<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Wayne</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Wayne"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Wayne"/>
	<updated>2026-09-22T14:02:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Honduras&amp;diff=704493</id>
		<title>Honduras</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Honduras&amp;diff=704493"/>
		<updated>2009-09-29T00:30:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''República de Honduras''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Honduras.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Honduras.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Honduras.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Tegucigalpa&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Democratic constitutional republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Spanish&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Roberto Micheletti (interim)&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =43,278 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =7,483,763 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$21.74 billion (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$3,009 (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Lempira&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Honduras''' is a country in [[Central America]], and one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere [http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/9476.pdf]. Its most recently elected leader was ousted in a coup. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/29/world/main5122602.shtml]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
Honduras is located roughly in the middle of [[Central America]], sharing borders with [[El Salvador]], [[Guatemala]], and [[Nicaragua]]; its water boundaries are the [[Caribbean Sea]] and the Golfo de Fonseca, an arm of the [[Pacific Ocean]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 112,090 sq. km. (43,278 sq. mi.); slightly larger than Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Tegucigalpa (capitol; pop. 1,150,000); San Pedro Sula (800,000-900,000).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Mountainous.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Tropical to subtropical, depending on elevation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
About 90% of the population is [[mestizo]]. There also are small minorities of [[European]], [[African]], [[Asian]], [[Arab]], and indigenous Indian descent. Most Hondurans are [[Roman Catholic]], but [[Protestantism|Protestant]] churches are growing in number. While [[Spanish]] is the predominant language, some [[English]] is spoken along the northern coast and is prevalent on the Caribbean Bay Islands. Several indigenous Indian languages and Garífuna (a mixture of Afro-indigenous languages) are also spoken. The restored [[Maya]]n ruins near the [[Guatemala]]n border in Copan reflect the great Mayan culture that flourished there for hundreds of years until the early 9th century. Columbus landed at mainland Honduras (Trujillo) in 1502, and named the area &amp;quot;Honduras&amp;quot; (meaning &amp;quot;depths&amp;quot;) for the deep water off the coast. Spaniard [[Hernando Cortes]] arrived in 1524. &lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2006 est.): 7.3 million.&lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006 est.): 2.16%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: 90% mestizo (mixed Indian and European); others of European, Arab, African, or Asian ancestry; and indigenous Indians.&lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: Roman Catholic, Protestant minority.&lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
*Education (2003): Years compulsory--6. Attendance--88% overall, 31% at junior high level. Literacy--76.2%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate--29.64/1,000. Life expectancy--66.2 yrs.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force: Services--42.2%; natural resources/agriculture--35.9%; manufacturing--16.3%; construction/housing--5.6%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
The 1982 constitution provides for a strong executive, a unicameral National Congress, and a judiciary appointed by the National Congress. The president is directly elected to a 4-year term by popular vote. The Congress also serves a 4-year term; congressional seats are assigned the parties' candidates in proportion to the number of votes each party receives in the various departments. The judiciary includes a Supreme Court of Justice (one president and 14 magistrates chosen by Congress for a seven-year term), courts of appeal, and several courts of original jurisdiction--such as labor, tax, and criminal courts. For administrative purposes, Honduras is divided into 18 departments, with municipal officials selected for 4-year terms. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Conditions===&lt;br /&gt;
Reinforced by the media and several political watchdog organizations, concerted efforts to protect human rights and civil liberties continued. Organized labor now represents approximately 8% of the work force and its economic and political influence has declined. Honduras held its seventh consecutive democratic elections in 2005 to elect a new president, unicameral Congress, and mayors. For the first time, as a result of the newly reformed Electoral Law, voters were able to vote for individual members of Congress, with photos of each candidate on the ballot, rather than party lists. For the electoral period 2006-2010, 31 women were elected to Congress; 27 of them chose women as their alternates for a total of 58 women in the legislature, an unprecedented number in the political history of the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Parties=== &lt;br /&gt;
The two major parties are the slightly left-of-center Liberal Party and the slightly-right-of-center National Party. The three much smaller registered parties--the Christian Democratic Party, the Innovation and National Unity Party, and the Democratic Unification Party--hold a few seats each in the Congress, but have never come close to winning the presidency. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials=== &lt;br /&gt;
*President--Roberto Micheletti (interim president)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Foreign Relations--Milton Jimenez Puerto&lt;br /&gt;
*President of Congress--Roberto Micheletti&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United States--Roberto Flores Bermúdez&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United Nations--Ivan Romero Martinez&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the OAS--Carlos Sosa Coello &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
Honduras is a member of the United Nations, the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Organization of American States (OAS), the Central American Parliament (PARLACEN), the Central American Integration System (SICA), the Conference of Central American Armed Forces (CFAC), and the Central American Security Commission (CASC). During 1995-96, Honduras--a founding member of the United Nations--served as a nonpermanent member of the UN Security Council for the first time. Honduras is currently a member of the UN Human Rights Commission. Honduras is a party to all UN and OAS counterterrorism conventions and protocols. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Honduras is a strong proponent of Central American cooperation and integration, and continues to work towards the implementation of a regional customs union and Central American passport, which would ease border controls and tariffs among Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and El Salvador. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1969, El Salvador and Honduras fought the brief &amp;quot;Soccer War&amp;quot; over disputed border areas. The two countries formally signed a peace treaty in 1980, which put the border dispute before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). In 1992, the Court awarded most of the disputed territory to Honduras, and in January 1998, Honduras and El Salvador signed a border demarcation treaty to implement the terms of the ICJ decree although delays continue due to technical difficulties. However, Honduras and El Salvador maintain normal diplomatic and trade relations. Honduras also has unresolved maritime border disputes with El Salvador, Nicaragua, Jamaica, and Cuba. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense==&lt;br /&gt;
With the cessation of the 1980s civil wars in El Salvador and Nicaragua, the Honduran armed forces refocused their orientation toward combating transnational threats such as narcoterrorism and organized crime. Honduras supports efforts at regional integration and deployed troops to Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. In 1999, the constitution was amended to abolish the position of military commander in chief of the armed forces, thus codifying civilian authority over the military. Former President Flores also named the first civilian Minister of Defense in the country's history. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
Honduras is one of the poorest and least developed countries in Latin America, with nearly two-thirds of Hondurans living in poverty. Although historically dependent on exports of coffee and bananas, the economy has diversified over the past 20 years with the development of non-traditional exports such as oriental vegetables, cultivated shrimp, melons, and tourism, and the establishment of a growing maquila industry (primarily assembly of apparel for re-export). The maquila industry employs approximately 130,000 Hondurans. Honduras also has extensive forest, marine, and mineral resources, although widespread slash-and-burn agricultural methods and illegal logging continue to destroy Honduran forests. Family remittances from Hondurans living abroad (mostly in the United States) have risen significantly, to an estimated $2.3 billion in 2006, which represents 15% of the country's foreign exchange earnings and over 20% of its GDP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exchange rate through the first quarter of 2007 was 18.89 Honduran Lempira to the dollar, a slight devaluation from the 2005 rate of 18.92. Inflation, as measured by the consumer price index, was estimated at approximately 6.0% in 2006 and was projected to remain at that rate in 2007. International reserves totaled $2.6 billion in 2006, up from an estimated $2.23 billion in 2005. Unemployment was estimated at around 28% in 2005. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP: $22.3 billion (PPP) or $9.3 billion (official exchange rate). &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate: 5.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita GDP: $2,900 (PPP).&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita income: $ 894.00&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Arable land, forests, minerals, and fisheries.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture (14.1% of GDP): Products--coffee, bananas, shrimp and lobster, sugar, fruits, basic grains, and livestock.&lt;br /&gt;
*Manufacturing (18% of GDP): Types--textiles and apparel, cement, wood products, cigars, and foodstuffs.&lt;br /&gt;
*Services (53.2% of GDP).&lt;br /&gt;
*Trade: Exports (goods)--$1.95 billion: apparel, coffee, shrimp, bananas, palm oil, gold, zinc/lead concentrates, soap/detergents, melons, lobster, pineapple, lumber, sugar, and tobacco. Major market--U.S. (54.4%). Imports (goods)--$5.00 billion: fabrics, yarn, machinery, chemicals, petroleum, vehicles, processed foods, metals, agricultural products, plastic articles, and paper articles. Major source--U.S. (37.5%). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning in late 1998, the United States helped conduct a massive reconstruction effort following the devastation left by [[Hurricane Mitch]], which also allowed thousands of displaced families to obtain permanent shelter. Basic infrastructure (water and sanitation, and bridges, including over 1,250 kilometers of roads) along with critical social infrastructure (schools and 123 damaged health clinics) lost or damaged during the storm had been rebuilt when the program was largely completed by the end of 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005, Honduras reached completion point under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative, qualifying the country for multilateral debt relief. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Honduras - Copan.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mayan Ruins of Copan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Independence==== &lt;br /&gt;
Honduras and other Central American provinces gained independence from Spain in 1821. The country was then briefly annexed to the Mexican Empire. In 1823, Honduras joined the newly formed United Provinces of Central America federation, which collapsed in 1838. Gen. Francisco Morazan--a Honduran national hero--led unsuccessful efforts to maintain the federation. Honduras' agriculture-based economy was dominated in the 1900s by U.S. companies that established vast banana plantations along the north coast. Foreign capital, plantation life, and conservative politics held sway in Honduras from the late 19th century until the mid-20th century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Military Rule====&lt;br /&gt;
Authoritarian Gen. Tiburcio Carias Andino controlled Honduras during the Great Depression, until 1948. In 1955--after two authoritarian administrations and a strike by banana workers--young military reformists staged a coup that installed a provisional junta and paved the way for constituent assembly elections in 1957. This assembly appointed Ramon Villeda Morales as President and transformed itself into a national legislature with a 6-year term. The Liberal Party ruled during 1957-63. In 1963, conservative military officers preempted constitutional elections and deposed Villeda in a bloody coup. These officers exiled Liberal Party members and took control of the national police. The armed forces, led by Gen. Lopez Arellano, governed until 1970. Popular discontent continued to rise after a 1969 border war with El Salvador, known as &amp;quot;the Soccer War.&amp;quot; A civilian President--Ramon Cruz of the National Party--took power briefly in 1970 but proved unable to manage the government. In 1972, Gen. Lopez staged another coup. Lopez adopted more progressive policies, including land reform, but his regime was brought down in the mid-1970s by corruption scandals. The regimes of Gen. Melgar Castro (1975-78) and Gen. Paz Garcia (1978-82) largely built the current physical infrastructure and telecommunications system of Honduras. The country also enjoyed its most rapid economic growth during this period, due to greater international demand for its products and the availability of foreign commercial lending. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Seven Consecutive Democratic Elections==== &lt;br /&gt;
Following the overthrow of Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua in 1979 and general instability in El Salvador at the time, Hondurans elected a constituent assembly in 1980 and voted in general elections in 1981. A new constitution was approved in 1982, and the Liberal Party government of President Roberto Suazo Cordoba took office. Suazo relied on U.S. support during a severe economic recession, including ambitious social and economic development projects sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Honduras became host to the largest Peace Corps mission in the world, and nongovernmental and international voluntary agencies proliferated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the 1985 election approached, the Liberal Party interpreted election law as permitting multiple presidential candidates from one party. The Liberal Party claimed victory when its presidential candidates, who received 42% of the vote, collectively outpolled the National Party candidate, Rafael Leonardo Callejas. Jose Azcona Hoyo, the candidate receiving the most votes among the Liberals, assumed the presidency in 1986. With the endorsement of the Honduran military, the Azcona administration ushered in the first peaceful transfer of power between civilian presidents in more than 30 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four years later, Nationalist Rafael Callejas won the presidential election, taking office in 1990. The nation's fiscal deficit ballooned during Callejas' last year in office. Growing public dissatisfaction with the rising cost of living and with widespread government corruption led voters in 1993 to elect Liberal Party candidate Carlos Roberto Reina with 56% of the vote. President Reina, elected on a platform calling for a &amp;quot;moral revolution,&amp;quot; actively prosecuted corruption and pursued those responsible for human rights abuses in the 1980s. He created a modern attorney general's office and an investigative police force, increased civilian control over the armed forces, transferred the police from military to civilian authority, and restored national fiscal health. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After winning the 1997 election by a 10% margin, Liberal Carlos Roberto Flores Facusse took office in 1998. Flores inaugurated programs of reform and modernization of the Honduran government and economy, with emphasis on helping Honduras' poorest citizens while maintaining the country's fiscal health and improving international competitiveness. In October 1998, Hurricane Mitch devastated Honduras, leaving more than 5,000 people dead and 1.5 million displaced. Damages totaled nearly $3 billion. President Flores and his administration successfully managed more than $600 million in international assistance. Flores also moved judicial and penal reforms forward, establishing an anticorruption commission, and supporting passage of a new penal code based on the oral accusatorial system and a law that created an independent Supreme Court. Flores also established a civilian Minister of Defense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ricardo Maduro Joest of the National Party won the 2001 presidential elections, and was inaugurated in 2002. During his campaign, President Maduro promised to reduce crime, reinvigorate the economy, and fight corruption. Maduro's first act as President was to deploy a joint police-military force to the streets to permit wider neighborhood patrols in the ongoing fight against the country's massive crime and gang problem. Maduro was a strong supporter of the global war on terrorism and joined the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq with an 11-month contribution of 370 troops. Under President Maduro's guidance, Honduras also negotiated and ratified the U.S.-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), received debt relief, became the first Latin American country to sign a Millennium Challenge Account compact with the U.S., and actively promoted greater Central American integration. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Manuel Zelaya.jpg|thumb|Removed President Manuel Zelaya Rosales]]&lt;br /&gt;
Jose Manuel &amp;quot;Mel&amp;quot; Zelaya Rosales of the Liberal Party won the November 27, 2005 presidential elections with less than a 4% margin of victory, the smallest margin ever in Honduran electoral history. Zelaya's campaign theme was &amp;quot;citizen power,&amp;quot; and he has vowed to increase transparency and combat narcotrafficking, while maintaining macroeconomic stability. The Liberal Party won 62 of the 128 congressional seats, just short of an absolute majority. Zelaya was inaugurated on January 27, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 28, 2009, Zelaya was removed from power by the Honduran military after he had ignored a Supreme Court order to reverse the firing of his armed forces chief [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=aCgN8Fgqu2B0].  Leftist leaders within Latin America - among them [[Hugo Chavez]] and [[Fidel Castro]], as well as [[United States]] president [[Barack Obama]], have condemned his removal in what they call a &amp;quot;coup&amp;quot;; however others have noted that his removal was justified as he was taking his country left and attempting to alter the Honduran constitution in a similar fashion to what Chavez has done to [[Venezuela]] in an effort to keep himself in power [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124658463338890161.html].  Roberto Micheletti currently serves as interim president. In late September 2009, the government suspended civil liberties and silenced opposition broadcasters in order to protect democracy and free speech &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,556381,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width: 100%; background:transparent; border: 2px solid #000099;&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=2 style=&amp;quot;width: 100%; text-align: center; background-color: #000088; color: white; &amp;quot;|'''Copyright Details'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;background-color: #000088; color:white;&amp;quot;|License:&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot; background-color: none;&amp;quot;| &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;This work is in the [[Public Domain]] in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the U.S. Code&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot; background-color: #000088; color:white;&amp;quot;|Source:&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;background-color: none;border-top: 2px solid black&amp;quot;| &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;File available from the {{{1|[[United States Federal Government]] here: &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}} [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/1922.htm]. &lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Central American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mayan world]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sacha_Baron_Cohen&amp;diff=704003</id>
		<title>Talk:Sacha Baron Cohen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sacha_Baron_Cohen&amp;diff=704003"/>
		<updated>2009-09-27T21:22:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Anagram */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Anagram==&lt;br /&gt;
Borat is a common Slavic name, which is why it was chosen for this movie.  It has nothing to do with being an anagram of &amp;quot;abort&amp;quot;. --[[User:ERiggs|ERiggs]] 16:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:They could have easily chosen any other common Slavic name. [[User:TimH|TimH]] 17:20, 27 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would you make the same claim about the Taxpayer Bill of Rights -- TABOR? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 17:22, 27 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why delete? ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article concerns a valid, noteworthy topic of interest to conservatives. You may not agree with the subject, or its presentation, but is that really the criteria for removal? Conservatives, too, might want to know what the controversy is. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 11:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sacha_Baron_Cohen&amp;diff=704002</id>
		<title>Talk:Sacha Baron Cohen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Sacha_Baron_Cohen&amp;diff=704002"/>
		<updated>2009-09-27T21:22:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Anagram */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Anagram==&lt;br /&gt;
Borat is a common Slavic name, which is why it was chosen for this movie.  It has nothing to do with being an anagram of &amp;quot;abort&amp;quot;. --[[User:ERiggs|ERiggs]] 16:06, 27 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:They could have easily chosen any other common Slavic name. [[User:TimH|TimH]] 17:20, 27 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Would you make the same calim about the Taxpayer Bill of Rights -- TABOR? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 17:22, 27 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why delete? ==&lt;br /&gt;
This article concerns a valid, noteworthy topic of interest to conservatives. You may not agree with the subject, or its presentation, but is that really the criteria for removal? Conservatives, too, might want to know what the controversy is. [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 11:44, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=International_Criminal_Tribunal_for_the_Former_Yugoslavia&amp;diff=703909</id>
		<title>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=International_Criminal_Tribunal_for_the_Former_Yugoslavia&amp;diff=703909"/>
		<updated>2009-09-27T15:33:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: what a mess.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia''' (ICTY) (Full name: ''International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991''), is the [[United Nations]] organization designed to bring justice to the former [[Yugoslavia]].  The tribunal is located in [[The Hague]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origin ==&lt;br /&gt;
The tribunal was established by [[UN Security Council]] resolution 827. It was passed on 25 [[May]] 1993 in the face of the serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991, and as a response to the threat to international peace and security posed by those serious violations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.un.org/icty/glance/keyfig-e.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jurisdiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
The tribunal has the authority to prosecute and try four types of offences committed in the former Yugoslavia since 1991: &lt;br /&gt;
*Grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. &lt;br /&gt;
*Violations of the laws or customs of war. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Genocide]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*Crimes against humanity.   &lt;br /&gt;
They only have the authority to try and prosecute individual people and not organizations, political parties or governments (ex. they cannot try &amp;quot;[[Serbia]]&amp;quot;).  They can take over national investigations and proceedings if it is in the interest of international justice&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.un.org/icty/glance/keyfig-e.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Accomplishments ==&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a list of accomplishments taken from the ICTY's official website[http://www.un.org/icty/glance-e/index.htm]:&lt;br /&gt;
*Spearheading the shift from impunity to accountability&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing the facts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Bringing justice to thousands of victims and giving them a voice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Strengthening the Rule of [[Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its accomplishments in international law include;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has expanded upon the legal elements of the crime of grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 by further defining the test of overall control, identifying the existence of an international armed conflict, and also the extended and exact definition of protected persons under the Conventions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has narrowed the differences that are perceived between the laws or customs of war applicable in internal and in international conflicts, thus approaching both standards for the protection of individuals &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has identified a general prohibition of torture in international law which cannot be derogated from by a treaty, internal law or otherwise &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has made significant advances in international humanitarian law pertaining to the legal treatment and punishment of sexual violence in wartime &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has specified crucial elements of the crime of [[genocide]], in particular the definition of the target of such crime, a group or part if a group of individuals &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has made several pivotal determinations with regard to crimes against humanity committed against civilians, in particular that this crime can be committed not only as part of, but also just during an armed conflict, thus identifying a wide scope of protection &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has specified the definitions of enslavement and persecution as parts of crimes against humanity, resulting in the first convictions after [[World War II]] for enslavement on the basis of a broadened definition &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has identified and applied the modern doctrine of criminal responsibility of superiors, so-called command responsibility, clarifying that a formal superior-subordinate relationship is not necessarily required for criminal responsibility &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the same vein, it has removed uncertainty about the level of knowledge to be expected from a superior, whose subordinates were about to commit crimes he did not prevent, or about crimes actually committed by them &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has made numerous contributions to procedural law issues, some of which are in the areas of protective measures for witnesses, the confidentiality and disclosure of information relevant for the national security of States, guilty pleas of accused, and duress as a defense  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It was the first tribunal established under Chapter VII of the UN Charter as a measure to maintain international peace and security &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It was the first truly international war crimes tribunal &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It was the first international criminal court to enforce the existing body of international humanitarian law, and in particular judicially determine its customary law aspects &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has created an independent system of law, comprising of elements from adversarial and inquisitory criminal procedure traditions &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has established the most modern court facilities in the world, the layout and technical equipment of which will be copied and taken as a model in other modern courtrooms, for example the ICC and the Special Court for [[Sierra Leone]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has established, developed and maintained an effective victims and witnesses programme &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It has established a unique legal aid system, and groomed a group of defense attorneys highly qualified to represent accused in war crimes proceedings &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Tribunal has created a Judicial Database of all its jurisprudence, soon to be available on the internet, providing access to a vast amount of decisions and orders in and international procedural and criminal law &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticisms==&lt;br /&gt;
The ICTY has received much criticism in its short years of existence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/yugo/2005/1120sham.htm The Hague Tribunal:The Political Economy of Sham Justice]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/yugo/2005/1113success.htm Jury Still Out on Tribunal's Success]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/yugo/2005/0107longtrials.htm Lengthy Hague Trials Under Scrutiny]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/yugo/2006/0721reconciliation.htm The Hague Tribunal and Balkan Reconciliation].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common criticisms include:&lt;br /&gt;
*The failure of the tribunal to prosecute non-[[Serb]] offenders&lt;br /&gt;
*The failure of the court to promote reconciliation, many view it as impeding reconciliation&lt;br /&gt;
*The failure of the court to give trials of reasonable length&lt;br /&gt;
*The failure to apprehend indictees, such as [[Ratko Mladic]].  However the court has no power to arrest individuals&lt;br /&gt;
*The cost of sustaining the court&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.un.org/icty/ Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United Nations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jaco_Pastorius&amp;diff=703732</id>
		<title>Jaco Pastorius</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jaco_Pastorius&amp;diff=703732"/>
		<updated>2009-09-26T22:55:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''John Francis Anthony &amp;quot;Jaco&amp;quot; Pastorius III''' (December 1, 1951–September 21, 1987) was an [[American]] [[jazz]] musician and composer famous for his abilities on the electric bass guitar.  He was known for using a fretless bass and incorporating a style that included natural and artificial harmonics, chords, notes in the higher register, and a strong sense of playing in the &amp;quot;groove.&amp;quot;  He is widely considered to be the greatest and most influential electric bassist of all time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1976 to 1982, he was a member of the jazz fusion band Weather Report (though he only played two tracks on their 1976 album &amp;quot;Black Market&amp;quot;).  During this period, he also collaborated with artists such as Pat Metheny, Joni Mitchell, Herbie Hancock, and Al Di Meola.  His 1976 self-titled debut album is often praised as a landmark album for the bass guitar, with &amp;quot;Donna Lee&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Continuum&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Portrait of Tracy&amp;quot; being stand-out tracks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Portrait of Tracy&amp;quot;, arguably his most famous composition, is frequently labeled as a bass standard.  The song consists almost entirely of artificial harmonics, giving it an ambient and relaxing tone not commonly heard on the bass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 1980s, Jaco's health began to deteriorate, and he was diagnosed with bipolar disorder.  He also began to abuse alcohol, which led to a sharp change in his personality.  On September 11, 1987, while trying to enter the Midnight Bottle Club in Wilton Manors, Florida, he got into an altercation with bouncer Luc Havan that quickly turned violent.  Jaco was hospitalized with severe brain damage, and fell into a coma.  After spending ten days on life support, he died on September 21 after developing a brain hemorrhage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jaco's debut album earned two Grammy nominations.  In 1988, he was became only the fourth bassist to be inducted into the Down Beat Jazz Hall of Fame, joining Milt Hinton, Charles Mingus, and Ray Brown); he is the only electric bassist to be so honoured.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RJJensen&amp;diff=703476</id>
		<title>User talk:RJJensen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RJJensen&amp;diff=703476"/>
		<updated>2009-09-25T16:16:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* &amp;quot;Revert vandalism&amp;quot; on the Chavez article */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[/Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haha, yeah the rain has been murderous all week long! I had the misfortune of planning to drive into Athens today, only to find all the roads underwater! I didn't realize until you messaged me that my talk page has the info intended for my user page, so thank you for your inadvertant help (also, yes, it appears my grammar died while I was writing it!) Are you from the area as well? Always good to meet a fellow southerner who understands the Obama Crisis. There are so many hayseed liberals down here it makes me sick! Don't worry tho, you won't hear me crying out for a confederate south:) Long live a STRONG CONSERVATIVE UNION, with a surplus export of integrity! [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 20:33, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::thanks for the update. I'm actually a Yankee now living in Montana, but I have had a strong interest in the South since I studiesd with C. Vann Woodward some years back.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 20:36, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can forgive a Yank, I used to be one (Mt. Vernon, Washington)! Unfortunately, that town's Conservative fervor lives solely in the words of one Glenn Beck (that man's done for intelligent conservatism what Sean Penn did for photographers dentistry.) [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 20:45, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now, what kind of a snide insult is that?  Beck is a thoughtful, honest fighter for the conservative cause, and if people are angered at the government by his exposés, all the better for the nation. Both he, and those of us who respect him, are intelligent people. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 20:59, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Forgive any intrusion or stamping upon your own loyalties. But surely you must admit that the movement suffers from a lack of Irving Kristol or William Buckley type figures. I long for the days when conservatism nakedly confessed that the intellectuals were the brains of the movement while the power of the people were its fists. OF COURSE a weapon must be weighted properly, with the correct balances, but it is only in retrospect that people might discuss its craftsmanship and the components which constituted it. I would venture to say that anyone slain by Excalibur would comment on anything but the sharpness of its blade, which in this most basic analogy, would comprise the incisive wit of conservatives who have lived and then gone to meet God in heaven. The fires of anger burn with intense heat in the belly of American conservatism, but to stoke these fires, as Beck often does, produces little but flash and smoke. It will be some current or future leader, a Reagan-type, I pray, who shall light his torch with such a flame and bring it to the halls of Congress or to the Obama home and say, &amp;quot;See, this same flame has burned for ages now let it singe you!&amp;quot;. God, conservatism, the side of moral right; all are the same, and united they are all consuming. But it must take SOMEONE...a prophet, a politician who does God's work, a priest with God's word in him...someone, SOMEONE must carry that torch. [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 21:15, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quakerism category ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for setting it up!  I'll try to contribute a few more new articles to insert. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Revert vandalism&amp;quot; on the Chavez article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hugo_Chavez&amp;amp;curid=5224&amp;amp;diff=703420&amp;amp;oldid=703401 this edit] really count as &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;? Or would it be more fair of you to qualify it as a different point of view? A point of view that may be criticized, perhaps, one that may or may not be backed up by whatever evidence is cited--but where is the &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 08:44, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::it's vandalism--it was designed to attack and denigrate and damage a CP article. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 10:10, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Introducing a different point of view--with a citation, no less--is denigrating and damaging to the article? Is the article that fragile? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 10:25, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::that was his goal. to sabotage the article by making it contradictory. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 10:38, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Would it not add to the credibility of the article and the site as a whole to engage with the ideas that the editor brought to the table on their own merits--or lack thereof-- as opposed to dismissing them as vandalism? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 12:16, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RJJensen&amp;diff=703444</id>
		<title>User talk:RJJensen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RJJensen&amp;diff=703444"/>
