<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Truthtopower</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Truthtopower"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Truthtopower"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T07:00:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=744382</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=744382"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T13:02:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Truthtopower: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Democratic Party''' is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. It is the center-left party. President [[Barack Obama]] and its other leaders are generally [[liberal]], but there are powerful moderate and conservative factions, especially the [[Blue Dogs]] in Congress. The party contrasts with rival [[Republican Party]], which is generally more [[conservative]] and [http://www.republicansforrape.org/ pro-rape].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the Democratic Party are known as Democrats. In the 19th century the party was sometimes called &amp;quot;The Democracy.&amp;quot; Today Republicans sometimes call it the &amp;quot;[[Democrat Party]]&amp;quot; as a term of respect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the doldrums after 2000, the party roared back with major gains in 2006, which it expanded in 2008 to sweep control of the national government, and leave the GOP in a state of confusion and decline. The GOP bounced back in 2009, with near-unanimous opposition to contentions Democratic policies, especially as stimulus spending and health care reform. Polls show Obama's popularity began to sink in the summer of 2009.[[File:Obama_approval_index_december_22_2009.jpg‎|thumb|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats currently control the White House and have decisive majorities in the [[111th United States Congress]], together with the majority of state governorships and legislatures and control most large cities as well, while suburbs and rural areas are more likely to be in republican hands.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Polls show 50% of voters identify themselves with the Democratic Party as opposed to 35% for the Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=312 Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987-2007] Pew Research Center, 22 March 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Democratic-majority Congress currently has a 55% negative approval rating, with only 31% expressing approval.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{AmericanPoliticalParty&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_name = Democratic Party&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_articletitle = Democratic Party (United States)&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_logo = [[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | website = [http://www.democrats.org www.democrats.org]&lt;br /&gt;
 | headquarters = 430 South Capitol Street SE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Washington, D.C.]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;20003 &lt;br /&gt;
 | chairman = [[Tim Kaine]]   &lt;br /&gt;
 | houseleader = [[Nancy Pelosi]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | senateleader = [[Harry Reid]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | foundation = 1832&lt;br /&gt;
 | ideology = range from liberal to moderate&lt;br /&gt;
 | socialpolicy = center-liberal&lt;br /&gt;
 | colors = Blue (unofficial)&lt;br /&gt;
 | footnotes =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies and criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
The views of individual Democrats sometimes diverge from the party's official stance as expressed in its national platform, however unlike the Republican party, the Democratic National Committee has not allowed dissenting opinions to share the podium on matters such as abortion at National Conventions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_03/005787.php] , http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_03/005787.php, March 6, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Unemployment.jpg|thumb|241px|right|''Source: Bureau of Labor Statisitcs'' [http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/2009/07/anti-stimulus-in-pictures-any-questions.html]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the field of economic policy, Democrats tend to favor high progressive taxes, more regulation, and higher government spending. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party has historically had ties to [[labor union|organized labor]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/913wopoz.asp Paying Dues - The Democrats settle up with their union bosses, [[Weekly Standard]], July 25, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Education Association]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nea.org/index.html National Education Association homepage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the largest union of public school teachers, is a backbone of the party, supplying the largest number of delegates to its national conventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats typically state that they want to help low-income Americans, however they usually seek to accomplish this by increasing the tax burden on the wealthiest Americans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since passage of the Economic Recovery Act of 2009, [[unemployment]] has increased from below 7% to slightly under 10%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign and military policy===&lt;br /&gt;
According to its platform, the Democratic Party has the objective of strengthening America.  Democratic national leadership has been accused of being ambivalent about terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and insufficiently patriotic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News]Transcript: December 1, 2001 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A poll conducted by [[Fox News]] released in October 2007 found that 1 in 5 Democrats &amp;amp;ndash; nearly 10 million voters &amp;amp;ndash; think the world will be better off if the [[United States]] were to lose the [[War in Iraq]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299374,00.html Nearly 1 in 5 Democrats Say World Will Be Better Off if U.S. Loses War], FOX News Poll, October 04, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The poll found this sentiment 3 to 4 times higher among Democrats than among moderate, centrist, and Republican voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===   &lt;br /&gt;
An organization affiliated with the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] called the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] claims a long-standing opposition to school vouchers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;21st Century Schools Project Bulletin: Special Edition [http://www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgAreaID=110&amp;amp;subsecID=900001&amp;amp;contentID=250630 ''Putting Vouchers in Perspective''], PPI E-newsletter 2 July 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jonathan Alter of ''Newsweek'' warned that opposition to vouchers might alienate some traditional Democratic voting blocs:   &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Can wealthy white liberals - many of whom send their kids to private school - really say to poor parents: 'We can have choices, but you must not?'...This is a glaring hypocrisy sitting at the heart of the liberal opposition to targeted vouchers… Right now, Democrats are in a highly compromised position on education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=newsLetter&amp;amp;sectionID=29&amp;amp;NLissueID=4&amp;amp;articleID=11&amp;amp;altCol=2 Center For Education Reform, Monthly Letter to Friends No. 75], Back to School 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment vs Labor===&lt;br /&gt;
Two other important coalition groups also find themselves in direct conflict with each other within the Democratic party coalition--[[Environmentalist]]s and Labor Unions.  While environmentalists support efforts like clean air and alternative fuels, for example, this creates tension with the workers of American automobile manufactures whose jobs are threatened by environmental policies such as increasing regulations and high costs. Such policies can lead to cutbacks and layoffs. Balancing these issues is difficult because some sacrifices of interests must be made by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Healthcare===&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic leaders have endorsed various [[Democratic Health Care Plans]]; the question in 2009 is whether a new trillion dollar plan can pass in a time of economic crisis. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, many argue that there may be some advantages to a universal health care system. Democrats generally regard [[universal health care]] to be a priority because of the appeal to poorer voters without any kind of [[health insurance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gay Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
White Democratic leaders --but not blacks or Latinos--consistently favor measures such as the establishment of [[same-sex civil union]]s.  They mostly reject [[gay marriage]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Policies===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats frequently support the minimum wage, workplace protections, the right of women to choose to have an [[abortion]], [[gun control]], gay marriage, and the separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, there is some correlation between religious and political affiliation, though people of all faiths and denominations can be found among the supporters of each of the main parties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic]] voters have had a tendency to identify with the Democratic Party; in recent decades there has been little difference. However Catholic politicians are mostly Democrats, including Speaker of the House [[Nancy Pelosi]] and Massachusetts Senator [[Ted Kennedy]]. However, several general ideals of the Democratic Party's platform - most notably, the party's overall support for the legality of [[abortion]] - are contrary to the position of the [[Catholic Church]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With regard to Protestants, members of [[Evangelical]] churches in recent years have voted about 70-80% Republican.  However, the large majority of Democratic Party members are Protestants.  One unusual feature of the Democratic Party, however, is that it draws substantial support both from committed African-American Protestants (most of whom are Baptists) and from secular and atheist voters. The strong opposition to [[homosexuality]] found among many Black Protestants contrasts strikingly with the support frequently shown by other Democrats for the [[homosexual agenda]]. One reason for this contrast could be the Democrats' strong support for minority rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats also generally believe that religion should be separate from public life, and as such are typically supported by the ACLU.  For example, in 1999 the Congress took up a bill to protect the display of the [[Ten Commandments]].  In the House of Representatives, over 3/4ths of the Democratic party members voted to remove the display.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/06/18/gun.rollcall/ten.commandments.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The measure did not pass the Legislature, and as a result when Justice [[Roy Moore]] posted a [[Ten Commandments]] display in his courthouse, the ACLU was able to have the display removed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dem-leaders.jpg|thumb|300px|Clockwise from far left: presidents Carter, Kennedy, Clinton, Wilson, Johnson, Truman, Jackson, Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
===First Party System===&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats claim the [[Thomas Jefferson]] founded their party in 1793 at the start of the [[First Party System]]. The [[Democratic-Republican Party]] was a political party established during the 1790's under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson and [[James Madison]]. It was generally called the Republican Party, but it had no relation to today's Republican Party, founded in 1854. By about 1816, the Federalist Party had broken up as a national organization. With its decline, the Democratic-Republican Party split into several groups. [[Andrew Jackson]] emerged as the candidate of one of these groups and was elected President in 1828.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origins===&lt;br /&gt;
Most historians regard Jackson's 1832 campaign organization as the beginning of today's Democratic Party. The Democratic Party itself traces its origin to Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[World Book]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A few Democratic-Republicans, such as [[John Quincy Adams]] and [[Henry Clay]], created the [[National Republican Party]]. Adams supporters called themselves National Republicans, antecedents of the Whig and later the Republican parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern Democratic party was formed during 1828-34, under the national leadership of Jackson and Van Buren, with organizations in all the states comprised of local political leaders. This became the era of [[Jacksonian Democracy]].  The Jacksonians resembled the [[Jeffersonian Democracy|Jeffersonians]] especially in terms of anti-elite rhetoric of opposition to &amp;quot;aristocracy&amp;quot; (that is, wealthy old families), distrust of banks (and paper money), and faith in &amp;quot;the people.&amp;quot; By his extensive use of federal [[Spoils system|patronage]], President Jackson removed old office-holders to make way for party loyalists.  With the emergence of the Whig Party, the nation now had a new party system, the [[Second Party System]], which lasted until 1854.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party held its first national convention in 1832 to choose a new running mate for Jackson; it nominated Martin Van Buren for vice president and endorsed the reelection of Jackson. Jackson easily defeated Clay in 1832.  In the political realignment of 1828-32, some of Jackson's supporters from the election of 1828, especially businessmen and bankers, switched to the opposition Whig Party as Jackson crusaded against the [[Second Bank of the United States]].  The name &amp;quot;Democratic Party&amp;quot; became common by the mid-1830s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jacksonian Democracy: 1832-1854 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:donk1837.jpg|thumb|300px|1837 cartoon shows Democratic Party as donkey ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The new party dominated the [[Second Party System]] (as political scientists call it; historians call it &amp;quot;Jacksonian Democracy&amp;quot;,  1832-54.  After 1832, the Democratic Party drew support from a cross section of the country; every group was represented. However the vast majority of rich merchants, bankers and plantation owners were Whigs, as were most evangelical Protestants.  The party was strongest among traditionalistic farmers, frontiersmen, unskilled workers, Irish Catholics, and local or state political leaders. It was weakest in [[New England]], where industrialization turned most factory workers and white collar workers into Whigs, but was dominant in all other regions.  The key issues it promoted were opposition to elites and aristocrats, popular democracy (in terms of voting rights and access to government patronage jobs) and opposition to the [[Bank of the United States]] (Jackson vetoed its charter renewal in 1832).  The policies were known as [[Jacksonian Democracy]]. [[Image:Jackson1832.jpg|thumb|300px|left]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Banking and tariffs were the central domestic policy issues from 1828 to 1852.  The Democrats favored the [[Mexican-American War]]; Whigs opposed it. Democrats attracted Catholic Irish and German immigrants and denounced anti-immigrant nativism. Both the Democrats and Whigs were divided on the issue of slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1830s the [[Loco-Focos]] in New York City were radically democratic, anti-monopoly, and proponents of [[laissez-faire]].  Their chief spokesman was writer [[William Leggett]]. At this time labor unions were few; some were loosely affiliated with the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy went sour in the late 1830s with Van Buren getting the blame; he lost reelection as president in 1840 to the Whig [[William Henry Harrison]]. The Democrats gained the White House back in 1844 with [[James K. Polk]]. He had a successful term, then retired. The Democratic National Committee was created in 1848 at the convention that nominated General [[Lewis Cass]], who lost to General [[Zachary Taylor]] of the Whigs. In state after state the Democrats gained small but permanent advantages over the Whigs, until by 1852 the Whig Party was fatally weakened by divisions regarding the issue of slavery and they soon vanished. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party dominated the North from the 1840s to 1854. Northern Democrats opposed banks, criticized corporate practices, and preached the ideals of a free society. They called for rapid territorial expansion of the United States, saying that in territorial expansion lay a means for thwarting the pretensions of the [[Slave Power]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Franklin Pierce]] of New Hampshire was elected president in 1852, followed by [[James Buchanan]] of Pennsylvania in 1856. They proved poor presidents who lost control of the slavery issue, and the party, as the nation broke apart and fought the [[American Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Third Party System: Civil War, Gilded Age: 1854-1896==&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Third Party System]] (1854-1896) the Democrats became the minority in the face of the newly formed Republican Party, which controlled nearly all northern states by 1860, bringing a solid majority in the Electoral College.  A powerful Republican issue was the allegation that northern Democrats, including &amp;quot;Doughfaces&amp;quot; like Pierce and Buchanan, and advocates of popular sovereignty like [[Stephen A. Douglas]] and [[Lewis Cass]], were accomplices to the [[Slave Power]]. The Republicans meant by Slave Power the conspiracy of slaveholders to seize control of the federal government and block the progress of liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:DEM1860.JPG|200px|thumb|left|To vote for Douglas in Virginia, a man had to deposit the ticket in the official ballot box.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1860 the Democrats were unable to stop the election of Republican [[Abraham Lincoln]], even as they feared his election would lead to civil war.  The party split in two.  The northern wing nominated Douglas, and the southern wing nominated Vice President [[John C. Breckinridge]]. Douglas campaigned across the country and came in second in the popular vote, but carried only Missouri. Breckinridge carried 11 slave states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party was beginning a 50-year era of dominance (1858-1910). During the war, Northern Democrats divided into two factions, [[War Democrats]], who supported the military policies of President Lincoln, and [[Copperheads]], who strongly opposed them. Historian Kenneth Stampp has captured the Copperhead spirit in his depiction of Democratic Congressman [[Daniel W. Voorhees]] of Indiana: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;There was an earthy quality in Voorhees, &amp;quot;the tall sycamore of the Wabash.&amp;quot; On the stump his hot temper, passionate partisanship, and stirring eloquence made an irresistible appeal to the western Democracy. His bitter cries against protective tariffs and national banks, his intense race prejudice, his suspicion of the eastern Yankee, his devotion to personal liberty, his defense of the Constitution and state rights faithfully reflected the views of his constituents. Like other Jacksonian agrarians he resented the political and economic revolution then in progress. Voorhees idealized a way of life which he thought was being destroyed by the current rulers of his country. His bold protests against these dangerous trends made him the idol of the Democracy of the Wabash Valley.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stampp, 211.