<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vmember</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vmember"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Vmember"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T21:57:52Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Hawk&amp;diff=586938</id>
		<title>Liberal Hawk</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_Hawk&amp;diff=586938"/>
		<updated>2008-12-15T03:41:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: New page: A '''Liberal Hawk''' is a person who is socially liberal but supports a strong hawkish foreign policy. Past U.S. presidents Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnso...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''Liberal Hawk''' is a person who is socially liberal but supports a strong hawkish foreign policy. Past U.S. presidents Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson have been described as liberal hawks for their roles in bringing about America's status as the world's premier military power. Of course because they are liberals they will only use force to defend liberal ideals as well as use [[deceit]] to enter wars.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:WesleyS&amp;diff=586915</id>
		<title>User talk:WesleyS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:WesleyS&amp;diff=586915"/>
		<updated>2008-12-15T03:05:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=[[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:29, 6 November 2008 (EST)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locked roster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've unlocked the roster of the Philadelphia Eagles, so you can update it if you wish.  If more rosters need unlocking, let me know.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:25, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks.  There were a couple, and I'll let you know what they are once I've compiled a list.  Honestly, though, it seems pointless to have them, but someone took the time to compile them, so we might as well do good by them.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 08:43, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The others are [[Cleveland Browns/Roster]] and [[Indianapolis Colts/Roster]].  Thanks!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 09:46, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: The first of those two is not locked, and the second I've now unlocked.  Happy editing.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:30, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandalism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, Wesley. I guess some people who cannot face the truth decide to attack the &amp;quot;annoying revealer&amp;quot;. I suppose we might call this [[liberal intolerance]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:29, 19 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem.  As active as you are within the site, I suppose you inevitably become a victim of the senselessness of others.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:32, 19 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for adding the categories. Very useful! [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:57, 19 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just trying to do my part.  To think I'm still in the A's of the uncategorized list of article.  There is a world of work ahead...  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 19 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cats ==&lt;br /&gt;
Were you planning on the (cat (literally)), and if so, for how long?  (Terrible pun, wish I'd thought of it, bravo.) [[User:JANorton|JANorton]] 18:16, 22 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, I've been adding categories for so long I just got bored...Glad someone caught it. [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:19, 22 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wesley thanks for your advise. I replied to your letter here coz I don't know how to reply directly to you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks,man ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Wesley, thanks for the warm welcome and the useful links.Also, thanks for the advice about the signatures.I wasn't sure if I should put it on the article or not.--[[User:DevenG|DevenG]] 23:20, 27 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a problem.  Just trying to help.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 11:11, 29 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Ditto ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I too add my thanks for your work on my articles. Looks good and it makes a difference. The catagories help in research.  I like music also. Have been playing saxophone for two years beginning at 68 years of age. Something I've wanted to do for a long time.[[User:BertSchlossberg|Bert Schlossberg]] 03:28, 29 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem.  Also, it is never too late to start playing music.  If I should make it so far, I'd like to earn a degree in music (of some form or another) after I retire.  Chances are I won't have time or funds for it now!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 11:11, 29 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Categories ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for all the work on the categories.  There's [http://paperlined.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/uncat_cats.cgi still some uncategorized categories] though, if you'd like to help out with those.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 13:32, 30 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I started to delve into those, but I was working a bit with the 'dead end pages', and quite a few of those cateories are locked from editing.  I'll just keep plugging away as time provides.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 20:27, 30 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A bit of mutual stalking going on, eh? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:17, 1 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yeah, you got me there.  It's not that I'm stalking, it's just that I check the 'uncategorized pages' page quite often, and if there is a few pages, I'll jump in and throw a cat in it.  Leave it to me to miss a category on my own page!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 20:21, 1 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't mind you throwing cats, as long as they land on their feet. ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Check this out.....[[Category_project|this]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:53, 3 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Thanks.  I'll keep my eye on the project page.  I've begun filing through the current list of categories and trying to make a logical flowchart of how things can be organized.  Upon completion I will run it past you before I make any changes.  I've begun taking on the Religion categories as well as the Science/Mathematics categories.  My thought is to make one supercategory (i.e. Religion) and branch it out into major subcategories (i.e. Religions, God, Creation, ID, People, Places, and Things), then further branch those out until we reach the most basic of categories.  If you have other plans for how this all should transpire, please let me know before I get too far in.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 09:38, 3 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cats ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the cats, I have no idea how to do those, and it has to be said I do have a tendancy to forget them as well.--[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 11:32, 4 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem.  [http://www.conservapedia.com/Help:How_to_create_a_category This] should help, but if there is already a category that you feel your article fits in better, use one of those.  Star Wars novels is a niche that should have a category of its own, because there is a Star Wars category and a Novels category, and this is right in between, thus creating its own category.  Any questions?  Let me know.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 11:38, 4 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks :-)--[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 13:20, 4 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Naming convention - update ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - to put my mind at rest I checked up and Korean and Chinese names are also family name then given name. I think Korean names are &amp;quot;automatically&amp;quot; written that way - think Kim Il-sung and Kim Yong-il - Kim is the family name, but again I am not sure. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:JessicaT|''ohayougozaimasu'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:55, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's what I thought.  I had taken a course in Eastern culture in college, and I know it had covered this topic, but that seems like forever ago.  Thanks for the update!  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 11:04, 7 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reverting vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great effort reverting the vandalism tonight!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:46, 10 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, Mr. Schlafly.  Just doing my part.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 22:12, 10 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cat commentary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just so you know, I'm keeping a rough outline of what I'm doing on the categories at [[Conservapedia:Category project]].--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:30, 13 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for adding the cat tag on my MGS article.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 22:05, 14 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586908</id>
		<title>Metal Gear Solid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586908"/>
		<updated>2008-12-15T02:59:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Metal Gear Solid''' is the first in a long line of Playstation based stealth action games. The Games deal primarily with conspiracy theories involving nuclear weapons, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and censorship. With the exception of Metal Gear Solid 3 every game is played mostly through the eyes of the character [[Solid Snake]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In each installment Snake would have to sneak into a place occupied with either terrorist or communist and rescue important government or military officials then destroy a [[Metal Gear]] and defeat super human bosses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Themes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The main character Solid Snake is actually a clone of his father [[Big Boss]] along with his two other brothers [[Liquid Snake]] and [[Solidus Snake]]. But considering how cloning is immoral the clones with the exception of Solid Snake become evil and end up as the final boss of 2 of the 4 games. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Metal Gear Solid 4 the entire world adopts a weapons system that allows only the military to use guns. The system is eventually taken over by terrorist and the entire world is put in danger of terrorist by [[gun control]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main villain of Metal Gear Solid 3 is a [[bisexual]] [[Russian]] [[communist]] who tortures people for fun and ended up nuking his own people to further his own goals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every super natural character is a evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character Vamp is a [[bisexual]] terrorist who killed several of the good characters in the series. Vamp also has many super natural powers though they are all explained through nano machines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though Solid Snake is a good character and has to defeat evil he still shows [[compassion]] for his fallen enemies even going as far as granting them their final wishes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Communist Russians create a nuclear weapon during the Cold War the breaks many treaties and ethics and plan to use it to end the Cold War but are stopped by Big Boss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretive villain throughout all the Metal Gear Solid games is actually a former British soldier who decides to control the world  through [[censorship]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the villains go through [[redemption]] before their deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snake refuses sex and his sexual urges several times throughout the series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former Mercenary and terrorist [[Grey Fox]] is [[resurrected | resurrection]] through science to be used to fight more but instead decides to give his life for his friend Solid Snake to help stop a Metal Gear being used for evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being stronger then some of the men in game none of the women are actually lesbians and are all completely [[heterosexual]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586907</id>
		<title>Metal Gear Solid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586907"/>
		<updated>2008-12-15T02:55:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Metal Gear Solid''' is the first in a long line of Playstation based stealth action games. The Games deal primarily with conspiracy theories involving nuclear weapons, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and censorship. With the exception of Metal Gear Solid 3 every game is played mostly through the eyes of the character [[Solid Snake]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In each installment Snake would have to sneak into a place occupied with either terrorist or communist and rescue important government or military officials then destroy a [[Metal Gear]] and defeat super human bosses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Themes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The main character Solid Snake is actually a clone of his father [[Big Boss]] along with his two other brothers [[Liquid Snake]] and [[Solidus Snake]]. But considering how cloning is immoral the clones with the exception of Solid Snake become evil and end up as the final boss of 2 of the 4 games. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Metal Gear Solid 4 the entire world adopts a weapons system that allows only the military to use guns. The system is eventually taken over by terrorist and the entire world is put in danger of terrorist by [[gun control]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main villain of Metal Gear Solid 3 is a [[bisexual]] [[Russian]] [[communist]] who tortures people for fun and ended up nuking his own people to further his own goals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every super natural character is a evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character Vamp is a [[bisexual]] terrorist who killed several of the good characters in the series. Vamp also has many super natural powers though they are all explained through nano machines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though Solid Snake is a good character and has to defeat evil he still shows [[compassion]] for his fallen enemies even going as far as granting them their final wishes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Communist Russians create a nuclear weapon during the Cold War the breaks many treaties and ethics and plan to use it to end the Cold War but are stopped by Big Boss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretive villain throughout all the Metal Gear Solid games is actually a former British soldier who decides to control the world  through [[censorship]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the villains go through [[redemption]] before their deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snake refuses sex and his sexual urges several times throughout the series.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former Mercenary and terrorist [[Grey Fox]] is [[resurrected | resurrection]] through science to be used to fight more but instead decides to give his life for his friend Solid Snake to help stop a Metal Gear being used for evil.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586902</id>
		<title>Metal Gear Solid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586902"/>
		<updated>2008-12-15T02:48:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Metal Gear Solid''' is the first in a long line of Playstation based stealth action games. The Games deal primarily with conspiracy theories involving nuclear weapons, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and censorship. With the exception of Metal Gear Solid 3 every game is played mostly through the eyes of the character [[Solid Snake]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In each installment Snake would have to sneak into a place occupied with either terrorist or communist and rescue important government or military officials then destroy a [[Metal Gear]] and defeat super human bosses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Themes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The main character Solid Snake is actually a clone of his father [[Big Boss]] along with his two other brothers [[Liquid Snake]] and [[Solidus Snake]]. But considering how cloning is immoral the clones with the exception of Solid Snake become evil and end up as the final boss of 2 of the 4 games. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Metal Gear Solid 4 the entire world adopts a weapons system that allows only the military to use guns. The system is eventually taken over by terrorist and the entire world is put in danger of terrorist by [[gun control]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main villain of Metal Gear Solid 3 is a [[bisexual]] [[Russian]] [[communist]] who tortures people for fun and ended up nuking his own people to further his own goals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every super natural character is a evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character Vamp is a [[bisexual]] terrorist who killed several of the good characters in the series. Vamp also has many super natural powers though they are all explained through nano machines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though Solid Snake is a good character and has to defeat evil he still shows [[compassion]] for his fallen enemies even going as far as granting them their final wishes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Communist Russians create a nuclear weapon during the Cold War the breaks many treaties and ethics and plan to use it to end the Cold War but are stopped by Big Boss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretive villain throughout all the Metal Gear Solid games is actually a former British soldier who decides to control the world  through [[censorship]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the villains go through [[redemption]] before their deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snake refuses sex and his sexual urges several times throughout the series.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586901</id>
		<title>Metal Gear Solid</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Metal_Gear_Solid&amp;diff=586901"/>
		<updated>2008-12-15T02:47:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: creating article will work more on it later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Metal Gear Solid''' is the first in a long line of Playstation based stealth action games. The Games deal primarily with conspiracy theories involving nuclear weapons, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and censorship. With the exception of Metal Gear Solid 3 every game is played mostly through the eyes of the character [[Solid Snake]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In each installment Snake would have to sneak into a place occupied with either terrorist or communist and rescue important government or military officials then destroy a [[Metal Gear]] and defeat super human bosses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Themes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The main character Solid Snake is actually a clone of his father [[Big Boss]] along with his two other brothers [[Liquid Snake]] and [[Solidus Snake]]. But considering how cloning is immoral the clones with the exception of Solid Snake become evil and end up as the final boss of 2 of the 4 games. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Metal Gear Solid 4 the entire world adopts a weapons system that allows only the military to use guns. The system is eventually taken over by terrorist and the entire world is put in danger of terrorist by [[gun control]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main villain of Metal Gear Solid 3 is a [[bisexual]] [[Russian]] [[communist]] who tortures people for fun and ended up nuking his own people to further his own goals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every super natural character is a evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The character Vamp is a [[bisexual]] terrorist who killed several of the good characters in the series. Vamp also has many super natural powers though they are all explained through nano machines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though Solid Snake is a good character and has to defeat evil he still shows [[compassion]] for his fallen enemies even going as far as granting them their final wishes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Communist Russians create a nuclear weapon during the Cold War the breaks many treaties and ethics and plan to use it to end the Cold War but are stopped by Big Boss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretive villain throughout all the Metal Gear Solid games is actually a former British soldier who decides to control the world  through [[censorship]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the villains go through [[redemption]] before their deaths.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556157</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556157"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T15:02:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: reverting page back to version by myself per points made on my talk page and Andy's before he removed them because he couldn't answer the questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' (born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) is the [[Democratic party|Democratic]] junior [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004 - present) and President-elect of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On November 4, Obama and his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]] won the presidency after spending a record-shattering $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors never disclosed by Obama.  President-elect Obama will likely become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and may use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office at his inauguration on [[January]] 20, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christian Science Monitor, ''At swearing in, congressman [Keith Ellison, D Minnesota, who is a Muslim] wants to carry Koran. Outrage ensues.'', by Jane Lampman, December 07, 2006, retrieved on 10/16/2008  [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1207/p01s03-uspo.html]&amp;quot;In Congress, newly elected representatives do not put their left hands on any book. They raise their right hands, and are sworn in together as the speaker of the House administers the oath of office. Some do carry a book, according to House historians, and some choose to photograph a private swearing-in afterward with their hand on the Bible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama hoped to become President when he was sworn in as U.S. Senator in 2004, and did not use a Koran at that time.  Subsequently Democratic House member Keith Ellison established the precedent for being sworn in using the Koran, and there is no guarantee that Obama would not do likewise if sworn in as President. [http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_obama.html FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, ''Sliming Obama'', January 10, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the socialist idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth&amp;quot;, in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay taxes. To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office. In addition, his health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system. The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves. To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres had ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayers had ghostwritten ''Dreams''.  Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make partial-birth abortion legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of mind control in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence that Obama is a Muslim includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which most Christians would not retain. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [Arabic] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008 when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join.&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II is said to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is some evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theinvigilator.blogspot.com/2008/10/on-front-of-disgust.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 123 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 9 million total votes. [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] is focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mccain/] Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (reared a Baptist) have been active members since 1988 at the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blames the media and not the rhetoric on display &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|“It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;}}  Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official, Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If states are no longer regarded as a valid authority on citizenship of those born within them then no one is eligible for President because no one can prove that they are natural born citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vmember&amp;diff=556153</id>
		<title>User talk:Vmember</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vmember&amp;diff=556153"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T14:49:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would take a look at the talk page and history of the Obama article before you make big changes. Many of them have been tried before, and the results haven't been very pretty... [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:38, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Does this look better? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Help:Practice_Page&amp;amp;oldid=555527  Hmm I kinda think instead of giving facts supporting the theory Obama is a muslim editors are trying to push it off as straight fact even though theres been evidence against it. Isn't that a tactic only liberals use and a form of deceit?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:45, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== One more reversion ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more reversion and your account will be blocked. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:19, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your comments on my talk page are insulting and filled with grammatical-type errors.  Contribute to other entries to show you want to improve this encyclopedia, then let's talk.  Your account will be blocked in you persist in your current misguided approach.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:31, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not going to repeat myself.  Also, please don't post such poorly written comments to my talk page again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:41, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My revisions to Obama article ==&lt;br /&gt;
You didn't read my edits on the talk page did you? By leaving the muslim part on top and under the contents your really are pushing the subject off as fact rather then theory. Thats a form of [[deceit]] that only liberals use shouldn't we conseratives be above this? It's also ugly considering it's into the section thats supposed to be a intro. Also looking at other pages of people who also ran for election that year there pages have a potrait of themselves up top. Obama's page has it all the way towards the middle. I think by not switching those pictures it strongly shows bias the same kind of bias that this enclyopedia was made to fight. Reply back to my talk page. I don't want to have to keep coming back to yours.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:28, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*How exactly are they insulting? How is my approach misguided? Instead of threatening me with blocking can you actually argue agaisnt or answer what my points are? Can we comprimise on the article?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:35, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Here Aschlafly ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Sorry if they're not written perfectly I didn't have the luxury of being home schooled. They're on my talk page now so you don't have to see them if they insult you. But you still haven't answered any of the points I made and instead your threatening me to silence any questions or oppositions I have. Silencing opposition like that isn't something us conservatives should do. I'm still asking for a compromise on the Obama article.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 09:49, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556135</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556135"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T14:09:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: reverting page back to version by myself per reasons on talk page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' (born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) is the [[Democratic party|Democratic]] junior [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004 - present) and President-elect of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On November 4, Obama and his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]] won the presidency after spending a record-shattering $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors never disclosed by Obama.  President-elect Obama will likely become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and may use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office at his inauguration on [[January]] 20, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christian Science Monitor, ''At swearing in, congressman [Keith Ellison, D Minnesota, who is a Muslim] wants to carry Koran. Outrage ensues.'', by Jane Lampman, December 07, 2006, retrieved on 10/16/2008  [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1207/p01s03-uspo.html]&amp;quot;In Congress, newly elected representatives do not put their left hands on any book. They raise their right hands, and are sworn in together as the speaker of the House administers the oath of office. Some do carry a book, according to House historians, and some choose to photograph a private swearing-in afterward with their hand on the Bible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama hoped to become President when he was sworn in as U.S. Senator in 2004, and did not use a Koran at that time.  Subsequently Democratic House member Keith Ellison established the precedent for being sworn in using the Koran, and there is no guarantee that Obama would not do likewise if sworn in as President. [http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_obama.html FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, ''Sliming Obama'', January 10, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the socialist idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth&amp;quot;, in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay taxes. To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office. In addition, his health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system. The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves. To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres had ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayers had ghostwritten ''Dreams''.  Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make partial-birth abortion legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of mind control in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence that Obama is a Muslim includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which most Christians would not retain. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [Arabic] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008 when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join.&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II is said to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is some evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theinvigilator.blogspot.com/2008/10/on-front-of-disgust.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 123 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 9 million total votes. [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] is focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mccain/] Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (reared a Baptist) have been active members since 1988 at the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blames the media and not the rhetoric on display &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|“It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;}}  Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official, Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If states are no longer regarded as a valid authority on citizenship of those born within them then no one is eligible for President because no one can prove that they are natural born citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556121</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556121"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T13:56:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: moved pictures around. per talk page disscussion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' (born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) is the [[Democratic party|Democratic]] junior [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004 - present) and President-elect of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On November 4, Obama and his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]] won the presidency after spending a record-shattering $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors never disclosed by Obama.  President-elect Obama will likely become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and may use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office at his inauguration on [[January]] 20, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christian Science Monitor, ''At swearing in, congressman [Keith Ellison, D Minnesota, who is a Muslim] wants to carry Koran. Outrage ensues.'', by Jane Lampman, December 07, 2006, retrieved on 10/16/2008  [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1207/p01s03-uspo.html]&amp;quot;In Congress, newly elected representatives do not put their left hands on any book. They raise their right hands, and are sworn in together as the speaker of the House administers the oath of office. Some do carry a book, according to House historians, and some choose to photograph a private swearing-in afterward with their hand on the Bible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama hoped to become President when he was sworn in as U.S. Senator in 2004, and did not use a Koran at that time.  Subsequently Democratic House member Keith Ellison established the precedent for being sworn in using the Koran, and there is no guarantee that Obama would not do likewise if sworn in as President. [http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_obama.html FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, ''Sliming Obama'', January 10, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the socialist idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth&amp;quot;, in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay taxes. To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office. In addition, his health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system. The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves. To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres had ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayers had ghostwritten ''Dreams''.  Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make partial-birth abortion legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of mind control in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence that Obama is a Muslim includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which most Christians would not retain. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [Arabic] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008 when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join.&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II is said to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is some evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theinvigilator.blogspot.com/2008/10/on-front-of-disgust.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 123 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 9 million total votes. [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] is focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mccain/] Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (reared a Baptist) have been active members since 1988 at the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blames the media and not the rhetoric on display &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|“It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;}}  Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official, Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If states are no longer regarded as a valid authority on citizenship of those born within them then no one is eligible for President because no one can prove that they are natural born citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556112</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=556112"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T13:46:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: moved muslim part per my reasoning on the talk page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' (born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) is the [[Democratic party|Democratic]] junior [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004 - present) and President-elect of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On November 4, Obama and his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]] won the presidency after spending a record-shattering $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors never disclosed by Obama.  President-elect Obama will likely become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and may use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office at his inauguration on [[January]] 20, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christian Science Monitor, ''At swearing in, congressman [Keith Ellison, D Minnesota, who is a Muslim] wants to carry Koran. Outrage ensues.'', by Jane Lampman, December 07, 2006, retrieved on 10/16/2008  [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1207/p01s03-uspo.html]&amp;quot;In Congress, newly elected representatives do not put their left hands on any book. They raise their right hands, and are sworn in together as the speaker of the House administers the oath of office. Some do carry a book, according to House historians, and some choose to photograph a private swearing-in afterward with their hand on the Bible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama hoped to become President when he was sworn in as U.S. Senator in 2004, and did not use a Koran at that time.  Subsequently Democratic House member Keith Ellison established the precedent for being sworn in using the Koran, and there is no guarantee that Obama would not do likewise if sworn in as President. [http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_obama.html FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, ''Sliming Obama'', January 10, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the socialist idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth&amp;quot;, in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay taxes. To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office. In addition, his health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system. The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves. To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres had ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Jack Cashill compared the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayers had ghostwritten ''Dreams''.  Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make partial-birth abortion legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of mind control in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence that Obama is a Muslim includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, which most Christians would not retain. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [Arabic] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008 when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join.&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II is said to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is some evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theinvigilator.blogspot.com/2008/10/on-front-of-disgust.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 123 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 9 million total votes. [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] is focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mccain/] Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (reared a Baptist) have been active members since 1988 at the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blames the media and not the rhetoric on display &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|“It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;}}  Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official, Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If states are no longer regarded as a valid authority on citizenship of those born within them then no one is eligible for President because no one can prove that they are natural born citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555533</id>
		<title>Talk:Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555533"/>
		<updated>2008-11-12T18:48:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archives:&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive1|1]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive2|2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disgusted Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've voted Republican in every election since 1960, but I'm absolutely disgusted by this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What happened to the dignity of our party under Goldwater and Reagan? This &amp;quot;encyclopedia&amp;quot; page is just one long rant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there any real conservatives out there willing to present objective, factual criticism of Obama? God knows there are enough valid arguments to make. Why are we channeling Michael Savage rather than William Buckley? Currently this page makes me cry for my party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like disgusted conservative is voting for BO. I happen to think it is an accurate account of a man that is dishonest. Where will you get the real picture about about if not here? Are you disgusted by Wikipedias article? How about the coverage on MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, LATimes, WaPo, NYT, Google, The Guardian. Why not be mad and except that the majority of America is being fooled? Why not be mad at someone as disgusting as BO, actually has a real chance to take the Presidency and doesn't deserve it IN THE LEAST? Reagan is rolling over in his grave and so all the Founders.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:54, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voting Republican again this year. I know you're mad about what's going on, but it shows throughout the page. An encyclopedia can't be written from an angry point of view. Let me be specific:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) &amp;quot;Obama and Elitism&amp;quot; plus &amp;quot;Obama and Islam&amp;quot; are not valid main introductory sections. Start with his early life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) His birth certificate gets its own section but his healthcare and tax plans don't? Focus on what's really important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) The &amp;quot;Insights&amp;quot; section is just a list of criticisms and belongs under a &amp;quot;Criticism&amp;quot; section. Categorize corectly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Off-topic side-swipes: &amp;quot;He became a member of the Harvard Law Review, which uses racial quotas, in 1989&amp;quot;. Why is &amp;quot;which uses racial quotas&amp;quot; in there? If it was a reason that he was chosen, say that. If it wasn't leave it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Unsubstantiated claims: &amp;quot;Obama's campaign has been financed largely by leftist donors opposed to the war and to the American military in general.&amp;quot; Citation definitely needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have several good sections in here: &amp;quot;Senate career&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Foreign policy experience&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Published criticism&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Religious affiliations&amp;quot;. These are high-quality and reflect well on Conservapedia. The others do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the reply from hsmom below as the kind of constructive, factual accuracy this page needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This sounds like you're standard liberal bellyaching.  The fact is that no real conservative Christian can vote for this man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::??!?! Trying to hold this article to some kind of standard is bellyaching? Would you like to address any of my points?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your points is liberal talking points.  The fact is that Barack Hussein Obama wants to talk with Iran without predeterminations, flip flops, and is close friends to an unrepentive TERRORIST.  What more can you know?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Trying to shift the focus on an ''encyclopedia page'' about a presidential candidate from hypothetical statements (his possible Islamic faith) and trivial matters (his birth certificate), to his actual stance on the issues is liberal bellyaching? If anything, we should be casting aside these trivial circumstances as beneath us and take the time to dissect each of his stances on the actual issues. That's what a real, dignified Conservative would do. Relying on ridiculous tactics such as these is asinine and cowardly. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 16:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think this article doesn't go far enough.  I think there should be a picture of Hitler as the top photo, just like the Evolution page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disgusted Conservative, sadly you are only wasting your time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does it say he MAY be the first Muslim President (a horrible, false claim) and he MAY use the Koran to be sworn in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama's pastor of twenty-years, Rev. Wright, was originally a member with the Nation of Islam (likely always has been, see [[taqiyya]])''  Let's be careful not to confuse the Nation of Islam with the traditional Muslim faith - they are two quite different things. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:10, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: What differences do you find so compelling?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:15, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't know that I'd use the word &amp;quot;compelling&amp;quot;; I don't know a whole lot about either faith.  I do know that they're quite different.  The Nation of Islam was started in Detroit in the 1930's as something of a black empowerment/separatist movement - it's a very race-based group, from what I understand, and (in what I would consider a cult-like way) based largely on the teachings of two or three men, who are considered more-or-less prophets.  It's been portrayed in the media as very racist and anti-Semitic, though I don't know enough about it to know how accurate that is.  It's a uniquely American faith.  Traditional Islam is quite a different thing - it's been around for thousands of years.  Malcolm X, for example, became a member of NOI in prison, then, due to disillusionment brought on by NOI leader/prophet Elijah Mohamed's adultery, converted to traditional Islam.  I have assumed that when you say that you believe that Barak Obama is a Muslim, you are referring to traditional Islam, right? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:37, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.  Are you saying that NOI adherents do not pray and submit to Allah?  I'm sure they do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:52, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.''  No, I wouldn't put it that way.  I wouldn't consider NOI to be Islam.  As I understand it, I think they are two fundamentally different faiths, though NOI has some trappings borrowed from traditional Islam, as well as some borrowed from Christianity.  NOI believes, among other things, &amp;quot;that Allah (God) appeared in the Person of Master W. Fard Muhammad, July, 1930; the long-awaited &amp;quot;Messiah&amp;quot; of the Christians and the &amp;quot;Mahdi&amp;quot; of the Muslims.&amp;quot;[http://www.noi.org/muslim_program.htm]  As I understand it, when NOI members pray to Allah, they mean (at least in part) W. Fard Muhammad (the founder of NOI).  Wheras of course traditional Muslims don't include anything about W. Fard Muhammad in their beliefs, nor do they recognize NOI as a Muslim denomination.  (Christians don't believe W. Fard Muhammad is the Messiah either, obviously.)  NOI is a uniquely American black separatist movement.  I believe it's quite a different faith from traditional Islam.  Maybe I was wrong about assuming you think Barak Obama is a traditional Muslim?  Do you think Barak Obama is a member of the NOI?  That would lead to quite different concerns; as I understand it, the NOI wants, among other things, quite substantial reparations for slavery. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:40, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Nation of Islam's relationship to Christianity is similar to the relationship of Christianity to Judaism.  They use the same texts (to some extent), and have practices that are shared with and developed out of the other - but such distortions take place that one is clearly no longer the other.  It's not even about &amp;quot;not being mainstream&amp;quot;, it's about that place and time when one religion truly ceases to be it's parent religion.  You would be fully inaccurate to call a christian merely a &amp;quot;Jesus loving Jew&amp;quot;.  Christianity became its own religion in the year 30 (give or take) when our Lord died and rose for us.  For the Nation of Islam, with the Prophet Elijah claiming to be the reincarnation of Mohammad, they cease to be merely &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; and become their own religion.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==57 Islamic states==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I attempted to make this article better by noting, as several other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; could be a reference to Heinz ketchup or simple a misstatement (Obama had visited 47 states), as well as the fact that there were not 57 Islamic states when Obama attended an Indonesian school. It was reverted. Why? Is this an encyclopedia, or a liberal hate blog? [[User:Egen|Egen]] 10:42, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your edit was baseless, and probably politically motivated.  The entry is factual and will remain that way.  Obama has likely remained a Muslim long after attending grade school.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:52, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On the subject, I think someone should add the following line to your page: &amp;quot;The odds against Aschlafly's claim to be named 'Andrew Schlafly' being truthful are less than 1 billion to one, as fewer than 6 people in the world are named Andrew Schlafly.&amp;quot; Don't put malarkey like this on a serious encyclopedia page and defend it as being &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot;. I remind you of Conservapedia Commandments 1, 2, and 5. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 11:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: In any case, I fail to see how it is &amp;quot;baseless&amp;quot; to note, as other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; cannot possibly be a reference to &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; and probably has a more benign origin. It does not to any good to assert that anyone who disagrees with you probably does so because they are &amp;quot;politically motivated&amp;quot; (read: liberal) when many conservatives have expressed disdain for this point. I doubt that the majority of Conservapedia editors would disagree with my edit. This encyclopedia is not a personal blog for you or for anyone else. Therefore, I am reinserting the edit. If anyone can provide proof that Obama was referring to the &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; which did not exist when he was growing up '''and''' provide proof that that is what he was referring to, I'll retract this. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 12:16, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Egen - I entirely agree with you. A lot of people here think this is a redstate comments thread rather than, as it says in the top left corner, &amp;quot;the trustworthy encyclopedia&amp;quot;. Snopes on this one: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/57states.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the mention of the 57 states, since the article later refers to a source that says that it was probably a misstatement as he has in fact visited 47 states. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;unsigned JohnFA&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement has been here for some time. It stays for now.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:44, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
      Jpatt - Why should it? It's repeated later on in the article where it is also explained. This statement is redundant since it doesn't even have a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added the fact that there were not 57 states when he went to school in indonesia, if we are going to mention that he went to an islamic school we are implying that that is where he learned about the 57 states, this is impossible and that should be noted. People will reference conservapedia and if they reference that he visited the 57 islamic states or that he learned about there being 57 islamic states in islamic school they will look like fools.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:06, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Right now, the implication made about Obama's gaff and &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; indicates the United States.  If it's about Indonesia, then state Indonesia, as well as prove that Indonesia is divided into 57 states.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I double-checked the references provided, one of which has a video of Obama himself doing the gaff; it may have been a minor slip of the tounge or a minor mistake, but not once was there a reference to visiting Islamic states or countries.  He specified visiting 57 ''U.S. states''.  The article was changed to reflect that fact, and the speculation on Islamic states was removed.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I wanted to do that but I figured I would just get reverted. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:53, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll let you take credit then for the fixing, or at least getting it started :)  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:57, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biased==&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this site supposed to be unbaised?-[[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] 16:46, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome to Conservapedia[[User:Pluto|Pluto]] 18:19, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;born, allegedly, in Honolulu&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's no doubt he was ''born''. that should read &amp;quot;allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless. [[User:JohnBarma|JohnBarma]] 13:30, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the previous poster said, &amp;quot;(born, allegedly, in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;, implies that he may not have been born, which I think is not what is intended.  &amp;quot;Allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot; has the same problem.  Putting aside whether or not the &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; is silly (and frankly I think the factcheck.org folks debunked this one), if you want to convey the idea that he was born, but may have been born somewhere other than Hawaii, then it should read &amp;quot;(born, allegedly in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;.  Comma placement matters. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:58, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct. Factcheck did take this one apart: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snope also: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&lt;br /&gt;
::''Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday'' What foolishness! As if the ability to run for President is the sole benefit to be derived from US citizenship! That his grandparents planted the announcement is entirely credible. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:30, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What we need to see to settle this controversy is the actual birth certificate; not a copy of it, and not someone's written opinion.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:47, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my understanding from a recent article on Fox that the form presented lists him as &amp;quot;African&amp;quot;.  This was 1961.  The concept of African-American or any reference to African in racial makeup, while very prevalent in the last 15+ years, was still more than 20 years off.  Birth certificates in 1961 used &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot;.  I'm surprised this isn't mentioned anywhere. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:19, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Favorite black leader ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've just finished reading Dreams from My Father. I don't recommend it. But one thing I missed was a reference to Malcolm X being Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot;. He speaks highly of Malcolm X's autobiography, but doesn't like the &amp;quot;religious baggage&amp;quot; that the guy &amp;quot;discarded in later life&amp;quot;. Is the reference here correct? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 17:10, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Search Google on {&amp;quot;Malcolm X&amp;quot; Obama favorite} and you'll find numerous credible confirmations of the statement about Malcolm X being Obama's favorite black leader.  The entry need not be limited to the silly Dreams book.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:03, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not really seeing it. Various claims Obama loves Malcolm X's autobiography (which, subject to the point above, seems correct), but the claims that he is Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot; all cite no reference, or cite Dreams - I think incorrectly. Is there a source for Obama having said or written this? If not, it should go. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 18:12, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree that it should be sourced, preferably with a quote from his book or one of his speeches, otherwise it could be mistaken for an untrue rumor.  If he qualified the statement with something about X's religion, as Marcdaniels noted above, that should be included in the quote.  I looked for a credible source, but couldn't find one.  I have added a fact tag, which can be removed when a suitable citation is found. (Let's not forget that Malcolm X was involved with the Nation of Islam, which is quite a different thing than traditional Islam.  He rejected the Nation of Islam later in life.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Examples supporting the statement are easy to find.  I just added one.  I don't think anyone seriously doubts the truth of the statement.  Feel free to find and add other citations supporting it.  The discomfort expressed above seems to be with the fact itself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Your source goes back to the book, which I'd thought we'd both agreed wasn't on point. It's entirely plausible that Obama might regard Malcolm X as his favorite black leader, and that would discomfort me in the slightest, but I'm having real difficulty finding any evidence that he has said or written this. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 07:40, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, you've misread me now.  I did not agree that book wasn't on point.  I did say there is further evidence beyond the book, which is easy to find on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The quote from the book is convincing enough.  If you won't accept it, then I doubt you would accept anything now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:20, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: I am now a little confused, and I'm not sure why you are getting personal. You suggested there were additional sources for the claim on the internet, other than those referring to the book, but I cannot find one. I may be missing something obvious - would be helpful if you could provide a link. The book shows Malcolm X's autobiography to have been Obama's favourite autobiography, and it would be accurate to say that, but anything further seems supposition rather than fact. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:35, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;if elected, Obama will become the first black, and possibly Muslim, President of the United States.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the problem with this sentence in place of the one currently there? For starters, it isn't proven that he's Muslim, but it ''is'' proven that he's black, so certainly it should be mentioned over the hypothetical. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:25, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The racial composition of all the past presidents is not completely known, so I doubt it's appropriate to insist that Obama would be the '''first''' black President.  Also, the racial composition of a man is not as important as his beliefs.  It is known that none of the prior presidents were Muslim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well said, Aschlafly.  It is the content of a person's character that should determine how we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; them.  Although, who are we to judge?  I suspect, however, looking at the photos, that Senator Obama would at least be the first President (if elected) with a clear [[African American]] heritage.  Whether a few others may have had a lineage leading back to Africa in their family tree is another, albeit interesting, question. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:16, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's an interesting argument. If we know so little about the former presidents that we cannot say whether any of them met society's contemporaneous definition of Black - the one-drop rule, for example - then how can we say than none of them were Muslim? If they could keep their African ancestry secret, why not their true religion? Is there evidence of political opponents accusing a candidate of being of mixed-blood ancestry?--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 23:21, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: When people vote, they are called to judge.  So the liberal canard of &amp;quot;judge not&amp;quot; is a useless argument here.  What will voters judge on?  More important than race is the views and beliefs of the candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: As to whether past presidents were Muslims, simply look at what they did and said ... including before they became politically ambitious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:33, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Of course we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot;, or at least &amp;quot;decide&amp;quot; when we vote.  However, when did &amp;quot;judge not... [lest ye be judged]&amp;quot; become a &amp;quot;liberal canard&amp;quot;?  I thought it was a warning in the Bible not to overstep our bounds?  Voting, of course, does not overstep them - we pencil in a space, or pull a lever.  That is not &amp;quot;judgment&amp;quot;, it is an expression of personal opinion or preference or ideas.  Moving beyond that simple step, however, leads us into judgment territory, potentially.  When we should be humble and add commentary on ourselves as well as those we judge is an issue of personal ethics - or morality.  A good time to sit down with good words and contemplate. [[User:Human|Human]] 01:22, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like someone to please explain to me how this is unbais? At least with the article you can try to make something up saying how its unbais but the main picture is trying to show very obviouisly that Obama is unpatriotic... If you look at McCains page or Palins the picture of professionally done. Please someone give me a reasonable answer [[User talk:Horriblesite]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Funny you should comment. Is it Conservapedia making Obama unpatriotic or is it Obama who IS unpatriotic? I will say the latter.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, &amp;quot;unbais&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;professionally done&amp;quot; are Liberal canards. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of Taqiyya in this article (''(allowed if) ... it advances the cause of Islam'') is incorrect for the Sunni Muslims. Taqiyya is only allowed when it will danger their lives otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, even with this allowance, many chose instead a honorable death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shi'ites (shia) is the one who practices this (taqiyya) in almost any situation that will cause discomfort to them otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sunni muslim and some branches of Shi'ite, because of their extreme stances, are pretty much a different religion. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya &amp;amp; takeyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the same thing? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:34, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:52, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== wife opinions  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing that bothers me about Obama is the comments attributed to his wife. 1. That it was the first time she was proud of america and 2.That black children had no future in america. Both she and her husband are examples of how well a black child can do so its hard to understand why she has that view. [[User:Markr|Markr]] 16:38, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::See similar comments from John McCain: http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2008/06/mccain-it-can-be-%E2%80%9Ctough%E2%80%9D-to-be-proud-of-usa/   “I’ll admit to you … that it’s tough in some respects,” McCain said when asked by a questioner at a town hall meeting how to be proud of the country. “We have not always done things right and we mismanaged the war in Iraq very badly for nearly four years.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obvious fake photo (hand on heart) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect this very obvious fake photo (look at how small the two women are compared to the chairs behind them, check out the flag's edges itself and what exactly is holding it up) was placed here by people hoping to discredit Conservapedia. I understand a popular activity among liberals and vandals is to insert things seeming to support Conservative and Christian values, but that are either extreme or fake, and so undermine the encyclopedia as a whole.--[[User:TruthOfChrist|TruthOfChrist]] 11:11, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It isn't fake.  Many other photos of this occasion exist.  Video, too.  The goofy-looking perspective is an artifact of the angle and lens used. --[[User:XavierJ|XavierJ]] 12:29, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp {{unsigned|Littleriverr}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single photo lacked context, and the writer of this article, unfortunately, chose to translate it negatively. A more balanced discussion is available on Snopes : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 10:51, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==birth certificate lawsuit number 2==&lt;br /&gt;
In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the authority to &amp;quot;prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters&amp;quot; who might have otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78111]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See my analysis of this on this Talk Page, point 58: &amp;quot;Barack raises the bar&amp;quot;. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 00:25, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Errors and dubious claims==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The first sentence says Obama was born in Hawaii.  At first I was under the impression that someone decided to act in a competent manner and remove the baseless innuendo about his place of birth.  Alas I was mistaken because later in the article the word 'alleged' is still used.  I thought all reasonable people would presume that a document from the State of Hawaii would suffice to prove one's citizenship instead of using the rants of the lunatic fringe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A lawsuit has been filed by someone seeking the real birth certificate.  Complain to him, and explain why it still apparently has not been produced.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The state of Hawaii is not just going to let anybody get a copy of Obama's birth certificate, let alone his original.  I can't even get my hands on my own original birth certificate and I'll bet neither can you.  A certified copy of Obama's birth certificate has been provided for anyone to look at.  If this copy is good enough for our government officials that are not part of the lunatic fringe, then why isn't it good enough for Conservapedia?  I'd like to think Conservapedia is not aligning itself with the likes of the people filing these nonsense lawsuits.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama only attended religious schools until he reached the age of ten (Islamic and Catholic).  The rest of his education from Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard was nonsectarian.  Clearly the vast majority of his education was non-religious. [[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Obama's formative years were spend being indoctrinated in Islam.  Less than 1% convert to Christianity after that experience.  Enough said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I was never under the impression that a person's formative years stopped at the age of ten.  According to you, Obama shouldn't be a liberal because he attended conservative religious schools during his alleged formative years, 6 - 10.  How is it that he is now a liberal after living another 35+ years and attending an ivy-league college?  You are also ignoring his years in a Catholic school during his time in Indonesia.  Why?  If he spent two of his formative years at a Catholic school, shouldn't he be a Catholic?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Malcom X was not THE leader of the Nation of Islam, he was A leader.  There is a distinct difference. [[http://www.finalcall.com/national/savioursday2k/hem_nation.htm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Nitpicking here.  I'll change &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't do it for me, do it for the reputation of Conservapedia.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama was baptized in 1988, the same year he started attending Harvard.  If there is a reference stating he was baptized prior to his political ambitions, please post it.  [[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: 1988 makes no sense, as no one ever saw any Christian behavior or church attendance by Obama at law school from 1988 to 1991.  Post his baptismal certificate.  You can't and neither can Obama.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why doesn't 1988 make any sense?  Was there a problem with my reference?  Are you able to provide reputable evidence that Obama's baptism didn't occur in 1988?  Just because a person doesn't attend church on a regular basis or hardly at all is not a reason to deny someone's baptism.  Elsewhere in this article is criticism directed at Obama's CHRISTIAN pastor of 20 years.  Either Obama is a Christian that attended a Christian church for 20 years or he is not.  If he is a Muslim, then why all the fuss about his Christian pastor of 20 years?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Just because someone reads a book allegedly 'from a Muslim point-of-view' does not mean they are actually a Muslim.  I have read parts of the book and I am not a Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It adds to the evidence.  If Obama were reading the Bible, then that would detract from the evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama does read his Bible and has encouraged others to do so as well.  Would like a reference?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Roosevelt communicated with America's enemies.  After the outbreak of WW II, Roosevelt was negotiating with the Japanese.  Things didn't go well and the Japanese were embargoed, thus losing most of their import capability including over 90% of their oil supplies. [[http://www.fff.org/freedom/1291c.asp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point is lacking here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In reference to Obama saying we should talk to our enemies, the following claim was made, &amp;quot;Roosevelt spoke with none of the Axis or Japanese leaders and the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender.&amp;quot;  Roosevelt and members of his administration talked to our enemies, the reference provided by the article was written by a columnist with a distinct lack of historical credibility.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- If Obama' likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students', then which scholarships were they?  Could a reference at least be provided?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You tell us.  Obama won't disclose who paid for his education.  He claimed he worked his way through school, but that was disproved.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why should I tell you?  The claim was made in the article without a shred of evidence to back it up.  I do happen to know that the Obama's used college loans to pay for much of their schooling and they only just recently paid them off with the proceeds from his books.  Since someone writing for Conservapedia is making the incredible claim that Obama was somehow able to acquire loans not available to most others, shouldn't a reference be provided so the claim will withstand scrutiny? --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Any chance a reference could be provided for the claim concerning the flag pin?  The way it reads now makes the entry look like partisan whining.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Be clearer.  No one denies Obama avoided wearing a flag pin as he catered to the anti-war crowd.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim, ' Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering' was made without a reference.  Any chance this opinion could be verified so the article doesn't sound like a smear?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general tone of the article makes it look like a partisan smear campaign, not the encyclopedic scholarly work Conservapedia alleges to produce.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 17:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think your conclusion applies more to your own comments.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your response.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama has written that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader, inspired him in his youth.''  I think this statement needs to be tweaked a bit.  While it's true that Malcolm X was a leader in the Nation of Islam (a radical black separatist group, not to be confused with the traditional Islam faith), by the time he wrote his autobiography (as told to Alex Haley, of Roots fame), he had rejected the Nation of Islam and converted to traditional Islam.  If Obama was inspired by the book to take up Malcolm's religion (which is a stretch, IMHO, as lots of people have read this book and not become Muslims), he would most likely have chosen traditional Islam like Malcolm did.  I think it's important to make that distinction clear.  (Unless this item is intended to suggest that Obama is a member of the Nation of Islam?  If so, it should be in a different section, as it's quite a different claim.)  FWIW, Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965, four years after Obama's birth.  Also, the title of the book is ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X''.  So I suggest this item be changed to something like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama has written that reading ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X'' inspired him in his youth.  Malcolm X converted to traditional Islam after leaving the radical Nation of Islam (a black separatist group).&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds considered and precise.  Most black muslims are NOT NOI, they are in fact sunni Muslim.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 20:11, 20 October 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obamas Grandmother==&lt;br /&gt;
Breaking news, Americans still forbidden to speak with Obamas grandmother. Now, we may never. Democrat Barack Obama is canceling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to fly to Hawaii to visit his suddenly ill 86-year-old grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters Monday that Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, who helped raise him, was released from the hospital late last week. But he says her health has deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious.&lt;br /&gt;
Gibbs said Obama would return to the campaign trail on Saturday, though he was unsure where.&lt;br /&gt;
Obama events originally planned for Madison, Wis., and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday will be replaced with one in Indianapolis before he makes the long flight to Hawaii. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:16, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggesting corrections to 'atom bomb' sentance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it should not say &amp;quot;atom bombs&amp;quot; because this is slang expression. It should be &amp;quot;atomic bombs&amp;quot; except since 1960s it usually is said &amp;quot;nuclear bombs&amp;quot; and even then there are other weapons from bombs (missles are not bombs, then there are torpedoes and so on) so it should say &amp;quot;nuclear weapons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my memory is fuzzy here but didn't Clinton have ties to other washed up sixties communist terrorists? Like former Black Panther Party people who were re-made into &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; democrat politicians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally and this is just style, I do not like the '''Bold text''', it makes look rather alarming, not that we are not alarmed about this, but I think it is best to say the raw facts directly and people will know to be alarmed, instead of trying to shock people with text formatting into coming to their sense. I heard Conservapedia wants to get away from &amp;quot;that other encyclopedia&amp;quot;'s use of sensationism and tabloid style, so, maybe take off the bold. [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:28, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