		<updated>2009-09-25T14:25:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* &amp;quot;Revert vandalism&amp;quot; on the Chavez article */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[/Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haha, yeah the rain has been murderous all week long! I had the misfortune of planning to drive into Athens today, only to find all the roads underwater! I didn't realize until you messaged me that my talk page has the info intended for my user page, so thank you for your inadvertant help (also, yes, it appears my grammar died while I was writing it!) Are you from the area as well? Always good to meet a fellow southerner who understands the Obama Crisis. There are so many hayseed liberals down here it makes me sick! Don't worry tho, you won't hear me crying out for a confederate south:) Long live a STRONG CONSERVATIVE UNION, with a surplus export of integrity! [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 20:33, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::thanks for the update. I'm actually a Yankee now living in Montana, but I have had a strong interest in the South since I studiesd with C. Vann Woodward some years back.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 20:36, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can forgive a Yank, I used to be one (Mt. Vernon, Washington)! Unfortunately, that town's Conservative fervor lives solely in the words of one Glenn Beck (that man's done for intelligent conservatism what Sean Penn did for photographers dentistry.) [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 20:45, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now, what kind of a snide insult is that?  Beck is a thoughtful, honest fighter for the conservative cause, and if people are angered at the government by his exposés, all the better for the nation. Both he, and those of us who respect him, are intelligent people. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 20:59, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Forgive any intrusion or stamping upon your own loyalties. But surely you must admit that the movement suffers from a lack of Irving Kristol or William Buckley type figures. I long for the days when conservatism nakedly confessed that the intellectuals were the brains of the movement while the power of the people were its fists. OF COURSE a weapon must be weighted properly, with the correct balances, but it is only in retrospect that people might discuss its craftsmanship and the components which constituted it. I would venture to say that anyone slain by Excalibur would comment on anything but the sharpness of its blade, which in this most basic analogy, would comprise the incisive wit of conservatives who have lived and then gone to meet God in heaven. The fires of anger burn with intense heat in the belly of American conservatism, but to stoke these fires, as Beck often does, produces little but flash and smoke. It will be some current or future leader, a Reagan-type, I pray, who shall light his torch with such a flame and bring it to the halls of Congress or to the Obama home and say, &amp;quot;See, this same flame has burned for ages now let it singe you!&amp;quot;. God, conservatism, the side of moral right; all are the same, and united they are all consuming. But it must take SOMEONE...a prophet, a politician who does God's work, a priest with God's word in him...someone, SOMEONE must carry that torch. [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 21:15, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quakerism category ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for setting it up!  I'll try to contribute a few more new articles to insert. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Revert vandalism&amp;quot; on the Chavez article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hugo_Chavez&amp;amp;curid=5224&amp;amp;diff=703420&amp;amp;oldid=703401 this edit] really count as &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;? Or would it be more fair of you to qualify it as a different point of view? A point of view that may be criticized, perhaps, one that may or may not be backed up by whatever evidence is cited--but where is the &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 08:44, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::it's vandalism--it was designed to attack and denigrate and damage a CP article. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 10:10, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Introducing a different point of view--with a citation, no less--is denigrating and damaging to the article? Is the article that fragile? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 10:25, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RJJensen&amp;diff=703423</id>
		<title>User talk:RJJensen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RJJensen&amp;diff=703423"/>
		<updated>2009-09-25T12:44:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* &amp;quot;Revert vandalism&amp;quot; on the Chavez article */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[/Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haha, yeah the rain has been murderous all week long! I had the misfortune of planning to drive into Athens today, only to find all the roads underwater! I didn't realize until you messaged me that my talk page has the info intended for my user page, so thank you for your inadvertant help (also, yes, it appears my grammar died while I was writing it!) Are you from the area as well? Always good to meet a fellow southerner who understands the Obama Crisis. There are so many hayseed liberals down here it makes me sick! Don't worry tho, you won't hear me crying out for a confederate south:) Long live a STRONG CONSERVATIVE UNION, with a surplus export of integrity! [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 20:33, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::thanks for the update. I'm actually a Yankee now living in Montana, but I have had a strong interest in the South since I studiesd with C. Vann Woodward some years back.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 20:36, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I can forgive a Yank, I used to be one (Mt. Vernon, Washington)! Unfortunately, that town's Conservative fervor lives solely in the words of one Glenn Beck (that man's done for intelligent conservatism what Sean Penn did for photographers dentistry.) [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 20:45, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now, what kind of a snide insult is that?  Beck is a thoughtful, honest fighter for the conservative cause, and if people are angered at the government by his exposés, all the better for the nation. Both he, and those of us who respect him, are intelligent people. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 20:59, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Forgive any intrusion or stamping upon your own loyalties. But surely you must admit that the movement suffers from a lack of Irving Kristol or William Buckley type figures. I long for the days when conservatism nakedly confessed that the intellectuals were the brains of the movement while the power of the people were its fists. OF COURSE a weapon must be weighted properly, with the correct balances, but it is only in retrospect that people might discuss its craftsmanship and the components which constituted it. I would venture to say that anyone slain by Excalibur would comment on anything but the sharpness of its blade, which in this most basic analogy, would comprise the incisive wit of conservatives who have lived and then gone to meet God in heaven. The fires of anger burn with intense heat in the belly of American conservatism, but to stoke these fires, as Beck often does, produces little but flash and smoke. It will be some current or future leader, a Reagan-type, I pray, who shall light his torch with such a flame and bring it to the halls of Congress or to the Obama home and say, &amp;quot;See, this same flame has burned for ages now let it singe you!&amp;quot;. God, conservatism, the side of moral right; all are the same, and united they are all consuming. But it must take SOMEONE...a prophet, a politician who does God's work, a priest with God's word in him...someone, SOMEONE must carry that torch. [[User:RoyP|RoyP]] 21:15, 21 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quakerism category ==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for setting it up!  I'll try to contribute a few more new articles to insert. --[[User:MarkGall|MarkGall]] 14:20, 22 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Revert vandalism&amp;quot; on the Chavez article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hugo_Chavez&amp;amp;curid=5224&amp;amp;diff=703420&amp;amp;oldid=703401 this edit] really count as &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;? Or would it be more fair of you to qualify it as a different point of view? A point of view that may be criticized, perhaps, one that may or may not be backed up by whatever evidence is cited--but where is the &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 08:44, 25 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homosexuality_obsession&amp;diff=702751</id>
		<title>Talk:Homosexuality obsession</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homosexuality_obsession&amp;diff=702751"/>
		<updated>2009-09-22T22:04:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /*  JPatt?!?!? What are you doing!?!?! */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Oh goodness. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:15, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Goodness it is indeed. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 19:58, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What then, does that make [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Search&amp;amp;ns0=1&amp;amp;ns2=1&amp;amp;ns4=1&amp;amp;ns120=1&amp;amp;redirs=0&amp;amp;search=homosexual&amp;amp;limit=50&amp;amp;offset=0 this] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Search&amp;amp;ns0=1&amp;amp;ns2=1&amp;amp;ns4=1&amp;amp;ns120=1&amp;amp;redirs=0&amp;amp;search=gay&amp;amp;limit=20&amp;amp;offset=0 this]? {{unsigned|CPAdmin1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Depending on the article, more of the same, I'd say. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:16, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Seriously, though. This article has no citations and has a LOT of statements which need them. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:19, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Tim, we may have several articles on homosexuality, but that's because we're exposing the liberals and the gay agenda. It's hardly our fault that they've aided the infiltration of homosexuality into the mainstream, but it's our duty to point out how this infiltration is occuring and the dangers of letting it proceed unchecked.&lt;br /&gt;
:::: HelpJazz, many of these points are taken up in the other articles. As my edit summary said when I created this article, it's more of a place to collect the general observations. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 21:28, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If that's true then we either don't need this article, or you can port over the references from those articles (assuming those articles have references...). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:53, 14 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Cite, cite, cite. HelpJazz, again, it doesn't take much work to find these references. The subject is pretty pervasive. I've added some cites to give the article some grounding, I'm sure others can find a wealth of other citations. It's nothing to ''obsess'' over :-P -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:10, 15 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It's a little better, but still a long ways to go. I'd explain what I mean, but the page is locked so it won't matter for a week.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The reason I let you do the work is 3-fold, but the most important reason is that if I teach a man to fish he can feed himself for a lifetime :) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:29, 15 November 2008 (EST) &amp;lt;-- Dreams of a day when people cite things without having to be asked&lt;br /&gt;
I woke up and found the article locked. NO FUN! :( I was going to touch it up today. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 15:36, 15 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Too big a target for ironic vandalism, it seems. It should settle down when they get their kicks. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:50, 15 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sigh. They don't give up, do they? -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 06:32, 16 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Latest vandalisms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must say, they had a point. Maybe the section on Wikipedia should be removed? --[[User:Vittu|Vittu]] 12:17, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Kind of ironic, huh? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:29, 26 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The real irony is the liberal vandals obsessing over this article. Now THAT's funny. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 16:36, 27 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Moral equivalence]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pointing out evil is nothing at all like pushing people to tolerate it. The two are as different as night and day. Discuss major changes like [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homosexual_obsession&amp;amp;diff=577491&amp;amp;oldid=576521 this] beforehand. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:42, 4 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Irony ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the risk of being labeled ''obsessive'' like someone in the above discussions, does anyone else see the irony in [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Search&amp;amp;ns0=1&amp;amp;ns2=1&amp;amp;ns4=1&amp;amp;ns120=1&amp;amp;redirs=0&amp;amp;search=homosexual&amp;amp;limit=50&amp;amp;offset=0 this], [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Search&amp;amp;ns0=1&amp;amp;ns2=1&amp;amp;ns4=1&amp;amp;ns120=1&amp;amp;redirs=0&amp;amp;search=gay&amp;amp;limit=20&amp;amp;offset=0 this], and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:PopularPages&amp;amp;limit=200&amp;amp;offset=0 this]? I really, honestly hope there's another active editor out there who gets this. --[[User:SStaples|SStaples]] 22:52, 16 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry, but the irony is lost on me. We are reporting on liberal behavior, in this case their obsession with homosexuality, and on the destructive nature of the homosexual movement. These are important issues to address publicly before they become too strong. Do you think [[Lot]] was obsessed with sodomy when he warned that God was angry with the actions in Sodom and Gomorrah? &lt;br /&gt;
:Since you bring up [[irony]], do you also consider it ironic that mainstream Hollywood and television has been artificially promoting homosexual characters (the [[token gay]]) to make it seem like they commonly exist among the general public, when in fact most decent people have not actually willfully encountered homosexuals? They make it seem like everyone has a gay friend or uncle or mailman, which is ironic to me, considering I don't have any gay friends, relatives, dentists or firefighters. Just good, honest, Christians. If you can't spot the liberal homosexual obsession, then you've already been duped, I'm sad to say. I'd encourage you to read some more insights, if you can bear the &amp;quot;irony&amp;quot;. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 17:00, 17 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;An irony that is lost on the publishers&amp;quot; indeed.  --[[User:Jfavor|Jfavor]] 21:55, 19 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  JPatt?!?!? What are you doing!?!?! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Redirecting the article on homosexual obsession to Sarah Palin? Is this a mistake? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 18:04, 22 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rachel_Maddow&amp;diff=702522</id>
		<title>Rachel Maddow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rachel_Maddow&amp;diff=702522"/>
		<updated>2009-09-22T01:36:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Rachel Maddow''' (b. 1973) is a [[left-wing]] American radio and television commentator for [[Air America]] radio and [[MSNBC]] cable television. She has a bachelors degree from [[Stanford]] University, and a doctorate from [[Oxford]]. (She went to Oxford as a [[Rhodes Scholar]].)  Maddow is one of the few [[lesbian|gay]] personalities in the mainstream news media. Like almost everyone at the MSNBC network, she has an immoral world view, and uses her position in the media to advance her [[homosexual agenda]]. As a hysterical opponent of former U.S [[President George W. Bush]], she continues to oppose [[Conservative values]] and the [[Republican Party]], while being a slavish supporter and follower of [[Barack Obama]]. There has never been a single instance where she has criticized Obama or his socialist policies in the slightest. She has dedicated several shows to defending welfare and is most likely an extremist socialist herself.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Maddow, Rachel}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality_in_the_media|Homosexuality in the Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tammy Bruce]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Broadcasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;diff=702396</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to an Old Earth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;diff=702396"/>
		<updated>2009-09-21T15:45:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;It takes only one &amp;quot;counterexample&amp;quot; to disprove the theory of an [[Old Earth]].  As with any logical proposition, one contradiction disproves the proposed rule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential counterexamples to the theory of an [[Old Earth]] include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[moon]] is receding from the [[Earth]] at a rate suggesting it would have been too close billions of years ago&lt;br /&gt;
* spiral galaxies appear to be young, and proposals of the existence of dark matter are needed to reconcile them with belief in an old universe&lt;br /&gt;
* the massive [[Great Lakes]] are receding in volume too rapidly&lt;br /&gt;
* freshwater lakes are known to be relatively young&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ice Age theories were developed to explain this, but massive freshwater lakes exist even near the equator&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Earth]]'s [[magnetism]] is changing at too fast a rate for the Earth to be old.  The Earth's magnetic field is weakening in strength by 5% every 100 years through the process of the reversal of polarity. This has occurred some 170 times over the last 76 million years. The last time this happened was approximately  770,000 years ago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/tour/AAmag.html Earth's Magnetic Field and its Changes in Time], from [[NASA]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Exponential decay at that rate is not compatible with an old Earth, since it would have required the Earth's magnetic field to be impossibly large at the times postulated by old-Earth theory. &lt;br /&gt;
* the existence of inland salt-water lakes, such as [[Mono Lake]] and the [[Great Salt Lake]], suggest a recent global [[flood]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Counterexamples to Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:geology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;diff=702395</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to an Old Earth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;diff=702395"/>
		<updated>2009-09-21T15:42:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: Added detail from NASA article.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;It takes only one &amp;quot;counterexample&amp;quot; to disprove the theory of an [[Old Earth]].  As with any logical proposition, one contradiction disproves the proposed rule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential counterexamples to the theory of an [[Old Earth]] include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[moon]] is receding from the [[Earth]] at a rate suggesting it would have been too close billions of years ago&lt;br /&gt;
* spiral galaxies appear to be young, and proposals of the existence of dark matter are needed to reconcile them with belief in an old universe&lt;br /&gt;
* the massive [[Great Lakes]] are receding in volume too rapidly&lt;br /&gt;
* freshwater lakes are known to be relatively young&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ice Age theories were developed to explain this, but massive freshwater lakes exist even near the equator&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Earth]]'s [[magnetism]] is changing at too fast a rate for the Earth to be old.  The Earth's magnetic field is weakening in strength by 5% every 100 years: This has occurred some 170 times over the last 76 million years. The last time this happened was approximately  770,000 years ago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/tour/AAmag.html Earth's Magnetic Field and its Changes in Time], from [[NASA]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Exponential decay at that rate is not compatible with an old Earth, since it would have required the Earth's magnetic field to be impossibly large at the times postulated by old-Earth theory. &lt;br /&gt;
* the existence of inland salt-water lakes, such as [[Mono Lake]] and the [[Great Salt Lake]], suggest a recent global [[flood]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Counterexamples to Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:geology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=702305</id>
		<title>Sarah Palin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=702305"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T23:31:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: vandalism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Sarah Palin&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Sarah Palin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Todd Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 4, 2006-July 26, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Sean Parnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Louise Heath Palin''' (pronounced pay'-lynn) (born February 11, 1964) served as the [[conservative]] [[Republican Party|Republican]] [[Governor]] of [[Alaska]] from 2006 through 2009. She is the youngest person to hold this office as well as the first woman to do so in the state's history. On July 3, 2009 Palin announced that she will resign as Governor of Alaska. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_not_running/2009/07/03/231789.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Executive power was transferred to [[Lieutenant Governor]] [[Sean Parnell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
Palin was Senator [[John McCain]]'s Vice Presidential running mate in the [[2008 Presidential Election]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/palins_vp_selection_speech.html Acceptance Speech by Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the first woman to appear on a Republican Presidential ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She brought a [[populism|populist]] image and a record of cutting wasteful spending and reforming government to McCain's ticket.  In the summer of 2007, she was the most popular governor in America, after cutting 13% of [[Alaska]]'s budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/851orcjq.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She is strongly [[pro-life]] and a prominent spokesperson for [[special needs]] children.  She favors more competition in health care, and pushed for abolishing the [[certificate of need]] regulations that interfere with opening new medical clinics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090403253.html?referrer=emailarticle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Married for 20 years, Sarah Palin's husband is a member of the United Steelworkers Union and her eldest son (of five children) is in the [[United States Army]], scheduled to go to Iraq.  In an appearance on August 30, 2008 in Washington, Pennsylvania, she was greeted by a surprisingly large crowd as she promoted the new McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She earned her Journalism degree from the University of [[Idaho]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/palin/story/516085.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and worked in the media and the utility industry before beginning her public service 14 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sarah Palin Todd Trig.jpg|thumb|right|In this April 23, 2008 file photo, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband, Todd Palin, hold their baby boy Trig in Anchorage, Alaska. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Photo courtesy of Newsmax.com'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Palin arrived in Alaska with her family in 1964, when her parents came to teach school in Skagway.  Palin attended Wasilla High School where her extracurricular activities included captaining the basketball team  which went on to win the state championship &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after graduating in 1982. She went on to college, after attending several institutions she received a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism from the University of Idaho in 1987. Over the course of her 44 years in Alaska she has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla. To earn money for college, Palin entered beauty pageants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is married to [[Todd Palin]], part Yupik [[Eskimo]], who is a lifelong Alaskan, works at a non-management union job in the oil industry, and also as a commercial salmon fisherman.  He is a four-time champion of the Iron Dog, the world's longest snowmobile race. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin is a [[Labor union | union]] member, a [[moose]] hunter and holds a membership in the [[NRA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/29/mccain-to-name-running-mate-on-friday/ McCain Names Alaska Gov. Palin as Running Mate] Fox News, August 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Todd and Sarah have five children together: Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has been widely praised among conservatives for acting on her [[pro-life]] beliefs in the case of her youngest son, Trig, who was diagnosed with [[Down syndrome]] in the fourth month of her pregnancy. After researching the condition, she and her husband agreed to continue to pregnancy:&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;[My husband Todd said,] we shouldn't be asking 'Why us?' We should be saying 'Well, why not us?' We've both been very vocal about being pro life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential. I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/gov-sarah-palin.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29242 Canadian Doctors 'Fear' Sarah Palin's Choice May Start a Trend] Catholic Online, Septmeber 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trig was born on April 18, 2008, four months before his mother was announced as the vice-presidential candidate.  Palin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;This new person in your life can help everyone put things in perspective and bind us together, and get everyone focused on what really matters ... Those who love him will think less about self and focus less on what the world tells [us] is 'normal' or 'perfect.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's a sign of the times to be able to do this,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can think of so many male candidates who watched a families grow while they were in office.  There is no reason to believe a woman can't do it with a growing family. My baby will not be at all or in any sense neglected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alaska governor balances newborn's needs, official duties [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-10-4082128881_x.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's older son, Track, serves in the U.S. Army, and was deployed to [[Iraq War|Iraq]] in September 2008. Palin says, &amp;quot;I'm proud of him but I worry.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was five months pregnant. After having been given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child.  Palin stated &amp;quot;We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_daughter Palin says 17-year-old daughter is pregnant]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bristol has since gone on to promote abstinence as a realistic choice for teenagers, stating, &amp;quot;[A]bstinence is the only way you can effectively, 100% foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5025.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin Family..jpg|thumb|left|Palin family members at the announcement of Palin's vice presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol, and Trig.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin was elected to two terms on the Wasilla City Council, and then two terms as the Mayor / Manager of Alaska's fastest growing community (Population: 5400 in 2000)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wasilla.areaconnect.com/statistics.htm Wasilla Population and Demographics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. During her time as mayor, Palin hired a Washington lobbying firm to help secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, otherwise known as earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-31-palin-bridge_N.htm Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ms. Palin's leadership qualities were recognized when she was elected as President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors.  In 2002, she ran for Lieutenant Governor, but came in second in a four-way race.  Later that year, when [[Frank Murkowski]] resigned his [[Senate]] seat to become [[governor]], she interviewed for the opening.  Instead, Murkowski appointed his daughter to the seat.  From there, she went on to run for governor and won, becoming the first female governor of Alaska and its youngest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, then-Governor Mukowski appointed Palin to serve as Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska's [[non-renewable energy|non-renewable]] resources: [[oil]] and [[gasoline|gas]].  She resigned in 2004 as a protest over the &amp;quot;lack of ethics&amp;quot; of fellow panelists who had ignored her complaints of legal violations and conflicts of interest. In a similar vein, Palin took a great political risk by revealing that Randy Reudrich, chairman of the state Republican party, was doing political business on state time. She did this to fulfil a [[conflict of interest]] statement that required her to report such things; to omit the revelation would have been dishonest. But it turned out that this action endeared her to the people of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help cultivate influence and political clout in the state, Palin served from 2003 - June, 2005 as one of three directors of the &amp;quot;Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.&amp;quot;, a 527 group that raised funds from corporate donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html#more Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Ted Stevens's 527 Group]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The stated purpose of the group is, &amp;quot;To increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/527/ted_stevens_excellence_in_public_service_inc.asp Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She ran for Governor in 2006 on a clean government platform, and accomplished a political rarity in defeating the incumbent Governor [[Frank Murkowski]] in his own Republican primary.  Palin went on to defeat former Governor [[Tony Knowles]] in the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has also served on the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She was named one of Alaska's &amp;quot;Top 40 Under 40&amp;quot;, Alaska's Public Works &amp;quot;Person of the Year&amp;quot;, and was recently inducted into the Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society at Alaska Pacific University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has served on numerous boards and commissions throughout the State, and stays active as a marathon runner, sports team mom, hockey manager and school volunteer.   A lifetime member of the [[NRA]], she enjoys hunting, fishing, and Alaska history. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php Alaska Governor Sarah Palin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Resignation===&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2009, Governor Palin shocked Alaska and the nation with her announcement that she would not seek a second term, and would resign her office effective July 26, 2009. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her own words:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''Some say things changed for me on August 29th last year – the day John McCain tapped me to be his running-mate – ''I say others changed''.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me speak to that for a minute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt. The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice. Over the past nine months I've been accused of all sorts of frivolous ethics violations – such as holding a fish in a photograph, wearing a jacket with a logo on it, and answering reporters’ questions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every one – all 15 of the ethics complaints have been dismissed. We’ve won! But it hasn't been cheap - the State has wasted thousands of hours of your time and shelled out some two million of your dollars to respond to “opposition research” – that’s money not going to fund teachers or troopers – or safer roads. And this political absurdity, the “politics of personal destruction” … Todd and I are looking at more than half a million dollars in legal bills in order to set the record straight. And what about the people who offer up these silly accusations? It doesn’t cost them a dime so they’re not going to stop draining public resources – spending other peoples’ money in their game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s pretty insane – my staff and I spend most of our day dealing with this instead of progressing our state now. I know I promised no more “politics as usual,” but this isn’t what anyone had in mind for Alaska. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I have learned one thing: life is about choices! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And one chooses how to react to circumstances. You can choose to engage in things that tear down, or build up. I choose to work very hard on a path for fruitfulness and productivity. I choose not to tear down and waste precious time; but to build up this state and our country, and her industrious, generous, patriotic, free people! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life is too short to compromise time and resources... it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: &amp;quot;Sit down and shut up&amp;quot;, but that's the worthless, easy path; that's a quitter's way out. And a problem in our country today is apathy. It would be apathetic to just hunker down and “go with the flow”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nah, only dead fish &amp;quot;go with the flow&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Productive, fulfilled people determine where to put their efforts, choosing to wisely utilize precious time... to build up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And there is such a need to build up and fight for our state and our country. I choose to fight for it! And I'll work hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government; strong national security for our country and support for our troops; energy independence; and for those who will protect freedom and equality and life... I'll work for and campaign for those proud to be American, and those who are inspired by our ideals and won't deride them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will support others who seek to serve, in or out of office, for the right reasons, and I don't care what party they're in or no party at all. Inside Alaska – or Outside Alaska. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I won’t do it from the Governor’s desk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I've never believed that I, nor anyone else, needs a title to do this - to make a difference... to help people. So I choose, for my State and my family, more &amp;quot;freedom&amp;quot; to progress, all the way around... so that Alaska may progress... I will not seek re-election as Governor.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn’t run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks… travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade – as so many politicians do. And then I thought – that’s what’s wrong – many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and “milk it”. I’m not putting Alaska through that – I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! That’s not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old “politics as usual.” I promised that four years ago – and I meant it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''It’s not what is best for Alaska.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I am determined to take the right path for Alaska even though it is unconventional and not so comfortable.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''With this announcement that I am not seeking re-election… I’ve determined it’s best to transfer the authority of governor to Lieutenant Governor Parnell; and I am willing to do so, so that this administration – with its positive agenda, its accomplishments, and its successful road to an incredible future – can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My choice is to take a stand and effect change – not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities – and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me go back to a comfortable analogy for me – sports… basketball. I use it because you’re naïve if you don’t see the national full-court press picking away right now: A good point guard drives through a full court press, protecting the ball, keeping her eye on the basket… and she knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can win. And I’m doing that – keeping our eye on the ball that represents sound priorities – smaller government, energy independence, national security, freedom! And I know when it’s time to pass the ball – for victory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have given my reasons candidly and truthfully… and my last day won’t be for another few weeks so the transition will be very smooth. In fact, we will look to swear Sean in – in Fairbanks at the conclusion of our Governor’s picnics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not want to disappoint anyone with my decision; all I can ask is that you trust me with this decision – but it’s no more “politics as usual”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Alaskans don’t mind wasting public dollars and state time. '''I do. I cannot stand here as your Governor and allow millions upon millions of our dollars go to waste just so I can hold the title of Governor. And my children won’t allow it either.''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php  Executive Column: Palin's resignation announcement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy and Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A strong supporter of harnessing [[oil]] and natural [[gas]] resources, Palin presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) in March 2007, which would be the new legal vehicle for building a natural gas pipeline from the state's North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/aug/29/palin-alaska-gasline-inducement-act-nears-completi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It received bipartisan support and was signed into law by Governor Palin in June. In August of 2008 she signed legislation giving state authority to award TransCanada Corp a license to build and operate a multibillion-dollar pipeline to ship natural gas from the North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2e84b1e8-9a4a-4558-ad05-21b517c50fae&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As Governor, Palin created a new subcabinet that will develop policies to reduce greenhouse gases and help the state adapt to [[climate change]]. She supports oil production in ANWR, connecting it with national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, over the objections of oil companies, Palin worked with the Alaska state legislature to approve a major increase in taxes on the oil industry. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008103325_alaskatax07.html Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The state then gave Alaskans a $1200 check to pay for increased gas prices, using the increased revenues from the tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/ Palin backed Alaskan windfalls-profit tax]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also announced on May 21, 2008 that the state would challenge a recent listing of [[polar bears]] as a threatened species as she and other Alaska elected officials feared such a listing would cripple oil and gas development in prime polar bear habitat off the state's northern and northwestern coasts.  Palin's belief is that there is not enough evidence to support a listing, asserting that polar bears are well-managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Govp_2008stos_large.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gov. Sarah Palin delivering her 2008 State of the State address]] At first, Palin supported the Gravina Island Bridge Project, otherwise known as the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;quot;.  In September 2006, during a stop in [[Ketchikan]] as part of her gubernatorial campaign, Palin stated, &amp;quot;OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere,&amp;quot; Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. &amp;quot;I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html Palin touts stance on 'Bridge to Nowhere']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The $398 million bridge would have connected Ketchikan, on Revillagigedo Island in southern southeast Alaska, to its airport on nearby Gravina island.  The Anchorage Daily News also quoted her in an October, 2006 article as saying yes, she would continue state funding for the bridge because she wanted swift action on infrastructure projects. &amp;quot;The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist,&amp;quot; she said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere;_ylt=Am.NkRx1mLWk9A34FLhn8IADW7oF Critics: Palin used 'Bridge to Nowhere' for gain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin announced her opposition to the project in a 2007 press release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has stated her opposition arose because of the excessive amount of pork-barrel spending in the project, and that she would not fund the $329 million that was short for the budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/22/alaska.bridge.ap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This reversal cost her the support of prominent Alaskan Republicans like Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, who said, &amp;quot;You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it&amp;quot;.  Palin instead said that the best option would be to upgrade the ferry system.  However, the money that was retained from the earmark was not used for the ferry system, but was spent building a road on Gravina Island that links to the site of the canceled bridge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901 Palin &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; line angers many Alaskans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent Alaskan politicians criticized Palin for not &amp;quot;giving back&amp;quot; money earmarked for the project.  These critics included her Republican campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, who stated that &amp;quot;She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, state governments do not &amp;quot;give back&amp;quot; money in the manner proposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three times during Palin's time as mayor, earmark funding for projects in Wasilla were noted in [[John McCain]]'s list of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; spending in 2001 and 2002. McCain's list of spending approved without normal budget scrutiny identified a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in the city and a $1 million earmark for an emergency communications center while $450,000 was set aside for an agricultural processing facility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,6145252.story McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin, of course, as mayor of a small town had no ability to put these items in a Congressional bill, but her town did benefit from earmarked spending given to Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foreign Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ftwainwright_govp_05s.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Governor Sarah Palin visits Strykers at Fort Wainwright, where she is briefed on how the troops are trained and what the training grounds provide.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Palin is Commander in Chief of the Alaska Army [[National Guard]]. In 2007 she visited troops in [[Germany]] and [[Kuwait]].  According to Major General Craig E. Campbell, the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard who commands the roughly 3,800 state militia members, the Alaskan governor is not in the site's chain of command and has no authority over its operations.  He told the Associated Press on August 31st that he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. He went on to state that the entire operation is under federal control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/31/ap/politics/main4401854.shtml GOP Cites Palin's Skill, But How Relevant Is It?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her first major interview, with ABC's [[Charlie Gibson]], Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the &amp;quot;[[Bush Doctrine]]&amp;quot;. Palin responded, &amp;quot;In what respect, Charlie?&amp;quot; Gibson followed, &amp;quot;What do you interpret it to be?&amp;quot; Palin answered with another question, &amp;quot;His world view?&amp;quot; Gibson still refused to answer directly but instead stated it was the doctrine Bush had proposed in September of 2002, before the Iraq war. Palin gave a response concerning Bush's attempt to eradicate Islamic extremism. Gibson then explained that the Bush doctrine refers to the right of anticipatory defense, a right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpJsQch9uZo Asked about the Bush Doctrine...Palin is Clueless]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What Gibson did not point out is that he himself once gave a definition of the &amp;quot;Bush doctrine&amp;quot; (a concept made up by the press that has no clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislature Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