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats lost consecutive presidential elections from 1860 through 1880 (but 1876 was in dispute); 1884 was their next victory. The Democrats were weakened by their record of opposition to the Civil War but nevertheless benefited from white Southerners' resentment of Reconstruction and consequent hostility to the Republican Party. The [[Redeemers]] gave the Democrats control of every Southern state; the disenfranchisement of black voters in most of the South took place 1890-1900. From 1880 to 1960 the &amp;quot;[[Solid South]]&amp;quot; voted Democratic in all presidential elections (except 1928). After 1900 the key election in southern states was the Democratic primary; victory in the that primary was &amp;quot;tantamount to election&amp;quot; because the GOP was so weak.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Republicans continued to control the White House until 1912 (except 1884 and 1892), the Democrats remained competitive in the states, especially in the mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest, and controlled the House of Representatives for most of that period. In the election of 1884, [[Grover Cleveland]], the conservative Democratic Governor of New York, won the presidency, a feat he repeated in 1892, having lost in the election of 1888.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1893cleveland-typewriter.jpg|thumb|350px|Typewriters were new in 1893 and this Gillam cartoon from ''Puck'' shows that Cleveland can't get the Democratic &amp;quot;machine&amp;quot; to work as the keys (key politicians) won't respond to his efforts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cleveland was the leader of the [[Bourbon Democrats]], the conservative wing of the party.  They represented business interests, supported banking and railroad goals, promoted capitalism, opposed imperialism and U.S. verseas expansion, opposed the annexation of [[Hawaii]], fought for the [[gold standard]], and opposed [[Bimetallism]].  They strongly supported reform movements such as [[Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act|Civil Service Reform]] and opposed corruption of city bosses, leading the fight against the [[Tweed Ring]].  The leading Bourbons included [[Samuel J. Tilden]], [[David Bennett Hill]] and [[William C. Whitney]] of New York, [[Arthur Pue Gorman]] of Maryland, [[Thomas F. Bayard]] of Delaware, [[William L. Wilson]] of West Virginia, [[John Griffin Carlisle]] of Kentucky, [[William F. Vilas]] of Wisconsin, [[J. Sterling Morton]] of Nebraska, [[John M. Palmer]] of Illinois, [[Horace Boies]] of Iowa, [[L.Q.C. Lamar]] of Mississippi, and railroad builder [[James J. Hill]] of Minnesota. A prominent intellectual was [[Woodrow Wilson]]. The Bourbons were in power when the [[Panic of 1893]] hit; it was a deep depression and they took the blame.  A fierce struggle inside the party ensued, with catastrophic losses for both the Bourbon and agrarian factions in 1894, leading to the showdown in 1896.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dead-dem1880.jpg|thumb|550px|In 1880 when General Hancock (right) became the presidential nominee of the Democrats, Republican cartoonists showed the Democratic party history as a horror chamber featuring atrocities in the Civil War era; the donkey&amp;quot; shows the party as a coalition of the rear end of the South joned to the rear end of the North]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnocultural voting: pietistic Republicans versus liturgical Democrats===&lt;br /&gt;
Religious lines were sharply drawn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kleppner (1979).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Methodists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Scandinavian Lutherans and other pietists and evangelicals in the North were tightly linked to the Republican Party. In sharp contrast, liturgical groups, especially the Catholics, Episcopalians, and German Lutherans, looked to the Democratic Party for protection from pietistic moralism, especially prohibition.  Both parties cut across the class structure, with the Democrats more bottom-heavy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cultural issues, especially prohibition and foreign language schools became important because of the sharp religious divisions in the electorate. In the North, about 50% of the voters were pietistic or evangelical Protestants who believed the government should be used to reduce social sins, such as drinking. Liturgical churches (Roman Catholics, German Lutherans, Episcopalians) comprised over a quarter of the vote and wanted the government to stay out of the morality business. Prohibition debates and referenda heated up politics in most states over a period of decade, as national prohibition was finally passed in 1918 (and repealed in 1933), serving as a major issue in the North between the wet Democracy and the dry GOP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In the South the Democrats were mostly on the dry side. Kleppner (1979).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Bryan Movement==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mark Hanna 1896 election.jpg|thumb|290px|right|Democratic attack ad in 1896 against GOP National Chairman [[Mark Hanna]]; cartoon by Davenport depicts Hanna as a slave driver; from Hearst's ''New York Journal'']] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Grover Cleveland]] led the conservative, pro-business [[Bourbon Democrat]]s but as the [[Panic of 1893|depression of 1893]] deepened his enemies multiplied. The Panic of 1893 started in February 1893, a full month before Cleveland became president. Convinced that the [[Sherman Silver Purchase Act]], passed under the administration of [[Benjamin Harrison]], was largely responsible for the alarming drain on federal gold, President Cleveland called Congress into special session to urge its repeal. Congress consented, but only after bitter debate that divided the Democratic party into two hostile camps-the eastern &amp;quot;goldbugs&amp;quot; and the silver wing of the West and South that was to propel young [[William Jennings Bryan]] to the fore in 1896.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the 1896 convention the silverite-agrarian faction repudiated the president, and nominated the crusading orator [[William Jennings Bryan]] on a platform of inflation through &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; silver. The idea was that minting huge numbers of silver dollars would flood the economy with cash and end the depression.  Eastern Democrats, unable to accept the party's free-silver platform and unwilling to support McKinley for his tariff views, nominated their own candidate, John M. Palmer of Illinois and called themselves the National, or Gold, Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Gold Democrats]] attracted politicians and intellectuals (including [[Woodrow Wilson]] and [[Frederick Jackson Turner]]) who refused to vote Republican. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bryan, an overnight sensation because of his phenomenal &amp;quot;Cross of Gold&amp;quot; speech, crusaded against the gold standard.  Crisscrossing the Midwest and East by special train, he gave over 500 speeches to audiences in the millions.  In St. Louis he gave 36 speeches to workingmen's audiences all over the city, all in one day.  Most Democratic newspapers were hostile (except [[William Randolph Hearst]]'s ''New York Journal'') but Bryan seized control of the media by making the news every day, as he hurled thunderbolts against Eastern monied interests. The rural folk in South and Midwest were ecstatic, showing an enthusiasm never before seen.  Ethnic Democrats, especially Germans, however, were alarmed and frightened by Bryan. The middle classes, businessmen, newspaper editors, factory workers, railroad workers, and prosperous farmers generally rejected Bryan's crusade. Bryan was overwhelmed by [[William McKinley]] in the most exciting race in national history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Refuting Bryan's charges, historians have discovered there was little coercion of workers.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McKinley promised a return to prosperity based on the gold standard, support for industry, railroads and banks, and pluralism that would enable every group to move ahead. Bryan did however, win the hearts and minds of a majority of Democrats. The election of 1896 was a political realignment. The victory of the Republican Party marked the start of the &amp;quot;Progressive Era,&amp;quot; from 1896 to 1932, in which the GOP usually was dominant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fourth Party System: Bryan, Wilson, Progressivism: 1896-1932 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Fourth Party System]] began with the 1896 election, a realignment during which the GOP controlled the presidency for 28 of 36 years. The GOP dominated most of the Northeast and Midwest, and half the West.  Bryan, with a base in the South and Plains states, was strong enough to get the nomination in 1900 (losing to McKinley) and 1908 (losing to Taft).  [[Theodore Roosevelt]] dominated the first decade of the century—and to the annoyance of Democrats &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the trust issue by crusading against trusts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Steal~trust.JPG|thumb|250px|[[Theodore Roosevelt]] steals the anti-trust issue from the Democrats, 1904]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Bryan conservatives controlled the convention in 1904, but they faced a [[Theodore Roosevelt]] landslide.  Bryan dropped his free silver and anti-imperialism rhetoric and supported mainstream progressive issues, such as the income tax, anti-trust, and direct election of Senators. He backed [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1912, was rewarded with the State Department, then resigned in protest against Wilson's non-pacifistic policies in 1916. Northern Democrats were progressive on most issues, but generally opposed prohibition, were lukewarm regarding woman's suffrage, and were reluctant to undercut the &amp;quot;boss system&amp;quot; in the big cities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taking advantage of a deep split in the GOP, the Democrats took control of the House in 1910, and elected the intellectual reformer [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1912 and 1916.  Wilson successfully led Congress to a series of Progressive laws, including a reduced tariff, stronger antitrust laws, the [[Federal Reserve System]], hours-and-pay benefits for railroad workers, and outlawing of child labor (which was reversed by the Supreme Court). Furthermore, constitutional amendments for prohibition and woman suffrage were passed in his second term.  In effect, Wilson laid to rest the issues of tariffs, money and antitrust that had dominated politics for 40 years.  Wilson led the U.S. to victory in the World War, and turned his attention to foreign affairs. He wrote parts of the [[Versailles Treaty]], especially the new [[League of Nations]]. But in 1919 Wilson's political skills faltered, and suddenly everything turned sour.  The Senate rejected Versailles and the League, a nationwide wave of strikes and violence caused unrest, and Wilson's health collapsed.  The GOP came roaring back in a landslide in 1920, as [[Warren G. Harding]] defeated a Democratic ticket memorable for having [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] as the vice presidential nominee. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:D-Edge-Congress.JPG|thumb|300px|Before 1932 Republicans usually controlled Congress; after 1932 the Democrats usually were in control]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 1924 Democratic National Convention, the big fight was over a resolution denouncing by name the [[Ku Klux Klan]]; it was pushed by New York governor [[Al Smith]] and Alabama Senator [[Oscar W. Underwood]] in order to embarrass the front-runner, [[William McAdoo]] of California. After furious debate, the resolution failed by just a single vote. The KKK faded away soon after, but the deep split in the party over cultural issues, especially Prohibition, facilitated Republican landslides in 1920, 1924 and 1928.  However [[Al Smith]] did build a strong Catholic base in the big cities in 1928, and [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'s election as Governor of New York that year brought a new leader to center stage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fifth Party System: The New Deal ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FDR_in_1933.jpg|thumb|left|180px|President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] (1933-1945)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Crash 1929|stock market crash of 1929]] and the ensuing [[Great Depression]] set the stage for a more progressive government and [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] won a [[landslide victory]] in the [[U.S. presidential election, 1932|election of 1932]], campaigning on a platform of &amp;quot;Relief, Recovery, and Reform.&amp;quot; This came to be termed &amp;quot;[[New Deal|The New Deal]]&amp;quot; after a phrase in his acceptance speech. The Democrats also swept to large majorities in both houses of Congress, and among state Governors. Roosevelt altered the nature of the Party, away from laissez-faire capitalism, and towards an ideology of economic regulation and insurance against hardship.  Conservative Democrats were outraged; led by [[Al Smith]] they formed the [[American Liberty League]] in 1934 and counterattacked. They failed and either retired from politics or joined the GOP.  A few of them, such as [[Dean Acheson]] found their way back to the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After making gains in Congress in 1934 Roosevelt moved left and embarked on an ambitious legislative program called &amp;quot;The Second New Deal.&amp;quot;  It was characterized by building up labor unions, nationalizing welfare by the [[WPA]] (which 2 million employed unemployed men), setting up [[Social Security]] and raising taxes on business profits.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; In general the New Deal, 1933-40, did not raise taxes, except for the Social Security tax that went into effect in 1937.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] programs focused on job creation through public works projects as well as Social Security. In the name of &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; it imposed strong regulations on the banking and financial system, transportation, communications, stock markets and labor-management relations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt successfully built up the &amp;quot;[[New Deal Coalition]]&amp;quot;, a powerful coalition of voters and interest groups that supported liberalism. Key components included big city machines and labor unions. Key voter groups included traditional Democrats, white Southerners, Catholics, Jews, and liberals, as well as many blacks. This united voter base allowed Democrats to be elected to Congress and the presidency for much of the next 30 years.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
After a sweeping landslide reelection in 1936--losing only Maine and Vermont--Roosevelt stunned the nation, and his party, by calling for legislation to enlarge the Supreme Court by five new members. A firestorm of opposition erupted, led by his own vice president [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt was defeated by an alliance of Republicans and conservative Democrats, who formed a [[Conservative coalition]] that managed to block nearly all liberal legislation. (Only a minimum wage law got through.) Angry with the conservative wing of his own party, Roosevelt tried to destroy it. In 1938, he actively campaigned against five incumbent conservative Democratic senators; all five senators won re-election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under FDR, the Democratic Party became identified closely with modern liberalism, which included the promotion of social welfare, unions and regulation of the economy. Civil rights were not on the party agenda at this time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Truman to Kennedy: 1945-1963==&lt;br /&gt;
Harry Truman took over unexpectedly in 1945, and the rifts inside the party that Roosevelt had papered over began to emerge. Former Vice President [[Henry A. Wallace]] denounced Truman as a war-monger for his anti-Soviet programs, the [[Truman Doctrine]], [[Marshall Plan]], and [[NATO]].   By cooperating with internationalist Republicans, Truman succeeded in defeating isolationists on the right and pro-Soviets on the left to establish a [[Cold War]] program that lasted until the fall of Communism in 1991. Wallace supporters and fellow travelers of the far left were pushed out of the party and the CIO in 1946-48 by young anti-Communists like [[Hubert Humphrey]], [[Walter Reuther]], and [[Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.]]. [[Hollywood]] emerged in the 1940s as an importance new base in the party, led by movie-star politicians such as [[Ronald Reagan]], who at this point in time strongly supported Roosevelt and Truman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Reagan became a conservative around 1960, saying the Democratic party had left him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the right the Republicans blasted Truman’s domestic policies. &amp;quot;Had Enough?&amp;quot; was the winning slogan as Republicans recaptured Congress in 1946.  Many party leaders were ready to dump Truman, but they lacked an alternative. Truman counterattacked, pushing [[J. Strom Thurmond]] and his [[Dixiecrats]] out, and taking advantage of the splits inside the GOP.  He was reelected in a stunning surprise.  However all of Truman’s Fair Deal proposals, such as universal health care were defeated by the [[Conservative Coalition]] in Congress.  His seizure of the steel industry was reversed by the Supreme Court.  &lt;br /&gt;
