Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington

2007-07-06T03:11:23Z

Staple:

[[Image:Wellington.jpg|right|thumb|250px|"Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington Field-Marshal & Prime Minister" by Alfred, Count D'Orsay (1845)]]
'''Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington''' (1769-1852)was born in [[Dublin]], [[Ireland]]. He was a British soldier and statesman. He is most well known as the general who defeated Napoleon’s army in [[Spain]] and [[Portugal]] and at the Battle of Waterloo. Wellington served as prime minister of the [[United Kingdom]] twice as the leader of the Tory party.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Wellesley, Arthur, 1st Duke of Wellington}}
[[Category:History]]
[[Category:Biography]]
[[Category:Biographies]]

Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington

2007-07-06T03:11:09Z

Staple:

[[Image:Wellington.jpg|right|thumb|250px|"Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington Field-Marshal & Prime Minister" by Alfred, Count D'Orsay (1845)]]
'''Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington''' (1769-1852)was born in [[Dublin]], [[Ireland]]. He was a British soldier and statesman. He is most well known as the general who defeated Napoleon’s army in [[Spain]] and [[Portugal]] and at the Battle of Waterloo. Wellington served as prime minister of the [[United Kingdom]] twice as the leader of the Tory party.

[{{DEFAULTSORT:Wellesley, Arthur, 1st Duke of Wellington}}
[[Category:History]]
[[Category:Biography]]
[[Category:Biographies]]

Alhurra

2007-07-06T03:01:39Z

Staple: Undo revision 219112 by Special:Contributions/HardOn4Jesus (User talk:HardOn4Jesus)

'''Alhurra''' (Arabic for "The Free One") is a commercial-free Arabic-language satellite television channel for the Middle East devoted primarily to news and information. In addition to reporting on regional and international events, the channel broadcasts discussion programs, current affairs magazines and features on a variety of subjects including health and personal fitness, entertainment, sports, fashion, and science and technology. Alhurra is dedicated to presenting accurate, balanced and comprehensive news. <ref>[http://www.alhurra.com/ Alhurra] </ref>

==References==
<references/>

[[Category:Media]]

Global village

2007-07-06T03:00:36Z

Staple: Undo revision 219105 by Special:Contributions/AndreM31 (User talk:AndreM31)

The global village is a world view of Earth as one common group of people, one community united by common needs and experiences. Some individuals reject this view of the world as both incorrect and undesirable. However, the [[Pentecost]] experience in the Upper Room, following the ascension of Christ, marks the birth of the Church and a reversal of the confusion of tongues instituted at Babel in the time of Genesis. In this view Christians are called to bring every nation into one body whose head is Jesus.
[[category:philosophy]]

Church

2007-07-06T02:54:10Z

Staple: Undo revision 219094 by Special:Contributions/NoMercyB (User talk:NoMercyB)

{{Christianity}}

A '''church''' is a building in which worship, usually of a [[Christian]] nature, takes place.

A church in which a bishop resides is known as a [[cathedral]].

==Etymology==

The word '''church''' comes, through the Old English ''circe'', from the Koine Greek κυριακον (''kyriakon''), which means "Lord's House".

[[Category:Religion]]

Women

2007-07-06T02:49:19Z

Staple: Undo revision 219085 by Special:Contributions/NoMercyB (User talk:NoMercyB)

{{generalize}}

'''Women''' is the plural for the female of the human species, with the biological role of bearing and nurturing offspring. In preparation for this role, women's breasts begin to grow at puberty, forming the most striking physical difference between women and men after the reproductive organs. Other differences include a layer of subcutaneous fat under the skin which hides the underlying musculature and a wider pelvis to facilitate carrying the [[baby]] and allowing it to be born. Women also have a greater proportion of fine vellus hair over certain areas of their skin (such as their face and legs) than the coarse terminal hair which appears on men. {{fact}}

While men have typically two or three times more upper body strength than women, their leg strength is comparable and women have proven more durable in feats of physical endurance. Women have slightly longer average lifespans than men, which results in women overtaking men in population by middle age despite a 1.05:1 boy to girl ratio at birth in the United States. This rate varies among countries. {{fact}}

== Women in history ==

Compared to men, relatively few women have had impact on history as leaders in diverse fields, but a small number of women have had enormous impact. They include [[Isabella of Spain]], [[Joan of Arc]], [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Elizabeth I]], [[Boudicca]], [[Catherine the Great]], [[Cleopatra]], [[Marie Curie]], [[Benazir Bhutto]], [[Golda Meir]], [[Indira Gandhi]], [[Lucretia Mott]], [[Susan B. Anthony]], [[Aung San Suu Kyi]], and [[Theresa of Calcutta]].

== Women in the Bible ==

=== Genesis ===
According to [[biblical literalism]], women, like men, were created by God on the 6th day of [[Creation]], as told in The Book of [[Genesis]]. [[Genesis]] further elaborates that [[God]] took a rib from [[Adam]], the first man, and from it created [[Eve]], the first woman, as a subservient companion for [[Adam]]. Also not explicitly stated in the [[Bible]], it is obvious that, due to the manner in which Eve was created, she was Adam's wife, as God does not intend for two humans in such a union to be any other way.{{fact}} According to some biblical literalists, Eve caused sin and suffering to come into the world when she tricked Adam into eating from The Tree of Knowledge an act directly forbidden by God Himself. As punishment for this, God declared that women shall experience great pain in childbirth and shall always be ruled over by their husbands. <ref>Genesis 3:16</ref>

=== New Testament statements on the role of women ===
Saint Paul also has much to say on the status of women in society, most memorably that women should submit to their husbands just as the church submits to God.
<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ephesians%205:22-24&version=9 Ephesians 5:22-24 ]</ref>
<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=I%20Corinthians%2011:8-9;&version=9; I Corinthians 11:8-9]</ref>
<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=I%20Corinthians%2011:4-7;&version=9; I Corinthians 11:4-7]</ref>
<ref>[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=I%20Corinthians%2014:34-35;&version=9; I Corinthians 14:34-35]</ref>
The Bible also states that if a man sells his daughter into slavery she must consent and "not go out as the menservants do." (Exodus 21:7)

The New Testament contains many instructions regarding the role of women:
# Women are to dress modestly<ref>1 Timothy 2:9</ref><ref>Peter 3:2-6</ref>.
# Women may learn in silence, but may not be permitted to teach<ref>1 Timothy 2:11-12</ref>. Some interpretations limit this rule to the teaching of doctrine.
# Women are not permitted to speak in church<ref>1 Corinthians 14:34-35 (Spoken by Paul></ref>.
# Women are to be subservient to and follow the instructions of their husbands<ref>Ephesians 5:22-24</ref><ref>Colossians 3:18</ref><ref>Titus 2:4-5</ref><ref>1 Peter 3:1-7</ref>.

These viewpoints are not not widely accepted in secular, first-world nations, although many believers still adhere to them.

==References==
<references />

== Related Topics ==
[[Men]]

Basal Cleavage

2007-07-06T02:45:51Z

Staple: Undo revision 219078 by Special:Contributions/Snacks (User talk:Snacks)

[[Cleavage]] that is [[parallel]] to the [[basal]] [[crystal plane]] of a [[mineral]].

Pellant, p. 250

=Sources=
*Pellant, Chris. ''The Complete Book of Rocks and Minerals'', Dorling Kindersley Inc.: New York (1995)

[[category:geology]]

Rabbi

2007-07-06T02:43:43Z

Staple: Undo revision 219074 by Special:Contributions/Snacks (User talk:Snacks)

A '''Rabbi''' is a faith leader in the Jewish religion, much like a minister or priest in the Christian religion. Rabbi means, "Teacher" in Hebrew.