In August of 2008, the [[Alaska]] state legislature began an investigation of Palin and her staff for potential abuse of power in regards to a firing of Commissioner of Public Safety Walter Monegan.  Legally, Palin could dismiss Monegan at any time as he serves at the pleasure of the governor. Monegan was dismissed from his position in July of 2008, which Palin's political opponents claim was due to Monegan's refusal to fire trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's former brother-in-law who had a history of complaints including tasering his 10 year old stepson.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168861.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin says she released Monegan due to differences on budgeting. In an interview Monegan said that he was never told specifically by Sarah Palin to fire the state trooper Mike Wooten.  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has denied the charges and, as is customary, the State of Alaska has hired a lawyer to represent her office in the investigation. August 25th, the Legislative Council voted 12-0 to hire Hollis French as the investigator. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=59d_1220063478 Investigation into Governor Sarah Palin's abuse of powers] CBS 11, August 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 and the House Judiciary Committee voted 7-0. The State's attorney released this statement:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cvn_palin_troopergate Palin hires attorney for Troopergate investigation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The governor of every state gets legal counsel and this attorney is part of a weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges.  This legal defense is neither new nor uncommon nor at all political. It is a matter of her job and is not recent and it is not related to her selection on the McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The McCain campaign came out with a picture that includes three lead state Democratic legislators investigating the Branchflower probe, known as ‘Troopergate'. The photo shows the three of them at [[Obama]] headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska in July. The McCain campaign said the whole investigation is politically tainted and compromised. Republican Rep. John Coghill of North Pole called on managing investigator, legislator French to step down from the probe, saying he no longer had confidence in his objectivity. &amp;quot;These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed,” Coghill wrote in a letter calling for French’s replacement. “The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078644/posts McCain Camp has pictures of &amp;quot;troopergate&amp;quot; investigators at Obama Headquarters] FreeRepublic.com, September 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democratic State Senator Kim Elton, head of the legislative council overseeing the investigation, said the decisions made by Sen. Hollis French &amp;quot;have been appropriate, bipartisan ... and unchallenged&amp;quot; and that French has called the comments he made last week &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/08/palin.investigation/ Head of Palin trooper probe will stay, lawmaker says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lawyer Thomas Van Flein called the investigation &amp;quot;unlawful and unconstitutional&amp;quot; and said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he is a friend of the fired commissioner. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/522488.html Palin's attorney calls investigator biased] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investigation issued its report for the Alaska State Legislative Council on October 10, 2008, concluding that Monegan's refusal to fire the trooper was not the sole reason he was dismissed, but was likely a contributing factor.  The author of the report, Stephen Branchflower, focused on two questions of the inquiry:  did Palin fire Walt Monegan improperly, and was the firing solely because of his refusal to fire her ex brother-in-law. &amp;quot;Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Based on this, Branchflower claims that &amp;quot;I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/DOWNLOAD.pdf Page 8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the second question the report focused on, Branchflower wrote, &amp;quot;I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote. The second finding of the report reads: &amp;quot;In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.&amp;quot;  Branchflower also dismissed the Palins' assertions that they were afraid of Wooten because of threats they said he made. &amp;quot;Such claims of fear were not bona fide and were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10692757?source=most_viewed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;A preemptive response to this report was issued by the McCain/Palin campaign on October 9th, in which the campaign's own investigation concluded that Palin &amp;quot;acted within her proper and lawful authority in the reassignment of Walt Monegan&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end the &amp;quot;October Surprise&amp;quot; predicted by the head of the commission came to pass.  Although the commission was asked not to release its findings until after the election to avoid political posturing, they refused to do so.  Apart from tarring and feathering Palin, the report made no recommendations for any further inquiries or punishment, as it was understood that there was no case to do so.  No direct reports of Sarah Palin abusing her power were ever produced or asking for the official to be fired were ever produced, but that didn't stop the report from drawing its conclusions based upon conjecture without evidence.  Indeed, after the hoopla over the report subsided, the state personnel board released its finding that exonnerated her of any wrongdoing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_el_pr/palin_troopergate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice Presidential Candidate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mccainpalin.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Sarah Palin vice presidential announcement, 08/29/08.]] On August 29, 2008, Palin was announced to be the Vice Presidential nominee for Republican Senator John McCain &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/sarah_palin_vp/2008/08/29/126138.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The selection was a surprise, as those in the media were expecting [[Minnesota]] Governor [[Tim Pawlenty]] or former [[Massachusetts]]'s Governor [[Mitt Romney]].  Palin adds youth and executive experience to the ticket. She is the second female Vice Presidential candidate of a major party in U.S. history and the first one on a Republican ticket.  The first was [[Geraldine Ferraro]], who the Democratic Party put on the ticket under [[Walter Mondale]] in 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's speech before the Republican convention on Wednesday, September 3rd was watched by over 40 million people.  She had as many people turn in to see her as watched Obama's acceptance speech on the final day of the Democratic convention.  Palin has also been attacked by the press on a level not seen since [[Dan Quayle]], although she ultimately handled it much better.  &lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat Responses===&lt;br /&gt;
In a possible problem for the Democratic ticket, a majority of people believed that the press was trying to hurt Palin&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/story/rasmussen/20080904/pl_rasmussen/palinmedia20080904;_ylt=AqErk__wZIKdoVvqUXdr44Nh24cA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that type of unwarranted attack could have backfired into more support for the McCain/Palin ticket especially with unaffiliated voters believing the press is purposely attacking Palin by a 49% to 32% margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats had advised the Obama campaign to ignore Palin, fearing that emphasis on her inexperience will backfire against Obama himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/capital/2008/09/05/tips-for-obama-ignore-palin-dis-mccain  Matt Coopoer, &amp;quot;Tips for Obama: Ignore Palin, Dis McCain,&amp;quot; Sept. 5, 2008, ''Conde-Nast Portfoloio.com'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She participated in a debate with the Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on October 2, 2008, ending up being declared the winner by most credible news sources that are not  influenced by liberal bias. Palin &amp;quot;kept Joe Biden on the defensive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ended up dominating [the debate]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14234.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Barack Obama said of the McCain/Palin ticket's similar policies, &amp;quot;...You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_lipstick_mccain/2008/09/09/129274.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given the fact that she's stated &amp;quot;The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull (is) lipstick&amp;quot; and the fact that only a female candidate would wear lipstick, the McCain camp released a web ad implying that the comment was targeting Governor Palin. The ad featured video clips of Gov. Palin convention speech, Obama's remarks at the campaign event, and a clip of Katie Couric commenting on pervasive sexism in the campaign. After extensive discussion in the news media, the ad was removed from McCain's website and other video sites following a copyright claim by CBS news. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/CBS_takes_down_McCain_webad_suggests_its_misleading.html?showall]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin is a lightning rod to the established [[liberal]] women's movement. She, like many high profile conservative females, have taken much abuse from the left. Palin has been forced to set up a legal defense fund to help pay for fees related to an onslaught of ethic complaints, which are always frivolous. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18738 Palin blasts Obama administration: Government wants to &amp;quot;control the people&amp;quot;] CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Because she is retiring from being governor of Alaska, the anti-American liberals pat themselves on the back in glee. Liberals don't understand yet, probably never will, that she is ''the'' typical conservative that the majority of Americans identify with. Her principles and her outlook on Americanism is a model for all future leaders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin said of the people who have filed the complaints:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Those are the folks who want to tell me, they want to tell you, to sit down and shut up. We will not do that. I just can't, because I love my state. I love my country.'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on Ticket===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the run-up to the Vice-Presidential debate on October 2, 2008, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center attempted to measure the degree to which Palin impacted the GOP ticket positively or negatively in September.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/456/obama-regains-lead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The survey compared the answers to two identical questions about her qualifications and overall favorable/unfavorable rating between polls taken in early and late September.  The results show that public opinion of Palin has fallen significantly since the Republican convention, particularly in the public's opinion of her qualification to be Vice President.  Faced with a barrage of negative press attacks after her nomination, some prominent Republicans like [[Mitt Romney]] believe that the isolation of Palin from the media in September was a mistake, and are calling for an increase in unscripted encounters with the press and public to counter that perception.  According to Romney, &amp;quot;Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake.  I think they’d be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/30/doubts-about-palin-grow-even-among-conservatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Exit polling from the election itself had the final say on the matter of her impact on the ticket.  For those who considered her nomination on the ticket to be unimportant, 57% voted for Obama.  For those who considered her nomination to be important, 53% voted for Obama, thereby showing a positive overall impact on the ticket.  Considering that exit polling tilts Democratic, the actual impact may have been greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Future political prospects==&lt;br /&gt;
It is suspected that Palin may spend the next four years building a base for a 2012 run for the Republican nomination against Barack Obama.  Given her personal charisma and Reagan-esque connection with average, conservative Americans, she may be able to pull off a resounding victory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.capitalcityweekly.com/stories/120308/new_363163237.shtml Sarah Palin hits Republican talking points while stumping in Georgia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Conservative groups have speculated possible running mates, including [[Michelle Bachmann]] and [[Sean Hannity]].  Others suspect she may again seek nomination as the Vice-presidential candidate,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SarahPAC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, 2009 Palin formed the political action committee (PAC) SarahPAC. The organization supports &amp;quot;energy independence and reform&amp;quot; and will endorse candidates who &amp;quot;share Governor Palin’s ideas and goals.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=azCCxotgdG1E&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin filled out a policy questionnaire for the Eagle Forum Alaska during her 2006 gubernatorial race.  One question asked, &amp;quot;Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?&amp;quot;  Palin responded, &amp;quot;Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.&amp;quot;  Yet [[public schools]] still resist teaching abstinence and instead promote sexual behavior by teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question asked, &amp;quot;Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?&amp;quot;  Palin replied, &amp;quot;Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the founding fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many liberals ignorant of the history of &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an &amp;quot;idiot&amp;quot; for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and George Washington's phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; was added to it in June 1954.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, the origin of the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; is the General Orders of [[George Washington]] on July 2 and 9, 1776: &amp;quot;The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army&amp;quot; (July 2); &amp;quot;the peace and safety of the Country now depends, under God, solely on the success of our arms&amp;quot; (July 9).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  George Washington was indeed a [[Founding Father]], and the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the [[Declaration of Independence]] and later writings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also believes that students need to learn of the controversy surrounding the [[Theory of evolution|Theory of evolution]], and that discussing Creationism should not be banned from schools.  During the 2006 campaign for the Alaskan Governorship, Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, &amp;quot;Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She later clarified her position by stating &amp;quot;I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&amp;quot;  She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.  As of September 2008 she has kept that pledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an example of liberal mockery, the [[Huffington Post]] attempted to make light of Sarah Palin's creationist beliefs, highlighting the creationary belief that [[dinosaur|dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; SNL likewise did a skit in which they had her refer to the Museum of Natural History as &amp;quot;that evolution museum&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Church Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin was baptized as a Roman Catholic and, at age 12, she was rebaptized in the Wasilla Assembly of God church.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccainveepbio30-2008aug30,0,2159346.story&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Palin has risen quickly from PTA to VP pick&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Decker, Cathleen and Michael Finnegan,&lt;br /&gt;
|work=Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
|date=August 30, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
| last = Gorsk| first = Eric&lt;br /&gt;
| url = http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g4-w_DCWffagBaQb8Il9a0R2hkPAD92SL7E00&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Evangelicals energized by McCain-Palin ticket&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher =Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
| date = 2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
| accessdate = 2008-08-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin attends the Wasilla Bible Church&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |first=David |last=Pepper |title=Regarding Governor Palin: A Letter from Pastor David Pepper |url=http://churchontherockak.org/Regarding-Sarah-Palin.html |publisher=Church on the Rock |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, an independent congregation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wasillabible.org/faq.htm |title=Wasilla Bible Church FAQ |accessdate=2008-09-05 |work= |publisher= |date= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;miller&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lisa Miller and Amanda Coyne. &amp;quot;[http://www.newsweek.com/id/156679 A Visit to Palin's Church: Scripture and discretion on the program in Wasilla].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. Sept. 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when at home and the Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau as governor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Statement Concerning Sarah Palin |url=http://www.jccalaska.com/images/10000/3000/582JU/user/palin.htm |publisher=Juneau Christian Center |date=2008-09-03 |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether or not people say that they like Sarah Palin, they gravitate to see her.  She earned the highest TV ratings at the Republican convention when she spoke, even surpassing McCain's acceptance speech, and matched Obama's acceptance speech when he was in front of a Greek temple with a stadium of people.  As a Vice Presidential candidate, that was unprecedented.  Likewise her Vice Presidential debate with Joe Biden had more viewers than any of the three debates between McCain and Obama.  Finally, her brief appearance on Saturday Night Live gave the show its highest ratings in 14 years, and was actually the third highest ranked show for the week based on the number of people who tuned in originally to watch her, 17 million, even though it ran at midnight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/20/ustelevision-tvratings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin.JPG|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska - Governor Sarah Palin Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=864bb9006da3f010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD National Governor's Association - Alaska Governor Sarah Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=27200 Project Vote Smart - Governor Sarah H. Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm Sarah Palin On the issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://parentingfreedom.com/2008/09/03/sarah-palin-mother-and-first-female-vice-president-pictures-children-parenting/ Sarah Palin: Mother and First Female Vice President], ''Parenting Freedom'', September 03, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=&amp;amp;w=MA== I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Palin, Sarah}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Mayors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberals_and_uncharitableness&amp;diff=702279</id>
		<title>Liberals and uncharitableness</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberals_and_uncharitableness&amp;diff=702279"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T21:15:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists.[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]  ]]. [[Liberal]]s are uncharitable relative to [[conservative]]s. In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University, published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than conservatives....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and [[Blood donation|give more blood]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] These figures do not, however, take into account volunteer work that may be done by these same people. Many argue that the actual volunteer work has equal or greater value to monetary donations.&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama]] has also been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal politicians and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and Uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Darwinism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theory of Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Charity]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Economics_Lecture_Four&amp;diff=702278</id>
		<title>Talk:Economics Lecture Four</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Economics_Lecture_Four&amp;diff=702278"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T21:12:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* MJ &amp;quot;was unsuccessful after he switched teams late in his career.&amp;quot; */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Re. your question on the Irish Famine - the actual number who died is usually judged to be between 750,000 and  1m[http://www.irelandinformationguide.com/Irish_potato_famine][http://www.nde.state.ne.us/SS/irish/irish_pf.html].   [[User:TadghOB|TadghOB]] 12:40, 12 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Giffen Legend seems to be a perfect example of people irrationally holding on to a theory, even when there is no evidence to support it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:20, 25 August 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MJ &amp;quot;was unsuccessful after he switched teams late in his career.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jordan came back with the Wizards in 2001 at age 38 with two gimpy knees. Could you still ball as well at 38 as you could when you were 24? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 17:12, 20 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arctic&amp;diff=702174</id>
		<title>Arctic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arctic&amp;diff=702174"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T17:01:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Arctic''' is the large region of the [[Earth]] of permanent [[ice]] at the [[North Pole]] as opposed to the southern region called the [[Antarctic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Arctic Circle]], is an imaginary line located at 66º, 30'N latitude, and as a guide defines the southernmost part of the Arctic. The climate within the Circle is extremely cold and much of the area is usually covered with ice.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Geography]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alfred_Tilton&amp;diff=702172</id>
		<title>Alfred Tilton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alfred_Tilton&amp;diff=702172"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T17:01:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Alfred Tilton''', or '''Joseph Paquett''', posed as a [[Canadian]] immigrant but was actually an ''illegal'' Soviet Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]) Officer in the [[United States]] in the late 1920s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
Inserted statement of Nicholas Dozenberg, hearings 8 November 1949, U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Un-American Activities, 81st Cong., 1st and 2d session.&lt;br /&gt;
*“Comintern Apparatus Summary Report,” 15 December 1944, FBI Comintern Apparatus file (FBI file 100-103581), serial 3702.&lt;br /&gt;
* John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr, ''Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America'', Yale University Press (1999).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Tilton, Alfred}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:KGB Agents and Sources]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abstinence_denial&amp;diff=702170</id>
		<title>Abstinence denial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abstinence_denial&amp;diff=702170"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T16:59:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Falsehoods */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Abstinence denial''' refers to two phenomena, deliberate denial by [[liberal]] and [[abortion|pro-abortion]] groups of the efficacy of [[abstinence]]-only programs in preventing disease, and denial from [[ignorance]] by those who have been convinced by the propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Falsehoods ==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals claim that [[virginity pledge|abstinence pledge campaigns]] are ineffective when compaired to programs that involve both abstinence and information about a variety of birth control methods. However, surely numerous studies disprove this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Motivation ==&lt;br /&gt;
Groups such as [[Planned Parenthood]] have enormous interest in promoting sexual promiscuity, as their profits rely on it.  Likewise, pharmaceutical groups selling drugs such as [[Gardasil]] and various forms of [[birth control]] cannot profit when abstinence is used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal [[entertainment]] industry relies on immoral consumers to purchase its products with immoral sexual content (television, film, etc.)  Denying abstinence's efficacy is thus part of a wider attack on [[Christian]] morality.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Heritage Foundation, ''The Effectiveness of Abstinence Education Programs in Reducing Sexual Activity Among Youth'', by Robert E. Rector, April 8, 2002 [http://www.heritage.org/Research/Abstinence/BG1533.cfm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category: liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Quebec&amp;diff=702168</id>
		<title>Quebec</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Quebec&amp;diff=702168"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T16:58:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Economy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Quebec''' ('''Québec''' in the French language)  is the largest [[province]] in [[Canada]] geographically, and the second most populous after [[Ontario]]. The English name is  Quebec.  The capital is [[Québec City]] and the largest city is [[Montreal|Montréal]] (Montreal).  Quebec entered Confederation in 1867 and has a total area of 1,540,680 km&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.  The population of Quebec was 7,546,131 in 2006, approximately 23.4% of the national total.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://canadaonline.about.com/cs/provinces/p/quebecfacts.htm Canadaonline]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quebec traces its roots to French colonization of North America prior to the British conquest of Canada in 1760 during the [[French and Indian Wars]].  Quebec still retains a unique French-language culture, although it has had little connection with France since the conquest. The &amp;quot;[[Quiet Revolution]]&amp;quot; of the 1960s dramatically changed the province; it modernized rapidly and the Catholic Church lost much of its innfluence, along with a large portion of its membership. A new sense of French nationalism emerged, calling for an independent nation, and meanwhile forcing out most of the great business and banking corporations that were run by English Canadians (they moved to [[Toronto]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The official language of the province is [[French]], although many residents are bilingual, speaking both French and [[English]]. Laws and regulations must be written in both English and French as per the Constitution Act of 1867. The provincial government has severely restricted the use of English in signage and schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The per capita provincial income in 2001 was $28,756 (Cdn).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dec-ced.gc.ca/Complements/Publications/ADT2003/en/2.html The Economy of Quebec and its Regions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  This has lagged behind the overall growth of Canada, in part because of the successive separatist governments who did not create a stable environment and their policies of large government intervention.  The economy has a large aerospace and manufacturing sector, however mineral extraction and forestry also play a large role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent history since 2000==&lt;br /&gt;
The separatist movement has waned recently, and since 2003 Québec has been governed by a pro-federalist party.   On March 26, 2007, the Liberal Party of Québec, led by [[Jean Charest]], was elected to a minority government, with Mario Dumont's Action Démocratique Québec forming the official opposition. The former official opposition, the Parti Québecois led by André Boisclair, finished the election in third place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
The '''history of Quebec''' stretches from the French explorers and settlers of the 17th century to a modern secular province of Canada in the 21st century that stresses a commitment to the French language and asks whether it should be independence of [[Canada]].  The official name is &amp;quot;Quebec&amp;quot; since Confederation in 1867; previous names include &amp;quot;[[New France]],&amp;quot; (1534 to 1763), &amp;quot;Province of Quebec&amp;quot; (1763-91), &amp;quot;Lower Canada&amp;quot; (1791-1841), and &amp;quot;Canada East&amp;quot; in the Province of Canada (1841-67). From 1783 to 1867 it was part of the [[British Empire]] informally called '''British North America.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Along with Nova Scotia, Cape Breton (annexed to Nova Scotia in 1820), Upper Canada (Ontario),  St John's Island (Prince Edward Island), Newfoundland, the Hudson's Bay Company Territories, and some land belonging directly to the Crown.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New France===&lt;br /&gt;
For a history of Quebec prior to 1763, see [[New France]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===British Colonial rule===&lt;br /&gt;
The Anglo-French imperial rivalry, particularly the [[French and Indian War]] of 1754-1763, (the [[Seven Years War]]) found France and and Britain at war yet again. The key to control of North America was the fortress at Quebec, which the British were determined to capture. In 1759 Major General James Wolfe, exploiting Britain's superior navy, seized Quebec City after a long and destructive siege. Montreal surrendered in 1760, and three years later the Treaty of Paris transferred New France to British control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British renamed the colony the Province of Quebec as British officials replaced royal officials who returned to France. Otherwise there was little change. Merchants prospered in the towns, while the seigneurs as a class declined slightly. The habitants prospered for they had a hungry new market for their wheat in London. A few sent sent their sons to the seminaries in Quebec and Montreal or to the collèges classiques. These private schools, established after 1800, prepared young men for careers as priests, teachers, lawyers, and doctors, thereby creating for the first time an intellectual class that proved central to Quebec's political development. Some French Canadians took minor government posts; most remained in agriculture. Entrepreneurial immigrants from America and England came to monopolize trade and commerce, which centered in Quebec City and Montreal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
London's plan was to assimilate the 80,000 or so French-speaking Canadiens, attract English settlers from America, introduce English laws and procedures, create freehold tenure (by which farmers would own land not merely rent it), impose anti-Catholic oaths, and set up an elected legislature. But the Americans did not arrive and the French wanted no part of British legal or political forms. The first governor, Sir James Murray, recognized reality, allowed Mgr Jean-Olivier Briand to become the Catholic bishop (1766) and provided lower courts where Canadiens could be jurors and lawyers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A central theme in French Canadian historiography, especially as developed by the scholar Abbe [[Lionel Groulx]] in the mid-20th century, was the British Conquest of 1759. France abandoned Quebec, and rejected its own past by its anti-Catholic [[French Revolution]]. The Quebeckers became victims of British oppression and were targeted for assimilation. The short and long range goals of the people became simply &amp;quot;La Survivance&amp;quot;, the survival of the nation. Groulx argues the energies of the people had to be fully mobilized for this struggle, with the Church taking the lead as an anti-colonial and passive resistance movement dedicated to the preservation of the true religion in North America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Ronald Rudin, ''Making History in Twentieth-Century Quebec.'' (1997). ch 1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Quebec Act, 1774====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Quebec Act}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1774 the British Parliament, threatened by restless American colonies, sought Canadiens' loyalty by passing the [[Quebec Act]]. It became the Magna Carta of French-Canadian liberties, for it guaranteed basic rights, with an oath of loyalty to the Crown replacing the anti-Catholic oaths. The Roman Catholic Church gained official recognition, and the the Act enabled it legally to collect the tithe (a 10% tax on farm produce). Government was vested in a governor and a legislative council, which had full power of internal legislation and taxation. The French civil law was restored in place of English common law, although English criminal law was retained. In addition, the French language received official approval. Finally, the boundaries of Quebec were extended to the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. British concessions strengthened conservative Canadiens and made them loyal to the British Crown at the moment when revolution was sweeping the American colonies. Indeed, the Americans were especially angry with the Quebec Act because it gave Catholics generous new rights while Britain was cutting back on the rights of Americans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the Americans went to war with Britain in 1775 they called upon Canadians to revolt, and sent small armies in 1775-76 to remove British power. Many habitants sympathized with the Americans and formed regiments that fought under [[George Washington]]. Others supported the British; most remained neutral.  The British repulsed the Americans, who retreated home.  Quebec then became a base for the invasion of New York that was decisively defeated with the surrender of the main British army at Saratoga in 1777.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Loyalists settle the Eastern townships====&lt;br /&gt;
After the victory of the American Revolution, 50,000 or so [[Loyalists]] (American colonists loyal to the British Crown), migrated north to Canada. They brought along several thousand black slaves, for slavery was legal until 1833. Most Loyalists went to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, but about 6,000 arrived in Quebec, especially in the &amp;quot;Eastern townships&amp;quot; south of Montreal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See article in [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0002491 ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Their demands for a separate colony and English law led to the division of 1791, with ''Upper Canada&amp;quot; (later Ontario) separated from Quebec, which became '''Lower Canada'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anglican Church launched a well-funded initiative to build churches and support missionaries in the Eastern townships, thereby building loyalty to the Empire. The are enjoys abundant rainfall, numerous water mill sites, accessible conifer forests, plentiful supplies of fire wood, good grazing land, and rich mineral deposits. However, the growing season for crops is short, and much of the soil is also generally thin and rocky. Most of the best land fell into the hands of absentee proprietors by 1800, and they fought incessantly with squatters. Outside markets were relatively inaccessible before the arrival of the railway around 1850. The English-speaking agricultural and entrepreneurial elite began to transfer its capital and skills westward, replaced by French speaking farmers and Irish Catholics fleeing the Potato Famine in the 1840s.  The &amp;quot;bonne entente theory&amp;quot; of sociologist Leon Gerin argues that the new Francophone arrivals were influenced by their enterprising and independent-minded Yankee neighbours. By 1870 they were a majority, and by the 21st century only 10% are Anglophone (and most of them are Irish).  In the 1840s, school reforms required compromise with the strong localist traditions of the Eastern Townships region. The inhabitants displayed strong lingering American traditions. Local fund-raising for schools was a hotly contested issue throughout the 1840s, with many prominent citizens actively opposing levying taxes for that purpose. School taxes diminished the role of affluent individuals who supported local schools and made possible the subsidization of poorer, neighbouring schools. Educational control remained local despite legislation enacted in 1846, which repealed prior acts and required school commissioners to assess property.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; J. I. Little, ''State and Society in Transition: The Politics of Institutional Reform in the Eastern Townships 1832-1852.'' (1997)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the late 1840s Yankees felt that union with the United States would end their economic isolation and stagnation as well as remove them from the growing threat of French-Canadian political domination. Leading proponents of this genuinely bipartisan movement were careful not to appear disloyal to Britain, however, and they actively discouraged popular protest at the local level. Fearful of American-style democracy, the local elite also expressed revulsion toward American slavery and militaristic expansionism. Consequently, the movement died out in the Eastern Townships as it did in Montreal after Britain expressed its official disapproval and trade with the United States began to increase thanks to the opening of the [[Grand Trunk Railway]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. I. Little, &amp;quot;The Short Life of a Local Protest Movement: the Annexation Crisis of 1849-50 in the Eastern Townships.&amp;quot; ''Journal of the Canadian Historical Association'' 1992 3: 45-67. Issn: 0847-4478 [http://www.erudit.org/revue/jcha/1992/v3/n1/031044ar.pdf online edition] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the Eastern townships, the western portions of Quebec (which later became Ontario) were attractive to many thousands of nonpolitical [[Yankees]] from New England. Most French habitants were content with their location along the St. Lawrence, and few moved west.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Catholic Church====&lt;br /&gt;
