<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shittles</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shittles"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Shittles"/>
	<updated>2026-09-24T02:33:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=199595</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=199595"/>
		<updated>2007-06-16T17:58:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shittles: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|right|thumb|200px|Official logo of the Democratic Party.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic Party''' is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. It is a leftist socialist party full of liberals and communists. It is generally seen as being politically between center and [[leftist | left]] of center, while the rival [[Republican Party]] is positioned to the [[rightist | right]] of center (see [[political spectrum theory]]). Members and supporters of the Democratic Party are known as Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats currently control the United States [[House of Representatives]] and the [[Senate]], together with the majority of State governorships and legislatures. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a Pew Research Center poll, 50 percent of Americans identify themselves with the Democratic Party as opposed to 35 percent for the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312 Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007] Pew Research Center, 22 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Democrats have served out only three of the last ten presidential terms. Democrats in the US Congress currently have a 56.3% disapproval and a 32.8% approval rating according to the RealClearPolitics Average of several dozens of Congressional Job Approval polls conducted 05/18 - 06/10. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/archive/?poll_id=18 RealClearPolitics Congressional Job Approval Poll], 05/18 - 06/10. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ''Investor's Business Daily'' remarked, &amp;quot;For all the promises of its new Democratic leaders, Congress seems truly interested in doing only one thing: surrendering in [[Iraq]]. No wonder its public approval ratings have sunk below the president's.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=264123134498383&amp;amp;kw=For,all,the,promises The Do-One-Thing Congress], ''Investor's Business Daily, May 15, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the Republicans, the Democrats are currently selecting their candidate for the 2008  presidential election; the front-runners in the contest are Senator [[Hillary Clinton]] of [[New York]] and Senator [[Barack Obama]] of [[Illinois]]. The most recent president who was a Democrat was [[Bill Clinton]], who served from 1993 to 2001. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party was founded in 1792  by [[Thomas Jefferson]] as a congressional caucus to fight for the [[Bill of Rights]] and to oppose the elitist [[Federalist Party]] led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], which fought for the [[Constitution]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1798 , the party was officially named the &amp;quot;Democratic-Republican Party&amp;quot;, and in 1800  Jefferson was elected as the first Democrat [[President of the United States]]. Jefferson, a member of the landed gentry and a slave owner, served two terms as president with distinction, and was succeeded by another Democrat, [[James Madison]], in 1808 . During Madison's tenure, the United States fought the [[United Kingdom]] to a draw in the [[War of 1812]]. James Monroe, another Democratic-Republican, was elected president in 1816  and led the nation through a time commonly known as &amp;quot;The Era of Good Feelings&amp;quot;. In this period, the party dominated American politics with little opposition. Monroe was followed by John Quincy Adams who won the hotly contested election of 1824, becoming the first son of a former president to be elected president. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Andrew Jackson]], defeated Adams in the 1828 election and signed into law the [[Indian Removal Act of 1830]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edweb.tusd.k12.az.us/UHS/APUSH/1st%20Sem/Articles%20Semester%201/Artiles%20Semester%201/Remini.htm Andrew Jackson and Indian Removal], by Robert Remini.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; according to the Democratic National Committee's website is &amp;quot;considered — along with Jefferson — one of the founding fathers of the Democratic Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/06/our_history.php Democratic National Committee, ''Our History''], retrieved 25 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Annual Jefferson-Jackson Day celebrations nationwide by local chapters of the Democratic Party commemorate the two founders of the Democratic Party. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022001949.html String of Successes Enlivens Democratic Party], Michael D. Shear, ''The Washington Post'', 22 February 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Indian Removal Act, enforced through a series of dishonest dealings with native people such as the Treaty of Dancing Rabitt Creek and the Treaty of New Echota, resulted in the wholesale deportation of Native Americans from the Southeastern states to Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma). &amp;lt;http://digital.library.okstate.edu/kappler/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Jacksonian period also saw the expansion of the voting franchise as most states did away with, or decreased property requirements for voting. The beneficiaries of the expansion of the franchise however, were nearly all white males.  