<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shinaisamurai</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shinaisamurai"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Shinaisamurai"/>
	<updated>2026-10-07T12:05:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lesbianism&amp;diff=461507</id>
		<title>Lesbianism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lesbianism&amp;diff=461507"/>
		<updated>2008-05-27T19:48:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shinaisamurai: /* Lesbianism and Health Issues */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Lesbianism''' is [[sex]]ual activity or attraction between [[women]]. Female [[homosexual]]s are often called '''lesbians''' (after the [[Greek]] island of [[Lesbos]], home of [[Sappho]]). Homosexuality normally focuses on men more than in women, but the problem is not minor. Women who are attracted to both women and men are called [[bisexual]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;lesbian&amp;quot; was first used in the late 16th century. Lesbianism is also called ''sapphism'' or ''female homosexuality''. (Sappho penned love sonnets to women. She lived from 610-580 B.C.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention Program included lesbians as a priority population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/conference/ppt/linda_ellis.ppt#291,3, Progress has been made in recognizing lesbians as a target population]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, estimates of lifetime same-sex behavior among women are 8%–20%, and 1.4%–4.3% of all women may be sexually active with other women. An estimated 2.3 million women describe themselves as lesbian. In its 1999 report, Lesbian Health: Current Assessment and Directions for the Future, the Institute of Medicine emphasized that more data on sexually transmitted infections (STIs), Pap smear screening, and risk for cervical cancer in lesbians were needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol10no11/04-0622_08.htm Lesbians and Infectious Diseases]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lesbianism and Health Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
In April of 2007, the ''[[American Journal of Public Health]]'' analyzed data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, and the data suggested that lesbian women were 2.69 times more likely to be overweight and 2.47 times more likely to be obese than all other female sexual orientation groups.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ajph&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&amp;amp;Cmd=ShowDetailView&amp;amp;TermToSearch=17463369&amp;amp;ordinalpos=1&amp;amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Overweight and Obesity in Sexual-Minority Women: Evidence From Population-Based Data, Ulrike Boehmer, Deborah J. Bowen, Greta R. Bauer, American Journal of Public Health, 2007 Jun;97(6):1134-40. E pub 2007 Apr 26.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The abstract for this study indicated that &amp;quot;lesbians are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality linked to overweight and obesity.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ajph&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; However, lesbians are considered to be amongst the lowest risk groups for some STDs including HIV &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HIV&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.metrokc.gov/health/glbT/lbstd.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of course, we're going through the process of lying to you because we're male homosexuals and despise the sight of a females vagina.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Health]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/ebc/article-9384264 Lesbianism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shinaisamurai</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Patriot_Act&amp;diff=461505</id>
		<title>Patriot Act</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Patriot_Act&amp;diff=461505"/>
		<updated>2008-05-27T19:45:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shinaisamurai: /* Success */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Gwbushsigningpatriotact.jpg|thumb|right|300px|President George W. Bush signing Patriot Act before bipartisan gathering of members of Congress]]‎ The '''USA PATRIOT ACT of 2001''' -- The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (more commonly known as simply the Patriot Act) -- is an anti-terrorism bill written in response to the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]]. It was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on October 26th, 45 days after the terrorist attacks.  The primary purpose of the bill was to provide [[law enforcement]] with the tools it needs to fight the domestic war on terror. The bill expanded the definitions of other crime-fighting bills to include [[terrorist]]s, it provided funds to the [[Justice Department]] for fighting terrorism, and, made broad changes to [[surveillance]] and intelligence procedures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Passage of the Act==&lt;br /&gt;