Johannes Kepler

2007-07-06T02:39:51Z

Staple: Undo revision 219065 by Special:Contributions/Snacks (User talk:Snacks)

[[Image:Gfdse5y465.jpg|right|thumb|Johannes Kepler]]
'''Johannes Kepler''' (1571-1630), a [[Protestant]] in [[Germany]], built on [[Copernicus]]'s work and discovered that planets orbited the sun in elliptical rather than perfectly circular orbits. Kepler was a brilliant mathematician, astronomer and devout [[Christian]] who cited God many times in all of his writings. He felt it was his Christian duty to understand the creation of God, the universe. He also felt that man, being in the image of God, was fully capable of understanding the universe. Like [[Plato]] and [[Pythagoras]], Kepler felt that God must have created the universe according to a mathematical plan.

Kepler overcame an enormous obstacle to become a great scientist, as he suffered from an attack of [[smallpox]] when he was only four years old. The disease left him with poor eyesight and crippled hands for the rest of his life. However, Kepler went on to propose three laws of planetary motion, known as Kepler's Laws, which later helped Newton formulate the theory of [[gravity]]. One of these laws described how the planets have elliptical orbits with the sun at one focus of each [[ellipse]].

Kepler wrote in book five of his work, "The Harmonies of the World,":

"O, Almighty God, I am thinking Thy thoughts after Thee! ... The book is written, to be read either now or by posterity, I care not which. It may be well to wait a century for a reader, as God has waited six thousand years for an observer."

Kepler compared the celestial orbits of the planets with polyphonic
harmonies in music. He wrote:

"Holy Father, keep us safe in the concord of our love for one another, that we may be one just as Thou art with Thy Son, Our Lord, and with the Holy Ghost, and just as through the sweetest bonds of harmonies Thou hast made all Thy works one; and that from the bringing of Thy people into concord, the body of Thy Church may be built up in the Earth, as Thou didst erect the heavens themselves out of harmonies."

[[Category:Astronomers|Kepler, Johannes]]

Jon Kyl

2007-07-06T02:37:26Z

Staple: Undo revision 219063 by Special:Contributions/Snacks (User talk:Snacks)

[[Image:kyl_pic.jpg|thumb|right|Jon Kyl (center), wearing US Marine Corps fatigues]]
'''Jon Kyl''' (born April 25, 1942) is the junior senator from Arizona.

==United States Senate==
While in the Senate, Kyl co-sponsored legislation that would give illegal immigrants up to five years to leave the country. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190550,00.html]

In February 2006, Kyl joined Senator Lindsey Graham in filing an amicus brief in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case, which appears to have been an attempt to mislead the Supreme Court by presenting an “extensive colloquy” added to the Congressional record but not included in the Dec 21st debate as evidence that "Congress was aware" that the Detainee Treatment Act would strip the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to hear "pending cases, including this case" brought by the Guantanamo detainees. [http://www.slate.com/id/2138750]

Kyl appeared in the U.S. national news near the end of his 2006 campaign as an example of a case where some bloggers were attempting to influence search engine results for searches on Kyl's name. [http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6129719.html?tag=st.util.print]

==External links==
-[http://kyl.senate.gov/ Official Senate Website]
[[Category:US Senators]]

Immanuel Kant

2007-07-06T02:32:39Z

Staple: Undo revision 219047 by Special:Contributions/Blue93apple (User talk:Blue93apple)

[[Image:Gfdyre.jpg|right|thumb]]
'''Immanuel Kant''' (1724-1804) was a [[German]] [[philosopher]]. Kant was among the last of the major [[Enlightenment]] thinkers, and was one of the most influential intellectuals in Europe during his lifetime.

In his ''A Critique of Pure Reason'' Kant criticizes pure [[reason]] as a guide to life, establishing several categories through which reason is able to comprehend the ultimate reality. Though Kant may not have been a [[Christian]] himself, he considered Christian values to be the best, due to the antimony of practical reason. Kant also established a systematic basis for critical philosophy, establishing [[synthetic a priori]] considerations as a prior necessity to [[analytic a priori]] concepts, and suggested a material origin for the solar system (prior to Kant, the origin of the solar system was considered to be immaterial and possibly even a priori). Kant's own suggestion for a moral daily life was the [[categorical imperative]]: ''Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law''. Expressed another way, an act is moral only if it works as a rule for everyone. For example, littering would be wrong because if everyone did it, then there would be an ugly mess. On the other hand, if a murderer asks you where someone is hiding, you should always tell them because lying is wrong. The categorical imperative can be contrasted with the [[hypothetical imperative]], which says that you should act according to any maxim which might possibly be willed. He remained single throughout his life, though he said, toward the end of it, that he could not afford a wife in his youth and did not need one in his old age. Kant's aim was to make philosophy truly scientific.

==Writings==

Books

*Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787)
*Metaphysic of Morals
*Critique of Practical Reason (1788)
*Metaphysical Elements of Ethics
*General Intro to Metaphysic of Morals
*Science of Right
*Critique of Judgement (1790)

::''"Two things fill the mind with ever-increasing wonder and awe, the more often and the more intensely the mind of thought is drawn to them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me."'' Critique of Practical Reason, 1799.

Articles (published in the 1780s and 1790s)

*An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?
*What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Thinking?
*On the Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy
*Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason

:::::''“What can I know? What ought I do? For what may I hope?”''

==External Links==
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-science/ Kant's Philosophy of Science]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-metaphysics/ Kant's Critique of Metaphysics]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-mind/ Kant's View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-aesthetics/ Kant's Aesthetics and Teleology]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-religion/ Kant's Philosophy of Religion]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-development/ Kant's Philosophical Development]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/ Kant's Moral Philosophy]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-leibniz/ Kant and Leibniz]
*[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ Kant's Theory of Judgment]

{{DEFAULTSORT:Kant, Immanuel}}
[[Category:Philosophers]]

User:Staple

2007-07-06T02:24:12Z

Staple: Removing all content from page

Conservapedia talk:Team contest/Team two

2007-07-06T02:17:50Z

Staple: New page: I noticed that you basically only have conservative users on your team. I think it would be more balanced if you had a ratio of 6 conservatives and 1 liberal user on your team. That way it...

I noticed that you basically only have conservative users on your team. I think it would be more balanced if you had a ratio of 6 conservatives and 1 liberal user on your team. That way it represents more closely the ideology of the American people. [[User:Staple|Staple]] 22:17, 5 July 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia talk:Team contest/Team one

2007-07-06T02:17:22Z

Staple:

I am honored to be on a team with such strong contributors. I hope I will be able to do you justice in what I am able to produce. Good luck all. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:54, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

I noticed that you basically only have conservative users on your team. I think it would be more balanced if you had a ratio of 6 conservatives and 1 liberal user on your team. That way it represents more closely the ideology of the American people. [[User:Staple|Staple]] 22:17, 5 July 2007 (EDT)

User:Staple

2007-06-29T04:02:44Z

Staple:

{|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:3px solid Khaki; background-color:beige;"
|
Favorite Fictional Characters
#God
#Auqaman
#Yoda

The Washington Post

2007-06-29T03:30:50Z

Staple:

'''The Washington Post''' is a [[newspaper]] in [[Washington D.C.]].

Talk:Quote mining

2007-06-29T03:15:27Z

Staple: Liberal Bias

==Usage of the term?==
I'd never heard it before. Some Googling and a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quote_mining the corresponding Wikipedia article] give me the distinct impression that it is commonly used by evolutionists against creationists, but that it is ''not commonly used in any other context.'' It also seems to be a fairly recent coinage.

