<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=RightStuff</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=RightStuff"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/RightStuff"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T13:49:51Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=762809</id>
		<title>Talk:Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=762809"/>
		<updated>2010-03-17T23:28:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: /* Most conservative? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some thoughts…..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this.  If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to quibble, but how does removing a &amp;quot;pro-tax bias&amp;quot; with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History has a liberal bias? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page?  Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.&lt;br /&gt;
==new text==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leading Intellectual ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; leading intellectual rather than &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; leading intellectual understates Hamilton's role a bit.  The other examples were not really his equal as an intellectual.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::well it depends what you mean by an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; rather little of Hamilton's career was spent as a writer (1788 on Fed Papers and 1792 on three big reports is about it, along with a couple essays in 1775.)  I think John Adams was more widely read, for example, and Franklin was a world-famous scientist. Noah Webster likewise was a major intellectual.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 23:35, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Most conservative? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alexander Hamilton can hardly be described as one of the most conservative founding father.  He believed in keeping a permenant debt to keep the nation together. He believed the consitution should be interperated loosely not literally.  Jefferson was a stickler for a literal interperation of the constiution. He was believed in a strong centralized goverment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His party, the federalists, were not a grass roots party.   They alienated the all but the elite.  The Democratic-Republicans or just Republicans were a much more appealing party to the common man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some issues yes he had conservative views, and in some cases he had liberal views.  But to call him the most conservative of the founding fathers is just inncorrect and ignorant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was not conservative or liberal.  He was a federalist.  The conservatives of the time were tories or loyalists and left when the United States gained their independence.  The federalist had some liberal view and some conservative views to call the one is just incorrect or dilberitly confusing the facts. --rightStuff March 1, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You make good points, though I disagree with any claim that someone &amp;quot;was not conservative or liberal.&amp;quot;  People hold views, and those views can be identified as conservative or liberal (or something else).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Feel free to improve this entry as you think best, and let's look at your changes.  I hope to learn from your edits.  But please don't delete information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:32, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I feel that the phrase the most conservative of the founding fathers is an opinion and should be omitted.  Let the reader decide that for themselves.  By saying he was a conservative there should be evidence in the article, but as I stated before it is a debatable point. rightStuff 1:34, 1 March (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Excuse me, ''wrong''stuff, but the Tories back then were those that argued for big government and big government interference in the lives of the citizens; these Tories demanded the population kowtow to the will of the king.  Does this sound familiar?  They were the ''liberals'' of their day, behaving exactly as the liberals of ''today'' are doing.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:30, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's times like this when CP's antipathy to the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; looks ''really'' silly. I'll save myself some typing and just point you to to your own bloody article on [[John Locke]]. --[[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] 16:52, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why? Has it hit a nerve because you know that your own liberal beliefs are faulted and wrong? Maybe you should use the [[liberal]] page to educate yourself. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 16:56, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:um Karajou, conservative, and liberal are both relative terms.  For instance Adam Smith was a liberal for time, but know his views are known as conservative.  The tories according to any dictonary and this site are conservative.  They would have favored mercantilism as insted of capitalism.  Alexander Hamilton by believing in Capitalism and Adam Smith's teachings in The Weath of Nations, published in 1776 makes him liberal in referance to his time period, yet conservative if he were around today.  THis is why I felt the most conservative of the founding father was a confusing phrase and shouold be removed.  --rightStuff 4:09 March 04, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The writings of George Washington as well as the writings about Washington by those who knew him personally state directly that he was a deeply-Christian man of the Episcopalian Church, yet there are liberal people today who demand that he be called a ''[[deist]]'', thereby distorting his memory and record.  When the word ''liberal'' is used in reference to the Founding Fathers, it is done by people of today who want to place those men with themselves, as if they are alive and around today.  But just what is the record of liberalism today?  Is it not distortions?  Is it not outright lying?  Is it the removal of First Amendment rights, such as freedom of speech and the press (read &amp;quot;kill talk radio&amp;quot; bills), freedom of religion (read &amp;quot;kid suspended from school for bring Bible&amp;quot;); freedom to assemble (read &amp;quot;atheist burns down Texas churches&amp;quot;)?  Does anyone here honestly think that a man of the integrity of Washington would associate which such people?  Washington ''fought'' against them during the Revolution.  And Hamilton was a close associate of Washington, politically and militarily.  Hamilton was the major author of the ''Federalist'', of which there are ideas which plainly contradict what liberals are saying now.  Which is why I'm making a demand that RightStuff read it for himself.&lt;br /&gt;
::No, we're not going to have modern liberals equate themselves with the Founding Fathers at all.  Despite the dictionary definition [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liberal], a modern liberal will never give; he will ''take'', and ''take'', and ''take'', until there is nothing left.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:23, 4 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As conservatives, RightStuff, we try to avoid historical [[revisionism]] as taught by [[leftist]] schools and teachers...given that you can't really be blamed personally for your misguided intentions. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, 4 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Let me set the record straight, I think Alexander Hamilton was conservative, but there are plenty of other more conservative founding fathers.  Saying most makes it much more debeatable as well as appearng to be slightly revisionist, preferable I would prefer to just say conservative, or nothing at all.  Personally I am not sure if the term conservative or liberal belongs with any of the founding fathers.  The argument can be made that Jefferson was more conservative than Hamilton, with his belief in the right to vote should belong to all people, and that the goverment should be small, and the constiution must be taken as close to literally as possible.  Hamilton is the one who pushed for the alien and sediation acts to be past by Adams.  Hamilton is not a one sided charater and to say he is the most conservative of the founding fathers is stretching and distorting the truth ever so slightly.  19:25, --RIGHTstuff 17 March 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=759496</id>
		<title>Talk:Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=759496"/>
		<updated>2010-03-04T21:11:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: /* Most conservative? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some thoughts…..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this.  If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to quibble, but how does removing a &amp;quot;pro-tax bias&amp;quot; with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History has a liberal bias? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page?  Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.&lt;br /&gt;
==new text==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leading Intellectual ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; leading intellectual rather than &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; leading intellectual understates Hamilton's role a bit.  The other examples were not really his equal as an intellectual.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::well it depends what you mean by an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; rather little of Hamilton's career was spent as a writer (1788 on Fed Papers and 1792 on three big reports is about it, along with a couple essays in 1775.)  I think John Adams was more widely read, for example, and Franklin was a world-famous scientist. Noah Webster likewise was a major intellectual.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 23:35, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Most conservative? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alexander Hamilton can hardly be described as one of the most conservative founding father.  He believed in keeping a permenant debt to keep the nation together. He believed the consitution should be interperated loosely not literally.  Jefferson was a stickler for a literal interperation of the constiution. He was believed in a strong centralized goverment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His party, the federalists, were not a grass roots party.   They alienated the all but the elite.  The Democratic-Republicans or just Republicans were a much more appealing party to the common man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some issues yes he had conservative views, and in some cases he had liberal views.  But to call him the most conservative of the founding fathers is just inncorrect and ignorant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was not conservative or liberal.  He was a federalist.  The conservatives of the time were tories or loyalists and left when the United States gained their independence.  The federalist had some liberal view and some conservative views to call the one is just incorrect or dilberitly confusing the facts. --rightStuff March 1, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You make good points, though I disagree with any claim that someone &amp;quot;was not conservative or liberal.&amp;quot;  People hold views, and those views can be identified as conservative or liberal (or something else).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Feel free to improve this entry as you think best, and let's look at your changes.  I hope to learn from your edits.  But please don't delete information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:32, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I feel that the phrase the most conservative of the founding fathers is an opinion and should be omitted.  Let the reader decide that for themselves.  By saying he was a conservative there should be evidence in the article, but as I stated before it is a debatable point. rightStuff 1:34, 1 March (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Excuse me, ''wrong''stuff, but the Tories back then were those that argued for big government and big government interference in the lives of the citizens; these Tories demanded the population kowtow to the will of the king.  Does this sound familiar?  They were the ''liberals'' of their day, behaving exactly as the liberals of ''today'' are doing.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:30, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's times like this when CP's antipathy to the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; looks ''really'' silly. I'll save myself some typing and just point you to to your own bloody article on [[John Locke]]. --[[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] 16:52, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why? Has it hit a nerve because you know that your own liberal beliefs are faulted and wrong? Maybe you should use the [[liberal]] page to educate yourself. [[User:Myrobi|Myrobi]] 16:56, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:um Karajou, conservative, and liberal are both relative terms.  For instance Adam Smith was a liberal for time, but know his views are known as conservative.  The tories according to any dictonary and this site are conservative.  They would have favored mercantilism as insted of capitalism.  Alexander Hamilton by believing in Capitalism and Adam Smith's teachings in The Weath of Nations, published in 1776 makes him liberal in referance to his time period, yet conservative if he were around today.  THis is why I felt the most conservative of the founding father was a confusing phrase and shouold be removed.  --rightStuff 4:09 March 04, 2010&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Tory&amp;diff=759490</id>
