<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Skelly</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Skelly"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Skelly"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T15:46:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&amp;diff=2022864</id>
		<title>User talk:RobSmith</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&amp;diff=2022864"/>
		<updated>2024-02-02T02:52:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: /* Re your essay Global Jihad */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 14]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 15]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Operation Prosperity Guardian]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I added your thought [[https://www.conservapedia.com/Operation_Prosperity_Guardian#Economic_goals here]].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll try to lay out the context of how many days delay using alternate routes, etc. in the next few days. This page will be a longterm project, lasting months, at least. Although fireworks can erupt at any time. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:34, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Check your email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I got your message. Please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:55, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Essays ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's give the creator of essays greater freedom over their own essays.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:46, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy, we decided a long time ago opinion Essays do not belong in Mainspace categories. That Essay in particular is just redundant [[racist]] [[spam]] cut n pasted from about 2 dozen other Essays designed to manipulate Google search traffic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Conservapedia has a rule against self promotion, and in these spam Essays he has a link to all his other Essays with his user name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the Mainspace category is to remain, then the rule against self-promotion should be enforced. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:51, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What User:Consewrvative is doing is building an algorithm to promote himself, at the expense of all other editors. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:53, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We have a Category where it rightfully belongs, [[:Category:United States History Essays]], and if it's a contemporary subject, [[:Category:United States Essays]] should be created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:58, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In those Categories the editor should be allowed to link to himself. But using Mainspace Categories for self-promotion of his personal opinions should be denied. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:59, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, you make good points but I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best.  That includes you too.  Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them).  The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I see your point; there's no problem with that. But cheating like this, bending the rules to create algorithms inside Conservapedia to promote his own Essays is what has led to his success. I could have done the same thing a long time ago, but chose to abide by the rules. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::More recently, he has created algorithms inside Conservapedia to suppress other editors work, specifically User:LT and myself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:31, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Leaving aside his active subversion of other editor's Mainspace contributions, it is [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Isolationalism_is_growing_in_the_United_States._Is_this_a_good_thing%3F&amp;amp;diff=2012547&amp;amp;oldid=2012527 this edit here], tying all his Essays together, that creates a very powerful algorithm. That, coupled with Mainspace categorization, makes it even more powerful. Users are prohibited from self-promotion in Mainspace, so he gets around that by tying it into a Mainspace category with hundreds or thousands of pages linked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:49, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't think that affects traffic to anything other than his own essays, so I think more freedom on this is best.  We want to avoid here the stifling aspects of Wikipedia.  Thanks for understanding. {{Unsigned|User:Aschlafly}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well it does affect traffic. When I introduce terms to him that he's never heard (like &amp;quot;multipolarity&amp;quot; for instance), and he writes a half dozen screeds attacking [[multipolarity]] which he knows nothing about. When I Google the term, his crap comes up and mine is suppressed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That's all he's done for the past six months, is use search terms he never heard of that I write about, then spam them into a dozen Essays trashing the concepts with [[neocon]] sources, promoting his own pages while ''also'' having an algorithm that specifically suppresses my content. And it's by cheating - blatant self-promotion - that he gets away with it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Basically, I am being censored cause I cannot use any new search terms that he hijacks and writes some of the most despicable screeds attacking the term, person, or idea. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:54, December 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::In sum: All I can say is, this [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_How_I_found_my_American_patriotism_again_and_began_to_appreciate_the_West_more&amp;amp;curid=178752&amp;amp;diff=2012622&amp;amp;oldid=2012551 cheating and trolling you want to give license to] will ultimately have a negative effect. And we have not even discussed his active duplicity and suppression of other editor's contributions with other algorithms. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:33, December 22, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tying things up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want Conservapedia's traffic to go up or at least not go down as fast, I would suggest cleaning up your user page so it's not an attack page on another editor. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But if you don't want to take my advice, so be it. Your just hurting your own readership and the website's readership. Why? Because nobody is interested in your dispute with another editor. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's the last string I wanted to tie up. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:35, December 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay. I won't spam attacks against other editors across other editor's user pages anymore. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:37, December 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biden's MEX trip/trick==&lt;br /&gt;
I see [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-blinken-meet-with-mexican-president-to-talk-migrant-crisis-amid-massive-numbers-new-caravan this] as a desperate campaign propaganda after [https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2023/12/24/exp-kevin-liptak-biden-immigration-lkl-122405aseg1-cnni-us.cnn this].  Which won't explain him in this field.&lt;br /&gt;
If he loses, which chances are big, it will be: economy and borders. &lt;br /&gt;
Shall we have a special 2024 campaign page - GOP VS DEM?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:The [[United States presidential election, 2024]] is the main Portal page; we need [[2024 Joe Biden presidential campaign]] and [[2024 Donald Trump presidential campaign]] subpages. I'd recommend using the 2024 Biden campaign page to start. We can always cut n paste information or susections from one to the other and/or create Redirects. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:24, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I created a link from the main Portal page to [[2024 Joe Biden presidential campaign]] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_presidential_election%2C_2024&amp;amp;diff=2013693&amp;amp;oldid=2003136 here.] Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:40, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Here's the Category you can use: [[:Category:United States Presidential Election, 2024]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:42, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, a side note. Trump does better with Latinos b/c of economy. [https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/19/trump-wipes-out-bidens-lead-with-latino-voters-in-2024-cnbc-survey-.html]. But more importantly.  Happy New Blessed Year!!![[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yah, you too. I'm always here to help. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Dems forget that Blacks &amp;amp; Hispanics still believe in God &amp;amp; family, and that's where Conservapedia plays a big role. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::On [[Prosperity Guardian]], I might do some updates on the military/diplomatic situation - but you have full editorial discretion and control. So if I word something improperly or use a source that doesn't meet your expectations, it's your baby so do what you like. Thanks again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:17, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I appreciate that. Just a note. The whole idea of peace through strength is that we won't need to use force... or at least not as much. Which Trump was good in a way but the master was Reagan. And this posture importance - Biden &amp;amp; co. Didn't get, before Iran felt emboldened to unleash its Houthis dogs. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right, deterrence. And Mutual Assured Destruction. But all that's out the window now. [[Climate change]] has replaced nuclear war as the No.1 threat, US neocons think they win a nuclear war under the doctrine of [[Nuclear primacy]], and there's no serious diplomatic efforts or discussions anymore. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::So we spend $900 billion on defense, and have to beg Japan to send [[Patriot missile]] systems to Ukraine? Where's all the money? What if Japan needs Patriots in a war with China over Taiwan? And how is $200 billion sent to Ukraine &amp;quot;only 5% of our defense budget&amp;quot; as Nikki Haley claims? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:37, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ukraine aid is losing steam...gradually. But look how powerful pro immigrant lobby is that it, in a way, put a hold to foreign aid... as GOP rightfully demanded border security preference.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:20, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The deal was something like $61 billion for Ukraine and $4.5 billion for the US border. That's unrealistic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::They need to demand the resignation [[Mayorkas]] and clamp down on the border as part of the deal, and at minimum cut that $61 billion request in half. Even if the border were sealed tomorrow, no way will 10 million illegal new arrivals ever be deported. Probably not half that number. If Trump were to take office in 2025, he'd struggle to deport 1 million over 4 years with much controversy. Nobody is looking at this problem realistically. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:28, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I got [[2024 Joe Biden presidential campaign]]. You wanna take it from here? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:49, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::In your opinion, is this [https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1740389548712940032?s=20 ad] effective enough?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::That's as much as you can pack into 30 secs. It's ongoing, and growing. Look at these 2 shorts from today:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::[https://youtu.be/z8_yWcdRvMg 47 secs - Illinois NAACP president suspended for calling migrants &amp;quot;savages&amp;quot; and rapists, CBS Chicago];&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::[https://youtu.be/ZXGKUxHow1k 1:29 - CNN reports that BLUE STATE voters are getting concerned about Biden’s Border Crisis].&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::The times they are a 'changing my friend - fast. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Indeed. Despite Biden's disastrous broken-borders policy. (This is from liberal) USA Today. &amp;quot;Black, Hispanic and young voters abandon Biden, new poll shows.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Jan 1, 2024[https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/01/01/biden-trump-poll-odds-black-hispanic-young-voters/72072111007/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:18, January 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I can't believe the DNC will let him run. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:20, January 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::You yave a valid point. Especially with such a low showing.  They need a 'boost.' Hope you have a blessed new year dear friend.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:33, January 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::You too, bro. Maybe Congress will take him out with the [[25th Amendment]] or something. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:40, January 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Not saying Vivek is my hero. But at times he gives it to MSM - right on... Kudos on this one[https://www.foxnews.com/video/6344268379112]. Another issue, DeSantis was asked about Ukraine (today on CNN TownHall), he replied that the way Biden left Afghanistan emboldened adversaries, that &amp;quot;it sent a signal to Iran and Russia.&amp;quot; He complained that Biden doesn't give a red line on Ukraine.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:29, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::Vivek a young man, and he's going places. I've been trying to think of job for him in Second Trump Administration. He could probably fill lots of spots, from Commerce Secretary to one of those jobs like Office of Science and Technology (a pretty important spot). Or maybe press secretary. 12:48, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::What's your take on the audacity step by Hunter's lawyers' for him to appear today on the Hill?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 15:13, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::Still gathering information. Looks like stunt so they can say that he did show up. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::Though he tried to show he isn't afraid, he [https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/hunter-biden-walks-mtg-house-oversight-contempt-hearing-1234943987/amp/ rushed out as soon as MTG began talking] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[Though she isn't particularly my favorite, but I liked the show, snd she was right]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:41, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A prediction? If Trump wins, Iran's global proxies will be deterred at least considerably... Reminding Reagan's first day replacing coward Carter. (After Biden cowing to Iran, it's a bit too late to show strength). I refer to projecting strength without having to use lethal force...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a failure of diplomacy. Nobody trusts or believes the United States anymore. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:09, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yup. It's the failed &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;manner&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; how Biden admin. managed the exit of Afghanistan.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::Military action is supposed to be the last resort when diplomacy fails, but the US doesn't even conduct diplomacy anymore. It's shoot first, ask questions later. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:29, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There were plenty of finance linked steps Biden could have taken against the Islamic Republic pre Oct 7.&lt;br /&gt;
It's very late now.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:50, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, [[USAID]] is still supporting Hamas, as I understand. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:55, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I wasn't aware of this. Maybe you meant UNRWA? Already rreported as helping Hamas in [https://www.jewishpolicycenter.org/2007/08/31/how-unrwa-supports-hamas/ 2007]. And Recent - - [https://www.timesofisrael.com/watchdog-finds-unrwa-workers-praised-hamas-massacres-in-internal-telegram-channel/ Watchdog finds UNRWA workers praised Hamas massacres in internal Telegram channel]&lt;br /&gt;
UN Watch probe uncovers messages by UN-employed teachers, urges United Nations to recognize that the relief agency incites to terror. By TOI STAFF, 10 January 2024. In any case Biden aid for Palestinian  Authority has been contributing to ''[https://www.google.com/search?q=%22pay-for-slay%22&amp;amp;oq=%22pay-for-slay%22 pay-for-slay]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.frontpagemag.com/twice-as-many-israelis-died-in-one-month-of-biden-than-in-one-year-of-trump/ Twice as Many Israelis Died in One Month of Biden than in One Year of Trump] June 26, 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-768735 PA to give Hamas terrorists' families close to $3 million in 'pay-for-slay'] Oct 17, 2023 — PA to give Hamas terrorists' families close to $3 million in 'pay-for-slay'. The PMW claims that the $2.8 million payments is a low estimate.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.jns.org/661-terrorists-tied-to-oct-7-to-get-pa-pay-for-slay-stipends/ 661 terrorists tied to Oct. 7 to get PA 'pay for slay' financial stipends] Jan 11, 2024 — “I want to go home very much, but you can't live with neighbors who make a living off our deaths,” she said. 'Pay for slay'.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:34, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Any source for this?==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. I saw the following line on DeSantis page: &amp;quot;the DeSantis campaign has been employing individuals with ties to the Israeli and Ukrainian governments to...&amp;quot; It's so weird, as the two are not connected. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite Zelanskyy push. Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 15:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah, I was suspicious of that, too. I was just consolidating sections, and didn't realize it was unsourced. It looks like classic subversive trolling. Feel free to toss it out. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Cheers. (It sounded more of a cheap attempted conspiratorial fantasy for a certain goal...) [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:26, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Good catch! There's a lot of that. I was just skimming to consolidate subsections, not copyediting or verifying sources, etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:04, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Minor change I just did was to dispel salad of things. I hope it's OK.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:48, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's on right now at [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page#Vivek_drops_out MPR/talk]. Let's see if Geo wants to defend calling Loomer a &amp;quot;cultist&amp;quot;. It still may be possible to disqualify Loomer as source in the DeSantis article. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:54, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Challenge accepted. I stand by what I said. She correctly pointed out Haley's eligibility issues, but refused to do the same with Vivek despite him having those exact same issues. And once Vivek dropped out, she called him the future of MAGA, implying that she would back him for 2028 if he ran. Basically, she's admitting that she doesn't care about eligibility issues as long as the candidate is friendly to Trump. That is a textbook example of a Trump cultist.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I also stand by citing Loomer's reporting on DeSantis. Bottom line is, she's great at exposing the skeletons in the closets of Trump's enemies. But when Trump's so-called friends have real skeletons in their own closets, she holds back from exposing those. I'm just being real here.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:16, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Of course I don't believe this at all. But if it is included, I think the bigger problem is the linking the two - feeding into that dangerous J boogieman fobia... Copying such a weird linkage in this respect.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:59, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Is that what this is all about? You know, calling out misbehavior by a foreign government which happens to be almost if not entirely exclusively Jewish isn't antisemitic in and of itself. Sure there are actual antisemites who would cite such misbehavior to justify their perverse hatred, but why should that deter me from speaking out?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:23, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Loomer doesn't call out a foreign government in her post. But apparently, we agree she is/could be acceptable in the DeSantis article (In the long run, the quote could be excised from DeSantis and put in the DeSantis 20924 campaign page). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::IMO, Laura Loomer is somehow on the Trump campaign payroll. If you've noticed, she almost exclusively is reporting on Trump challengers and foes in recent months. I think she's working closely with [[Roger Stone]]. In that tweet, it looks like its directed at the neocons. I'm willing to give her some slack for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:03, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Another point. What we knew for years. &amp;quot;[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/383752 Hamas propaganda? Wikipedia's shocking anti-Israel bias.] Jan.17.2024[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:42, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fetterman drastic change==&lt;br /&gt;
I hope it's fine (Fetterman page), as Fetternan broke from the left and praised by many on the right. Especially  regarding the border. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:40, January 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah, I've seen that. Unsure what to make of it. Glad you're covering it. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:46, January 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:54, January 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==When you have the time==&lt;br /&gt;
Please delete duplicates: [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Support_for_Hamas_and_swastikas-_the_tomb_of_Prolhet_Joshua_-_Yehoshua_bin_Nun_in_Samaria_was_vandalized_by_Arab_Palestinian_twice_within_two_weeks_Dec.2024.jpg], [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Support_for_Hamas_and_swastikas-_the_tomb_of_Prophet_Joshua_-_Yehoshua_bin_Nun_in_Samaria_was_vandalized_by_Arab_Palestinian_twice_within_two_weeks_Dec.2024.jpg] wrong dates. Cheeres.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:20, January 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Check your email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:56, December 30, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I did. My phone doesn't ring, remember? Answer the phone when I call you back. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:23, December 30, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I sent you another email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:42, December 30, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Check your email. I just sent you another email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:12, December 30, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Your edits on my talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First off, don't condescend to me and treat me like I was your &amp;quot;pet&amp;quot; like you did [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&amp;amp;diff=2015798&amp;amp;oldid=2015350 in your most recent edit on my talk page] because it's demeaning and insulting and people don't like being treated that way, okay?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, as [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#User pages and user space|this specific rule states]], a user's pages and space (including his/her talk page) is his/her castle and can be done with as the user wishes (including the removal of unwanted messages) - but [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&amp;amp;diff=2015587&amp;amp;oldid=2015586 you only heed that rule when it applies to you and your talk page alone] while [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&amp;amp;diff=2015350&amp;amp;oldid=2015345 you go out of your way to ignore that same rule] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:LT&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=2000848 when it comes] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MayGodBless&amp;amp;diff=2003586&amp;amp;oldid=2003498 to everyone else] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=2009407&amp;amp;oldid=2009405 and their talk/user pages] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=2009373&amp;amp;oldid=2009371 as you see fit] (just as you likewise ignore the other rules here - some of which you unilaterally created yourself, without input from anyone else here - that you impose on everyone else).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing to note - [[wishful thinking|as much as you want to pretend otherwise]], criticism of your behavior on this site is ''not'' &amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;incivility&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;gossip&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;personal attacks&amp;quot; (except according ''only to you'', further proving [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1989530 what others here] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=1999757 have said about you] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1999713 self-righteously playing the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; when called out on it] while you go out of your way to engage in victim-blaming and refusal to take responsibility for your own actions against [[User:LT]] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:LT&amp;amp;diff=2004125&amp;amp;oldid=2000915 by falsely blaming User:Conservative for &amp;quot;extending&amp;quot; the blocks which you yourself unjustly and falsely imposed against LT based on false claims by you of &amp;quot;incivility&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;recidivism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;violating the 90/10 rule&amp;quot;] because you didn't like his criticism of your behavior) and acting vindictively and spitefully to unjustly block those who criticize that behavior is both an unjustified and abusive use of that power - but then, I've noticed [[Bullying|you only go after those who stand up to you, yet don't have the means to protect or defend themselves against said abuses of power by you]], so what does that say about you?  Also when you do that, all it does is prove the points of everyone here who has criticized what you have done to drive off other editors or otherwise force them to curtail their activity on this site (and in doing so, severely cutting down on editing/article creation activity on this site in the process).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sooner you realize what you've been doing to harm this site and its ability to grow (and the sooner you come around and change your ways and your attitude because of it), the better off you'll be here.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 03:30, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Bla bla bla. This incivility and vendettas are coming to an end. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:19, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think you really mean [[liberal projection|your ''own'' incivility and vendettas against the critics of your behavior]], don't you?  Thanks for proving my point once again.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 12:23, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::What point? You left 3,500 bytes of crap on my page that I didn't read. I've been debating with myself about removing it, but I think that's rude. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:27, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You claim that you &amp;quot;didn't read&amp;quot; what I posted, but it's evident from your reaction that you did, and it further proves what I {{personal remark removed}} have been saying about your refusal to take responsibility for your actions and to shift blame to others.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 12:35, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::What reaction? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:41, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The exact reaction you're engaging in right now, Rob - and BTW, thanks for also proving your choice to ignore the &amp;quot;my user/talk page, my castle&amp;quot; rule when it comes to everyone else's talk pages here with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&amp;amp;diff=2015879&amp;amp;oldid=2015837 your continued] [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&amp;amp;diff=2015885&amp;amp;oldid=2015883 reversion of my removal] of your snarky and condescending post (which violates the incivility rule, another rule here that you conveniently ignore when it suits you alone, also demonstrating your willingness to ignore any rule here that doesn't suit you - including those laid down by others, including even Andy).  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 12:50, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The incivility and lynch mobs are coming to an end. If you have a problem, there is a place for it. If you have a problem with another editor. There is a place for that. The days of spamming attacks against other editors all over the wiki are ending. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::BTW, was it you who hacked Bhathorn's account? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:56, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[[Liberal projection|You're only continuing to prove my point regarding your behavior here and your projection thereof]] (including making false and libelous accusations and assumptions while continuing to self-righteously claim to be the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot;) when you get confronted about said behavior here, Rob.  One thing that needs to be said here regarding that - does the name [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_a_Good_Life_(The_Twilight_Zone) Anthony Fremont] ring a bell?  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 13:03, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::My further point regarding that (as I was going to say before getting unjustly and rudely blocked by you for the 22nd time) - it was the behavior you're engaging in now (the pointing out of which, no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise, is ''not'' &amp;quot;redundant&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;spamming&amp;quot;) that got you desysopped twice in the past to rein you in, and you're treading a ''very'' thin line toward getting desysopped for a third time, because you're repeatedly proven that, like Anthony Fremont, you can't handle the power that you've been given and you use it to spitefully, vindictively and unjustly punish the critics of your out-of-control behavior and abuse of power (up to and including treating Conservapedia as if it were yours and yours alone, demonstrating an unwillingness by you to get along or work with others unless you get to have your way at others' and this site's expense) and to then cover up evidence of said behavior (and much as you think that criticism by others of said behavior is a &amp;quot;personal attack&amp;quot; against you [thus proving your willingness to play the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; when it suits you], it is not) - and ''that'' is what needs to end.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Comment: You were not &amp;quot;rudely&amp;quot; blocked. I did not remove your &amp;quot;rude&amp;quot; comments from my castle page, as noted above - because I considered THAT to be rude, stifling discussion. Feel free to continue using my castle and talk page for your personal attacks, incivility, [[gossip]], and rude conduct toward me. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:20, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Simply put, you need to look in a mirror and realize that the only one here responsible for your behavior on this site is ''you'', and ''only'' you.  ''Your'' repeated refusal to take [[responsibility]] for ''your'' own actions and [[persecution complex|''your'' choice to victim-blame and project against your critics while playing the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; role]] only degrades ''your'' integrity, costs ''you'' respect and makes ''you'' look bad in the eyes of everyone else here (including visitors to this site), and ultimately, that will exact its toll on you.  If that dose of truth triggers you (as it would a liberal) and causes you to irrationally and emotionally lash out as you have (also a liberal trait), that - once again - is on you and you alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::And while I'm thinking about it, here's something you could do - instead of spending every single waking moment hovering over Conservapedia as you do and [[Egocentric Thinking|treating it as if it were your own personal playground and expecting everyone else here to do your bidding]], do like the rest of us editors here do - go offline, go out and get some fresh air and experience the real world; you'll be doing yourself a huge favor.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 14:07, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I notice you don't answer my question, it obviously was an inside job. Did you do the hack?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::It's amazing. You can be inactive for three months, but as soon as there's a vandal attack, you're there Johnny-on-the-spot to prove how valuable you are. You don't contribute much content, but you're always there to help sow division in the community and tear it down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:13, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::So, yet again (as you just did with your '''23rd''' unjust block of me), you go out of your way to prove my point and do exactly what I said about you regarding your behavior (including libelous attacks and making assumptions without proof while you further engage in incivility and projection [i.e. accusing me and others of &amp;quot;sowing division in the community and tearing it down&amp;quot; when that is exactly what you yourself are doing], as well - with said snarky and uncivil comments by you right before you blocked me - as resorting to &amp;quot;[[last wordism]]&amp;quot;) - and incidentally, you yourself weren't there to do ''anything'' to stop what happened or remedy it and it took [[User:PeterKa]], [[User:Conservative]], [[User:DMorris]] and myself to fix the damage that got done.  In my case, I was asleep in bed (as most normal folks would be at that hour) when the vandal attack occurred - given how much time you spend on this site, what was ''your'' excuse?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::In any event, you're only proving by acting and reacting as you have that you don't have the courage of your convictions or the moral high ground (and that you either lack awareness that what you're doing is wrong, or if you ''are'' aware, [[selfishness|then you simply don't care and you consciously choose to continue doing wrong to the detriment of this site]] - just as a liberal would), and the more you continue doing what you're doing (the criticism of which, again, [[liberal projection|is ''not'' &amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;]] and is ''not'' a &amp;quot;blockable offence&amp;quot;, no matter how much you want to pretend the opposite) while refusing to take personal responsibility for what you do and say, the deeper a hole you're only digging yourself into and it won't end well for you.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 16:23, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::Still trolling. Do you have anything positive to say?  Why when there is a vandal attack, you're the first one to respond, even after months of inactivity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::Did you do the hack? The pattern is clear - after you get a pat on the back from Andy, you immediately start trolling me with this nonsense that it is okay to spam personal attacks across every active user's page. No, it's not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::And your arguments posted here are redundant - me &amp;amp; everybody have heard them over and over and over years ago. ''They think they'll be heard for their much speaking.'' All you do is sow division. You're not interested in building a conservative community. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:36, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::Here's what I think: You were upset about the one day block you received so you staged another vandal attack so you could come back and play hero. It's an old game. You need a new playbook. We've seen it all before. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:16, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Check your email ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please check your email. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:32, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Jihadis Houthis...and its Iranian boss==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Houthis: 'We Do Not Support Russia - Even Though Russia Supports Us'&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.memri.org/tv/mohammed-al-bukhaiti-yemen-houthi-official-moral-dont-support-russia-in-ukraine].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:54, January 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah, I saw that. I wonder how they feel about [[Kadyrov]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:00, January 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Great question. Given the Islamism. Or maybe they see him just as a tool by Putin. They will never talk about the Uighur Muslims plight.. either.  As the Israel issue is more of the anti-Jewish war than pro Palestinian. They see the non-Arab non-Muslim (Dhimmi) entity at their midst. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(Though some 25% of Israelis are Arabs and the Arabs are overwhelmingly Muslim -  but the country's majority and as a whole isn't)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; The 'other.' You know their slogan is not even &amp;quot;just against Zionists...&amp;quot; - Look how their boss the Islamic Republic [https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-783208 fake low tricks] goes. You know that this Russian Rabbi B. Lazar (which Iranians photoshopped) is rather, actually Putin's friend.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::You can learn a lot listening to them. I didn't know Donald Trump was the Pope of America until I heard it from a kid over there. For a minute I thought he must've went to an American public school. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:04, January 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Donald Trump was the Pope of America... wow. Iran is a closed dictatorship and they can feed their people whatever they wish. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:23, January 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The thing is, you hate to be disagreeable. It can only result in a fight too often. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:32, January 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Wonder by which verse in their book they were motivated to [https://www.ynetnews.com/article/h1bdbgyq6 'obliterate womens' faces'] (Oct 7)[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:05, February 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Re your essay Global Jihad==&lt;br /&gt;
