<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Richfactor</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Richfactor"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Richfactor"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T14:22:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rush_Limbaugh&amp;diff=171537</id>
		<title>Rush Limbaugh</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rush_Limbaugh&amp;diff=171537"/>
		<updated>2007-05-21T17:50:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Richfactor: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Rush Limbaugh''' (born January 12, 1951) is a [[conservative]] [[United States of America|American]] radio talk show host and notorious pill popper.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Limbaugh.jpg|thumb|right|Rush Limbaugh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Radio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Limbaugh hosts a radio show famed for its blustery denunciations of anything [[liberal]]. He is often at odds with [[liberal]] activist [[Al Franken]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fireside.designcommunity.com/topic-9993.html Forum thread] discussing a NYT Editorial&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. He habitually refers to [[feminists]] as ''feminazis'' and to his own self as &amp;quot;talent on loan from God&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Limbaugh's style has been credited with &amp;quot;reviving AM radio in the United States, and is considered by many to have been a catalyst for the [[Republican Party]]'s 1994 Congressional victories&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10813FA3B5D0C708EDDAB0894DE494D81&amp;amp;n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fL%2fLimbaugh%2c%20Rush Radio Talk Show Host Fears For True Conservatism's Fate], New York Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Rush's conservative talk show is nationally syndicated and averages over 13.5 million listeners weekly, making Rush the '#1 Radio Talk Show Host'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.talkers.com/main/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=17&amp;amp;Itemid=34 The Top Talk Radio Audiences] Tallkers magazine online&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 6, 2003 Limbaugh told his audience he was addicted to OxyContin and other painkillers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Rush Limbaugh Show, October 6, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Limbaugh underwent treatment for his addiction, and charges against him for alleged &amp;quot;doctor shopping&amp;quot; to procure prescription medications were dropped on the condition that he continue treatment for his addiction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/28/national/main1561324.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Media Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Limbaugh Letter is a monthly publication that contains conservative articles and humor in Rush's style. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Limbaugh is involved in the conservative satire show &amp;quot;The 1/2 Hour News Hour&amp;quot; show on the [[Fox News Channel]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/16/AR2007021602098.html Fox News Channel's '1/2 Hour News Hour': Right Funny, in Spots] washingtonpost.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Limbaugh briefly held a position as a commentator on ESPN's Sunday NFL Countdown pre-game show. He resigned from the show on October 2, 2006 after criticism of his statement that Philadelphia Eagles quaterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media wanted to see a black NFL player succeed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://espn.go.com/gen/news/2003/1001/1628537.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alleged Nobel Nomination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, Mark R. Levin of the Landmark Legal Foundation issued a press release giving the text of a letter from the Foundation to the Chairman of the Nobel Institute. The letter &amp;quot;submits the name of Rush Limbaugh as an unsolicited nomination for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize&amp;quot; for his &amp;quot;tireless efforts to promote liberty, equality and opportunity for all mankind, regardless of race, creed, economic stratum or national origin.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/02-01-2007/0004518421&amp;amp;EDATE Landmark Legal Foundation Nominates Rush Limbaugh for 2007 Nobel Peace Prize&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize is by invitation only, and the names of the nominees and their nominations are kept secret for fifty years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/ Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize], Nobel Foundation. The position of the Nobel Foundation, with regard to all [http://nobelprize.org/nomination/nomination_facts.html rumored nominations], is &amp;quot;Well, either it's just a rumour, or someone among the invited nominators has leaked information. Since the nominations are kept secret for 50 years, you'll have to wait until then to find out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html Official Rush Limbaugh website]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Limbaugh, Rush}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Broadcasters]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Richfactor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=171533</id>
		<title>Global warming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=171533"/>
		<updated>2007-05-21T17:45:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Richfactor: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Global warming''' is the term ascribed to an increase in the [[global mean temperature]].  Average [[Earth]] surface air temperature has risen just over one degree since 1850. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hansen's group at the Goddard Institute wrote, &amp;quot;Global warming is now 0.6&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.0&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past three decades and 0.8&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.4&amp;amp;nbsp;°F]in the past century.&amp;quot; http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2005/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very few scientists (less than 5%) such as [[Richard Lindzen]] of [[MIT]], [[Sallie Baliunas]] of [[Harvard]] and [[Fred Singer]] (independent) say that the patterns of global warming are naturally caused (see [[climate cycles]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessments by the [[United Nations]] promote the world view that the warming since around 1850 is mostly human-caused.&lt;br /&gt;