		<title>Talk:Tory</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Tory&amp;diff=759490"/>
		<updated>2010-03-04T21:03:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: Created page with 'I was banned for calling tories conservative so this page must be wrong. --rightStuff 4:01 Thursday March 04, 2010'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I was banned for calling tories conservative so this page must be wrong. --rightStuff 4:01 Thursday March 04, 2010&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758632</id>
		<title>Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758632"/>
		<updated>2010-03-01T18:51:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[image:alexhamilton.jpg|300px|thumb|Alexander Hamilton by John Trumbull 1792.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Alexander Hamilton''' (January 11, 1757 - July 12, 1804) was one of the most important and nationalistic of the [[Founding Fathers]] of the [[United States]].  After wartime service as chief of staff to General [[George Washington]], he became a leading lawyer in New York.  He called for a strong new constitution to replace the weak national government, and in 1788 he wrote half the ''Federalist Papers'', which mobilized supporters of the Constitution and continues to be the single most influential interpretation of [[republicanism]] and what the Constitution means.  He was a leading intellectual of his time, and the driving force of the Washington Administration that shaped the young nation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton realized that the basis of British power was its system of centralized tax collection and its funded national debt together with its sophisticated banking structure and its open market in public securities. For a state to wage war successfully, it had to tax efficiently and borrow cheaply--To become a powerful nation, America had to follow the British financial example. Hamilton's conclusion horrified Jefferson and his followers--they saw a deliberate adoption of British methods as an evil corruption--a betrayal of the values of [[Republicanism]] inherent in the American Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton played a key role in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the continued success of George Washington as his top aide&lt;br /&gt;
* the ratification of the Constitution in 1788&lt;br /&gt;
* the interpretation of the Constitution to this day&lt;br /&gt;
* the policies that made the United States an economic power&lt;br /&gt;
* writing George Washington's [[Farewell Address]], which remains one of the finest statements of conservative principles &lt;br /&gt;
* the compromise that placed the nation's capital at Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
* the election of [[Thomas Jefferson]] as president rather than Aaron Burr in 1801&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the nation's first [[United States Secretary of the Treasury|Secretary of the Treasury]], Hamilton's far reaching vision put the United States on an stable financial basis and promoted national unity. His Treasury took over state debts as well as debts owed by the national government, and funded them with long-term national debt, which in turn was paid by a new tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey.  He set up the Bank of the United States, a central bank to make liquidity in financial markets possible. The nation's business and financial communities for the first time became united in a single economy, and provided critical support for Hamilton. To mobilize that grass-roots support he founded the [[Federalist Party]], which operated in every state. It was the first political party in the new world, but soon had competition from the [[Democratic-Republican Party]] founded by his great adversary [[Thomas Jefferson]].  In foreign affairs he was a strong supporter of Britain, and the well-balanced British political system. Working closely with Washington, Hamilton in 1795 secured the critical [[Jay Treaty]] over the intense opposition of Jeffersonians who favored France in its war with Britain.  Despite an embarrassing sex scandal, Hamilton tried to keep control of the Federalist Party while [[John Adams]] was president, and orchestrated the creation of a powerful national army in 1798, which he and Washington were to head. Adams' achievement of peace with France frustrated Hamilton's plans, so he sabotaged Adams' reelection in 1800.  Nevertheless he helped Jefferson become president when it appeared the scoundrel [[Aaron Burr]] might take the office. He was killed by Burr in a duel, and for most of the 19th century was a target of attacks by Democrats as undemocratic and even pro-monarchy.  By the [[Progressive Era]] after 1900, however, Hamilton's nationalism, financial wizardry, and promotion of business and banking increasingly appealed to conservatives, who made Hamilton into a hero of their own.  Hamilton was one of the great expositors of the American political creed of [[Republicanism]], and set up programs that proved a strong, effective government of the people could be made operational without an aristocracy or monarch.&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton was born out of wedlock in the [[British West Indies]].  A prodigy, he was handling merchant accounts as a teenager, and his essay on a hurricane attracted patrons who paid his way to the American colonies.  Some scholars have argued that Hamilton’s  origins can be reflected in his later life, where, unlike much of the Revolutionary generation, his views were more nationalistic, rather than tied to the interests of a particular region or state.   &lt;br /&gt;
==Revolution==&lt;br /&gt;
As a student at King's College (now Columbia University), Hamilton took a major role in the political debates over independence. Hamilton raised a company of artillery and was selected captain. Fighting the British invasion of new York City in late 1776, he came to the attention of [[George Washington]], commander in chief of the Continental Army.  Washington promoted Hamilton to colonel and made him his senior aide--in effect the chief of staff (although that title was not in use. Hamilton had a combat command at the battle of Yorktown that ended the war in 1781.  Hamilton may have alerted General Washington to the existence of the Newburgh Conspiracy, in which disgruntled officers might have become a threat to civilian government. Washington prevented that. &lt;br /&gt;
==New York==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton became a leading lawyer in New York City, and married into the rich and powerful Schuyler family. Along with his close friend [[John Jay]], he was active in anti-slavery movements. Hamilton was elected to the Continental Congress, the [[New York]] State assembly, and was chosen by the legislature as a delegate to the [[Philadelphia]] Constitutional in 1787/ he played a minor role in the convention. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton authored 51 of the 85  ''[[Federalist Papers]],'' while [[James Madison]] and [[John Jay]] composed the others.   These essays, published anonymously in newspapers in New York and throughout the United States, helped turn popular opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution, particularly in the decisive states of [[New York]] and [[Virginia]].  &lt;br /&gt;
==Secretary of the Treasury==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Hamilton's greatest contribution to the success of the United States occurred during his tenure as Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury from 1789 to 1795.  Through a system of tariffs and excise taxes (some of which, as demonstrated by the [[Whiskey Rebellion]], caused a great deal of resentment), Hamilton placed the United States on sound financial footing. Hamilton also felt that a national debt was needed in order to insure that United States have political unity, and to give foriegn powers, who had invested in new nation, a interest in the United States' success.  While Hamilton disliked taxes, he also realized that they were necessary.  Hamilton not only favored close trade ties with [[Great Britain]], the world’s leading commercial power, but he believed that the United States should emulate their economic system.  In his Report on Manufactures, Hamilton envisioned the United States as a nation that would rely on manufacturing and commerce in order to become a great power. This (among other things) put him at odds with [[Thomas Jefferson]], who envisioned the United States as an agrarian republic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Federalist Party==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton saw the need for political newspapers and subsidized numerous editors, most famously [[Noah Webster]]. In 1801,  with $10,000 from investors, Hamilton started the ''New-York Evening Post''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  It is currently published by Rupert Murdoch under the name [[New York Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adams and Jefferson administrations==&lt;br /&gt;
==Republicanism==&lt;br /&gt;
Jefferson repeatedly attacked Hamilton as an enemy of American values--and Jeffersonians have echoed the criticism over the centuries. Jefferson said he was an enemy of popular government, did not believe in republicanism, admired the British system too much, and even wanted to set up a monarchy.  Since the 1980s scholars have rescued rescue Hamilton from these interpretations and stressed his republicanism, arguing that Jefferson went too far in his attacks.  Historians now portray Hamilton as a moderate, mainstream republican.  They point to the ''Federalist Papers'' as a core statement of American values, and also Washington's &amp;quot;Farewell Address.&amp;quot;  One debate in the 1790s was whether true republican citizens should have &amp;quot;confidence&amp;quot; in their elected leaders, which was Hamilton's position, or maintain a &amp;quot;vigilant&amp;quot; scrutiny of them, which was Jefferson's. Hamilton stressed  confidence in his vision of republican citizenship and freedom of the press. Hamilton's philosophy, argues Martin (2005), is best understood as an energetic, elitist reformulation of republicanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton's conception of human nature shaped his political thought. His predominantly and radically liberal conception of human nature was based on John Locke's concept of liberty, Thomas Hobbes's concept of power, and Nicolò Machiavelli's concept of the 'effectual truth.' It thus stressed the necessary relation between self-interest and republican government and entailed the repudiation of classical republican and Christian political ideals.  Hamilton was an elitest believing that the rich and the educated should be the ones to goverment and he feared a goverment controlled by the masses. But Hamilton's love of liberty was nonetheless rooted in a sense of classical nobility and Christian philanthropy that simultaneously elevated and contradicted his liberalism. The complex relation between liberty, nobility, philanthropy, and power in Hamilton's conception of human nature, in effect, defined his thought and exposed the strengths and weaknesses of his ideology. That complexity formed the spirit of his liberal [[republicanism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael J. Rosano, &amp;quot;Liberty, Nobility, Philanthropy, and Power in Alexander Hamilton's Conception of Human Nature&amp;quot;. ''American Journal of Political Science'' 2003 47(1): 61-74 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton's long standing rivalry with [[Aaron Burr]] eventually lead to Burr accusing Hamilton of [[slander]]. Hamilton replied that the anti-Burr statements he had made were not slander, but were instead the truth. The resulting argument brought a lifetime of feuding to a head in the form of a duel. The duel took place on the 11th of July 1804 at Weehawken, New Jersey. Hamilton believed that a gentleman shoots over his target, and that honor is served.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/hamilton/filmmore/pt_2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Burr had no such belief. Hamilton shot over Burr's head, but Burr's shot struck its target into Hamilton's body.  Hamilton was taken away and after suffering horribly from the wound throughout the night, died the next day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=H000101 Biography]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Hamilton's son, who was given the same advice by his father that a gentleman shoots over his target, had earlier died in a duel the same way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reputation==&lt;br /&gt;