[[United States|Attorney General]] [[John Ashcroft]] formally proposed the increases in law enforcement powers on September 19th, requesting that they be considered immediately.  Bush administration, along with the overwhelming majority of members of Congress, felt these provisions were necessary to prevent any more imminent or future attacks. Many of the proposed powers had been sought by the Justice Department for years (the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] administration, for example, sought but was denied so-called [[roving wiretap]]s – a power that was included in the final bill), but in the wake of a successful attack upon American soil and the demands of the American public for action gave Congress the impetus to pass the measures. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CQ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;USA PATRIOT Act, 2001-2002 Legislative Chronology.&amp;quot; Congress and the Nation, 2001-2004, vol. 11, pp. 187-8 (Washington: CQ Press, 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The [[House Judiciary Committee]] debated the proposal for weeks and reached an agreement on October 2nd, with few minor changes.  A [[sunset provision]], the hallmark of [[Newt Gingrich|Gingrich]]-style reform, was included requiring renewal of the act within two years. The committee said that it understood the need for expediency, so it would add the sunset clauses to allow debate on the issue when time was not as much of an issue. The administration, however, was worried that the United States would still be fighting the war on terror when the clause came into effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bridis, Ted and Jess Bravin. “White House Seeks to Remove Time Limit On Surveillance Part of Anti-terrorism Bill.” The Wall Street Journal, October 5th, 2001, p. A.18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratically controlled [[United States Senate|Senate]] version of the bill went more in favor of the White House. While the bill was never considered by the [[Senate Judiciary Committee]], the committee’s chair [[Patrick J. Leahy]], a [[Democrat]] from [[Vermont]], along with members from both parties met with the Bush Administration to negotiate a bill that the Senate and [[White House]] could agree on. This version (finalized on October 4th) did not include a sunset provision, and it allowed lower barriers for obtaining [[search warrant]]s. Additionally it gave the [[federal]] government new tools to fight [[money laundering]]. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CQ&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate passed its version of the bill with a 96-1 vote (only Senator [[Russ D. Feingold]], a Democrat from Wisconsin voted nay) after just three hours of debate on October 11th. The House revised its version of the bill to make it a little more to the Administration’s and Senate's liking than the version approved by the House Judiciary Committee, including moving the date of the sunset back three years, to 2006. The Senate agreed to the sunset provision and this version passed the House the next day by a massive 337-79 vote. The House and Senate reconciled an agreement between the two versions (including changing the sunset date to December 31st, 2005) and sent the bill, now officially known as the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, back to their respective chambers, where it passed 357-66 in the House on October 24th and 98-1 in the Senate (with Senator Feingold dissenting) a day later. It was signed into law by President Bush on the following day, 37 days after the original proposal to Congress.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CQ&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How the Act Fights Terrorism==&lt;br /&gt;
The Patriot Act Fights Terrorism in three main ways: disrupting terrorist’s funding, improving methods of prosecuting terrorists, and expanding surveillance procedures and intelligence sharing. There were other minor parts, such as setting up a fund in the Treasury Department to reimburse the Department of Justice for fighting terrorism and a section which condemns discrimination against Muslims and Arab Americans.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;leahy&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Leahy, Patrick. “USA PATRIOT Act – Section by Section Analysis.” http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200110/102401a.html (Accessed April 16th, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most of the provisions deal directly with terrorism, but some have broader applicability, and some are not related to terrorism at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Roving Wiretaps===&lt;br /&gt;
The first step in disrupting terrorism is finding the terrorists before they can successfully act on a plot to attack the United States. The Patriot Act provides the means for the federal government to gather intelligence on these plots, primarily through wiretaps and search warrants. One such provision is the so-called [[roving wiretaps]] provision. Roving wiretaps themselves are not new, they have been use investigating crime since 1986; the Patriot act simply extends this tool to gathering intelligence of terrorists.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;206derosa&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DeRosa, Mary. “Section 206: Roving Surveillance Authority Under FISA: A Summary” (American Bar Association, 2005). http://www.abanet.org/natsecurity/patriotdebates/section-206 (Accessed April 16th, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Before roving wiretaps, the [[Federal Bureau of Investigation|FBI]] would need to get a separate FISC ([[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]) warrant for each method of communication used by a terrorist. This means that if the suspect switched phones or used public [[computer]]s the FBI would need to get multiple warrants. The Patriot Act allows for FISC warrants on a specific person, rather than a single specific phone line as under the old law. This means that the FBI could get one warrant, and tap whatever line the suspect happens to be using at the time.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;206derosa&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sneak and Peek Warrants===&lt;br /&gt;