Thoughts? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:55, 8 March 2007 (EST)

:I have heard this term before, but only ever used by evolutionists as an attack on creation researchers. It was apparently coined on the evolutionist discussion group Talk.Origins. CreationWiki [http://creationwiki.org/Quote-mining has a response to this]. Perhaps for balance, the sample "mined" quote could be changed from Darwin to an example of an evolutionist quoting, say, Dembski, out of context? [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] 07:55, 8 March 2007 (EST)

::Surely 'balance' would be having both? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:01, 8 March 2007 (EST)

:::Not if it's really ''used'' only in one direction. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:38, 8 March 2007 (EST)

::::Good point. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:54, 8 March 2007 (EST)

::Maybe we could change it to a more abstract (and made-up) example that emphasizes the point while at the same time simply telling the context in which the term is often used (Evolutionists accusing Creationists of doing so, possibly with the reply by Creationists as Richard gave it - I haven't checked that link)? The quote strikes me as needlessly complicated, especially for an example that is supposed to make a point clear. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 08:33, 8 March 2007 (EST)

:::Actually, what triggered my comment was that I was ''planning'' to find or concoct an example that did not involve either evolution or creationism, but if I'm correct that the phrase is used only in the evolution/creationism dispute—and, as [[User:Rich P|Dr. Richard Paley]] notes, only in one direction—such an example would be misleading, because it wouldn't be illustrating the actual way the term is used. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:35, 8 March 2007 (EST)

:::(MAD Magazine once had a very funny article about the way in which movie advertising takes reviewers' quotes out of context.) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:37, 8 March 2007 (EST)

::::I suspect you're right; while the phenomenon is fairly ubiquitous, the 'quote mine' tag seems to be a neologism more or less unique to this case. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 08:54, 8 March 2007 (EST)

I attempted to solve some of the issues here by using a quote where the subject, Dembski, wrote a response to being accused of quote mining. Are people more comfortable with this arrangement or should we keep looking for another solution? [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 13:16, 8 March 2007 (EST)

: No, I don't think that Dembski story solved anything, because you have done a little quote mining yourself in order to tell it the way that you did. You ran together 2 quotes that are really 5 pages apart. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:49, 8 March 2007 (EST)
::It was the only reliable source that had responded to a quote mine so I ran with it with out realizing that they were separated, my mistake, I have reverted to the old quote and weaved in your information, removing the now irrelevant text. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:02, 8 March 2007 (EST)

But the new example isn't an example of "quote mining," it's an example of plain old "quotation out of context." Unless you can find a reference that says it's ever referred to as "quote mining" outside of talk.origins, CreationWiki, and other discussions specifically of evolution/creationism. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:35, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Yea, yea, but quote mining is the collection of "out of context quotes" but I know what you are getting at though. I do not think there is anyway to save this page on conservapedia, all the material will be way to tendentious because of the dichotomy of creation/evolution. So I say we just nuke the whole darn thing!

Now I am not convinced that its not salvageable at wikipedia but I will take that up there :) [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:54, 8 March 2007 (EST)

:(In case people don't understand: I nominated "Quote mining" for deletion on Wikipedia on the grounds that it's not yet in dictionaries or what Wikipedia considers to be reliable published sources. Tmtoulouse or you or I can do some original research and confirm that it's widely used in a few specific places, such as the USENET newsgroup talk.origins, and that it's used primarily in the context of the evolution/creationism debate, but I don't think you can find that information in a published source meeting WIkipedia's reliable source guidelines. I could well be wrong...) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:01, 8 March 2007 (EST)

::There is also developing a more general use. It is perhaps rather bold to start with the most contentious topics, but the two examples show how it can be used to support various types of argument. If it is an invalid method of argument, and yet creationists use is, where can they be shown this is a more friendly place than here?[[User:DDG|DDG]] 23:58, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

I think that there may be a misunderstanding concerning quote mining. Quote mining is a concept that has existed ever since books, papers, and intellectual journals have been written. One of the primary determinants of an accurate and honest work is the avoidance of quote mining, as it is tempting to skew sources to support whatever the writer would like to say. Anyone can find dozens of sources to support even the most ridiculous of notions. I think that the is no legitimate reason for this article to be deleted. It has nothing to do with the imaginary war between science and religion. It's about good, factual writing.

: So I guess that you would argue that no accurate and honest work would ever use Bartlett's Familiar Quotations. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:10, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
:: It is one thing to pull out a quote to add flavor to opinion piece (something on love on Valentines day). It is quite another to use out of context or partial quotes to try to support an argument - especially when that quote when in context says the opposite of what the out of context part says. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 16:20, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

::: Yes, those are different, but which is "quote mining"? I don't think that the term has any generally-agreed definition. Thumbing thru Bartlett's sure seems like quote mining to me. It also seems like quote mining when the press digs out old quotes from presidential candidates, even if the quotes are presented in context. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 18:09, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

I'm confused by the George W. Bush quotation. How are the bold words taken out of context?

: The excerpt removes the antecedent to "they", changing the meaning. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:33, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Why is this article up for deletion?
It's neutral and balanced in its current form.

[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]

...and now, 4 hours later (21:14, 28 April) it isn't anymore...
You've got to admire such efficiency.

[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]

:Indeed; Aschlafly did a hatchet job on the into. An [[Out of context]] quote might be accidental, but Quote Mining reflects a deliberate and often systematic misrepresentation. To say "quote mining reflects an objection to quoting someone for criticizing his own belief system, on the theory that if he still believes in the system then it is somehow unfair to quote his criticism of it." is disingenuous; consider the Darwin quote. We can mention that the term was coined by people discussing evolution, but it has moved beyond that. -- [[User:Limulus|Limulus]] 16:59, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

== Liberal Bias ==

How can this article have a liberal bias to it? There is nothing political at all about quote mining. [[User:Staple|Staple]] 23:15, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Quote mining

2007-06-29T03:12:23Z

Staple: updated reference

'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is a meaningless term that expresses objection when a quote is used against person quoted. This term is not recognized by the dictionary, and is used primarily by evolution believers to oppose the use of quotations by evolutionists that tend to discredit their theory.<ref>The term "quote mining" shows up on only 52,700 Google pages as of June 28, 2007.</ref>

The entire legal and political fields use quotes by others against them. There is nothing objectionable about this practice, and the term quote-mining could apply to nearly every legal proceeding and political campaign.

==References==
<references/>

==External Links==
* [http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7547/cequotes.html Selected Creation/Evolution Quotes]
* [http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/Tools/Quotes.asp Creation Quotes] list from [[Answers in Genesis]]
*[http://creationwiki.org/%28Talk.Origins%29_Quote-mining (Talk.Origins) Quote-mining - CreationWiki]
* [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/quotes/mine/project.html The Quote Mine Project] - hosted by the [[talk.origins]] archive

==See also==
*[[Evolution]]
*[[Young Earth Creationism]]

Rugby

2007-06-29T02:37:54Z

Staple: Replacing page with 'Rugby can refer to: *Rugby (Sport)- A sport played in England. *Rugby, North Dakota- A city in North Dakota.'

Rugby can refer to:

*[[Rugby (Sport)]]- A sport played in England.
*[[Rugby, North Dakota]]- A city in North Dakota.

Rugby (sport)

2007-06-29T02:36:36Z

Staple: New page: '''Rugby''' refers to the sports of rugby union and rugby league, which are team sports popular in the Britain, France, Ireland, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and throughout...

'''Rugby''' refers to the sports of [[rugby union]] and [[rugby league]], which are team sports popular in the Britain, France, Ireland, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and throughout the south Pacific region. It is similar in some ways to [[American football]], being the original basis of American football's laws, and to [[soccer]].