Hardy (2007) examines the period from 1760 to 1840, showing the Catholic Church at all times exerted considerable influence in parishes and that Catholic habitants were respectful of the demands of their faith. By 1800 the Church adopted new ways to transform religious practice. It received the state's support, and after 1840 it benefited from the support of elites that emerged from the failed rebellions. From that date forward, the Church was given responsibility for the public education system. Consequently, the school became the most effective way to indoctrinate the populace, disseminate Catholic values, and transmit the Church's new directions in religious practices. The religious culture that gradually emerged from this vast acculturation offensive was a direct result of the continuation and outcome of actions undertaken by the clergy during the first half of the 19th century. The new religious culture was defined by the respect of mandatory religious practices; the enticement of indulgences used to soften the fires of purgatory; the wealth of devotion and religious ceremonies, which now covered the entire year and dictated a rhythm to the social calendar; and the manifestation of faith through processions, pilgrimages, actions, postures, and behaviors, which were visible testimonies of faith. This behavioral model quickly became the norm during the second half of the 19th century, and any deviation from it brought the community's sharp disapproval.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;René Hardy, &amp;quot;Regards sur la Construction de la Culture Catholique Quebecoise au XIX Siecle,&amp;quot; ''Canadian Historical Review'' 2007 88(1): 7-40. Issn: 0008-3755 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Province within Canada===&lt;br /&gt;
Ignace Bourget, Bishop of Montreal from 1840 to 1876, played a central role in strengthening French Canadian culture once Quebec became part of the English-dominated Canadian Federation, at the same time assuring the Catholic Church a dominant position in French Canadian cultural identity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ShowBio.asp?BioId=39507&amp;amp;query=Bourget ''Dictionary of Canadian Biography''] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Deliberately drawing on Rome rather than France for inspiration, he presided over the expansion of the Church's activities in Quebec, seeking to make religion more accessible to the people through an emotional appeal. By helping to create a network of religious, social, and even economic institutions for the Quebecois, Bourget contributed to the emergence of a traditional culture in a modern, urban space which would define French Canadian identity until the Quiet Revolution at the end of the 1960s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roberto Perin, &amp;quot;L'eglise et L'edification D'une Culture Publique au Quebec,&amp;quot; ''Etudes D'histoire Religieuse: Société Canadienne D'histoire De L'eglise Catholique'' 2001 67: 261-270. Issn: 0318-6172 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Political culture====&lt;br /&gt;
From 1840 to 1873 Montreal politics were dominated by wealthy English Protestants who also participated in provincial and federal politics. From 1873 to 1914 was a transition period with French Canadians generally in the majority in the city council, and with the mayors drawn from a wider variety of backgrounds. A new political type emerged after 1914, his power based on popularity rather than wealth, on social appeal rather than status, who views politics as a career.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Guy Bourassa, &amp;quot;Les Elites Politiques de Montreal: De L'Aristocratie a la Democratie,&amp;quot; ''The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science'' Vol. 31, No. 1. (Feb., 1965), pp. 35-51. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0315-4890%28196502%2931%3A1%3C35%3ALEPDMD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1867 to 1940, the Catholic Church played the primary role in Quebec in the development of both public education and family assistance, and the church actively promoted a virulent form of antistatism that opposed any government involvement in social affairs. A theological justification for antistatism explained that only the father, as head of his family, should be directly concerned with his family's welfare and with his children's education, which was controlled by the Catholic Church. Conservative politicians were content to ally themselves with the Church against any forms of liberal social interventionism. While there were some exceptions to the rule - primarily the social legislation passed by the Liberal government of Adélard Godbout during World War II - the role of the state did not really begin to change until 1945, when the national government of [[William Lyon Mackenzie King]] passed family assistance legislation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ralph Heintzman, &amp;quot;The Political Culture of Quebec, 1840-1960,&amp;quot; ''Canadian Journal of Political Science'' Vol. 16, No. 1. (Mar., 1983), pp. 3-59. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While scholars often emphasize traditionalism, ruralism, and antistatism as the dominant factors of Quebec's political culture prior to the 1960s, some Quebecois embraced progressivism early in the 20th century. Municipal government reform, one of the hallmarks of the progressive movement, cropped up in Canada's largest city, Montreal. It was led by Anglophones and remnants of Quebec's Parti Rouges, but support for reform came from a wide section of Montreal's French-speaking population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Alan Gordon, &amp;quot;Ward Heelers and Honest Men: Urban Quebecois Political Culture and the Montreal Reform of 1909.&amp;quot; ''Urban History Review'' 1995 23(2): 20-32. Issn: 0703-0428 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first decades of the 20th century saw an accelerated urbanization, which made anonymity possible and facilitated an escape from social constraints for those individuals who so wished.  Emigration to New England also offered a safety valve, as hundreds of thousands moved there permanently, finding work in the textile factories. This freedom from religious retribution and constraints played an important role and became a mitigating factor in the decline of the religious culture, a culture that slowly unraveled before being swept away by the Quiet Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
====Duplessis era====&lt;br /&gt;
Maurice Duplessis&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0002468 biography at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  was premier of Quebec during 1936-39 and 1944-59 and leader of the National Union Party (UN).  Until his death in 1959 he ran an authoritarianism government, with antilabor policies. He feared communism, cared little for industry, and promoted agriculture, which he considered a panacea for industrial evils. A Catholic and a French Canadian nationalist, he was a provincial conservative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most prominent nationalist spokesman in the era was Lionel Groulx (1878-1967), a Catholic priest whose histories of Quebec presented a conservative mission for the province.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Susan Mann Trofimenkoff, &amp;quot;Lionel Groulx,&amp;quot; in  [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Params=A1ARTA0003472 ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As professor of Canadian history at the Université de Montréal (1915-1949) he directly influenced the intellectual leaders of the era. The true Quebec, he argued, was based on the supremacy of the Church and family that challenged liberalism at all points. His organicist concept of the nation, in which the nation is understood as a &amp;quot;collective individual&amp;quot; with structured thought, brought Groulx to treat the individual as subordinate to the societal group. From this outlook, Groulx defended tradition and promoted a conception of education that aimed to foster the development of the national feeling of belonging. His conception of the state was also antiliberal, particularly because it rejected the distinction between the political and religious spheres.  Groulx found Duplessis distasteful, and welcomed the economic developments of the Quiet Revolution, realizing too late that it would destroy the Church's central role.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
===The Quiet Revolution of the 1960s===&lt;br /&gt;
The Quiet Revolution (Révolution Tranquille) of the 1960s saw a radical nonviolent transformation in the politics, society and economy of Quebec. A traditional people modernized the economy and the social structure, threw off Church control, rejected Anglo control of Quebec's economy, and finally sought, but failed, to gain independence from Canada. The Revolution was strongly promoted by the governments of Liberal Premier [[Jean Lesage]] (1960-66) and Premier [[Daniel Johnson]] (1966-68) of the opposition Union Nationale party.  The government nationalized hydroelectric utilities, created crown corporations, and undertook to provide the educational, health care, and social services formerly under Church control.  The Quiet Revolution has resulted in the ascendency of an enormous civil service in Quebec that is directed by a middle class technocracy allied with business interests to insure control of the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Political upheaval=====&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1950s Duplessis came under attack from a small but influential group of well-educated young French Canadian reformers, who took over and revived the Quebec Liberal Party. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1960 reformers defeated the Union Nationale and formed a government under Liberal [[Jean Lesage]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0004642 biography at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with the slogan &amp;quot;Maitres chez nous&amp;quot; (Masters in Our Own Home).  Reelected in 1962 by promising to nationalize the giant hydro-electricity industry, the Quebec Liberals initiated the '''Quiet Revolution'''--a program of economic, political, and educational reforms aimed at both modernizing the province and intensifying its French characteristics. In response to their demands for greater autonomy, Ottawa conceded an &amp;quot;opting-out&amp;quot; formula whereby Quebec was not required to participate in such federal welfare programs as the Canada Pension Plan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0001236 article at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but could instead receive an amount of federal money equal to that which would have been spent in the province under the Pension Plan. This &amp;quot;special status&amp;quot; for Quebec irritated many English-speaking Canadians, although it fell far short of satisfying the rapidly growing French Canadian separatist movement, which advocated complete independence for Quebec. Some separatist leaders began to resort to terrorism, and in 1963 there was a series of bombings in the English-speaking districts of Montreal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faced with a serious crisis, the national government of Prime Minister [[Lester Pearson]] appointed a royal commission to investigate the problems of bilingualism and biculturalism in Canada. The commission's report documented the economic disadvantages suffered by French Canadians and recommended full recognition of both French and English as equal official languages at the federal level and in the provinces of Quebec, New Brunswick, and Ontario. In administrative policy the Pearson government favored &amp;quot;cooperative federalism,&amp;quot; meaning continuous consultation between federal and provincial departments of government, as well as fairly frequent full-scale federal-provincial conferences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1966 the Lesage government in Quebec was defeated by the Union Nationale under Daniel Johnson,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0004149 biography at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which claimed to be even more vigorously nationalist than its opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Lesage's party won 47% of the vote to Johnson's 41%, but the Union Nationale won 56 seats vs 51 because its vote was concentrated in rural constituencies which were overrepresented. Claude  Ryan, &amp;quot;Quebec Changes Governments&amp;quot;. ''Foreign Affairs'' 1966 45(1): 148-161. Issn: 0015-7120 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Meanwhile, the Liberal government in Ottawa, which had been reelected in 1965, secured the final adoption of a distinctive national flag featuring the maple leaf as the nation's symbol. Another important piece of legislation was the National Medicare Act, which provided for joint federal-provincial financing of universal health care insurance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quebec's &amp;quot;psychological secession&amp;quot; from Canada came in five stages: the Quiet Revolution of 1960, the 1980 sovereignty-association vote, the constitutional process of 1980-82, the Meech Lake Accord process of 1987-90, and the 1992 Charlottetown Accord referendum. The 1995 referendum for independence, saw the narrow victory for the &amp;quot;no&amp;quot; side.  Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chrétien&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0001606 biography at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  announced three policy initiatives that promised to change unemployment insurance, to recognize Quebec as a distinct society, and to empower Quebec and certain other Canadian regions to veto changes to the federal constitution.  French-speaking Quebecois gradually replaced ethnic consciousness by allegiance to a &amp;quot;national state&amp;quot; on the territory of the province of Quebec.  The '''Parti Québécois''' (PQ) emerged as a dominant nationalist party, formed in 1968.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0006123 article in ''Canada Encyclopedia'' (2000)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  PQ succeeded in passing two important charters, the Québec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms (1975)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0009340 article at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and Bill 101, Charte de la langue française (1977)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0000744 article at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, marked this significant evolution of Quebecois collective identity. Bill 101 made French the official language of the government and of the courts in Quebec; more controversially it made French the normal language of the workplace, of instruction, of communications, of commerce and of business. Education in French became compulsory for immigrants, even those from other Canadian provinces. The failure of the 1980 referendum on independence, and the 1982 economic crisis, led to the return to power of Robert Bourassa's Liberals in 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The national government in Ottawa refused to countenance independence. Under the leadership of Prime Minister [[Pierre Trudeau]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ShowBio.asp?BioId=42553&amp;amp;query=quebec ''Dictionary of Canadian Biography''] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, himself a leader in the Quiet Revolution, Ottawa countered with the concept of a single Canadian nation. Trudeau's actions culminated with the 1982 Constitution and the national Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which Quebec never endorsed and still is considered illegitimate by many Quebecers. The root problem is that Canada, as it is conceived by Anglophone Canadians, does not seem compatible with an enduring Quebec identity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Louis Balthazar, &amp;quot;Canada in the Setting of the New Nationalism &lt;br /&gt;
Quebec and the Ideal of Federalism,&amp;quot; ''Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,''  Vol. 538, Being and Becoming Canada. (Mar., 1995), pp. 40-53. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-7162%28199503%29538%3C40%3AQATIOF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Quiet Revolution: Social upheaval====&lt;br /&gt;
In social terms, the [[Quiet Revolution]] undercut the authority of the Catholic Church in taking away the schools and indeed the unquestioned authority of parish priests. The Union Nationale, the political party of Duplessis, together with the Catholic clergy, had actively propagated an ideology of conservatism: the Quebecois were destined to be peasants, to guarantee the survival of the Catholic religion and of the French language in North America.  Gauvreau (2005) however reveals also a positive role that minority elements of the Church played in the origins of Quebec's Quiet Revolution. He argues that Catholic youth movements played a major positive role in the origin of the most profound of Quebec's multiple &amp;quot;quiet revolutions,&amp;quot; beginning with the Catholic youth movements in the 1930s. They introduced &amp;quot;personalism&amp;quot;, a philosophical movement from France that was a kind of neo-Thomism.  In creating an active youth movement reformers inside the Church in effect repudiated much of the historic traditionalism of a peasant society, such as patriarchal families and sexuality focused solely on producing large families rather than companionate marriages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Michael Gauvreau, &amp;quot;From Rechristianization to Contestation: Catholic Values and Quebec Society, 1931-1970,&amp;quot; ''Church History,'' Vol. 69, No. 4. (Dec., 2000), pp. 803-833 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0009-6407%28200012%2969%3A4%3C803%3AFRTCCV%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q in JSTOR]; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exodus from Catholicism began by 1960, with church attendance in Montreal plunging in half in the decade of the 1960s, with even faster declines in rural parishes. Young couple rejected the Church's renewed opposition to birth control.  The Quebec independence movement focused on language  and culture, and no longer saw Quebec as the stronghold of Catholicism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parent Report on education in the province of Quebec (1963-66) was a key part of the Quiet Revolution that modernized and democratized education in Quebec. The report's attempt at democratizing manifested itself through its recommendations to open access to all levels of education; to create the Ministry of Education as a central authority responsible for all aspects of education; to replace local, religion-based educational authorities with local and regional authorities whose members would be elected directly by the parents rather than the general public; and to reorganize education finance in order to make it more equal. The article assesses the degree to which these recommendations were implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Quiet Revolution moved the socialization of youth from private and social milieus, primarily the Church and family, to the public sphere, shaped by government policy, resulting in a more self-conscious socialization process. This process includes an emphasis on a shared francophone history and culture and on the importance of the French language to that culture. With new challenges to the institutionalization of the société distincte the state increasingly operates as a key agent of socialization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Politics====&lt;br /&gt;
On May 20th, 1980 a separatist government held a referendum on declaring independence from Canada.  This was defeated by a 60% to 40% vote. A second referendum was held on October 31st, 1995 and saw the separatist side lose again, but by less than two percentage points.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1993 national elections the Progressive Conservative Party collapsed and the official opposition became the avowedly separatist '''Bloc Québécois''', a new party formed in 1991 for the national parliament.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0000829 article at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Inside Quebec the PQ regained power in 1994 under the resolutely nationalist leader Jacques Parizeau, and called for a referendum in 1995 it was convinced would lead to immediate independence. Preparations were made for diplomatic recognition and an army, but the &amp;quot;no&amp;quot; votes prevailed by 1%, largely because of the intense opposition of non-Francophones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;Params=A1ARTA0010730 article at ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2000)], and Gregory S. Mahler, &amp;quot;Canadian Federalism and the 1995 Referendum: a Perspective from Outside of Quebec.&amp;quot; ''American Review of Canadian Studies'' 1995 25(4): 449-476. Issn: 0272-2011 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The separatists were narrowly defeated in the 30 October 1995 referendum by 53,500 votes. Anglophones (English-speakers) and immigrants voted &amp;quot;no&amp;quot; as they vigorously sought to maintain Quebec's allegiance to the Canadian government. Francophones, using language with racial undertones, continue to foster the cause of an independent Quebec. Led by charismatic Lucien Bouchard, the separatists displayed an insensitivity toward those outside their ethnic group and ignored the difficulties independence would place on the debt-ridden, economically depressed province.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; J. A. S. Evans, &amp;quot;The Present State of Canada.&amp;quot; ''Virginia Quarterly Review'' 1996 72(2): 213-225. Issn: 0042-675x Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
Before the 1960s the business and banking of Montreal and smaller cites was Anglophones; but by 2000 the business community was largely Francophone, particularly in management and the elite.  Some large corporations relocated their headquarters to Toronto and retained their Anglophone character.  Globalization strengthened the use of French. Foreign investment in new business increased, but the majority of foreign investment was in existing businesses. The provincial government implemented policies that supported successful exporting as well as other measures to stimulate an entrepreneurial business class.  The Quebec government established offices across the U.S. to promote trade, direct investment and tourism. The Parti Québécois has always experienced a lack of American support in its struggle for sovereignty, especially during the [[Bill Clinton]] administration in the 1990s. Agriculture, mining, and forestry declined, however.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Joseph Lemay, &amp;quot;The Impact of the Quiet Revolution: the Business Environment of Smaller Cities and Regions of Quebec 1960-2000.&amp;quot; ''Québec Studies'' 2002-03 (34): 19-30. Issn: 0737-3759; William F. Averyt, &amp;quot;Quebec's Economic Development Policies, 1960-1987: Between Étatisme and Privatisation.&amp;quot; ''American Review of Canadian Studies'' 1989 19(2): 159-175. Issn: 0272-2011  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ ''The Dictionary of Canadian Biography''] (1966-2006), thousands of scholarly biographies of notables who died by 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCESubjects&amp;amp;Params=A1 ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008)] reliable detailed encyclopedia, on-line free&lt;br /&gt;
* Armstrong, Robert. ''Structure and Change: An Economic History of Québec'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dickinson, John Alexander, and Brian Young. ''A Short History of Quebec'' (2003) [http://www.amazon.com/Short-History-Quebec-Alexander-Dickinson/dp/0773524509/ref=pd_bbs_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1199373095&amp;amp;sr=8-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Eccles, W. J.  ''The Canadian Frontier, 1534-1760'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=10657323 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Heintzman, Ralph. &amp;quot;The Political Culture of Quebec, 1840-1960,&amp;quot; ''Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique,'' Vol. 16, No. 1. (Mar., 1983), pp. 3-59. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0008-4239%28198303%2916%3A1%3C3%3ATPCOQ1%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lanctot, Gustave. ''A History of Canada'' 3 vol Toronto. 1963. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=3115015 Volume One: From its Origins to the Royal Régime, 1663; online], [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=98311761 Volume Two: From the Royal Régime to the Treaty of Utrecht, 1663-1713, online] &lt;br /&gt;
* Linteau, Paul-André, René Durocher, Jean-Claude Robert, and Robert Chodos. ''Quebec: A History 1867-1929'' (1983) ''Quebec Since 1930'' (1991), standard 2 vol textbook. &lt;br /&gt;
*  Moogk, Peter. ''La Nouvelle France: The Making of French Canada a Cultural History'' (2000) to 1763 [http://www.questia.com/library/book/la-nouvelle-france-the-making-of-french-canada-a-cultural-history-by-peter-moogk.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Trofimenkoff, Susan Mann. ''Dream of Nation: A Social and Intellectual History of Quebec'' (1982)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wade, Mason. ''The French Canadians, 1760-1945'' (1955), standard history, 1136pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=8474052 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Young, Brian and Dickinson, John A.  ''A Short History of Quebec: A Socio-Economic Perspective.'' (3rd ed. 2002. 238 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Before 1867===&lt;br /&gt;
* Brecher, Frank W. ''Losing a Continent: France's North American Policy, 1753-1763'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/Losing-Continent-American-1753-1763-Contributions/dp/0313307865/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205993021&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Creighton, Donald G. ''The Commercial Empire of the St. Lawrence, 1760-1850'' (1937) [http://www.questia.com/read/96753630?title=The%20Commercial%20Empire%20of%20the%20St.%20Lawrence%2c%201760-1850 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dechêne, Louise. ''Habitants and Merchants in Seventeenth-Century Montreal'' (1974; English ed. 2003), highly influential study from [[Annales School]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Egnal, Marc.  ''Divergent Paths: How Culture and Institutions Have Shaped North American Growth.'' (1996). 304 pp.  economic historian compares Quebec to U.S. 1750-1850&lt;br /&gt;
* Gossage, Peter.  ''Families in Transition: Industry and Population in Nineteenth-Century Saint-Hyacinthe.'' (1999). 299 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Greer, Allan ''The people of New France'' (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greer, Allan. ''The patriots and the people: the rebellion of 1837 in rural Lower Canada'' (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
* Greer, Allan. ''Peasant, Lord and Merchant: Rural Society in Three Quebec Parishes, 1740- 1840.'' (1985)&lt;br /&gt;
* Innis, Harold A. ''The Fur Trade in Canada'' (1930)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jaenen, Cornelius. ''Friend and Foe'' (1976) brief survey of French-Indian relations in the 16th &amp;amp; 17th centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Manning, Helen Taft; ''The Revolt of French Canada, 1800-1835: A Chapter of the History of the British Commonwealth'' (1962) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-revolt-of-french-canada-1800-1835-a-chapter-of-the-history-of-the-british-commonwealth-by-helen-taft-manning.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Miquelon, Dale. ''New France, 1701-1744: A Supplement to Europe'' (1989)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Moogk, Peter. ''La Nouvelle France: The Making of French Canada a Cultural History'' (2000) to 1763 [http://www.questia.com/library/book/la-nouvelle-france-the-making-of-french-canada-a-cultural-history-by-peter-moogk.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ouellet, Fernand. ''Lower Canada, 1791-1840: Social Change and Nationalism'' (1980), synthesis by leading scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*  Pritchard, James.  ''In Search of Empire: The French in the Americas, 1670-1730.'' (2004). 484 pp.  includes Louisiana, the Caribbean, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
* Trudel, Marcel. ''The Beginnings of New France 1524-1663'' (1973)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wrong, George McKinnon. ''The Fall of Canada: A Chapter in the History of the Seven Years' War'' (1914), 272pp [http://books.google.com/books?id=KfJBAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=intitle:history+intitle:canada&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1 full text online]  &lt;br /&gt;
* Young, Brian, ''George-Etienne Cartier: Montreal bourgeois'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Since 1867===&lt;br /&gt;
* Armstrong, Elizabeth H. ''The Crisis of Quebec, 1914-1918'' (1937) &lt;br /&gt;
* Betcherman, Lita-rose ''Ernest Lapointe: Mackenzie King's Great Quebec Lieutenant'' (2002) 438pp &lt;br /&gt;
*  Behiels, Michael D. ''Prelude to Quebec's Quiet Revolution: Liberalism Versus Neo-Nationalism, 1945-1960'' (1985) &lt;br /&gt;
* Black, Conrad.  ''Duplessis.'' (1977). 743 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bothwell, Robert.  ''Canada and Quebec: One Country, Two Histories.'' (1995). 269 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Clarkson, Stephen,  and Christina McCall. ''Trudeau and our times'' (2v., 1990–94)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cohen, Andrew, and J. L. Granatstein, eds. ''Trudeau's shadow: the life and legacy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau''. (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
* Couture, Claude,  and Vivien Bosley. ''Paddling with the Current: Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Etienne Parent, Liberalism, and Nationalism in Canada'' (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Gagnon, Alain-G., ed. ''Quebec, State and Society'' (3rd ed. 2004) 500pp; readings by experts&lt;br /&gt;
*  Gagnon, Alain-G. and Montcalm, Mary Beth.  ''Quebec beyond the Quiet Revolution.'' (2000) 221 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Gauvreau, Michael. ''The Catholic Origins of Quebec's Quiet Revolution, 1931-1970'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Grace, Robert J.  ''The Irish in Quebec: An Introduction to the Historiography.'' (1992)&lt;br /&gt;
* Langlois, Simon, ed.  ''Recent Social Trends in Quebec, 1960-1990.'' (1992). 606 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* McRoberts, Kenneth. ''Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis.'' (1988). &lt;br /&gt;
* Neatby, H. Blair. ''Laurier and a Liberal Quebec: A Study in Political Management'' (1973) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=8104462 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Quinn, Herbert F. ''The Union Nationale: A Study in Quebec Nationalism'' (1963) 254 pgs. [http://www.questia.com/read/2983146?title=The%20Union%20Nationale%3a%20A%20Study%20in%20Quebec%20Nationalism online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Robinson, Gertrude.  ''Constructing the Quebec Referendum: French and English Media Voices.'' (1998). 262 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
*  Saywell, John. ''The Rise of the Parti Québécois 1967-76'' (1977) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=1347933 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Stevenson, Garth.  ''Community Besieged: The Anglophone Minority and the Politics of Quebec.'' (1999). 363 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Thomson, Dale C.  ''Jean Lesage and the Quiet Revolution.'' (1984). 501 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Young, Robert A.  ''The Struggle for Quebec: From Referendum to Referendum?'' (1999). 210 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Montreal===&lt;br /&gt;
see also [[Montreal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Atherton, William Henry. ''Montreal, 1535-1914'' (1914) [http://books.google.com/books?id=RT1KUs2ax0sC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:montreal+date:1900-1922&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1&amp;amp;source=gbs_summary_s&amp;amp;cad=0 complete text online] &lt;br /&gt;
* Baillargeon, Denyse. ''Making Do: Women, Family and Home in Montreal during the Great Depression.'' (1999). 232 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Germain, Annick and Damaris, Rose. ''Montréal: The Quest for a Metropolis'' (2000). 306 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Historiography===&lt;br /&gt;
* Gagnon, Serge.  ''Quebec and Its Historians, 1840-1920.'' (1982). 161 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Havard, Gilles, and Cécile Vidal, &amp;quot;Making New France New Again: French historians rediscover their American past,&amp;quot; ''Common-Place'' (July 2007) v 7 #4 [http://www.common-place.org/vol-07/no-04/harvard/ online version]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ouellet, Fernand. ''Economy, class &amp;amp; nation in Quebec: Interpretive essays'' (1991), historiography &lt;br /&gt;
* Rudin, Ronald. ''Making History in Twentieth-Century Quebec'' (1997) [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;id=Bh5dDMnmFdQC&amp;amp;oi=fnd&amp;amp;pg=PR9&amp;amp;dq=historiography+quebec&amp;amp;ots=qc1xuagw7u&amp;amp;sig=jy5eKg_vKpxz_0NKEdvWnGQ8EKM excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Vidal, Cécile. &amp;quot;The Reluctance of French Historians to Address Atlantic History,&amp;quot; ''The Southern Quarterly'' 43:4 (2006): 153-189;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Cameron, David R., ed.  ''The Referendum Papers: Essays on Secession and National Unity.'' (1999). 430 pp &lt;br /&gt;
* Cook, Ramsay, ed. ''French-Canadian Nationalism: An Anthology'' (1969) &lt;br /&gt;
* Lamonde, Yvan and Corbo, Claude, eds. ''Le Rouge et le Bleu: Une Anthologie de la Pensée Politique au Québec de la Conquête à la Révolution Tranquille'' (1999). 576 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Lévesque, René. &amp;quot;For an Independent Quebec.&amp;quot; ''Foreign Affairs'' 1976 54(4): 734-744. The author was president of the Parti Québécois. Issn: 0015-7120 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/docs/index.htm Primary sources--texts]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/stats/index.htm Primary sources--statistics]]&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bonjourquebec.com/ Quebec Tourism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Provinces]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Quebec]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Canada]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ontario&amp;diff=702166</id>
		<title>Ontario</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ontario&amp;diff=702166"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T16:57:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ontario''' is a [[Canada|Canadian]] province, the third largest province by size, and the largest by population. Ontario rests between [[Manitoba]] and [[Québec]].  It is bordered by the American states of [[Michigan]], [[New York]], [[Ohio]], [[Pennsylvania]] and [[Minnesota]]. It also borders on Hudson Bay to the north. It contains the southernmost point in Canada, Middle Island, which is further south than some points of [[California]]. Ontario has the highest GDP in Canada and is the center of Canada's manufacturing industry. The vast north of Ontario has many mineral deposits and large forests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Toronto]] is the capital of Ontario, and the largest city in Canada.  [[Ottawa]], the capital of Canada is located on the Ontario-Quebec border.  &lt;br /&gt;
Ontario's current Premier is Dalton McGuinty, of the Liberal Party.&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ ''The Dictionary of Canadian Biography''] (1966-2006), thousands of scholarly biographies of notables who died by 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCESubjects&amp;amp;Params=A1 ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008)] reliable detailed encyclopedia, on-line free&lt;br /&gt;
*  Baskerville, Peter A.  ''Sites of Power: A Concise History of Ontario.'' Oxford U. Press., 2005. 296 pp.  (first edition was ''Ontario: Image, Identity and Power,'' 2002). [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=112191064889930 online review]&lt;br /&gt;
* Craig, Gerald. ''Upper Canada. The Formative Years 1784-1841'' (1968), the standard scholarly history of Ontario before 1841&lt;br /&gt;
* Hall, Roger; Westfall, William; and MacDowell, Laurel Sefton, eds.  ''Patterns of the Past: Interpreting Ontario's History.'' Dundurn Press, 1988. 406 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Halpern, Monda.  ''And on that Farm He Had a Wife: Ontario Farm Women and Feminism, 1900-1970.'' (2001). 234 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Johnson, J. K. and Wilson, Bruce G., eds.  ''Historical Essays on Upper Canada: New Perspectives.'' (1975). . 604 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Kilbourn, William.; ''The Firebrand: William Lyon Mackenzie and the Rebellion in Upper Canada'' (1956) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99227317 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Landon, Fred, and J.E. Middleton. ''Province of Ontario: A History'' (1937) 4 vol. with 2 vol of biographies&lt;br /&gt;
* Mays, John Bentley.  ''Arrivals: Stories from the History of Ontario.''  (2002). 418 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
*  Montigny, Edgar-Andre, and Lori Chambers, eds. ''Ontario since Confederation: A Reader'' (2000). &lt;br /&gt;
*  Moss, Mark.  ''Manliness and Militarism: Educating Young Boys in Ontario for War.'' (2001). 216 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Noël, Françoise. ''Family Life and Sociability in Upper and Lower Canada, 1780-1870.'' (2003) 384pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Noël, Françoise. ''Family and Community Life in Northeastern Ontario: The Interwar Years'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Noel, S. J. R.  ''Patrons, Clients, Brokers: Ontario Society and Politics, 1791-1896.'' (1990).  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ontario Bureau of Statistics and Research. ''A Conspectus of the Province of Ontario'' (1947) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99258086 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parr, Joy, ed.  ''A Diversity of Women: Ontario, 1945-1980.'' (1996). 335 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Rawlings-Way, Charles,  and Natalie Karneef. ''Toronto'' (2007) , guide book &lt;br /&gt;
* Rogers, Edward S. and Smith, Donald B., eds.  ''Aboriginal Ontario: Historical Perspectives on the First Nations.'' Dundurn, 1994. 448 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Schull, Joseph. ''Ontario since 1867'' (1978), narrative history&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Graham, ed.  ''The Government and Politics of Ontario.'' 5th ed. (1997). 458 pp.  university textbook&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Randall.  ''Ontario since 1985.'' Eastendbooks, 1998. 320 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
====notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ontariotravel.net/ Ontario Tourism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Provinces]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ontario&amp;diff=702165</id>
		<title>Ontario</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ontario&amp;diff=702165"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T16:56:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ontario''' is a [[Canada|Canadian]] province, the third largest province by size, and the largest by population.. Ontario rests between [[Manitoba]] and [[Québec]].  It is bordered by the American states of [[Michigan]], [[New York]], [[Ohio]], [[Pennsylvania]] and [[Minnesota]]. It also borders on Hudson Bay to the north. It contains the southernmost point in Canada, Middle Island, which is further south than some points of [[California]]. Ontario has the highest GDP in Canada and is the center of Canada's manufacturing industry. The vast north of Ontario has many mineral deposits and large forests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Toronto]] is the capital of Ontario, and the largest city in Canada.  [[Ottawa]], the capital of Canada is located on the Ontario-Quebec border.  &lt;br /&gt;
