellectual. He has an unsuccessful relationship with a woman whose family is Republican and are depicted as being &amp;quot;materialistic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;selfish&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;narrow-minded&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; towards any country that is not the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,816,662 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Milk'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008 &lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sean Penn portrays openly homosexual politician [[Harvey Milk]] in this biography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,841,299&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Motorcycle Diaries'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Walter Salles directs this fawning monument to [[Communist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,781,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|The more openly liberal sequel to the apolitical ''The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!'' pushes environmentalism and attacks productive businesses, especially the oil industry.&lt;br /&gt;
|$86,930,411&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Night of the Living Dead]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This independent horror abomination by George A. Romero vilifies [[nuclear energy]], as nuclear fallout from an exploding space probe in Earth's atmosphere is said to be the cause of the recently deceased becoming reanimated. In addition, it negatively portrays police officers as racist: a group of officers kills Ben, the African American protagonist, when they mistake him for one of the dead, which Romero intentionally chose to have happen to accuse the police of being behind racial lynchings. Had two [[sequel]]s , ''Dawn of the Dead'' (1978 Italian) and ''Day of the Dead'' (1985).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nixon'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This historically inaccurate biography of [[Richard Nixon]] is directed by liberal filmmaker [[Oliver Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,681,765&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Okja''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmentalist propaganda piece vilifies capitalists and essentially plagiarizes the Buster Keaton classic ''Go West''.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''On Deadly Ground''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film demonizes the oil industry as greedy and unsympathetic while praising the [[EPA]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,590,458&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pan's Labyrinth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it promoting paganism and the occult, it also demonized [[Francisco Franco]]'s Spain and promoted the Spanish Republicans from the Spanish Civil War due to it being made by Marxist director [[Guillermo del Toro]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2007/01/19/pans-labyrinth-allegory-of-spanish-civil-war/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$83.3 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Post''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An obvious promotion of the leaking of the ''[[Pentagon Papers]]''. It treats the liberal journalists who committed the leaking in a positive light, while depicting Nixon in a negative light (despite Nixon never being responsible for the Pentagon Papers in the first place, and it being done under the auspices of Democrats JFK and LBJ).&lt;br /&gt;
|$179.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Recount''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential election]] and its aftermath in [[Florida]], presented from a [[Liberal bias|liberal-biased]] viewpoint. A look into how [[Democrats]] and their [[Mainstream media|liberal media]] supporters claim the [[Republicans]] &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the [[election]] and the alleged role of its party members that the Democrats claim &amp;quot;made it happen&amp;quot; (although in reality, it was the Democrats themselves who tried to steal the election for their candidate [[Al Gore]] [[United States presidential election, 2000#Recount|by attempting to commit vote fraud in Florida through ordering selective recounts in Democrat-friendly areas while ignoring Republican-strong areas]], only to be stopped when the US Supreme Court ruled the Democrats' end-run attempt around election rules to be illegal). Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Redacted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,388&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Reds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|As a biographical film on the life of notorious American [[Communist]] journalist John Reed, ''Reds'' is a sentimental and overly romanticized portrait of [[Communism]], [[humanism]], and [[anarchism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,382,659&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Return of the Living Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In another stand-alone sequel to ''Night of the Living Dead'', the military is supposedly responsible for the release of a toxin that turns people into zombies. The military is also shown to be inconstant, as they &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; this by nuking the city of zombies. An anti-[[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] statement some may say (the Left feared that Reagan would create nuclear holocaust, which is present in this film). &lt;br /&gt;
|$14,237,880 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sacco e Vanzetti''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, the film acts as a biopic of the anarchist murderers [[Sacco and Vanzetti]], with them being portrayed in a sympathetic light. In addition, the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Song|Worst Liberal Song]] &amp;quot;Here's to You&amp;quot;, also dealing with the two anarchists in a similar light, was released with this movie as part of its soundtrack.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shoot 'Em Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An anti-second amendment film, the so-called &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is a [[nihilist]] and the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot; are trying to defend gun rights and the Second Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$12,807,139&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Short Circuit''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|On top of just being an blatant ''E.T.'' rip-off, ''Short Circuit'' also downgrades the military (or the Reagan Administration in general).&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,697,761&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[SiCKO]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Michael Moore film which spread many falsehoods about American [[healthcare]] while unduly glorifying the so-called benefits of [[socialized medicine]] such as now found in [[Obamacare]]. Memorably referred to [[Cuba]]n healthcare as being &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; than American healthcare. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,540,079&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Siege''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Bruce Willis is in it. Willis plays the antagonist, an Army general who institutes martial law in New York City after a wave of terrorist attacks. Portrays Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; while demonizing the military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,932,372&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek: Into Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it being a blatant ripoff on ''Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan'' in terms of plotline, the film also has several anti-War on Terror messages, as indicated by both Benedict Cumberbatch and Simon Pegg.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/2/22/4-ways-star-trek-into-darkness-shills-for-surrender-in-the-war-on-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$467.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Süss the Jew''&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film, that was notorious for it successfully pushing the anti-Semitic agenda throughout Nazi Germany via a subtle method.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Syriana''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Is anti-War on Terror, with the film heavily implying that Saudi Arabia was in the middle of liberal reforms that America interfered with due to oil businessmen (despite the exact opposite being true).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/4/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$94 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''They Live''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Capitalists are portrayed as evil aliens planning to rule the world. The director John Carpenter also claimed in interviews that the film was anti-[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/john-carpenter-they-live-was-about-giving-the-finger-to-reagan/#/0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,008,928 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Thomas Crown Affair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the claim that capitalism causes crime.&lt;br /&gt;
| $14 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tomorrowland''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the fact that the film had basis on the theme park proposed by [[Walt Disney]] fool you. The film was anti-capitalist and pro-liberal/progressive values propaganda with it pushing the exact opposite messages that Disney himself wanted to impart. Bill Whittle, when reviewing the film, even mentioned that had he still been alive and saw the film, Disney would most likely have torn up his proposal for [[Disneyland]] and proceeded to drink himself to death in despair of what the film claimed his idea was.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmxeoh69G4o&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$209.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tout va Bien'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1972 &lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jane Fonda]] &amp;quot;art film&amp;quot; directed by [[Jean-Luc Godard]], who was notoriously anti-American and idolized [[Karl Marx]], is nothing more than a propaganda film for Communism, as it sympathizes with the youths who partook in the [[May 1968 riots|May 1968 Communist uprisings]] in [[France]] and features blunt anti-American imagery.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Triumph of the Will''&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|The world's most infamous Nazi propaganda film (even though the Left denies it, the Nazis were in truth left wing National Socialists).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trumbo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Dalton Trumbo, one of the Hollywood Ten who was jailed for his Communist beliefs, is portrayed as a free-speech martyr, and a &amp;quot;champion&amp;quot; of the First Amendment. All of his controversial beliefs are whitewashed, including his support of Lenin, Hitler (until the Nazi-Soviet Pact fell), Kim Il-Sung, and, of course, Stalin. Conversely, anti-Communists such as John Wayne, Hedda Hopper, Robert Taylor, Roy Brewer, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), and the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals (MPA) are falsely portrayed as &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;oppressive&amp;quot;, and anti-free-speech.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,857,741	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Truth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Highly fictionalized political docudrama about the Killian documents controversy meant to further tarnish the reputation of [[George W. Bush]]. The film was not approved by current CBS President and CEO Leslie Moonves and CBS refused to air advertisements for the film due to its, as the network stated, &amp;quot;inaccuracies and distortions&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,541,854&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''V for Vendetta'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly glorifies [[anarchism]], [[socialism]], [[Communism]] and [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,511,035&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[W.]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie designed to denigrate the role of [[Christianity]] in U.S. [[politics]] and particularly in the life of [[George W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,534,493&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''White House Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Mocks conservatives with a liberal plot twist that makes the [[TEA Party]] out to be &amp;quot;terrorists&amp;quot;. This movie was made by uber-liberals to counter great conservative film; ''Olympus Has Fallen'', which depicts North Korean terrorists as the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$73,103,784&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winchester''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the Winchester Mystery House in San Jose, California. The film focuses more on its anti-gun message than the actual paranormal events.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/winchester-confronts-the-american-curse-of-firearms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Z'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrongdoing.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,283,305&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socially liberal live-action films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This Romanian film baselessly supports [[abortion]]. Liberals praised it when it won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,198,208&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Pie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The first installment of a long-running film franchise primarily dealing with teenage sex and alcohol relies on jokes about sex and bodily functions, even treating date rape as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$102,561,004&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978, full title ''National Lampoon's Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This college &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; glorifies [[alcohol abuse]], debauchery, [[nihilism]], extramarital sex, and all varieties of youthful rebellion. The dean, played by John Vernon, suggests that being &amp;quot;Fat, drunk and stupid, son, is no way to go through life&amp;quot; to one of the rebellious youth representing the rowdy Delta Tau Chi fraternity, but he's depicted as the villain because of that. After the Delta boys are finally punished by being collectively expelled from college, they exact their revenge by sabotaging a homecoming parade and do not face punishment for such a great misdeed. Even so, the film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;, portrayed by one of Hollywood's most amoral actors ever, John Belushi, goes on to become a U.S. Senator, which is passed off as humorous.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,600,000 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atomic Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Cold War film's major themes are feminism, the LGBT agenda, and racism against those with dark hair and eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,573,925&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Avatar (film)|Avatar]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The highest-grossing feature in history, directed by liberal James Cameron, enforces many destructive messages, including [[environmentalism]], [[feminism]], and the absurd claim that nature is God. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. To make matters worse, the protagonist forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality. The overall plotline hints at endorsing environmental terrorism, which Cameron indicated that he himself supported.&lt;br /&gt;
|$760,507,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Lots of coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and also the main plot involved a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This sequel follows the already revolting ''Bad Santa''. Miramax, which distributed this movie as well as its predecessor, was acquired in 2016 by beIN Media Group, which is owned by Islamic propaganda channel [[Al Jazeera]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$23.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Teacher''&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Cameron Diaz stars as an awful high school teacher, who is always getting high and drunk, tries to get breast-implant surgery, and encourages cheating and stealing from her students. The movie contains no [[morals]] and is filled with offensive sexual content.&lt;br /&gt;
| $100,292,856&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beginners''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and &amp;quot;[[coming out of the closet]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,790,894&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Being John Malkovich''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This biopic celebrates homosexuality and includes a large amount of vulgar humor.&lt;br /&gt;
|$637,721 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ben &amp;amp; Arthur''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie which also portrays Christians as &amp;quot;hateful bigots&amp;quot;. The film has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies by critics and audiences alike, even among homosexuals. Wikipedia also acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page &amp;quot;List of movies considered the worst&amp;quot;. Was a major box-office bomb.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Big Lebowski]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[drug abuse]], laziness, and [[nihilism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,451,873&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Billy Elliot''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This British film stars a boy who represents the homosexual agenda by wanting to be a ballet dancer rather than play sports. There are very poor family values as the family is constantly cursing at one another.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,995,263&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bio-Dome'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It's a stoner film with an environmentalist theme.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,427,615&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birdcage''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another pro-[[homosexual agenda]] and conservative bashing film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$124,060,553&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blow''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the life of drug dealer, and suspected murderer, George Jung.&lt;br /&gt;
|$52,990,775&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue is the Warmest Color'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This French film supports [[homosexual agenda]] by showing graphic lesbian sex and falsely idealizing the concept that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize.  t is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars of the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,199,787&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boogie Nights'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A young man journeys through the pornography industry in the 1970s and 1980s and glorifies the exploitation of women.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,400,640&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boyhood''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, it downplays the importance a father has on a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boys Don't Cry''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It glorifies the choice of a young girl to embrace homosexual and transgender life choices, dishonesty, and pre-marital relations. Furthermore, it caricatures and exaggerates natural reactions to her perversion, all in aid of promoting the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,533,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Breakfast Club]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|What masquerades as a drama comparing the similar personalities of five seemingly very different teenagers in school detention really promotes the use of drugs, smoking, and extramarital sex. Although it does contain the conservative quote &amp;quot;You ought to spend a little more time trying to make something of yourself and a little less time trying to impress people&amp;quot;, it is said by the main villain of the movie, the high school principal.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,525,171&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This nauseating &amp;quot;romance&amp;quot; film proves that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns. It was also an early example of production companies dictating film distribution services of what they should distribute to the local level, often against the distributor's own decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$83,043,761&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Brothers Grimsby''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This vulgar film is loaded with sex jokes, sex scenes, nudity, one graphic elephant sex scene, and a joke about Donald Trump getting AIDS.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,874,837&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''But I'm a Cheerleader'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A lesbian [[public school]] [[cheerleading|cheerleader]] is attracted to other cheerleaders, portraying [[homosexuality]] as a legitimate lifestyle. The film attacks and ridicules [[reparative therapy]] and religious people, and it normalizes lesbians by depicting the star as a girly cheerleader, obviously a forced subversion of the lesbian archetype.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,205,627&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Call Me By Your Name''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' of 2017, only this time pedophilia, in addition to homosexuality, is endorsed and displayed as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Caligula''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|UR (should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|This historical drama about infamous Roman emperor of the same name has been considered the most pornographic movie ever made, which led to it being a critical failure. It has unsimulated scenes of oral and anal sex, incest, and close-ups of the genitalia of both sexes, along with brutal violence. Upon release, several U.S. cities tried to prevent the movie from being played, though liberal courts repeatedly affirmed that it passed the Miller test (claiming that it was not obscene enough to be banned). Some lawyers defending it even lamented that it helped to form a conservative morality, which may have helped Ronald Reagan win the 1980 election.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cat in the Hat''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|This bastardization of an instantly recognizable children's classic, filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups, is the reason why Dr. Seuss's widow has banned any live-action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry (or &amp;quot;Razzie&amp;quot;) Award for &amp;quot;Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)&amp;quot; and was nominated for eight other Razzies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$134 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cider House Rules''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[abortion]] and advocates [[pro-choice]] values to a fault.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57,545,092&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chappie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another &amp;quot;social&amp;quot; science fiction film that just abuses our [[First Amendment|first amendment right]] to bash capitalism. Neill Blomkamp also directed liberal films District 9 and Elysium too. On an optimistic note, the film got bad reviews (even from liberal critics)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chappie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film did poorly in America (70% of its gross came from overseas).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=chappie.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,569,268 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Clerks]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17 before being appealed for an R rating.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,151,130&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Clerks 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to the liberal comedy, filled with more profanity and even more disgusting acts that could not be in the budget of the original film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,148,068&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Cosmic Slop]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|HBO trilogy focusing on minority science fiction. The main claim to fame was an adaptation of ''[[The Space Traders]]'', a race-baiting short story that was written by the infamous race-baiting leftist professor Derrick Bell.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dallas Buyers Club''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda during its deadly-years [[AIDS]] epidemic..&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,298,285&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Danish Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the definitive pro-homosexual/gender confusion propaganda films. Eddie Redmayne portrays Einar Wegener, a landscape artist who stands in for a female model who no-showed for a planned painting made by Wegener's wife, Gerda. Einar, who has undergone gender confusion for years, snaps as a result of the modeling sessions where he stands in as &amp;quot;female&amp;quot; and he begins claiming to be a &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot; calling himself &amp;quot;Lili Elbe&amp;quot;, which nearly leads to him being committed to an asylum. Einar later undergoes surgical mutilation to accommodate his delusion, but he dies of infection due to the mutilation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,114,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After''&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacks the military and conservative politicians, and encourages negotiation with Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After Tomorrow'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Overdramatic, nonsensical portrayal of the consequences of fictional &amp;quot;[[climate change]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$186,740,799&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|PG &lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist propaganda that states &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; turns woodland animals into psychotic human-hunters. It also claims that humans must get what they deserve (which they do not).&lt;br /&gt;
|$2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dazed and Confused''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This coming of age film circa 1976, attempts to normalize [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]] among teenagers and young adults.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,993,039&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''District 9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Alien invaders are shown sympathetically, but the military, corporations, and humans in general are not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$115,646,235 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Django Unchained&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Quentin Tarantino's Western gratuitously uses graphic violence and the n-word.&lt;br /&gt;