Annual Jefferson-Jackson Day celebrations nationwide by local chapters of the Democratic Party commemorate the two founders of the Democratic Party. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/20/AR2007022001949.html String of Successes Enlivens Democratic Party], Michael D. Shear, ''The Washington Post'', 22 February 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat [[Franklin Roosevelt]], who served as President from 1933 to 1945, led the United States during the [[Great Depression]] and throughout most of the [[Second World War]]. Under his successor, [[Harry Truman]] the United States emerged a victor from World War II and articulated the Doctine of [[Containment]] which committed the U.S. to stop the spread of global [[Communism]]. Truman ordered the Berlin airlift in 1948 and sent U.S. troops to Korea in 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies and criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2005, while Democrats held a mock impeachment inquiry in President's Bush's foreign policy, [[anti-Semitic]] materials were distributed at the Democratic Party National headquarters.  The literature claimed that an Israeli company had warning of the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]], and an &amp;quot;insider trading scam&amp;quot;  on Wall Street had occured simultaneously. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/16/AR2005061601570.html Democrats Play House To Rally Against the War], Dana Milbank, ''Washington Post'', June 17, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the views of individual Democrats sometimes diverge from the party's official stance as expressed in its national platform. The same is true of individual Republicans. Nonetheless, Tyrell accuses Democrats of wearing ideological blinders:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can anything embarrass [[Speaker Pelosi]] and the rest of the Democratic leadership? Frankly I doubt it. They are all neatly shut off from the world in their fantasy of moral and intellectual superiority. [http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20070510-092027-4746r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of economic policy, Democrats favor high progressive taxes, higher government spending and increasing the minimum wage.'{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party has historically had ties to [[union|organized labor]]. The [[National Education Association]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nea.org/index.html National Education Association homepage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the largest union of public school teachers, is a backbone of the party, supplying the largest number of delegates to its national conventions.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military policy===&lt;br /&gt;
According to its platform, the Democratic Party has the objective of strengthening America.  Democratic national leadership has been accused of being ambivalent about terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and insufficiently patriotic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News]Transcript: December 1, 2001 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===   &lt;br /&gt;
An organization affiliated with the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] called the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] which claims a long standing opposition to school vouchers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;21st Century Schools Project Bulletin: Special Edition [http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&amp;amp;subsecID=900001&amp;amp;contentID=250630 ''Putting Vouchers in Perspective''], PPI E-newsletter 2 July 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reported Jonathan Alter of ''Newsweek'' saying,   &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Can wealthy white liberals - many of whom send their kids to private school - really say to poor parents: 'We can have choices, but you must not?'...This is a glaring hypocrisy sitting at the heart of the liberal opposition to targeted vouchers… Right now, Democrats are in a highly compromised position on education.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=newsLetter&amp;amp;sectionID=29&amp;amp;NLissueID=4&amp;amp;articleID=11&amp;amp;altCol=2 Center For Education Reform, Monthly Letter to Friends No. 75], Back to School 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment vs Labor===&lt;br /&gt;
Two other important coalition groups also find themselves in direct conflict with each other within the Democratic party coalition--[[Environmentalist]]s and Labor Unions.{{fact}}  While environmentalists support efforts like clean air and alternative fuels, for example, this creates tension with the workers of American automobile manufactures whose jobs are threatened by environmental policies such as increasing regulations and high costs. Such policies can lead to cutbacks and layoffs. Balancing these issues is difficult because some sacrifices of interests must be made by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Healthcare===&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat fondness for heavy government intervention into the marketplace{{fact}} and social engineering{{fact}} means that a significant proportion of their base and of their candidates for the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election ideologically favor introducing a system of [[socialized healthcare]]{{fact}}; regardless of the crippling tax burden this would require to sustain itself{{fact}} and the low standard of care achieved by socialized health programs in other countries compared to the United States.