other than this a very good job in the article, maybe it is too late to change direction your country is going, but at least people will know who had the facts before things all went wrong! [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:30, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I appreciate your comments but don't find them compelling.  &amp;quot;Atom bombs&amp;quot; is a familiar term; whether Clinton did likewise concerning terrorists is irrelevant; and bolding is obviously helpful for emphasis.  Thanks anyway and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::While I plan to stick to the 90-10 ratio here, and this is the first comment I've made, I did want to note that I agree with Eleger about &amp;quot;Atomic Bombs&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Nuclear Weapons&amp;quot; simply on the basis of the being more accurate terms. My person phrase of choice would be Nuclear arsenal though. Maybe nitpicking, but I think fair. -EternalCritic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I came to post that too; I also have a problem with &amp;quot;first&amp;quot; part of &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first person having ties to a known terrorist to gain control over America's atom bombs&amp;quot;. The most recent Democrat President was bad too. OTOH, something like &amp;quot;second person...&amp;quot; might distract from the point that Obama is a threat.[[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How low can you go? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this meant as an &amp;quot;How To&amp;quot; article on character assassination? Though I do find some of the 'links' in the Obama and Islam hilarious, I'd thought that the conservative parts of the US had a shred of dignity left. It appears not to be the case. But keep feeding the lies to your fellow yes-men, the rest of us are quite amused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::We are not going low at all, You Who Did Not Leave Your Name. This entry is nothing about the truth about Barack Obama. Unfortunately, liberals like you will not find out until it is too late.--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 21:20, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: ''&amp;quot;the rest of us are quite amused.&amp;quot;'' I am sure the leftwingers are quite amused of the nonstop Obama media lovefest. I am sure they are also amused at the whole disenfranchisement of voting in a Democracy thanks to ACORN. I am on a conservative website and I can't find a good Obama bio, shucks billybob, I need the Obama I can believe in, let's look at MSNBC... La La La, liberal fantasy land.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:48, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In response to the first (unsigned) comment above, liberals enjoy deceit.  But not everyone is fooled by it, and liberals get very irritable when they see that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Berg Obama lawsuit==&lt;br /&gt;
Philip J. Berg announced 10/21 that Obama and the DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President. [http://obamacrimes.com/]--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;admission&amp;quot; is nothing more than an acknowledgment that there was no response to his suit, so Berg is claiming that this qualifies as an admission that all his allegations are true.  Berg's now positioning this as &amp;quot;Obama admits he's not a citizen&amp;quot;, but that is legal spin, not reality, and I'd be hesitant to claim it as anything other than the latest round in a lawsuit.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:52, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a legal principle that the silent are understood to consent.  Obama's failure to deny Berg's request for admission means that he admits those items under the law.  This definitely should be included, and should be reason enough to disqualify him from the election.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:03, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The judge in the Berg-Obama case has tossed out the suit [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvhtmoNEnyP1Bu6Ol4zJsN94mlewD941NCJG0]--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 16:30, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just because an activist judge tossed out the suit doesn't mean that the admissions don't count.  I'm sure Berg will appeal.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:54, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Is the judge activist? Is there reason to believe he's an Obama partisan? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:38, 26 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lefty DindaleP was right, though it shouldn't be hard to find a sympathetic judge in Democrat bastion of Philadelphia. If, if the bozo (obama) wins, this issue will not go away easily and will be justification for impeachment. Though, will be hard to impeach with super-majority liberal congress, God help us. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:35, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Actually, McCain has a similar issue, in that he was not born in the US, and arguably not on US territory.  Most every single scholar I've read in the last few days on this has said McCain's case will be a compelling one, legally, because no court in the land would dare say a person born out of this country to two citizens, one of whom was SERVING HIS COUNTRY, would be denied the right to be president.  As we become more and more of a mobile population, with people traveling and living overseas for extended periods of time (business, government, or travel) I think more children will be born of two natural citizens, but not on the US territory.  I will be curious to watch how the term &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot; is defined by the Court under any case, Obama or McCain, just for the historical precedent it will set.  --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:41, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: By the way, Qwest, there is no legal principal that &amp;quot;silence is admittance&amp;quot;.  Until or unless a Judge posts an Order compelling you to provide a particular document or telling you to agree or deny, you are not obligated to.  Some instances this might be used could include famous people being hit over and over again with frivolis lawsuits, just cause they have money or power.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::McCain was born in United States territory, which the Panama Canal Zone was prior to 1978, when by treaty it was turned over to Panama.  Anyone born in the United States, its territories, or its overseas military bases is an American citizen.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:18, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Yes, very much an American citizen.  The interesting language is &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot;.  That is what will be interesting to see how it's defined.  I think it makes rational sense that anyone born to American parents should be &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot;, regardless of where they are born.  But the Framers didn't explain the terms.  (I'm not arguing, by the way, for any point.  I'm simply saying scholars say this issue of an American Citizen not born on US land has not yet been addressed - or rather, what do the words &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; mean, in that context.)  The lawsuit for McCain is totally irrelevant (even though the judge has not seen fit to toss it yet), since the Congress already said he is exempt per their own Resolution. --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 13:23, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Birthplace and Grammar Revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
''Barack Hussein Obama, II (allegedly born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)''  Putting aside all issues about whether the &amp;quot;where Obama was born&amp;quot; issue is worth mentioning, given that it ''is'' going to be mentioned, let's get it right.  The issue (as a previous poster mentioned somewhere above), is not ''whether'' he was born - we all agree on that.  The issue is whether he was born ''in Honolulu''.  Thus the phrase should read: ''Barack Hussein Obama, II (born, allegedly in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)'' --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:06, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request addition==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to add this external page and somehow link to this photo Democrat_Obama_during_the_Pledge.jpg   [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html No hand over heart from Obama during national anthem video]| Original footage ABC, now available through RawStory Media. [[Fair use]] --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:07, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Will unlock for you now.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:13, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First Muslim President ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found this claim quite amusing at first, especially with Snopes already had it debunked quite extensively : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I remember that we, Indonesian, also got the wrong information. We thought Obama is a muslim, and we rejoiced. &lt;br /&gt;
We found out later that (1) clearly his parents are quite liberal on religions (2) the context at that time in Indonesia is that most Muslims were not religious. We were pretty laid back then. My parents drink alcohol and misses their obligatory religious duties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So even if (again, IF) Obama was a Muslim, there's no way he's enrolled in a &amp;quot;radical Wahabi school&amp;quot;. It just didn't exist back then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, if we, Indonesians, were wrong about Obama at his time in Indonesia, it's quite understandable if others were also mistaken. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:47, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If elected, Obama would likely become the first Muslim President&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence pointing to Obama being a Muslim can be included, but Barack Obama has said he is a Christian, and is a member of the United Church of Christ. So is saying he is likely to become a Muslim president meant to imply that Obama is secretly a Muslim? Perhaps a better phrased version of this sentence would be &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;. This is concurrent list that follows it, and is much less hypothetical like a good resource should be.  --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 21:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obama's claims to be a Christian are meaningless for three reasons; first, his distinctly non-Christian stance on issues such as [[abortion]] and the [[homosexual agenda]]; second, the radical, [[Marxism|Marxist]] theology preached by his church; and third, the [[Muslim]] concept of [[taqiyya]] outlined in the article. All the of the evidence points away from his being a Christian. [[User:SMichaels|SMichaels]] 16:06, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using Taqiyya as a defense is a joke. I'm not doubting it's authenticity, but I could claim the same thing about you and you would have no defense. See Salem Witch Trials for more information. --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama's stances on [[abortion]] the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[marxism|Marxism]] do take credibility away from his Chrisitian stance, but Muslims are against [[abortion]], [[homosexual agena|homosexualiity]] and women's rights themselves. Furthermore, [[Marxism]] is against all religions, and if his church preaches Marxism, that makes him a Marxist Christian, not a Marxist Muslim. While I myself question his faith in Jesus, I sincerely doubt that he is a Muslim. And as for Taqiyya? Isn't that just an obscure segment of a doctrine practiced only by some Sunnis and considered hypocrisy by other muslims? [[user:justiceisblind|Justice Is Blind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The facts you gave are true, but you did not address my bringing up the idea of rewording the phrase. Having a set of words like &amp;quot;might be&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; seem extremely unscholarly. Those facts you threw up also would correspond to him having a strong leaning toward Islam, minus the hypothetical thought he might be a Muslim. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 23:03, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The truth is what it is, whether you find it &amp;quot;unscholarly&amp;quot; or not.  We're not fooled here when politicians try to deceive the public about who they are and what they believe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:00, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why is it so hard to directly answer my question? First off, do not mix my words, I said the way the sentence is phrased is not scholarly, what is truth or not does not matter to me.  I don't really care what you say is the truth, and what you are or are not fooled by. I am just bringing up the option that as long as Obama himself and no mosques claim he is a member, perhaps it should be reworded to &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;, which also corresponds to the list that follows it, and is all based on fact no conjecture. The reader should have the right to make up their own mind after reading the examples which are listed. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 22:18, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are strong evidence that Obama is a muslim and it has been layed out again and again.  He has never come out and said he's not a muslim among all the questions.  There for if elected, he will be the first muslim president ever elected.  It's as simple as that. --[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sure he has.  [http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=0GFKqOf8EHQ]--[[User:KathrynMonroe|KathrynMonroe]] 22:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes, he has. [http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2008/01/obama_mail]  --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack raises the bar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The snide accusation that Barack Obama insulted America because he refused to hold his hand over his heart is completely off-target. (See photo at top of article). The human heart is just a pump , medically speaking, but culturally it represents the finest, most vital and sensitive parts of our soul. Barack is indicating precisely how much he loves America by putting not one, but both hands over that part of his body which truly encompasses the most vital, potent and sincere components of his soul. Bill Clinton might not be his biggest fan, but he would be the first to applaud this magnificent gesture. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:37, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: ??? --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:36, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL [[User:Aperson41|Aperson41]] 01:50, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow. I have no idea of what to say to that.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A hypothetical article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of this article appears to be purely hypothetical and some of it seems to be fradulent, such as the pornographer donation and the speculation that Obama is a muslim. It is refreshing to see Obama in such a sober light, but I would encourage previous and future writers to be less interested in controversy, and to use legitimate information on the article instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the article lacks structure, and seems to dive in and out of his history, his policies, quotations in a manner which pleases the tone. It is all quite juvenile and sad; an encyclopedia is where questions are answered, not where additional questions are brought up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Birth Certificate Controversy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole section should be reworded or entirely deleted. According to [http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04 this], there can be no more doubt about Obama's birthplace. The article also states, that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate, so all demands for him to do that can only be part of a smear campaign. --[[User:Ascat|Ascat]] 15:22, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed.  For more confirmation see [http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu] and [http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov01/0,4670,InternetPoliticalRumors,00.html Fox News' article about Web political rumors.]  Having 'allegedly' made sense before all the facts were on the table, but now I'm removing the word because it lessens the strength of our true, verifiable criticisms if we leave it there. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 20:58, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: What about the lawsuit against him about this? [http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=2313]--[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 21:23, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The lawsuits all fell through, because anyone looking at the official documents could tell that they were real, it was a manufactured controversy thanks to Hillary (boy I wish expletives were allowed on conservapedia). --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 16:49, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This issue remains valid even though rejected by the courts. Expect it to be revisited if he wins. Plus, allegiances owed to Keyna and Indonesia are part of the birth certificate controversy. Neither gossip nor the certificate proven true and Hawaii actions are unexplained, still. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My version doesn't violate comandments 1, 3, and 5 like the version that was removed. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:24, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I don't like the edit, but I will let it remain. It does violate CP with personal opinion, (costly time and money during busy election season). --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:30, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The tone is bad I will admit, but that is all fact and not opinion. Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes tie to sit in court for several days? Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes money to pay court costs and extra lawyers? Is it an opinion or a fact that he is in a campaign where the outcome depends largely on the tie and money he spends campaigning? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:44, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::JPatt, could you explain &amp;quot;allegiance to Kenya?&amp;quot;  I don't understand this comment.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:57, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original post on this page says &amp;quot;that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate.&amp;quot;  I do not believe this to be what the original article says.  I think it means simply that no state official has the authority to release publicly a birth certificate, not that Obama himself is unable to do so. [[User:TGeary|TGeary]] 20:15, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mr. Obama's Grandmother just died==&lt;br /&gt;
Without getting into politics, it would be nice to mention it respectfully on his page.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:33, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we have any reputable sources for that?  Given Obama's history of engaging in [[liberal deceit]], I wouldn't put it past him to fabricate a story like this to nullify attacks on Election Day. [[User:Neutronium|Neutronium]] 14:06, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::May I say, comments like this are what hurt our republican party this year.  His politics may be liberal, but he's still a human and making fun of a death of a loved one is beneath a good Christian. {{unsigned|JeanJacques}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Neutronium, keep the parody to a minimum, please. That is simply heartless.&lt;br /&gt;
:::JeanJacques, yes, if it's relevant (do we have the mention of grandparents on anyone else's page? I don't know without looking) the we need it added in a respectful way. No matter what we think about Obama, he is a human and so is his grandmother. The was it is presented now, it almost seems as if we are implying that her death contributes to the controversy, when it clearly doesn't. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neutronium, there is a difference between being a cautious &amp;amp; prudent person, and being a paranoid, heartless person (i use the word &amp;quot;person&amp;quot; only due to the website rules of proper conduct). You would do well to realize that...AndrewM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama attending his Grandma's funeral? No mention from the O-MSM! --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:03, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This Is Why Obama Is Wining==&lt;br /&gt;
Articles like this make me think that Conservapedia is run by liberals. Burying real facts like Obama's membership in a Black Liberation Theology church, with silly lies like he is a &amp;quot;muslim&amp;quot;, only serve to discredit real objections to the Obama candidacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed. Congratulayions Andy, you did more for the Democrats than you can possibly know. Thoroughly discrediting this site with ridiculous partisan accusations based onm the flimsiest of evidence meant that anything that was a genuine talking point just got lost among the nonsense. That many on the left pointed to this page to discredit the entire conservapedia idea just goes to show that you can go too far. Congratulations for playing your part in losing the election and being successfully gamed by the left, who knew that you would leave tenuous ridiculous nonsense up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's not badmouth the side that lost. Andy, you did your best, and I appreciate that. However, you can see from my comments from way back, that the Obama article was way too extreme, and included a number of outright falsehoods. Not saying that this lost the race for McCain, but going too extreme eventually starts to hurt. Like in business - a good CEO is someone who is willing to go to the edge of what is legal, but not cross that line. Those CEO's who stay on the edge are winners, those who go over, go to jail. Same thing here...I think the whole Republican campaign was just too darn negative, and put off a lot of undecided voters. Anyway, here's looking forward to President Schwarzenegger in 2012...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Both sides were overly negative, but in reality that's a natural thing for long campaigns. The longer it runs the less fresh the ideas seem. It gets repetetive so after a while, in order to keep things fresh, mudslinging becomes common. I honestly wish we had a much shorter election time frame. Like six months max. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:41, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've just decided that this site's main contributors are probably liberals messing around with people. I bet there are some liberals somewhere getting a huge laugh at people who are seriously offended, or seriously believe half of these articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I have decided the same thing, though maybe not to that extent.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:11, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is going to be the next president==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama has won the election, and I think this should be added to the page. [[User:Arthur205|Arthur205]] 00:12, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes he is, sadly. I encourage all of us to PRAY for the FATE OF OUR COUNTRY. Unfortunately, this page must be updated. [[User:LuvinGodDP|LuvinGodDP]] 10:10, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised no one has updated it yet, it's been over 12 hours since it's been announced. Honestly this sort of time lag on the internet is just sad. You would think that they would at least un-protect it in order for someone else to update it. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:13, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States of America==&lt;br /&gt;
Article should be updated accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
: President-''Elect'', technically speaking. He won't be President until he's inaugurated, and we should hold off on explicitly saying he's the winner until the electoral college has voted (not that I'm pretending there's any real chance of 100+ faithless electors suddenly popping up to help McCain). Right now, he's just the likely winner of the presidential race. --[[User:JeremyDB|JeremyDB]] 12:24, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Let's not disrespect McCain's gracious concession. We should put in that he's the President Elect and when he will be inaugurated. Let's at least be up to date. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:56, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The first section of this article has been updated to reflect that Obama is now president-elect, but the rest needs to be updated also.  For instance, the section entitled &amp;quot;Obama would be the first Muslim President&amp;quot; should now be &amp;quot;Obama will be the first Muslim President,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;will use the Koran to be sworn in,&amp;quot; etc. -[[User:Rfreeman|Rfreeman]] 18:04, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What happening with the muslim section? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see why it needs to be above the TOC, The TOC lets people find what they are looking for, which may very well be proof that he is a Muslim, and really should be on the first page for formatting reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also some points that really stand out to me, &lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama's middle name (Hussein) references its namesake Husayn, who was the grandson of Muhammad, which most Christians would not retain.''&lt;br /&gt;
In this case the reference should be after the word Muhammad, because it does not reference the notion that christians would have there name changed, also it is his fathers name, and if he changed it it could negatively impact his relationship with his family, I would not consider this strong evidence. Seems like Opinion to me&lt;br /&gt;
*'' Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;'' You do know that the video cited as its source showed clearly that he was talking about a tactic that McCain could use, not his real faith (I strongly suspect Obama to be pretty apathetic to religion)&lt;br /&gt;
*''On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria, which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.'' If reading a book written in a muslim POV makes you a muslim than how do we know what is in this book, because we can't trust anyone who read it to not be a muslim. If he were seen praying out the the qran that would be another story entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.'' Pakistan is an islamic nation, the american way of saying it is a bastardized version, he is using the name the nation calls its self.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really think that this should be reworded in to prose and that it needs to be below the TOC.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:46, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Copyediting needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that updating things like this as the news changes is tough, but:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama II (born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961), Democratic Party member, junior senator of the state of Illinois, and president-elect of the United States, winning the 2008 Election over Arizona Senator John McCain [3].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is not a sentence... [[User:Human|Human]] 14:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know they won't let me because I'm too new and can be a bit controversial, but I would love to rewrite the entire first paragraph. It has become such a muddled mess that it doesn't read well at all. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 14:27, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That section of the article looks like its attempting to proove that he is a muslim. Why not simply say &amp;quot;some prominent christian sites including X and Y have suggested that Obama may be a muslim&amp;quot;. It currently looks like it's trying to make people think that he is a muslim, and that for some reason that's bad. What's wrong with muslims?--[[User:Newguy123|Newguy123]] 16:15, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the point is that - no there is nothing wrong with being a Muslim but lying about it for political gain is a problem. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:32, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Again, that makes the presupposition being that someone lies when all you have is superficial, rather strained evidence to say he isn't lying.  Not very gracious on our part.  There are plenty of legitimate issues with Mr. Obama.  Living in gossip and innuendo and &amp;quot;he once made a mistake when talking&amp;quot; seems petty on our part.  Isn't it more important to emphasis why he is a socialist?  All we say is &amp;quot;he is&amp;quot;, not what that means, and how it could effect the country, etc.  It bothers me that this site emphasizes gossip.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:42, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Personally I dont think he is a Muslim however I am not going to kick up a fuss as I was already warned by Aschlafly (is he the boss?) for....something I did? Not sure what. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:45, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's funny how at the beginning of the article it claims he is a muslim, and then at the end discusses his previous church and pastor. It even lists 1988 as his year of baptism despite the beginning of the article stating he didn't have a date for baptism, which for everyone here in the conservapedia zone seems to take as undeniable proof he is a super secret muslim spy out for your children and pets.&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously though, I've mentioned it above that having an article for the current president of the U.S. start out with a poor and unnecessary argument over his faith is ''unprofessional'' at best. The beginning makes no valid points, manages to insult Muslims as a whole, and also contains that stupid picture of Obama in a traditional Kenyan costume.--[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 23:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Muslim President-elect! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the article assures us the Barack is a secret Muslim and would if elected become the first Muslim President of the United States, for consistency's sake, it should now be updated by something like the following: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Now that the unthinkable has occurred and Obama has duped the American People and stolen the election, he will become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and will probably use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is widely believed that now he is President-elect, Obama will drop the tiresome pretence of being a Christian and produce his other wives from hiding, don a turban and a scimitar, pray buns-up five times a day on a Persian carpet while facing Mecca, have a minaret built on top of the White House from which he will personally play the role of the muezzin and call the faithful to prayer, will establish policy recommending that “the Zionist entity be driven into the sea”, and put bin Laden’s face on the American dollar. The week after that will probably be even worse.&amp;quot; If no one objects, I will make some such interpolations in the article proper. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:30, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[ADL]] said:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Prager is flat-out wrong when he asserts that Representative Ellison's use of a Koran would be 'damaging to the fabric of American civilization.' To the contrary, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that, 'no religious test shall ever be required' to hold public office in America. Members of Congress, like all Americans, should be free to observe their own religious practices without government interference or coercion. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/swearing-on-the-koran_b_36907.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what all the fuss is about. Certainly there have been radical Muslims who support anti-US terrorism, but politically motivated distortions do not make Islam a wicked religion. Is Christianity to be rejected because of the abuses of the Crusades, the Inquisition, or the fact that Anglo-American Christians held slaves? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;70's terrorist&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I object to Ayers being referred to as a &amp;quot;terrorist from the 70's&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he is a &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; end of story. once a terrorist, always a terrorist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
we won't call Bin Laden a &amp;quot;2000's terrorist&amp;quot; in 2050&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 00:22, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good point, [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]].  Thanks for the edit. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 00:24, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The man is a functioning member of society, an educator, a family man, who has condemns his past actions, and has worked greatly towards improving the lives of others through charity work. He was a part of a group that destroyed ''property'', which doesn't make him a terrorist because that would imply he did random acts of terror on ''people''. Blowing up statues and parts of buildings was wrong but they did not go after people, and no one was hurt or killed. To compare him to Bin Laden is ''despicable''. And to put a section about this man at the top of the page of Presidential-elect Obama who worked with him in an organization to help reduce poverty levels is neither well thought out or ''tactful''. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 08:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that the Weather Underground did in fact kill people - 3 of their own, in a bomb-making accident.  Sometimes that happens when you set off bombs, even if it's not what you had in mind.  I would put other property-destruction crimes such as cross burning in the terror category as well.  I do agree that Obama's association with Ayres is minimal, at best, and I have huge issues with all the guilt-by-association tactics employed by the McCain campaign.  I'm not taking a stand on the content of this article one way or another. I'm just trying to organize it and cite it as best I can. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't believe an accidental death of their own people should be considered &amp;quot;terror&amp;quot; though. People could technically die while making signs for a normal type of protest, not as likely, but an accident is an accident. Although I do think that some property destruction like cross burning could be argued to be terroristic because it is done in order to terrify a group of people and incite violence against that group. However I still think that what the weather underground did does not quite carry that same connotations. They were protesting a war, and doing so by costing the government money and drawing attention to their cause, at no time was a group of people targeted in a way that would indicate that they were in danger directly from a hostile organization, unless you were an office desk or a public statue/monument. To use the word &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot;, especially nowadays, in the case of Bill Ayers is misleading, and it is a word that should not be tossed around lightly. It seems that people believe that Ayers = Terrorist, so therefore he must have killed people or tried to kill people, and this article does little to correct this misconception. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MInd Control? Really now? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people who published this lost what little credibility they had when they published this. Repeating it on this page just makes you look bad. I mean an O looks like a crystal ball? First of all it also looks like an orange or a penny or anything else that is round and circular. Also, I think that crystal balls are the favorite of ''fortune tellers'' so unless Obama can predict the future (which I think might make him a ''better'' president) this doesn't mean much. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:54, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  I am a practicing stage hypnotist (practicing because I still need work :) and I can tell you that most hypnotists use nothing but their voices and physical presence, and those who do use props traditionally use a pencil. [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 13:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Absence of Dancing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dancing is a popular form of celebration and partying by all ethnicities.  But why is [[Barack Obama]] rarely seen dancing, or even allowing and attending dancing.  Perhaps I've missed it (please let me know if I have).  I know, there was one highly staged politically correct dance with Ellen DeGeneris as Obama was catering to her audience.  But where's the rest?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One explanation is that the Islamic [[sharia]] disfavors dancing.[http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2008/10/islamic-scholars-denounce-dancing-say.html] --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:08, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When's the last time you went dancing, Andy? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:23, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::um, lol?&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpxJQABkSsQ Dancing in Puerto Rico]&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axH9bhwI8os Dancing to Snoop Dogg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::so there it is... at least three different places where he's seen dancing. Here's my question: lets see you find videos of Mccain dancing! xP your Islamic assumption thingy holds no water since you can say the same for McCain! [[User:Ema|Ema]] 11:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah! Ema, don't be fooled by this [[deceit]], he might secretly be a [http://www.dankphotos.com/whirling/ whirling dervish!] They're members of [[Sufi]] Islam, by the way. --[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I took a look at the Puerto Rico video.  It proves my point.  I've never seen anyone dance-without-dancing like that.  Have you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.  Judging by the determined objections above, it may be quite a while for some of his supporters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your argument is that he is a bad dancer so he must be a Muslim? Seriously Andrew, take a deep breath and relax, proving him to be a Muslim is not going to get him impeached, he has the presidency and that is that. In four years it might matter, but that means you have poor years to find less circumstantial evidence. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, Brendanw, it is obviously not my argument that he is a &amp;quot;bad dancer.&amp;quot;  I think you understand my argument perfectly well and won't admit it.  Suit yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:31, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Brendan's right about one thing at least. All the evidence listed is either circumstantial or draws illogical conclusions. The one about him when he says he joins a church after a suggestion does not in any way imply him as a muslim, though it might imply him as a disingenuous Christian. The two are mutually exclusive. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:38, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Well please explain it to  me differently, initially you said he didn't dance, and now that we have three videos of it you say that he &amp;quot;dances with out dancing&amp;quot; what does that mean if not bad dancer? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:45, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Andy's saying that, in those three videos, Obama isn't really ''dancing'', in the sense of crossing a line of Muslim (im)morality.  It's like being against swearing, but recognizing that words like &amp;quot;heck&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;geez&amp;quot; don't really cross that line.  That said, however, I did run across a video where [http://splicd.com/wzyT9-9lUyE/31/52 Obama dances] by anyone's definition.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 14:25, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::RossC, this video is obviously faked. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if he will dance at his inaugural ball, if it gets to that point. (see: Berg) [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 13:47, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
:In some Islamic traditions dancing is not allowed, in some christian traditions dancing is not allowed, some people regardless of religion just don't dance with enthusiasm (was he supposed to be [dancing inappropriately with] Ellen? While Barrack is a hottie I'm not sure she would let him do that) I was raised catholic and as a result I am a very quiet person who does not raise his arms in celebration. This is just such a far stretch that it doesn't mean anything. Heck if he were keeping his faith hidden and not praying to meca and not following the rules of Islam in order to complete the 35 year long mission that was trained in to him at a public school in indonesia at the age of 10 don't you think he would dance anyways? And his wife is a great dancer, in Islam men have a whole lot more freedom than women. this just doesn't add up to anything but crazy. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 15:30, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love to dance.  For what it's worth, I have seen an Obama campaign button with a picture of him dancing, and the words &amp;quot;Dance Yes We Can&amp;quot; on it.  It caught my eye because I take dance lessons.  See here [http://www.zazzle.com/obama_dance_button-145707809176961889] for a picture of the button. Over the years, I have met homeschooling moms of various faiths (Christian, Muslim, Jewish) who are careful about their children dancing for modesty reasons. Not everyone enjoys dancing, of course, particularly men.  While it's an interesting facet of Obama, to be honest I don't see it as a strong indicator of his religious beliefs.  When weaker arguments are included, it detracts from the stronger ones, I think. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't dance, and I can assure you that I'm not a Muslim. I'm a lousy dancer, and self-conscious about it. I also don't have a tinfoil hat, which might be why this whole conversation seems ludicrous to me. Godspeed.[[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 21:40, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The very conservative former Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard, did not dance in public. This is despite the fact that his treasurer, Peter Costello, and his rival and current Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, both danced on national television. Is this evidence that John Howard is a Muslim? Certainly not. There is a much less sinister and blatantly obvious explanation for Obama's lack of dancing - he isn't good at it. Just have a look at the videos posted, he has clearly received minimal dance instruction and is evidently self conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And just out of curiosity, has anyone actually seen John McCain dance? How about Palin or Biden? If these three have not then why should the explanation for their lack of participation not be extended to Obama? [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:05, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the fact that Spectral Evidence was outlawed in America back in the 1600's after 19 people were murdered for being accused of witchcraft. Get with the times, Schlafly. [[User:DRuss|DRuss]] 08:51, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is different about Obama that makes it unusual for him to not be much of a dancer?  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 09:45, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still waiting on an answer, Andy. When'd you last hit the dance floor? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 15:43, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Though irrelevant to the issue, I dance in times of celebration, and have also arranged for the availability of dancing by attendees at such events.  Pursue this irrelevancy further and your account will be blocked, per my comment on your talk page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:41, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: He does somewhat have a point, even if his methods of conveying it are a little childish. He's pretty much pointing out that your accusation opens up a big can of worms. If I was to say that Obama's lack of dancing must mean he is Muslim due to Islamic Sharia, I could also say that if I saw you sitting on the floor you must be a Muslim who is kneeling to Mecca. [[User:St0dad|St0dad]] 09:09, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Simple solution to this whole thing.  Islam does not forbid dancing.  Amazing no?  Islam forbids certain kinds of dancing.  Such as dancing involving the men and women who are not married, and dancing with the intention to be provocative.  Of course there are always members of a group who are more conservative with religious laws (no dancing at all) or more liberal with laws (any dancing is ok) but as written, Dancing is allowed as long as it is well mannered, does not stimulate desires, and does not mix men and women who are not married.&lt;br /&gt;
That being said, there are also christian groups that forbid dancing as well.  For much the same reasons.  So just because Obama doesn't dance enough for your satisfaction does not mean anything regarding religion.--[[User:ScottA|ScottA]] 22:50, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti Americanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many points in this article could be summarized into a section called &amp;quot;Anti Americanism&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised this hasn't been done already. Anti Americanism should be a given a very prominent place in this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like this idea because I feel the article is too fragmented and not organized. People are adding self contained ideas in various points in the article, especially at the top, which disrupts the flow and readablity. I cleaned up the first paragraph, but I can't smooth up everything [[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I make such an edit will I be banned? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:01, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; comment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe Barack Obama is a Muslim or at least more sympathetic to them than Christians, but the &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; statement is taken out of context. I removed it as part of the evidence of him being Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpoAVAA1F30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't like that video btw, I only posted it to show the full context [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On a side note, the entire section, for accuracy's sake, should be called &amp;quot;Why Barack Obama is not a Christian&amp;quot; since the only parts that are not circumstantial are in regard to disingenuous Christianity. Beyond that the idea of him not changing his name making him muslim is ridiculous. He was named for his Father. Example from reality: my middle name is Paul. I received it fromt he name of my grandfather. I'm no longer Christian. But I don't change my middle name because I no longer believe Paul's words. I keep it because I love and respect my grandfather. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I partially agree. Maybe there should be two sections. One detailing Anti-Christian facts and one for Pro-Muslim [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Schlafly reverted my change ... Why? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 14:18, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Because you don't agree with him.[[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 15:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's Schlaflypedia then? I had high hopes for Conservapedia [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 15:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I reverted your change because you deleted factual information.  That reason should be obvious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socialistic==&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting to note that the MSM has buried the exact phrase and can only be found on blogs. The media will use the third person term, e.g. &amp;quot;Obama responds to McCains allegations of Socialistic.&amp;quot; The quote itself is relevent. A play on words to blunt its' true impact. Actual charges of 'Socialism' or of being a 'Socialist'. Nobody uses &amp;quot;Socialistic&amp;quot;--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wait==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please explain to me how Barack Obama is a Muslim? Thanks. [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 23:12, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly someone's not paying attention. Not that I endorse the, uh, theory, but there's a whoooooole big section about it in the article. And several discussions on this talk page. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:15, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this point the very thought that he's a Muslim is preposterous. No Muslim would willingly put Rahm Emmanuel, someone so notably Jewish and pro israel in such a powerful position (chief of staff). All in all though, a pretty good choice from the pool. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 23:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama isn't a muslim.  He doesn't have the character we see on the trail to do so.  I think Obama will be an awful President, is not a christian (it's too liberal), supports infanticide and sodomy, and won't do almost ''any'' of the thigs he has promised.  That aside I don't think he's a muslim.  Alot of the proof is probably just part of his warped view of multi-culturism, which includes the so-called ''peaceful'' religion of Allah and Muhammed.  This should be placed on a different page and other more certain information placed on this page (e.g. a better photo should be placed on the top, not a picture of him which tries to accuse his patriotism.)  He is going to be President, a bad one, but one nonetheless.  Please, let us respect the authority of our time.  [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 07:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Think about this: If I had told you on September 12 2001, that in 6 years we'd ellect a liberal, socialist muslim named Barack Hussein Obama, who has terrorist friends, you call me crazy.  But here we are.  [[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connections with Irish Terrorists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I note that a liberal contributor has seen fit to add a line stating that The Republic of Ireland refused to extradite Rita O'Hare -- the IRA terrorist who Obama met last year -- for one of several alleged offences. Why is this of any interest? She served time in the Republic for smuggling explosives. So that country's legal authorities were in no doubt as to her status. Does Wikipedia regard shooting British soldiers in Northern Ireland as a &amp;quot;political offence&amp;quot;? If so, then should we regard killing American soldiers in Iraq the same way? I don't think so. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 18:29, 7 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well spoken Keith!   I intend to contact the Irish Embassy in Washington and ask that they make a clear statement condemning our Marxist Terrorist President-Elect's meeting with these vile killers.   I would encourage ASchlafly to perhaps make a television appearance about this?   As a lawyer, I'm sure he can speak to the international law aspects of this very serious matter.   What's next I wonder - how soon are Nobama's Shining Path, Khmer Rouge, Sandanista, and Red Brigade friends going to crawl their way from their terrorist swamps into the halls of Washington power?!   Not long I'll bet!   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 13:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nodanca was was probably a member of the [[FLQ]], too! [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 18:38, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, it was the High Court in the Republic of Ireland that regarded her case as falling under the exemptions for 'political offences'.  That is why they refused to extradite her to N. Ireland.  Also, Arnie S., if you truly are indignant about the &amp;quot;vile killer&amp;quot; Rita O'Hare, why don't you call your members of Congress to condemn the fact that she is the duly appointed Sinn Fein Representative to the US. [[User:Tordenvaer|Tordenvaer]] 18:37, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't understand. I genuinely don't understand. My edit to the Obama page on this subject has been deleted as being &amp;quot;inappropriate and silly&amp;quot;. What is the distinction between a link with the Weather Underground and a link with the IRA? Why are inverted commas placed around “terrorism” (like this) when discussing the latter organisation and not when deriding Bill Ayres's mob. I suppose it's different -- and less significant -- when Obama's pals are blowing up Irish folk rather than Americans. Would it be different if he were pictured grinning next to some PLO hoodlum?  --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 02:42, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Tordenvaer (if that is your real name), I already HAVE called my member of Congress about the matter - I don't mess around!   The Sinn Feiners are a terrible organization with deep terrorist roots who killed many British soldiers and people over a hundred years in Ireland.   I'm as surprised as Keith is about the removal of his well-referenced material.   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 21:57, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys, grind your ax about Irish &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; somewhere else.  Obama has no plausible connection with it and I'm not going to waste any more time on this silliness.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:01, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, why do you place quote marks around the word terrorism? [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]]  [[User talk:Ferret|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Nice old chat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 22:08, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;- I'm not going to get involved in any discussion here, but it appears a lot of you know a fair bit about [[Rita O'Hare]]. I have started her article, please contribute and spread your knowledge. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:13, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: If the site administrator does not think this worthy of inclusion then there is no point arguing the case. But I must again ask -- the question is reiterated above by Ferret -- why this site puts inverted commas around terrorism when discussing the IRA, but not when discussing the Weather Underground. The slaughter of innocent Northern Irish people may seem &amp;quot;silly&amp;quot; to you. It does not to us. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 12:36, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Could be because Irish terrorism was largely funded by US &amp;quot;Irish&amp;quot; Catholics? [[User:GeorgeK|GeorgeK]] 07:48, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inciting hatred ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow, have you ever asked yourselves &amp;quot;What would Jesus do?&amp;quot;. I hardly think He would write such a biased and bigoted &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot; article. Real Christians don't need this sort of tripe. People are worked up over fundamentalist muslims, but it is writing like this that brings hatred on Christians and Americans and makes you just as bad, if not worse, than them. This was the first article I have ever read on Conservapedia and it will be http://www.conservapedia.com/skins/common/images/button_sig.pngthe last. WWJD?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Jesus came to tell the truth, no one can deny that.  And many people hated Him for it, obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:02, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.&amp;quot;  -Gandhi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now who's the ONE? [[User:Wikified|Wikified]] 10:41, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Gandhi deserves much respect, but I've never heard Christians cite him as an authority on Christianity.  I wouldn't expect a Christian to interpret Gandhi's religion for him either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:10, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trust, but verify; then get an eight day block==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trust, but verify.  Though he was not the originator of this quote, it was one of Ronald Reagan's favorites.  He quoted it when signing treaties with the Soviet Union and it's a useful concept in today's society.  It was in the spirit of this quote that I first read and edited at this encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The commandments and guidelines appear to support Reagan's idiom, yet some of the people in charge feel they can rule with an iron fist and pick and choose which rules they want to follow.  I experienced it first hand when I edited this article.  I first made several comments about the shortcomings of this article on the talk page so anyone could give me their opinion of my thoughts.  These comments highlighted various portions of the article that were factually incorrect, contained partisan sniping, unsupported assertions, gossip or deception by omission.  The response I got from Aschlafly was not encouraging, yet he didn't say I was prohibited from making any changes.  In fact, the pages that govern this encyclopedia say a lot about how articles must be sourced, placement of citation tags, how facts must to true and verifiable, etc.  Based on reading the guidelines, I made several changes that I thought reflected well on conservatives and Conservapedia.  Yet alas, I was blocked by Aschlafly for eight days.  The reason given was for 'inappropriate edits', that's very vague but I was unable to get any more information because Aschlafly doesn't provide contact information for people that have questions about their block.  This says a lot about a person's integrity if they refuse to follow the rules and then block other people because they made an 'inappropriate edit' that followed the spirit and intent of the commandments and guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since this encyclopedia is being used an educational resource for home-schooled children, I'd like to think the information contained within would be factual and verifiably true.  I'd feel very embarrassed for my child if she read some of the inaccurate content of this encyclopedia and then repeated it to an informed person that was educated on the true and verifiable facts of Barack Obama or others.  It is my honest opinion that this encyclopedia is a long way from earning respectability; and blocking editors for making true and verifiable edits is not going to help.  The administrators should clean up their act because there are a lot of people out there that will follow Reagan's advice; trust, yet verify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I will continue to make the same edits proposed by the commandments and the guidelines.  If an admin feels they can do without another conservative editing this encyclopedia in an ethical and trustworthy manner, it is their loss.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 16:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference 29 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; section there is a point about his name, and following that there is a reference. That reference includes a big chunk of argument and then a few references of its own and some examples and its just a mess. I am about to go through and trim the fat, that means I'm going to take off the examples, and I'm going tot take off the parts that say that it is common to change your name of conversion (Obama never claims to have converted from Islam, so it doesn't really stand out as an inconsistency in his story, some might even claim its a [[straw man]]) and I am going to move the reference to the fact with in the bullet point that it supports and put up a fact tag. I am not taking down the bullet point which I would dispute. I would encourage any one who has a problem with this to go out and find a real reference that shows that most christians would not maintain their fathers name if it were tied to another religion. Please don't block me for a good faith factual edit. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 19:12, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim, Koran, ''redux'' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the silly Muslim and Koran references in the first paragraph for two reasons - one, they are completely unfounded statements with no basis in reality, and two, they are repeated ''ad nauseum'' in the first &amp;quot;section&amp;quot;, which is apparently intentionally placed above a TOC tag.  Let's leave the panicky POV-pushing to sections, at least, in the desperate attempt for this site to resemble an encyclopedia. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:30, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama is not a muslim nor a person who embraces biblical Christianity because the evidence contradicts this matter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a well written and scholarly piece that examines Obama's religious views and it was written by the National Clergy Council:  http://nationalclergycouncil.org/010807BarackObama.htm  The evidence does not support Obama being a muslim.  The evidence also does not support Obama embracing biblical Christianity.[[User:Conservative|conservative]] 09:19, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I skimmed it and don't see where it concludes that Obama is not a Muslim.  The article fails to recognize that less than 1% of people raised Muslim (as Obama was) ever leave the religion.  The article says Obama is a member of a Christian church, but he left that many months ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:24, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Okay, a couple questions.  1) Where are you getting this 1% figure from? 2) How was he raised muslim? Countless acquaintances of mine who were 'raised catholic,' spending ample time learning about Catholicism in school are nothing of the sort.  3) Why would a 1% conversion rate even matter? A person's religion isn't probabilistically determined.  By that logic, since 0% of previous Presidents were black, it's unlikely that Obama is president.  I don't like this guy or his policy, but real criticism seems to be the way to go, not pointless claims about his religion. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 10:50, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, as he is the president now, wouldn't it be far more constructive to work on things about his articulated agenda, and how it will affect Americans, write about how to influence our Congress people to stand up to agenda, and how to work with him to reflect what real Americans want - rather than report on unproven and unsupported claims?  It would be beyond comprehension if something said by panicked conservatives (not specifically here, just in genera) caused someone to think the right answer is to assassinate him.  Far better to focus on what we CAN do to remind our government who they serve - themselves or us.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are several points wrong with youe assertion.  1) He is not the president now, George W. Bush is. 2) His muslim faith is not unsupported and is far from irrelivant.  It will effect his leadership (shiria law anyone?) and his cabinet choices.  It is a very big deal seeing as he is the first non-Christian president ever elected.  Are we suppose to just stick our heads in the sand??[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 12:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Andy, you say that less than one percent of people raised as Muslims convert to another religion and use that percentage as if it is not a significant number.  It is.  Let us assume that there are one billion Muslims in the world today- this is a conservative estimate, using numbers from [http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html www.adherents.com].  Let us then assume that, for the sake of a conservative estimate, that 0.1% of Muslims convert to other religions.  That means that out of the one billion Muslims alive today, one million would convert.  That's more than the population of San Jose, California.  This is not an insignificant number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My point here, Andy, is that your use of this statistic is not a good argument.  Less than one percent is a far cry from none.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 12:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Statistical evidence is relevant and compelling.  But it does not stand alone here.  There are at least a dozen other compelling evidentiary items, and the list is growing.  Supporting a ruler who has an agreement to convert the country to Islam, for example, is persuasive evidence also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:28, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fist of all, I think you mean Sh'''a'''ria, but seeing as how you misspelled some English words, I can't really blame you for getting that wrong. To think that just because you believe he is a Muslim (and I emphasize ''believe'', but there are already multiple sections on this page saying why he is not) he would somehow be able to implement Sharia law in the U.S. is silly. The First Amendment prevents religious laws from being able to be made from ''any'' religion. So even if he was Muslim, that doesn't mean it would make pass some sort of Muslim laws, although I'm not exactly sure what ones you are worried about anyway, no intoxicants perhaps? You may be interested in hearing that the U.S. legal system may have been founded in part on ideas from Sharia law. And last but not least, what makes you think every president was Christian? The majority were to be sure, but as far as we know Jefferson was a deist whose ideas were closest to unitarianism, and Grant, Lincoln, Johnson, and Hayes had no religious affiliation and could have ranged from anything such as some sort of personal Christianity, simple theism, agnosticism, or even atheism. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Maybe he wouldn't be able to push sharia law (although the liberals have a majority now), but that doesn't not mean that he wouldn't like to, or introduce pieces of it little by little using deceit.  Liberals love to use &amp;quot;what if's&amp;quot; and draw conclusions using their &amp;quot;feelings&amp;quot; about someone or something, but to me it's a matter of facts: As Mr. Schlafly has pointed out, less than 1% of people raised as muslims ever leave the religion.  In other words, 99% of those raised muslim stay that way for the rest of their lifes.  Whether or not Obama is a muslim at this time is contested, but it is a fact that he was RAISED with muslim beliefs.  Which means there is a 99% chance that he still holds those beliefs.  Those are tough odds.  The US is engaged in a war on terror against muslim extremeists, and there is a 99% chance that our soon to be commander and chief is himself a muslim.  Now, no rational person believes that he shares the views of radical muslims or would wish harm on the country, but it is a connection that is difficult to ignore.  Especially given his relationship with an unrepentive domestic terrorist.  The issue is not that he has a religion other than Christianity, it's that his religion may lead him to sympathize with the very people trying to kill us.  Just as if a presidential nominee had had fuzzy ties to the USSR during the cold war.  People would, and should, look at those ties closely.[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 16:54, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Muslim Votes==&lt;br /&gt;
Wondering if the following should be added to Why barack is a Muslim. &amp;quot;90 Percent of American Muslims Voted for Obama.&amp;quot; [http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=39031] They voted in such numbers because he is Jewish? No, because he is Muslim. They voted for him because he is a convert to Christianity from Islam? Nope, they voted for a Muslim. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Correlation does not equal causation. A lot of other demographics were won over by Obama too, it doesn't make him an hispanic, a young white college student, a Native American, or a resident of California. I think a stronger reason why Muslims voted for Obama may be more of a problem with McCain's and Palin's treatment of certain minorities during the campaign such as the &amp;quot;he's not an Arab, he is a good family man&amp;quot; comment, as well as what other groups these Muslims belonged too such as their overall economic status. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Can you cite any other voting pattern as high as 90% that is not based on religion or ethnicity?  Not your other examples of Hispanic and young white college student, that's for sure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::With the greatest of respect, what an extraordinary thing to say!  Are you suggesting that Muslim voters can somehow read Obama's mind and see that he is really a Muslim?  The most that such a correlation could indicate is that Muslim voters might ''think'' that Obama is a Muslim.  And frankly, it doesn't even show that because you cannot know what was in their minds when they voted (possibly any number of different things).  Talk about clutching at straws!  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 16:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::78% of Jewish people voted for Obama, and I doubt they want to convert to either Christianity or Islam.   70% of people who live in urban areas &amp;gt; 500,000 voted for him.   Just two examples, from the excellent [http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/11/09/weekinreview/20081109_CONNELLY_GRFK.html National Election Pool synopsis], [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html tables] and [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html data].   There's plenty of information there, so any trends should be visible.   But one does need to be careful about correlation and causation, clearly.   Famously, the population of penguins at the North Pole is supposed to correlate perfectly with the number of sitting MP's in the UK Labour Party.   [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 16:07, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::So what? Big cities are notorious cesspools of subversion and licence - just the sort of people to be attracted by a chancer like Obama. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:17, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The point he was making before you blocked him is that while Obama received a high percentage of the Muslim votes, he also received high percentages from numerous other demographics.  Clearly Obama does not belong to all of these demographics, and as such it is a misuse of the data to pick the one group you want to tie Obama to and declare him a part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An interesting idea to consider is the possible circularity or self-fulfillment of this argument.  Some people say that Obama is a Muslim, and hence a bad guy.  Voting Muslims generally take offense and vote for Obama, giving him a high percentage of their vote.  Some people then claim that receiving most of the Muslim vote further indicates that Obama is a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 16:44, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent find.  This should help put to rest any doubts that remain about Obama's muslim faith. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 16:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gays overwhelmingly voted for Obama, cleary this is because this married man is a flaming homosexual. If Obama is a socialist, why do you guys silence any mention that Americans VOTED FOR a socialist president?--[[User:MichaelMo|MichaelMo]] 16:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deniers, you strike out.  Nothing approaches the 90% statistic cited by Jpatt, and for obvious reasons.  Go somewhere else to try to fool people.  You're not fooling anyone here, particularly when you look at the even more compelling evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:55, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't matter how strong the correlation is, it still doesn't prove causation. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The real question should be: why are you arguing with facts on this website? We argue with feelings here. I ''feel'' that Obama is a Muslim, so it's true.--[[User:AshleyB|AshleyB]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, none of this evidence is compelling- it's all weak at best, and when strung together and passed off as proof it just doesn't work.  90% of Muslim votes.  Less than 1% of Muslims convert.  The list goes on.  This &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; amounts to a wobbly house of cards, and I'm looking forward to it falling over and people discussing facts and positions, not resorting to religious persecution.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:04, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not persecution, Corry. Discussion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him.  I don't know what else to call that.  Also, I would recommend you don't Google what AshleyB advised you to Google on your talk page.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:10, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This suggestion by ASchlafly is worse than weak, it's nonsensical.  ASchlalfy talks about correlation being indicative of causation.  How can there be any '''causation'''?  In order for there to be causation the Muslim voters would have to have ''known'' that Obama was a Muslim.  Is there some vast secret conspiracy going on?  Have the Muslim voters been given contacted and given the secret &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; information by the Obama campaign?  Are the rest of us being kept in the dark?  How many Muslim voters are we talking about?  This is just plain silly.--[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:14, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be aware, all commenters above, that your accounts will be blocked if you misrepresent what someone else says (as in Corry claiming that &amp;quot;[T]he argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him&amp;quot; or HGridley pretending this is about some &amp;quot;secret conspiracy.&amp;quot;)  You won't be warned again.  Be respectful and truthful in this discussion, or you'll be ranting in the future on a different site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one else can come up with anything close to a 90% voting correlation except where there is religious or ethnic identity.  Scientifically and objectively, that is noteworthy.  There are a dozen more compelling pieces of evidence, but that does not mean this data point is not suggestive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have been utterly truthful in what I have said.  You appear to have missed the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In order for there to have been causation (i.e. Obama's being a Muslim caused Muslims to vote for him) the Muslims would necessarily have to ''know'' (not just suspect) that Obama is a Muslim.  In order for that to be the case there would need to be a vast conspiracy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty simple really.  Can you tell us what you know about this secret conspiracy?  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And how am I misrepresenting you, Andy?  Are you trying to convince people that Obama is a Muslim for purely academic reasons?  I stand by my statement.  This article, in the collection of &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; that Obama may be a Muslim, reads that &amp;quot;Contrary to Christianity, the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&amp;quot;  So we have the premise that Muslims lie to advance Islam, and Obama is part of this.  I would also like to point out you comment in a different section that &amp;quot;It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.&amp;quot;  That definitely sounds like it'd be a pretty bad thing if Obama was a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 18:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mystery:Why Do Black Americans Vote For Liberal Candidates?|Black Americans vote for the Democrat presidential candidate over 90% of the time]], even when that candidate is not Black. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:20, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Those Democrat cantidates were probably secretly black.  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 18:23, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We are trying to build an encyclopedia here. Either help out or get out of the way, HGridley. You might find more people who think you are funny on a liberalpedia, if one exists.&lt;br /&gt;