No figure in American history has had so many ups and down, so many champions and detractors as Hamilton over the last two centuries. Historians continue to ask, &amp;quot;Was he a closet monarchist or a sincere republican? A victim of partisan politics or one of its most active promoters? A lackey for British interests or a foreign policy mastermind? An economic genius or a shill for special interests? The father of a vigorous national government or the destroyer of genuine federalism? A defender of governmental authority or a dangerous militarist?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ambrose and Martin, ed. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton'' (2006) p. 11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton, along with [[Benjamin Franklin]], is one of the very few non-presidents to be portrayed on American money. Hamilton's portrait is on the $10 bill, while Franklin is on the $100 bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Ellis, Joseph J. ''Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation'' (2002), won Pulitzer Prize. [http://www.amazon.com/Founding-Brothers-Revolutionary-Joseph-Ellis/dp/0375405445/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083971&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ferling, John. ''A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), good overview of the era&lt;br /&gt;
* Brookhiser, Richard. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton, American&amp;quot;. (1999) biography [http://www.amazon.com/ALEXANDER-HAMILTON-American-Richard-Brookhiser/dp/0684863316/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083822&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chernow, Ron. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton&amp;quot;. (2004) full length detailed biography [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Ron-Chernow/dp/B000UENRQU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196084039&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.  ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography'' (1979), biography by leading conservative historian; focused on intellectual history esp on AH's republicanism. [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Biography-Forrest-McDonald/dp/039330048X/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220839663&amp;amp;sr=8-5 excerpt and text search]; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101665868 complete edition online from Questia] &lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.   &amp;quot;Hamilton, Alexander&amp;quot;; [http://www.anb.org/articles/02/02-00154.html; American National Biography Online 2000], 5000 words&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''Alexander Hamilton: Portrait in Paradox'' (1959), full-length scholarly biography; [http://www.questia.com/library/book/alexander-hamilton-portrait-in-paradox-by-john-c-miller.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrose, Douglas, and Robert W. T. Martin, eds. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life and Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father.'' (2006) 310pp, essays by scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/Many-Faces-Alexander-Hamilton-Americas/dp/0814707149/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083971&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooke, Jacob E. ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography.'' (1982) by leading scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Flexner, James Thomas. &amp;quot;The Young Hamilton: A Biography&amp;quot;. (1997) &lt;br /&gt;
* Hacker, Louis M. ''Alexander Hamilton in the American Tradition.'' (1957) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=95039628 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.  ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography'' (1979) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101665868 online edition] biography focused on intellectual history esp on AH's republicanism. &lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.   &amp;quot;Hamilton, Alexander&amp;quot;; [http://www.anb.org/articles/02/02-00154.html; American National Biography Online 2000], 5000 words&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''Alexander Hamilton: Portrait in Paradox'' (1959), full-length scholarly biography; [http://www.questia.com/library/book/alexander-hamilton-portrait-in-paradox-by-john-c-miller.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitchell, Broadus. ''Alexander Hamilton'' (2 vols, 1957–62), the most detailed scholarly biography; [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=33716230 online edition of vol 1]&lt;br /&gt;
** Mitchell, Broadus. ''Alexander Hamilton: A Concise Biography'' (1976), 395pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Nevins, Allan. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton&amp;quot; in ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall, Willard Sterne. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton: A Life&amp;quot;. (2003) Popular. [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Willard-Sterne-Randall/dp/0060954663/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083900&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political philosophy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Chan, Michael D. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton on Slavery.&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics'' 66 (Spring 2004): 207-31. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408953  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fatovic, Clement. &amp;quot;Constitutionalism and Presidential Prerogative: Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian Perspectives.&amp;quot; ''American Journal of Political Science'' 2004 48(3): 429-444. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519908 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Horton, James Oliver. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton: Slavery and Race in a Revolutionary Generation&amp;quot; ''New-York Journal of American History'' 2004 65(3): 16–24. [http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:88cftz6zXJYJ:www.alexanderhamiltonexhibition.org/about/Horton%2520-%2520Hamiltsvery_Race.pdf+james+horton+%22alexander+hamilton%22+slavery&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=1 online version]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mason,  Alpheus Thomas. &amp;quot;The Federalist--A Split Personality,&amp;quot; ''American Historical Review'' 57 (1952): 625-43 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8762(195204)57%3A3%3C625%3ATFSP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z online at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Martin, Robert W. T. &amp;quot;Reforming Republicanism: Alexander Hamilton's Theory of Republican Citizenship and Press Liberty.&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic'' 2005 25(1): 21-46. Issn: 0275-1275 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_the_early_republic/v025/25.1martin.html in Project Muse] &lt;br /&gt;
* Rossiter, Clinton. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Constitution'' (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
* Sheehan, Colleen. &amp;quot;Madison V. Hamilton: The Battle Over Republicanism And The Role Of Public Opinion&amp;quot; ''American Political Science Review'' 2004 98(3): 405–424. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=245205 online abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
* Stourzh, Gerald. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government'' (1970), &lt;br /&gt;
*  Staloff, Darren.  &amp;quot;Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding.&amp;quot; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bassett, John Spencer. ''The Federalist System, 1789-1801'' (1906) old scholarly survey; [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0qz0JCJMPjp9xrk7lF2zF07&amp;amp;id=LAoOAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=toc&amp;amp;dq=bassett+%22federalist+system%22&amp;amp;sig=CPcsG1aOwgXiDZ7TIRpl1bKO4P0 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bowers, Claude G. ''Jefferson and Hamilton'' (1925), a slashing attack on Hamilton as unamerican aristocrat &lt;br /&gt;
* Charles, Joseph. &amp;quot;The Jay Treaty: The Origins of the American Party System,&amp;quot; in ''William and Mary Quarterly'', (Oct., 1955), pp. 581-630. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1918627  online at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, ''The Age of Federalism.'' (1993), the most advanced history of politics in 1790s [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-age-of-federalism-by-stanley-elkins-eric-mckitrick.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kurtz; Stephen G. ''The Presidency of John Adams: The Collapse of Federalism, 1795-1800'' 1957 [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=14355519 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''The Federalist Era: 1789-1801'' (1960), scholarly survey&lt;br /&gt;
* Nevins, Allan. ''The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism'' (1922) [http://books.google.com/books?id=q-F2daxBy1AC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:allan+inauthor:nevins&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1#PPA5,M1 online edition] ch 1 on Hamilton's ownership&lt;br /&gt;
* Sharp, James. ''American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis.'' (1995), survey of politics in 1790s&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Finance===&lt;br /&gt;
* Edling, Max M. &amp;quot;'So Immense a Power in the Affairs of War': Alexander Hamilton and the Restoration of Public Credit.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 2007 64(2): 287-326.  in [[History Cooperative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Flaumenhaft, Harvey. ''The Effective Republic: Administration and Constitution in the Thought of Alexander Hamilton'' Duke University Press, 1992 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=37077611 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest. ''The Presidency of George Washington'' (1974). &lt;br /&gt;
* McNamara, Peter. ''Political Economy and Statesmanship: Smith, Hamilton, and the Foundation of the Commercial Republic.'' (Northern Illinois University Press, 1997). 256 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nettels, Curtis P. ''The Emergence of a National Economy, 1775–1815'' (1962). general survey of economic history and policy&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Leonard D. ''The Federalists'' (1949), detailed coverage of how the Treasury and other departments were created and operated. &lt;br /&gt;
*  Wright; Robert E. ''Hamilton Unbound: Finance and the Creation of the American Republic'' Praeger (2002) [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102032054 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Bemis, Samuel Flagg. ''Jay's Treaty: A Study in Commerce and Diplomacy'' (1923) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/jays-treaty-a-study-in-commerce-and-diplomacy-by-samuel-flagg-bemis.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Coleman, Aaron N. &amp;quot;'A Second Bounaparty?': A Reexamination of Alexander Hamilton during the Franco–American Crisis, 1796–1801,&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic,'' Volume 28, Number 2, Summer 2008, pp. 183-214 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_the_early_republic/v028/28.2.coleman.html in Project Muse]&lt;br /&gt;
* Combs, Jerald. A. ''The Jay Treaty: Political Background of Founding Fathers'' (1970) Combs dislikes Hamilton's quest for national power and a &amp;quot;heroic state&amp;quot; dominating the Western Hemisphere, but concludes the Federalists &amp;quot;followed the proper policy&amp;quot; because the treaty preserved peace with Britain&lt;br /&gt;
* Harper, John Lamberton.  ''American Machiavelli: Alexander Hamilton and the Origins of U.S. Foreign Policy.'' (2004) [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=220511093955403 online review]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lycan, Gilbert L. ''Alexander Hamilton and American Foreign Policy: A Design for Greatness'' (1970),&lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Robert W.  ''Keeping the Republic: Ideology and Early American Diplomacy.'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Walling, Karl-Friedrich. ''Republican Empire: Alexander Hamilton on War and Free Government'' (1999), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Personality===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrose, Douglas and Robert W. T. Martin, eds. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life &amp;amp; Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father '' (2006) &lt;br /&gt;
* Freeman, Joanne B. ''Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic'' (2001). essential on the meaning of duels; [http://www.common-place.org/vol-02/no-02/author/ online interview]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, Roger G. ''Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson: A Study in Character'' Oxford UP, 2000 [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=59887100 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Knott, Stephen F. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Persistence of Myth'' University Press of Kansas, (2002) (ISBN 0-7006-1157-6).&lt;br /&gt;
* Trees, Andrew S. &amp;quot;The Importance of Being Alexander Hamilton.&amp;quot;  ''Reviews in American History'' 2005 33(1): 8-14. Issn: 0048-7511 Fulltext: in Project Muse &lt;br /&gt;
* Trees, Andrew S.  ''The Founding Fathers and the Politics of Character.'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Freeman, Joanne B., ed. ''Alexander Hamilton: Writings'' (2001), [http://www.loa.org The Library of America] edition, 1108 pages. Most of Hamilton's major writings and many of his letters [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Writings-Library-America/dp/1931082049/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220839663&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Syrett, Harold C. ed. ''The Papers of Alexander Hamilton'' (27 vol, Columbia University Press, 1961–87); includes all letters and writing by Hamilton, and all important letters written to him; this is the definitive letterpress edition, heavily annotated by scholars; it is available in larger academic libraries; there is also a separate Law series. &lt;br /&gt;
