<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tomcole</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tomcole"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Tomcole"/>
	<updated>2026-10-07T17:29:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Gravitation&amp;diff=28920</id>
		<title>Talk:Gravitation</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Gravitation&amp;diff=28920"/>
		<updated>2007-03-12T18:14:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tomcole: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I am curious; what about the conventional definition of gravitation and the citations for it's history in Wikipedia is considered inappropriate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it the intention of Conservapedia to supplant essentially all articles in Wikipedia, or only those that are deemed to be inconsistent with the stated objective(s) of this project?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tomcole</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>