Two teams of fifteen (rugby union) or thirteen (rugby league) players carry, pass and kick the ball down the field in order to be able to touch the ball down in the opposition's in-goal, (an in-goal being the comparative and the derivative of the end zone in America football). When the ball is touched down, it is known as a '''try'''. Scoring a try awards that team a certain amount of points: 5 in rugby union and 4 in rugby league. An '''attempt''' (or try, the original source of the word) '''at conversion''' is than allowed which is taken by kicking the ball from a stationary position on the ground (usually with the help of a kicking tee or a small mound of dirt) over the '''crossbars''' of the posts which awards the team an additional 2 points. Other manners of scoring points is by penalty kick: worth 2 points in rugby league and 3 points in rugby union, or by drop goal:worth 1 point in rugby league and 3 points in rugby union. [http://www.uidaho.edu/clubs/womens_rugby/RugbyRoot/rugby/Rules/LawBook/preface.html#object]

==See also==
*[[History of rugby]]
*[[Touch football]]
*[[Rugby league]]

[[Category:Sport]]

Rugby, North Dakota

2007-06-29T02:35:31Z

Staple: New page: '''Rugby''' is a city in North Dakota. Rugby is the geographical center of North America.

'''Rugby''' is a city in [[North Dakota]]. Rugby is the geographical center of [[North America]].

Winnipeg

2007-06-29T02:32:28Z

Staple:

'''Winnipeg''' is the captial and largest city of [[Manitoba]], a province of [[Canada]]. The city is north of the geographical center of North America, and is the "Gateway to the West" in Canada, were the Praries open up from the Canadian Shield.

==Winnipeg Sports Franchises ==

*Winnipeg [[Blue Bombers]] ([[CFL]] [[Football]])
*Winnipeg [[Jets]] ([[NHL]]) ([[Hockey]]) -No longer exists

[[Category:Canada]]

User talk:Dickisgreat

2007-06-29T02:27:07Z

Staple: New page: I like your name. :) ~~~~

I like your name. :) [[User:Staple|Staple]] 22:27, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Political positions of George W. Bush

2007-06-29T02:24:24Z

Staple: Redirecting to George W. Bush

#REDIRECT [[George W. Bush]]

Political positions of George W. Bush

2007-06-29T02:19:37Z

Staple: Redirecting to George W. Bush

#REDIRECT [[George W. Bush]]

Political positions of George W. Bush

2007-06-29T02:19:02Z

Staple: Redirecting to George Bush

#REDIRECT [[George Bush]]

Sexual

2007-06-28T03:32:58Z

Staple: Redirecting to Gender

#REDIRECT [[Gender]]

Fargo

2007-06-28T03:28:52Z

Staple:

'''Fargo''' is the largest city in [[North Dakota]]. It is the county seat of [[Cass County]], and is located in the Red River Valley. As of the 2000 Census, Fargo's population was above 90,000. Including [[Moorhead]], [[Minnesota]], it forms the [[Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area]]. Currently the population is above 180,000 and includes a portion of [[Clay County]] in northwestern Minnesota.

The city of Fargo is the crossroads of Interstate 29 and Interstate 94, making it the economic center of a large portion of eastern North Dakota and a portion of northwestern Minnesota. The population of North Dakota can be accurately "split" by these two highways.

Fargo's motto is "Gateway to the West". Fargo was founded in 1871.
'''Mayor''' [[Dennis Walaker]].

== Ten Commandments in Fargo ==
Recently, the Fargo City Commissioners decided in a 3-2 vote to remove the [[Ten Commandments]] monument from the City Hall mall in Fargo. This has outraged many Christians in Fargo and has caused them to start petitioning so that they can bring the issue to the Fargo voters. <ref>http://www.thepath.fm/news/newsitem.cfm?id=25163</ref>

== References ==
<references/>

[[Category:US Towns and Cities]]

Bosnia

2007-06-23T05:01:30Z

Staple:

'''Bosnia''' is the northern part of [[Bosnia-Herzegovina]]. It is a mountainous republic of south-central [[Europe]]; formerly part of the [[Ottoman Empire]] and then a part of [[Yugoslavia]]. The capital of Bosnia is [[Sarajevo]]. Bosnia voted for independence in 1990 but the mostly [[Serbian]] army of Yugoslavia refused to accept the vote and began ethnic cleansing in order to rid Bosnia of its [[Croats]] and [[Muslims]] (see [[Bosnian War]])

Talk:Tree of Life

2007-06-23T04:57:06Z

Staple: New page: Shouldn't this be a part of Charles Darwin page? Does it really need its own article? ~~~~

Shouldn't this be a part of Charles Darwin page? Does it really need its own article? [[User:Staple|Staple]] 00:57, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Taxation

2007-06-23T04:55:19Z

Staple:

'''Taxation''' is how [[government]]s obtain [[money]] in order to provide services required for the common good.

There are many kinds of taxes, just as there are many things that are (or are not) considered to be in the common good.

Taxes can include:
*[[Tariff]]s on imported or exported goods and services
*[[Property tax]]es on the value of one's [[real estate]] holdings
*[[Sales tax]]es on marketplace transactions
**(The preceding three are examples of ''[[ad valorem tax|ad valorem]]'' taxes)
*[[Income tax]]es on money that is earned
*[[Estate tax]]es on inheritances
*[[Poll tax]]es required in order to vote
*[[Rooms and meals tax]]es, charged on [[restaurant]] and [[hotel]] purchases
*"[[Sin tax]]es" which are applied to socially disapproved products such as tobacco and alcohol
*[[Pigovian tax]]es are applied to correct negative externalities
*[[Toll]]s are fees paid by users of a specific piece of [[infrastructure]], like a [[road]] or [[bridge]]
*[[Value Added Tax|Value added tax]] is charged to manufacturers on the increase in value from raw materials to finished product (and of course passed along to consumers of the product)

Most systems of taxation not only use a combination of several of these, but have many exceptions (and loopholes) from universal application - for instance, a sales tax might not apply to food or clothing.

Rates of taxation and the provision of some services can be matters of great [[politics|political]] contention.

==See Also==

[[Government services]]

Spokane

2007-06-23T04:53:04Z

Staple:

'''Spokane''' is the second largest city in [[Washington]] state. Spokane is named after the Spokane Indian Tribe. The 2006 population was 201,600. It is located in eastern Washington and is about 18 miles from the Washington-Idaho border. The Spokane river runs through downtown Spokane and Mount Spokane is located to the Northeast.

Fargo

2007-06-23T04:44:40Z

Staple:

North Dakota

2007-06-23T04:39:06Z

Staple:

{| border="1" align="right" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="300" style="margin-left:5px"
|align="center" colspan="2"|
|-
!colspan="2" align="center" style="color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;"|North Dakota
|-
!colspan="2" align="center" style="color: black; height: 30px; background: white no-repeat scroll top left;"|[[Image:North_Dakota_State_Flag.gif|250px]]
Flag of North Dakota
|-
|Capital
|[[Bismarck]]
|-
|Nickname
|Peace Garden State
|-
|Official Language
|[[English]]
|-
|Governor
|[[John Hoeven]] ([[Republican|R]])
|-
|U.S. Senator
|[[Byron Dorgan]] ([[Democrat|D]])
|-
|U.S. Senator
|[[Kent Conrad]] ([[Democrat|D]])
|-
|House of Representative
|[[Earl Pomeroy]] ([[Democrat|D]])
|-
|Area
|70,762 sq mi
|-
|Population (2000 estimate)
|642,200
|-
|Admission to Union
|November 2, 1889
|-
|}

'''North Dakota''' is a northern Midwestern state that became the thirty-ninth state to enter into the union on November 2, 1889. It entered on the same day as [[South Dakota]], but is given status first because of alphabetical order. Its capital is Bismarck, and largest city by population is Fargo. North Dakota is the only state that has a state-owned bank in the nation.<ref>http://www.banknd.nd.gov/bndhome.jsp</ref>

Its current political nature is an anomaly; while it has given its electoral votes to Republican Presidential candidates since 1968, usually by wide margins, voters have continued to elect all Democrats to both Houses of Congress.