* Morris, Richard. ed. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Founding of the Nation'' (1957), excerpts from AH's writings, by topic, 617pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Morton J. Frisch ed. ''Selected Writings and Speeches of Alexander Hamilton.'' (1985), 528pp. [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=58312678 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Works of Alexander Hamilton'' edited by Henry Cabot Lodge (1904) [http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC01013&amp;amp;id=R7TukmWbcrcC&amp;amp;printsec=toc full text online at Google Books] [http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/Author.php?recordID=0135 online in HTML edition]. This is the only online collection of Hamilton's writings and letters. Published in 10 volumes, containing about 1.3 million words. [http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=Hamilton%2C%20alexander%20works full text online at archive.org]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Federalist Papers''] under the shared pseudonym &amp;quot;Publius&amp;quot; by Alexander Hamilton (c. 52 articles), [[James Madison]] (28 articles) and [[John Jay]] (five articles)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooke, Jacob E. ed., ''Alexander Hamilton: A Profile'' (1967), short excerpts from AH and his critics. &lt;br /&gt;
* Cunningham, Noble E. ''Jefferson vs. Hamilton: Confrontations that Shaped a Nation'' (2000), short collection of primary sources with commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
* Taylor, George Rogers. ed, ''Hamilton and the National Debt'' 1950, excerpts from all sides in 1790s [http://www.questia.com/library/book/hamilton-and-the-national-debt-by-george-rogers-taylor.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hamilton, Alexander}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Secretaries of the Treasury]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Modernization]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758631</id>
		<title>Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758631"/>
		<updated>2010-03-01T18:44:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[image:alexhamilton.jpg|300px|thumb|Alexander Hamilton by John Trumbull 1792.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Alexander Hamilton''' (January 11, 1757 - July 12, 1804) was one of the most important and nationalistic of the [[Founding Fathers]] of the [[United States]].  After wartime service as chief of staff to General [[George Washington]], he became a leading lawyer in New York.  He called for a strong new constitution to replace the weak national government, and in 1788 he wrote half the ''Federalist Papers'', which mobilized supporters of the Constitution and continues to be the single most influential interpretation of [[republicanism]] and what the Constitution means.  He was a leading intellectual of his time, and the driving force of the Washington Administration that shaped the young nation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton realized that the basis of British power was its system of centralized tax collection and its funded national debt together with its sophisticated banking structure and its open market in public securities. For a state to wage war successfully, it had to tax efficiently and borrow cheaply--To become a powerful nation, America had to follow the British financial example. Hamilton's conclusion horrified Jefferson and his followers--they saw a deliberate adoption of British methods as an evil corruption--a betrayal of the values of [[Republicanism]] inherent in the American Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton played a key role in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the continued success of George Washington as his top aide&lt;br /&gt;
* the ratification of the Constitution in 1788&lt;br /&gt;
* the interpretation of the Constitution to this day&lt;br /&gt;
* the policies that made the United States an economic power&lt;br /&gt;
* writing George Washington's [[Farewell Address]], which remains one of the finest statements of conservative principles &lt;br /&gt;
* the compromise that placed the nation's capital at Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
* the election of [[Thomas Jefferson]] as president rather than Aaron Burr in 1801&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the nation's first [[United States Secretary of the Treasury|Secretary of the Treasury]], Hamilton's far reaching vision put the United States on an stable financial basis and promoted national unity. His Treasury took over state debts as well as debts owed by the national government, and funded them with long-term national debt, which in turn was paid by a new tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey.  He set up the Bank of the United States, a central bank to make liquidity in financial markets possible. The nation's business and financial communities for the first time became united in a single economy, and provided critical support for Hamilton. To mobilize that grass-roots support he founded the [[Federalist Party]], which operated in every state. It was the first popular political party in the world, but soon had competition from the [[Democratic-Republican Party]] founded by his great adversary [[Thomas Jefferson]].  In foreign affairs he was a strong supporter of Britain, and the well-balanced British political system. Working closely with Washington, Hamilton in 1795 secured the critical [[Jay Treaty]] over the intense opposition of Jeffersonians who favored France in its war with Britain.  Despite an embarrassing sex scandal, Hamilton tried to keep control of the Federalist Party while [[John Adams]] was president, and orchestrated the creation of a powerful national army in 1798, which he and Washington were to head. Adams' achievement of peace with France frustrated Hamilton's plans, so he sabotaged Adams' reelection in 1800.  Nevertheless he helped Jefferson become president when it appeared the scoundrel [[Aaron Burr]] might take the office. He was killed by Burr in a duel, and for most of the 19th century was a target of attacks by Democrats as undemocratic and even pro-monarchy.  By the [[Progressive Era]] after 1900, however, Hamilton's nationalism, financial wizardry, and promotion of business and banking increasingly appealed to conservatives, who made Hamilton into a hero of their own.  Hamilton was one of the great expositors of the American political creed of [[Republicanism]], and set up programs that proved a strong, effective government of the people could be made operational without an aristocracy or monarch.&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton was born out of wedlock in the [[British West Indies]].  A prodigy, he was handling merchant accounts as a teenager, and his essay on a hurricane attracted patrons who paid his way to the American colonies.  Some scholars have argued that Hamilton’s  origins can be reflected in his later life, where, unlike much of the Revolutionary generation, his views were more nationalistic, rather than tied to the interests of a particular region or state.   &lt;br /&gt;
==Revolution==&lt;br /&gt;
As a student at King's College (now Columbia University), Hamilton took a major role in the political debates over independence. Hamilton raised a company of artillery and was selected captain. Fighting the British invasion of new York City in late 1776, he came to the attention of [[George Washington]], commander in chief of the Continental Army.  Washington promoted Hamilton to colonel and made him his senior aide--in effect the chief of staff (although that title was not in use. Hamilton had a combat command at the battle of Yorktown that ended the war in 1781.  Hamilton may have alerted General Washington to the existence of the Newburgh Conspiracy, in which disgruntled officers might have become a threat to civilian government. Washington prevented that. &lt;br /&gt;
==New York==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton became a leading lawyer in New York City, and married into the rich and powerful Schuyler family. Along with his close friend [[John Jay]], he was active in anti-slavery movements. Hamilton was elected to the Continental Congress, the [[New York]] State assembly, and was chosen by the legislature as a delegate to the [[Philadelphia]] Constitutional in 1787/ he played a minor role in the convention. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton authored 51 of the 85  ''[[Federalist Papers]],'' while [[James Madison]] and [[John Jay]] composed the others.   These essays, published anonymously in newspapers in New York and throughout the United States, helped turn popular opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution, particularly in the decisive states of [[New York]] and [[Virginia]].  &lt;br /&gt;
==Secretary of the Treasury==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Hamilton's greatest contribution to the success of the United States occurred during his tenure as Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury from 1789 to 1795.  Through a system of tariffs and excise taxes (some of which, as demonstrated by the [[Whiskey Rebellion]], caused a great deal of resentment), Hamilton placed the United States on sound financial footing. Hamilton also felt that a national debt was needed in order to insure that United States have political unity, and to give foriegn powers, who had invested in new nation, a interest in the United States' success. to United States.  While Hamilton disliked taxes, he also realized that they were necessary.  Hamilton not only favored close trade ties with [[Great Britain]], the world’s leading commercial power, but he believed that the United States should emulate their economic system.  In his Report on Manufactures, Hamilton envisioned the United States as a nation that would rely on manufacturing and commerce in order to become a great power. This (among other things) put him at odds with [[Thomas Jefferson]], who envisioned the United States as an agrarian republic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Federalist Party==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton saw the need for political newspapers and subsidized numerous editors, most famously [[Noah Webster]]. In 1801,  with $10,000 from investors, Hamilton started the ''New-York Evening Post''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  It is currently published by Rupert Murdoch under the name [[New York Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adams and Jefferson administrations==&lt;br /&gt;
==Republicanism==&lt;br /&gt;
Jefferson repeatedly attacked Hamilton as an enemy of American values--and Jeffersonians have echoed the criticism over the centuries. Jefferson said he was an enemy of popular government, did not believe in republicanism, admired the British system too much, and even wanted to set up a monarchy.  Since the 1980s scholars have rescued rescue Hamilton from these interpretations and stressed his republicanism, arguing that Jefferson went too far in his attacks.  Historians now portray Hamilton as a moderate, mainstream republican.  They point to the ''Federalist Papers'' as a core statement of American values, and also Washington's &amp;quot;Farewell Address.&amp;quot;  One debate in the 1790s was whether true republican citizens should have &amp;quot;confidence&amp;quot; in their elected leaders, which was Hamilton's position, or maintain a &amp;quot;vigilant&amp;quot; scrutiny of them, which was Jefferson's. Hamilton stressed  confidence in his vision of republican citizenship and freedom of the press. Hamilton's philosophy, argues Martin (2005), is best understood as an energetic, elitist reformulation of republicanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton's conception of human nature shaped his political thought. His predominantly and radically liberal conception of human nature was based on John Locke's concept of liberty, Thomas Hobbes's concept of power, and Nicolò Machiavelli's concept of the 'effectual truth.' It thus stressed the necessary relation between self-interest and republican government and entailed the repudiation of classical republican and Christian political ideals. But Hamilton's love of liberty was nonetheless rooted in a sense of classical nobility and Christian philanthropy that simultaneously elevated and contradicted his liberalism. The complex relation between liberty, nobility, philanthropy, and power in Hamilton's conception of human nature, in effect, defined his thought and exposed the strengths and weaknesses of his ideology. That complexity formed the spirit of his liberal [[republicanism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael J. Rosano, &amp;quot;Liberty, Nobility, Philanthropy, and Power in Alexander Hamilton's Conception of Human Nature&amp;quot;. ''American Journal of Political Science'' 2003 47(1): 61-74 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton's long standing rivalry with [[Aaron Burr]] eventually lead to Burr accusing Hamilton of [[slander]]. Hamilton replied that the anti-Burr statements he had made were not slander, but were instead the truth. The resulting argument brought a lifetime of feuding to a head in the form of a duel. The duel took place on the 11th of July 1804 at Weehawken, New Jersey. Hamilton believed that a gentleman shoots over his target, and that honor is served.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/hamilton/filmmore/pt_2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Burr had no such belief. Hamilton shot over Burr's head, but Burr's shot struck its target into Hamilton's body.  Hamilton was taken away and after suffering horribly from the wound throughout the night, died the next day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=H000101 Biography]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Hamilton's son, who was given the same advice by his father that a gentleman shoots over his target, had earlier died in a duel the same way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reputation==&lt;br /&gt;