Another tool provided by the Patriot Act is delayed-notification search warrants, or [[sneak and peek]] warrants.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;213derosa&amp;quot; &amp;gt;DeRosa, Mary. “Section 213: ‘Sneak and Peek’ Search Warrants: A Summary” (American Bar Association, 2005). http://www.abanet.org/natsecurity/patriotdebates/section-213 (Accessed April 16th, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;These are warrants which allow for the execution of a [[search and seizure]] of a property in a federal crime without notification of the subject. The government must show the court “reasonable cause” to believe that notifying the suspect would lead to an “adverse result” such as destruction of [[evidence]], [[intimidation]] of a [[witness]], or jeopardizing the investigation. &amp;quot;Reasonable cause&amp;quot; is not defined in the act. Sneak and peek warrants, like roving wiretaps, have been used in the past under other circumstances, but they had never before been allowed to retrieve physical evidence, only information or photographs of a scene.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;213derosa&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Libraries Provision===&lt;br /&gt;
A third tool provided by the Patriot Act is the so-called “libraries provision,” sometimes just called Section 215. Section 215 broadens the FBI’s power to seize records of terrorist activities, specifically business records. Before the Act, the FBI could only subpoena “hotels, motels, car and truck rental agencies, and storage rental facilities,” but these powers were expanded through the act to include records from any place of business.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;215derosa&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DeRosa, Mary. “Section 215: Access to Business Records under FISA (‘Libraries Provision’): A Summary” (American Bar Association, 2005). http://www.abanet.org/natsecurity/patriotdebates/sections-214-and-215 (Accessed April 16th, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Section 215 also expands the items the FBI can obtain to include “any tangible things (including books, records, papers, documents, and other items).”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;215derosa&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The Act also loosens the requirements to procure a warrant. Whereas before the FBI had to show evidence that the subject under surveillance was a foreign power or agent thereof, after the act, the FBI simply has to assert that the seizure is for a foreign intelligence investigation, clandestine intelligence activities or to protect against international terrorism. There is no requirement for an [[evidential hearing]]. Section 215 is called the libraries provision because it could potentially be used to subpoena a list of books checked out from a library, or a list of websites visited at a library computer, all without notifying the suspect.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;215derosa&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intelligence Sharing===&lt;br /&gt;
The Patriot Act also has several provisions which allow for information and intelligence to be better shared among the investigative and intelligence agencies. The Act allowed information about terrorist activities to be shared between federal, state and local governments, as it was previously allowed for other types of crimes. It also allowed for adding [[DNA]] samples of terrorists and other violent offenders to the national database which already includes DNA samples of other certain crimes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;leahy&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Money Laundering===&lt;br /&gt;
Another way the Patriot Act fights terrorism is by cutting off sources of illegal funding, which it does by attempting to curtail money laundering. The act requires all monetary institutions (the definition of which is very broad; it includes [[pawn broker]]s, [[insurance]] agencies, and [[diamond]] dealers) to enact a four part program.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;serino&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Serino, Robert. “Anti-Laundering Concerns Not Just for Banks Anymore.” American Banker, November 30th, 2001, vol. 167, iss. 229, p. 9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The institution must appoint a compliance officer, establish a training program to recognize money laundering, establish a testing or auditing program to evaluate the accuracy of laundering detection and establish policies to avoid being used to launder money.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;serino&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Definition of Terrorism===&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the Patriot Act expands upon the definition of terrorism to include acts which were previously not part of [[federal law]]. It makes illegal terrorist acts against [[mass transportation]] systems as well as harboring terrorists or persons one knows or should know to be terrorists. The Act also expands the definition of [[conspiracy]] to allow for conspiracies in other types of crime, such as [[arson]], and creates a definition of [[domestic terrorist]] (someone who commits an offence which is “(1) dangerous to human life and violate[s] the criminal laws of the United States or any state; and (2) appear[s] to be intended (or have the effect) – to intimidate a [[civilian]] population; influence government policy by intimidation or [[coercion]]; or affect government conduct by mass destruction, [[assassination]], or [[kidnapping]] (or a threat of)”). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;leahy&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Expiration==&lt;br /&gt;