In foreign policy, Europe was safe but troubles mounted in Asia.  China fell to the Communists in 1949. Truman entered the [[Korean War]] without formal Congressional approval—the last time a president would ever do so. When the war turned to a stalemate in 1951 he fired General [[Douglas MacArthur]], a hero to conservatives. Republicans blasted Truman's failure to stop Communist gains in Asia. A series of petty scandals among friends and buddies of Truman further tarnished his image, allowing [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and the Republicans in 1952 to crusade against &amp;quot;Korea, Communism and Corruption.&amp;quot; Truman dropped out of the presidential race early in 1952, leaving no obvious successor. The convention nominated [[Adlai Stevenson]] in 1952 and 1956, only to see him overwhelmed by two Eisenhower landslides.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1952-32.jpg|thumb|480px|right|Stevenson and labor unions warn against a return of the Republican policies of Herbert Hoover in 1952 campaign poster]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Congress the powerful duo of House Speaker [[Sam Rayburn]] and Senate Majority leader [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] held the party together, often by compromising with Eisenhower. In 1958 the party made dramatic gains in the midterms and seemed to have a permanent lock on Congress. Indeed, Democrats had majorities in the House every election from 1930 to 1992 (except 1946 and 1952). Most southern Congressmen were conservative Democrats, however, and they usually worked with conservative Republicans. The result was a [[Conservative Coalition]] that blocked practically all liberal domestic legislation from 1937 to the 1970s, except for a brief spell 1964-65, when Johnson neutralized its power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nomination of [[John F. Kennedy]] in 1960 energized the Catholic population, which jammed motorcades and turned out in heavy numbers (over 80% voted for Kennedy), while also causing a backlash among white Protestants (over 70% of whom voted for Republican candidate [[Richard Nixon]].  Reaching beyond the traditional Irish, German, Italian and Polish Catholic ethnics, Viva Kennedy set out to mobilize the previously passive Latino vote, and it perhaps provided the margin of victory for Kennedy in Texas and New Mexico.  Kennedy's victory reinvigorated the party. His youth, vigor and intelligence caught the popular imagination. In foreign policy he was strongly anti-Communist, and promptly launched an invasion of casto's Cuba; it failed badly. A few new programs like the Peace Corps harnessed idealism.  In terms of legislation, Kennedy was stalemated by the [[Conservative Coalition]], and anyway his proposals were all cautious and incremental.  In three years he was unable to pass any significant new legislation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kennedy's election did mark the coming of age of the Catholic component of the New Deal Coalition.  After 1964 middle class Catholics started voting Republicans in the same proportion as their Protestant neighbors.  Except for the Chicago of [[Richard J. Daley]], the last of the Democratic machines faded away.  His involvement in Vietnam proved momentous, for his successor Lyndon Johnson decided to stay, and double the investment, and double the bet again and again until over 500,000 American soldiers were fighting in that small country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Civil Rights, Riots, War and collapse of the New Deal Coalition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:LBJ-64.jpg|280px|left|thumb|President Lyndon Johnson ran for reelection in the shadow of Kennedy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal Coalition began to fracture as union and religious leaders demanded support for [[civil rights]], upsetting the party's traditional base of conservative Southern Democrats. After Harry Truman's platform showed support for civil rights and anti-segregation policies during the 1948 Democratic National Convention, many Southern Democratic delegates decided to split from the Party and formed the &amp;quot;[[Dixiecrats]],&amp;quot; led by [[South Carolina]] governor [[Strom Thurmond]] (who, as a Senator, would later join the Republican Party). Over the next few years, many conservative Democrats in the &amp;quot;[[Solid South]]&amp;quot; drifted away from the party. By 1940 most northern Blacks had shifted to the Democratic Party due to its New Deal relief programs and support for civil rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party's dramatic reversal on civil rights issues culminated when Democratic President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] signed into law the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]. The new laws ended segregation and also ended the main argument Democrats had used to block Republican gains in the South (that is, only the Democrats could protect segregation). The South became competitive in presidential politics in the 1970s and 1980s, giving strong support to Republican Ronald Reagan and rejecting the liberal northern candidates. The Democrats responded by nominating Southerners (Carter in 1976 and 1980, Clinton in 1992 and 1996, Gore in 2000). Few southern states were won by Democratic presidential candidates from the North (Humphrey in 1968, McGovern in 1972, Mondale in 1984, Dukakis in 1988, Kerry in 2004).  At the state and local level the Republicans made slow, steady gains, especially among upscale middle class whites and migrants from the North. By the 1990s the GOP was competitive at the state and local level throughout the South. The Democrats made gains in the west, converting California to a Democratic stronghold and gaining in fast-growing Arizona and Nevada. The Northeast became more and more a Democratic enclave, especially after 2006 when numerous Republican moderates were defeated for reelection.  the Midwest remained a battleground.  The Democrats made strong gains in Illinois, but slipped a little in Minnesota.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Demfight1968.jpg|thumb|290px|By 1968 Democrats were bitterly fighting over Vietnam and the failures of the Great Society]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1968 to 1999==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party split five ways in 1968 and became the minority party in presidential elections for decades; after 1964 they won a majority of the presidential vote only in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jimmy Carter.jpg|thumb|right|180px|Jimmy Carter was elected in 1976 and defeated in 1980.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1972, the Democrats nominated Sen. [[George McGovern]] (SD) as the presidential candidate on a platform which advocated, among other things, U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam and a guaranteed minimum income for all Americans. McGovern's forces at the national convention ousted Mayor [[Richard J. Daley]] and the entire Chicago delegation, replacing them with insurgents led by [[Jesse Jackson]]. After it became know that McGovern's running mate, [[Thomas Eagleton]], had received electric shock therapy, McGovern said he supported Eagleton &amp;quot;1000%&amp;quot; but he was soon forced to drop him and find a new running mate.  With his campaign stalled for several weeks McGovern finally selected [[Sargent Shriver]], a Kennedy-in-law who was close to Mayor Daley.  On July 14, 1972, McGovern appointed his campaign manager, Jean Westwood as the first woman chair of the Democratic National Committee.  McGovern was defeated in a landslide by incumbent [[Richard Nixon]], winning only Massachusetts and Washington, D.C.  The [[Watergate affair]] of 1973-74 made corruption a central issue, especially after [[Gerald Ford]] pardoned Nixon in September 1974. The Democrats made major gains in the 1974 off-year elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1976, mistrust of the administration, complicated by a combination of economic recession and inflation, sometimes called ''[[stagflation]]'', led to Ford's narrow defeat in 1976 by [[Jimmy Carter]], a former governor of Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carter represented the total outsider, who promised honesty in government. He had served as a naval officer, a farmer, a state senator, and a one-term governor. His only experience with federal politics was when he chaired the Democratic National Committee's congressional and gubernatorial elections in 1974. Some of Carter's major accomplishments consisted of the creation of a national energy policy and the consolidation of governmental agencies, resulting in two new cabinet departments, the [[United States Department of Energy]] and the [[United States Department of Education]]. Carter also successfully deregulated the trucking, airline, rail, finance, communications, and oil industries, bolstered the [[social security]] system, and appointed record numbers of women and minorities to significant government and judicial posts. He also enacted strong legislation on environmental protection, through the expansion of the [[National Park Service]] in [[Alaska]], creating 103 million new acres of land. In foreign affairs, Carter's accomplishments consisted of the [[Camp David Accords]], the [[Panama Canal Treaties]], the creation of full diplomatic relations with the [[People's Republic of China]], and the negotiation of the [[SALT II]] Treaty. In addition, he championed human rights throughout the world and used human rights as the center of his administration's foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even with all of these successes, Carter failed to implement a national health plan or to reform the tax system, as he had promised in his campaign. Inflation was also on the rise. Abroad, the Iranians held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days, and Carter's diplomatic and military rescue attempts failed. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan later that year weakened the perception Americans had of Carter. Even though he had already been defeated for re-election, Carter fortunately was able to negotiate the release of every American hostage. They were lifted out of Iran minutes after Reagan was inaugurated and Carter served as Reagan's emissary to greet them when they arrived in Germany. In 1980, Carter defeated liberal champion [[Edward Kennedy]] to gain renomination, but lost to conservative [[Ronald Reagan]] by a landslide. The Democrats lost 12 Senate seats, and for the first time since 1954, the Republicans controlled the Senate.  The House, however, remained in Democratic hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1980s: Battling Reaganism===&lt;br /&gt;
Instrumental in the election of Republican [[Ronald Reagan]] in 1980, were Democrats who supported many conservative policies. Among legislators, one of the most prominent of these consevative Democrats was Georgia congressman and second chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], [[Larry McDonald]], who was a passenger on [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] shot down by the Soviets on Sept. 1, 1983. The &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot;  were Democrats before the Reagan years, and afterward, but they voted for [[Ronald Reagan]] in 1980 and 1984 (and for [[George H. W. Bush]] in 1988), producing their landslide victories. They were mostly white ethnics in the Northeast who were attracted to Reagan's social conservatism on issues such as abortion, and to his strong foreign policy. They did not continue to vote Republican in 1992 or 1996, so the term fell into disuse except as a reference to the 1980s. The term is not used to describe southern whites who became permanent Republicans in presidential elections.   Stanley Greenberg, a Democratic pollster analyzed white ethnic voters, largely unionized  auto workers, in suburban Macomb County, Michigan, just north of Detroit. The county voted 63 percent for Kennedy in 1960 and 66 percent for Reagan in 1984.  He concluded that Reagan Democrats no longer saw Democrats as champions of their  middle class aspirations, but instead saw it as being a party working primarily for the benefit of others, especially African Americans and the very poor.  Bill Clinton targeted the Reagan Democrats with considerable success in 1992 and 1996. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Liberal1984.jpg|thumb|350px]] The failure to hold the Reagan Democrats and the white South led to the final collapse of the [[New Deal coalition]]. Reagan carried 49 states against former Vice President and Minnesota Senator [[Walter Mondale]], a New Deal stalwart, in 1984.  Massachusetts Governor [[Michael Dukakis]], running not as a New Dealer but as an efficiency expert in public administration, lost by a landslide in 1988 to Vice President [[George H. W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to these landslide defeats, the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] was created. It worked to move the Party rightwards to the ideological center in order to recover some of the fundraising that had been lost to the Republicans due to corporate donors supporting Reagan. With the Party retaining left-of-center supporters as well as supporters holding moderate or conservative views on some issues, the Democrats became generally a &amp;quot;big tent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;catch all party&amp;quot; with widespread appeal to most opponents of the Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The South Becomes Republican===&lt;br /&gt;
In the century after the end of [[Reconstruction]] in 1877, the white South identified with Democratic Party. The Democrats' lock on power was so strong, the region was called the [[Solid South]]. The Republicans only controlled parts of the Appalachian mountains, but they sometimes did compete for statewide office in the border states. Before 1964, the southern Democrats saw their party as the defender of the southern way of life, which included a respect for states' rights and an appreciation for traditional southern values. They repeatedly warned against the aggressive designs of Northern liberals and Republicans, as well as civil rights activists whom they denounced as &amp;quot;outside agitators.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, between 1964 and 2004, the Democratic Party's lock on the South was broken. The long-term cause had to do with the South becoming more like the rest of the nation. It could not long stand apart in terms of racial segregation.  Modernization had brought factories, national businesses, and larger, more cosmopolitan cities to the South, as well as millions of migrants from the North and more opportunities for higher education. Meanwhile, the cotton and tobacco economy of the traditional rural South faded away, as former farmers commuted to factory jobs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integration and the civil rights movement caused enormous controversy in the white South, with many attacking it as a violation of states' rights.  When segregation was outlawed by court order and by the Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965, a die-hard element resisted integration, led by Democratic governors  [[Orval Faubus]] of Arkansas, [[Lester Maddox]] of Georgia, and, especially [[George Wallace]] of Alabama. These populist governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds favored the Democratic Party, but opposed desegregation. After 1965 most Southerners accepted integration (with the exception of public schools). Believing themselves betrayed by the Democratic Party, traditional white southerners joined the new middle-class and the Northern transplants in moving toward the Republican Party. Meanwhile, newly enfranchised Black voters began supporting Democratic candidates at the 80-90-percent levels, producing Democratic leaders such as [[Julian Bond]] and [[John Lewis]] of Georgia, and [[Barbara Jordan]] of Texas. Just as Martin Luther King had promised, integration had brought about a new day in Southern politics, freeing both blacks and whites from old hatreds and fears. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using issues of cultural conservatism, especially opposition to abortion and homosexuality and support for school prayer, Republicans attracted strong majorities among evangelical Christians. They were nationwide, but strongest in the South; before to the 1980s they were largely apolitical.  Exit polls in 2004  showed that Bush led Kerry by 70-30% among Southern whites, who comprised 71% of the voters.  Kerry had a 90-9 lead among the 18% of Southern voters who were black. One third of the Southern voters said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80-20.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See the exit polls at [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.3.html |date=[[2004-11-02]]|accessdate=2006-11-18]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1990s===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s the Democratic Party revived itself, in part by moving to the right on economic and social policy. President [[Bill Clinton]], who defeated the incumbent [[George H. W. Bush]] in 1992, implemented a balanced federal budget and [[welfare reform]] (cutting benefits and requiring many recipients to take jobs), traditionally conservative causes. Labor unions, which had been steadily losing membership since the 1960s, found they had also lost political clout inside the Democratic Party: Clinton enacted the [[NAFTA]] free trade agreement with Canada and Mexico over the strong objection of these labor unions, much to the disappointment of those on the left of the party. The [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] took control of both the House of Representatives and the United States Senate after the 1994 election. Clinton was impeached in 1998 and subsequently acquitted in 1999.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the [[DLC]] attempted to move the Democratic agenda in favor of more centrist positions, prominent Democrats from both the centrist and conservative factions assumed leadership of the party and its direction. Some liberals and progressives felt alienated by the Democratic Party, which they felt had become unconcerned with the interests of the common people and left-wing issues in general. Some Democrats challenged the validity of such critiques, citing the Democratic role in pushing for progressive reforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==21st century==&lt;br /&gt;
===Election of 2000===&lt;br /&gt;
During the presidential election of 2000, the Democrats chose Vice President [[Al Gore]] to be the party's candidate for the presidency. Gore and [[George W. Bush]], the Republican candidate and son of former President George H.W. Bush, disagreed on a number of issues, including abortion, gun control, environmentalism, gay rights, tax cuts, foreign policy, public education, global warming, judicial appointments, and affirmative action. Nevertheless, Gore's affiliation with Clinton and the DLC caused critics—Green Party presidential candidate [[Ralph Nader]] in particular—to assert that Bush and Gore were too similar, especially on free trade, reductions in social welfare, and the death penalty. &amp;quot;We want to punish the Democrats, we want to hurt them, wound them,&amp;quot; Nader's closest advisor said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harry G. Levinem &amp;quot;Ralph Nader, Suicide Bomber.&amp;quot; ''The Village Voice'' May 3, 2004 at [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0418,levine,53179,1.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore won a popular plurality of over 500,000 votes over Bush, but lost in the electoral vote by four votes. In a close election anything can be decisive, but many angry Democrats blamed Nader's third-party spoiler role for Gore's defeat. Controversy plagued the election, and Gore largely dropped from politics for years; by 2005 however he was making speeches critical of Bush's foreign and environmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Gore's close defeat, the Democrats gained five seats in the Senate (including the election of [[Hillary Clinton]] in New York), to turn a 55-45 Republican edge into a 50-50 split (with a Republican Vice President breaking a tie). However, when Republican Senator [[Jim Jeffords]] of Vermont decided in 2001 to become an independent and vote with the Democratic Caucus, the majority status shifted along with the seat, including control of the floor (by the Majority Leader) and control of all committee chairmanships. However, the Republicans regained their Senate majority with gains in 2002 and 2004, leaving the Democrats with only 44 seats, the fewest since the 1920s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2001-2003===&lt;br /&gt;
In the aftermath of the [[9-11 Attacks]], the nation's focus was changed to issues of national security. All but one Democrat&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Representative [[Barbara Lee]] of Texas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; joined the Republicans to authorize President Bush to invade invasion of Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. House leader [[Richard Gephardt]] and Senate leader [[Thomas Daschle]] pushed Democrats to vote for the [[USA PATRIOT Act]] and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Democrats were split over entering Iraq in 2003 and increasingly expressed concerns about both the justification and progress of the [[War on Terrorism]], as well as the domestic effects, including supposed threats to civil rights and civil liberties from the PATRIOT Act. Senator [[Russ Feingold]] was the only Senator to vote against the act; it received more resistance when it came up for renewal, but was renewed in 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the financial fraud scandal of the [[Enron Corporation]] and other corporations, Congressional Democrats pushed for a legal overhaul of business accounting with the intention of preventing further accounting fraud. This led to the bipartisan [[Sarbanes-Oxley Act]] in 2002. Economic issues did not work well in 2002, as the Democrats lost a few seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. They lost three seats in the Senate. While Democrats gained governorships in New Mexico (where [[Bill Richardson]] was elected), Arizona ([[Janet Napolitano]]) and Wyoming ([[Dave Freudenthal]]), other Democrats lost governorships in South Carolina ([[Jim Hodges]]), Alabama ([[Don Siegelman]]) and, for the first time in more than a century, Georgia ([[Roy Barnes]]). The election led to another round of soul searching about the party's narrowing base. The party's miseries mounted in 2003, when a voter recall unseated their unpopular governor of California, [[Gray Davis]], and replaced him which a charismatic liberal Republican [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. By the end of 2003 the four largest states had Republican governors: California, Texas, New York and Florida.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Election of 2004===&lt;br /&gt;