2023: 23,000 dead Africans linked to Islamists. &amp;quot;Deaths Linked to Militant Islamist Violence in Africa Continue to Spiral.&amp;quot; By the Africa Center for Strategic Studies. January 29, 2024. &amp;quot;Fatalities linked to militant Islamist violence jumped by 20 percent in the past year, claiming more than 23,000 lives—a new record. Over 80 percent of these deaths were in the Sahel and Somalia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://africacenter.org/spotlight/mig2024-deaths-militant-islamist-violence-africa-rise/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That essay is in sore need of some updating (it hasn't been touched since the Obama years). Go ahead and feel free to update, add, or work on it if you like. It did actually rank in the Google Top 10 during the Obama years, at the height of the [[Islamic State]] when the official position of the Obama regime and US State Dept. was to deny that a Global Jihad existed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:18, February 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Btw, did you ever see the [https://ok.ru/video/1918828153524 opening scene to this film,] particularly the reference to the [[Amalekites]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:30, February 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I just watched it, I didn't remember this opening about ancient Amalekites. BTW, King David was red hair...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I used [http://www.attacreport.com/overview.htm this website extensively] to corroborate a lot of information years ago, for example [http://www.attacreport.com/ar_terror/tframe.php?region=namerica&amp;amp;group=wuo here when I was] doing the hit pieces on Barack Obama's connection with Bill Ayers and the [[Weather Underground]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:51, February 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==block request==&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative/mailbox#I_request_a_block&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=2022848</id>
		<title>GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=2022848"/>
		<updated>2024-02-02T02:20:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: Idk why this is mainspace but okay&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nicolo.jpg|right|thumb|250px|right|GrammarCommie is known for his bullying. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Research on the dark triad of personality traits ([[narcissism]], [[Machiavellianism]], and [[Psychopath|psychopathy]]) indicate a correlation with bullying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chabrol H.; Van Leeuwen N.; Rodgers R.; Séjourné S. (2009). &amp;quot;''Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency''&amp;quot;. ''Personality and Individual Differences''. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and narcissism]] and [[Atheism and psychopathy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Portrait of [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] by Santi di Tito.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''GrammarCommie''' (GC) is largely a former RationalWiki administrator. He retired and vowed to never come back a few times (He came back a few times. His last post was January 26, 2024).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/GrammarCommie GrammarCommie contributions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[RationalWiki and web traffic|RationalWiki.org]] is a politically [[leftism|left]] leaning [[wiki]] website that skews towards [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] in terms of its [[worldview]]. RationalWiki has a lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in 2019 (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He formerly served on the RationalWiki Foundation board of directors until he had a mental health crisis which consisted of him threatening to cut himself and commit suicide in order to get his way at RationalWiki (see screen captures below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie is an [[atheism|atheist]] and [[Leftism|leftist]]. He has  himself thusly, &amp;quot;Deeply [[cynicism|cynical]] and borderline [[misanthropy|misanthropic]]. Very much not [[Utopian]]. Unconventional left-winger. If you want more info engage me in a conversation. I'm an asshole, but I'm honest.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:GrammarCommie GrammarCommie user page at RationalWiki]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; GrammarCommmie is admin at RationalWiki, which is a wiki that intentionally lies about its web traffic statistics on its article about itself in that it greatly inflates its web traffic and global market share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie has anger management issues which sometimes results in him angrily posting abusive posts in all caps laced with profanity (see also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and profanity]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399206&amp;amp;oldid=2399203 Revision as of 22:51, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399207&amp;amp;oldid=2399206 Revision as of 22:55, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure. During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie frequently bans people which contributes to RationalWiki being a wiki that has a low [[Essay: Edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki|edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki]]. He also frequently reverts other editors. A wiki with a low edit to block ratio tends to be a closed-minded wiki that is dogmatic and intolerant (see also: [[Atheism and dogmatism]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is also known for his bullying. Research on the dark triad of personality traits ([[narcissism]], [[Machiavellianism]], and [[Psychopath|psychopathy]]) indicate a correlation with bullying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chabrol H.; Van Leeuwen N.; Rodgers R.; Séjourné S. (2009). &amp;quot;''Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency''&amp;quot;. ''Personality and Individual Differences''. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and narcissism]] and [[Atheism and psychopathy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June of 2022, GrammarCommie was banning and unbanning himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.conservapedia.com/images/b/b4/RationalWiki_GrammarCommie_blocking_and_unblocking_himself.jpg Screencapture of GrammarCommie banning and unbanning himself]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Before banning himself initially, GrammarCommie said that RationalWiki was &amp;quot;half-dead&amp;quot; and filled with &amp;quot;twits&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2friedeggs&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2460941 Revision as of 03:49, 10 June 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Specifically, he wrote: &amp;quot;You know what, fine. Take your half dead site, where most of you twits obsess over one or two articles and et the rest of the site rot, where I can't even perform basic category maintenance without someone getting on my ass, which by the way is why i haven't touched mainspace in ages, where trolls are humored as long as there's the barest minimum level of plausible deniability, and shove it right up your f**king *ss.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2friedeggs&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2460941 Revision as of 03:49, 10 June 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In reply, the RationalWiki user 2friedeggs said:  &amp;quot;This site is dying for a reason&amp;quot; and he indicated that GrammarCommie was chasing good faith editors away. On July 3, 2022, the RationalWiki Moderator [[LeftyGreenMario]] gave Grammarcommie an ultimatum. He could either unblock himself and &amp;quot;contribute to the community without taking swipes at other people&amp;quot; or he could stay blocked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GrammarCommie&amp;amp;oldid=2467127#two_choices LeftyGreenMario's ultimatum to GrammarCommie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In response, GrammarCommie replied: &amp;quot;@LeftyGreenMario What, exactly, am I supposed to contribute? I try to deal with trolls and asshats, I get burned. I try to clean up categories, I get burned. So. What, exactly, am I supposed to contribute?&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GrammarCommie&amp;amp;oldid=2467127#two_choices LeftyGreenMario's ultimatum to GrammarCommie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After poor handling of a situation with administrator 2friedeggs, in July 13, 2022, moderator Bongolian revoked his sysop privileges after a vote of 63% support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie often pontificates about politics and economics and sees himself as very knowledgeable about these areas despite describing himself as being lower middle class. On July 30, 2021, GrammarCommie wrote: &amp;quot;I asked for data, not random factoids. Just as we can't infer that every white person lives at the lower middle class level because I do...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2348120&amp;amp;oldid=2348116 RationalWiki Saloon Revision as of 04:33, 30 July 2021 (view source) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs) (→‎Critical Race Theory)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is also known for correcting people's grammar and being intolerant of people's grammatical errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Grammar%20Commie Grammar Commie - Urban dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has admitted on-wiki that he has spent time in prison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Screenshot captures of RationalWiki posts related to GrammnarCommie ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie on cutting himself, feelings of wanting to die and his feelings of low self-worth ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie is a former board member of RationalWiki Foundation and admin of RationalWiki who very heavily censored and banned other RationalWiki editors - even by RationalWiki's heavy-handed, censorous standards. He is an intolerant atheist whose politics is left of center.  He still actively edits RationalWiki. See: [[Atheism and intolerance]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWiki Foundation member and Admin GrammarCommie having a mental breakdown at RationalWiki.PNG|thumbnail|1700px|center|The RationalWiki administrator who goes by the username CircularReasoning wrote the above about the matter of the Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie threatening to cut himself on several Rationalwiki user pages and cursing other fellow RationalWiki users. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure.  During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Angry atheist.jpg|thumbnail|center|250px|An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-philosopher-explores-causes-of-atheism-44353/ Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and love]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Anyway, the world is so just and peaceful and better and everyone is so happy and I used a nail file to cut myself in the arm again woop dee doo!!!&amp;quot; - GrammarCommie, former admin of RationalWiki, March 25, 2020&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Helena_Bonham_Carter&amp;amp;diff=2303227&amp;amp;oldid=2297847 GrammarCommie posting at RationalWiki that he cuts himself&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GrammarCommie screencap.PNG|thumbnail|center|2000px|Screen capture of GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;No. I'll wait to be laughed at. Like the loser and freak that I am. I don't which one you are on Discord. And I don't wantt to yell or talk, I want the stupidity to end. I want to die.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== RationalWiki admins and editors indicate GrammarCommies public statements on harming himself were inappropriate and were a form of manipulation/emotional blackmail ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As I trust you all know, @GrammarCommie, a once-effective RMF staff member, has recently fallen from grace, randomly cursing out people left, right and center and making threats of self-harm on multiple user talkpages (which have since been deleted), and has started a huge flame-war on his own talkpage as well, which has since rapidly devolved after numerous containment measures by moi failed. After getting a slap on the wrist from @Christopher for edit-warring over a collapse that had proven time and time again to be a lost cause, I was forced to watch helplessly as GC and @DuceMoosolini began exchanging insults and &amp;quot;*#@&amp;amp; you&amp;quot;s, while GC tried shifting the blame onto others many times.&amp;quot; - User:CircularReasoning, 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&amp;amp;diff=2303840&amp;amp;oldid=2303837 RationalWiki ChickenCoop]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is completely unacceptable to employ talk of self-harm and / or suicide as leverage in any interaction with anyone, ever. This is isn't remotely controversial: it's mental health adulting 101, and is specifically addressed in this site's Legal FAQs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RationalWiki takes all threats of harm to self or others very seriously. Such statements will be removed from the wiki and all relevant information about the editor (including IP address) will be forwarded to appropriate authorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a entire world of difference between &amp;quot;I feel bad and need help&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Look at what you've made me do!&amp;quot;. The former requires compassion and immediate referral to professionals better equipped to assist; the latter is textbook emotional abuse and manipulation, and should not be tolerated on these pages for a solitary *$#@%ing second.&amp;quot; - Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303466&amp;amp;oldid=2303420 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;OK, I agree with that. I have removed those two comments and made them invisible in edit history.&amp;quot; - Bongolian (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303485&amp;amp;oldid=2303466 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User: Conservative at Conservapedia and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rationalwikian says fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User Conservative at Conservapedia.JPG|thumbnail|center|1601px|As you can see above, a RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of [[User:Conservative]] at [[Conservapedia]] and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWikians on their wiki not being a place conduscive to mental health at the present time.PNG|thumbnail|2000px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Can't everyone just calm down. It's not like it's the end of the world... yet.&amp;quot; -  Unclescrooge (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303279&amp;amp;oldid=2303278 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and leadership]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other RationalWiki leaders:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[LeftyGreenMario]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rational Media Board of Director and RationalWiki Moderater User: Spud and ultra-processed/unhealthy/junk food|User: Spud]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2021/04/rationalwiki-website-editors-are-having.html Several RationalWiki website editors have experienced mental health issues amidst the public having a much lower interest their website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: RationalWiki]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Skelly&amp;diff=2018456</id>
		<title>User talk:Skelly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Skelly&amp;diff=2018456"/>
		<updated>2024-01-17T22:24:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: removing stuff that i wrote when I was depressed. Yes I got much better now that I am in high school&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Retired}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistaken block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mistaken block, I was busy dealing with the spam-created multiple Jimbo Wales vulgarity pages being made by that sock troll-creating punk kid with nothing better to do with his time outside of school and you got caught in the crossfire of edits by accident.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:13, November 5, 2021 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Emo&amp;diff=2018454</id>
		<title>Emo</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Emo&amp;diff=2018454"/>
		<updated>2024-01-17T22:21:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: /* &amp;quot;Emo&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Emo''' is a form of rock music, currently usually considered a sub-genre of alternative or &amp;quot;indie&amp;quot; rock.  It is thought that the term emo derived from the fact that, on occasion, members of a band would become spontaneously and strongly emotional during performances, giving rise to the music term 'Emotional Hardcore'. Emerging in the mid-to-late 1980s as a distinctive form of Hardcore [[punk|punk rock]], the genre has recently gained popularity thanks to bands such as: [[Fall Out Boy]], [[My Chemical Romance]], [[Dashboard Confessional]], [[Taking Back Sunday]], [[Coheed and Cambria]], [[Brand New]], and many others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1983, the DC [[punk]] scene began to lose popularity and many of the bands of the era had started to break up. In 1984, the band [[Husker Dü]] began the slow start of the early emo movement with the release of their album, [[Zen Arcade]]. The album featured melodic songwriting, intense vocals, and punk style guitars. Soon afterward, bands such as [[Rites Of Spring]] and [[Embrace]] began to perfect the &amp;quot;DC Sound&amp;quot; with their music. Later on, this style of music begins to be referred to as &amp;quot;emo-core&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fourfa.com Fourfa&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Emo&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1997, several new bands inspired by the &amp;quot;emo-core&amp;quot; bands of a few years before began to emerge in several areas around [[North America]]. These bands added their own unique sound to the genre, including softer and sometimes whispered vocals, louder guitars, screaming vocals, and the most recognizable element of the genre, octave chords. The vocal style for this genre could range from normal singing, to screaming and even crying at some parts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of the lyrics for this genre were somewhat abstract poetry which were often inaudible because of the volume of the instruments. When playing live, many bands would keep their backs to the audience while playing the quiet parts and would jump around and knock things over and scream at the top of their lungs during the loud parts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was almost no commercialism at all for this genre as most bands did not make T-shirts and only sold records at their shows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most &amp;quot;emo&amp;quot; bands would only be around for a short time. Many bands only released their first records posthumously.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2000s, with the rise in popularity of such bands as Fall Out Boy. Panic! at the Disco, and My Chemical Romance, emo has become quite mainstream, getting as much radio play (if not more so) than hip-hop and &amp;quot;bubblegum&amp;quot; pop.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://altmusic.about.com/od/genresstyles/p/emo.htm Altmusic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Then, it started dying as the teenager fanbase grew with many of the mainstream bands either breakup or distancing themselves from the subculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Noteworthy Early Bands==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Husker Dü]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rites Of Spring]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Embrace]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dag Nasty]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jawbreaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Moss Icon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Shotmaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Still Life]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Hardcore Emo&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Emo&amp;quot; played harder, faster and louder beginning in the early 1990s with bands such as [[Mohinder]], [[Heroin]], and [[Swing Kids]]. This can be seen as both a return to the original connotations of Emo, and an extension upon current Emo music trends.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Emo as a sub-culture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, the term &amp;quot;Emo&amp;quot; has been used to describe people who wear dark clothing, makeup, use eye-liner, and wear tight pants. This modern stereotype also mentions that &amp;quot;emos&amp;quot; are emotional, suicidal, and often associated with [[borderline personality disorder]]. Although originally considered to be an extremely rude and false term, modern society has slowly accepted &amp;quot;emo&amp;quot; term to describe such people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Musical Genres]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Culture]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1872733</id>
		<title>GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1872733"/>
		<updated>2022-07-15T21:22:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nicolo.jpg|right|thumb|GrammarCommie is known for his bullying. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Research on the dark triad of personality traits ([[narcissism]], [[Machiavellianism]], and [[Psychopath|psychopathy]]) indicate a correlation with bullying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chabrol H.; Van Leeuwen N.; Rodgers R.; Séjourné S. (2009). &amp;quot;''Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency''&amp;quot;. ''Personality and Individual Differences''. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and narcissism]] and [[Atheism and psychopathy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Portrait of [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] by Santi di Tito.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''GrammarCommie''' (GC) is a [[RationalWiki]] administrator. [[RationalWiki and web traffic|RationalWiki.org]] is a politically [[leftism|left]] leaning [[wiki]] website that skews towards [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] in terms of its [[worldview]]. RationalWiki has a lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in 2019 (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He formerly served on the RationalWiki Foundation board of directors until he had a mental health crisis which consisted of him threatening to cut himself and commit suicide in order to get his way at RationalWiki (see screen captures below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie is an [[atheism|atheist]] and [[Leftism|leftist]]. He has  himself thusly, &amp;quot;Deeply [[cynicism|cynical]] and borderline [[misanthropy|misanthropic]]. Very much not [[Utopian]]. Unconventional left-winger. If you want more info engage me in a conversation. I'm an asshole, but I'm honest.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:GrammarCommie GrammarCommie user page at RationalWiki]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; GrammarCommmie is admin at RationalWiki, which is a wiki that intentionally lies about its web traffic statistics on its article about itself in that it greatly inflates its web traffic and global market share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie has anger management issues which sometimes results in him angrily posting abusive posts in all caps laced with profanity (see also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and profanity]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399206&amp;amp;oldid=2399203 Revision as of 22:51, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399207&amp;amp;oldid=2399206 Revision as of 22:55, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure. During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie frequently bans people which contributes to RationalWiki being a wiki that has a low [[Essay: Edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki|edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki]]. He also frequently reverts other editors. A wiki with a low edit to block ratio tends to be a closed-minded wiki that is dogmatic and intolerant (see also: [[Atheism and dogmatism]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is also known for his bullying. Research on the dark triad of personality traits ([[narcissism]], [[Machiavellianism]], and [[Psychopath|psychopathy]]) indicate a correlation with bullying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chabrol H.; Van Leeuwen N.; Rodgers R.; Séjourné S. (2009). &amp;quot;''Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency''&amp;quot;. ''Personality and Individual Differences''. 47 (7): 734–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and narcissism]] and [[Atheism and psychopathy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June of 2022, GrammarCommie was banning and unbanning himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.conservapedia.com/images/b/b4/RationalWiki_GrammarCommie_blocking_and_unblocking_himself.jpg Screencapture of GrammarCommie banning and unbanning himself]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Before banning himself initially, GrammarCommie said that RationalWiki was &amp;quot;half-dead&amp;quot; and filled with &amp;quot;twits&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2friedeggs&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2460941 Revision as of 03:49, 10 June 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Specifically, he wrote: &amp;quot;You know what, fine. Take your half dead site, where most of you twits obsess over one or two articles and et the rest of the site rot, where I can't even perform basic category maintenance without someone getting on my ass, which by the way is why i haven't touched mainspace in ages, where trolls are humored as long as there's the barest minimum level of plausible deniability, and shove it right up your f**king *ss.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2friedeggs&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2460941 Revision as of 03:49, 10 June 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In reply, the RationalWiki user 2friedeggs said:  &amp;quot;This site is dying for a reason&amp;quot; and he indicated that GrammarCommie was chasing good faith editors away. On July 3, 2022, the RationalWiki Moderator [[LeftyGreenMario]] gave Grammarcommie an ultimatum. He could either unblock himself and &amp;quot;contribute to the community without taking swipes at other people&amp;quot; or he could stay blocked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GrammarCommie&amp;amp;oldid=2467127#two_choices LeftyGreenMario's ultimatum to GrammarCommie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In response, GrammarCommie replied: &amp;quot;@LeftyGreenMario What, exactly, am I supposed to contribute? I try to deal with trolls and asshats, I get burned. I try to clean up categories, I get burned. So. What, exactly, am I supposed to contribute?&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GrammarCommie&amp;amp;oldid=2467127#two_choices LeftyGreenMario's ultimatum to GrammarCommie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After poor handling of a situation with administrator 2friedeggs, in July 13, 2022, moderator Bongolian revoked his sysop privileges after a vote of 63% support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie often pontificates about politics and economics and sees himself as very knowledgeable about these areas despite describing himself as being lower middle class. On July 30, 2021, GrammarCommie wrote: &amp;quot;I asked for data, not random factoids. Just as we can't infer that every white person lives at the lower middle class level because I do...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2348120&amp;amp;oldid=2348116 RationalWiki Saloon Revision as of 04:33, 30 July 2021 (view source) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs) (→‎Critical Race Theory)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is also known for correcting people's grammar and being intolerant of people's grammatical errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Grammar%20Commie Grammar Commie - Urban dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Screenshot captures of RationalWiki posts related to GrammnarCommie ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie on cutting himself, feelings of wanting to die and his feelings of low self-worth ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie is a former board member of RationalWiki Foundation and admin of RationalWiki who very heavily censored and banned other RationalWiki editors - even by RationalWiki's heavy-handed, censorous standards. He is an intolerant atheist whose politics is left of center.  He still actively edits RationalWiki. See: [[Atheism and intolerance]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWiki Foundation member and Admin GrammarCommie having a mental breakdown at RationalWiki.PNG|thumbnail|1700px|center|The RationalWiki administrator who goes by the username CircularReasoning wrote the above about the matter of the Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie threatening to cut himself on several Rationalwiki user pages and cursing other fellow RationalWiki users. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure.  During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Angry atheist.jpg|thumbnail|center|250px|An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-philosopher-explores-causes-of-atheism-44353/ Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and love]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Anyway, the world is so just and peaceful and better and everyone is so happy and I used a nail file to cut myself in the arm again woop dee doo!!!&amp;quot; - GrammarCommie, former admin of RationalWiki, March 25, 2020&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Helena_Bonham_Carter&amp;amp;diff=2303227&amp;amp;oldid=2297847 GrammarCommie posting at RationalWiki that he cuts himself&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GrammarCommie screencap.PNG|thumbnail|center|2000px|Screen capture of GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;No. I'll wait to be laughed at. Like the loser and freak that I am. I don't which one you are on Discord. And I don't wantt to yell or talk, I want the stupidity to end. I want to die.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== RationalWiki admins and editors indicate GrammarCommies public statements on harming himself were inappropriate and were a form of manipulation/emotional blackmail ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As I trust you all know, @GrammarCommie, a once-effective RMF staff member, has recently fallen from grace, randomly cursing out people left, right and center and making threats of self-harm on multiple user talkpages (which have since been deleted), and has started a huge flame-war on his own talkpage as well, which has since rapidly devolved after numerous containment measures by moi failed. After getting a slap on the wrist from @Christopher for edit-warring over a collapse that had proven time and time again to be a lost cause, I was forced to watch helplessly as GC and @DuceMoosolini began exchanging insults and &amp;quot;*#@&amp;amp; you&amp;quot;s, while GC tried shifting the blame onto others many times.&amp;quot; - User:CircularReasoning, 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&amp;amp;diff=2303840&amp;amp;oldid=2303837 RationalWiki ChickenCoop]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is completely unacceptable to employ talk of self-harm and / or suicide as leverage in any interaction with anyone, ever. This is isn't remotely controversial: it's mental health adulting 101, and is specifically addressed in this site's Legal FAQs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RationalWiki takes all threats of harm to self or others very seriously. Such statements will be removed from the wiki and all relevant information about the editor (including IP address) will be forwarded to appropriate authorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a entire world of difference between &amp;quot;I feel bad and need help&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Look at what you've made me do!&amp;quot;. The former requires compassion and immediate referral to professionals better equipped to assist; the latter is textbook emotional abuse and manipulation, and should not be tolerated on these pages for a solitary *$#@%ing second.&amp;quot; - Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303466&amp;amp;oldid=2303420 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;OK, I agree with that. I have removed those two comments and made them invisible in edit history.&amp;quot; - Bongolian (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303485&amp;amp;oldid=2303466 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User: Conservative at Conservapedia and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rationalwikian says fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User Conservative at Conservapedia.JPG|thumbnail|center|1601px|As you can see above, a RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of [[User:Conservative]] at [[Conservapedia]] and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWikians on their wiki not being a place conduscive to mental health at the present time.PNG|thumbnail|2000px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Can't everyone just calm down. It's not like it's the end of the world... yet.&amp;quot; -  Unclescrooge (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303279&amp;amp;oldid=2303278 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2021/04/rationalwiki-website-editors-are-having.html Several RationalWiki website editors have experienced mental health issues amidst the public having a much lower interest their website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: RationalWiki]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Skelly&amp;diff=1848769</id>
		<title>User talk:Skelly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Skelly&amp;diff=1848769"/>
		<updated>2022-03-29T16:30:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Retired}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 8:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, s***, p***, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistaken block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mistaken block, I was busy dealing with the spam-created multiple Jimbo Wales vulgarity pages being made by that sock troll-creating punk kid with nothing better to do with his time outside of school and you got caught in the crossfire of edits by accident.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:13, November 5, 2021 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1848591</id>
		<title>Talk:GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1848591"/>
		<updated>2022-03-28T20:34:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Edit request==&lt;br /&gt;
Moved to [[Talk:LeftyGreenMario#Lol]]. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 14:06, January 8, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rationalwiki hit a new moral low==&lt;br /&gt;
Voting has started for a my blocking admin GrammarCommie for a vile suicide comment in the saloon bar. Despite retracting his apology, and calling LGM and Andrew5 “fucking swines”, people are excusing him because of his “anti-vandalism”. Wow. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 16:34, March 28, 2022 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Skelly&amp;diff=1833457</id>
		<title>User talk:Skelly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Skelly&amp;diff=1833457"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T14:46:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Retired}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--How in the hell could a man enjoy being awakened at 8:30 a.m. by an alarm clock, leap out of bed, dress, force-feed, shit, piss, brush teeth and hair, and fight traffic to get to a place where essentially you made lots of money for somebody else and were asked to be grateful for the opportunity to do so?--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mistaken block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about the mistaken block, I was busy dealing with the spam-created multiple Jimbo Wales vulgarity pages being made by that sock troll-creating punk kid with nothing better to do with his time outside of school and you got caught in the crossfire of edits by accident.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:13, November 5, 2021 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Yogurt&amp;diff=1833456</id>
		<title>Yogurt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Yogurt&amp;diff=1833456"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T14:41:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Yogurt''' (or '''yoghurt''') is a kind of fermented [[cow]]'s [[milk]]. It is created by the voluntary introduction of live [[culture]]s, such as L. acidophilus, into [[milk]] [[product]]s. The bacteria convert [[lactose]] and [[galactose]] into the distinctive yogurt product. America, Europe, and other countries differ in their regulations for what is a healthy amount of culture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yogurt is a key part of the [[diet]] in places such as [[Mongolia]] (where it is made from [[goat]] or [[yak]] milk).  It is important to many other cultures worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yogurt is sometimes sweetened with sugar, raisins, [[rose water]], or fruit. It is a refreshing snack that is naturally low in [[calorie]]s and [[trans fat]]. It can be used as a substitute for sour cream in many recipes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was developed by the [[Bulgarian]]s in the 11th century A.D., and brought to [[America]] by [[Hispanic]]s in the early 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dairy products]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mayonnaise&amp;diff=1833455</id>