No figure in American history has had so many ups and down, so many champions and detractors as Hamilton over the last two centuries. Historians continue to ask, &amp;quot;Was he a closet monarchist or a sincere republican? A victim of partisan politics or one of its most active promoters? A lackey for British interests or a foreign policy mastermind? An economic genius or a shill for special interests? The father of a vigorous national government or the destroyer of genuine federalism? A defender of governmental authority or a dangerous militarist?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ambrose and Martin, ed. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton'' (2006) p. 11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton, along with [[Benjamin Franklin]], is one of the very few non-presidents to be portrayed on American money. Hamilton's portrait is on the $10 bill, while Franklin is on the $100 bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Ellis, Joseph J. ''Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation'' (2002), won Pulitzer Prize. [http://www.amazon.com/Founding-Brothers-Revolutionary-Joseph-Ellis/dp/0375405445/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083971&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ferling, John. ''A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), good overview of the era&lt;br /&gt;
* Brookhiser, Richard. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton, American&amp;quot;. (1999) biography [http://www.amazon.com/ALEXANDER-HAMILTON-American-Richard-Brookhiser/dp/0684863316/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083822&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chernow, Ron. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton&amp;quot;. (2004) full length detailed biography [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Ron-Chernow/dp/B000UENRQU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196084039&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.  ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography'' (1979), biography by leading conservative historian; focused on intellectual history esp on AH's republicanism. [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Biography-Forrest-McDonald/dp/039330048X/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220839663&amp;amp;sr=8-5 excerpt and text search]; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101665868 complete edition online from Questia] &lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.   &amp;quot;Hamilton, Alexander&amp;quot;; [http://www.anb.org/articles/02/02-00154.html; American National Biography Online 2000], 5000 words&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''Alexander Hamilton: Portrait in Paradox'' (1959), full-length scholarly biography; [http://www.questia.com/library/book/alexander-hamilton-portrait-in-paradox-by-john-c-miller.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrose, Douglas, and Robert W. T. Martin, eds. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life and Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father.'' (2006) 310pp, essays by scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/Many-Faces-Alexander-Hamilton-Americas/dp/0814707149/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083971&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooke, Jacob E. ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography.'' (1982) by leading scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Flexner, James Thomas. &amp;quot;The Young Hamilton: A Biography&amp;quot;. (1997) &lt;br /&gt;
* Hacker, Louis M. ''Alexander Hamilton in the American Tradition.'' (1957) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=95039628 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.  ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography'' (1979) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101665868 online edition] biography focused on intellectual history esp on AH's republicanism. &lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.   &amp;quot;Hamilton, Alexander&amp;quot;; [http://www.anb.org/articles/02/02-00154.html; American National Biography Online 2000], 5000 words&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''Alexander Hamilton: Portrait in Paradox'' (1959), full-length scholarly biography; [http://www.questia.com/library/book/alexander-hamilton-portrait-in-paradox-by-john-c-miller.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitchell, Broadus. ''Alexander Hamilton'' (2 vols, 1957–62), the most detailed scholarly biography; [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=33716230 online edition of vol 1]&lt;br /&gt;
** Mitchell, Broadus. ''Alexander Hamilton: A Concise Biography'' (1976), 395pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Nevins, Allan. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton&amp;quot; in ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall, Willard Sterne. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton: A Life&amp;quot;. (2003) Popular. [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Willard-Sterne-Randall/dp/0060954663/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083900&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political philosophy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Chan, Michael D. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton on Slavery.&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics'' 66 (Spring 2004): 207-31. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408953  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fatovic, Clement. &amp;quot;Constitutionalism and Presidential Prerogative: Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian Perspectives.&amp;quot; ''American Journal of Political Science'' 2004 48(3): 429-444. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519908 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Horton, James Oliver. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton: Slavery and Race in a Revolutionary Generation&amp;quot; ''New-York Journal of American History'' 2004 65(3): 16–24. [http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:88cftz6zXJYJ:www.alexanderhamiltonexhibition.org/about/Horton%2520-%2520Hamiltsvery_Race.pdf+james+horton+%22alexander+hamilton%22+slavery&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=1 online version]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mason,  Alpheus Thomas. &amp;quot;The Federalist--A Split Personality,&amp;quot; ''American Historical Review'' 57 (1952): 625-43 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8762(195204)57%3A3%3C625%3ATFSP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z online at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Martin, Robert W. T. &amp;quot;Reforming Republicanism: Alexander Hamilton's Theory of Republican Citizenship and Press Liberty.&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic'' 2005 25(1): 21-46. Issn: 0275-1275 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_the_early_republic/v025/25.1martin.html in Project Muse] &lt;br /&gt;
* Rossiter, Clinton. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Constitution'' (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
* Sheehan, Colleen. &amp;quot;Madison V. Hamilton: The Battle Over Republicanism And The Role Of Public Opinion&amp;quot; ''American Political Science Review'' 2004 98(3): 405–424. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=245205 online abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
* Stourzh, Gerald. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government'' (1970), &lt;br /&gt;
*  Staloff, Darren.  &amp;quot;Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding.&amp;quot; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bassett, John Spencer. ''The Federalist System, 1789-1801'' (1906) old scholarly survey; [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0qz0JCJMPjp9xrk7lF2zF07&amp;amp;id=LAoOAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=toc&amp;amp;dq=bassett+%22federalist+system%22&amp;amp;sig=CPcsG1aOwgXiDZ7TIRpl1bKO4P0 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bowers, Claude G. ''Jefferson and Hamilton'' (1925), a slashing attack on Hamilton as unamerican aristocrat &lt;br /&gt;
* Charles, Joseph. &amp;quot;The Jay Treaty: The Origins of the American Party System,&amp;quot; in ''William and Mary Quarterly'', (Oct., 1955), pp. 581-630. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1918627  online at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, ''The Age of Federalism.'' (1993), the most advanced history of politics in 1790s [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-age-of-federalism-by-stanley-elkins-eric-mckitrick.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kurtz; Stephen G. ''The Presidency of John Adams: The Collapse of Federalism, 1795-1800'' 1957 [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=14355519 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''The Federalist Era: 1789-1801'' (1960), scholarly survey&lt;br /&gt;
* Nevins, Allan. ''The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism'' (1922) [http://books.google.com/books?id=q-F2daxBy1AC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:allan+inauthor:nevins&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1#PPA5,M1 online edition] ch 1 on Hamilton's ownership&lt;br /&gt;
* Sharp, James. ''American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis.'' (1995), survey of politics in 1790s&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Finance===&lt;br /&gt;
* Edling, Max M. &amp;quot;'So Immense a Power in the Affairs of War': Alexander Hamilton and the Restoration of Public Credit.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 2007 64(2): 287-326.  in [[History Cooperative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Flaumenhaft, Harvey. ''The Effective Republic: Administration and Constitution in the Thought of Alexander Hamilton'' Duke University Press, 1992 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=37077611 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest. ''The Presidency of George Washington'' (1974). &lt;br /&gt;
* McNamara, Peter. ''Political Economy and Statesmanship: Smith, Hamilton, and the Foundation of the Commercial Republic.'' (Northern Illinois University Press, 1997). 256 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nettels, Curtis P. ''The Emergence of a National Economy, 1775–1815'' (1962). general survey of economic history and policy&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Leonard D. ''The Federalists'' (1949), detailed coverage of how the Treasury and other departments were created and operated. &lt;br /&gt;
*  Wright; Robert E. ''Hamilton Unbound: Finance and the Creation of the American Republic'' Praeger (2002) [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102032054 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Bemis, Samuel Flagg. ''Jay's Treaty: A Study in Commerce and Diplomacy'' (1923) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/jays-treaty-a-study-in-commerce-and-diplomacy-by-samuel-flagg-bemis.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Coleman, Aaron N. &amp;quot;'A Second Bounaparty?': A Reexamination of Alexander Hamilton during the Franco–American Crisis, 1796–1801,&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic,'' Volume 28, Number 2, Summer 2008, pp. 183-214 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_the_early_republic/v028/28.2.coleman.html in Project Muse]&lt;br /&gt;
* Combs, Jerald. A. ''The Jay Treaty: Political Background of Founding Fathers'' (1970) Combs dislikes Hamilton's quest for national power and a &amp;quot;heroic state&amp;quot; dominating the Western Hemisphere, but concludes the Federalists &amp;quot;followed the proper policy&amp;quot; because the treaty preserved peace with Britain&lt;br /&gt;
* Harper, John Lamberton.  ''American Machiavelli: Alexander Hamilton and the Origins of U.S. Foreign Policy.'' (2004) [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=220511093955403 online review]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lycan, Gilbert L. ''Alexander Hamilton and American Foreign Policy: A Design for Greatness'' (1970),&lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Robert W.  ''Keeping the Republic: Ideology and Early American Diplomacy.'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Walling, Karl-Friedrich. ''Republican Empire: Alexander Hamilton on War and Free Government'' (1999), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Personality===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrose, Douglas and Robert W. T. Martin, eds. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life &amp;amp; Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father '' (2006) &lt;br /&gt;
* Freeman, Joanne B. ''Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic'' (2001). essential on the meaning of duels; [http://www.common-place.org/vol-02/no-02/author/ online interview]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, Roger G. ''Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson: A Study in Character'' Oxford UP, 2000 [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=59887100 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Knott, Stephen F. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Persistence of Myth'' University Press of Kansas, (2002) (ISBN 0-7006-1157-6).&lt;br /&gt;