::The only truly funny thing about your note is that you call them &amp;quot;cantidates&amp;quot;, which is a true record of how liberals treat Black Americans -- telling them &amp;quot;You can't, so depend on the government to do so for you.&amp;quot; [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:29, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to confess to being very confused by everything that's being said here.   None of it seems to quite line up.  Wouldn't the Jewish community be LESS likely to vote for a Muslim candidate, particularly one with the alleged terrorist links?   Yet 78% of them voted for him - in greater proportion than they have previously voted for a Democrat?   That seems to be completely counter to the allegation?    It just all seems very odd, and very confusing to a passing reader.   [[User:HarryR|HarryR]] 22:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Confusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little bit confused about one of the dot points claiming Obama is a Muslim, and was wondering if someone could explain it. It is the one about him leaving his Church without first finding a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in Australia, while many people are members of a Church, a majority of us Christians are not. There is often no official enrolment beyond donations or small groups, and most families simply attend the Church closest to them, some even attending a number of Churches. As such it is quite confusing to state that a person is not a Christian simply because they have not &amp;quot;joined&amp;quot; a Church, as this is not a reflection on whether or not they attend, let alone their individual faith. Perhaps this could be clarified for an international audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also the line &amp;quot;Many of Obama's statements about religion conflict with Christianity&amp;quot; is entirely conterproductive to the argument, as the statements made by Obama that are in opposition to Christianity (regarding homosexuality) are also in opposition to Islam. If anything this is proof that Obama is not a Muslim and is in fact an atheist, and should be removed asap! [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also Malcolm X did not become a Muslim after he was a National of Islam leader, it was before. The current wording needs to be fixed. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:51, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lenin Poster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statement about the Lenin-like poster is informative.  We don't censor informative information here.  Let the reader decide.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:22, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, did you happen to take a look at the reference? The article claims that &amp;quot;Obama also ''revealed'' his ''deep Marxist/Leninist roots''&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;clear parallels between the poster design and Lenin's earlier poster was ''obviously a deliberate yet hidden hint'' to his European, socialistic audience as to his political roots and beliefs&amp;quot; (emphasis mine). The citation, which was a blog, by the way, and not in any way a trustworthy source of informative information, gives no evidence to back up these statements. It shows a poster of Lenin and a poster of Obama, both of which show profiles of the figures. Assuming these pictures weren't entirely made up, do you really think that this slight similarity is Obama's way of confessing closet Marxism? Not to mention the fact that Obama likely didn't make the posters anyway -- maybe we should accuse his (very expensive!!) marketing designer of being a Marxist/Leninist. 15:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama and beer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several stories (with photos) of Obama drinking beer, which as an intoxicant is banned by Muslim sharia. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2008/05/06/20/125-6web-Obama_Beer-minor.standalone.prod_affiliate.91.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.mcclatchydc.com/100/story/36055.html&amp;amp;h=325&amp;amp;w=485&amp;amp;sz=47&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=28&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__ShpWdieNIwhr4Rp3jHtLe7U9MB8=&amp;amp;tbnid=Se90xFLBo6rNQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=86&amp;amp;tbnw=129&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bdrinks%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156_t.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156.html&amp;amp;h=332&amp;amp;w=400&amp;amp;sz=16&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=15&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__Yubc0nmus36Cf4Rrf7BL7-33-0g=&amp;amp;tbnid=xuWGKQ1Sl8_bQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=103&amp;amp;tbnw=124&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bbeer%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No rational person can say that a practicing Muslim wouldn't violate the law in such a blatant, repeated manner. Another strike against the goofy Muslim charge. And remember, we don't censor here. Godspeed. [[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 12:52, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think many American Muslims drink beer.  Nice try, though.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:57, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hussein reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's factual and it's informative.  If there is reasoned basis for deleting it, let's see it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:03, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Again, no reason has been given for deleting the Hussein reference, and there is none.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Andy, this is false.  Reasons have been given on this talk page numerous times before.  I just had a quick look, and found reasons being given in all archives except the first, as well as other places on this talk page.  So you are wrong to say that no reason has been given, and wrong to say that there is no reason.  And, as I have pointed out in the edit comments, five senior administrators have said that they disagree with it being there.  Is your view on this somehow superior to those five put together?  Do you want this to be a collaborative encyclopaedia or your blog?  The former demands that you not impose your opinion regardless of who is disagreeing.  Imposing your opinion regardless suggests that this is your blog.  I know you don't consider it to be the latter, but that's the way it's looking.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:21, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not a blog but an encylopedia. If it were a blog, your opinion would carry as much weight as anyone else's. Let's put this one in [[Conservapedia:Debate Topics]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:24, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: If it were a blog, the blog owner's opinion would carry the most weight.  Almost all blogs are the opinions of an ''individual'', not a group of people.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Philip, the truth is not dependent on consensus, and 5 out of several dozen is not a consensus anyway.  Give your best reason for deleting this information here.  Since the beginning we have had a policy not to delete factual, informative material, particularly when it is liberal ideology that motivates the demand for censorship of it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:29, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I said five of the ''senior'' administrators, which numbers about eleven.  So that's five out of eleven, not dozens.  Further, that's five against and one (yourself) for, as the remainder have not offered an opinion that I'm aware of.  (One perhaps did support you, but because they wanted to support you, not because they considered it a valid argument.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My reason is relevance, not (primarily) accuracy.  I'm not disputing that his middle name is Hussein.  The claim that &amp;quot;most Christians would not retain&amp;quot; their (former/Muslim/Arabic?; it's not clear) name is not supported by the references, and even if it is true, means little in individual cases.  That is, even if 99% changed their name, Obama not changing his name might mean no more than him being in the other 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: And this is just one of the points in that section.  The entire argument that Obama is a Muslim is built on very circumstantial evidence, selective evidence, and logical fallacy, and is rejected by other conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Philip, it obviously is relevant, which you say is your primary objection.  We don't censor information here based on liberal dislike for it.  Wikipedia does that.  We provide the information and let the reader decide.  If some readers want to conclude that someone with a Muslim name is actually a Christian, even though less than 1% of those raised as Muslims convert, so be it.  We're not going to censor this factual information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Exactly.  The point of Conservapedia is ''not'' to censor information, but to leave it to our readers to decide.  The MSM has tried to push this under the rug, so the least we can do is offer these arguments to the intelligent public. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 11:27, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The problem is that these points are fallacious and lead to a conclusion based on specious arguments. That is neither &amp;quot;trustworthy&amp;quot; nor encyclopedic. Obama may not be your brand of xian, but he's certianly no brand of muslim. Your inability to accept that this is incorrect despite repeated arguments wherein you have shown nothing but fallacious arguments drawing poor conclusions hurts the credibility of all Conservapedia. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 11:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debate On Obama's Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debate is continuing at [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?‎]] It may be best to continue arguing the point there with the aim of reaching a conclusion which can then be utilised in the article, and leave this talk page for discussing other improvements. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:22, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:09, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:08, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action?   Untrue.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am no fan of Obama.  I do plan on respectfully opposing him via various channels on the internet.  However, I believe I should state my opposition to this sentence of the article: &amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not read the rest of the article because I believed months ago and for good reasons that Obama was going to win this election. For example, the unpopular war and  poor economy that was partly caused by a guns and lots of butter spending strategy (Bush should have learned from LBJ committing us to a war and the Great Society programs at the same time).   I also thought that it would have been easy for the Republicans to win 12 years in a row given the low quality of the Democratic party. I think the Republicans snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory.  I also think Americans have too much debt (last time I heard the average American had lots of credit card debt). One of the reasons for the great depression is that American's had too much debt at the time. I think Bush's call for Americans to do to do more shopping mall spending was a joke.  If anything, Americans need to increase their skills to be more productive (The libraries are open but you might have to watch less TV.  Last time I checked the average American watches 3 hours of television a day) and work harder to pay off their debt.  American's are going to get out of the hole by increasing their productivity.    It seems as if Bush did not want to learn from economic history and was only looking out for short term fixes.  Well sooner or later, common sense says you have to pay the piper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Getting back to Obama, obviously, Obama's marital success in terms of not getting divorced compared to Ronald Reagan is not the result of affirmative action.  I am sure I could come up with others.  I have not read the article for the most part because this sentence turned me off to the whole article.  Judging from the &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot; sentence, I  believe a lot of time is probably being spent to defend an article rather than improve it where obvious improvements could be made. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 06:04, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Staying married is laudable but in this context it would not be considered a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement.&amp;quot;  If you would like to add a footnote exception to the remark along the lines of, &amp;quot;he has been married for x years,&amp;quot; I'm not opposed but I would expect that to caveat to seem off-topic, or even sarcastic, for most readers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:52, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One CP writer told me he equates divorce with adultery, and he accused Reagan of adultery on this basis. Is this the consensus view of Conservatives? Or just his own idea? Or what?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We ought to be clear on the standards by which we judge public figures. And consistent, too. I mean, which is worse, committing actual adultery (JFK, Clinton) or getting divorced and then remarrying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Biblically, divorce is not adultery.  However, divorce is wrong unless the spouse has been unfaithful.  Remarriage after a legitimate divorce is okay.  The question is whether remarriage after a wrong divorce is okay.  Many believe, I think that although the act of divorce may be wrong, that is a forgivable sin like any other sin, and remarriage is not a further sin.  And I'd tend to agree that committing &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; adultery is worse than divorce and remarriage.  However, the point that Conservative was raising was not between those two cases, but between divorce and remarriage compared to marriage without divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm not convinced that Obama's marriage does not constitute a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot;.  Given the divorce rate these days, especially among prominent people, I would think that it ''was'' a clear personal achievement.  In fact I'd consider staying marriage a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot; for anybody these days, given all the pressures on marriage, including the peer pressure that divorce is okay.&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:35, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I rarely disagree with you, Philip, as I find your comments to be some of the more considered on this board, but here I would have to disagree.  Jesus makes it quite clear that divorce *is* adultery, not *like* adultery.  More then any other text, especially OT text, I take Jesus's words to heart. Mark 10&lt;br /&gt;
2 Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, &amp;quot;Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
3 &amp;quot;What did Moses command you?&amp;quot; he replied.&lt;br /&gt;
4 They said, &amp;quot;Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
5 &amp;quot;It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,&amp;quot; Jesus replied.&lt;br /&gt;
6 &amp;quot;But at the beginning of creation God `made them male and female.'&lt;br /&gt;
7 `For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,&lt;br /&gt;
8 and the two will become one flesh.' So they are no longer two, but one.&lt;br /&gt;
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this.&lt;br /&gt;
11 He answered, &amp;quot;Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.&lt;br /&gt;
12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.&amp;quot; --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 09:41, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama spiruality interview ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html   a interview from a pretty religous website about Obama. Should it be mentioned? Or since it kinda contradicts abit of the article should it be ommitted? --[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What one might say in an interview really means very little, Vmember, particularly if one is seeking to achieve a position by hiding one's essential nature or beliefs. So really what he says when seeking to impress is irrelevant. It is what he does and has done, and what he says in unguarded moments, that matters. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:16, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*um then shouldn't it atleast be mentioned somewhere in the article about this interview maybe as a response to questions about his faith section? And why is him maybe being a muslim all the way at the top of the article? Shouldn't be be somewhere towards the middle? I've never seen in all my time part of a article pushed into the intro section. Also the article contradicts itself by stating that Obama is most likely a muslim while at the same time pointing at that he was a member of a radical Christian church. That doesn't make any sense. You can't have it both ways.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:25, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You can if you're a sleeper for radical Islam. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:27, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
**Wait you seriously think that? Hmm fringe ideas and theories on any subject is detrimental to a discussion let alone a encyclopedia. It's dangerous thinking like that is why us conservatives lost the election and alienated so many moderates and weak liberals. Would there be any objection if I were to move the muslim part to the middle and add a section with his response to questions of his faith?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:34, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
***Does this look better? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Help:Practice_Page&amp;amp;oldid=555527  Hmm I kinda think instead of giving facts supporting the theory Obama is a muslim editors are trying to push it off as straight fact even though theres been evidence against it. Isn't that a tactic only liberals use and a form of deceit?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:45, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vmember&amp;diff=555529</id>
		<title>User talk:Vmember</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Vmember&amp;diff=555529"/>
		<updated>2008-11-12T18:45:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would take a look at the talk page and history of the Obama article before you make big changes. Many of them have been tried before, and the results haven't been very pretty... [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:38, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Does this look better? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Help:Practice_Page&amp;amp;oldid=555527  Hmm I kinda think instead of giving facts supporting the theory Obama is a muslim editors are trying to push it off as straight fact even though theres been evidence against it. Isn't that a tactic only liberals use and a form of deceit?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:45, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555509</id>
		<title>Talk:Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555509"/>
		<updated>2008-11-12T18:34:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: /* Obama spiruality interview */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archives:&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive1|1]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive2|2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disgusted Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've voted Republican in every election since 1960, but I'm absolutely disgusted by this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What happened to the dignity of our party under Goldwater and Reagan? This &amp;quot;encyclopedia&amp;quot; page is just one long rant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there any real conservatives out there willing to present objective, factual criticism of Obama? God knows there are enough valid arguments to make. Why are we channeling Michael Savage rather than William Buckley? Currently this page makes me cry for my party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like disgusted conservative is voting for BO. I happen to think it is an accurate account of a man that is dishonest. Where will you get the real picture about about if not here? Are you disgusted by Wikipedias article? How about the coverage on MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, LATimes, WaPo, NYT, Google, The Guardian. Why not be mad and except that the majority of America is being fooled? Why not be mad at someone as disgusting as BO, actually has a real chance to take the Presidency and doesn't deserve it IN THE LEAST? Reagan is rolling over in his grave and so all the Founders.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:54, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voting Republican again this year. I know you're mad about what's going on, but it shows throughout the page. An encyclopedia can't be written from an angry point of view. Let me be specific:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) &amp;quot;Obama and Elitism&amp;quot; plus &amp;quot;Obama and Islam&amp;quot; are not valid main introductory sections. Start with his early life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) His birth certificate gets its own section but his healthcare and tax plans don't? Focus on what's really important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) The &amp;quot;Insights&amp;quot; section is just a list of criticisms and belongs under a &amp;quot;Criticism&amp;quot; section. Categorize corectly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Off-topic side-swipes: &amp;quot;He became a member of the Harvard Law Review, which uses racial quotas, in 1989&amp;quot;. Why is &amp;quot;which uses racial quotas&amp;quot; in there? If it was a reason that he was chosen, say that. If it wasn't leave it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Unsubstantiated claims: &amp;quot;Obama's campaign has been financed largely by leftist donors opposed to the war and to the American military in general.&amp;quot; Citation definitely needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have several good sections in here: &amp;quot;Senate career&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Foreign policy experience&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Published criticism&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Religious affiliations&amp;quot;. These are high-quality and reflect well on Conservapedia. The others do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the reply from hsmom below as the kind of constructive, factual accuracy this page needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This sounds like you're standard liberal bellyaching.  The fact is that no real conservative Christian can vote for this man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::??!?! Trying to hold this article to some kind of standard is bellyaching? Would you like to address any of my points?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your points is liberal talking points.  The fact is that Barack Hussein Obama wants to talk with Iran without predeterminations, flip flops, and is close friends to an unrepentive TERRORIST.  What more can you know?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Trying to shift the focus on an ''encyclopedia page'' about a presidential candidate from hypothetical statements (his possible Islamic faith) and trivial matters (his birth certificate), to his actual stance on the issues is liberal bellyaching? If anything, we should be casting aside these trivial circumstances as beneath us and take the time to dissect each of his stances on the actual issues. That's what a real, dignified Conservative would do. Relying on ridiculous tactics such as these is asinine and cowardly. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 16:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think this article doesn't go far enough.  I think there should be a picture of Hitler as the top photo, just like the Evolution page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disgusted Conservative, sadly you are only wasting your time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does it say he MAY be the first Muslim President (a horrible, false claim) and he MAY use the Koran to be sworn in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama's pastor of twenty-years, Rev. Wright, was originally a member with the Nation of Islam (likely always has been, see [[taqiyya]])''  Let's be careful not to confuse the Nation of Islam with the traditional Muslim faith - they are two quite different things. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:10, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: What differences do you find so compelling?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:15, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't know that I'd use the word &amp;quot;compelling&amp;quot;; I don't know a whole lot about either faith.  I do know that they're quite different.  The Nation of Islam was started in Detroit in the 1930's as something of a black empowerment/separatist movement - it's a very race-based group, from what I understand, and (in what I would consider a cult-like way) based largely on the teachings of two or three men, who are considered more-or-less prophets.  It's been portrayed in the media as very racist and anti-Semitic, though I don't know enough about it to know how accurate that is.  It's a uniquely American faith.  Traditional Islam is quite a different thing - it's been around for thousands of years.  Malcolm X, for example, became a member of NOI in prison, then, due to disillusionment brought on by NOI leader/prophet Elijah Mohamed's adultery, converted to traditional Islam.  I have assumed that when you say that you believe that Barak Obama is a Muslim, you are referring to traditional Islam, right? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:37, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.  Are you saying that NOI adherents do not pray and submit to Allah?  I'm sure they do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:52, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.''  No, I wouldn't put it that way.  I wouldn't consider NOI to be Islam.  As I understand it, I think they are two fundamentally different faiths, though NOI has some trappings borrowed from traditional Islam, as well as some borrowed from Christianity.  NOI believes, among other things, &amp;quot;that Allah (God) appeared in the Person of Master W. Fard Muhammad, July, 1930; the long-awaited &amp;quot;Messiah&amp;quot; of the Christians and the &amp;quot;Mahdi&amp;quot; of the Muslims.&amp;quot;[http://www.noi.org/muslim_program.htm]  As I understand it, when NOI members pray to Allah, they mean (at least in part) W. Fard Muhammad (the founder of NOI).  Wheras of course traditional Muslims don't include anything about W. Fard Muhammad in their beliefs, nor do they recognize NOI as a Muslim denomination.  (Christians don't believe W. Fard Muhammad is the Messiah either, obviously.)  NOI is a uniquely American black separatist movement.  I believe it's quite a different faith from traditional Islam.  Maybe I was wrong about assuming you think Barak Obama is a traditional Muslim?  Do you think Barak Obama is a member of the NOI?  That would lead to quite different concerns; as I understand it, the NOI wants, among other things, quite substantial reparations for slavery. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:40, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Nation of Islam's relationship to Christianity is similar to the relationship of Christianity to Judaism.  They use the same texts (to some extent), and have practices that are shared with and developed out of the other - but such distortions take place that one is clearly no longer the other.  It's not even about &amp;quot;not being mainstream&amp;quot;, it's about that place and time when one religion truly ceases to be it's parent religion.  You would be fully inaccurate to call a christian merely a &amp;quot;Jesus loving Jew&amp;quot;.  Christianity became its own religion in the year 30 (give or take) when our Lord died and rose for us.  For the Nation of Islam, with the Prophet Elijah claiming to be the reincarnation of Mohammad, they cease to be merely &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; and become their own religion.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==57 Islamic states==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I attempted to make this article better by noting, as several other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; could be a reference to Heinz ketchup or simple a misstatement (Obama had visited 47 states), as well as the fact that there were not 57 Islamic states when Obama attended an Indonesian school. It was reverted. Why? Is this an encyclopedia, or a liberal hate blog? [[User:Egen|Egen]] 10:42, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your edit was baseless, and probably politically motivated.  The entry is factual and will remain that way.  Obama has likely remained a Muslim long after attending grade school.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:52, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On the subject, I think someone should add the following line to your page: &amp;quot;The odds against Aschlafly's claim to be named 'Andrew Schlafly' being truthful are less than 1 billion to one, as fewer than 6 people in the world are named Andrew Schlafly.&amp;quot; Don't put malarkey like this on a serious encyclopedia page and defend it as being &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot;. I remind you of Conservapedia Commandments 1, 2, and 5. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 11:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: In any case, I fail to see how it is &amp;quot;baseless&amp;quot; to note, as other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; cannot possibly be a reference to &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; and probably has a more benign origin. It does not to any good to assert that anyone who disagrees with you probably does so because they are &amp;quot;politically motivated&amp;quot; (read: liberal) when many conservatives have expressed disdain for this point. I doubt that the majority of Conservapedia editors would disagree with my edit. This encyclopedia is not a personal blog for you or for anyone else. Therefore, I am reinserting the edit. If anyone can provide proof that Obama was referring to the &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; which did not exist when he was growing up '''and''' provide proof that that is what he was referring to, I'll retract this. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 12:16, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Egen - I entirely agree with you. A lot of people here think this is a redstate comments thread rather than, as it says in the top left corner, &amp;quot;the trustworthy encyclopedia&amp;quot;. Snopes on this one: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/57states.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the mention of the 57 states, since the article later refers to a source that says that it was probably a misstatement as he has in fact visited 47 states. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;unsigned JohnFA&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement has been here for some time. It stays for now.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:44, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
      Jpatt - Why should it? It's repeated later on in the article where it is also explained. This statement is redundant since it doesn't even have a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added the fact that there were not 57 states when he went to school in indonesia, if we are going to mention that he went to an islamic school we are implying that that is where he learned about the 57 states, this is impossible and that should be noted. People will reference conservapedia and if they reference that he visited the 57 islamic states or that he learned about there being 57 islamic states in islamic school they will look like fools.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:06, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Right now, the implication made about Obama's gaff and &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; indicates the United States.  If it's about Indonesia, then state Indonesia, as well as prove that Indonesia is divided into 57 states.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I double-checked the references provided, one of which has a video of Obama himself doing the gaff; it may have been a minor slip of the tounge or a minor mistake, but not once was there a reference to visiting Islamic states or countries.  He specified visiting 57 ''U.S. states''.  The article was changed to reflect that fact, and the speculation on Islamic states was removed.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I wanted to do that but I figured I would just get reverted. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:53, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll let you take credit then for the fixing, or at least getting it started :)  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:57, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biased==&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this site supposed to be unbaised?-[[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] 16:46, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome to Conservapedia[[User:Pluto|Pluto]] 18:19, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;born, allegedly, in Honolulu&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's no doubt he was ''born''. that should read &amp;quot;allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless. [[User:JohnBarma|JohnBarma]] 13:30, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the previous poster said, &amp;quot;(born, allegedly, in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;, implies that he may not have been born, which I think is not what is intended.  &amp;quot;Allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot; has the same problem.  Putting aside whether or not the &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; is silly (and frankly I think the factcheck.org folks debunked this one), if you want to convey the idea that he was born, but may have been born somewhere other than Hawaii, then it should read &amp;quot;(born, allegedly in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;.  Comma placement matters. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:58, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct. Factcheck did take this one apart: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snope also: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&lt;br /&gt;
::''Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday'' What foolishness! As if the ability to run for President is the sole benefit to be derived from US citizenship! That his grandparents planted the announcement is entirely credible. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:30, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What we need to see to settle this controversy is the actual birth certificate; not a copy of it, and not someone's written opinion.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:47, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my understanding from a recent article on Fox that the form presented lists him as &amp;quot;African&amp;quot;.  This was 1961.  The concept of African-American or any reference to African in racial makeup, while very prevalent in the last 15+ years, was still more than 20 years off.  Birth certificates in 1961 used &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot;.  I'm surprised this isn't mentioned anywhere. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:19, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Favorite black leader ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've just finished reading Dreams from My Father. I don't recommend it. But one thing I missed was a reference to Malcolm X being Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot;. He speaks highly of Malcolm X's autobiography, but doesn't like the &amp;quot;religious baggage&amp;quot; that the guy &amp;quot;discarded in later life&amp;quot;. Is the reference here correct? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 17:10, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Search Google on {&amp;quot;Malcolm X&amp;quot; Obama favorite} and you'll find numerous credible confirmations of the statement about Malcolm X being Obama's favorite black leader.  The entry need not be limited to the silly Dreams book.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:03, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not really seeing it. Various claims Obama loves Malcolm X's autobiography (which, subject to the point above, seems correct), but the claims that he is Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot; all cite no reference, or cite Dreams - I think incorrectly. Is there a source for Obama having said or written this? If not, it should go. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 18:12, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree that it should be sourced, preferably with a quote from his book or one of his speeches, otherwise it could be mistaken for an untrue rumor.  If he qualified the statement with something about X's religion, as Marcdaniels noted above, that should be included in the quote.  I looked for a credible source, but couldn't find one.  I have added a fact tag, which can be removed when a suitable citation is found. (Let's not forget that Malcolm X was involved with the Nation of Islam, which is quite a different thing than traditional Islam.  He rejected the Nation of Islam later in life.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Examples supporting the statement are easy to find.  I just added one.  I don't think anyone seriously doubts the truth of the statement.  Feel free to find and add other citations supporting it.  The discomfort expressed above seems to be with the fact itself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Your source goes back to the book, which I'd thought we'd both agreed wasn't on point. It's entirely plausible that Obama might regard Malcolm X as his favorite black leader, and that would discomfort me in the slightest, but I'm having real difficulty finding any evidence that he has said or written this. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 07:40, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, you've misread me now.  I did not agree that book wasn't on point.  I did say there is further evidence beyond the book, which is easy to find on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The quote from the book is convincing enough.  If you won't accept it, then I doubt you would accept anything now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:20, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: I am now a little confused, and I'm not sure why you are getting personal. You suggested there were additional sources for the claim on the internet, other than those referring to the book, but I cannot find one. I may be missing something obvious - would be helpful if you could provide a link. The book shows Malcolm X's autobiography to have been Obama's favourite autobiography, and it would be accurate to say that, but anything further seems supposition rather than fact. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:35, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;if elected, Obama will become the first black, and possibly Muslim, President of the United States.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the problem with this sentence in place of the one currently there? For starters, it isn't proven that he's Muslim, but it ''is'' proven that he's black, so certainly it should be mentioned over the hypothetical. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:25, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The racial composition of all the past presidents is not completely known, so I doubt it's appropriate to insist that Obama would be the '''first''' black President.  Also, the racial composition of a man is not as important as his beliefs.  It is known that none of the prior presidents were Muslim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well said, Aschlafly.  It is the content of a person's character that should determine how we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; them.  Although, who are we to judge?  I suspect, however, looking at the photos, that Senator Obama would at least be the first President (if elected) with a clear [[African American]] heritage.  Whether a few others may have had a lineage leading back to Africa in their family tree is another, albeit interesting, question. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:16, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's an interesting argument. If we know so little about the former presidents that we cannot say whether any of them met society's contemporaneous definition of Black - the one-drop rule, for example - then how can we say than none of them were Muslim? If they could keep their African ancestry secret, why not their true religion? Is there evidence of political opponents accusing a candidate of being of mixed-blood ancestry?--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 23:21, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: When people vote, they are called to judge.  So the liberal canard of &amp;quot;judge not&amp;quot; is a useless argument here.  What will voters judge on?  More important than race is the views and beliefs of the candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: As to whether past presidents were Muslims, simply look at what they did and said ... including before they became politically ambitious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:33, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Of course we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot;, or at least &amp;quot;decide&amp;quot; when we vote.  However, when did &amp;quot;judge not... [lest ye be judged]&amp;quot; become a &amp;quot;liberal canard&amp;quot;?  I thought it was a warning in the Bible not to overstep our bounds?  Voting, of course, does not overstep them - we pencil in a space, or pull a lever.  That is not &amp;quot;judgment&amp;quot;, it is an expression of personal opinion or preference or ideas.  Moving beyond that simple step, however, leads us into judgment territory, potentially.  When we should be humble and add commentary on ourselves as well as those we judge is an issue of personal ethics - or morality.  A good time to sit down with good words and contemplate. [[User:Human|Human]] 01:22, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like someone to please explain to me how this is unbais? At least with the article you can try to make something up saying how its unbais but the main picture is trying to show very obviouisly that Obama is unpatriotic... If you look at McCains page or Palins the picture of professionally done. Please someone give me a reasonable answer [[User talk:Horriblesite]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Funny you should comment. Is it Conservapedia making Obama unpatriotic or is it Obama who IS unpatriotic? I will say the latter.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, &amp;quot;unbais&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;professionally done&amp;quot; are Liberal canards. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of Taqiyya in this article (''(allowed if) ... it advances the cause of Islam'') is incorrect for the Sunni Muslims. Taqiyya is only allowed when it will danger their lives otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, even with this allowance, many chose instead a honorable death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shi'ites (shia) is the one who practices this (taqiyya) in almost any situation that will cause discomfort to them otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sunni muslim and some branches of Shi'ite, because of their extreme stances, are pretty much a different religion. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya &amp;amp; takeyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the same thing? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:34, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:52, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== wife opinions  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing that bothers me about Obama is the comments attributed to his wife. 1. That it was the first time she was proud of america and 2.That black children had no future in america. Both she and her husband are examples of how well a black child can do so its hard to understand why she has that view. [[User:Markr|Markr]] 16:38, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::See similar comments from John McCain: http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2008/06/mccain-it-can-be-%E2%80%9Ctough%E2%80%9D-to-be-proud-of-usa/   “I’ll admit to you … that it’s tough in some respects,” McCain said when asked by a questioner at a town hall meeting how to be proud of the country. “We have not always done things right and we mismanaged the war in Iraq very badly for nearly four years.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obvious fake photo (hand on heart) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect this very obvious fake photo (look at how small the two women are compared to the chairs behind them, check out the flag's edges itself and what exactly is holding it up) was placed here by people hoping to discredit Conservapedia. I understand a popular activity among liberals and vandals is to insert things seeming to support Conservative and Christian values, but that are either extreme or fake, and so undermine the encyclopedia as a whole.--[[User:TruthOfChrist|TruthOfChrist]] 11:11, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It isn't fake.  Many other photos of this occasion exist.  Video, too.  The goofy-looking perspective is an artifact of the angle and lens used. --[[User:XavierJ|XavierJ]] 12:29, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp {{unsigned|Littleriverr}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single photo lacked context, and the writer of this article, unfortunately, chose to translate it negatively. A more balanced discussion is available on Snopes : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 10:51, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==birth certificate lawsuit number 2==&lt;br /&gt;
In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the authority to &amp;quot;prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters&amp;quot; who might have otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78111]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See my analysis of this on this Talk Page, point 58: &amp;quot;Barack raises the bar&amp;quot;. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 00:25, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Errors and dubious claims==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The first sentence says Obama was born in Hawaii.  At first I was under the impression that someone decided to act in a competent manner and remove the baseless innuendo about his place of birth.  Alas I was mistaken because later in the article the word 'alleged' is still used.  I thought all reasonable people would presume that a document from the State of Hawaii would suffice to prove one's citizenship instead of using the rants of the lunatic fringe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A lawsuit has been filed by someone seeking the real birth certificate.  Complain to him, and explain why it still apparently has not been produced.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The state of Hawaii is not just going to let anybody get a copy of Obama's birth certificate, let alone his original.  I can't even get my hands on my own original birth certificate and I'll bet neither can you.  A certified copy of Obama's birth certificate has been provided for anyone to look at.  If this copy is good enough for our government officials that are not part of the lunatic fringe, then why isn't it good enough for Conservapedia?  I'd like to think Conservapedia is not aligning itself with the likes of the people filing these nonsense lawsuits.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama only attended religious schools until he reached the age of ten (Islamic and Catholic).  The rest of his education from Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard was nonsectarian.  Clearly the vast majority of his education was non-religious. [[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Obama's formative years were spend being indoctrinated in Islam.  Less than 1% convert to Christianity after that experience.  Enough said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I was never under the impression that a person's formative years stopped at the age of ten.  According to you, Obama shouldn't be a liberal because he attended conservative religious schools during his alleged formative years, 6 - 10.  How is it that he is now a liberal after living another 35+ years and attending an ivy-league college?  You are also ignoring his years in a Catholic school during his time in Indonesia.  Why?  If he spent two of his formative years at a Catholic school, shouldn't he be a Catholic?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Malcom X was not THE leader of the Nation of Islam, he was A leader.  There is a distinct difference. [[http://www.finalcall.com/national/savioursday2k/hem_nation.htm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Nitpicking here.  I'll change &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't do it for me, do it for the reputation of Conservapedia.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama was baptized in 1988, the same year he started attending Harvard.  If there is a reference stating he was baptized prior to his political ambitions, please post it.  [[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: 1988 makes no sense, as no one ever saw any Christian behavior or church attendance by Obama at law school from 1988 to 1991.  Post his baptismal certificate.  You can't and neither can Obama.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why doesn't 1988 make any sense?  Was there a problem with my reference?  Are you able to provide reputable evidence that Obama's baptism didn't occur in 1988?  Just because a person doesn't attend church on a regular basis or hardly at all is not a reason to deny someone's baptism.  Elsewhere in this article is criticism directed at Obama's CHRISTIAN pastor of 20 years.  Either Obama is a Christian that attended a Christian church for 20 years or he is not.  If he is a Muslim, then why all the fuss about his Christian pastor of 20 years?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Just because someone reads a book allegedly 'from a Muslim point-of-view' does not mean they are actually a Muslim.  I have read parts of the book and I am not a Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It adds to the evidence.  If Obama were reading the Bible, then that would detract from the evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama does read his Bible and has encouraged others to do so as well.  Would like a reference?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Roosevelt communicated with America's enemies.  After the outbreak of WW II, Roosevelt was negotiating with the Japanese.  Things didn't go well and the Japanese were embargoed, thus losing most of their import capability including over 90% of their oil supplies. [[http://www.fff.org/freedom/1291c.asp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point is lacking here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In reference to Obama saying we should talk to our enemies, the following claim was made, &amp;quot;Roosevelt spoke with none of the Axis or Japanese leaders and the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender.&amp;quot;  Roosevelt and members of his administration talked to our enemies, the reference provided by the article was written by a columnist with a distinct lack of historical credibility.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- If Obama' likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students', then which scholarships were they?  Could a reference at least be provided?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You tell us.  Obama won't disclose who paid for his education.  He claimed he worked his way through school, but that was disproved.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why should I tell you?  The claim was made in the article without a shred of evidence to back it up.  I do happen to know that the Obama's used college loans to pay for much of their schooling and they only just recently paid them off with the proceeds from his books.  Since someone writing for Conservapedia is making the incredible claim that Obama was somehow able to acquire loans not available to most others, shouldn't a reference be provided so the claim will withstand scrutiny? --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Any chance a reference could be provided for the claim concerning the flag pin?  The way it reads now makes the entry look like partisan whining.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Be clearer.  No one denies Obama avoided wearing a flag pin as he catered to the anti-war crowd.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim, ' Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering' was made without a reference.  Any chance this opinion could be verified so the article doesn't sound like a smear?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general tone of the article makes it look like a partisan smear campaign, not the encyclopedic scholarly work Conservapedia alleges to produce.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 17:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think your conclusion applies more to your own comments.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your response.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama has written that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader, inspired him in his youth.''  I think this statement needs to be tweaked a bit.  While it's true that Malcolm X was a leader in the Nation of Islam (a radical black separatist group, not to be confused with the traditional Islam faith), by the time he wrote his autobiography (as told to Alex Haley, of Roots fame), he had rejected the Nation of Islam and converted to traditional Islam.  If Obama was inspired by the book to take up Malcolm's religion (which is a stretch, IMHO, as lots of people have read this book and not become Muslims), he would most likely have chosen traditional Islam like Malcolm did.  I think it's important to make that distinction clear.  (Unless this item is intended to suggest that Obama is a member of the Nation of Islam?  If so, it should be in a different section, as it's quite a different claim.)  FWIW, Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965, four years after Obama's birth.  Also, the title of the book is ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X''.  So I suggest this item be changed to something like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama has written that reading ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X'' inspired him in his youth.  Malcolm X converted to traditional Islam after leaving the radical Nation of Islam (a black separatist group).&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds considered and precise.  Most black muslims are NOT NOI, they are in fact sunni Muslim.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 20:11, 20 October 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obamas Grandmother==&lt;br /&gt;
Breaking news, Americans still forbidden to speak with Obamas grandmother. Now, we may never. Democrat Barack Obama is canceling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to fly to Hawaii to visit his suddenly ill 86-year-old grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters Monday that Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, who helped raise him, was released from the hospital late last week. But he says her health has deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious.&lt;br /&gt;
Gibbs said Obama would return to the campaign trail on Saturday, though he was unsure where.&lt;br /&gt;
Obama events originally planned for Madison, Wis., and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday will be replaced with one in Indianapolis before he makes the long flight to Hawaii. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:16, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggesting corrections to 'atom bomb' sentance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it should not say &amp;quot;atom bombs&amp;quot; because this is slang expression. It should be &amp;quot;atomic bombs&amp;quot; except since 1960s it usually is said &amp;quot;nuclear bombs&amp;quot; and even then there are other weapons from bombs (missles are not bombs, then there are torpedoes and so on) so it should say &amp;quot;nuclear weapons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my memory is fuzzy here but didn't Clinton have ties to other washed up sixties communist terrorists? Like former Black Panther Party people who were re-made into &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; democrat politicians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally and this is just style, I do not like the '''Bold text''', it makes look rather alarming, not that we are not alarmed about this, but I think it is best to say the raw facts directly and people will know to be alarmed, instead of trying to shock people with text formatting into coming to their sense. I heard Conservapedia wants to get away from &amp;quot;that other encyclopedia&amp;quot;'s use of sensationism and tabloid style, so, maybe take off the bold. [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:28, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
other than this a very good job in the article, maybe it is too late to change direction your country is going, but at least people will know who had the facts before things all went wrong! [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:30, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I appreciate your comments but don't find them compelling.  &amp;quot;Atom bombs&amp;quot; is a familiar term; whether Clinton did likewise concerning terrorists is irrelevant; and bolding is obviously helpful for emphasis.  Thanks anyway and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::While I plan to stick to the 90-10 ratio here, and this is the first comment I've made, I did want to note that I agree with Eleger about &amp;quot;Atomic Bombs&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Nuclear Weapons&amp;quot; simply on the basis of the being more accurate terms. My person phrase of choice would be Nuclear arsenal though. Maybe nitpicking, but I think fair. -EternalCritic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I came to post that too; I also have a problem with &amp;quot;first&amp;quot; part of &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first person having ties to a known terrorist to gain control over America's atom bombs&amp;quot;. The most recent Democrat President was bad too. OTOH, something like &amp;quot;second person...&amp;quot; might distract from the point that Obama is a threat.[[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How low can you go? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this meant as an &amp;quot;How To&amp;quot; article on character assassination? Though I do find some of the 'links' in the Obama and Islam hilarious, I'd thought that the conservative parts of the US had a shred of dignity left. It appears not to be the case. But keep feeding the lies to your fellow yes-men, the rest of us are quite amused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::We are not going low at all, You Who Did Not Leave Your Name. This entry is nothing about the truth about Barack Obama. Unfortunately, liberals like you will not find out until it is too late.--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 21:20, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: ''&amp;quot;the rest of us are quite amused.&amp;quot;'' I am sure the leftwingers are quite amused of the nonstop Obama media lovefest. I am sure they are also amused at the whole disenfranchisement of voting in a Democracy thanks to ACORN. I am on a conservative website and I can't find a good Obama bio, shucks billybob, I need the Obama I can believe in, let's look at MSNBC... La La La, liberal fantasy land.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:48, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In response to the first (unsigned) comment above, liberals enjoy deceit.  But not everyone is fooled by it, and liberals get very irritable when they see that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Berg Obama lawsuit==&lt;br /&gt;
Philip J. Berg announced 10/21 that Obama and the DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President. [http://obamacrimes.com/]--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;admission&amp;quot; is nothing more than an acknowledgment that there was no response to his suit, so Berg is claiming that this qualifies as an admission that all his allegations are true.  Berg's now positioning this as &amp;quot;Obama admits he's not a citizen&amp;quot;, but that is legal spin, not reality, and I'd be hesitant to claim it as anything other than the latest round in a lawsuit.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:52, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a legal principle that the silent are understood to consent.  Obama's failure to deny Berg's request for admission means that he admits those items under the law.  This definitely should be included, and should be reason enough to disqualify him from the election.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:03, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The judge in the Berg-Obama case has tossed out the suit [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvhtmoNEnyP1Bu6Ol4zJsN94mlewD941NCJG0]--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 16:30, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just because an activist judge tossed out the suit doesn't mean that the admissions don't count.  I'm sure Berg will appeal.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:54, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Is the judge activist? Is there reason to believe he's an Obama partisan? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:38, 26 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lefty DindaleP was right, though it shouldn't be hard to find a sympathetic judge in Democrat bastion of Philadelphia. If, if the bozo (obama) wins, this issue will not go away easily and will be justification for impeachment. Though, will be hard to impeach with super-majority liberal congress, God help us. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:35, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Actually, McCain has a similar issue, in that he was not born in the US, and arguably not on US territory.  Most every single scholar I've read in the last few days on this has said McCain's case will be a compelling one, legally, because no court in the land would dare say a person born out of this country to two citizens, one of whom was SERVING HIS COUNTRY, would be denied the right to be president.  As we become more and more of a mobile population, with people traveling and living overseas for extended periods of time (business, government, or travel) I think more children will be born of two natural citizens, but not on the US territory.  I will be curious to watch how the term &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot; is defined by the Court under any case, Obama or McCain, just for the historical precedent it will set.  --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:41, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: By the way, Qwest, there is no legal principal that &amp;quot;silence is admittance&amp;quot;.  Until or unless a Judge posts an Order compelling you to provide a particular document or telling you to agree or deny, you are not obligated to.  Some instances this might be used could include famous people being hit over and over again with frivolis lawsuits, just cause they have money or power.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::McCain was born in United States territory, which the Panama Canal Zone was prior to 1978, when by treaty it was turned over to Panama.  Anyone born in the United States, its territories, or its overseas military bases is an American citizen.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:18, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Yes, very much an American citizen.  The interesting language is &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot;.  That is what will be interesting to see how it's defined.  I think it makes rational sense that anyone born to American parents should be &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot;, regardless of where they are born.  But the Framers didn't explain the terms.  (I'm not arguing, by the way, for any point.  I'm simply saying scholars say this issue of an American Citizen not born on US land has not yet been addressed - or rather, what do the words &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; mean, in that context.)  The lawsuit for McCain is totally irrelevant (even though the judge has not seen fit to toss it yet), since the Congress already said he is exempt per their own Resolution. --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 13:23, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Birthplace and Grammar Revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
''Barack Hussein Obama, II (allegedly born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)''  Putting aside all issues about whether the &amp;quot;where Obama was born&amp;quot; issue is worth mentioning, given that it ''is'' going to be mentioned, let's get it right.  The issue (as a previous poster mentioned somewhere above), is not ''whether'' he was born - we all agree on that.  The issue is whether he was born ''in Honolulu''.  Thus the phrase should read: ''Barack Hussein Obama, II (born, allegedly in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)'' --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:06, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request addition==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to add this external page and somehow link to this photo Democrat_Obama_during_the_Pledge.jpg   [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html No hand over heart from Obama during national anthem video]| Original footage ABC, now available through RawStory Media. [[Fair use]] --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:07, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Will unlock for you now.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:13, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First Muslim President ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found this claim quite amusing at first, especially with Snopes already had it debunked quite extensively : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I remember that we, Indonesian, also got the wrong information. We thought Obama is a muslim, and we rejoiced. &lt;br /&gt;
We found out later that (1) clearly his parents are quite liberal on religions (2) the context at that time in Indonesia is that most Muslims were not religious. We were pretty laid back then. My parents drink alcohol and misses their obligatory religious duties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So even if (again, IF) Obama was a Muslim, there's no way he's enrolled in a &amp;quot;radical Wahabi school&amp;quot;. It just didn't exist back then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, if we, Indonesians, were wrong about Obama at his time in Indonesia, it's quite understandable if others were also mistaken. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:47, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If elected, Obama would likely become the first Muslim President&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence pointing to Obama being a Muslim can be included, but Barack Obama has said he is a Christian, and is a member of the United Church of Christ. So is saying he is likely to become a Muslim president meant to imply that Obama is secretly a Muslim? Perhaps a better phrased version of this sentence would be &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;. This is concurrent list that follows it, and is much less hypothetical like a good resource should be.  --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 21:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obama's claims to be a Christian are meaningless for three reasons; first, his distinctly non-Christian stance on issues such as [[abortion]] and the [[homosexual agenda]]; second, the radical, [[Marxism|Marxist]] theology preached by his church; and third, the [[Muslim]] concept of [[taqiyya]] outlined in the article. All the of the evidence points away from his being a Christian. [[User:SMichaels|SMichaels]] 16:06, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using Taqiyya as a defense is a joke. I'm not doubting it's authenticity, but I could claim the same thing about you and you would have no defense. See Salem Witch Trials for more information. --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama's stances on [[abortion]] the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[marxism|Marxism]] do take credibility away from his Chrisitian stance, but Muslims are against [[abortion]], [[homosexual agena|homosexualiity]] and women's rights themselves. Furthermore, [[Marxism]] is against all religions, and if his church preaches Marxism, that makes him a Marxist Christian, not a Marxist Muslim. While I myself question his faith in Jesus, I sincerely doubt that he is a Muslim. And as for Taqiyya? Isn't that just an obscure segment of a doctrine practiced only by some Sunnis and considered hypocrisy by other muslims? [[user:justiceisblind|Justice Is Blind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The facts you gave are true, but you did not address my bringing up the idea of rewording the phrase. Having a set of words like &amp;quot;might be&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; seem extremely unscholarly. Those facts you threw up also would correspond to him having a strong leaning toward Islam, minus the hypothetical thought he might be a Muslim. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 23:03, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The truth is what it is, whether you find it &amp;quot;unscholarly&amp;quot; or not.  We're not fooled here when politicians try to deceive the public about who they are and what they believe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:00, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why is it so hard to directly answer my question? First off, do not mix my words, I said the way the sentence is phrased is not scholarly, what is truth or not does not matter to me.  I don't really care what you say is the truth, and what you are or are not fooled by. I am just bringing up the option that as long as Obama himself and no mosques claim he is a member, perhaps it should be reworded to &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;, which also corresponds to the list that follows it, and is all based on fact no conjecture. The reader should have the right to make up their own mind after reading the examples which are listed. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 22:18, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are strong evidence that Obama is a muslim and it has been layed out again and again.  He has never come out and said he's not a muslim among all the questions.  There for if elected, he will be the first muslim president ever elected.  It's as simple as that. --[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sure he has.  [http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=0GFKqOf8EHQ]--[[User:KathrynMonroe|KathrynMonroe]] 22:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes, he has. [http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2008/01/obama_mail]  --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack raises the bar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The snide accusation that Barack Obama insulted America because he refused to hold his hand over his heart is completely off-target. (See photo at top of article). The human heart is just a pump , medically speaking, but culturally it represents the finest, most vital and sensitive parts of our soul. Barack is indicating precisely how much he loves America by putting not one, but both hands over that part of his body which truly encompasses the most vital, potent and sincere components of his soul. Bill Clinton might not be his biggest fan, but he would be the first to applaud this magnificent gesture. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:37, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: ??? --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:36, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL [[User:Aperson41|Aperson41]] 01:50, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow. I have no idea of what to say to that.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A hypothetical article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of this article appears to be purely hypothetical and some of it seems to be fradulent, such as the pornographer donation and the speculation that Obama is a muslim. It is refreshing to see Obama in such a sober light, but I would encourage previous and future writers to be less interested in controversy, and to use legitimate information on the article instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the article lacks structure, and seems to dive in and out of his history, his policies, quotations in a manner which pleases the tone. It is all quite juvenile and sad; an encyclopedia is where questions are answered, not where additional questions are brought up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Birth Certificate Controversy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole section should be reworded or entirely deleted. According to [http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04 this], there can be no more doubt about Obama's birthplace. The article also states, that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate, so all demands for him to do that can only be part of a smear campaign. --[[User:Ascat|Ascat]] 15:22, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed.  For more confirmation see [http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu] and [http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov01/0,4670,InternetPoliticalRumors,00.html Fox News' article about Web political rumors.]  Having 'allegedly' made sense before all the facts were on the table, but now I'm removing the word because it lessens the strength of our true, verifiable criticisms if we leave it there. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 20:58, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: What about the lawsuit against him about this? [http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=2313]--[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 21:23, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The lawsuits all fell through, because anyone looking at the official documents could tell that they were real, it was a manufactured controversy thanks to Hillary (boy I wish expletives were allowed on conservapedia). --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 16:49, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This issue remains valid even though rejected by the courts. Expect it to be revisited if he wins. Plus, allegiances owed to Keyna and Indonesia are part of the birth certificate controversy. Neither gossip nor the certificate proven true and Hawaii actions are unexplained, still. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My version doesn't violate comandments 1, 3, and 5 like the version that was removed. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:24, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I don't like the edit, but I will let it remain. It does violate CP with personal opinion, (costly time and money during busy election season). --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:30, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The tone is bad I will admit, but that is all fact and not opinion. Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes tie to sit in court for several days? Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes money to pay court costs and extra lawyers? Is it an opinion or a fact that he is in a campaign where the outcome depends largely on the tie and money he spends campaigning? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:44, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::JPatt, could you explain &amp;quot;allegiance to Kenya?&amp;quot;  I don't understand this comment.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:57, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original post on this page says &amp;quot;that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate.&amp;quot;  I do not believe this to be what the original article says.  I think it means simply that no state official has the authority to release publicly a birth certificate, not that Obama himself is unable to do so. [[User:TGeary|TGeary]] 20:15, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mr. Obama's Grandmother just died==&lt;br /&gt;
Without getting into politics, it would be nice to mention it respectfully on his page.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:33, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we have any reputable sources for that?  Given Obama's history of engaging in [[liberal deceit]], I wouldn't put it past him to fabricate a story like this to nullify attacks on Election Day. [[User:Neutronium|Neutronium]] 14:06, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::May I say, comments like this are what hurt our republican party this year.  His politics may be liberal, but he's still a human and making fun of a death of a loved one is beneath a good Christian. {{unsigned|JeanJacques}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Neutronium, keep the parody to a minimum, please. That is simply heartless.&lt;br /&gt;
:::JeanJacques, yes, if it's relevant (do we have the mention of grandparents on anyone else's page? I don't know without looking) the we need it added in a respectful way. No matter what we think about Obama, he is a human and so is his grandmother. The was it is presented now, it almost seems as if we are implying that her death contributes to the controversy, when it clearly doesn't. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neutronium, there is a difference between being a cautious &amp;amp; prudent person, and being a paranoid, heartless person (i use the word &amp;quot;person&amp;quot; only due to the website rules of proper conduct). You would do well to realize that...AndrewM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama attending his Grandma's funeral? No mention from the O-MSM! --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:03, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This Is Why Obama Is Wining==&lt;br /&gt;
Articles like this make me think that Conservapedia is run by liberals. Burying real facts like Obama's membership in a Black Liberation Theology church, with silly lies like he is a &amp;quot;muslim&amp;quot;, only serve to discredit real objections to the Obama candidacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed. Congratulayions Andy, you did more for the Democrats than you can possibly know. Thoroughly discrediting this site with ridiculous partisan accusations based onm the flimsiest of evidence meant that anything that was a genuine talking point just got lost among the nonsense. That many on the left pointed to this page to discredit the entire conservapedia idea just goes to show that you can go too far. Congratulations for playing your part in losing the election and being successfully gamed by the left, who knew that you would leave tenuous ridiculous nonsense up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's not badmouth the side that lost. Andy, you did your best, and I appreciate that. However, you can see from my comments from way back, that the Obama article was way too extreme, and included a number of outright falsehoods. Not saying that this lost the race for McCain, but going too extreme eventually starts to hurt. Like in business - a good CEO is someone who is willing to go to the edge of what is legal, but not cross that line. Those CEO's who stay on the edge are winners, those who go over, go to jail. Same thing here...I think the whole Republican campaign was just too darn negative, and put off a lot of undecided voters. Anyway, here's looking forward to President Schwarzenegger in 2012...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Both sides were overly negative, but in reality that's a natural thing for long campaigns. The longer it runs the less fresh the ideas seem. It gets repetetive so after a while, in order to keep things fresh, mudslinging becomes common. I honestly wish we had a much shorter election time frame. Like six months max. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:41, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've just decided that this site's main contributors are probably liberals messing around with people. I bet there are some liberals somewhere getting a huge laugh at people who are seriously offended, or seriously believe half of these articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I have decided the same thing, though maybe not to that extent.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:11, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is going to be the next president==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama has won the election, and I think this should be added to the page. [[User:Arthur205|Arthur205]] 00:12, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes he is, sadly. I encourage all of us to PRAY for the FATE OF OUR COUNTRY. Unfortunately, this page must be updated. [[User:LuvinGodDP|LuvinGodDP]] 10:10, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised no one has updated it yet, it's been over 12 hours since it's been announced. Honestly this sort of time lag on the internet is just sad. You would think that they would at least un-protect it in order for someone else to update it. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:13, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States of America==&lt;br /&gt;
Article should be updated accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
: President-''Elect'', technically speaking. He won't be President until he's inaugurated, and we should hold off on explicitly saying he's the winner until the electoral college has voted (not that I'm pretending there's any real chance of 100+ faithless electors suddenly popping up to help McCain). Right now, he's just the likely winner of the presidential race. --[[User:JeremyDB|JeremyDB]] 12:24, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Let's not disrespect McCain's gracious concession. We should put in that he's the President Elect and when he will be inaugurated. Let's at least be up to date. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:56, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The first section of this article has been updated to reflect that Obama is now president-elect, but the rest needs to be updated also.  For instance, the section entitled &amp;quot;Obama would be the first Muslim President&amp;quot; should now be &amp;quot;Obama will be the first Muslim President,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;will use the Koran to be sworn in,&amp;quot; etc. -[[User:Rfreeman|Rfreeman]] 18:04, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What happening with the muslim section? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see why it needs to be above the TOC, The TOC lets people find what they are looking for, which may very well be proof that he is a Muslim, and really should be on the first page for formatting reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also some points that really stand out to me, &lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama's middle name (Hussein) references its namesake Husayn, who was the grandson of Muhammad, which most Christians would not retain.''&lt;br /&gt;
In this case the reference should be after the word Muhammad, because it does not reference the notion that christians would have there name changed, also it is his fathers name, and if he changed it it could negatively impact his relationship with his family, I would not consider this strong evidence. Seems like Opinion to me&lt;br /&gt;