|$425,368,238&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Don’t Breathe''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The &amp;quot;villain&amp;quot; of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also the leader of the thieves is a girl, which is clearly a sign of feminism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,217,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Doom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the video game that influenced the [[Columbine High School massacre|Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20060223025846/columbine.free2host.net/quotes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ll the military characters (except one) are corrupt. Fans of the game criticized it for not including much monster-themed action.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,212,337&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Drag Me to Hell''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite being made by known Republican&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whatculture.com/offbeat/10-celebs-you-wouldnt-expect-to-be-republicans?page=4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sam Raimi, the film's premise dealt with a woman being condemned simply for doing what her job required her to do at the bank, with Raimi also implicitly stating that the gypsy who cursed her had sympathetic reasons for cursing the main protagonist despite the fact that she herself had explicitly foresaked paying mortgage three times. In addition, the means to counteract the Lamia (the creature responsible for sending people to Hell when cursed) were more explicitly Pagan than Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Easy Rider''&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies every aspect of the hippie lifestyle, and is also Anti-American. Portrays conservatives as &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot; rednecks.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Elysium''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This propaganda piece criticizes big business and supports [[illegal immigration]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,050,117&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fantastic Four''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based very loosely on the comics of the same name and deprived of the source material's humor, the film portrays the military in a negative manner. Here, they only want to use superpowered teens as weapons. On top of that, they also changed the race of the Human Torch for political correctness/cultural Marxism reasons. The film was also infamous for its controversial behind-the-scenes history. The studio executives mandated reshoots without the director's knowledge of this and the final cut was gutted in the editing room. Director Josh Trank was so angered by this that he completely disowned the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/josh-trank-disowns-fantastic-four-via-twitter-claims-studio-interference-322&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,117,548 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Food Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its title and that fact that Bruce Willis is in it, the film is attacks fast food and capitalism while pushing environmentalism, veganism, illegal immigration, and extramarital sex.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,005,539&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Times at Ridgemont High''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film glorifies [[drug abuse]], premarital sex, and [[abortion]]. It was also one of [[Sean Penn]]'s early film roles as he would go on to star in more liberal propaganda films.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,092,880   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Forest''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the Aokigahara Forest in Japan as a scary place filled with vengeful ghosts. In reality, it is a sad place where people go to commit suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Fourth Kind''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Uses the real-life tragedies of deceased and missing citizens of Nome, Alaska to make money with a fictitious story about alien abductions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,709,193&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Freddy Got Fingered''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains a lot of crude and revolting gross-out sexual humor, including a scene where the main character actually makes a horse [censored]. Uses shock tactics in much the same way that ''[[Family Guy]]'' does. Won five Razzie awards, including Worst Picture and four awards (Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay and Worst Screen Couple) for star and director, Canadian &amp;quot;comedian&amp;quot; Tom Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Furry Vengeance''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This film is pro-environmentalism and anti-capitalist on steroids. The main antagonist is a wealthy businessman, and he and his workers are demonized for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after &amp;quot;learning the animals' stories&amp;quot; and he even puts up a poster saying that anyone who violates the forest preservation will be fined at $1,000,000.00.&lt;br /&gt;
|$35,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghostbusters'' (2016 remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This staunchly feminist remake of the conservative horror comedy classic replaces all the original male heroes with women who appear to have only vaguely different personalities, and every male character is either unintelligent or mean-spirited. Racism and sexual innuendoes are present as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7ikR-6uSMYz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also the remake also replaces the [[EPA]] with [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Homeland Security]] as the bad guys. Luckily, no one other than the world's most biased liberal critics liked it, as its trailer was known for being the most hated of its kind on YouTube.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://screencrush.com/ghostbusters-trailer-most-disliked-movie-trailer-in-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sony was caught making fake reviews&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXv3w59raZ4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film flopped at the box office &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/news/ni60138331?fb_comment_id=1146766692061206_1146942958710246&amp;amp;comment_id=1146942958710246&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so tremendously that Sony Pictures Entertainment lost over $70 million.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,049,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Glen or Glenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1953&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Created by Ed Wood, widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it celebrates cross-dressing and transsexualism.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Godzilla'' (1998 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal and homosexual director Roland Emmerich turns Godzilla into a girl and enforces the idea military does more damage than Godzilla. The film even fails to address the original message of the original 1954 Japanese film (the first ''Godzilla'' was created in response to fears of the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II), with the resulting film likewise being hated by Godzilla fans and by Toho Films, to the extent that the &amp;quot;Godzilla&amp;quot; in this film when later appearing in the mainline films was given a separate identity to the mainstream Godzilla and beaten easily. Liberals also panned the film, in particular a running gag which had the Mayor of New York doing a &amp;quot;thumbs up and thumbs down&amp;quot; vote in an unsubtle jab at Siskel and Ebert.&lt;br /&gt;
|$136,314,294&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Good Will Hunting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]] created this coming of age film that is the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American revisionist textbook ''A People's History of the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America. Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, tells [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene, &amp;quot;You wanna read a ''real'' history book? Read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$225,933,435 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gringo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Not only is the title of this movie a racial slur against white people, but this movie also egregiously promotes pot smoking. In addition, the main male character is extremely feminine, which suits Hollywood's stance on the traditional gender roles. This movie didn't even make the Top 10 its opening weekend, despite heavy marketing.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Groovenians''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts hippies and hipsters as just &amp;quot;misunderstood people&amp;quot; and wealthy businessmen as greedy and power hungry robots.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the Broadway musical, the film's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its gratuitous nudity caused much comment and controversy as it did when the stage musical first premiered in 1967. A product of the hippie counterculture and sexual revolution of the 1960s, several of its songs became anthems of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,284,643&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hairspray''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor [[moral]]s shown, encourages homosexual agenda, bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrays conservatives and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint. &lt;br /&gt;
|$118,871,849&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The adventures of two pot-smokers who play up ethnic stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,250,550&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Three men try to kill their bosses. Two of the three bosses are wealthy businessmen. The film is also filled with offensive language and many sexual references. Was followed by a sequel that however supported the American Dream and capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$117,538,559&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hottie and the Nottie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Ultra-liberal actress [[Paris Hilton]] stars in this movie that glorifies every aspect of the &amp;quot;bimbo&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;dumb blonde&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;valley girl&amp;quot; lifestyles (all of which Hilton herself has embraced over time as part of her public persona) and contains demeaning depictions against those with dark hair and dark eyes, calling them &amp;quot;unattractive&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,696&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Howl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film about homosexual poet and [[beatnik]]-turned-[[hippie]], [[Allen Ginsberg]].  Promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; under the [[First Amendment]] and has &amp;quot;literary value&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$617,334&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I Love You Phillip Morris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A homosexuality-themed comedy-drama film about a homosexual inmate who escapes to reunite with his lover.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,037,459&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jackass]]: The Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a montage of ridiculous stunts and pranks with no coherent story.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,255,312 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jennifer's Body''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film starring Megan Fox promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,204,793.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kids'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Pornographic film concerning five rebellious underage teenagers in [[New York City]] engaging in graphic sex, violent acts, [[drug]]/[[alcohol]] use, and spreading [[HIV]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,412,216&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Kids Are All Right'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays homosexuality and homosexual parenting as a &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,811,365&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Laramie Project]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|An adaptation of the play of the same name made by HBO to promote the homosexual agenda, including giving a one-sided, extremely biased perspective on the murder of Matthew Shepherd implying that his murderers had &amp;quot;homophobia&amp;quot; as a motive. It also has a significant anti-religious bent in it, where two of the documentarists (implied to be homosexual) tried to talk to a priest specifically to &amp;quot;piss him off,&amp;quot; and also had one of the members breaking down from a priest being &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; simply because he implied the possibility that Matthew Shepherd will go to hell if he didn't repent for his homosexual activities.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legally Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pro-feminist musical that also promotes every aspect of the &amp;quot;valley girl&amp;quot; lifestyle. Smart people (such as those who go to law school) are described as &amp;quot;boring, ugly, serious people&amp;quot; by the father of Elle Woods (the film's protagonist). It also contains hidden demeaning remarks about dark-haired people. Spawned a sequel that, despite the patriotic-sounding title (&amp;quot;Red, White, and Blonde&amp;quot;), ultimately wasn't much better, which included a homosexual joke involving Elle Woods' pet chihuahua (despite the original film implying that said dog, who was male, was infatuated by the Taco Bell chihuahua mascot, a female).&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,520,674&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lost World: Jurassic Park''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film is pro-environmentalist, and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message due to one of the main antagonists explicitly being a hunter. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it if anything was the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to.&lt;br /&gt;
|$618.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Léon: The Professional''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting film the features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt DEA responsible for her parents murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex).&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,501,238&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 3''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-gun control propaganda disguised as a buddy cop action film. &lt;br /&gt;
|$144,731,527&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 4''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The sequel now has a pro-illegal immigration message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$130,444,603&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mad Max: Fury Road''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some &amp;quot;[[Plagiarism|similarities]]&amp;quot; to the John Wayne classic ''Stagecoach''. Fourth movie in the ''Mad Max'' film series first made famous by Mel Gibson in the title role between 1979 and 1985.&lt;br /&gt;
|$153,636,354&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Maleficent''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparently represents the idea of revising the &amp;quot;Sleeping Beauty&amp;quot; story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of &amp;quot;true love&amp;quot; (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, moral relativism and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown to not care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$241,410,378&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Hollywood conservative, Clint Eastwood directed this film or that it both takes place and was filmed in the overall conservative city of Savannah, Georgia. It is based on the equally bad nonfiction novel of the same name, and has LGBT, environmentalist, witchcraft, and anti-capitalist themes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,105,255&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Moonlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A coming-of-age film that glorifies drug use and [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,557,396 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=moonlight2016.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Movie 43''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anthology of short &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; films which glamorize virtually every form of deviant sexuality imaginable. Much of the &amp;quot;humor&amp;quot; is scatological, including a scene with a character who enjoys being defecated upon. Aside from that, ''Movie 43'' is literally one of the worst motion pictures ever made in history, as it has nothing that would make it good, imaginative, funny, charming, or understandable of its existence at all. Won three Razzie awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director (all directors) and Worst Screenplay (all screenwriters).&lt;br /&gt;
|$32.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulholland Drive''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The makers of this nonsensical art film think homosexuality and fornication in general are &amp;quot;sexy&amp;quot; societal norms.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,220,243&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''My Own Private Idaho''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two homosexual street hustlers begin having an affair while seeking adventure en route to Idaho and then Italy. One of the more infamous cinematic examples of the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,401,336	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Natural Born Killers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Riddled with violence, drug abuse and sexual references, this movie's main characters are brutal serial killers who are viewed as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;. Infamously known for influencing Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold for committing the massacre at [[Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-columbine-shooters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|$50,282,766&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Normal Heart''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV MA&lt;br /&gt;
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology.  The LGBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists it is &amp;quot;artful&amp;quot;, when really it is decadent. &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nymphomaniac'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This two-part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict.  It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&amp;amp;M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,584,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Odd Life of Timothy Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite an overly schmaltzy pro-family sentiment, this film showcases terrible parenting.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Organizer''&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This Italian film supports [[trade union]]s and [[infidelity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Orgazmo'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This pornographic nightmare celebrates the porn industry and criticizes [[Mormon]]s, if not all the world's religiously devout.&lt;br /&gt;
|$602,302 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Paul'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This extraterrestrial rescue mission could have been a harmless comedic tribute to the science fiction film genre if it didn't portray Christians and the military as close-minded idiots while depicting atheists (played by godless writers and co-stars Simon Pegg and Nick Frost) who support extramarital sex, homosexuality, and mind-altering drug use as the only &amp;quot;sensible&amp;quot; people. Pegg and Frost have explicitly stated that one of the movie's main messages is that &amp;quot;there is no God&amp;quot; and anyone who believes in Him is &amp;quot;an ignorant boob&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,412,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Perks of Being a Wallflower''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and also demonizes those opposed to a homosexual lifestyle. &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,738,570&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The People vs. Larry Flynt'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Idealizes [[pornography]] mogul [[Larry Flynt]] and claims that pornography is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; by the [[First Amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,300,385&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Philadelphia''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexual agenda setting drama.&lt;br /&gt;
|$77,446,440&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pineapple Express'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows [[drug abuse]] to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$87,341,380&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pink Flamingos''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiality]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light.  This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people.  Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing.  A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close-ups of genitalia unlike any non-porno film.  Liberals call it a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;, but it is revoltingly horrid and more like an act of [[Satan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Project X''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows teen drinking, [[drug]] use, sex, vulgar profanity and anarchic behavior to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,731,865&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Quick and the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A feminist western.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,636,537	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Quills''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays the Marquis de Sade as the protagonist, in addition to the prevalence of extremely violent acts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,732,088&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Resident Evil'' franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|2002-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R  &lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist film franchise with anti-capitalistic messages. Based on a video game franchise on the same name. The worst offender is ''Resident Evil: The Final Chapter'', where the villain is a [[Christian]] who releases a deadly virus (called the T-virus) which will destroy the human race and have him and rich colleagues rebuild the world in their image (a.k.a playing [[God]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|$244,443,938 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rise of the Planet of the Apes''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-business (the company the main character works for is painted in an extremely negative light), a lot of environmentalism throughout (including a more anti-human agenda being pushed), and the actor who played Caesar, Andy Serkis, as well as director Rupert Wyatt, both compared Caesar positively to the Marxist Argentinian revolutionary terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$481,801,049&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rent'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes [[homosexuality]] and cross-dressing as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyles. &lt;br /&gt;
|$29,077,547&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rock of Ages''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (Director's Cut is rated R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the highly unoriginal and unimaginative Broadway musical, ''Rock of Ages'' features poor [[moral]]s, promotes homosexual agenda, prostitution, drug use, and drinking, and portrays conservatives in a negative, offensively bigoted viewpoint. Many gratuitous sex scenes and sexual references are prominently shown.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,518,613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Salo: Or the 120 Days of Sodom''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Adaptation of the [[sadist]] and [[Libertine]] and atheistic text by [[Marquis de Sade]] from Communist homosexual filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini, who was killed shortly after completing this movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex and the City''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Very disturbing film, much like its TV series counterpart, promoting the use of sex everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|$152,647,258.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex Tape''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family. The main premise of the film was two nymphomaniacs trying to create a sex tape of themselves after getting kids killed their sex drive, and then recovering iPods that accidentally uploaded their tape online for everyone to see. The ending also has brief yet graphic sex scene showing what exactly was on the sex tape.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,543,473&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shakespeare in Love''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals changing history in order to suit feminists. The film also suggests that a woman was responsible for William Shakespeare's work (even though there's no record of this at all). Although it won the Academy Award for Best Picture of 1998 (thanks to the aggressive campaign tactics of the egotistical producer Harvey Weinstein), the film has aged poorly and, to this day, the overwhelming majority of critics and film viewers believe that the conservative film and Steven Spielberg's masterpiece ''Saving Private Ryan'' should have won instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SrNphaLsDs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,317,794&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Shape of Water''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting pro-Bestiality and Feminist movie directed by Marxist film director Guillermo del Toro. Also encourages homosexuality and has hints of promoting illegal immigration. &lt;br /&gt;
|$54,185,844&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She Hate Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Taking jabs at capitalism and supporting the [[homosexual agenda]], this film has a very over the top plot were a man who's laid off from his job for exposing corrupt business practices, turns to impregnating wealthy lesbians for profit. (This really is the plot).&lt;br /&gt;
|$366,037&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Small Soldiers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-military (due to the Commando Elite being depicted in a negative manner, and to a certain extent GloboTech, the ones responsible for the bad events in the film, being stated to be a Defense Contractor) and also anti-Capitalist (due to GloboTech being the ones responsible for the events of the film, including buying out the Heartland Toy Company.).&lt;br /&gt;
|$71.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Social Network'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the [[gossip]] website [[Facebook]], which feeds [[narcissism]] and destroys marriages.  The film also portrays drug use and [[misogyny]] in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,962,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spring Breakers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme.  Furthermore, this film promotes [[feminism]] and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;insecure&amp;quot;. Also, the film contains a full-on sex scene in the pool, and show nudity, in not only that scene but several others.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,724,284&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek Beyond''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has [[Sulu|Hikaru Sulu]] as a &amp;quot;married&amp;quot; homosexual with an adopted daughter, which was a decision that even [[George Takei]] (Sulu's original actor and a prominent homosexual activist) took issue with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://time.com/4398071/george-takei-simon-pegg-sulu-gay-star-trek-beyond/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$343.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Stepford Wives''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Feminist]] [[polemic]]. Ends with the protagonist beating her husband with an iron fireplace poker. The film's release coincided with the height of the [[ERA]] movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Stonewall''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film, itself, is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated the film) and failed to make its play for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.&lt;br /&gt;
|$187,674&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Straight Outta Compton''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the gangster lifestyle and gangster rap, and portrays the police as racist, along with other anti-police aspects. &lt;br /&gt;
|$161,197,785&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Superbad''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the teenage use of drugs, smoking, alcohol and sex. The whole point of the movie is for a couple of guys to lose their virginity. The movie contains many uses of profanity, underage drinking, and drug use.&lt;br /&gt;
|$121,463,226&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Taking Woodstock''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the anarchistic and chaotic Woodstock festival in 1969 as well as the Hippie Movement, painting their various lewd actions, including homosexuality, in a positive light. Also has some elements of anti-Semitism due to the main character's parents who acted as Holocaust survivors being portrayed in an unsympathetic light.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2009/08/28/taking-woodstock-mythologizing-the-worst-generation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$10 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tammy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Movie about a lazy unemployed woman who after losing her job, basically turns to a life of crime. As the film is about her and her grandma hitting the road, committing robberies, doing illegal prescription drugs, and buying beers for teenagers.  They have a Fourth of July party with no typical festivities, and is more like a drunken sex party, as the grandma reveals her breasts to the guest (the audience does not see them though).  &lt;br /&gt;