		<title>Mayonnaise</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mayonnaise&amp;diff=1833455"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T14:38:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:mayo.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Not all mayonnaise is made with eggs.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mayonnaise''' (often referred to as mayo) is a [[condiment]] originating in [[France|French]] cuisine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/371054/mayonnaise&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It is made by emulsifying [[egg]]s, oil and an [[acid]]ic liquid such as [[vinegar]] or [[lemon]] juice, and may have herbs, garlic, or spices added for flavor. This is traditionally done by combining the egg and liquid and slowly whisking in the oil.  Blenders, mixers, and food processors allow modern cooks to incorporate the oil much more quickly.  Mayonnaise may separate and fail to emulsify if the oil is added too quickly or it isn't mixed thoroughly enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mayonnaise is a popular condiment for many foods, including [[chicken]], [[egg]], and [[potato]] salads; [[hamburger]]s; [[sandwich]]es; [[French fries]], and raw [[vegetable]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commercially prepared mayonnaise is widely available, and more popular than mayonnaise made from scratch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those following low-fat diets, lower fat and fat-free versions and substitutes are available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aioli is a [[garlic]]-flavored mayonnaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Condiments]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mayonnaise&amp;diff=1833454</id>
		<title>Mayonnaise</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mayonnaise&amp;diff=1833454"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T14:38:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:mayo.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Not all mayonnaise is made with eggs.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mayonnaise''' (often referred to as mayo) is a [[condiment]] originating in [[France|French]] cuisine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/371054/mayonnaise&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It is made by emulsifying [[egg]]s, oil and an [[acid]]ic liquid such as [[vinegar]] or [[lemon]] juice, and may have herbs, garlic, or spices added for flavor. This is traditionally done by combining the egg and liquid and slowly whisking in the oil.  Blenders, mixers, and food processors allow modern cooks to incorporate the oil much more quickly.  Mayonnaise may separate and fail to emulsify if the oil is added too quickly or it isn't mixed thoroughly enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mayonnaise is a popular condiment for many foods, including [[chicken]], [[egg]], and [[potato]] salads; [[hamburger]]s; [[sandwich]]es; [[French fries]], and raw [[vegetable]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commercially prepared mayonnaise is widely available, and more popular than mayonnaise made from scratch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those following low-fat diets, lower fat and fat-free versions and substitutes are available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aioli is a [[garlic]]-flavored [ayonnaise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Condiments]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mayonnaise&amp;diff=1833453</id>
		<title>Mayonnaise</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mayonnaise&amp;diff=1833453"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T14:38:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:mayo.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Not all mayonnaise is made with eggs.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mayonnaise''' (often referred to as mayo) is a [[condiment]] originating in [[France|French]] cuisine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/371054/mayonnaise&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It is made by emulsifying [[egg]]s, oil and an [[acid]]ic liquid such as [[vinegar]] or [[lemon]] juice, and may have herbs, garlic, or spices added for flavor. This is traditionally done by combining the egg and liquid and slowly whisking in the oil.  Blenders, mixers, and food processors allow modern cooks to incorporate the oil much more quickly.  Mayonnaise may separate and fail to emulsify if the oil is added too quickly or it isn't mixed thoroughly enough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mayonnaise is a popular condiment for many foods, including [[chicken]], [[egg]], and [[potato]] salads; [[hamburger]]s; [[sandwich]]es; [[French fries]], and raw [[vegetable]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commercially prepared mayonnaise is widely available, and more popular than mayonnaise made from scratch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those following low-fat diets, lower fat and fat-free versions and substitutes are available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Aioli''' is a [[garlic]]-flavored [[mayonnaise]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Condiments]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Aioli&amp;diff=1833452</id>
		<title>Aioli</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Aioli&amp;diff=1833452"/>
		<updated>2022-01-18T14:38:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: Redirected page to Mayonnaise&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Mayonnaise]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lesbianism_and_obesity&amp;diff=1830651</id>
		<title>Lesbianism and obesity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lesbianism_and_obesity&amp;diff=1830651"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:26:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: /* Lesbianism, obesity, coronavirus infections and medical complications */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:11834504 3cc3c49559.jpg|180px|right|thumbnail|In April 2007, the ''American Journal of Public Health'' analyzed data from 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the data suggested that [[United States|American]] [[lesbianism|lesbian]] women were 2.69 times more likely to be overweight and 2.47 times more likely to be obese than all other female sexual orientation groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ajph&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&amp;amp;Cmd=ShowDetailView&amp;amp;TermToSearch=17463369&amp;amp;ordinalpos=1&amp;amp;itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum Overweight and Obesity in Sexual-Minority Women: Evidence From Population-Based Data, Ulrike Boehmer, Deborah J. Bowen, Greta R. Bauer, American Journal of Public Health, 2007 Jun;97(6):1134-40. E pub 2007 Apr 26.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH) reported that 75% of American [[lesbianism|lesbians]] are [[obese]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cnsnews.com/news/article/feds-spend-15-million-study-why-lesbians-are-fat Feds Spend $1.5 Million to Study Why Lesbians Are Fat - CNS News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/feds-spend-1-5-million-to-study-obese-lesbians.html Feds Spend $1.5 million to Study Obese Lesbians]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In April 2007, the ''American Journal of Public Health''  analyzed data from 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the data suggested that [[United States|American]] [[lesbianism|lesbian]] women were 2.69 times more likely to be overweight and 2.47 times more likely to be obese than all other female sexual orientation groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ajph&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The abstract for this study indicated that &amp;quot;lesbians are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality linked to overweight and obesity.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ajph&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009, the ''PubMed'' article abstract for the Polish psychiatry journal ''Psychiatria Polska'' article ''Body Image in [[Homosexual]] Persons'' declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Homosexual women are less concentrated on physical appearance and more satisfied with their bodies while being more tolerant to obesity.... For lesbian women the ideal body image is more massive than for heterosexual women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19694404?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;amp;ordinalpos=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, a purported [[lesbian]] wrote to [[Andrew Sullivan]], the political commentator and administrator of ''The Daily Dish'' blog:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And - oh heck, I'll admit it - aesthetics have value, too! As a woman, I may not be as focused on looks as men are predisposed to be, but I sure am tired of seeing so many queer ladies out there who are way past 200 pounds. Way, way past. Sorry, but no amount of &amp;quot;fat acceptance&amp;quot; is going to make that a pleasant sight - gay, straight, butch, femme, male or female.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/05/obesity_and_les.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lesbianism, obesity, coronavirus infections and medical complications ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality, coronavirus infections and medical complications#Lesbianism, obesity, coronavirus infections and medical complications|Lesbianism, obesity, coronavirus infections and medical complications]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physical and mental health related problems associated with obesity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Health risks linked to obesity]] and [[Atheism and Mental and Physical Health]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the medical conditions associated with [[obesity]] include: type 2 [[diabetes]], [[high blood pressure]], high [[cholesterol]] and [[triglyceride]]s, coronary artery disease (CAD), [[stroke]], [[arthritis]], [[cancer]], sleep apnea, [[reproduction|reproductive problems]] in women and varicose veins.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.webmd.com/diet/tc/obesity-health-risks-of-obesity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/fact_consequences.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/obesity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://stanfordhospital.org/clinicsmedServices/COE/surgicalServices/vascularSurgery/patientEducation/varicose.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[medical science]] research indicates that excess weight impairs brain function.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pn.psychiatryonline.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://pn.psychiatryonline.org/content/41/18/25.1.full&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health.usnews.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/brain-and-behavior/articles/2009/08/25/as-waistlines-widen-brains-shrink.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21167850&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sciencedaily.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/07/100714112832.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ReferenceA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2568718/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cerebellum.png|right|thumb|240px|Medical research indicates that excess weight impairs brain function.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pn.psychiatryonline.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health.usnews.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sciencedaily.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ReferenceA&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;]] &lt;br /&gt;
According to the Mayo Clinic some of the symptoms associated with obesity can include:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
* Difficulty sleeping&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Snoring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sleep apnea&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Pain in your back or joints&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Excessive sweating&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Always feeling hot&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rashes or infection in folds of your skin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Feeling out of breath with minor exertion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Daytime sleepiness or fatigue&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Depression&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/obesity/DS00314/DSECTION=symptoms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obesity and the feet/ankles: According to Stuart D. Miller, M.D.: &amp;quot;It is important for the public to know that obesity isn't just an aesthetic issue, but a contributing cause of musculoskeletal health problems, specifically with the feet and ankles.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/27570.php Survey Suggests Obesity May Cause Foot Problems]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lower levels of balance recovery and increased risk of falls:  In her thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, entitled ''A modeling investigation of obesity and balance recovery'', Sara Louise Matrangola writes in the abstract: &amp;quot;Obesity is associated with an increased risk of falls and subsequent injury. Previous studies have shown weight loss and strength training to be beneficial to balance, but knowing which is more beneficial will allow researchers to design interventions to maximize the benefits in terms of balance and reducing risk of falls.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-07162008-101646/unrestricted/matrangola_thesis_etd.pdf Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, entitled ''A modeling investigation of obesity and balance recovery''by Sara Louise Matrangola]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and obesity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and obesity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lesbianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gluttony]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and health]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gay bowel syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obesity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Health]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=LGM&amp;diff=1830648</id>
		<title>LGM</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=LGM&amp;diff=1830648"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:20:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:LeftyGreenMario.JPG|thumbnail|right|500px|LeftyGreenMario (LGM) is a RationalWiki moderator.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
LeftyGreenMario is not sure if she has bad judgment. She feels as if she is a bad person due to her gossiping about other RationalWikians at the RationalWiki Discord server. See: [[Essay: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki|RationalWiki GossipGate scandal]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The above screenshot was taken from the RationalWiki Discord server.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''LeftyGreenMario''' (LGM) is a lady RationalWiki (RW) moderator and administrator.  She is also a RationalWiki Foundation trustee. [[RationalWiki and web traffic|RationalWiki.org]] is a politically [[leftism|left]] leaning [[wiki]] website that skews towards [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] in terms of its [[worldview]].  LeftyGreenMario became a RationalWiki moderator in January of 2018.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:LeftyGreenMario&amp;amp;diff=1917739&amp;amp;oldid=1908438 LeftyGreenMario's post on her user page that she became a RationalWiki Moderator]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Google has a number of quality indicators by which is rates a website. According to SEMRush, RationalWiki had 1.49 million monthly referral visits from Google in January of 2018 (which is when LeafyGreenMario became a RationalWiki moderator). According to SEMRush, RationalWiki's peak Google referral traffic was 3.5 million visits per month in August 2019. In June of 2020, according to SEMRush, RationalWiki had 464,000 monthly referrals from Google. In January of 2022, according to SEMRUsh, RationalWiki had 185,661 monthly referrals from Google. RationalWiki has lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in August of 2019 (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LeftyGreenMario is not sure if she has bad judgment (see screenshot graphic to the right). She feels as if she is a bad person due to her gossiping about other RationalWikians at the RationalWiki Discord server (see: [[Essay: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki|RationalWiki GossipGate scandal]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was threatened with impeachment by a former RationalWiki Moderator and current Administrator of RationalWiki, who goes by the username Ace McWicked, due to her involvement in the RationalWiki GossipGate scandal (She gossiped about Ace McWicked). She apologized to Ace McWicked to turn things around, to no effect (see screenshot graphic to the right).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LeftyGreenMario did apologize to user Andrew5 at RationalWiki for gossiping about him, but she relapsed and gossiped about him two days later. She has yet to apologize to Andrew5 for her gossiping relapse. For further details, please see: [[Essay: GossipGate scandal at RationalWiki|RationalWiki GossipGate scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January of 2022, LeftyGreenMario has removed sysop rights of a RationalWiki administrator known as [[GrammarCommie]].&lt;br /&gt;
LeftyGreenMario is a [[feminism|feminist]], self-described [[asexual]], [[atheism|atheist]], [[evolution]]ist, proponent of [[abortion]], [[environmentalism|environmentalist]] and a video game enthusiast.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:LeftyGreenMario LeftyGreenMario - RationalWiki]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  LeftyGreenMario is a student of [[Herbert Marcuse]]'s [[partisan tolerance]], and almost singlehandedly destroyed what little bit of balance and tolerance of diverse viewpoints existed in the Rationalwiki community since its founding in 2007.  Her asexual outlook on life has been transformed into feelings of hostility and meanspiritedness toward other human beings.  As a Trustee of the RationalMedia Foundation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_nm/4330247&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; LeftyGreenMario has led the project down the road of leftist intolerance.  Many longtime contributors have abandoned the project since her rise as a central figure.  See also: [[Essay: Morale is down at RationalWiki|Morale is down at RationalWiki]]&lt;br /&gt;
and  [[RationalWiki and web traffic#LeafyGreenMario and Google referral traffic|LeafyGreenMario and Google referral traffic]] &lt;br /&gt;
== RationalWikian Ace McWicked accuses LeftGreenMario of being a phony liar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former RationalWiki moderator and present RationalWiki admin Ace McWicked accuses LeftGreenMario of being a phony liar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 3, the former RationalWiki moderator Ace McWicked wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|LGM should immediately be removed as a mod. The shit she has been saying about me away from prying eyes completely disqualifies her as a mod on RW. She is not an honest broker in the slightest. I may be a lot of things but I am honest - LGM is a lying scumbag pretending to be an upfront negotiator. I have to find out second hand that she is accusing me of being a drug addict (of all criticism one could make of me 'drug addict' would be the last thing). Yah, I cause drama it seems but what you see is what you get. LGM is a dishonest prick. I have the screenshots if anyone is interested. Acei9 22:35, 3 January 2022 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation/Archive50 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation/Archive50]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 4, 2022, Ace McWicked wrote: &amp;quot;I might be abrasive and awful. But I am honest. Time for you to be honest........ can you? LGM. you lie more than I do. Acei9 00:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation/Archive50 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation/Archive50]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LeftyGreenMario RationalWiki moderator.JPG|thumbnail|center|1500px|RationalWiki administrator Hastur on LeftyGreenMario's temperament.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2399454&amp;amp;oldid=2399448 Latest revision as of 14:46, 5 January 2022 (view source) Hastur (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to RationalWiki policy, ill-behavior on the RationalWiki Discord Server is not a recallable offense. However, RationalWikians do ignore their policies and act arbitrarily. For example, a RationalWikian was permabanned from the RationalWiki website without a 2/3rds vote which by RationalWkiki's policies is required.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2296799 Revision as of 21:46, 11 March 2021 (view source) Christopher (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== LeftyGreenMario's influence on RationalWiki according to RationalWiki Admininstrator Ace McWicked ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LeftyGreenMario RationalWiki.png|thumbnail|600px|center|On May 23, 2020, a RationalWiki (RW) administrator who goes by the moniker Ace McWicked essentially admits that RationalWiki is becoming an echo chamber of its most prominent administrator. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the above quote, LGM is an acronym for the lady, RationalWiki administrator LeftyGreenMario. See: [[Atheism and groupthink]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles about other RationalWikians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Techpriest (RationalWiki)|Techpriest]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[GrammarCommie]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DuceMoosolini]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheist feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SJW atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Humor:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: LeafyGreenMario is not asexual. She is a gossipy, apologetic, girly girl who hugs her Mario brother stuffed toy|LeafyGreenMario is not asexual. She is a gossipy, apologetic, girly girl who hugs her Mario brother stuffed toy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: RationalWiki, militant secular leftism, LeftyGreenMario and gossipy, short woman's syndrome|RationalWiki, militant secular leftism, LeftyGreenMario and gossipy, short woman's syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The mean girls who rule over the male, weirdo, pansies at RationalWiki|The mean girls who rule over the male, weirdo, pansies at RationalWiki]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:LeftyGreenMario LeftyGreenMario userpage at RationalWiki]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.deviantart.com/leftygreenmario/gallery LeftyGreenMario - User profile - Deviant art website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://steamcommunity.com/id/professionalwariokiller LeftyGreennMario - Steam community]&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: RationalWiki]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830647</id>
		<title>GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830647"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:19:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''GrammarCommie''' (GC) is a former&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;18:46, 8 January 2022 LeftyGreenMario (talk | contribs) changed group membership for GrammarCommie from Autopatrolled, Ninja and Sysop to Autopatrolled and Ninja (Cool it)&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; RationalWiki administrator. [[RationalWiki and web traffic|RationalWiki.org]] is a politically [[leftism|left]] leaning [[wiki]] website that skews towards [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] in terms of its [[worldview]]. RationalWiki has a lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in 2019 (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He formerly served on the RationalWiki Foundation board of directors until he had a mental health crisis which consisted of him threatening to cut himself and commit suicide in order to get his way at RationalWiki (see screen captures below). He is an atheist and leftist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie has anger management issues which sometimes results in him angrily posting abusive posts in all caps laced with profanity (see also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and profanity]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399206&amp;amp;oldid=2399203 Revision as of 22:51, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399207&amp;amp;oldid=2399206 Revision as of 22:55, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure. During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie frequently bans people which contributes to RationalWiki being a wiki that has a low [[Essay: Edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki|edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki]]. He also frequently reverts other editors. A wiki with a low edit to block ratio tends to be a closed-minded wiki that is dogmatic and intolerant (see also: [[Atheism and dogmatism]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie often pontificates about politics and economics and sees himself as very knowledgeable about these areas despite describing himself as being lower middle class. On July 30, 2021, GrammarCommie wrote: &amp;quot;I asked for data, not random factoids. Just as we can't infer that every white person lives at the lower middle class level because I do...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2348120&amp;amp;oldid=2348116 RationalWiki Saloon Revision as of 04:33, 30 July 2021 (view source) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs) (→‎Critical Race Theory)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is also known for correcting people's grammar and being intolerant of people's grammatical errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Grammar%20Commie Grammar Commie - Urban dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie describes himself thusly, &amp;quot;Deeply [[cynicism|cynical]] and borderline [[misanthropy|misanthropic]]. Very much not [[Utopian]]. Unconventional left-winger. If you want more info engage me in a conversation. I'm an asshole, but I'm honest.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:GrammarCommie GrammarCommie user page at RationalWiki]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; GrammarCommmie is admin at RationalWiki, which is a wiki that intentionally lies about its web traffic statistics on its article about itself in that it greatly inflates its web traffic and global market share. &lt;br /&gt;
== Screenshot captures of RationalWiki posts related to GrammnarCommie ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie on cutting himself, feelings of wanting to die and his feelings of low self-worth ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie is a former board member of RationalWiki Foundation and admin of RationalWiki who very heavily censored and banned other RationalWiki editors - even by RationalWiki's heavy-handed, censorous standards. He is an intolerant atheist whose politics is left of center.  He still actively edits RationalWiki. See: [[Atheism and intolerance]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWiki Foundation member and Admin GrammarCommie having a mental breakdown at RationalWiki.PNG|thumbnail|1700px|center|The RationalWiki administrator who goes by the username CircularReasoning wrote the above about the matter of the Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie threatening to cut himself on several Rationalwiki user pages and cursing other fellow RationalWiki users. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure.  During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Angry atheist.jpg|thumbnail|center|250px|An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-philosopher-explores-causes-of-atheism-44353/ Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and love]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Anyway, the world is so just and peaceful and better and everyone is so happy and I used a nail file to cut myself in the arm again woop dee doo!!!&amp;quot; - GrammarCommie, former admin of RationalWiki, March 25, 2020&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Helena_Bonham_Carter&amp;amp;diff=2303227&amp;amp;oldid=2297847 GrammarCommie posting at RationalWiki that he cuts himself&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GrammarCommie screencap.PNG|thumbnail|center|2000px|Screen capture of GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;No. I'll wait to be laughed at. Like the loser and freak that I am. I don't which one you are on Discord. And I don't wantt to yell or talk, I want the stupidity to end. I want to die.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== RationalWiki admins and editors indicate GrammarCommies public statements on harming himself were inappropriate and were a form of manipulation/emotional blackmail ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As I trust you all know, @GrammarCommie, a once-effective RMF staff member, has recently fallen from grace, randomly cursing out people left, right and center and making threats of self-harm on multiple user talkpages (which have since been deleted), and has started a huge flame-war on his own talkpage as well, which has since rapidly devolved after numerous containment measures by moi failed. After getting a slap on the wrist from @Christopher for edit-warring over a collapse that had proven time and time again to be a lost cause, I was forced to watch helplessly as GC and @DuceMoosolini began exchanging insults and &amp;quot;*#@&amp;amp; you&amp;quot;s, while GC tried shifting the blame onto others many times.&amp;quot; - User:CircularReasoning, 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&amp;amp;diff=2303840&amp;amp;oldid=2303837 RationalWiki ChickenCoop]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is completely unacceptable to employ talk of self-harm and / or suicide as leverage in any interaction with anyone, ever. This is isn't remotely controversial: it's mental health adulting 101, and is specifically addressed in this site's Legal FAQs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RationalWiki takes all threats of harm to self or others very seriously. Such statements will be removed from the wiki and all relevant information about the editor (including IP address) will be forwarded to appropriate authorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a entire world of difference between &amp;quot;I feel bad and need help&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Look at what you've made me do!&amp;quot;. The former requires compassion and immediate referral to professionals better equipped to assist; the latter is textbook emotional abuse and manipulation, and should not be tolerated on these pages for a solitary *$#@%ing second.&amp;quot; - Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303466&amp;amp;oldid=2303420 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;OK, I agree with that. I have removed those two comments and made them invisible in edit history.&amp;quot; - Bongolian (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303485&amp;amp;oldid=2303466 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User: Conservative at Conservapedia and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rationalwikian says fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User Conservative at Conservapedia.JPG|thumbnail|center|1601px|As you can see above, a RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of [[User:Conservative]] at [[Conservapedia]] and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWikians on their wiki not being a place conduscive to mental health at the present time.PNG|thumbnail|2000px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Can't everyone just calm down. It's not like it's the end of the world... yet.&amp;quot; -  Unclescrooge (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303279&amp;amp;oldid=2303278 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles on other RationalWikians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[LeftyGreenMario]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Techpriest (RationalWiki)|Techpriest]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DuceMoosolini]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2021/04/rationalwiki-website-editors-are-having.html Several RationalWiki website editors have experienced mental health issues amidst the public having a much lower interest their website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: RationalWiki]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830645</id>
		<title>GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830645"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:18:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''GrammarCommie''' (GC) is a former&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;18:46, 8 January 2022 LeftyGreenMario (talk | contribs) changed group membership for GrammarCommie from Autopatrolled, Ninja and Sysop to Autopatrolled and Ninja (Cool it)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; RationalWiki administrator. [[RationalWiki and web traffic|RationalWiki.org]] is a politically [[leftism|left]] leaning [[wiki]] website that skews towards [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] in terms of its [[worldview]]. RationalWiki has a lost a massive amount of web traffic since its peak in 2019 (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He formerly served on the RationalWiki Foundation board of directors until he had a mental health crisis which consisted of him threatening to cut himself and commit suicide in order to get his way at RationalWiki (see screen captures below). He is an atheist and leftist. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie has anger management issues which sometimes results in him angrily posting abusive posts in all caps laced with profanity (see also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and profanity]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399206&amp;amp;oldid=2399203 Revision as of 22:51, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2399207&amp;amp;oldid=2399206 Revision as of 22:55, 4 January 2022 (edit) (undo) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure. During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie frequently bans people which contributes to RationalWiki being a wiki that has a low [[Essay: Edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki|edits to blocked editor accounts ratio at a wiki]]. He also frequently reverts other editors. A wiki with a low edit to block ratio tends to be a closed-minded wiki that is dogmatic and intolerant (see also: [[Atheism and dogmatism]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie often pontificates about politics and economics and sees himself as very knowledgeable about these areas despite describing himself as being lower middle class. On July 30, 2021, GrammarCommie wrote: &amp;quot;I asked for data, not random factoids. Just as we can't infer that every white person lives at the lower middle class level because I do...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&amp;amp;diff=2348120&amp;amp;oldid=2348116 RationalWiki Saloon Revision as of 04:33, 30 July 2021 (view source) GrammarCommie (talk | contribs) (→‎Critical Race Theory)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is also known for correcting people's grammar and being intolerant of people's grammatical errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Grammar%20Commie Grammar Commie - Urban dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie describes himself thusly, &amp;quot;Deeply [[cynicism|cynical]] and borderline [[misanthropy|misanthropic]]. Very much not [[Utopian]]. Unconventional left-winger. If you want more info engage me in a conversation. I'm an asshole, but I'm honest.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User:GrammarCommie GrammarCommie user page at RationalWiki]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; GrammarCommmie is admin at RationalWiki, which is a wiki that intentionally lies about its web traffic statistics on its article about itself in that it greatly inflates its web traffic and global market share. &lt;br /&gt;
== Screenshot captures of RationalWiki posts related to GrammnarCommie ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie on cutting himself, feelings of wanting to die and his feelings of low self-worth ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie is a former board member of RationalWiki Foundation and admin of RationalWiki who very heavily censored and banned other RationalWiki editors - even by RationalWiki's heavy-handed, censorous standards. He is an intolerant atheist whose politics is left of center.  He still actively edits RationalWiki. See: [[Atheism and intolerance]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWiki Foundation member and Admin GrammarCommie having a mental breakdown at RationalWiki.PNG|thumbnail|1700px|center|The RationalWiki administrator who goes by the username CircularReasoning wrote the above about the matter of the Former RationalWiki RationalWiki Foundation board member and Admin GrammarCommie threatening to cut himself on several Rationalwiki user pages and cursing other fellow RationalWiki users. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