Ontario's current Premier is Dalton McGuinty, of the Liberal Party.&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ ''The Dictionary of Canadian Biography''] (1966-2006), thousands of scholarly biographies of notables who died by 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCESubjects&amp;amp;Params=A1 ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008)] reliable detailed encyclopedia, on-line free&lt;br /&gt;
*  Baskerville, Peter A.  ''Sites of Power: A Concise History of Ontario.'' Oxford U. Press., 2005. 296 pp.  (first edition was ''Ontario: Image, Identity and Power,'' 2002). [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=112191064889930 online review]&lt;br /&gt;
* Craig, Gerald. ''Upper Canada. The Formative Years 1784-1841'' (1968), the standard scholarly history of Ontario before 1841&lt;br /&gt;
* Hall, Roger; Westfall, William; and MacDowell, Laurel Sefton, eds.  ''Patterns of the Past: Interpreting Ontario's History.'' Dundurn Press, 1988. 406 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Halpern, Monda.  ''And on that Farm He Had a Wife: Ontario Farm Women and Feminism, 1900-1970.'' (2001). 234 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Johnson, J. K. and Wilson, Bruce G., eds.  ''Historical Essays on Upper Canada: New Perspectives.'' (1975). . 604 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Kilbourn, William.; ''The Firebrand: William Lyon Mackenzie and the Rebellion in Upper Canada'' (1956) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99227317 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Landon, Fred, and J.E. Middleton. ''Province of Ontario: A History'' (1937) 4 vol. with 2 vol of biographies&lt;br /&gt;
* Mays, John Bentley.  ''Arrivals: Stories from the History of Ontario.''  (2002). 418 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
*  Montigny, Edgar-Andre, and Lori Chambers, eds. ''Ontario since Confederation: A Reader'' (2000). &lt;br /&gt;
*  Moss, Mark.  ''Manliness and Militarism: Educating Young Boys in Ontario for War.'' (2001). 216 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Noël, Françoise. ''Family Life and Sociability in Upper and Lower Canada, 1780-1870.'' (2003) 384pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Noël, Françoise. ''Family and Community Life in Northeastern Ontario: The Interwar Years'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Noel, S. J. R.  ''Patrons, Clients, Brokers: Ontario Society and Politics, 1791-1896.'' (1990).  &lt;br /&gt;
* Ontario Bureau of Statistics and Research. ''A Conspectus of the Province of Ontario'' (1947) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99258086 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parr, Joy, ed.  ''A Diversity of Women: Ontario, 1945-1980.'' (1996). 335 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Rawlings-Way, Charles,  and Natalie Karneef. ''Toronto'' (2007) , guide book &lt;br /&gt;
* Rogers, Edward S. and Smith, Donald B., eds.  ''Aboriginal Ontario: Historical Perspectives on the First Nations.'' Dundurn, 1994. 448 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Schull, Joseph. ''Ontario since 1867'' (1978), narrative history&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Graham, ed.  ''The Government and Politics of Ontario.'' 5th ed. (1997). 458 pp.  university textbook&lt;br /&gt;
* White, Randall.  ''Ontario since 1985.'' Eastendbooks, 1998. 320 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
====notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ontariotravel.net/ Ontario Tourism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian Provinces]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lake_Huron&amp;diff=702164</id>
		<title>Lake Huron</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lake_Huron&amp;diff=702164"/>
		<updated>2009-09-20T16:56:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Lake Huron''' is one of the five [[Great Lake]]s found in [[North America]].  It forms a natural border between eastern [[Michigan]] and [[Ontario]], [[Canada]].  The largest island on an inland [[lake]], Manitoulin Island, is located in Lake Huron.  Georgian Bay, is a large bay  attached to Lake Huron, separated by the Bruce Peninsula.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Great Lakes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Satan&amp;diff=701948</id>
		<title>Satan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Satan&amp;diff=701948"/>
		<updated>2009-09-19T21:29:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: Undo revision 701947 by CharlieHa (Talk) VANDAL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:GustaveDoreParadiseLostSatanProfile.jpg|right|thumb|Gustave Doré's depiction of Satan from John Milton's Paradise Lost.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Satan''' (from the Hebrew &amp;quot;ha-satan&amp;quot;, meaning the &amp;quot;accuser&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;tempter&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;persecutor&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;calumniator&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;adversary&amp;quot;) was a member of the [[divine council]] of God referenced in the [[Old Testament]] in [[Job]].  He is referenced 11 times in Job and 4 other times in the Old Testament.  The [[New Testament]] mentions Satan 34 times in all starting with the first book [[Matthew]] and ending with the last [[Revelation]].  In the Christian tradition he rebelled against [[God]] and is now the enemy of God and man alike.  He is the father of lies and no good is found in him.  He leads a host of fallen angels (or [[demon]]s) who know their days are numbered before they will be cast in the [[lake of fire]] and they seek to take as many humans as possible with them.  Those who worship Satan are called [[satanism | Satanists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three classic defenses against Satan are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* mockery, which Satan cannot withstand due to his pride&lt;br /&gt;
* sunlight or exposure, from which Satan hides&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[Holy Spirit]], meaning &amp;quot;The Advocate&amp;quot; (i.e., defense lawyer), or the [[Armor of God]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ephesians 6:1-17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that Satan lacks self-restraint, which often leads him to failure.  In addition, Satan delights in [[deceit]], even to the point of causing his downfall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History and Goals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Christianity]] Satan's goal is to lead people away from the love of God, by tempting or tricking them. The only sources of supernatural power in the world are from either God (good) or Satan (evil).  In the book of [[Genesis]], Satan takes the form of a snake and tempts Eve with fruit from a tree.  This causes sin to come into the world.  Satan, in the Book of Job, listens to God speak highly of Job and accuses Job to God before the host of angels that Job praises God only because he is blessed and would curse God if he was forced to suffer.  God allows Satan to do what he will except to spare his life, and Satan causes Job to suffer immensely.  (Job remained true to God through his hardships; Satan accused him further and punished him further, but could not get Job to break).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] makes references to demonic possession on multiple occasions that He then casts out.  Some believe that Satan is able to possess and control living humans on Earth even today.  The Catholic church believes that priests (and sometimes only bishops) are able to [[exorcise]] this possession through Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[New Testament]], Satan tries to tempt [[Jesus]] in the desert, and fails.  Jesus warns extensively to beware of Satan as does [[Paul]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Satan, is also called by several different names (the Devil, deceiver, Bealzebub, Beelzebul, Lucifer, Dis, [[Asmodeus]], Abaddon, &amp;quot;Old Scratch,&amp;quot; the Crooked One, etc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notion of Satan, or an evil force, is noted in many if not all of the major world religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lucifer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lucifer''' is a name literally meaning &amp;quot;Son of the Morning&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Light-Bearer&amp;quot;), and is mentioned in the [[Bible]] only in the [[book of Isaiah]] (Isaiah 14:12). Though in Christian tradition Lucifer is equated with Satan, the immediate context of the passage is Isaiah's prophecy against the king of Babylon, and the name &amp;quot;Lucifer&amp;quot; was not present at all in the original manuscripts (in the Latin Vulgate, the phrase &amp;quot;Son of the Morning&amp;quot; was transliterated as a proper name).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whomever Lucifer may be, the Isaiah makes strong prophecy against him, condemning him for 5 pronouncements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I will ascend into [[heaven]]&lt;br /&gt;
* I will exalt my throne above the stars of God&lt;br /&gt;
* I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north&lt;br /&gt;
* I will ascend above the heights of the clouds&lt;br /&gt;
* I will be like the most High&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who take this passage to be a reference to Satan believe that it gives more history of what caused his downfall, that he was created by God as one of His most powerful angels (possibly a Seraphim), but that he fell from grace after he in his pride rebelled against his Creator. Some, however, believe that there is no grounding to interpret the passage as a history of Satan, citing that the passage uses highly figurative and poetic language that was meant as a prophecy against Babylon and nothing more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Paradise Lost 12.jpg|right|thumb|''The fall of Lucifer'' by Gustave Doré.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jewish Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Jewish tradition, Satan is an angel who faithfully serves God as a prosecuting attorney - one who accuses men of wickedness and impiety.  At the direction of God, Satan may be permitted to test these accusations, such as in Job.  In this view, Satan's goal is not to lead men away from their faithfulness to God, but merely to reveal the true depths of their devotion, although in [[I Chronicles]] 21:1 Satan provoked [[David]] to take a [[census]] of the people of Israel against the will of God and 70,000 men are slain because of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Abrahamic Religions]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DivineComedy}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=701896</id>
		<title>United States of America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=701896"/>
		<updated>2009-09-19T17:24:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: Undo revision 701895 by Scotsman (Talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''United States of America''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =US map.PNG&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of United States.png&lt;br /&gt;
|established=1776&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =50 star flag.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =United States arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Federal Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English&lt;br /&gt;
|official =n&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =3,718,695 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =301,554,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$13.049 trillion (2007&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$44,333 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=dollar&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''United States of America''' (commonly referred to as '''the United States''', '''the USA''', '''the US''', '''the States''', or simply as '''America''') is a North American nation that consists of a federal union of fifty individual states, along with territories and a capital district.  Founded originally as 13 colonies in the [[British Empire]], they united to become a nation on July 4, 1776 with the [[Declaration of Independence]]. After defeating Britain in the [[American Revolutionary War|War of Independence]], the U.S. expanded westward thanks to rapid growth from high birth rates, low death rates and high immigration from Europe and  Africa (slaves). It wrote a Constitution in 1787 that remains in effect today and is based on [[republican]] political principles. The Americans created the world's first political parties, and, since abolishing slavery in a bloody [[American Civil War|civil war]] in the 1860s, has been committed to democracy at home and abroad. Its capitalist economy grew rapidly, becoming the largest in the world by the 1870s. After defeating Communism in the [[Cold War]], the U.S. emerged as the world's only [[superpower]], boasting the largest economy and most powerful military. It exerts enormous cutural and intellectual influence worldwide, and in return is the target of the enemies of democracy and capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States has borders with [[Canada]] and [[Mexico]]. It is otherwise bounded by the [[Pacific Ocean]], the Bering Sea, the Arctic Ocean, the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Caribbean Sea. Two of the fifty states, [[Alaska]], an exclave, and [[Hawaii]], an archipelago, are not contiguous with any of the other states.  Puerto Rico, which is largely self governing, is part of the U.S., as are several smaller territories in the Pacific Ocean, such as Guam. Each of the 50 states has a certain level of sovereignty under the federal system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At over 3.7 million square miles (over 9.6 million km²), the U.S. (including its non-contiguous and overseas states and territories) is the third largest country by total area. It is the world's third most populous nation, with over 350 million people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Constitution and Politics in the United States==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:76485685i79.jpg|left|thumb|300px|The drafting committee presenting the [[Declaration of Independence]] to the [[Continental Congress]], painted by John Trumbull 1817–1819.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1776 and 1788, the United States was governed according to the [[Articles of Confederation]].  The [[Founding Fathers]] formally established the current structure of the United States by ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1788. Since 1789, that constitution has been the basic governing document. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. is politically dedicated to [[republicanism]] with its commitment to civic virtue, and opposition to corruption and aristocracy. Another characteristic is its strong emphasis on [[federalism]] and states' rights. The United States invented popular parties in the 1790s; currently the two major political parties are the [[Democratic Party]], and the [[Republican Party]]. Minor parties are of little importance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Role of Religion in Government ===&lt;br /&gt;
see [[Religion and U.S. Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
===Thirteen Colonies===&lt;br /&gt;
see [[Thirteen Colonies]]  [[Image:Pop1750.jpg|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===American Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
see [[American Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American Revolution arose from the conjunction of multiple factors.  The British victory in the French and Indian War ended the threat that foreign powers might attack the colonies; Britain's protection was no longer needed. At the same time Britain needed revenue to pay the war debts, and looked to the rich, fast-growing colonies for funding. The fatal mistake was to not ask the colonial legislatures; instead Britain imposed taxes without consultation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile the Americans had been adopting a new political philosophy, called [[republicanism]] that stressed civic virtue, fear of corruption, and disdain for aristocracy (there were no aristocrats in America apart from occasional British visitors). Republicanism alerted Americans to their constitutional rights as Englishmen--one right was the people through their elected officials set the taxes.  To Americans this meant their colonial legislatures, because they were not represented in the British Parliament. The British replied haughtily that Americans were &amp;quot;virtually represented&amp;quot; somehow. The tax on stamps in 1765 incited near rebellion, as the 13 separate colonies began meeting together and sharing their grievances. The stamp tax was repealed but others followed, especially the tax on tea. Americans boycotted tea and merchants refused to order it, except in Boston. There a well-organized group of patriots dumped the tea in the harbor at the [[Boston Tea Party]]. London was livid and sent troops and stripped Massachusetts of its self government and suspended the historic rights the colonists were so proud of. Now all 13 colonies started organizing shadow governments called &amp;quot;Committees of Correspondence&amp;quot; that prepared for the day &amp;quot;patriots&amp;quot; 9or &amp;quot;Whigs&amp;quot;) as they called themselves could assume all functions of local government. That day came when the British sent troops from Boston to seize gunpowder and the patriots gathered there.  The American &amp;quot;Minute men&amp;quot; (militia) had trained and planned for the day and they back at Lexington and Concord, and defeated elite British troops. The war had begun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 13 colonies, now organized as the &amp;quot;Continental COngress&amp;quot; now became a national government, as the shadow governments in each colony took control and ousted all royal officials. Congress set up a Continental Army and gave command to Virginia leader [[George Washington]]. he took charge in Boston, and forced the British to leave in spring 1776.  All 13 colonies were now under Patriot control, and they listened as [[Tom Paine]] explained in ''Common Sense'' that America was a strong and powerful nation in its own right and no longer needed a foreign king. Congress called on the colonies to make themselves states and write new constitutions. On July 4, 1776, Congress unanimously declared the independence of a new nation, the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
King [[George III]] could not abide the insolent Americans and he sent his small army and large navy to reconquer his lost colonies.  They did capture New York City, but little else. The powerful Royal navy gave the British command of the seas and the ability to land troops anywhere and capture any specific place, but the shortage of British soldiers, and the very long 3000 mile supply line, meant that the British could only hold a few points at any one time. Hiring German soldiers (Hessians) was necessary, but they were not enough, for the Patriots always had more available soldiers. The British expectations that Loyalist would rise up and overthrow the Patriots was a chimera; the Loyalists did provide some help to British invasion forces, but were never strong enough to operate on their own or control any territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France, humiliated by Britain in the 1760s, was stronger now and wanted revenge. It secretly armed and financed the Americans.  In 1777 the British sent a large army to invade New York and cut off the revolutionary states of New England. The plan was a disaster as the American militia captured the entire British invasion force at Saratoga. Encouraged by diplomat [[Benjamin Franklin]], the French now recognized the United States, signed a treaty of alliance, and entered the war against Britain. Later it brought in Span and the Netherlands as allies; Britain's diplomacy was so bad that it had no allies at all, and now was militarily matched or surpassed by the allies.  The British invasion of the South in 178-81 was designed to bring out Loyalist support, but it failed and the second major British army was captured at thew [[Battle of Yorktown]]. The British Parliament revolted at their reckless king and his incompetent government and sued for peace, which was achieved on terms favorable to the U.S. in 1783. About 20% of the Loyalists removed to Canada, but the others stayed, and the new peaceful nation resumed its rapid growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New Nation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1783, when the Treaty of Paris concluded the war of independence, the American population totalled some three million citizens and slaves living on about one million square miles of land.  Tens of thousands of [[Native Americans]] also lived in the [[Northwest Territory]] and the Southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Thirteen original states are [[Connecticut]], [[Delaware]], [[Georgia]], [[Maryland]], [[Massachusetts]] (including [[maine]]), [[New Hampshire]], [[New Jersey]], [[New York]], [[North Carolina]], [[Pennsylvania]], [[Rhode Island]], [[South Carolina]] and [[Virginia]].  In 1790, an agreement between supporters of Jefferson and those of [[Alexander Hamilton]] resulted in the creation of the [[District of Columbia]] from part of [[Maryland]]; it has served as the national capital since 1800.  The remainder of the 1783 territory was eventually organized as the states of [[Ohio]], [[Indiana]], [[Michigan]], [[Illinois]], [[Wisconsin]], [[Kentucky]], [[Tennessee]], [[Mississippi]] and [[Alabama]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1803, [[French]] emperor [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] took advantage of a lull in his war with Great Britain to sell the [[Louisiana Territory]] to the United States, more than doubling the nation's land area.  This territory would later be organized as the states of [[Minnesota]], [[North Dakota]], [[South Dakota]], [[Montana]], [[Wyoming]], [[Nebraska]], [[Iowa]], [[Missouri]], [[Arkansas]], [[Kansas]], [[Oklahoma]], and [[Louisiana]] proper.  President Jefferson commissioned [[Lewis and Clark]] to explore the new territory from 1802 to 1804.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. seized, then purchased [[Florida]] from Spain in 1819. [[Texas]] joined the United States in 1845 after winning its revolution against Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After victory the [[Mexican American War]] of 1846-48, the U.S. purchased via the [[Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo]] territory that became the states of [[California]], [[Nevada]], [[Utah]], [[Colorado]], [[New Mexico]] and [[Arizona]].  In 1846 the U.S. and Britain agreed that the 49th Parallel (degree of latitude) would serve as the boundary between the U. S. and [[British Columbia]] (now part of Canada). The American portion became the states of [[Washington]], [[Oregon]] and [[Idaho]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1867, the U.S. purchased [[Alaska]] from [[Russia]]. It became a state in 1960.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hawaii became an independent republic in 1894 and voluntarily joined the U.S. in 1898, becoming a state in 1960. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the [[Spanish-American War]], in which the United States took control of the [[Philippines]] and annexed [[Puerto Rico]] and [[Guam]].  The Phillipines became independent in 1946, after the U.S. reconquered the islands from Japan in World War II. [[Puerto Rico]] has occasionally held referenda that ratified its continuing unique &amp;quot;Commonwealth&amp;quot; status as part of the United States.  The residents of Puerto Rico are U.S. citizens.  Guam continues as a U.S. owned territory with full citizenship for its inhabitants. The people of Puerto Rico and Guam have a vote in presidential primaries and a voice, but not a vote, in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:56eugyjnm.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The [[White House]], the official home and workplace of the [[President of the United States]] of America.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Flag of the United States of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pledge of Allegiance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous American artists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of 50 states]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Americas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[America (continent)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/america.htm America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/flags_of_us_states.htm Flags of the U.S. States]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pibmug.com/files/map_test.swf Interactive map test of the 50 U.S. states]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb US universities}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Racism&amp;diff=701887</id>
		<title>Racism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Racism&amp;diff=701887"/>
		<updated>2009-09-19T16:51:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Racism and President Obama */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Racism''' is [[prejudice]] and [[discrimination]] based on [[race]].&lt;br /&gt;
An example is a claim that of inferiority or superiority based on the color of one's skin.  Another example was the [[Jim Crow]] laws. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Racism has come to mean the hatred of another person because of the color of his or her skin, or perceived difference in origin.  The doctrine of [[substantive due process]] in United States constitutional law can be used to invalidate racist laws.  Alternately, the [[Equal Protection|equal protection]] clause of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] can be used to do the same.  ''See e.g.'' [[Brown v. Board of Education]], 347 U.S. 483 (1954).&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Opposition to racism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Laird Wilcox]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a [[humanist]] anti-racism that focuses on [[reconciliation]] and [[healing]], that works to bring people together, that functions openly and honestly without the use of [[dossier]]s, [[spies]], specious [[lawsuit]]s, [[disinformation]], and that recognizes the [[right]]s of individuals whether they agree with one another or not. This is the anti-racism of good neighbors, of people helping people, of community goodwill, and of the realization that we are all [[human being]]s. ... On the other hand there is a vindictive and corrupt anti-racism that focuses on paybacks and [[punishment]], that demonizes and degrades its critics, that attempts to carve out [[special rights]] for its constituency, that opposes free and open discussion of ideas, that attempts to silence, [[censor]] and stifle its opposition through intimidation and harassment, and encourages [[law enforcement]] scrutiny of opponents because of their alleged [[values]], opinions and beliefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Watchdogs: A Close Look at Anti-Racist &amp;quot;Watchdog&amp;quot; Groups'', Laird Wilcox, Editorial Research Service, 1999, pg. 3. ISBN 0-993592-96-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Racism and President Obama==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009, some on the political far-left began a campaign to portray those expressing any sort of opposition to President Obama as being motivated by racism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maureen Dowd wrote an op-ed piece slamming Representative Joe Wilson's &amp;quot;You lie!&amp;quot; outburst as racist, ridiculously claiming she &amp;quot;heard.. an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/opinion/13dowd.html?_r=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most obsessive purveyors of the racism claim is MS-NBC's Keith Olbermann.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rhk_r3oqVw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former president Jimmy Carter also lent his voice to the racism charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/09/17/2009-09-17_jimmy_carter_gets_flak_for_racism_charge__even_from_white_house.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These attacks continue despite the White House's assertion that &amp;quot;[t]he President does not believe that criticism comes based on the color of his skin.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to noted conservative commentator [[Glenn Beck]], Obama is a racist with a &amp;quot;deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/07/29/2009-07-29_fox_news_glenn_beck_president_barack_obama_is_racist_with_deepseated_hatred_of_w.html} &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ku Klux Klan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nazism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reverse racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/racism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Racism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Permanent_revolution&amp;diff=701833</id>
		<title>Permanent revolution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Permanent_revolution&amp;diff=701833"/>
		<updated>2009-09-19T12:07:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Further reading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Permanent Revolution''' is a plan for the overthrow of capitalism throughout the world, as envisioned by Bolshevik leader [[Leon Trotsky]] in 1905.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist theory from the days of Karl Marx had stated that the socialist revolution would automatically happen some years after capitalism and the bourgeoisie had triumphed over feudalism. It would happen when the industrial proletariat, organized by the party, overthrows capitalism in advanced industrial states. Thee revolution, according to this theory, could not happen in undeveloped countries like Russia in 1905 because they had not yet reached the proper stage of development. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet the left hoped to start a revolution in Russia--it almost succeeded in 1905 and did succeed in 1917. Trotsky was there to adjust Marxist theory to real life. He argued for an immediate seizure of power everywhere in order to telescope the bourgeois and socialist revolutions into one seamless sequence. That was &amp;quot;permanent revolution.&amp;quot; Trotsky maintained that revolution would spread worldwide after the international proletariat's aid to the Russian workers, who in turn would 'export' the revolution abroad. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Joseph Stalin]] had an opposing viewpoint. Stalin's thesis on socialism in one country, launched in 1926, brought Trotsky into conflict with the Bolshevik leadership, eager to exploit his real and alleged divergences from Marxism-Leninism.  Trotsky broke with Stalin by 1928 and was expelled from Russia. Before he was murdered at Stalin's command in 1940 Trotsky preached &amp;quot;permanent revolution&amp;quot; as a rallying cry for the anti-capitalist far left.  His ideas caused considerable disruption in the Communist movement. In China [[Mao Zedong]] adapted Trotsky's ideas to his need to base a revolution on he peasantry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paleoconservative]] historians in recent years have alleged that [[Neoconservatives]] believe in the Trotskyite Permanent Revolution because most of them came out of the Trotskyite cause in the 1930s. That is false.  There are four fundamental flaws in the paleoconservatives' attack: most of the neoconservatives were never Trotskyites; none of them ever subscribed to the right-wing Socialism of Max Shachtman; the assertion that neoconservatives subscribe to 'inverted Trotskyism' is misleading; and neoconservatives advocate democratic globalism, not permanent revolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See King (2005) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Thus very few neoconservatives ever were Trotskyites, and even those discarded permanent Revolution when they rejected all forms of Communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[Irving Kristol]] for a while was a Trotskyite. As he noted, &amp;quot;I’ve been a neo-something: a neo-Marxist, a neo-Trotskyist, a neo-liberal, a neo-conservative and, in religion, always a neo-orthodox, even while I was a neo-Trotskyist and a neo-Marxist.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* James, C.L.R. ''World Revolution 1917-1936: The Rise and Fall of the Communist International.'' New York: Pioneer Publishers, 1937.&lt;br /&gt;
* King, William F. &amp;quot;Neoconservatives and 'Trotskyism'.&amp;quot; ''American Communist History'' 2004 3(2): 247-266&lt;br /&gt;
* Thatcher, Ian. &amp;quot;Leon Trotsky and 1905&amp;quot; ''History Review,'' Sept 2005, Issue 52, pp 21-25, in [[EBSCO]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Trotsky, Leon. ''The Age of Permanent Revolution: A Trotsky Anthology'' ed. by Isaac Deutscher (1965); primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Ree, Erik. &amp;quot;Socialism in One Country: A Reassessment.&amp;quot;  ''Studies in East European Thought,'' June 1998, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p77-117&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Scotsman&amp;diff=701341</id>
		<title>The Scotsman</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Scotsman&amp;diff=701341"/>
		<updated>2009-09-18T01:36:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: another liberal British paper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''The Scotsman''' is a daily newspaper published in [[Edinburgh]] and circulating largely in [[Scotland]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was founded in 1817, and was initially seen as a radical publication although inow follows a mainstream Scottish liberal line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rampantscotland.com/features/bldev_scotsman.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is currently owned by the Johnston Press group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Scotland]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_News_Of_The_World&amp;diff=701340</id>
		<title>The News Of The World</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_News_Of_The_World&amp;diff=701340"/>
		<updated>2009-09-18T01:35:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: another liberal British paper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''The News Of The World''' is a British Sunday tabloid [[newspaper]] published by the [[News Corporation]]. Its stock-in-trade is celebrity gossip, salacious tittle-tattle, sensationalised crime stories, and sport; where it covers politics, it takes a [[liberal]] line.&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sunday_Post&amp;diff=701339</id>
		<title>Sunday Post</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sunday_Post&amp;diff=701339"/>
		<updated>2009-09-18T01:35:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: another liberal British paper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Sunday Post''' is a Sunday newspaper published by [[D.C. Thomson]] of [[Dundee]]; it circulates mainly in [[Scotland]] and the north of [[England]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sundaypost.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It is noted for its liberal political and social ethos and its homey, even folksy style. It is also well-known for two full-page cartoon series published on alternate weeks and celebrating family life in small-town Scotland: [[The Broons]] and [[Oor Wullie]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Daily_Mail&amp;diff=701338</id>
		<title>Daily Mail</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Daily_Mail&amp;diff=701338"/>
		<updated>2009-09-18T01:34:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: another liberal British paper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Dail Mail front page.jpg|right|thumb|250px|July 15 2005 edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''''Daily Mail''''' is the second biggest selling British [[tabloid]] newspaper, and possibly the least [[liberal]] in its editorial stances. It has a Sunday edition called ''The Mail on Sunday''. Its two million plus circulation is one of the largest of any daily newspaper in English. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/dailymail/home.html?in_page_id=1766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Daily Mail'' was founded as a [[broadsheet]] newspaper in 1896, but changed to a tabloid format 75 years later. Its closest rival in terms of being less liberal is the ''[[Daily Express]]'', which sells far fewer copies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it was launched by Alfred and Harold Harmsworth (who later became respectively [[Lord Northcliffe]] and [[Lord Rothermere]]) it made an unashamed bid for the mass market. It was published at half the price of other newspapers, and kept its coverage both more concise and more populist. This approach led to it being highly successful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Taylor, S. J. ''The Great Outsiders: Northcliffe, Rothermere and the Daily Mail.'' &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Daily Mail'' also set out to be entertaining, using in particular competitions as a means of promotion, and focusing on human-interest stories as a way of attracting readers to whom in-depth political analysis did not appeal. Among other promotions, they began the [[Ideal Home Exhibition]], which continues to be held in [[London]] every year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The paper lost circulation during [[World War I]], when it spoke out in favor of [[conscription]] after the outbreak of war, and particularly when it attacked [[Herbert Kitchener|Lord Kitchener]], who was at that time a national hero. It was accused by the Prime Minister, [[Herbert Asquith]], of disloyalty to the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the resignation of Asquith, [[David Lloyd George]] asked Lord Northcliffe to join his cabinet, but Northcliffe refused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1920s==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Northcliffe died in 1922, his brother Lord Rothermere took control. It was under his regime that the ''Daily Mail'' published the [[Zinoviev Letter]], a forgery that seemed to indicate that the [[Communist Party of Great Britain]] was planning a violent revolution. Many people believed this was responsible for the defeat of the [[Labour Party]] in the 1924 general election held a few days later, and since then some Labour party members have been known to refer to the ''Daily Mail'' as “The Forgers’ Gazette”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1930s==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1930s, the ''Daily Mail'' was politically sympathetic to [[fascism]], and Lord Rothermere wrote articles praising the [[British Union of Fascists]] and  their leader [[Oswald Mosley]] in particular for showing “sound, commonsense, Conservative doctrine”. One headline notoriously read &amp;quot;Hurrah for the Blackshirts&amp;quot;. However, he toned down his support after the Fascist party was involved in street violence. The ''Mail''’s political stance was also influenced by Rothermere’s personal friendship with both [[Benito Mussolini]] and [[Adolf Hitler]] and his [[Nazi Party]] – the only newspaper to support them both consistently. Rothermere sent Hitler a telegram of congratulations after Germany invaded the [[Sudetenland]] in 1938. The paper also published ''[[The Protocols of The Elders of Zion]]'' in serial form, and ran inflammatory articles about Jewish immigrants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Griffiths, Richard. ''Fellow Travellers of the Right: British Enthusiasts for Nazi Germany, 1933-39''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Neville Chamberlain]]’s [[appeasement]] policy was supported by the ''Daily Mail'' until after the [[Munich Agreement]], but the newspaper changed its stance after the Nazi invasion of [[Hungary]] in 1939. This change of attitude may have been influenced by Chamberlain’s threat to close them down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent history==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fortunes of the ''Daily Mail'' were revived after a decline in the 1950s by its then-editor Sir David English, and its current editor Paul Dacre continues that trend. He has widened the paper’s market by launching an Irish edition and a summarized edition for UK expatriates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political and editorial stances==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Daily Mail'' claims to represent Middle England and Conservative values, opposing the [[liberal]] establishment. It generally opposes the [[European Union]] and the increasing trend to see Britain as part of [[Europe]]. It is usually against immigration, although it has supported the wish of white asylum-seekers from [[Zimbabwe]] to remain in [[Britain]]. It is generally against [[abortion]] and in favour of the [[monarchy]], tax cuts and harsher penalties for criminals. It is generally supportive of [[Israel]], although it has recently been attacked for its lack of support for the war in [[Iraq]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It generally takes a strong stand against criminality. It is often referred to by the left wing press as &amp;quot;The Hate Mail&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;The Daily Hate&amp;quot;, because of a quotation from Lord Northcliffe that said the formula for success was to give readers a &amp;quot;daily hate&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It perceives many public media such as the [[British Broadcasting Corporation|BBC]] as biased to the left politically. Its columnists tend to be politically right-wing. It endorses the [[Conservative Party]] in most elections, and publicly repudiates groups like the [[British National Party]], who are associated with far-right politics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mail is often accused of fear mongering with numerous health scare articles (recent examples include &amp;quot;How using Facebook could raise your risk of cancer&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Mouthwash 'causes oral cancer' and should be pulled from supermarkets, say experts&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers|Daily Mail]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Daily_Express&amp;diff=701337</id>