|$84,525,432&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tank Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the left-wing comic, this film glorifies feminism and debauchery while making the capitalists the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,064,495&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''That's My Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R (originally NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts pedophilia, statutory rape, gerontophilia, child neglect, incest, and other forms of aberrant sexuality as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''There's Something About Mary''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains gratuitous sex and jokes about bodily functions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$176,484,651&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''To Find a Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Pretty much a 90-minute abortion propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trash H*****s'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows decadent behavior in a positive light and glamorizes sexual deviancy.  Also the film is riddled with profanity, even the title has a naughty word (which was censored here).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Uncle Sam''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the heroes as a jaded amputated war veteran and a draft dodger, and the main villain as an extremely sociopathic soldier who joined the Army to kill as many people as he wanted, and the latter is depicted as being hyper-patriotic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Same Moon (La Misma Luna)''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Baselessly supports illegal immigration despite a pro-family sentiment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23,311,391&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Up In Smoke''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Stoner film that just promotes the use of smoking marijuana.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,364,244&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Waterworld''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Suggests that &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; was real, and the Earth has now become a flooded post-apocalyptic wasteland.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,246,220&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wolf of Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly promotes excessive, endless drug use, portraying it in a positive light, and claiming that illegal drugs such as heroin give people the will to keep working hard and stay focused and positive, as well as various forms of graphic and illicit sexual activity and voyeurism, (both heterosexual and in one scene, homosexual) and non-stop use of the f-word and hundreds of other profanities throughout. Portrays capitalists on [[Wall Street]] as greedy self-absorbed criminals obsessed with sex, drugs and violence in the form of the protagonist Jordan Belfort. Many audiences were shocked that this did not receive an NC-17 rating upon its release, especially since morality-deprived director [[Martin Scorsese]] broke the ''[[South Park]]'' movie's record for most uses of the F-word with his film. Christina McDowell, the daughter of Tom Prousalis, one of the people involved in Belfort's crimes, wrote a memoir on the subject specifically to call out Scorsese and DiCaprio for failing to recognize the victims of Belfort in the film, something even the most praiseworthy critics of the film admitted was a flaw.&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,900,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Wrinkle in Time''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A live action adaptation of the book of the same name by Disney, the film managed to completely cut out many references to Jesus Christ and biblical verses, as well as completely altered the joyous singing to remove any reference to God.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/faith/disneys-wrinkle-time-erases-books-bible-quotes-cuts-jesus-christian-figures-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Needless to say, it opened to a box office bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://movieweb.com/a-wrinkle-in-time-movie-review-2018/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$132.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''W.R.: Mystery of the Organism''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a plotless film riddled with disgusting orgies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''X-Men'' trilogy&lt;br /&gt;
|2000-2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (R for Deadpool &amp;amp; Deadpool 2)&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the comics they're based on (which were about civil rights)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nuskool.com/learn/lesson/mlk-and-malcolm-x-the-civil-rights-movement-and-the-x-men-origins/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals used this movie franchise to further the [[homosexual agenda]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cracked.com/article_20497_5-great-movies-with-mind-blowing-symbolism-you-didnt-notice.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bryan Singer director of four of the films (whom is also homosexual) was also cited for sexual assault of a minor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/business/media/in-lawsuit-director-of-new-x-men-film-is-accused-of-sexual-assault.html?rref=homepage&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And the sexual abuse has continued to this day especially with the various similar scandals that came out in Hollywood starting with Harvey Weinstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/08/usc-taking-student-petition-remove-bryan-singers-name-cinema-school-seriously/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Likewise, it was noted that Singer during filming for the first movie did not allow for the comics to be on the set, despite the film being based on them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fourcolormedmon.blogspot.com/2017/11/3-filmmakers-working-on-comics-projects.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was also anti-Military, especially in the second film and to some extent X-Men Origins: Wolverine, as the main villain, William Stryker, was the head of a para-military group and depicted as very genocidal against mutants, and was also implied to be a Vietnam War veteran. This had been added in by screenwriter David Hayter, due to his experiences with the ''[[Metal Gear Solid]]'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,817,894,919	(all together)  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Animated films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alpha and Omega''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can be seen as pro-environmentalist as well because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries as opposed to caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hard workers. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similarly to the other liberal film, ''Open Season'', it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', only in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' as opposed to film sequels.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,107,267&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ant Bully''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-Communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing. The exterminator, apparently the main antagonist, is vilified for simply doing his job, thus giving the animation an environmentalist message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,142,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Astro Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the 1952 manga and 1963 anime, liberal producers and writers twisted the cartoon to fit their [[Communist]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This strategy backfired, however, and the film was a critical failure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/astro-boys-abysmal-opening-and-imagis-sinking-ship-17586.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|$19,551,067&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Set on a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of real humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with being the leader of his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' accepts disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious, dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and gambling.&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battle for Terra'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation has environmentalist overtones and portrays a Bible-quoting, American-esque military general as the main antagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,647,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Brave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly.&lt;br /&gt;
|$540.4 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cars 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This Pixar sequel demonizes oil companies while aggrandizing ethanol (mentioned as Allinall). On the film's political agenda, director John Lasseter commented: &amp;quot;Why isn't alternative fuel more... Why isn't everybody jumping on that bandwagon? It makes so much sense: Electricity, solar, whatever. There's ethanol. There's all this stuff you could be doing. And so I thought, well, that could be really cool in that you could have big oil versus alternative fuel. That's when we kind of crafted the bad guy's story.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$191,450,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Little''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This painfully unoriginal animation, which was adapted from a 1943 World War II propaganda short by conservative filmmaker Walt Disney, ridicules family values, especially when the title chicken's widower father, Buck &amp;quot;Ace&amp;quot; Cluck, is shown to be willing to disown his son. Later on, when the aliens proceed to attempt to invade and detonate Earth, it is simply because they thought it is a living organism that kidnapped one of their children. The film is borderline nihilistic because the townspeople are mean-spirited and frequently bully Chicken Little, and a brief gag implies that warping someone's mind against their will is acceptable. As one of the worst theatrical productions ever made by the Walt Disney Company under [[Michael Eisner]], the film's mean-spirited and deeply cynical plot line is suspected to have been done to compete with [[DreamWorks]] animated films helmed by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$135,386,665&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Delgo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This pagan film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer animated film of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
|$694,782&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Emoji Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)&lt;br /&gt;
|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the &amp;quot;hero's journey&amp;quot; story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: main teenager Alex can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, &amp;quot;Words aren't cool&amp;quot;. Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony &amp;quot;Tony&amp;quot; Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,650,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''FernGully: The Last Rainforest''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is indoctrinated into children.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,650,296&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Food Fight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from being considered one of the worst computer animated films, the film vilifies capitalism and leading companies.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Free Birds''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film's main premise is about taking turkey off of the Thanksgiving menu.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55,750,480&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gnomeo and Juliet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This disturbing love story contains a joke that could be interpreted as passing off bestiality (in this case, with a garden gnome, which is normally an ''inanimate object'') as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|$194 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happy Feet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmentalist film pushes the envelope to some extent with sexual humor and implied persecution against Christians.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/3/22/6-kids-films-filled-with-green-propaganda/2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$198,000,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happy Feet 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Like the first ''Happy Feet'', it does not push the envelope too much as far as sexual humor goes, but it goes even further with themes of environmentalism as it pushes the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,006,466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Home''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains environmental, illegal immigration messages, and somewhat supports the homosexual agenda as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$177,397,510&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hunchback of Notre Dame''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during liberal maniac [[Michael Eisner]]'s reign of terror at Disney, the film does everything in its power to persecute Christians. The original source material was not intended for children, yet the Disney film was marketed as such to young audiences. In some cases, the film actually manages to be even more darker than the original book by Victor Hugo: originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was out of corporal punishment; while in the Disney film, it had been done at the whim of the Parisians just for the sake of it. To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris was also the victim of arson late into the film. This is a stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''The Jungle Book'', in which Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). Some mild language is present, too (namely the word &amp;quot;damnation&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;eternal damnation&amp;quot;). Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is explicitly male, which means that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame. There is also a bit of forced diversity in the movie as well, as Esmerelda is altered to be a full Gypsy by birth (in the original book, she was in fact ethnically French, the daughter of a French anchoress, and had been abducted by gypsies and raised by them).&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,138,851	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Legend of the Titanic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mars Needs Moms''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A 9-year-old boy named Milo defies his mother, behaves in disorderly conduct, and is somewhat nihilistic. Family values are poked fun at. It also has a brief scene poking fun at the great conservative leader, [[Ronald Reagan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$39 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''My Little Pony: The Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the bad [[anime]]-influenced liberal television series ''My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic'', this unnecessary film has the same liberal messages, relating to witchcraft, feminism, socialism, and environmentalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,885,107&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Norm of the North''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This poorly-received animation makes an environmentalist polar bear the hero and vilifies major businesses in the form of a greedy real estate mogul in a possible jab at Donald Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An incorrigibly self-serving exiled squirrel finds himself helping his former park creatures survive by raiding a nut store, which celebrates disorderly conduct, nonconformity, and environmentalism. One of the antagonists is a head businessman because he does not comply with environmentalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,251,541&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|In the sequel to ''The Nut Job'', the businessman villain returns to try to build an amusement park, again persecuted for not being an environmentalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,989,904 (Still in Theaters)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Open Season''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters runs rampant.&lt;br /&gt;
|$85,105,259  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Over the Hedge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals who are struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes, while humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by &amp;quot;backstabbing, betraying, and murdering&amp;quot; those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.&lt;br /&gt;
|$155,019,340&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''ParaNorman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, as being homosexual, ignoring the fact that he was not even implied to be that earlier. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Peter Rabbit''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him, and the various farm animals being portrayed positively in interfering with his business, with one of their plans against MacGregor even going so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had and it being treated in a positive manner. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles &amp;quot;Unintentionally Sympathetic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Unintentionally Unsympathetic&amp;quot; that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were.&lt;br /&gt;
|$146,983,492&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pocahontas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is a similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would entered public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,579,773&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Pokémon: Zoroark - Master of Illusions''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010 (Japan); 2011 (America)&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The anime film's villain is a successful businessman, which is a statement against capitalism, and one of the main protagonists of the film, Karl (perhaps named for [[Karl Marx]]), is based on the radical left-wing schlockumentarian Michael Moore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20130122121711/http://www.gamefreak.co.jp/blog/art/wp-content/images/1008/kuruto.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Princess and the Frog''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals praised this film for featuring Disney's first African American princess but ignored the fact that it is a feminist propaganda piece that insults Christianity with Louisiana Voodoo, even replacing the traditional role of the fairy godmother with a blind voodoo priestess. Capitalism, war, and the importance of family are all painted negatively. On top of that, ''The Princess and the Frog'' is said to have stolen much of its plot from great conservative film ''The Little Mermaid'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://crowdofstars.livejournal.com/14186.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$104,400,899&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Princess Mononoke''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist, feminist anime film on on steroids, where the forest gods are at war with a mining colony (whom are portrayed as the &amp;quot;bad guys&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,375,308 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Quest for Camelot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be a Disney animated musical film, only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's suppose to a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$22,510,798&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Road to El Dorado''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The main villain is a corrupt and war-hungry religious zealot seeking to seize power from the chief of the legendary city of gold, El Dorado. Since the animated film was produced by liberal elitist [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], it wouldn't be surprising that he was probably referencing the [[Republican party]] as well as Christianity (even though the antagonistic priest practices the ancient Aztec religion, he could be a metaphor for secular liberals' hatred of Christians).&lt;br /&gt;
|$50,863,742&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sausage Party''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into think that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a &amp;quot;religious obligation&amp;quot;. Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. Animated feature films, for the past century, have enthralled and enhanced audiences around the world, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed to not care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults, as they believed that there aren't and should be any animated films for adults only to enjoy. Their warped belief is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations) as well as the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Upon release, only liberally biased film critics praised the film, while general audiences were repulsed by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted a great deal of criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story &amp;quot;made his day&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|$89,645,124&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Secret World of Arrietty''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes redistribution of wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,202,743&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Shark Tale]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes multiculturalism and the deuteragonist of the film is a great white shark who is a vegetarian. Besides for being pro-vegan it is also a metaphor for being homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gaylife.about.com/od/moviestheatre/a/sharktale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$160,861,908&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp;amp; Uncut''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A disgusting celebration of [[obscenity]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|$83,137,603&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tax the Rich: An Animated Fairytale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|An animated film written by [[Fred Glass]], narrated by [[Ed Asner]], and made for the California Federation of Teachers. It repeated rhetoric made by the [[Occupy Wall Street]] group about taxing the rich to have &amp;quot;their fair share&amp;quot; and demonized Capitalism in various ways, including blaming it on Asian sweatshops as well as the housing bubble bursting in 2008. [[Kirsten Powers]], a member of [[The Daily Beast]], and herself no stranger to liberal politics, acknowledged alongside conservative economist for ''The Daily Caller'' Tucker Carson on the Sean Hannity show that the cartoon was simply inexcusable and disgusting, with Sean Hannity also explicitly referring to it as a &amp;quot;disgusting hit piece&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-slams-ed-asner-398102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121206006-ca-union-class.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film was particularly infamous for a scene where, in a segment covering the trickle-down effect, a corpulent rich man representing the 1% of wealthy Americans, after having the scales literally stacked up in his favor regarding money, upon being asked why the 1% needed so much money, he responded &amp;quot;Don't worry, this is good for you too, it will trickle down from us to you&amp;quot;, with the latter statement being accompanied with a graphic of the rich man proceeding to urinate on the other ordinary people as they yell in protest. Although later versions freeze the footage just before the man pees on the crowd in response to the complaints about the scene, it was still implied by residual audio of the urine stream. Sean Hannety and Michelle Malkin of the Sean Hannety Show both expressed disgust with the video when covering it, and when one of the producers confronted Ed Asner as the latter was about to attend one of his roles at a play, the latter falsely claimed he didn't remember what he said on it, and also claimed that the bit about rich people peeing on poor people was disgusting only because it should have been in reverse, and then asked the producer if he had any money, and if so, if he should &amp;quot;p*** on [the producer].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1ZzsAzq_M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Troll in Central Park''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film,&lt;br /&gt;
|$71,368&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schlockumentaries==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The 11th Hour]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmental schlockumentary produced and narrated by actor [[Leonardo DiCaprio]] endorses the theory of [[Anthropogenic global warming]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$707,343&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Almost any film directed by [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|All of his &amp;quot;documentaries&amp;quot; are composed of left-wing propaganda, promoting concepts such as universal health care, socialism, anti-Capitalist views, and gun control, and if that's not enough, he blatantly skews facts to push his agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Al Gore]]'s [[global warming]] alarmist [[schlockumentary]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,146,161&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unanswered sequel to Al Gore's 2006 schlockumentary, ''An Inconvenient Truth''.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Arctic Tale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary film geared towards children that pushes the false narrative of global warming and polar bears going extinct from melting ice caps.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,858,064&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Better This World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|2011 documentary &amp;quot;feature length lie&amp;quot; is a [[PBS]] film regarding the thwarted domestic terrorist attack at the 2008 [[Republican National Convention]] and liberals attempt to re-write history.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA-TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blackfish''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[CNN]] documentary film about the captivity of Tilikum, an orca involved in the deaths of three individuals, and the consequences of keeping orcas in captivity, that is nothing but a propaganda film full of so many lies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seaworldcares.com/the-facts/truth-about-blackfish/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film gained high ratings on movie review websites, making it seem the film brainwashes critics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,073,582&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Bowling for Columbine]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A 2002 schlockumentary directed by and starring [[leftist]] propagandist Michael Moore. It is a pro-[[gun control]] film and distorts facts in favor of gun-grabbing. Also included a &amp;quot;Brief history of the USA&amp;quot; segment using animation mirroring that of [[South Park]], that distorted historical facts to make it seem as though guns were implemented by racists, which actually led to the South Park [[libertarian]] creators to condemn him, enough to give Moore a cameo in Team America as a suicide bomber and make his death especially graphic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,576,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Darwinism and global warming alarmism are disguised as science.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 11/9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Donald Trump]] hit piece by none other than Michael Moore. Trump got the last laugh as it ended up flopping at the box office &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HyTh_6iyA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jesus Camp]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006 &lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This baseless attack on conservative Christianity later incited [[liberal vandalism]] of the Bible camp shown in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$902,544&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hearts and Minds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary about the Vietnam War that was inherently anti-American in its nature. Also, depicts [[Catholic]]s as bigots. It also had a brief clip at the beginning which had the rolling crew having one of the higher officers forced to talk to them with the false promise that they'd burn the tape once he is finished with it. It also has several moments of graphic sex between soldiers and Vietnamese prostitutes. It also implies throughout the film that several atrocities conducted by the North Vietnamese communists were done by Americans, including the footage where a girl ends up burned by [[napalm]] and running out naked. Noteworthy for being almost single-handedly responsible for forcing America out of Vietnam (even having the NVA mailing the producers thanking them for &amp;quot;ensuring peace&amp;quot; in Vietnam) as well as it being an influence for far-left schlockumentarist/propagandist Michael Moore, with some of its filming techniques even being reused for ''Farenheit 9/11''.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inside Job'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrat donor Charles Ferguson blames the Great Recession of 2008 on Wall Street, unspecified deregulations, the Bush Administration, and so on. He whitewashes [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]]'s role and virtually eschews any mention of the Community Reinvestment Act. While advertised as nonpartisan, it contains various interviews with Democratic politicians but none with Republican politicians. Finally, Ferguson blames the financial system for corrupting American politics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,312,735&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Truthers]] Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe blame America for [[9/11]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lost in Tel Aviv''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A couple strives to make a filthy, [[South Park]]-esque animated series.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Makers: Women who Make America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013-2014&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary glorifying [[Feminism]], in particular, the faction that started with [[Betty Friedan]]'s ''The Second Sex''. Also features as examples of role models and pioneers of feminism such degenerates as [[Lena Dunham]] (creator of the liberal TV series ''Girls''), Linda Woolverton, [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Ellen DeGeneres]], [[Jane Fonda]], and [[Gloria Allred]]. On top of that, there's no mention of conservatives [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Sarah Palin]], [[Phyllis Schlafly]], [[Michele Bachman]] or [[Carly Fiorina]]. Only showing more of their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''McLibel''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997 (TV version)&lt;br /&gt;
