<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=RFayiz</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=RFayiz"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/RFayiz"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T09:17:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&amp;diff=452289</id>
		<title>Albert Einstein</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein&amp;diff=452289"/>
		<updated>2008-05-13T16:03:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RFayiz: /* Religion */ New quote from a newly-released letter&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:600px-Albert Einstein Head.jpg|right|thumb|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Albert Einstein''' (1879-1955) was a theoretical [[physicist]]. He was born in Ulm, in Württemberg, [[Germany]] in a [[Judaism|Jewish]] family. During his stay at the [[Switzerland|Swiss]] [[Patent and Trademark Office|Patent Office]] Einstein produced much of his remarkable work. In 1905 he obtained his [[Doctor|doctor's degree]]. He won the [[Nobel Prize]] for his work on the Photoelectric Effect in 1921. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Einstein [[Immigration|immigrated]] to the [[United States of America|United States]] in the late 1930s to take the position of Professor of Theoretical Physics at [[Princeton University|Princeton]]; upon the urging of a colleague in physics, recommended that [[President of the United States of America|President]] [[Franklin Roosevelt|Franklin D. Roosevelt]] develop an [[atomic bomb]] project. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dannen.com/ae-fdr.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He later regretted this and became a passionate [[Pacifism|pacifist]].  In 1952, he was offered the Presidency of [[Israel]], but he turned it down. Einstein collaborated with Dr. Chaim Weizmann in establishing the [[Hebrew]] [[University]] of [[Jerusalem]]. Albert Einstein died on April 18, 1955 at Princeton, [[New Jersey]] at the age of 76.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anecdotes==&lt;br /&gt;
*IN 1898, young Albert Einstein applied for admission to the Munich Technical Institute and was turned down. The young man, the Institute declared, &amp;quot;showed no promise&amp;quot; as a student. By 1905, he had formulated his special [[theory of relativity]]. [http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*Einstein came to Princeton University in 1935 and was asked what he would require for his study. he replied: &amp;quot;A desk, some pads and a pencil, and a large wastebasket to hold all of my mistakes.&amp;quot; [http://oaks.nvg.org/sa5ra17.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*THE SCULPTOR Jacob Epstein tells this story:&lt;br /&gt;
*:&amp;quot;When I was doing Professor Albert Einstein's bust he had many a jibe at the Nazi professors, one hundred of whom had condemned his theory of relativity in a book.&lt;br /&gt;
*:&amp;quot;Were I wrong,&amp;quot; he said, &amp;quot;one professor would have been enough.&amp;quot; [ibid]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Works ==&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein contributed to the theory of a [[Special Relativity]] and the theory of [[General Relativity]].  He also contributed to the study of Photoelectric Effect, Brownian Motion and Bose-Einstein Statistics.  He was critical of quantum mechanics and has proposed the EPR-Paradox in attempt to point out spooky aspects of the theory.  The last fifteen years of his life were spent in unsuccessfully searching for a [[Unified Field Theory]].  &lt;br /&gt;
Einstein's best-known scientific work is his 1905 papers on [[Special Relativity]]. The theory of relativity had already been published by [[Hendrik Lorentz]] and [[Henri Poincaré]]. Einstein's contribution was to give a description of the Lorentz-Poincare theory without reference to the luminiferous aether, and to clarify some of the physical consequences of the theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein then wrote a series of papers applying relativity to gravity using the mathematics of Riemannian Geometry, resulting in [[General Relativity]]. Much of the actual mathematics of general relativity was worked out by Marcel Grossman, David Hilbert, and others. Einstein's main contribution was to give an alternate derivation of the field equations, and to apply them to explain an [[anomaly]] in the advance of the perihelion in Mercury's orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Eddington popularized General Relativity by publishing an explanation of it and by attempting to prove the theory experimentally in a dramatic test.  Eddington embarked on a highly publicized trip into the Atlantic Ocean off Africa in order to observe the bending of [[star]]light passing nearby the [[Sun]] during the total [[solar eclipse]] of May 29, 1919.  Eddington returned with a declaration that he had proven Einstein's theory of [[General Relativity]], making Einstein extremely famous&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On November 8, 1919, for example, the ''London Times'' had an article headlined: &amp;quot;The Revolution In Science/Einstein Versus Newton.&amp;quot; Two days later, ''The New York Times''' headlines read: &amp;quot;Lights All Askew In The Heavens/Men Of Science More Or Less Agog Over Results Of Eclipse Observations/Einstein Theory Triumphs.&amp;quot; [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/relativity/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, when in fact he had selectively used data to attain this result.  