* Trees, Andrew S. &amp;quot;The Importance of Being Alexander Hamilton.&amp;quot;  ''Reviews in American History'' 2005 33(1): 8-14. Issn: 0048-7511 Fulltext: in Project Muse &lt;br /&gt;
* Trees, Andrew S.  ''The Founding Fathers and the Politics of Character.'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Freeman, Joanne B., ed. ''Alexander Hamilton: Writings'' (2001), [http://www.loa.org The Library of America] edition, 1108 pages. Most of Hamilton's major writings and many of his letters [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Writings-Library-America/dp/1931082049/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220839663&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Syrett, Harold C. ed. ''The Papers of Alexander Hamilton'' (27 vol, Columbia University Press, 1961–87); includes all letters and writing by Hamilton, and all important letters written to him; this is the definitive letterpress edition, heavily annotated by scholars; it is available in larger academic libraries; there is also a separate Law series. &lt;br /&gt;
* Morris, Richard. ed. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Founding of the Nation'' (1957), excerpts from AH's writings, by topic, 617pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Morton J. Frisch ed. ''Selected Writings and Speeches of Alexander Hamilton.'' (1985), 528pp. [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=58312678 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Works of Alexander Hamilton'' edited by Henry Cabot Lodge (1904) [http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC01013&amp;amp;id=R7TukmWbcrcC&amp;amp;printsec=toc full text online at Google Books] [http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/Author.php?recordID=0135 online in HTML edition]. This is the only online collection of Hamilton's writings and letters. Published in 10 volumes, containing about 1.3 million words. [http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=Hamilton%2C%20alexander%20works full text online at archive.org]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Federalist Papers''] under the shared pseudonym &amp;quot;Publius&amp;quot; by Alexander Hamilton (c. 52 articles), [[James Madison]] (28 articles) and [[John Jay]] (five articles)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooke, Jacob E. ed., ''Alexander Hamilton: A Profile'' (1967), short excerpts from AH and his critics. &lt;br /&gt;
* Cunningham, Noble E. ''Jefferson vs. Hamilton: Confrontations that Shaped a Nation'' (2000), short collection of primary sources with commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
* Taylor, George Rogers. ed, ''Hamilton and the National Debt'' 1950, excerpts from all sides in 1790s [http://www.questia.com/library/book/hamilton-and-the-national-debt-by-george-rogers-taylor.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hamilton, Alexander}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Secretaries of the Treasury]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Modernization]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758629</id>
		<title>Talk:Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758629"/>
		<updated>2010-03-01T18:34:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: /* Most conservative? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some thoughts…..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this.  If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to quibble, but how does removing a &amp;quot;pro-tax bias&amp;quot; with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History has a liberal bias? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page?  Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.&lt;br /&gt;
==new text==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leading Intellectual ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; leading intellectual rather than &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; leading intellectual understates Hamilton's role a bit.  The other examples were not really his equal as an intellectual.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::well it depends what you mean by an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; rather little of Hamilton's career was spent as a writer (1788 on Fed Papers and 1792 on three big reports is about it, along with a couple essays in 1775.)  I think John Adams was more widely read, for example, and Franklin was a world-famous scientist. Noah Webster likewise was a major intellectual.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 23:35, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Most conservative? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alexander Hamilton can hardly be described as one of the most conservative founding father.  He believed in keeping a permenant debt to keep the nation together. He believed the consitution should be interperated loosely not literally.  Jefferson was a stickler for a literal interperation of the constiution. He was believed in a strong centralized goverment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His party, the federalists, were not a grass roots party.   They alienated the all but the elite.  The Democratic-Republicans or just Republicans were a much more appealing party to the common man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some issues yes he had conservative views, and in some cases he had liberal views.  But to call him the most conservative of the founding fathers is just inncorrect and ignorant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was not conservative or liberal.  He was a federalist.  The conservatives of the time were tories or loyalists and left when the United States gained their independence.  The federalist had some liberal view and some conservative views to call the one is just incorrect or dilberitly confusing the facts. --rightStuff March 1, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You make good points, though I disagree with any claim that someone &amp;quot;was not conservative or liberal.&amp;quot;  People hold views, and those views can be identified as conservative or liberal (or something else).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Feel free to improve this entry as you think best, and let's look at your changes.  I hope to learn from your edits.  But please don't delete information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:32, 1 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I feel that the phrase the most conservative of the founding fathers is an opinion and should be omitted.  Let the reader decide that for themselves.  By saying he was a conservative there should be evidence in the article, but as I stated before it is a debatable point. rightStuff 1:34, 1 March (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758570</id>
		<title>Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758570"/>
		<updated>2010-03-01T16:47:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: /* Secretary of the Treasury */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[image:alexhamilton.jpg|300px|thumb|Alexander Hamilton by John Trumbull 1792.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Alexander Hamilton''' (January 11, 1757 - July 12, 1804) was one of the most important, and most conservative and nationalistic, of the [[Founding Fathers]] of the [[United States]].  After wartime service as chief of staff to General [[George Washington]], he became a leading lawyer in New York.  He called for a strong new constitution to replace the weak national government, and in 1788 he wrote half the ''Federalist Papers'', which mobilized supporters of the Constitution and continues to be the single most influential interpretation of [[republicanism]] and what the Constitution means.  He was a leading intellectual of his time, and the driving force of the Washington Administration that shaped the young nation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton realized that the basis of British power was its system of centralized tax collection and its funded national debt together with its sophisticated banking structure and its open market in public securities. For a state to wage war successfully, it had to tax efficiently and borrow cheaply--To become a powerful nation, America had to follow the British financial example. Hamilton's conclusion horrified Jefferson and his followers--they saw a deliberate adoption of British methods as an evil corruption--a betrayal of the values of [[Republicanism]] inherent in the American Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton played a key role in:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the continued success of George Washington as his top aide&lt;br /&gt;
* the ratification of the Constitution in 1788&lt;br /&gt;
* the interpretation of the Constitution to this day&lt;br /&gt;
* the policies that made the United States an economic power&lt;br /&gt;
* writing George Washington's [[Farewell Address]], which remains one of the finest statements of conservative principles &lt;br /&gt;
* the compromise that placed the nation's capital at Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
* the election of [[Thomas Jefferson]] as president rather than Aaron Burr in 1801&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the nation's first [[United States Secretary of the Treasury|Secretary of the Treasury]], Hamilton's far reaching vision put the United States on an stable financial basis and promoted national unity. His Treasury took over state debts as well as debts owed by the national government, and funded them with long-term national debt, which in turn was paid by a new tariff on imports and a tax on whiskey.  He set up the Bank of the United States, a central bank to make liquidity in financial markets possible. The nation's business and financial communities for the first time became united in a single economy, and provided critical support for Hamilton. To mobilize that grass-roots support he founded the [[Federalist Party]], which operated in every state. It was the first popular political party in the world, but soon had competition from the [[Democratic-Republican Party]] founded by his great adversary [[Thomas Jefferson]].  In foreign affairs he was a strong supporter of Britain, and the well-balanced British political system. Working closely with Washington, Hamilton in 1795 secured the critical [[Jay Treaty]] over the intense opposition of Jeffersonians who favored France in its war with Britain.  Despite an embarrassing sex scandal, Hamilton tried to keep control of the Federalist Party while [[John Adams]] was president, and orchestrated the creation of a powerful national army in 1798, which he and Washington were to head. Adams' achievement of peace with France frustrated Hamilton's plans, so he sabotaged Adams' reelection in 1800.  Nevertheless he helped Jefferson become president when it appeared the scoundrel [[Aaron Burr]] might take the office. He was killed by Burr in a duel, and for most of the 19th century was a target of attacks by Democrats as undemocratic and even pro-monarchy.  By the [[Progressive Era]] after 1900, however, Hamilton's nationalism, financial wizardry, and promotion of business and banking increasingly appealed to conservatives, who made Hamilton into a hero of their own.  Hamilton was one of the great expositors of the American political creed of [[Republicanism]], and set up programs that proved a strong, effective government of the people could be made operational without an aristocracy or monarch.&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton was born out of wedlock in the [[British West Indies]].  A prodigy, he was handling merchant accounts as a teenager, and his essay on a hurricane attracted patrons who paid his way to the American colonies.  Some scholars have argued that Hamilton’s  origins can be reflected in his later life, where, unlike much of the Revolutionary generation, his views were more nationalistic, rather than tied to the interests of a particular region or state.   &lt;br /&gt;
==Revolution==&lt;br /&gt;
As a student at King's College (now Columbia University), Hamilton took a major role in the political debates over independence. Hamilton raised a company of artillery and was selected captain. Fighting the British invasion of new York City in late 1776, he came to the attention of [[George Washington]], commander in chief of the Continental Army.  Washington promoted Hamilton to colonel and made him his senior aide--in effect the chief of staff (although that title was not in use. Hamilton had a combat command at the battle of Yorktown that ended the war in 1781.  Hamilton may have alerted General Washington to the existence of the Newburgh Conspiracy, in which disgruntled officers might have become a threat to civilian government. Washington prevented that. &lt;br /&gt;
==New York==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton became a leading lawyer in New York City, and married into the rich and powerful Schuyler family. Along with his close friend [[John Jay]], he was active in anti-slavery movements. Hamilton was elected to the Continental Congress, the [[New York]] State assembly, and was chosen by the legislature as a delegate to the [[Philadelphia]] Constitutional in 1787/ he played a minor role in the convention. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton authored 51 of the 85  ''[[Federalist Papers]],'' while [[James Madison]] and [[John Jay]] composed the others.   These essays, published anonymously in newspapers in New York and throughout the United States, helped turn popular opinion in favor of ratifying the Constitution, particularly in the decisive states of [[New York]] and [[Virginia]].  &lt;br /&gt;