Sixteen sections of the original bill were set to expire on December 31st, 2001, unless Congress decided to extend them or make them permanent. These sections were all from Title II of the act, the title which contained surveillance procedures, including the controversial ones mentioned above. After months of wrangling, negotiation, and debate (and two deadline extensions) Congress finally on March 2nd, 2006 passed a bill which renewed the Patriot Act but implemented additional safeguards for civil liberties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Diamond, John. “Senate Passes Patriot Act Changes; Civil liberties protections added to anti-terror law clear way for renewal” USA Today. March 2nd, 2006, p A.8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most of the measures were permanent, but the roving wiretap provision was extended only until 2009. Section 215, the libraries provision, was also extended to 2009, but now recipients of the FISA warrant may petition the government after one year to remove the gag order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success==&lt;br /&gt;
The PATRIOT Act has succeeded it's main goal, to completely dismantle this nations sense of freedom. The Act has esentially given the United States government an almost Nazi-like grip which still holds fast to our right to privacy and free speech. The PATRIOT Act has done nothing to protect you because the government could care less about your safety. All the Act does is put money into the pockets of tyrants.--[[User:Shinaisamurai|Shinaisamurai]] 15:45, 27 May 2008 (EDT)Anonymous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html Text of Patriot act]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:h.r.03162: Library of Congress info on Patriot Act]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ala.org/cfapps/archive.cfm?path=washoff/Patriotres.html view of American Library Association]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/01/patriot-games-terrorism-law-and.php view of the Jurist]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lifeandliberty.gov/subs/u_myths.htm Department of Justice Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fbi.gov/aboutus/transformation/patriot_act.htm FBI Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shinaisamurai</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Libertarianism&amp;diff=461503</id>
		<title>Libertarianism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Libertarianism&amp;diff=461503"/>
		<updated>2008-05-27T19:40:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shinaisamurai: /* Libertarian Philosophy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Libertarianism''' is a [[Political Philosophy|political philosophy]] emphasizing ''liberty'' and ''property''. A libertarian believes in minimizing or entirely eliminating government interventionism in all aspects of life; including economic, personal and in foreign policy matters. The [[French]] [[term]] of ''[[Laissez faire|Laissez-Faire]]'', or ''let us do'', is a term that describes some aspects of the libertarian belief. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Libertarians are neither. Unlike liberals or conservatives, Libertarians advocate a high degree of both personal and economic liberty. For example, Libertarians advocate freedom in economic matters, so we're in favor of lowering taxes, slashing bureaucratic regulation of business, and charitable -- rather than government -- welfare. But Libertarians are also socially tolerant.  We won't demand laws or restrictions on other people who we may not agree because of personal actions or lifestyles. &lt;br /&gt;
Think of us as a group of people with a &amp;quot;live and let live&amp;quot; mentality and a balanced checkbook.&amp;quot; [http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Philosophy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians in America tend to be [[liberal]] on social issues but [[conservative]] on economic issues. Libertarians generally support the legalization of narcotics, prostitution, [[same-sex marriage]], [[polygamy]] and [[abortion]]. They oppose restrictions on [[pornography]]. However, they also oppose [[universal health care]], [[taxes]] and the [[welfare state]]. They are strong supports of [[school choice]], and oppose continuing the [[public school]] system. Some libertarians support [[school vouchers]], while others are skeptical due to the issue of government influence over [[private education]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians support an expansive view of liberty as the proper basis for organizing civil society.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Libertarianism is closely related to liberalism, if this word is interpreted according to its original meaning of '[[classical liberal|classical liberalism]]'.