*'' Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;'' You do know that the video cited as its source showed clearly that he was talking about a tactic that McCain could use, not his real faith (I strongly suspect Obama to be pretty apathetic to religion)&lt;br /&gt;
*''On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria, which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.'' If reading a book written in a muslim POV makes you a muslim than how do we know what is in this book, because we can't trust anyone who read it to not be a muslim. If he were seen praying out the the qran that would be another story entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.'' Pakistan is an islamic nation, the american way of saying it is a bastardized version, he is using the name the nation calls its self.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really think that this should be reworded in to prose and that it needs to be below the TOC.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:46, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Copyediting needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that updating things like this as the news changes is tough, but:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama II (born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961), Democratic Party member, junior senator of the state of Illinois, and president-elect of the United States, winning the 2008 Election over Arizona Senator John McCain [3].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is not a sentence... [[User:Human|Human]] 14:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know they won't let me because I'm too new and can be a bit controversial, but I would love to rewrite the entire first paragraph. It has become such a muddled mess that it doesn't read well at all. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 14:27, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That section of the article looks like its attempting to proove that he is a muslim. Why not simply say &amp;quot;some prominent christian sites including X and Y have suggested that Obama may be a muslim&amp;quot;. It currently looks like it's trying to make people think that he is a muslim, and that for some reason that's bad. What's wrong with muslims?--[[User:Newguy123|Newguy123]] 16:15, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the point is that - no there is nothing wrong with being a Muslim but lying about it for political gain is a problem. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:32, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Again, that makes the presupposition being that someone lies when all you have is superficial, rather strained evidence to say he isn't lying.  Not very gracious on our part.  There are plenty of legitimate issues with Mr. Obama.  Living in gossip and innuendo and &amp;quot;he once made a mistake when talking&amp;quot; seems petty on our part.  Isn't it more important to emphasis why he is a socialist?  All we say is &amp;quot;he is&amp;quot;, not what that means, and how it could effect the country, etc.  It bothers me that this site emphasizes gossip.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:42, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Personally I dont think he is a Muslim however I am not going to kick up a fuss as I was already warned by Aschlafly (is he the boss?) for....something I did? Not sure what. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:45, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's funny how at the beginning of the article it claims he is a muslim, and then at the end discusses his previous church and pastor. It even lists 1988 as his year of baptism despite the beginning of the article stating he didn't have a date for baptism, which for everyone here in the conservapedia zone seems to take as undeniable proof he is a super secret muslim spy out for your children and pets.&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously though, I've mentioned it above that having an article for the current president of the U.S. start out with a poor and unnecessary argument over his faith is ''unprofessional'' at best. The beginning makes no valid points, manages to insult Muslims as a whole, and also contains that stupid picture of Obama in a traditional Kenyan costume.--[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 23:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Muslim President-elect! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the article assures us the Barack is a secret Muslim and would if elected become the first Muslim President of the United States, for consistency's sake, it should now be updated by something like the following: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Now that the unthinkable has occurred and Obama has duped the American People and stolen the election, he will become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and will probably use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is widely believed that now he is President-elect, Obama will drop the tiresome pretence of being a Christian and produce his other wives from hiding, don a turban and a scimitar, pray buns-up five times a day on a Persian carpet while facing Mecca, have a minaret built on top of the White House from which he will personally play the role of the muezzin and call the faithful to prayer, will establish policy recommending that “the Zionist entity be driven into the sea”, and put bin Laden’s face on the American dollar. The week after that will probably be even worse.&amp;quot; If no one objects, I will make some such interpolations in the article proper. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:30, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[ADL]] said:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Prager is flat-out wrong when he asserts that Representative Ellison's use of a Koran would be 'damaging to the fabric of American civilization.' To the contrary, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that, 'no religious test shall ever be required' to hold public office in America. Members of Congress, like all Americans, should be free to observe their own religious practices without government interference or coercion. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/swearing-on-the-koran_b_36907.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what all the fuss is about. Certainly there have been radical Muslims who support anti-US terrorism, but politically motivated distortions do not make Islam a wicked religion. Is Christianity to be rejected because of the abuses of the Crusades, the Inquisition, or the fact that Anglo-American Christians held slaves? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;70's terrorist&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I object to Ayers being referred to as a &amp;quot;terrorist from the 70's&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he is a &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; end of story. once a terrorist, always a terrorist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
we won't call Bin Laden a &amp;quot;2000's terrorist&amp;quot; in 2050&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 00:22, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good point, [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]].  Thanks for the edit. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 00:24, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The man is a functioning member of society, an educator, a family man, who has condemns his past actions, and has worked greatly towards improving the lives of others through charity work. He was a part of a group that destroyed ''property'', which doesn't make him a terrorist because that would imply he did random acts of terror on ''people''. Blowing up statues and parts of buildings was wrong but they did not go after people, and no one was hurt or killed. To compare him to Bin Laden is ''despicable''. And to put a section about this man at the top of the page of Presidential-elect Obama who worked with him in an organization to help reduce poverty levels is neither well thought out or ''tactful''. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 08:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that the Weather Underground did in fact kill people - 3 of their own, in a bomb-making accident.  Sometimes that happens when you set off bombs, even if it's not what you had in mind.  I would put other property-destruction crimes such as cross burning in the terror category as well.  I do agree that Obama's association with Ayres is minimal, at best, and I have huge issues with all the guilt-by-association tactics employed by the McCain campaign.  I'm not taking a stand on the content of this article one way or another. I'm just trying to organize it and cite it as best I can. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't believe an accidental death of their own people should be considered &amp;quot;terror&amp;quot; though. People could technically die while making signs for a normal type of protest, not as likely, but an accident is an accident. Although I do think that some property destruction like cross burning could be argued to be terroristic because it is done in order to terrify a group of people and incite violence against that group. However I still think that what the weather underground did does not quite carry that same connotations. They were protesting a war, and doing so by costing the government money and drawing attention to their cause, at no time was a group of people targeted in a way that would indicate that they were in danger directly from a hostile organization, unless you were an office desk or a public statue/monument. To use the word &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot;, especially nowadays, in the case of Bill Ayers is misleading, and it is a word that should not be tossed around lightly. It seems that people believe that Ayers = Terrorist, so therefore he must have killed people or tried to kill people, and this article does little to correct this misconception. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MInd Control? Really now? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people who published this lost what little credibility they had when they published this. Repeating it on this page just makes you look bad. I mean an O looks like a crystal ball? First of all it also looks like an orange or a penny or anything else that is round and circular. Also, I think that crystal balls are the favorite of ''fortune tellers'' so unless Obama can predict the future (which I think might make him a ''better'' president) this doesn't mean much. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:54, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  I am a practicing stage hypnotist (practicing because I still need work :) and I can tell you that most hypnotists use nothing but their voices and physical presence, and those who do use props traditionally use a pencil. [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 13:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Absence of Dancing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dancing is a popular form of celebration and partying by all ethnicities.  But why is [[Barack Obama]] rarely seen dancing, or even allowing and attending dancing.  Perhaps I've missed it (please let me know if I have).  I know, there was one highly staged politically correct dance with Ellen DeGeneris as Obama was catering to her audience.  But where's the rest?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One explanation is that the Islamic [[sharia]] disfavors dancing.[http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2008/10/islamic-scholars-denounce-dancing-say.html] --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:08, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When's the last time you went dancing, Andy? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:23, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::um, lol?&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpxJQABkSsQ Dancing in Puerto Rico]&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axH9bhwI8os Dancing to Snoop Dogg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::so there it is... at least three different places where he's seen dancing. Here's my question: lets see you find videos of Mccain dancing! xP your Islamic assumption thingy holds no water since you can say the same for McCain! [[User:Ema|Ema]] 11:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah! Ema, don't be fooled by this [[deceit]], he might secretly be a [http://www.dankphotos.com/whirling/ whirling dervish!] They're members of [[Sufi]] Islam, by the way. --[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I took a look at the Puerto Rico video.  It proves my point.  I've never seen anyone dance-without-dancing like that.  Have you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.  Judging by the determined objections above, it may be quite a while for some of his supporters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your argument is that he is a bad dancer so he must be a Muslim? Seriously Andrew, take a deep breath and relax, proving him to be a Muslim is not going to get him impeached, he has the presidency and that is that. In four years it might matter, but that means you have poor years to find less circumstantial evidence. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, Brendanw, it is obviously not my argument that he is a &amp;quot;bad dancer.&amp;quot;  I think you understand my argument perfectly well and won't admit it.  Suit yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:31, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Brendan's right about one thing at least. All the evidence listed is either circumstantial or draws illogical conclusions. The one about him when he says he joins a church after a suggestion does not in any way imply him as a muslim, though it might imply him as a disingenuous Christian. The two are mutually exclusive. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:38, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Well please explain it to  me differently, initially you said he didn't dance, and now that we have three videos of it you say that he &amp;quot;dances with out dancing&amp;quot; what does that mean if not bad dancer? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:45, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Andy's saying that, in those three videos, Obama isn't really ''dancing'', in the sense of crossing a line of Muslim (im)morality.  It's like being against swearing, but recognizing that words like &amp;quot;heck&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;geez&amp;quot; don't really cross that line.  That said, however, I did run across a video where [http://splicd.com/wzyT9-9lUyE/31/52 Obama dances] by anyone's definition.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 14:25, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::RossC, this video is obviously faked. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if he will dance at his inaugural ball, if it gets to that point. (see: Berg) [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 13:47, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
:In some Islamic traditions dancing is not allowed, in some christian traditions dancing is not allowed, some people regardless of religion just don't dance with enthusiasm (was he supposed to be [dancing inappropriately with] Ellen? While Barrack is a hottie I'm not sure she would let him do that) I was raised catholic and as a result I am a very quiet person who does not raise his arms in celebration. This is just such a far stretch that it doesn't mean anything. Heck if he were keeping his faith hidden and not praying to meca and not following the rules of Islam in order to complete the 35 year long mission that was trained in to him at a public school in indonesia at the age of 10 don't you think he would dance anyways? And his wife is a great dancer, in Islam men have a whole lot more freedom than women. this just doesn't add up to anything but crazy. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 15:30, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love to dance.  For what it's worth, I have seen an Obama campaign button with a picture of him dancing, and the words &amp;quot;Dance Yes We Can&amp;quot; on it.  It caught my eye because I take dance lessons.  See here [http://www.zazzle.com/obama_dance_button-145707809176961889] for a picture of the button. Over the years, I have met homeschooling moms of various faiths (Christian, Muslim, Jewish) who are careful about their children dancing for modesty reasons. Not everyone enjoys dancing, of course, particularly men.  While it's an interesting facet of Obama, to be honest I don't see it as a strong indicator of his religious beliefs.  When weaker arguments are included, it detracts from the stronger ones, I think. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't dance, and I can assure you that I'm not a Muslim. I'm a lousy dancer, and self-conscious about it. I also don't have a tinfoil hat, which might be why this whole conversation seems ludicrous to me. Godspeed.[[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 21:40, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The very conservative former Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard, did not dance in public. This is despite the fact that his treasurer, Peter Costello, and his rival and current Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, both danced on national television. Is this evidence that John Howard is a Muslim? Certainly not. There is a much less sinister and blatantly obvious explanation for Obama's lack of dancing - he isn't good at it. Just have a look at the videos posted, he has clearly received minimal dance instruction and is evidently self conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And just out of curiosity, has anyone actually seen John McCain dance? How about Palin or Biden? If these three have not then why should the explanation for their lack of participation not be extended to Obama? [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:05, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the fact that Spectral Evidence was outlawed in America back in the 1600's after 19 people were murdered for being accused of witchcraft. Get with the times, Schlafly. [[User:DRuss|DRuss]] 08:51, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is different about Obama that makes it unusual for him to not be much of a dancer?  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 09:45, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still waiting on an answer, Andy. When'd you last hit the dance floor? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 15:43, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Though irrelevant to the issue, I dance in times of celebration, and have also arranged for the availability of dancing by attendees at such events.  Pursue this irrelevancy further and your account will be blocked, per my comment on your talk page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:41, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: He does somewhat have a point, even if his methods of conveying it are a little childish. He's pretty much pointing out that your accusation opens up a big can of worms. If I was to say that Obama's lack of dancing must mean he is Muslim due to Islamic Sharia, I could also say that if I saw you sitting on the floor you must be a Muslim who is kneeling to Mecca. [[User:St0dad|St0dad]] 09:09, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Simple solution to this whole thing.  Islam does not forbid dancing.  Amazing no?  Islam forbids certain kinds of dancing.  Such as dancing involving the men and women who are not married, and dancing with the intention to be provocative.  Of course there are always members of a group who are more conservative with religious laws (no dancing at all) or more liberal with laws (any dancing is ok) but as written, Dancing is allowed as long as it is well mannered, does not stimulate desires, and does not mix men and women who are not married.&lt;br /&gt;
That being said, there are also christian groups that forbid dancing as well.  For much the same reasons.  So just because Obama doesn't dance enough for your satisfaction does not mean anything regarding religion.--[[User:ScottA|ScottA]] 22:50, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti Americanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many points in this article could be summarized into a section called &amp;quot;Anti Americanism&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised this hasn't been done already. Anti Americanism should be a given a very prominent place in this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like this idea because I feel the article is too fragmented and not organized. People are adding self contained ideas in various points in the article, especially at the top, which disrupts the flow and readablity. I cleaned up the first paragraph, but I can't smooth up everything [[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I make such an edit will I be banned? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:01, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; comment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe Barack Obama is a Muslim or at least more sympathetic to them than Christians, but the &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; statement is taken out of context. I removed it as part of the evidence of him being Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpoAVAA1F30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't like that video btw, I only posted it to show the full context [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On a side note, the entire section, for accuracy's sake, should be called &amp;quot;Why Barack Obama is not a Christian&amp;quot; since the only parts that are not circumstantial are in regard to disingenuous Christianity. Beyond that the idea of him not changing his name making him muslim is ridiculous. He was named for his Father. Example from reality: my middle name is Paul. I received it fromt he name of my grandfather. I'm no longer Christian. But I don't change my middle name because I no longer believe Paul's words. I keep it because I love and respect my grandfather. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I partially agree. Maybe there should be two sections. One detailing Anti-Christian facts and one for Pro-Muslim [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Schlafly reverted my change ... Why? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 14:18, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Because you don't agree with him.[[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 15:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's Schlaflypedia then? I had high hopes for Conservapedia [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 15:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I reverted your change because you deleted factual information.  That reason should be obvious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socialistic==&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting to note that the MSM has buried the exact phrase and can only be found on blogs. The media will use the third person term, e.g. &amp;quot;Obama responds to McCains allegations of Socialistic.&amp;quot; The quote itself is relevent. A play on words to blunt its' true impact. Actual charges of 'Socialism' or of being a 'Socialist'. Nobody uses &amp;quot;Socialistic&amp;quot;--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wait==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please explain to me how Barack Obama is a Muslim? Thanks. [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 23:12, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly someone's not paying attention. Not that I endorse the, uh, theory, but there's a whoooooole big section about it in the article. And several discussions on this talk page. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:15, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this point the very thought that he's a Muslim is preposterous. No Muslim would willingly put Rahm Emmanuel, someone so notably Jewish and pro israel in such a powerful position (chief of staff). All in all though, a pretty good choice from the pool. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 23:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama isn't a muslim.  He doesn't have the character we see on the trail to do so.  I think Obama will be an awful President, is not a christian (it's too liberal), supports infanticide and sodomy, and won't do almost ''any'' of the thigs he has promised.  That aside I don't think he's a muslim.  Alot of the proof is probably just part of his warped view of multi-culturism, which includes the so-called ''peaceful'' religion of Allah and Muhammed.  This should be placed on a different page and other more certain information placed on this page (e.g. a better photo should be placed on the top, not a picture of him which tries to accuse his patriotism.)  He is going to be President, a bad one, but one nonetheless.  Please, let us respect the authority of our time.  [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 07:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Think about this: If I had told you on September 12 2001, that in 6 years we'd ellect a liberal, socialist muslim named Barack Hussein Obama, who has terrorist friends, you call me crazy.  But here we are.  [[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connections with Irish Terrorists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I note that a liberal contributor has seen fit to add a line stating that The Republic of Ireland refused to extradite Rita O'Hare -- the IRA terrorist who Obama met last year -- for one of several alleged offences. Why is this of any interest? She served time in the Republic for smuggling explosives. So that country's legal authorities were in no doubt as to her status. Does Wikipedia regard shooting British soldiers in Northern Ireland as a &amp;quot;political offence&amp;quot;? If so, then should we regard killing American soldiers in Iraq the same way? I don't think so. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 18:29, 7 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well spoken Keith!   I intend to contact the Irish Embassy in Washington and ask that they make a clear statement condemning our Marxist Terrorist President-Elect's meeting with these vile killers.   I would encourage ASchlafly to perhaps make a television appearance about this?   As a lawyer, I'm sure he can speak to the international law aspects of this very serious matter.   What's next I wonder - how soon are Nobama's Shining Path, Khmer Rouge, Sandanista, and Red Brigade friends going to crawl their way from their terrorist swamps into the halls of Washington power?!   Not long I'll bet!   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 13:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nodanca was was probably a member of the [[FLQ]], too! [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 18:38, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, it was the High Court in the Republic of Ireland that regarded her case as falling under the exemptions for 'political offences'.  That is why they refused to extradite her to N. Ireland.  Also, Arnie S., if you truly are indignant about the &amp;quot;vile killer&amp;quot; Rita O'Hare, why don't you call your members of Congress to condemn the fact that she is the duly appointed Sinn Fein Representative to the US. [[User:Tordenvaer|Tordenvaer]] 18:37, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't understand. I genuinely don't understand. My edit to the Obama page on this subject has been deleted as being &amp;quot;inappropriate and silly&amp;quot;. What is the distinction between a link with the Weather Underground and a link with the IRA? Why are inverted commas placed around “terrorism” (like this) when discussing the latter organisation and not when deriding Bill Ayres's mob. I suppose it's different -- and less significant -- when Obama's pals are blowing up Irish folk rather than Americans. Would it be different if he were pictured grinning next to some PLO hoodlum?  --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 02:42, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Tordenvaer (if that is your real name), I already HAVE called my member of Congress about the matter - I don't mess around!   The Sinn Feiners are a terrible organization with deep terrorist roots who killed many British soldiers and people over a hundred years in Ireland.   I'm as surprised as Keith is about the removal of his well-referenced material.   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 21:57, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys, grind your ax about Irish &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; somewhere else.  Obama has no plausible connection with it and I'm not going to waste any more time on this silliness.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:01, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, why do you place quote marks around the word terrorism? [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]]  [[User talk:Ferret|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Nice old chat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 22:08, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;- I'm not going to get involved in any discussion here, but it appears a lot of you know a fair bit about [[Rita O'Hare]]. I have started her article, please contribute and spread your knowledge. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:13, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: If the site administrator does not think this worthy of inclusion then there is no point arguing the case. But I must again ask -- the question is reiterated above by Ferret -- why this site puts inverted commas around terrorism when discussing the IRA, but not when discussing the Weather Underground. The slaughter of innocent Northern Irish people may seem &amp;quot;silly&amp;quot; to you. It does not to us. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 12:36, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Could be because Irish terrorism was largely funded by US &amp;quot;Irish&amp;quot; Catholics? [[User:GeorgeK|GeorgeK]] 07:48, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inciting hatred ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow, have you ever asked yourselves &amp;quot;What would Jesus do?&amp;quot;. I hardly think He would write such a biased and bigoted &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot; article. Real Christians don't need this sort of tripe. People are worked up over fundamentalist muslims, but it is writing like this that brings hatred on Christians and Americans and makes you just as bad, if not worse, than them. This was the first article I have ever read on Conservapedia and it will be http://www.conservapedia.com/skins/common/images/button_sig.pngthe last. WWJD?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Jesus came to tell the truth, no one can deny that.  And many people hated Him for it, obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:02, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.&amp;quot;  -Gandhi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now who's the ONE? [[User:Wikified|Wikified]] 10:41, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Gandhi deserves much respect, but I've never heard Christians cite him as an authority on Christianity.  I wouldn't expect a Christian to interpret Gandhi's religion for him either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:10, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trust, but verify; then get an eight day block==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trust, but verify.  Though he was not the originator of this quote, it was one of Ronald Reagan's favorites.  He quoted it when signing treaties with the Soviet Union and it's a useful concept in today's society.  It was in the spirit of this quote that I first read and edited at this encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The commandments and guidelines appear to support Reagan's idiom, yet some of the people in charge feel they can rule with an iron fist and pick and choose which rules they want to follow.  I experienced it first hand when I edited this article.  I first made several comments about the shortcomings of this article on the talk page so anyone could give me their opinion of my thoughts.  These comments highlighted various portions of the article that were factually incorrect, contained partisan sniping, unsupported assertions, gossip or deception by omission.  The response I got from Aschlafly was not encouraging, yet he didn't say I was prohibited from making any changes.  In fact, the pages that govern this encyclopedia say a lot about how articles must be sourced, placement of citation tags, how facts must to true and verifiable, etc.  Based on reading the guidelines, I made several changes that I thought reflected well on conservatives and Conservapedia.  Yet alas, I was blocked by Aschlafly for eight days.  The reason given was for 'inappropriate edits', that's very vague but I was unable to get any more information because Aschlafly doesn't provide contact information for people that have questions about their block.  This says a lot about a person's integrity if they refuse to follow the rules and then block other people because they made an 'inappropriate edit' that followed the spirit and intent of the commandments and guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since this encyclopedia is being used an educational resource for home-schooled children, I'd like to think the information contained within would be factual and verifiably true.  I'd feel very embarrassed for my child if she read some of the inaccurate content of this encyclopedia and then repeated it to an informed person that was educated on the true and verifiable facts of Barack Obama or others.  It is my honest opinion that this encyclopedia is a long way from earning respectability; and blocking editors for making true and verifiable edits is not going to help.  The administrators should clean up their act because there are a lot of people out there that will follow Reagan's advice; trust, yet verify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I will continue to make the same edits proposed by the commandments and the guidelines.  If an admin feels they can do without another conservative editing this encyclopedia in an ethical and trustworthy manner, it is their loss.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 16:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference 29 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; section there is a point about his name, and following that there is a reference. That reference includes a big chunk of argument and then a few references of its own and some examples and its just a mess. I am about to go through and trim the fat, that means I'm going to take off the examples, and I'm going tot take off the parts that say that it is common to change your name of conversion (Obama never claims to have converted from Islam, so it doesn't really stand out as an inconsistency in his story, some might even claim its a [[straw man]]) and I am going to move the reference to the fact with in the bullet point that it supports and put up a fact tag. I am not taking down the bullet point which I would dispute. I would encourage any one who has a problem with this to go out and find a real reference that shows that most christians would not maintain their fathers name if it were tied to another religion. Please don't block me for a good faith factual edit. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 19:12, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim, Koran, ''redux'' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the silly Muslim and Koran references in the first paragraph for two reasons - one, they are completely unfounded statements with no basis in reality, and two, they are repeated ''ad nauseum'' in the first &amp;quot;section&amp;quot;, which is apparently intentionally placed above a TOC tag.  Let's leave the panicky POV-pushing to sections, at least, in the desperate attempt for this site to resemble an encyclopedia. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:30, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama is not a muslim nor a person who embraces biblical Christianity because the evidence contradicts this matter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a well written and scholarly piece that examines Obama's religious views and it was written by the National Clergy Council:  http://nationalclergycouncil.org/010807BarackObama.htm  The evidence does not support Obama being a muslim.  The evidence also does not support Obama embracing biblical Christianity.[[User:Conservative|conservative]] 09:19, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I skimmed it and don't see where it concludes that Obama is not a Muslim.  The article fails to recognize that less than 1% of people raised Muslim (as Obama was) ever leave the religion.  The article says Obama is a member of a Christian church, but he left that many months ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:24, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Okay, a couple questions.  1) Where are you getting this 1% figure from? 2) How was he raised muslim? Countless acquaintances of mine who were 'raised catholic,' spending ample time learning about Catholicism in school are nothing of the sort.  3) Why would a 1% conversion rate even matter? A person's religion isn't probabilistically determined.  By that logic, since 0% of previous Presidents were black, it's unlikely that Obama is president.  I don't like this guy or his policy, but real criticism seems to be the way to go, not pointless claims about his religion. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 10:50, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, as he is the president now, wouldn't it be far more constructive to work on things about his articulated agenda, and how it will affect Americans, write about how to influence our Congress people to stand up to agenda, and how to work with him to reflect what real Americans want - rather than report on unproven and unsupported claims?  It would be beyond comprehension if something said by panicked conservatives (not specifically here, just in genera) caused someone to think the right answer is to assassinate him.  Far better to focus on what we CAN do to remind our government who they serve - themselves or us.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are several points wrong with youe assertion.  1) He is not the president now, George W. Bush is. 2) His muslim faith is not unsupported and is far from irrelivant.  It will effect his leadership (shiria law anyone?) and his cabinet choices.  It is a very big deal seeing as he is the first non-Christian president ever elected.  Are we suppose to just stick our heads in the sand??[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 12:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Andy, you say that less than one percent of people raised as Muslims convert to another religion and use that percentage as if it is not a significant number.  It is.  Let us assume that there are one billion Muslims in the world today- this is a conservative estimate, using numbers from [http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html www.adherents.com].  Let us then assume that, for the sake of a conservative estimate, that 0.1% of Muslims convert to other religions.  That means that out of the one billion Muslims alive today, one million would convert.  That's more than the population of San Jose, California.  This is not an insignificant number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My point here, Andy, is that your use of this statistic is not a good argument.  Less than one percent is a far cry from none.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 12:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Statistical evidence is relevant and compelling.  But it does not stand alone here.  There are at least a dozen other compelling evidentiary items, and the list is growing.  Supporting a ruler who has an agreement to convert the country to Islam, for example, is persuasive evidence also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:28, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fist of all, I think you mean Sh'''a'''ria, but seeing as how you misspelled some English words, I can't really blame you for getting that wrong. To think that just because you believe he is a Muslim (and I emphasize ''believe'', but there are already multiple sections on this page saying why he is not) he would somehow be able to implement Sharia law in the U.S. is silly. The First Amendment prevents religious laws from being able to be made from ''any'' religion. So even if he was Muslim, that doesn't mean it would make pass some sort of Muslim laws, although I'm not exactly sure what ones you are worried about anyway, no intoxicants perhaps? You may be interested in hearing that the U.S. legal system may have been founded in part on ideas from Sharia law. And last but not least, what makes you think every president was Christian? The majority were to be sure, but as far as we know Jefferson was a deist whose ideas were closest to unitarianism, and Grant, Lincoln, Johnson, and Hayes had no religious affiliation and could have ranged from anything such as some sort of personal Christianity, simple theism, agnosticism, or even atheism. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Maybe he wouldn't be able to push sharia law (although the liberals have a majority now), but that doesn't not mean that he wouldn't like to, or introduce pieces of it little by little using deceit.  Liberals love to use &amp;quot;what if's&amp;quot; and draw conclusions using their &amp;quot;feelings&amp;quot; about someone or something, but to me it's a matter of facts: As Mr. Schlafly has pointed out, less than 1% of people raised as muslims ever leave the religion.  In other words, 99% of those raised muslim stay that way for the rest of their lifes.  Whether or not Obama is a muslim at this time is contested, but it is a fact that he was RAISED with muslim beliefs.  Which means there is a 99% chance that he still holds those beliefs.  Those are tough odds.  The US is engaged in a war on terror against muslim extremeists, and there is a 99% chance that our soon to be commander and chief is himself a muslim.  Now, no rational person believes that he shares the views of radical muslims or would wish harm on the country, but it is a connection that is difficult to ignore.  Especially given his relationship with an unrepentive domestic terrorist.  The issue is not that he has a religion other than Christianity, it's that his religion may lead him to sympathize with the very people trying to kill us.  Just as if a presidential nominee had had fuzzy ties to the USSR during the cold war.  People would, and should, look at those ties closely.[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 16:54, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Muslim Votes==&lt;br /&gt;
Wondering if the following should be added to Why barack is a Muslim. &amp;quot;90 Percent of American Muslims Voted for Obama.&amp;quot; [http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=39031] They voted in such numbers because he is Jewish? No, because he is Muslim. They voted for him because he is a convert to Christianity from Islam? Nope, they voted for a Muslim. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Correlation does not equal causation. A lot of other demographics were won over by Obama too, it doesn't make him an hispanic, a young white college student, a Native American, or a resident of California. I think a stronger reason why Muslims voted for Obama may be more of a problem with McCain's and Palin's treatment of certain minorities during the campaign such as the &amp;quot;he's not an Arab, he is a good family man&amp;quot; comment, as well as what other groups these Muslims belonged too such as their overall economic status. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Can you cite any other voting pattern as high as 90% that is not based on religion or ethnicity?  Not your other examples of Hispanic and young white college student, that's for sure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::With the greatest of respect, what an extraordinary thing to say!  Are you suggesting that Muslim voters can somehow read Obama's mind and see that he is really a Muslim?  The most that such a correlation could indicate is that Muslim voters might ''think'' that Obama is a Muslim.  And frankly, it doesn't even show that because you cannot know what was in their minds when they voted (possibly any number of different things).  Talk about clutching at straws!  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 16:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::78% of Jewish people voted for Obama, and I doubt they want to convert to either Christianity or Islam.   70% of people who live in urban areas &amp;gt; 500,000 voted for him.   Just two examples, from the excellent [http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/11/09/weekinreview/20081109_CONNELLY_GRFK.html National Election Pool synopsis], [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html tables] and [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html data].   There's plenty of information there, so any trends should be visible.   But one does need to be careful about correlation and causation, clearly.   Famously, the population of penguins at the North Pole is supposed to correlate perfectly with the number of sitting MP's in the UK Labour Party.   [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 16:07, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::So what? Big cities are notorious cesspools of subversion and licence - just the sort of people to be attracted by a chancer like Obama. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:17, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The point he was making before you blocked him is that while Obama received a high percentage of the Muslim votes, he also received high percentages from numerous other demographics.  Clearly Obama does not belong to all of these demographics, and as such it is a misuse of the data to pick the one group you want to tie Obama to and declare him a part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An interesting idea to consider is the possible circularity or self-fulfillment of this argument.  Some people say that Obama is a Muslim, and hence a bad guy.  Voting Muslims generally take offense and vote for Obama, giving him a high percentage of their vote.  Some people then claim that receiving most of the Muslim vote further indicates that Obama is a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 16:44, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent find.  This should help put to rest any doubts that remain about Obama's muslim faith. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 16:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gays overwhelmingly voted for Obama, cleary this is because this married man is a flaming homosexual. If Obama is a socialist, why do you guys silence any mention that Americans VOTED FOR a socialist president?--[[User:MichaelMo|MichaelMo]] 16:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deniers, you strike out.  Nothing approaches the 90% statistic cited by Jpatt, and for obvious reasons.  Go somewhere else to try to fool people.  You're not fooling anyone here, particularly when you look at the even more compelling evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:55, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't matter how strong the correlation is, it still doesn't prove causation. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The real question should be: why are you arguing with facts on this website? We argue with feelings here. I ''feel'' that Obama is a Muslim, so it's true.--[[User:AshleyB|AshleyB]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, none of this evidence is compelling- it's all weak at best, and when strung together and passed off as proof it just doesn't work.  90% of Muslim votes.  Less than 1% of Muslims convert.  The list goes on.  This &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; amounts to a wobbly house of cards, and I'm looking forward to it falling over and people discussing facts and positions, not resorting to religious persecution.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:04, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not persecution, Corry. Discussion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him.  I don't know what else to call that.  Also, I would recommend you don't Google what AshleyB advised you to Google on your talk page.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:10, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This suggestion by ASchlafly is worse than weak, it's nonsensical.  ASchlalfy talks about correlation being indicative of causation.  How can there be any '''causation'''?  In order for there to be causation the Muslim voters would have to have ''known'' that Obama was a Muslim.  Is there some vast secret conspiracy going on?  Have the Muslim voters been given contacted and given the secret &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; information by the Obama campaign?  Are the rest of us being kept in the dark?  How many Muslim voters are we talking about?  This is just plain silly.--[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:14, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be aware, all commenters above, that your accounts will be blocked if you misrepresent what someone else says (as in Corry claiming that &amp;quot;[T]he argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him&amp;quot; or HGridley pretending this is about some &amp;quot;secret conspiracy.&amp;quot;)  You won't be warned again.  Be respectful and truthful in this discussion, or you'll be ranting in the future on a different site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one else can come up with anything close to a 90% voting correlation except where there is religious or ethnic identity.  Scientifically and objectively, that is noteworthy.  There are a dozen more compelling pieces of evidence, but that does not mean this data point is not suggestive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have been utterly truthful in what I have said.  You appear to have missed the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In order for there to have been causation (i.e. Obama's being a Muslim caused Muslims to vote for him) the Muslims would necessarily have to ''know'' (not just suspect) that Obama is a Muslim.  In order for that to be the case there would need to be a vast conspiracy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty simple really.  Can you tell us what you know about this secret conspiracy?  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And how am I misrepresenting you, Andy?  Are you trying to convince people that Obama is a Muslim for purely academic reasons?  I stand by my statement.  This article, in the collection of &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; that Obama may be a Muslim, reads that &amp;quot;Contrary to Christianity, the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&amp;quot;  So we have the premise that Muslims lie to advance Islam, and Obama is part of this.  I would also like to point out you comment in a different section that &amp;quot;It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.&amp;quot;  That definitely sounds like it'd be a pretty bad thing if Obama was a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 18:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mystery:Why Do Black Americans Vote For Liberal Candidates?|Black Americans vote for the Democrat presidential candidate over 90% of the time]], even when that candidate is not Black. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:20, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Those Democrat cantidates were probably secretly black.  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 18:23, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We are trying to build an encyclopedia here. Either help out or get out of the way, HGridley. You might find more people who think you are funny on a liberalpedia, if one exists.&lt;br /&gt;
::The only truly funny thing about your note is that you call them &amp;quot;cantidates&amp;quot;, which is a true record of how liberals treat Black Americans -- telling them &amp;quot;You can't, so depend on the government to do so for you.&amp;quot; [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:29, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to confess to being very confused by everything that's being said here.   None of it seems to quite line up.  Wouldn't the Jewish community be LESS likely to vote for a Muslim candidate, particularly one with the alleged terrorist links?   Yet 78% of them voted for him - in greater proportion than they have previously voted for a Democrat?   That seems to be completely counter to the allegation?    It just all seems very odd, and very confusing to a passing reader.   [[User:HarryR|HarryR]] 22:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Confusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little bit confused about one of the dot points claiming Obama is a Muslim, and was wondering if someone could explain it. It is the one about him leaving his Church without first finding a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in Australia, while many people are members of a Church, a majority of us Christians are not. There is often no official enrolment beyond donations or small groups, and most families simply attend the Church closest to them, some even attending a number of Churches. As such it is quite confusing to state that a person is not a Christian simply because they have not &amp;quot;joined&amp;quot; a Church, as this is not a reflection on whether or not they attend, let alone their individual faith. Perhaps this could be clarified for an international audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also the line &amp;quot;Many of Obama's statements about religion conflict with Christianity&amp;quot; is entirely conterproductive to the argument, as the statements made by Obama that are in opposition to Christianity (regarding homosexuality) are also in opposition to Islam. If anything this is proof that Obama is not a Muslim and is in fact an atheist, and should be removed asap! [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also Malcolm X did not become a Muslim after he was a National of Islam leader, it was before. The current wording needs to be fixed. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:51, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lenin Poster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statement about the Lenin-like poster is informative.  We don't censor informative information here.  Let the reader decide.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:22, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, did you happen to take a look at the reference? The article claims that &amp;quot;Obama also ''revealed'' his ''deep Marxist/Leninist roots''&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;clear parallels between the poster design and Lenin's earlier poster was ''obviously a deliberate yet hidden hint'' to his European, socialistic audience as to his political roots and beliefs&amp;quot; (emphasis mine). The citation, which was a blog, by the way, and not in any way a trustworthy source of informative information, gives no evidence to back up these statements. It shows a poster of Lenin and a poster of Obama, both of which show profiles of the figures. Assuming these pictures weren't entirely made up, do you really think that this slight similarity is Obama's way of confessing closet Marxism? Not to mention the fact that Obama likely didn't make the posters anyway -- maybe we should accuse his (very expensive!!) marketing designer of being a Marxist/Leninist. 15:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama and beer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several stories (with photos) of Obama drinking beer, which as an intoxicant is banned by Muslim sharia. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2008/05/06/20/125-6web-Obama_Beer-minor.standalone.prod_affiliate.91.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.mcclatchydc.com/100/story/36055.html&amp;amp;h=325&amp;amp;w=485&amp;amp;sz=47&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=28&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__ShpWdieNIwhr4Rp3jHtLe7U9MB8=&amp;amp;tbnid=Se90xFLBo6rNQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=86&amp;amp;tbnw=129&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bdrinks%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156_t.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156.html&amp;amp;h=332&amp;amp;w=400&amp;amp;sz=16&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=15&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__Yubc0nmus36Cf4Rrf7BL7-33-0g=&amp;amp;tbnid=xuWGKQ1Sl8_bQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=103&amp;amp;tbnw=124&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bbeer%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No rational person can say that a practicing Muslim wouldn't violate the law in such a blatant, repeated manner. Another strike against the goofy Muslim charge. And remember, we don't censor here. Godspeed. [[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 12:52, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think many American Muslims drink beer.  Nice try, though.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:57, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hussein reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's factual and it's informative.  If there is reasoned basis for deleting it, let's see it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:03, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Again, no reason has been given for deleting the Hussein reference, and there is none.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Andy, this is false.  Reasons have been given on this talk page numerous times before.  I just had a quick look, and found reasons being given in all archives except the first, as well as other places on this talk page.  So you are wrong to say that no reason has been given, and wrong to say that there is no reason.  And, as I have pointed out in the edit comments, five senior administrators have said that they disagree with it being there.  Is your view on this somehow superior to those five put together?  Do you want this to be a collaborative encyclopaedia or your blog?  The former demands that you not impose your opinion regardless of who is disagreeing.  Imposing your opinion regardless suggests that this is your blog.  I know you don't consider it to be the latter, but that's the way it's looking.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:21, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not a blog but an encylopedia. If it were a blog, your opinion would carry as much weight as anyone else's. Let's put this one in [[Conservapedia:Debate Topics]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:24, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: If it were a blog, the blog owner's opinion would carry the most weight.  Almost all blogs are the opinions of an ''individual'', not a group of people.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Philip, the truth is not dependent on consensus, and 5 out of several dozen is not a consensus anyway.  Give your best reason for deleting this information here.  Since the beginning we have had a policy not to delete factual, informative material, particularly when it is liberal ideology that motivates the demand for censorship of it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:29, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I said five of the ''senior'' administrators, which numbers about eleven.  So that's five out of eleven, not dozens.  Further, that's five against and one (yourself) for, as the remainder have not offered an opinion that I'm aware of.  (One perhaps did support you, but because they wanted to support you, not because they considered it a valid argument.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My reason is relevance, not (primarily) accuracy.  I'm not disputing that his middle name is Hussein.  The claim that &amp;quot;most Christians would not retain&amp;quot; their (former/Muslim/Arabic?; it's not clear) name is not supported by the references, and even if it is true, means little in individual cases.  That is, even if 99% changed their name, Obama not changing his name might mean no more than him being in the other 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: And this is just one of the points in that section.  The entire argument that Obama is a Muslim is built on very circumstantial evidence, selective evidence, and logical fallacy, and is rejected by other conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Philip, it obviously is relevant, which you say is your primary objection.  We don't censor information here based on liberal dislike for it.  Wikipedia does that.  We provide the information and let the reader decide.  If some readers want to conclude that someone with a Muslim name is actually a Christian, even though less than 1% of those raised as Muslims convert, so be it.  We're not going to censor this factual information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Exactly.  The point of Conservapedia is ''not'' to censor information, but to leave it to our readers to decide.  The MSM has tried to push this under the rug, so the least we can do is offer these arguments to the intelligent public. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 11:27, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The problem is that these points are fallacious and lead to a conclusion based on specious arguments. That is neither &amp;quot;trustworthy&amp;quot; nor encyclopedic. Obama may not be your brand of xian, but he's certianly no brand of muslim. Your inability to accept that this is incorrect despite repeated arguments wherein you have shown nothing but fallacious arguments drawing poor conclusions hurts the credibility of all Conservapedia. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 11:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debate On Obama's Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debate is continuing at [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?‎]] It may be best to continue arguing the point there with the aim of reaching a conclusion which can then be utilised in the article, and leave this talk page for discussing other improvements. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:22, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:09, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:08, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action?   Untrue.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am no fan of Obama.  I do plan on respectfully opposing him via various channels on the internet.  However, I believe I should state my opposition to this sentence of the article: &amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not read the rest of the article because I believed months ago and for good reasons that Obama was going to win this election. For example, the unpopular war and  poor economy that was partly caused by a guns and lots of butter spending strategy (Bush should have learned from LBJ committing us to a war and the Great Society programs at the same time).   I also thought that it would have been easy for the Republicans to win 12 years in a row given the low quality of the Democratic party. I think the Republicans snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory.  I also think Americans have too much debt (last time I heard the average American had lots of credit card debt). One of the reasons for the great depression is that American's had too much debt at the time. I think Bush's call for Americans to do to do more shopping mall spending was a joke.  If anything, Americans need to increase their skills to be more productive (The libraries are open but you might have to watch less TV.  Last time I checked the average American watches 3 hours of television a day) and work harder to pay off their debt.  American's are going to get out of the hole by increasing their productivity.    It seems as if Bush did not want to learn from economic history and was only looking out for short term fixes.  Well sooner or later, common sense says you have to pay the piper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Getting back to Obama, obviously, Obama's marital success in terms of not getting divorced compared to Ronald Reagan is not the result of affirmative action.  I am sure I could come up with others.  I have not read the article for the most part because this sentence turned me off to the whole article.  Judging from the &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot; sentence, I  believe a lot of time is probably being spent to defend an article rather than improve it where obvious improvements could be made. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 06:04, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Staying married is laudable but in this context it would not be considered a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement.&amp;quot;  If you would like to add a footnote exception to the remark along the lines of, &amp;quot;he has been married for x years,&amp;quot; I'm not opposed but I would expect that to caveat to seem off-topic, or even sarcastic, for most readers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:52, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One CP writer told me he equates divorce with adultery, and he accused Reagan of adultery on this basis. Is this the consensus view of Conservatives? Or just his own idea? Or what?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We ought to be clear on the standards by which we judge public figures. And consistent, too. I mean, which is worse, committing actual adultery (JFK, Clinton) or getting divorced and then remarrying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Biblically, divorce is not adultery.  However, divorce is wrong unless the spouse has been unfaithful.  Remarriage after a legitimate divorce is okay.  The question is whether remarriage after a wrong divorce is okay.  Many believe, I think that although the act of divorce may be wrong, that is a forgivable sin like any other sin, and remarriage is not a further sin.  And I'd tend to agree that committing &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; adultery is worse than divorce and remarriage.  However, the point that Conservative was raising was not between those two cases, but between divorce and remarriage compared to marriage without divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm not convinced that Obama's marriage does not constitute a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot;.  Given the divorce rate these days, especially among prominent people, I would think that it ''was'' a clear personal achievement.  In fact I'd consider staying marriage a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot; for anybody these days, given all the pressures on marriage, including the peer pressure that divorce is okay.&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:35, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I rarely disagree with you, Philip, as I find your comments to be some of the more considered on this board, but here I would have to disagree.  Jesus makes it quite clear that divorce *is* adultery, not *like* adultery.  More then any other text, especially OT text, I take Jesus's words to heart. Mark 10&lt;br /&gt;
2 Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, &amp;quot;Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
3 &amp;quot;What did Moses command you?&amp;quot; he replied.&lt;br /&gt;
4 They said, &amp;quot;Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
5 &amp;quot;It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,&amp;quot; Jesus replied.&lt;br /&gt;
6 &amp;quot;But at the beginning of creation God `made them male and female.'&lt;br /&gt;
7 `For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,&lt;br /&gt;
8 and the two will become one flesh.' So they are no longer two, but one.&lt;br /&gt;
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this.&lt;br /&gt;
11 He answered, &amp;quot;Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.&lt;br /&gt;
12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.&amp;quot; --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 09:41, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama spiruality interview ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html   a interview from a pretty religous website about Obama. Should it be mentioned? Or since it kinda contradicts abit of the article should it be ommitted? --[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What one might say in an interview really means very little, Vmember, particularly if one is seeking to achieve a position by hiding one's essential nature or beliefs. So really what he says when seeking to impress is irrelevant. It is what he does and has done, and what he says in unguarded moments, that matters. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:16, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*um then shouldn't it atleast be mentioned somewhere in the article about this interview maybe as a response to questions about his faith section? And why is him maybe being a muslim all the way at the top of the article? Shouldn't be be somewhere towards the middle? I've never seen in all my time part of a article pushed into the intro section. Also the article contradicts itself by stating that Obama is most likely a muslim while at the same time pointing at that he was a member of a radical Christian church. That doesn't make any sense. You can't have it both ways.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:25, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You can if you're a sleeper for radical Islam. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:27, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
**Wait you seriously think that? Hmm fringe ideas and theories on any subject is detrimental to a discussion let alone a encyclopedia. It's dangerous thinking like that is why us conservatives lost the election and alienated so many moderates and weak liberals. Would there be any objection if I were to move the muslim part to the middle and add a section with his response to questions of his faith?--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:34, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555486</id>
		<title>Talk:Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555486"/>
		<updated>2008-11-12T18:25:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archives:&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive1|1]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive2|2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disgusted Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've voted Republican in every election since 1960, but I'm absolutely disgusted by this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What happened to the dignity of our party under Goldwater and Reagan? This &amp;quot;encyclopedia&amp;quot; page is just one long rant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there any real conservatives out there willing to present objective, factual criticism of Obama? God knows there are enough valid arguments to make. Why are we channeling Michael Savage rather than William Buckley? Currently this page makes me cry for my party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like disgusted conservative is voting for BO. I happen to think it is an accurate account of a man that is dishonest. Where will you get the real picture about about if not here? Are you disgusted by Wikipedias article? How about the coverage on MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, LATimes, WaPo, NYT, Google, The Guardian. Why not be mad and except that the majority of America is being fooled? Why not be mad at someone as disgusting as BO, actually has a real chance to take the Presidency and doesn't deserve it IN THE LEAST? Reagan is rolling over in his grave and so all the Founders.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:54, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voting Republican again this year. I know you're mad about what's going on, but it shows throughout the page. An encyclopedia can't be written from an angry point of view. Let me be specific:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) &amp;quot;Obama and Elitism&amp;quot; plus &amp;quot;Obama and Islam&amp;quot; are not valid main introductory sections. Start with his early life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) His birth certificate gets its own section but his healthcare and tax plans don't? Focus on what's really important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) The &amp;quot;Insights&amp;quot; section is just a list of criticisms and belongs under a &amp;quot;Criticism&amp;quot; section. Categorize corectly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Off-topic side-swipes: &amp;quot;He became a member of the Harvard Law Review, which uses racial quotas, in 1989&amp;quot;. Why is &amp;quot;which uses racial quotas&amp;quot; in there? If it was a reason that he was chosen, say that. If it wasn't leave it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Unsubstantiated claims: &amp;quot;Obama's campaign has been financed largely by leftist donors opposed to the war and to the American military in general.&amp;quot; Citation definitely needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have several good sections in here: &amp;quot;Senate career&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Foreign policy experience&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Published criticism&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Religious affiliations&amp;quot;. These are high-quality and reflect well on Conservapedia. The others do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the reply from hsmom below as the kind of constructive, factual accuracy this page needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This sounds like you're standard liberal bellyaching.  The fact is that no real conservative Christian can vote for this man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::??!?! Trying to hold this article to some kind of standard is bellyaching? Would you like to address any of my points?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your points is liberal talking points.  The fact is that Barack Hussein Obama wants to talk with Iran without predeterminations, flip flops, and is close friends to an unrepentive TERRORIST.  What more can you know?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Trying to shift the focus on an ''encyclopedia page'' about a presidential candidate from hypothetical statements (his possible Islamic faith) and trivial matters (his birth certificate), to his actual stance on the issues is liberal bellyaching? If anything, we should be casting aside these trivial circumstances as beneath us and take the time to dissect each of his stances on the actual issues. That's what a real, dignified Conservative would do. Relying on ridiculous tactics such as these is asinine and cowardly. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 16:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think this article doesn't go far enough.  I think there should be a picture of Hitler as the top photo, just like the Evolution page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disgusted Conservative, sadly you are only wasting your time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does it say he MAY be the first Muslim President (a horrible, false claim) and he MAY use the Koran to be sworn in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama's pastor of twenty-years, Rev. Wright, was originally a member with the Nation of Islam (likely always has been, see [[taqiyya]])''  Let's be careful not to confuse the Nation of Islam with the traditional Muslim faith - they are two quite different things. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:10, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: What differences do you find so compelling?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:15, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't know that I'd use the word &amp;quot;compelling&amp;quot;; I don't know a whole lot about either faith.  I do know that they're quite different.  The Nation of Islam was started in Detroit in the 1930's as something of a black empowerment/separatist movement - it's a very race-based group, from what I understand, and (in what I would consider a cult-like way) based largely on the teachings of two or three men, who are considered more-or-less prophets.  It's been portrayed in the media as very racist and anti-Semitic, though I don't know enough about it to know how accurate that is.  It's a uniquely American faith.  Traditional Islam is quite a different thing - it's been around for thousands of years.  Malcolm X, for example, became a member of NOI in prison, then, due to disillusionment brought on by NOI leader/prophet Elijah Mohamed's adultery, converted to traditional Islam.  I have assumed that when you say that you believe that Barak Obama is a Muslim, you are referring to traditional Islam, right? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:37, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.  Are you saying that NOI adherents do not pray and submit to Allah?  I'm sure they do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:52, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.''  No, I wouldn't put it that way.  I wouldn't consider NOI to be Islam.  As I understand it, I think they are two fundamentally different faiths, though NOI has some trappings borrowed from traditional Islam, as well as some borrowed from Christianity.  NOI believes, among other things, &amp;quot;that Allah (God) appeared in the Person of Master W. Fard Muhammad, July, 1930; the long-awaited &amp;quot;Messiah&amp;quot; of the Christians and the &amp;quot;Mahdi&amp;quot; of the Muslims.&amp;quot;[http://www.noi.org/muslim_program.htm]  As I understand it, when NOI members pray to Allah, they mean (at least in part) W. Fard Muhammad (the founder of NOI).  Wheras of course traditional Muslims don't include anything about W. Fard Muhammad in their beliefs, nor do they recognize NOI as a Muslim denomination.  (Christians don't believe W. Fard Muhammad is the Messiah either, obviously.)  NOI is a uniquely American black separatist movement.  I believe it's quite a different faith from traditional Islam.  Maybe I was wrong about assuming you think Barak Obama is a traditional Muslim?  Do you think Barak Obama is a member of the NOI?  That would lead to quite different concerns; as I understand it, the NOI wants, among other things, quite substantial reparations for slavery. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:40, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Nation of Islam's relationship to Christianity is similar to the relationship of Christianity to Judaism.  They use the same texts (to some extent), and have practices that are shared with and developed out of the other - but such distortions take place that one is clearly no longer the other.  It's not even about &amp;quot;not being mainstream&amp;quot;, it's about that place and time when one religion truly ceases to be it's parent religion.  You would be fully inaccurate to call a christian merely a &amp;quot;Jesus loving Jew&amp;quot;.  Christianity became its own religion in the year 30 (give or take) when our Lord died and rose for us.  For the Nation of Islam, with the Prophet Elijah claiming to be the reincarnation of Mohammad, they cease to be merely &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; and become their own religion.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==57 Islamic states==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I attempted to make this article better by noting, as several other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; could be a reference to Heinz ketchup or simple a misstatement (Obama had visited 47 states), as well as the fact that there were not 57 Islamic states when Obama attended an Indonesian school. It was reverted. Why? Is this an encyclopedia, or a liberal hate blog? [[User:Egen|Egen]] 10:42, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your edit was baseless, and probably politically motivated.  The entry is factual and will remain that way.  Obama has likely remained a Muslim long after attending grade school.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:52, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On the subject, I think someone should add the following line to your page: &amp;quot;The odds against Aschlafly's claim to be named 'Andrew Schlafly' being truthful are less than 1 billion to one, as fewer than 6 people in the world are named Andrew Schlafly.&amp;quot; Don't put malarkey like this on a serious encyclopedia page and defend it as being &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot;. I remind you of Conservapedia Commandments 1, 2, and 5. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 11:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: In any case, I fail to see how it is &amp;quot;baseless&amp;quot; to note, as other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; cannot possibly be a reference to &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; and probably has a more benign origin. It does not to any good to assert that anyone who disagrees with you probably does so because they are &amp;quot;politically motivated&amp;quot; (read: liberal) when many conservatives have expressed disdain for this point. I doubt that the majority of Conservapedia editors would disagree with my edit. This encyclopedia is not a personal blog for you or for anyone else. Therefore, I am reinserting the edit. If anyone can provide proof that Obama was referring to the &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; which did not exist when he was growing up '''and''' provide proof that that is what he was referring to, I'll retract this. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 12:16, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Egen - I entirely agree with you. A lot of people here think this is a redstate comments thread rather than, as it says in the top left corner, &amp;quot;the trustworthy encyclopedia&amp;quot;. Snopes on this one: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/57states.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the mention of the 57 states, since the article later refers to a source that says that it was probably a misstatement as he has in fact visited 47 states. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;unsigned JohnFA&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement has been here for some time. It stays for now.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:44, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
