<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TimothyAWallace</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TimothyAWallace"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TimothyAWallace"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T15:45:27Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gerund&amp;diff=872746</id>
		<title>Gerund</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gerund&amp;diff=872746"/>
		<updated>2011-05-27T19:10:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimothyAWallace: fixed some minor typos&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''gerund''' is a [[verb]]al [[noun]].  In English, it is constructed by adding &amp;quot;-ing&amp;quot; to the stem of the verb (just as the present [[participle]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gerunds express the action of the verb as if they were an object.  Thus, for example, one could say:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Reading'' teaches you many things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that sentence, the verb &amp;quot;to read&amp;quot; is converted into a gerund, &amp;quot;reading&amp;quot;, which then functions as the subject of the sentence and so acts like a noun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gerunds can function as verbs within a dependent clause; in this case, the clause as a whole functions as a noun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Reading'' The Huffington Post teaches you many things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In that sentence, &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot; is the direct object of the gerund &amp;quot;reading&amp;quot;.  The entire clause &amp;quot;Reading Conservapedia&amp;quot; is the subject of the main clause in the sentence.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Parts of Speech]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimothyAWallace</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_TV_Shows&amp;diff=872744</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative TV Shows</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_TV_Shows&amp;diff=872744"/>
		<updated>2011-05-27T19:06:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimothyAWallace: /* Six Million Dollar Man */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Six Million Dollar Man ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The technology could have been developed by private companies under contract with the government.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:18, 25 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It &amp;quot;could've&amp;quot; been a lot of things, and I would gladly concede the point given any evidence to back up such an assertion. But as I recall, the protagonist was an astronaut who was &amp;quot;put back together&amp;quot; by the OSI (a fictional government agency) and worked in the public service thereafter. [[User:LloydR|LloydR]] 18:29, 25 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm pretty sure the whole premise of the show is based around violating God's creation, the human form. Conservative? I don't think so. [[User:TimothyAWallace|TimothyAWallace]] 15:06, 27 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Star Trek ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Federation was an extremely [[socialist]] government, to the point where the very concept of money was downright offensive to humans.  Furthermore, the only &amp;quot;[[capitalist]]&amp;quot; race in Star Trek--the Ferengi--started off as villains in the early TNG episodes before becoming comic relief pn DS9. --[[User:AdamDiscordia|&amp;amp;#91;&amp;amp;#91;User:AdamDiscordia&amp;amp;#124;Yours in Christ, Adam Discordia&amp;amp;#93;&amp;amp;#93;]] 00:08, 26 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Sounds like Star Trek should be downgraded to &amp;quot;Debatable Whether Conservative.&amp;quot;  Please feel free to move it ... but &amp;quot;Trekies&amp;quot; may not like that!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:26, 26 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Simpsons? ==&lt;br /&gt;
This may be a long shot but could the Simpsons fit under the Debatable category? Although it does occasionally send liberal messages, it embraces very conservative family values. I'm just not sure whether or not its liberal messages exclude it entirely from being included here. --[[User:JimMac|JimMac]] 09:31, 26 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Personally, I don't any value -- conservative or otherwise -- in the ''Simpsons''.  I think it presents [[Hollywood]]'s negative caricature of the family, as several other sitcoms have.  But I welcome comments by others about this show, and thanks for the suggestion.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:23, 26 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would agree - showing a dysfunctional family is hardly conservative. It would be like saying the abysmal &amp;quot;Married with children&amp;quot; is conservative. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 11:21, 26 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Action shows==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm thinking about shows from my youth, such as CHiPs  - which portrays law enforcement in a positive light, while wholesome lead characters and little violence, and MacGuyver, again a show with little violence and a character using Yankee ingenuity to extract himself from a tight situation. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 11:21, 26 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimothyAWallace</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_TV_Shows&amp;diff=872742</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative TV Shows</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_TV_Shows&amp;diff=872742"/>
		<updated>2011-05-27T19:01:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimothyAWallace: Removed American Idol...Andy Schlafly said it was &amp;quot;content free&amp;quot; so I don't feel it should be here&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Here are some of the greatest conservative television shows:&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Family Ties'': a [[conservative]] teenager (played by Michael J. Fox) tries to enlighten his [[liberal]], ex-hippie, underachieving&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The father would be criticized by the son for working for less money at a public television station, rather than in free enterprise.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; parents&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Office'': mockery of liberal [[political correctness]] and corporate [[socialism]] in an office setting. The character of Ryan in particular is a lampoon of [[liberal arrogance]] and immorality. While the show mocks all types, this show is unusual in its willingness to mock liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Apprentice'': liberals stopped watching when they realized that [[Donald Trump]] might be conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
# The ''Six Million Dollar Man'': capitalism at its finest - a government program improving health with technological advances.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Cosby Show'': promoting good family values&lt;br /&gt;
# ''24'': Jack Bauer shows us how to beat Islamic terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Star Trek'': emphasized morality, honor, abiding by a strict code of conduct, and problem solving in a science fiction setting that inspired real world innovations. Portrayed the Cold War struggle as a conflict between the democratic Federation (USA) and the authoritarian, collectivist Klingons (the Soviet Union), correctly forecast the eventual winner.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Waltons'': a family struggles in rural America but promotes Christian morality and charity to strangers, and honors military service.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Lawrence Welk Show'': a clean, family oriented variety show that appealed to Midwestern values.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Chuck'': emphasizes family values, honor, and a respect for our nation's servicemen.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Little House on the Prairie'': A show that celebrates family values and the courage of the pioneers who made our country what it is today.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Touched by an Angel'': a popular drama about an angel in human form who visited troubled people in crisis, it was a highly ranked series for four seasons and ran for a remarkable nine seasons.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Life is Worth Living'': Emmy Award winning show hosted by Archbishop [[Fulton Sheen]]. Between 10 &amp;amp; 30 million people watched the show weekly on moral issues of the day.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''7&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;th&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Heaven'': Show about a Christian minister's family, that dealt with moral and controversial themes, which are approached from a socially and politically conservative Protestant Christian point of view. It was the longest-running family drama in U.S. television history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1028153,00.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Life Goes On'': Follows the experiences of a young man with Down Syndrome and recognizes the dignity of people with developmental disabilities and the joy and love they give to their families and others.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Dragnet'': starring Jack Webb as Sgt. Joe Friday and his partner(s) solving actual cases from the files of the Los Angeles Police Department. Great use of law enforcement jargon by the officers while educating the public on the Rule of Law. Showed fine examples of moral conduct, honor of self/others and sacrifice for the good of the public.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Parking Wars'': Demonstrates the offensiveness of overbearing government bureaucracy while maintaining a respect for law officers.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''Pawn Stars'': Shows how two parties can **mutually and fairly benefit** from a negotiated free-market transaction, independent of any government &amp;quot;assistance&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Bob Newhart Show'': a mockery of how crazy people become in a secular world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(please add to list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Debatable Whether Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Twilight Zone'': a recurring theme is that the selfish and the self-centered eventually lose what they sought to gain.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''The Beverly Hillbillies'': though silly, the show is powerful in illustrating how material possessions are not what define a person.&lt;br /&gt;
# ''King of the Hill'': despite cartoonish nature, shows the struggle of a hardworking, traditional American family against &amp;quot;alternative&amp;quot; modern cultural movements&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Songs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimothyAWallace</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>