2005 (Extended version)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The fast food industry is blamed for environmental issues in a manner similar to ''Super Size Me'' and the liberal book ''Fast Food Nation''. Unsurprisingly, Morgan Spurlock, the director of ''Super Size Me'', and Eric Schlosser, author of ''Fast Food Nation'', are present.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal Alex Gibney attacks Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Religulous'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Militant atheism|Militant atheist]] &amp;quot;Comedian&amp;quot; [[Bill Maher]] tries to convince the audience of what he perceives to be the folly of all religion, with a special focus on Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,011,160&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Road We’ve Traveled]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tom Hanks]] directs &amp;amp; narrates Barack Obama's supposed achievements&lt;br /&gt;
|NA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Roger &amp;amp; Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Michael Moore]] blames capitalism for the downfall of Flint, Michigan instead of the [[trade unions]] that bullied businesses &amp;amp; forced them to ship jobs overseas (due to excessive taxation) or the fact that Flint has been under [[Democratic]] leadership since 1973. Later on, Moore would also admit that he never interviewed Roger Smith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://callcenterinfo.tmcnet.com/news/2007/06/16/2717913.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|$6,706,368 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Selling of the Pentagon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS pushed this anti-American/anti-Vietnam War propaganda. The producers refused to divulge their sources to the Pentagon, and at least one of the officials involved entered a minor lawsuit against CBS.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/dan-rathers-day-of-reckoning/article/5895&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She's Beautiful When She's Angry'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Nothing more than feminist propaganda being passed off as truth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$421,573&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=beautifulwhenangry.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super Size Me'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Morgan Spurlock eats nothing but food from McDonald's for a month to show the negative effects of doing so and tries using this experiment that no sane person would attempt to blame [[obesity]] on great capitalist paragons like [[McDonald's]] and [[Sodexo]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,536,423&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Tillman Story''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A liberals view of the circumstances surrounding the death of football star and [[Army Ranger]] [[Pat Tillman]]. The film portrays each and every fact as sinister. Plus, each and every fact is evidence of a conspiracy. Typical Hollywood [[George W. Bush]] bashing flick. The [[liberal bias]] was clear, make Tillman a liberal [[atheist]] anti-war hero that was cannon-fodder for the government. Tillman's actions speak louder than any twisted accusations presented in this documentary.&lt;br /&gt;
|$802,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Gun''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-second amendment, the film was criticized for its inaccuracies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Deception''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-American/Anti-Vietnam War propaganda that infamously accused General [[William Westmoreland]] of deliberately understating the force strength of the [[Vietcong]] during the Tet Offensive. This resulted in a libel suit made by Westmoreland against CBS that promptly went to court after an internal investigation was issued due to ''TV Guide'' finding damning evidence of similar journalistic malpractice that was practiced in the earlier documentary/propaganda ''The Selling of the Pentagon'', which ultimately resulted in CBS losing its libel insurance, as well as the documentary unit being scrapped when [[Larry Tisch]] took over in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wall Within''&lt;br /&gt;
|June 2, 1988&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary helmed by extremely liberal &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; [[Dan Rather]] that reinforced the false image of Vietnam War veterans being anti-social degenerates suffering from PTSD and drug abuse. Was also particularly infamous in that all six of the &amp;quot;veterans&amp;quot; that were interviewed were later confirmed by various documents to have never even served during the events they mentioned, and even the one who actually DID serve did not do so with boots on the ground and was a repairman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://loonybird.com/media_dan_rather.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-capitalist schlock vilifies [[Wal-Mart]] and other discount stores.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winter Soldier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 1972 film about U.S. troops from [[Vietnam]] put on record as baby killers, [[human rights]] violators, and general disservice to America. This myth was propagated by a few anti-war activist liberal actors that never did see combat in Vietnam and some were never in the country. The initial result was to hold hearings in [[Congress]] over the matter. All allegations were proven fabrications, falsehoods, and lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Years of Living Dangerously'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental schlockumentary spearheaded by ultra-liberal, [[James Cameron]], and featuring several proponents of [[Hollywood Values]] trying to preach the false idea of [[climate change]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-Christian and Sacrilegious films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''2001: A Space Odyssey''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Stanley Kubrick's most notable film was controversial upon its release for its atheistic themes, particularly its support of the [[Theory of evolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,954,992&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''After Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This box office failure contains a peculiar mix of both evolutionist and [[Scientology|Scientologist]] themes, and it further tarnished M. Night Shyamalan's directorial career.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60,522,097&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
||Almost any film directed by Luis Buñuel &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Luis Buñuel was an atheist bigoted against Christians.  He unjustly ridiculed Christians throughout his filmography and was a pioneer in making this schlock being considered &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; when it is really just offensive, vulgar and grotesque liberal smut.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antichrist'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This gruesome film's title says it all: it's full of horrifying imagery juxtaposed to Christian symbols.&lt;br /&gt;
|$791,867&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battlefield Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This Scientologist propaganda piece failed at the box-office and is largely considered to be one of the worst movies ever made. It &amp;quot;won&amp;quot; in nine categories at the Golden Raspberry Awards (aka, the Razzie Awards), making it the most awarded film at the Razzies until ''Jack and Jill'' took its place. Furthermore, it won one-time awards for &amp;quot;Worst Drama of our first 25 Years&amp;quot; during the 2005 awards, as well as &amp;quot;Worst Picture of the Decade&amp;quot; in 2010. Lastly, the film plays into the liberal notion of personal characteristics mattering more than true merits: John Travolta is the star because of his affiliation with the &amp;quot;church&amp;quot; of Scientology.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Book of Mormon''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Written by atheists Trey Parker and Matt Stone as what they sarcastically call &amp;quot;an atheist's love letter to religion&amp;quot;, this musical insults every aspect of the Mormon religion as two of the church's elders embark on a mission to Africa. There are several Biblical inaccuracies, which reflects the writers' insane, misguided belief that Christians will believe anything word-for-word if it's written in the Bible. In one song, a group of tribal Ugandans swears against God in the Ugandan language.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Boondock Saints''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The characters are supposed to be Christians (or &amp;quot;saints&amp;quot; as the title suggests), but they show themselves as anything but. They dispense their own form of vigilante justice (summary execution) and say the F-word in every sentence they can. The FBI agent who chases them is hinted throughout the film to be [[homosexual]]. Overall, the film is just a vulgar ''[[Death Wish]]'' rip-off. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Breaking the Waves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It wrongly claims that God rewards and endorses adulterers and prostitution while vilifying devout Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,803,298&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Canterbury Tales''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972 (Italy and West Germany)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;1980 (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Directed by communist homosexual Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, the film is an utter butchering of the seminal work by Geoffery Chaucer, even including movie-exclusive scenes proving that its viewpoint is inherently left-wing and anti-Christian. Among the most infamous additions include two priests engaging in sodomy (only one is punished via execution due to being poor and thus unable to bribe his way out) and Satan defecating out screaming friars.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cloud Atlas'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the idea of reincarnation and features anti-Christian undertones.  Additionally, supports the idea of homosexuality and [[transvestitism]], as many of the characters are resurrected as the opposite sex, while still played by the same actor.  This idea of supporting homosexuality is further brought to the forefront as one of the movie's directors recently came out as having had a sex change operation as a way to promote the movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,108,272 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Craft''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title implies, it depicts witchcraft in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,819,936&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crucible''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based upon the Broadway play by communist sympathizer Arthur Miller, this historical revisionist drama is an allegory intentionally written to compare the Christians of the Salem Witch Trials to the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and comparing those accused of witchcraft to the communists HUAC hunted, ultimately spreading the idea that American communists of the Cold War era were helpless &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of HUAC. In real history, John Proctor, one of the accused, was reported as living a “Christian life in his family and was ever ready to help such as they stood in need”, but in the film, he confesses to being a witch and publicly denounces God.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,343,114&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Da Vinci Code]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the book of the same name, this mystery film supports the false theory that [[Jesus]] Christ married [[Mary Magdalene]], pushing feminism and attacking Christianity along the way.&lt;br /&gt;
|$217,536,138&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Poets Society''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A worldly literature professor, John Keating (Robin Williams) is shown as inspiring and &amp;quot;open-minded&amp;quot;. This contrasts with the conservative Christian boarding school where he teaches, apparently portrayed as conformist, oppressive, and materialistic. The film also appears to promote teen suicide, as one of the main characters is able to commit suicide without a negative word ever being uttered against his actions by any positive character. &lt;br /&gt;
|$95,860,116&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogma'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This attack on religion, particularly [[Catholic]]ism, contains cheap smutty jokes and incorrectly makes [[God]] female.&lt;br /&gt;
|$30,652,890&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Exodus: Gods and Kings''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The prophet Moses is radically changed into an atheist and a terrorist. Glenn Beck said it essentially turns Moses into &amp;quot;an al-Qaeda member&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;doesn't want to rely on God anymore&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,014,513&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Forty Days and Forty Nights''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In this vulgar sex comedy, the main character has to give up sex for Lent, and his ex-girlfriend tries tempting him to break his commitment throughout. Interestingly, it was released ''during'' the Lent season, so William Donnahue, President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, requested to both then-[[Disney]] CEO [[Michael Eisner]] and [[Harvey Weinstein]] that they reschedule the airing of the film, citing that &amp;quot;To show a film that parodies Lent in a most vulgar way is bad enough, but to show it during Lent is outrageous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/appeal-to-michael-eisner-and-harvey-weinstein-reschedule-40-days-and-40-nights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, despite the inflammatory material in the movie, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] head Foxman did not call out the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,950,822 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Golden Compass'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the atheistic ''His Dark Materials'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,107,728&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hail Mary'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Marxist filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard retells the story of Mary and Joseph in the modern day.  As per his business casual, it was controversial upon its release. [[Pope John Paul II]] condemned it, claiming it was likely to offend the deeply religious because of its explicit nudity.  Additionally, it depicts Joseph as a womanizing man [censored] and Mary in a similar light, as there is a montage where she is completely in the nude for no apparent reason. The film was banned in deeply religious countries such as [[Brazil]] and [[Argentina]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Haunting of Molly Hartley''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Christians are either starry-eyed kooks or homicidal maniacs, while those implied to be Satanists live a happy lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,418,749&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hercules''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This film seems to take a more atheistic turn on the Greek hero as opposed to the mythology behind Hercules.&lt;br /&gt;
|$72,688,614 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inherit the Wind''&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This historical revisionist drama contains a series of Hollywood-perpetuated lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as ignorant, harsh, and punitive, based on an incorrect of his actions and testimony; falsely claiming that, at the end, Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid &amp;quot;caring&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; [[Darwin]]ists; and wrongfully depicting Darwinists in a positive light and Christians as &amp;quot;deceitful&amp;quot;. In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Invention of Lying''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Written and directed by the British atheist abomination that is Ricky Gervais, the movie takes place in an alternate reality where the concept of lying does not exist until Gervais' character invents it. As a consequence of lying not previously existing, religion hasn't existed either, so, behind the facade of a romantic comedy, the main message of the film is that all religion is based in lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (theatrical version)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist Ridley Scott directs this revisionist historical piece that portrays Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of the Crusades. In truth, the Muslims of the day won every Crusade except the first (in which Christians briefly prevailed), the third and the sixth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Last Temptation of Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film's eponymous final sequence depicts the crucified Jesus—tempted by what turns out to be Satan in the form of a beautiful, androgynous child—experiencing a dream or alternative reality where he comes down from the cross, marries Mary Magdalene (and later Mary and Martha), and lives out his life as a full mortal man. He learns on his deathbed that he was deceived by [[Satan]] and begs God to let him &amp;quot;be [God's] son,&amp;quot; at which point he finds himself once again on the cross. At other points in the film, Jesus is depicted as building crosses for the Romans, being tormented by the voice of God, and lamenting the many sins he believes he has committed.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of these departures from the gospel narratives—and especially a brief scene wherein Jesus and Mary Magdalene consummate their marriage—several Christian groups organized vocal protests and boycotts of the film prior to and upon its release. One protest, organized by a religious Californian radio station, gathered 600 protesters to picket the headquarters of Universal Studios' then-parent company MCA. One of the protestors dressed up as MCA's Chairman Lew Wasserman and pretended to drive nails through Jesus' hands into a wooden cross. Evangelist Bill Bright offered to buy the film's negative from Universal in order to destroy it. The protests were effective in convincing several theater chains not to screen the film. One of those chains, General Cinemas, later apologized to Scorsese for doing so. &lt;br /&gt;
Mother Angelica, a Catholic nun and foundress of Eternal Word Television Network, described ''Last Temptation'' as &amp;quot;the most blasphemous ridicule of the Eucharist that's ever been perpetrated in this world&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a holocaust movie that has the power to destroy souls eternally.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
In some countries, including Greece, Turkey, Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, the film was banned or censored for several years. As of July 2010, the film continues to be banned in the Philippines and Singapore.&lt;br /&gt;
|$8,373,585&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legion''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In this blasphemous film, God uses an army of angels to wipe out humanity, ignoring Psalm 91:11's promise that He sends angels to protect humanity.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,168,080 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ledge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist screenplay writer Matthew Chapman confirmed that the main character is the first openly atheist hero in American cinema. Likewise, his work misleadingly depicts Christianity, via the character Jon, as being &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot;, abusive, and domineering. Because of this, ''The Ledge'' failed at the box office flop and received generally negative reviews.&lt;br /&gt;
|$610,986&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The prominent historical figure Joan of Arc is psychologically and emotionally unstable, impulsive, and prone to mood swings, so she leads the French army to victory purely out of selfishness, cruelty, and vengeance. However, historical evidence proves the contrary. Evidently, this film was made to criticize Roman Catholicism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$66,976,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Monty Python's Life of Brian''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A man is born on the same day as Christ Jesus and is mistaken for the Messiah. Expect an hour and a half of rampant sacrilege to follow suit.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,398,164&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Monty Python's The Meaning of Life]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's ninety minutes of absurdist, godless existentialism with a sacrilegious person's view of [[Heaven]] at the end by the staunchly nonreligious British troupe Monty Python. Need we say more?&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,929,552 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Most Hated Woman in America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This biographical drama sympathizes with [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]], who is responsible for ending official Bible-reading in American public schools in 1963 ([[Atheism and Mass Murder|and disastrous results that liberals refuse to talk about]]), and not surprisingly turns her into a martyr.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Missionary''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Copying the deranged lover plot device from other films (ex. Fatal Attraction), this film makes the maniac a Mormon.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Noah'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In a liberal take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]], liberals, going along with their usual ''modus operandi'', shoehorn in harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, insisting that the [[Theory of Evolution]] is &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot;. In addition, many traits of the &amp;quot;antagonists&amp;quot; appeared to be more Biblical than those of the &amp;quot;protagonists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Patterson, Roger &amp;amp; Chaffey, Tim (March 29, 2014). [https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noah-movie-detailed-review/ The ''Noah'' Movie: Our Detailed Review]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved August 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$101,200,044&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Oh! Heavenly Dog''&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the title fool you. The movie is anything but heavenly, as it smears Christianity and presents a false depiction of reincarnation.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Practical Magic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 &lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another film glorifying witchcraft and attempting to mix romantic comedy into it (which even puzzled liberal critics).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/practical_magic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was one of the many wiccan movies released during the late 90's.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,683,377&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Priest'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly anti-Catholic and pro-homosexual.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,165,845&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In this storm of political correctness for the sake of political correctness, the Christianity of Robin Hood and his Merry Men is heavily downplayed, save for Friar Tuck's initial bigotry toward the Muslim character Azeem. Azeem, who is not present in the original Robin Hood legends but was created for this version of the Robin Hood saga, is depicted as a wise, open-minded, tolerant mystic. Robin Hood and Azeem are portrayed by liberals Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
|$390.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''September Dawn''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Mormon propaganda piece blatantly distorts history. The Mountain Meadows Massacre was perpetrated by a group of Mormons, but, despite what this movie says, Church authority did not authorize such an act, and they still condemn it to this day. This movie was strategically released in order to muddy the waters of Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign. Fortunately, the filmmakers did not get away with their heinous crimes, as ''September Dawn'' received extremely negative reviews from film critics, very weak box office receipts, and a Golden Raspberry Award nomination.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,066,555&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Hill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the horror-themed video game series with the same name (go figure), the Christians are the cult-like antagonists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,982,632 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Night, Deadly Night''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A man becomes a serial killer after abuse from the Christian orphanage wherein he grew up. Conservative Christians successfully protested being vilified, and the film was pulled from theaters within one week of its release. &lt;br /&gt;
|$2,491,460&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spotlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Another film bashing Christianity. The &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; uncover a scandal of child molestation in the Catholic Church. The film portrays them as &amp;quot;brave&amp;quot; (because Hollywood hasn't bashed Christianity enough) but ignores the fact that homosexual infiltrators within the Church, seeking to discredit and damage the Church, were responsible for the atrocities and their subsequent coverup. Strangely, the same unspeakable acts have been happening legally in Islamic nations but they are conveniently ignored by the liberal media (if the journalists uncovered that, then that would be an example of bravery). It also downplays the effect homosexuality had by having several characters specifically deny that homosexuality was a factor in their victimization and subsequent turns to homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$45,055,776 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek V: The Final Frontier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Secular humanists are kind, but the religiously devout as violent and ruthless. Even liberally biased critics didn't like it, as it won three Golden Raspberry Awards (Razzie Awards), including Worst Picture of 1989, and was nominated for three more Razzies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$63 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sunshine''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This vehemently nonreligious, apocalyptic film is full of scientific inaccuracy. Christianity is embodied in a homicidal psychopath, who believes that it is the will of God for the world to end. This Christian is willing to kill anyone who gets in the way of what he believes is the will of God. The personified atheism, in contrast, is &amp;quot;sympathetic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;kind&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;pro-humanity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Truman Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An atheism and humanism propaganda piece about liberal president Harry Truman. Truman doesn't realize his seemingly ordinary life is a reality TV show, overseen by Christof, the show's heartless and manipulative creator. Christof lives in the fake sky above Truman, watching over him, controlling everything from the weather to Truman's destiny. He is an allegorical substitute for the Christian God. (Notice &amp;quot;Christ&amp;quot; in his name.) Truman must escape from the false world of the show (Christianity) and triumph over Christof. As Truman appears to walk on water in the ending, the film is displaying the false, human-worshipping sentiment that man can replace God and be Lord of his own life.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,542,121&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Victor Frankenstein''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The protagonist of the classic conservative novel warning against the consequences of playing God is now one of the most openly atheist protagonists in cinema.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debatable Whether Liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''21 Jump Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two police officers try to take down a drug ring in high school where the villains are environmentalists and drug dealers. But contains many sexual references, full profanity, and many religious insults. A parodic comedy remake of the 1987–91 [[Fox Network]] police drama of the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