      Jpatt - Why should it? It's repeated later on in the article where it is also explained. This statement is redundant since it doesn't even have a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added the fact that there were not 57 states when he went to school in indonesia, if we are going to mention that he went to an islamic school we are implying that that is where he learned about the 57 states, this is impossible and that should be noted. People will reference conservapedia and if they reference that he visited the 57 islamic states or that he learned about there being 57 islamic states in islamic school they will look like fools.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:06, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Right now, the implication made about Obama's gaff and &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; indicates the United States.  If it's about Indonesia, then state Indonesia, as well as prove that Indonesia is divided into 57 states.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I double-checked the references provided, one of which has a video of Obama himself doing the gaff; it may have been a minor slip of the tounge or a minor mistake, but not once was there a reference to visiting Islamic states or countries.  He specified visiting 57 ''U.S. states''.  The article was changed to reflect that fact, and the speculation on Islamic states was removed.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I wanted to do that but I figured I would just get reverted. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:53, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll let you take credit then for the fixing, or at least getting it started :)  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:57, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biased==&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this site supposed to be unbaised?-[[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] 16:46, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome to Conservapedia[[User:Pluto|Pluto]] 18:19, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;born, allegedly, in Honolulu&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's no doubt he was ''born''. that should read &amp;quot;allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless. [[User:JohnBarma|JohnBarma]] 13:30, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the previous poster said, &amp;quot;(born, allegedly, in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;, implies that he may not have been born, which I think is not what is intended.  &amp;quot;Allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot; has the same problem.  Putting aside whether or not the &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; is silly (and frankly I think the factcheck.org folks debunked this one), if you want to convey the idea that he was born, but may have been born somewhere other than Hawaii, then it should read &amp;quot;(born, allegedly in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;.  Comma placement matters. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:58, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct. Factcheck did take this one apart: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snope also: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&lt;br /&gt;
::''Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday'' What foolishness! As if the ability to run for President is the sole benefit to be derived from US citizenship! That his grandparents planted the announcement is entirely credible. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:30, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What we need to see to settle this controversy is the actual birth certificate; not a copy of it, and not someone's written opinion.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:47, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my understanding from a recent article on Fox that the form presented lists him as &amp;quot;African&amp;quot;.  This was 1961.  The concept of African-American or any reference to African in racial makeup, while very prevalent in the last 15+ years, was still more than 20 years off.  Birth certificates in 1961 used &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot;.  I'm surprised this isn't mentioned anywhere. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:19, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Favorite black leader ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've just finished reading Dreams from My Father. I don't recommend it. But one thing I missed was a reference to Malcolm X being Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot;. He speaks highly of Malcolm X's autobiography, but doesn't like the &amp;quot;religious baggage&amp;quot; that the guy &amp;quot;discarded in later life&amp;quot;. Is the reference here correct? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 17:10, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Search Google on {&amp;quot;Malcolm X&amp;quot; Obama favorite} and you'll find numerous credible confirmations of the statement about Malcolm X being Obama's favorite black leader.  The entry need not be limited to the silly Dreams book.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:03, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not really seeing it. Various claims Obama loves Malcolm X's autobiography (which, subject to the point above, seems correct), but the claims that he is Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot; all cite no reference, or cite Dreams - I think incorrectly. Is there a source for Obama having said or written this? If not, it should go. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 18:12, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree that it should be sourced, preferably with a quote from his book or one of his speeches, otherwise it could be mistaken for an untrue rumor.  If he qualified the statement with something about X's religion, as Marcdaniels noted above, that should be included in the quote.  I looked for a credible source, but couldn't find one.  I have added a fact tag, which can be removed when a suitable citation is found. (Let's not forget that Malcolm X was involved with the Nation of Islam, which is quite a different thing than traditional Islam.  He rejected the Nation of Islam later in life.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Examples supporting the statement are easy to find.  I just added one.  I don't think anyone seriously doubts the truth of the statement.  Feel free to find and add other citations supporting it.  The discomfort expressed above seems to be with the fact itself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Your source goes back to the book, which I'd thought we'd both agreed wasn't on point. It's entirely plausible that Obama might regard Malcolm X as his favorite black leader, and that would discomfort me in the slightest, but I'm having real difficulty finding any evidence that he has said or written this. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 07:40, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, you've misread me now.  I did not agree that book wasn't on point.  I did say there is further evidence beyond the book, which is easy to find on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The quote from the book is convincing enough.  If you won't accept it, then I doubt you would accept anything now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:20, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: I am now a little confused, and I'm not sure why you are getting personal. You suggested there were additional sources for the claim on the internet, other than those referring to the book, but I cannot find one. I may be missing something obvious - would be helpful if you could provide a link. The book shows Malcolm X's autobiography to have been Obama's favourite autobiography, and it would be accurate to say that, but anything further seems supposition rather than fact. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:35, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;if elected, Obama will become the first black, and possibly Muslim, President of the United States.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the problem with this sentence in place of the one currently there? For starters, it isn't proven that he's Muslim, but it ''is'' proven that he's black, so certainly it should be mentioned over the hypothetical. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:25, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The racial composition of all the past presidents is not completely known, so I doubt it's appropriate to insist that Obama would be the '''first''' black President.  Also, the racial composition of a man is not as important as his beliefs.  It is known that none of the prior presidents were Muslim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well said, Aschlafly.  It is the content of a person's character that should determine how we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; them.  Although, who are we to judge?  I suspect, however, looking at the photos, that Senator Obama would at least be the first President (if elected) with a clear [[African American]] heritage.  Whether a few others may have had a lineage leading back to Africa in their family tree is another, albeit interesting, question. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:16, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's an interesting argument. If we know so little about the former presidents that we cannot say whether any of them met society's contemporaneous definition of Black - the one-drop rule, for example - then how can we say than none of them were Muslim? If they could keep their African ancestry secret, why not their true religion? Is there evidence of political opponents accusing a candidate of being of mixed-blood ancestry?--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 23:21, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: When people vote, they are called to judge.  So the liberal canard of &amp;quot;judge not&amp;quot; is a useless argument here.  What will voters judge on?  More important than race is the views and beliefs of the candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: As to whether past presidents were Muslims, simply look at what they did and said ... including before they became politically ambitious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:33, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Of course we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot;, or at least &amp;quot;decide&amp;quot; when we vote.  However, when did &amp;quot;judge not... [lest ye be judged]&amp;quot; become a &amp;quot;liberal canard&amp;quot;?  I thought it was a warning in the Bible not to overstep our bounds?  Voting, of course, does not overstep them - we pencil in a space, or pull a lever.  That is not &amp;quot;judgment&amp;quot;, it is an expression of personal opinion or preference or ideas.  Moving beyond that simple step, however, leads us into judgment territory, potentially.  When we should be humble and add commentary on ourselves as well as those we judge is an issue of personal ethics - or morality.  A good time to sit down with good words and contemplate. [[User:Human|Human]] 01:22, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like someone to please explain to me how this is unbais? At least with the article you can try to make something up saying how its unbais but the main picture is trying to show very obviouisly that Obama is unpatriotic... If you look at McCains page or Palins the picture of professionally done. Please someone give me a reasonable answer [[User talk:Horriblesite]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Funny you should comment. Is it Conservapedia making Obama unpatriotic or is it Obama who IS unpatriotic? I will say the latter.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, &amp;quot;unbais&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;professionally done&amp;quot; are Liberal canards. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of Taqiyya in this article (''(allowed if) ... it advances the cause of Islam'') is incorrect for the Sunni Muslims. Taqiyya is only allowed when it will danger their lives otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, even with this allowance, many chose instead a honorable death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shi'ites (shia) is the one who practices this (taqiyya) in almost any situation that will cause discomfort to them otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sunni muslim and some branches of Shi'ite, because of their extreme stances, are pretty much a different religion. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya &amp;amp; takeyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the same thing? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:34, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:52, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== wife opinions  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing that bothers me about Obama is the comments attributed to his wife. 1. That it was the first time she was proud of america and 2.That black children had no future in america. Both she and her husband are examples of how well a black child can do so its hard to understand why she has that view. [[User:Markr|Markr]] 16:38, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::See similar comments from John McCain: http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2008/06/mccain-it-can-be-%E2%80%9Ctough%E2%80%9D-to-be-proud-of-usa/   “I’ll admit to you … that it’s tough in some respects,” McCain said when asked by a questioner at a town hall meeting how to be proud of the country. “We have not always done things right and we mismanaged the war in Iraq very badly for nearly four years.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obvious fake photo (hand on heart) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect this very obvious fake photo (look at how small the two women are compared to the chairs behind them, check out the flag's edges itself and what exactly is holding it up) was placed here by people hoping to discredit Conservapedia. I understand a popular activity among liberals and vandals is to insert things seeming to support Conservative and Christian values, but that are either extreme or fake, and so undermine the encyclopedia as a whole.--[[User:TruthOfChrist|TruthOfChrist]] 11:11, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It isn't fake.  Many other photos of this occasion exist.  Video, too.  The goofy-looking perspective is an artifact of the angle and lens used. --[[User:XavierJ|XavierJ]] 12:29, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp {{unsigned|Littleriverr}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single photo lacked context, and the writer of this article, unfortunately, chose to translate it negatively. A more balanced discussion is available on Snopes : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 10:51, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==birth certificate lawsuit number 2==&lt;br /&gt;
In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the authority to &amp;quot;prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters&amp;quot; who might have otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78111]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See my analysis of this on this Talk Page, point 58: &amp;quot;Barack raises the bar&amp;quot;. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 00:25, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Errors and dubious claims==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The first sentence says Obama was born in Hawaii.  At first I was under the impression that someone decided to act in a competent manner and remove the baseless innuendo about his place of birth.  Alas I was mistaken because later in the article the word 'alleged' is still used.  I thought all reasonable people would presume that a document from the State of Hawaii would suffice to prove one's citizenship instead of using the rants of the lunatic fringe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A lawsuit has been filed by someone seeking the real birth certificate.  Complain to him, and explain why it still apparently has not been produced.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The state of Hawaii is not just going to let anybody get a copy of Obama's birth certificate, let alone his original.  I can't even get my hands on my own original birth certificate and I'll bet neither can you.  A certified copy of Obama's birth certificate has been provided for anyone to look at.  If this copy is good enough for our government officials that are not part of the lunatic fringe, then why isn't it good enough for Conservapedia?  I'd like to think Conservapedia is not aligning itself with the likes of the people filing these nonsense lawsuits.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama only attended religious schools until he reached the age of ten (Islamic and Catholic).  The rest of his education from Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard was nonsectarian.  Clearly the vast majority of his education was non-religious. [[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Obama's formative years were spend being indoctrinated in Islam.  Less than 1% convert to Christianity after that experience.  Enough said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I was never under the impression that a person's formative years stopped at the age of ten.  According to you, Obama shouldn't be a liberal because he attended conservative religious schools during his alleged formative years, 6 - 10.  How is it that he is now a liberal after living another 35+ years and attending an ivy-league college?  You are also ignoring his years in a Catholic school during his time in Indonesia.  Why?  If he spent two of his formative years at a Catholic school, shouldn't he be a Catholic?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Malcom X was not THE leader of the Nation of Islam, he was A leader.  There is a distinct difference. [[http://www.finalcall.com/national/savioursday2k/hem_nation.htm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Nitpicking here.  I'll change &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't do it for me, do it for the reputation of Conservapedia.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama was baptized in 1988, the same year he started attending Harvard.  If there is a reference stating he was baptized prior to his political ambitions, please post it.  [[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: 1988 makes no sense, as no one ever saw any Christian behavior or church attendance by Obama at law school from 1988 to 1991.  Post his baptismal certificate.  You can't and neither can Obama.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why doesn't 1988 make any sense?  Was there a problem with my reference?  Are you able to provide reputable evidence that Obama's baptism didn't occur in 1988?  Just because a person doesn't attend church on a regular basis or hardly at all is not a reason to deny someone's baptism.  Elsewhere in this article is criticism directed at Obama's CHRISTIAN pastor of 20 years.  Either Obama is a Christian that attended a Christian church for 20 years or he is not.  If he is a Muslim, then why all the fuss about his Christian pastor of 20 years?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Just because someone reads a book allegedly 'from a Muslim point-of-view' does not mean they are actually a Muslim.  I have read parts of the book and I am not a Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It adds to the evidence.  If Obama were reading the Bible, then that would detract from the evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama does read his Bible and has encouraged others to do so as well.  Would like a reference?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Roosevelt communicated with America's enemies.  After the outbreak of WW II, Roosevelt was negotiating with the Japanese.  Things didn't go well and the Japanese were embargoed, thus losing most of their import capability including over 90% of their oil supplies. [[http://www.fff.org/freedom/1291c.asp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point is lacking here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In reference to Obama saying we should talk to our enemies, the following claim was made, &amp;quot;Roosevelt spoke with none of the Axis or Japanese leaders and the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender.&amp;quot;  Roosevelt and members of his administration talked to our enemies, the reference provided by the article was written by a columnist with a distinct lack of historical credibility.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- If Obama' likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students', then which scholarships were they?  Could a reference at least be provided?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You tell us.  Obama won't disclose who paid for his education.  He claimed he worked his way through school, but that was disproved.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why should I tell you?  The claim was made in the article without a shred of evidence to back it up.  I do happen to know that the Obama's used college loans to pay for much of their schooling and they only just recently paid them off with the proceeds from his books.  Since someone writing for Conservapedia is making the incredible claim that Obama was somehow able to acquire loans not available to most others, shouldn't a reference be provided so the claim will withstand scrutiny? --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Any chance a reference could be provided for the claim concerning the flag pin?  The way it reads now makes the entry look like partisan whining.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Be clearer.  No one denies Obama avoided wearing a flag pin as he catered to the anti-war crowd.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim, ' Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering' was made without a reference.  Any chance this opinion could be verified so the article doesn't sound like a smear?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general tone of the article makes it look like a partisan smear campaign, not the encyclopedic scholarly work Conservapedia alleges to produce.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 17:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think your conclusion applies more to your own comments.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your response.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama has written that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader, inspired him in his youth.''  I think this statement needs to be tweaked a bit.  While it's true that Malcolm X was a leader in the Nation of Islam (a radical black separatist group, not to be confused with the traditional Islam faith), by the time he wrote his autobiography (as told to Alex Haley, of Roots fame), he had rejected the Nation of Islam and converted to traditional Islam.  If Obama was inspired by the book to take up Malcolm's religion (which is a stretch, IMHO, as lots of people have read this book and not become Muslims), he would most likely have chosen traditional Islam like Malcolm did.  I think it's important to make that distinction clear.  (Unless this item is intended to suggest that Obama is a member of the Nation of Islam?  If so, it should be in a different section, as it's quite a different claim.)  FWIW, Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965, four years after Obama's birth.  Also, the title of the book is ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X''.  So I suggest this item be changed to something like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama has written that reading ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X'' inspired him in his youth.  Malcolm X converted to traditional Islam after leaving the radical Nation of Islam (a black separatist group).&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds considered and precise.  Most black muslims are NOT NOI, they are in fact sunni Muslim.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 20:11, 20 October 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obamas Grandmother==&lt;br /&gt;
Breaking news, Americans still forbidden to speak with Obamas grandmother. Now, we may never. Democrat Barack Obama is canceling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to fly to Hawaii to visit his suddenly ill 86-year-old grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters Monday that Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, who helped raise him, was released from the hospital late last week. But he says her health has deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious.&lt;br /&gt;
Gibbs said Obama would return to the campaign trail on Saturday, though he was unsure where.&lt;br /&gt;
Obama events originally planned for Madison, Wis., and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday will be replaced with one in Indianapolis before he makes the long flight to Hawaii. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:16, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggesting corrections to 'atom bomb' sentance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it should not say &amp;quot;atom bombs&amp;quot; because this is slang expression. It should be &amp;quot;atomic bombs&amp;quot; except since 1960s it usually is said &amp;quot;nuclear bombs&amp;quot; and even then there are other weapons from bombs (missles are not bombs, then there are torpedoes and so on) so it should say &amp;quot;nuclear weapons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my memory is fuzzy here but didn't Clinton have ties to other washed up sixties communist terrorists? Like former Black Panther Party people who were re-made into &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; democrat politicians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally and this is just style, I do not like the '''Bold text''', it makes look rather alarming, not that we are not alarmed about this, but I think it is best to say the raw facts directly and people will know to be alarmed, instead of trying to shock people with text formatting into coming to their sense. I heard Conservapedia wants to get away from &amp;quot;that other encyclopedia&amp;quot;'s use of sensationism and tabloid style, so, maybe take off the bold. [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:28, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
other than this a very good job in the article, maybe it is too late to change direction your country is going, but at least people will know who had the facts before things all went wrong! [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:30, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I appreciate your comments but don't find them compelling.  &amp;quot;Atom bombs&amp;quot; is a familiar term; whether Clinton did likewise concerning terrorists is irrelevant; and bolding is obviously helpful for emphasis.  Thanks anyway and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::While I plan to stick to the 90-10 ratio here, and this is the first comment I've made, I did want to note that I agree with Eleger about &amp;quot;Atomic Bombs&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Nuclear Weapons&amp;quot; simply on the basis of the being more accurate terms. My person phrase of choice would be Nuclear arsenal though. Maybe nitpicking, but I think fair. -EternalCritic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I came to post that too; I also have a problem with &amp;quot;first&amp;quot; part of &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first person having ties to a known terrorist to gain control over America's atom bombs&amp;quot;. The most recent Democrat President was bad too. OTOH, something like &amp;quot;second person...&amp;quot; might distract from the point that Obama is a threat.[[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How low can you go? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this meant as an &amp;quot;How To&amp;quot; article on character assassination? Though I do find some of the 'links' in the Obama and Islam hilarious, I'd thought that the conservative parts of the US had a shred of dignity left. It appears not to be the case. But keep feeding the lies to your fellow yes-men, the rest of us are quite amused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::We are not going low at all, You Who Did Not Leave Your Name. This entry is nothing about the truth about Barack Obama. Unfortunately, liberals like you will not find out until it is too late.--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 21:20, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: ''&amp;quot;the rest of us are quite amused.&amp;quot;'' I am sure the leftwingers are quite amused of the nonstop Obama media lovefest. I am sure they are also amused at the whole disenfranchisement of voting in a Democracy thanks to ACORN. I am on a conservative website and I can't find a good Obama bio, shucks billybob, I need the Obama I can believe in, let's look at MSNBC... La La La, liberal fantasy land.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:48, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In response to the first (unsigned) comment above, liberals enjoy deceit.  But not everyone is fooled by it, and liberals get very irritable when they see that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Berg Obama lawsuit==&lt;br /&gt;
Philip J. Berg announced 10/21 that Obama and the DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President. [http://obamacrimes.com/]--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;admission&amp;quot; is nothing more than an acknowledgment that there was no response to his suit, so Berg is claiming that this qualifies as an admission that all his allegations are true.  Berg's now positioning this as &amp;quot;Obama admits he's not a citizen&amp;quot;, but that is legal spin, not reality, and I'd be hesitant to claim it as anything other than the latest round in a lawsuit.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:52, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a legal principle that the silent are understood to consent.  Obama's failure to deny Berg's request for admission means that he admits those items under the law.  This definitely should be included, and should be reason enough to disqualify him from the election.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:03, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The judge in the Berg-Obama case has tossed out the suit [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvhtmoNEnyP1Bu6Ol4zJsN94mlewD941NCJG0]--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 16:30, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just because an activist judge tossed out the suit doesn't mean that the admissions don't count.  I'm sure Berg will appeal.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:54, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Is the judge activist? Is there reason to believe he's an Obama partisan? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:38, 26 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lefty DindaleP was right, though it shouldn't be hard to find a sympathetic judge in Democrat bastion of Philadelphia. If, if the bozo (obama) wins, this issue will not go away easily and will be justification for impeachment. Though, will be hard to impeach with super-majority liberal congress, God help us. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:35, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Actually, McCain has a similar issue, in that he was not born in the US, and arguably not on US territory.  Most every single scholar I've read in the last few days on this has said McCain's case will be a compelling one, legally, because no court in the land would dare say a person born out of this country to two citizens, one of whom was SERVING HIS COUNTRY, would be denied the right to be president.  As we become more and more of a mobile population, with people traveling and living overseas for extended periods of time (business, government, or travel) I think more children will be born of two natural citizens, but not on the US territory.  I will be curious to watch how the term &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot; is defined by the Court under any case, Obama or McCain, just for the historical precedent it will set.  --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:41, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: By the way, Qwest, there is no legal principal that &amp;quot;silence is admittance&amp;quot;.  Until or unless a Judge posts an Order compelling you to provide a particular document or telling you to agree or deny, you are not obligated to.  Some instances this might be used could include famous people being hit over and over again with frivolis lawsuits, just cause they have money or power.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::McCain was born in United States territory, which the Panama Canal Zone was prior to 1978, when by treaty it was turned over to Panama.  Anyone born in the United States, its territories, or its overseas military bases is an American citizen.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:18, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Yes, very much an American citizen.  The interesting language is &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot;.  That is what will be interesting to see how it's defined.  I think it makes rational sense that anyone born to American parents should be &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot;, regardless of where they are born.  But the Framers didn't explain the terms.  (I'm not arguing, by the way, for any point.  I'm simply saying scholars say this issue of an American Citizen not born on US land has not yet been addressed - or rather, what do the words &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; mean, in that context.)  The lawsuit for McCain is totally irrelevant (even though the judge has not seen fit to toss it yet), since the Congress already said he is exempt per their own Resolution. --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 13:23, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Birthplace and Grammar Revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
''Barack Hussein Obama, II (allegedly born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)''  Putting aside all issues about whether the &amp;quot;where Obama was born&amp;quot; issue is worth mentioning, given that it ''is'' going to be mentioned, let's get it right.  The issue (as a previous poster mentioned somewhere above), is not ''whether'' he was born - we all agree on that.  The issue is whether he was born ''in Honolulu''.  Thus the phrase should read: ''Barack Hussein Obama, II (born, allegedly in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)'' --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:06, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request addition==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to add this external page and somehow link to this photo Democrat_Obama_during_the_Pledge.jpg   [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html No hand over heart from Obama during national anthem video]| Original footage ABC, now available through RawStory Media. [[Fair use]] --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:07, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Will unlock for you now.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:13, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First Muslim President ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found this claim quite amusing at first, especially with Snopes already had it debunked quite extensively : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I remember that we, Indonesian, also got the wrong information. We thought Obama is a muslim, and we rejoiced. &lt;br /&gt;
We found out later that (1) clearly his parents are quite liberal on religions (2) the context at that time in Indonesia is that most Muslims were not religious. We were pretty laid back then. My parents drink alcohol and misses their obligatory religious duties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So even if (again, IF) Obama was a Muslim, there's no way he's enrolled in a &amp;quot;radical Wahabi school&amp;quot;. It just didn't exist back then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, if we, Indonesians, were wrong about Obama at his time in Indonesia, it's quite understandable if others were also mistaken. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:47, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If elected, Obama would likely become the first Muslim President&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence pointing to Obama being a Muslim can be included, but Barack Obama has said he is a Christian, and is a member of the United Church of Christ. So is saying he is likely to become a Muslim president meant to imply that Obama is secretly a Muslim? Perhaps a better phrased version of this sentence would be &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;. This is concurrent list that follows it, and is much less hypothetical like a good resource should be.  --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 21:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obama's claims to be a Christian are meaningless for three reasons; first, his distinctly non-Christian stance on issues such as [[abortion]] and the [[homosexual agenda]]; second, the radical, [[Marxism|Marxist]] theology preached by his church; and third, the [[Muslim]] concept of [[taqiyya]] outlined in the article. All the of the evidence points away from his being a Christian. [[User:SMichaels|SMichaels]] 16:06, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using Taqiyya as a defense is a joke. I'm not doubting it's authenticity, but I could claim the same thing about you and you would have no defense. See Salem Witch Trials for more information. --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama's stances on [[abortion]] the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[marxism|Marxism]] do take credibility away from his Chrisitian stance, but Muslims are against [[abortion]], [[homosexual agena|homosexualiity]] and women's rights themselves. Furthermore, [[Marxism]] is against all religions, and if his church preaches Marxism, that makes him a Marxist Christian, not a Marxist Muslim. While I myself question his faith in Jesus, I sincerely doubt that he is a Muslim. And as for Taqiyya? Isn't that just an obscure segment of a doctrine practiced only by some Sunnis and considered hypocrisy by other muslims? [[user:justiceisblind|Justice Is Blind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The facts you gave are true, but you did not address my bringing up the idea of rewording the phrase. Having a set of words like &amp;quot;might be&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; seem extremely unscholarly. Those facts you threw up also would correspond to him having a strong leaning toward Islam, minus the hypothetical thought he might be a Muslim. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 23:03, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The truth is what it is, whether you find it &amp;quot;unscholarly&amp;quot; or not.  We're not fooled here when politicians try to deceive the public about who they are and what they believe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:00, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why is it so hard to directly answer my question? First off, do not mix my words, I said the way the sentence is phrased is not scholarly, what is truth or not does not matter to me.  I don't really care what you say is the truth, and what you are or are not fooled by. I am just bringing up the option that as long as Obama himself and no mosques claim he is a member, perhaps it should be reworded to &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;, which also corresponds to the list that follows it, and is all based on fact no conjecture. The reader should have the right to make up their own mind after reading the examples which are listed. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 22:18, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are strong evidence that Obama is a muslim and it has been layed out again and again.  He has never come out and said he's not a muslim among all the questions.  There for if elected, he will be the first muslim president ever elected.  It's as simple as that. --[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sure he has.  [http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=0GFKqOf8EHQ]--[[User:KathrynMonroe|KathrynMonroe]] 22:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes, he has. [http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2008/01/obama_mail]  --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack raises the bar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The snide accusation that Barack Obama insulted America because he refused to hold his hand over his heart is completely off-target. (See photo at top of article). The human heart is just a pump , medically speaking, but culturally it represents the finest, most vital and sensitive parts of our soul. Barack is indicating precisely how much he loves America by putting not one, but both hands over that part of his body which truly encompasses the most vital, potent and sincere components of his soul. Bill Clinton might not be his biggest fan, but he would be the first to applaud this magnificent gesture. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:37, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: ??? --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:36, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL [[User:Aperson41|Aperson41]] 01:50, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow. I have no idea of what to say to that.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A hypothetical article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of this article appears to be purely hypothetical and some of it seems to be fradulent, such as the pornographer donation and the speculation that Obama is a muslim. It is refreshing to see Obama in such a sober light, but I would encourage previous and future writers to be less interested in controversy, and to use legitimate information on the article instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the article lacks structure, and seems to dive in and out of his history, his policies, quotations in a manner which pleases the tone. It is all quite juvenile and sad; an encyclopedia is where questions are answered, not where additional questions are brought up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Birth Certificate Controversy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole section should be reworded or entirely deleted. According to [http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04 this], there can be no more doubt about Obama's birthplace. The article also states, that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate, so all demands for him to do that can only be part of a smear campaign. --[[User:Ascat|Ascat]] 15:22, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed.  For more confirmation see [http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu] and [http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov01/0,4670,InternetPoliticalRumors,00.html Fox News' article about Web political rumors.]  Having 'allegedly' made sense before all the facts were on the table, but now I'm removing the word because it lessens the strength of our true, verifiable criticisms if we leave it there. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 20:58, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: What about the lawsuit against him about this? [http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=2313]--[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 21:23, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The lawsuits all fell through, because anyone looking at the official documents could tell that they were real, it was a manufactured controversy thanks to Hillary (boy I wish expletives were allowed on conservapedia). --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 16:49, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This issue remains valid even though rejected by the courts. Expect it to be revisited if he wins. Plus, allegiances owed to Keyna and Indonesia are part of the birth certificate controversy. Neither gossip nor the certificate proven true and Hawaii actions are unexplained, still. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My version doesn't violate comandments 1, 3, and 5 like the version that was removed. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:24, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I don't like the edit, but I will let it remain. It does violate CP with personal opinion, (costly time and money during busy election season). --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:30, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The tone is bad I will admit, but that is all fact and not opinion. Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes tie to sit in court for several days? Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes money to pay court costs and extra lawyers? Is it an opinion or a fact that he is in a campaign where the outcome depends largely on the tie and money he spends campaigning? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:44, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::JPatt, could you explain &amp;quot;allegiance to Kenya?&amp;quot;  I don't understand this comment.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:57, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original post on this page says &amp;quot;that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate.&amp;quot;  I do not believe this to be what the original article says.  I think it means simply that no state official has the authority to release publicly a birth certificate, not that Obama himself is unable to do so. [[User:TGeary|TGeary]] 20:15, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mr. Obama's Grandmother just died==&lt;br /&gt;
Without getting into politics, it would be nice to mention it respectfully on his page.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:33, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we have any reputable sources for that?  Given Obama's history of engaging in [[liberal deceit]], I wouldn't put it past him to fabricate a story like this to nullify attacks on Election Day. [[User:Neutronium|Neutronium]] 14:06, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::May I say, comments like this are what hurt our republican party this year.  His politics may be liberal, but he's still a human and making fun of a death of a loved one is beneath a good Christian. {{unsigned|JeanJacques}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Neutronium, keep the parody to a minimum, please. That is simply heartless.&lt;br /&gt;
:::JeanJacques, yes, if it's relevant (do we have the mention of grandparents on anyone else's page? I don't know without looking) the we need it added in a respectful way. No matter what we think about Obama, he is a human and so is his grandmother. The was it is presented now, it almost seems as if we are implying that her death contributes to the controversy, when it clearly doesn't. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neutronium, there is a difference between being a cautious &amp;amp; prudent person, and being a paranoid, heartless person (i use the word &amp;quot;person&amp;quot; only due to the website rules of proper conduct). You would do well to realize that...AndrewM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama attending his Grandma's funeral? No mention from the O-MSM! --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:03, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This Is Why Obama Is Wining==&lt;br /&gt;
Articles like this make me think that Conservapedia is run by liberals. Burying real facts like Obama's membership in a Black Liberation Theology church, with silly lies like he is a &amp;quot;muslim&amp;quot;, only serve to discredit real objections to the Obama candidacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed. Congratulayions Andy, you did more for the Democrats than you can possibly know. Thoroughly discrediting this site with ridiculous partisan accusations based onm the flimsiest of evidence meant that anything that was a genuine talking point just got lost among the nonsense. That many on the left pointed to this page to discredit the entire conservapedia idea just goes to show that you can go too far. Congratulations for playing your part in losing the election and being successfully gamed by the left, who knew that you would leave tenuous ridiculous nonsense up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's not badmouth the side that lost. Andy, you did your best, and I appreciate that. However, you can see from my comments from way back, that the Obama article was way too extreme, and included a number of outright falsehoods. Not saying that this lost the race for McCain, but going too extreme eventually starts to hurt. Like in business - a good CEO is someone who is willing to go to the edge of what is legal, but not cross that line. Those CEO's who stay on the edge are winners, those who go over, go to jail. Same thing here...I think the whole Republican campaign was just too darn negative, and put off a lot of undecided voters. Anyway, here's looking forward to President Schwarzenegger in 2012...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Both sides were overly negative, but in reality that's a natural thing for long campaigns. The longer it runs the less fresh the ideas seem. It gets repetetive so after a while, in order to keep things fresh, mudslinging becomes common. I honestly wish we had a much shorter election time frame. Like six months max. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:41, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've just decided that this site's main contributors are probably liberals messing around with people. I bet there are some liberals somewhere getting a huge laugh at people who are seriously offended, or seriously believe half of these articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I have decided the same thing, though maybe not to that extent.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:11, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is going to be the next president==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama has won the election, and I think this should be added to the page. [[User:Arthur205|Arthur205]] 00:12, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes he is, sadly. I encourage all of us to PRAY for the FATE OF OUR COUNTRY. Unfortunately, this page must be updated. [[User:LuvinGodDP|LuvinGodDP]] 10:10, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised no one has updated it yet, it's been over 12 hours since it's been announced. Honestly this sort of time lag on the internet is just sad. You would think that they would at least un-protect it in order for someone else to update it. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:13, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States of America==&lt;br /&gt;
Article should be updated accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
: President-''Elect'', technically speaking. He won't be President until he's inaugurated, and we should hold off on explicitly saying he's the winner until the electoral college has voted (not that I'm pretending there's any real chance of 100+ faithless electors suddenly popping up to help McCain). Right now, he's just the likely winner of the presidential race. --[[User:JeremyDB|JeremyDB]] 12:24, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Let's not disrespect McCain's gracious concession. We should put in that he's the President Elect and when he will be inaugurated. Let's at least be up to date. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:56, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The first section of this article has been updated to reflect that Obama is now president-elect, but the rest needs to be updated also.  For instance, the section entitled &amp;quot;Obama would be the first Muslim President&amp;quot; should now be &amp;quot;Obama will be the first Muslim President,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;will use the Koran to be sworn in,&amp;quot; etc. -[[User:Rfreeman|Rfreeman]] 18:04, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What happening with the muslim section? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see why it needs to be above the TOC, The TOC lets people find what they are looking for, which may very well be proof that he is a Muslim, and really should be on the first page for formatting reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also some points that really stand out to me, &lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama's middle name (Hussein) references its namesake Husayn, who was the grandson of Muhammad, which most Christians would not retain.''&lt;br /&gt;
In this case the reference should be after the word Muhammad, because it does not reference the notion that christians would have there name changed, also it is his fathers name, and if he changed it it could negatively impact his relationship with his family, I would not consider this strong evidence. Seems like Opinion to me&lt;br /&gt;
*'' Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;'' You do know that the video cited as its source showed clearly that he was talking about a tactic that McCain could use, not his real faith (I strongly suspect Obama to be pretty apathetic to religion)&lt;br /&gt;
*''On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria, which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.'' If reading a book written in a muslim POV makes you a muslim than how do we know what is in this book, because we can't trust anyone who read it to not be a muslim. If he were seen praying out the the qran that would be another story entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.'' Pakistan is an islamic nation, the american way of saying it is a bastardized version, he is using the name the nation calls its self.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really think that this should be reworded in to prose and that it needs to be below the TOC.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:46, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Copyediting needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that updating things like this as the news changes is tough, but:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama II (born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961), Democratic Party member, junior senator of the state of Illinois, and president-elect of the United States, winning the 2008 Election over Arizona Senator John McCain [3].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is not a sentence... [[User:Human|Human]] 14:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know they won't let me because I'm too new and can be a bit controversial, but I would love to rewrite the entire first paragraph. It has become such a muddled mess that it doesn't read well at all. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 14:27, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That section of the article looks like its attempting to proove that he is a muslim. Why not simply say &amp;quot;some prominent christian sites including X and Y have suggested that Obama may be a muslim&amp;quot;. It currently looks like it's trying to make people think that he is a muslim, and that for some reason that's bad. What's wrong with muslims?--[[User:Newguy123|Newguy123]] 16:15, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the point is that - no there is nothing wrong with being a Muslim but lying about it for political gain is a problem. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:32, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Again, that makes the presupposition being that someone lies when all you have is superficial, rather strained evidence to say he isn't lying.  Not very gracious on our part.  There are plenty of legitimate issues with Mr. Obama.  Living in gossip and innuendo and &amp;quot;he once made a mistake when talking&amp;quot; seems petty on our part.  Isn't it more important to emphasis why he is a socialist?  All we say is &amp;quot;he is&amp;quot;, not what that means, and how it could effect the country, etc.  It bothers me that this site emphasizes gossip.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:42, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Personally I dont think he is a Muslim however I am not going to kick up a fuss as I was already warned by Aschlafly (is he the boss?) for....something I did? Not sure what. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:45, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's funny how at the beginning of the article it claims he is a muslim, and then at the end discusses his previous church and pastor. It even lists 1988 as his year of baptism despite the beginning of the article stating he didn't have a date for baptism, which for everyone here in the conservapedia zone seems to take as undeniable proof he is a super secret muslim spy out for your children and pets.&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously though, I've mentioned it above that having an article for the current president of the U.S. start out with a poor and unnecessary argument over his faith is ''unprofessional'' at best. The beginning makes no valid points, manages to insult Muslims as a whole, and also contains that stupid picture of Obama in a traditional Kenyan costume.--[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 23:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Muslim President-elect! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the article assures us the Barack is a secret Muslim and would if elected become the first Muslim President of the United States, for consistency's sake, it should now be updated by something like the following: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Now that the unthinkable has occurred and Obama has duped the American People and stolen the election, he will become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and will probably use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is widely believed that now he is President-elect, Obama will drop the tiresome pretence of being a Christian and produce his other wives from hiding, don a turban and a scimitar, pray buns-up five times a day on a Persian carpet while facing Mecca, have a minaret built on top of the White House from which he will personally play the role of the muezzin and call the faithful to prayer, will establish policy recommending that “the Zionist entity be driven into the sea”, and put bin Laden’s face on the American dollar. The week after that will probably be even worse.&amp;quot; If no one objects, I will make some such interpolations in the article proper. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:30, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[ADL]] said:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Prager is flat-out wrong when he asserts that Representative Ellison's use of a Koran would be 'damaging to the fabric of American civilization.' To the contrary, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that, 'no religious test shall ever be required' to hold public office in America. Members of Congress, like all Americans, should be free to observe their own religious practices without government interference or coercion. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/swearing-on-the-koran_b_36907.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what all the fuss is about. Certainly there have been radical Muslims who support anti-US terrorism, but politically motivated distortions do not make Islam a wicked religion. Is Christianity to be rejected because of the abuses of the Crusades, the Inquisition, or the fact that Anglo-American Christians held slaves? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;70's terrorist&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I object to Ayers being referred to as a &amp;quot;terrorist from the 70's&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he is a &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; end of story. once a terrorist, always a terrorist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
we won't call Bin Laden a &amp;quot;2000's terrorist&amp;quot; in 2050&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 00:22, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good point, [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]].  Thanks for the edit. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 00:24, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The man is a functioning member of society, an educator, a family man, who has condemns his past actions, and has worked greatly towards improving the lives of others through charity work. He was a part of a group that destroyed ''property'', which doesn't make him a terrorist because that would imply he did random acts of terror on ''people''. Blowing up statues and parts of buildings was wrong but they did not go after people, and no one was hurt or killed. To compare him to Bin Laden is ''despicable''. And to put a section about this man at the top of the page of Presidential-elect Obama who worked with him in an organization to help reduce poverty levels is neither well thought out or ''tactful''. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 08:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that the Weather Underground did in fact kill people - 3 of their own, in a bomb-making accident.  Sometimes that happens when you set off bombs, even if it's not what you had in mind.  I would put other property-destruction crimes such as cross burning in the terror category as well.  I do agree that Obama's association with Ayres is minimal, at best, and I have huge issues with all the guilt-by-association tactics employed by the McCain campaign.  I'm not taking a stand on the content of this article one way or another. I'm just trying to organize it and cite it as best I can. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't believe an accidental death of their own people should be considered &amp;quot;terror&amp;quot; though. People could technically die while making signs for a normal type of protest, not as likely, but an accident is an accident. Although I do think that some property destruction like cross burning could be argued to be terroristic because it is done in order to terrify a group of people and incite violence against that group. However I still think that what the weather underground did does not quite carry that same connotations. They were protesting a war, and doing so by costing the government money and drawing attention to their cause, at no time was a group of people targeted in a way that would indicate that they were in danger directly from a hostile organization, unless you were an office desk or a public statue/monument. To use the word &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot;, especially nowadays, in the case of Bill Ayers is misleading, and it is a word that should not be tossed around lightly. It seems that people believe that Ayers = Terrorist, so therefore he must have killed people or tried to kill people, and this article does little to correct this misconception. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MInd Control? Really now? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people who published this lost what little credibility they had when they published this. Repeating it on this page just makes you look bad. I mean an O looks like a crystal ball? First of all it also looks like an orange or a penny or anything else that is round and circular. Also, I think that crystal balls are the favorite of ''fortune tellers'' so unless Obama can predict the future (which I think might make him a ''better'' president) this doesn't mean much. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:54, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  I am a practicing stage hypnotist (practicing because I still need work :) and I can tell you that most hypnotists use nothing but their voices and physical presence, and those who do use props traditionally use a pencil. [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 13:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Absence of Dancing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dancing is a popular form of celebration and partying by all ethnicities.  But why is [[Barack Obama]] rarely seen dancing, or even allowing and attending dancing.  Perhaps I've missed it (please let me know if I have).  I know, there was one highly staged politically correct dance with Ellen DeGeneris as Obama was catering to her audience.  But where's the rest?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One explanation is that the Islamic [[sharia]] disfavors dancing.[http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2008/10/islamic-scholars-denounce-dancing-say.html] --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:08, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When's the last time you went dancing, Andy? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:23, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::um, lol?&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpxJQABkSsQ Dancing in Puerto Rico]&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axH9bhwI8os Dancing to Snoop Dogg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::so there it is... at least three different places where he's seen dancing. Here's my question: lets see you find videos of Mccain dancing! xP your Islamic assumption thingy holds no water since you can say the same for McCain! [[User:Ema|Ema]] 11:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah! Ema, don't be fooled by this [[deceit]], he might secretly be a [http://www.dankphotos.com/whirling/ whirling dervish!] They're members of [[Sufi]] Islam, by the way. --[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I took a look at the Puerto Rico video.  It proves my point.  I've never seen anyone dance-without-dancing like that.  Have you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.  Judging by the determined objections above, it may be quite a while for some of his supporters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your argument is that he is a bad dancer so he must be a Muslim? Seriously Andrew, take a deep breath and relax, proving him to be a Muslim is not going to get him impeached, he has the presidency and that is that. In four years it might matter, but that means you have poor years to find less circumstantial evidence. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, Brendanw, it is obviously not my argument that he is a &amp;quot;bad dancer.&amp;quot;  I think you understand my argument perfectly well and won't admit it.  Suit yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:31, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Brendan's right about one thing at least. All the evidence listed is either circumstantial or draws illogical conclusions. The one about him when he says he joins a church after a suggestion does not in any way imply him as a muslim, though it might imply him as a disingenuous Christian. The two are mutually exclusive. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:38, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Well please explain it to  me differently, initially you said he didn't dance, and now that we have three videos of it you say that he &amp;quot;dances with out dancing&amp;quot; what does that mean if not bad dancer? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:45, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Andy's saying that, in those three videos, Obama isn't really ''dancing'', in the sense of crossing a line of Muslim (im)morality.  It's like being against swearing, but recognizing that words like &amp;quot;heck&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;geez&amp;quot; don't really cross that line.  That said, however, I did run across a video where [http://splicd.com/wzyT9-9lUyE/31/52 Obama dances] by anyone's definition.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 14:25, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::RossC, this video is obviously faked. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if he will dance at his inaugural ball, if it gets to that point. (see: Berg) [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 13:47, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
:In some Islamic traditions dancing is not allowed, in some christian traditions dancing is not allowed, some people regardless of religion just don't dance with enthusiasm (was he supposed to be [dancing inappropriately with] Ellen? While Barrack is a hottie I'm not sure she would let him do that) I was raised catholic and as a result I am a very quiet person who does not raise his arms in celebration. This is just such a far stretch that it doesn't mean anything. Heck if he were keeping his faith hidden and not praying to meca and not following the rules of Islam in order to complete the 35 year long mission that was trained in to him at a public school in indonesia at the age of 10 don't you think he would dance anyways? And his wife is a great dancer, in Islam men have a whole lot more freedom than women. this just doesn't add up to anything but crazy. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 15:30, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love to dance.  For what it's worth, I have seen an Obama campaign button with a picture of him dancing, and the words &amp;quot;Dance Yes We Can&amp;quot; on it.  It caught my eye because I take dance lessons.  See here [http://www.zazzle.com/obama_dance_button-145707809176961889] for a picture of the button. Over the years, I have met homeschooling moms of various faiths (Christian, Muslim, Jewish) who are careful about their children dancing for modesty reasons. Not everyone enjoys dancing, of course, particularly men.  While it's an interesting facet of Obama, to be honest I don't see it as a strong indicator of his religious beliefs.  When weaker arguments are included, it detracts from the stronger ones, I think. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't dance, and I can assure you that I'm not a Muslim. I'm a lousy dancer, and self-conscious about it. I also don't have a tinfoil hat, which might be why this whole conversation seems ludicrous to me. Godspeed.[[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 21:40, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The very conservative former Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard, did not dance in public. This is despite the fact that his treasurer, Peter Costello, and his rival and current Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, both danced on national television. Is this evidence that John Howard is a Muslim? Certainly not. There is a much less sinister and blatantly obvious explanation for Obama's lack of dancing - he isn't good at it. Just have a look at the videos posted, he has clearly received minimal dance instruction and is evidently self conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And just out of curiosity, has anyone actually seen John McCain dance? How about Palin or Biden? If these three have not then why should the explanation for their lack of participation not be extended to Obama? [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:05, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the fact that Spectral Evidence was outlawed in America back in the 1600's after 19 people were murdered for being accused of witchcraft. Get with the times, Schlafly. [[User:DRuss|DRuss]] 08:51, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is different about Obama that makes it unusual for him to not be much of a dancer?  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 09:45, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still waiting on an answer, Andy. When'd you last hit the dance floor? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 15:43, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Though irrelevant to the issue, I dance in times of celebration, and have also arranged for the availability of dancing by attendees at such events.  Pursue this irrelevancy further and your account will be blocked, per my comment on your talk page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:41, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: He does somewhat have a point, even if his methods of conveying it are a little childish. He's pretty much pointing out that your accusation opens up a big can of worms. If I was to say that Obama's lack of dancing must mean he is Muslim due to Islamic Sharia, I could also say that if I saw you sitting on the floor you must be a Muslim who is kneeling to Mecca. [[User:St0dad|St0dad]] 09:09, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Simple solution to this whole thing.  Islam does not forbid dancing.  Amazing no?  Islam forbids certain kinds of dancing.  Such as dancing involving the men and women who are not married, and dancing with the intention to be provocative.  Of course there are always members of a group who are more conservative with religious laws (no dancing at all) or more liberal with laws (any dancing is ok) but as written, Dancing is allowed as long as it is well mannered, does not stimulate desires, and does not mix men and women who are not married.&lt;br /&gt;