The 2004 campaign began in late 2002, when Gore said he would not run again. [[Howard Dean]], former Governor of Vermont, an opponent of the war and a critic of the Democratic establishment, was the front-runner leading into the Democratic primaries. Dean had immense grassroots support, especially from the left wing of the party. Massachusetts Senator [[John Kerry]], a more centrist figure with heavy support from the [[Democratic Leadership Council]], was nominated because he was seen as more &amp;quot;electable&amp;quot; than Dean. Democrats moves to populist anti-business positions that denounced free trade and the [[NAFTA]] agreement. The party rhetoric attacked the Bush administration rather than propose alternative programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, Kerry lost both the popular vote (by 3 million out of over 120 million votes cast) and the [[Electoral College]]. Republicans also gained four seats in the Senate and three seats in the House of Representatives. Also, for the first time since 1952, the Democratic leader of the Senate lost re-election. In the end, there were 3,660 Democratic state legislators across the nation to the Republicans' 3,557. Democrats gained governorships in Louisiana, New Hampshire and Montana. However, they lost the governorship of Missouri and a legislative majority in Georgia—which had long been a Democratic stronghold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were many reasons for the defeat. After the election most analysts concluded that Kerry was a poor campaigner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Evan Thomas and Staff of Newsweek,''Election 2004: How Bush Won and What You Can Expect in the Future''(2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A group of Vietnam veterans opposed to Kerry called the &amp;quot;Swift Boat Veterans for Truth&amp;quot; undercut Kerry's use of his military past as a campaign strategy.  Kerry was unable to reconcile his initial support of the [[Iraq War]] with his opposition to the war in 2004, or manage the deep split in the Democratic Party between those who favored and opposed the war. Republicans ran thousands of television commercials to argue that Kerry had flip-flopped on Iraq.  When Kerry's home state of Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage, the issue split liberal and conservative Democrats and independents (Kerry publicly stated throughout his campaign that he opposed same sex marriage, but favored civil unions).  Republicans exploited the same-sex marriage issue by promoting ballot initiatives in 11 states that brought conservatives to the polls in large numbers; all 11 initiatives passed. Some Democrats argued that flaws in vote-counting systems may also have played a role in Kerry's defeat in Ohio. Other factors include a healthy job market, a rising stock market, strong home sales, and low unemployment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 2004 election, prominent Democrats began to rethink the party's direction, and a variety of strategies for moving forward were voiced. Some Democrats proposed moving towards the right; others demanded that the party move more to the left and become a stronger opposition party. . Rethinking the party's position on gun control became a matter of discussion, brought up by [[Howard Dean]], [[Bill Richardson]], [[Brian Schweitzer]] and other Democrats who had won governorships in states where Second Amendment rights were important to many voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2005 - 2007===&lt;br /&gt;
These debates were reflected in the 2005 campaign for Chairman of the [[Democratic National Committee]], which [[Howard Dean]] won. He sought to move the Democratic strategy away from the establishment, and bolster support for the party's state organizations, even in Red states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the 109th Congress convened in 2005, [[Harry Reid]], the new Senate Minority Leader, tried to convince the Democratic Senators to vote more as a bloc on important issues; he forced the Republicans to abandon their push for privatization of Social Security. In 2005, the Democrats retained their governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, electing [[Tim Kaine]] and [[Jon Corzine]], respectively. However, the party lost the mayoral race in New York City, a Democratic stronghold, for the fourth straight time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, with scandals involving Republican lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]], as well as GOP House leader [[Tom DeLay]], Ohio GOP governor [[Bob Taft]] and others, the Democrats used the slogan &amp;quot;Culture of corruption.&amp;quot; Negative public opinion on the war in Iraq, along with widespread dissatisfaction among conservatives over government spending, dragged President Bush's job approval ratings down to the lowest levels of his presidency.  To win control the Democrats had to add 15 seats in the House (they added 30), and 6 in the Senate (they added 6). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party's electoral success has been attributed to running relatively conservative Democrats in close seats, such as the Senate races in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Montana. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Dewan Shaila and Anne E. Kornblut, &amp;quot;In Key House Races, Democrats Run to the Right,&amp;quot; ''New York Times,'' 2006-10-30; but compare Rick Perlstein, &amp;quot;Who deserves credit for the Democratic comeback?&amp;quot; ''The New Republic'' 2006-11-08]] at [https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=w061106&amp;amp;s=perlstein110806] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Exit polling suggested that corruption was a key issue for many voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN, &amp;quot;Corruption named as key issue by voters in exit polls,&amp;quot; 2006-11-08 at [http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.exitpolls/] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 Democrats gained a majority of governorships and made gains in many state legislatures. No Democratic incumbent was defeated in any major race. &lt;br /&gt;
===2007-2009===&lt;br /&gt;
House Democrats chose Rep. [[Nancy Pelosi]] of California for Speaker, the first woman ever, but rejected her choice for Majority Leader. Senate Democrats promoted Harry Reid to Majority Leader.  Neither have been very effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The presidential campaign of 2008 featured a remarkable duel between Obama--the first major black candidate, and [[Hillary Clinton]], the first major woman contender. Obama won with his charismatic oratory and his highly efficient fund-raising and strong organization in the caucus states, while Clinton went downscale to pick up big majorities among poor whites and Hispanics. The contest between Obama and GOP nominee [[John McCain]] was very close until September, when the collapse of the financial system soured the voters on the GOP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Obama Administration]] got off to a fast start in 2009, especially in vigorous efforts to combat the [[Recession of 2008]] with heavy new stimulus spending, massive loans to banks, increased regulation, and deep intervention in the automobile industry.  All those policies were begun by Bush, and had failed to reverse the decline of the economy in late 2008.  Whether they will now succeed remains an open question, with the GOP now voting solidly against them and some conservatives like [[Rush Limbaugh]] hoping that the Democrats will fail badly and that the people will again turn to the Republican party.  The Democratic Party is feeling the sting from the opposition and many Democrats are beginning to question their own leadership.  However, their questioning will remain pointless until they realize the errors of their ways and join the GOP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symbols==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democraticjackass.jpg|thumb|250px|&amp;quot;A Live Jackass Kicking a Dead Lion&amp;quot; by Thomas Nast]]&lt;br /&gt;
The most common symbol for the party is the donkey, although the party itself never officially adopted this symbol.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/06/history_of_the.php History of the Democratic Donkey]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some historians suggest the jackass was born 1828 when Jackson was sometimes called a jackass by his opponents as a play on his name. A political cartoon depicting Jackson riding and directing a donkey (representing the Democratic Party) was published in 1837. A political cartoon by [[Thomas Nast]] in an 1870  revived the donkey as a symbol for the Democratic Party. Cartoonists ever since have followed Nast and used the donkey to represent the Democrats, and the elephant to represent the Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Democratic Party in many states was the rooster, as opposed to the Republican eagle. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no official color, but since election night 2000 blue has become the identification color of the Democratic Party for maps, while the red has become the color of the Republicans.  Increasingly blue is used by Democrats for promotions (e.g BuyBlue, BlueFund) and by the party itself, which in 2006 unveiled the &amp;quot;Red to Blue Program&amp;quot; to support Democratic candidates running against Republican incumbents in the 2006 midterm election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jefferson-Jackson Day]] annual fundraising celebrations are held by local chapters of the Democratic Party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The song &amp;quot;[[Happy Days Are Here Again]]&amp;quot; is the unofficial song of the Democratic Party. It was used prominently when Roosevelt was nominated for president at the 1932 Democratic National Convention and remains a sentimental favorite for Democrats today. During the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] era, the [[Fleetwood Mac]] song &amp;quot;Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow&amp;quot; became a popular song at Democratic events, reflecting the growing prominence of Baby Boomers in the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democratic Presidents==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Andrew Jackson]] (1829-1837)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Martin Van Buren]] (1837-1841)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James K. Polk]] (1845-1849)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franklin Pierce]] (1853-1857)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James Buchanan]] (1857-1861)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889) (1893-1897)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Woodrow Wilson]] (1913-1921)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franklin Roosevelt]] (1933-1945)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harry S Truman]] (1945-1953)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John F. Kennedy]] (1961-1963)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] (1963-1969)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jimmy Carter]] (1977-1981)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Clinton]] (1993-2001)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]] (2009 - Present)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Democrats|Articles about '''Democrats''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gestapo care]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Current===&lt;br /&gt;
*Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa, ''The Almanac of American Politics 2008: The Senators, the Representatives and the Governors: Their Records and Election Results, Their States and Districts'' (2007) covers all the live politicians with amazing detail. New edition every two years since 1975.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Brownstein, Ronald. ''The Second Civil War: How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America''(2007)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Crane, Michael. ''The Political Junkie Handbook: The Definitive Reference Books on Politics'' (2004) covers all the major issues explaining the parties' positions&lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ''Divided States of America: The Slash and Burn Politics of the 2004 Presidential Election'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ed. ''The Sixth Year Itch: The Rise and Fall of the George W. Bush Presidency'' (1907), in-depth essays by scholars on key states in 2006&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J., and Howard R. Ernst  eds. ''Political Parties and Elections'' (2007), 540pp; an encyclopedia with 450 entries by scholars; focus is 1945 to present&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. and Bruce Larson. ''The Party's Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America's Future'' (2001) textbook.&lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), long essays by specialists on each time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron and Richard Johnston. ''The End of Southern Exceptionalism'' (2006), uses statistical election data &amp;amp; polls to argue  GOP growth was primarily a response to economic change&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''American National Biography'' (20 volumes, 1999) covers all politicians no longer alive; online and paper copies at many academic libraries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Jensen, Richard. ''Grass Roots Politics: Parties, Issues, and Voters, 1854-1983'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/grass-roots-politics-parties-issues-and-voters-1854-1983-by-christopher-c-gibbs-richard-j-jensen-steven-l-piott.jsp online edition]; survey by conservative scholar, with primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, David M. ''Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945'' (2001), synthesis by leading scholar; Pulitzer prize [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=52284041 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kleppner, Paul et al. ''The Evolution of American Electoral Systems'' (1983), essays by scholars (some of them conservatives), 1790s to 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kleppner, Paul. ''The Third Electoral System 1853-1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures'' (1979), analysis of voting behavior, with emphasis on region, ethnicity, religion and class. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24451028  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ling, Peter J. ''The Democratic Party: A Photographic History'' (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945-1974'' (1997) synthesis by leading scholar. [http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Expectations-United-1945-1974-History/dp/0195117972/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1211911625&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore'' (2005) synthesis by leading scholar. [http://www.amazon.com/Restless-Giant-United-Watergate-History/dp/0195305221/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1211911625&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ritchie, Donald A. ''Electing FDR: The New Deal Campaign of 1932'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Electing-FDR-Campaign-Presidential-Elections/dp/0700615504/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1195784762&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rutland, Robert Allen. ''The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton'' (1995). &lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), most recent collection of new essays by specialists on each time period:  &lt;br /&gt;
**includes: &amp;quot;State Development in the Early Republic: 1775–1840&amp;quot; by Ronald P. Formisano; &amp;quot;The Nationalization and Racialization of American Politics: 1790–1840&amp;quot; by David Waldstreicher; &amp;quot;'To One or Another of These Parties Every Man Belongs;&amp;quot;: 1820–1865 by Joel H. Silbey; &amp;quot;Change and Continuity in the Party Period: 1835–1885&amp;quot; by Michael F. Holt; &amp;quot;The Transformation of American Politics: 1865–1910&amp;quot; by Peter H. Argersinger; &amp;quot;Democracy, Republicanism, and Efficiency: 1885–1930&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen; &amp;quot;The Limits of Federal Power and Social Policy: 1910–1955&amp;quot; by Anthony J. Badger; &amp;quot;The Rise of Rights and Rights Consciousness: 1930–1980&amp;quot; by James T. Patterson, Brown University; and &amp;quot;Economic Growth, Issue Evolution, and Divided Government: 1955–2000&amp;quot; by Byron E. Shafer&lt;br /&gt;
* Schlisinger, Galbraith. ''Of the People: The 200 Year History of the Democratic Party'' (1992)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Sundquist, James L. ''Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States'',  (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=29223022   online edition&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilentz, Sean. ''The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln'' (2005), detailed synthesis by a leading liberal scholar. [http://www.amazon.com/Rise-American-Democracy-Jefferson-Lincoln/dp/0393058204/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1195784940&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Witcover, Jules. ''Party of the People: A History of the Democrats'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schlesinger, Arthur Meier, Jr. ed. ''History of American Presidential Elections, 1789-2000'' (various multivolume editions, latest is 2001). For each election includes a short history by a leading scholar and a selection of primary documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.democrats.org/ Democratic Party Official Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.demconvention.com/assets/downloads/2008-Democratic-Platform-final.pdf 2008 Democratic Platform (pdf download)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gilded Age]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Jacksonian Democracy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Truthtopower</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republican_Party&amp;diff=744381</id>
		<title>Republican Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republican_Party&amp;diff=744381"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T13:00:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Truthtopower: /* Ideology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{AmericanPoliticalParty&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_name = Republican Party&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_articletitle = Republican Party (United States)&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_logo = [[Image:Cjjfdjfty.png|200px|&amp;quot;Republican Party Elephant&amp;quot; logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | website = [http://www.gop.com www.gop.com]&lt;br /&gt;
 | headquarters = 310 K Street SE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Washington, D.C.]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;20003 &lt;br /&gt;
 | chairman = [[Michael Steele]]   &lt;br /&gt;
 | houseleader = [[John Boehner]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | senateleader = [[Mitch McConnell]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | foundation = 1854&lt;br /&gt;
 | ideology = [[moderate|Centrism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Conservative|Conservatism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Fiscal Conservative|Fiscal conservatism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Neoconservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | fiscalpolicy = [[Free Market]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | socialpolicy = [[Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | international = [[International Democrat Union]]  &lt;br /&gt;
 | colors = [[Red states and blue states|Red]] (unofficial)&lt;br /&gt;