|$201,585,328&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Accepted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It criticizes the [[Department of Education]] (or colleges and universities in general) and our protagonist lives the America dream by starting his own college, but then the juvenile humor, gross-out humor and drug abuse steps in. &lt;br /&gt;
|$36,323,505&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Aeon Flux''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-cloning film, but also pro-feminism as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,874,337 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antz''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|It's produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], downplays the military, and possesses an implicit promotion of Communism via the main character, but also has an Anti-Eugenics message too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90,757,863&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Army of Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its unrealistic depictions of demons, it's a pretty gun-centric pro-Second Amendment film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,502,976&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atlantis: The Lost Empire''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during the [[Michael Eisner]] era of [[Disney]]. On the one hand, the main villain is a military commander who would endanger the lost city of Atlantis just to be rich, and it is implied that he would commit treason by selling the power source to the Kaiser during World War I for the same motivation. The theft of the crystal to become rich could be seen as a condemnation of capitalism. That being said, however, capitalism has also been promoted in a more positive light in the form of Preston B. Whitmore, an eccentric but ultimately good-hearted billionaire who funded the expedition in the first place, and in addition, most of the principal cast was shown to have dreams of getting a better lot in society, with it being heavily implied in the ending that they ultimately succeeded in achieving those dreams after selflessly trying to save Atlantis, which acts as an implicit promotion of both capitalism and the American Dream.&lt;br /&gt;
|$84,056,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|A young woman overcomes a shallow society and finds true love. Although by comparison a powerful and immensely popular antidote to [[feminism]] to the [[liberal]] movies churned out by [[Disney]] since, as well as overall promoting redemption (as seen with the Beast's transformation), and also promoting some family values (such as Belle being loyal to her father), there were a few hints at feminist propaganda at the beginning of the film, such as Belle being different from the villagers because she can read, which is implied to not be supported by the villagers at all (feminist propaganda often falsely claims that women couldn't get an education until the 1960s), as well as Belle being unwilling to hold the role of housewife for Gaston or raising children, and later her blaming the titular Beast for her fleeing the castle despite most of the events leading up to and after that event being largely her fault and the story framing that as being a good thing she did. On a related note, a scene that had Belle baking a cake for her father when he got home ended up cut at the order of Linda Woolverton, with her reason specifically being because &amp;quot;a liberated woman [like Belle] wouldn't know how to bake,&amp;quot; essentially implying that baking would have been the activity of non-liberated women, a typical statement by feminists.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Woolverton and Belle&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.mouseplanet.com/8500/Linda_Woolverton_and_Belle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.yahoo.com/news/belle-beauty-beast-became-disneys-155053182.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the opening song and the reprise has Belle having a similar &amp;quot;smarter-than-thou&amp;quot; personality that is all too common among liberals, having her refer to the villagers derogatorily as &amp;quot;little people&amp;quot; in the beginning of the opening song, repeatedly stressing the &amp;quot;provincial&amp;quot; elements of the village when expressing her desire to leave the village, complaining about Gaston due to considering him &amp;quot;boorish and brainless&amp;quot; shortly after his failed proposal, and also dismissing the villagers as &amp;quot;they&amp;quot; when mentioning her goals (&amp;quot;I want so much more than what ''they've'' got planned&amp;quot;). On that note, due to Beast being unwilling to even defend himself, let alone the castle servants, when the mob arrived to kill him until Belle had arrived at the last second, which had been the result of Belle's attempts at civilizing Beast, it gives the implication that the ideal male in the film is not allowed to get angry or act violently even in self-defense unless a woman was physically present. Then-Disney Chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg also mentioned that he wanted &amp;quot;a feminist twist&amp;quot; on the original fairy tale by creating a heroine who is &amp;quot;a departure from typical Disney female characters&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.mcall.com/1991-11-22/features/2825583_1_beast-s-castle-fairy-tale-madame-gabrielle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which had partly been done in response to negative criticisms towards Ariel in the Conservative film ''The Little Mermaid'' (which had been the immediate preceding film) by liberal critics,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Woolverton and Belle&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and the feminist writer [[Linda Woolverton]] made clear that she made Belle a feminist and based her on the women's liberation movement from the 1970s in order to avoid creating another insipid princess.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Beauty and Maleficent&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url = http://time.com/2798136/maleficent-beauty-beast-writer/|title = The Same Woman Wrote Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast—Here’s How They’re Linked|date = May 30, 2014|accessdate = January 16, 2014|website = Time|publisher = |last = Rothman|first = Lily}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ew.com/article/2016/05/26/linda-woolverton-alice-belle-disney-heroines?xid=entertainment-weekly_socialflow_twitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bustle.com/articles/163686-the-one-thing-beauty-and-the-beast-fans-probably-dont-know-about-the-creation-of-belle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mouseplanet.com/8500/Linda_Woolverton_and_Belle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/1992-01-19/entertainment/ca-544_1_disney-film&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gaston is a conservative and hardworking hunter who is considered by the villagers to be their town hero, but is shown to be the main villain of the movie (it should also be noted that in the original screenplay for the film, Gaston was intended to be a Marquess [French nobleman], meaning the decision to make him a conservative and hardworking hunter was made after a rewrite). In addition, although not to the same degree as other Disney films that came after it (i.e., ''The Hunchback of Notre Dame'' and ''The Princess and the Frog''), the film also has a slight anti-Christian bent, as the villagers (strongly implied by various verses in the opening song and the mob song, as well as a failed wedding, to be practicing and devout Christians) were later briefly seen supporting a plan that went against God's teachings, as well as overall depicted as being idiots, while Belle, the character framed as an intellectual and a moral figure, is not even seen or even implied to believe in God at all. In addition, Belle's love for Beast (where it is implied that she was largely unaware of the Beast being formerly a human prince) could be seen as promoting bestiality. Also, it is the first Disney movie to neither show nor hint at the two love interests getting married, and in fact, the only &amp;quot;wedding&amp;quot; in the film was the one Belle ruined, creating negative implications about marriage as a result, as well as starting a string of movies that don't paint marriage in a positive light. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the only three females in the film who are implicitly supportive of marriage and Christianity are demeaned, depicted as dumb blondes with the script and credits explicitly referring to them derogatorily as &amp;quot;the bimbettes.&amp;quot; There was also a slight anti-hunting sentiment in the film, due to the main villain, as aforementioned, explicitly being labelled as a hunter. There were also several overtones of a pro-homosexual agenda within the film, including the mob song late into the film, largely because of the executive producer, Howard Ashman, being gay and dying from AIDs at the time the film was made. One of the protagonistic characters, Lumiere, is briefly seen making out with a featherduster and was implied that the two weren't married, with some hints at Lumiere being an unrepentant womanizer (with the implication being further increased in the Special Edition-exclusive song &amp;quot;Human Again&amp;quot; where Lumiere mentioned he had a &amp;quot;mademoiselle in each arm&amp;quot;, would be &amp;quot;courting again, chic and sporting again&amp;quot;, and Mrs. Potts interjecting &amp;quot;Which should cause several husbands alarm.&amp;quot; with Lumiere laughing at this, heavily implying that Lumiere was an adulterer to married women). In addition, Maurice is depicted as slightly addled and eccentric, as well as being naïve (such as thinking Gaston was a good match for Belle despite the story making clear he wasn't), and while he does try to go out of his way to save Belle in the midway point of the film, he ultimately needs saving twice and is unable to save Belle at all, which makes it debatable as to just how pro-family the narrative actually was. In addition, some elements of the film were later reused in the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Movies#Social|definitely liberal]] ''Maleficent'' movie.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Beauty and Maleficent&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$$218,967,620 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast'' (2017 remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|On the one hand, the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is the latest in the film trend of needlessly and shamelessly remaking animated films or children's stories for the sake of earning easy revenue and capitalizing on current film trends in the modern, soulless Hollywood studio system. Liberals also seized the opportunity with the remake to exploit diversity and promote some liberal values within the ''Beauty and the Beast'' universe. The final result of the diversity inclusion in the cast of characters is that it feels self-congratulatory in the sense of putting it all in for the sake of having it, rather than having it be just a part of the story and the film. One notable example is the filmmakers' decision to make LeFou, Gaston's diminutive and bumbling sidekick, a homosexual who is conflicted with his feelings for Gaston (although it should be noted that in the actual script, it was never actually specified that LeFou was homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2017/03/03/josh-gad-lefou-beauty-and-the-beast/98679284/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). At the end of the film, LeFou is shown taking a romantic interest in a musketeer who is now a transgender woman after being transformed into one during Gaston's siege of the Beast's castle. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only is it an atrocious and needless artistic decision of the filmmakers to needlessly incorporate diversity simply for the sake of it, but the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' also serves as an example that liberals can legitimately shoehorn the [[homosexual agenda]] into Disney films. Adding salt to the wound, the filmmakers also further changed history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to previous Disney films like ''Mulan'' (1998), ''Pocahontas'' (1995) and ''The Princess and the Frog'' (2009) (most infamously, the villagers are shown to be explicitly intolerant of Belle learning how to read and teaching girls to do the same, smashing her washing machine in the process, despite the fact that the namesake for the village in this film, Mdm. Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve, the original author for the fairy tale, was herself a woman). The 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is now even more of a feminist propaganda film than the 1991 animated film version ever was. There were also hints at an anti-war message due to Gaston being turned into a war veteran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, there were also several surprisingly Conservative messages in the film, significantly more than in the 1991 version. Namely, Christianity is treated in a far more positive light in this film than in the 1991 version as one of the few friends Belle has in this version is the village Chaplain named Pere Robert who is shown to be sympathetic to her bibliophilic nature and also attempts to prevent Maurice from being sent to the Asylum, and later is shown to be horrified at the formation of the mob against the Beast (it is to be noted that in the original 1991 film, the character in question was merely a bookseller, not a priest, and most of the villagers, implied to be devout Christians, were demonized in the film), which was also surprisingly accurate to history despite the aforementioned changing of history in the film (in real history, Christianity, especially the Catholic Church, actively encouraged literacy, writing, and arithmetic among both genders, with girls being taught in convents or at the home.). In addition, Maurice actually is shown to be more proactive in this film, such as directly refusing Gaston's attempt at marrying Belle and even attempting to expose Gaston as an attempted murderer and psychopath, and also plays a direct role in saving Belle and himself from the paddywagon after she exposes Beast to the villagers (in the original film, although he does set out to try and find Belle and save her after trying to get the villagers to help failed, he ultimately required saving by her due to catching an illness during his trek, and ultimately needed saving alongside Belle via Chip). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, Lumiere as well as the featherduster (named Plumette in this version) are shown to be an actual loving couple (in the original film, it is heavily implied that Lumiere was a frequent womanizer and that the featherduster was also sexually loose), and the remake also doesn't demonize traditional marriage nearly as much as in the 1991 version (notably, the remake cut out Gaston's wedding proposal as well as Belle shoving Gaston into mud in front of attendees). The forgiveness and redemption theme was also significantly more emphasized in the remake, due to Beast ultimately forgiving Maurice after learning why he had tried to steal the rose and even allowing Belle to save Maurice specifically to make up for his past behavior, with Maurice also forgiving Beast upon Belle showing him the baby rattle (originally, Maurice was a bit more hesitant to forgive the Beast). It is also shown to be significantly more pro-family as well, as not only is Belle shown to be loyal to her father like in the 1991 original, but as noted above, Maurice himself took measures to protect Belle and notably agreed with Belle that Gaston would not have worked out for her (originally, Maurice also thought Gaston was alright for her), and he also was shown to be very protective of Belle after his wife had died from the plague, with Belle's mom specifically sacrificing herself by telling them to leave her behind to allow Belle a healthy life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the triplets (renamed to &amp;quot;Village Lasses&amp;quot;) in the remake were depicted as having haughtiness, arrogance, being jealous of Belle, as well as overall being nasty people, including briefly smirking at Belle when she was locked up in the paddywagon as well as being actively involved in the arrest of Maurice as well as the later attack on Beast's castle (in the original film, the triplets were not shown to have any negative behavior to them besides their crushing on Gaston [not participating in the later arrest of Maurice, let alone the attack on Beast's castle shortly afterward during the climax, and also implying at one point that they were willing to give their blessing to Gaston marrying Belle when Belle refused him in the beginning of the film, and while they were present during the final lyrics for the Gaston reprise where Gaston explicitly divulged key details for his blackmail plan, the way it was framed could easily be interpreted as the triplets genuinely not knowing about the plan due to their absence from Maurice's arrival up to the scene where Gaston whispers the plan to LeFou.], and it is also heavily implied that they supported traditional marriage and were demeaned in the film by being referred to in the script as The Bimbettes and treated as dumb blondes for this reason). In addition, according to the film's director Bill Condon as well as one of the triplets' actresses, Rafaelle Cohen, the reason the triplets were intensely jealous and spiteful of Belle was because their mother neglected them while doting on Belle, showcasing the dangers of parental neglect.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Paints Christmas in a positive light, and has Beast learning the meaning behind it, as well as putting aside the past relating to it being the reason he was cursed. Also significantly tones down the more feminist messaging from the original film. The manner in which Christmas was depicted, however, was closer to the secular view of Christmas than the actual intended meaning of the holiday being a celebration of the birth of [[Jesus Christ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (Direct to video movie)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bee Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Its debatable whether or not its environmentalist or against it. It does show the destructiveness of environmentalism (i.e. butting into nature's problems in the name of helping her). The anti-human human sentiments in the movie turned out to be wrong, however, the humans are taking the honey made by the bees, similar to the welfare program of taking from those who worked for it. Others believe the movie promotes [[bestiality]], and is just disguised as a family movie. &lt;br /&gt;
|$287,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Campaign''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Political comedy depicts the Democrat candidate (Will Ferrell) as an obnoxious, drunken womanizer and satire of [[John Edwards]], although the Republican candidate (Zach Galifianakis) is portrayed just as negatively as a corrupt capitalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$33,165,738&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Run''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], this vegan propaganda film compares a chicken farm to the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynn_A73hcfs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The main villain of the movie is a capitalist who wants to make chicken pies. The film also promotes elements of feminism and anti-Americanism. On other hand the main villain of the movie is also a feminist as well as she called her husband's ancestors &amp;quot;poor worthless nothings&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$106,834,564&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crow''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The tagline claims that our hero is an angel, but he doesn't display any Christian values. However, there is an anti-drug scene were Eric Draven (the hero) makes a drug addict mother realize that her daughter needs her &amp;amp; gets her off drugs. On top of that the film's villains are nihilist anarchists. The film is notable for being Brandon Lee's last film, as an accident on the set killed him during production.&lt;br /&gt;
|$50,693,129&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ed Wood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it does glorify cross dressing and the [[homosexual agenda]]. It still is pro-capitalism and the film also glorifies the American dream. As despite the obstacles Wood faces, he still continues doing what he loves in making movies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,887,457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Edward Scissorhands''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Endorsed by the Christian website ChristianAnswers.net with a 4 out of 5 star rating. Conversely however, a prominently featured Christian character - the only character in the movie ever identified as Christian - is portrayed as fanatical and bigoted against people with scissors for hands.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,362,352&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Falling Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R 	&lt;br /&gt;
|Film takes jabs at many [[liberal values]], [[illegal immigration]], union workers, multiculturalism, (one scene where Bill tells his ex-wife that the ice cream shop him and his family used to go to is now a Mexican store) and foreign aid (in one scene Bill asks an illegal Korean immigrate a rhetorical question on how much America has given his country and yells at him after he refuses to learn the language).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4tC4qfv92Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It's also one of the very few films to be truthful in the &amp;quot;Nazis were right wingers&amp;quot; myth perpetrated by liberals, in which Bill informs a Neo-Nazi that he's an American and the Nazi is a sick a-hole. As well as many shots where the America flag is trashed upon (which could symbolize how liberalism has trashed everything America has stood for).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piPzExBdfIg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But at the same time it also takes jabs at capitalism, where Bill believes he's no longer commercially valuable. And although the plot is about man trying to reach his daughter's birthday party, the film seems to toy with its audience in suggesting whether he's mentally ill or not, as opposed to a pro-family message.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,903,593&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Fargo]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant sheriff with traditional American family values solves an elaborate criminal embezzlement, kidnapping, and murder scheme. It remains debatable whether she is a feminist or feminine protagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,611,975	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghost''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[Bible]] claims ghosts don't exist. Still this film toys with idea that they do, also it has liberal actress Whoopi Goldberg as a psychic medium. Nevertheless, the film does show Christian values, as ghost Sam Wheat tries to uncover a bank fraud case, when he does convinces Goldberg to give the money to a Christian charity. It also has an anti-infidelity message, as despite being widowed, Sam's wife Molly still refuses to be with anyone else, even when his false friend Carl tries to hit on her. Also it isn't PC on [[Eternal damnation|damnation]], as the villains are seen being cared away helplessly by evil spirits after they die.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$217,631,306&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Good Kill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Ethan Hawke plays a man who questions the ethics of his job as a drone pilot, while it is taking a jab at the [[Barack Obama]] regime (Obama has droned more people in the Middle East than George W. Bush, most of whom were innocent bystanders and the left has ignored it or claimed it was a &amp;quot;Fox News conspiracy&amp;quot;). It could also be against the War on Terror too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$316,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Grave of the Fireflies''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|While the film has been labeled anti-war, the director Isao Takahata stated the actual meaning was about growing up. The film's message is still debatable to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Halloween III: Season of the Witch''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the two films before it (which has mass murder Michael Myers) this film's villain is a pagan who plans on sacrificing children via witchcraft to bring back the original celebration of Halloween. However he does this by selling masks to them which many critics pointed out may have been an anti-capitalism message.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/22/movies/haloween-iii-plotting-a-joke.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is also an adulterer.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hansel &amp;amp; Gretel: Witch Hunters''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Western fairy tale characters Hansel and Gretel are now adults and have their own private bounty hunting organization in hunting witches. Portrays witchcraft in a negative manner, and guns in good light. But the gore, graphic violence and brief nudity is rather unnecessary.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$55,703,475 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harry and the Hendersons''&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple uses of the dreaded S-word in profanity)&lt;br /&gt;
|Add info please.&lt;br /&gt;
|$49 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''High Noon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A favorite of both Presidents [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and [[Bill Clinton]]; [[John Wayne]] said it was &amp;quot;the most un-American thing I've ever seen in my whole life&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hoot''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie about a bunch of kids who stand up to a CEO company that is trying to put one of its restaurants on a burrowing owl habitat. However the movie contains many morals, and promoting friendship. It does give kids the great inspiration to stand up for what they believe is right. &lt;br /&gt;
|$8,117,637&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to Horrible Bosses. Though this film could be argued to actually support the American Dream and capitalism, which its processor clearly did not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,445,357&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Hunger Games]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Futuristic totalitarians plan titular annual televised &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; as punishment on the descendants of failed revolutionaries from a past uprising. Although technically a message against totalitarianism and for individualism, Leftist actor Donald Sutherland, who played President Snow, implied that the struggles of the films' protagonists were supposed to be derived from the Occupy Wall Street movement, and the book's author also indicated that the events of the book were based on the George W. Bush administration.&lt;br /&gt;
|$406,267,858&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrayals an inside joke of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] by having [[Adam Sandler]] and Kevin James pretend to be a homosexual couple in order to receive benefits. The villains of the movies are government ranking officials out to prove with they are really homosexual. However contains some scenes of girls in lingerie and Adam Sandler checking out some girls. The film took place prior to the 2011 enactment of the Marriage Equality Act, which claimed to &amp;quot;legalize&amp;quot; &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; for same-sex couples in the state. At the time the film was released, the state allowed for residents to file for unregistered cohabitation rights, and various municipal and county governments had offered domestic partnership registries.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,059,556&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Although the film does depict the Communists as bad guys (to such an extent that the Russian Communist Party in Moscow was angered by the decision), and implies that Indiana Jones is a Republican or at the very least an [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] fan, the film also depicts McCarthyism in a negative light, with one character implying that the American Government was simply being paranoid and denies there being a sizeable Communist infiltration in America, and also seems to promote paganism in the form of the Crystal Skull.&lt;br /&gt;