That being said, there are also christian groups that forbid dancing as well.  For much the same reasons.  So just because Obama doesn't dance enough for your satisfaction does not mean anything regarding religion.--[[User:ScottA|ScottA]] 22:50, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti Americanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many points in this article could be summarized into a section called &amp;quot;Anti Americanism&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised this hasn't been done already. Anti Americanism should be a given a very prominent place in this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like this idea because I feel the article is too fragmented and not organized. People are adding self contained ideas in various points in the article, especially at the top, which disrupts the flow and readablity. I cleaned up the first paragraph, but I can't smooth up everything [[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I make such an edit will I be banned? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:01, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; comment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe Barack Obama is a Muslim or at least more sympathetic to them than Christians, but the &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; statement is taken out of context. I removed it as part of the evidence of him being Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpoAVAA1F30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't like that video btw, I only posted it to show the full context [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On a side note, the entire section, for accuracy's sake, should be called &amp;quot;Why Barack Obama is not a Christian&amp;quot; since the only parts that are not circumstantial are in regard to disingenuous Christianity. Beyond that the idea of him not changing his name making him muslim is ridiculous. He was named for his Father. Example from reality: my middle name is Paul. I received it fromt he name of my grandfather. I'm no longer Christian. But I don't change my middle name because I no longer believe Paul's words. I keep it because I love and respect my grandfather. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I partially agree. Maybe there should be two sections. One detailing Anti-Christian facts and one for Pro-Muslim [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Schlafly reverted my change ... Why? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 14:18, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Because you don't agree with him.[[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 15:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's Schlaflypedia then? I had high hopes for Conservapedia [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 15:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I reverted your change because you deleted factual information.  That reason should be obvious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socialistic==&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting to note that the MSM has buried the exact phrase and can only be found on blogs. The media will use the third person term, e.g. &amp;quot;Obama responds to McCains allegations of Socialistic.&amp;quot; The quote itself is relevent. A play on words to blunt its' true impact. Actual charges of 'Socialism' or of being a 'Socialist'. Nobody uses &amp;quot;Socialistic&amp;quot;--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wait==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please explain to me how Barack Obama is a Muslim? Thanks. [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 23:12, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly someone's not paying attention. Not that I endorse the, uh, theory, but there's a whoooooole big section about it in the article. And several discussions on this talk page. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:15, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this point the very thought that he's a Muslim is preposterous. No Muslim would willingly put Rahm Emmanuel, someone so notably Jewish and pro israel in such a powerful position (chief of staff). All in all though, a pretty good choice from the pool. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 23:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama isn't a muslim.  He doesn't have the character we see on the trail to do so.  I think Obama will be an awful President, is not a christian (it's too liberal), supports infanticide and sodomy, and won't do almost ''any'' of the thigs he has promised.  That aside I don't think he's a muslim.  Alot of the proof is probably just part of his warped view of multi-culturism, which includes the so-called ''peaceful'' religion of Allah and Muhammed.  This should be placed on a different page and other more certain information placed on this page (e.g. a better photo should be placed on the top, not a picture of him which tries to accuse his patriotism.)  He is going to be President, a bad one, but one nonetheless.  Please, let us respect the authority of our time.  [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 07:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Think about this: If I had told you on September 12 2001, that in 6 years we'd ellect a liberal, socialist muslim named Barack Hussein Obama, who has terrorist friends, you call me crazy.  But here we are.  [[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connections with Irish Terrorists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I note that a liberal contributor has seen fit to add a line stating that The Republic of Ireland refused to extradite Rita O'Hare -- the IRA terrorist who Obama met last year -- for one of several alleged offences. Why is this of any interest? She served time in the Republic for smuggling explosives. So that country's legal authorities were in no doubt as to her status. Does Wikipedia regard shooting British soldiers in Northern Ireland as a &amp;quot;political offence&amp;quot;? If so, then should we regard killing American soldiers in Iraq the same way? I don't think so. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 18:29, 7 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well spoken Keith!   I intend to contact the Irish Embassy in Washington and ask that they make a clear statement condemning our Marxist Terrorist President-Elect's meeting with these vile killers.   I would encourage ASchlafly to perhaps make a television appearance about this?   As a lawyer, I'm sure he can speak to the international law aspects of this very serious matter.   What's next I wonder - how soon are Nobama's Shining Path, Khmer Rouge, Sandanista, and Red Brigade friends going to crawl their way from their terrorist swamps into the halls of Washington power?!   Not long I'll bet!   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 13:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nodanca was was probably a member of the [[FLQ]], too! [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 18:38, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, it was the High Court in the Republic of Ireland that regarded her case as falling under the exemptions for 'political offences'.  That is why they refused to extradite her to N. Ireland.  Also, Arnie S., if you truly are indignant about the &amp;quot;vile killer&amp;quot; Rita O'Hare, why don't you call your members of Congress to condemn the fact that she is the duly appointed Sinn Fein Representative to the US. [[User:Tordenvaer|Tordenvaer]] 18:37, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't understand. I genuinely don't understand. My edit to the Obama page on this subject has been deleted as being &amp;quot;inappropriate and silly&amp;quot;. What is the distinction between a link with the Weather Underground and a link with the IRA? Why are inverted commas placed around “terrorism” (like this) when discussing the latter organisation and not when deriding Bill Ayres's mob. I suppose it's different -- and less significant -- when Obama's pals are blowing up Irish folk rather than Americans. Would it be different if he were pictured grinning next to some PLO hoodlum?  --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 02:42, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Tordenvaer (if that is your real name), I already HAVE called my member of Congress about the matter - I don't mess around!   The Sinn Feiners are a terrible organization with deep terrorist roots who killed many British soldiers and people over a hundred years in Ireland.   I'm as surprised as Keith is about the removal of his well-referenced material.   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 21:57, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys, grind your ax about Irish &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; somewhere else.  Obama has no plausible connection with it and I'm not going to waste any more time on this silliness.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:01, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, why do you place quote marks around the word terrorism? [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]]  [[User talk:Ferret|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Nice old chat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 22:08, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;- I'm not going to get involved in any discussion here, but it appears a lot of you know a fair bit about [[Rita O'Hare]]. I have started her article, please contribute and spread your knowledge. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:13, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: If the site administrator does not think this worthy of inclusion then there is no point arguing the case. But I must again ask -- the question is reiterated above by Ferret -- why this site puts inverted commas around terrorism when discussing the IRA, but not when discussing the Weather Underground. The slaughter of innocent Northern Irish people may seem &amp;quot;silly&amp;quot; to you. It does not to us. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 12:36, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Could be because Irish terrorism was largely funded by US &amp;quot;Irish&amp;quot; Catholics? [[User:GeorgeK|GeorgeK]] 07:48, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inciting hatred ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow, have you ever asked yourselves &amp;quot;What would Jesus do?&amp;quot;. I hardly think He would write such a biased and bigoted &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot; article. Real Christians don't need this sort of tripe. People are worked up over fundamentalist muslims, but it is writing like this that brings hatred on Christians and Americans and makes you just as bad, if not worse, than them. This was the first article I have ever read on Conservapedia and it will be http://www.conservapedia.com/skins/common/images/button_sig.pngthe last. WWJD?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Jesus came to tell the truth, no one can deny that.  And many people hated Him for it, obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:02, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.&amp;quot;  -Gandhi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now who's the ONE? [[User:Wikified|Wikified]] 10:41, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Gandhi deserves much respect, but I've never heard Christians cite him as an authority on Christianity.  I wouldn't expect a Christian to interpret Gandhi's religion for him either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:10, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trust, but verify; then get an eight day block==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trust, but verify.  Though he was not the originator of this quote, it was one of Ronald Reagan's favorites.  He quoted it when signing treaties with the Soviet Union and it's a useful concept in today's society.  It was in the spirit of this quote that I first read and edited at this encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The commandments and guidelines appear to support Reagan's idiom, yet some of the people in charge feel they can rule with an iron fist and pick and choose which rules they want to follow.  I experienced it first hand when I edited this article.  I first made several comments about the shortcomings of this article on the talk page so anyone could give me their opinion of my thoughts.  These comments highlighted various portions of the article that were factually incorrect, contained partisan sniping, unsupported assertions, gossip or deception by omission.  The response I got from Aschlafly was not encouraging, yet he didn't say I was prohibited from making any changes.  In fact, the pages that govern this encyclopedia say a lot about how articles must be sourced, placement of citation tags, how facts must to true and verifiable, etc.  Based on reading the guidelines, I made several changes that I thought reflected well on conservatives and Conservapedia.  Yet alas, I was blocked by Aschlafly for eight days.  The reason given was for 'inappropriate edits', that's very vague but I was unable to get any more information because Aschlafly doesn't provide contact information for people that have questions about their block.  This says a lot about a person's integrity if they refuse to follow the rules and then block other people because they made an 'inappropriate edit' that followed the spirit and intent of the commandments and guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since this encyclopedia is being used an educational resource for home-schooled children, I'd like to think the information contained within would be factual and verifiably true.  I'd feel very embarrassed for my child if she read some of the inaccurate content of this encyclopedia and then repeated it to an informed person that was educated on the true and verifiable facts of Barack Obama or others.  It is my honest opinion that this encyclopedia is a long way from earning respectability; and blocking editors for making true and verifiable edits is not going to help.  The administrators should clean up their act because there are a lot of people out there that will follow Reagan's advice; trust, yet verify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I will continue to make the same edits proposed by the commandments and the guidelines.  If an admin feels they can do without another conservative editing this encyclopedia in an ethical and trustworthy manner, it is their loss.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 16:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference 29 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; section there is a point about his name, and following that there is a reference. That reference includes a big chunk of argument and then a few references of its own and some examples and its just a mess. I am about to go through and trim the fat, that means I'm going to take off the examples, and I'm going tot take off the parts that say that it is common to change your name of conversion (Obama never claims to have converted from Islam, so it doesn't really stand out as an inconsistency in his story, some might even claim its a [[straw man]]) and I am going to move the reference to the fact with in the bullet point that it supports and put up a fact tag. I am not taking down the bullet point which I would dispute. I would encourage any one who has a problem with this to go out and find a real reference that shows that most christians would not maintain their fathers name if it were tied to another religion. Please don't block me for a good faith factual edit. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 19:12, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim, Koran, ''redux'' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the silly Muslim and Koran references in the first paragraph for two reasons - one, they are completely unfounded statements with no basis in reality, and two, they are repeated ''ad nauseum'' in the first &amp;quot;section&amp;quot;, which is apparently intentionally placed above a TOC tag.  Let's leave the panicky POV-pushing to sections, at least, in the desperate attempt for this site to resemble an encyclopedia. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:30, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama is not a muslim nor a person who embraces biblical Christianity because the evidence contradicts this matter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a well written and scholarly piece that examines Obama's religious views and it was written by the National Clergy Council:  http://nationalclergycouncil.org/010807BarackObama.htm  The evidence does not support Obama being a muslim.  The evidence also does not support Obama embracing biblical Christianity.[[User:Conservative|conservative]] 09:19, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I skimmed it and don't see where it concludes that Obama is not a Muslim.  The article fails to recognize that less than 1% of people raised Muslim (as Obama was) ever leave the religion.  The article says Obama is a member of a Christian church, but he left that many months ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:24, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Okay, a couple questions.  1) Where are you getting this 1% figure from? 2) How was he raised muslim? Countless acquaintances of mine who were 'raised catholic,' spending ample time learning about Catholicism in school are nothing of the sort.  3) Why would a 1% conversion rate even matter? A person's religion isn't probabilistically determined.  By that logic, since 0% of previous Presidents were black, it's unlikely that Obama is president.  I don't like this guy or his policy, but real criticism seems to be the way to go, not pointless claims about his religion. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 10:50, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, as he is the president now, wouldn't it be far more constructive to work on things about his articulated agenda, and how it will affect Americans, write about how to influence our Congress people to stand up to agenda, and how to work with him to reflect what real Americans want - rather than report on unproven and unsupported claims?  It would be beyond comprehension if something said by panicked conservatives (not specifically here, just in genera) caused someone to think the right answer is to assassinate him.  Far better to focus on what we CAN do to remind our government who they serve - themselves or us.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are several points wrong with youe assertion.  1) He is not the president now, George W. Bush is. 2) His muslim faith is not unsupported and is far from irrelivant.  It will effect his leadership (shiria law anyone?) and his cabinet choices.  It is a very big deal seeing as he is the first non-Christian president ever elected.  Are we suppose to just stick our heads in the sand??[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 12:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Andy, you say that less than one percent of people raised as Muslims convert to another religion and use that percentage as if it is not a significant number.  It is.  Let us assume that there are one billion Muslims in the world today- this is a conservative estimate, using numbers from [http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html www.adherents.com].  Let us then assume that, for the sake of a conservative estimate, that 0.1% of Muslims convert to other religions.  That means that out of the one billion Muslims alive today, one million would convert.  That's more than the population of San Jose, California.  This is not an insignificant number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My point here, Andy, is that your use of this statistic is not a good argument.  Less than one percent is a far cry from none.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 12:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Statistical evidence is relevant and compelling.  But it does not stand alone here.  There are at least a dozen other compelling evidentiary items, and the list is growing.  Supporting a ruler who has an agreement to convert the country to Islam, for example, is persuasive evidence also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:28, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fist of all, I think you mean Sh'''a'''ria, but seeing as how you misspelled some English words, I can't really blame you for getting that wrong. To think that just because you believe he is a Muslim (and I emphasize ''believe'', but there are already multiple sections on this page saying why he is not) he would somehow be able to implement Sharia law in the U.S. is silly. The First Amendment prevents religious laws from being able to be made from ''any'' religion. So even if he was Muslim, that doesn't mean it would make pass some sort of Muslim laws, although I'm not exactly sure what ones you are worried about anyway, no intoxicants perhaps? You may be interested in hearing that the U.S. legal system may have been founded in part on ideas from Sharia law. And last but not least, what makes you think every president was Christian? The majority were to be sure, but as far as we know Jefferson was a deist whose ideas were closest to unitarianism, and Grant, Lincoln, Johnson, and Hayes had no religious affiliation and could have ranged from anything such as some sort of personal Christianity, simple theism, agnosticism, or even atheism. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Maybe he wouldn't be able to push sharia law (although the liberals have a majority now), but that doesn't not mean that he wouldn't like to, or introduce pieces of it little by little using deceit.  Liberals love to use &amp;quot;what if's&amp;quot; and draw conclusions using their &amp;quot;feelings&amp;quot; about someone or something, but to me it's a matter of facts: As Mr. Schlafly has pointed out, less than 1% of people raised as muslims ever leave the religion.  In other words, 99% of those raised muslim stay that way for the rest of their lifes.  Whether or not Obama is a muslim at this time is contested, but it is a fact that he was RAISED with muslim beliefs.  Which means there is a 99% chance that he still holds those beliefs.  Those are tough odds.  The US is engaged in a war on terror against muslim extremeists, and there is a 99% chance that our soon to be commander and chief is himself a muslim.  Now, no rational person believes that he shares the views of radical muslims or would wish harm on the country, but it is a connection that is difficult to ignore.  Especially given his relationship with an unrepentive domestic terrorist.  The issue is not that he has a religion other than Christianity, it's that his religion may lead him to sympathize with the very people trying to kill us.  Just as if a presidential nominee had had fuzzy ties to the USSR during the cold war.  People would, and should, look at those ties closely.[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 16:54, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Muslim Votes==&lt;br /&gt;
Wondering if the following should be added to Why barack is a Muslim. &amp;quot;90 Percent of American Muslims Voted for Obama.&amp;quot; [http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=39031] They voted in such numbers because he is Jewish? No, because he is Muslim. They voted for him because he is a convert to Christianity from Islam? Nope, they voted for a Muslim. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Correlation does not equal causation. A lot of other demographics were won over by Obama too, it doesn't make him an hispanic, a young white college student, a Native American, or a resident of California. I think a stronger reason why Muslims voted for Obama may be more of a problem with McCain's and Palin's treatment of certain minorities during the campaign such as the &amp;quot;he's not an Arab, he is a good family man&amp;quot; comment, as well as what other groups these Muslims belonged too such as their overall economic status. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Can you cite any other voting pattern as high as 90% that is not based on religion or ethnicity?  Not your other examples of Hispanic and young white college student, that's for sure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::With the greatest of respect, what an extraordinary thing to say!  Are you suggesting that Muslim voters can somehow read Obama's mind and see that he is really a Muslim?  The most that such a correlation could indicate is that Muslim voters might ''think'' that Obama is a Muslim.  And frankly, it doesn't even show that because you cannot know what was in their minds when they voted (possibly any number of different things).  Talk about clutching at straws!  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 16:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::78% of Jewish people voted for Obama, and I doubt they want to convert to either Christianity or Islam.   70% of people who live in urban areas &amp;gt; 500,000 voted for him.   Just two examples, from the excellent [http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/11/09/weekinreview/20081109_CONNELLY_GRFK.html National Election Pool synopsis], [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html tables] and [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html data].   There's plenty of information there, so any trends should be visible.   But one does need to be careful about correlation and causation, clearly.   Famously, the population of penguins at the North Pole is supposed to correlate perfectly with the number of sitting MP's in the UK Labour Party.   [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 16:07, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::So what? Big cities are notorious cesspools of subversion and licence - just the sort of people to be attracted by a chancer like Obama. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:17, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The point he was making before you blocked him is that while Obama received a high percentage of the Muslim votes, he also received high percentages from numerous other demographics.  Clearly Obama does not belong to all of these demographics, and as such it is a misuse of the data to pick the one group you want to tie Obama to and declare him a part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An interesting idea to consider is the possible circularity or self-fulfillment of this argument.  Some people say that Obama is a Muslim, and hence a bad guy.  Voting Muslims generally take offense and vote for Obama, giving him a high percentage of their vote.  Some people then claim that receiving most of the Muslim vote further indicates that Obama is a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 16:44, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent find.  This should help put to rest any doubts that remain about Obama's muslim faith. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 16:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gays overwhelmingly voted for Obama, cleary this is because this married man is a flaming homosexual. If Obama is a socialist, why do you guys silence any mention that Americans VOTED FOR a socialist president?--[[User:MichaelMo|MichaelMo]] 16:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deniers, you strike out.  Nothing approaches the 90% statistic cited by Jpatt, and for obvious reasons.  Go somewhere else to try to fool people.  You're not fooling anyone here, particularly when you look at the even more compelling evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:55, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't matter how strong the correlation is, it still doesn't prove causation. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The real question should be: why are you arguing with facts on this website? We argue with feelings here. I ''feel'' that Obama is a Muslim, so it's true.--[[User:AshleyB|AshleyB]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, none of this evidence is compelling- it's all weak at best, and when strung together and passed off as proof it just doesn't work.  90% of Muslim votes.  Less than 1% of Muslims convert.  The list goes on.  This &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; amounts to a wobbly house of cards, and I'm looking forward to it falling over and people discussing facts and positions, not resorting to religious persecution.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:04, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not persecution, Corry. Discussion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him.  I don't know what else to call that.  Also, I would recommend you don't Google what AshleyB advised you to Google on your talk page.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:10, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This suggestion by ASchlafly is worse than weak, it's nonsensical.  ASchlalfy talks about correlation being indicative of causation.  How can there be any '''causation'''?  In order for there to be causation the Muslim voters would have to have ''known'' that Obama was a Muslim.  Is there some vast secret conspiracy going on?  Have the Muslim voters been given contacted and given the secret &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; information by the Obama campaign?  Are the rest of us being kept in the dark?  How many Muslim voters are we talking about?  This is just plain silly.--[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:14, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be aware, all commenters above, that your accounts will be blocked if you misrepresent what someone else says (as in Corry claiming that &amp;quot;[T]he argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him&amp;quot; or HGridley pretending this is about some &amp;quot;secret conspiracy.&amp;quot;)  You won't be warned again.  Be respectful and truthful in this discussion, or you'll be ranting in the future on a different site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one else can come up with anything close to a 90% voting correlation except where there is religious or ethnic identity.  Scientifically and objectively, that is noteworthy.  There are a dozen more compelling pieces of evidence, but that does not mean this data point is not suggestive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have been utterly truthful in what I have said.  You appear to have missed the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In order for there to have been causation (i.e. Obama's being a Muslim caused Muslims to vote for him) the Muslims would necessarily have to ''know'' (not just suspect) that Obama is a Muslim.  In order for that to be the case there would need to be a vast conspiracy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty simple really.  Can you tell us what you know about this secret conspiracy?  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And how am I misrepresenting you, Andy?  Are you trying to convince people that Obama is a Muslim for purely academic reasons?  I stand by my statement.  This article, in the collection of &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; that Obama may be a Muslim, reads that &amp;quot;Contrary to Christianity, the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&amp;quot;  So we have the premise that Muslims lie to advance Islam, and Obama is part of this.  I would also like to point out you comment in a different section that &amp;quot;It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.&amp;quot;  That definitely sounds like it'd be a pretty bad thing if Obama was a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 18:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mystery:Why Do Black Americans Vote For Liberal Candidates?|Black Americans vote for the Democrat presidential candidate over 90% of the time]], even when that candidate is not Black. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:20, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Those Democrat cantidates were probably secretly black.  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 18:23, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We are trying to build an encyclopedia here. Either help out or get out of the way, HGridley. You might find more people who think you are funny on a liberalpedia, if one exists.&lt;br /&gt;
::The only truly funny thing about your note is that you call them &amp;quot;cantidates&amp;quot;, which is a true record of how liberals treat Black Americans -- telling them &amp;quot;You can't, so depend on the government to do so for you.&amp;quot; [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:29, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to confess to being very confused by everything that's being said here.   None of it seems to quite line up.  Wouldn't the Jewish community be LESS likely to vote for a Muslim candidate, particularly one with the alleged terrorist links?   Yet 78% of them voted for him - in greater proportion than they have previously voted for a Democrat?   That seems to be completely counter to the allegation?    It just all seems very odd, and very confusing to a passing reader.   [[User:HarryR|HarryR]] 22:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Confusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little bit confused about one of the dot points claiming Obama is a Muslim, and was wondering if someone could explain it. It is the one about him leaving his Church without first finding a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in Australia, while many people are members of a Church, a majority of us Christians are not. There is often no official enrolment beyond donations or small groups, and most families simply attend the Church closest to them, some even attending a number of Churches. As such it is quite confusing to state that a person is not a Christian simply because they have not &amp;quot;joined&amp;quot; a Church, as this is not a reflection on whether or not they attend, let alone their individual faith. Perhaps this could be clarified for an international audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also the line &amp;quot;Many of Obama's statements about religion conflict with Christianity&amp;quot; is entirely conterproductive to the argument, as the statements made by Obama that are in opposition to Christianity (regarding homosexuality) are also in opposition to Islam. If anything this is proof that Obama is not a Muslim and is in fact an atheist, and should be removed asap! [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also Malcolm X did not become a Muslim after he was a National of Islam leader, it was before. The current wording needs to be fixed. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:51, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lenin Poster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statement about the Lenin-like poster is informative.  We don't censor informative information here.  Let the reader decide.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:22, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, did you happen to take a look at the reference? The article claims that &amp;quot;Obama also ''revealed'' his ''deep Marxist/Leninist roots''&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;clear parallels between the poster design and Lenin's earlier poster was ''obviously a deliberate yet hidden hint'' to his European, socialistic audience as to his political roots and beliefs&amp;quot; (emphasis mine). The citation, which was a blog, by the way, and not in any way a trustworthy source of informative information, gives no evidence to back up these statements. It shows a poster of Lenin and a poster of Obama, both of which show profiles of the figures. Assuming these pictures weren't entirely made up, do you really think that this slight similarity is Obama's way of confessing closet Marxism? Not to mention the fact that Obama likely didn't make the posters anyway -- maybe we should accuse his (very expensive!!) marketing designer of being a Marxist/Leninist. 15:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama and beer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several stories (with photos) of Obama drinking beer, which as an intoxicant is banned by Muslim sharia. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2008/05/06/20/125-6web-Obama_Beer-minor.standalone.prod_affiliate.91.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.mcclatchydc.com/100/story/36055.html&amp;amp;h=325&amp;amp;w=485&amp;amp;sz=47&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=28&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__ShpWdieNIwhr4Rp3jHtLe7U9MB8=&amp;amp;tbnid=Se90xFLBo6rNQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=86&amp;amp;tbnw=129&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bdrinks%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156_t.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156.html&amp;amp;h=332&amp;amp;w=400&amp;amp;sz=16&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=15&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__Yubc0nmus36Cf4Rrf7BL7-33-0g=&amp;amp;tbnid=xuWGKQ1Sl8_bQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=103&amp;amp;tbnw=124&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bbeer%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No rational person can say that a practicing Muslim wouldn't violate the law in such a blatant, repeated manner. Another strike against the goofy Muslim charge. And remember, we don't censor here. Godspeed. [[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 12:52, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think many American Muslims drink beer.  Nice try, though.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:57, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hussein reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's factual and it's informative.  If there is reasoned basis for deleting it, let's see it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:03, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Again, no reason has been given for deleting the Hussein reference, and there is none.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Andy, this is false.  Reasons have been given on this talk page numerous times before.  I just had a quick look, and found reasons being given in all archives except the first, as well as other places on this talk page.  So you are wrong to say that no reason has been given, and wrong to say that there is no reason.  And, as I have pointed out in the edit comments, five senior administrators have said that they disagree with it being there.  Is your view on this somehow superior to those five put together?  Do you want this to be a collaborative encyclopaedia or your blog?  The former demands that you not impose your opinion regardless of who is disagreeing.  Imposing your opinion regardless suggests that this is your blog.  I know you don't consider it to be the latter, but that's the way it's looking.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:21, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not a blog but an encylopedia. If it were a blog, your opinion would carry as much weight as anyone else's. Let's put this one in [[Conservapedia:Debate Topics]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:24, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: If it were a blog, the blog owner's opinion would carry the most weight.  Almost all blogs are the opinions of an ''individual'', not a group of people.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Philip, the truth is not dependent on consensus, and 5 out of several dozen is not a consensus anyway.  Give your best reason for deleting this information here.  Since the beginning we have had a policy not to delete factual, informative material, particularly when it is liberal ideology that motivates the demand for censorship of it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:29, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I said five of the ''senior'' administrators, which numbers about eleven.  So that's five out of eleven, not dozens.  Further, that's five against and one (yourself) for, as the remainder have not offered an opinion that I'm aware of.  (One perhaps did support you, but because they wanted to support you, not because they considered it a valid argument.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My reason is relevance, not (primarily) accuracy.  I'm not disputing that his middle name is Hussein.  The claim that &amp;quot;most Christians would not retain&amp;quot; their (former/Muslim/Arabic?; it's not clear) name is not supported by the references, and even if it is true, means little in individual cases.  That is, even if 99% changed their name, Obama not changing his name might mean no more than him being in the other 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: And this is just one of the points in that section.  The entire argument that Obama is a Muslim is built on very circumstantial evidence, selective evidence, and logical fallacy, and is rejected by other conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Philip, it obviously is relevant, which you say is your primary objection.  We don't censor information here based on liberal dislike for it.  Wikipedia does that.  We provide the information and let the reader decide.  If some readers want to conclude that someone with a Muslim name is actually a Christian, even though less than 1% of those raised as Muslims convert, so be it.  We're not going to censor this factual information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Exactly.  The point of Conservapedia is ''not'' to censor information, but to leave it to our readers to decide.  The MSM has tried to push this under the rug, so the least we can do is offer these arguments to the intelligent public. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 11:27, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The problem is that these points are fallacious and lead to a conclusion based on specious arguments. That is neither &amp;quot;trustworthy&amp;quot; nor encyclopedic. Obama may not be your brand of xian, but he's certianly no brand of muslim. Your inability to accept that this is incorrect despite repeated arguments wherein you have shown nothing but fallacious arguments drawing poor conclusions hurts the credibility of all Conservapedia. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 11:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debate On Obama's Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debate is continuing at [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?‎]] It may be best to continue arguing the point there with the aim of reaching a conclusion which can then be utilised in the article, and leave this talk page for discussing other improvements. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:22, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:09, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:08, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action?   Untrue.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am no fan of Obama.  I do plan on respectfully opposing him via various channels on the internet.  However, I believe I should state my opposition to this sentence of the article: &amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not read the rest of the article because I believed months ago and for good reasons that Obama was going to win this election. For example, the unpopular war and  poor economy that was partly caused by a guns and lots of butter spending strategy (Bush should have learned from LBJ committing us to a war and the Great Society programs at the same time).   I also thought that it would have been easy for the Republicans to win 12 years in a row given the low quality of the Democratic party. I think the Republicans snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory.  I also think Americans have too much debt (last time I heard the average American had lots of credit card debt). One of the reasons for the great depression is that American's had too much debt at the time. I think Bush's call for Americans to do to do more shopping mall spending was a joke.  If anything, Americans need to increase their skills to be more productive (The libraries are open but you might have to watch less TV.  Last time I checked the average American watches 3 hours of television a day) and work harder to pay off their debt.  American's are going to get out of the hole by increasing their productivity.    It seems as if Bush did not want to learn from economic history and was only looking out for short term fixes.  Well sooner or later, common sense says you have to pay the piper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Getting back to Obama, obviously, Obama's marital success in terms of not getting divorced compared to Ronald Reagan is not the result of affirmative action.  I am sure I could come up with others.  I have not read the article for the most part because this sentence turned me off to the whole article.  Judging from the &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot; sentence, I  believe a lot of time is probably being spent to defend an article rather than improve it where obvious improvements could be made. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 06:04, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Staying married is laudable but in this context it would not be considered a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement.&amp;quot;  If you would like to add a footnote exception to the remark along the lines of, &amp;quot;he has been married for x years,&amp;quot; I'm not opposed but I would expect that to caveat to seem off-topic, or even sarcastic, for most readers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:52, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One CP writer told me he equates divorce with adultery, and he accused Reagan of adultery on this basis. Is this the consensus view of Conservatives? Or just his own idea? Or what?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We ought to be clear on the standards by which we judge public figures. And consistent, too. I mean, which is worse, committing actual adultery (JFK, Clinton) or getting divorced and then remarrying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Biblically, divorce is not adultery.  However, divorce is wrong unless the spouse has been unfaithful.  Remarriage after a legitimate divorce is okay.  The question is whether remarriage after a wrong divorce is okay.  Many believe, I think that although the act of divorce may be wrong, that is a forgivable sin like any other sin, and remarriage is not a further sin.  And I'd tend to agree that committing &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; adultery is worse than divorce and remarriage.  However, the point that Conservative was raising was not between those two cases, but between divorce and remarriage compared to marriage without divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm not convinced that Obama's marriage does not constitute a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot;.  Given the divorce rate these days, especially among prominent people, I would think that it ''was'' a clear personal achievement.  In fact I'd consider staying marriage a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot; for anybody these days, given all the pressures on marriage, including the peer pressure that divorce is okay.&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:35, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I rarely disagree with you, Philip, as I find your comments to be some of the more considered on this board, but here I would have to disagree.  Jesus makes it quite clear that divorce *is* adultery, not *like* adultery.  More then any other text, especially OT text, I take Jesus's words to heart. Mark 10&lt;br /&gt;
2 Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, &amp;quot;Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
3 &amp;quot;What did Moses command you?&amp;quot; he replied.&lt;br /&gt;
4 They said, &amp;quot;Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
5 &amp;quot;It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,&amp;quot; Jesus replied.&lt;br /&gt;
6 &amp;quot;But at the beginning of creation God `made them male and female.'&lt;br /&gt;
7 `For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,&lt;br /&gt;
8 and the two will become one flesh.' So they are no longer two, but one.&lt;br /&gt;
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this.&lt;br /&gt;
11 He answered, &amp;quot;Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.&lt;br /&gt;
12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.&amp;quot; --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 09:41, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama spiruality interview ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html   a interview from a pretty religous website about Obama. Should it be mentioned? Or since it kinda contradicts abit of the article should it be ommitted? --[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What one might say in an interview really means very little, Vmember, particularly if one is seeking to achieve a position by hiding one's essential nature or beliefs. So really what he says when seeking to impress is irrelevant. It is what he does and has done, and what he says in unguarded moments, that matters. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 13:16, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*um then shouldn't it atleast be mentioned somewhere in the article about this interview maybe as a response to questions about his faith section? And why is him maybe being a muslim all the way at the top of the article? Shouldn't be be somewhere towards the middle? I've never seen in all my time part of a article pushed into the intro section. Also the article contradicts itself by stating that Obama is most likely a muslim while at the same time pointing at that he was a member of a radical Christian church. That doesn't make any sense. You can't have it both ways.--[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:25, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555459</id>
		<title>Talk:Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=555459"/>
		<updated>2008-11-12T18:06:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archives:&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive1|1]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive2|2]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/archive4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disgusted Conservative ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've voted Republican in every election since 1960, but I'm absolutely disgusted by this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What happened to the dignity of our party under Goldwater and Reagan? This &amp;quot;encyclopedia&amp;quot; page is just one long rant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are there any real conservatives out there willing to present objective, factual criticism of Obama? God knows there are enough valid arguments to make. Why are we channeling Michael Savage rather than William Buckley? Currently this page makes me cry for my party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds like disgusted conservative is voting for BO. I happen to think it is an accurate account of a man that is dishonest. Where will you get the real picture about about if not here? Are you disgusted by Wikipedias article? How about the coverage on MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, LATimes, WaPo, NYT, Google, The Guardian. Why not be mad and except that the majority of America is being fooled? Why not be mad at someone as disgusting as BO, actually has a real chance to take the Presidency and doesn't deserve it IN THE LEAST? Reagan is rolling over in his grave and so all the Founders.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:54, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Voting Republican again this year. I know you're mad about what's going on, but it shows throughout the page. An encyclopedia can't be written from an angry point of view. Let me be specific:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) &amp;quot;Obama and Elitism&amp;quot; plus &amp;quot;Obama and Islam&amp;quot; are not valid main introductory sections. Start with his early life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) His birth certificate gets its own section but his healthcare and tax plans don't? Focus on what's really important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) The &amp;quot;Insights&amp;quot; section is just a list of criticisms and belongs under a &amp;quot;Criticism&amp;quot; section. Categorize corectly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) Off-topic side-swipes: &amp;quot;He became a member of the Harvard Law Review, which uses racial quotas, in 1989&amp;quot;. Why is &amp;quot;which uses racial quotas&amp;quot; in there? If it was a reason that he was chosen, say that. If it wasn't leave it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) Unsubstantiated claims: &amp;quot;Obama's campaign has been financed largely by leftist donors opposed to the war and to the American military in general.&amp;quot; Citation definitely needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have several good sections in here: &amp;quot;Senate career&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Foreign policy experience&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Published criticism&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Religious affiliations&amp;quot;. These are high-quality and reflect well on Conservapedia. The others do not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the reply from hsmom below as the kind of constructive, factual accuracy this page needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This sounds like you're standard liberal bellyaching.  The fact is that no real conservative Christian can vote for this man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::??!?! Trying to hold this article to some kind of standard is bellyaching? Would you like to address any of my points?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your points is liberal talking points.  The fact is that Barack Hussein Obama wants to talk with Iran without predeterminations, flip flops, and is close friends to an unrepentive TERRORIST.  What more can you know?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Trying to shift the focus on an ''encyclopedia page'' about a presidential candidate from hypothetical statements (his possible Islamic faith) and trivial matters (his birth certificate), to his actual stance on the issues is liberal bellyaching? If anything, we should be casting aside these trivial circumstances as beneath us and take the time to dissect each of his stances on the actual issues. That's what a real, dignified Conservative would do. Relying on ridiculous tactics such as these is asinine and cowardly. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 16:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think this article doesn't go far enough.  I think there should be a picture of Hitler as the top photo, just like the Evolution page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disgusted Conservative, sadly you are only wasting your time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does it say he MAY be the first Muslim President (a horrible, false claim) and he MAY use the Koran to be sworn in&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama's pastor of twenty-years, Rev. Wright, was originally a member with the Nation of Islam (likely always has been, see [[taqiyya]])''  Let's be careful not to confuse the Nation of Islam with the traditional Muslim faith - they are two quite different things. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:10, 7 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: What differences do you find so compelling?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:15, 18 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't know that I'd use the word &amp;quot;compelling&amp;quot;; I don't know a whole lot about either faith.  I do know that they're quite different.  The Nation of Islam was started in Detroit in the 1930's as something of a black empowerment/separatist movement - it's a very race-based group, from what I understand, and (in what I would consider a cult-like way) based largely on the teachings of two or three men, who are considered more-or-less prophets.  It's been portrayed in the media as very racist and anti-Semitic, though I don't know enough about it to know how accurate that is.  It's a uniquely American faith.  Traditional Islam is quite a different thing - it's been around for thousands of years.  Malcolm X, for example, became a member of NOI in prison, then, due to disillusionment brought on by NOI leader/prophet Elijah Mohamed's adultery, converted to traditional Islam.  I have assumed that when you say that you believe that Barak Obama is a Muslim, you are referring to traditional Islam, right? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:37, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.  Are you saying that NOI adherents do not pray and submit to Allah?  I'm sure they do.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:52, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''Perhaps you think Nation of Islam is a denomination of Islam that has slightly different motivations from other denominations, but it's still Islam.''  No, I wouldn't put it that way.  I wouldn't consider NOI to be Islam.  As I understand it, I think they are two fundamentally different faiths, though NOI has some trappings borrowed from traditional Islam, as well as some borrowed from Christianity.  NOI believes, among other things, &amp;quot;that Allah (God) appeared in the Person of Master W. Fard Muhammad, July, 1930; the long-awaited &amp;quot;Messiah&amp;quot; of the Christians and the &amp;quot;Mahdi&amp;quot; of the Muslims.&amp;quot;[http://www.noi.org/muslim_program.htm]  As I understand it, when NOI members pray to Allah, they mean (at least in part) W. Fard Muhammad (the founder of NOI).  Wheras of course traditional Muslims don't include anything about W. Fard Muhammad in their beliefs, nor do they recognize NOI as a Muslim denomination.  (Christians don't believe W. Fard Muhammad is the Messiah either, obviously.)  NOI is a uniquely American black separatist movement.  I believe it's quite a different faith from traditional Islam.  Maybe I was wrong about assuming you think Barak Obama is a traditional Muslim?  Do you think Barak Obama is a member of the NOI?  That would lead to quite different concerns; as I understand it, the NOI wants, among other things, quite substantial reparations for slavery. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 10:40, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Nation of Islam's relationship to Christianity is similar to the relationship of Christianity to Judaism.  They use the same texts (to some extent), and have practices that are shared with and developed out of the other - but such distortions take place that one is clearly no longer the other.  It's not even about &amp;quot;not being mainstream&amp;quot;, it's about that place and time when one religion truly ceases to be it's parent religion.  You would be fully inaccurate to call a christian merely a &amp;quot;Jesus loving Jew&amp;quot;.  Christianity became its own religion in the year 30 (give or take) when our Lord died and rose for us.  For the Nation of Islam, with the Prophet Elijah claiming to be the reincarnation of Mohammad, they cease to be merely &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; and become their own religion.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==57 Islamic states==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I attempted to make this article better by noting, as several other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; could be a reference to Heinz ketchup or simple a misstatement (Obama had visited 47 states), as well as the fact that there were not 57 Islamic states when Obama attended an Indonesian school. It was reverted. Why? Is this an encyclopedia, or a liberal hate blog? [[User:Egen|Egen]] 10:42, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your edit was baseless, and probably politically motivated.  The entry is factual and will remain that way.  Obama has likely remained a Muslim long after attending grade school.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:52, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On the subject, I think someone should add the following line to your page: &amp;quot;The odds against Aschlafly's claim to be named 'Andrew Schlafly' being truthful are less than 1 billion to one, as fewer than 6 people in the world are named Andrew Schlafly.&amp;quot; Don't put malarkey like this on a serious encyclopedia page and defend it as being &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot;. I remind you of Conservapedia Commandments 1, 2, and 5. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 11:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: In any case, I fail to see how it is &amp;quot;baseless&amp;quot; to note, as other Conservapedia writers have, that &amp;quot;57 states&amp;quot; cannot possibly be a reference to &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; and probably has a more benign origin. It does not to any good to assert that anyone who disagrees with you probably does so because they are &amp;quot;politically motivated&amp;quot; (read: liberal) when many conservatives have expressed disdain for this point. I doubt that the majority of Conservapedia editors would disagree with my edit. This encyclopedia is not a personal blog for you or for anyone else. Therefore, I am reinserting the edit. If anyone can provide proof that Obama was referring to the &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; which did not exist when he was growing up '''and''' provide proof that that is what he was referring to, I'll retract this. [[User:Egen|Egen]] 12:16, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Egen - I entirely agree with you. A lot of people here think this is a redstate comments thread rather than, as it says in the top left corner, &amp;quot;the trustworthy encyclopedia&amp;quot;. Snopes on this one: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/57states.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the mention of the 57 states, since the article later refers to a source that says that it was probably a misstatement as he has in fact visited 47 states. &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;unsigned JohnFA&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement has been here for some time. It stays for now.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:44, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
      Jpatt - Why should it? It's repeated later on in the article where it is also explained. This statement is redundant since it doesn't even have a source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added the fact that there were not 57 states when he went to school in indonesia, if we are going to mention that he went to an islamic school we are implying that that is where he learned about the 57 states, this is impossible and that should be noted. People will reference conservapedia and if they reference that he visited the 57 islamic states or that he learned about there being 57 islamic states in islamic school they will look like fools.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:06, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Right now, the implication made about Obama's gaff and &amp;quot;57 Islamic states&amp;quot; indicates the United States.  If it's about Indonesia, then state Indonesia, as well as prove that Indonesia is divided into 57 states.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I double-checked the references provided, one of which has a video of Obama himself doing the gaff; it may have been a minor slip of the tounge or a minor mistake, but not once was there a reference to visiting Islamic states or countries.  He specified visiting 57 ''U.S. states''.  The article was changed to reflect that fact, and the speculation on Islamic states was removed.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I wanted to do that but I figured I would just get reverted. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:53, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'll let you take credit then for the fixing, or at least getting it started :)  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:57, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biased==&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this site supposed to be unbaised?-[[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] 16:46, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Welcome to Conservapedia[[User:Pluto|Pluto]] 18:19, 8 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;born, allegedly, in Honolulu&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there's no doubt he was ''born''. that should read &amp;quot;allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless. [[User:JohnBarma|JohnBarma]] 13:30, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the previous poster said, &amp;quot;(born, allegedly, in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;, implies that he may not have been born, which I think is not what is intended.  &amp;quot;Allegedly born in Honolulu&amp;quot; has the same problem.  Putting aside whether or not the &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; is silly (and frankly I think the factcheck.org folks debunked this one), if you want to convey the idea that he was born, but may have been born somewhere other than Hawaii, then it should read &amp;quot;(born, allegedly in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MSM Ignores Democrat Lawsuit Against Obama[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/08/22/msm-ignores-democrat-lawsuit-against-obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961)&amp;quot;.  Comma placement matters. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 20:58, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct. Factcheck did take this one apart: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snope also: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp&lt;br /&gt;
::''Of course, it's distantly possible that Obama's grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for president someday'' What foolishness! As if the ability to run for President is the sole benefit to be derived from US citizenship! That his grandparents planted the announcement is entirely credible. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:30, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What we need to see to settle this controversy is the actual birth certificate; not a copy of it, and not someone's written opinion.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:47, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is my understanding from a recent article on Fox that the form presented lists him as &amp;quot;African&amp;quot;.  This was 1961.  The concept of African-American or any reference to African in racial makeup, while very prevalent in the last 15+ years, was still more than 20 years off.  Birth certificates in 1961 used &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot;.  I'm surprised this isn't mentioned anywhere. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:19, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Favorite black leader ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've just finished reading Dreams from My Father. I don't recommend it. But one thing I missed was a reference to Malcolm X being Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot;. He speaks highly of Malcolm X's autobiography, but doesn't like the &amp;quot;religious baggage&amp;quot; that the guy &amp;quot;discarded in later life&amp;quot;. Is the reference here correct? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 17:10, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Search Google on {&amp;quot;Malcolm X&amp;quot; Obama favorite} and you'll find numerous credible confirmations of the statement about Malcolm X being Obama's favorite black leader.  The entry need not be limited to the silly Dreams book.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:03, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not really seeing it. Various claims Obama loves Malcolm X's autobiography (which, subject to the point above, seems correct), but the claims that he is Obama's &amp;quot;favorite black leader&amp;quot; all cite no reference, or cite Dreams - I think incorrectly. Is there a source for Obama having said or written this? If not, it should go. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 18:12, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree that it should be sourced, preferably with a quote from his book or one of his speeches, otherwise it could be mistaken for an untrue rumor.  If he qualified the statement with something about X's religion, as Marcdaniels noted above, that should be included in the quote.  I looked for a credible source, but couldn't find one.  I have added a fact tag, which can be removed when a suitable citation is found. (Let's not forget that Malcolm X was involved with the Nation of Islam, which is quite a different thing than traditional Islam.  He rejected the Nation of Islam later in life.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:13, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Examples supporting the statement are easy to find.  I just added one.  I don't think anyone seriously doubts the truth of the statement.  Feel free to find and add other citations supporting it.  The discomfort expressed above seems to be with the fact itself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 10 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Your source goes back to the book, which I'd thought we'd both agreed wasn't on point. It's entirely plausible that Obama might regard Malcolm X as his favorite black leader, and that would discomfort me in the slightest, but I'm having real difficulty finding any evidence that he has said or written this. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 07:40, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, you've misread me now.  I did not agree that book wasn't on point.  I did say there is further evidence beyond the book, which is easy to find on the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The quote from the book is convincing enough.  If you won't accept it, then I doubt you would accept anything now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:20, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: I am now a little confused, and I'm not sure why you are getting personal. You suggested there were additional sources for the claim on the internet, other than those referring to the book, but I cannot find one. I may be missing something obvious - would be helpful if you could provide a link. The book shows Malcolm X's autobiography to have been Obama's favourite autobiography, and it would be accurate to say that, but anything further seems supposition rather than fact. [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:35, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;if elected, Obama will become the first black, and possibly Muslim, President of the United States.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's the problem with this sentence in place of the one currently there? For starters, it isn't proven that he's Muslim, but it ''is'' proven that he's black, so certainly it should be mentioned over the hypothetical. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:25, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The racial composition of all the past presidents is not completely known, so I doubt it's appropriate to insist that Obama would be the '''first''' black President.  Also, the racial composition of a man is not as important as his beliefs.  It is known that none of the prior presidents were Muslim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:54, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well said, Aschlafly.  It is the content of a person's character that should determine how we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; them.  Although, who are we to judge?  I suspect, however, looking at the photos, that Senator Obama would at least be the first President (if elected) with a clear [[African American]] heritage.  Whether a few others may have had a lineage leading back to Africa in their family tree is another, albeit interesting, question. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:16, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's an interesting argument. If we know so little about the former presidents that we cannot say whether any of them met society's contemporaneous definition of Black - the one-drop rule, for example - then how can we say than none of them were Muslim? If they could keep their African ancestry secret, why not their true religion? Is there evidence of political opponents accusing a candidate of being of mixed-blood ancestry?--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 23:21, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: When people vote, they are called to judge.  So the liberal canard of &amp;quot;judge not&amp;quot; is a useless argument here.  What will voters judge on?  More important than race is the views and beliefs of the candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: As to whether past presidents were Muslims, simply look at what they did and said ... including before they became politically ambitious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:33, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Of course we &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot;, or at least &amp;quot;decide&amp;quot; when we vote.  However, when did &amp;quot;judge not... [lest ye be judged]&amp;quot; become a &amp;quot;liberal canard&amp;quot;?  I thought it was a warning in the Bible not to overstep our bounds?  Voting, of course, does not overstep them - we pencil in a space, or pull a lever.  That is not &amp;quot;judgment&amp;quot;, it is an expression of personal opinion or preference or ideas.  Moving beyond that simple step, however, leads us into judgment territory, potentially.  When we should be humble and add commentary on ourselves as well as those we judge is an issue of personal ethics - or morality.  A good time to sit down with good words and contemplate. [[User:Human|Human]] 01:22, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Picture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would like someone to please explain to me how this is unbais? At least with the article you can try to make something up saying how its unbais but the main picture is trying to show very obviouisly that Obama is unpatriotic... If you look at McCains page or Palins the picture of professionally done. Please someone give me a reasonable answer [[User talk:Horriblesite]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Funny you should comment. Is it Conservapedia making Obama unpatriotic or is it Obama who IS unpatriotic? I will say the latter.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, &amp;quot;unbais&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;professionally done&amp;quot; are Liberal canards. --[[User:FrankincenseMonster|FrankincenseMonster]] 21:56, 12 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of Taqiyya in this article (''(allowed if) ... it advances the cause of Islam'') is incorrect for the Sunni Muslims. Taqiyya is only allowed when it will danger their lives otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
Also, even with this allowance, many chose instead a honorable death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shi'ites (shia) is the one who practices this (taqiyya) in almost any situation that will cause discomfort to them otherwise. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sunni muslim and some branches of Shi'ite, because of their extreme stances, are pretty much a different religion. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Taqiyya &amp;amp; takeyya ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these the same thing? [[User:LiamG|LiamG]] 15:34, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 15:52, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== wife opinions  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thing that bothers me about Obama is the comments attributed to his wife. 1. That it was the first time she was proud of america and 2.That black children had no future in america. Both she and her husband are examples of how well a black child can do so its hard to understand why she has that view. [[User:Markr|Markr]] 16:38, 16 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::See similar comments from John McCain: http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2008/06/mccain-it-can-be-%E2%80%9Ctough%E2%80%9D-to-be-proud-of-usa/   “I’ll admit to you … that it’s tough in some respects,” McCain said when asked by a questioner at a town hall meeting how to be proud of the country. “We have not always done things right and we mismanaged the war in Iraq very badly for nearly four years.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obvious fake photo (hand on heart) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect this very obvious fake photo (look at how small the two women are compared to the chairs behind them, check out the flag's edges itself and what exactly is holding it up) was placed here by people hoping to discredit Conservapedia. I understand a popular activity among liberals and vandals is to insert things seeming to support Conservative and Christian values, but that are either extreme or fake, and so undermine the encyclopedia as a whole.--[[User:TruthOfChrist|TruthOfChrist]] 11:11, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It isn't fake.  Many other photos of this occasion exist.  Video, too.  The goofy-looking perspective is an artifact of the angle and lens used. --[[User:XavierJ|XavierJ]] 12:29, 17 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthcertificate.asp {{unsigned|Littleriverr}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The single photo lacked context, and the writer of this article, unfortunately, chose to translate it negatively. A more balanced discussion is available on Snopes : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 10:51, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==birth certificate lawsuit number 2==&lt;br /&gt;
In a second lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; citizenship, a Washington resident is demanding officials review original or certified birth documents for the Democratic Party presidential candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Marquis of Fall City, Wash., filed suit Oct. 9 in Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State Sam Reed to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day. Marquis released a statement saying the state has the authority to &amp;quot;prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters&amp;quot; who might have otherwise had the opportunity to choose a qualified candidate should records show Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78111]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See my analysis of this on this Talk Page, point 58: &amp;quot;Barack raises the bar&amp;quot;. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 00:25, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Errors and dubious claims==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The first sentence says Obama was born in Hawaii.  At first I was under the impression that someone decided to act in a competent manner and remove the baseless innuendo about his place of birth.  Alas I was mistaken because later in the article the word 'alleged' is still used.  I thought all reasonable people would presume that a document from the State of Hawaii would suffice to prove one's citizenship instead of using the rants of the lunatic fringe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A lawsuit has been filed by someone seeking the real birth certificate.  Complain to him, and explain why it still apparently has not been produced.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The state of Hawaii is not just going to let anybody get a copy of Obama's birth certificate, let alone his original.  I can't even get my hands on my own original birth certificate and I'll bet neither can you.  A certified copy of Obama's birth certificate has been provided for anyone to look at.  If this copy is good enough for our government officials that are not part of the lunatic fringe, then why isn't it good enough for Conservapedia?  I'd like to think Conservapedia is not aligning itself with the likes of the people filing these nonsense lawsuits.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama only attended religious schools until he reached the age of ten (Islamic and Catholic).  The rest of his education from Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard was nonsectarian.  Clearly the vast majority of his education was non-religious. [[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Obama's formative years were spend being indoctrinated in Islam.  Less than 1% convert to Christianity after that experience.  Enough said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I was never under the impression that a person's formative years stopped at the age of ten.  According to you, Obama shouldn't be a liberal because he attended conservative religious schools during his alleged formative years, 6 - 10.  How is it that he is now a liberal after living another 35+ years and attending an ivy-league college?  You are also ignoring his years in a Catholic school during his time in Indonesia.  Why?  If he spent two of his formative years at a Catholic school, shouldn't he be a Catholic?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Malcom X was not THE leader of the Nation of Islam, he was A leader.  There is a distinct difference. [[http://www.finalcall.com/national/savioursday2k/hem_nation.htm]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Nitpicking here.  I'll change &amp;quot;the&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;a&amp;quot; for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Don't do it for me, do it for the reputation of Conservapedia.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Obama was baptized in 1988, the same year he started attending Harvard.  If there is a reference stating he was baptized prior to his political ambitions, please post it.  [[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: 1988 makes no sense, as no one ever saw any Christian behavior or church attendance by Obama at law school from 1988 to 1991.  Post his baptismal certificate.  You can't and neither can Obama.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why doesn't 1988 make any sense?  Was there a problem with my reference?  Are you able to provide reputable evidence that Obama's baptism didn't occur in 1988?  Just because a person doesn't attend church on a regular basis or hardly at all is not a reason to deny someone's baptism.  Elsewhere in this article is criticism directed at Obama's CHRISTIAN pastor of 20 years.  Either Obama is a Christian that attended a Christian church for 20 years or he is not.  If he is a Muslim, then why all the fuss about his Christian pastor of 20 years?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Just because someone reads a book allegedly 'from a Muslim point-of-view' does not mean they are actually a Muslim.  I have read parts of the book and I am not a Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It adds to the evidence.  If Obama were reading the Bible, then that would detract from the evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama does read his Bible and has encouraged others to do so as well.  Would like a reference?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Roosevelt communicated with America's enemies.  After the outbreak of WW II, Roosevelt was negotiating with the Japanese.  Things didn't go well and the Japanese were embargoed, thus losing most of their import capability including over 90% of their oil supplies. [[http://www.fff.org/freedom/1291c.asp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your point is lacking here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In reference to Obama saying we should talk to our enemies, the following claim was made, &amp;quot;Roosevelt spoke with none of the Axis or Japanese leaders and the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender.&amp;quot;  Roosevelt and members of his administration talked to our enemies, the reference provided by the article was written by a columnist with a distinct lack of historical credibility.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- If Obama' likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students', then which scholarships were they?  Could a reference at least be provided?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You tell us.  Obama won't disclose who paid for his education.  He claimed he worked his way through school, but that was disproved.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why should I tell you?  The claim was made in the article without a shred of evidence to back it up.  I do happen to know that the Obama's used college loans to pay for much of their schooling and they only just recently paid them off with the proceeds from his books.  Since someone writing for Conservapedia is making the incredible claim that Obama was somehow able to acquire loans not available to most others, shouldn't a reference be provided so the claim will withstand scrutiny? --[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Any chance a reference could be provided for the claim concerning the flag pin?  The way it reads now makes the entry look like partisan whining.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Be clearer.  No one denies Obama avoided wearing a flag pin as he catered to the anti-war crowd.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim, ' Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering' was made without a reference.  Any chance this opinion could be verified so the article doesn't sound like a smear?--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general tone of the article makes it look like a partisan smear campaign, not the encyclopedic scholarly work Conservapedia alleges to produce.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 17:08, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think your conclusion applies more to your own comments.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for your response.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 18:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
''Obama has written that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader, inspired him in his youth.''  I think this statement needs to be tweaked a bit.  While it's true that Malcolm X was a leader in the Nation of Islam (a radical black separatist group, not to be confused with the traditional Islam faith), by the time he wrote his autobiography (as told to Alex Haley, of Roots fame), he had rejected the Nation of Islam and converted to traditional Islam.  If Obama was inspired by the book to take up Malcolm's religion (which is a stretch, IMHO, as lots of people have read this book and not become Muslims), he would most likely have chosen traditional Islam like Malcolm did.  I think it's important to make that distinction clear.  (Unless this item is intended to suggest that Obama is a member of the Nation of Islam?  If so, it should be in a different section, as it's quite a different claim.)  FWIW, Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965, four years after Obama's birth.  Also, the title of the book is ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X''.  So I suggest this item be changed to something like:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama has written that reading ''The Autobiography of Malcolm X'' inspired him in his youth.  Malcolm X converted to traditional Islam after leaving the radical Nation of Islam (a black separatist group).&lt;br /&gt;
:Sounds considered and precise.  Most black muslims are NOT NOI, they are in fact sunni Muslim.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 20:11, 20 October 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obamas Grandmother==&lt;br /&gt;
Breaking news, Americans still forbidden to speak with Obamas grandmother. Now, we may never. Democrat Barack Obama is canceling nearly all his campaign events Thursday and Friday to fly to Hawaii to visit his suddenly ill 86-year-old grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
Campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters Monday that Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, who helped raise him, was released from the hospital late last week. But he says her health has deteriorated to the point where her situation is very serious.&lt;br /&gt;
Gibbs said Obama would return to the campaign trail on Saturday, though he was unsure where.&lt;br /&gt;
Obama events originally planned for Madison, Wis., and Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday will be replaced with one in Indianapolis before he makes the long flight to Hawaii. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:16, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggesting corrections to 'atom bomb' sentance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it should not say &amp;quot;atom bombs&amp;quot; because this is slang expression. It should be &amp;quot;atomic bombs&amp;quot; except since 1960s it usually is said &amp;quot;nuclear bombs&amp;quot; and even then there are other weapons from bombs (missles are not bombs, then there are torpedoes and so on) so it should say &amp;quot;nuclear weapons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also my memory is fuzzy here but didn't Clinton have ties to other washed up sixties communist terrorists? Like former Black Panther Party people who were re-made into &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; democrat politicians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally and this is just style, I do not like the '''Bold text''', it makes look rather alarming, not that we are not alarmed about this, but I think it is best to say the raw facts directly and people will know to be alarmed, instead of trying to shock people with text formatting into coming to their sense. I heard Conservapedia wants to get away from &amp;quot;that other encyclopedia&amp;quot;'s use of sensationism and tabloid style, so, maybe take off the bold. [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:28, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