In February, 2007, the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]], a body of scientists&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0704280477apr29,1,4275902.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; established by the [[United Nations]], released their fourth assessment report on climate change. That report concluded that recent global climate change was &amp;quot;very likely&amp;quot; caused by human activity, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6321351.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Politicians who support the [[Kyoto Protocol]] have made the claim that there is a cause and effect relationship between increases in atmospheric concentrations of [[greenhouse gas]]es and air temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Hockey Stick Reconstruction==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hockey stick chart ipcc.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The 2001 IPCC report shows blue proxy values along the &amp;quot;shaft&amp;quot; with red instrumental values superimposed as the &amp;quot;blade&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main arguments for anthropogenic global warming during the 3rd IPCC report was a temperature reconstruction done by climatologist Michael Mann.  The resulting graph of the Northern Hemisphere temperature is shaped like a hockey stick, and it is used as evidence for the unusualness of the earth's temperature in the past few decades.  However, Stephen McIntyre and economist Ross McKitrick later discovered a serious flaw in the statistical methods used to construct the hockey stick graph.  Because of this, the 4th Assessment Report of the IPCC included several different temperature reconstruction methods instead of favoring just one hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Natural variability of the climate system==&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionary scientists who believe in global warming think that the Earth has experienced numerous [[Ice Age|ice age]]s over two million years, during which global temperatures dropped approximately 6 degrees Celsius and then returned to normal. The frigid temperatures allowed ice sheets to expand southward, covering much of [[Asia]], [[Europe]], and [[North America]]. The cooling associated with ice ages is gradual, while the terminations are relatively rapid. However, even the rapid terminations of ice ages take centuries to millennia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Global Warming on other Planets==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [[Viking spacecraft]] reached [[Mars]] in the 1970s until recent readings were taken, the average temperature on Mars has risen 1.1 degrees Fahrenheit just as the average temperature on the earth has risen.  Since human industrialization is clearly not to blame for the change on Mars, other causes are being considered.  One possibility is that dust storms are changing the albedo of the planet, allowing it to warm, while another possibility is that solar variations from the sun are causing the warming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070404_gw_mars.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, it has also been found that similar to the Earth and Mars, [[Neptune]] is also undergoing global warming.  Measurements taken at the Lowell observatory in [[Arizona]] have shown an increase in Neptune's brightness and temperature since 1980 following the same pattern seen on Earth and Mars.  The researchers who discovered this warming suggest there may be a correlation between the warming and solar variations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007.../2006GL028764.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pluto]] has also been found to be undergoing global warming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_warming_021009.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics of global warming==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The global average surface temperature warmed about 0.5&amp;amp;nbsp;°C (0.9&amp;amp;nbsp;°F) over the second half of the 20th Century, and to some the warming appears to be related to increases in [[carbon dioxide]] and other greenhouse gases. The possibility of adverse consequences has become a major concern for environmentalists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessments of climate science by the [[United Nations]] (see [[IPCC]] - ''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'')&lt;br /&gt;
have claimed that scientists are 90% sure that over 50% of the observed global warming in recent decades is human-caused, and that continued global warming should be expected over at least the next century. ''Science'' published a literature search by Naomi Oreskes concluding that &amp;quot;scientific consensus&amp;quot; supports the IPCC reports. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several prominent scientists have pointed out the [[politicized science]] of the UN's assessment methods. The scientific reports are submitted to a panel of representatives appointed by each country in the IPCC. Several scientists whose research demonstrates that climate change is taking place have complained about their work being misrepresented by the U.N. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
58% of the 279 climate scientists working at US federal agences who responded to a survey by The Union of Concerned Scientists reported 435 incidents of political interference over the past five years&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Union of Concerned Scientists and Government Accountability Project, February 2007. Atmosphere of Pressure: Political Interference in Federal Climate Science. http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/Atmosphere-of-Pressure.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that they had experienced at least one of these constraints: &lt;br /&gt;