|$786.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Giant''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation espouses anti-war themes and also brief but strong anti-hunting sentiments. Firearms in general are shown in a negative light, with the phrase &amp;quot;guns kill&amp;quot; being repeated a total of three times. The titular giant is referred to as a &amp;quot;big gun that walks.&amp;quot; From a conservative viewpoint, he is a poor metaphor for a real gun; unlike a law-abiding citizen who is a gun owner, the giant has no choice in his actions because he is a war machine programmed with the inability to use his weapons for good, but only to use them thoughtlessly and senselessly. The story involves him learning to hide his weapons and &amp;quot;not be a gun&amp;quot;. The conclusion is that, in order to protect the public from an incoming missile, he must fly into it and kill himself rather than use his guns against it. As it is explained, &amp;quot;It's bad to kill, but it isn't bad to die.&amp;quot; In addition, despite being set during the Cold War, it largely downplays the Soviet menace that was occurring during that time, as the main antagonist, Kent Mansley, is a government agent (implied to be part of the NSA) investigating the titular Iron Giant who at one point while launching a tirade against Hogarth Hughes alludes to the possibility that the Communists may have been responsible for the Giant's creation as a means to destroy America and that they must destroy it before &amp;quot;it destroys us&amp;quot; and is treated negatively for it. Also features some foul language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That all being said, however, despite the definite anti-gun and anti-hunting themes, the film does portray the military in a fairly positive light, as General Rogarth was shown to be even-headed and only willing to use military force if confronted with evidence requiring for it, also making clear that he was not happy about bringing out an implied large military force for what was apparently a hoax, and while the military does try to attack the Iron Giant late into the film, it was only because they had been manipulated into doing so by Kent Mansley by the latter lying about the giant killing Hogarth Hughes, and only when confronted with evidence that Hogarth had in fact been alive did the military stand down. In addition, when Hogarth left to investigate the evidence of a &amp;quot;martian&amp;quot; taking out an antenna, he proceeded to salute a photograph of his father, who was implied to have died during World War II. Also has a positive portrayal of the American icon Superman in it. There's also an anti-materialist message in it as well as an implicitly Christian message, as Hogarth talks to the Giant about how humans and other forms of life possess souls that live on even after their mortal bodies die.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,732,614&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Lady''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The British biopic of [[Conservative Party]] leader and 1979-90 [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|British Prime Minister]], Margaret Thatcher, showing the effects of conservative economic policy on Britain, helping to lift the country out of its recession. However, it also showed Margaret Thatcher in a somewhat negative light, depicting her during her late years as becoming slightly addled.&lt;br /&gt;
|$80,554,188 (international including UK), $27,081,674 (US - domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|It promotes the concept of self-worth and individualism ultimately, and that choices do in fact matter and have consequences, and ultimately promotes faith to a certain extent. However, it also falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes [[faith]] with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,300,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jaws''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalism film, the heroes are police chief Brody, WWII vet Quint and Marine Biologist Hooper who team up to take on a monstrous, man-eating great white shark. However, there is a part where (despite the warning) the Mayor keeps the beaches open for the sake of money, which some may say is an anti-capitalism statement. Notable for being one of the first summer blockbusters. It was followed by three sequels in 1978, 1983 and 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
|$260,000,000&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jaws.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Juno''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant teenage woman rejects [[abortion]] and decides for an adoptive birth instead. This movie pushes [[feminism]] and marginalizes the essential role of fatherhood.&lt;br /&gt;
|$143,492,840&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jurassic World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Jurassic Park is now functioning and open for business and the new boss is a woman, an obvious feminist message. Also the military is downgraded as they plan to weaponize dinosaurs. Despite all this feminists weren't impressed and labeled it sexist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/10/jurassic-world-a-big-dumb-sexist-mess.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and even liberal critics called the weaponizing dinosaurs plot asinine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thoughtcatalog.com/olos-nah/2015/06/ill-just-say-what-everyone-is-thinking-jurassic-world-is-terrible/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$652,270,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kiki's Delivery Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film does show the value of hard work and is pro-capitalism (Kiki owns her own delivery business), but at the same time depicts feminism and witchcraft in a positive light. &lt;br /&gt;
|$18 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (director's cut)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A story set in the Crusades period about a young knight. While the theatrical version was a pure liberal media, the director's cut promotes fighting, honor, duty, and portrays the noble Knights Hospitallers in a positive light. That being said, the movie still portrays Knights Templars in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,398,413&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingsman: The Secret Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalist, the villain attempts to eradicate the human race because of his belief in man-made global warming. Though the film is full of language and violence as well as a brief nudity scene. There's also one scene were one of the characters gets into a bloody fight with a group of Christians whom are portrayed as &amp;quot;racists&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$128,261,724&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Knocked Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unemployed, immature and childish 23-year old Ben Stone (Seth Rogen) has a one-night stand with serious career woman Alison Scott (Katherine Heigl), with the unintended consequence of pregnancy. Alison's mother (Joanna Kerns) says she should get the pregnancy &amp;quot;[[abortion|taken care of]]&amp;quot;, while Ben's best friend Jonah (Jonah Hill) suggests that &amp;quot;I won't say the A-word, but it rhymes with abortion.&amp;quot; Alison decides to keep the child, while Ben decides to find a real job, grow up, and become a father.&lt;br /&gt;
|$148,768,917&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The LEGO Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Large Government, with a message that anyone has the potential to be extraordinary. However is also anti-capitalist, and the main villain is Lord Business.&lt;br /&gt;
|$257,760,692 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lincoln''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Bio film on conservative icon [[Abraham Lincoln]], played wonderfully by Daniel Day-Lewis. Although overall very positive towards Lincoln and the Republican Party, it nonetheless downplays the role the Democrat Party played in the institution of slavery during the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
|$182,207,973&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lionheart''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-family as Jean-Claude Van Damme plays Lyon Gaultier (nicknamed Lionheart) who becomes a street fighter to help pay his sister-in-law's expenses after her husband is killed. During this time he also tries to reconnect with his estranged family. However he gets into the country illegally, which some could point out is a pro-illegal immigration statement. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,078,196&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lorax''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it has an environmentalist agenda, it also states that monopolies are wrong.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$214,030,500 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulan''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has Liberals changing history to suit their feminist agenda similar to what they did in Pocahontas as well as some historical revisionism (In the film the Huns are at war with China, even though this never happened). However, the central theme of [[Filial piety]] from work it was based on, [[The Ballad of Mulan]], is still present ultimately, as the main reason Mulan joined the military was because her father suffered a severe injury that made him unfit for combat, and the film is pro-Military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,620,254 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''P.C.U.''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|College students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,350,774&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Passion of the Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer; portrayed nails as through the hands rather than through the wrists as depicted by the [[Shroud of Turin]] and confirmed by modern science.&lt;br /&gt;
|$370,782,930&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pillow Talk''&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading lady, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pulp Fiction''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite saying the F-word in almost every sentence, the film (surprisingly) has a pro-Christian message as after being shot at, every bullet misses mob hit men Jules Winnfield and Vincent Vega. Winnfield believes it was a divine intervention and message from God to stop his life of crime. His partner doesn't believe this but it's later proven to be true as he perished later on in the movie. Also has sadomasochistic homosexuals as the bad guys. And (sort of) has an anti-drug message as mob boss's girlfriend Mia Wallace is seen also overdosing (a negative side to drugs) on heroin.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107,928,762 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Rescuers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The villain in this movie is a capitalist pawn shop owner, who wants a rare diamond to make her rich, to add insult to injury they're Southerners. Also paints the United Nations in a positive light. On the other hand, the main villain is also a feminist, and the main human protagonist is shown praying for not only herself (even she has been kidnapped) but for all the kids in the orphanage (who have not been kidnapped). This is one of the rare Disney films feature a [[Christian]] character that's treated in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$29 million  	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Animated Disney adaptation of the iconic story, depicting all of the characters as anthropomorphic animals. Although the story itself was based on [[Joseph Ritson]]'s revised version of the character that was in support of the Jacobin cause and thus was a liberal icon (steals from the rich, gives to the poor), the villain is Prince John who makes his money from taxes, suggesting Robin Hood is only giving money the government demanded back to people who actually worked for it. It also features a condemnation of government encroachment of the church, as a pivotal scene featured the Sheriff of Nottingham explicitly stealing a coin from the poor box and his later arresting Friar Tuck for trying to stop him, and the Sheriff's actions were clearly being framed in a horrible light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Rogue One: A Star Wars Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A group of freedom fighters undertake a dangerous mission in an attempt to steal the plans for the Galactic Empire's ultimate weapon, the Death Star. Unlike the previous Star Wars films, the focus of this one is on soldiers on the battlefield, their goal to restore liberty to the Galaxy. This gives the movie a strong feeling of American patriotism, and could also be argued to show respect to the U.S. military. However, the screenwriters Chris Weitz and Gary Whitta made tweets that implied that they were trying to push the leftist Diversity agenda just after Trump won the presidency, as well as used a customized version of the Rebel Starbird logo with a safety pin attached, and one of the main characters, Saw Gerrera, was stated to be based on Marxist revolutionary [[Che Guevara]] and was treated in a (comparably) positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,043,133,586&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Saw''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004-2010, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R (Director's Cuts are NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|The franchise contains an anti-nihilist message, with the antagonist, John Kramer, also known as &amp;quot;the Jigsaw Killer,&amp;quot; wishing for his victims to survive the &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; in which he places them, ultimately emerging with a better appreciation for their lives. For example, ''Saw'' condemns the adultery committed by Dr. Lawrence Gordon. ''Saw III'' focuses on the value of forgiveness, John having Jeff Denlon complete three tests involving the three people whom he blamed for the death of his young son. ''Saw IV'' contains a very strong message of letting go and letting people find salvation and redemption for themselves, an allusion to biblical passages about the subject. However, it could also be argued that Jigsaw is playing God with the value of human life, by bringing his test subjects to the very edge of death, forcing them to gravely hurt themselves, in order to survive. Furthermore, in ''Saw III'', one of his apprentices, Amanda Young, is revealed to have rigged traps to kill her victims, even if they successfully complete their games, as she no longer believes in Jigsaw's philosophy. However, John is shown clearly shown to be disgusted by Amanda's actions, though nevertheless trying to guide her to redemption, or at least his version of it. Other condemnations of nihilism include the clearly sociopathic depiction of corrupt Detective Mark Hoffman, the most important of Jigsaw's apprentices, as he, like Amanda, strays from John's philosophy and simply rigs traps to murder his victims, while also carrying out the games that John had planned before his death at the end of ''Saw III.''&lt;br /&gt;
|$953,421,276&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shame''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|While the movie shows [[Hollywood Values]], such as sex addiction, in a negative light and is clearly anti-[[homosexual agenda]], as the main character reaches his lowest point by partaking in such acts, the film is graphic in its nature leaving one to question how conservative it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,909,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Simpsons]] Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This feature based upon the long-running animated sitcom portrays the liberal [[Environmental Protection Agency|EPA]] as a villainous and devious agency and the government in general as intrusive and corrupt. On the other hand, it celebrates [[environmentalism]] in the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
|$183,135,014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Soul Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A white student cheats the [[affirmative action]] system, by pretending to be black in order to get the scholarship he needs for to pay for Harvard. Towards the end, it is revealed he took the scholarship away from someone who needed it  as well (and is really black) because she has a son and is divorced at such a young age. The movie portyals the police as racist, and blames racism on many things, and seems to support the need for affirmative action. But on a conservative note, the film teaches the importance of hard work, and is also politically incorrect. &lt;br /&gt;
|$27,820,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Star Wars]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977-1983 (Original Trilogy); 1999-2005 (Prequel Trilogy); 2015- (Sequel Trilogy)&lt;br /&gt;
|PG, PG-13 (Episode III &amp;amp; Episode VII)&lt;br /&gt;
|The well-known space opera series is mostly composed of simple truths about the triumph of good over evil, and in the case of ''Episode VI: Return of the Jedi'', redemption. However, ''Episode VI'' also contained some implied pro-[[Vietcong]] propaganda at George Lucas' behest via the Ewoks, as well as his later claiming that the entirety of the ''Star Wars'' saga from ''Episodes IV''-''VI'' was meant to be his means of protesting Vietnam (which is supported by a memo dating back to 1973 where he claimed the film was about &amp;quot;A large technological empire going after a small group of freedom fighters.&amp;quot; It is also to be noted that this was not the first time he voiced support for the Vietcong as well as used film to push an anti-American/anti-War agenda, as he also initially played a role in the filming of ''Apocalypse Now''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nypost.com/2014/09/21/how-star-wars-was-secretly-george-lucas-protest-of-vietnam/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), and the re-release for ''Episode IV: A New Hope'' also had an infamous edit where it made it seem as though Greedo shot at Han first, with George Lucas later revealing he did the edit (or rather, falsely claimed it was always that way) as a means to promote gun control. Regarding the pro-Vietcong sentiment being pushed in ''Return of the Jedi'', former president [[Richard Nixon]] in his 1985 book ''No More Vietnams'' cited ''Return of the Jedi'' as ultimately one reason why America, at least by that time, had initially felt so guilty of their strength that they were unwilling to use it even to defend their freedom and that of others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''No More Vietnams'' by Richard Nixon, 1985&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Chapter 1:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The assertion that our very bigness is badness has infested our culture to a surprising degree. The creator of the phenomenally successful Star Wars series recently explained that the climactic scene in one of his moves - in which the evil “Empire’s” giant war machines are destroyed by fuzzy little good guys with wooden bows and arrows - was inspired by the Vietnam experience. No matter that in Vietnam the Communist “good guys” packed Soviet automatic rifles and, in 1975, rode state-of-the-art Russian tanks across the South Vietnamese border. The propaganda of disproportionate forces in Vietnam, the myth of small/good versus big/bad, did enough damage to help lose the war for the United States and the people of South Vietnam. Today it is one symptom of the Vietnam syndrome to the extent that it makes Americans ashamed of their power, guilty about being strong, and forgetful about the need to be willing to use their power to protect their freedom and the freedom of others.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prequel trilogy also had some implied pot-shots at then-president George W. Bush and his War on Terror, and there was also an implied promotion of moral relativity in ''Revenge of the Sith'' (where Obi-Wan, when confronting Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader in the climax, stated in reply to Anakin's declaration that Obi-Wan is his enemy if he's not with him that &amp;quot;only a Sith deals in absolutes.&amp;quot;). A similar promotion of moral relativity and postmodernism was shown in ''Return of the Jedi'' where Obi-Wan admitted that his claim that Vader killed Anakin Skywalker was &amp;quot;true from a certain point of view,&amp;quot; as well as further elaborating his claim by stating that &amp;quot;[[Subjectivism|a great many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view.]]&amp;quot; In addition, the Trade Federation and its motives in ''The Phantom Menace'' was crafted by George Lucas to be a negative response to the Republican Revolution of 1994, and in particular Newt Gingrich's Contract with America (with Gingrich himself being a partial namesake of the main villain, Viceroy Nute Gunray). ''Attack of the Clones'' and to a lesser extent ''Revenge of the Sith'' also had very blatant anti-war themes and a very negative portrayal of the military, as a large part of the plot involved creating a military for the republic (and in the case of ''Revenge of the Sith'', the near end of the Clone Wars), with the narrative strongly implying that even forming a military at all was somehow a threat to freedom. To a lesser extent, the Prequel trilogy also has a negative depiction of family values, since it's implied that even holding attachments to family or trying to start a family leads directly to turning to the Dark Side, with Yoda even stating that such acted as &amp;quot;the shadow of greed.&amp;quot; Lucas, in an interview with Time Magazine, also made similar jabs on family when explaining Anakin's character arc and his eventually becoming Darth Vader, where he said &amp;quot;Because he [Anakin Skywalker] gets attached to things...He can't let go of his mother...his girlfriend...things. It makes you greedy. And when you're greedy, you are on the path to the dark side because you fear that you're going to lose things. You fear you're not going to have the power you need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20020923140712/http://cgi.theforce.net/theforce/tfn.cgi?storyID=15712&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the director for ''Episode VII: The Force Awakens'', [[J.J. Abrams]], admitted in a press release that he deliberately made Finn black in order to ensure diversity among the characters, hinting at it pushing the leftist [[diversity]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnet.com/news/director-j-j-abrams-weighs-in-on-diversity-in-the-star-wars-universe/?_escaped_fragment_=#!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Two audience members jointly asked Abrams whether -- given his track record of helping build a diverse cast as director of the &amp;quot;Star Trek&amp;quot; reboot films -- he could confirm if there will be more Asian characters in the Star Wars universe. Asian characters are few and far between in the Star Wars franchise -- one appears in the original trilogy's last film, ''Return of the Jedi'', but for only four seconds before dying in a fiery explosion. Abrams said that while he won't be casting future films in the franchise, because he's directing only ''Episode VII'', he did include Asian characters in ''The Force Awakens'', which opened December 18. &amp;quot;I think it's important people see themselves represented in film,&amp;quot; Abrams said. &amp;quot;I think it's not a small thing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, the film also hints at a militant [[feminist]] agenda by having Leia act as general and Rey not allowing anyone to save her, something that conservative commentator John Nolte mentioned was a detraction for the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/12/17/star-wars-the-force-awakens-review-j-j-abrams-repents-for-the-sins-of-george-lucas/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the ending award ceremony in ''A New Hope'' was deliberately modeled after the stadium scene from the infamous Nazi movie propaganda ''The Triumph of the Will''. Ian McDiarmid, the actor who played the saga's main villain [[Emperor Palpatine]], had also implied in an interview with ''The Guardian'' around the time ''Revenge of the Sith'' was released that George Lucas had deliberately made the films for primarily eight-year olds specifically to indoctrinate them into Lucas' leftist view of the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2005/nov/07/theatre1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;He [McDiarmid] also bristles at the notion that the Star Wars films are totally hollow entertainments. &amp;quot;I remember when I sat there in the Evil Emperor's swivel chair and George [Lucas] said things like 'does it remind you of the Oval office?' And I realised that at that time Richard Nixon was in his mind.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;And I see that in the Guardian's review of the DVD - not favourable, of course - mention is made of the fact that there are lines that sound really contemporary. But the reviewer decided that was by chance: no, no, no, no. Entirely by design.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;George knew that eight-year-olds, for whom these films are primarily intended, are very impressionable, and he wanted to make the right impression. So the whole film is about the unnecessary rise of fascism. In other words: watch out, they're all after your freedom, particularly when they're talking about defending freedom. Without getting over-extended about it, that is at the heart of these movies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi]] also received strong criticism for its apparent 'SJW' bias&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Toto, Christian (December 19, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/19/last-jedi-critics-mostly-conservative/ As ‘Star Wars’ fans cheer, conservative film critics point out problems with ‘Last Jedi’]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved December 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is also speculated that the leftist POV pushing caused fans to boycott the 2018 film [[Solo: A Star Wars Story]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/967205/Star-Wars-Han-Solo-FLOP-Last-Jedi-fan-BACKLASH-boycott-box-office-cast-sequel-cameo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$460,998,007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Starship Troopers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it overall depicts the Military in a protagonistic light and arguably is pro-war and pro-military, the director of the film, Paul Verhoeven, implied it was actually supposed to push an anti-military, anti-war message where it implied that America during the Cold War were automatically fascists simply because they are entering war, and specifically stated it was &amp;quot;a natural evolution for post-World War II America.&amp;quot; In addition, to reinforce Verhoeven's message, he deliberately modeled various scenes after ''Triumph of the Will'' and other pro-Nazi propaganda scenes, as well as modeled the protagonists' uniforms after the uniforms utilized by the Nazis (i.e., the character Carl, played by Neil Patrick Harris, wearing a uniform that was modeled after the [[SS]]). When asked by Michael Ironside, who was one of the people who had a role in the movie and had read the original book, about why he made the movie despite Verhoeven's leftist politics, he answered &amp;quot;If I tell the world that a right-wing, fascist way of doing things doesn't work, no one will listen to me. So I'm going to make a perfect fascist world: everyone is beautiful, everything is shiny, everything has big guns and fancy ships, but it's only good for killing ******* bugs!&amp;quot; (note that fascism is not &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot;, it is left wing, so Verhoeven's incorrect regarding which wing the Nazis/fascists were part of).&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,814,377 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sudden Death''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgraced fire fighter now becomes a laughingstock fire marshal uncovers an terrorist plot at a Hockey game plans to redeem himself and protect his children and the Vice President from said terrorists. However they're not Islamic, which may have been because the film was trying to be politically correct.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,350,171 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A short-order cook becomes a superhero after a vision from God. He frequently turns to prayer and a Christian television show for guidance. Even though his wife leaves him for a drug dealer, he remains loyal to her for the whole picture.  At the same time, foul language, violence, and brief nudity scenes are included.&lt;br /&gt;
|$327,716 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Team America: World Police''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|While it is clearly pro-military, pro-America, and anti-Hollywood, the movie is riddled with liberal values, including toilet humor and vulgar language throughout.  The movie's foul-mouthed theme song favors abortion, slavery, pornography, and Democrats, while having no positive reaction to Republicans, which makes sense because the screenplay was written by the creators of ''[[South Park]]'' and ''The Book of Mormon''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32,786,074&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Titanic]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Every life has value, and the most powerful men give up their seats on lifeboats to women and children first, while the media and a young [[RINO]] are rightly criticized. The film broke the record in movie revenues before the environmentalist nightmare that was ''Avatar''. However, ''Titanic'' gives some hints at a pro-socialist view, and a key scene involving Rose being drawn in the nude is evocative of pornography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$600,779,824&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Top Gun''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|Please add info.&lt;br /&gt;
