<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Sarahj74</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Sarahj74"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Sarahj74"/>
	<updated>2026-10-22T07:43:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Worst_Liberal_TV_Shows&amp;diff=1291098</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Worst Liberal TV Shows</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Worst_Liberal_TV_Shows&amp;diff=1291098"/>
		<updated>2016-11-25T16:48:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sarahj74: /* Crazy Ex-Girlfriend */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I think each entry should have a brief description what makes the show liberal and what makes it particularly egregious. --[[User:JoshuaB|JoshuaB]] 18:14, 16 March 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree. Each entry does need an explanation of why it is liberal.--[[User:GOPFan2011|GOPFan2011]] 22:26, 16 March 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree also. And the page should be renamed &amp;quot;'''Most''' Liberal TV Shows&amp;quot;. Some are good shows, even if one disagrees with their alleged liberal-ness. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 15:36, 8 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funny, what about [[Doctor Who]]? Jk, this whole essay is bunk. you could say the same about almost everything.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 13:39, 13 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 'all american muslim' show and a couple of talk shows still don't have any description.  does anyone know why they are here?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 09:59, 22 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How are they particularly liberal? Yes, they mock conservative politicians, but they mock liberal politicians too. That's why they're parodies of political talk shows. And didn't Colbert support Cain in the election until he dropped out? Stewart's a liberal, but that doesn't make his show liberally-biased. As long as they parody conservative and liberal politicians equally, I don't think they belong here. Otherwise, we would have to include SNL and virtually every single late-night comedy show. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 18:03, 14 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Colbert Report encouraged vandalism of Conservapedia and Wikipedia. We associate vandalism with liberalism. 'Nuff said. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 10:08, 17 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Essay&amp;quot;? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All I see is a list. Where is the essay? [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 16:49, 16 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's listed as an essay because it is just a list, and not an article. Some people are very, very fond of lists. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 17:25, 16 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::So if I understand correctly on Conservapedia every text that doesn't constitute a proper article is classified as an essay? [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 08:38, 17 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I guess so. But you overthink things. Try it out. Write an essay. You may like it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 08:40, 17 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes, &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; denotes content that is personal opinion and not necessarily encyclopaedic. Perhaps this could be made clearer to new users. But not in a way that devalues these pages, because some of the best content on Conservapedia is designated &amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== South Park ==&lt;br /&gt;
South Park is a Libertarian tv show not a liberal one. The how actually mocks conservatives as well as liberals. I remember one episode portrayed environmentalists as evil people who murder people and brainwash people. Plus show creators trey parker and matt stone are libertarians and  matt stone once said he hates liberals more than he hates conservatives. Yes there are liberal themes on the show and mockery of conservatives but there is about as mockery of liberals as their is of conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Alright, I removed it.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:39, 17 February 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== US Shows ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm guessing this list is intended to contain only the &amp;quot;Worst Liberal US TV Shows&amp;quot; but does that mean anything broadcast in the US or only programs actually produced in America? These days there is also a possibility that &amp;quot;widely seen&amp;quot; doesn't necessarily coincide with &amp;quot;broadcast,&amp;quot; just to complicate matters. Should there be a paragraph about this? [[User:ConsMovies|ConsMovies]] 12:19, 17 February 2015 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Should TV specials count as movies or TV shows? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking of adding the infamous ''Star Wars Holiday Special'' to either here or the Worst Liberal Movies counterpart (for a good reason why I think it belongs in either of those two categories, let's just say that it involved Art Carney's character AND Itchy watching what was strongly implied to be a porn film, that such an action was treated in a positive light, and it seems to really let loose with left-wing sensibilities overall even by Star Wars standards). However, I'm not sure whether TV specials count as TV shows or movies. Can someone tell me if the appropriate place for TV specials (not just the Holiday Special, but any special) is here or on Movies (either Greatest Conservative or Worst Liberal, take your pick). [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:37, 30 May 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mr. Robot ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4158110/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe this should be considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Around the very beginning of the show the main character blatantly shows how insane the liberal agenda has made him. &amp;quot;What I'm about to tell you is Top Secret. A conspiracy bigger than all of us. There's a powerful group of people out there that are secretly running the world. I'm talking about the guys no one knows about, the guys that are invisible. The top 1% of the top 1%, the guys that play God without permission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#Heavily criticizes corporations. The corporation that kindly gave the main character a job his brain registers as &amp;quot;evil corp&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;e-corp&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#The main character's love interest is a beautiful girl who dates a guy who likes bush and conservativeness. When the main character announced that about the hated boyfriend, he said &amp;quot;need I say more? ...I don't dislike him as much as the other boyfriends she gets though. He's too stupid to be evil.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#The first successful business we're introduced to is a coffee shop entrepreneur. The main character illegally hacked his business and found child porn. It seems every thriving business in this show is evil. When the child pronographer offers to give him money for blackmail he says &amp;quot;I don't give a shit about money.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#Near the end of the show the scheme the hackers have is to illegally erase all debt to evil corp. as Mr. Robot would put it, “the single greatest incident of wealth redistribution in history.”&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Sersafir|Sersafir]] ([[User talk:Sersafir|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crazy Ex-Girlfriend ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to suggest this show be considered - themes of feminism, homosexuality, Judaism, abortion, promiscuity, profanity, and so on&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Sarahj74</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>