No Nobel Prize was given for relativity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2007, NASA reported early results from their satellite Gravity Probe B, confirming 'to a precision of better than 1 per cent' Einstein's assertion that large objects such as the Earth distort the fabric of space and time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2057529,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Gravity Probe B project, a joint mission between NASA and Stanford University, used the most precise gyroscopes ever manufactured to detect minute distortions in the fabric of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein compared the effects of large objects on space and time to the way that a large ball placed on a sheet of rubber stretches the material and causes it to sag, and drew the analogy with the way stars and planets warp space-time. A smaller ball rolling along the sagging fabric will be drawn towards the larger ball, in the same way that the Earth is drawn towards the sun, but will not fall into it as long as it continues to move at sufficient speed. This was a change in thinking from the Newtonian cosmos, in which gravity was viewed purely as an attractive force between bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Massey of the Royal Astronomical Society said: 'From the most esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple equation, E=mc², the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe are standing up to the test of time,'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;===&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein’s famous formula E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; says that mass and energy can turn into each other. It was first published by H. Poincare. E stands for [[energy]], m is [[mass]], and c is the [[speed of light]]. So, if you increase the energy of a substance, for example by heating it, it gains a minute amount of mass. It was later realized that if you split an atom apart, as in a nuclear explosion, it loses a tiny amount of mass and you release a huge amount of [[energy]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The connection E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; to nuclear energy is not as direct as pop culture sometimes represents. Einstein did not discover the huge energy available from nuclear reactions. Early workers in radioactivity, such as Ernest Rutherford, understood clearly that the natural radioactive decay of radium released quantities of energy that could not be explained by chemistry, and were much larger than those of chemical reactions. Neither did Einstein originate the key idea that made nuclear energy a possible weapon or a practical energy source. That was Leo Szilard, who acknowledged having been inspired by a 1914 H. G. Wells novel. Szilard discovered or invented the chain reaction (and patented it). What Einstein did was to provide a theoretical framework that accounted for the release of energy, and a quantitative theory that was used by the scientists at Los Alamos who designed and built the bomb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Energy binds together the parts of an [[atom]], including the [[nucleus]]. The nucleus of an atom is tiny, but very little mass could release a huge amount of energy. When one nucleus splits apart, it splits other nuclei around it. This is called a [[chain reaction]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cosmological Constant===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein revised his work on [[General Relativity]] to include a 'fudge-factor' which he termed the [[Cosmological Constant]]. He was trying to account for the apparent steady-state nature of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Edwin Hubble]], in whose name [[NASA]]'s famous [[Hubble Space Telescope]] is named, later convinced him otherwise.  At one point he had Einstein actually making direct observations alongside him, and Hubble's findings showed conclusively that the [[universe]] was indeed expanding, as predicted by certain solutions of GR's field equations in the absence of a cosmological constant.  Einstein recanted his original [[philosophy]], and accepted as true the notion of a changing universe having a definite [[begin]]ning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He later said of his Cosmological Constant, &amp;quot;It was the biggest blunder of my life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An interesting end-note on this term: Principle investigators from [[Princeton University]] first published findings in 1998 apparently revealing an accelerating expansion for the universe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_mm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Because this initially seemed like it might be a sort of 'anti-gravity' effect (similar in concept to Einstein's original notion), it briefly became quite popular for scientists to dub the phenomenon the 'Cosmological Constant' as well.  For more information, see: [[Dark Energy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Special Theory of Relativity (1905)&lt;br /&gt;
*Relativity (English translations, 1920 and 1950) &lt;br /&gt;
*General Theory of Relativity (1916) &lt;br /&gt;
*Investigations on Theory of Brownian Movement (1926) &lt;br /&gt;
*The Evolution of Physics (1938) &lt;br /&gt;
*About Zionism (1930)&lt;br /&gt;
*Why War? (1933), &lt;br /&gt;
*My Philosophy (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
*(The World As I See It) (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