==Notable people from North Dakota==

*[[Dick Armey]], a former US Representative who played a significant role in the Republican takeover of the House of Representatives in 1994, was born in Cando.
*[[Louis L'Amour]], an author who specialized in writing Westerns, was born in Jamestown.
*[[Sacagawea]], who served as a guide on Lewis and Clark's expedition, spent several years living in a village in what is now North Dakota.

== References ==
<references/>
[[Category:US state]]

Presuppositionalist Metaphysics

2007-06-23T04:30:32Z

Staple:

'''Presuppositionalist Metaphysics''' holds that first principles should be discovered or known prior to developing an empirical method of inquiry. This is a time-honored [[philosophy]] that is still held by [[Christian apologetics|apologists]] the world over. In staunch contrast to presuppositionalism, [[logical positivism|logical positivists]] and [[pragmatism|pragmatists]] often seek, instead, to take the functionality of the empirical method as self-evident, and then infer ontological and cognitive stability from that. This is an effort, in both cases, to dispense with metaphysics in favor of the materialistic philosophy espoused by [[Karl Popper]] and [[Rudolf Carnap]]. This method can be subjected to two critiques: 1) We are still engaging in presuppositionalism since we're now presupposing that science works or 2) This is circular reasoning because the goal is to find an ontological structure in the world which will allow materialistic methods to work by assuming that the materialistic methods work.

Because apologists are often more careful in their philosophy, presuppositionalist metaphysics (being the only logical course of investigation in metaphysics) can then be used to infer a designer. If first principles are obtained, then we have either obtained them by divine inspiration, or by our own investigation. But to find them by our own investigation would require a functional method of empirical inquiry, which we cannot have without the first principles from which we might infer the appropriate method of empirical inquiry. So, if we are to have a functional empirical method, we must possess the first principles a priori -- thus they have been given to us by God. This is why [[creationism|creationists]] will often challenge [[darwinism|Darwinists]] on epistemological grounds -- the Darwinists have rigged the game by simply "defining away" the first principles which make knowledge possible while, for creationists, the methodology is based on the principles given by divine writ.

[[Category:Philosophy]]

User talk:Staple

2007-06-23T04:29:18Z

Staple: /* Green card */

== I think he means... ==

This? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harvard_abortion_study&diff=125203&oldid=125193 Andy will be on you if you reveal his pov for him. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but I was changing opinion into fact. An article shouldn't have opinions. It should only have facts.--[[User:Staple|Staple]] 13:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

You forget you are on Conservapedia, not Wikipedia :P
see [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 13:55, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but it is exactly that kind of double-talk, truth-telling gobbledygook that will get you into trouble around here. Mr. Andy doesn't want you to reveal what he thinks, he wants people to accept his opinion ''as'' fact. Now, stop being rational and get back to work. ;-) [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:57, 24 April 2007 (EDT) (At this point I'll turn off the sarcasm. Oh, and help yourself to a userbox on my page if you'd like. I offer them out like Halloween candy.)

Halloween candy makes me fat.--[[User:Staple|Staple]] 14:00, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

== See you in 5 ==

You silly monkey ;-) [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:01, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

:#Flippin, be nice.
:#Staple, don't fan the flames: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harvard_abortion_study&diff=prev&oldid=125231] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:03, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

*I just assumed that Aschlafly would want facts in '''his''' articles and not opinions.--[[User:Staple|Staple]] 14:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
*:"Facts are stubborn things." [http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/3235.html] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

::Hey, meant no harm Staples. But the powersn that be don't like it when you point out that they not only have an agenda, but sometimes and axe that needs grinding. Tread lightly at first, then tell the truth. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

*"Facts are stubborn things." That statement is just someone's opinion. --[[User:Staple|Staple -Sysop]] 14:15, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

==Abortion Study==
Activate email (and then email me) or catch me on IRC to get the study. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]][[User_talk:ColinR|talk]] 14:10, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:Ok, just email me (click [[Special:Emailuser/ColinR|here]]) and I'll send you the study. IRC is Internet Relay Chat, which is similar to AIM, etc. 13:41, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

==Thanks==
I appreciate your vote! [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:35, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

==Question==
could you put the [[Aberdeen Football Club]] article in your soccer category? I would do it but i might mess up somehow.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]

==Liberal user category==

Careful adding it to pages, it will bring up memories of Richard. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 22:18, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:Who is Richard? I just figured this site needs to show which editors are liberal and which are conservative.--'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]''' 22:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
::I appreciate the label! Thanks! [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 22:23, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
I would have added it myself, if it had been an act of free will. '''''HOWEVER''''', you have chosen to edit my user page. Why did you not have the simple courtesy to mention the category on my talk page? I consider this to be a grave breach of wikiquette. [[User:Human|Human]] 22:53, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

==Green card==

Welcome back. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:28, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
:I'm glad to be back. [[User:Staple|Staple]] 00:29, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Talk:Essay:School sports and antitrust

2007-06-23T04:27:15Z

Staple: New page: Shouldn't this be listed as an essay? ~~~~

Shouldn't this be listed as an essay? '''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple HI!]''' 00:27, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

User talk:DanH

2007-06-21T19:01:24Z

Staple: /* Freedom */

'''Archives:'''

[[User talk:MountainDew]]

[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]

==Vandalism==

Dan,

Thanks for all your help dealing with this latest vandal. Rather than deleting all the pages he creates, I have been replacing them with content or redirecting them, and then protecting them. Eventually, we can hope he will run out of inventive names for Satan! ~ [[User:SharonS|Sharon]] [[User talk:SharonS|Talk]] 16:38, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[deletedpage]] ==

when pages need to be deleted and protected, just protect it and replace the content with <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[deletedpage]]</nowiki>. that way it doesn't show up on searches. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim (CPAdmin1)]][[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]] 12:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

== Please take a look at this edit ==

You might want to have a look at this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Che_Guevara&diff=160970&oldid=160909 edit], and the associated photo that was uploaded to make the edit possible. I've already left a message with the user responsible for the photo and edit, but am not sure if it is revertable. [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 18:41, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

==Allegation of Racism==

I fail to see how my comments on Sikhs are racist. Islam and Sikhism do not describe races they describe religion. Both are wrong in my opinion are to be condemed

== Thank you indeed ==

It has been an honor. Thank you indeed.

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:42, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

== Deceit Entry ==

Dan, please accept my apologies on the Ward Churchill edit to the [[deceit]] entry. I was confused about who he is. Feel free to reinsert something, with support like this: [http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_3841949,00.html]
--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:08, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
No need to apologize. I just figured that this instance was not quite conducive to the direct you had intended for this article. I'll re-add it a little later this evening. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:29, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

== Hovind ==

May I ask why you removed "controversial". Given that many other YECs also have issues with him, calling him controversial seems fair. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 12:59, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

== notice ==

please read this: [[New Sysops Training Page]]

[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

== Hello! ==

First of all, thanks for the greeting. This project is very interessting. I'm trying to build up a counter-Wikipedia in german language. The situation of the german Wikipedia is really dire. If you are dissapoited by the english language Wikipeda, take a closer look at the german one. There are not liberals (left) dominating, there are partly well known left-wing extremists (communists, socialists) serving as administrators. It's bad. --[[User:Deutscher|Deutscher]] 16:43, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

== Trashbat ==
Dan - I've no idea if Trashbat is blocked or otherwise in disgrace but the crude sexual reference you removed from [[Leeds]] was not posted by him but by Tony Drago. FYI. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
: I stand corrected. Well spotted. Tony Drago must have been a sock. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:49, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

*I don't see Dan online, however I did see: ''10:13, 20 May 2007 DanH blocked "Trashbat" with an expiry time of infinite ("dogging" reference to Leeds)'' So the two users being blocked are different instances. The other user's block isn't infinte. ;-) --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 14:51, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

:TK The "dogging" reference was put in twice but I only noticed the second edit which was done by Tony Drago. I thought that Trashbat was being unfairly blocked instead of Tony Drago but Dan pointed out that Trashbat had made the orginal edit a lot earlier, so it was fair after all. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:20, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== Siege mentality ==