The RationalWiki admin who goes by the moniker CorruptUser wrote about GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;GC has this belief that there's a Certain Way you have to make arguments, and seeing anyone deviating from that Certain Way results in him losing control, and he has little ability to regain his composure.  During this time he will write vicious screeds, make threats, or engage in blockwars including removal of rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303295&amp;amp;oldid=2303292 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation - March 25, 2021 post by Admin CorruptUser&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Angry atheist.jpg|thumbnail|center|250px|An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-philosopher-explores-causes-of-atheism-44353/ Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and love]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Anyway, the world is so just and peaceful and better and everyone is so happy and I used a nail file to cut myself in the arm again woop dee doo!!!&amp;quot; - GrammarCommie, former admin of RationalWiki, March 25, 2020&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Helena_Bonham_Carter&amp;amp;diff=2303227&amp;amp;oldid=2297847 GrammarCommie posting at RationalWiki that he cuts himself&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheism and mental illness]] and [[Atheism and human worth]] and [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GrammarCommie screencap.PNG|thumbnail|center|2000px|Screen capture of GrammarCommie on March 25, 2021: &amp;quot;No. I'll wait to be laughed at. Like the loser and freak that I am. I don't which one you are on Discord. And I don't wantt to yell or talk, I want the stupidity to end. I want to die.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== RationalWiki admins and editors indicate GrammarCommies public statements on harming himself were inappropriate and were a form of manipulation/emotional blackmail ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As I trust you all know, @GrammarCommie, a once-effective RMF staff member, has recently fallen from grace, randomly cursing out people left, right and center and making threats of self-harm on multiple user talkpages (which have since been deleted), and has started a huge flame-war on his own talkpage as well, which has since rapidly devolved after numerous containment measures by moi failed. After getting a slap on the wrist from @Christopher for edit-warring over a collapse that had proven time and time again to be a lost cause, I was forced to watch helplessly as GC and @DuceMoosolini began exchanging insults and &amp;quot;*#@&amp;amp; you&amp;quot;s, while GC tried shifting the blame onto others many times.&amp;quot; - User:CircularReasoning, 21:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&amp;amp;diff=2303840&amp;amp;oldid=2303837 RationalWiki ChickenCoop]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is completely unacceptable to employ talk of self-harm and / or suicide as leverage in any interaction with anyone, ever. This is isn't remotely controversial: it's mental health adulting 101, and is specifically addressed in this site's Legal FAQs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RationalWiki takes all threats of harm to self or others very seriously. Such statements will be removed from the wiki and all relevant information about the editor (including IP address) will be forwarded to appropriate authorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a entire world of difference between &amp;quot;I feel bad and need help&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Look at what you've made me do!&amp;quot;. The former requires compassion and immediate referral to professionals better equipped to assist; the latter is textbook emotional abuse and manipulation, and should not be tolerated on these pages for a solitary *$#@%ing second.&amp;quot; - Helena Bonham Carter (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303466&amp;amp;oldid=2303420 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;OK, I agree with that. I have removed those two comments and made them invisible in edit history.&amp;quot; - Bongolian (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303485&amp;amp;oldid=2303466 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User: Conservative at Conservapedia and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rationalwikian says fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of User Conservative at Conservapedia.JPG|thumbnail|center|1601px|As you can see above, a RationalWikian says that fellow RationalWikian GrammarCommie may be afraid of [[User:Conservative]] at [[Conservapedia]] and that he is acting like an irrational fanatic.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== RationalWiki admin LeftyGreenMario and another editor on the website not being a website conducive to mental health on the day of March 25, 2021 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RationalWikians on their wiki not being a place conduscive to mental health at the present time.PNG|thumbnail|2000px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Can't everyone just calm down. It's not like it's the end of the world... yet.&amp;quot; -  Unclescrooge (talk) 04:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki_talk:All_things_in_moderation&amp;amp;diff=2303279&amp;amp;oldid=2303278 RationalWiki talk:All things in moderation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles on other RationalWikians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[LeftyGreenMario]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Techpriest (RationalWiki)|Techpriest]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DuceMoosolini]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2021/04/rationalwiki-website-editors-are-having.html Several RationalWiki website editors have experienced mental health issues amidst the public having a much lower interest their website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: RationalWiki]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=PewDiePie&amp;diff=1830642</id>
		<title>PewDiePie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=PewDiePie&amp;diff=1830642"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:13:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;220&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: green no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Pewdiepie&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Subscribers&lt;br /&gt;
|111,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Views&lt;br /&gt;
|~28,093,591,999&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Creator&lt;br /&gt;
|Felix Kjellberg&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''PewDiePie''', real name Felix Kjellberg, is a popular YouTuber from Sweden who mainly creates videos focused on gaming and memes. He has over 100 million subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==About==&lt;br /&gt;
He has been slandered and censored by neocons and the left several times over the course of his career. For example, the neoconservative [[Wall Street Journal]] published a video calling him an anti-Semite.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFY7mGkmFxo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When he accidentally used the N-word during a livestream, a media firestorm ensued.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://variety.com/2017/digital/news/youtubes-pewdiepie-apologizes-for-using-the-n-word-im-just-an-idiot-1202555309/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/9/11/16288826/pewdiepie-n-word-playerunknown-battlegrounds&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2017/09/12/there-are-no-excuses-for-it-pewdiepie-apologizes-for-saying-the-n-word-in-a-youtube-livestream/?noredirect=on&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/why-pewdiepie-accidentally-using-n-word-matters-2017-9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/11/pewdiepie-youtube-racist-developer-campo-santo-backlash-felix-kjellberg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/sep/11/pewdiepie-racism-youtube-games-industry&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Wikipedia]] article regarding his feud with Indian music company T-Series implies that he is racist, bigoted, and xenophobic, or acted that way toward the corporation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PewDiePie_vs_T-Series&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was accused of being [[transphobia|transphobic]] for &amp;quot;misgendering&amp;quot; a [[Dr. Phil]] guest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icdDPuiNwGE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The libertarian animated series [[South Park]] included PewDiePie in a two-part episode,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XifO5eWIo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and he has created Let's Play series for each South Park video game.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yP35-V042c&amp;amp;list=PLYH8WvNV1YEmylTFsGz3CbQ0aSKYU0TEf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dU2Vi1rBDuQ&amp;amp;list=PLYH8WvNV1YElC-B0WN5R-EpN12dhWnFtQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under his video celebrating his acquirement of 100 million subscribers, commenters insisted that top comments were being deleted by the [[Anti-Defamation League]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYlesHOaPkY&amp;amp;lc=UgwK-oozrtI1EDIEPSV4AaABAg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In that video, he mentions the fact that he had planned to donate $50,000 to the ADL, an organization which had previously maligned him; however, he explained in a subsequent video that, due to major events occurring in his life, he did not have sufficient time to properly consider which charity he would like to donate to, and was advised to donate to the ADL, which he then decided against.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbfX3ZyHLJg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PewDiePie has criticized both [[YouTube]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9-4eMdBejk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Twitter]], deleting his Twitter account.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n_cPIhag28&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has promoted members of the [[Alternative Influence Network]] on numerous occasions. In November 2018, he hosted [[conservative]] editor-in-chief of [[The Daily Wire]] [[Ben Shapiro]] for a &amp;quot;Bonus Meme Review,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBDNbpWSUx8&amp;amp;t=492s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was patronizingly reprimanded by elitists in the media and on Twitter for doing so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ganker.com/pewdiepie-ben-shapiro-meme-review/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In December 2018, he praised severely politically incorrect YouTuber &amp;quot;E;R&amp;quot; for his video essays,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/EsemicolonR/status/1071860268412661760&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was attacked by a virtue-signalling leftist mob who alleged that the latter was an anti-Semite, among other things.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph8M_8sVOEA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In October 2019, he left multiple comments in the livestream of libertarian YouTuber &amp;quot;The Quartering,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1180681076500504576&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was subsequently smeared for doing so by the mainstream media and [[social justice warrior]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.deviantart.com/crescendodragon/journal/PewDiePie-Slandered-for-Watching-TheQuartering-816042025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has also defended comedian [[Steven Crowder]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is an [[atheist]], and once asserted that [[Jordan Peterson]] is too &amp;quot;religious.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ_qiYc133U&amp;amp;t=1080s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was banned in the [[People's Republic of China]] by their [[communist]] government in October 2019 for reviewing memes related to the situation in [[Hong Kong]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HehfOtRbUk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has been accused of insulting his fans in [[Malaysia]] and [[Singapore]] for expressing his discomfort regarding their excitability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gvxaYH6sO0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to popular demand, PewDiePie created substitute YouTube Rewinds for both 2018&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=By_Cn5ixYLg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 2019&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diT6jc9flkc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; due to the perceived inadequacy of the originals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of 2019, the mainstream media created and spread a false rumour that PewDiePie was &amp;quot;quitting YouTube&amp;quot; when he announced that he would be &amp;quot;taking a break&amp;quot; in early 2020.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoFSqtrivFs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After returning from his month-long break, the media immediately attacked him for reviewing memes about the Chinese [[coronavirus]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyNLo9gQEA0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within hours of PewDiePie self-censoring and re-publishing a video,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2ntCdMggj0&amp;amp;lc=UgxfJfyWXxugNKV-EtN4AaABAg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Looper published an article listing off every smear against the YouTuber since his career gained international publicity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.looper.com/191519/the-shady-side-of-pewdiepie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PewDiePie is vehemently pro-mask.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L55LjpWJuCA&amp;amp;t=427s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, he has also teased that COVID-19 may be a Chinese bioweapon created in a Wuhan laboratory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmXQcs-iScA&amp;amp;t=535s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2021, PewDiePie uploaded a satirical &amp;quot;disstrack&amp;quot; video against Cocomelon, an American company which posts musical nursery rhymes for children on YouTube, and which had been approaching PewDiePie in its number of subscribers for months prior. Although some have criticized the company for allowing parents to abdicate responsibility for their children by surrendering them to the &amp;quot;hypnotic effect&amp;quot; of Cocomelon's videos, which cause them to become docile,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.distractify.com/p/cocomelon-diss-track&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kjellberg had repeatedly and routinely clarified that his &amp;quot;feud&amp;quot; with Cocomelon was just &amp;quot;a joke.&amp;quot; The disstrack, titled &amp;quot;Coco,&amp;quot; garnered around 10 million views before the video was removed by YouTube a few days later for allegedly &amp;quot;violating YouTube's policy on harassment and bullying.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DHuHkwaWWs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; YouTube issued a statement on Twitter accusing Kjellberg of violating two of YouTube's policies: &amp;quot;1) Child safety: by looking like it was made for kids but containing inappropriate content (incl[uding] violence) 2) Harassment: we allow criticism &amp;amp; also diss tracks in some cases, but [with] both policies in mind, this video crossed the line.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1362572883793309698&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; YouTube also stated that any re-uploads of the video, or any videos themselves containing clips from the video (still images excluded), would be immediately removed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1362573082523619329&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; YouTube followed through on the latter announcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reddit.com/r/PewdiepieSubmissions/comments/lnyzmj/i_ended_up_liking_most_of_the_coco_reuploads_just/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/HeavenlysMommie/status/1362558330015678465&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1362602712672710656&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mainstream media coverage was skewed against PewDiePie,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/18/22290549/pewdiepie-cocomelon-youtube-video-removal-child-safety-cyberbullying-tseries-diss-track&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/youtube-yanks-pewdiepie-video-that-attacked-top-kids-channel/ar-BB1dOhAV&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/news/pewdiepies-lyrics-targeting-cocomelon-and-jk-rowling-that-may-have-gotten-youtube-angry-enough-to-pull-the-video-down/articleshow/81102941.cms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but others gave him fair treatment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sportskeeda.com/esports/youtube-fire-removing-pewdiepie-s-cocomelon-diss-track-violation-child-safety-cyberbullying-rules&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://reclaimthenet.org/youtube-deletes-pewdiepie-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XHGvGFU0CY&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The video is still available on [[BitChute]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bitchute.com/video/9DHuHkwaWWs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The song additionally criticizes rapper &amp;quot;Tekashi 6ix9ine&amp;quot; and ''[[Harry Potter]]'' author [[J.K. Rowling]]. 6ix9ine is an alleged pedophile,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://people.com/music/tekashi-6ix9ine-sentenced-to-4-years-probation-child-sex-case/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Rowling is a pro-homosexual social justice warrior who once accused PewDiePie of &amp;quot;fascism&amp;quot; on Twitter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/831514821174648833&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:If Representation Is So Important, Where's The Representation For PewDiePie Subscribers?]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cancel culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further viewing==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CsLB43xvQ8 Assumptions About Me...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
* https://www.youtube.com/user/PewDiePie --- YouTube channel. PewDiePie is the first individual YouTuber to gain over 100 million subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* https://pew.news --- Pew News. Launched in February 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:YouTube]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Media Personalities]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alternative Influence Network]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Banned in China]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Memes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Racialism&amp;diff=1830641</id>
		<title>Racialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Racialism&amp;diff=1830641"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:11:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: Redirected page to Scientific racism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Scientific racism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_justice_warrior&amp;diff=1830639</id>
		<title>Social justice warrior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_justice_warrior&amp;diff=1830639"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:09:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''social justice warrior''', often abbreviated as '''SJW''', is a type of [[leftism|leftist]] who acts like a small child and physically assaults people and breaks things. SJWs typically hold the [[racist]] view that [[white people]] are the source of all [[evil]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[https://www.carolinajournal.com/news-article/activist-exterminate-white-people/ Activist: exterminate white people],'' by Jon Sanders, Carolina Journal, Oct. 21, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term is a pejorative for those who engage in [[identity politics]] and [[political correctness]]. A large percentage of social justice warriors are [[secular left]]ists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to the explosion of the internet, only a small number of societal problems were brought forth at any given moment, racism perhaps being foremost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Greenfield wrote about the phenomenon at ''Frontpage Magazine'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|[[Social justice]] warriors use the language of [[Civil Rights Movement|civil rights]] to assert their private victimhood identity. This can range from the simple, race and gender, to a list of dozens of sexual identities, psychological disorders and survivor of assorted traumas. And let’s not forget disabilities (real or imagined) and morbid [[obesity]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/know-your-social-justice-warriors/ Know Your Social Justice Warriors] by Daniel Greenfield at'' Frontpage Magazine'', April 21, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Asia, South America, Central America and the Middle East, there are no social justice warriors decrying &amp;quot;white privilege&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Asian privilege&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Hispanic/Latino privilege&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Arab privilege&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In India, the Philippines, Korea, Japan, Nigeria, Pakistan and in South American countries a type of colourism exists preferring fair skin due to the effects of mass media and in some cases due to past colonialism (in the colonial period manual laborers would work long hours in the sun and their skin would darken while the wealthy lived a life of leisure indoors).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://japansociology.com/2013/10/25/colourism-in-the-philippines-behind-the-veil-of-whiteness/ Colourism in the Philippines: Behind the Veil of Whiteness], JapanSociology by Adelle Tamblyn, Japansociology, Posted on October 25, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SJW atheists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[SJW atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gramsci.png|thumb|200px|[[Antonio Gramsci]] was a [[Cultural Marxism|cultural Marxist]]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Postmodernism]] and [[Marxism]] are both [[atheism|atheistic]] ideologies (see also: [[Atheism and postmodernism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keri Smith wrote at the news website Medium:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I don’t yet know what to call this part of the [[Leftism|left]]. Maajid Nawaz calls them the “Regressive Left.” Others call them [[SJW]]s (Social Justice Warriors) or the Alt-Left. The ideology is post-modernist [[Cultural Marxism|cultural marxism]], and it operates as a [[Atheism is a religion|secular religion]]. Most are indoctrinated in liberal elite colleges, though many are being indoctrinated online these days. It has its own dogma and jargon, meant to make you feel like a good person, and used to lecture others on their ‘sin.’ “Check your privilege”- much like “mansplaining” and “gaslighting”- all at one time useful terms- have over time lost a lot of their meaning. These days I see them most frequently being abused as weaponized ad hominem attacks on a person’s immutable identity markers….a way to avoid making an argument, while simultaneously claiming an unearned moral highground in a discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been wondering why more people on the left are not speaking up against violence, in favor of free exchange of ideas and dialogue, in favor of compassion. But I know why. I was in the cult. Part of it is that you are a true believer, and part of it is that you are fearful of being called an apostate — in being trashed as a [[sexism|sexist]], [[racism|racist]], [[Homophobia|homophobic]], [[Transphobia|transphobic]], [[Islamophobia|Islamophobic]], [[Xenophobia|xenophobic]], [[facism|fascist]], [[White supremacy|white supremacist]] [[Nazism|nazi]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://medium.com/indian-thoughts/on-leaving-the-sjw-cult-and-finding-myself-1a6769b2f1ff On Leaving the SJW Cult and Finding Myself]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Growth of global desecularization#American secular leftism and Christian backlash|American secular leftism and Christian backlash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Justice Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Social justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[GamerGate]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism and the fat acceptance movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism and envy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism and social justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheist whining]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meT-8a83Pfw Microaggression: A Beginner's #SJW Guide!]  on Louder With Crowder&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee_ESpTudus #SJW Feminist Myths Destroyed by Karen Straughan] on Louder With Crowder&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/07/did-i-miss-anything.html 8 steps of a SJW attack]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://shadowtolight.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/the-social-justice-movement-and-christians-a-comparison/ The Social Justice Movement and Christians: A Comparison]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
List of social justice warriors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sjwlist.com/Main_Page The complete list of social justice warriors]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_justice_warrior&amp;diff=1830637</id>
		<title>Social justice warrior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_justice_warrior&amp;diff=1830637"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:08:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''social justice warrior''', often abbreviated SJW, is a type of [[leftism|leftist]] who acts like a small child and physically assaults people and breaks things. SJWs typically hold the [[racist]] view that [[white people]] are the source of all [[evil]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[https://www.carolinajournal.com/news-article/activist-exterminate-white-people/ Activist: exterminate white people],'' by Jon Sanders, Carolina Journal, Oct. 21, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term is a pejorative for those who engage in [[identity politics]] and [[political correctness]]. A large percentage of social justice warriors are [[secular left]]ists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to the explosion of the internet, only a small number of societal problems were brought forth at any given moment, racism perhaps being foremost. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Greenfield wrote about the phenomenon at ''Frontpage Magazine'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|[[Social justice]] warriors use the language of [[Civil Rights Movement|civil rights]] to assert their private victimhood identity. This can range from the simple, race and gender, to a list of dozens of sexual identities, psychological disorders and survivor of assorted traumas. And let’s not forget disabilities (real or imagined) and morbid [[obesity]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dgreenfield/know-your-social-justice-warriors/ Know Your Social Justice Warriors] by Daniel Greenfield at'' Frontpage Magazine'', April 21, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Asia, South America, Central America and the Middle East, there are no social justice warriors decrying &amp;quot;white privilege&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Asian privilege&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Hispanic/Latino privilege&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Arab privilege&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In India, the Philippines, Korea, Japan, Nigeria, Pakistan and in South American countries a type of colourism exists preferring fair skin due to the effects of mass media and in some cases due to past colonialism (in the colonial period manual laborers would work long hours in the sun and their skin would darken while the wealthy lived a life of leisure indoors).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://japansociology.com/2013/10/25/colourism-in-the-philippines-behind-the-veil-of-whiteness/ Colourism in the Philippines: Behind the Veil of Whiteness], JapanSociology by Adelle Tamblyn, Japansociology, Posted on October 25, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== SJW atheists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[SJW atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gramsci.png|thumb|200px|[[Antonio Gramsci]] was a [[Cultural Marxism|cultural Marxist]]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Postmodernism]] and [[Marxism]] are both [[atheism|atheistic]] ideologies (see also: [[Atheism and postmodernism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keri Smith wrote at the news website Medium:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I don’t yet know what to call this part of the [[Leftism|left]]. Maajid Nawaz calls them the “Regressive Left.” Others call them [[SJW]]s (Social Justice Warriors) or the Alt-Left. The ideology is post-modernist [[Cultural Marxism|cultural marxism]], and it operates as a [[Atheism is a religion|secular religion]]. Most are indoctrinated in liberal elite colleges, though many are being indoctrinated online these days. It has its own dogma and jargon, meant to make you feel like a good person, and used to lecture others on their ‘sin.’ “Check your privilege”- much like “mansplaining” and “gaslighting”- all at one time useful terms- have over time lost a lot of their meaning. These days I see them most frequently being abused as weaponized ad hominem attacks on a person’s immutable identity markers….a way to avoid making an argument, while simultaneously claiming an unearned moral highground in a discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been wondering why more people on the left are not speaking up against violence, in favor of free exchange of ideas and dialogue, in favor of compassion. But I know why. I was in the cult. Part of it is that you are a true believer, and part of it is that you are fearful of being called an apostate — in being trashed as a [[sexism|sexist]], [[racism|racist]], [[Homophobia|homophobic]], [[Transphobia|transphobic]], [[Islamophobia|Islamophobic]], [[Xenophobia|xenophobic]], [[facism|fascist]], [[White supremacy|white supremacist]] [[Nazism|nazi]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://medium.com/indian-thoughts/on-leaving-the-sjw-cult-and-finding-myself-1a6769b2f1ff On Leaving the SJW Cult and Finding Myself]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Growth of global desecularization#American secular leftism and Christian backlash|American secular leftism and Christian backlash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Justice Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Social justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[GamerGate]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism and the fat acceptance movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism and envy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism and social justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheist whining]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meT-8a83Pfw Microaggression: A Beginner's #SJW Guide!]  on Louder With Crowder&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ee_ESpTudus #SJW Feminist Myths Destroyed by Karen Straughan] on Louder With Crowder&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/07/did-i-miss-anything.html 8 steps of a SJW attack]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://shadowtolight.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/the-social-justice-movement-and-christians-a-comparison/ The Social Justice Movement and Christians: A Comparison]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
List of social justice warriors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sjwlist.com/Main_Page The complete list of social justice warriors]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830635</id>
		<title>Talk:GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830635"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:06:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Edit request==&lt;br /&gt;
Moved to [[Talk:LeftyGreenMario#Lol]]. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 14:06, January 8, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830634</id>
		<title>Talk:GrammarCommie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:GrammarCommie&amp;diff=1830634"/>
		<updated>2022-01-08T19:05:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: Created page with &amp;quot;==Edit request== GrammarCommie had been desysoped (temporarily). https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Log/rights ~~~~&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Edit request==&lt;br /&gt;
GrammarCommie had been desysoped (temporarily). https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Log/rights [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 14:05, January 8, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ketogenic_diet&amp;diff=1829030</id>
		<title>Ketogenic diet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ketogenic_diet&amp;diff=1829030"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:50:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: Redirected page to Carbohydrate-insulin model&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Carbohydrate-insulin model]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829027</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829027"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:46:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People commonly criticize this diet for being rich in (red) meat&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/07/28/stone-soup&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; even though low meat and vegetarian forms exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Staples===&lt;br /&gt;
*Nuts&lt;br /&gt;
*Above ground vegetables&lt;br /&gt;
*Berries, avocado, and olives (only fruits allowed)&lt;br /&gt;
*Meat&lt;br /&gt;
*Dairy&lt;br /&gt;
*High fiber seeds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health in the long term.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829024</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829024"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:42:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People commonly criticize this diet for being rich in (red) meat&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/07/28/stone-soup&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; even though low meat and vegetarian forms exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health in the long term.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829019</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829019"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:40:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health in the long term.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829018</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829018"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:39:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health in the long term.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“ harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829017</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829017"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:38:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health in the long term.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829016</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829016"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:38:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829015</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829015"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:37:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829013</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829013"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:37:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829012</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829012"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:37:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no evidence suggests that reducing carbohydrates alone can help improve health.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”&amp;gt; https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829011</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829011"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:36:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
In the mid 2010s, it took over another diet known as paleo. However, it is not as well known as veganism or vegetarianism.&amp;lt;ref name=“harvardReview”&amp;gt; https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-weight/diet-reviews/ketogenic-diet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829006</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829006"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:34:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829005</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1829005"/>
		<updated>2022-01-05T01:33:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
People who believe in this hypothesis also believe something called “cholesterol denialism” where they deny that LDL and total cholesterol directly causes heart disease because they think that the high markers might be a result of chronic inflammation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/05/statin-denialism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&amp;diff=1828387</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Community Portal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&amp;diff=1828387"/>