*Out of My Later Years (1950)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''...the daily effort comes from no deliberate intention or program, but straight from the heart.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Honors ==&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein received honorary doctorate degrees in science, medicine and philosophy from many American and European universities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He won the Nobel Prize in 1921 for his work on the Photoelectric Effect.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It strikes me as unfair, and even in bad taste, to select a few individuals for boundless admiration, attributing superhuman powers of mind and character to them. This has been my fate, and the contrast between the popular assessment of my powers and achievements and the reality is simply grotesque.&amp;quot; [http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein told a friend in 1930, &amp;quot;To punish me for my contempt of authority, Fate has made me an authority myself.&amp;quot; [http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He gained the Copley Medal of the Royal Society of London in 1925 and the Franklin Medal of the Franklin Institute in 1935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was offered the presidency of Israel in 1952 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.einstein-website.de/z_information/variousthings.html#president]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but respectfully declined because he believed his life-long scientific attitude of objectivity made him an inappropriate candidate for such a high political position, he was also strongly opposed to nationalism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999, he was named &amp;quot;Person of the Century&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;Time&amp;quot; magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Einstein and the A-bomb==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1939 research done by several leading scientists including [[Enrico Fermi]] regarding chain reactions of nuclear fission prompted [[Leo Szilard]] to persuade Einstein to write a letter to President &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Roosevelt]] [http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, to warn the President about the possibility of nuclear weapons and that Nazi [[Germany]] had already taken an interest in this technology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein himself had never been involved in the [[Manhattan project]]. He was considered a security risk, as he was a member, sponsor, or affiliated with thirty-four communist fronts between 1937 and 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/einstein.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later he condemned the use of nuclear weapons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy Surrounding His Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Thomas Stoltz Harvey, then a pathologist, performed the autopsy on Einstein in the [[Princeton Medical Center]] several hours after his death.  Upon completion, Dr. Harvey removed the brain and eyes &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NPR, [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4602913]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  There is controversy about whether or not Harvey had consent from the Einstein family to remove the brain and keep it, though letters from Otto Nathan, executer of the Einstein estate, suggest that Harvey did indeed have permission to keep the brain, as long as research performed on it was only described in scientific journals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The brain was photographed and sliced into 240 pieces in order to be preserved and further studied.  Harvey hoped some uniqueness would be discovered that distinguished Einstein's brain as &amp;quot;genius&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although he sent pieces away for further study, the bulk of the brain remained with Harvey for over 40 years. His once-ambitious plans for doing research on Einstein's brain were never actualized, though there were at least two controversial studies performed which suggested a physical reason for Einstein's intellegence. In 1996 Harvey entrusted Elliot Krauss, cheif [[pathologist]] at the Princeton Medical Center, with the brain. The brain now sits in a secret location, possibly only a few feet away from where it was first removed from Einstein's head. Krauss loans out pieces of the brain for scientific research, but he is very discriminating in deciding whom shall receive a piece.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abraham, Carolyn. ''Possessing Genius''. Icon Books Ltd (2005)&amp;lt;/reF&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Einstein inshul1930.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein wearing a kippah in a Berlin Synagogue, 1930.|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
There is some controversy surrounding the religion of Albert Einstein.  &lt;br /&gt;
He explained his religious views to Time magazine in this manner: “I'm not an atheist. I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God. We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but only dimly understand these laws.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1607298,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein also said &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognise, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fanatical atheists, are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who--in their grudge against traditional religion as the 'opium of the masses'-- cannot hear the music of the spheres.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Life-Universe-Walter-Isaacson/dp/0743264738&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which shows that while Einstein rejected the traditional personal God of Judaism and Christianity, he did believe in the existence of higher power(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views On Judaism and Zionism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Einst 22.jpg|right|thumb|Einstein with [[David Ben-Gurion]].|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1920, in a letter to the Central Association of German Citizens of the Jewish Faith, Einstein wrote&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am neither a German citizen, nor is there in me anything that can be described as ‘Jewish faith.’ But I am happy to belong to the Jewish people, even if I do not consider them in any way God's elect.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein do not view fellow Jews as co-religionists, but as tribal companions.&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was made an honorary citizen of [[Tel Aviv]] during his visit in 1923.&lt;br /&gt;