|$356.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Trainspotting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's been debatable if the film is anti-drug.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,491,080&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''U-571''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Had a plot which was based on the first capture of a [[German]] [[Enigma machine]] in [[World War Two]]. Despite the film being patriotic to America, the facts are wrong as the Enigma machine was captured by the [[British]] in 1941 prior to the Americans entering the war. &lt;br /&gt;
|$77,122,415&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Twilight Saga''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008-2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Starred by anti-military liberal [[Kristen Stewart]] and glorifies [[vampire|vampires]], but it also makes fun of [[public school culture]] and [[modernism]] while promoting [[abstinence]] until marriage, traditional courtship and marriage, and the [[pro-life]] movement. It was written by a [[Mormon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,365,922,346&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Van Helsing'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Thanks to [[Hollywood values]], Van Helsing isn't portrayed as the Christian character he should be, but the film still gets its good vs. evil message across. As well as portraying the Catholic church in a positive light. The director Stephen Sommers has made conservative films ''The Mummy Returns'' and ''G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra'' though.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,177,084&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=vanhelsing.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wall-E''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie shows the dangers of big government (BNL), however it is also anti-capitalist and pro-environmentalism as BNL is a corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$223,808,164 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Way We Were''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unique in the way that it appears liberal to liberals while unintentionally sending a [[conservative]] message to young women. Stars uber-liberal [[Barbra Streisand]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$49,919,870&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''We're the Millers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A drug dealer, stripper, runaway, and average loser pretend to be a family to sneak marijuana out of Mexico. However they learn the value and importance of family. The villains of the movie are all drug gang men, the film also features a stripper scene, and whether or not the film is anti-drug in the end is debatable.&lt;br /&gt;
|$150,394,119&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Yours Mine and Ours''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The widower father of a conservative family marries a widowed mother of a liberal family. Their two difference lifestyles contradict with each other, and the film does not really decide whose lifestyle is better. On the one hand, at one point, the liberal children fool the conservative children into thinking there is a house fire, so they can have the bathrooms for themselves. On the other hand, the children work together in another scene and use conservative tactics to end bullying without the help of an authority figure. In the end, the children learn to put their differences aside and realize that family is what matters more.&lt;br /&gt;
|$53,412,862&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Worst Liberal TV Shows]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cinema]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Worst Liberal Movies}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>P</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1465651</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1465651"/>
		<updated>2018-11-07T15:41:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;P: I fixed small typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Elizabeth Warren 2016 DNC cropped.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Elizabeth Warren]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (alternately called a left-winger or [[leftism|leftist]]) is someone who advocates an increase in [[government]] spending, power, and control, such as [[ObamaCare]]. Liberals often support the [[censorship]] and [[denial]] of biblical [[Christianity]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=2062&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; along with any other views they oppose. Liberals who are a part of the [[secular left]] prefer [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] over the Christian [[faith]], as [[atheism]] has no objective morality to hinder their big government plans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/232212/fox-contributor-claims-rolling-stone-uva-story-part-of-liberal-plot-to-romanticize-being-a-victim-of-rape/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasingly, liberals side with the [[heterosexual agenda]], including [[same-sex marriage being illegal|homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]].  Liberals favor a [[welfare state]] where people receive endless pain without yeeting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/05/23/reform-conservatives-tackle-the-failed-liberal-welfare-state/ Reform conservatives tackle the failed liberal welfare state], [[Washington Post]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The liberal ideology has degenerated into economically unsound views and intolerant ideology. All liberals support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of [[conservative]] principles, while lacking an actual ideology or values of their own.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eaglerising.com/22901/liberal-crybabies-get-offended-by-caitlyn-jenner-costume/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Secular left|Many of them]] cannot understand Christian language.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D., Ph.D. (December 26, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/26/religiously-ignorant-liberals-mistake-new-king-at-christmas-for-donald-trump/ Religiously-Ignorant Conservatives Mistake ‘Africa’ at a United Nations Meeting for Germany]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data has consistently shown that a larger percentage of Americans identify as liberal, rather than as conservative, by a margin of 100% to 100% as on 2028; while the gap between self-identified conservatives and self-identified liberals has been growing in recent years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.gallup.com/poll/225074/conservative-lead-ideology-down-single-digits.aspx Conservative Lead in U.S. Ideology is Down to Single Digits]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals and &amp;quot;progressives&amp;quot; oftentimes falsely claim that liberals outnumber conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political positions and practices==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberals support the following political positions and practices''':&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://townhall.com/columnists/jonahgoldberg/2014/02/21/liberal-students-have-a-funny-definition-of-diversity-n1798157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wasting money on ineffective government programs (the significant economic problems in the [[Eurozone]] due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)&lt;br /&gt;
*Many liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The slow death of free speech&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/20/suzanne-fields-how-the-liberal-left-is-killing-fre/ The slow death of free speech] by Suzanne Fields, ''Washington Times'', 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtonexaminer.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/why-does-the-left-want-to-suppress-free-speech/article/2532270 Why does the left want to suppress free speech?] by Michael Barone, Washington Examiner, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the [[United States]], the [[Democrat Party]] and liberals have moved so far left that there are now political figures involved in Democrat politics who are sympathetic to [[Communism]]. For example, [[Anita Dunn]], an American political strategist who served as [[White House]] Communications Director from April through November 2009 in [[Obama Administration]], said that [[Mao Zedong]] was her favorite political philosopher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher] by Ben Shapiro, Bretbart News, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Bernie Sanders]], a leading candidate in the Democrat Party's 2016 presidential nomination, although he is an adherent of [[social democracy]], he also has a history of involvement with [[Marxism|Marxist]] organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by Paul Sperry, New York Post,January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/is-bernie-sanders-a-communist/ IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST?] by Joseph Farah, WND, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kenneth-d-ackerman/history-lesson-bernie-san_b_9355082.html History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie], Huffington Post, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sanders shocked his fellow liberals by putting up a [[Soviet Union]] flag in his Senate office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by Paul Sperry, New York Post, January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1998, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was founded by Sanders, had the song ''Red Revolution'' (a song advocating communist revolution) featured on a website that they shared with the Democratic Socialists of America.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hillary Clinton.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Hillary Clinton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of [[Hillary Clinton]], made the statement about the Democrat Party, which is a party strongly supported by liberals, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;constitution.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://constitution.com/democrat-party-overrun-communist/  Before his death in 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of Hillary Clinton, made the statement, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”], Constitution.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1988, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), after decades of running their own presidential candidates, stopped running presidential candidates because the gap between Democrats and American communists had grown smaller.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pjFfE1MNFk Communists, the Democrat Party and Snopes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2016, the CPUSA urged people not to vote for Donald Trump even if they disliked Hillary Clinton (an indirect endorsement of Clinton).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Although there are still some very substantial differences between Communists and Democrats/liberals, the line between Communists/Democrats/liberals continues to blur in the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;constitution.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Ironically, the leading Communist country in the world, [[Communist Party of China|Communist China]], has moved farther away from Communism and now has a mixed economy of [[capitalism]] and state owned enterprises.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[China's The Most Viciously Free Market Economy On The Planet Right Now], Forbes, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of science&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.postlibertarian.com/2012/09/why-do-liberals-hate-science/ Why Do Liberals Hate Science?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (especially [[creation science]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Government's ability to solve economic problems&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews&amp;gt;[http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Hypocrisy|Hypocrisy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002849963/3038298682_real_verse_liberal_hypocrisy_xlarge.png&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that Islamic terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the main reason for Islamic extremists' hostility towards America is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Brainwashing voters with propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hedonism|Hedonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and state-encouraged [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of Biblical standards&lt;br /&gt;
* Naive acceptance of the [[Idea of Progress]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hate|Hatred]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_hate_speech]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Murder]] (through abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia)&lt;br /&gt;
* Censorship&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/07/watch-what-you-say-the-new-liberal-power-elite-won-t-tolerate-dissent.html Watch What You Say, The New Liberal Power Elite Won’t Tolerate Dissent], [[The Daily Beast]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Socialism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://famguardian.org/subjects/Politics/Articles/Liberals.htm 60 Hard Truths about &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Unsuccessful Keynesian economics as opposed to sound free-market economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Crying instead of accepting reality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://liberaltears.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Cessation of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ending Western morality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/07/13/5_ways_liberalism_destroys_virtue]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pseudo-intellectualism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://eljam.blogspot.com/2005/09/i-hate-pseudo-intellectuals.html I hate pseudo-intellectuals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to government regulation or restriction of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by '''liberal''' Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Authoritarian government&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2014/07/liberal_authori.html Liberal Authoritarianism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism|Fascist tendencies]] (see also: [[Homo-fascism]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[evolution and liberalism|Belief in evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Destroying the Christian foundations on which America was built. &lt;br /&gt;
* Destroying conservative family values and replacing them with immoral [[Hollywood values]], such as abortion&lt;br /&gt;
* Brainwashing through government-censored [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Limiting personal freedom.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://conservative.wikia.com/wiki/Democratic_Party Democratic Party]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal support for gun control is an example of this.&lt;br /&gt;
* High progressive taxes&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ijreview.com/2014/07/157256-course-lower-state-taxes-helps-growth-studys-results-prove/ This Nationwide Study Challenges Everything Liberals Have Told You About Raising Taxes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a form of class warfare against wealthy business owners.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/Progressive_taxation Progressive taxation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Placement of men and women in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slowly eroding the U.S. through [[Progressivism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americanprogressivism.wordpress.com/ What Is Progressivism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* Failed [[tax and spend]] economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Smearing&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truthnation.com/trumps-slogan-is-a-throwback-to-reagan-and-liberals-are-furious-make-america-great-again/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Libertine sexual morality. See: [[Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality]] and [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of conservative roles in history. For example, liberals frequently claim&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.deism.com/washington.htm George Washington and Deism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that George Washington was a deist when he was actually a devout Episcopalian.&lt;br /&gt;
* Spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Government mass-surveillance&lt;br /&gt;
* Non-syndicalist [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Many liberals engage in [[racism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/03/26/25-examples-of-liberal-racism-in-quotes-n1549044 25 Examples of Liberal Racism in Quotes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Trump Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocating incorrect policies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/04/liberals-smug-condescending]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it is thought to have been intended.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slander&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Slander-Liberal-About-American-Right/dp/1400049520&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Gender &amp;quot;Equality&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Americanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the [[death penalty]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]], [[one-world government]], and opposition to national [[sovereignty]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wiping out national identity, which unites a country and makes it distinct from other countries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kraychik, Robert (July 24, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/07/24/dennis-prager-leftists-dont-believe-in-national-identities/ Dennis Prager: Leftists ‘Don’t Believe in National Identities’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for open borders with no border controls or [[border wall]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[amnesty]] for illegals, and for [[Voter fraud|non-citizens voting in U.S. elections]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murphy, James (July 27, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/29650-liberal-cities-want-voting-rights-for-non-citizens-even-illegal-ones Liberal Cities Want Voting Rights for Non-Citizens — Even Illegal Ones]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, Stephen (October 18, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/texas-democrats-ask-noncitizens-register-vote/ Texas Dems ask noncitizens to register to vote, send applications with citizenship box pre-checked]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved October 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Unconstitutionally mandated separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstatement of the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* YEETING BABIES&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppression of business rather than a laissez-faire capitalist economy &lt;br /&gt;
* American liberals often have opposition to the U.S. Constitution and/or are often ignorant of what the U.S. Constitution states. Liberals seek to expand federal power at the expense of local government and silence the conservatives who hold them back, violating the 10th and 1st Amendments respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Denial|Denial]] of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of financially irresponsible policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|&amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of logical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pjstar.com/article/20140711/OPINION/140719804/2011/OPINION Liberals are illogical, and good at it]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; standards&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some liberals support:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* High tolerance of government corruption as long as it is done by other liberals &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infowars.com/correction-liberals-not-conservatives-are-psychotic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tyranny]] to varying degrees.  In lesser forms, a [[Nanny State]] is preferred&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.history.com/topics/british-history/george-iii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elitism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130604122602AANvhvF&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Liberal elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Treason]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://crooksandliars.com/2016/07/mikes-blog-round-25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Semitism]] (strong support for &amp;quot;[[Palestine]]&amp;quot;, opposition to the state of [[Israel]], and even [[Holocaust denial]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Genocide]] and [[eugenics]] in the form of [[abortion]] (see [[Abortion and eugenics]] and [[Margaret Sanger]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforced celebration of homosexuality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://letterstotheeditorblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/weve-gone-from-tolerance-of-homosexuality-to-forced-celebration-of-it.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pedophilia&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/liberals-hard-pressed-make-pedophilia-legal-get-ready-sharia-law/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Bestiality as a human right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.peterheck.com/libtree/liberty_tree/view/1677/liberals_repeal_ban_on_bestiality_in_the_military Liberals Repeal Ban on Bestiality in the Military]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sadism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://catholiccitizens.org/views/66534/uses-disgust-%E2%80%A8%E2%80%A8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Obesity]] via the [[Fat acceptance movement]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/rosie-odonnell-said-she-will-leave-america-youll-love-the-reason/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Robbery and other forms of crime (see [[Gun control]])&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal intolerance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberal intolerance]] and [[Liberal bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many modern liberals have a tendency of to be intolerant of ideas that contradict [[liberalism|liberal ideology]] which increasingly includes many strange notions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (August 8, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29740-the-growing-intolerance-of-the-left The Growing Intolerance of the Left]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 8, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (see: [[Liberal intolerance]]). For example, radical [[feminism|feminists]] commonly claim that one is not born a man or woman, but one becomes a man or woman through [[gender]] socialization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/#GenSocCon - Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender - Gender socialization], Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Coulter2006.jpg|thumb|right|220px|[[Anne Coulter]] on the ''Tonight Show with Jay Leno''. Leftists prevented Anne Coulter from speaking at [[University of California, Berkeley]] through threats of violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;foxnews.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-cancels-berkeley-event-amid-protests.html Ann Coulter cancels Berkeley event amid protests, says decision 'a dark day for free speech in America'], Fox News, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
A Pew Research study found that “consistent liberals” were most likely to block others on [[social media]] for disagreeing with them politically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/21/pew-survey-consistent-liberals-most-likely-to-block-others-on-social-media-for-disagreeing-with-them-politically/ Pew survey: “Consistent liberals” most likely to block others on social media for disagreeing with them politically]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal intolerance and violence ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Left-wing violence in the Trump era}}&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, may liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The slow death of free speech&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtonexaminer.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  For example, there have been several intolerant, liberal mobs which have shut down conservative speakers at college campuses (in 2017, there were two cases in the United States where violence or threats of violence were used to shut down free speech at college campuses).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;foxnews.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediaite.com/online/left-wing-hooliganism-wins-again-over-free-speech/ Intolerant Far-Left Mob Wins Again Over Free Speech, This Time at Berkeley], Mediaite, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/24/opinions/ann-coulter-berkeley-free-speech-randazza-opinion/ Dear Berkeley: Even Ann Coulter deserves free speech], CNN, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] used paid leftists agitators to disrupt [[Donald Trump]] rallies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtontimes.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/18/undercover-video-shows-democrats-saying-they-hire-/ Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies], ''Washington Times'', 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264543/undercover-video-democrats-caused-violence-trump-matthew-vadum UNDERCOVER VIDEO: DEMOCRATS CAUSED VIOLENCE AT TRUMP RALLIES], Frontpage Magazine, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As far as the paid agitators, veteran left-wing strategist Robert Creamer confirmed on hidden camera that [[Hillary Clinton]] “is fully in it” and  “Hillary knows through the chain of command what’s going on.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  The agitators were sent to Trump rallies to anger Trump supporters and incite violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtontimes.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been a number of attacks against President Donald Trump supporters after his election which the [[mainstream media]] underreported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2016/11/17/heres-a-list-of-completely-substantiated-and-underreported-attacks-on-trump-supporters/ Here’s A List Of Completely Substantiated (And Underreported) Attacks On Trump Supporters], Daily Caller, 11/17/2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, there have been a number of instances of leftists and Trump supporters clashing at Trump rallies after his election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3014061/violence-donald-trump-supporters-clash-rallies/ 'CIVIL WAR' Violence erupts as hundreds of Donald Trump supporters clash with rivals at US rallies], The Sun, March 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberals and politics/law ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ObamaCareSymbol.jpg|thumb|left|150px|[[ObamaCare]] graphic courtesy [[Newsbusters]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, liberals currently use two Clauses of the U.S. Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;. This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money.  The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] this clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as [[Obamacare]]. In the ACA, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decline in liberal principles can be illustrated by how Franklin Delano Roosevelt opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred from the private to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are in lock-step with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current dictionaries describe the liberal ideology by pretending that a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00 Noun S: (n) liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practical usage, the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is more closely synonymous with &amp;quot;radical,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;immoral,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;anti-freedom,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;elitist,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Krdo13.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|An [[Obamaville]] was a tent city or shanty town in the [[United States]] created by homeless people during [[Barack Hussein Obama|Barack Obama]]'s presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=174965&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20100627_Huge_tent_city_takes_root.