other than this a very good job in the article, maybe it is too late to change direction your country is going, but at least people will know who had the facts before things all went wrong! [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 21:30, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I appreciate your comments but don't find them compelling.  &amp;quot;Atom bombs&amp;quot; is a familiar term; whether Clinton did likewise concerning terrorists is irrelevant; and bolding is obviously helpful for emphasis.  Thanks anyway and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:44, 20 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::While I plan to stick to the 90-10 ratio here, and this is the first comment I've made, I did want to note that I agree with Eleger about &amp;quot;Atomic Bombs&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Nuclear Weapons&amp;quot; simply on the basis of the being more accurate terms. My person phrase of choice would be Nuclear arsenal though. Maybe nitpicking, but I think fair. -EternalCritic&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I came to post that too; I also have a problem with &amp;quot;first&amp;quot; part of &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first person having ties to a known terrorist to gain control over America's atom bombs&amp;quot;. The most recent Democrat President was bad too. OTOH, something like &amp;quot;second person...&amp;quot; might distract from the point that Obama is a threat.[[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How low can you go? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this meant as an &amp;quot;How To&amp;quot; article on character assassination? Though I do find some of the 'links' in the Obama and Islam hilarious, I'd thought that the conservative parts of the US had a shred of dignity left. It appears not to be the case. But keep feeding the lies to your fellow yes-men, the rest of us are quite amused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::We are not going low at all, You Who Did Not Leave Your Name. This entry is nothing about the truth about Barack Obama. Unfortunately, liberals like you will not find out until it is too late.--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 21:20, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: ''&amp;quot;the rest of us are quite amused.&amp;quot;'' I am sure the leftwingers are quite amused of the nonstop Obama media lovefest. I am sure they are also amused at the whole disenfranchisement of voting in a Democracy thanks to ACORN. I am on a conservative website and I can't find a good Obama bio, shucks billybob, I need the Obama I can believe in, let's look at MSNBC... La La La, liberal fantasy land.--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:48, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In response to the first (unsigned) comment above, liberals enjoy deceit.  But not everyone is fooled by it, and liberals get very irritable when they see that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Berg Obama lawsuit==&lt;br /&gt;
Philip J. Berg announced 10/21 that Obama and the DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President. [http://obamacrimes.com/]--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;quot;admission&amp;quot; is nothing more than an acknowledgment that there was no response to his suit, so Berg is claiming that this qualifies as an admission that all his allegations are true.  Berg's now positioning this as &amp;quot;Obama admits he's not a citizen&amp;quot;, but that is legal spin, not reality, and I'd be hesitant to claim it as anything other than the latest round in a lawsuit.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:52, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::There's a legal principle that the silent are understood to consent.  Obama's failure to deny Berg's request for admission means that he admits those items under the law.  This definitely should be included, and should be reason enough to disqualify him from the election.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:03, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The judge in the Berg-Obama case has tossed out the suit [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvhtmoNEnyP1Bu6Ol4zJsN94mlewD941NCJG0]--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 16:30, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Just because an activist judge tossed out the suit doesn't mean that the admissions don't count.  I'm sure Berg will appeal.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 16:54, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Is the judge activist? Is there reason to believe he's an Obama partisan? [[User:Marcdaniels|Marcdaniels]] 11:38, 26 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Lefty DindaleP was right, though it shouldn't be hard to find a sympathetic judge in Democrat bastion of Philadelphia. If, if the bozo (obama) wins, this issue will not go away easily and will be justification for impeachment. Though, will be hard to impeach with super-majority liberal congress, God help us. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:35, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Actually, McCain has a similar issue, in that he was not born in the US, and arguably not on US territory.  Most every single scholar I've read in the last few days on this has said McCain's case will be a compelling one, legally, because no court in the land would dare say a person born out of this country to two citizens, one of whom was SERVING HIS COUNTRY, would be denied the right to be president.  As we become more and more of a mobile population, with people traveling and living overseas for extended periods of time (business, government, or travel) I think more children will be born of two natural citizens, but not on the US territory.  I will be curious to watch how the term &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot; is defined by the Court under any case, Obama or McCain, just for the historical precedent it will set.  --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:41, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: By the way, Qwest, there is no legal principal that &amp;quot;silence is admittance&amp;quot;.  Until or unless a Judge posts an Order compelling you to provide a particular document or telling you to agree or deny, you are not obligated to.  Some instances this might be used could include famous people being hit over and over again with frivolis lawsuits, just cause they have money or power.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 12:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::McCain was born in United States territory, which the Panama Canal Zone was prior to 1978, when by treaty it was turned over to Panama.  Anyone born in the United States, its territories, or its overseas military bases is an American citizen.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:18, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Yes, very much an American citizen.  The interesting language is &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot;.  That is what will be interesting to see how it's defined.  I think it makes rational sense that anyone born to American parents should be &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot;, regardless of where they are born.  But the Framers didn't explain the terms.  (I'm not arguing, by the way, for any point.  I'm simply saying scholars say this issue of an American Citizen not born on US land has not yet been addressed - or rather, what do the words &amp;quot;natural born&amp;quot; mean, in that context.)  The lawsuit for McCain is totally irrelevant (even though the judge has not seen fit to toss it yet), since the Congress already said he is exempt per their own Resolution. --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 13:23, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Birthplace and Grammar Revisited==&lt;br /&gt;
''Barack Hussein Obama, II (allegedly born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)''  Putting aside all issues about whether the &amp;quot;where Obama was born&amp;quot; issue is worth mentioning, given that it ''is'' going to be mentioned, let's get it right.  The issue (as a previous poster mentioned somewhere above), is not ''whether'' he was born - we all agree on that.  The issue is whether he was born ''in Honolulu''.  Thus the phrase should read: ''Barack Hussein Obama, II (born, allegedly in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961)'' --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:06, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Request addition==&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to add this external page and somehow link to this photo Democrat_Obama_during_the_Pledge.jpg   [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html No hand over heart from Obama during national anthem video]| Original footage ABC, now available through RawStory Media. [[Fair use]] --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:07, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Will unlock for you now.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:13, 25 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First Muslim President ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found this claim quite amusing at first, especially with Snopes already had it debunked quite extensively : http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then I remember that we, Indonesian, also got the wrong information. We thought Obama is a muslim, and we rejoiced. &lt;br /&gt;
We found out later that (1) clearly his parents are quite liberal on religions (2) the context at that time in Indonesia is that most Muslims were not religious. We were pretty laid back then. My parents drink alcohol and misses their obligatory religious duties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So even if (again, IF) Obama was a Muslim, there's no way he's enrolled in a &amp;quot;radical Wahabi school&amp;quot;. It just didn't exist back then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, if we, Indonesians, were wrong about Obama at his time in Indonesia, it's quite understandable if others were also mistaken. --[[User:Sufehmi|Sufehmi]] 11:47, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If elected, Obama would likely become the first Muslim President&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence pointing to Obama being a Muslim can be included, but Barack Obama has said he is a Christian, and is a member of the United Church of Christ. So is saying he is likely to become a Muslim president meant to imply that Obama is secretly a Muslim? Perhaps a better phrased version of this sentence would be &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;. This is concurrent list that follows it, and is much less hypothetical like a good resource should be.  --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 21:52, 27 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obama's claims to be a Christian are meaningless for three reasons; first, his distinctly non-Christian stance on issues such as [[abortion]] and the [[homosexual agenda]]; second, the radical, [[Marxism|Marxist]] theology preached by his church; and third, the [[Muslim]] concept of [[taqiyya]] outlined in the article. All the of the evidence points away from his being a Christian. [[User:SMichaels|SMichaels]] 16:06, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Using Taqiyya as a defense is a joke. I'm not doubting it's authenticity, but I could claim the same thing about you and you would have no defense. See Salem Witch Trials for more information. --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Obama's stances on [[abortion]] the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[marxism|Marxism]] do take credibility away from his Chrisitian stance, but Muslims are against [[abortion]], [[homosexual agena|homosexualiity]] and women's rights themselves. Furthermore, [[Marxism]] is against all religions, and if his church preaches Marxism, that makes him a Marxist Christian, not a Marxist Muslim. While I myself question his faith in Jesus, I sincerely doubt that he is a Muslim. And as for Taqiyya? Isn't that just an obscure segment of a doctrine practiced only by some Sunnis and considered hypocrisy by other muslims? [[user:justiceisblind|Justice Is Blind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The facts you gave are true, but you did not address my bringing up the idea of rewording the phrase. Having a set of words like &amp;quot;might be&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; seem extremely unscholarly. Those facts you threw up also would correspond to him having a strong leaning toward Islam, minus the hypothetical thought he might be a Muslim. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 23:03, 28 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The truth is what it is, whether you find it &amp;quot;unscholarly&amp;quot; or not.  We're not fooled here when politicians try to deceive the public about who they are and what they believe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:00, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why is it so hard to directly answer my question? First off, do not mix my words, I said the way the sentence is phrased is not scholarly, what is truth or not does not matter to me.  I don't really care what you say is the truth, and what you are or are not fooled by. I am just bringing up the option that as long as Obama himself and no mosques claim he is a member, perhaps it should be reworded to &amp;quot;If elected, Obama would become the first president with a strong leaning toward Islam&amp;quot;, which also corresponds to the list that follows it, and is all based on fact no conjecture. The reader should have the right to make up their own mind after reading the examples which are listed. --[[User:anonymous123|anonymous123]] 22:18, 29 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are strong evidence that Obama is a muslim and it has been layed out again and again.  He has never come out and said he's not a muslim among all the questions.  There for if elected, he will be the first muslim president ever elected.  It's as simple as that. --[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sure he has.  [http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=0GFKqOf8EHQ]--[[User:KathrynMonroe|KathrynMonroe]] 22:23, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yes, he has. [http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2008/01/obama_mail]  --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:42, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack raises the bar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The snide accusation that Barack Obama insulted America because he refused to hold his hand over his heart is completely off-target. (See photo at top of article). The human heart is just a pump , medically speaking, but culturally it represents the finest, most vital and sensitive parts of our soul. Barack is indicating precisely how much he loves America by putting not one, but both hands over that part of his body which truly encompasses the most vital, potent and sincere components of his soul. Bill Clinton might not be his biggest fan, but he would be the first to applaud this magnificent gesture. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:37, 31 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: ??? --[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 09:36, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL [[User:Aperson41|Aperson41]] 01:50, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow. I have no idea of what to say to that.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A hypothetical article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of this article appears to be purely hypothetical and some of it seems to be fradulent, such as the pornographer donation and the speculation that Obama is a muslim. It is refreshing to see Obama in such a sober light, but I would encourage previous and future writers to be less interested in controversy, and to use legitimate information on the article instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the article lacks structure, and seems to dive in and out of his history, his policies, quotations in a manner which pleases the tone. It is all quite juvenile and sad; an encyclopedia is where questions are answered, not where additional questions are brought up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Birth Certificate Controversy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole section should be reworded or entirely deleted. According to [http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04 this], there can be no more doubt about Obama's birthplace. The article also states, that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate, so all demands for him to do that can only be part of a smear campaign. --[[User:Ascat|Ascat]] 15:22, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed.  For more confirmation see [http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu] and [http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov01/0,4670,InternetPoliticalRumors,00.html Fox News' article about Web political rumors.]  Having 'allegedly' made sense before all the facts were on the table, but now I'm removing the word because it lessens the strength of our true, verifiable criticisms if we leave it there. [[User:Jinkas|Jinkas]] 20:58, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: What about the lawsuit against him about this? [http://www.rightpundits.com/?p=2313]--[[User:Limbo|Limbo]] 21:23, 1 November 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The lawsuits all fell through, because anyone looking at the official documents could tell that they were real, it was a manufactured controversy thanks to Hillary (boy I wish expletives were allowed on conservapedia). --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 16:49, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This issue remains valid even though rejected by the courts. Expect it to be revisited if he wins. Plus, allegiances owed to Keyna and Indonesia are part of the birth certificate controversy. Neither gossip nor the certificate proven true and Hawaii actions are unexplained, still. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My version doesn't violate comandments 1, 3, and 5 like the version that was removed. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:24, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I don't like the edit, but I will let it remain. It does violate CP with personal opinion, (costly time and money during busy election season). --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:30, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The tone is bad I will admit, but that is all fact and not opinion. Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes tie to sit in court for several days? Is it an opinion or a fact that it takes money to pay court costs and extra lawyers? Is it an opinion or a fact that he is in a campaign where the outcome depends largely on the tie and money he spends campaigning? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 17:44, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::JPatt, could you explain &amp;quot;allegiance to Kenya?&amp;quot;  I don't understand this comment.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:57, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: The original post on this page says &amp;quot;that Obama has no right to release his birth certificate.&amp;quot;  I do not believe this to be what the original article says.  I think it means simply that no state official has the authority to release publicly a birth certificate, not that Obama himself is unable to do so. [[User:TGeary|TGeary]] 20:15, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mr. Obama's Grandmother just died==&lt;br /&gt;
Without getting into politics, it would be nice to mention it respectfully on his page.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 17:33, 3 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do we have any reputable sources for that?  Given Obama's history of engaging in [[liberal deceit]], I wouldn't put it past him to fabricate a story like this to nullify attacks on Election Day. [[User:Neutronium|Neutronium]] 14:06, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::May I say, comments like this are what hurt our republican party this year.  His politics may be liberal, but he's still a human and making fun of a death of a loved one is beneath a good Christian. {{unsigned|JeanJacques}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::Neutronium, keep the parody to a minimum, please. That is simply heartless.&lt;br /&gt;
:::JeanJacques, yes, if it's relevant (do we have the mention of grandparents on anyone else's page? I don't know without looking) the we need it added in a respectful way. No matter what we think about Obama, he is a human and so is his grandmother. The was it is presented now, it almost seems as if we are implying that her death contributes to the controversy, when it clearly doesn't. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:54, 4 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neutronium, there is a difference between being a cautious &amp;amp; prudent person, and being a paranoid, heartless person (i use the word &amp;quot;person&amp;quot; only due to the website rules of proper conduct). You would do well to realize that...AndrewM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama attending his Grandma's funeral? No mention from the O-MSM! --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:03, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This Is Why Obama Is Wining==&lt;br /&gt;
Articles like this make me think that Conservapedia is run by liberals. Burying real facts like Obama's membership in a Black Liberation Theology church, with silly lies like he is a &amp;quot;muslim&amp;quot;, only serve to discredit real objections to the Obama candidacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agreed. Congratulayions Andy, you did more for the Democrats than you can possibly know. Thoroughly discrediting this site with ridiculous partisan accusations based onm the flimsiest of evidence meant that anything that was a genuine talking point just got lost among the nonsense. That many on the left pointed to this page to discredit the entire conservapedia idea just goes to show that you can go too far. Congratulations for playing your part in losing the election and being successfully gamed by the left, who knew that you would leave tenuous ridiculous nonsense up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's not badmouth the side that lost. Andy, you did your best, and I appreciate that. However, you can see from my comments from way back, that the Obama article was way too extreme, and included a number of outright falsehoods. Not saying that this lost the race for McCain, but going too extreme eventually starts to hurt. Like in business - a good CEO is someone who is willing to go to the edge of what is legal, but not cross that line. Those CEO's who stay on the edge are winners, those who go over, go to jail. Same thing here...I think the whole Republican campaign was just too darn negative, and put off a lot of undecided voters. Anyway, here's looking forward to President Schwarzenegger in 2012...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Both sides were overly negative, but in reality that's a natural thing for long campaigns. The longer it runs the less fresh the ideas seem. It gets repetetive so after a while, in order to keep things fresh, mudslinging becomes common. I honestly wish we had a much shorter election time frame. Like six months max. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:41, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I've just decided that this site's main contributors are probably liberals messing around with people. I bet there are some liberals somewhere getting a huge laugh at people who are seriously offended, or seriously believe half of these articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I have decided the same thing, though maybe not to that extent.--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 19:11, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is going to be the next president==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama has won the election, and I think this should be added to the page. [[User:Arthur205|Arthur205]] 00:12, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes he is, sadly. I encourage all of us to PRAY for the FATE OF OUR COUNTRY. Unfortunately, this page must be updated. [[User:LuvinGodDP|LuvinGodDP]] 10:10, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised no one has updated it yet, it's been over 12 hours since it's been announced. Honestly this sort of time lag on the internet is just sad. You would think that they would at least un-protect it in order for someone else to update it. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:13, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States of America==&lt;br /&gt;
Article should be updated accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
: President-''Elect'', technically speaking. He won't be President until he's inaugurated, and we should hold off on explicitly saying he's the winner until the electoral college has voted (not that I'm pretending there's any real chance of 100+ faithless electors suddenly popping up to help McCain). Right now, he's just the likely winner of the presidential race. --[[User:JeremyDB|JeremyDB]] 12:24, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Let's not disrespect McCain's gracious concession. We should put in that he's the President Elect and when he will be inaugurated. Let's at least be up to date. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:56, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The first section of this article has been updated to reflect that Obama is now president-elect, but the rest needs to be updated also.  For instance, the section entitled &amp;quot;Obama would be the first Muslim President&amp;quot; should now be &amp;quot;Obama will be the first Muslim President,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;will use the Koran to be sworn in,&amp;quot; etc. -[[User:Rfreeman|Rfreeman]] 18:04, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What happening with the muslim section? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see why it needs to be above the TOC, The TOC lets people find what they are looking for, which may very well be proof that he is a Muslim, and really should be on the first page for formatting reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also some points that really stand out to me, &lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama's middle name (Hussein) references its namesake Husayn, who was the grandson of Muhammad, which most Christians would not retain.''&lt;br /&gt;
In this case the reference should be after the word Muhammad, because it does not reference the notion that christians would have there name changed, also it is his fathers name, and if he changed it it could negatively impact his relationship with his family, I would not consider this strong evidence. Seems like Opinion to me&lt;br /&gt;
*'' Obama recently referred to his &amp;quot;Muslim faith.&amp;quot;'' You do know that the video cited as its source showed clearly that he was talking about a tactic that McCain could use, not his real faith (I strongly suspect Obama to be pretty apathetic to religion)&lt;br /&gt;
*''On the campaign trail Obama has been reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria, which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.'' If reading a book written in a muslim POV makes you a muslim than how do we know what is in this book, because we can't trust anyone who read it to not be a muslim. If he were seen praying out the the qran that would be another story entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.'' Pakistan is an islamic nation, the american way of saying it is a bastardized version, he is using the name the nation calls its self.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really think that this should be reworded in to prose and that it needs to be below the TOC.--[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 13:46, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Copyediting needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know that updating things like this as the news changes is tough, but:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama II (born in Honolulu,[1][2] August 4, 1961), Democratic Party member, junior senator of the state of Illinois, and president-elect of the United States, winning the 2008 Election over Arizona Senator John McCain [3].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
is not a sentence... [[User:Human|Human]] 14:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know they won't let me because I'm too new and can be a bit controversial, but I would love to rewrite the entire first paragraph. It has become such a muddled mess that it doesn't read well at all. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 14:27, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That section of the article looks like its attempting to proove that he is a muslim. Why not simply say &amp;quot;some prominent christian sites including X and Y have suggested that Obama may be a muslim&amp;quot;. It currently looks like it's trying to make people think that he is a muslim, and that for some reason that's bad. What's wrong with muslims?--[[User:Newguy123|Newguy123]] 16:15, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the point is that - no there is nothing wrong with being a Muslim but lying about it for political gain is a problem. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:32, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Again, that makes the presupposition being that someone lies when all you have is superficial, rather strained evidence to say he isn't lying.  Not very gracious on our part.  There are plenty of legitimate issues with Mr. Obama.  Living in gossip and innuendo and &amp;quot;he once made a mistake when talking&amp;quot; seems petty on our part.  Isn't it more important to emphasis why he is a socialist?  All we say is &amp;quot;he is&amp;quot;, not what that means, and how it could effect the country, etc.  It bothers me that this site emphasizes gossip.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 16:42, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Personally I dont think he is a Muslim however I am not going to kick up a fuss as I was already warned by Aschlafly (is he the boss?) for....something I did? Not sure what. [[User:AdamBeyer|AdamBeyer]] 16:45, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think it's funny how at the beginning of the article it claims he is a muslim, and then at the end discusses his previous church and pastor. It even lists 1988 as his year of baptism despite the beginning of the article stating he didn't have a date for baptism, which for everyone here in the conservapedia zone seems to take as undeniable proof he is a super secret muslim spy out for your children and pets.&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously though, I've mentioned it above that having an article for the current president of the U.S. start out with a poor and unnecessary argument over his faith is ''unprofessional'' at best. The beginning makes no valid points, manages to insult Muslims as a whole, and also contains that stupid picture of Obama in a traditional Kenyan costume.--[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 23:17, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Muslim President-elect! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the article assures us the Barack is a secret Muslim and would if elected become the first Muslim President of the United States, for consistency's sake, it should now be updated by something like the following: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Now that the unthinkable has occurred and Obama has duped the American People and stolen the election, he will become the first [[Muslim]] [[President]], and will probably use the [[Koran]] to be sworn into office.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is widely believed that now he is President-elect, Obama will drop the tiresome pretence of being a Christian and produce his other wives from hiding, don a turban and a scimitar, pray buns-up five times a day on a Persian carpet while facing Mecca, have a minaret built on top of the White House from which he will personally play the role of the muezzin and call the faithful to prayer, will establish policy recommending that “the Zionist entity be driven into the sea”, and put bin Laden’s face on the American dollar. The week after that will probably be even worse.&amp;quot; If no one objects, I will make some such interpolations in the article proper. [[User:MylesP|MylesP]] 23:30, 5 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[ADL]] said:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Prager is flat-out wrong when he asserts that Representative Ellison's use of a Koran would be 'damaging to the fabric of American civilization.' To the contrary, the U.S. Constitution guarantees that, 'no religious test shall ever be required' to hold public office in America. Members of Congress, like all Americans, should be free to observe their own religious practices without government interference or coercion. [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-dershowitz/swearing-on-the-koran_b_36907.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder what all the fuss is about. Certainly there have been radical Muslims who support anti-US terrorism, but politically motivated distortions do not make Islam a wicked religion. Is Christianity to be rejected because of the abuses of the Crusades, the Inquisition, or the fact that Anglo-American Christians held slaves? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;70's terrorist&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I object to Ayers being referred to as a &amp;quot;terrorist from the 70's&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he is a &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; end of story. once a terrorist, always a terrorist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
we won't call Bin Laden a &amp;quot;2000's terrorist&amp;quot; in 2050&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 00:22, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good point, [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]].  Thanks for the edit. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 00:24, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The man is a functioning member of society, an educator, a family man, who has condemns his past actions, and has worked greatly towards improving the lives of others through charity work. He was a part of a group that destroyed ''property'', which doesn't make him a terrorist because that would imply he did random acts of terror on ''people''. Blowing up statues and parts of buildings was wrong but they did not go after people, and no one was hurt or killed. To compare him to Bin Laden is ''despicable''. And to put a section about this man at the top of the page of Presidential-elect Obama who worked with him in an organization to help reduce poverty levels is neither well thought out or ''tactful''. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 08:46, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Except that the Weather Underground did in fact kill people - 3 of their own, in a bomb-making accident.  Sometimes that happens when you set off bombs, even if it's not what you had in mind.  I would put other property-destruction crimes such as cross burning in the terror category as well.  I do agree that Obama's association with Ayres is minimal, at best, and I have huge issues with all the guilt-by-association tactics employed by the McCain campaign.  I'm not taking a stand on the content of this article one way or another. I'm just trying to organize it and cite it as best I can. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I don't believe an accidental death of their own people should be considered &amp;quot;terror&amp;quot; though. People could technically die while making signs for a normal type of protest, not as likely, but an accident is an accident. Although I do think that some property destruction like cross burning could be argued to be terroristic because it is done in order to terrify a group of people and incite violence against that group. However I still think that what the weather underground did does not quite carry that same connotations. They were protesting a war, and doing so by costing the government money and drawing attention to their cause, at no time was a group of people targeted in a way that would indicate that they were in danger directly from a hostile organization, unless you were an office desk or a public statue/monument. To use the word &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot;, especially nowadays, in the case of Bill Ayers is misleading, and it is a word that should not be tossed around lightly. It seems that people believe that Ayers = Terrorist, so therefore he must have killed people or tried to kill people, and this article does little to correct this misconception. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MInd Control? Really now? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people who published this lost what little credibility they had when they published this. Repeating it on this page just makes you look bad. I mean an O looks like a crystal ball? First of all it also looks like an orange or a penny or anything else that is round and circular. Also, I think that crystal balls are the favorite of ''fortune tellers'' so unless Obama can predict the future (which I think might make him a ''better'' president) this doesn't mean much. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 10:54, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree.  I am a practicing stage hypnotist (practicing because I still need work :) and I can tell you that most hypnotists use nothing but their voices and physical presence, and those who do use props traditionally use a pencil. [[User:SamuelA|SamuelA]] 13:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Absence of Dancing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dancing is a popular form of celebration and partying by all ethnicities.  But why is [[Barack Obama]] rarely seen dancing, or even allowing and attending dancing.  Perhaps I've missed it (please let me know if I have).  I know, there was one highly staged politically correct dance with Ellen DeGeneris as Obama was catering to her audience.  But where's the rest?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One explanation is that the Islamic [[sharia]] disfavors dancing.[http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2008/10/islamic-scholars-denounce-dancing-say.html] --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:08, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When's the last time you went dancing, Andy? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 11:23, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::um, lol?&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpxJQABkSsQ Dancing in Puerto Rico]&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axH9bhwI8os Dancing to Snoop Dogg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::so there it is... at least three different places where he's seen dancing. Here's my question: lets see you find videos of Mccain dancing! xP your Islamic assumption thingy holds no water since you can say the same for McCain! [[User:Ema|Ema]] 11:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ah! Ema, don't be fooled by this [[deceit]], he might secretly be a [http://www.dankphotos.com/whirling/ whirling dervish!] They're members of [[Sufi]] Islam, by the way. --[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I took a look at the Puerto Rico video.  It proves my point.  I've never seen anyone dance-without-dancing like that.  Have you?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.  Judging by the determined objections above, it may be quite a while for some of his supporters.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your argument is that he is a bad dancer so he must be a Muslim? Seriously Andrew, take a deep breath and relax, proving him to be a Muslim is not going to get him impeached, he has the presidency and that is that. In four years it might matter, but that means you have poor years to find less circumstantial evidence. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: No, Brendanw, it is obviously not my argument that he is a &amp;quot;bad dancer.&amp;quot;  I think you understand my argument perfectly well and won't admit it.  Suit yourself.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:31, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Brendan's right about one thing at least. All the evidence listed is either circumstantial or draws illogical conclusions. The one about him when he says he joins a church after a suggestion does not in any way imply him as a muslim, though it might imply him as a disingenuous Christian. The two are mutually exclusive. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 12:38, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Well please explain it to  me differently, initially you said he didn't dance, and now that we have three videos of it you say that he &amp;quot;dances with out dancing&amp;quot; what does that mean if not bad dancer? --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:45, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Andy's saying that, in those three videos, Obama isn't really ''dancing'', in the sense of crossing a line of Muslim (im)morality.  It's like being against swearing, but recognizing that words like &amp;quot;heck&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;geez&amp;quot; don't really cross that line.  That said, however, I did run across a video where [http://splicd.com/wzyT9-9lUyE/31/52 Obama dances] by anyone's definition.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 14:25, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::RossC, this video is obviously faked. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 14:32, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wonder if he will dance at his inaugural ball, if it gets to that point. (see: Berg) [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 13:47, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
:In some Islamic traditions dancing is not allowed, in some christian traditions dancing is not allowed, some people regardless of religion just don't dance with enthusiasm (was he supposed to be [dancing inappropriately with] Ellen? While Barrack is a hottie I'm not sure she would let him do that) I was raised catholic and as a result I am a very quiet person who does not raise his arms in celebration. This is just such a far stretch that it doesn't mean anything. Heck if he were keeping his faith hidden and not praying to meca and not following the rules of Islam in order to complete the 35 year long mission that was trained in to him at a public school in indonesia at the age of 10 don't you think he would dance anyways? And his wife is a great dancer, in Islam men have a whole lot more freedom than women. this just doesn't add up to anything but crazy. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 15:30, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love to dance.  For what it's worth, I have seen an Obama campaign button with a picture of him dancing, and the words &amp;quot;Dance Yes We Can&amp;quot; on it.  It caught my eye because I take dance lessons.  See here [http://www.zazzle.com/obama_dance_button-145707809176961889] for a picture of the button. Over the years, I have met homeschooling moms of various faiths (Christian, Muslim, Jewish) who are careful about their children dancing for modesty reasons. Not everyone enjoys dancing, of course, particularly men.  While it's an interesting facet of Obama, to be honest I don't see it as a strong indicator of his religious beliefs.  When weaker arguments are included, it detracts from the stronger ones, I think. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 21:21, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't dance, and I can assure you that I'm not a Muslim. I'm a lousy dancer, and self-conscious about it. I also don't have a tinfoil hat, which might be why this whole conversation seems ludicrous to me. Godspeed.[[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 21:40, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The very conservative former Prime Minister of Australia, John Howard, did not dance in public. This is despite the fact that his treasurer, Peter Costello, and his rival and current Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, both danced on national television. Is this evidence that John Howard is a Muslim? Certainly not. There is a much less sinister and blatantly obvious explanation for Obama's lack of dancing - he isn't good at it. Just have a look at the videos posted, he has clearly received minimal dance instruction and is evidently self conscious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And just out of curiosity, has anyone actually seen John McCain dance? How about Palin or Biden? If these three have not then why should the explanation for their lack of participation not be extended to Obama? [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:05, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not to mention the fact that Spectral Evidence was outlawed in America back in the 1600's after 19 people were murdered for being accused of witchcraft. Get with the times, Schlafly. [[User:DRuss|DRuss]] 08:51, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is different about Obama that makes it unusual for him to not be much of a dancer?  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 09:45, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still waiting on an answer, Andy. When'd you last hit the dance floor? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 15:43, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Though irrelevant to the issue, I dance in times of celebration, and have also arranged for the availability of dancing by attendees at such events.  Pursue this irrelevancy further and your account will be blocked, per my comment on your talk page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:41, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: He does somewhat have a point, even if his methods of conveying it are a little childish. He's pretty much pointing out that your accusation opens up a big can of worms. If I was to say that Obama's lack of dancing must mean he is Muslim due to Islamic Sharia, I could also say that if I saw you sitting on the floor you must be a Muslim who is kneeling to Mecca. [[User:St0dad|St0dad]] 09:09, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Simple solution to this whole thing.  Islam does not forbid dancing.  Amazing no?  Islam forbids certain kinds of dancing.  Such as dancing involving the men and women who are not married, and dancing with the intention to be provocative.  Of course there are always members of a group who are more conservative with religious laws (no dancing at all) or more liberal with laws (any dancing is ok) but as written, Dancing is allowed as long as it is well mannered, does not stimulate desires, and does not mix men and women who are not married.&lt;br /&gt;
That being said, there are also christian groups that forbid dancing as well.  For much the same reasons.  So just because Obama doesn't dance enough for your satisfaction does not mean anything regarding religion.--[[User:ScottA|ScottA]] 22:50, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti Americanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many points in this article could be summarized into a section called &amp;quot;Anti Americanism&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm surprised this hasn't been done already. Anti Americanism should be a given a very prominent place in this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I like this idea because I feel the article is too fragmented and not organized. People are adding self contained ideas in various points in the article, especially at the top, which disrupts the flow and readablity. I cleaned up the first paragraph, but I can't smooth up everything [[User:MikeMike|MikeMike]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I make such an edit will I be banned? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:01, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; comment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe Barack Obama is a Muslim or at least more sympathetic to them than Christians, but the &amp;quot;Muslim Faith&amp;quot; statement is taken out of context. I removed it as part of the evidence of him being Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpoAVAA1F30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:06, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't like that video btw, I only posted it to show the full context [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:07, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: On a side note, the entire section, for accuracy's sake, should be called &amp;quot;Why Barack Obama is not a Christian&amp;quot; since the only parts that are not circumstantial are in regard to disingenuous Christianity. Beyond that the idea of him not changing his name making him muslim is ridiculous. He was named for his Father. Example from reality: my middle name is Paul. I received it fromt he name of my grandfather. I'm no longer Christian. But I don't change my middle name because I no longer believe Paul's words. I keep it because I love and respect my grandfather. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 13:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I partially agree. Maybe there should be two sections. One detailing Anti-Christian facts and one for Pro-Muslim [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 13:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Schlafly reverted my change ... Why? [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 14:18, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Because you don't agree with him.[[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 15:14, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::So it's Schlaflypedia then? I had high hopes for Conservapedia [[User:Mike770781|Mike770781]] 15:17, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I reverted your change because you deleted factual information.  That reason should be obvious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:41, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socialistic==&lt;br /&gt;
It is interesting to note that the MSM has buried the exact phrase and can only be found on blogs. The media will use the third person term, e.g. &amp;quot;Obama responds to McCains allegations of Socialistic.&amp;quot; The quote itself is relevent. A play on words to blunt its' true impact. Actual charges of 'Socialism' or of being a 'Socialist'. Nobody uses &amp;quot;Socialistic&amp;quot;--'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wait==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please explain to me how Barack Obama is a Muslim? Thanks. [[User:Rockthecasbah|Rockthecasbah]] 23:12, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly someone's not paying attention. Not that I endorse the, uh, theory, but there's a whoooooole big section about it in the article. And several discussions on this talk page. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:15, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this point the very thought that he's a Muslim is preposterous. No Muslim would willingly put Rahm Emmanuel, someone so notably Jewish and pro israel in such a powerful position (chief of staff). All in all though, a pretty good choice from the pool. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 23:27, 6 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama isn't a muslim.  He doesn't have the character we see on the trail to do so.  I think Obama will be an awful President, is not a christian (it's too liberal), supports infanticide and sodomy, and won't do almost ''any'' of the thigs he has promised.  That aside I don't think he's a muslim.  Alot of the proof is probably just part of his warped view of multi-culturism, which includes the so-called ''peaceful'' religion of Allah and Muhammed.  This should be placed on a different page and other more certain information placed on this page (e.g. a better photo should be placed on the top, not a picture of him which tries to accuse his patriotism.)  He is going to be President, a bad one, but one nonetheless.  Please, let us respect the authority of our time.  [[User:Additioner|Additioner]] 07:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Think about this: If I had told you on September 12 2001, that in 6 years we'd ellect a liberal, socialist muslim named Barack Hussein Obama, who has terrorist friends, you call me crazy.  But here we are.  [[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Connections with Irish Terrorists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I note that a liberal contributor has seen fit to add a line stating that The Republic of Ireland refused to extradite Rita O'Hare -- the IRA terrorist who Obama met last year -- for one of several alleged offences. Why is this of any interest? She served time in the Republic for smuggling explosives. So that country's legal authorities were in no doubt as to her status. Does Wikipedia regard shooting British soldiers in Northern Ireland as a &amp;quot;political offence&amp;quot;? If so, then should we regard killing American soldiers in Iraq the same way? I don't think so. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 18:29, 7 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well spoken Keith!   I intend to contact the Irish Embassy in Washington and ask that they make a clear statement condemning our Marxist Terrorist President-Elect's meeting with these vile killers.   I would encourage ASchlafly to perhaps make a television appearance about this?   As a lawyer, I'm sure he can speak to the international law aspects of this very serious matter.   What's next I wonder - how soon are Nobama's Shining Path, Khmer Rouge, Sandanista, and Red Brigade friends going to crawl their way from their terrorist swamps into the halls of Washington power?!   Not long I'll bet!   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 13:34, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nodanca was was probably a member of the [[FLQ]], too! [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 18:38, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, it was the High Court in the Republic of Ireland that regarded her case as falling under the exemptions for 'political offences'.  That is why they refused to extradite her to N. Ireland.  Also, Arnie S., if you truly are indignant about the &amp;quot;vile killer&amp;quot; Rita O'Hare, why don't you call your members of Congress to condemn the fact that she is the duly appointed Sinn Fein Representative to the US. [[User:Tordenvaer|Tordenvaer]] 18:37, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't understand. I genuinely don't understand. My edit to the Obama page on this subject has been deleted as being &amp;quot;inappropriate and silly&amp;quot;. What is the distinction between a link with the Weather Underground and a link with the IRA? Why are inverted commas placed around “terrorism” (like this) when discussing the latter organisation and not when deriding Bill Ayres's mob. I suppose it's different -- and less significant -- when Obama's pals are blowing up Irish folk rather than Americans. Would it be different if he were pictured grinning next to some PLO hoodlum?  --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 02:42, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Tordenvaer (if that is your real name), I already HAVE called my member of Congress about the matter - I don't mess around!   The Sinn Feiners are a terrible organization with deep terrorist roots who killed many British soldiers and people over a hundred years in Ireland.   I'm as surprised as Keith is about the removal of his well-referenced material.   [[User:ArnieS|ArnieS]] 21:57, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys, grind your ax about Irish &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot; somewhere else.  Obama has no plausible connection with it and I'm not going to waste any more time on this silliness.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:01, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, why do you place quote marks around the word terrorism? [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]]  [[User talk:Ferret|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Nice old chat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 22:08, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;- I'm not going to get involved in any discussion here, but it appears a lot of you know a fair bit about [[Rita O'Hare]]. I have started her article, please contribute and spread your knowledge. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:13, 7 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: If the site administrator does not think this worthy of inclusion then there is no point arguing the case. But I must again ask -- the question is reiterated above by Ferret -- why this site puts inverted commas around terrorism when discussing the IRA, but not when discussing the Weather Underground. The slaughter of innocent Northern Irish people may seem &amp;quot;silly&amp;quot; to you. It does not to us. --[[User:KeithJoseph|KeithJoseph]] 12:36, 8 November 2008 (GMT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Could be because Irish terrorism was largely funded by US &amp;quot;Irish&amp;quot; Catholics? [[User:GeorgeK|GeorgeK]] 07:48, 8 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inciting hatred ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wow, have you ever asked yourselves &amp;quot;What would Jesus do?&amp;quot;. I hardly think He would write such a biased and bigoted &amp;quot;factual&amp;quot; article. Real Christians don't need this sort of tripe. People are worked up over fundamentalist muslims, but it is writing like this that brings hatred on Christians and Americans and makes you just as bad, if not worse, than them. This was the first article I have ever read on Conservapedia and it will be http://www.conservapedia.com/skins/common/images/button_sig.pngthe last. WWJD?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Jesus came to tell the truth, no one can deny that.  And many people hated Him for it, obviously.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:02, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.&amp;quot;  -Gandhi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now who's the ONE? [[User:Wikified|Wikified]] 10:41, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Gandhi deserves much respect, but I've never heard Christians cite him as an authority on Christianity.  I wouldn't expect a Christian to interpret Gandhi's religion for him either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:10, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trust, but verify; then get an eight day block==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trust, but verify.  Though he was not the originator of this quote, it was one of Ronald Reagan's favorites.  He quoted it when signing treaties with the Soviet Union and it's a useful concept in today's society.  It was in the spirit of this quote that I first read and edited at this encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The commandments and guidelines appear to support Reagan's idiom, yet some of the people in charge feel they can rule with an iron fist and pick and choose which rules they want to follow.  I experienced it first hand when I edited this article.  I first made several comments about the shortcomings of this article on the talk page so anyone could give me their opinion of my thoughts.  These comments highlighted various portions of the article that were factually incorrect, contained partisan sniping, unsupported assertions, gossip or deception by omission.  The response I got from Aschlafly was not encouraging, yet he didn't say I was prohibited from making any changes.  In fact, the pages that govern this encyclopedia say a lot about how articles must be sourced, placement of citation tags, how facts must to true and verifiable, etc.  Based on reading the guidelines, I made several changes that I thought reflected well on conservatives and Conservapedia.  Yet alas, I was blocked by Aschlafly for eight days.  The reason given was for 'inappropriate edits', that's very vague but I was unable to get any more information because Aschlafly doesn't provide contact information for people that have questions about their block.  This says a lot about a person's integrity if they refuse to follow the rules and then block other people because they made an 'inappropriate edit' that followed the spirit and intent of the commandments and guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since this encyclopedia is being used an educational resource for home-schooled children, I'd like to think the information contained within would be factual and verifiably true.  I'd feel very embarrassed for my child if she read some of the inaccurate content of this encyclopedia and then repeated it to an informed person that was educated on the true and verifiable facts of Barack Obama or others.  It is my honest opinion that this encyclopedia is a long way from earning respectability; and blocking editors for making true and verifiable edits is not going to help.  The administrators should clean up their act because there are a lot of people out there that will follow Reagan's advice; trust, yet verify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I will continue to make the same edits proposed by the commandments and the guidelines.  If an admin feels they can do without another conservative editing this encyclopedia in an ethical and trustworthy manner, it is their loss.--[[User:NormaN|NormaN]] 16:23, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference 29 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; section there is a point about his name, and following that there is a reference. That reference includes a big chunk of argument and then a few references of its own and some examples and its just a mess. I am about to go through and trim the fat, that means I'm going to take off the examples, and I'm going tot take off the parts that say that it is common to change your name of conversion (Obama never claims to have converted from Islam, so it doesn't really stand out as an inconsistency in his story, some might even claim its a [[straw man]]) and I am going to move the reference to the fact with in the bullet point that it supports and put up a fact tag. I am not taking down the bullet point which I would dispute. I would encourage any one who has a problem with this to go out and find a real reference that shows that most christians would not maintain their fathers name if it were tied to another religion. Please don't block me for a good faith factual edit. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 19:12, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Muslim, Koran, ''redux'' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed the silly Muslim and Koran references in the first paragraph for two reasons - one, they are completely unfounded statements with no basis in reality, and two, they are repeated ''ad nauseum'' in the first &amp;quot;section&amp;quot;, which is apparently intentionally placed above a TOC tag.  Let's leave the panicky POV-pushing to sections, at least, in the desperate attempt for this site to resemble an encyclopedia. [[User:Human|Human]] 23:30, 9 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama is not a muslim nor a person who embraces biblical Christianity because the evidence contradicts this matter ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a well written and scholarly piece that examines Obama's religious views and it was written by the National Clergy Council:  http://nationalclergycouncil.org/010807BarackObama.htm  The evidence does not support Obama being a muslim.  The evidence also does not support Obama embracing biblical Christianity.[[User:Conservative|conservative]] 09:19, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I skimmed it and don't see where it concludes that Obama is not a Muslim.  The article fails to recognize that less than 1% of people raised Muslim (as Obama was) ever leave the religion.  The article says Obama is a member of a Christian church, but he left that many months ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:24, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Okay, a couple questions.  1) Where are you getting this 1% figure from? 2) How was he raised muslim? Countless acquaintances of mine who were 'raised catholic,' spending ample time learning about Catholicism in school are nothing of the sort.  3) Why would a 1% conversion rate even matter? A person's religion isn't probabilistically determined.  By that logic, since 0% of previous Presidents were black, it's unlikely that Obama is president.  I don't like this guy or his policy, but real criticism seems to be the way to go, not pointless claims about his religion. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 10:50, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, as he is the president now, wouldn't it be far more constructive to work on things about his articulated agenda, and how it will affect Americans, write about how to influence our Congress people to stand up to agenda, and how to work with him to reflect what real Americans want - rather than report on unproven and unsupported claims?  It would be beyond comprehension if something said by panicked conservatives (not specifically here, just in genera) caused someone to think the right answer is to assassinate him.  Far better to focus on what we CAN do to remind our government who they serve - themselves or us.--[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 11:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are several points wrong with youe assertion.  1) He is not the president now, George W. Bush is. 2) His muslim faith is not unsupported and is far from irrelivant.  It will effect his leadership (shiria law anyone?) and his cabinet choices.  It is a very big deal seeing as he is the first non-Christian president ever elected.  Are we suppose to just stick our heads in the sand??[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 12:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Andy, you say that less than one percent of people raised as Muslims convert to another religion and use that percentage as if it is not a significant number.  It is.  Let us assume that there are one billion Muslims in the world today- this is a conservative estimate, using numbers from [http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html www.adherents.com].  Let us then assume that, for the sake of a conservative estimate, that 0.1% of Muslims convert to other religions.  That means that out of the one billion Muslims alive today, one million would convert.  That's more than the population of San Jose, California.  This is not an insignificant number of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My point here, Andy, is that your use of this statistic is not a good argument.  Less than one percent is a far cry from none.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 12:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Statistical evidence is relevant and compelling.  But it does not stand alone here.  There are at least a dozen other compelling evidentiary items, and the list is growing.  Supporting a ruler who has an agreement to convert the country to Islam, for example, is persuasive evidence also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:28, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Fist of all, I think you mean Sh'''a'''ria, but seeing as how you misspelled some English words, I can't really blame you for getting that wrong. To think that just because you believe he is a Muslim (and I emphasize ''believe'', but there are already multiple sections on this page saying why he is not) he would somehow be able to implement Sharia law in the U.S. is silly. The First Amendment prevents religious laws from being able to be made from ''any'' religion. So even if he was Muslim, that doesn't mean it would make pass some sort of Muslim laws, although I'm not exactly sure what ones you are worried about anyway, no intoxicants perhaps? You may be interested in hearing that the U.S. legal system may have been founded in part on ideas from Sharia law. And last but not least, what makes you think every president was Christian? The majority were to be sure, but as far as we know Jefferson was a deist whose ideas were closest to unitarianism, and Grant, Lincoln, Johnson, and Hayes had no religious affiliation and could have ranged from anything such as some sort of personal Christianity, simple theism, agnosticism, or even atheism. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:43, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Maybe he wouldn't be able to push sharia law (although the liberals have a majority now), but that doesn't not mean that he wouldn't like to, or introduce pieces of it little by little using deceit.  Liberals love to use &amp;quot;what if's&amp;quot; and draw conclusions using their &amp;quot;feelings&amp;quot; about someone or something, but to me it's a matter of facts: As Mr. Schlafly has pointed out, less than 1% of people raised as muslims ever leave the religion.  In other words, 99% of those raised muslim stay that way for the rest of their lifes.  Whether or not Obama is a muslim at this time is contested, but it is a fact that he was RAISED with muslim beliefs.  Which means there is a 99% chance that he still holds those beliefs.  Those are tough odds.  The US is engaged in a war on terror against muslim extremeists, and there is a 99% chance that our soon to be commander and chief is himself a muslim.  Now, no rational person believes that he shares the views of radical muslims or would wish harm on the country, but it is a connection that is difficult to ignore.  Especially given his relationship with an unrepentive domestic terrorist.  The issue is not that he has a religion other than Christianity, it's that his religion may lead him to sympathize with the very people trying to kill us.  Just as if a presidential nominee had had fuzzy ties to the USSR during the cold war.  People would, and should, look at those ties closely.[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 16:54, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Muslim Votes==&lt;br /&gt;
Wondering if the following should be added to Why barack is a Muslim. &amp;quot;90 Percent of American Muslims Voted for Obama.&amp;quot; [http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=39031] They voted in such numbers because he is Jewish? No, because he is Muslim. They voted for him because he is a convert to Christianity from Islam? Nope, they voted for a Muslim. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#6698FF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#E41B17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#F88017&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#347C17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#A74AC7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;t&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:Jpatt|  ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Correlation does not equal causation. A lot of other demographics were won over by Obama too, it doesn't make him an hispanic, a young white college student, a Native American, or a resident of California. I think a stronger reason why Muslims voted for Obama may be more of a problem with McCain's and Palin's treatment of certain minorities during the campaign such as the &amp;quot;he's not an Arab, he is a good family man&amp;quot; comment, as well as what other groups these Muslims belonged too such as their overall economic status. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 15:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Can you cite any other voting pattern as high as 90% that is not based on religion or ethnicity?  Not your other examples of Hispanic and young white college student, that's for sure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::With the greatest of respect, what an extraordinary thing to say!  Are you suggesting that Muslim voters can somehow read Obama's mind and see that he is really a Muslim?  The most that such a correlation could indicate is that Muslim voters might ''think'' that Obama is a Muslim.  And frankly, it doesn't even show that because you cannot know what was in their minds when they voted (possibly any number of different things).  Talk about clutching at straws!  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 16:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::78% of Jewish people voted for Obama, and I doubt they want to convert to either Christianity or Islam.   70% of people who live in urban areas &amp;gt; 500,000 voted for him.   Just two examples, from the excellent [http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/11/09/weekinreview/20081109_CONNELLY_GRFK.html National Election Pool synopsis], [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html tables] and [http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html data].   There's plenty of information there, so any trends should be visible.   But one does need to be careful about correlation and causation, clearly.   Famously, the population of penguins at the North Pole is supposed to correlate perfectly with the number of sitting MP's in the UK Labour Party.   [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 16:07, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::So what? Big cities are notorious cesspools of subversion and licence - just the sort of people to be attracted by a chancer like Obama. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:17, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The point he was making before you blocked him is that while Obama received a high percentage of the Muslim votes, he also received high percentages from numerous other demographics.  Clearly Obama does not belong to all of these demographics, and as such it is a misuse of the data to pick the one group you want to tie Obama to and declare him a part of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An interesting idea to consider is the possible circularity or self-fulfillment of this argument.  Some people say that Obama is a Muslim, and hence a bad guy.  Voting Muslims generally take offense and vote for Obama, giving him a high percentage of their vote.  Some people then claim that receiving most of the Muslim vote further indicates that Obama is a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 16:44, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent find.  This should help put to rest any doubts that remain about Obama's muslim faith. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 16:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gays overwhelmingly voted for Obama, cleary this is because this married man is a flaming homosexual. If Obama is a socialist, why do you guys silence any mention that Americans VOTED FOR a socialist president?--[[User:MichaelMo|MichaelMo]] 16:53, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deniers, you strike out.  Nothing approaches the 90% statistic cited by Jpatt, and for obvious reasons.  Go somewhere else to try to fool people.  You're not fooling anyone here, particularly when you look at the even more compelling evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:55, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't matter how strong the correlation is, it still doesn't prove causation. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The real question should be: why are you arguing with facts on this website? We argue with feelings here. I ''feel'' that Obama is a Muslim, so it's true.--[[User:AshleyB|AshleyB]] 17:02, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, none of this evidence is compelling- it's all weak at best, and when strung together and passed off as proof it just doesn't work.  90% of Muslim votes.  Less than 1% of Muslims convert.  The list goes on.  This &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; amounts to a wobbly house of cards, and I'm looking forward to it falling over and people discussing facts and positions, not resorting to religious persecution.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:04, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Not persecution, Corry. Discussion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him.  I don't know what else to call that.  Also, I would recommend you don't Google what AshleyB advised you to Google on your talk page.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:10, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: This suggestion by ASchlafly is worse than weak, it's nonsensical.  ASchlalfy talks about correlation being indicative of causation.  How can there be any '''causation'''?  In order for there to be causation the Muslim voters would have to have ''known'' that Obama was a Muslim.  Is there some vast secret conspiracy going on?  Have the Muslim voters been given contacted and given the secret &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; information by the Obama campaign?  Are the rest of us being kept in the dark?  How many Muslim voters are we talking about?  This is just plain silly.--[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:14, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Be aware, all commenters above, that your accounts will be blocked if you misrepresent what someone else says (as in Corry claiming that &amp;quot;[T]he argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him&amp;quot; or HGridley pretending this is about some &amp;quot;secret conspiracy.&amp;quot;)  You won't be warned again.  Be respectful and truthful in this discussion, or you'll be ranting in the future on a different site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one else can come up with anything close to a 90% voting correlation except where there is religious or ethnic identity.  Scientifically and objectively, that is noteworthy.  There are a dozen more compelling pieces of evidence, but that does not mean this data point is not suggestive also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:26, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have been utterly truthful in what I have said.  You appear to have missed the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In order for there to have been causation (i.e. Obama's being a Muslim caused Muslims to vote for him) the Muslims would necessarily have to ''know'' (not just suspect) that Obama is a Muslim.  In order for that to be the case there would need to be a vast conspiracy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pretty simple really.  Can you tell us what you know about this secret conspiracy?  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:33, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And how am I misrepresenting you, Andy?  Are you trying to convince people that Obama is a Muslim for purely academic reasons?  I stand by my statement.  This article, in the collection of &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; that Obama may be a Muslim, reads that &amp;quot;Contrary to Christianity, the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&amp;quot;  So we have the premise that Muslims lie to advance Islam, and Obama is part of this.  I would also like to point out you comment in a different section that &amp;quot;It will be fascinating to see how long it takes people to wake up to who Obama really is.&amp;quot;  That definitely sounds like it'd be a pretty bad thing if Obama was a Muslim.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 18:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mystery:Why Do Black Americans Vote For Liberal Candidates?|Black Americans vote for the Democrat presidential candidate over 90% of the time]], even when that candidate is not Black. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:20, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Often correlation is indicative of causation.  Those Democrat cantidates were probably secretly black.  --[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 18:23, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We are trying to build an encyclopedia here. Either help out or get out of the way, HGridley. You might find more people who think you are funny on a liberalpedia, if one exists.&lt;br /&gt;