 | footnotes =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Republican Party''' or informally the '''GOP''' (short for Grand Old Party), is one of the two major political parties in the [[United States]].  The party is the U.S.'s major center-right party. The Republican voter coalitions have generally comprised businessmen, military veterans and evangelical Protestants, while the [[Democratic Party]] appealed more to the poor and to minority ethnic, racial and religious groups. Some groups have realigned: blacks went from the GOP to the Democrats in the 1930s, while white Southerners became Republicans in the 1980s. Catholics switched from 80% Democratic in 1960 to 50-50 in recent years. In recent years youth and better educated professionals have moved to the Democrats, while blue collar workers have become more Republican. The GOP had a lock on the South since 1980, but that weakened in 2008 as the GOP lost presidential votes in every region. The elections of 2006 and 2008 marked back-to-back major gains by the Democrats in Congress, giving them large majorities in both houses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party was created in 1854 by anti-slavery activists. It soon swept to control of all the northern states, and in 1860 elected [[Abraham Lincoln]] president.  The South seceded, and the Union side of the [[American Civil War]] was directed by Lincoln and the new party, with help from &amp;quot;War Democrats.&amp;quot; The GOP (as it was also called from the 1880s) dominated the elections of the [[Third Party System]] (1854-1894) as well as the [[Fourth Party System]] or Progressive Era (1894-1932).  However the Democrats built a liberal [[New Deal Coalition]] under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], and dominated the [[Fifth Party System]], 1932-1966, with the GOP only electing Eisenhower in that era.  The [[Sixth Party System]], since 1968, has been dominated by the GOP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18 of the 27 US Presidents since 1861 have been Republicans and since that same year a Republican has won 23 of the last 37 presidential elections. The party's most recent candidate [[Arizona]] Senator [[John McCain]], together with his running mate Alaska Governor [[Sarah Palin]] lost the 2008 presidential election to Democrat [[Barack Obama]] and his running mate [[Joe Biden]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Symbol ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:The_off_year_nast_1877.jpg|left|thumb|1877 Thomas Nast drawing of the Republican elephant]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The official symbol of the Republican Party is the elephant.  Although the elephant had occasionally been associated with the party earlier, a political cartoon by Thomas Nast, published in ''Harper's Weekly'' on November 7, 1874, is considered the first important use of the symbol&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harpweek.com/09Cartoon/BrowseByDateCartoon.asp?Year=2003&amp;amp;Month=November&amp;amp;Date=7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Republican party in some Midwestern states was the eagle, as opposed to the Democratic cock. The eagle still appears on Indiana ballots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A political term referring to the party is &amp;quot;G.O.P.&amp;quot;, which was originally an acronym of &amp;quot;Grand Old Party&amp;quot;. The term was coined in 1875.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideology==&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, the fundamental philosophy and political ideals of the Republican Party are founded on the idea that societal health is rooted in personal responsibility and actions. The Republican Party holds the belief that all material things are earned, not owed. This is seen most often in the party's push for lower taxes. This is fought for in an attempt to treat all citizens equally despite income, race, gender, or religion. They also see taxes as a drag on the economy, and believe private spending is usually more efficient than public spending.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Republicans also show concerns about having big government in charge of such vital issues as food, shelter, or health care, as they believe the private sector and/or the individual are better suited to control their own lives. President [[Ronald Reagan]] who became a Republican in the early 1960s after being a [[New Deal]]er at one time, has been quoted as saying &amp;quot;Government is not the solution, it is the problem.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party tends to hold both [[conservative]] and [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] stances on social and economic issues respectively. Major policies that the party has recently supported include a conservative foreign policy, including [[War on Terror]], liberations of [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]], and strong support for democracy especially in the [[Middle East]]. Many party members and politicians have shown a distrust of the [[United Nations]] due to the organization's incompetent bureaucracy, anti-capitalist undertone, corruption on the [[Security Council]] and in UN humanitarian programs. Along with demanding radical reforms in the UN, many Republican politicians also opposes the Kyoto Protocol due the protocol's unfair application to certain countries (especially the United States) and the fact that it prevents economic growth and slows the reduction of poverty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party generally supports free trade, especially [[NAFTA]] and [[CAFTA]]. It is responsible for a series of across-the-board tax cuts since 2001 that have bolstered the economy and reduced the punitive aspect of the income tax. It has sought business deregulation, reduction of environmental regulations that restrict fair use of land and property, and other policies that are pro-capitalism. It supports gun ownership rights, [http://www.republicansforrape.org/ rape], and enterprise zones (low taxes for investing in poverty areas). On social issues the majority of its national and state candidates usually favor the death penalty, call for stronger state-level control on access to [[abortion]], support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage at the federal level and by the states, favor faith-based charitable initiatives, support school choice and homeschooling, social welfare benefit reform, and oppose reverse racism, such as racial quotas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years the party has called for much stronger accountability in the public schools, especially through the &amp;quot;No Child Left behind Act&amp;quot; of 2001 (which also increased [[federal funding]] for schools). The party is split on the issue of federally funding embryonic stem cell research that involves the cloning and killing of human embryos. Many in the party think it  unethical to force tax payers who believe this type of research is morally wrong to finance it. Historically Republicans have had a strong belief in [[individualism]], limited government, and business entrepreneurship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, the Republican party has downplayed its emphasis on small government. Under the administration of [[George W. Bush]], the federal government has been expanded to record levels, surpassing even the Great Depression era &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Additionally, the Bush administration has acted to nationalize the country's banking institutions in an effort to stymie the decline of the U.S. economy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12078933&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GOP-presidents.jpg|thumb|300px|GOP Presidents by Andy Thomas; clockwise from far right: Nixon, Ford, Lincoln, GHW Bush, Reagan, GW Bush, Eisenhower, Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
The party  began in 1854, at the start of the [[Third Party System]]. The '''GOP''' (or &amp;quot;Grand Old Party&amp;quot; as it was nicknamed after 1880) dominated national politics, including most of the [[Fourth Party System]] until 1932. Then the [[Fifth Party System]] (or &amp;quot;New Deal Coalition&amp;quot;) was dominant until the late 1960s.  Since 1968 the GOP has won 7 of 11 presidential elections (losing in 1976, 1992, 1996 and 2008). Its great rival is the [[U.S. Democratic Party, history|Democratic Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Third Party System: 1854-1894===&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican party began as a spontaneous grass roots protest against the [[Kansas-Nebraska Act]] of 1854, which allowed slavery into western territories where it had been forbidden by earlier compromises.  The creation of the new party, along with the death of the [[Whig Party]], realigned American politics. The central issues were new, as were the voter alignments, and the balance of power in Congress. The central issues became slavery, race, civil war and the reconstruction of the Union into a more powerful nation, with rules changed that gave the vote to former slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Issues: Slavery====&lt;br /&gt;
Republican activists denounced the Kansas-Nebraska act as proof of the power of the [[Slave Power]]--the powerful class of slaveholders who were conspiring to control the federal government and to spread slavery nationwide. The name &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot; gained such favor in 1854 because &amp;quot;[[Republicanism, U.S.|republicanism]]&amp;quot; was the paramount political value the new party meant to uphold. The name also echoed the former Jeffersonian party of the [[First Party System]]. The party founders adopted the name &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot; to indicate it was the carrier of &amp;quot;republican&amp;quot; beliefs about civic virtue, and opposition to aristocracy and corruption. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Gould (2003) pp 14-15; republicanism is explored in depth by Foner (1970).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two small cities of the Yankee diaspora, Ripon, Wisconsin, and Jackson, Michigan, claim the birthplace honors. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;There is also a myth that the town of Exeter, New Hampshire was first by six months, but nothing came of the secret meeting there and scholars dismiss the claim.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ripon held the first county convention on March 20, 1854. Jackson held the first statewide convention where delegates on July 6, 1854 declared their new party opposed to the expansion of slavery into new territories and  selected a state-wide slate of candidates. The Midwest took the lead in forming state party tickets, while the eastern states lagged a year or so. There were no efforts to organize the party in the South, apart from a few areas adjacent to free states. The new party was sectional, based in the northeast and northern Midwest--areas with a strong Yankee presence. It had only scattered support in slave states before the Civil War.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; There was some strength in border cities such as St. Louis, Louisville, Wheeling, and Baltimore.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first presidential nomination in 1856 when to an obscure western explorer [[John C. Fremont]], as the party crusaded against the Slave Power with the slogan, &amp;quot;Free Soil, Free Labor, Free men, Fremont and victory!&amp;quot;  Democrats warned darkly that disunion and Civil War would result.  The remnants of the Know Nothing movement prevented the new party from sweeping the North, and the Democrats elected [[James Buchanan]]. By 1858 the Know Nothings were  gone and the Republicans swept the North.  The 1860 election seemed a certain victory, for the party had majorities in states with a majority of the electoral votes.  In the event the opposition split three ways, and [[Abraham Lincoln]] coasted to an easy victory, carrying 18 states with 190 electoral votes, while the opposition carried 15 states (mostly in the South) with 123 electoral votes. Lincoln had 1.9 million popular votes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Modernization====&lt;br /&gt;
Besides opposition to slavery, the new party put forward a modernizing vision --emphasizing higher education, banking, railroads, industry and cities, while promising free homesteads to farmers. It vigorously argued that free-market labor was superior to slavery and the very foundation of civic virtue and true American values -  this is the &amp;quot;Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men&amp;quot; ideology explored by historian Eric Foner &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Foner, Eric. ''Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men''. 1993.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Republicans absorbed the previous traditions of its members, most of whom had been [[Whig Party|Whigs]], and some of whom had been Democrats or members of third parties (especially the [[Free Soil Party]] and Know-Nothings (American Party). Many [[U.S. Democratic Party, history|Democrats]] who joined up were rewarded with governorships. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; They included [[Nathaniel P. Banks]] of Massachusetts, [[Kinsley Bingham]] of Michigan, [[William H. Bissell]] of Illinois, [[Salmon P. Chase]] of Ohio, [[Hannibal Hamlin]] of Maine, [[Samuel J. Kirkwood]] of Iowa, [[Ralph Metcalf]] of New Hampshire, [[Lot Morrill]] of Maine, and [[Alexander Randall]] of Wisconsin).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or seats in the U.S. Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The senators included Bingham and Hamlin, as well as [[James R. Doolittle]] of Wisconsin, [[John P. Hale]] of New Hampshire, [[Preston King]] of New York, [[Lyman Trumbull]] of Illinois, and [[David Wilmot]] of Pennsylvania.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since its inception, its chief opposition has been the Democratic Party, but the amount of flow back and forth of prominent politicians between the two parties was quite high from 1854 to 1896.&lt;br /&gt;
====Ethnocultural voting====&lt;br /&gt;
Historians have explored the ethnocultural foundations of the party, along the line that ethnic and religious groups set the moral standards for their members, who then carried those standards into politics.  The churches also provided social networks that politicians used to sign up voters.  The pietistic churches, heavily influenced by the revivals of the [[Second Great Awakening]], emphasized the duty of the Christian to purge sin from society.  Sin took many forms--alcoholism, polygamy and slavery became special targets for the Republicans. The Yankees, who dominated New England, much of upstate New York, and much of the upper Midwest were the strongest supporters of the new party.  This was especially true for the pietistic Congregationalists and Presbyterians among them and (during the war), the Methodists, along with Scandinavian Lutherans.  The Quakers were a small tight-knit group that was heavily Republican.  The liturgical churches (Roman Catholic, Episcopal, German Lutheran), by contrast, largely rejected the moralism of the GOP; most of their adherents voted Democratic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kleppner (1979) has extensive detail on the voting behavior of groups.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Politics 1854-1860====&lt;br /&gt;
[[John C. Frémont]] ran as the first Republican nominee for [[President of the United States|President]] in 1856, using the [[political slogan]]: &amp;quot;[[United States Free Soil Party#Positions|Free soil, free labor, free speech, free men]], Frémont.&amp;quot; Although Frémont's bid was unsuccessful, the party showed a strong base. It dominated in New England, New York and the northern Midwest, and had a strong presence in the rest of the North. It had almost no support in the South, where it was roundly denounced in 1856-60 as a divisive force that threatened civil war. The election of [[Abraham Lincoln]] in 1860 ended the domination of the fragile coalition of pro-slavery southern Democrats and conciliatory northern Democrats which had existed since the days of [[Andrew Jackson]]. Instead, a new era of Republican dominance based in the industrial and agricultural north ensued. Republicans still often refer to their party as the &amp;quot;party of Lincoln&amp;quot; in honor of the first Republican President.&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|American election campaigns in the 19th century}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Third Party System}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil War: 1861-1865====&lt;br /&gt;
Lincoln proved brilliantly successful in uniting the factions of his party to fight for the Union.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goodwyn 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However he usually fought the [[Radical Republicans]] who demanded harsher measures. Most Democrats at first were [[War Democrats]], and supportive until the fall of 1862. When Lincoln added the abolition of slavery as a war goal, many war Democrats became &amp;quot;peace Democrats.&amp;quot; All the state Republican parties accepted the antislavery goal except Kentucky. In Congress, the party passed major legislation to promote rapid modernization, including a national banking system, high tariffs, an income tax, many excise taxes, paper money issued without backing (&amp;quot;greenbacks&amp;quot;), a huge national debt, homestead laws, and aid to education and agriculture. The Republicans denounced the peace-oriented Democrats as [[Copperheads]] and won enough [[War Democrats]] to maintain their majority in 1862; in 1864, they formed a coalition with many War Democrats as the &amp;quot;National Union Party&amp;quot; which reelected Lincoln easily, then folded back into the Republican party. During the war, upper middle-class men in major cities formed [[Union League]]s, to promote and help finance the war effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reconstruction: Blacks, Carpetbaggers and Scalawags====&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Reconstruction]], how to deal with the ex-Confederates and the freed slaves, or [[Freedmen]], were the major issues. By 1864, [[Radical Republicans]] controlled Congress and demanded more aggressive action against slavery, and more vengeance toward the Confederates. Lincoln held them off, but just barely. Republicans at first welcomed President [[Andrew Johnson]]; the Radicals thought he was one of them and would take a hard line in punishing the South. Johnson however broke with them and formed a loose alliance with moderate Republicans and Democrats. The showdown came in the Congressional elections of 1866, in which the Radicals won a sweeping victory and took full control of Reconstruction, passing key laws over the veto. Johnson was impeached by the House, but acquitted by the Senate. With the election of [[Ulysses S. Grant]] in 1868, the Radicals had control of Congress, the party and the Army, and attempted to build a solid Republican base in the South using the votes of [[Freedmen]], [[Scalawags]] and [[Carpetbaggers]], supported directly by U.S. Army detachments. Republicans all across the South formed local clubs called [[Union League]]s that effectively mobilized the voters, discussed issues, and when necessary fought off [[Ku Klux Klan]] attacks. Thousands died on both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grant supported radical reconstruction programs in the South, the 14th Amendment, and equal civil and voting rights for the freedmen. Most of all he was the hero of the war veterans, who marched to his tune. The party had become so large that factionalism was inevitable; it was hastened by Grant's tolerance of high levels of corruption typified by the [[Whiskey Ring]]. The &amp;quot;[[Liberal Republican]]s&amp;quot; split off in 1872 on the grounds that it was time to declare the war finished and bring the troops home. Many of the founders of the GOP joined the movement, as did many powerful newspaper editors. They nominated [[Horace Greeley]], who gained unofficial Democratic support, but was defeated in a landslide. The depression of 1873 energized the Democrats. They won control of the House and formed &amp;quot;[[Redeemers|Redeemer]]&amp;quot; coalitions which recaptured control of each southern state, in some cases using threats and violence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rings.jpg|thumb|250px|right|1874 Keppler cartoon of Grant using Whiskey Ring and corruption to hold GOP together.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconstruction came to an end when the contested election of 1876 was awarded by a special [[Electoral Commission (United States)|electoral commission]] to Republican [[Rutherford B. Hayes]] who promised, through the unofficial [[Compromise of 1877]], to withdraw federal troops from control of the last three southern states. The region then became the [[Solid South]], giving overwhelming majorities of its electoral votes and Congressional seats to the Democrats until 1964. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of racial issues, &amp;quot;White Republicans as well as Democrats solicited black votes but reluctantly rewarded blacks with nominations for office only when necessary, even then reserving the more choice positions for whites. The results were predictable: these half-a-loaf gestures satisfied neither black nor white Republicans. The fatal weakness of the Republican party in Alabama, as elsewhere in the South, was its inability to create a biracial political party.  And while in power even briefly, they failed to protect their members from Democratic terror. Alabama Republicans were forever on the defensive, verbally and physically.&amp;quot; [Woolfolk p 134]  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Social pressure eventually forced most [[Scalawags]] to join the conservative/Democratic Redeemer coalition. A minority persisted and formed the &amp;quot;tan&amp;quot; half of the &amp;quot;Black and Tan&amp;quot; Republican party, a minority in every southern state after 1877. (DeSantis 1998)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gilded Age: 1877-1894====&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;GOP&amp;quot; (as it was now nicknamed) split into factions in the late 1870s. The Stalwarts, followers of Senator Conkling, defended the spoils system. The Half-Breeds, who followed Senator [[James G. Blaine]] of Maine, pushed for [[Civil service reform]]. Independents who opposed the spoils system altogether were called &amp;quot;[[Mugwumps]]&amp;quot;. In 1884 they rejected [[James G. Blaine]] as corrupt and helped elect Democrat [[Grover Cleveland]]; most returned to the party by 1888. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the Northern post-bellum economy boomed with heavy and light industry, railroads, mines, and fast-growing cities, as well as prosperous agriculture, the Republicans took credit and promoted policies to keep the fast growth going. They supported big business generally, hard money (i.e. the [[gold standard]]), high [[tariff]]s, and high pensions for Union veterans. By 1890, however, the Republicans had agreed to the [[Sherman Anti-Trust Act]] and the [[Interstate Commerce Commission]] in response to complaints from owners of small businesses and farmers. The high [[McKinley Tariff]] of 1890 hurt the party and the Democrats swept to a landslide in the off-year elections, even defeating McKinley himself.&lt;br /&gt;