		<updated>2022-01-04T00:07:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;''(this page redirects from [[CP:COMPORT]])''&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This is the place to discuss issues of interest to the Conservapedia community.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Community Portal/Archives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''This page contains some material that has been moved from [[Talk:Main_Page]].  We are attempting to get general discussion of issues relating to Conservapedia's content and policies on this page, leaving the main talk page for its original purpose of discussing the content of the Main Page.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NEWSECTIONLINK__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Eulogy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many eulogies are for people who are still alive.  Aristotle called this speaking epideicticly.  I don't know what I'm talking about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All who know me know what a positive person I am, having admired Trump, but I am still learning.  In that spirit, allow me to eulogize my favorite same-sex-loving person, Christopher Ciccone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was just looking at my 1985 high school yearbook.  The four years of classes voted Madonna (Ciccone) &amp;quot;Best female vocalist&amp;quot;.  Most every girl in those classes was out of my league at the time, so I guess I have to admit they knew more than me about some things.  Anyway, it turns out Christopher claimed he designed Madonna's looks.  People say her singing wasn't that great despite being the vocalist on a number of good songs, so her looks probably were a significant part of her appeal, and Christopher would deserve a lot of credit for her success.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher became a well-respected interior designer and designed Madonna's beautiful and exquisitely tasteful mansion when she was rich and famous.  And when she turned on him, he wrote a book about her that was fair about her trying to improve her sympathy towards her male companions, but still proved she was disloyal to people, said he nearly threw a punch at her pretty-boy newlywed husband for patronizing him and walked out of her life when she wouldn't stop doing to him all the things caused by what people have come to dislike about her.  What's not to love about Christopher Ciccone?  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 07:16, 7 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Commentary on the foregoing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You'll notice I used the word &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; in what could be taken in two different senses.  This is a portal for communication among encyclopedia writers, so I think the writers who profess such ability should be able to handle this much ambiguity.  If they think otherwise, I might mention it would be just as much their fault as mine for not seeing that as something upon which to be remarked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People can use the word &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; in numerous ways and end in ambiguity and indeed contradiction.  If you pay attention, you'll realize in one sense &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; can be Divine, in another ungodly.  In one sense: fruits of the spirit (Isaiah 11)!; in another: sterility. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 06:18, 12 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main page news ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everybody there are important news I want share on main page. how can I introduce news? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:15, 16 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put it on [[User_talk:Aschlafly]] or [[User_talk:TerryH]]. At least in theory, [[Talk:Main_Page]] is the page for this purpose. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 12:29, 17 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Photo upload ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I want to know how I can upload photo file here? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:11, 10 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, you can post specific requests here: [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] ([[CP:IUR]]).&lt;br /&gt;
:Ideally, please find images which are either in the [[public domain]], or under [[Creative Commons]] licenses. If you need any assistance, have questions, or need ideas on where to look, let me know. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:51, 10 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Project Started ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Conservapedia editors!  Yesterday I started [[Conservapedia:Project Current Events]] and I just wanted to invite anyone that wants to help out on the Project.  The idea is similar to Wikipedia’s “Current Event WikiProject”, which I am the lead coordinator of, so hopefully Conservapedia can stay up to date on major current events.  One such event that Wikipedia is barely talking about is [[45 Office]], which Donald Trump created yesterday.  Because of my status on Wikipedia, I know a lot of the behind the scenes things, so hopefully I can grow Conservapedia just as much as I did Wikipedia.  Feel free to join the Project.  --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 12:17, 30 March 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Discussion for a possible new Wikipedia Article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should a new article be started for discussions on Wikipedia that have major effects?  (An example of one is [[Elijahandskip#Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory article]]).  Or, should the discussion details be added to [[Wikipedia]] or [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]].  I don't really know if they should go in the examples of bias article, because some aren't really a &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot; per say, but have extreme lasting effects on Wikipedia.  Also, if you think a new article, what would the articles title be?  --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 18:07, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:My recommendation would be to create the page on WP's Ukraine conspiracy theory article if you have enough to make it not a just stub, and put a link to it from the Bias in WP portal to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:13, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I wasn't just thinking about that discussion in general.  I have been a part of tons of 'major' discussion on Wikipedia.  One also involved Wikipedia removing information about US Governor Impeachment efforts (Both Republican and Democratic governor impeachment efforts).  I also participated and know the history of a discussion where Wikipedia was about to say the assassination of an Italian Diplomat was no notable for Wikipedia.  I would be perfectly fine creating an article just for that discussion, but what about the other discussions that had controversy on Wikipedia? --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 18:17, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Me personally, I'm all for bringing controversial questions that are squashed in Wikipedia here, and even making full-blown mainspace articles of them (see for example [[Murder of Seth Rich]], [[Clinton donors in the Panama Papers]] and [[Naked short selling]], for example. These are all full-blown articles that were censored in WP).  The problem is not making just stub articles out of them. If there is only stub material, then it can go into the Biases in WP article with a link back to WP referencing the controversy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:28, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The difference between a full-blown mainspace article and stubs usually will be the links to external sources, and not just links to WP talk pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:36, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If Wikipedia is suppressing well-researched work by an editor, properly sourced with external links, we want that work (generally in most cases). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:38, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah.  That is good advice.  I will wait for a day or so to let a few other people drop their opinions.  But that is a really good idea. --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 19:30, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It sounds good in theory, at least. I don't want us to just become &amp;quot;anti-Wikipedia&amp;quot; though, but rather a place where discussion like that isn't stifled. Rob is right to point out those examples...the Seth Rich article in particular stands out to me, because that information was heavily suppressed on numerous platforms. When our page went up, there seemed to be a lot of interest. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:50, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::We definitely should make articles for the Seth Rich article. Anything Wikipedia rejects is good for this site. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:04, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::i would say that we should also be lobbying search engines to teplace Wikipedia with this site as its more reliable. Or maybe with a more neutral version of this site&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia Scope ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just thought I'd ask the community here, but does anyone like the idea of Conservapedia allowing for a scope about as large as Wikipedia, but with obvious exceptions (e.g. no media that glorifies sin or is beyond vile). Perhaps allowing for some subjects that Wikipedia would not allow under their general notability guideline. Example: I made a [[Bulbasaur]] article &amp;amp; might make more [[Pokemon]] articles to accommodate the growing base of conservative gamers -- Wikipedia won't allow for articles on &amp;quot;non-notable&amp;quot; subjects and tend to take it too far, and perhaps this is an issue that Conservapedia can address. Although Wikipedia has an article on Bulbasaur, there are several other Pokemon that they simply merge in a list &amp;amp; so I wondered if a way to differentiate is have a subject on all Pokemon. There's probably a lot of students who would be eager to write essays on Pokemon if it were, let's say, a homework subject. At same time, having a guide for parents about Pokemon and the series because some conservative parents might feel uncomfortable about the series. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 12:59, May 28, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I really like this idea. What we don't make for in community size we could make up in quantity of articles. If the articles are well written and focus on the aspects of it not generally defined by Wikipedia, then I think it helps (P.S I am a new member, it would be better to ask one of the big dogs).  --[[User:Man O Wisdom|Man O Wisdom]] ([[User talk:Man O Wisdom|talk]]) 03:10, January 3, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Template:Infobox Film ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed in the [[Template:Infobox Film|Infobox Film template]] that there is no space included for production companies.  Could the article be temporarily unlocked so I can add a production company space to that infobox?  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:59, August 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for that, now [[Template:Infobox Film/doc|its related article]] will need editing as well to bring it in line.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:39, August 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added introduction to myself on forum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey everyone, i just found this site and am so excited to learn together. already edited a few pages. I added a song to the Greatest Conservative Songs page and corrected the Hebrew on the Tower of Babel page. Looking forward to meeting you all online.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome to our site and thanks for the contributions you've made so far.  Just be sure to sign your posts when you post here and on talk pages.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:03, September 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Orphan pages==&lt;br /&gt;
Orphan pages, particularly orphan stubs, have become a real problem at Conservapedia. [https://conservapedia.com/Special:LonelyPages]  When creating new content, please follow these Guidelines: [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Article_length]].  Stub pages (pages with less than 300 words), and particularly uncategorized stubs, orphaned stubs, stubs with few or no outgoing links have the detrimental effect of lowering our Google rankings. To avoid an accidental deletion during a routine cleanup of the server, when creating a stub, please integrate your new article into the whole wiki by de-orphaning it, adding a Category, and have a few good quality external links. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:04, September 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we (as a wiki collective), adopt these pages? Or should they just be swept under the rug until deletion? I need something to do, I have some time to donate. --[[User:Man O Wisdom|Man O Wisdom]] ([[User talk:Man O Wisdom|talk]]) 03:13, January 3, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Offline Conservapedia archive ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've undertaken an effort to create an offline archive of Conservapedia in OpenZim format that can be used for any of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* Homeschool parents who want to give their kids access without opening them up to the rest of the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
* People in rural (homesteaders) or remote areas (missionaries) with little or no internet access.&lt;br /&gt;
* Preppers who are trying to keep archives of important data in case the access to the internet is lost or severely censored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm using the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;mwoffliner&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tool but I discovered that the version of Mediawiki running on the site needs to be updated for compatibility with that tool. I went ahead and created a clone of Conservapedia on my home computer using the latest version on Docker. As I started to archive the site with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;mwoffliner&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; there are a few pages that I stumbled upon that had issues causing errors with the archival. I would like to offer my help to the community at large with contributing back these corrections and to share the finished ZIM file when it is ready. Is there anyone who would like to join me in this effort? It would be especially helpful if someone could help by upgrading the site from the current version of 1.24.2 to 1.36.1 or later. I'm willing to pitch in if needed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks! -- [[User:John6|John6]] ([[User talk:John6|talk]]) 22:26, September 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know the current version level of the site is incompatible with some modern tools, and that is unfortunate. While I have no say in the upgrade decision, my understanding is that it probably won't be happening for some time. 1.24 offers features and options with were removed or changed in later versions.&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the issues you noted, you might want to check logs, and see if any pages in particular are giving you issues. There are a few pages with weird (typically ASCII) symbol codes, or NBS characters, which can mess with API calls. You might want to see if you can identify specific problematic pages, and exclude them, so you can archive the rest (if you are able to do so at all, with this wiki version). --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:16, September 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is hard for me to tell how many of the issues were a result of the export and rebuild process on the newer version of Mediawiki. The best way to know is to perform the export from the live site. Is there anything I can contribute to help get us ready to upgrade to a newer version? What features were removed and can I help to migrate to something new?  [[User:John6|John6]] ([[User talk:John6|talk]]) 18:26, September 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing my username ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, is there a way for me to usurp another person's username? [[User:Cicero|Cicero]] was permanently blocked in 2007, having made no non-deleted contributions. [[User:Cicero1|Cicero1]] ([[User talk:Cicero1|talk]]) 18:06, October 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:41, October 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I recall that the MediaWiki software allows users to be renamed. First move the usurpee to a different name like &amp;quot;User (old)&amp;quot;, and then move the usurper to the requested username. I am not sure if this works on all wikis. [[User:Cicero1|Cicero1]] ([[User talk:Cicero1|talk]]) 20:17, October 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You sure? Look at these requests [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Username_changes#Requests_involving_merges,_usurps_or_other_complications here]. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 09:26, November 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I am not sure. I asked the owner of the website about this issue many years ago and he said he could not help the person. And unfortunately, at the present time, I don't have the time to try to assist User: Cicero1 further. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:59, November 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes Cicero1, you are correct. Perhaps you can ask Andy [[User talk:Aschlafly|here]] about potentially renaming the current User:Cicero to clear the way for you to be renamed with that specific username. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 19:27, November 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Is someone going to delete the Jimbo Wales is peеd on pages? ==&lt;br /&gt;
As the title says. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 19:07, January 3, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&amp;diff=1828386</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Community Portal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&amp;diff=1828386"/>
		<updated>2022-01-04T00:07:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;''(this page redirects from [[CP:COMPORT]])''&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This is the place to discuss issues of interest to the Conservapedia community.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Community Portal/Archives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''This page contains some material that has been moved from [[Talk:Main_Page]].  We are attempting to get general discussion of issues relating to Conservapedia's content and policies on this page, leaving the main talk page for its original purpose of discussing the content of the Main Page.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__NEWSECTIONLINK__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Eulogy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many eulogies are for people who are still alive.  Aristotle called this speaking epideicticly.  I don't know what I'm talking about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All who know me know what a positive person I am, having admired Trump, but I am still learning.  In that spirit, allow me to eulogize my favorite same-sex-loving person, Christopher Ciccone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was just looking at my 1985 high school yearbook.  The four years of classes voted Madonna (Ciccone) &amp;quot;Best female vocalist&amp;quot;.  Most every girl in those classes was out of my league at the time, so I guess I have to admit they knew more than me about some things.  Anyway, it turns out Christopher claimed he designed Madonna's looks.  People say her singing wasn't that great despite being the vocalist on a number of good songs, so her looks probably were a significant part of her appeal, and Christopher would deserve a lot of credit for her success.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher became a well-respected interior designer and designed Madonna's beautiful and exquisitely tasteful mansion when she was rich and famous.  And when she turned on him, he wrote a book about her that was fair about her trying to improve her sympathy towards her male companions, but still proved she was disloyal to people, said he nearly threw a punch at her pretty-boy newlywed husband for patronizing him and walked out of her life when she wouldn't stop doing to him all the things caused by what people have come to dislike about her.  What's not to love about Christopher Ciccone?  [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 07:16, 7 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Commentary on the foregoing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You'll notice I used the word &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; in what could be taken in two different senses.  This is a portal for communication among encyclopedia writers, so I think the writers who profess such ability should be able to handle this much ambiguity.  If they think otherwise, I might mention it would be just as much their fault as mine for not seeing that as something upon which to be remarked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People can use the word &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; in numerous ways and end in ambiguity and indeed contradiction.  If you pay attention, you'll realize in one sense &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; can be Divine, in another ungodly.  In one sense: fruits of the spirit (Isaiah 11)!; in another: sterility. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 06:18, 12 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main page news ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everybody there are important news I want share on main page. how can I introduce news? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:15, 16 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put it on [[User_talk:Aschlafly]] or [[User_talk:TerryH]]. At least in theory, [[Talk:Main_Page]] is the page for this purpose. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 12:29, 17 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Photo upload ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I want to know how I can upload photo file here? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:11, 10 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, you can post specific requests here: [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] ([[CP:IUR]]).&lt;br /&gt;
:Ideally, please find images which are either in the [[public domain]], or under [[Creative Commons]] licenses. If you need any assistance, have questions, or need ideas on where to look, let me know. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:51, 10 March 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Project Started ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Conservapedia editors!  Yesterday I started [[Conservapedia:Project Current Events]] and I just wanted to invite anyone that wants to help out on the Project.  The idea is similar to Wikipedia’s “Current Event WikiProject”, which I am the lead coordinator of, so hopefully Conservapedia can stay up to date on major current events.  One such event that Wikipedia is barely talking about is [[45 Office]], which Donald Trump created yesterday.  Because of my status on Wikipedia, I know a lot of the behind the scenes things, so hopefully I can grow Conservapedia just as much as I did Wikipedia.  Feel free to join the Project.  --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 12:17, 30 March 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Discussion for a possible new Wikipedia Article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should a new article be started for discussions on Wikipedia that have major effects?  (An example of one is [[Elijahandskip#Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory article]]).  Or, should the discussion details be added to [[Wikipedia]] or [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]].  I don't really know if they should go in the examples of bias article, because some aren't really a &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot; per say, but have extreme lasting effects on Wikipedia.  Also, if you think a new article, what would the articles title be?  --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 18:07, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:My recommendation would be to create the page on WP's Ukraine conspiracy theory article if you have enough to make it not a just stub, and put a link to it from the Bias in WP portal to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:13, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I wasn't just thinking about that discussion in general.  I have been a part of tons of 'major' discussion on Wikipedia.  One also involved Wikipedia removing information about US Governor Impeachment efforts (Both Republican and Democratic governor impeachment efforts).  I also participated and know the history of a discussion where Wikipedia was about to say the assassination of an Italian Diplomat was no notable for Wikipedia.  I would be perfectly fine creating an article just for that discussion, but what about the other discussions that had controversy on Wikipedia? --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 18:17, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Me personally, I'm all for bringing controversial questions that are squashed in Wikipedia here, and even making full-blown mainspace articles of them (see for example [[Murder of Seth Rich]], [[Clinton donors in the Panama Papers]] and [[Naked short selling]], for example. These are all full-blown articles that were censored in WP).  The problem is not making just stub articles out of them. If there is only stub material, then it can go into the Biases in WP article with a link back to WP referencing the controversy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:28, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The difference between a full-blown mainspace article and stubs usually will be the links to external sources, and not just links to WP talk pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:36, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If Wikipedia is suppressing well-researched work by an editor, properly sourced with external links, we want that work (generally in most cases). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:38, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yeah.  That is good advice.  I will wait for a day or so to let a few other people drop their opinions.  But that is a really good idea. --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 19:30, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It sounds good in theory, at least. I don't want us to just become &amp;quot;anti-Wikipedia&amp;quot; though, but rather a place where discussion like that isn't stifled. Rob is right to point out those examples...the Seth Rich article in particular stands out to me, because that information was heavily suppressed on numerous platforms. When our page went up, there seemed to be a lot of interest. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:50, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::We definitely should make articles for the Seth Rich article. Anything Wikipedia rejects is good for this site. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:04, 14 May 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::i would say that we should also be lobbying search engines to teplace Wikipedia with this site as its more reliable. Or maybe with a more neutral version of this site&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia Scope ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just thought I'd ask the community here, but does anyone like the idea of Conservapedia allowing for a scope about as large as Wikipedia, but with obvious exceptions (e.g. no media that glorifies sin or is beyond vile). Perhaps allowing for some subjects that Wikipedia would not allow under their general notability guideline. Example: I made a [[Bulbasaur]] article &amp;amp; might make more [[Pokemon]] articles to accommodate the growing base of conservative gamers -- Wikipedia won't allow for articles on &amp;quot;non-notable&amp;quot; subjects and tend to take it too far, and perhaps this is an issue that Conservapedia can address. Although Wikipedia has an article on Bulbasaur, there are several other Pokemon that they simply merge in a list &amp;amp; so I wondered if a way to differentiate is have a subject on all Pokemon. There's probably a lot of students who would be eager to write essays on Pokemon if it were, let's say, a homework subject. At same time, having a guide for parents about Pokemon and the series because some conservative parents might feel uncomfortable about the series. [[User:Patriotic Gamer|Patriotic Gamer]] ([[User talk:Patriotic Gamer|talk]]) 12:59, May 28, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I really like this idea. What we don't make for in community size we could make up in quantity of articles. If the articles are well written and focus on the aspects of it not generally defined by Wikipedia, then I think it helps (P.S I am a new member, it would be better to ask one of the big dogs).  --[[User:Man O Wisdom|Man O Wisdom]] ([[User talk:Man O Wisdom|talk]]) 03:10, January 3, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Template:Infobox Film ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed in the [[Template:Infobox Film|Infobox Film template]] that there is no space included for production companies.  Could the article be temporarily unlocked so I can add a production company space to that infobox?  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:59, August 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for that, now [[Template:Infobox Film/doc|its related article]] will need editing as well to bring it in line.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:39, August 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added introduction to myself on forum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hey everyone, i just found this site and am so excited to learn together. already edited a few pages. I added a song to the Greatest Conservative Songs page and corrected the Hebrew on the Tower of Babel page. Looking forward to meeting you all online.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome to our site and thanks for the contributions you've made so far.  Just be sure to sign your posts when you post here and on talk pages.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:03, September 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Orphan pages==&lt;br /&gt;
Orphan pages, particularly orphan stubs, have become a real problem at Conservapedia. [https://conservapedia.com/Special:LonelyPages]  When creating new content, please follow these Guidelines: [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Article_length]].  Stub pages (pages with less than 300 words), and particularly uncategorized stubs, orphaned stubs, stubs with few or no outgoing links have the detrimental effect of lowering our Google rankings. To avoid an accidental deletion during a routine cleanup of the server, when creating a stub, please integrate your new article into the whole wiki by de-orphaning it, adding a Category, and have a few good quality external links. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:04, September 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we (as a wiki collective), adopt these pages? Or should they just be swept under the rug until deletion? I need something to do, I have some time to donate. --[[User:Man O Wisdom|Man O Wisdom]] ([[User talk:Man O Wisdom|talk]]) 03:13, January 3, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Offline Conservapedia archive ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've undertaken an effort to create an offline archive of Conservapedia in OpenZim format that can be used for any of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
* Homeschool parents who want to give their kids access without opening them up to the rest of the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
* People in rural (homesteaders) or remote areas (missionaries) with little or no internet access.&lt;br /&gt;
* Preppers who are trying to keep archives of important data in case the access to the internet is lost or severely censored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm using the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;mwoffliner&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; tool but I discovered that the version of Mediawiki running on the site needs to be updated for compatibility with that tool. I went ahead and created a clone of Conservapedia on my home computer using the latest version on Docker. As I started to archive the site with &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;mwoffliner&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; there are a few pages that I stumbled upon that had issues causing errors with the archival. I would like to offer my help to the community at large with contributing back these corrections and to share the finished ZIM file when it is ready. Is there anyone who would like to join me in this effort? It would be especially helpful if someone could help by upgrading the site from the current version of 1.24.2 to 1.36.1 or later. I'm willing to pitch in if needed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks! -- [[User:John6|John6]] ([[User talk:John6|talk]]) 22:26, September 15, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know the current version level of the site is incompatible with some modern tools, and that is unfortunate. While I have no say in the upgrade decision, my understanding is that it probably won't be happening for some time. 1.24 offers features and options with were removed or changed in later versions.&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the issues you noted, you might want to check logs, and see if any pages in particular are giving you issues. There are a few pages with weird (typically ASCII) symbol codes, or NBS characters, which can mess with API calls. You might want to see if you can identify specific problematic pages, and exclude them, so you can archive the rest (if you are able to do so at all, with this wiki version). --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:16, September 16, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It is hard for me to tell how many of the issues were a result of the export and rebuild process on the newer version of Mediawiki. The best way to know is to perform the export from the live site. Is there anything I can contribute to help get us ready to upgrade to a newer version? What features were removed and can I help to migrate to something new?  [[User:John6|John6]] ([[User talk:John6|talk]]) 18:26, September 17, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing my username ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, is there a way for me to usurp another person's username? [[User:Cicero|Cicero]] was permanently blocked in 2007, having made no non-deleted contributions. [[User:Cicero1|Cicero1]] ([[User talk:Cicero1|talk]]) 18:06, October 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:41, October 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I recall that the MediaWiki software allows users to be renamed. First move the usurpee to a different name like &amp;quot;User (old)&amp;quot;, and then move the usurper to the requested username. I am not sure if this works on all wikis. [[User:Cicero1|Cicero1]] ([[User talk:Cicero1|talk]]) 20:17, October 31, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You sure? Look at these requests [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Username_changes#Requests_involving_merges,_usurps_or_other_complications here]. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 09:26, November 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I am not sure. I asked the owner of the website about this issue many years ago and he said he could not help the person. And unfortunately, at the present time, I don't have the time to try to assist User: Cicero1 further. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:59, November 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes Cicero1, you are correct. Perhaps you can ask Andy [[User talk:Aschlafly|here]] about potentially renaming the current User:Cicero to clear the way for you to be renamed with that specific username. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 19:27, November 1, 2021 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the title says. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 19:07, January 3, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828385</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828385"/>
		<updated>2022-01-04T00:05:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms. The most common form is a ketogenic protocol, a diet originally formed in the 1920s for treating children with epilepsy where 5% of the energy intake is carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828378</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828378"/>
		<updated>2022-01-03T23:54:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Health effects===&lt;br /&gt;
Its effects remain either unclear or exaggerated. Some sources would like to claim that it can have dangerous effects like ketoacidosis even though this almost only happens in type 1 diabetics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324237&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828376</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828376"/>
		<updated>2022-01-03T23:51:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that hormonal imbalances like high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828375</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828375"/>
		<updated>2022-01-03T23:50:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reception==&lt;br /&gt;
This hypothesis remains controversial. With people claiming that the hypothesis is not supported as well as the calorie hypothesis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5546881&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while others claim that researching their aspects helped made better health decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828373</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828373"/>
		<updated>2022-01-03T23:47:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Diet==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Avocado.jpg|thumb|Fats such as avocado and coconut oil are common staples in these forms of diet.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Their proposed solution is reducing carbohydrate which can take in many forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Low-carbohydrate_diet&amp;diff=1828372</id>
		<title>Low-carbohydrate diet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Low-carbohydrate_diet&amp;diff=1828372"/>
		<updated>2022-01-03T23:45:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: Redirected page to Carbohydrate-insulin model&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Carbohydrate-insulin model]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828371</id>
		<title>Carbohydrate-insulin model</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carbohydrate-insulin_model&amp;diff=1828371"/>
		<updated>2022-01-03T23:41:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''carbohydrate-insulin model''' is a controversial hypothesis claiming that high levels of insulin leads to weight gain and that simple carbohydrates (non-resistant starch and sugar) raises the most insulin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/obesity-framework-carbohydrates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The hypothesis developed from figures like Gary Taubes in the mid 2000s throughout multiple publications such as “Good calories, bad calories”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/2007/oct/22/health/he-fat22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atkins diet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_RationalWiki_user_Andrew5,_who_leans_somewhat_politically_to_the_right,_is_an_irritating_thorn_in_the_side_of_politically_left-leaning_RationalWikians_and_he_is_an_obsessive,_officious,_serial_liar_with_bad_judgment_(who_is_also_a_wikiholic)&amp;diff=1826326</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay: RationalWiki user Andrew5, who leans somewhat politically to the right, is an irritating thorn in the side of politically left-leaning RationalWikians and he is an obsessive, officious, serial liar with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_RationalWiki_user_Andrew5,_who_leans_somewhat_politically_to_the_right,_is_an_irritating_thorn_in_the_side_of_politically_left-leaning_RationalWikians_and_he_is_an_obsessive,_officious,_serial_liar_with_bad_judgment_(who_is_also_a_wikiholic)&amp;diff=1826326"/>