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They tend to define liberty as the freedom to do whatever one wishes up to the point that one's behavior begins to interfere with another's person or property through coercive means. At the point of interference, each party would become subject to certain principled rules for adjudicating disputes, generally accepting that one who has demonstrated a proven lack of respect for the rights of others should be subject to sanctions, including possible constraints on their freedom. They believe that liberty is the right of every individual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians generally defend the ideal of freedom from the perspective of how little one is constrained by authority, i.e., how much one is allowed to do (also referred to as negative liberty). This ideal is distinguished from a view of freedom focused on how much one is able to do (also called positive liberty).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Factions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians tend to use the word &amp;quot;libertarian&amp;quot; (small &amp;quot;l&amp;quot;) to refer to the philosophy, and &amp;quot;Libertarian&amp;quot; (capital &amp;quot;L&amp;quot;) to refer to the party. Thus, more libertarians exist than members of the [[Libertarian Party]]. Two general factions exist in the libertarian movement. The first are those libertarians who apply the principles of right to person and property to an absolute. They believe that no person, group, or government is above the right to violate these two things. They thus believe that government itself is illegitimate because it violates person and property. These libertarians subscribe to [[anarcho-capitalism]], as first named by [[Murray N. Rothbard]]. They believe that law and security can be handled by private means in the free market. The other faction believes in a very limited government. They are often referred to as [[minarchists]]. Libertarian minarchists want the state to only enforce law and order but generally nothing else. [[Ayn Rand]] was a minarchist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians tend to view liberalism as a philosophy advocating less government interference in private morality and more government control of business, and view conservatism as a philosophy advocating more government interference in private morality and less government control of business, while they view libertarianism as advocating less government control in all areas. However, there have been fusionist attempts to mix libertarianism and with social conservatism. This is noted in particular by [[paleolibertarians]]. They believe that social conservatism is a natural entity in a free society, but do not believe that it can be enforced by state interventionism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Thought in America ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While there are libertarian factions within the [[Democratic]] and [[Republican]] [[parties]], neither party is particularly well aligned with libertarian thought. While the Republican Party sometimes adopts libertarian-sounding rhetoric of small government in economic affairs, many libertarians see it as being a force that has increased government interventionism in these affairs. Libertarians generally, for example, are opposed to the [[USA PATRIOT Act]], which they believe increases government power and removes protections on the liberty and privacy of the public. Most conservatives, on the other hand, view it as a necessary government program and believe security to be more important than personal liberty and privacy. Libertarians point out that such a view contradicts those of the founding fathers, such as Benjamin Franklin, who  summarized it most eloquently, &amp;quot;Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.&amp;quot; Libertarians are also generally opposed to the [[Iraq War]], unlike the majority of conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While all libertarians agree in general on the principles of the desirability of maximizing individual liberty and avoiding excessive government interference with the operation of the free market, individual libertarians have opinions that differ wildly within these general principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The libertarian movement generally praises the [[United States Constitution]], regarding it as the proper scope of the national government. They believe that the Democratic and Republican parties have overstepped constitutional limits. Anarcho-capitalist libertarians, on the other hand, view the implementation of the constitution as the very reason the national government is the size it is today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable Libertarians ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Alexis de tocqueville.jpg|right|thumb|Alexis de Tocqueville]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian libertarian Lord Acton referred to the philosopher and theologian [[Thomas Aquinas]] as &amp;quot;the first Whig&amp;quot; or classical liberal. Other libertarian-oriented historic figures would include [[Adam Smith]], [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[Alexis de Tocqueville]], [[John Stuart Mill]], Thomas Paine, [[John Locke]], [[Patrick Henry]], George Mason, [[Carl Menger]], [[C.S. Lewis]], [[Ludwig von Mises]], [[James Madison]], H. L. Mencken, Rose Wilder Lane, Albert Jay Nock, [[Frédéric Bastiat]], [[Herbert Spencer]], Richard Cobden, [[Henry David Thoreau]], and [[Hugo Grotius]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Paul]], 1988 Libertarian Party and 2008 Republican Party presidential candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