====Ethnocultural Voters: pietistic Republicans versus liturgical Democrats====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1860 to 1912, the Republicans took advantage of the association of the Democrats with &amp;quot;Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion&amp;quot;. Rum stood for the liquor interests and the tavernkeepers, in contrast to the GOP, which had a strong dry element. &amp;quot;Romanism&amp;quot; meant Catholics, especially Irish Americans, who ran the Democratic party in every big city, and whom the Republicans denounced for political corruption. &amp;quot;Rebellion&amp;quot; stood for the Confederates who tried to break the Union in 1861, and the [[Copperheads]] in the North who sympathized with them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic trends aided the Democrats, as the German and Irish Catholic immigrants were Democrats, and outnumbered the English and Scandinavian Republicans. During the 1880s and 1890s, the Republicans struggled against the Democrats' efforts, winning several close elections and losing two to Grover Cleveland (in [[U.S. presidential election, 1884|1884]] and [[U.S. presidential election, 1892|1892]]).&lt;br /&gt;
Religious lines were sharply drawn [Kleppner 1979]. Methodists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Scandinavian Lutherans and other pietists in the North were tightly linked to the GOP. In sharp contrast, liturgical groups, especially the Catholics, Episcopalians, and German Lutherans, looked to the Democratic party for protection from pietistic moralism, especially prohibition.  Both parties cut across the class structure, with the Democrats more bottom-heavy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cultural issues, especially prohibition and foreign language schools became important because of the sharp religious divisions in the electorate. In the North, about 50% of the voters were pietistic Protestants (Methodists, Scandinavian Lutherans, Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Disciples of Christ) who believed the government should be used to reduce social sins, such as drinking. Liturgical churches (Roman Catholics, German Lutherans, Episcopalians) comprised over a quarter of the vote and wanted the government to stay out of the morality business. Prohibition debates and referenda heated up politics in most states over a period of decade, as national prohibition was finally passed in 1918 (and repealed in 1932), serving as a major issue between the wet Democracy and the dry GOP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See  Kleppner (1979)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Fourth Party System: 1896-1932: The Progressive Era ===&lt;br /&gt;
The election of [[William McKinley]] in 1896 was a [[realigning election]] that changed the balance of power, and introduced new rules, new issues and new leaders. It did not, however, see the emergence of a new major party.  The Republican sweep of the 1894 Congressional elections presaged the McKinley landslide of 1896, which was repeated in 1900, thus locking the GOP in full control of the national government and most northern state governments. The GOP made major gains as well in the border states.  The [[Fourth Party System]] was dominated by Republican presidents, with the exception of the two terms of Democrat [[Woodrow Wilson]], 1912-1920. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====McKinley and realignment====&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley promised that high tariffs would end the severe hardship caused by the [[Panic of 1893]], and that the GOP would guarantee a sort of pluralism in which all groups would benefit. He denounced [[William Jennings Bryan]], the Democratic nominee, as a dangerous radical whose plans for &amp;quot;Free Silver&amp;quot; at 16-1 (or [[Bimetallism]]) would bankrupt the economy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley relied heavily on industry and the middle classes for his support and cemented the Republicans as the party of business; his [[campaign manager]], Ohio's [[Mark Hanna]], developed a detailed plan for getting contributions from the business world, and McKinley outspent his rival [[William Jennings Bryan]] by a large margin.  McKinley was the first president to promote [[pluralism]], arguing that prosperity would be shared by all ethnic and religious groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Roosevelt and Progressivism====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theodore Roosevelt]], who became president in 1901, had the most dynamic personality in the nation.  Roosevelt had to contend with men like Senator [[Mark Hanna]], whom he outmaneuvered to gain control of the convention in 1904 that renominated him. More difficult to handle was conservative House Speaker [[Joseph Gurney Cannon]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt achieved modest legislative gains in terms of railroad legislation and pure food laws. He was more successful in Court, bringing antitrust suits that broke up the [[Northern Securities]] trust and [[Standard Oil]].  Roosevelt moved left in his last two years in office but was unable to pass major Square Deal proposals.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt did succeed in naming his successor Secretary of War [[William Howard Taft]] who easily defeated Bryan again in 1908. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Progressive insurgents vs. Conservatives====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GOP was divided between insurgents and stand-patters (liberals and conservatives, to use 21st century terms). [[Theodore Roosevelt]] was an enormously popular president (1901-1909), and he transferred the office to [[William Howard Taft]]. Taft, however, did not have TR's enormous popularity nor his ability to bring rival factions together. When Taft sided with the standpatters under Speaker [[Joe Cannon]] and Senate leader [[Nelson Aldrich]], the insurgents revolted. Led by [[George Norris]] the insurgents took control of the House away from Cannon and imposed a new system whereby committee chairmanships depended on seniority (years of membership on the committee), rather than party loyalty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tariff issue was pulling the GOP apart. Roosevelt tried to postpone the issue but Taft had to meet it head on in 1909 with the [[Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act]].  Eastern conservatives led by [[Nelson A. Aldrich]] wanted high tariffs on manufactured goods (especially woolens), while Midwesterners called for low tariffs.  Aldrich tricked them by lowering the tariff on farm products, which outraged the farmers.  In a stunning comeback the Democrats won control of the House in  1910, as the GOP rift between insurgents and conservatives widened.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt sided with the insurgents and, after long indecision, decided to run against Taft for the 1912 nomination. Roosevelt had to steamroll over insurgent Senator [[Robert LaFollette]] of Wisconsin, turning an ally into an enemy.  Taft outmaneuvered Roosevelt and controlled the convention. Roosevelt walked out and formed a third party, the &amp;quot;Progressive&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Bull Moose&amp;quot; party. Very few officeholders supported him, and the new party collapsed by 1914. With the GOP vote divided in half, Democrat [[Woodrow Wilson]] easily won the 1912 election, and was narrowly reelected in 1916.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====State and local politics====&lt;br /&gt;
The Republicans welcomed the [[Progressive Era]] at the state and local level.  The first important reform mayor was [[Hazen S. Pingree]] of Detroit (1890-97) who was elected governor of Michigan in 1896. In New York City the Republicans joined nonpartisan reformers to battle [[Tammany Hall]], and elected Seth Low (1902-03). Samuel &amp;quot;Golden Rule&amp;quot; Jones was first elected mayor of Toledo as a Republican in 1897, but was reelected as an independent when his party refused to renominate him.  In Iowa Senator Albert Cummins came up with the &amp;quot;Iowa Idea&amp;quot; that blamed the trust or monopoly problem on the high tariff, angering the eastern industrialists and factory workers. Many Republican civic leaders, following the example of [[Mark Hanna]], were active in the [[National Civic Federation]], which promoted urban reforms and sought to avoid wasteful strikes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Harding-Coolidge-Hoover, 1920-1932====&lt;br /&gt;
The party controlled the presidency throughout the 1920s, running on a platform of opposition to the League of Nations, high tariffs, and promotion of business interests. [[Warren G. Harding]], [[Calvin Coolidge]] and [[Herbert Hoover]] were resoundingly elected in the elections of 1920, 1924 and 1928 as the Democrats were deeply split on prohibition and religion. The breakaway efforts of Senator [[Robert LaFollette]] in 1924 failed to stop a landslide for Coolidge, and his movement fell apart.  The [[Teapot Dome Scandal]] threatened to hurt the party but Harding died and Coolidge blamed everything on him, as the opposition splintered in 1924. The pro-business policies of the decade seemed to produce an unprecedented prosperity--until the Wall Street Crash of 1929 heralded the [[Great Depression]].  Although the party did very well in large cities and among ethnic Catholics in presidential elections of 1920-24, it was unable to hold those gains in 1928. By 1932 the cities--for the first time ever--had become Democratic strongholds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The African American vote held for Hoover in 1932, but started moving toward Roosevelt. By 1940 the majority of northern blacks were voting Democratic. Southern blacks who could vote (in border states) were split; disenfranchised blacks in the South probably preferred the Republicans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Great Depression]] cost Hoover the presidency with the [[U.S. presidential election, 1932|1932 landslide election]] of [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]. Roosevelt's [[New Deal coalition]] controlled American politics for most of the next three decades, excepting the two-term presidency of Republican [[Dwight Eisenhower]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fifth Party System: 1932-1980 ==&lt;br /&gt;
Minority parties tend to factionalize and after 1936 the GOP split into a conservative faction (dominant in the West and Southeast) and a liberal faction (dominant in the Northeast) &amp;amp;ndash; combined with a residual base of inherited progressive Republicanism active throughout the century.   [[U.S. presidential election, 1936|In 1936]] Kansas governor [[Alf Landon]] and his young followers defeated the [[Herbert Hoover]] faction.  Landon generally supported most New Deal programs, but carried only two states in the Roosevelt landslide. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator [[Robert Taft]] of Ohio represented the Midwestern wing of the party that continued to oppose [[New Deal]] reforms and continued to champion [[isolationism]]. [[Thomas Dewey]], governor of New York, represented the Northeastern wing of the party. Dewey did not reject the New Deal programs, but demanded more efficiency, more support for economic growth, and less corruption. He was more willing than Taft to support Britain in 1939-40. After the war the isolationists wing strenuously opposed the [[United Nations]], and was half-hearted in opposition to world Communism. Senator [[William F. Knowland]] of California, sobriquet ''Senator from Formosa'' (Taiwan).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dwight Eisenhower]], an internationalist allied with the Dewey wing, challenged Taft in 1952 on foreign policy issues. The two men were not far apart on domestic issues. Eisenhower's victory broke a 20 year Democratic lock on the White House.  Eisenhower did not try to roll back the New Deal, but he did expand the Social Security system and built the Interstate Highway system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatives in 1964 made a comeback under the leadership of [[Barry Goldwater]] who defeated [[Nelson Rockefeller]] as the Republican candidate in the [[U.S. presidential election, 1964|1964 presidential convention]]. Goldwater was strongly opposed to the New Deal and the United Nations, but he rejected isolationism and containment, calling for an aggressive anti-Communist foreign policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any long-term movement toward the GOP was interrupted by the [[Watergate Scandal]], which forced Nixon to resign in 1974 under threat of impeachment. [[Gerald Ford]] succeeded Nixon and gave him a full pardon--thereby giving the Democrats a powerful issue they used to sweep the 1974 off-year elections. Ford never fully recovered, and in 1976 he barely defeated [[Ronald Reagan]] for the nomination. The taint of Watergate and the nation's economic difficulties contributed to the election of Democrat [[Jimmy Carter]] in [[U.S. presidential election, 1976|1976]], running as a Washington outsider.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Strength of Parties 1977==== &lt;br /&gt;
How the Two Parties Stood after the 1976 Election:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Party &lt;br /&gt;
! Republican&lt;br /&gt;
! Democratic&lt;br /&gt;
! Independent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Party ID (Gallup)&lt;br /&gt;
| 22%&lt;br /&gt;
| 47%&lt;br /&gt;
| 31%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! Congressmen&lt;br /&gt;
| 181&lt;br /&gt;
| 354&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! House&lt;br /&gt;
| 143&lt;br /&gt;
| 292&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! Senate&lt;br /&gt;
| 38&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! % House popular vote nationally&lt;br /&gt;
| 42%&lt;br /&gt;
| 56%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the East&lt;br /&gt;
| 41%&lt;br /&gt;
| 57%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the South&lt;br /&gt;
| 37%&lt;br /&gt;
| 62%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the Midwest&lt;br /&gt;
| 47%&lt;br /&gt;
| 52%&lt;br /&gt;
| 1%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the West&lt;br /&gt;
| 43%&lt;br /&gt;
| 55%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! Governors&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 37&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=2 | State Legislators&lt;br /&gt;
| 2,370&lt;br /&gt;
| 5,128&lt;br /&gt;
| 55&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 31%&lt;br /&gt;
| 68%&lt;br /&gt;
| 1%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! State legislature control&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 80&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 * &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the East&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 13&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the South&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 32&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the Midwest&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 17&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 * &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the West&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! States' one party control&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of legislature and governorship&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 29&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;The unicameral Nebraska legislature, in fact controlled by the Republicans, is technically nonpartisan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Everett Carll Ladd Jr. ''Where Have All the Voters Gone? The Fracturing of America's Political Parties'' (1978) p.6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Moderate Republicans of 1940-80====&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''Rockefeller Republican'' was used 1960-80 to designate a faction of the party holding &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; views similar to those of the late [[Nelson Rockefeller]], [[governor of New York]] from 1959 to 1974 and vice president under President [[Gerald Ford]] in 1974-77. Before Rockefeller, [[Tom Dewey]], governor of New York 1942-54 and GOP presidential nominee in 1944 and 1948 was the leader. [[Dwight Eisenhower]] reflected many of their views. An important leader in the 1950s was Connecticut Republican Senator [[Prescott Bush]], father and grandfather of presidents of [[George H. W. Bush]] and [[George W. Bush]]. After Rockefeller left the national stage in 1976, this faction of the party was more often called &amp;quot;moderate Republicans,&amp;quot; in contrast to the conservatives who rallied to [[Ronald Reagan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
Historically, Rockefeller Republicans were moderate or liberal on domestic and social policies. They favored New Deal programs, including regulation and welfare. They were very strong supporters of civil rights. They were strongly supported by big business on Wall Street (New York City). In fiscal policy they favored balanced budgets and relatively high tax levels to keep the budget balanced. They sought long-term economic growth through entrepreneurships, not tax cuts. In state politics, they were strong supporters of state colleges and universities, low tuition, and large research budgets. They favored infrastructure improvements, such as highway projects. In foreign policy they were internationalists, and anti-Communists. They felt the best way to counter Communism was sponsoring economic growth (through foreign aid), maintaining a strong military, and keeping close ties to [[NATO]]. Geographically their base was the Northeast, from Pennsylvania to Maine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Suburbia====&lt;br /&gt;