Thanks for moving that. I was trying to do it myself with a name change and redirect but being a sysop has its advantages I guess. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:15, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[Contaception]] ==

Dan, can you move this to its proper title with an '''R''' in it. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:26, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[Orthohombic]] ==

OK here's another one with a missing '''R''' - it should be orthorhombic. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:38, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== think i made a mistake ==

Got your message. I unblocked him I think before i got your message. Please make sure I did the unblocking right as i am not too techie here. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:58, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

== Question ==
I notice that some sysops protect images. Do you want me to do that to?[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 15:16, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

==Article Creations==
Your welcome Dan. I enjoy contributing to this site. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]]) 22:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

== ! ==
I wanted to undo the Joshua article! Your to fast.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 23:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for your kind welcome. I am glad to be here. I hope I can make a positive contribution. --[[User:ErnstR|ErnstR]] 00:06, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for protecting Joshua. Recently I have become more aware of the responsibility that we have to avoid efforts at sensationalism or inappropriate edits. I found one of our articles in an internet search engine, the first one I have seen. It was listed under atheism. There, proudly, is the link to conservapedia. What is the first line of text in the search engine for all to see what conservapedia says? George Bush states that he doesn't believe atheists should be U.S. citizens... This is what is presented as conservapedia? When we allow through junk, we sully the reputation of the site... Thanks again... [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:25, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks! (sorry not to have anything different from the above 2) ==

It's good to be back! Oh, and check out my shiny new hellenised sig!--[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''ύικι ντερπρετηρ''']] [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]

== Tiny typo==

Hi, hope you don't mind but I am really really picky about punctuation. I'm not proud of the fact, I just can't help it! In the Bible article, in the King James section, second paragraph, second sentence, it says "it's vocabulary", which should be "its vocabulary". "It's" is only ever a contraction of "It is". I wouldn't say anything but I just know there are people like me out there who will see that mistake, roll their eyes, and jump to conclusions (unfairly) about the quality of the article. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 19:09, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

* And then I went and wrote "tint typo" as the description. That's justice. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 19:10, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
==Chrono Trigger==
This was a well known video game in the mid 90s. It is definetly noteworthy. Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia both have articles on it.

== Answers in Creation ==

So do I get brownie points for creating this one Dan? ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:05, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

You definitely do from me, but probably not from the majority of the sysops. LOL just kidding [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:12, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

Hi Dan, I'm trying for sysop now to join you 'elect' guys. I know you've put a 'good job' on my page before so I thought I'd ask what you think of my overall contribution to conservapedia. If you're pleased with my work, I hope you'll drop by and add some comments. Thanks ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:25, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

== Weimar republic ==

Why did you remove the stub? It is more than appropriate for this article. [[User:Order]]

== Protection ==

Hi Dan,

We may be at the point where it would be wise to protect Satan (again) and Hell. I know Satan was opened again to merge in Luficer, but that's been taken care of. Thanks! [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:05, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

== Lions Den ==

Dan with a name like yours was it wise to enter the Lion's Den? :-) [[User:DollarsAndSense|DollarsAndSense]] 16:38, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

== Cumbernauld ==

DanH I see you reverted my reversion of this entry. Channel 4, is an incredibly controversial channel in the UK often broadcating sensationalist programs. It's main output is a program called Big Brother where members of the public are locked in a house together in order to be voted out by the public. Even this is fixed as the most sensational members are reinstated to boost viewing figures. It has featured coed type nude jacuzzi scenes and even live sexual acts. It also gave a prime-time slot to Richard Dawkins to attack religious belief. I would not take seriously any reference to programming from this source. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 17:58, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
:Follow the link - [http://www.channel4.com/life/microsites/D/demolition/worst2.html] Or would you prefer a BBC link? Try [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4362410.stm] I have no idea why you have suddenly appeared to defend reversion of my corrections of previous deliberately inserted inaccuracies and falsehoods, but I stand by my edits and the links above refute your opinion. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:02, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::Your BBC link actually refers to a protest by the local council against this slur. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:06, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
::: A ''slur'' that has seen the town 3 times voted a "carbuncle" etc. Regardless of the news source, the national opinions remain the same. Attacking the edit by claiming it is a liberalist, pornographers' conspiracy is just peurile. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::::If your are going to engage in ''ad hominem'' attacks and name calling then I will not continue this discussion. It is not appropriate language for Conservapedia. [[User:Dafydd|Dafydd]] 18:15, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::The word "peurile" is directed at the action, not the person. And did you forget which sock you were supposed to be using? I thought you were [[User:Alban]]...? Sock-puppetry is also a peurile action. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::::Thank you for your support Dafydd but as a native Scot I think I know what I'm talking about. Cumbernauld is not a monstrous carbuncle and deserves better than being derided by a sensationalist sassenach TV station. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:18, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::Oops! Got the correct puppet on now XD [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::::::Oh yes, very funny. Accuse me of socking. Just because someone else objects to your abusive language. If you want to continue this discussion further then I suggest you move it to one of our talk pages rather than cluttering up a sysops page. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:32, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::::Please refer back to [[User talk:Dafydd|your other talk page]] to see confirmation that you were busted via IP address. Nice try. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:37, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

==Thanks==
Thanks Dan. I appreciate your support. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 23:29, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

==Why was my edit reverted?==

What's wrong? I'm trying to improve the baraminology article by explaining what the types of people under the Human Holobaramin are. It's what's in the Bible. [[User:BillJones|BillJones]] 02:02, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

The Mongoloid entry was totally racist. For one. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 02:26, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

==Your granny==

I mean, your grammar: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Skylab&curid=28032&diff=186334&oldid=186289] Nice fix! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 22:30, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Thank you. My Grandmother would expect nothing less. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

== South Africa ==

Dan, there's a lot on this site I disagree with. So be it. But I am glad to see that people here find all those racist bits on South Africa as loathsome as I do. Thanks for nuking all those entries by a guy who seems to be longing for the days of Pik Botha. [[User:Sevenstring|Sevenstring]] 23:15, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

==Capitals==

Thanks for the info. I did search under several titles for US Capitals, etc. but no pages came up. Should I ask a sysop to delete my page, or is that unnecessary? [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 15:20, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

I think your page looks good, and better than the other one. Maybe if all the links got fixed that would be best. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

== blocking ==

Hey how can you find the IP for the user, I dont think I have the checkuser button. lol Sorry I might sound dumb.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:19, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

I sent the instructions to you through Conservapedia email. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:21, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

::I heard about the email and no one told me how to acess it!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:44, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

How to access your email? It should just be sent to whatever email you signed up to the site with. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:45, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

::O thanks. Um Tk told me you also get a email through conservapedia. So I got that confused.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

That may be what he meant. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

:Yes, it was. Will, if your email is enabled here, users can email you, CP will forward it to your regular email account. If you reply to them via your email client, they will also have your email. If you respond to them via the CP "email this user" deal, they will not. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 06:05, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

Should I block Brainslug? Brainslug created Zimbardo Cookie Experiment and has had a 2 hour block in his past. [[User:BethanyS|~Beth~]]

Yes. If he wants back, he can email you and plead his case. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:17, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

== Question ==

How was your paper on [[Putin]]? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:17, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
:well done. He is not a good guy. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:57, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

== Andorra ==
On the matter of [[Andorra]], look at who the edits before me were made by; [[So Alone]] who was blocked for being a sock of this one guy. Do you think his edits are trustworthy? [[User:UnderCurrent|UnderCurrent]] 16:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for pointing that out! Definitely not trustworthy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:38, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

:P.S. Where would one find a compendium on user boxes around here? [[User:UnderCurrent|UnderCurrent]] 16:53, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Userboxes [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:56, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