==Secretary of the Treasury==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Hamilton's greatest contribution to the success of the United States occurred during his tenure as Washington’s Secretary of the Treasury from 1789 to 1795.  Through a system of tariffs and excise taxes (some of which, as demonstrated by the [[Whiskey Rebellion]], caused a great deal of resentment), Hamilton placed the United States on sound financial footing. Hamilton also felt that a national debt was needed in order to insure that United States have political unity, and to give foriegn powers, who had invested in new nation, a interest in the United States' success. to United States.  While Hamilton disliked taxes, he also realized that they were necessary.  Hamilton not only favored close trade ties with [[Great Britain]], the world’s leading commercial power, but he believed that the United States should emulate their economic system.  In his Report on Manufactures, Hamilton envisioned the United States as a nation that would rely on manufacturing and commerce in order to become a great power. This (among other things) put him at odds with [[Thomas Jefferson]], who envisioned the United States as an agrarian republic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Federalist Party==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton saw the need for political newspapers and subsidized numerous editors, most famously [[Noah Webster]]. In 1801,  with $10,000 from investors, Hamilton started the ''New-York Evening Post''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  It is currently published by Rupert Murdoch under the name [[New York Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adams and Jefferson administrations==&lt;br /&gt;
==Republicanism==&lt;br /&gt;
Jefferson repeatedly attacked Hamilton as an enemy of American values--and Jeffersonians have echoed the criticism over the centuries. Jefferson said he was an enemy of popular government, did not believe in republicanism, admired the British system too much, and even wanted to set up a monarchy.  Since the 1980s scholars have rescued rescue Hamilton from these interpretations and stressed his republicanism, arguing that Jefferson went too far in his attacks.  Historians now portray Hamilton as a moderate, mainstream republican.  They point to the ''Federalist Papers'' as a core statement of American values, and also Washington's &amp;quot;Farewell Address.&amp;quot;  One debate in the 1790s was whether true republican citizens should have &amp;quot;confidence&amp;quot; in their elected leaders, which was Hamilton's position, or maintain a &amp;quot;vigilant&amp;quot; scrutiny of them, which was Jefferson's. Hamilton stressed  confidence in his vision of republican citizenship and freedom of the press. Hamilton's philosophy, argues Martin (2005), is best understood as an energetic, elitist reformulation of republicanism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton's conception of human nature shaped his political thought. His predominantly and radically liberal conception of human nature was based on John Locke's concept of liberty, Thomas Hobbes's concept of power, and Nicolò Machiavelli's concept of the 'effectual truth.' It thus stressed the necessary relation between self-interest and republican government and entailed the repudiation of classical republican and Christian political ideals. But Hamilton's love of liberty was nonetheless rooted in a sense of classical nobility and Christian philanthropy that simultaneously elevated and contradicted his liberalism. The complex relation between liberty, nobility, philanthropy, and power in Hamilton's conception of human nature, in effect, defined his thought and exposed the strengths and weaknesses of his ideology. That complexity formed the spirit of his liberal [[republicanism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael J. Rosano, &amp;quot;Liberty, Nobility, Philanthropy, and Power in Alexander Hamilton's Conception of Human Nature&amp;quot;. ''American Journal of Political Science'' 2003 47(1): 61-74 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton's long standing rivalry with [[Aaron Burr]] eventually lead to Burr accusing Hamilton of [[slander]]. Hamilton replied that the anti-Burr statements he had made were not slander, but were instead the truth. The resulting argument brought a lifetime of feuding to a head in the form of a duel. The duel took place on the 11th of July 1804 at Weehawken, New Jersey. Hamilton believed that a gentleman shoots over his target, and that honor is served.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/hamilton/filmmore/pt_2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Burr had no such belief. Hamilton shot over Burr's head, but Burr's shot struck its target into Hamilton's body.  Hamilton was taken away and after suffering horribly from the wound throughout the night, died the next day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=H000101 Biography]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Hamilton's son, who was given the same advice by his father that a gentleman shoots over his target, had earlier died in a duel the same way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reputation==&lt;br /&gt;
No figure in American history has had so many ups and down, so many champions and detractors as Hamilton over the last two centuries. Historians continue to ask, &amp;quot;Was he a closet monarchist or a sincere republican? A victim of partisan politics or one of its most active promoters? A lackey for British interests or a foreign policy mastermind? An economic genius or a shill for special interests? The father of a vigorous national government or the destroyer of genuine federalism? A defender of governmental authority or a dangerous militarist?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ambrose and Martin, ed. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton'' (2006) p. 11 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
==Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamilton, along with [[Benjamin Franklin]], is one of the very few non-presidents to be portrayed on American money. Hamilton's portrait is on the $10 bill, while Franklin is on the $100 bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Ellis, Joseph J. ''Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation'' (2002), won Pulitzer Prize. [http://www.amazon.com/Founding-Brothers-Revolutionary-Joseph-Ellis/dp/0375405445/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083971&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ferling, John. ''A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic'' (Oxford University Press, 2003), good overview of the era&lt;br /&gt;
* Brookhiser, Richard. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton, American&amp;quot;. (1999) biography [http://www.amazon.com/ALEXANDER-HAMILTON-American-Richard-Brookhiser/dp/0684863316/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083822&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chernow, Ron. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton&amp;quot;. (2004) full length detailed biography [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Ron-Chernow/dp/B000UENRQU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196084039&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.  ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography'' (1979), biography by leading conservative historian; focused on intellectual history esp on AH's republicanism. [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Biography-Forrest-McDonald/dp/039330048X/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220839663&amp;amp;sr=8-5 excerpt and text search]; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101665868 complete edition online from Questia] &lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.   &amp;quot;Hamilton, Alexander&amp;quot;; [http://www.anb.org/articles/02/02-00154.html; American National Biography Online 2000], 5000 words&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''Alexander Hamilton: Portrait in Paradox'' (1959), full-length scholarly biography; [http://www.questia.com/library/book/alexander-hamilton-portrait-in-paradox-by-john-c-miller.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrose, Douglas, and Robert W. T. Martin, eds. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life and Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father.'' (2006) 310pp, essays by scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/Many-Faces-Alexander-Hamilton-Americas/dp/0814707149/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083971&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooke, Jacob E. ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography.'' (1982) by leading scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Flexner, James Thomas. &amp;quot;The Young Hamilton: A Biography&amp;quot;. (1997) &lt;br /&gt;
* Hacker, Louis M. ''Alexander Hamilton in the American Tradition.'' (1957) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=95039628 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.  ''Alexander Hamilton: A Biography'' (1979) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101665868 online edition] biography focused on intellectual history esp on AH's republicanism. &lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest.   &amp;quot;Hamilton, Alexander&amp;quot;; [http://www.anb.org/articles/02/02-00154.html; American National Biography Online 2000], 5000 words&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''Alexander Hamilton: Portrait in Paradox'' (1959), full-length scholarly biography; [http://www.questia.com/library/book/alexander-hamilton-portrait-in-paradox-by-john-c-miller.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitchell, Broadus. ''Alexander Hamilton'' (2 vols, 1957–62), the most detailed scholarly biography; [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=33716230 online edition of vol 1]&lt;br /&gt;
** Mitchell, Broadus. ''Alexander Hamilton: A Concise Biography'' (1976), 395pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Nevins, Allan. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton&amp;quot; in ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Randall, Willard Sterne. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton: A Life&amp;quot;. (2003) Popular. [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Willard-Sterne-Randall/dp/0060954663/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1196083900&amp;amp;sr=8-1  excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political philosophy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Chan, Michael D. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton on Slavery.&amp;quot; ''Review of Politics'' 66 (Spring 2004): 207-31. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1408953  in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fatovic, Clement. &amp;quot;Constitutionalism and Presidential Prerogative: Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian Perspectives.&amp;quot; ''American Journal of Political Science'' 2004 48(3): 429-444. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519908 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Horton, James Oliver. &amp;quot;Alexander Hamilton: Slavery and Race in a Revolutionary Generation&amp;quot; ''New-York Journal of American History'' 2004 65(3): 16–24. [http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:88cftz6zXJYJ:www.alexanderhamiltonexhibition.org/about/Horton%2520-%2520Hamiltsvery_Race.pdf+james+horton+%22alexander+hamilton%22+slavery&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=1 online version]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mason,  Alpheus Thomas. &amp;quot;The Federalist--A Split Personality,&amp;quot; ''American Historical Review'' 57 (1952): 625-43 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8762(195204)57%3A3%3C625%3ATFSP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z online at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Martin, Robert W. T. &amp;quot;Reforming Republicanism: Alexander Hamilton's Theory of Republican Citizenship and Press Liberty.&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic'' 2005 25(1): 21-46. Issn: 0275-1275 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_the_early_republic/v025/25.1martin.html in Project Muse] &lt;br /&gt;
* Rossiter, Clinton. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Constitution'' (1964)&lt;br /&gt;
* Sheehan, Colleen. &amp;quot;Madison V. Hamilton: The Battle Over Republicanism And The Role Of Public Opinion&amp;quot; ''American Political Science Review'' 2004 98(3): 405–424. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=245205 online abstract]&lt;br /&gt;
* Stourzh, Gerald. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government'' (1970), &lt;br /&gt;
*  Staloff, Darren.  &amp;quot;Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding.&amp;quot; (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bassett, John Spencer. ''The Federalist System, 1789-1801'' (1906) old scholarly survey; [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0qz0JCJMPjp9xrk7lF2zF07&amp;amp;id=LAoOAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=toc&amp;amp;dq=bassett+%22federalist+system%22&amp;amp;sig=CPcsG1aOwgXiDZ7TIRpl1bKO4P0 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bowers, Claude G. ''Jefferson and Hamilton'' (1925), a slashing attack on Hamilton as unamerican aristocrat &lt;br /&gt;
* Charles, Joseph. &amp;quot;The Jay Treaty: The Origins of the American Party System,&amp;quot; in ''William and Mary Quarterly'', (Oct., 1955), pp. 581-630. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1918627  online at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