::The only truly funny thing about your note is that you call them &amp;quot;cantidates&amp;quot;, which is a true record of how liberals treat Black Americans -- telling them &amp;quot;You can't, so depend on the government to do so for you.&amp;quot; [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 18:29, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to confess to being very confused by everything that's being said here.   None of it seems to quite line up.  Wouldn't the Jewish community be LESS likely to vote for a Muslim candidate, particularly one with the alleged terrorist links?   Yet 78% of them voted for him - in greater proportion than they have previously voted for a Democrat?   That seems to be completely counter to the allegation?    It just all seems very odd, and very confusing to a passing reader.   [[User:HarryR|HarryR]] 22:46, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Confusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just a little bit confused about one of the dot points claiming Obama is a Muslim, and was wondering if someone could explain it. It is the one about him leaving his Church without first finding a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in Australia, while many people are members of a Church, a majority of us Christians are not. There is often no official enrolment beyond donations or small groups, and most families simply attend the Church closest to them, some even attending a number of Churches. As such it is quite confusing to state that a person is not a Christian simply because they have not &amp;quot;joined&amp;quot; a Church, as this is not a reflection on whether or not they attend, let alone their individual faith. Perhaps this could be clarified for an international audience.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also the line &amp;quot;Many of Obama's statements about religion conflict with Christianity&amp;quot; is entirely conterproductive to the argument, as the statements made by Obama that are in opposition to Christianity (regarding homosexuality) are also in opposition to Islam. If anything this is proof that Obama is not a Muslim and is in fact an atheist, and should be removed asap! [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:48, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also Malcolm X did not become a Muslim after he was a National of Islam leader, it was before. The current wording needs to be fixed. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 19:51, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lenin Poster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statement about the Lenin-like poster is informative.  We don't censor informative information here.  Let the reader decide.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:22, 10 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, did you happen to take a look at the reference? The article claims that &amp;quot;Obama also ''revealed'' his ''deep Marxist/Leninist roots''&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;clear parallels between the poster design and Lenin's earlier poster was ''obviously a deliberate yet hidden hint'' to his European, socialistic audience as to his political roots and beliefs&amp;quot; (emphasis mine). The citation, which was a blog, by the way, and not in any way a trustworthy source of informative information, gives no evidence to back up these statements. It shows a poster of Lenin and a poster of Obama, both of which show profiles of the figures. Assuming these pictures weren't entirely made up, do you really think that this slight similarity is Obama's way of confessing closet Marxism? Not to mention the fact that Obama likely didn't make the posters anyway -- maybe we should accuse his (very expensive!!) marketing designer of being a Marxist/Leninist. 15:45, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama and beer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several stories (with photos) of Obama drinking beer, which as an intoxicant is banned by Muslim sharia. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2008/05/06/20/125-6web-Obama_Beer-minor.standalone.prod_affiliate.91.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.mcclatchydc.com/100/story/36055.html&amp;amp;h=325&amp;amp;w=485&amp;amp;sz=47&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=28&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__ShpWdieNIwhr4Rp3jHtLe7U9MB8=&amp;amp;tbnid=Se90xFLBo6rNQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=86&amp;amp;tbnw=129&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bdrinks%26start%3D18%26ndsp%3D18%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156_t.jpg&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.nancarrow-webdesk.com/warehouse/storage2/2008-w18/img.211156.html&amp;amp;h=332&amp;amp;w=400&amp;amp;sz=16&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;start=15&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;usg=__Yubc0nmus36Cf4Rrf7BL7-33-0g=&amp;amp;tbnid=xuWGKQ1Sl8_bQM:&amp;amp;tbnh=103&amp;amp;tbnw=124&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dobama%2Bbeer%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DG&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No rational person can say that a practicing Muslim wouldn't violate the law in such a blatant, repeated manner. Another strike against the goofy Muslim charge. And remember, we don't censor here. Godspeed. [[User:Thecount|Thecount]] 12:52, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think many American Muslims drink beer.  Nice try, though.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:57, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hussein reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's factual and it's informative.  If there is reasoned basis for deleting it, let's see it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:03, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Again, no reason has been given for deleting the Hussein reference, and there is none.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Andy, this is false.  Reasons have been given on this talk page numerous times before.  I just had a quick look, and found reasons being given in all archives except the first, as well as other places on this talk page.  So you are wrong to say that no reason has been given, and wrong to say that there is no reason.  And, as I have pointed out in the edit comments, five senior administrators have said that they disagree with it being there.  Is your view on this somehow superior to those five put together?  Do you want this to be a collaborative encyclopaedia or your blog?  The former demands that you not impose your opinion regardless of who is disagreeing.  Imposing your opinion regardless suggests that this is your blog.  I know you don't consider it to be the latter, but that's the way it's looking.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:21, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Not a blog but an encylopedia. If it were a blog, your opinion would carry as much weight as anyone else's. Let's put this one in [[Conservapedia:Debate Topics]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:24, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: If it were a blog, the blog owner's opinion would carry the most weight.  Almost all blogs are the opinions of an ''individual'', not a group of people.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Philip, the truth is not dependent on consensus, and 5 out of several dozen is not a consensus anyway.  Give your best reason for deleting this information here.  Since the beginning we have had a policy not to delete factual, informative material, particularly when it is liberal ideology that motivates the demand for censorship of it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:29, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I said five of the ''senior'' administrators, which numbers about eleven.  So that's five out of eleven, not dozens.  Further, that's five against and one (yourself) for, as the remainder have not offered an opinion that I'm aware of.  (One perhaps did support you, but because they wanted to support you, not because they considered it a valid argument.)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: My reason is relevance, not (primarily) accuracy.  I'm not disputing that his middle name is Hussein.  The claim that &amp;quot;most Christians would not retain&amp;quot; their (former/Muslim/Arabic?; it's not clear) name is not supported by the references, and even if it is true, means little in individual cases.  That is, even if 99% changed their name, Obama not changing his name might mean no more than him being in the other 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: And this is just one of the points in that section.  The entire argument that Obama is a Muslim is built on very circumstantial evidence, selective evidence, and logical fallacy, and is rejected by other conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:58, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Philip, it obviously is relevant, which you say is your primary objection.  We don't censor information here based on liberal dislike for it.  Wikipedia does that.  We provide the information and let the reader decide.  If some readers want to conclude that someone with a Muslim name is actually a Christian, even though less than 1% of those raised as Muslims convert, so be it.  We're not going to censor this factual information.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:37, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Exactly.  The point of Conservapedia is ''not'' to censor information, but to leave it to our readers to decide.  The MSM has tried to push this under the rug, so the least we can do is offer these arguments to the intelligent public. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 11:27, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: The problem is that these points are fallacious and lead to a conclusion based on specious arguments. That is neither &amp;quot;trustworthy&amp;quot; nor encyclopedic. Obama may not be your brand of xian, but he's certianly no brand of muslim. Your inability to accept that this is incorrect despite repeated arguments wherein you have shown nothing but fallacious arguments drawing poor conclusions hurts the credibility of all Conservapedia. [[User:EternalCritic|EternalCritic]] 11:49, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debate On Obama's Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debate is continuing at [[Debate:Is Obama a Muslim?‎]] It may be best to continue arguing the point there with the aim of reaching a conclusion which can then be utilised in the article, and leave this talk page for discussing other improvements. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 22:22, 11 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:09, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Get the section about him being a &amp;quot;Muslim&amp;quot; there have already been to debates concluding that this should be removed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:Is_Obama_a_Muslim%3F &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; http://www.conservapedia.com/Debate:_What_is_sufficient_proof_that_Obama_is_a_Muslim%3F-[[User:Vcelloho|Vcelloho]] 00:08, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action?   Untrue.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am no fan of Obama.  I do plan on respectfully opposing him via various channels on the internet.  However, I believe I should state my opposition to this sentence of the article: &amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not read the rest of the article because I believed months ago and for good reasons that Obama was going to win this election. For example, the unpopular war and  poor economy that was partly caused by a guns and lots of butter spending strategy (Bush should have learned from LBJ committing us to a war and the Great Society programs at the same time).   I also thought that it would have been easy for the Republicans to win 12 years in a row given the low quality of the Democratic party. I think the Republicans snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory.  I also think Americans have too much debt (last time I heard the average American had lots of credit card debt). One of the reasons for the great depression is that American's had too much debt at the time. I think Bush's call for Americans to do to do more shopping mall spending was a joke.  If anything, Americans need to increase their skills to be more productive (The libraries are open but you might have to watch less TV.  Last time I checked the average American watches 3 hours of television a day) and work harder to pay off their debt.  American's are going to get out of the hole by increasing their productivity.    It seems as if Bush did not want to learn from economic history and was only looking out for short term fixes.  Well sooner or later, common sense says you have to pay the piper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Getting back to Obama, obviously, Obama's marital success in terms of not getting divorced compared to Ronald Reagan is not the result of affirmative action.  I am sure I could come up with others.  I have not read the article for the most part because this sentence turned me off to the whole article.  Judging from the &amp;quot;&amp;quot;He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.&amp;quot; sentence, I  believe a lot of time is probably being spent to defend an article rather than improve it where obvious improvements could be made. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 06:04, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Staying married is laudable but in this context it would not be considered a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement.&amp;quot;  If you would like to add a footnote exception to the remark along the lines of, &amp;quot;he has been married for x years,&amp;quot; I'm not opposed but I would expect that to caveat to seem off-topic, or even sarcastic, for most readers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 07:52, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One CP writer told me he equates divorce with adultery, and he accused Reagan of adultery on this basis. Is this the consensus view of Conservatives? Or just his own idea? Or what?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We ought to be clear on the standards by which we judge public figures. And consistent, too. I mean, which is worse, committing actual adultery (JFK, Clinton) or getting divorced and then remarrying? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Biblically, divorce is not adultery.  However, divorce is wrong unless the spouse has been unfaithful.  Remarriage after a legitimate divorce is okay.  The question is whether remarriage after a wrong divorce is okay.  Many believe, I think that although the act of divorce may be wrong, that is a forgivable sin like any other sin, and remarriage is not a further sin.  And I'd tend to agree that committing &amp;quot;actual&amp;quot; adultery is worse than divorce and remarriage.  However, the point that Conservative was raising was not between those two cases, but between divorce and remarriage compared to marriage without divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
::: I'm not convinced that Obama's marriage does not constitute a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot;.  Given the divorce rate these days, especially among prominent people, I would think that it ''was'' a clear personal achievement.  In fact I'd consider staying marriage a &amp;quot;clear personal achievement&amp;quot; for anybody these days, given all the pressures on marriage, including the peer pressure that divorce is okay.&lt;br /&gt;
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:35, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I rarely disagree with you, Philip, as I find your comments to be some of the more considered on this board, but here I would have to disagree.  Jesus makes it quite clear that divorce *is* adultery, not *like* adultery.  More then any other text, especially OT text, I take Jesus's words to heart. Mark 10&lt;br /&gt;
2 Some Pharisees came and tested him by asking, &amp;quot;Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
3 &amp;quot;What did Moses command you?&amp;quot; he replied.&lt;br /&gt;
4 They said, &amp;quot;Moses permitted a man to write a certificate of divorce and send her away.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
5 &amp;quot;It was because your hearts were hard that Moses wrote you this law,&amp;quot; Jesus replied.&lt;br /&gt;
6 &amp;quot;But at the beginning of creation God `made them male and female.'&lt;br /&gt;
7 `For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife,&lt;br /&gt;
8 and the two will become one flesh.' So they are no longer two, but one.&lt;br /&gt;
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this.&lt;br /&gt;
11 He answered, &amp;quot;Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her.&lt;br /&gt;
12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.&amp;quot; --[[User:JeanJacques|JeanJacques]] 09:41, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama spiruality interview ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html   a interview from a pretty religous website about Obama. Should it be mentioned? Or since it kinda contradicts abit of the article should it be ommitted? --[[User:Vmember|Vmember]] 13:06, 12 November 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chris_Rock&amp;diff=555443</id>
		<title>Chris Rock</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chris_Rock&amp;diff=555443"/>
		<updated>2008-11-12T18:01:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Chris Rock''' is an [[American]] [[comedian]] who first came to prominence on [[Saturday Night Live]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His material often draws on [[race relations]] from an [[African American]] perspective. Though most of his jokes are African American orientated he has been critical of the black community and supportive of better race relations. His wife runs an organization that helps women who have stopped receiving [[welfare]] and begun to start working. and   In 2005, he hosted [[the Oscars]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Rock, Chris}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comedians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mongols&amp;diff=552345</id>
		<title>Mongols</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mongols&amp;diff=552345"/>
		<updated>2008-11-08T22:49:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Mongols''' are an ethnic group that originated in modern day [[Mongolia]], [[Russia]], and [[China]].  They successfully invaded and controlled much of Asia, including all of [[China]], parts of [[Russia]], and most of the [[Middle East]] during [[Medieval Times]]. At the height of their empire they controlled  22% of the Earth's total land area around 12,741,000 square miles. Given their size they were the world's second largest empire ever to exist right behind [[Great Britain]] and the world's largest Contiguous empire ever 6 times the size of the [[Roman Empire]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:anthropology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremiah_Wright&amp;diff=552306</id>
		<title>Jeremiah Wright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremiah_Wright&amp;diff=552306"/>
		<updated>2008-11-08T22:18:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|left|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]] The '''Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.''' was the pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ, a large [[Chicago]] church with a black congregation. He had a relatively privileged upbringing in [[Philadelphia]], where his father was a [[Baptist]] minister in the Germantown section and his mother was Vice-Principal at the prestigious Philadelphia High School for Girls.  Jeremiah Wright himself attended the Central High School for Boys, which was a selective school that ranked among the very best in the [[United States]]. After attending 2 years of college Wright dropped out and joined first the [[United States Marine Corps]] and then the [[United States Navy]]. Wright was the mentor of [[Democratic]] presidential candidate [[Barack Obama]]. Wright married Obama and his wife, baptized his children and had been a close spiritual adviser to [[Obama]] for twenty years. Wright even inspired the title of Obama's book ''The Audacity of Hope''. Wright came under fire for anti-American statements he has made, and for implying that the [[AIDS]] virus was spread by the United States government to wipe out the black population and that the United States got what it deserved on [[9/11]] and that the Jews are evil white people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wright's comments were condemned across America. Only when it became politically important, Obama finally distanced himself from Wright.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeremiah Wright is a staunch supporter for the Nation of Islam. Wright received an award from none other than Louis Farrakhan.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberal defenders of Obama like to point out that not everyone was shocked at Wright's preachings and that he was actually defended by [[Mike Huckabee]]. Mike Huckabee stated: &amp;quot;We've got to cut some slack to people who grew up being called names, being told, &amp;quot;You have to sit in the balcony when you go to the movie. You have to go to the back door to go into the restaurant. And you can't sit out there with everyone else. There's a separate waiting room in the doctor's office. Here's where you sit on the bus.&amp;quot; And you know what? Sometimes people do have a chip on their shoulder and resentment. And you have to just say, I probably would too. I probably would too. In fact, I may have had a more, more of a chip on my shoulder had it been me.&amp;quot;[http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/huckabee-defend.html]  &lt;br /&gt;
Huckabee went on to say that '''&amp;quot;...no one can defend the content of Wright's statements.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religious People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Children of Clergy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roger_B._Taney&amp;diff=552293</id>
		<title>Roger B. Taney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roger_B._Taney&amp;diff=552293"/>
		<updated>2008-11-08T22:11:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Roger Brooke Taney''' was the Fifth Chief Justice of the [[US Supreme Court]] (1836-1864) succeeding the Honorable [[John Marshall]] and preceding the Honorable [[Salmon P. Chase]]. He was nominated for the Supreme Court by then president [[Andrew Jackson]]. He is most famous for the decision he wrote in [[Dred Scott v. Sanford]], which rendered multiple slavery compromises void. Prior to being elevated to the Court, he was the 12th [[Secretary of the Treasury]] and 12th [[Attorney General]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Supreme Court]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Franklin_Delano_Roosevelt_Memorial&amp;diff=552268</id>
		<title>The Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Franklin_Delano_Roosevelt_Memorial&amp;diff=552268"/>
		<updated>2008-11-08T21:47:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial''' is a presidential memorial dedicated to the 32nd President of the [[United States]] [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] and the era he led the United States through. The 7.5 acre memorial was dedicated in the year 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dcrosmor.jpg|right|thumb|330px|One of the many statues at the Memorial.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Memorials]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Franklin_Delano_Roosevelt_Memorial&amp;diff=552265</id>
		<title>The Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Franklin_Delano_Roosevelt_Memorial&amp;diff=552265"/>
		<updated>2008-11-08T21:44:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: New page: The '''Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial''' is a presidential memorial dedicated to the 32nd President of the United States Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the era he led the United...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial''' is a presidential memorial dedicated to the 32nd President of the [[United States]] [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] and the era he led the United States through. The 7.5 acre memorial was dedicated in the year 1997.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franklin_D._Roosevelt&amp;diff=552261</id>
		<title>Franklin D. Roosevelt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franklin_D._Roosevelt&amp;diff=552261"/>
		<updated>2008-11-08T21:36:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vmember: /* Legacy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{President&lt;br /&gt;
|image=509px-FDR in 1933.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=32&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=March 4, 1933&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=April 12, 1945    &lt;br /&gt;
|party=Democratic    &lt;br /&gt;
|vp= John N. Garner&lt;br /&gt;
|vp_dates=1933-1941          &lt;br /&gt;
|2vp=Henry A. Wallace          &lt;br /&gt;
|2vp_dates=1941-1945          &lt;br /&gt;
|3vp=Harry Truman          &lt;br /&gt;
|3vp_dates=1945          &lt;br /&gt;
|4vp=          &lt;br /&gt;
|4vp_dates=          &lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Herbert Hoover&lt;br /&gt;
|next=Harry Truman      &lt;br /&gt;
|seq2= &lt;br /&gt;
|term2_start=    &lt;br /&gt;
|term2_end=    &lt;br /&gt;
|party2=    &lt;br /&gt;
|vp2=          &lt;br /&gt;
|vp2dates=          &lt;br /&gt;
|2vp2=          &lt;br /&gt;
|2vp2dates=          &lt;br /&gt;
|3vp2=          &lt;br /&gt;
|3vp2dates=          &lt;br /&gt;
|4vp2=          &lt;br /&gt;
|4vp2dates=          &lt;br /&gt;
|previous2=&lt;br /&gt;
|next2=          &lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=January 30, 1882 &lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Hyde Park, New York&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=April 12, 1945&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=Warm Springs, Georgia&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Eleanor Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2=&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Episcopalian]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Franklin Delano Roosevelt''' was the 32nd [[President of the United States of America]], 1933-45, leading the U.S. from the darkest days of the [[Great Depression]] to victory over Germany and Japan; he built the '''New Deal Coalition''' which dominated American politics into the 1960s, and is still fondly remembered by liberals.  His [[New Deal]] was a very large, complex interlocking set of programs designed to produce relief (which meant jobs for the unemployed), recovery (of the GDP), and reform (by which he meant regulation of Wall Street and the economy), as well as reelection (in 1936, 1940 and 1944) and realignment of the political system.  Conservatives strongly opposed many, but not all, of the New Deal programs. Conservatives abolished most of the relief programs when unemployment practically ended in the 1940s. Most of the regulations on business were ended about 1975-85, except for the regulation of Wall Street by the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]], which still exists. The major surviving program is [[Social Security]], which Roosevelt passed in 1935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives at the time denounced his bids for presidential power, including building a national political machine through the [[WPA]] (it lasted from 1935 to 1943), attempting to take control of the Supreme Court by adding new liberal judges (an attempt which failed, 1937), and trying to purge the Democratic party of conservative congressman (an attempt which failed in 1938). The failures of those attempts can be attributed to the [[Conservative Coalition]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After 1938 FDR turned his attention to [[World War II]]. he was a strong advocate of support for China against Japan; most conservatives agreed.  He also was a strong supporter of military aid to Britain. Conservatives split on that, with the &amp;quot;isolationists&amp;quot; opposed, and others like [Henry Stimson]] in favor.  Once Pearl Harbor brought the U.S. into the war, conservatives strongly supported the war effort and generally approved his military leadership, although highly critical of his close cooperation with [[Stalin]] and the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was the first and only President to be elected four times, breaking the traditional two-term-limit precedent established by [[George Washington]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Tradition was restored by the 22ndAmendment in 1947.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's health failed rapidly in 1944-45, even as he ran for reelection. He died On April 12, 1945. Despite polio which crippled him starting in the early 1920s, he exuded a sense of confidence and hope for the future that made for a charismatic personality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholars have argued that some relief efforts actually helped to prolong the [[Great Depression]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin Roosevelt studied law at Columbia University where he failed to graduate.  Secretary of Labor [[Frances  Perkins]], the first woman ever appointed to a cabinet post and knew FDR from his early manhood up to his death, says he was not a student, that he knew nothing of economics and that he admitted he had never read a book on the subject. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt I Knew,'' Frances Perkins, New York, Viking Press, 1946. p. 34.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Election of 1932 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats made Government non-intervention under the Hoover administration an issue in the campaign of 1932, charging that Hoover's laissez faire approach was not working.  After Roosevelt had taken office, former Democratic New York Governor Al Smith, saw Roosevelt's ultimately expansive policies as a departure from the ideals of Conservatives and supported Republican candidates in subsequent elections. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Democrats were damning Hoover as a big spender, at the same time he was refusing to be drawn into big spending, the Democratic House passed a bill appropriating $1,500,000,000 for old-fashioned [[pork-barrel]] outlays.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of Hoover's hesitance to utilize government spending to bail the nation out of the depression, he became incredibly unpopular, paving the way for Roosevelt's landslide victory in the presidential election of 1932, winning 472 electoral votes (nearly 90% of the total) and 22,800,000 popular votes (57% of the total) to defeat incumbent president Herbert Hoover.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1932 Presidential Election Results http://www.uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?f=0&amp;amp;year=1932&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was running primarily on the platform that he would help the country recover from the Great Depression with his New Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First Term ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
On November 16, 1933, when the Roosevelt administration granted diplomatic recognition to the [[Union of Soviet Socialist Republics]], the USSR pledged itself to refrain &amp;quot;from interfering in any manner in the internal affairs of the United States.&amp;quot;  This occurred three weeks after the founding of the [[Comintern]] affiliated [[American League for Peace and Democracy]]. The process of Communist “influence” in American life was accelerated.  This “influence,” as described by [[Communist party]] defector [[Louis Budenz]], was to “infiltrate key government posts, undermine the patriotism of well meaning people in strategic or confidential positions, and win over those whose words, spoken and written, have an effect on American [[public opinion]];” it was checked “partially during the [[Molotov-Ribbentrop pact|Hitler-Stalin alliance]], it went all out in the course of the [[Second World War]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Men Without Faces, The Communist Conspiracy in the U. S. A., By Louis Budenz, New York  Harper &amp;amp; Brothers, 1950, [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=//PDFsml_AD/Men_Without_Faces-Louis_Francis_Budenz-1950-315pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=238&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 pg. 2] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Numerous [[Attorney General's list|Comintern affiliate]] organizations sprung up in the ensuing years, including the [[American Youth Congress]] in 1934 and the [[League of American Writers]] in 1935.  [[KGB]] officers traveled the country in the guise of diplomatic and consular officials, conducting [[espionage]] activities &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/venona-soviet-espionage-and-the-american-response-1939-1957/10.gif Anonymous letter to Hoover], undated (received 7 August 1943), National Security Agency Venona Collection. &amp;quot;[[SEMENOV]] works in AMTORG, is robbing the whole of the war industry in America. SEMENOV has his agents in all the industrial towns of the U.S.A., in all aviation and chemical war factories and in big industries.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; freely and offering bribes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 28, 1934, Elliott Roosevelt, son of the President, and [[Anthony Fokker]] each received half a million dollars for selling fifty military aircraft to the Soviet government. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,756770-2,00.html ''Son's Scheme''], Time magazine, Oct. 19, 1936,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New Deal===&lt;br /&gt;
:''For Main Article see '''[[New Deal]].'''''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flatgrowth.JPG|thumb|300px|right|Real Output and Growth remained stagnant throughout the New Deal largely due to government involvement. The Depression came back with a vengeance in 1937-1938 because of the [[economic planner]]s over emphasis on consumption, and deemphasis and persecution of producers--the people who make the economy work. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Source:New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis, ''Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian, Journal of Political Economy, volume 112 (2004), pages 779–816.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
FDR is also famous for his [[New Deal]], a set of [[economic planning]] experiments that were instilled in the hope of ending the [[Great Depression]]. After many years, unemployment was finally brought down to reasonable levels as World War II began and the draft opened up more opportunties for people to move into the workforce. [[Economic growth]] was generally occurring, but the nation wasn't back on its feet until the war progressed.&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the [[Anti-trust Act]] was considered as an essential instrument to prevent [[cartel]]s and trusts in restraint of trade which had been viewed as deadly to the system of [[free enterprise]]. On the campaign trail Roosevelt called loudly for its strict enforcement. Yet immediately upon Roosevelt's accession to office the Anti-trust Act was suspended in order to cartelize every industry in America on the Italian [[fascist]] corporative model. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 1, Chapter 4, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/cgi-bin/framed/2767/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Four___The_New_New_Deal.htm ''The New New Deal''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Recovery Act (NRA) and the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) were plans to take the whole industrial and agricultural life of the country under the wing of the government, organize it into vast farm and industrial cartels, as they were called in Germany, cooperatives as they were called in Italy, and operate business and farms by economic planning schemes dictated and carried out under the supervision of government. It is also worth noting that World War II was total warfare on both sides.  Even the Allied Powers such as the British took control of the nation's economy.  Such intervention was very much necessary in order to gain every advantage possible against the enemy.  Centralized planning allowed for greater efficiency, yet some civil liberties were suppressed in the effort. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=420&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AAA reported to the Secretary of Agriculture but was independent of the Department of Agriculture bureaucracy. [[Harold Ware]] was a [[Communist Party USA]] (CPUSA) official in the AAA and founded the [[Ware group]]. The group consisted of young lawyers and economists, had about 75 members in 1934 and was divided into about eight cells. The AAA was later found [[unconstitutional]], but by that time the Communist operatives had established jobs in government employment. [[Alger Hiss]], [[Lee Pressman]], [[John Abt]], [[Charles Kramer]], [[Nathan Witt]], [[Henry Collins]], [[George Silverman]], [[Marion Bachrach]], [[John Herrmann]], [[Nathaniel Weyl]], [[Donald Hiss]] and [[Victor Perlo]] were all members of the Ware group.  [[Harry Dexter White]], who was involved in the most auspicious policy [[subversion (political)|subversion]] as Director of the Division of Monetary Research in the [[Treasury Department]], was also affiliated with the group. The Ware group was the CPUSA's covert arm at this time.   Each of these agents not only provided classified documents to Soviet intelligence, but was involved in political influence operations as well.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1934, a Congressional Investigation was held to examine statements by Dr. William A. Wirt, who headed the U.S. [[Department of Education|Office of Education]]. Dr. Wirt had attended a dinner party with several Brain Trusters at the home of his secretary, [[Alice Barrows]].  Barrows began working for the Office of Education in 1919 and was secretly a member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) which advocated the violent overthrow of the United States Constitution.  Several of the Brain Trusters present at the dinner revealed to Wirt they were CPUSA members. Wirt testified,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery, they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce.  By propaganda, they would destroy institutions making long term capital loans—and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier, he must also follow his money with control and management. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hearings, House Select Committee To Investigate Certain Statements of Dr. William Wirt, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session, April 10 and 17, 1934. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Dr Wirt faces the cameras and tells all'', Literary Digest v. 117 (April 21 1934) p. 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster053.pdf Volume 53 June 1946], p. 78 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A June 1945 [[Venona project]] decryption of Soviet [[KGB]] wartime cables from the Washington D.C. KGB Office to Moscow's Eighth Department, the political intelligence wing, relayed information on matters regarding Attorney General Francis Biddle.  KGB agent [[Charles Kramer]], who served on the staff of several U.S. Senate Subcommittees, and Barrows are the sources of the information. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Venona 3706 KGB Washington to Moscow, 29 June 1945.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Mary Van Kleek who headed the Russell Sage Foundation and also served on the Board of the National Council, visited Washington weekly to meet with Barrows and [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During [[World War II]] Barrows was the Executive Secretary of the the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship.  This organization was declared in 1953 to be a [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Fronts_and_cutouts|Communist front]] organization by the [[Subversive Activities Control Board]] (SACB). In its Findings of Fact, the SACB said the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|advances positions...markedly pro-Soviet and...anti-United States Government...is a Communist-action organization which has as its primary purpose to advance the objectives of the world Communist movement under the [[hegemony]] of the Soviet Union; it has the policy to support and defend the Soviet Union under any and all circumstances...We conclude that the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc., is substantially directed, dominated, and controlled by the Communist Party of the United States...and is primarily operated for the purpose of giving aid and support to...the Soviet Union, a Communist foreign government.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;United States. Subversive Activities Control Board. [http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=usfexec;cc=usfexec;q1=Barrows;rgn=full text;idno=81242.0001.001;didno=81242.0001.001;view=image;seq=511;page=root;size=s;endseq=3;frm=frameset Reports of the Subversive Activities Control Board.] Washington. United States Government Printing Office. 1966. Vol. 1, p. 501.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civilian Conservation Corps====&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Civilian Conservation Corps]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon after President Roosevelt's inauguration in March 1933, he announced the establishment of the CCC camps to take the &amp;quot;boys&amp;quot; (age 17-23) off the street corners; they were paid $30 a month, of which $25 went to their families.  The U.S. Army ran the camps, which provided a generation of young Army officers with leadership experience, as 2.5 million young men spent 6-months or 12-months in the camps. However there were no uniforms or military drills.  Of all the New Deal innovations, perhaps the most generally applauded was the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). It was strongly approved at the time by conservatives and liberals alike, including most religious and business leaders as a way to save the boys who were perpectually unemployed and drifting into gangs. The CCC was ended in 1943 when the need had vanished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Social Security===&lt;br /&gt;
An Old Age Social Security Bill was passed during his first term which provided for workers who reach the age of 65 a pension of $8 a week at most. The plan had to be pushed through against his procrastination until finally in the 1934 congressional elections the Republicans denounced him for his tardiness. When he did finally consent to a bill, it contained a plan for building a huge reserve fund that would extract billions from the workers' payrolls without any adequate return. Over the protest of the President, the Congress finally took that provision proposed by Roosevelt out of the law. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Roosevelt Myth'', Book 3, Chapter 14, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Fifteen___The_Roosevelt_.htm ''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Taxation===&lt;br /&gt;
FDR, in a letter to journalist Roy W. Howard, wrote, &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;What is known as consumer taxes, namely the invisible taxes paid by people in every walk of life, fall relatively much more heavily upon the poor man than on the rich man.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Franklin D. Roosevelt, letter to Roy W. Howard, September 2, 1935. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Robert H. Jackson]], then serving as [[Internal Revenue Service]] General Counsel, observed in Congressional testimony that prior to FDR’s election, &amp;quot;we find those taxes bearing most heavily on the well-to-do contributed 68% per cent of the government's total internal revenue and customs receipts, while miscellaneous taxes and customs receipts, bearing most heavily upon the consumer contributed only 31.8%”  By 1935 the situation was reversed with “taxes based on ability to pay contributed 38.7% . . . there has been an increase in the proportion of revenues contributed by taxes on consumption to 61.3%.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Testimony of Robert Jackson, Assistant General Counsel, Treasury Department, Committee on Finance, U . S. Senate, August 6, 1985.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic growth===&lt;br /&gt;
New capital made available for investment amounted to $348,000,000 in 1935. This was less than 1/10th of the amount available in 1929.  By contrast, the British economy had nearly recovered to its 1929 levels by 1935, and the amount available for investment was almost twice as much as the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! United States &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Standard Statistics Co., ''New Honey for Operating and Producing.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Great Britain &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Midland Bank, London, ''New Issues for British Companies,'' converted from £ to $ at $4.8665.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1927&lt;br /&gt;
| $3,201,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| $710,509,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1928&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,062,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 983,033,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1929&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,668,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 759,174,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1930&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,039,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 394,186,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1931&lt;br /&gt;
| 1,006,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 155,728,000 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1932&lt;br /&gt;
| 321,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 248,191,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1933&lt;br /&gt;
| 177,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 296,856,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1934&lt;br /&gt;
| 356,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 350,388,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1935&lt;br /&gt;
| 348,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 666,710,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Congress of Industrial Organizations===&lt;br /&gt;
By 1935 membership in labor unions had sunk to a low figure as a result of [[unemployment]].  There were men around the President at this time that saw the tremendous possibilities of organizing labor as a political force. An industrial union is one in which all the people engaged in a single industry are included without regard to the type of skills at which they work.  The industrial union was the one great instrument by which all labor could be organized and the President was urged to promote this idea as the starting point in building up a powerful political labor movement. There were three large industrial unions at that time, [[John L. Lewis]]’s [[United Mine Workers]] (UMW), the International Ladies Garment Workers Union of David Dubinsky and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of [[Sidney Hillman]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt tried to sell the plan to John L. Lewis of the UMW, and William Green, head of the American Federation of Labor (AFL). Green and the AFL opposed the idea of industrial unions and refused, but under the leadership of Lewis, a new group of unions was formed called the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO).  The Comintern directed [[Lee Pressman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Report, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster082.pdf Underground Soviet Espionage (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government], October 21, 1946, United States Government, pgs. 298 - 300 pdf. &amp;quot;Leon Pressman, alias Lee Pressman, served as General Counsel for the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] from 1933 to 1935; in 1935 he was appointed General Counsel for the [[Works Progress Administration]]. In 1937 he was appointed to the General Counsel for the National [[Congress of Industrial Organizations]] (CIO). Pressman was also associated with various Communist front organizations.  Pressman was a known contact of [[Anatoly Gorsky]], New York [[KGB]] Rezident, and KGB Agents [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Harry Dexter White]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of the [[Ware group]] to assume the position of general counsel&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster132.pdf Vol. 132, pg. 109] pdf. &amp;quot;Pressman is said to have run arms to Spain during the Civil War via Mexico and to have worked with General Mark Moren in the project. Moren was involved in the [[Rubens Robinson]] passport case in 1938.&amp;quot;  See also Underground Espionage Agent, Adolf Berle notes, September 2, 1939. [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page100.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,789421,00.html ''32,000 &amp;amp; Mrs. Rubens''], Time magazine, Feb. 07, 1938. &amp;quot;In the first years of the Soviet Union, to escape from Russia was difficult and dangerous. Today it has become almost impossible, an attempt tantamount to suicide. Barbed and electrically charged wire, searchlight-equipped watch towers. 24-hour frontier patrols aided by bloodhounds and police dogs guard every mile of border. .... Weak from [[scurvy]] and [[dysentery]], Konarski told correspondents: 'The camp contains about 32,000 prisoners. They are kept there until [[death]] results from hard work, bad food and consequent sickness. I met two [[American citizen]]s in the camp, Arthur Hanley, a chemical engineer from California, and Edward Rose, a machinist from Boston, Mass. They said they came to Russia in 1921 as volunteer workers. Rose said he was [[arrest]]ed in Leningrad in 1923. Hanley was caught trying to escape from Russia to Latvia in 1925. Each was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment, but, although they have served out their sentences, they are still being held. They told me they know of three other native-born Americans who are held prisoner in other Soviet camps.'...Mrs. Ruth Marie Rubens (alias Robinson), one U. S. citizen officially known to be in jail in Moscow (TIME, Dec. 27 [1938]). In Moscow on December 9 able, active U. S. Charge d'Affaires Loy W. Henderson learned that Mrs. Rubens had &amp;quot;disappeared&amp;quot;' from the big Hotel National next door to the U.S. Embassy. On January 18 the Soviet Foreign Office finally admitted that Mrs. Rubens was under arrest, failed to say on what charge.... hundreds of Germans are today in Soviet jails and for years German diplomatic &amp;amp; consular officials have not been allowed to see them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; where he became known as &amp;quot;Comrade Big.&amp;quot;  The year 1936 was a period of furious organizing work by it among the unskilled workers of the country. As Lewis,  Dubinsky, and Hillman set about organizing millions of workers they were immediately up against the problem of finding skilled organizers to promote and manage the new unions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There had been in the United States a [[Communist]] labor organization known as the Trade Union Unity League which took its instructions directly from [[Moscow]]. It is estimated that ten or fifteen thousand Communists were in these unions. In 1934, Moscow directed the Communist party in the United States to dissolve the Trade Union Unity League unions and to march the members of those unions into the American Federation of Labor. The purpose was not to advance the cause of labor unions or to get better working conditions for the members, but to use the apparatus of the labor union as an instrument of [[revolution]]. The Communist leaders saw in the rise of the CIO a better opportunity for their own revolutionary objectives than in the AFL and instructed their members to withdraw from the AFL and go into the CIO where they achieved disproportionate influence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Soviet World of American Communism'', Harvey Klehr, John Earl Haynes, and Kyrill M. Anderson, Yale University Press, 1998,  Document 13, pp. 58-68. ISBN 0-300-07150-7. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lewis was interested in bringing into existence industrial unions like his own, in which he had always believed. Roosevelt was interested in bringing into American labor unions as many voters as possible and in capturing their leadership to build a powerful labor faction which could control the Democratic party and which he and his allies could control through the vast power of the government and the vast powers of labor leaders, along with the immense financial resources that so great a labor movement would have. The Communists were interested in getting into key positions as union officers, statisticians, economists, etc., in order to utilize the apparatus of the unions to promote the cause of revolution.  By the early part of 1938, over three million workers had been organized.  Lewis was later to split with FDR. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Communists and the CIO: From the Soviet archives'', Harvey Klehr and John E. Haynes, Labor History, Volume 35, Issue 3 Summer 1994 , pages 442 - 446. [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a772103056~db=all?tab=references]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,788129-4,00.html ''Turning Point?''], Time magazine, Monday, Jul. 12, 1937.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Third Term ==&lt;br /&gt;
It is fairly certain that early in 1939, if not a little sooner, FDR made up his mind to seek a third election in the [[United States presidential election, 1940|presidential election of 1940]].  FDR realized the political difficulties involved in a third nomination so he wanted to make it appear as a &amp;quot;draft Roosevelt&amp;quot; movement. He discussed other candidates with his aids, among the names were Democratic National Committee Chairman [[James Farley]], whom FDR rejected because he was [[Roman Catholic]].  The name of Paul McNutt was urged; FDR was angry McNutt would even permit his name to be discussed. FDR told Farley: &amp;quot;I consider it bad taste on his part to be letting his name be used when he is still a member of my administration.&amp;quot; Roosevelt sent him as High Commissioner to the Philippines and jokingly asked: &amp;quot;Is that far enough?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', Book 1, Ch. 6, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Seven___The_Third_Term.htm  ''The Third Term''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian [[Doris Kearns Goodwin]] in her book ''No Ordinary Time'' explored the decision to seek a third time and concludes FDR probably decided to enter the war at the same time he decided to run again, although he was politically unable to enter the war until the [[Japanese]] [[attack on Pearl Harbor]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Administrative Assistants to Roosevelt included [[James Forrestal]], [[Lauchlin Currie]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Committee on Un-American Activities, &amp;quot;The Shameful Years: Thirty Years of Soviet Espionage in the United States,&amp;quot; 82d Congress, 2d Session, 1951, pp. 15-17; [http://www.counterintelligencetraining.com/BK/ci_centre_bibliography.htm Required Reading List for Counterintelligence, Counterterrorism, Intelligence and Security Professionals,]The Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Alexandria, VA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[David K. Niles]]. Their function was &amp;quot;to get, information and to condense and summarize it for [Roosevelt's] use.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Roosevelt and Hopkins : An Intimate History'', Robert E. Sherwood, New York Harper and Brothers, 1948, [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=/PDFsml_AD/Roosevelt_and_Hopkins-An_Intimate_History-Robert_E_Sherwood-1948-1034pgs-GOV-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=252&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 pg. 226] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Forrestal later was to jump from a 16th story window of Bethesda Naval Hospital psychiatric ward. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People'', John Loftus and Mark Aarons, New York : St.Martin's Press, 1994. [http://yamaguchy.netfirms.com/vegyes_/secretwar_06.rtf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Currie and Niles were to be found working for the [[KGB]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Uncovering Stalin's Spies'' Julius W. Friend, International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, (2000) Vol. 13 No. 3, pgs. 381 - 384. [http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/index/UN1VH8U16UMXEFGF.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nsa.gov/publications/publi00039.cfm ''The Venona Story''], Robert L. Benson, Center for Cryptological History, National Security Agency.  One of the special reports issued in July 1948 (1948 was a presidential election year) gives the earliest translation found that mentions friends of [[David Niles]], an important advisor to Presidents Roosevelt and Truman, &amp;quot;will arrange anything for a bribe.&amp;quot;  Venona message 786 New York KGB to Moscow, 1 June 1944, [http://www.nsa.gov/venona/releases/01_Jun_1944_R3_m1_p1.gif pg. 1], [http://www.nsa.gov/venona/releases/01_Jun_1944_R3_m1_p2.gif pg. 2]).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Currie alerted his KGB controllers that &amp;quot;the United States was on the verge of breaking the Soviet code.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors'',  Herbert Romerstein and Eric Breindel, Washington, DC, Regnery, 2000, [http://books.google.com/books?id=mVpWH51F7toC&amp;amp;pg=PA27&amp;amp;lpg=PA27&amp;amp;dq=lauchlin+currie+break+code&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=Yj2NHYwgxB&amp;amp;sig=sbZ3789Tz0jd7xPRiC6EEdeuJ48 pg. 27.] Herbert Romerstein was the Chief, Office to Counter Soviet Disinformation and Active Measures, U.S. Information Agency from (1983-1989), Staff member, U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (1978-1983), and Minority Chief Investigator, House Committee on Internal Security (1971-1975). [http://www.iwp.edu/faculty/facultyID.9/profile.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commander in Chief === &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Josephstalin.jpg‎|thumb|325px|right|Roosevelt, a long-time advocate of [[Fascism#Beliefs|corporate statism]], was a great friend of [[Soviet]] leader [[Joseph Stalin]], despite the latter's war crimes and use of genocide as a political tool. Upon meeting him face-to-face for the first time at the [[Yalta Conference]], he greeted him warmly: 'I am glad to see you. I have tried for a long time to bring this about'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/AD_Issues/amdipl_6/stefan.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In August 1939 Stalin made an alliance with Hitler that allowed Hitler to invade Poland; the two divided P{oland and eastern Europe between them, as Germany turned toward France and Britain.  With Roosevelt strongly supporting France and Britain, the American Communist Party began attacking Roosevelt in the wildest terms and did so for the next twenty-two months. It used antiwar slogans like &amp;quot;The Yanks Are Not Coming&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Hands Off.&amp;quot; It set up a &amp;quot;perpetual peace vigil&amp;quot; across the street from the White House. Communist party leader Earl Browder announced that FDR, head of the &amp;quot;war party of the American bourgeoisie,&amp;quot; was no better than the Communists great enemy, FBI head J. Edgar Hoover.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James G. Ryan, ''Earl Browder: The Failure of American Communism,'' (1997), p.  168.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the 1940 election, pro-Moscow elements in the CIO forced John L. Lewis to turn against Roosevelt and support the liberal Republican [[Wendell Willkie]]. Roosevelt meanwhile moved right, and brought into top jobs the GOP vice presidential nominee from 1936, Frank Knox (a conservative who became Secretary of the Navy) and conservative Republican lawyer [[Henry Stimson]], who took over the War Department.  Rejecting advice from the far left, 90% of CIO members voted for Roosevelt, who was easily elected to a third term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[John P. Davies]] was assigned to Gen. [[Joseph Stilwell]] as Stilwell's adviser in China. Hopkins made a note at the time: &amp;quot;The President indicated his strong dissatisfaction with the way the whole show was running in China. He stated that Stillwell obviously hated the Chinese and that his cablegrams are sarcastic about the Chinese and this feeling is undoubtedly known to the Generalissimo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roosevelt and Hopkin, Sherwood, pg. 739.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Roosevelt and Hopkins biographer [[Robert Sherwood]] wrote that Gen. [[George C. Marshall]] told Hopkins his only serious disagreement with&lt;br /&gt;
Hopkins was on the issue of Stilwell. Sherwood adds that &amp;quot;he was unquestionably a serious nuisance to Roosevelt and there were many times when he was on the verge of recalling him.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt and Hopkin, Sherwood, pg. 740.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was determined to help [[England]] against [[Germany]] and at one point [[Winston Churchill]] even moved into the [[White House]] while [[Britain]] was at war.  Roosevelt said in May 1941:  &amp;quot;You know I am a juggler, and I never let my right hand know what my left hand does ... I may have one policy for Europe and one diametrically opposite for North and South America. I may be entirely inconsistent, and furthermore I am perfectly willing to mislead and tell untruths if it will help win the war.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2008/05/deception_for_country_not_for.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 19, 1942, pressured by Communist union officials of the American Communications Association, [[CIO]], Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox, informed Rear Admiral Adolphus Staton that Communist radio operators were not to be removed from their ships. Less than six months earlier, Congress, with the lone dissenting vote of [[Vito Marcantonio]], enacted Public Law 351, which authorized the Secretary of the Navy to have all radio operators with a [[subversion (political)|subversive]] background taken off their ships. Rear Admiral Staton had recommended the removal of a number of Communists. In the presence of Rear Admiral S. C. Hooper and others, Knox instructed Rear Admiral Staton &amp;quot;that, in the opinion of the President, membership or suspected membership in the CPUSA was not sufficient to deprive a radio operator of his job.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''America's Tragedy-Today'', Major Hamilton A.  Long, (NY: Post Printing), pgs. 15-25.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Expounding a memorandum bearing President Roosevelt's initials, Knox brushed aside the objections of Staton and Hooper, declaring that the order came from the President himself. Because the presidential command defied the law of the land, it was not put into writing. Consequently, the Communist radio operators returned to their ships and Rear Admirals Hooper and Staton were put on the inactive list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stalin publicly disbanded the [[Comintern]] in 1943. A Moscow message to all stations on 12 September 1943, message number 142, relating to this event is one of the most interesting and historically important messages &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nsa.gov/venona/venon00008.cfm Venona 142(a) Moscow to Canberra 12 September 1943]. Text reads: &amp;quot;change in circumstances - and in particular the dissolution of the [[Comintern]] - necessitates a change in the method used by the workers of our residencies to keep in touch with the leaders of the local [[Communist_Party_of_the_United_States_of_America#Secret_apparatus|Communist]] organizations on intelligence matters. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. Our workers, by continuing to meet the leader of the Communists, are exposing themselves to danger and are giving cause [''orgs of''] local authorities to suspect that the Comintern is still in existence. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. We propose: &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
a. That personal contact with leaders of the local Communist organizations should cease and that Communist material should not be accepted for forwarding to the Comintern. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
b. That meetings of our workers may take place only with special reliable undercover [ZAKONSPIRIROVANNYJ] contacts of the Communist [D% organizations], who are not suspected by the [''orgs of''] local authorities, exclusively about specific aspects of our intelligence work (acquiring [1 group unidentified] contacts, leads [NAVODKI], rechecking of those who are being cultivated, etc.). For each meeting it is necessary to obtain our consent. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Representative of the Soviet Union.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. 4084 &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Lt. Gen. [[P.M. Fitin]]. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notes: [a] This message is known to have been sent also to NEW YORK, SAN FRANCISCO, and OTTAWA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the entire corpus of [[VENONA]] translations. This message clearly discloses the [[KGB]]'s connection to the Comintern and to the national Communist parties. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Counterintelligence Reader'', National Counterintelligence Center, United States,  [http://www.fas.org/irp/ops/ci/docs/ci2/2ch4_a.htm Vol. 2, Ch. 4], n.d.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Shortly afterwards Rear Admiral Staton, a Congressional Medal of Honor recipient, was asked to testify before the Cox Committee of House of Representatives on the [[White House]] efforts to protect Communists in the Armed Forces. Staton complied in executive session. Before he could appear in public hearings, [[Adlai Stevenson]], assistant to Secretary Knox, instructed him that &amp;quot;there were White House orders&amp;quot; forbidding him to testify. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,777835,00.html ''Cox's Circus''], Time magazine, Monday, Jul. 19, 1943.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By that time Counter-Intelligence officers had obtained irrefutable proof that the CPUSA had developed an extensive plan to abolish the Armed Forces' counter-subversive system. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Long, op.cit., pg. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt himself was responsible for the order of January 1, 1944 which abolished the entire setup of the Counter-Intelligence Corps in the [[War Department]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Long, op.cit., pg. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On February 19 the War Department issued the order which purposely disorganized the counter-subversive  reporting system of the Armed Forces. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Long, op.cit., pg. 13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On May 19, the day after learning of the secret order to destroy the War Department records on subversives, Senator [[StyIes Bridges]], a member of the Military Affairs Committee, demanded an explanation from Secretary of War [[Henry Stimson]]. Lieutenant General McNarney, Army Chief of Staff deputy, was &amp;quot;vague, evasive and obstructive.&amp;quot; Bridges told McNarney &amp;quot;he could forgive an officer who makes a mistake or loses a battle, but that an officer who betrays the security of his country should be taken out and shot.&amp;quot;  McNarney admitted the order had been issued from &amp;quot;higher authority.&amp;quot; After much wrangling, Secretary Stimson in a letter of May 27 promised to prevent the destruction of records on subversives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Long, op.cit., pgs. 28-31.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The War Department, on December 30, 1944, issued a secret order which expressly condoned &amp;quot;divided loyalty&amp;quot; and established as a guiding rule that &amp;quot;the subversive-suspect should be given the benefit of all reasonable doubt.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Big Three conferences===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also '''[[Teheran conference]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the [[Teheran conference]] it was secretly agreed to let the Soviet Union have not only eastern Poland but also part of Finland, the Baltic States and parts of Romania. It was secretly agreed to support the Yugoslav Communist, [[Joseph Broz Tito]], and desert the pro-Western, anti-totalitarian friend, General Mihailovich.  Roosevelt told a joint session of Congress upon his return to the United States that no secret arrangements had been made. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also '''[[Yalta conference]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the [[Yalta conference]] a [[reparations]] commission was set up. The Soviet Union wanted the amount to be 20 billion dollars of which the USSR would take half. It was agreed that labor might be taken as a possible source of reparations. This was a way of authorizing the seizure of human beings to work as [[slave]]s and is the basis of the crime perpetrated after hostilities ceased to which Franklin Roosevelt agreed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Speaking Frankly'', James F. Byrnes, New York: Harper &amp;amp; Bros., 1947, p. 29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt also agreed at Yalta to have all fugitive Soviet nationals or citizens of satellite nations and tens of thousands of [[POW]]'s who elected to stay this side of the [[Iron Curtain]], returned to the Soviet Union. This was in contravention of the Geneva Convention.  The ''Saturday Evening Post'' commented:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|With this shameful agreement as their authority, Russian [[KGB|MVD]] agents strode through the displaced-persons camps after the war and put the finger on thousands who had managed to escape the Soviet tyranny. These miserable victims were herded into boxcars and driven back to death, torture or the slow murder of the Siberian mines and forests. Many killed themselves on the way. Also under a Yalta agreement, the Russians were permitted to use German prisoners in forced labor as an item in 'reparations account.' For such inhumanities there is no excuse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Saturday Evening Post'', Editorial, April 11, 1953, pg. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt not only made agreements secret from the American people but secret from his closest advisers in the government. He made agreements with Stalin hostile to the objectives of Churchill and kept secret from Churchill. He made secret agreements with [[Chiang Kai-shek]] secret from both Churchill and Stalin. He made secret agreements in derogation of Chiang Kai-shek's interests without Chiang Kai-shek's knowledge. And he made many secret agreements which no one in the U.S. State Department knew about until after his death and then learned about only at embarrassing moments from Soviet Foreign Minister [[Vyacheslav Molotov]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Roosevelt Myth'', Book 3, Ch. 13, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Thirteen___The_Final_Bet.htm ''The Final Betrayal''], Flynn, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fourth Term ==&lt;br /&gt;
In February 1944 Congress rejected Roosevelt's demand for a $10,500,000,000 tax increase and cut it to $2,300,000,000. Roosevelt vetoed it saying this was a &amp;quot;bill not for relief of the needy but of the greedy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator [[Alben Barkley]], Democratic leader, rose on the floor of the Senate to say the veto was &amp;quot;a calculated and deliberate assault upon the legislative integrity of every member of Congress.&amp;quot; The entire Senate united in a roar of applause. Barkley declared that after seven years of carrying the [[New Deal]] banner for Roosevelt, he would resign his post as Democratic majority leader and he called on every member of the Congress to preserve its self respect and override the veto. The Senate overrode it 72 to 14 and the House 299 to 95. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[Comintern]] was disbanded Roosevelt was offered the nomination of the [[Communist]] dominated [[American Labor Party]] and he had accepted their nomination in the [[Presidential election of 1944]].  It was 825,000 votes from  [[Earl Browder]] and [[Sidney Hillman]]'s American Labor Party that gave him his majority in New York State. His administration was now the hopeless prisoner of these demanding and ruthless radical labor leaders,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Roosevelt Myth'', Book 3, Ch. 12, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Twelve___The_Atlantic_Ch.htm ''The Atlantic Charter Is Scrapped''], Flynn, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who had shown their ability to elect or defeat the Democratic party, who had filled all the departments and bureaus with their agents and who had insinuated their experts into the CIO labor unions and their propagandists into the radio, the movies and all the great instruments of communication and opinion - a fact which Mr. Roosevelt's successors would have to face when the war ended. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Hayen B. Peake, Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3. &amp;quot;[[Venona]] makes absolutely clear that they had active agents in the U.S. State Department, Treasury Department, Justice Department, Senate committee staffs, the military services, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the [[Manhattan Project]], and the [[White House]], as well as wartime agencies. No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; [[Hayden B. Peake]] is the curator of [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s (CIA) Historical Intelligence Collection. [http://intellit.muskingum.edu/alpha_folder/P_folder/peake.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So thorough was [[KGB]] penetration of the Roosevelt Administration, that when [[Army Signals Intelligence]] cryptographer [[Meredith Gardner]] extracted the names of [[Hans Bethe]], [[Niels Bohr]], [[Enrico Fermi]], [[Harold Urey]], [[Edward Teller]] and 11 other scientists working on the [[Manhattan Project]] from a December 2, 1944 KGB encypherment,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nsa.gov/venona/venon00014.cfm Venona 1699 New York to Moscow, December 2, 1944].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; KGB agent [[William Weisband]] watched him do it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;VENONA: Soviet Espionage and the American Response, 1939-1957, Robert Louis Benson and Michael Warner, eds., (Washington, D.C.: [[National Security Agency]], Central Intelligence Agency, 1996) [https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/venona-soviet-espionage-and-the-american-response-1939-1957/preface.htm]; The ''Baltimore Sun'' (Laura Sullivan, &amp;quot;SPY'S ROLE LINKED TO US FAILURE ON KOREA,&amp;quot; 6/29/00) reported that a report newly declassified by the US National Security Agency (NSA) shows that [[William Weisband]] alerted the Soviets to extensive US eavesdropping in 1948, resulting in a complete blackout of information from the communist bloc for more than two years. This crippled the NSA's intelligence gathering efforts in the late 1940s and begins to explain why the US was caught unprepared for the [[DPRK]]'s 1950 invasion of the [[ROK]]. NSA historian David A. Hatch, who authored the report, said, &amp;quot;This report answers several significant questions. Up until now, there has been a great lack of knowledge surrounding some of these events ... and this should help sharpen [the public's] understanding.&amp;quot; [Ed. note: This article was included in the US Department of Defense's Early Bird news service for June 29, 2000.] [http://www.nautilus.org/archives/napsnet/dr/0006/JUN29.html#item8] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Strom Thurmond]] also supported FDR's decision to seek a fourth term, and referred to Roosevelt as having been the world’s greatest leader. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kevinbaker.info/c_wtm.html What Trent Meant], Kevin Baker.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reflections on Christianity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FDR said this about the Bible in an address on October 6, 1935: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;We cannot read the history of our rise and development as a nation, without reckoning with the place the [[Bible]] has occupied in shaping the advances of the Republic.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Where we have been the truest and most consistent in obeying its precepts, we have attained the greatest measure of contentment and prosperity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted in DeMar, ''The Untold Story'', p. 60 and Gabrial Sivan, ''The Bible and Civilization'' (New York: Quadrangle/The New York Times Book Co., 1973), p. 178.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FDR became famous for delivering &amp;quot;fireside chats&amp;quot; over the new medium of [[radio]], and on March 9, 1937 he declared: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I hope that you have re-read the [[United States Constitution| Constitution]] of the United States in these past few weeks. Like the Bible, it ought to be read again and again.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While running for his third time in a Brooklyn speech, Roosevelt said,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I am certain that the rank and file of patriotic Republicans do not realize the nature of this threat. They should remember, and we must remember, what the collaborative understanding between Communism and Nazism has done to the processes of democracy abroad...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Those forces hate democracy and Christianity as two phases of the same civilization. They oppose democracy because it is Christian. They oppose Christianity because it preaches democracy. Their objective is to prevent democracy from becoming strong. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Roosevelt and Hopkins'', Sherwood, 1948, pgs. 193-194 (pgs. 211 - 212 pdf).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As [[World War II]] broke out in Europe, FDR warned:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Those forces hate [[Democracy]] and [[Christianity]] as two phases of the same civilization.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following year, on May 27, 1941, FDR stated in one of his radio addresses: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Nazis are as ruthless as the Communists in the denial of God.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In his second inaugural address, FDR pledged to do his utmost by 'seeking Divine guidance.' He took that mission further on January 25, 1941, when he wrote a personal prologue to a special edition of the [[New Testament]], which was distributed to millions of U.S. soldiers. 'As Commander-in-Chief,' Roosevelt wrote, 'I take pleasure in commending the reading of the Bible to all who serve in the armed forces of the United States.' He believed that all American soldiers should have the opportunity to read the words of [[Christ]] in preparing for battle. Once, when joining those soldiers aboard a warship with Winston Churchill, FDR asked the crew and prime minister to join him in singing the hymn 'Onward Christian Soldiers.' In his final inaugural address, FDR affirmed, &amp;quot;So we pray to Him for the vision to see our way clearly ... to achievement of His will.' &amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;God and George W. Bush (New York: Regan Books, 2004), p. 176&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When American soldiers were landing on the beaches of Normandy, Roosevelt led the nation in prayer during a radio broadcast. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum,  [http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/odddayp.html Franklin Roosevelt's D-Day Prayer], June 6, 1944.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legacy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dcrosmor.jpg|right|thumb|330px|Statue of the president at [[The Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial]] in Washington D.C.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt is an admired but still hotly debated president. Many credit Roosevelt with helping the United States survive the Great Depression and with providing solid leadership during World War II. Others, especially conservatives, assert that he uselessly expanded the welfare state, abused executive powers, and badly botched diplomacy before and during World War II.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's image now appears on the [[Dime]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Ordeal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Whitney Straight]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*H.W. Brands, ''Traitor to His Class: The Privileged Life and Radical Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt'' (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
*Smith, Jean Edward. ''FDR'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/FDR-Jean-Edward-Smith/dp/1400061210/ref=pd_ts_b_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;* [http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=176 &amp;quot;The Mythology of Roosevelt and the New Deal,&amp;quot; by Robert Higgs]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.onpower.org/history_greatdepression.html/ Great Depression]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=12&amp;amp;articleID=139 &amp;quot;On the Brink of World War II: Justus Doenecke’s ''Storm on the Horizon'',&amp;quot; by Ralph Raico]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/publications/working_papers/article.asp?id=1499 &amp;quot;Government and the Economy: The World Wars,&amp;quot; by Robert Higgs]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=113 &amp;quot;How War Amplified Federal Power in the Twentieth Century,&amp;quot; by Robert Higgs]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/store/book_detail.asp?bookID=65 ''Depression, War and Cold War'', by Robert Higgs]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=138 &amp;quot;Wartime Prosperity?&amp;quot;, by Robert Higgs]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/issues/article.asp?id=1431 Pearl Harbor]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1468 FDR: The Man, the Leader, the Legacy], Ralph Raico, Future of Freedom Foundation, April 1, 2001. Retrieved from The Independent Institute.org 06/17/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Roosevelt, Franklin D.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People who were Educated at Home]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vmember</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>