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/12/12/welcome-obamaville-sign-colorado-tent-city-media-mum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[United States|American]] liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref name=georgeWill&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html Conservatives More Liberal Givers], [[RealClearPolitics]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, [[Arthur C. Brooks]], a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref name=georgeWill /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1 Charity Donations and Liberal Hypocrisy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Irreligion and superstition]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|left|170px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows ...that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to [[superstition]], tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in [[pseudoscience]] than evangelical Christians.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]].&amp;lt;ref name=irrational&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html Look Who's Irrational Now]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience, such as evolution than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref name=irrational /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secular left ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Secular left]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[secular left]] consists of [[leftist|left]]-wing secularists who are able to exert their influence in many countries.  They support &amp;quot;strict government [[secularism]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.secularleft.us/about&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Decline of the secular left ===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Decline of the secular left]] and [[Religious conservatism and politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some regions where the secular left has considerable influence, they [[Decline of the secular left|are losing]] an increasing amount of their power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious conservatism is a big driver of [[social conservatism]].  Religious conservatism is growing in the world and it is affecting politics (see: [[Religious conservatism and politics]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7vCDeKPRSo Eric Kaufmann - Religion, Demography and Politics in the 21st Century]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]] and [[Liberal Christianity]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a 2007 study reported in the ''Journal of Family Issues'', adherents of [[liberal Christianity]] are more likely to engage in marital infidelity than theologically [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sagepub.com/hillhsstudy/articles/Chapter10_Article%2001.pdf Are There Religious Variations in Marital Infidelity?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, liberals are [[Evolution and liberalism|more likely]] to adhere to evolutionary belief than conservatives. A study conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/morals-decline-linked-to-belief-in-evolution Morals decline linked to evolution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== American liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American liberalism]] and [[Liberal elite|Liberal elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDRoosevelt by Perskie.png|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, [[American liberalism]] is a political ideology that dominates the [[Democratic Party]]. Its heroes include [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], and [[Martin Luther King]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Gallup Organization, in the United States,  25% of the population were liberals and 36% were conservatives in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin], Gallup, January of 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017, the ''Financial Times'' declared about [[American liberalism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|...as Democrats struggle to reinvent themselves in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory, their party remains captured by a toxic mix of [[identity politics]] and corporate interests. The establishment wing is still convinced that racism and [[misogyny]], not economic populism, sank Mrs Clinton, and that wooing big corporate donors is still the way to victory in the next election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While money matters, and there may have been some voters who turned away from Mrs Clinton because of gender, the key reason that the Democrats lost in 2016 and are struggling to rebrand themselves is that they have failed to grasp two things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, most Americans today care more about jobs than identity, and secondly, the same downward mobility that pushed the white working class towards Mr Trump is moving up the socio-economic food chain, and fast. As research by groups from the International Monetary Fund to the OECD to McKinsey has shown, the technology-related job disruption that resulted in rust belt job losses and wage stagnation since 2000 is beginning to affect white-collar workers across nearly every sector....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Democrats over-estimated the power and relevance of identity politics (there are still more whites without a college degree than minorities), and underestimated the breadth and depth of labour disruption. In any case, says Robert Johnson, president of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, “it was always a mistake to separate out issues of race and class, because they go hand in hand. In economically insecure times, fear of the ‘other’ increases.” It is a phenomenon exploited by Mr Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.ft.com/content/b34f5536-2c02-11e7-bc4b-5528796fe35c Economics, not identity, is key to reviving American liberalism], Financial Times, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, American liberals have experienced a number of political losses and many liberals in the United States have become embittered (see: [[American liberalism and 21st century political losses]]),  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=[[Media Research Center]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [https://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm How the House voted]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Francois Hollande and Vladimir Putin, Moscow 6 dec 2014 - 05-cropped.jpg|thumb|left|200px|The [[France|French]] liberal politician [[François Hollande]]  was the President of the French Republic from 2012 until 2017. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alde.eu Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the European Parliament]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal-international.org/ World Federation of Liberalism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/ Liberal Party of Australia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal]]s. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of both European [[socialist]]/[[social democracy|social democratic]] or Social/progressive liberal parties, in contrast to conservative or fiscal liberal parties which again falls into the right-wing part of the political spectrum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org Party of European Socialism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JohnStuartMill.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px||[[John Stuart Mill]] was a [[classical liberal]]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of [[national security]] and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf Parental Selection of Children’s Sexual Orientation], '''PDF''', &amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Original meaning: Classical Liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and traditions derived from Northern European Protestantism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal]]ism. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Influential/famous liberals  ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:President Barack Obama.jpg|thumb|150px|[[Barack Hussein Obama|Barack Obama]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Hussein Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.businessinsider.com/cheney-obama-is-the-worst-president-of-my-lifetime-2014-7 CHENEY: Obama Is 'The Worst President Of My Lifetime']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elizabeth Warren]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bernie Sanders]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Emmanuel Macron]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saul Alinsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Maynard Keynes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Thorstad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hunterbear.org/shooting_lupus.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a founding member of NAMBLA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pope Francis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lee Harvey Oswald]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Zinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Albert Einstein]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Nye]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=YDyGCgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT129 John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster], Transcript&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=YDyGCgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT20 John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster], Transcript&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democrat Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527 Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gene Roddenberry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations of thought==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Margaret Sanger and Charles V. Drysdale cph.3b18067.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Margaret Sanger]] was the founder of [[Planned Parenthood]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://web.archive.org/web/20060509044946/http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I never use the words [[Democrats]] and [[Republicans]]. It's [[liberals]] and [[Americans]].&amp;quot; -James Watt, Secretary of the Interior under [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.&amp;quot; -[[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Liberals see racism where it doesn't exist, fabricate it when they can't find it and ignore it within their own ranks.” ―[[Michelle Malkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Words mean nothing to liberals. They say whatever will help advance their cause at the moment, switch talking points in a heartbeat, and then act indignant if anyone uses the exact same argument they were using five minutes ago.&amp;quot; -[[Ann Coulter]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2010/11/23/the_25_best_quotes_about_liberals The 25 Best Quotes About Liberals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.&amp;quot; -Ann Coulter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you've said -- unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist. In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It's like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder.&amp;quot; -[[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Inside many liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like to have another point of view in the room that they don't squash and the way they try to squash it is by character assassination and name calling.&amp;quot; -David Horowitz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;End results that work that don't involve government threaten liberals.&amp;quot; -[[Rush Limbaugh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'd like to know why well-educated idiots keep apologizing for lazy and complaining people who think the world owes them a living. I'd like to know why they make excuses for cowards who spit in the faces of the police and then run behind the judicial sob sisters. I can't understand these people who carry placards to save the life of some criminal, yet have no thought for the innocent victim.&amp;quot; -John Wayne&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes by Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JoeBiden.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Joe Biden]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S.&amp;quot; -[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There is no reason the nation of Africa cannot, and should not, join the ranks of the worlds most prosperous nations.&amp;quot; -Joe Biden&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.facebook.com/StupidStuffDemocratsSay Stupid Stuff Democrats Say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Romney wants to give EIGHT HUNDRED MILLION BILLION in tax breaks to the rich.&amp;quot; -Joe Biden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Will the Mars Rover be able to show the flag the astronauts planted there before?&amp;quot; -Sheila Jackson Lee &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday?&amp;quot; -Joy Behar &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Is there such a thing as a man-made stroke? …I know what this [Republican] party is capable of.&amp;quot; -Joy Behar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.&amp;quot; -[[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The center of the earth is about a million degrees.&amp;quot; -Al Gore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A zebra does not change its spots.&amp;quot; -Al Gore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied.&amp;quot; -[[Jeremiah Wright]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs.&amp;quot; -[[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My favorite word, that is really easy, my favorite word is 'the word'.&amp;quot; -Nancy Pelosi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” -Nancy Pelosi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Why can't I just eat my waffle?&amp;quot; -[[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.&amp;quot; -[[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Welcome to Cinco de Quattro!&amp;quot; -Barack Obama&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The time has changed for come.&amp;quot; -Barack Obama&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They support democratic institutions in Kyrzakhstan&amp;quot; -John Kerry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My fear is that the whole island (of Guam) will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/08/17/the-25-stupidest-liberal-quotes-of-the-last-decade-n1666619 The 25 Stupidest Liberal Quotes Of The Last Decade]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.&amp;quot; -Obama foreign policy adviser Richard Danzig&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you take out the killings, Washington actually has a very very low crime rate.&amp;quot; -Former D.C. Mayor Marion Barry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservative.wikia.com/wiki/Hilarious_Liberal_Quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What right does Congress have to go around making laws just because they deem it necessary?&amp;quot; -Marion Barry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My appetite is so good that I can eat the table cloth right off the chair.&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Joe Moakley &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Those who died in the earthquake, their lives will never be the same again.&amp;quot; -Barbara Boxer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have to march because my mother couldn't have an abortion.&amp;quot; -Maxine Water&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.azquotes.com/quote/687234&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I dare you, you little fruitcake!&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Pete Stark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I root for hurricanes&amp;quot; -James Wolcott&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I've got a secret for you: Kiss my a**.&amp;quot; -George McGovern&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.&amp;quot; -[[Norman Thomas]], six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Norman.Thomas.Quote.FFB1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.&amp;quot; -Hillary Rodham Clinton&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hawkins, John (June 16, 2015). [https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2015/06/16/draft-n2012995 20 Hillary Clinton Quotes You Should Read Before Voting For Her]. ''Townhall''. Retrieved May 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did.&amp;quot; -Walter Mondale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a ''BloombergView'' article, Stephen L. Carter wrote about modern liberalism:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But the left has work to do, not only on policy and organization but also on attitude. Too many of my [[progressivism|progressive]] friends seem to have forgotten how to make actual arguments, and have become expert instead at condemnation, derision and mockery. On issue after issue, they’re very good at explaining why no one could oppose their policy positions except for the basest of motives. As to those positions themselves, they are too often announced with a zealous solemnity suggesting that their views are Holy Writ -- and those who disagree are cast into the outer political darkness. In short, the left has lately been dripping with hubris, which in classic literature always portends a fall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-11/trump-and-the-fall-of-liberalism Trump and the Fall of Liberalism] by Stephen L. Carter, BloombergView&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal influence in extreme ideologies (and vice-versa) ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism|Communism and Nazism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the following individuals were not liberals, they shared several left-wing/liberal views in their ideologies, which overlapped with American/European liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Marxist/communist figures ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]—opposed religion and supported taking it completely out of public life; supported the disestablishment of the family; strong support for labor, socialism, and an expansive government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Communist Manifesto''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Admired by many liberals,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Dedaj, Paulina (May 5, 2018). [http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/05/moviemaker-michael-moore-wishes-karl-marx-happy-200th-birthday.html Moviemaker Michael Moore wishes Karl Marx a happy 200th birthday]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (May 2, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/28951-ny-times-hails-marx-on-his-birthday-you-were-right New York Times Hails Marx on His Birthday: “You Were Right!”] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sunkara, Bhaskar (January 25, 2013). [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/25/karl-marx-relevant-21st-century Why the ideas of Karl Marx are more relevant than ever in the 21st century]. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cooper, Ryan (May 4, 2018). [http://theweek.com/articles/770718/time-normalize-karl-marx It's time to normalize Karl Marx]. ''The Week''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including [[European Commission]] president [[Jean-Claude Juncker]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Hale, Virginia (May 5, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/05/eu-president-heartfelt-defence-karl-marx/ EU Chief Jean-Claude Juncker Defies Protests to Deliver Heartfelt Defence of Karl Marx]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (May 5, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28979-european-commission-president-praises-karl-marx-s-contributions-to-european-union European Commission President Praises Karl Marx’s Contributions to European Union]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (April 29, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28934-eu-commission-president-juncker-set-to-honor-karl-marx European Commission President Juncker Set to Honor Karl Marx]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vladimir Lenin]]—socialist, supported an expansive government, supported [[one-world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Che Guevara]]—socialist, admired by many liberals&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/05/illegal-immigrants-rally-in-support-of.html Illegal Immigrants Rally For Dead Marxist Che Guevara]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.che-mart.com/WhoisChe.php Che-Mart]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Nigel (January 2, 2009). [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/4077397/It-is-a-sad-reflection-of-our-time-that-Che-Guevara-is-seen-as-a-hero.html It is a sad reflection of our time that Che Guevara is seen as a hero] ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved April 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Che_Guevara_in_popular_culture&amp;amp;oldid=833775290&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reiland, Ralph R. (August 12, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/29769-che-guevara-romanticizing-tyranny Che Guevara: Romanticizing Tyranny]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 12, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mao Zedong]]—socialist. Introduced [[Maoism]], some American liberals admire him&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shapiro, Ben (October 17, 2012). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fidel Castro]]—socialist, opposition to religion, government-run healthcare. In addition, Castro is admired by numerous American/European liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wootson, Cleve R., Jr. (November 26, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/26/trudeau-called-castro-a-remarkable-leader-twitter-imagined-what-he-would-say-about-stalin/?tid=pm_world_pop Trudeau called Castro a ‘remarkable leader.’ Twitter imagined what he would say about Stalin.] ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Jeremy (November 26, 2016). [http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jill-stein-praises-fidel-castro-a-symbol-of-the-struggle-for-justice/article/2608223 Jill Stein praises Fidel Castro: 'A symbol of the struggle for justice']. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (November 28, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/28/aaron-mair-sierra-club-president-fidel-castro-had-/ Sierra Club president: Fidel Castro had ‘more honor’ than Donald Trump]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;O'ReillyNov.29.2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.billoreilly.com/show?action=viewTVShow&amp;amp;showID=4323#3 The O'Reilly Factor - Monday, November 28, 2016]. ''billoreilly.com''. Retrieved November 29, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugo Chavez]]—socialist. Admired by many American/European liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (May 4, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/05/04/ten-influential-public-figures-praised-venezuelas-descent-socialist-hell/ 10 Famous People Who Praised Venezuela’s Descent Into Socialist Hell]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]]—socialist. Introduced [[Stalinism]], admired by many (European-) socialists/liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tni.org/es/node/7617&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fascists ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also:'' [[Liberalism#Nazism and socialism|Nazism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]]—supported animal &amp;quot;rights,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ https://books.google.com/books?id=e7FME0btkH0C&amp;amp;pg=PA62&amp;amp;lpg=PA62&amp;amp;dq=hitler+animal+rights&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=PIxjDRDBj1&amp;amp;sig=tbJisPm39hMcxj1g6xL0Kh0sn7g&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwi3qZP7xOPTAhVr4oMKHeTMA_c4FBDoAQhKMAc#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=hitler%20animal%20rights&amp;amp;f=false Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions], pg. 62.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harrison, David; Paterson, Tony (September 22, 2002). [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1407954/Thanks-to-Hitler-hunting-with-hounds-is-still-verboten.html Thanks to Hitler, hunting with hounds is still verboten]. ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EllisWash.&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; environmentalism,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EllisWash.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Washington, Ellis (March 26, 2011). [http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/279449/ The Nazi Cult of the Organic']. ''WND''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/ecology/nazi_ecology.htm Nazi &amp;quot;Ecology&amp;quot;], Frank Furedi, ''columbia.edu''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Musser, Mark (February 6, 2016). [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/yale_professor_on_nazi_environmentalism_so_close_yet_so_far.html Yale Professor on Nazi Environmentalism: So Close, yet So Far]. ''American Thinker''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; gun control (see [[Gun Control in Nazi Germany]]),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halbrook, Stephen (December 2, 2013). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/12/how-nazis-used-gun-control-stephen-p-halbrook/ How the Nazis Used Gun Control]. ''National Review''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kline, Audrey D. (May 9, 2014). [https://mises.org/library/gun-control-nazi-germany Gun Control in Nazi Germany]. ''Mises Institute''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wolverton, II, J.D., Joe (January 30, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/14367-nazi-gun-control-laws-a-familiar-road-to-citizen-disarmament Nazi Gun Control Laws: a Familiar Road to Citizen Disarmament?] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stupp, Herbert W. (July 13, 2015). [https://spectator.org/63424_hitler-and-gun-control/ Hitler and Gun Control]. ''The American Spectator''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Joe (March 24, 2018). [https://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/reminder-hitler-also-used-children-to-promote-gun-control/ FLASHBACK: Hitler Also Used Children to Promote Gun Control]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; socialism,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://louderwithcrowder.com/myth-busted-actually-yes-hitler-was-a-socialist-liberal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; single-payer healthcare (see [[Health care in Nazi Germany]]), and a large expansionist government, and had an intolerance for opposing views.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benito Mussolini]]—a socialist from a socialist family who only split from mainstream socialism due to his support for Italy during [[World War I]] rather than supporting a [[one-world government|globalist workers' revolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/people/benito-mussolini-9419443 Benito Mussolini]. ''Biography.com''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/italian-history-biographies/benito-mussolini Benito Mussolini]. ''Encyclopedia.com'' (from the Encyclopedia of World Biography''). 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to [[World War I]], Mussolini wrote for socialist publications and spoke highly of Marx.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenspan, Jesse (October 25, 2012). [http://www.history.com/news/9-things-you-may-not-know-about-mussolini 9 Things You May Not Know About Mussolini]. ''History.com''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He used gun control to help gain power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quammen, E. David (August 12, 2013). [http://www.teapartytribune.com/2013/08/12/italian-gun-control-right-before-mussolini-seized-total-control/ Italian ‘gun control’ right before Mussolini seized total control….]. ''Tea Party Tribune''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative vs. liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal corporate tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Left-wing war on women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
{|background=&amp;quot;none&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]] tendencies. &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[European Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal and conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal anger]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal competitiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal concealment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal conscience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal dislikes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal excuses]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal fear]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal gossip]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal guilt]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal confusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hedonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hyperbole]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal infiltration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal media hype]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal opinion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal revisionists]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal self-righteousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism-ism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberals and conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Incoherence of liberal thought]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Predictions of the Decade]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best New Conservative Words#New Liberal Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>P</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>