		<updated>2021-12-27T18:10:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Given his 3+ month tenure at RationalWiki and his many edits, it appears as if he fits in well at RationalWiki!&amp;quot;.  I don't read that in the clips presented at all. I read a Discord discussion about a problem user (whom evidently some know from WP) among RW admin, and what to do about him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok. We will agree to disagree then. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But I believe there are plenty of workplaces/clubs where an obsessive, creepy, serial lying weirdo with bad judgment would not last 3+ months if he showed up very regularly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Furthermore, according to RationalWiki admin Moosolino RationalWiki &amp;quot;attracts all sorts of weird people&amp;quot;.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:18, November 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My local 7-11 attracts all sorts of weird people, too. RW has processes to deal with unwanted or abusive editors, not just arbitrary blocking by anyone with blocking powers.  I'm not sure what we disagree about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Bottomline: Their own words cited in this Essay differ from your conclusion that he &amp;quot;fits right in&amp;quot;. Anyone can see that, except possibly you because of your bias and prejudice against RW editors. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:12, November 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS response ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You expect me or anybody to read all this junk? You are not being cooperative.  You're just vomiting all over the discussion page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:33, December 1, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have you ever heard about Conservapedia obsessive-compulsive disorder? RationalWiki is one of the top referring websites to Conservapedia according to Alexa. There most certainly will be people who read the material!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Second dog with a bone.jpg|center|thumbnail|320px|[[Liberal]]s/[[left]]ists  obsessed with [[Conservapedia]] are like a [[dog]] with a bone. Their dogged persistence in thinking about Conservapedia, discussing Conservapedia and making forecasts about Conservapedia is quite prodigious and intense. ]] &lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Not really. All I see is you spamming the talk page with junk to avoid addressing the issue I raise. You remind me of [[User:Dataclarifier]] who was in the habit of responding the same way. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:34, December 1, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I provided evidence that RW does arbitrary/capriciously blocking and they are not consistent in their rules/processes. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:56, December 1, 2021 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
::::If a tree falls in the forest, does anybody hear it? Now how about addressing the point I activated this page for. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:23, December 1, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Note ==&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking as Andrew5 himself, I would like to point out I was on RW for now nearly 9 months [https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJPMaster&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2305179]. Other then that... --[[User:Andrew5|Andrew5]] ([[User talk:Andrew5|talk]]) 17:18, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I fixed it Andrew. I suggest making friends in your own community if you have not done so already. And possibly blogging if you still want to write online. If you continue your efforts at RationalWiki, you will become more and more like them.  The wiki has a history of malevolent people. And there have been some notable instances of people there who are mentally unstable at that wiki. I found the following article enlightening you might want to read it also: [https://medium.com/the-mission/youre-not-the-average-of-the-five-people-you-surround-yourself-with-f21b817f6e69 You’re NOT The Average Of The Five People You Surround Yourself With]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:35, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the interesting read. I actually have made friends in my community; I am trying to curb RW usage. Oh also, not entirely sure how much RW appreciates you stalking their discord. --[[User:Andrew5|Andrew5]] ([[User talk:Andrew5|talk]]) 20:36, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you want to curb your RW usage and realize it is a hindrance in your life, then switch to Wikipedia for a while. Then taper down your Wikipedia usage where you do less and less Wikipedia editing each day. Like set a limit on how much Wikipedia editing you do each day and make it less and less each day until it's gone. Another alternative is to go &amp;quot;cold turkey&amp;quot; and abruptly end your RationalWiki and other wiki editing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, speaking as a person who knows something about web marketing, RationalWiki is currently bleeding inbound links at a fast clip and it also lost some search engine traffic in December (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]). Both of these developments may be a sign of future web traffic loss. RationalWiki has 7,000+ pages of web content, but not enough editors to keep the content updated. RationalWiki is in a downward spiral that is more concerned with the ideological purity of its editors rather than the quality of its editors. So the future of that wiki is grim. On top of this, the politically left-of-center faction of USA politics in the USA is probably going to suffer some bruising defeats in 2022 so that might be a demotivator in terms of volunteers. So if you are looking for people to actually read your content in the future, RationalWiki is not a good place to post content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As far as RW's online forum (The Saloon bar), according to the book ''Click On Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action'', &amp;quot;Peter Kollock and Marc Smith, editors of ''Communities in Cyberspace'',  online chat groups tend to be anarchistic or a dictatorship, depending on how well moderated they are.&amp;quot;(''Click On Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action'', page 5, by Steve Davis, Larry Elin and Grant Reheer, Westview Press, 2002). The talk pages and &amp;quot;Saloon Bar&amp;quot; discussion areas of RationalWiki fall on the dictatorship part of the moderation spectrum. The problem with this approach is that it is not a viable way to bring in new editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also have another suggestion that I am doing myself. It involves replacing less profitable activities for more profitable ones. For example, in 2022 I am expanding my work hours and upgrading some skill sets I have. Since you have an interest in writing, perhaps you might want to peruse this list of classic books on how to write better that is located [[User:Conservative/Excellent books on basic skills|HERE]]. I plan on reading some of those books in the next 3-5 years. And now that the pandemic is becoming less lethal [https://www.statnews.com/2021/12/22/omicron-oddity-case-numbers-dont-predict-deaths/ via a less deadly variant], I would like to resume my gym membership in either 2022/2023. In the meantime, it is unfortunately going to be aerobic routines and calisthenics. Plus, I have a book on karate so perhaps that will be more fun (In the past, I was a member of a martial art school. It is a great way to get in shape.). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:16, December 27, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::One additional matter.  LeafyGreenMariao wrote: &amp;quot;That's probably just the nature of the Discord. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄(Mod) 20:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Andrew5, that is a lame excuse. The Discord gives people an outlet to bring out their true selves. Jesus said, &amp;quot;The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.&amp;quot; (Luke 6:45 ESV).  After all is said and done, either what they wrote about you is true or it is not. If it is true, then they should have confronted you at their wiki rather than engage in gossip. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:08, December 27, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
=== Attention Andrew and other RationalWiki editors. I would abandon that sinking ship you call RationalWiki. See the disheartening data below. Abandon all hope RationalWikians! The end is near! ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEMRush Google referal traffic to RationalWiki 12-27-2021.JPG|20000px|center|thumbnail|Accordimg to SEMRush.com, RationalWiki received about 185,000 monthly referral visits from Google desktop computer users in December as of December 27, 2021 and the monthly web visitors saw about a 5.8% loss. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Key point:'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; If you click on the graphic below, you will see that RationalWiki was receiving 300,000+ monthly referral visits from Google desktop computer users in April 2021.  So RationalWiki lost a large amount of its Google referral traffic in 2021. Specifically, RationalWiki lost 115,000 Google monthly referral visits from Google desktop computer users from April 2021 to December 2021. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Google referral traffic to RationalWiki.org.PNG|thumbnail|20,000px|center|RationalWiki lost a massive amount of Google referral traffic in 2019/2020 (Please click graphic above to enlarge it). ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
“switch to Wikipedia for a while” He’s blocked there [https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:Andrew5]. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 13:09, December 27, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_RationalWiki_user_Andrew5,_who_leans_somewhat_politically_to_the_right,_is_an_irritating_thorn_in_the_side_of_politically_left-leaning_RationalWikians_and_he_is_an_obsessive,_officious,_serial_liar_with_bad_judgment_(who_is_also_a_wikiholic)&amp;diff=1826325</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay: RationalWiki user Andrew5, who leans somewhat politically to the right, is an irritating thorn in the side of politically left-leaning RationalWikians and he is an obsessive, officious, serial liar with bad judgment (who is also a wikiholic)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_RationalWiki_user_Andrew5,_who_leans_somewhat_politically_to_the_right,_is_an_irritating_thorn_in_the_side_of_politically_left-leaning_RationalWikians_and_he_is_an_obsessive,_officious,_serial_liar_with_bad_judgment_(who_is_also_a_wikiholic)&amp;diff=1826325"/>
		<updated>2021-12-27T18:09:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: /* Note */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Given his 3+ month tenure at RationalWiki and his many edits, it appears as if he fits in well at RationalWiki!&amp;quot;.  I don't read that in the clips presented at all. I read a Discord discussion about a problem user (whom evidently some know from WP) among RW admin, and what to do about him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok. We will agree to disagree then. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But I believe there are plenty of workplaces/clubs where an obsessive, creepy, serial lying weirdo with bad judgment would not last 3+ months if he showed up very regularly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Furthermore, according to RationalWiki admin Moosolino RationalWiki &amp;quot;attracts all sorts of weird people&amp;quot;.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:18, November 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My local 7-11 attracts all sorts of weird people, too. RW has processes to deal with unwanted or abusive editors, not just arbitrary blocking by anyone with blocking powers.  I'm not sure what we disagree about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Bottomline: Their own words cited in this Essay differ from your conclusion that he &amp;quot;fits right in&amp;quot;. Anyone can see that, except possibly you because of your bias and prejudice against RW editors. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:12, November 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS response ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You expect me or anybody to read all this junk? You are not being cooperative.  You're just vomiting all over the discussion page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:33, December 1, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have you ever heard about Conservapedia obsessive-compulsive disorder? RationalWiki is one of the top referring websites to Conservapedia according to Alexa. There most certainly will be people who read the material!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Second dog with a bone.jpg|center|thumbnail|320px|[[Liberal]]s/[[left]]ists  obsessed with [[Conservapedia]] are like a [[dog]] with a bone. Their dogged persistence in thinking about Conservapedia, discussing Conservapedia and making forecasts about Conservapedia is quite prodigious and intense. ]] &lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Not really. All I see is you spamming the talk page with junk to avoid addressing the issue I raise. You remind me of [[User:Dataclarifier]] who was in the habit of responding the same way. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:34, December 1, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I provided evidence that RW does arbitrary/capriciously blocking and they are not consistent in their rules/processes. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:56, December 1, 2021 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
::::If a tree falls in the forest, does anybody hear it? Now how about addressing the point I activated this page for. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:23, December 1, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Note ==&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking as Andrew5 himself, I would like to point out I was on RW for now nearly 9 months [https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJPMaster&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2305179]. Other then that... --[[User:Andrew5|Andrew5]] ([[User talk:Andrew5|talk]]) 17:18, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I fixed it Andrew. I suggest making friends in your own community if you have not done so already. And possibly blogging if you still want to write online. If you continue your efforts at RationalWiki, you will become more and more like them.  The wiki has a history of malevolent people. And there have been some notable instances of people there who are mentally unstable at that wiki. I found the following article enlightening you might want to read it also: [https://medium.com/the-mission/youre-not-the-average-of-the-five-people-you-surround-yourself-with-f21b817f6e69 You’re NOT The Average Of The Five People You Surround Yourself With]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:35, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for the interesting read. I actually have made friends in my community; I am trying to curb RW usage. Oh also, not entirely sure how much RW appreciates you stalking their discord. --[[User:Andrew5|Andrew5]] ([[User talk:Andrew5|talk]]) 20:36, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you want to curb your RW usage and realize it is a hindrance in your life, then switch to Wikipedia for a while. Then taper down your Wikipedia usage where you do less and less Wikipedia editing each day. Like set a limit on how much Wikipedia editing you do each day and make it less and less each day until it's gone. Another alternative is to go &amp;quot;cold turkey&amp;quot; and abruptly end your RationalWiki and other wiki editing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, speaking as a person who knows something about web marketing, RationalWiki is currently bleeding inbound links at a fast clip and it also lost some search engine traffic in December (see: [[RationalWiki and web traffic]]). Both of these developments may be a sign of future web traffic loss. RationalWiki has 7,000+ pages of web content, but not enough editors to keep the content updated. RationalWiki is in a downward spiral that is more concerned with the ideological purity of its editors rather than the quality of its editors. So the future of that wiki is grim. On top of this, the politically left-of-center faction of USA politics in the USA is probably going to suffer some bruising defeats in 2022 so that might be a demotivator in terms of volunteers. So if you are looking for people to actually read your content in the future, RationalWiki is not a good place to post content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As far as RW's online forum (The Saloon bar), according to the book ''Click On Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action'', &amp;quot;Peter Kollock and Marc Smith, editors of ''Communities in Cyberspace'',  online chat groups tend to be anarchistic or a dictatorship, depending on how well moderated they are.&amp;quot;(''Click On Democracy: The Internet's Power to Change Political Apathy into Civic Action'', page 5, by Steve Davis, Larry Elin and Grant Reheer, Westview Press, 2002). The talk pages and &amp;quot;Saloon Bar&amp;quot; discussion areas of RationalWiki fall on the dictatorship part of the moderation spectrum. The problem with this approach is that it is not a viable way to bring in new editors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also have another suggestion that I am doing myself. It involves replacing less profitable activities for more profitable ones. For example, in 2022 I am expanding my work hours and upgrading some skill sets I have. Since you have an interest in writing, perhaps you might want to peruse this list of classic books on how to write better that is located [[User:Conservative/Excellent books on basic skills|HERE]]. I plan on reading some of those books in the next 3-5 years. And now that the pandemic is becoming less lethal [https://www.statnews.com/2021/12/22/omicron-oddity-case-numbers-dont-predict-deaths/ via a less deadly variant], I would like to resume my gym membership in either 2022/2023. In the meantime, it is unfortunately going to be aerobic routines and calisthenics. Plus, I have a book on karate so perhaps that will be more fun (In the past, I was a member of a martial art school. It is a great way to get in shape.). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:16, December 27, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::One additional matter.  LeafyGreenMariao wrote: &amp;quot;That's probably just the nature of the Discord. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄(Mod) 20:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Andrew5, that is a lame excuse. The Discord gives people an outlet to bring out their true selves. Jesus said, &amp;quot;The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.&amp;quot; (Luke 6:45 ESV).  After all is said and done, either what they wrote about you is true or it is not. If it is true, then they should have confronted you at their wiki rather than engage in gossip. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:08, December 27, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
=== Attention Andrew and other RationalWiki editors. I would abandon that sinking ship you call RationalWiki. See the disheartening data below. Abandon all hope RationalWikians! The end is near! ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEMRush Google referal traffic to RationalWiki 12-27-2021.JPG|20000px|center|thumbnail|Accordimg to SEMRush.com, RationalWiki received about 185,000 monthly referral visits from Google desktop computer users in December as of December 27, 2021 and the monthly web visitors saw about a 5.8% loss. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Key point:'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; If you click on the graphic below, you will see that RationalWiki was receiving 300,000+ monthly referral visits from Google desktop computer users in April 2021.  So RationalWiki lost a large amount of its Google referral traffic in 2021. Specifically, RationalWiki lost 115,000 Google monthly referral visits from Google desktop computer users from April 2021 to December 2021. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Google referral traffic to RationalWiki.org.PNG|thumbnail|20,000px|center|RationalWiki lost a massive amount of Google referral traffic in 2019/2020 (Please click graphic above to enlarge it). ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
“ switch to Wikipedia for a while” He’s blocked there [wikipedia.org/wiki/user:Andrew5]. [[User:Skelly|Skelly]] ([[User talk:Skelly|talk]]) 13:09, December 27, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=European_Union&amp;diff=1819167</id>
		<title>European Union</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=European_Union&amp;diff=1819167"/>
		<updated>2021-12-04T20:56:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:''For the results of EU policies, see [[European migrant crisis]]''&lt;br /&gt;
{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =EU member states.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =European Union flag.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	= &lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	= [[Brussels]], [[Luxembourg]], [[Strasbourg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|government	= &lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	= Sui generis [[supranationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|language	= 24 official languages&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	= [[Charles Michel]] (Council)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Ursula von der Leyen]] (Commission)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[David Sassoli]] (Parliament)&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =4,475,757 km² (1,728,099 sq mi)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =511,805,088 (2017)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$17.1 trillion (2017 IMF)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$33,551 (2017 IMF)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=euro&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =.eu&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''European Union (EU)''' is an [[anti-democratic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/brexits-in-trouble-the-us-can-help&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; experiment in [[globalism]], combining very different cultures and nations into one legal, political and economic union of 27 [[European]] countries after the [[United Kingdom]] exited it in [[Brexit]] effective Jan. 31, 2020. The EU was formed in 1993 with the ratification of the [[Maastricht Treaty]], though its predecessor, the [[European Economic Community]], was founded in 1957. It is not the same as &amp;quot;[[Europe]]&amp;quot;, though most nations from the continent have joined the EU but [[Britain]] has left it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a set of institutions, the EU has more powers over its member states and their citizens than other international bodies; many of its competencies are supranational (above the member states) rather than intergovernmental (between them).  Despite having a legal personality and sovereignty in agreed areas, it is not regarded as a federation or state in its own right: rather, it stands somewhere between these two points. Fifteen member states use a common currency, the '''[[euro]]'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Five other states formally agree to use it, and four others use it without formal agreement.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The EU is moving in the direction of eventually becoming a politically unified federation, something which many of its leaders consciously support.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Newman, Alex (August 20, 2013). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/16343-the-eu-regionalization-trumps-sovereignty The EU: Regionalization Trumps Sovereignty]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no EU military.  Each nation has its own forces, but nearly all are members of [[NATO]], in which the U.S. has a preponderant voice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is a driving force of global economic and political integration, but Hix (2008) sees three problems with the EU: policy gridlock, lack of popular legitimacy and the democratic deficit. He notes, &amp;quot;In substantive terms ... the EU is closer to a form of enlightened despotism than a genuine democracy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hix (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, on February 5, 2000, John Laughland indicated in ''The Spectator'' that the European Union's entire purpose was to subject Western Europe to Marxist–Leninist/Marxist-Trotskyist thought.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;THE [European ]UNION CAN MAKE A VITAL CONTRIBUTION to the reform of the international economic architecture and to the establishment of a mechanism for collective governance.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*From: Commission of the European Communities&lt;br /&gt;
*Brussels 9.2.2000 [COM (2000) 154 final]&lt;br /&gt;
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 2000-2005&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;SHAPING THE NEW EUROPE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing in The Spectator (London) of 5th February 2000 John Laughland stated that &amp;quot;The West is now on the verge of achieving that of which Lenin and Trotsky dreamed in 1917. For the point is not to replace nation states with a European or world superstate. It is instead to achieve the old Marxist dream of abolishing statehood altogether&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the EU's facilitation of the [[European migrant crisis]], [[Euroskeptic]]s and native [[populist]] movements regard the EU as a [[totalitarian]] [[bureaucracy]]. In 2016, the UK voted to leave the EU; a process termed [[Brexit]], making them the first country to leave the European Union. This decision was finalized on January 1, 2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |url=https://www.euronews.com/2020/12/31/brexit-begins-for-real-on-friday-but-what-are-the-key-changes |title= Brexit has happened. UK and EU finally split as a New Year dawns. But what are the key changes? |publisher=Euronews |date=1 January 2021|access-date=19 June 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
Each nation elects members to the Parliament in proportion to population.  The June 2009 elections saw sweeping gains by conservative and anti-immigration parties, as labor and socialist parties lost heavily.  Since the 2004 elections the largest grouping has for the last five years been the centre-right European People's Party '''EPP''' (288 seats out of a current 785), followed by the centre-left '''PES''' (216) and the liberal '''ALDE''' (100). With the 2009 election EPP made gains and retains power in the parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Jose Manuel Barroso, who will have a second term as European Commission president, thanked voters and assured them their voices would be heard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009 The British [[Labour Party]], Germany's [[SPD]] (Social Democrats) and France's Socialist Party suffered historic defeats—the worst defeat for Labour in Britain in a century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turnout was at an all-time low in some countries, including France (41%) and Germany (42%).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The European Commission===&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009 Jose Manuel Barroso, was re-elected as president of the [[European Commission]] after the European Parliament voted to give him a second term. This ended weeks of uncertainty during which Socialist, Green and Liberal critics tried to block Mr Barroso's candidacy on the grounds that he had yielded too much power to national governments and promoted the kind of free-market liberalism that led to the financial crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The role and responsibilities of the European Commission place it at the centre of the EU's decision-making process. Acting as the EU's policy and executive engine, the Commission is composed of 28 Commissioners, one from each state, and is supported by a substantial staff located primarily in [[Brussels]], [[Belgium]]. In matters relating to economic integration (&amp;quot;First or 'Community' Pillar&amp;quot;), only the Commission has the right to propose legislation for approval by the EU Council and European Parliament. As &amp;quot;guardian of the Treaties,&amp;quot; the Commission ensures that EU laws are applied and upheld throughout the EU, prosecuting member states and other institutions for failing to follow treaty precepts or otherwise apply Community law. The Commission has full authority to enforce Community competition policy, and its policing of implementation of Community legislation preserves the integrity of the EU single market. The Commission likewise manages and develops the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), implements the budget, and represents the European Community in its areas of competence, notably including international trade negotiations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commission President is appointed by agreement of the EU heads of government and is subject to approval by the European Parliament. Commissioners serve for a renewable five-year term. New Commissioners are identified by member state governments in consultation with the President-designate of the Commission and are normally put in place at the beginning of the term of the Commission President. The entire Commission must be confirmed as a collective whole by the European Parliament before its formal appointment by common accord of EU governments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The European Council===&lt;br /&gt;
The European Council brings together EU heads of government and the President of the European Commission; foreign ministers of member states also participate. Finance ministers are normally included when the leaders discuss questions related to the euro and the economy. The European Council meets at least twice a year, usually quarterly, at the end of each Presidency, to review major EU projects, set guidelines for policies and provide necessary guidance. The Presidency of the Council rotates every six months among EU member states (January&amp;amp;ndash;June; July&amp;amp;ndash;December). Its role has become increasingly important with the expansion of EU responsibilities and competencies. The Presidency organises and presides over the meetings of the European Council and EU Council (ministerial) meetings, drafts compromises, and seeks solutions to problems submitted to the European Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Council of Ministers===&lt;br /&gt;
The Council of Ministers of the European Union (the &amp;quot;EU Council&amp;quot;) is the body in which representatives of the individual member state governments, usually ministers, legislate for the EU, set its political objectives, coordinate national policies and resolve differences among their governments and with other EU bodies. Legally speaking, there is only one Council, but it meets in nine different formations, depending on the matters on its agenda. Foreign ministers usually meet at least once a month in the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC), which deals with major foreign policy issues and plays a coordinating role. Ministers for the Economy and Finance (ECOFIN) and ministers responsible for agriculture also hold monthly meetings. Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) hold regular meetings to coordinate policies within their competence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Council holds formal sessions in its Brussels headquarters, except in April, June and October, when all sessions take place in Luxembourg. Most formations of the Council also meet informally (tasking no legally binding decisions) in the country holding the EU Presidency, usually once in the course of the Presidency's six-month term. The most prominent of these informal meetings is the so-called &amp;quot;Gymnich&amp;quot; meeting of foreign ministers, named for a town in Germany where the first such meeting took place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Council takes most decisions under the Community Pillar by qualified majority voting (QMV) but endeavours to reach the broadest possible consensus before approving legislation. Unanimity is required for a number of specific areas related to economic integration (e.g. taxation), constitutional matters such as amendments to the treaties, the launching of a new common policy, the accession of a new member state, and matters falling within the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy, European Security and Defence Policy, and aspects of law enforcement and judicial cooperation. The number of votes cast by each member state when the EU Council votes by qualified majority voting was determined by the Nice Treaty and roughly correlates to the size of its population. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The [[European Parliament]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conchita Wurst Ban Ki Moon.jpg|right|300px|thumb|UN Geneal Secretary Ban Ki-Moon with singer Conchita Wurst. In 2014 Wurst was invited to sing before the European Parliament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The European Parliament is the largest trans-national parliament in the world, and the second-largest overall (behind [[India]]), with an electorate of almost half a billion. Members of the Parliament are directly elected by all EU citizens for five-year terms; elections follow national election procedures, except they have to be a form of proportional representation. Members do not sit in national delegations; rather, they sit in groups according to political affiliation (including Socialists, Christian Democrats/Conservatives, Liberals, Greens, et cetera). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parliament's powers have gradually grown with the entry into force of the Single European Act (1986), the Maastricht Treaty (1993) and the Treaty of Amsterdam (1999). Parliament shares decision-making power on an equal footing with the Council in many areas under the Community Pillar to which the &amp;quot;co-decision procedure&amp;quot; applies. The European Parliament is one of the two branches with budgetary authority &amp;amp;ndash; the Council is the other. The signature of the EP president brings the overall EU budget into effect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The European Parliament also plays a role in the process of selecting the President and other members of the Commission. The European Council's nomination of the President is subject to approval by the Parliament. The EP holds U.S.-style public hearings of Commission nominees before taking a formal vote to approve the nomination of the Commission as a body. Parliament has the power to censure the entire Commission, but not to dismiss individual Commissioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The European Court of Justice===&lt;br /&gt;
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ensures uniform interpretation and application of both the Treaties establishing the European Communities and the secondary legislation and other law adopted under their authority. To enable it to carry out that task, the Court has wide jurisdiction to hear various types of cases. For example, the Court has the authority to hear and issue binding judgements in lawsuits that seek to annul a law adopted by the EU, to compel an EU institution to act, or to require that a member state comply with EU law. The ECJ may issue clarifications of EU law (in response to a request for a preliminary ruling from any member state court) and hears appeals on legal questions arising out of cases at the Court of First Instance. The ECJ currently has 28 justices and eight advocates-general, who are appointed by common accord of the governments of the member states and who hold office for six-year renewable terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sovereignty==&lt;br /&gt;
The member states of the European Union fall under the jurisdiction of the Union's legislative and judicial institutions (the Court of Justice, the Commission, the Council and the Parliament) in those competences that they have conferred to the Union (the principle of subsidiarity). Similar to Federal Law trumping State Law in United States politics, EU member states are obliged to follow the laws set forth by the European Court of Justice, even if their national laws are contradictory. This system of government pools sovereignty in those agreed areas from the nation, and rests it in the EU institutions. Some political theorists argue that the EU is thus the death of the nation, as by the [[Treaty of Westphalia]], nations are defined by their right of self-sovereignty; however, each member state has a legal right to cede from the EU, which non-sovereign components of states do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Eurozone Crisis}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The institutions of the European Union were originally created to oversee the operation of the several economic communities that later became the Single European Market. Even as the EU's political integration has continued, the area of greatest integration has always been in the economic sphere: goods, capital, and labour move freely between member states (with exceptions for goods which pose a public health risk), businesses in all member states are increasingly subject to common basic rules, and fifteen of the 28 member states use a common currency, the euro. The rest of the states are legally obliged to adopt the euro when their economies meet strict ''Convergence Criteria'' (except the UK and Denmark, which negotiated opt-outs). The fifteen euro-area countries share a common monetary policy administered by the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, Germany. The EU strives to eliminate internal barriers to the free flow of goods, services, labour, and capital, and to promote the overall convergence of living standards. Internationally, the EU aims to strengthen Europe's trade position and capitalise on the political and economic leverage that a large, unified market brings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Growth===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is the world's largest economic area (the U.S. is second) with a 2007 GDP of $16.6 trillion. Growth in many member states has been slow; between 2001 and 2003, the overall growth rate dropped from 1.8 percent to 1.0 percent, then recovered in 2004 to 2.4%, fell to 1.8 percent in 2005, then rose to 2.8% in 2006 and 2.4% in 2007. Within the euro area, growth varies as much as 4.5 percentage points between the fastest and slowest-growing economies: in 2005, the economies of Germany, France and Italy, grew by less than two percent. Growth remains strong in the new [[Central Europe]]an member states with rapidly industrialising economies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spring 2000, the EU committed to a ten-year strategic goal of transforming the EU into a more competitive, knowledge-based economy capable of sustaining higher levels of growth. Focusing on labour market reform, macroeconomic and fiscal policy, and promotion of e-commerce and entrepreneurship, the EU's &amp;quot;Lisbon Agenda&amp;quot; was an attempt to stimulate growth while remaining committed to the EU social model. Some suggest that it has so far failed to achieve its goals in large part because national governments (which retain authority over employment policy, immigration, large public sector workforces, entitlement programs and pensions) have not completed the necessary reforms, with unemployment at 6.9 percent in 2007. The European Commission re-launched the Lisbon Agenda in March 2005, promising three percent growth and six million new jobs by 2010. The revamped strategy focuses on developing political consensus within member states to make the changes necessary to complete elimination of barriers in the internal market, reduce the regulatory burden on business, improve labour market flexibility, provide incentives to work and increase investment in human capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fiscal and Monetary Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