{{fact}} Among the leading proponents for this idea include [[Barack Obama|Sen. Barack Obama]] and [[John Edwards|Sen. John Edwards]]; the latter formerly being the running mate to [[John Kerry|Sen. John Kerry]] in the disastrous [[2004 Presidential Election]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homosexual Agenda===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat lawmakers and opinion-formers consistently favor measures such as the establishment of same-sex civil unions, gay marriage and gay adoption of heterosexual children over defense of the traditional family. Likewise they are vigorous in attempting to amend [[hate crime|&amp;quot;hate crime&amp;quot;]] laws to make criticism of the homosexual lifestyle illegal;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54535 Christian belief a 'hate crime' under plan], WorldNetDaily, March 3, 2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while at the same time supporting efforts to [[propaganda|disseminate favorable opinions]] regarding [[homosexuality]] through channels such as the mainstream media and even the educational system in the face of opposition from churches and religious authorities, a broad coalition of [[Republican Party|Republican]] and Independent politicians and a clear majority of the American public{{fact}}. Democrats reject the idea of a [[Homosexual agenda]] preferring to speak in terms of [[Gay rights|&amp;quot;gay rights&amp;quot;]] when this issue is raised; the Democratic Party is the recipient and beneficiary of funding from homosexual lobbying groups and can be seen by their positions as the United States' largest and most powerful ''de facto'' supporter of the Homosexual Agenda. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.asp?ID=D000000158 Human Rights Campaign], opensecrets.org &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Policies===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats frequently support the minimum wage, workplace protections, the right of women to choose to have an [[abortion]], [[gun control]], gay marriage, and the separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, there is some correlation between religious and political affiliation, though people of all faiths and denominations can be found among the supporters of each of the main parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both historically and today, [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] voters have had a tendency to identify with the Democratic Party {{fact}}, and a number of Democratic office-holders, such as Senator [[Jim Webb]] of [[Virginia]], are Catholics. However, several general ideals of the Democratic Party's platform - most notably, the party's overall support for the legality of [[abortion]] - are contrary to the position of the [[Catholic Church]].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to [[Protestant]] Christians, members of [[Evangelical]] churches in particular are associated with the [[Republican Party]]. One unusual feature of the Democratic Party, however, is that it draws substantial support both from committed African-American Protestant Christians and from secular and atheist white voters.{{fact}} The strong opposition to [[homosexuality]] found among many Black Protestant Christians (and, indeed, among orthodox Catholics) contrasts strikingly with the support frequently shown by other Democrats for the [[homosexual agenda]].{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats also generally believe that religion should be separate from public life, and as such are typically supported by the ACLU.  For example, in 1999 the Congress took up a bill to protect the display of the [[Ten Commandments]].  In the House of Representatives, over 3/4ths of the Democratic party members voted to remove the display. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/06/18/gun.rollcall/ten.commandments.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The measure did not pass the Legislature, and as a result when Justice [[Roy Moore]] posted a [[Ten Commandments]] display in his courthouse, the ACLU was able to have the display removed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==110th Congress==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats in the House of Representatives had promised major reforms within the first 100 hours. One reform in particular was lobbying and ethics reform--a key plank in the Congressional Democrats fall campaign.  Democrats had vowed greater openess in the Congressional Appropriations process, and an end to so-called &amp;quot;[[earmark]]s&amp;quot;, an appropriation designated to spend specific money on a specific project in a specific members district, sometimes designating a specific private business concern to whom the money is to be spent with. Several Republican members had been caught up in so-called earmark scandals, trading money for influence, and this was widely acredited as a key reason why the GOP had lost control of the House after a dozen years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first five months of 2007 after the Democratic party took control of Congress, the majority party,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reissued a &amp;quot;blank check&amp;quot; to the President on the [[Iraq War]], which allegedly was opposed by 70 percent &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18831132/ The entire government has failed us on Iraq], Keith Olbermann, MSNBC ''Countdown'', May 24, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in opinion polls and was vociferously oppposed by many Congressional candidates in 2006. The bill included an increase in the minimum wage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Successfully renamed six post offices, four courthouses, a national park, and one of the buildings housing the Department of Education in Washington. They also extended the lives of two government commissions, reduced the membership of the Red Cross board of governors from 50 to 20, and authorized construction of 541 feet of road on a flood plain in St. Louis County, Missouri. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Kept the government going with two temporary spending bills, completed no regular appropriations bills, redesignated five Eastern European countries (Albania, Macedonia, Croatia, Georgia and Ukraine) for security aid, and passed a bill on penalties for animal fighting that had passed in the Republican Congress last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Voted to kill lobbying reforms that were part of the 2006 [[Honest Leadership and Open Government Act]] Democratic candidates made a centerpiece of their campaign message in 2006. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/panel-softens-lobbying-bill-provisions-2007-05-17.html Panel softens lobbying bill provisions], By Alexander Bolton, ''The Hill'', May 17, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A House ethics panel is led by a lawmaker who holds the record for taking the most free travel, while another panel member was implicated in the recent flap over the firing of U.S. attorneys.  The earmark process by which so-called &amp;quot;pork barrel&amp;quot; projects are doled out to members by June of 2007 saw no major changes.  In fact, rules approved the first day in power in January, the ''Associated Press'' reported, where being ignored. Rep. [[David Obey]] of Wisconsin, Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, has instructed members to withhold &amp;quot;earmark requests&amp;quot; until September, when it is to late for critics to effectively call public attention to wasteful spending.  Citizens groups are outraged.. According to the ''Associated Press'', What Obey is doing runs counter to new rules that Democrats promised would make such spending decisions more open. Those rules made it clear that projects earmarked for federal dollars and their sponsors were to be made available to public scrutiny when appropriations bills are debated.  The rules also require lawmakers requesting such projects to provide a written explanation describing their requests and a letter certifying that they or their spouse would not make any financial gain from them.  The greater transparency was supposed to lead to more self-discipline on the part of lawmakers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Jun03/0,4670,CongressPetProjects,00.html House Keeps Pet Projects From Scrutiny] Andrew Taylor, Associated Press, June 03, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phonemarks]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.therealdemocratstory.com/ The Real Democrat Story], Open the File on the Freshmen Democrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shittles</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Baseball&amp;diff=199594</id>
		<title>Baseball</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Baseball&amp;diff=199594"/>
		<updated>2007-06-16T17:58:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shittles: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Busch Stadium.jpg|right|thumb|200px|A baseball game at George W. Bush Stadium, St. Louis, Missouri.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Baseball''', known as rounders in England where it originated, is a [[game]] consisting of nine active players on each [[team]] (except for those teams having [[designated hitter]]s) who take turns playing defense on the field and batting one at a time.  The object is for the batters to hit a ball thrown by the [[pitcher]] into &amp;quot;fair&amp;quot; territory such that it is not caught in the air and gives the batter time to run to a base.  The offense strives to advance these baserunners until they circle the three [[infield]] bases in order and get to the fourth base, called &amp;quot;home&amp;quot;.  This results in the scoring of a run.  Failing to reach a base during their batting attempt results in an out, and the offense is only allowed three outs before they must take the field once again.  Each team is allowed nine of these &amp;quot;innings&amp;quot; during the course of the game, an exception being that a team does not bat a ninth time if they are winning after the other teams ninth attempt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
A well-publicized [[tradition]] holds that the game was invented by Abner Doubleday in [[Cooperstown]], [[New York State|New York]] in 1839. But not even the National Baseball Hall of Fame, founded on the strength of that tradition, seriously promotes this theory any more:&lt;br /&gt;
:After the [1905] Commission [appointed to determine the game's origins] reported its findings in 1908, many of the game's historians disputed Graves' accounts, noting that many of the innovations he attributed to Doubleday were already being practiced earlier in the 1830s. The discovery in 1999 of the original Mills Commission papers, long reported to have been burned, supports the view of many researchers that Baseball developed from, and along with, other bat-and-ball games earlier in the nineteenth century.&amp;lt;ref name=cooperstown&amp;gt;[http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/about/history.htm The Origins of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;baseball&amp;quot; is mentioned in passing in [[Jane Austen]]'s 1803 British novel [[Northanger Abbey]], set in England:&lt;br /&gt;
