https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=PatrickTom 2026-10-20T21:12:35Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Jpatt&diff=659915 2009-05-04T03:02:37Z

<p>PatrickTom: Blanked the page</p> <hr /> <div></div>

PatrickTom https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Iduan&diff=659914 2009-05-04T03:02:03Z

<p>PatrickTom: </p> <hr /> <div>COWARD</div>

PatrickTom https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Iduan&diff=659912 2009-05-04T03:01:46Z

<p>PatrickTom: Undo revision 659910 by Iduan (Talk)</p> <hr /> <div></div>

PatrickTom https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Iduan&diff=659909 2009-05-04T03:00:33Z

<p>PatrickTom: Blanked the page</p> <hr /> <div></div>

PatrickTom https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Pat_Tillman_was_not_an_atheist&diff=659887 2009-05-04T02:31:19Z

<p>PatrickTom: fix grammar</p> <hr /> <div>Your logic is very questionable. You're saying &quot;We have to disregard the fact that Tillman said he was an atheist, because what he did does not fit my perception of atheists.&quot; You're wrong. You have to disregard your perception of atheists, because when you actually look at who atheists are, you see that they do not fit a mold. Atheists can be drug dealers, or, as Pat Tillman so beautifully proved with his life - heroes. And if you would honestly throw out everything that Tillman did if he was an atheist (in spite of the fact he died for this country, you say that if he was an atheist, he'd be a &quot;leftwing zero&quot;) then it is you who are the zero.--[[User:PatrickTom|PatrickTom]] 22:16, 3 May 2009 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Nobody changes right? At 16, his convictions for life are atheism, yeah right. Not my perception, it is the fact what he did after that point. All atheists are zeros, getit? By what he did and acted, he never was one. At the very least, he was agnostic. You are wrong, to bad for your atheist trophy is now tarnished.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:25, 3 May 2009 (EDT)<br /> <br /> ::All atheists are zeroes? So if Tillman were an atheist - you would trash the fact that he died for this country. Again - it is your mold that does not fit atheists; as I said, atheists can be drug dealers - or they can be heroes. If you are so naive to believe that everyone who is an atheist must be a bad person - than you should grow up - and until you grow up - why don't you not accuse any American soldier of being a liar. You have tarnished your own trophy.--[[User:PatrickTom|PatrickTom]] 22:30, 3 May 2009 (EDT)</div>

PatrickTom https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Pat_Tillman_was_not_an_atheist&diff=659885 2009-05-04T02:30:43Z

<p>PatrickTom: response</p> <hr /> <div>You're logic is very questionable. You're saying &quot;We have to disregard the fact that Tillman said he was an atheist, because what he did does not fit my perception of atheists.&quot; You're wrong. You have to disregard your perception of atheists, because when you actually look at who atheists are, you see that they do not fit a mold. Atheists can be drug dealers, or, as Pat Tillman so beautifully proved with his life - heroes. And if you would honestly throw out everything that Tillman did if he was an atheist (in spite of the fact he died for this country, you say that if he was an atheist, he'd be a &quot;leftwing zero&quot;) then it is you who are the zero.--[[User:PatrickTom|PatrickTom]] 22:16, 3 May 2009 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Nobody changes right? At 16, his convictions for life are atheism, yeah right. Not my perception, it is the fact what he did after that point. All atheists are zeros, getit? By what he did and acted, he never was one. At the very least, he was agnostic. You are wrong, to bad for your atheist trophy is now tarnished.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:25, 3 May 2009 (EDT)<br /> <br /> ::All atheists are zeroes? So if Tillman were an atheist - you would trash the fact that he died for this country. Again - it is your mold that does not fit atheists; as I said, atheists can be drug dealers - or they can be heroes. If you are so naive to believe that everyone who is an atheist must be a bad person - than you should grow up - and until you grow up - why don't you not accuse any American soldier of being a liar. You have tarnished your own trophy.--[[User:PatrickTom|PatrickTom]] 22:30, 3 May 2009 (EDT)</div>

PatrickTom https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Pat_Tillman_was_not_an_atheist&diff=659882 2009-05-04T02:16:05Z

<p>PatrickTom: Created page with 'You're logic is very questionable. You're saying &quot;We have to disregard the fact that Tillman said he was an atheist, because what he did does not fit my perception of atheists.&quot; ...'</p> <hr /> <div>You're logic is very questionable. You're saying &quot;We have to disregard the fact that Tillman said he was an atheist, because what he did does not fit my perception of atheists.&quot; You're wrong. You have to disregard your perception of atheists, because when you actually look at who atheists are, you see that they do not fit a mold. Atheists can be drug dealers, or, as Pat Tillman so beautifully proved with his life - heroes. And if you would honestly throw out everything that Tillman did if he was an atheist (in spite of the fact he died for this country, you say that if he was an atheist, he'd be a &quot;leftwing zero&quot;) then it is you who are the zero.--[[User:PatrickTom|PatrickTom]] 22:16, 3 May 2009 (EDT)</div>

PatrickTom