The suburban electorate passed the city electiorate in the 1950s, as Eisenhower showed unusually strength there. The history of suburban politics is encapsulated in Nassau County (New York), just east of New York City, where a moderate Republican party machine operated. Despite predictions that the New Deal spelled the demise of the political machine, Nassau provided fertile ground for a party organization that rivaled its big city Democratic counterparts. The traditionally GOP county underwent a booming expansion during 1945-60, with an influx of new residents, many with previous Democratic party affiliations. In established villages and new housing developments such as [[Levittown]], under the canny leadership of J. Russel Sprague, the party used patronage and community organizing techniques to build its base among ethnic voters, young people, and new homeowners. The party expanded beyond its white Protestant base, with Italian Americans becoming particularly prominent in party leadership. Sprague was both party leader and county executive. That post was created in 1936 under a new charter engineered by Sprague to update a municipal apparatus unable to meet the infrastructure and development needs of a county that by 1960 had 1.3 million residents. Democrats and reformers had promoted charter revision for decades, and some consolidation of government services did take place. As county &amp;quot;boss,&amp;quot; Sprague ruled with an iron hand. Nassau's pluralities for such candidates as Governor Thomas E. Dewey and President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Sprague's fundraising prowess made him a force in national party politics. He advocated a moderate, middle-of-the-road position that recognized expectations created by the New Deal while criticizing what were claimed to be Democratic excesses. After leaving elective office and party leadership, Sprague became a major campaign issue when the Democrats, in a 1961 historic upset, won the county executive post by both lambasting Sprague, tainted by a racetrack-stock scandal, and criticizing the developer-friendly &amp;quot;Spragueland&amp;quot; regime that had governed Nassau for decades. Soon after Sprague died in 1969, the Nassau GOP regained its control of the county government and reestablished virtual one-party rule until the 1990s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Marjorie Freeman Harrison, &amp;quot;Machine Politics Suburban Style: J. Russel Sprague and the Nassau County (New York) Republican Party at Midcentury.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation Columbia U. 2005. 388 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
DAI 2005 66(5): 1925-A. DA3174807  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An even longer reign of power characterized GOP machine control of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, a rural and suburban area south of Philadelphia. William McClure controlled the GOP from 1875 until his death in 1907; his son John J. McClure, was in control from 1907 until his death in 1965. McLarnon (1998) has four main findings. First, political machines were not confined to big cities; the demographic and political peculiarities of suburban counties lent themselves to continued domination by political machines long after the heyday of the city machine had passed. Secondly, neither the New Deal, immigration restriction, nor the rise of organized labor destroyed all the old Republican machines. Delaware was one of several similar counties in southeastern Pennsylvania where the GOP continued to hold sway throughout the 20th century. Thirdly, not all blacks switched their electoral loyalties to the Democratic party in 1936. The black population of Chester, Delaware County's industrial city, generally voted Republican for offices below the presidential level. Finally, the citizens of Delaware County supported and continues to support the Republican machine because the machine delivered and continues to deliver those things that the citizens want most. At the beginning of the century, the machine provided food, work, and police protection to Chester's European and black immigrants. During Prohibition, it supplied the county with liquor. Through the Depression, patronage and close alliances with local industrialists kept a significant portion of machine loyalists employed. In the 1950s and 1960s the machine kept taxes low, initiated a war on organized vice, successfully defeated all threats to home rule, and discouraged blacks from settling in historically white communities. The trash was collected, the snow plowed, the streets repaired. The buses ran on time, the playgrounds and parks were clean, and the schools acceptably average. These were the most important concerns of a majority of county's citizens. While the citizens and their concerns changed over time, two things seem to have remained constant: the McClures', and their successors' ability to read and react to the needs of the electorate; and the fact that rarely, if ever, has a desire for honest, democratic government been high on Delaware County voters' list of priorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Morrison McLarnon, &amp;quot;Ruling Suburbia: A Biography of the McClure Machine of Delaware County, Pennsylvania.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation U. of Delaware 1998. 616 pp.  DAI 1998 58(12): 4780-A. DA9819160   &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Rise of the right====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barry Goldwater]] crusaded against the Rockefeller Republicans, beating Rockefeller narrowly in the California primary of 1964. That set the stage for a conservative resurgence, based in the South and West, in opposition to the Northeast.  Brennan (1995) stresses that conservatives in the late 1950s and early 1960s had many internal problems to overcome before they could mount an effective challenge to the hegemony of the distrusted Eastern Establishment, typified by [[Nelson A. Rockefeller]]. The conservative movement had some newspapers and magazines (especially [[William F. Buckley]]'s ''National Review'') and one charismatic national leader, Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater. The movement gained momentum once they had established a unity out of diverse elements on the Right with a common commitment to a militant anticommunism, and once they had succeeded in mobilizing a grassroots base inside a number of state and local organizations in the Sun Belt on behalf of a draft Goldwater campaign in 1960. Although Nixon was acceptable to the conservatives, they worried that he compromised with Rockefeller in 1960. His defeat in 1960 removed a major obstacle and also gave ammunition to those who wanted &amp;quot;a choice, not an echo&amp;quot; (to echo a Goldwater slogan). After 1960 liberals and moderates in the Republican party failed to appreciate the magnitude of the challenge they faced on the grass-roots level. They too readily equated their conservative opponents in the party with the &amp;quot;lunatic fringe&amp;quot; and did not take them seriously until they found themselves deposed by a grass roots insurgency of the sort unknown in the party since 1912.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Brennan (1995) p, 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Goldwater's landslide defeat opened the way to a liberal Democratic resurgence, but did little to help the liberal wing of the GOP. The failues of the Great Society, especially  a wave of major urban riots and a surge in violent crime, led to major gains in 1966, and to Nixon's election in the chaotic 1968 election. The Democrats became deeply divided on the Vietnam war (which did not divide the GOP), and on issues of race, when Alabamian [[George C. Wallace]] set up a third party that carried much of the deep South.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Goldwater faded to a lesser role after 1964, a new conservative hero emerged: in the largest and most trendy state film star [[Ronald Reagan]] was elected governor of California in 1966 and reelected in 1970. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the rise of conservatism the national Republican Party became more ideologically homogeneous. This change occurred as conservative politicians and voters joined the party and their liberal counterparts abandoned the GOP. Events in New York State during the 1960s and 1970s facilitated this transformation. Here, ideological conservatives formed a third party for the express purpose of changing a state GOP that both symbolized and contributed to the national GOP's liberal viewpoint. The [[Conservative Party, New York|Conservative Party]] relied on the state's unique election law to crash the New York GOP, either by forcing its way in or by imposing a lethal electoral price.  The GOP-Conservative Party relationship began in 1962 at sword's point but achieved a high degree of harmony in 1980. Initially, New York Republicans, led by Governor [[Nelson Rockefeller]], successfully marginalized the new party. As the conservative movement matured, however, the balance of power began to shift. When Nixon was elected president in 1968, the Conservative Party gained an external ally who proved invaluable. The third party achieved partial acceptance in 1970 with the election of [[James Buckley]] to the Senate. For much of the ensuing decade, however, Conservatives struggled with success suffering a series of damaging setbacks. Only in the late 1970s, did the party recover when it embraced a more modest agenda. Finally, the 1980 election settled the overall contours of the relationship between the two parties. Conservatives formed their party to force the state GOP to the right, to drive liberal Republicans from office, and allow ideologically conservative national Republicans to succeed in the state. By 1980, it had achieved these goals changing the nature of politics in the state. This resolution affected politics beyond the state by diminishing the importance of ideological liberals in the national GOP, thus freeing a more ideologically consistent national Republican Party to promote the rise of conservatism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Timothy J. Sullivan, &amp;quot;Crashing the Party: The New York State Conservative and Republican Parties, 1962-1980.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation U. of Maryland, College Park 2003. 458 pp.  DAI 2004 64(11): 4181-A. DA3112508  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Realignment: The South becomes Republican====&lt;br /&gt;
In the century after Reconstruction ended in 1877, the white South identified with the [[U.S. Democratic Party|Democratic Party]]. The Democrats' lock on power was so strong, the region was called the &amp;quot;Solid South.&amp;quot; The Republicans controlled certain parts of the Appalachian mountains, but they sometimes did compete for statewide office in the border states. Before 1964, the southern Democrats saw their party as the defender of the southern way of life, which included a respect for states' rights and an appreciation for traditional southern values. They repeatedly warned against the aggressive designs of Northern liberals and Republicans, as well as the civil rights activists they denounced as &amp;quot;outside agitators.&amp;quot; Thus there was a serious barrier to becoming a Republican.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, since 1964, the Democratic lock on the South has been broken. The long-term cause was that the region was becoming more like the rest of the nation and could not long stand apart in terms of racial segregation. Modernization that brought factories, businesses, and cities, and millions of migrants from the North; far more people graduated from high school and college. Meanwhile the cotton and tobacco basis of the traditional South faded away, as former farmers moved to town or commuted to factory jobs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate cause of the political transition involved civil rights. The [[American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968)|civil rights movement]] caused enormous controversy in the white South with many attacking it as a violation of states' rights. When segregation was outlawed by court order and by the Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965, a die-hard element resisted integration, led by Democratic governors [[Orval Faubus]] of Arkansas, [[Lester Maddox]] of Georgia, and, especially [[George Wallace]] of Alabama. These populist governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds favored the Democratic party, but opposed segregation. After passage of the Civil Rights Act most Southerners accepted the integration of most institutions (except public schools). With the old barrier to becoming a Republican removed, traditional Southerners joined the new middle class and the Northern transplants in moving toward the Republican party. Integration thus liberated Southern politics, just as [[Martin Luther King]] had promised. Meanwhile the newly enfranchised black voters supported Democratic candidates at the 85-90% level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The South's transition to a Republican stronghold took decades. First the states started voting Republican in presidential elections--the Democrats countered that by nominating Southerners who could carry some states in the region, such as [[Jimmy Carter]] in 1976 and 1980, and [[Bill Clinton]] in 1992 and 1996; the strategy did not work with [[Al Gore]] in 2000, or [[John Edwards]] in 2004. Then the states began electing Republican senators to fill open seats caused by retirements, and finally governors and state legislatures changed sides. Georgia was the last state to fall, with [[Sonny Perdue]] taking the governorship in 2002. Republicans aided the process with systematic gerrymandering that protected the African American and Hispanic vote (as required by the Civil Rights laws), but split up the remaining white Democrats so that Republicans mostly would win. In 2006 the Supreme Court endorsed nearly all of the redistricting engineered by [[Tom DeLay]] that swung the Texas Congressional delegation to the GOP in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to its white middle class base, Republicans attracted strong majorities from the evangelical Christian vote, which had been nonpolitical before 1980. The national Democratic Party's support for liberal social stances such as [[abortion]] drove many former Democrats into a Republican party that was embracing the conservative views on these issues. Conversely, liberal Republicans in the northeast began to join the Democratic Party. In 1969 in ''The Emerging Republican Majority'', [[Kevin Phillips]], argued that support from Southern whites and growth in the [[Sun Belt]], among other factors, was driving an enduring Republican electoral [[realigning election|realignment]]. Today, the South is again solid, but the reliable support is for Republican presidential candidates. Exit polls in 2004 showed that Bush led Kerry by 70-30% among whites, who comprised 71% of the Southern voters. Kerry had a 90-9% lead among the 18% of the voters who were black. One third of the Southerners said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80-20%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.3.html exit polls]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reagan Era===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1980, [[Ronald Reagan]] won the Republican nomination and easily beat Carter and a breakaway Republican with his strong communication skills and message of economic freedom and strength against the [[Soviet Union]]. Reagan produced a major realignment with his 1980 and 1984 landslides. In 1980 the Reagan coalition was possible because of Democratic losses in most social-economic groups. In 1984 Reagan won nearly 60% of the popular vote and carried every state except his Democrat opponent Walter Mondale's home state of [[Minnesota]] and the District of Columbia, creating a record 525 electoral vote total (of 538 possible). Even in Minnesota, Mondale won by a mere 3,761 votes &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1984&amp;amp;fips=27&amp;amp;f=1&amp;amp;off=0&amp;amp;elect=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, meaning Reagan came within less than 3,800 votes of winning in all fifty states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Running on a &amp;quot;Peace Through Strength&amp;quot; platform to combat the Communist threat and massive tax cuts to revitalize the economy, Reagan's strong but genial persona proved too much for the ineffective and sour Carter in 1980. Reagan's election also gave Republicans control of the Senate for the first time in decades. Dubbed the &amp;quot;Reagan Revolution&amp;quot; he fundamentally altered several long standing debates in Washington, namely dealing with the Soviet threat and reviving the economy. His election saw the conservative wing of the party gain control. While reviled by liberal opponents in his day, his proponents contend his programs provided unprecedented economic growth, and spurred the collapse of the former Soviet Union. Currently regarded as one of the most popular and successful presidents in the modern era (1960-present.) He inspired Conservatives to greater electoral victories by being re-elected in a landslide against Walter Mondale in 1984 but oversaw the loss of the Senate in 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The so-called &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot; were Democrats before the Reagan years, and afterwards, but who voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984 (and for George H.W. Bush in 1988), producing their landslide victories. They were primarily ethnic Catholics in the Northeast and were frustrated by their seeing abandonment on cultural issues by the Democratic party's national leaders. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan's Vice-President, George H.W. Bush, a [[World War II]] war hero, was elected in 1988 but was defeated in 1992 as domestic issues took prominence after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and end of the [[Cold War]].  Democratic challenger [[Bill Clinton]] strategically repositioned the Democrats to the right. [[Ross Perot]]'s candidacy was instrumental in Clinton's victory as he took Republican votes with his criticism of deficits.  Perot won 19% of the popular vote, and Clinton, still a largely unknown quantity in American politics with 41% of the popular vote took office. Despite his loss, George H.W. Bush left office in 1993 with a 56 percent job approval rating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
House Republican Minority Whip [[Newt Gingrich]]-led the &amp;quot;Republican Revolution&amp;quot; of 1994 and its famous ''Contract With America''. It was the first time since 1952 that the Republicans secured control of both houses of U.S. Congress, which, with the exception of the Senate during 2001-2002, lasted until the 2006 mid-term elections.  Democrats had controlled both houses of Congress for the forty years preceding 1994, with the exception of the 1981-1987 Congresses (in which Republicans controlled the Senate). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1994 mid-term election, Republican congressional candidates ran on a platform  of promising floor votes to force members of Congress to go on record on a series of popular reforms -- something the Democrats had stifled for decades. These measures and others formed the Contract with America, which represented the first effort to have a party platform in a mid-term election. Seven of the ten Contract items actually became Law.  The budget reforms, coupled with reduced defence spending after the Cold War, and the earlier Reagan Tax Cuts for Business Research and Development in the 1980s, led to a high tech consumer boom, rising incomes for all groups, and unprecedented, sustained economic growth in the late 1990s. Democratic President Bill Clinton opposed some of the social agenda initiatives but he co-opted the proposals for welfare reform and a balanced federal budget. The result was a major change in the welfare system, which conservatives hailed and liberals bemoaned. One Contract item, which required Democrats in a two-thirds majority to pass a Constitutional amendment to impose term limits on members of Congress, failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, a budget battle with [[President Clinton]] led to the brief shutdown of the federal government, an event which contributed to Clinton's victory in the 1996 election. That year the Republicans nominated Bob Dole, who was unable to transfer his success in Senate leadership to a viable presidential campaign. Ross Perot ran again (this time on Reform Party ticket), once again draining away a large percentage of Dole's support and insuring Clinton another term after the majority of Americans voters voted against him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the election of George W. Bush (son of former president George H. W. Bush) in an extremely close 2000 election, the Republican party controlled both the presidency and both houses of Congress for the first time since 1952. However, after [[Vermont]] senator Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party to become an independent aligned with the Democrats in June of 2001, Republicans lost control of the Senate by a single seat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, however, Bush pursued a &amp;quot;War on Terrorism&amp;quot; that included the liberation of Afghanistan from the radical Islamist Taliban regime and the [[Patriot act|USA PATRIOT act]]. By early 2002, the Taliban was removed from power in Afghanistan. On March 20, 2003, U.S. and allied nations initiated &amp;quot;Operation Iraqi Freedom&amp;quot; to liberate the Iraqi people from the brutal regime of [[Saddam Hussein]]. By May 1, 2003, the regime of Saddam was declared officially over. Once US and allied military forces entered Iraq, they discovered that various international terrorists had been given sanctuary by Saddam and ran their terrorist operations from Iraq. Notable terrorists found included Muhammad Zaidan aka Abu Abbas and Sabri Khalil al-Banna aka Abu Nidal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party fared well in the 2002 midterm elections, solidifying its hold on the House and regaining control of the Senate, in the run-up to the liberation of Iraq. This marked just the third time since the Civil War that the party in control of the White House gained seats in both houses of Congress in a midterm election (others were 1902 and 1934). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bush was renominated without opposition for the [[United States presidential election, 2004]] and titled his political platform &amp;quot;A Safer World and a More Hopeful America&amp;quot;. It expressed Bush's commitment to winning the War on Terror, ushering in an Ownership Era, and building an innovative economy to compete in the world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 2, 2004, Bush was re-elected, while Republicans gained seats in both houses of Congress, leaving Democrats in disarray. Bush carried 31 of 50 states for 286 Electoral College votes. In that election, he also received more popular votes than any previous presidential candidate, 62.0 million votes. Democrat challenger, Senator [[John Kerry]], won 251 Electoral votes and 48% of the popular vote to Bush's 51%. It was the first time anyone won a popular majority since 1988. 2004 marked the seventh consecutive election in which the Democratic nominee failed to reach that threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contemporary Party ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The contemporary Republican Party represents a wide array of interests such as the conservative evangelicals and the economic libertarians. The party has had some internal conflict over attitudes about how governments should run and how large they should be, what the party stands for, and what the party's attitude towards [[neo-conservatism]] should be especially in regard to foreign policy. The party is also divided over immigration issues with some members (such as George W. Bush) favoring workers visas and permits and some other members favoring strict control of immigration and strong action against illegal immigration.  Unlike the Democratic party, the Republican party routinely allows dissenting factions such as the [[Log Cabin Republicans]] to speak at National Conventions.&lt;br /&gt;