:it was not very wonderful that Catherine, who had by nature nothing heroic about her, should prefer cricket, baseball, riding on horseback, and running about the country at the age of fourteen, to books...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Austen, Jane (1803) ''[Northanger Abbey http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext94/nabby11h.htm]'', Chapter 1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but there is nothing in the context that tells any details of the game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Base-ball&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;base ball&amp;quot; was being played, under that name, during the [[Civil War]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:Captain Kimberly was an experienced and skillful player and base ball player and took the lead in inaugurating a series of games of base ball.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nash, Eugene Arus (1910) ''A History of the Forty-fourth Regiment, New York Volunteer Infantry, in the Civil War, 1861-1865'', [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0Tt8agPo9LwQQsMG9YEqtf&amp;amp;id=L1eQYSRFhIQC&amp;amp;pg=PA166&amp;amp;lpg=PA166&amp;amp;dq=base-ball+civil+war&amp;amp;as_brr=1 p. 166]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:The air seemed full of heavy shot, and as the flew they could be seen as plainly as a base-ball in one of our games.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Robert Underwood and Clarence Clough Buel (1888), ''Battles and Leaders of the Civil War,'' Volume IV, [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0veexS1IQVEWthmLI7jQgT3&amp;amp;id=rSwOAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA37&amp;amp;lpg=PA37&amp;amp;dq=base-ball+civil+war&amp;amp;as_brr=1 p. 37]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A 1902 book about [[Philadelphia]] says that &amp;quot;base-ball&amp;quot; was simply a new name for an older game:&lt;br /&gt;
:During the Civil War there was an interesting athletic development when the old game of &amp;quot;town-ball&amp;quot; was rechristened &amp;quot;base-ball.&amp;quot; It is believed that the first town-ball club, called the Olympic, was established in 1833.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edmond, Franklin Spencer, ''History of the Central High School of Philadelphia'' [http://books.google.com/books?vid=0z6LOHidtNQ5hb4rcxNHUcc&amp;amp;id=wogWAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA251&amp;amp;lpg=PA251&amp;amp;dq=base-ball+civil+war&amp;amp;as_brr=1 p. 251]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, a baseball historian made national news with the apparent discovery of 1791 bylaw of the town of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, stating that&lt;br /&gt;
:for the Preservation of the Windows in the New Meeting House... no Person or Inhabitant of said town, shall be permitted to play at any game called Wicket, Cricket, Baseball, Football, Cat, Fives or any other game or games with balls, within the Distance of Eighty Yards from said Meeting House.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pittsfield-ma.org/subpage.asp?ID=226 Pittsfield is &amp;quot;Baseball's Garden of Eden&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Abner-Doubleday-in-Cooperstown tradition was a reaction to famous baseball writer Henry Chadwick, who had stated that the game evolved from the British game of &amp;quot;rounders.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=cooperstown/&amp;gt;. In response, Albert G. Spaulding, another baseball pioneer, urged the formation of a commission to determine the game's origin; one was formed, and in due course issued a report on December 30, 1907 stating &amp;quot;the first scheme for playing baseball, according to the best evidence obtainable to date, was devised by Abner Doubleday at Cooperstown, N.Y. in 1839.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
The results of the Spaulding committee led to the 1939 founding of the National Baseball Hall of Fame in the city of Cooperstown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The National Baseball Hall of Fame was inspired by the Hall of Fame for Great Americans in New York. Established in 1901, with a 600-foot colonnade ultimately containing bronze busts of 98 great Americans, the Hall of Fame was at one time a major landmark, and the additions of honorees to it was a national news event. Ironically, the Hall of Fame for Great Americans has itself passed into obscurity; today, the phrase &amp;quot;Hall of Fame&amp;quot; has practically come to mean the National Baseball Hall of Fame.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Miscellaneous==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baseball as we know it&amp;amp;mdash;or at least the familiar &amp;quot;figure-eight&amp;quot; stitched cover&amp;amp;mdash;was invented in the 1840s by Ellis Drake of Stoughton, Massachusetts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.19cbaseball.com/19th-century-baseball.html Nineteenth-century baseballs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The umpire's hand signals for &amp;quot;strike&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; were invented by deaf baseball player William &amp;quot;Dummy&amp;quot; Hoy (1861-1961)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://library.gallaudet.edu/dr/faq-deaf-place-names.html Deaf Place Names]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes and references==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Baseball]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shittles</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anglo-Saxons&amp;diff=199593</id>
		<title>Anglo-Saxons</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anglo-Saxons&amp;diff=199593"/>