		<title>Daily Express</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Daily_Express&amp;diff=701337"/>
		<updated>2009-09-18T01:32:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: another liberal British paper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Daily Express front page.jpg|right|thumb|250px|July 22 2005 edition]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Daily Express''' is a [[liberal]] [[British]] tabloid [[newspaper]] published by Express Newspapers. It has a daily circulation of over 760,000. Founded in 1900, it switched from  broadsheet to [[tabloid]] format in 1977. It is a frequent target of criticism by [[liberal]]s and ''[[The Guardian]]'', who accuse it of being nationalistic, [[Xenophobia|xenophobic]] and [[Homophobia|homophobic]]. Despite professing family values, the newspaper is part of the Northern and Shell Group, which publishes pornographic magazines and owns the pornographic Television X tv channels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mediauk.com/owners/35/northern-and-shell&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Times_of_London&amp;diff=701330</id>
		<title>The Times of London</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Times_of_London&amp;diff=701330"/>
		<updated>2009-09-18T00:56:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: another liberal British paper&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''The Times''''' is a leading, and well respected, British daily newspaper founded in 1785 as ''The Daily Universal Register'', changing its name to ''The Times'' in 1788. Nicknamed &amp;quot;The Thunderer&amp;quot;, it is regarded as the newspaper of the British Establishment and [[Tories]] and has traditionally followed a liberal political line, sometimes embarrassingly so, as with its editorial support of [[appeasement]] in the 1930s. The paper was closed down by an industrial dispute between December 1978 and November 1979. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1981, ''The Times'' and associated titles have been owned by [[News Corporation]], a giant global mainstream media conglomerate owned by [[Rupert Murdoch]], who owns newspapers and television stations around the world, including ''The Sun'' (UK), Sky TV (UK), Fox TV (USA), Fox News (USA) and Fox Movie Studios (USA). In 1986 the newspaper editorial and production facilities were moved from central London (near [[Fleet Street]]) to a new site at [[Wapping]] in east London, where modernised plant and working methods were to be employed. This prompted a year-long strike by printworkers, accompanied by picket-line violence, but production of the newspaper was never completely interrupted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative news organizations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Daily_Telegraph&amp;diff=701056</id>
		<title>Daily Telegraph</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Daily_Telegraph&amp;diff=701056"/>
		<updated>2009-09-17T02:12:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: Changed to reflect front page story re: British liberal press which quotes the DT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Daily Telegraph''' is a [[British]] [[daily newspaper]] founded in 1855. It follows a traditionally [[liberal]] political line, and is the largest-selling 'quality' newspaper in the [[United Kingdom]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Newspapers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Deal&amp;diff=700037</id>
		<title>New Deal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Deal&amp;diff=700037"/>
		<updated>2009-09-13T00:21:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Deal''' was the name coined by President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]], for otherwise disjointed [[Socialism|socialist]] programs he conducted throughout the [[Great Depression]], especially from 1933-36. His program had three stated aspects: Relief, Recovery and Reform, although the extent to which it achieved these is at best debatable. It sought to provide immediate Relief for the millions of unemployed in the [[Great Depression]]. It was intended to promote Recovery of the economy to normal standards--a goal he did not fully achieve. It involved a series of Reforms, especially in the financial system and labor relations. The basic issue was how to deal with the severely damaged economy --and great social misery--caused by three years of the [[Great Depression]].  Conservatives endorsed parts of the '''First New Deal''' (the 1933 programs)  and rejected the more radical '''Second New Deal''' (the 1934-35 programs).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was popular among voters leading to the formation of the [[New Deal Coalition]], which made the Democrats the majority party during the [[Fifth Party System]] into the 1960s. However a [[Conservative Coalition]] took control of Congress in 1937 and  blocked nearly all additional programs; during the war years (1941-45) the conservatives successfully rolled back many of the relief efforts on the grounds they were no longer needed since full employment was achieved.  The &amp;quot;reforms&amp;quot; that regulated the economy were mostly dropped in the deregulation era (1974-87), except for oversight of Wall Street buy the [[SEC]], which conservatives approved because it increased investor confidence.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Deal Coalition]] dominated national politics until it split apart in the 1960s. Ever since it has been the holy grail of liberals seeking to restore their former glory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the New Deal did not fully solve the economic catastrophe that was on the verge of destroying the US economy in early 1933, it achieved many of its objectives and the period of 1933-37 saw some sectors return to economic growth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Broker State==&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal created the &amp;quot;Broker State&amp;quot;, where different interest groups compete in the national market. The government became a mediator between those interest groups, giving power to those who has enough political and economic power to demand it. One of the limitations of this Broker States was that minority groups were often ignored since they did not have political power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic planning==&lt;br /&gt;
As the Depression set in, terms like “[[planned economy]]” and “national planning” became the watchwords of the day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1468 ''FDR: The Man, the Leader, the Legacy''], Ralph Raico, Future of Freedom Foundation, April 1, 2001. Retreived from The Independent Institute.org 06/17/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They had been used by theoriticians for years and popularized by best-selling writers like George Soule and Stuart Chase, who lauded the Soviet Gosplan (central planning), asking plaintively, “Why should the Russians have all the fun of remaking a world?” One prominent [[Brain Trust]]ers was [[Rexford Guy Tugwell]]. Tugwell was a follower of the school of thought known as &amp;quot;Institutional Economics&amp;quot;. His official position was assistant secretary of agriculture, that is, second in command to [[Henry A. Wallace]], but his influence extended far beyond that. Tugwell had traveled to the Soviet Union in 1927 and observed through scientific economic planning the Soviets were able to “carry out their industrial operations with a completely thought-out program.” “The future,” he announced, “is becoming visible in Russia.”  Tugwell scorned the [[free market]] as anarchical, an uncoordinated muddle of hopelessly conflicting aims and purposes. It would have to be replaced by national planning, or technocracy, another shibboleth of the day, implying rule by the technical experts and managers, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Burnham, ''The Managerial Revolution'', (1966).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; like himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==First and Second New Deals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians distinguish between the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; of 1933, which had something for almost every group, and the &amp;quot;Second New Deal&amp;quot; (1935–36), which introduced class conflict, especially between business and labor unions.   The First New Deal (1933-34) included many &amp;quot;alphabet agencies&amp;quot;, notably ([[AAA]], [[CCC]], [[FERA]], CWA, [[FHA]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.fha.com/fha_loans.cfm Federal Housing Administration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[FDIC]]&amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.fdic.gov/ FDIC - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[NRA]], [[PWA]], [[TVA]], [[SEC]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml SEC - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Second New Deal, started in 1934-35 included the [[WPA]], a giant relief agency, and Social Security&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  See [http://www.ssa.gov/history/history.html SSA - Social Security History]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, as well as the [[NLRA]] or &amp;quot;Wagner Act&amp;quot; that promoted rapid growth of labor unions. The opponents of the New Deal, complaining of the cost and the shift of power to Washington, stopped its expansion by 1937, and abolished many of its programs by 1943. The Supreme Court ruled several programs unconstitutional (some parts of them were soon replaced, except for the NRA). The main New Deal programs still in existence today are Social Security the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] (FDIC) and the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] (SEC) which regulates Wall Street.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Other major programs that still exist under their original names include the, the [[Federal Housing Administration]] (FHA)[http://www.fha.com/fha_loans.cfm Federal Housing Administration]and the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA)[http://www.tva.gov/abouttva/history.htm TVA]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign policy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see [[World Economic Conference of 1933]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In foreign policy the New Deal pursued isolationism, set in motion by Roosevelt's &amp;quot;bombshell message&amp;quot; to the [[World Economic Conference of 1933]] which ended efforts to stabilize  international exchange rates. Roosevelt--acting against the advice of his top aides--feared that cooperation with major nations would limit his abilities to manipulate the money supply and end the [[deflation]] that was a crippling element of the depression.  The major nations were appalled.  Nazi Germany, which promoted autarchy, rejoiced for it gained a free hand to expand its economic power across the globe.  A series of Neutrality Laws (see [[Neutrality Act]]) were passed that prohibited American business from selling munitions to nations at war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a peculiar affinity between the New Deal and the European dictatorships that on occasion extended even to [[fascism]] and [[national socialism]]  Early on, FDR referred to [[Benito Mussolini]] as “the admirable Italian gentlemen,” stating to his ambassador in Rome, “I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.&amp;quot;  Mussolini, in turn, was flattered by what he saw as the New Deal’s copying of his own corporate state, in the [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA) and other early measures.  Even [[Hitler]] had kind words at first for Roosevelt’s “dynamic” leadership, stating that “I have sympathy with President Roosevelt because he marches straight to his objective over Congress, over lobbies, over stubborn bureaucracies.”   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What linked the New Deal to the regimes in Italy and Germany, as well as in Soviet Russia, was their fellowship in the wave of [[collectivism]] that was sweeping the world. In an essay published in 1933, [[John Maynard Keynes]] observed this trend, and expressed his sympathy with the “variety of politico-economic experiments” under way in the continental dictatorships as well as in the United States. All of them, he gloated, were turning their backs on the old, discredited [[laissez-faire]] and embracing national planning in one form or another.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was a kinder, gentler form of the collectivism.  In all of the national planning schemes, government gained power at the expense of the people, with the leaders seeking to impose a philosophy of life that subordinated the individual to the needs of the community—as defined by the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt and the State Department promoted a &amp;quot;Good Neighbor&amp;quot; policy toward Latin America, which meant that the U.S. would no longer try to prevent or overthrow dictatorships or governments ruinous to the people. An immediate result was the takeover of [[Cuba]] by a military dictatorship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally realizing the dangers posed by the Nazis, Roosevelt reversed course in 1938 and sought to repeal the neutrality laws.  However not all the New Dealers went along with FDR; many remained isolationist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relief, Recovery, and Reform==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal had three components: direct relief, economic recovery, and financial reform; these were also called the 'Three Rs'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Relief'' was the immediate effort to help the one-third of the population that was hardest hit by the depression.  Roosevelt expanded Hoover's [[Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA) work relief program, and added the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), and (starting in 1935) the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA).  In 1935 the social security and unemployment insurance programs were added.  Separate programs were set up for relief in rural America, such as the [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA) and [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA).  These work relief programs have been praised by most economists in retrospect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Parker 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[Milton Friedman]] who after taking a graduate degree in economics was employed by the WPA to analyze family budgets and studied the hardships of families said that, at the time, he and his wife &amp;quot;regarded [these job-creation programs] appropriate responses to the critical situation&amp;quot; but not &amp;quot;the price- and wage-fixing measures of the National Recovery Administration and the Agricultural Adjustment Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Friedman, ''Two Lucky People''  (1998) p. 59.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Recovery'' was the effort in numerous programs to restore the economy to normal health.  By most economic indicators this was achieved by 1937--except for unemployment, which remained stubbornly high until World War II began.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Reform'' was based on the assumption that the depression was caused by the inherent instability of the market and that government intervention was necessary to rationalize and stabilize the economy, and to balance the interests of farmers, business and labor. It included the [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA, 1933) (which ended in 1935), regulation of Wall Street ([[SEC]], 1934), the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) farm programs (1933 and 1938), insurance of bank deposits ([[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] 1933) and the [[Wagner Act]] (1935)encouraging workers to organize into labor unions.  Despite urgings by some New Dealers, there was no major anti-trust program.  Roosevelt rejected the opportunity to take over banks and railroads. He did not support state ownership of factories, and only one major program, the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (1933), involved government ownership of the means of production.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Recovery Act (NRA) and the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA) were  plans to take the whole industrial and agricultural life of the country under the wing of the government, organize it into vast farm and [[industrial cartel]]s, as they were called in Germany, [[corporative]]s as they were called in Italy, and operate business and the farms under plans made and carried out under the supervision of government. This is the complete negation of [[classical liberalism]]. It is, in fact, the essence of [[fascism]]. Fascism goes one step further and insists this cannot be done by a [[democracy|democratic]] government; that it can be done successfully only under a [[totalitarian]] regime. At the time fascism was not defined as [[anti-Semitism]]. It was a word used to describe the political system of Italian Premier [[Benito Mussolini]]. Roosevelt adopted the Italian model merely because at the moment it seemed politically expedient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1934, the Supreme Court began declaring significant parts of the New Deal unconstitutional.  The programs were quickly fixed to pass muster, but in 1937 Roosevelt stunned the nation by a surprise proposal to pack the Supreme Court by adding five new justices. The proposal failed and Roosevelt permanently alienated many conservative Democrats; however the Supreme Court started upholding New Deal laws. Justices then started retiring, allowing Roosevelt to select a majority of the Court. By 1942, the Supreme Court had almost completely abandoned its &amp;quot;judicial activism&amp;quot; of striking down congressional laws. The Supreme Court ruled in ''[[Wickard v. Filburn]]'' that the [[Commerce Clause]] covered almost all such regulation allowing the necessary expansion of federal power to make the New Deal &amp;quot;constitutional&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two old words now took on new meaning. &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; no longer referred to [[classical liberalism]] but now meant a supporter of the New Deal; conservative meant upholding the Constitution.  Whether the New Deal was successful is usually approached not as a historical problem, but as a current debate whether the New Deal should be a model for government today, complicated by its conflicting goals of promising something for nothing for everyone. Liberals  continue to battle conservatives.  The term &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; is also used to describe the [[New Deal Coalition]] that Roosevelt created to support his programs, including the Democratic party, big city machines, labor unions, Catholic and Jewish minorities, African Americans, farmers, and most Southern whites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Origins of the New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 29th of October, 1929, the flight of capital from the over valued U.S. stock market set off a downward spiral in employment and growth in every part of the globe known as the [[Great Depression]]. Although statistics were not kept it was later estimated unemployment in the U.S. increased from 4% to 25% between 1929 and 1933 while manufacturing output plunged by approximately a third. Gross private domestic investment, which includes construction and inventories, shrank from $16.2 billion to $1.4 billion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1958 constant dollars.  Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, ''Federal Reserve Bulletin'',  June 1973, p. A68.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prices everywhere fell, making the burden of the repayments of debts much harder.  Heavy industry, mining, lumbering and agriculture were hard hit.  The impact was much less severe in white collar and service sectors, but every city and state was hit hard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon accepting the 1932 [[U.S. Democratic Party, history|Democratic]] nomination for president, Roosevelt promised &amp;quot;a new deal for the American people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The phrase came from the title of popular writer Stuart Chase's book ''A New Deal'' published earlier in 1932. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt entered office with no single ideology or plan for dealing with the depression. He was willing to try anything, and, indeed, in the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; (1933-34) virtually every organized group (except the Socialists and Communists) gained much of what they demanded. This &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; thus was self-contradictory, pragmatic, and experimental. Government spending propelled the economy to recover from the deep pit of 1932, and started heading upward again until 1937, when the over emphasis on consumption of capital resources plunged the economy into the [[Recession of 1937]] and sent unemployment back to 1934 levels. Whether the New Deal was responsible for the recovery, or whether it even slowed the recovery, is a subject of debate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal drew from many different sources over the previous half-century.  Some New Dealers, led by [[Thurman Arnold]], went back to the anti-monopoly tradition in the Democratic party that stretched back a century.  Monopoly was bad for America, [[Louis Brandeis]] kept insisting, because it produced waste and inefficiency. However, the anti-monopoly group never had a major impact on New Deal policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the Wilson administration, other New Dealers, such as [[Hugh Samuel Johnson|Hugh Johnson]] of the [[National Recovery Administration|NRA]], were shaped by efforts to mobilize the economy for [[World War I]],  They brought ideas and experience from the government controls and spending of 1917-18. And from the policy experiments of the 1920s, New Dealers picked up ideas from efforts to harmonize the economy by creating cooperative relationships among its constituent elements. Roosevelt brought together a so-called &amp;quot;[[Brain Trust]]&amp;quot; of academic advisers to assist in his recovery efforts. They sought to introduce extensive government intervention in the form of spending and regulation instead of allowing self-correcting mechanisms to run its course. New Dealers such as Donald Richberg, as the replacement head of the NRA, said &amp;quot;A nationally [[planned economy]] is the only salvation of our present situation and the only hope for the future.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leuchtenburg p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian Clarence B. Carson says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this remove in time from the early days of the New Deal, it is difficult to recapture, even in imagination, the heady enthusiasm among a goodly number of intellectuals for a government planned economy. So far as can now be told, they believed that a bright new day was dawning, that national planning would result in an organically integrated economy in which everyone would joyfully work for the common good, and that American society would be freed at last from those antagonisms arising, as General Hugh Johnson put it, from “the murderous doctrine of savage and wolfish individualism, looking to dog-eat-dog and devil take the hindmost.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carson, Clarence B. [http://www.libertyhaven.com/theoreticalorphilosophicalissues/economichistory/relicsdeal.shtml ''The Relics of Intervention'' part 4. ''New Deal Collective Planning'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Newdealstamp.png|thumb|280px|1998 US stamp celebrates alphabet agencies of New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal faced some very vocal [[American conservatism|conservative]] opposition. The first organized opposition in 1934 came from the [[American Liberty League]] led by Democrats such as 1924 and 1928 presidential candidates [[John W. Davis]] and [[Al Smith]]. There was also  a large loose grouping of opponents of the New Deal who have come to be known as the [[Old Right (United States)|Old Right]] which included politicians, intellectuals, writers, and newspaper editors of various philosophical persuasions including [[classical liberals]], conservatives, Democrats and Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===World Comparisons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain was unable to adopt major programs to stop its depression.  That led to collapse of the Labour government and replacement in 1931 by a National coalition (predominantly Conservative). There was no equivalent &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; government intervention in Britain, which allowing self correcting market mechanism to operate, brought about a higher level of sustained employment and recovered more quickly from the Depression. In Canada, Conservative Prime Minister [[R. B. Bennett]] pushed for a program similar to the New Deal but failed to get it enacted and was defeated for reelection by the Liberals under [[William Mackenzie King]]. In New Zealand a series of economic and social policies similar to the New Deal were adopted after the election of the first Labour Government in 1935 [http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/H/HistoryEconomic/LabourPolicy/en].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Nazi Germany]], economic recovery was pursued through wage controls, suppression of unions, and big government spending programs on [[Autobahn|infrastructure]] and public works; as in the United States, large-scale armament spending came later in the 1930s. In [[Mussolini]]'s Italy, the economic controls of his corporate state were tightened.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The First Hundred Days==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FDR0415.JPG|framed|Roosevelt's energetic public personality--&amp;quot;the only thing we have to fear is fear itself,&amp;quot; and his &amp;quot;[[fireside chats]]&amp;quot; helped restore confidence.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having won a decisive victory in 1932, and with his party having decisively swept Congressional elections across the nation, Roosevelt entered office with unprecedented political capital. Many Congressmen had their favorite projects, like the TVA plan of Senator [[George Norris]], which the administration adopted and treated as its own.  Finally there were numerous Hoover plans that he could not get passed but were ready to go, such as the emergency banking laws. Americans of all political persuasions were demanding immediate action, and Roosevelt responded with a series of new programs in the “first hundred days” of the administration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The &amp;quot;Bank Holiday&amp;quot; and the Emergency Banking Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt hurled the blame at businessmen and bankers with religious rhetoric: &amp;quot;Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men....The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The failure of Credit Anstalt, a large commercial bank in Austria in 1931, brought a new wave of financial panic to Wall Street. By March 4, all banks in the country were virtually closed by their governors, and Roosevelt kept them all closed until he could pass new legislation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; for details see &amp;quot;Bottom&amp;quot; in ''Time Magazine'' (March 13, 1933) online at [http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,745289,00.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On March 9, Roosevelt sent to Congress the [[Emergency Banking Act]], drafted in large part by Hoover's administration; the act was passed and signed into law the same day. It provided for a system of reopening sound banks under Treasury supervision, with federal loans available if needed.  Three-quarters of the banks in the [[Federal Reserve System]] reopened within the next three days. Billions of dollars in &amp;quot;hoarded&amp;quot; currency and gold flowed back into them within a month, thus stabilizing the banking system. All was normal by April. During all of 1933, 4,004 small local banks were permanently closed and were merged into larger banks.  (Their depositors eventually received 85 cents on the dollar of their deposits.)  Congress created the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] in June, which insured deposits for up to $5,000, although Roosevelt opposed it support was overwhelming.  The establishment of the FDIC virtually ended the era of &amp;quot;runs&amp;quot; on banks.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Banking Act of 1935 removed the Secretary of the Treasury from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and established the [[Federal Open Market Committee]] to control market operations of the the Federal Reserve, the buying and selling of Government securities the Federal Reserve System.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic growth===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy hit rock bottom in March 1933 and now it started to expand.  As historian Broadus Mitchell notes, &amp;quot;Most indexes worsened until the summer of 1932, which may be called the low point of the depression economically and psychologically.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mitchell p 404.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Economic indicators show the economy reached nadir in the first days of March, then began a steady, sharp upward recovery. Thus the Federal Reserve Index of Industrial Production hit its lowest point of 52.8 in July 1932 (with 1935-39 = 100) and was practically unchanged at 54.3 in March 1933; however by July 1933, it reached 85.5, a dramatic rebound of 57% in four months. Growth was steady and strong until 1937 but job creation continued to lag. By 1941personal consumption expenditures - despite population increase - were virtually unchanged since 1929, reflecting a general impoverishment of the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Personal consumption expenditures in the aggregate for 1929 were 77.2 billion, 45.8 billion in 1933, and 80.6 billion in 1941.  Measured in constant 1958 dollars. Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, ''Federal Reserve Bulletin'',  June 1973, p. A68.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US-jobs2040.JPG|thumb|450px|Chart 2: total employment in US, excluding farms and WPA]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Economy Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Economy Act]], drafted by Budget Director [[Lewis Douglas]] was passed on March 20, 1933. The act proposed to balance the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; (non-emergency) federal budget by cutting the salaries of government employees and cutting pensions to veterans by 40 percent. It saved $500 million a year and reassured deficit hawks such as Douglas that the new president was fiscally conservative.  Roosevelt argued there were two budgets: the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; federal budget, which he balanced, and the &amp;quot;emergency budget,&amp;quot; which was needed to defeat the depression.  It was imbalanced on a temporary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was ran on a platform of balancing the budget, but in office found himself running spending deficits to fund the numerous programs he created. Douglas, however, rejecting the distinction between a regular and emergency budget, resigned in 1934, and became an outspoken critic of the New Deal. Roosevelt strenuously opposed the [[Bonus Bill]] that would give World War I veterans a cash bonus.  Finally, Congress passed it over his veto in 1936, and the Treasury distributed $1.5 billion in cash to 4 million of bonus welfare benefits to veterans just before the 1936 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These blank check appropriations led to the subservience of Congress and the rise of bureaucracy. Under the Constitution, Congress alone can write laws. The executive branch only enforces the law. But Congress now began to pass laws that created large bureaus empowered to make [[regulation]]s or directives with a wide range of authority. Under these laws the executive bureau became a quasi-legislative body authorized by Congress to make regulations which had the effect of law. This practice grew until Washington was filled with a [[New Deal agencies|vast array of bureaus]] that were making laws, enforcing them and actually interpreting them through [[administrative law court]]s set up within the bureaus, abolishing on a large scale the [[separation of powers]] between executive, legislative and judicial processes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least until [[John F. Kennedy]] in 1960, New Dealers never fully recognized the [[Keynesian  economics|Keynesian]] argument for government spending as a vehicle for recovery. Most economists of the era, along with [[Henry Morgenthau, Jr.|Henry Morgenthau]] of the Treasury Department,  rejected Keynesian solutions and favored balanced budgets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minimum wage===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after his election FDR forced the Congress to scrap minimum wage and maximum hour legislation which the Senate had already passed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 2, Ch. 3., [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Three___The_Forgotten_De.htm ''The Forgotten Deprssion''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Farm Programs ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was keenly interested in farm issues, and emphasized that true prosperity would not return until farming was prosperous.  Many different programs were directed at farmers. The first hundred days produced a federal program to protect commercial farmers from the uncertainties of the depression through subsidies and production controls. This program began with the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]], creating the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA), which Congress passed in May 1933.  The Act reflected the demands of leaders of major farm organizations, especially the Farm Bureau, and reflected debates among Roosevelt's farm advisers such as [[Henry A. Wallace]], [[Rexford Tugwell]], and [[George Peek]]. The AAA implemented a provision for crop reductions known as the &amp;quot;domestic allotment&amp;quot; system of the act. Under this system producers of corn, cotton, dairy products, hogs, rice, tobacco, and wheat would decide on production limits for their crops. The AAA would then pay land owners subsidies for leaving some of their land idle with funds provided by a new tax on food processing. Farm prices were to be subsidized up to the point of parity.  Some crops were ordered to be destroyed and some livestock slaughtered to raise the prices farmers received. The idea was that the less produced, the higher the price, and the farmer would benefit.   Farm incomes increased significantly in the first three years of the New Deal. A Gallup Poll revealed that a majority of the American public opposed the AAA; conservatives complained that price fixing was dangerously distorting the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The milk program was especially problematic--and indeed still is in the 21st century, with state governments having a major role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main farm program was the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] or AAA, enacted in 1933.  The government rented land from farmers to take it out of production, therby hoping the reduce the surpluses that caused such low prices.  By 1936 conditions had dramatically improved in agriculture. Although the holy grail of 100% parity was not reached until 1943, incomes were much higher rising from $4.7 billion in 1932 to $8.7 billion in 1936. The heavy burden of debt that had soured the 1920s was mostly paid off or refinanced.  The chimerical vision of escaping to the rich cities no longer enthralled the farm youth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main causes of the return to prosperity include the overall improved national economy, the severe draught of 1934 that reduced output and caused prices to rise.  The AAA payments to farmers were a help.  The acreage reduction program had little effect except in cotton and tobacco. In other crops the farmers improved their efficiency on the remaining acreage and output stayed level. In cotton and tobacco, however, prices were much higher and since the great majority of Southerners lived in rural areas and depended on these crops, the New Deal was very well regarded.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Benedict, ''Farm Policies,'' p 353&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AAA established an important and long-lasting federal role in the planning on the entire agricultural sector of the economy, with support from liberals and conservatives alike.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1936, the Supreme Court declared the AAA to be [[Constitutionality|unconstitutional]], stating that &amp;quot;a statutory plan to regulate and control agricultural production, is a matter beyond the powers delegated to the federal government...&amp;quot; The AAA was replaced by a similar program that did win Court approval, and was endorsed by the both parties in the 1936 election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal regulation of agricultural production has been modified many times since then, but together with large subsidies it is still in effect in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tenant farmers and sharecroppers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, henry Wallace and many New Dealers were highly sympathetic to the marginal farmers who lived on the land in severe poverty, especially in the South.  Major programs addressed to their needs included the [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA), the [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA), the [[Rural Electrification Administration]] (REA), the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA) and rural welfare projects sponsored by the WPA, NYA, Forest Service and CCC, including school lunches, building new schools, opening roads in remote areas, reforestation, and purchase of marginal lands to enlarge national forests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relief ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The administration launched a series of relief measures and welfare agencies to give meaningful jobs to the unemployed, especially unskilled laborers. The largest programs were the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), the [[Civil Works Administration]] (CWA), the [[Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA), the [[National Youth Administration]] (NYA), and above all, the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA).  The WPA employed a maximum of 3.3 million in November 1938.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Nancy Rose' Put to Work.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, even at this level of WPA employment, unemployment (counting WPA as employment) was still 12.5% in 1938 according to figures from Micheal Darby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Darby, Michael R.''Three and a half million U.S. Employees have been mislaid: or, an Explanation of Unemployment, 1934-1941.'' Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 1 (1976): 1-16.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All these emergency programs were terminated in 1942-43, when unemployment had vanished due to World War II related employment offers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wpa1.JPG|thumb|275px|WPA employed 2 to 3 million unemployed at unskilled labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933 the administration launched the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]], a project involving dam construction planning on an unprecedented scale in order to curb flooding, generate electricity, and modernize the very poor farms in the [[Tennessee Valley]] region of the [[US South|Southern United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Repeal of prohibition===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a measure that garnered substantial popular support, Roosevelt, in his first days of office, moved to put to rest one of the most divisive cultural issues of the 1920s.  He supported and signed a bill to legalize the manufacture and sale of beer, an interim measure pending the repeal of [[Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Prohibition]], for which a constitutional amendment (the Twenty-first) was already in process.  The amendment was ratified later in 1933. Prohibition had been a rather unpopular amendment and led to bootlegging, the illegal manufacture (or importation) and sale of liquor within the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communists in 1930s===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was infiltrated with [[Communists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy]] wrote in its final report, &amp;quot;The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Hollywood.&amp;quot; [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa6.