* “Pressure to eliminate the words ‘climate change,’ ‘global warming’, or other similar terms” from their communications. &lt;br /&gt;
* Editing of scientific reports by their superiors which “changed the meaning of scientific findings”. &lt;br /&gt;
* Statements by officials at their agencies which misrepresented their findings. &lt;br /&gt;
* “The disappearance or unusual delay of websites, reports, or other science-based materials relating to climate”. &lt;br /&gt;
* “New or unusual administrative requirements that impair climate-related work”. &lt;br /&gt;
* “Situations in which scientists have actively objected to, resigned from, or removed themselves from a project because of pressure to change scientific findings.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, those who believe that either global warming is not a real phenomenon or that humanity's contribution to it has been overstated have made similar complaints. The UCS states in its report about the IPCC &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/the-ipcc.html &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 	 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Climate contrarians frequently claim that the IPCC produces politically motivated reports that show only one side of the issues. Given the many stages at which experts from across the political and scientific spectrum are included in the process, however, this is a difficult position to defend. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;	 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; Furthermore, according to IPCC principles, lead authors are “required to record views in the text which are scientifically or technically valid, even if they cannot be reconciled with a consensus view.”&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is widely held belief among the American public that global warming is a reality. A poll conducted March 11-14 of 2007 found that the majority of the American public (59%) believes we are already seeing the effects of global warming, an additional 3% and 8% respectively believe they will see the effects with in a few years or within their lifetime, and 19% believe that global warming will be seen, not in their lifetime, but in future generations—only a small minority (8%) believe that global warming will never happen. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Poling report on Gallup poll for March 11-14, 2007[http://www.pollingreport.com/enviro.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scientists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerrevelle.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;35%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Achim Steiner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Singer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Richard Lindzen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sallie Baliunas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lonnie Thompson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;33%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James E. Hansen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Keeling]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edwin A. Hernández-Delgado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/global-temperature-not-exist.pdf Does a global temperature exist?], ''Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics'', June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html The appliance of science] by Mike Hulme.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climatecrisis.net/ ''An Inconvenient Truth''], Film by [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455&amp;amp;q=great+global+warming+swindle ''The Great Global Warming Swindle'' - Documentary Film]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/%7Emotl/iris-effect.pdf Climate Sensitivity and Observed Negative Feedbacks], lecture by Richard Lindzen and Roberto Rondanelli.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/%7Emotl/lindzen-nature-of-arguments.pdf Nature of Arguments for Anthropogenic Global Warming], by Richard Lindzen&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/store/book_detail.asp?bookID=42 ''Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warmings's Unfinished Debate'', by S. Fred Singer]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus] - [[Richard S. Lindzen]], Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=47&amp;amp;articleID=604 &amp;quot;Should We Have Acted Thirty Years Ago to Prevent Climate Change?&amp;quot;, by Randall G. Holcombe].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=25&amp;amp;articleID=296 &amp;quot;After Kyoto: A Global Scramble for Advantage,&amp;quot; by Bruce Yandle].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/20030825-090130-5881r.htm Global warming smear targets]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=2319 The physical evidence of earth's unstoppable 1,500-year climate cycle]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1714 &amp;quot;Is There a Basis for Global Warming Alarm?&amp;quot;, by Richard Lindzen]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/policy_reports/detail.asp?type=full&amp;amp;id=5 &amp;quot;New Perspectives in Climate Change: What the EPA Isn’t Telling Us&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17181 Survey Shows Climatologists Are Split on Global Warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.magma.ca/~hurleyp/FightingTheHoax.htm Fighting the Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Critique of the Hokey Stick Reconstruction==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/05/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html The Decay of the Hockey Stick by Von Storch] published on the journal ''Nature'''s blog, May 3, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/13830/ A Global Warming Bombshell] by Richard A. Muller, ''Technology Review'' , Oct. 2004; calls into question famous graph by [[Michael Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/306/5696/679 Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data] by Hans von Storch, Eduardo Zorita, Julie M. Jones, Yegor Dimitriev, Fidel González-Rouco, Simon F. B. Tett, ''Science'' magazine, 22 October 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:earth science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Richfactor</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>