Introduced in 1999, the euro is currently the official currency of fifteen of the 27 EU member states. Denmark and Sweden chose to retain their national currencies, and some of the newer EU members have yet to meet the strict economic conditions required to adopt the euro. Prior to the euro's launch in 1999, national currency exchange rates of countries intending to join the euro were fixed within an Exchange Rate Mechanism. Following the January 2002 introduction of euro notes and coins into general circulation, national currencies were removed from circulation. Each of the euro area countries agreed to abide by a shared fiscal policy rule book known as the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). This agreement generally obliges national governments to limit government budget deficits to 3 percent of GDP and established a target debt-to-GDP ratio of below sixty percent. Although enforcement actions have been forgiving – France and Germany, for example, avoided sanctions despite missing SGP targets – countries violating the SGP are technically subject to sanctions by the European Commission. As of March 2005, national governments have been granted budget leeway to achieve structural reforms and to combat prolonged stagnation, negative growth or other factors, such as the cost of German reunification or state pensions. The revised standards still require deficits to remain close to the targets; they may only temporarily exceed the three percent limit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The euro area's monetary policy is set by the European Central Bank (ECB), which must devise a monetary policy to accommodate a wide range of domestic policies and economic conditions within the euro area. The Treaties require that the ECB's primary objective be to maintain price stability (i.e., to keep inflation low). Euro area national governments have sometimes criticised the ECB for guarding against inflation at the expense of interest rate flexibility that could enable struggling economies to gain traction. The ECB's consistent overnight interest rate of two percent has been credited with creating favourable conditions for growth in Spain and Ireland, but has been blamed for hindering growth in France, Germany, Italy, and Portugal. Non-EU countries have also adopted the euro, including Andorra, United Kingdom base areas, Kosovo, Monaco, Montenegro, and the Vatican City. Additionally, several countries have currencies pegged to the euro, including French African states and those in the Exchange Rate Mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is the world's largest exporter of goods and services. In 2003, the then fifteen EU members exported $987 billion worth of goods to non-EU countries. The EU's exports grew rapidly between 1996 and 2000 but have grown more slowly since. Except for 2002, the EU as a whole has posted a trade deficit every year since 1999; it was $62 billion in 2004. The EU is a major exporter of chemicals, transport equipment, and industrial machinery. The EU has large trade deficits in raw materials and energy, and a small deficit in food and drink. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. is the EU's main trading partner by a wide margin. U.S. goods and services exports to the EU reached $283 billion in 2004, while U.S. goods and services imports from the EU totalled $388 billion. Asian economies such as Japan and China, however, account for an increasingly important share of EU trade. The EU's two-way merchandise trade with China grew to $223 million in 2004, while merchandise trade with Japan was $149 million. Internal trade between euro area and non-euro area countries was down one percent in the first quarter of 2005, but the EU's external trade was up four percent, particularly with Russia and Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Member states have given almost exclusive authority to the EU to negotiate binding international trade treaties. The European Community (EC) is a full member of the World Trade Organisation and plays an active role in the Doha Development Round to foster international trade in services and agricultural products. Bilaterally, the EC maintains framework agreements to facilitate trade flows with thirty-five countries worldwide, mostly elsewhere in Europe, in North Africa, and in the Middle East. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Direct Investment===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is both a major destination for foreign direct investment (FDI) and a major source of FDI. U.S. foreign direct investment in the EU totalled $83.3 billion in 2004; EU FDI into the U.S. totalled $46.6 billion. Following strong year-upon-year growth in the late 1990s, however, inward and outward flows of FDI have contracted since 2001. The EU is a net recipient of FDI from Japan, receiving $81 billion in 2003. Conversely, the EU is a net investor in Canada ($86 billion in outward investment in 2003), and China ($29 billion in outward investment in 2003). Growth of intra-EU FDI has increased rapidly in recent years and has increased much faster than FDI in non-EU countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pattern of foreign investment by European firms reflects deep commercial ties with the United States. U.S. and EU businesses invest heavily and operate profitably on both sides of the Atlantic. U.S. affiliates in Europe accounted for 56 percent of the aggregate output of U.S. affiliates worldwide. European firms were the largest foreign investors in 44 U.S. states and the second largest foreign investor in the remaining six. Sales by U.S. affiliates in Europe totalled $1.5 trillion in 2002, more than double those of U.S. affiliates in the Asia/Pacific region. European affiliate sales in the U.S. were $1.2 trillion in 2002, more than three times the value of U.S. imports from Europe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intra-firm trade involving foreign affiliates is particularly important to the transatlantic trade and investment relationship. Approximately 58 percent of U.S. imports from the EU in 2004 involved trade between related parties, as did 30 percent of U.S. exports to Europe in 2003. This high level of intra-firm trade has contributed to the persistence of the U.S. trade deficit with Europe even as the dollar has lost value against the euro since 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU's budget is composed of member state contributions. Equivalent to roughly one percent of the member states' combined gross national income (GNI), it was $123 billion in 2005. The UK receives a rebate for some of its contribution, as the CAP benefits the UK less than other states. In June 2005, the EU failed to agree on a budget plan for 2007 through 2013, due in part to a disagreement between the UK and France over the persistence of the UK budget rebate and the funding of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Costs attributable to the CAP constitute the EU's largest annual budget item, benefiting farmers across the EU, especially in France. Payments to net-recipient member states, designed to reduce economic and social disparities among EU countries and regions, are another budget item which has become more contentious with the accession of ten new states poorer than the EU average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:No-EU.png|thumb|250px|Numerous people oppose the EU due to its [[socialist]] and [[globalist]] policies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Euroskepticism|European migrant crisis}}&lt;br /&gt;
A significant number of Europeans on the political right-of-center are opposed to the EU on the grounds that it undermines national sovereignty and identity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (August 20, 2013). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/16343-the-eu-regionalization-trumps-sovereignty The EU: Regionalization Trumps Sovereignty]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 28, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (November 14, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30645-euro-globalists-pursue-eu-military-for-empire-of-peace Euro-Globalists Pursue EU Military for “Empire of Peace”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (November 14, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30647-brexit-difficulty-best-course-is-not-to-get-into-globalist-deals-such-as-european-union Brexit Difficulty: Best Course Is Not to Get Into Globalist Deals Such as European Union]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Montgomery, Jack (December 13, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/13/eu-none-member-states-big-enough-pursue-national-interest/ EU: ‘None of Our Member-States Is Big Enough to Pursue Their Own National Interests’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (December 19, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/34382-poland-s-national-sovereignty-challenged-by-eu Poland’s National Sovereignty Challenged by EU]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term &amp;quot;eurosceptic&amp;quot; has risen in popularity in Britain to describe these people, and among them are such members as the former British Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] (although, while in power, she committed Britain to the 1986 Single European Act, a major integrationist measure). They also, however, include less well-respected politicians belonging to &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot; or [[nationalism|nationalist]] parties, such as France's [[Jean-Marie Le Pen]]. There are also extreme left-wing opponents of the European Union, such as ''Die Linke'' in Germany, who regard it as constituting an anti-progressive &amp;quot;Fortress Europe&amp;quot;, and claim that EU membership impedes countries from following socialist policies. However, compared to [[conservative]] critics, left-wing Euroskeptics usually take softer positions against the EU, as they still support many of its policies such as on immigration and nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The European Union has been described as &amp;quot;a culturally amorphous post-ideological world. A [[cosmopolitan]] easy going [[agnostic]] world where the European Parliament invites a long-haired bearded [[Transgender|shemale]] to perform in front of its building and announces him/her as 'The voice of Europe' singing for equality, without anyone batting an eye.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gatestone.eu/eu-going-down/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 2019 Pew Research Center poll found that 54% of Europeans viewed the EU as &amp;quot;inefficient,&amp;quot; 64% viewing it as &amp;quot;out of touch,&amp;quot; and with majorities also finding it &amp;quot;intrusive&amp;quot; and pursuing harmful migration policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D. (March 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/03/22/europeans-say-brussels-is-intrusive-inefficient-and-out-of-touch/ Europeans Say Brussels Is ‘Intrusive, Inefficient, and Out of Touch’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From an economic perspective, while the EU has low unemployment on paper, many of those jobs are bad and low-paying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Montgomery, Jack (May 8, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/08/eu-not-working-workers-high-employment-but-pay-low-jobs-bad/ EU Not Working for Workers: High Employment, But Jobs Bad and Pay Low]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-Israel===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013 the European Union forced their 28 members not to cooperate with Israeli entities in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2013/noah-beck/the-eus-broken-mideast-compass/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2015 the EU issued guidelines for the labeling of products from Israeli settlements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/11/eu-sets-guidelines-on-labelling-products-from-israeli-settlements&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Following World War II, traditional European rivals sought to solidify peace by bringing their nations together under a common institutional structure. Influenced by his compatriot [[Jean Monnet]], French Foreign Minister [[Robert Schuman]] officially tabled a plan on May 9, 1950 to pool French and German coal and steel production under an organisation that would be open to other European countries. German Chancellor [[Konrad Adenauer]] supported this proposal, and six founding countries – Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands – took an early step toward European integration by establishing the '''European Coal and Steel Community''' (ECSC) in 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After failing to establish a European Defence Community in the 1950s, the six countries then decided to set up a common market. With the entry into force of the '''Treaty of Rome''' in 1957, they created the '''European Economic Community''' (EEC), with an objective of liberating the movement of goods, capital, workers and services. (The European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) was also established at this time.) The Treaty of Rome established the basic institutions and decision-making mechanisms still in place in today's European Union. in 1968, the EEC abolished customs duties between member states on manufactured goods. New policies, including a common agricultural policy (CAP) and a common trade policy, were in place by the end of the 1960s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The success of the European integration project during a period of steady economic growth in the 1960s set the stage for a first enlargement &amp;amp;ndash; the accession of Britain, Ireland and Denmark &amp;amp;ndash; in 1973. Further &amp;quot;deepening&amp;quot; of European integration followed: the Community acquired executive authority in social, regional, and environment policies. The benefits of economic convergence became more evident in the context of the 1970s energy crisis and financial turmoil, which led to the launch of the European Monetary System in 1979. In the same year, the first direct elections to the European Parliament (EP) took place. Previously, delegates from national parliaments had represented their country's legislative bodies at the EP in Strasbourg, France. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Community further expanded southward with the accession of Greece (1981, the second enlargement), followed by Spain and Portugal (1986, the third enlargement). These accessions led the EEC to adopt &amp;quot;structural programs&amp;quot; in order to reduce economic and social disparities among its regions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1960s and 1970s, the Community began to assert itself on the international scene with the conclusion of agreements with southern Mediterranean countries. Starting in 1963, the EEC signed four successive Lome Conventions, which guaranteed trading advantages and development aid for member states' former colonies in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Pacific (ACP). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
World recession and internal disputes over member states' financial burdens gave way, from 1985 onward, to renewed efforts for economic integration, enshrined in the 1985 &amp;quot;Single European Act&amp;quot; (SEA) and marked by the 1992 &amp;quot;Single Market Project.&amp;quot; The SEA set January 1, 1993 as the date by which an internal single market was to be established and, by extending the practice of majority voting rather than unanimity in the EU Council, gave Community institutions the means of adopting the 300 Community-wide Directives required to abolish the remaining barriers and obstacles to intra-Community trade. In 1995, the Community entered into the &amp;quot;Barcelona&amp;quot; partnership with twelve southern Mediterranean countries. The partnership, reinforced by agreements on social, cultural, and human cooperation, was intended to lead to a free-trade area. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collapse of the Berlin Wall and German unification prompted member states to negotiate the 1992 Treaty on European Union (the &amp;quot;Maastricht Treaty&amp;quot;). In addition to establishing the European Union, the Maastricht Treaty set an ambitious program of further integration: establishment of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) by 1999 (part of the &amp;quot;First or 'Community' Pillar&amp;quot;), setting up of a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) (&amp;quot;Second Pillar&amp;quot;); and cooperation on Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) (&amp;quot;Third Pillar&amp;quot;). Shortly thereafter, in 1995, Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the EU &amp;amp;ndash; the fourth enlargement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signed in 1997 and entering into force on May 1, 1999, the '''Amsterdam Treaty''' partially streamlined the EU institutional structure. Its most significant effects were: (1) to transfer aspects of Justice and Home Affairs policy to the Community Pillar, enabling the Commission to propose decisions to be taken by the EU Council by qualified majority voting instead of by consensus, and (2) to establish a High Representative for the CFSP (who also serves as Secretary-General of the Council Secretariat). Ten countries in [[Central Europe]] and Cyprus began accession procedures in 1997, followed by Malta. The prospect of eastward enlargement raised significant resource concerns and prompted the adoption in March 1999 of the &amp;quot;Agenda 2000&amp;quot; package, which covered amendments to the CAP and EU structural policies, as well as a budgetary framework through 2006. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 1998, EU heads of government officially designated eleven member states eligible to adopt a single currency. Britain and Denmark &amp;quot;opted out.&amp;quot; On January 1, 1999, the euro became the official currency of the EU, and the '''European Central Bank''' (ECB) put euro notes and coins into circulation in 2002. Today, fifteen countries use the euro: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streamlining the size and procedures of EU institutions to make the expanded EU more efficient was also an aim of the 2003 Treaty of Nice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU adopted the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, further centralizing the organization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017 and 2018, the EU began pushing for a unified military.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (November 21, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/27431-eu-super-state-agrees-to-plan-for-eu-military EU Super-state Agrees to Plan for EU Military]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 25, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (June 26, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/29395-eu-takes-major-step-toward-european-army EU Takes Major Step Toward “European Army”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 26, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (November 14, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30645-euro-globalists-pursue-eu-military-for-empire-of-peace Euro-Globalists Pursue EU Military for “Empire of Peace”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Montgomery, Jack (December 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/12/21/secret-army-no-eu-military-just-civilian-troops-wearing-european-uniform-carrying-weapons/ Backdoor Army: No EU ‘Military’ Yet, But Armed ‘Civilian Troops’ in ‘European Uniform’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined the EU, and in 2007 Bulgaria and Romania acceded, bringing total membership to 27. Croatia joined in 2013, making the total number of members 28. Candidate countries currently include [[Turkey]], FYR [[Macedonia]] and [[Montenegro]], [[Serbia]], and potential candidates include the rest of the Western [[Balkans|Balkan]] states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2004, member states signed an EU Constitutional Treaty designed to replace all previous treaties. French and Dutch voters rejected the treaty through referendums in 2005, thereby suspending the ratification process. In 2007, a modified '''Treaty of Lisbon''' was agreed upon, which retains most of the reforms of the Constitution, but amends rather than replaces previous treaties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the late 2009 the [[Eurozone Crisis|European sovereign-debt crisis]] started. [[Greece]], [[Ireland]], [[Portugal]], [[Cyprus]], [[Spain]] and [[Italy]] are most affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU and other European countries were greatly affected by the [[European migrant crisis]] resulting from lax immigration standards due to EU policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Candidates for membership==&lt;br /&gt;
There are four official candidates being considered for membership, [[Turkey]], [[Montenegro]], [[Serbia]] and [[Macedonia]]. The western Balkan states of Kosovo, Bosnia-Hercegovina and Albania are officially ''potential candidates''. A country that is expected to accede is required to make some economic, social and governmental changes to bring it in line with other member states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The status of Turkey is highly controversial. It has repeatedly applied to join the EU but has been rejected each time on numerous grounds. Despite being one of the first countries to join the post-war Council of Europe and being a key regional power with a strong military, Turkey has a long list of obstacles to overcome before accession. Many nations have cited its poor relations with other countries such as Cyprus, as well as its views on the rights of women and the Turkish Penal Code which includes the notorious Article 301. Article 301 is a recent piece of legislation that provides that &amp;quot;a person who publicly insults the Turkish nation, the State of the Republic of Turkey, or the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and two years&amp;quot;. Turkey's population of 70 million would make it one of the largest states in the EU with the second-highest amount of MEPs, and would be the first Muslim-majority state in Europe. Britain under David Cameron supports admission while France is strongly against Turkey's membership. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gateway to the European Union (EU official website) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://europa.eu/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Member states==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austria]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Belgium]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bulgaria]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Croatia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cyprus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Czech Republic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Denmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Estonia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Finland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[France]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greece]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hungary]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ireland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Italy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Latvia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lithuania]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Luxembourg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Malta]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Netherlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Poland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Portugal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Romania]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slovakia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slovenia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spain]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sweden]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{License|license = This work is in the [[public domain]] in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.| source = [http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/54126.htm]}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, Michelle, and Nieves Perez-Solorzano Borragan, eds. ''European Union Politics'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Craig, Paul and Gráinne de Búrca. ''EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials'' (4th ed. 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dinan, Desmond. '' Europe Recast: A History of European Union' '(2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* Hix, Simon. ''What's Wrong with the Europe Union and How to Fix It'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/Whats-Wrong-Europe-Union-How/dp/0745642055/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1263576617&amp;amp;sr=1-10-spell excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kaiser, Wolfram. ''Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peterson, John, and Michael Shackleton eds. ''The Institutions of the European Union'' (2nd ed. 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
* McCormick, John. ''The European Union: Politics and Policies'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pinder, John,  and Simon Usherwood. ''The European Union: A Very Short Introduction'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/European-Union-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/0199233977/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1263575844&amp;amp;sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Podmore, Will &amp;amp; Nicholls, Doug (2006), The EU: bad for Britain - a [[trade union]] view. Bread Books, ISBN 0-942112-5-1.&lt;br /&gt;
* Staab, Andreas.  ''The European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/European-Union-Explained-Institutions-Actors/dp/0253220181/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1263575844&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Yesilada, Birol A. and David M. Wood. ''The Emerging European Union'' (5th ed. 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Globalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Globalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=European_Union&amp;diff=1819166</id>
		<title>European Union</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=European_Union&amp;diff=1819166"/>
		<updated>2021-12-04T20:55:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:''For the results of EU policies, see [[European migrant crisis]]''&lt;br /&gt;
{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =EU member states.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =European Union flag.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	= &lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	= [[Brussels]], [[Luxembourg]], [[Strasbourg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|government	= &lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	= Sui generis [[supranationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|language	= 24 official languages&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	= [[Charles Michel]] (Council)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Ursula von der Leyen]] (Commission)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[David Sassoli]] (Parliament)&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =4,475,757 km² (1,728,099 sq mi)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =511,805,088 (2017)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$17.1 trillion (2017 IMF)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$33,551 (2017 IMF)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=euro&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =.eu&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''European Union (EU)''' is an [[anti-democratic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/brexits-in-trouble-the-us-can-help&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; experiment in [[globalism]], combining very different cultures and nations into one legal, political and economic union of 27 [[European]] countries after the [[United Kingdom]] exited it in [[Brexit]] effective Jan. 31, 2020. The EU was formed in 1993 with the ratification of the [[Maastricht Treaty]], though its predecessor, the [[European Economic Community]], was founded in 1957. It is not the same as &amp;quot;[[Europe]]&amp;quot;, though most nations from the continent have joined the EU but [[Britain]] has [[Brexit|left it]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a set of institutions, the EU has more powers over its member states and their citizens than other international bodies; many of its competencies are supranational (above the member states) rather than intergovernmental (between them).  Despite having a legal personality and sovereignty in agreed areas, it is not regarded as a federation or state in its own right: rather, it stands somewhere between these two points. Fifteen member states use a common currency, the '''[[euro]]'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Five other states formally agree to use it, and four others use it without formal agreement.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The EU is moving in the direction of eventually becoming a politically unified federation, something which many of its leaders consciously support.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Newman, Alex (August 20, 2013). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/16343-the-eu-regionalization-trumps-sovereignty The EU: Regionalization Trumps Sovereignty]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no EU military.  Each nation has its own forces, but nearly all are members of [[NATO]], in which the U.S. has a preponderant voice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is a driving force of global economic and political integration, but Hix (2008) sees three problems with the EU: policy gridlock, lack of popular legitimacy and the democratic deficit. He notes, &amp;quot;In substantive terms ... the EU is closer to a form of enlightened despotism than a genuine democracy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hix (2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, on February 5, 2000, John Laughland indicated in ''The Spectator'' that the European Union's entire purpose was to subject Western Europe to Marxist–Leninist/Marxist-Trotskyist thought.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;THE [European ]UNION CAN MAKE A VITAL CONTRIBUTION to the reform of the international economic architecture and to the establishment of a mechanism for collective governance.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*From: Commission of the European Communities&lt;br /&gt;
*Brussels 9.2.2000 [COM (2000) 154 final]&lt;br /&gt;
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 2000-2005&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;SHAPING THE NEW EUROPE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing in The Spectator (London) of 5th February 2000 John Laughland stated that &amp;quot;The West is now on the verge of achieving that of which Lenin and Trotsky dreamed in 1917. For the point is not to replace nation states with a European or world superstate. It is instead to achieve the old Marxist dream of abolishing statehood altogether&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the EU's facilitation of the [[European migrant crisis]], [[Euroskeptic]]s and native [[populist]] movements regard the EU as a [[totalitarian]] [[bureaucracy]]. In 2016, the UK voted to leave the EU; a process termed [[Brexit]], making them the first country to leave the European Union. This decision was finalized on January 1, 2021.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |url=https://www.euronews.com/2020/12/31/brexit-begins-for-real-on-friday-but-what-are-the-key-changes |title= Brexit has happened. UK and EU finally split as a New Year dawns. But what are the key changes? |publisher=Euronews |date=1 January 2021|access-date=19 June 2021}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
Each nation elects members to the Parliament in proportion to population.  The June 2009 elections saw sweeping gains by conservative and anti-immigration parties, as labor and socialist parties lost heavily.  Since the 2004 elections the largest grouping has for the last five years been the centre-right European People's Party '''EPP''' (288 seats out of a current 785), followed by the centre-left '''PES''' (216) and the liberal '''ALDE''' (100). With the 2009 election EPP made gains and retains power in the parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative Jose Manuel Barroso, who will have a second term as European Commission president, thanked voters and assured them their voices would be heard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009 The British [[Labour Party]], Germany's [[SPD]] (Social Democrats) and France's Socialist Party suffered historic defeats—the worst defeat for Labour in Britain in a century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turnout was at an all-time low in some countries, including France (41%) and Germany (42%).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Structure==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The European Commission===&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2009 Jose Manuel Barroso, was re-elected as president of the [[European Commission]] after the European Parliament voted to give him a second term. This ended weeks of uncertainty during which Socialist, Green and Liberal critics tried to block Mr Barroso's candidacy on the grounds that he had yielded too much power to national governments and promoted the kind of free-market liberalism that led to the financial crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The role and responsibilities of the European Commission place it at the centre of the EU's decision-making process. Acting as the EU's policy and executive engine, the Commission is composed of 28 Commissioners, one from each state, and is supported by a substantial staff located primarily in [[Brussels]], [[Belgium]]. In matters relating to economic integration (&amp;quot;First or 'Community' Pillar&amp;quot;), only the Commission has the right to propose legislation for approval by the EU Council and European Parliament. As &amp;quot;guardian of the Treaties,&amp;quot; the Commission ensures that EU laws are applied and upheld throughout the EU, prosecuting member states and other institutions for failing to follow treaty precepts or otherwise apply Community law. The Commission has full authority to enforce Community competition policy, and its policing of implementation of Community legislation preserves the integrity of the EU single market. The Commission likewise manages and develops the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP), implements the budget, and represents the European Community in its areas of competence, notably including international trade negotiations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commission President is appointed by agreement of the EU heads of government and is subject to approval by the European Parliament. Commissioners serve for a renewable five-year term. New Commissioners are identified by member state governments in consultation with the President-designate of the Commission and are normally put in place at the beginning of the term of the Commission President. The entire Commission must be confirmed as a collective whole by the European Parliament before its formal appointment by common accord of EU governments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The European Council===&lt;br /&gt;
The European Council brings together EU heads of government and the President of the European Commission; foreign ministers of member states also participate. Finance ministers are normally included when the leaders discuss questions related to the euro and the economy. The European Council meets at least twice a year, usually quarterly, at the end of each Presidency, to review major EU projects, set guidelines for policies and provide necessary guidance. The Presidency of the Council rotates every six months among EU member states (January&amp;amp;ndash;June; July&amp;amp;ndash;December). Its role has become increasingly important with the expansion of EU responsibilities and competencies. The Presidency organises and presides over the meetings of the European Council and EU Council (ministerial) meetings, drafts compromises, and seeks solutions to problems submitted to the European Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Council of Ministers===&lt;br /&gt;