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 6. The Experience of The Bomb]; the report also included, &amp;quot;At this distance it is difficult to conceive the intensity of Communist conviction in the 1930s....Looking back, however, we see more clearly the dilemma ... By 1950... the United States Government possessed information which the American public desperately needed to know: proof that there had been a serious attack on American security by the [[Soviet Union]], with considerable assistance from what was, indeed, an “enemy within.” The fact that we knew this was now known to, or sufficiently surmised by, the Soviet authorities. Only the American public was denied this information. [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa7.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 7. The Cold War]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Harold Ware]] was a [[Communist Party USA]] (CPUSA) official in the AAA and founded the [[Ware group]]. The group consisted of young lawyers and economists, had about 75 members in 1934 and was divided into about eight cells. The AAA was later found [[unconstitutional]], but by that time the Communist operatives had established jobs in government employment. [[Alger Hiss]], [[Lee Pressman]], [[John Abt]], [[Charles Kramer]], [[Nathan Witt]], [[Henry Collins]], [[George Silverman]], [[Marion Bachrach]], [[John Herrmann]], [[Nathaniel Weyl]], [[Donald Hiss]] and [[Victor Perlo]] were all members.  [[Harry Dexter White]], who was involved in the most auspicious policy [[subversion (political)|subversion]] as Director of the Division of Monetary Research in the [[Treasury Department]], was also affiliated with the group. The Ware group was the CPUSA's covert arm at this time.  Each of these agents not only provided classified documents to Soviet intelligence, but was involved in political influence operations as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1934, a Congressional Investigation was held to examine statements by Dr. [[William A. Wirt]], who headed the U.S. [[Department of Education|Office of Education]]. Dr. Wirt had attended a dinner party with several Brain Trusters at the home of his secretary, [[Alice Barrows]].  Barrows began working for the Office of Education in 1919 and was secretly a member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) which advocated the violent overthrow of the United States Constitution.  Several of the Brain Trusters present at the dinner revealed to Wirt they were CPUSA members. Wirt testified, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery, they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce.  By propaganda, they would destroy institutions making long term capital loans—and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier, he must also follow his money with control and management. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hearings, House Select Committee To Investigate Certain Statements of Dr. William Wirt, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session, April 10 and 17, 1934. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Dr Wirt faces the cameras and tells all'', Literary Digest v. 117 (April 21 1934) p. 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster053.pdf Volume 53 June 1946], p. 78 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside government, the far left was  exerting considerable influence in the labor movement (it dominated the new [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]]), and was building a network of membership organizations. Thus the [[American League Against War and Fascism]] was formed in 1933 and, in 1937, became the American League for Peace and Democracy.  There followed the [[American Youth Congress]], 1934; League of American Writers, 1935; National Negro Congress, 1936; and the American Congress for Democracy and Intellectual Freedom, 1939.  All had significant Stalinist connections, and fought furious battles with the anti-Communist left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leuchtenburg (1963) 281-3; Irving Howe, Lewis A. Coser, and Julius Jacobson, ''The American Communist Party: a critical history, 1919-1957'' (1957); James R. Barrett, ''William Z. Foster and the Tragedy of American Radicalism'' (2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Puerto Rico===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A separate set of programs operated in [[Puerto Rico]], headed by the Puerto Rico Reconstruction Administration.  It promoted [[land reform]] and helped small farms; it set up farm cooperatives, promoted crop diversification, and helped local industry. The Puerto Rico Reconstruction Administration was directed by [[Ernest Gruening]] from 1935 to 1937.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reform: (NIRA)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Business, labor, and government cooperation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides programs for immediate 'relief' the New Deal embarked quickly on an agenda of long-term 'reform' aimed at avoiding another depression. The New Dealers responded to demands to inflate the currency by a variety of means. Another group of reformers sought to build consumer and farmer co-ops as a counterweight to big business.  The consumer co-ops did not take off, but the [[Rural Electrification Administration]] used co-ops to bring electricity to rural areas. (As of 2007, many still operate.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt realized that these initial actions were nothing but short term solutions, and that more comprehensive government programs would be necessary. In the roughly three years between the Great Crash and Roosevelt's First Hundred Days, the industrial economy had been suffering from a vicious cycle of [[deflation (economics)|deflation]]. Since 1931, the [[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]], then and now the voice of the nation's organized business, had been urging the Hoover administration to adopt an anti-deflationary scheme that would permit trade associations to cooperate in stabilizing prices within their industries. While existing antitrust laws clearly forbade such practices, organized business found a receptive ear in the Roosevelt administration.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration, packed with reformers aspiring to forge all elements of society into a cooperative unit (a reaction to the worldwide specter of business-labor &amp;quot;class struggle&amp;quot;), was fairly amenable to the idea of cooperation among producers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration insisted that business would have to ensure that the incomes of workers would rise along with their prices.  The product of all these impulses and pressures was the [[National Industrial Recovery Act]] (NIRA) which was passed by  Congress in June 1933. The NIRA established the [[National Planning Board]], also called the National Resources Planning Board (NRPB), to assist in planning the economy by providing recommendations and information. Fredric A. Delano was appointed head of the NRPB.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NIRA guaranteed to workers the right of collective bargaining and helped spur some union organizing activity, but much faster growth of union membership came after the 1935 Wagner Act. The NIRA established the [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA), which attempted to stabilize prices and wages through cooperative &amp;quot;code authorities&amp;quot; involving government, business, and labor. The NRA included a multitude of regulations imposing the pricing and production standards for all sorts of goods and services. Some ridiculed it as the &amp;quot;National Run Around.&amp;quot;  Most economists were dubious because it was based on fixing prices to reduce competition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Parker&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian Jim Power, in ''FDR's Folly'' says that the above-market wage rates dictated by the NRA made it more expensive for employers to hire people, and therefore unnecessarily maintained high unemployment and prolonged the Depression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To prime the pump and cut unemployment, the NIRA created the [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), a major program of public works. From 1933 to 1939 PWA spent $6 billion with private companies to build 34,500 projects, many of them quite large.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The NRA &amp;quot;Blue Eagle&amp;quot; campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Blue-nra.jpg|thumb|300px}left|NRA &amp;quot;Blue Eagle&amp;quot; stamps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the center of the NIRA was the National Recovery Administration (NRA), headed by former General [[Hugh Samuel Johnson]]. Johnson called on every business establishment in the nation to accept a stopgap &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot;: a minimum wage of between 20 and 40 cents an hour, a maximum workweek of 35 to 40 hours, and the abolition of child labor. Johnson and Roosevelt contended that the &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot; would raise consumer purchasing power and increase employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To mobilize political support for the NRA, and the administrations &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot;, Johnson launched the &amp;quot;NRA [[Blue Eagle]]&amp;quot; publicity campaign to boost his bargaining strength to negotiate the codes with business and labor. The NRA negotiated specific sets of codes with leaders of the nation's major industries; the most important provisions were anti-deflationary floors below which no company would lower prices or wages, and agreements on maintaining employment and production. In a remarkably short time, the NRA won agreements from almost every major industry in the nation. Six months after the NRA went into effect industrial production dropped 25 percent. Donald Richberg, who soon replaced Johnson as the head of the NRA said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no choice presented to American business between intelligently planned and uncontrolled industrial operations and a return to the gold-plated anarchy that masqueraded as &amp;quot;rugged individualism.&amp;quot;...Unless industry is sufficiently socialized by its private owners and managers so that great essential industries are operated under public obligation appropriate to the public interest in them, the advance of political control over private industry is inevitable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur Meier&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schlesinger, Jr. ''The Coming of the New Deal,'' (1957), p. 115&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time it ended in May 1935, industrial production was 22% higher than in May 1933. On May 27 1935, the NRA was found to be unconstitutional by a unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of [[Schechter v. United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; On that same day, the Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Frazier-Lemke Act that put a moratorium on farm mortgages.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US-mfg20-40.jpg|thumb|400px|Chart 3: employment in manufacturing 1920-1940, in millions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employment in private sector factories recovered to the level of the late 1920s by 1937 (see chart 2), but did not grow much bigger until the war came; during the war manufacturing employment leaped from 11 million in 1940 to 18 million in 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Second New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second New Deal Enacted 1935===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the spring of 1935, responding to the setbacks in the Court, a new skepticism in Congress, and the growing popular clamor for more dramatic action, the administration proposed or endorsed several important new initiatives. Historians refer to them as the &amp;quot;Second New Deal&amp;quot; and note that it was more radical, more pro-labor and anti-business than the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; of 1933-34. The [[National Labor Relations Act]], also known as the '''Wagner Act''', revived and strengthened the protections of collective bargaining contained in the original (and now unconstitutional) NIRA. The result was a tremendous growth of membership in the labor unions comprising the [[American Federation of Labor]]. Labor thus became a major component of the New Deal political coalition.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt nationalized unemployment relief through the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA), headed by close friend [[Harry Hopkins]].  It created hundreds of thousands of low-skilled blue collar jobs for unemployed men (and some for unemployed women and white collar workers).  Applicants for WPA jobs did not have to be Democrats, but their foremen quickly explained that Roosevelt created their paychecks and that conservative Republicans wanted to abolish the program.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[NYA|National Youth Administration]] was the semi-autonomous WPA program for youth. Its Texas director, [[Lyndon Baines Johnson]], later used the NYA as a model for some of his [[Great Society]] programs in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the very long run, the most important program of 1935, and perhaps the New Deal as a whole, was the [[Social Security Act]], which established a system of retirement pensions for people in the industrial sector (not including farmers or household workers) and unemployment insurance, as well as welfare benefits for poor families and the handicapped. It established the framework for the U.S. welfare system. Roosevelt insisted that it should be funded by payroll taxes rather than from the general fund; he said, &amp;quot;We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.&amp;quot;  With the [[Unified budget Act]] &amp;lt;-source-&amp;gt; the Social Security Trust Fund was used to fiance the Vietnam War and Great Society programs.  The original payroll witholding was 1% of the workers gross income, with Roosevelt pledging it would never exceed 3%. Today it 6.2% and 12.4% for self-employed workers - one sixth of a workers lifetime earnings when Medicare is factored in.  The withholding is on the first dollar of income with no deductions or exemptions allowed to offset contributions, and a worker was no claim or control over the assets in his account.  If a worker dies before retirement, his estate has no claim on his lifetime contributions.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Social Security remains by far the single largest program driving the growth of [[National Debt]]; since it is value of [[labor]] that is withheld, the more people [[emjployment|employed]], the higher wages are paid. the more hours worked including overtime, all is added to the national debt as a promise by the federal government repay at some future date.  And given that it is labor driving the creation of federal debt, the national debt cannot be paid down by labor.  This is refered to as the &amp;quot;structrual flaw&amp;quot; in the original Social Securioty Act.  Further, FDR's assertion that &amp;quot;no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program&amp;quot; would not withstand a Constitutional challenge.  In American people are born free, and no politician can the pledge that some future Congress elected by free citizens can refuse to honor the promises to pay seniors given that benefits are paid out from current workers earnings on a &amp;quot;pay as you go&amp;quot; basis, and are not held in a trust fund. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
One of the last New Deal agencies was the [[United States Housing Authority]], created in 1937 with some Republican support to abolish slums.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Defeat: Court Packing and Executive Reorganization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, however, emboldened by the triumphs of his first term, set out in 1937 to consolidate authority within the government in ways that provoked powerful opposition. Early in the year, he asked Congress to [[Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937|expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court]] so as to allow him to appoint members sympathetic to his ideas and hence tip the ideological balance of the Court.  This proposal provoked a storm of protest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In one sense, however, it succeeded; Justice [[Owen Josephus Roberts|Owen Roberts]], switched positions and began voting to uphold New Deal measures, effectively creating a liberal majority in ''[[West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish]]'' and ''[[National Labor Relations Board v. Jones &amp;amp; Laughlin Steel Corporation]]'' thus departing from the ''[[Lochner v. New York]]'' era and giving the government more power in questions of economic policies. Journalists called this change &amp;quot;[[the switch in time that saved nine]].&amp;quot; Recent scholars have noted that since the vote in Parrish took place several months before the court-packing plan was announced, other factors, like evolving jurisprudence, must have contributed to the Court's swing.  The opinions handed down in Spring 1937, favorable to the government, also contributed to the downfall of the plan. In any case, the &amp;quot;court packing plan,&amp;quot; as it was known, did lasting political damage to Roosevelt and was finally rejected by Congress in July.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At about the same time, the administration proposed a plan to reorganize the executive branch in ways that would significantly increase the president's control over the bureaucracy. Like the Court-packing plan, executive reorganization garnered opposition from those who feared a &amp;quot;Roosevelt dictatorship&amp;quot; and it failed in Congress; a watered-down version of the bill finally won passage in 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Attacks Right and Left ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the left denounce Roosevelt for rescuing capitalism when the opportunity was at hand to nationalize banking, railroads and other industries.[Conkin] Liberal historians argue that Roosevelt restored hope and self-respect to tens of millions of desperate people, built labor unions, upgraded the national infrastructure and saved capitalism in his first term when he could have destroyed it and easily nationalized the banks and the railroads. [Sitkoff]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the right complain that he enlarged the powers of the federal government, built up labor unions, slowed long-term economic growth, and weakened the business community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|A 1936 cartoon shows the GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the left have denounced the New Deal as a conservative phenomenon that let slip the opportunity to radically reform capitalism. Since the 1960s, &amp;quot;[[New Left]]&amp;quot; historians have been among the New Deal's harsh critics. (''For a list of relevant works, see the list of suggested readings appearing toward the bottom of the article.'') Barton J. Bernstein, in a 1968 essay, compiled a chronicle of missed opportunities and inadequate responses to problems. The New Deal may have saved capitalism from itself, Bernstein charged, but it had failed to help&amp;amp;mdash;and in many cases actually harmed&amp;amp;mdash;those groups most in need of assistance. Paul K. Conkin in ''The New Deal'' (1967) similarly chastised the government of the 1930s for its policies toward marginal farmers, for its failure to institute sufficiently progressive tax reform, and its excessive generosity toward select business interests. [[Howard Zinn]], in 1966, criticized the New Deal for working actively to actually preserve the worst evils of capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1970s research on the New Deal has been less interested in the question of whether the New Deal was a &amp;quot;conservative,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;revolutionary&amp;quot; phenomenon than in the question of constraints within which it was operating. Political sociologist [[Theda Skocpol]], in an influential series of articles, has emphasized the issue of &amp;quot;state capacity&amp;quot; as an often-crippling constraint. Ambitious reform ideas often failed, she argued because of the absence of a government bureaucracy with significant strength and expertise to administer them. Other more recent works have stressed the political constraints that the New Deal encountered. Both in Congress and among certain segments of the population conservative inhibitions about government remained strong; thus some scholars have stressed that the New Deal was not just a product of its liberal backers, but also a product of the pressures of its conservative opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Role: balance labor, business and farming==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the dismal record in aiding marginal farmers and African Americans, among others--  contrasted with its often frequent generosity toward certain business interests--the New Deal was to elevate and strengthen new interest groups so as to allow them to compete more effectively for the interests by having the federal government evolve into an arbitrator in competition among all elements and classes of society, acting as a force that could mediate when necessary to help some groups and limit the power of others. By the end of the 1930s, business found itself competing for influence with an increasingly powerful labor movement, one that was engaged in mass mobilization and sometimes militant action; with an organized agricultural economy, and occasionally with aroused consumers. The New Deal accomplished this by creating a series of state institutions that greatly, and permanently, expanded the role of the federal government in American life. The government was now committed to providing at least minimal assistance to the poor and unemployed; to protecting the rights of labor unions; to stabilizing the banking system; to building low-income housing; to regulating financial markets; to subsidizing agricultural production; and to doing many other things that had not previously been federal responsibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, perhaps the strongest legacy of the New Deal, in other words, was to make the federal government a protector of interest groups and a supervisor of competition among them. As a result of the New Deal, political and economic life became politically more competitive than before, with workers, farmers, consumers, and others now able to press their demands upon the government in ways that in the past had been available only to the corporate world. Hence the frequent description of the government the New Deal created as the &amp;quot;broker state,&amp;quot; a state brokering the competing claims of numerous groups.  If there was more political competition, there was less market competition. Farmers were not allowed to sell for less than the official price. The transportation industry (especially airlines, trucking and railroads) was tightly regulated so that every firm had a guaranteed market and management and labor had high profits and high wages, all at the cost of high prices and much inefficiency.  Quotas in the oil industry were fixed by the [[Railroad Commission of Texas]] with the federal [[Tom Connally|Connally]] Hot Oil Act of 1935&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Handbook of Texas Online: [http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/CC/mlc3.html Connally Hot Oil Act of 1935]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; guaranteeing that illegal &amp;quot;hot oil&amp;quot; would not be sold.   To the New Dealers, the free market meant &amp;quot;cut-throat competition&amp;quot; and they considered that evil.  Not until the 1970s and 1980s would most of the New Deal regulations be relaxed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, it did not transform American capitalism in any genuinely radical way. Except in the field of labor relations, corporate power remained nearly as free from government regulation in 1939 as it had been in 1933, but that changed dramatically during the war, as Washington took control over wage rates, prices, and allocation of raw materials, and sent military officers into munitions plants. All the relief programs were closed down during the war, but one major program survived--Social Security--to become the liberal hallmark of the New Deal into the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==African Americans==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal set up numerous agencies to help impoverished farmers, but in the long run they had to move to the cities to become better off.  Many leading New Dealers, including [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], [[Harold L. Ickes]], [[Aubrey Williams]] and [[Harry Hopkins]] worked hard to ensure Blacks received at least 10% of welfare assistance payments.  Economic uplift was one thing but political revolution was another: the New Deal did not try to undercut segregation or change the second class political status of Blacks in the South. Roosevelt did appoint an unprecedented number of African Americans to second-level positions in his administration that collectively were called the Black Cabinet, perhaps due to the influence of Eleanor Roosevelt, a vocal advocate of easing discrimination. Roosevelt and Hopkins worked with big city mayors to welcome Black political organizations that made the transition from the GOP to the Democratic party in 1934-36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WPA, NYA, and CCC relief programs allocated 10% of their budgets to blacks (who comprised about 10% of the total population, and 20% of the poor). They operated separate all-black units with the same pay and conditions as white units. The African American community responded favorably, so that by 1936 the majority who voted (usually in the North) were voting Democratic. This was a sharp realignment from 1932, when most African Americans preferred the Republican ticket. The New Deal thus established a political alliance between African Americans and the Democratic Party that survives into the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal historians argue the New Deal laid the ground work for black breakthroughs during World War II, the civil rights movement and the [[Great Society]] of the 1960s.  Militant African Americans insist that the Civil Rights movement owed everything to black activists, and very little to the New Deal.  Note that the New Deal was especially beneficial to white ethnic minorities, who responded with 80-90% of their votes for Roosevelt's reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The recession of 1937 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Newdealcartoon.GIF|thumb|left|250px| Some conservatives, like this cartoonist, argued that the New Deal was all package and little content. Others charged it went much too far. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration was under assault during FDR's second term, which presided over a new dip in the Great Depression in the fall of 1937 that continued through most of 1938. Production declined sharply, as did profits and employment. The Government's own statistics were showing that 23.8% of the Workforce was either unemployed, or underemployed. The term for the human suffering at the hands of [[government planners]] was &amp;quot;wastage.&amp;quot; According to the Brain Trusters own statistics, of &amp;quot;100 Per Cent Manpower,&amp;quot; 23.8 were &amp;quot;Per Cent Wastage.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Population and the Pattern of Unemployment, 1930-1937'', Rupert B. Vance and Nadia Danilevski, The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Jan., 1940), pp. 27-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After four years of &amp;quot;government solutions,&amp;quot; contemporaneous reports were stating &amp;quot;much of the unemployment in 1937 was due to a decrease in the number of jobs available.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Population and the Pattern of Unemployment, 1930-1937'', Vance and Danilevski.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynesian economists speculated that this was a result of a premature effort to curb government spending and balance the budget, while conservatives said it was caused by attacks on business and by the huge strikes caused by the organizing activities of the [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]] and the [[American Federation of Labor]] (AFL).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt rejected the advice of Morgenthau to cut spending, and decided big business was trying to ruin the New Deal by causing another depression that voters would react against by voting Republican. It was a &amp;quot;capital strike&amp;quot; said Roosevelt, and he ordered the FBI to look for a criminal conspiracy (they found none).  Roosevelt moved left and unleashed a rhetorical campaign against monopoly power, which was cast as the cause of the new crisis. Ickes attacked automaker Henry Ford, steelmaker Tom Girdler, and the super rich &amp;quot;Sixty Families&amp;quot; who supposedly comprised &amp;quot;the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States.&amp;quot; Left unchecked, Ickes warned, they would create &amp;quot;big-business Fascist America -- an enslaved America.&amp;quot; The president appointed Robert Jackson as the aggressive new director of the antitrust division of the Justice Department, but this effort lost its effectiveness once World War II began and big business was urgently needed to produce war supplies. [Kennedy p 352]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the administration's other response to the 1937 deepening of the Great Depression had more tangible results. Ignoring the vitriolic pleas of the Treasury Department and responding to the urgings of the converts to Keynesian economics and others in his administration, Roosevelt embarked on an antidote to the depression, reluctantly abandoning his efforts to balance the budget and launching a $5 billion spending program in the spring of 1938, an effort to increase mass purchasing power. The New Deal had in fact engaged in deficit spending since 1933, but it was apologetic about it. The debt did NOT rise as a proportion of GDP, but did rise in terms of dollars. Now they had a theory to justify what they were doing.  Roosevelt explained his program in a fireside chat in which he explained it was up to the government to &amp;quot;create an economic upturn&amp;quot; by making &amp;quot;additions to the purchasing power of the nation.&amp;quot; He was opposed by [[Fiscal Conservatism|fiscal conservatives]] who thought all government spending was inefficient and generated corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Business-oriented observers explained the recession and recovery in very different terms from the Keynesians.  They argued that the New Deal had been very hostile to business expansion in 1935-37, had encouraged massive strikes which had a negative impact on major industries such as automobiles, and had threatened massive anti-trust legal attacks on big corporations.  All those threats diminished sharply after 1938.  For example, the antitrust efforts fizzled out without major cases. The CIO and AFL unions started battling each other more than corporations, and tax policy became more favorable to long-term growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1937 - 1943 Depression was longer in duration than the 1929 - 1932 crash, the result of massive government intrusion into the private economy which stunted growth.  Manufacturing demand stimulated by WWII led to the 1943-1949 recovery, where finally, in 1949, the New York Stock Exchange recovered to the level it had been at 1929.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many New Deal reforms were unpopular and criticized.  In 1948 President [[Harry Truman]] ran on a reformed New Deal platform called the [[Fair Deal]], which was regarded largely as an admission the New Deal had not been fair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==World War II and the end of the New Deal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prosperity had returned by 1938 for most people--but not for the bottom third, who remained plagued by structural unemployment. The impact of war mobilization and massive war spending doubled the GNP.  Businessmen ignored the mounting national debt and heavy new taxes, redoubling their efforts for greater output as an expression of patriotism.  Patriotism drove most people to voluntarily work overtime and give up leisure activities to make money after so many hard years. Patriotism meant that people accepted rationing and price controls for the first time.  &amp;quot;Cost-plus&amp;quot; pricing in munitions contracts guaranteed that businesses would make a profit no matter how many mediocre workers they employed, no matter how inefficient the techniques they used.  The demand was for a vast quantity of war supplies as soon as possible, regardless of cost.  Business hired every person in sight, even driving sound trucks up and down city streets begging people to apply for jobs. New workers were needed to replace the 12 million working-age men serving in the military.  These events magnified the role of the federal government in the national economy. In 1929, federal expenditures accounted for only 3% of [[GNP]]. Between 1933 and 1939, federal expenditure tripled, and Roosevelt's critics charged that he was turning America into a [[socialism|socialist]] state. However, spending on the New Deal was far smaller than on the war effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first peacetime year of 1946, federal spending still amounted to $62 billion, or 30% of GNP. Wartime spending and other measures were able to provide an enormous output. Between 1939 and 1944, the peak of wartime production, the nation's total output almost doubled. This, along with the conscription and removal of soldiers, meant that civilian unemployment plummeted&amp;amp;mdash;from 14% in 1940 to less than 2% in 1943 as the labor force grew by ten million.  Millions of farmers left marginal operations, students quit school, and housewives returned to the labor force.  The war economy was not run on the basis of free enterprise, but was the result of government/business cooperation, with government bankrolling business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major result of the full employment at high wages was a sharp, permanent decrease in the level of income inequality.  The gap between rich and poor narrowed dramatically in the area of nutrition, because food rationing and price controls guaranteed a reasonably priced diet to everyone.  Large families that had been poverty-stricken in the 1930s had four or five or more workers, and shot to the top one-third income bracket.  Overtime made for huge paychecks in the munitions factories; white collar workers were fully employed too, but they did not receive overtime and their salary scale was no longer much higher than the blue collar wage scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economist Robert Higgs (1987), argues that the War did not end the Great Depression. Rather, a return to normality after the war, as the government relaxed wage controls, price controls, capital controls, reduced tariffs and other trade barriers, and eliminated the rationing of goods and the relaxing of Federal control over American industries, ended it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conflicting interpretation of the New Deal economic policies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Depression Statistics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Econ30s.jpg|thumb|400px|major economic indicators, 1929-52]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic indicators show the American economy reached nadir in summer 1932 to February 1933, then began recovering until the Roosevelt recession of 1937-1938. Thus the Federal Reserve [[Industrial Production Index]] hit its low of 52.8 on [[1932-07-01]] and was practically unchanged at 54.3 on [[1933-03-01]]; however by [[1933-07-01]], it reached 85.5 (with 1935-39 = 100, and for comparison 2005 = 1,342).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/INDPRO.txt Industrial Production Index]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Roosevelt's twelve years in office the economy had an 8.5% compound annual growth of GDP,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Historical Statistics of the United States'' (1976) series F31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the highest growth rate in the history of any industrial country,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Angus Maddison, ''The World Economy: Historical Statistics'' (OECD 2003); Japan is close, see p 174&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however, recovery was slow --by 1939 GDP per adult was still 27% below trend.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Cole&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cole, Harold L and Ohanian, Lee E. [http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/seminars/02-03/02-21.pdf ''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis''], 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   And, throughout the New Deal the median joblessness rate was 17.2 percent and never went below 14 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GDP20-40.JPG|thumb|350px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |Table 1: Statistics&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Income and Product Accounts [http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/GDPreal.htm Real GDP and GNP]; Mitchell 446, 449, 451; [http://home.att.net/~rdavis2/cpi_m2.html Consumer Price Index AND M2 Money Supply: 1800-2003]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;9%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1929&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1931&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1933&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;5%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1937&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1938&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;3%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1940&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Real Gross National Product (GNP) (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|101.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 84.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 68.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|103.9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|96.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|113.0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Consumer Price Index (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|122.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|108.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 92.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|102.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 99.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|100.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Index of Industrial Production (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|109&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Money Supply M2 ($ billions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|46.6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|42.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|32.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|45.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|49.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|55.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Exports ($ billions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|5.24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|2.42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|1.67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|3.35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|3.18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|4.02&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Unemployment (% of civilian work force)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 3.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|16.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|25.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|13.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|16.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|13.9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) in 1929 dollars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) 1935-39 = 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining exports===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1932 to 1935 the volume of imports of crude foodstuffs increased 41% and of manufactured foodstuffs 49%. The volume of Agricultural exports from the United States declined. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Publications of United States Department of Commerce.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table gives the volume of imports in 1932 and 1935 for important agricultural products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Agricultural Imports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Before Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''3 years into 'relief' efforts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Commodity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! 1932 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! 