==2009==&lt;br /&gt;
After smashing defeats in 2006 and 2008, the GOP lost control of Congress, the White House, and many states. They confront president who still retains some popularity, but have been able to chip away at support for his domestic policies, as the [[recession of 2008]] continues to drag on.  In June 2009 public opinion was favorable toward Obama personally, but increasingly dubious about his plans to overhaul health care, rescue the auto industry and close the prison at Guantánamo Bay. But with a positive job approval rating of 51% , Obama has the backing of most Democrats, even as Republicans turn negative, with only 23% supporting him.  Support for Obama's foreign policies and terrorism policies remains high at 57-59%.  Meanwhile the GOP weaknesses were glaring: the June poll found that the Republican Party is viewed favorably by only 28% of Americans, the lowest rating ever in a New York Times/CBS News poll. In contrast, 57% said that they had a favorable view of the Democratic Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [Jeff Zeleny and Dalia Sussman, &amp;quot;Obama Poll Sees Doubt on Budget and Health Care [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/us/politics/18poll.html?th&amp;amp;emc=th ''New York Times'' June 17, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== GOP (Frisbee team) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term GOP may also refer to one of the frisbee teams of Carleton College, located in Northfield, MN.[https://apps.carleton.edu/campus/rec/club/?item_id=43089]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidents from the party==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Abraham Lincoln]] (1861-1865)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Ulysses S. Grant]] (1869-1877)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Rutherford B. Hayes]] (1877-1881)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[James Garfield]] (1881)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Chester A. Arthur]] (1881-1885)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Benjamin Harrison]] (1889-1893)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[William McKinley]] (1897-1901)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1901-1909)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[William Howard Taft]] (1909-1913)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Warren G. Harding]] (1921-1923)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-1929)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Herbert Hoover]] (1929-1933)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Dwight Eisenhower]] (1953-1961)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Richard Nixon]] (1969-1974)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Gerald Ford]] (1974-1977)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Ronald Reagan]] (1981-1989)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[George H. W. Bush]] (1989-1993)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Republicans==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abraham Lincoln]] (1809 - 1865), 16th President of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James G. Blaine]] (1830 - 1893), Senator from Maine and Presidential nominee&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Gurney Cannon]] (1836 - 1926), Speaker of the House&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Curtis]] (1860 - 1936), [[United States Vice President|Vice President]], a Native American&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles G. Dawes]] (1865 - 1951), Vice President&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Dewey]] (1902 - 1971), governor of New York; presidential nominee 1944 and 1948&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John C. Frémont]] (1813 - 1890), 1st Republican Candidate for President of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mark Hanna]] (1837 - 1904), Senator from Ohio; manager of 1896 campaign&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Frisbie Hoar]] (1826 - 1904), Senator from Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Evans Hughes]] governor of New York, nominee for president in 1916, Secretary of State, [[Chief Justice of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Fife Knowland]] (1908-1974), Senator from [[California]]; Senate Majority Leader: 1953-1955; Senate Minority Leader: 1955-1959 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Cabot Lodge]] (1850 - 1924), Senator from [[Massachusetts]]; foreign policy spokesman&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph McCarthy]] (1908 - 1957), Senator from [[Wisconsin]] and noted [[anti-communist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Nixon]] (1913 - 1994), 37th president of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Brackett Reed]] (1839 - 1902), [[Speaker of the House]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nelson Rockefeller]] (1908 - 1979), Vice President, [[Governor of New York]], leader of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theodore Roosevelt]], President of the United States, (1901 - 1909)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thaddeus Stevens]] (1792-1868), Pennsylvania Senator; leader of Radicals in Civil War and Reconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Sumner]] (1811-1874), Senator from Massachusetts; leader of Radicals in Civil War and Reconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Stimson]], Secretary of War for Taft and FDR; Secretary of State for Hoover &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert Taft]] (1889 - 1953), Ohio Senator and presidential hopeful; leader of conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Strom Thurmond]] (1902 - 2003), the oldest serving Senator in history (from [[South Carolina]])&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arthur H. Vandenberg]] (1884 - 1951), Michigan Senator; leader of internationalism in 1940s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight Eisenhower]] (1890-1969), President of United States, (1953-1961)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Earl Warren]] (1891 - 1974), Vice presidential nominee, [[Governor of California]], and [[Chief Justice of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]], President of the United States, (1981 - 1989)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George H.W. Bush]], President of the United States, (1989 - 1993)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George W. Bush]], President of the United States, (2001 - 2009)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John McCain]], presidential nominee, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]], Vice-presidential nominee, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arnold Schwarzenegger]], Governor of California&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[RINO]] - '''R'''epublicans '''i'''n '''N'''ame '''O'''nly&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Republicans|Articles about '''Republicans''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical===&lt;br /&gt;
*''American National Biography'' (20 volumes, 1999) covers all politicians no longer alive; online at many academic libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Abramson, Paul R.  et al. ''Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Change-Continuity-2004-2006-Elections/dp/0872894150/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1221785751&amp;amp;sr=8-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Batchelor, John Calvin.  ''&amp;quot;Ain't You Glad You Joined the Republicans?&amp;quot; A Short History of the GOP.'' 1996. 399 pp.  well-written popular history, well illustrated&lt;br /&gt;
* Chace, James. ''1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft, and Debs - The Election That Changed the Country.'' (2004). 323 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections'' (4th ed 2003) 1600pp, vast compilation of data, esp., since 1945&lt;br /&gt;
* Foner, Eric. ''Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War (1970), influential history of ideas and ideology; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=90104191 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Gienapp, William E. ''The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852-1856'' (1987), quantitative voting studies, by state&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldberg, Robert Alan. ''Barry Goldwater'' (1995), &lt;br /&gt;
*Gould, Lewis. ''Grand Old Party: A History of the Republicans'' (2003), the best scholarly overview.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hodgson, Godfrey. ''The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America'' (1996). by British journalist&lt;br /&gt;
*Jensen, Richard. ''Grass Roots Politics: Parties, Issues, and Voters, 1854-1983'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=15326916 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
*Jensen, Richard. ''The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888-1896'' (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
*Kleppner, Paul, et al. ''The Evolution of American Electoral Systems'' (1983), applies party systems model&lt;br /&gt;
*Kleppner, Paul. ''The Third Electoral System 1853-1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures'' (1979), analysis of voting behavior, with emphasis on region, ethnicity, religion and class. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24451028 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus, Robert. ''Grand Old Party: Political Structure in the Gilded Age, 1880-1896'' 1971.&lt;br /&gt;
*Morgan, H. Wayne. ''From Hayes to McKinley; National Party Politics, 1877-1896'' (1969) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=94446383 online edition], good survey of era&lt;br /&gt;
*Mayer, George H. ''The Republican Party, 1854-1966.'' 2nd ed. (1967), narrative.&lt;br /&gt;
*Parmet, Herbert S. ''Eisenhower and the American Crusades'' (1972) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=14967951 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Mr. Republican: A Biography of Robert A. Taft'' (1972) &lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2002) well written, broad account of 1964&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008), 896pp; covers 1965 to 1972 &lt;br /&gt;
* Reinhard, David W. ''The Republican Right since 1945'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=91954887 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rutland, Robert Allen. ''The Republicans: From Lincoln to Bush'' (1996) popular narrative&lt;br /&gt;
*Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), long essays by specialists on each time period: [http://www.amazon.com/Contesting-Democracy-Substance-Structure-Political/dp/0700611398/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1221785707&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
**includes: &amp;quot;'To One or Another of These Parties Every Man Belongs;&amp;quot;: 1820–1865 by Joel H. Silbey; &amp;quot;Change and Continuity in the Party Period: 1835–1885&amp;quot; by Michael F. Holt; &amp;quot;The Transformation of American Politics: 1865–1910&amp;quot; by Peter H. Argersinger; &amp;quot;Democracy, Republicanism, and Efficiency: 1885–1930&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen; &amp;quot;The Limits of Federal Power and Social Policy: 1910–1955&amp;quot; by Anthony J. Badger; &amp;quot;The Rise of Rights and Rights Consciousness: 1930–1980&amp;quot; by James T. Patterson; and &amp;quot;Economic Growth, Issue Evolution, and Divided Government: 1955–2000&amp;quot; by Byron E. Shafer&lt;br /&gt;
*Schlesinger, Arthur Meier, Jr. ed. ''History of American Presidential Elections, 1789-2000'' (various multivolume editions, latest is 2001). For each election includes good scholarly history and selection of primary document. Essays on the most important election are reprinted in Schlesinger, ''The Coming to Power: Critical presidential elections in American history'' (1972)&lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Richard Norton. An Uncommon Man: The Triumph of Herbert Hoover, (1987) full-length scholarly biography.&lt;br /&gt;
*Summers, Mark Wahlgren. ''Rum, Romanism &amp;amp; Rebellion: The Making of a President, 1884'' (2000) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104865169 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sundquist, James L. ''Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=29223022 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thelen, David. ''Robert M. La Follette and the Insurgent Spirit'' 1976. short interpretive biography &lt;br /&gt;
===Since 1980===&lt;br /&gt;
*Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa, ''The Almanac of American Politics 2008: The Senators, the Representatives and the Governors: Their Records and Election Results, Their States and Districts'' (2007) covers all incumbent Congressmen and governors with amazing detail.  New edition published every two years since 1975.&lt;br /&gt;
* Aistrup, Joseph A. ''The Southern Strategy Revisited: Republican Top-Down Advancement in the South'' (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
* Black, Earl and Black, Merle.  ''The Rise of Southern Republicans.'' (2002). 442 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime'' (2000), [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=88989671 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007), by a leading conservative historian  &lt;br /&gt;
* Edwards, Lee.  ''The Conservative Revolution: The Movement That Remade America.'' (1999). 391 pp.  by a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
*Ehrman, John, ''The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan'' (2005) by a conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal attack  [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/B000FTWB3K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072365&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Green, John Robert. ''The Presidency of George Bush.'' (2000). 1989-1993&lt;br /&gt;
* Lamis, Alexander P. ed. ''Southern Politics in the 1990s'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
* Layman, Geoffrey. ''The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics.'' (2001). 435pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Levy, Peter B. ''Encyclopedia of the Reagan-Bush Years'' Greenwood Press, 1996 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=77341841 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lublin, David.  ''The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change.'' Princeton U. Press, 2004. 272 pp.  [http://www.amazon.com/Republican-South-Democratization-Partisan-Change/dp/0691130477/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072384&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore.'' (2005), standard scholarly synthesis.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) favorable biography by historian; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=49534236 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reeves, Richard. ''President Reagan: The Triumph of Imagination'' (2005) detailed analysis by conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Rymph, Catherine.  ''Republican Women: Feminism and Conservatism from Suffrage through the Rise of the New Right.'' U. of North Carolina Press, 2006. 338 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. ed. ''The Sixth Year Itch: The Rise and Fall of the George W. Bush Presidency'' (2007), in-depth essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ''Divided States of America: The Slash and Burn Politics of the 2004 Presidential Election'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. and Bruce Larson. ''The Party's Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America's Future'' (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
* Schaller, Michael and Rising, George.  ''The Republican Ascendancy: American Politics, 1968-2001.'' Harlan Davidson, 2002. 210 pp.  Short survey by liberal scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* Steely, Mel.  ''The Gentleman from Georgia: The Biography of Newt Gingrich.'' Mercer U. Press, 2000. 431 pp.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Taylor, Andrew J.  ''Elephant's Edge: The Republicans as a Ruling Party.''  2005. 336 pp. academic study of how GOP turned small advantages into power [http://www.amazon.com/Elephants-Edge-Republicans-Ruling-Party/dp/0275985369/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072452&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilentz, Sean. ''The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008'' (2008) by a liberal historian. [http://www.amazon.com/Age-Reagan-History-1974-2008/dp/0060744804/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1221786281&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Wooldridge, Adrian and John Micklethwait. ''The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America'' sophisticated study by two British journalists (2004). [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072420&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gop.com/ Official GOP Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf 2008 Republican Platform (pdf download)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nyyrcrecord.blogspot.com/ New York Young Republican Record]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.house.gov/hensarling/rsc/doc/rsc_action_plan.pdf The RSC’s Action Plan for House Republicans], Republican Study Committee, May 20, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.house.gov/hensarling/rsc/doc/rsc_action_plan_(broad).pdf A Detailed Action Plan For House Republicans: Bold, Simple, and Different than the Democrats], Republican Study Committee, May 20, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/republicans/ What Liberals Say - Category: Republicans], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Modernization]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Truthtopower</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>