*Elkins, Stanley M. and Eric McKitrick, ''The Age of Federalism.'' (1993), the most advanced history of politics in 1790s [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-age-of-federalism-by-stanley-elkins-eric-mckitrick.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kurtz; Stephen G. ''The Presidency of John Adams: The Collapse of Federalism, 1795-1800'' 1957 [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=14355519 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Miller, John C. ''The Federalist Era: 1789-1801'' (1960), scholarly survey&lt;br /&gt;
* Nevins, Allan. ''The Evening Post: A Century of Journalism'' (1922) [http://books.google.com/books?id=q-F2daxBy1AC&amp;amp;pg=PA7&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:allan+inauthor:nevins&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1#PPA5,M1 online edition] ch 1 on Hamilton's ownership&lt;br /&gt;
* Sharp, James. ''American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis.'' (1995), survey of politics in 1790s&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Finance===&lt;br /&gt;
* Edling, Max M. &amp;quot;'So Immense a Power in the Affairs of War': Alexander Hamilton and the Restoration of Public Credit.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 2007 64(2): 287-326.  in [[History Cooperative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Flaumenhaft, Harvey. ''The Effective Republic: Administration and Constitution in the Thought of Alexander Hamilton'' Duke University Press, 1992 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=37077611 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* McDonald, Forrest. ''The Presidency of George Washington'' (1974). &lt;br /&gt;
* McNamara, Peter. ''Political Economy and Statesmanship: Smith, Hamilton, and the Foundation of the Commercial Republic.'' (Northern Illinois University Press, 1997). 256 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nettels, Curtis P. ''The Emergence of a National Economy, 1775–1815'' (1962). general survey of economic history and policy&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Leonard D. ''The Federalists'' (1949), detailed coverage of how the Treasury and other departments were created and operated. &lt;br /&gt;
*  Wright; Robert E. ''Hamilton Unbound: Finance and the Creation of the American Republic'' Praeger (2002) [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=102032054 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
* Bemis, Samuel Flagg. ''Jay's Treaty: A Study in Commerce and Diplomacy'' (1923) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/jays-treaty-a-study-in-commerce-and-diplomacy-by-samuel-flagg-bemis.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Coleman, Aaron N. &amp;quot;'A Second Bounaparty?': A Reexamination of Alexander Hamilton during the Franco–American Crisis, 1796–1801,&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Early Republic,'' Volume 28, Number 2, Summer 2008, pp. 183-214 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_the_early_republic/v028/28.2.coleman.html in Project Muse]&lt;br /&gt;
* Combs, Jerald. A. ''The Jay Treaty: Political Background of Founding Fathers'' (1970) Combs dislikes Hamilton's quest for national power and a &amp;quot;heroic state&amp;quot; dominating the Western Hemisphere, but concludes the Federalists &amp;quot;followed the proper policy&amp;quot; because the treaty preserved peace with Britain&lt;br /&gt;
* Harper, John Lamberton.  ''American Machiavelli: Alexander Hamilton and the Origins of U.S. Foreign Policy.'' (2004) [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=220511093955403 online review]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lycan, Gilbert L. ''Alexander Hamilton and American Foreign Policy: A Design for Greatness'' (1970),&lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Robert W.  ''Keeping the Republic: Ideology and Early American Diplomacy.'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Walling, Karl-Friedrich. ''Republican Empire: Alexander Hamilton on War and Free Government'' (1999), &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Personality===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ambrose, Douglas and Robert W. T. Martin, eds. ''The Many Faces of Alexander Hamilton: The Life &amp;amp; Legacy of America's Most Elusive Founding Father '' (2006) &lt;br /&gt;
* Freeman, Joanne B. ''Affairs of Honor: National Politics in the New Republic'' (2001). essential on the meaning of duels; [http://www.common-place.org/vol-02/no-02/author/ online interview]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, Roger G. ''Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson: A Study in Character'' Oxford UP, 2000 [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=59887100 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Knott, Stephen F. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Persistence of Myth'' University Press of Kansas, (2002) (ISBN 0-7006-1157-6).&lt;br /&gt;
* Trees, Andrew S. &amp;quot;The Importance of Being Alexander Hamilton.&amp;quot;  ''Reviews in American History'' 2005 33(1): 8-14. Issn: 0048-7511 Fulltext: in Project Muse &lt;br /&gt;
* Trees, Andrew S.  ''The Founding Fathers and the Politics of Character.'' (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Freeman, Joanne B., ed. ''Alexander Hamilton: Writings'' (2001), [http://www.loa.org The Library of America] edition, 1108 pages. Most of Hamilton's major writings and many of his letters [http://www.amazon.com/Alexander-Hamilton-Writings-Library-America/dp/1931082049/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1220839663&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Syrett, Harold C. ed. ''The Papers of Alexander Hamilton'' (27 vol, Columbia University Press, 1961–87); includes all letters and writing by Hamilton, and all important letters written to him; this is the definitive letterpress edition, heavily annotated by scholars; it is available in larger academic libraries; there is also a separate Law series. &lt;br /&gt;
* Morris, Richard. ed. ''Alexander Hamilton and the Founding of the Nation'' (1957), excerpts from AH's writings, by topic, 617pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Morton J. Frisch ed. ''Selected Writings and Speeches of Alexander Hamilton.'' (1985), 528pp. [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=58312678 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Works of Alexander Hamilton'' edited by Henry Cabot Lodge (1904) [http://books.google.com/books?vid=OCLC01013&amp;amp;id=R7TukmWbcrcC&amp;amp;printsec=toc full text online at Google Books] [http://oll.libertyfund.org/Home3/Author.php?recordID=0135 online in HTML edition]. This is the only online collection of Hamilton's writings and letters. Published in 10 volumes, containing about 1.3 million words. [http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=Hamilton%2C%20alexander%20works full text online at archive.org]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Federalist Papers''] under the shared pseudonym &amp;quot;Publius&amp;quot; by Alexander Hamilton (c. 52 articles), [[James Madison]] (28 articles) and [[John Jay]] (five articles)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cooke, Jacob E. ed., ''Alexander Hamilton: A Profile'' (1967), short excerpts from AH and his critics. &lt;br /&gt;
* Cunningham, Noble E. ''Jefferson vs. Hamilton: Confrontations that Shaped a Nation'' (2000), short collection of primary sources with commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
* Taylor, George Rogers. ed, ''Hamilton and the National Debt'' 1950, excerpts from all sides in 1790s [http://www.questia.com/library/book/hamilton-and-the-national-debt-by-george-rogers-taylor.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hamilton, Alexander}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Secretaries of the Treasury]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Modernization]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758559</id>
		<title>Talk:Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758559"/>
		<updated>2010-03-01T16:26:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: /* Most conservative? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some thoughts…..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this.  If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to quibble, but how does removing a &amp;quot;pro-tax bias&amp;quot; with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History has a liberal bias? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page?  Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.&lt;br /&gt;
==new text==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leading Intellectual ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; leading intellectual rather than &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; leading intellectual understates Hamilton's role a bit.  The other examples were not really his equal as an intellectual.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::well it depends what you mean by an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; rather little of Hamilton's career was spent as a writer (1788 on Fed Papers and 1792 on three big reports is about it, along with a couple essays in 1775.)  I think John Adams was more widely read, for example, and Franklin was a world-famous scientist. Noah Webster likewise was a major intellectual.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 23:35, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Most conservative? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alexander Hamilton can hardly be described as one of the most conservative founding father.  He believed in keeping a permenant debt to keep the nation together. He believed the consitution should be interperated loosely not literally.  Jefferson was a stickler for a literal interperation of the constiution. He was believed in a strong centralized goverment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His party, the federalists, were not a grass roots party.   They alienated the all but the elite.  The Democratic-Republicans or just Republicans were a much more appealing party to the common man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some issues yes he had conservative views, and in some cases he had liberal views.  But to call him the most conservative of the founding fathers is just inncorrect and ignorant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was not conservative or liberal.  He was a federalist.  The conservatives of the time were tories or loyalists and left when the United States gained their independence.  The federalist had some liberal view and some conservative views to call the one is just incorrect or dilberitly confusing the facts. --rightStuff March 1, 2010&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758558</id>
		<title>Talk:Alexander Hamilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Alexander_Hamilton&amp;diff=758558"/>
		<updated>2010-03-01T16:25:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RightStuff: /* Most conservative? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some thoughts…..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this.  If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to quibble, but how does removing a &amp;quot;pro-tax bias&amp;quot; with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History has a liberal bias? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page?  Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.&lt;br /&gt;
==new text==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leading Intellectual ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; leading intellectual rather than &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; leading intellectual understates Hamilton's role a bit.  The other examples were not really his equal as an intellectual.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::well it depends what you mean by an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; rather little of Hamilton's career was spent as a writer (1788 on Fed Papers and 1792 on three big reports is about it, along with a couple essays in 1775.)  I think John Adams was more widely read, for example, and Franklin was a world-famous scientist. Noah Webster likewise was a major intellectual.  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 23:35, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Most conservative? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alexander Hamilton can hardly be described as one of the most conservative founding father.  He believed in keeping a permenant debt to keep the nation together. He believed the consitution should be interperated loosely not literally.  Jefferson was a stickler for a literal interperation of the constiution. He was believed in a strong centralized goverment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His party, the federalists, were not a grass roots party.   They alienated the all but the elite.  The Democratic-Republicans or just Republicans were a much more appealing party to the common man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some issues yes he had conservative views, and in some cases he had liberal views.  But to call him the most conservative of the founding fathers is just inncorrect and ignorant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was not conservative or liberal.  He was a federalist.  The conservatives of the time were tories or loyalists and left when the United States gained their independence.  The federalist had some liberal view and some conservative views to call the one is just incorrect or dilberitly confusing the facts.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RightStuff</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>