The Council of Ministers of the European Union (the &amp;quot;EU Council&amp;quot;) is the body in which representatives of the individual member state governments, usually ministers, legislate for the EU, set its political objectives, coordinate national policies and resolve differences among their governments and with other EU bodies. Legally speaking, there is only one Council, but it meets in nine different formations, depending on the matters on its agenda. Foreign ministers usually meet at least once a month in the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC), which deals with major foreign policy issues and plays a coordinating role. Ministers for the Economy and Finance (ECOFIN) and ministers responsible for agriculture also hold monthly meetings. Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) hold regular meetings to coordinate policies within their competence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Council holds formal sessions in its Brussels headquarters, except in April, June and October, when all sessions take place in Luxembourg. Most formations of the Council also meet informally (tasking no legally binding decisions) in the country holding the EU Presidency, usually once in the course of the Presidency's six-month term. The most prominent of these informal meetings is the so-called &amp;quot;Gymnich&amp;quot; meeting of foreign ministers, named for a town in Germany where the first such meeting took place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Council takes most decisions under the Community Pillar by qualified majority voting (QMV) but endeavours to reach the broadest possible consensus before approving legislation. Unanimity is required for a number of specific areas related to economic integration (e.g. taxation), constitutional matters such as amendments to the treaties, the launching of a new common policy, the accession of a new member state, and matters falling within the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy, European Security and Defence Policy, and aspects of law enforcement and judicial cooperation. The number of votes cast by each member state when the EU Council votes by qualified majority voting was determined by the Nice Treaty and roughly correlates to the size of its population. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The [[European Parliament]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conchita Wurst Ban Ki Moon.jpg|right|300px|thumb|UN Geneal Secretary Ban Ki-Moon with singer Conchita Wurst. In 2014 Wurst was invited to sing before the European Parliament.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The European Parliament is the largest trans-national parliament in the world, and the second-largest overall (behind [[India]]), with an electorate of almost half a billion. Members of the Parliament are directly elected by all EU citizens for five-year terms; elections follow national election procedures, except they have to be a form of proportional representation. Members do not sit in national delegations; rather, they sit in groups according to political affiliation (including Socialists, Christian Democrats/Conservatives, Liberals, Greens, et cetera). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parliament's powers have gradually grown with the entry into force of the Single European Act (1986), the Maastricht Treaty (1993) and the Treaty of Amsterdam (1999). Parliament shares decision-making power on an equal footing with the Council in many areas under the Community Pillar to which the &amp;quot;co-decision procedure&amp;quot; applies. The European Parliament is one of the two branches with budgetary authority &amp;amp;ndash; the Council is the other. The signature of the EP president brings the overall EU budget into effect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The European Parliament also plays a role in the process of selecting the President and other members of the Commission. The European Council's nomination of the President is subject to approval by the Parliament. The EP holds U.S.-style public hearings of Commission nominees before taking a formal vote to approve the nomination of the Commission as a body. Parliament has the power to censure the entire Commission, but not to dismiss individual Commissioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The European Court of Justice===&lt;br /&gt;
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ensures uniform interpretation and application of both the Treaties establishing the European Communities and the secondary legislation and other law adopted under their authority. To enable it to carry out that task, the Court has wide jurisdiction to hear various types of cases. For example, the Court has the authority to hear and issue binding judgements in lawsuits that seek to annul a law adopted by the EU, to compel an EU institution to act, or to require that a member state comply with EU law. The ECJ may issue clarifications of EU law (in response to a request for a preliminary ruling from any member state court) and hears appeals on legal questions arising out of cases at the Court of First Instance. The ECJ currently has 28 justices and eight advocates-general, who are appointed by common accord of the governments of the member states and who hold office for six-year renewable terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sovereignty==&lt;br /&gt;
The member states of the European Union fall under the jurisdiction of the Union's legislative and judicial institutions (the Court of Justice, the Commission, the Council and the Parliament) in those competences that they have conferred to the Union (the principle of subsidiarity). Similar to Federal Law trumping State Law in United States politics, EU member states are obliged to follow the laws set forth by the European Court of Justice, even if their national laws are contradictory. This system of government pools sovereignty in those agreed areas from the nation, and rests it in the EU institutions. Some political theorists argue that the EU is thus the death of the nation, as by the [[Treaty of Westphalia]], nations are defined by their right of self-sovereignty; however, each member state has a legal right to cede from the EU, which non-sovereign components of states do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Eurozone Crisis}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The institutions of the European Union were originally created to oversee the operation of the several economic communities that later became the Single European Market. Even as the EU's political integration has continued, the area of greatest integration has always been in the economic sphere: goods, capital, and labour move freely between member states (with exceptions for goods which pose a public health risk), businesses in all member states are increasingly subject to common basic rules, and fifteen of the 28 member states use a common currency, the euro. The rest of the states are legally obliged to adopt the euro when their economies meet strict ''Convergence Criteria'' (except the UK and Denmark, which negotiated opt-outs). The fifteen euro-area countries share a common monetary policy administered by the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, Germany. The EU strives to eliminate internal barriers to the free flow of goods, services, labour, and capital, and to promote the overall convergence of living standards. Internationally, the EU aims to strengthen Europe's trade position and capitalise on the political and economic leverage that a large, unified market brings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Growth===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is the world's largest economic area (the U.S. is second) with a 2007 GDP of $16.6 trillion. Growth in many member states has been slow; between 2001 and 2003, the overall growth rate dropped from 1.8 percent to 1.0 percent, then recovered in 2004 to 2.4%, fell to 1.8 percent in 2005, then rose to 2.8% in 2006 and 2.4% in 2007. Within the euro area, growth varies as much as 4.5 percentage points between the fastest and slowest-growing economies: in 2005, the economies of Germany, France and Italy, grew by less than two percent. Growth remains strong in the new [[Central Europe]]an member states with rapidly industrialising economies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spring 2000, the EU committed to a ten-year strategic goal of transforming the EU into a more competitive, knowledge-based economy capable of sustaining higher levels of growth. Focusing on labour market reform, macroeconomic and fiscal policy, and promotion of e-commerce and entrepreneurship, the EU's &amp;quot;Lisbon Agenda&amp;quot; was an attempt to stimulate growth while remaining committed to the EU social model. Some suggest that it has so far failed to achieve its goals in large part because national governments (which retain authority over employment policy, immigration, large public sector workforces, entitlement programs and pensions) have not completed the necessary reforms, with unemployment at 6.9 percent in 2007. The European Commission re-launched the Lisbon Agenda in March 2005, promising three percent growth and six million new jobs by 2010. The revamped strategy focuses on developing political consensus within member states to make the changes necessary to complete elimination of barriers in the internal market, reduce the regulatory burden on business, improve labour market flexibility, provide incentives to work and increase investment in human capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fiscal and Monetary Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
Introduced in 1999, the euro is currently the official currency of fifteen of the 27 EU member states. Denmark and Sweden chose to retain their national currencies, and some of the newer EU members have yet to meet the strict economic conditions required to adopt the euro. Prior to the euro's launch in 1999, national currency exchange rates of countries intending to join the euro were fixed within an Exchange Rate Mechanism. Following the January 2002 introduction of euro notes and coins into general circulation, national currencies were removed from circulation. Each of the euro area countries agreed to abide by a shared fiscal policy rule book known as the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP). This agreement generally obliges national governments to limit government budget deficits to 3 percent of GDP and established a target debt-to-GDP ratio of below sixty percent. Although enforcement actions have been forgiving – France and Germany, for example, avoided sanctions despite missing SGP targets – countries violating the SGP are technically subject to sanctions by the European Commission. As of March 2005, national governments have been granted budget leeway to achieve structural reforms and to combat prolonged stagnation, negative growth or other factors, such as the cost of German reunification or state pensions. The revised standards still require deficits to remain close to the targets; they may only temporarily exceed the three percent limit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The euro area's monetary policy is set by the European Central Bank (ECB), which must devise a monetary policy to accommodate a wide range of domestic policies and economic conditions within the euro area. The Treaties require that the ECB's primary objective be to maintain price stability (i.e., to keep inflation low). Euro area national governments have sometimes criticised the ECB for guarding against inflation at the expense of interest rate flexibility that could enable struggling economies to gain traction. The ECB's consistent overnight interest rate of two percent has been credited with creating favourable conditions for growth in Spain and Ireland, but has been blamed for hindering growth in France, Germany, Italy, and Portugal. Non-EU countries have also adopted the euro, including Andorra, United Kingdom base areas, Kosovo, Monaco, Montenegro, and the Vatican City. Additionally, several countries have currencies pegged to the euro, including French African states and those in the Exchange Rate Mechanism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is the world's largest exporter of goods and services. In 2003, the then fifteen EU members exported $987 billion worth of goods to non-EU countries. The EU's exports grew rapidly between 1996 and 2000 but have grown more slowly since. Except for 2002, the EU as a whole has posted a trade deficit every year since 1999; it was $62 billion in 2004. The EU is a major exporter of chemicals, transport equipment, and industrial machinery. The EU has large trade deficits in raw materials and energy, and a small deficit in food and drink. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. is the EU's main trading partner by a wide margin. U.S. goods and services exports to the EU reached $283 billion in 2004, while U.S. goods and services imports from the EU totalled $388 billion. Asian economies such as Japan and China, however, account for an increasingly important share of EU trade. The EU's two-way merchandise trade with China grew to $223 million in 2004, while merchandise trade with Japan was $149 million. Internal trade between euro area and non-euro area countries was down one percent in the first quarter of 2005, but the EU's external trade was up four percent, particularly with Russia and Norway. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Member states have given almost exclusive authority to the EU to negotiate binding international trade treaties. The European Community (EC) is a full member of the World Trade Organisation and plays an active role in the Doha Development Round to foster international trade in services and agricultural products. Bilaterally, the EC maintains framework agreements to facilitate trade flows with thirty-five countries worldwide, mostly elsewhere in Europe, in North Africa, and in the Middle East. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Direct Investment===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU is both a major destination for foreign direct investment (FDI) and a major source of FDI. U.S. foreign direct investment in the EU totalled $83.3 billion in 2004; EU FDI into the U.S. totalled $46.6 billion. Following strong year-upon-year growth in the late 1990s, however, inward and outward flows of FDI have contracted since 2001. The EU is a net recipient of FDI from Japan, receiving $81 billion in 2003. Conversely, the EU is a net investor in Canada ($86 billion in outward investment in 2003), and China ($29 billion in outward investment in 2003). Growth of intra-EU FDI has increased rapidly in recent years and has increased much faster than FDI in non-EU countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pattern of foreign investment by European firms reflects deep commercial ties with the United States. U.S. and EU businesses invest heavily and operate profitably on both sides of the Atlantic. U.S. affiliates in Europe accounted for 56 percent of the aggregate output of U.S. affiliates worldwide. European firms were the largest foreign investors in 44 U.S. states and the second largest foreign investor in the remaining six. Sales by U.S. affiliates in Europe totalled $1.5 trillion in 2002, more than double those of U.S. affiliates in the Asia/Pacific region. European affiliate sales in the U.S. were $1.2 trillion in 2002, more than three times the value of U.S. imports from Europe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intra-firm trade involving foreign affiliates is particularly important to the transatlantic trade and investment relationship. Approximately 58 percent of U.S. imports from the EU in 2004 involved trade between related parties, as did 30 percent of U.S. exports to Europe in 2003. This high level of intra-firm trade has contributed to the persistence of the U.S. trade deficit with Europe even as the dollar has lost value against the euro since 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Budget===&lt;br /&gt;
The EU's budget is composed of member state contributions. Equivalent to roughly one percent of the member states' combined gross national income (GNI), it was $123 billion in 2005. The UK receives a rebate for some of its contribution, as the CAP benefits the UK less than other states. In June 2005, the EU failed to agree on a budget plan for 2007 through 2013, due in part to a disagreement between the UK and France over the persistence of the UK budget rebate and the funding of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Costs attributable to the CAP constitute the EU's largest annual budget item, benefiting farmers across the EU, especially in France. Payments to net-recipient member states, designed to reduce economic and social disparities among EU countries and regions, are another budget item which has become more contentious with the accession of ten new states poorer than the EU average.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:No-EU.png|thumb|250px|Numerous people oppose the EU due to its [[socialist]] and [[globalist]] policies.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Euroskepticism|European migrant crisis}}&lt;br /&gt;
A significant number of Europeans on the political right-of-center are opposed to the EU on the grounds that it undermines national sovereignty and identity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (August 20, 2013). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/16343-the-eu-regionalization-trumps-sovereignty The EU: Regionalization Trumps Sovereignty]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 28, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (November 14, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30645-euro-globalists-pursue-eu-military-for-empire-of-peace Euro-Globalists Pursue EU Military for “Empire of Peace”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (November 14, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30647-brexit-difficulty-best-course-is-not-to-get-into-globalist-deals-such-as-european-union Brexit Difficulty: Best Course Is Not to Get Into Globalist Deals Such as European Union]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Montgomery, Jack (December 13, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/13/eu-none-member-states-big-enough-pursue-national-interest/ EU: ‘None of Our Member-States Is Big Enough to Pursue Their Own National Interests’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (December 19, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/34382-poland-s-national-sovereignty-challenged-by-eu Poland’s National Sovereignty Challenged by EU]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term &amp;quot;eurosceptic&amp;quot; has risen in popularity in Britain to describe these people, and among them are such members as the former British Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] (although, while in power, she committed Britain to the 1986 Single European Act, a major integrationist measure). They also, however, include less well-respected politicians belonging to &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot; or [[nationalism|nationalist]] parties, such as France's [[Jean-Marie Le Pen]]. There are also extreme left-wing opponents of the European Union, such as ''Die Linke'' in Germany, who regard it as constituting an anti-progressive &amp;quot;Fortress Europe&amp;quot;, and claim that EU membership impedes countries from following socialist policies. However, compared to [[conservative]] critics, left-wing Euroskeptics usually take softer positions against the EU, as they still support many of its policies such as on immigration and nationalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The European Union has been described as &amp;quot;a culturally amorphous post-ideological world. A [[cosmopolitan]] easy going [[agnostic]] world where the European Parliament invites a long-haired bearded [[Transgender|shemale]] to perform in front of its building and announces him/her as 'The voice of Europe' singing for equality, without anyone batting an eye.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gatestone.eu/eu-going-down/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 2019 Pew Research Center poll found that 54% of Europeans viewed the EU as &amp;quot;inefficient,&amp;quot; 64% viewing it as &amp;quot;out of touch,&amp;quot; and with majorities also finding it &amp;quot;intrusive&amp;quot; and pursuing harmful migration policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D. (March 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/03/22/europeans-say-brussels-is-intrusive-inefficient-and-out-of-touch/ Europeans Say Brussels Is ‘Intrusive, Inefficient, and Out of Touch’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From an economic perspective, while the EU has low unemployment on paper, many of those jobs are bad and low-paying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Montgomery, Jack (May 8, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/08/eu-not-working-workers-high-employment-but-pay-low-jobs-bad/ EU Not Working for Workers: High Employment, But Jobs Bad and Pay Low]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-Israel===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013 the European Union forced their 28 members not to cooperate with Israeli entities in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2013/noah-beck/the-eus-broken-mideast-compass/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2015 the EU issued guidelines for the labeling of products from Israeli settlements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/11/eu-sets-guidelines-on-labelling-products-from-israeli-settlements&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Following World War II, traditional European rivals sought to solidify peace by bringing their nations together under a common institutional structure. Influenced by his compatriot [[Jean Monnet]], French Foreign Minister [[Robert Schuman]] officially tabled a plan on May 9, 1950 to pool French and German coal and steel production under an organisation that would be open to other European countries. German Chancellor [[Konrad Adenauer]] supported this proposal, and six founding countries – Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands – took an early step toward European integration by establishing the '''European Coal and Steel Community''' (ECSC) in 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After failing to establish a European Defence Community in the 1950s, the six countries then decided to set up a common market. With the entry into force of the '''Treaty of Rome''' in 1957, they created the '''European Economic Community''' (EEC), with an objective of liberating the movement of goods, capital, workers and services. (The European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM) was also established at this time.) The Treaty of Rome established the basic institutions and decision-making mechanisms still in place in today's European Union. in 1968, the EEC abolished customs duties between member states on manufactured goods. New policies, including a common agricultural policy (CAP) and a common trade policy, were in place by the end of the 1960s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The success of the European integration project during a period of steady economic growth in the 1960s set the stage for a first enlargement &amp;amp;ndash; the accession of Britain, Ireland and Denmark &amp;amp;ndash; in 1973. Further &amp;quot;deepening&amp;quot; of European integration followed: the Community acquired executive authority in social, regional, and environment policies. The benefits of economic convergence became more evident in the context of the 1970s energy crisis and financial turmoil, which led to the launch of the European Monetary System in 1979. In the same year, the first direct elections to the European Parliament (EP) took place. Previously, delegates from national parliaments had represented their country's legislative bodies at the EP in Strasbourg, France. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Community further expanded southward with the accession of Greece (1981, the second enlargement), followed by Spain and Portugal (1986, the third enlargement). These accessions led the EEC to adopt &amp;quot;structural programs&amp;quot; in order to reduce economic and social disparities among its regions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1960s and 1970s, the Community began to assert itself on the international scene with the conclusion of agreements with southern Mediterranean countries. Starting in 1963, the EEC signed four successive Lome Conventions, which guaranteed trading advantages and development aid for member states' former colonies in Africa, the Caribbean, and the Pacific (ACP). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
World recession and internal disputes over member states' financial burdens gave way, from 1985 onward, to renewed efforts for economic integration, enshrined in the 1985 &amp;quot;Single European Act&amp;quot; (SEA) and marked by the 1992 &amp;quot;Single Market Project.&amp;quot; The SEA set January 1, 1993 as the date by which an internal single market was to be established and, by extending the practice of majority voting rather than unanimity in the EU Council, gave Community institutions the means of adopting the 300 Community-wide Directives required to abolish the remaining barriers and obstacles to intra-Community trade. In 1995, the Community entered into the &amp;quot;Barcelona&amp;quot; partnership with twelve southern Mediterranean countries. The partnership, reinforced by agreements on social, cultural, and human cooperation, was intended to lead to a free-trade area. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collapse of the Berlin Wall and German unification prompted member states to negotiate the 1992 Treaty on European Union (the &amp;quot;Maastricht Treaty&amp;quot;). In addition to establishing the European Union, the Maastricht Treaty set an ambitious program of further integration: establishment of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) by 1999 (part of the &amp;quot;First or 'Community' Pillar&amp;quot;), setting up of a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) (&amp;quot;Second Pillar&amp;quot;); and cooperation on Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) (&amp;quot;Third Pillar&amp;quot;). Shortly thereafter, in 1995, Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the EU &amp;amp;ndash; the fourth enlargement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Signed in 1997 and entering into force on May 1, 1999, the '''Amsterdam Treaty''' partially streamlined the EU institutional structure. Its most significant effects were: (1) to transfer aspects of Justice and Home Affairs policy to the Community Pillar, enabling the Commission to propose decisions to be taken by the EU Council by qualified majority voting instead of by consensus, and (2) to establish a High Representative for the CFSP (who also serves as Secretary-General of the Council Secretariat). Ten countries in [[Central Europe]] and Cyprus began accession procedures in 1997, followed by Malta. The prospect of eastward enlargement raised significant resource concerns and prompted the adoption in March 1999 of the &amp;quot;Agenda 2000&amp;quot; package, which covered amendments to the CAP and EU structural policies, as well as a budgetary framework through 2006. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 1998, EU heads of government officially designated eleven member states eligible to adopt a single currency. Britain and Denmark &amp;quot;opted out.&amp;quot; On January 1, 1999, the euro became the official currency of the EU, and the '''European Central Bank''' (ECB) put euro notes and coins into circulation in 2002. Today, fifteen countries use the euro: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Streamlining the size and procedures of EU institutions to make the expanded EU more efficient was also an aim of the 2003 Treaty of Nice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU adopted the Lisbon Treaty in 2009, further centralizing the organization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017 and 2018, the EU began pushing for a unified military.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (November 21, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/27431-eu-super-state-agrees-to-plan-for-eu-military EU Super-state Agrees to Plan for EU Military]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 25, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (June 26, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/29395-eu-takes-major-step-toward-european-army EU Takes Major Step Toward “European Army”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 26, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (November 14, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30645-euro-globalists-pursue-eu-military-for-empire-of-peace Euro-Globalists Pursue EU Military for “Empire of Peace”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Montgomery, Jack (December 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/12/21/secret-army-no-eu-military-just-civilian-troops-wearing-european-uniform-carrying-weapons/ Backdoor Army: No EU ‘Military’ Yet, But Armed ‘Civilian Troops’ in ‘European Uniform’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia joined the EU, and in 2007 Bulgaria and Romania acceded, bringing total membership to 27. Croatia joined in 2013, making the total number of members 28. Candidate countries currently include [[Turkey]], FYR [[Macedonia]] and [[Montenegro]], [[Serbia]], and potential candidates include the rest of the Western [[Balkans|Balkan]] states.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2004, member states signed an EU Constitutional Treaty designed to replace all previous treaties. French and Dutch voters rejected the treaty through referendums in 2005, thereby suspending the ratification process. In 2007, a modified '''Treaty of Lisbon''' was agreed upon, which retains most of the reforms of the Constitution, but amends rather than replaces previous treaties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the late 2009 the [[Eurozone Crisis|European sovereign-debt crisis]] started. [[Greece]], [[Ireland]], [[Portugal]], [[Cyprus]], [[Spain]] and [[Italy]] are most affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU and other European countries were greatly affected by the [[European migrant crisis]] resulting from lax immigration standards due to EU policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Candidates for membership==&lt;br /&gt;
There are four official candidates being considered for membership, [[Turkey]], [[Montenegro]], [[Serbia]] and [[Macedonia]]. The western Balkan states of Kosovo, Bosnia-Hercegovina and Albania are officially ''potential candidates''. A country that is expected to accede is required to make some economic, social and governmental changes to bring it in line with other member states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The status of Turkey is highly controversial. It has repeatedly applied to join the EU but has been rejected each time on numerous grounds. Despite being one of the first countries to join the post-war Council of Europe and being a key regional power with a strong military, Turkey has a long list of obstacles to overcome before accession. Many nations have cited its poor relations with other countries such as Cyprus, as well as its views on the rights of women and the Turkish Penal Code which includes the notorious Article 301. Article 301 is a recent piece of legislation that provides that &amp;quot;a person who publicly insults the Turkish nation, the State of the Republic of Turkey, or the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and two years&amp;quot;. Turkey's population of 70 million would make it one of the largest states in the EU with the second-highest amount of MEPs, and would be the first Muslim-majority state in Europe. Britain under David Cameron supports admission while France is strongly against Turkey's membership. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gateway to the European Union (EU official website) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://europa.eu/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Member states==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austria]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Belgium]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bulgaria]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Croatia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cyprus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Czech Republic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Denmark]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Estonia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Finland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[France]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greece]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hungary]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ireland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Italy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Latvia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lithuania]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Luxembourg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Malta]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Netherlands]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Poland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Portugal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Romania]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slovakia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Slovenia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spain]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sweden]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{License|license = This work is in the [[public domain]] in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.| source = [http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/54126.htm]}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, Michelle, and Nieves Perez-Solorzano Borragan, eds. ''European Union Politics'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Craig, Paul and Gráinne de Búrca. ''EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials'' (4th ed. 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dinan, Desmond. '' Europe Recast: A History of European Union' '(2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* Hix, Simon. ''What's Wrong with the Europe Union and How to Fix It'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/Whats-Wrong-Europe-Union-How/dp/0745642055/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1263576617&amp;amp;sr=1-10-spell excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kaiser, Wolfram. ''Christian Democracy and the Origins of European Union'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peterson, John, and Michael Shackleton eds. ''The Institutions of the European Union'' (2nd ed. 2006)&lt;br /&gt;
* McCormick, John. ''The European Union: Politics and Policies'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pinder, John,  and Simon Usherwood. ''The European Union: A Very Short Introduction'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/European-Union-Short-Introduction-Introductions/dp/0199233977/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1263575844&amp;amp;sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Podmore, Will &amp;amp; Nicholls, Doug (2006), The EU: bad for Britain - a [[trade union]] view. Bread Books, ISBN 0-942112-5-1.&lt;br /&gt;
* Staab, Andreas.  ''The European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/European-Union-Explained-Institutions-Actors/dp/0253220181/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1263575844&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Yesilada, Birol A. and David M. Wood. ''The Emerging European Union'' (5th ed. 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Globalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Globalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atkins_Diet&amp;diff=1819165</id>
		<title>Atkins Diet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atkins_Diet&amp;diff=1819165"/>
		<updated>2021-12-04T20:51:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Skelly: /* See also */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Atkins.jpg|thumb|Dr. Robert Coleman Atkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Atkins Diet''' is a controversial theory that overweight persons can best lose weight by reducing their intake of [[carbohydrates]].  While the diet encourages the replacement of manufactured carbohydrates with complex and natural carbohydrates, it also allows encourages consumption of increased levels of proteins and healthy fats, which critics argue is contrary to most traditional views of good diet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Cardiologist Dr. Robert Coleman Atkins was the creator if this approach, and his &amp;quot;Dr Atkins' Diet Revolution&amp;quot; was first published in 1972, and then reissued 20 years later as Dr Atkins' New Diet Revolution.  It was the bestselling diet [[book]] in history with sales of 12 million copies.  It is not clear if the record sales were due to the success of the diet or the popularity of message regardless of its effectiveness. Dr. Atkins himself found a center for [[complementary medicine]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it was reported that Dr. Atkins died of a heart attack, in fact, he died from complications following a head injury after a fall on April 17, 2003.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1126011 Robert Coleman Atkins]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Procedure==&lt;br /&gt;
Followers of the Atkins Diet adhere to a plan to reduce intake of refined carbohydrates, increasing intakes of health [[fat]] like Omega-3 and other healthy meat and vegetable fats and to increase water intake to at least eight cups of water a day to help properly hydrate the body. Meals consist of five per day to even out the blood sugars in the body and keep the body &amp;quot;convinced&amp;quot; it is not in a state of starvation. The theory and observed results show that weight loss and body transformations take place for the vast majority who follow this approach. The diet also has been shown to have a healthy effect on pre-diabetic and diabetic patients who follow it. Studies have shown repeatedly that low-carb diets improve the ability of the body to regulate and deal with sugar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People who follow the Atkins Diet eat in phases. Phase One of the diet encourages people to reduce carbohydrate intake by eating a foundation of healthy vegetables, proteins, healthy fats and cheeses as well as nuts and seeds. The Phase 1 approach is often called &amp;quot;Induction&amp;quot; and allows for 20 grams of carbohydrates a day for two weeks. Eating foods loaded with healthy fats, such as Salmon and avocados along with vegetables kick-starts the weight loss and transformation of the body. Drinking lots of water and healthy exercise is also encouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second phase, also called &amp;quot;Balancing&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;OWL - Ongoing Weight Loss&amp;quot; is to slowly increase the number of vegetables, nuts and fruit back into the diet and to monitor how the individual body reacts to this. Allowed carbs are 25 grams per day during this phase at the start and to increase by five grams weekly until your body stops the weight loss. The diet recognizes this fact that each person is different and encourages people to be vigilant and monitor weight and health as these foods are reintroduced. Once ongoing weight loss comes to a halt, the person removes 5 grams from the daily intake and weight loss recommences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third phase, &amp;quot;Fine Tuning&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Pre-Maintenance&amp;quot;, is designed to add more health carbohydrates as the weight loss slows and as the person is within reach of their goal weight. The daily healthy carbohydrate intake is upped by ten-gram increments to evaluate how the body will react and to allow the person to gauge their set point for weight-loss versus weight-gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Phase four, &amp;quot;Maintenance&amp;quot;, is a variation of Phase 3 with the person varying their diet seasonally and monitoring their weight and fitness to keep the weight off. This is described by many as the hardest aspect of the plan, but supporters argue that this is no different than any other diet plan where successful weight loss has occurred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Impact ==&lt;br /&gt;
Atkins promoted an measure called &amp;quot;Net Carbs&amp;quot; where the total carbohydrates are deducted from the fiber (and later on, sugar alternatives like erythritol and allulose). This measure is now abundant in modern food products low in carbohydrates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Medical Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Doctor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nutrition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Diabetes]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ, the apostles and the Mediterranean diet/Mosaic diet]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carbohydrate-insulin model]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.atkins-diet-advisor.com/ The Comprehensive Guide to the Atkins Diet Plan]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://altmedicine.about.com/od/popularhealthdiets/a/AtkinsDiet.htm The Atkins Diet for Type 2 Diabetes]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.atkins.com/ Atkins Diet home page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nutrition]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Skelly</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>