== Question ==

Hello, I was looking at the user creation log and I noticed this:

15:08, 12 June 2007 HolographicMedia (Talk | contribs | block) created account for User:OpticalEthernet (Talk | contribs | block)

What happened, and is this allowed? Can users create accounts for others like this?[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:56, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

I'm not sure how that works, but I think that without an explanation given, it generally isn't allowed. I know that HolographicMedia was blocked earlier today. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:58, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

== you missed ==
I think you missed [[User:MartyFillmore]]. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 18:43, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

== Image ==

Hello, Dan. I see you protected an [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Balkans.png image] I uploaded. Did you, by any chance, look at the talk page? The image is a modified version of a Wikipedia image, and I wasn't sure if it was acceptable. Thanks! [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 00:31, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

== War Elephants ==

Hell ya it is!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:25, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

I bet its true [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:48, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

== Request for assistence in writing Article. ==

I have noted that two rather influential Supreme Court Justices have not managed to receive articles about them, namely, Hugo L. Black and William O. Douglas. However previous attempts at writing articles have ended in deletion as the result of perhaps a bit too overt a bias, I have the [[William Orville Douglas| beginnings of an article]] but am not remotely certain as to how I should proceed from here without repeating past mistakes. If at all possible could you review the beginnings of the page and lend me some of your wisdom?
Thanks-N. i. V.[[User:Nullius in Verba|Nullius in Verba]] 08:40, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

*Don't bother, Dan. I rather think old Nullius will have a problem with soiled robes, and won't be able to participate. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 09:26, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

==[[Freedom]]==
Dan, have you seen the Freedom entry? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom&action=history] This article probably needs some serious treatment. Any idea who we can recruit to work on it? Thanks. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:32, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
:I'll ask Karajou. Thanks. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:37, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

::It's on my list, boys. This should have been emailed, to keep from crossing up. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 08:21, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

==script?==
do we italicize book titles? Thanks!--'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple HI!]''' 15:01, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Talk:Ezra Pound

2007-06-21T19:00:09Z

Staple: New page: This should be a huge page, if anyone wants to help. He had a lot of influence. --~~~~

This should be a huge page, if anyone wants to help. He had a lot of influence. --'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple HI!]''' 15:00, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Ezra Pound

2007-06-21T18:58:52Z

Staple: New page: Ezra Pound (1885–1972) was an American poet, musician, and critic who was a major figure of the Modernist movement in early-to mid- 20th century poetry. He was the driving force ...

Ezra Pound (1885–1972) was an American [[poet]], musician, and critic who was a major figure of the [[Modernist movement]] in early-to mid- 20th century poetry. He was the driving force behind several Modernist movements, notably [[Imagism]] and [[Vorticism]].

As critic, Pound helped establish the careers of some of the 20th century's most influential writers including [[W. B. Yeats]], [[T.S. Eliot]], [[James Joyce]], [[Robert Frost]], [[William Carlos Williams]], [[H.D.]], [[Marianne Moore]], [[Ernest Hemingway]], [[D. H. Lawrence]], [[Basil Bunting]], [[George Oppen]], and [[Charles Olson]].

==Selected Bibliography==
*The Cantos
*athay, poems in translation
*Cavalcanti, opera
*Jefferson and/or Mussolini, essays
*L'America, Roosevelt e le Cause della Guerra Presente, essays

User talk:Staple

2007-06-21T18:49:00Z

Staple: /* Nazi Flag */

Talk:Gary Soto

2007-06-21T18:48:39Z

Staple:

Are you sure it's poetry for adults? I've always known him as a children's writer. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:47, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
:Yes, he is included in the Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry. His poem '''Oranges''' is often cited as his best work. He also writes children's books and poetry. '''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]''' 14:48, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Gary Soto

2007-06-21T18:46:40Z

Staple: New page: Gary Soto, (1952-?) is from Fresno, California, and is the author of ten poetry collections for adults, most notably ''New and Selected Poems'', a 1995 finalist for both the ''Los ...

Gary Soto, (1952-?) is from [[Fresno]], [[California]], and is the author of ten poetry collections for adults, most notably ''New and Selected Poems'', a 1995 finalist for both the ''Los Angeles Times Book Award'' and the ''National Book Award.''

Soto lives and teaches in Fresno.

==Selected Bibliography==
*Buried Onions
*New and Selected Poems
*Cesar Chavez: A Hero for Everyone
*Baseball in April and Other Stories
*Novio Boy: A Play

Richard Hugo

2007-06-21T18:39:40Z

Staple:

Richard Hugo was born on December 21, 1923, in [[White Center]], [[Washington]], a suburb of [[Seattle]]. He is known as a Pacific Northwest poet and studied with both [[James Wright]] (poet) and [[Theodore Roethke]], who taught his class at the University of Washington.

==Selected Bibliography==
*The Triggering Town: Lectures and Essays on Poetry and Writing
*Making Certain It Goes On: The Collected Poems of Richard Hugo
*The Real West Marginal Way: A Poet's Autobiography

Richard Hugo

2007-06-21T18:39:06Z

Staple: New page: Richard Hugo was born on December 21, 1923, in White Center, Washington, a suburb of Seattle. He is known as a Pacific Northwest poet and studied with both James Wright and...

Richard Hugo was born on December 21, 1923, in [[White Center]], [[Washington]], a suburb of [[Seattle]]. He is known as a Pacific Northwest poet and studied with both [[James Wright]] and [[Theodore Roethke]], who taught his class at the University of Washington.

==Selected Bibliography==
*The Triggering Town: Lectures and Essays on Poetry and Writing
*Making Certain It Goes On: The Collected Poems of Richard Hugo
*The Real West Marginal Way: A Poet's Autobiography

Talk:Keith Douglas

2007-06-21T18:33:59Z

Staple: New page: A good picture of the poet: http://www.poemhunter.com/i/p/61/8561_b_3985.jpg ~~~~

A good picture of the poet: http://www.poemhunter.com/i/p/61/8561_b_3985.jpg '''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]''' 14:33, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Keith Douglas

2007-06-21T18:33:36Z

Staple: New page: Keith Douglas (1920-1944) was a poet and soldier who died during World War II. Douglas began to publish his verse in periodicals in the 1930s, while he was still studying at Oxford; howe...

Keith Douglas (1920-1944) was a poet and soldier who died during World War II.

Douglas began to publish his verse in periodicals in the 1930s, while he was still studying at Oxford; however, the only volume to be published in his lifetime was 'Selected Poems' (1943). He was killed in [[Normandy]], by [[friendly fire]]. His reputation rests mainly on his war poetry.

==Selected Bibliography==
*Selected Poems
*Complete Works of Keith Douglas
*Alamein to Zem Zem (autobiographical story of service in North Africa)

User talk:Staple

2007-04-28T02:19:20Z

Staple: /* Liberal user category */

== I think he means... ==

This? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harvard_abortion_study&diff=125203&oldid=125193 Andy will be on you if you reveal his pov for him. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but I was changing opinion into fact. An article shouldn't have opinions. It should only have facts.--[[User:Staple|Staple]] 13:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

You forget you are on Conservapedia, not Wikipedia :P
see [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 13:55, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

Yes, but it is exactly that kind of double-talk, truth-telling gobbledygook that will get you into trouble around here. Mr. Andy doesn't want you to reveal what he thinks, he wants people to accept his opinion ''as'' fact. Now, stop being rational and get back to work. ;-) [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:57, 24 April 2007 (EDT) (At this point I'll turn off the sarcasm. Oh, and help yourself to a userbox on my page if you'd like. I offer them out like Halloween candy.)