In 1952, Einstein was offered the position of president of Israel by the 1st prime minster of [[Israel]] David Ben-Gurion, but declined the offer.  Before his death in 1955, Einstein wrote to the Zionist leader Kurt Blumenfeld:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I thank you, even at this late hour, for having made me conscious of the Jewish soul.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein willed that all his scholarly work be archieved in Israel's Hebrew University after his death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever his views on Zionism were, Einstein has always expressed his anti-war views and staunchly opposed nationalism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;He who joyfully marches to rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be done away with at once. Heroism on command, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so a base of action. It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Einstein on Germany and the rise of Hitler==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1944, in a message to a bulletin run by Polish Jews in New York, Einstein wrote&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Germans as an entire people are responsible for the mass murders and must be punished as a people if there is justice in the world and if the consciousness of collective responsibility in the nations is not to perish from the earth entirely. Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book [Mein Kampf] and in his speeches made his shameful [genocidal] intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== False attributions == &lt;br /&gt;
Many ideas and quotes are falsely attributed to Einstein. He did not invent very much of we now call special relativity. The Principle of Relativity, that the law of physics should be the same in all inertial frames, had already been published before Einstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0408077]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not discover the Lorentz transformation, or the Lorentz invariance of Maxwell's equations for electromagnetism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://eprint.uq.edu.au/archive/00002307/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was not the first to propose that the speed of light is constant for all observers, or that the aether is superfluous and not observable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lost in Einstein's Shadow, American Scientist, 2006. [http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/49611/page/1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was not the first to recognize and explain how special relativity causes an ambiguity in defining simultaneity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity/Poincare.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not combine space and time into a four-dimensional spacetime in his special relativity papers until others had been doing it for a couple of years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein was not the first to observe the equation E=mc&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;H. Poincare published it in 1900. [http://www.serve.com/herrmann/ein.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a consequence of special relativity, or to foresee its application to nuclear binding energies or [[antimatter]] annihilation. He did not foresee a nuclear chain reaction and had to be persuaded about the possibility of an atomic bomb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein did not originate the idea of using metric tensors to reconcile gravity with special relativity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.univ-nancy2.fr/DepPhilo/walter/papers/b4.pdf] It was not his idea to describe gravity in covariant equations, and he published papers supposedly showing that it was impossible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/decades_re-set.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He did not discover the Lagrangian formulation of general relativity, and was not the first to publish the field equations. He did not foresee the expansion of the universe, the possibility of black holes, or dark energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Einstein never developed a unified field theory of any significance. He published papers on quantum mechanics, but always insisted on a deterministic interpretation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many quotes are falsely attributed to Einstein. Here are a few. &amp;quot;If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;We use only 10% of our brains.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Evil is simply the absence of God.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Originality is the art of concealing your sources.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;!-- please show location of quotes attributed to Einstein and who said them if they are to be attributed to another individual --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921&amp;quot;[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On The Electrodynamics Of Moving Bodies&amp;quot;[http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Does The Inertia Of A Body Depend Upon Its Energy-Content?&amp;quot;[http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Paterniti, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Driving Mr. Albert: A Trip Across America With Einstein's Brain&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Collected Quotes from Albert Einstein&amp;quot; [http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Confusion regarding Einstein's Religion&amp;quot;[http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2004/04/confusion.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Einstein, Albert}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Physicists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RFayiz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christopher_Hitchens&amp;diff=449403</id>