*The psychiatrist Thomas Szasz, opponent of the therapeutic state and compulsory mental institutionalization.&lt;br /&gt;
*Nobel Laureate economists [[Milton Friedman]], [[F.A. Hayek]], [[Ronald Coase]], Gary Becker, James Buchanan, [[George Stigler]], and Vernon Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
*The novelist [[Ayn Rand]] advocated a philosophy of ''Objectivism'', embodying some libertarian thought, although differing from libertarianism in many ways. Some of her novels, such as ''Atlas Shrugged'', have become icons of some people in the libertarian movement, while others find her materialism and [[atheism]] incompatible with moral ethics and natural rights and law.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert LeFevre]], significant in promoting libertarian philosophy in the 1950s and 1960s before it was a well-defined movement, with his &amp;quot;Freedom School&amp;quot; seminars on political and economic philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Hess]], speechwriter for [[Barry Goldwater]] credited with penning Goldwater's famous 1964 statement &amp;quot;Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice&amp;quot;.  Hess later became a major figure in the Libertarian Party.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Murray N. Rothbard]] was nicknamed &amp;quot;Mr. Libertarian.&amp;quot; He brought to life the anarcho-capitalist movement. Rothbard was an economist of the [[Austrian School]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Samuel Edward Konkin III]], a significant figure in 1970s libertarianism, whose influence waned considerably after the rise of the Libertarian Party as he opposed political parties and voting as being against libertarian principles.  He proposed instead a purely marketplace-based route to a free society, such as [[tax resistance]] and doing business &amp;quot;off the books&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert A. Heinlein]], science fiction author, whose 1966 novel ''The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress'' was an influence on the movement.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[L. Neil Smith]], [[J. Neil Schulman]], and [[Brad Linaweaver]], science fiction writers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Several popular financial writers including [[Harry Browne]] and [[Howard J. Ruff]].  Browne would later run for President, twice, on the Libertarian Party ticket.  Ruff declared his political philosophy as libertarian but as a socially conservative [[Mormon]] made an exception on issues like abortion and prostitution, where he disagreed with the libertarian view.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Penn and Teller]], stage magicians turned libertarian evangelicals preaching [[atheism]] and promoting libertarian philosophies, including controversial positions such as legalization of prostitution and drugs in their Showtime series, which sports a name that cannot for reasons of good taste be expressed here.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Canadian rock band [[Rush]], which has been together since 1968, often explores libertarian themes in their lyrics.&lt;br /&gt;
*Humorist Dave Barry, actor/comedian Drew Carey, actor Denis Leary, former MTV VJ Lisa &amp;quot;Kennedy&amp;quot; Montgomery, actor Kurt Russell, investigative reporter [[John Stossel]], and the late rocker Frank Zappa have all referred to themselves as being aligned with or openly supporting the Libertarian Party.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the creators of [[South Park]], proclaimed that they are libertarians. While South Park often offend conservative positions like religion, are vulgar, and support evolution they also make fun of liberals positions such as political correctness and environmentalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reason.com/news/show/116787.html] Parker and Stone, Reason Magazine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The phrases &amp;quot;South Park Conservative&amp;quot; (the name of a book) and &amp;quot;South Park Republican&amp;quot; are used to describe the followers of these beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ed Clark]], the Libertarian Party's 1980 nominee for President.  Clark obtained the highest popular vote percentage to date for a Libertarian candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.faqs.org/faqs/libertarian/faq/ Libertarian FAQ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://dmoz.org/Society/Politics/Liberalism/Libertarianism/ Open Directory libertarian links ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://chelm.freeyellow.com/black_index.html Black Libertarians]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://libertarianwiki.org/Main_Page Libertarian Wiki]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.l4l.org/ Libertarians for Life]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/ The Independent Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mises.org/ Ludwig von Mises Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.fee.org/ Foundation for Economic Education]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democratic Freedom Caucus]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Republican Liberty Caucus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shinaisamurai</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>