Halloween candy makes me fat.--[[User:Staple|Staple]] 14:00, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

== See you in 5 ==

You silly monkey ;-) [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:01, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

:#Flippin, be nice.
:#Staple, don't fan the flames: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harvard_abortion_study&diff=prev&oldid=125231] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:03, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

*I just assumed that Aschlafly would want facts in '''his''' articles and not opinions.--[[User:Staple|Staple]] 14:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
*:"Facts are stubborn things." [http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/3235.html] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

::Hey, meant no harm Staples. But the powersn that be don't like it when you point out that they not only have an agenda, but sometimes and axe that needs grinding. Tread lightly at first, then tell the truth. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 14:12, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

*"Facts are stubborn things." That statement is just someone's opinion. --[[User:Staple|Staple -Sysop]] 14:15, 24 April 2007 (EDT)

==Abortion Study==
Activate email (and then email me) or catch me on IRC to get the study. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]][[User_talk:ColinR|talk]] 14:10, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:Ok, just email me (click [[Special:Emailuser/ColinR|here]]) and I'll send you the study. IRC is Internet Relay Chat, which is similar to AIM, etc. 13:41, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

==Thanks==
I appreciate your vote! [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 13:35, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

==Question==
could you put the [[Aberdeen Football Club]] article in your soccer category? I would do it but i might mess up somehow.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]

==Nazi Flag==
??? [[User:ColinR|ColinR]][[User_talk:ColinR|talk]] 16:52, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

Can't I add the image?--'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]''' 16:52, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:I see no reason why not. I was just curious as to why. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]][[User_talk:ColinR|talk]] 16:54, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
::My user page looked kind of bland and so I wanted to add an image. There weren't too many good ones to choose from so I picked the nazi flag.--'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]''' 16:55, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Fair enough. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]][[User_talk:ColinR|talk]] 16:56, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

==Liberal user category==

Careful adding it to pages, it will bring up memories of Richard. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 22:18, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Who is Richard? I just figured this site needs to show which editors are liberal and which are conservative.--'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple Your comments are welcomed!]''' 22:19, 27 April 2007 (EDT)

User:RobSmith

2007-04-28T02:17:24Z

Staple:

{{Sysop Pledge}}
{{Userboxtop|}}
{{User Sysop}}
<div style="float:{{{float|right}}}; border:{{{border-width|{{{border-s|1}}}}}}px solid {{{border-color|{{{1|red}}}}}}; margin:1px;">
{| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px; background:{{{info-background|{{{2|black}}}}}};"
| style="width:45px; height:45px; background:{{{logo-background|{{{1|}}}}}}; text-align:center; font-size:{{{logo-size|{{{5|}}}}}}pt; color:{{{logo-color|}}};" | '''{{{logo|{{{3|[[Image:800px-Mauthausen-Barbed wire memorial.jpg|45px]]}}}}}}'''
| style="font-size:{{{info-size|8}}}pt; padding:4pt; line-height:1.25em; color:{{{info-color|white}}};" | This user is a proud veteran of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_and_others/Proposed_decision&diff=29531355&oldid=29476030|{{{4|'''Wikigulag.}}}]
|}
{{Userboxbottom}}[[Image:284991223 72663058ac o.jpg|thumb|241px|right|<center>'''Connent the dots.'''</center>]]

<big>'''Karl von Clausewitz, ''On War'','''

'''Chapter II'''

'''End and Means in War'''
</big>

If we ask first of all for the aim upon which the whole war is to be directed, in order that it may be the right means for the attainment of the political object, we shall find that it is just as variable as are the political object and the particular circumstances of the war.

... we must at once draw a distinction between three things, which as three general objects comprise everything else within them. They are the military power, the country, and the will of the enemy.

... the hostile feeling and action of hostile agencies, cannot be considered as at an end as long as the will of the enemy is not subdued also; that is, its Government and its allies forced into signing a peace, or the people into submission; for whilst we are in full occupation of the country the war may break out afresh, either in the interior or through assistance given by allies. No doubt this may also take place after a peace, but that shows nothing more than that every war does not carry in itself the elements for a complete decision and final settlement.

... we must bear in mind the diversity of political objects which may cause a war,—measure at a glance the distance which there is between a death struggle for political existence, and a war which a forced or tottering alliance makes a matter of disagreeable duty. Between the two, gradations innumerable occur in reality. ...

... It follows, therefore, that the destruction of the enemy's military force is the foundation-stone of all action in war... All action, therefore, takes place on the supposition that if the solution by force of arms which lies at its foundation should be realised, it will be a favourable one. The decision by arms is, for all operations in war, great and small, what cash payment is in bill transactions. However remote from each other these relations, however seldom the realisation may take place, still it can never entirely fail to occur.

If the decision by arms lies at the foundation of all combinations, then it follows that the enemy can defeat each of them by gaining a successful decision with arms, not merely if it is that one on which our combination directly depends, but also by any other, if it is only important enough for every important decision by arms—that is, destruction of the enemy's forces reacts upon all preceding it, because, like a liquid element, they bring themselves to a level.

Thus, the destruction of the enemy's armed force appears, therefore, always as the superior and more effectual means, to which all others must give way.

...nothing obliges us to confine this idea to the mere physical force; on the contrary, the moral is necessarily implied as well, because both in fact are interwoven with each other even in the most minute details, and, therefore, cannot be separated. ...

That this means must be costly stands to reason, for the waste of our own military forces must, ''ceteris paribus'', always be greater the more our aim is directed upon the destruction of the enemy's.

But the danger of this means lies in this, that just the greater efficacy which we seek recoils on ourselves, and therefore has worse consequences in case we fail of success.

... If, therefore, one of two belligerents is determined to take the way of the great decision by arms, then he has also a high probability of success, as soon as he is certain his opponent will not take that way, but follows a different object; and every one who sets before himself any such other aim only does so in a reasonable manner, provided he acts on the supposition that his adversary has as little intention as he has of resorting to the great decision by arms.

We have now to consider the opposite of the destruction of the enemy's armed force, that is to say, the preservation of our own....The endeavour to destroy the enemy's force has a positive object and leads to positive results, of which the final aim is the conquest of the enemy. The preservation of our own forces has a negative object, leads therefore to the defeat of the enemy's intentions, that is to pure resistance...

The effort with a positive object calls into existence the act of destruction; the effort with the negative object awaits it.

... It would, therefore, be a great error in the fundamental idea to suppose that the consequence of the negative course is that we are precluded from choosing the destruction of the enemy's military force as our object, and must prefer a bloodless solution. The advantage which the negative effort gives may certainly lead to that, but only at the risk of its not being the most advisable method, as that question is dependent on totally different conditions, resting not with ourselves but with our opponents. This other bloodless way cannot, therefore, be looked upon at all as the natural means of satisfying our great anxiety to spare our forces; on the contrary, when circumstances are not favourable to that way, it would be the means of completely ruining them. ...consequence of that is generally the postponement of the action as much as possible in time and also in space, in so far as space is in connection with it....

We have seen, therefore, in the foregoing reflections, that there are many ways to the aim, that is, to the attainment of the political object; but that the only means is the combat, and that consequently everything is subject to a supreme law: which is the decision by arms; that where this is really demanded by one, it is a redress which cannot be refused by the other; that, therefore, a belligerent who takes any other way must make sure that his opponent will not take this means of redress, or his cause may be lost in that supreme court; that, therefore, in short, the destruction of the enemy's armed force amongst all the objects which can be pursued in war appears always as that one which overrules all.
[[Category:Conservative Users]]

User:Staple

2007-04-28T02:15:34Z

Staple:

{|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" style="border:3px solid Khaki; background-color:beige;"
|
[[Image: ‎Swastika.jpg|300px|left]]
Welcome to my page and thank you for visiting!

'''Current Projects'''
*Sports pages
*Making the categories more concise

'''ARTICLES I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WRITTEN AT CONSERVAPEDIA'''

*[[Political Science]]
*[[Brown v. Board of Education]]
[[Category:Conservative Users]]