		<updated>2007-06-16T17:57:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shittles: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Anglo-Saxon''' is a term used to describe the people who lived in the south and east of [[The British Isles]] from the mid-5th century AD to the [[Norman Conquest]] of 1066.  They were originally [[Germanic tribe]]s--the [[Angles]] and the [[Saxons]]--who gradually conquered England after much raiding and ruled it until the Norman Conquest.&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:European History]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anglo-Saxon is still used to refer to the people in and originating from England. They are also the master race.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shittles</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_Democracy&amp;diff=199592</id>
		<title>Social Democracy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_Democracy&amp;diff=199592"/>
		<updated>2007-06-16T17:57:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shittles: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Social democracy''' is an ideology of the political Left that emerged from [[socialism]] in the earlier part of the twentieth century. Unlike its cousin [[Communism]], which seeks to destroy [[capitalism]] by (violent) revolution and replace it with a different social and economic system, social democracy seeks to subject capitalism to regulation and governmental intervention in order to remedy its alleged deficiencies. It is really just a cover for radical Marxism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is generally considered that the international Left split into two distinct camps after the [[Russian Revolution]] of 1917. Members of the more extreme factions around the world, which sought to achieve radical societal change through revolution, became known as ''[[communists]]'', while members of the less extreme factions, which sought to pursue gradual change through the democratic system, became known as ''social democrats''. The roots of these divisions, in fact, long preceded 1917: [[Marxists]], for example, had called for violent revolution in the nineteenth century, while more moderate parties such as the [[British]] [[Labour Party]] had never espoused such ideas.  Austrian economist [[Friedrich Hayek]] writing in 1945 observed, &amp;quot;To many who have watched the transition from socialism to [[fascism]] at close quarters the connection between the two systems has become increasingly obvious, but in the democracies the majority of people still believe that socialism and [[freedom]] can be combined. They do not realize that democratic socialism, the great [[utopia]] of the last few generations, is not only unachievable, but that to strive for it produces something utterly different – the very destruction of freedom itself. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iea.org.uk/files/upld-publication43pdf?.pdf ''Road to Serfdom'',] Friedrich A. Hayek, Reader's Digest Condensed Version, April 1945, pg. 36.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On one definition, social democrats continue to have the ultimate objective of achieving full socialism, albeit by peaceful means. Others prefer to call such people &amp;quot;democratic socialists&amp;quot; (though ''non''-democratic, violent socialism continues to exist in various parts of the world), and reserve the term &amp;quot;social democrats&amp;quot; for those who would be content with a society comprising a mixture of capitalist and socialist elements (for example, an economy in which a market operates, but with sizeable governmental intervention, and in which enterprise is possible, but business is subjected to high taxes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many parties in economically developed nations have espoused social democratic beliefs, including the [[Labour Party]] in the [[United Kingdom]], the [[SPD]] in [[Germany]], the Social Democratic Parties in [[Sweden]] and [[Finland]], and the [[Australian Labor Party]]. Social democratic beliefs are also found in parts of the American [[Democratic Party]], and some European and South American [[Christian democracy|Christian Democratic]] parties have resemblences to social democratic parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1980s, a number of social democratic parties have moved away from the territory of the traditional Left and have accepted greater elements of free-market, capitalistic thought. The principal example of this phenomenon is the British Labour Party under [[Tony Blair]], while other examples include the [[Australian]] Labor Party under [[Bob Hawke]] and [[Paul Keating]], and the German SPD under [[Gerhard Schroeder]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shittles</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Individualism&amp;diff=199591</id>
		<title>Individualism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Individualism&amp;diff=199591"/>
		<updated>2007-06-16T17:56:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shittles: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Individualism''', in contrast to [[socialism]], [[liberalism]], and all other forms of [[totalitarianism]], as described by noted economist [[Friedrich Hayek]], is based on the respect of [[Christianity]] for the individual man and the belief that it is desirable that men should be free to develop their own individual gifts. This philosophy, first fully developed during the [[Renaissance]], grew and spread into what we know as [[Western civilization]]. The general direction of social development was one of freeing the individual from the ties which bound him in [[feudal]] society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iea.org.uk/files/upld-publication43pdf?.pdf ''Road to Serfdom'',] Friedrich A. Hayek, Reader's Digest Condensed Version, April 1945, pg. 34.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shittles</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>