		<title>Christopher Hitchens</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christopher_Hitchens&amp;diff=449403"/>
		<updated>2008-05-08T12:57:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RFayiz: c/e&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitchens,_Stanford.jpg‎ |right|thumb|200px|Christopher Hitchens]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christopher Eric Hitchens''' (born April 13, 1949, in [[Portsmouth]], [[England]]) is a journalist, author and literary critic. Hitchens received degrees in philosophy, politics and economics from [[Oxford University|Balliol College]], [[Oxford]], in 1970. From 1971-1981, he worked in [[Britain]] as book reviewer for ''The Times'' newspaper.  He emigrated to the United States in 1981, and has written regularly, or been a contributing editor for ''Harper's'', ''Vanity Fair'' and [[Nation (magazine)|''The Nation'']]. He is [[Judaism|Jewish]] by matrilineal descent, although he did not discover this until he was 38 years old. He is an avowed [[Atheism|atheist]]. Hitchens has a younger brother, [[Peter Hitchens]], who is also a very prominent journalist, author and critic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Hitchens was a member of the International Socialists and an active [[Trotskyist]] during his youth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Opposition to Islam and Support of the War on Terror==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Hitchens became an activist against Islam when Ayatullah Kohmeini declared a [[fatwa]] against his personal friend [[Salman Rushdie]]. The event has led him to become very vocal in his support of the war in Iraq and heavily critical of Muslim society and ethics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Select bibliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
*''Callaghan: The Road to Number Ten'' (Cassell, 1976) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Hostage to History: Cyprus From the Ottomans to Kissinger'' (Farrar, Straus &amp;amp; Giroux, 1989) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Imperial Spoils: The Case of the Parthenon Marbles'' (Hill and Wang, 1989) &lt;br /&gt;
*''Blood, Class and Nostalgia: Anglo-American Ironies'' (Farrar, Straus &amp;amp; Giroux, 1990)  &lt;br /&gt;
*''The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice'' (Verso, 1995)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Prepared for the Worst'' (Hill and Wang, 1989)  &lt;br /&gt;
*''For the Sake of Argument: Essays &amp;amp; Minority Reports'' (Verso, 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
*''No One Left to Lie To: The Values of the Worst Family'' (Verso, 2000)&lt;br /&gt;
*''God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything'' - outside the US, published with the alternate subtitle ''The Case Against Religion'' (Atlantic, 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hitchens, Christopher}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Authors|Hitchens, Christopher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RFayiz</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Christopher_Hitchens&amp;diff=448692</id>
		<title>Talk:Christopher Hitchens</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Christopher_Hitchens&amp;diff=448692"/>
		<updated>2008-05-07T11:05:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RFayiz: /* Not a conservative */ more info&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot;? &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;previous unsigned comment added by [[User:The Four Deuces |The Four Deuces]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Variously the article has described him as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;neo-conservative&amp;quot; and not at all. Hitchens is very much a paradox, and I for one wouldn't like to try to pin down exactly which part of the political spectrum he fits into. Several areas at once, probably. I'm not convinced that conservative or neo-conservative are accurate. Perhaps we should discuss here exactly who thinks he's what and why [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 09:09, 20 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Egads!  Perhaps it's even possible that one cannot be neatly placed into a category of conservative or liberal?  Whatever shall we do!?  [[User:QNA|QNA]] 15:32, 20 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thankyou for your constructive and intelligent contribution to the discussion.[[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:38, 20 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You want constructive and intelligent, you're in the wrong place.  If you don't see the futility in trying to categorize someone into a neat little box, then I'm not sure what more I can say... Hitchens is a lovely example of a real person who can not be categorized so easily, and who will drive most of the people on this site insane.  You'll gladly use his quotes that are critical of Michael Moore, yet you'll marginalize and condemn him because he is an outspoken atheist... he openly contradicts the fiction that this site is trying to perpetuate which is that conservative and young earth creationist (or at the very least fundamentalist Christian) are synonymous.  That a little more constructive for you, skippy?  [[User:QNA|QNA]] 15:46, 20 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LoL, you should get out more :) [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:56, 20 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitchens is certainly not a conservative--or if he is, not one of very old vintage.  He is a supporter of the Iraq war, but that does not a conservative make.  He's also a staunch critic of Reagan, Kissinger, etc., etc.  I would put him as an iconoclast, an image he's worked very hard to maintain.  As for the article, I would simply delete &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; and leave it at that.[[User:Reaganetics|Reaganetics]] 16:43, 22 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My 2 cents - I agree with the above. He doesn't fit comfortably into liberal, conservative, or neocon, particularly as those labels have been defined here on CP. Labels ought to be deleted from the article; describe the stances he has taken and let readers decide what they think of him, free of preconceptions. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 00:39, 25 June 2007 (EDT) ''&amp;lt;- needs change for a nickel...''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hitchens' self-describes as &amp;quot;Social-Conservative&amp;quot;. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 00:45, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe we could say &amp;quot;Hitchens is a self-described conservative&amp;quot;. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:49, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*ROFL!  He's a bit of an ass. Self-described human might be more accurate.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 00:52, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hitchens is an interesting character; like many so-called &amp;quot;leftists&amp;quot; who one day grow up, Hitchens has become something of a neo-con, if &amp;quot;neocon&amp;quot; is defined a liberal mugged by reality.  Hitchens mugging by reality apparantly even bagan prior to 9/11, but was even more solidified by that historic event.  Hitchens does have one problem though, he went way to far out on a limb with ''Trial of Henry Kissinger'', the matter was even pursued litigously, so while he'd like to say publicly, &amp;quot;I was an idiot, as is typical of youngsters and loud mouth liberals.  I didn't really beleive any of that garbage, in fact, I didn't really even understand the issues.  I just thought my job as a young loud mouth liberal was to slander people with outrageous accusations, and didn't think anybody would really be hurt by it.  But now I'm grown up and see the world differently.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately Hitchens can't say this, cause that would be an admission what he wrote and what he said decades ago was false and malicious, hence he'd get his butt sued bigtime, and loose in court bigtime.  Soooo, he's married to the sins of his youth and has to carry all that contradictary baggage, and try to make half-hearted attempts to say now that he still really meant it and beleives it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This could be a lesson for students wishing to make a career in journalism.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:50, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This is a lesson for all young people in general.  We are all married to our pasts.  One cannot wipe your past statements from reality like a hard drive.  ;-)  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 00:54, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's patent nonsense to describe Hitchens as a conservative. In [http://www.slate.com/id/2161171/ this] article he implies that he is a member of the ACLU (&amp;quot;In ACLU circles, we often refer to ourselves as &amp;quot;First Amendment Absolutists&amp;quot;). In [http://www.slate.com/id/2093620/ another], he debates the Iraq War with other Slate contributors, referring to themselves as &amp;quot;Liberal hawks&amp;quot;. And, of course, Slate is a liberal publication--[[User:Afi|Afi]] 16:43, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ah, so his saracasm is lost on you too... --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 18:27, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Maybe there was in the Ayaan Hirsi Ali article, but I didn't detect any. There definitely wasn't in the &amp;quot;Liberal hawks&amp;quot; article because, well, how can you insert sarcasm in the title of the article you co-wrote? With seven other people? That's totally absurd and you know it. --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 10:12, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: By the way, I've got the full quote here to demonstrate the total lack of sarcasm in the Ayaan Hirsi Ali article. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Let me give another example of linguistic slippage. In ACLU circles, we often refer to ourselves as &amp;quot;First Amendment absolutists.&amp;quot; By this we mean, ironically enough, that we prefer to interpret the words of the Founders, if you insist, literally. The literal meaning in this case seems (to us) to be that Congress cannot inhibit any speech or establish any state religion. This means that we defend all expressions of opinion including those that revolt us, and that we say that nobody can be forced to practice, or forced to foreswear, any faith. I suppose I would say that this is an inflexible principle, or even a dogma, with me. But who dares to say that's the same as the belief that criticism of religion should be censored or the belief that faith should be imposed?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was using his membership as an example. If he was being super-subtle and injecting sarcasm into his article, he'd be purposefully sabotaging his point. Why?  --[[User:Afi|Afi]] 10:22, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you think he's a conservative because he supports the War on Terror, you're being absolutely ridiculous. I know you enjoy the credibility of having the fifth most famous public intellectual in your camp, so to speak, but does that mean the other left-wing supporters of the War on Terror are conservative? What about Nick Cohen?--[[User:Afi|Afi]] 14:12, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He is more accurately, a [[neoconservative]]. [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 16:02, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Good point.  Done. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:11, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per [[Nick Cohen]], merely being a critic of various elements of the Left does not make you of the Right.   Hitchens is no 'neo-conservative', not at all.  I would edit the article to remove it, but for some reason this article is locked.   Actually, the more I look around here, I see a lot of locked articles?   Why is that?   [[User:BritLibDem|BritLibDem]] 21:22, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/2007/477/index.html?id=mp46.htm It's generally left-wingers who call Nick Cohen &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot;]. [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 09:38, 19 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[http://www.melaniephillips.com/articles-new/?p=181 Here's another article on how some former liberals are being labeled right-wing].[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 10:12, 19 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Articles get locked due to vandalism. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 21:23, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*And here at CP, POV pushing and constant argument is another.  Being contentious is another reason people are blocked. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:56, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But isn't the point of a Wiki encyclopedia to reach some kind of CONSENSUS of opinion?   Even if here on CP you'd prefer that to come from a small section of the population?   Anyway, an illustration of this point is that I doubt you'll find anyone British - no matter how conservative (with a small 'c', of course) - who would call Hitchens a 'neocon'.   And although it does indeed seem many have posted in agreement on this matter here, the article remains locked and thus the information cannot be added.   I certainly support your ability to have the content as it agrees with you, but I doubt a public wiki is the right way for you to go about this if you're not prepared to allow public edits.    My best to you all.   [[User:BritLibDem|BritLibDem]] 22:04, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's generally lefties who call Hitchen a neoconservative. [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 09:26, 19 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll stay out of this, as I don't know my British politics.  I just wanted to answer your question about protecting articles.  [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:06, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Enjoy Houston, and your new firm! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 22:21, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j082602.html CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS, NEOCON]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_10_10/article3.html The Purest Neocon]&lt;br /&gt;
:[http://www.slate.com/id/2124500/ Cindy Sheehan's Sinister Piffle]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hitchen Quote==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;George Bush may subjectively be a Christian, but he -- and the US armed forces -- have objectively done more for secularism than the whole of the American agnostic community combined and doubled.&amp;quot; [http://slate.com/id/2109377/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not a conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know how one should describe Hitchens' political stance, or even if there is a single category into which he fits, but he has expressly denied being &amp;quot;any kind of conservative&amp;quot;. See [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at8kdzJdrjs the first 25 seconds of this video]. [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 17:23, 4 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More information in a Prospect magazine [http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=10157 article] about him.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Many of Hitchens's critics conclude that this is his way of saying he's a neoconservative. His reply is that he doesn't consider himself to be &amp;quot;any kind of conservative.&amp;quot; He would rather just be called a human rights hawk. &amp;quot;There should be a word for people who believe US power can and should be used to oppose totalitarianism,&amp;quot; he says. With no faith left in the French and Russian revolutions, or the proletariat, all that now remains is his idea of America as &amp;quot;the last revolution in town&amp;quot;—its spirit of liberty revived by the struggle to transform the middle east.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a night with Hitchens threatens to break into morning, theories of how the neoconservative strain emerged from schisms within New York's anti-Stalinist left, become increasingly labyrinthine. &amp;quot;Does this mean anything to you?&amp;quot; he asks at one point. &amp;quot;It must sound like the dribblings of someone reminiscing about being governor-general of the Punjab.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RFayiz|RFayiz]] 07:05, 7 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RFayiz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>