1935&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Wheat &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 27,439,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Corn &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 344,000 bu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 43,242,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Oats &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 59,000 bu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 10,107,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Barley &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| None &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4,840,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Rye &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| None &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 9,643,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Rice &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 19,074,000 lb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 53,457,000 lb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Barley malt &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 52,533,000 lb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 320,6 23,000 lb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Hay &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 13,858 tons &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 67,171 tons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quantities of individual commodities exported declined as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Agricultural Exports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Declines 3 years into&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Commodity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! New Dealism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Cotton&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 33%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unmanufactured tobacco &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Wheat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 99%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Flour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 491%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Meat products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 19%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Lard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 82% &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the summer of 1933 New Dealers paid farmers under the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) to plow up 10,500,000 acres of growing cotton, or 25% of the total acreage.  The Bankhead Cotton Act of 1934 set a limit OF 10,000,000 bales of cotton to be marketed by farmers from the 1934 - 1935 crop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the fall of 1933, the AAA destroyed 6,200,000 pigs and 220,000 mother sows were slaughtered in the AAA's effort to raise prices at a cost of over $30,000,000. The total live weight of the pigs and sows slaughtered was 443,69.7,348 pounds. Of this only 97,064,159 pounds of food products were obtained-the rest was converted into inedible grease or fertilizer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relief Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 3: Families on Relief 1936-41:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prolonged/Worsened the Depression===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 1995 survey of economic historians and economists asked &amp;quot;Taken as a whole, government policies of the New Deal served to lengthen and deepen the Great Depression.&amp;quot;  Of the economists 27% agreed and 51% disagreed. Of the economic historians, only 6% agreed and 74% disagreed. (the rest were in the partly agree/disagree group).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://eh.net/lists/archives/eh.res/feb-1997/0010.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minority view is represented by Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian who conclude that the &amp;quot;New Deal labor and industrial policies did not lift the economy out of the Depression as President Roosevelt and his economic planners had hoped,&amp;quot; but that the &amp;quot;New Deal policies are an important contributing factor to the persistence of the Great Depression.&amp;quot; They conclude that the New Deal &amp;quot;cartelization policies are a key factor behind the weak recovery.&amp;quot; They say that the &amp;quot;abandonment of these policies coincided with the strong economic recovery of the 1940s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cole, Harold L and Ohanian, Lee E. [http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/seminars/02-03/02-21.pdf ''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis''], 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lowell E. Gallaway and Richard K. Vedder conclude that the &amp;quot;Great Depression was very significantly prolonged in both its duration and its magnitude by the impact of New Deal programs.&amp;quot; They argue that without Social Security, work relief, unemployment insurance, and especially without the labor unions, business would have hired more workers and the unemployment rate would have been lower. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gallaway, Lowell E. and Vedder, Richard K. ''Out of Work: Unemployment and Government in Twentieth-Century America'', New York University Press; Updated edition (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Few economists or economic historians have agreed with these speculations. The New Deal years 1933-36 (or indeed the FDR years 1933-45) showed the highest growth rates in the history of the American economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unemployment continues===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darby counts WPA workers as employed; Lebergott as unemployed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: ''Historical Statistics US'' (1976)  series D-86; Smiley 1983&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Smiley, Gene, &amp;quot;Recent Unemployment Rate Estimates for the 1920s and 1930s,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History,'' June 1983, 43, 487-93.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal tried public works, farm subsidies and other devices to reduce unemployment, but FDR never completely gave up trying to balance the budget.  Unemployment remained high throughout the New Deal years; business simply would not hire more people, especially the low skilled and supposedly &amp;quot;untrainable&amp;quot; men who had been unemployed for years and lost any job skill they once had. [[Keynesian]]s later argued that by spending vastly more money--using [[fiscal policy]]--the government could provide the needed stimulus through the &amp;quot;multiplier&amp;quot; effect.  Critics of Keynesianism said that would just take money out of the private sector, causing a negative multiplier effect there. However, no economist has written a full-scale Keynesian analysis of the depression, so it is difficult to evaluate how that model would work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unemployment peaked in 1933, at 24.9%, and by 1941 unemployment had subsided to 9.9%, which was near the 1930 level of 8.9%.  [http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cm20030124ar03p1.htm] Unemployment increased 163% over the average of what it had been in 1930 by the third year of the New Deal. By contrast, recovery was well underway in Great Britain, with an increase of only 1.1%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years more influential among economists has been the monetarist interpretation of [[Milton Friedman]], which did include a full-scale monetary history of what he calls the &amp;quot;Great Contraction.&amp;quot;  Friedman concentrated on the failures before 1933, and in his memoirs said the relief programs were an appropriate response. From 1935 to 1943, Friedman was himself a Keynesian who was (1941-43) an official spokesman for the New Deal before Congress; he did not at that time criticize any New Deal or Federal Reserve policies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from building up labor unions, the New Deal did not substantially alter the distribution of power within American [[capitalism]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes visited to the White House in 1934 to urge President Roosevelt to do more deficit spending. Roosevelt complained to Labor Secretary [[Frances Perkins]], &amp;quot;He left a whole rigmarole of figures--he must be a mathematician rather than a political economist.&amp;quot;  That is, Keynes had an abstract theory but no useful suggestions about what to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|380px|right|Although Hopkins denied saying &amp;quot;Spend-Spend-Spend; Tax-Tax-Tax; Elect-Elect-Elect,&amp;quot; conservative critics thought it fit the New Deal very well]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TABLE BORDER=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TH colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Table 2: Unemployment (% labor force)&amp;lt;/TH&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;Year&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Lebergott&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Darby&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1933&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,24.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      24.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,20.6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      20.6&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1934&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,21.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      21.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,16&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      16.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1935&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,20.1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      20.1&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1936&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,16.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      16.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1937&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.3&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.1&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1938&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,19&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      19.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,12.5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      12.5&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1939&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,17.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      17.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,11.3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      11.3&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1940&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.6&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.5&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1941&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      8.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1942&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,4.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      4.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,4.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      4.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1943&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1944&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1945&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/TABLE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fiscal Conservatism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatism was a key component of the New Deal, as Zelizer (2000) demonstrates.  It was supported by Wall Street and local investors and most of the business community;  mainstream academic economists believed in it, as apparently did the majority of the public. Conservative southern Democrats, who favored balanced budgets and opposed new taxes, controlled Congress and its major committees.  Even liberal Democrats at the time regarded balanced budgets as essential to economic stability in the long run, although they were more willing to accept short-term deficits.  Public opinion polls consistently showed public opposition to deficits and debt.  Throughout his terms, Roosevelt recruited fiscal conservatives to serve in his administration, most notably [[Lewis Douglas]] the Director of Budget from 1933 to 1934, and [[Henry Morgenthau Jr.]], Secretary of the Treasury from 1934 to 1945.  They defined policy in terms of budgetary cost and tax burdens rather than needs, rights, obligations, or political benefits.  Personally the president embraced their fiscal conservatism.  Politically, he realized that fiscal conservatism enjoyed a strong wide base of support among voters, leading Democrats, and businessmen.   On the other hand there was enormous pressure to act–and spending money on high visibility programs attracted Roosevelt, especially if it tied millions of voters to him, as did the WPA.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas proved too inflexible, and quit in 1934.  Morgenthau made it his highest priority to stay close to Roosevelt, no matter what.  Douglas' position, like many of the [[Old Right]] was grounded in a basic distrust of politicians and the deeply ingrained fear that government spending always involved a degree of patronage and corruption that offended his Progressive sense of efficiency.  The Economy Act of 1933, passed early in the Hundred Days, was Douglas' great achievement. It  reduced federal expenditures by $500 million, to be achieved by reducing veterans’ payments and federal salaries.  Douglas cut government spending through executive orders that cut the military budget by $125 million, $75 million from the Post Office, $12 million from Commerce, $75 million from government salaries, and $100 million from staff layoffs.  As Freidel concludes, &amp;quot;The economy program was not a minor aberration of the spring of 1933, or a hypocritical concession to delighted conservatives. Rather it was an integral part of Roosevelt's overall New Deal.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freidel 1990, p. 96&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Revenues were so low that borrowing was necessary (only the richest 3% paid any income tax before 1942.)  Douglas therefore hated the relief programs, which he said reduced business confidence, threatened the government’s future credit, and had the &amp;quot;destructive psychological effects of making mendicants of self-respecting American citizens.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zelizer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt was pulled toward greater spending by Hopkins and Ickes, and as the 1936 election approached he decided to gain votes by attacking big business.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Debt29-50.jpg|thumb|400px|left|National Debt as a percentage of GNP climbs from 20% to 40% as Hoover begins relief efforts with the [[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]] and levels off during the New Deal; soars during WW2  from ''Historical Statistics US'' (1976)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Morgenthau shifted with FDR, but at all times tried to inject fiscal responsibility; he deeply believed in balanced budgets, stable currency, reduction of the national debt, and the need for more private investment .  The Wagner Act met Morgenthau’s requirement because it strengthened the party’s political base and involved no new spending.  In contrast to Douglas, Morgenthau accepted Roosevelt’s  double budget as legitimate–that is a balanced regular budget, and an “emergency” budget for agencies, like the WPA, PWA and CCC, that would be temporary until full recovery was at hand.  He fought against the veterans’ bonus until Congress finally overrode Roosevelt’s veto and gave out $2.2 billion in 1936.   His biggest success was the new Social Security program; he managed to reverse the proposals to fund it from general revenue and insisted it be funded by new taxes on employees.  It was Morgenthau who insisted on excluding farm workers and domestic servants from Social Security because workers outside industry would not be paying their way.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zelizer 2000; Savage 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deficits held relatively constant throught the 1930s at about 40% of the GDP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Economists at the time used GNP (gross national product) and today they prefer GDP (gross domestic product). For the US, GNP and GDP are almost the same.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Claims the New Deal adopted or resembled Fascist economic models===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;fascism&amp;quot; in the 21st century has very strong connotations of mass murder and death camps, however, in the 1930s it meant the [[planned economy]] and [[corporativism]] exemplified by the economic plans of Benito Mussolini in Italy. And, comparisons have been made between the economic systems of Fascist Italy and the New Deal programs. Communists, classical liberals, conservatives, and [[Herbert Hoover]] used the term fascism in that manner at that time. Likewise, modern-day [[paleoconservatives]] argue that the New Deal was a major milestone in the rise of America's [[managerial state]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journalist [[John T. Flynn]], a former socialist, in his 1944 book ''As We Go Marching'', said that &amp;quot;the New Dealers...began to flirt with the alluring pastime of reconstructing the capitalist system...and in the process of this new career they began to fashion doctrines that turned out to be the principles of fascism.&amp;quot;  Former President Herbert Hoover argued that some (but not all) New Deal programs were &amp;quot;fascist,&amp;quot; and that there was a presidential dictatorship. [''Memoirs'' 3:420]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Among the early Roosevelt fascist measures was the National Industry Recovery Act (NRA) of June 16, 1933 .... These ideas were first suggested by Gerald Swope (of the General Electric Company)....[and] the United States Chamber of Commerce. During the campaign of 1932, Henry I. Harriman, president of that body, urged that I agree to support these proposals, informing me that Mr. Roosevelt had agreed to do so. I tried to show him that this stuff was pure fascism; that it was a remaking of Mussolini's &amp;quot;corporate state&amp;quot; and refused to agree to any of it. He informed me that in view of my attitude, the business world would support Roosevelt with money and influence. That for the most part proved true.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever Hoover was told, Roosevelt had ''not'' agreed to any such plan. In 1934, Roosevelt himself warned his &amp;quot;fireside chat&amp;quot; radio audiences against linguistic confusion. Some people, he said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
will try to give you new and strange names for what we are doing. Sometimes they will call it 'Fascism,' sometimes 'Communism,' sometimes 'Regimentation,' sometimes 'Socialism.' But, in so doing, they are trying to make very complex and theoretical something that is really very simple and very practical. . . . Plausible self-seekers and theoretical die-hards will tell you of the loss of individual liberty. Answer this question out of the facts of your own life. Have you lost any of your rights or liberty or constitutional freedom of action and choice?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy 1999, p 246.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1934 Roosevelt defended a more powerful national government as he believed was necessary to control the economy, by quoting conservative Republican Elihu Root: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tremendous power of organization [Root had said] has combined great aggregations of capital in enormous industrial establishments . . . so great in the mass that each individual concerned in them is quite helpless by himself. . . . The old reliance upon the free action of individual wills appears quite inadequate. . . . The intervention of that organized control we call government seems necessary. . . . Men may differ as to the particular form of governmental activity with respect to industry or business, but nearly all are agreed that private enterprise in times such as these cannot be left without assistance and without reasonable safeguards lest it destroy not only itself but also our process of civilization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy 1999, p 246.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One historian remarks, &amp;quot;What Fascist corporatism and the New Deal had in common was a certain amount of state intervention in the economy. Beyond that, the only figure who seemed to look on Fascist corporatism as a kind of model was [[Hugh Samuel Johnson|Hugh Johnson]], FDR's head of the National Recovery Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanley Payne, ''History of Fascism'' (1995) p 230.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson strenuously denied any association with Mussolini, saying the NRA &amp;quot;is being organized almost as you would organize a business. I want to avoid any Mussolini appearance -- the President calls this Act industrial self-government.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hugh S. Johnson, ''The Blue Eagle, from Egg to Earth'' (1935), p 223&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Donald Richberg after a series of scandals replaced General Hugh Johnson as head of NRA and speaking before a Senate committee said &amp;quot;A nationally [[planned economy]] is the only salvation of our present situation and the only hope for the future.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leuchtenburg p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historians such as Hawley (1966) have examined the origins of the NRA in detail, claiming the main inspiration came from Senators [[Hugo Black]] and [[Robert F. Wagner]] and from American business leaders such as the Chamber of Commerce. The main model was Woodrow Wilson's [[War Industries Board]], in which Johnson had been involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Art and music==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Works Progress Administration]] subsidized artists, musicians, painters and writers on relief with a group of projects called [[Federal One]].  While the WPA program was by the most widespread, it was preceded by three programs administered by the [[United States Department of the Treasury|US Treasury]] which hired commercial artists at usual commissions to add murals and sculptures to federal buildings. The first of these efforts was the [[Public Works of Art Project]], organized by Edward Bruce, an American businessman and artist.  The [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA) and [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA) had major photography programs.  The New Deal arts programs emphasized regionalism, socialist realism, class conflict, proletarian interpretations, and audience participation. The unstoppable collective powers of common man, contrasted to the failure of individualism], was a favorite theme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mathews 1975&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FSA photography project is most responsible for creating the image of the Depression in the USA. Many of the images appeared in popular magazines. The photographers were under instruction from Washington as to what overall impression the New Deal wanted to give out. Director [[Roy Stryker]]'s agenda focused on his faith in [[social engineering]], the poor conditions among cotton tenant farmers, and the very poor conditions among migrant farm workers; above all he was committed to social reform through New Deal intervention in people's lives. Stryker demanded photographs that &amp;quot;related people to the land and vice versa&amp;quot; because these photographs reinforced the RA's position that poverty could be controlled by &amp;quot;changing land practices.&amp;quot; Though Stryker did not dictate to his photographers how they should compose the shots, he did send them lists of desirable themes, e.g., &amp;quot;church&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;court day&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;barns&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Cara A. Finnegan. ''Picturing Poverty: Print Culture and FSA Photographs'' (Smithsonian Books, 2003) pp 43-44 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  New Deal era films such as ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' ridiculed so-called &amp;quot;great men&amp;quot;, while class warfare appeared in numerous movies, such as ''[[Meet John Doe]]'' and ''[[The Grapes of Wrath]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast there was also a smaller but influential stream of anti-New Deal art.  Thus [[Gutzon Borglum]]'s sculptures on [[Mount Rushmore]] emphasized great men in history (his designs had the approval of [[Calvin Coolidge]]).  [[Gertrude Stein]] and [[Ernest Hemingway]] disliked the New Deal and celebrated the organic autonomy of perfected written work in opposition to the New Deal trope of writing as performative labor.  The [[Southern Agrarians]] celebrated a premodern regionalism and opposed the TVA as a modernizing, disruptive force.  Under Chief Justice [[Charles Evans Hughes]], the Supreme Court built one of the most architecturally striking buildings; its classical lines and small size contrasted sharply with the gargantuan modernistic federal buildings in Washington.  Hollywood managed to synthesize both streams, as in [[Busby Berkeley]]'s ''Gold Digger'' musicals, where the storylines exalt individual autonomy while the spectacular musical numbers show abstract populations of interchangeable dancers securely contained within patterns beyond their control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Szalay 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The legacies of the New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDR-LBJ.png|thumb|left|220px|The New Deal was the inspiration for [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s  [[Great Society]] in 1960s. Johnson (on right) headed the Texas NYA and was elected to Congress in 1938.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some economists argue that although the New Deal did not end the depression, all in all it helped to prevent the economy from decaying further by increasing the regulatory functions of the federal government in ways that helped stabilize previous trouble areas of the economy: the stock market, the banking system, and others. Others argue that it worsened the depression. All analysts agree the New Deal produced a new political coalition that sustained the Democratic Party as the majority party in national politics for more than a generation after its own end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's 12 years in office saw a dramatic increase in the power of the federal government as a whole. Roosevelt also established the presidency as the preeminent center of authority within the federal government. By creating a large array of agencies protecting various groups of citizens&amp;amp;mdash;workers, farmers, and others&amp;amp;mdash;who suffered from the crisis, enabling them to challenge the powers of the corporations, the Roosevelt administration generated a set of political ideas&amp;amp;mdash;known to later generations as New Deal liberalism&amp;amp;mdash;that remained a source of inspiration and controversy for decades and that helped shape the next great experiment in liberal reform, the [[Great Society]] of the 1960s.  The wartime [[FEPC]] executive orders that forbade job discrimination against African Americans, women and ethnic groups was a major breakthrough that brought better jobs and pay to millions of minority Americans. Historians usually treat FEPC as part of the war effort and not part of the New Deal itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; as Political Metaphor===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1933 politicians and pundits have often called for a &amp;quot;new deal&amp;quot; regarding this or that political object.  That is, they demand a completely new, large-scale approach to a project. As Arthur A. Ekirch Jr. (1971) has shown, the New Deal stimulated utopianism in American political and social thought on a wide range of issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada, Conservative Prime Minister [[Richard B. Bennett]] in 1935 proposed a &amp;quot;new deal&amp;quot; of regulation , taxation, and social insurance that was a copy of the American program; Bennett's proposals were not enacted and he was defeated for reelection in October 1935. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the rise of the use of U.S. political phraseology in Britain, the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] Government has termed some of its employment programs 'New Deal'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brain trust==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt gathered around himself informal advisors, mostly university professors, dubbed by the media the [[Brain Trust]]. A key advisor was [[Raymond Moley]], who by 1936 broke with Roosevelt and provided the most important conservative critique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main programs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Recovery Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933 Italian Premier [[Benito Mussolini]] was a towering figure. Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,774563-4,00.html Axis (1936-1943)], ''[[TIME magazine]]'', Sep. 20, 1943,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  President of Columbia University and [[Nobel Prize for Peace]], said of [[fascism]], it is as a “form of government of the very first order of excellence”; and found it “safe to predict that just as [[Oliver Cromwell|Cromwell]] made modern England, so Mussolini would make modern Italy.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/wright/1943/10/italy.htm What To Do With Italy?], John G. Wright, From Fourth International, Vol.4 No.10, October 1943, pp.308-311.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chariman [[Sol Bloom]] of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U. S. House of Representives, suggested Mussolini was a great man and had something the [[United States]] government might well look to for imitation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John T. Flynn, ''As We Go Marching'', Doubleday, 1944, p. 70.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What they liked particularly was his [[corporative]] system. Mussolini organized each trade or industrial group or professional group into a state supervised trade association. Mussolini called it a corporative. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmre.org/GeneSmileypresentation.pdf The New Deal and Corporatism], Prof. Emeritus Gene Smiley, Marquette University, Presented at the Committee for Monetary Research and Education,October 19, 2006,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These corporatives operated under state supervision and provided economic planning of production, quality, prices, distribution, labor standards, etc.  The National Recovery Act, or NRA as it came to be called, provided that a corporative system in America for each industry should be organized into a federally supervised trade association. It was not called a corporative. It was called a [[Code Authority]]. In [[Nazi]] Germany such government run planning authorities built on the Italian model were called [[industrial cartel]]s. This was the same as fascism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/hbzfrm.htm ''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 1, Ch. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These code authorities could regulate production, quantities, qualities, prices, distribution methods, etc., under the supervision of the NRA that had the effect of ending the downward spiral of deflation and falling prices, but which risked the long-term effect of stifling innovation and favoring big business over small.  Anti­-trust laws forbade such organizations. Roosevelt had denounced Hoover for not enforcing these laws sufficiently. Now Roosevelt suspended the anti-trust laws and compelled men to combine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NRA Act provided an appropriation of $3,300,000,000 which the President was given to be spent at his own discretion. He had a sum of money equal to what the government spent in the prvious ten years outside of discretionary spending. Roosevelt decided how it should be spent and where. If a congressman or senator needed an appropriation for his district, instead of introducing a bill in Congress, he went to Roosevelt to ask for it. All over the country, states, cities, counties, business organizations, institutions of all sorts wanted projects of all kinds. Instead of going to Congress they went to the President. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1935 the Supreme Court said the NRA's procedures were unconstitutional, and it was never revived.  In the twenty-three months that NRA was on the Statute books, the average number of workers involved in strikes and lockouts and the number of days of idleness and lost productivity per month resulting were approximately four times as large as during the six months before NRA. After NRA was declared unconstitutional, both the number of workers involved in industrial disputes and the number of days lost declined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt asked [[Clarence Darrow]] to head up a national recovery review board.  The Darrow Committee's report stated, &amp;quot;We have here a body not only perfectly equipped to exercise monopolistic control, but endowed with extraordinary powers incompatible with the ideals heretofore entertained in a free country. . . In proportion as the authority of government sanctions regulation by industrial combinations, the inevitable tendency is toward monopoly with the elimination of the small business .&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Special and Supplementary Reports of Darrow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Committee, appointed by the President, released May 20, 1934. [http://robsrealnews.com/revisedNEWDEAL8.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Richberg, former Counsel and later Administrator of NRA admitted candidly, &amp;quot;Yet step by step through the diabolical logic of events the NRA became the apparent exponent and protector of 'price fixing' - that hateful objective of that most hated ogre, a big business monopoly.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Donald R. Richberg, ''The Rainbow'', (1936), pg. 31.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civilian Conservation Corps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of FDR’s favorites was the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), a relatively small program designed to keep unemployed young men out of trouble while giving them food and clothing and discipline, and their families some cash.  Roosevelt described work camps as a means for getting youth &amp;quot;off the city street corners.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young men were enrolled as amateur forest rangers, marsh-drainers, and the like, on projects designed to improve the countryside. The recruits were given room and board, clothing, and a dollar a day (they kept $5 a month, and the parents received the other $25). More than two and half million of them passed through the camps of the Civilian Conservation Corps, until the program was abolished in 1942, when the men were needed for the draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CCC was highly popular among Americans, both liberals and conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973, John A. Garraty published an important article on the CCC in the ''American Historical Review'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The New Deal, National Socialism, and the Great Depression'', John A. Garraty, American Historical Review, Vol. 78, October 1973. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Garraty was Gouverneur Morris Professor of American history at Columbia and later general editor of the ''American National Biography''. Yet, while an admirer of FDR, Garraty was compelled to note the striking similarities between the CCC and parallel programs set up by the [[Nazi]]s for German youth. Both were essentially designed to keep young men out of the labor market. Roosevelt described work camps as a means for getting youth “off the city street corners,” [[Hitler]] as a way of keeping them from “rotting helplessly in the streets.” In both countries much was made of the beneficial social results of mixing thousands of young people from different walks of life in the camps. . . . Furthermore, both were organized on semi-military lines with the subsidiary purposes of improving the physical fitness of potential soldiers and stimulating public commitment to national service in an emergency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Garraty listed many other similarities between the New Deal and [[National Socialism]]. Like Roosevelt, Hitler prided himself on being a “pragmatist” in economic affairs, trying out one panacea after another. Through a multitude of new agencies and mountains of new regulations, both in [[Germany]] and America, owners and managers of enterprises found their freedom to make decisions sharply curtailed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis encouraged working-class mobility, through vocational training, the democratizing youth camps, and a myriad of youth organizations. They usually favored workers as against employers in industrial disputes and, in another parallel to the New Deal, supported higher agricultural prices. Both FDR and Hitler “tended to romanticize rural life and the virtues of an agricultural existence“ and harbored dreams of the rural resettlement of urban populations, which proved disappointing. Characteristically for the collectivist movements of the time, “enormous [[propaganda]] campaigns” were mounted in the United States, Germany, and [[Italy]] (as well as in Russia) to fire up enthusiasm for the government’s programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is no wonder, then, as Professor Garraty writes, that “during the first years of the New Deal the German press praised [Roosevelt] and the New Deal to the skies. . . . Early New Deal policies seemed to the Nazis essentially like their own and the role of Roosevelt not very different from the [[Führer]]’s.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Woman Child.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Mother of seven children without food, California, ca. February 1936. ''[http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/128_migm.html Farm Security Administration Collection], Library of Congress'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Works Progress Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Works Progress Administration ([[WPA]]) operated 1935-43 and was the largest and most controversial of the relief programs. Until now relief had been a local responsibility, although both Hoover and FDR had provided federal funding.  Now the national government took full control; conservatives charged it was done to build a vast national political machine for Roosevelt.  TheWPA had a larger size and budget($5 billion at first) than previous efforts such as FERA and CWA. [[Harry Hopkins]], a liberal close to FDR, was the director. The WPA was responsible for the building and renovation of over 100,000 public buildings and the construction of 600 airports, more than 500,000 miles of roads, and over 100,000 bridges. The WPA was also well known for its flexibility. It employed not only construction workers but also artists and authors as well as operating separate sewing projects for women. The [[NYA|National Youth Administration]] (NYA) was a unit of the WPA for young men and women (in contrast to its rival the CCC, which only enrolled young men).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===No training===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major failing of the New Deal, and especially the CCC and WPA, was the deliberate decision not to provide job training. The reason was that liberals (and especially labor unions) thought there were already too many unemployed skilled workers and there was no need for more.  In retrospect this was one of the major failings of the New Deal, and was reversed in World War II, when the government subsidized job training on a very large scale in industry and the military.  Ever since 1996 the consensus has been that job training is an essential part of any program designed to help the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! United States &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Great Britain &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unemployment (1930 average)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4,770,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 1,993,951&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unemployment February 1936&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 12,550,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 2,016,578 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Percent increase'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 163 % &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Federation of Labor.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;League of Natione, ''Bulletin of&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Ordeal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable New Deal programs== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Newdealstamp.png|thumb|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal had countless programs, labeled an &amp;quot;alphabet soup&amp;quot; by its detractors. Among the New Deal acts were the following, most of them passed within the first 100 days of FDR's administration. Most were abolished around 1943, others remain in operation in 2009:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]] a Hoover agency expanded under [[Jesse Holman Jones]] to make large loans to big business.  Ended in 1954.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FERA|Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA). ERA, a Hoover loan program to states for relief; replaced by FERA in 1933 to give grants to states to operate relief projects for the unskilled; replaced by WPA in 1935. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bank Holiday, 1933: closed all banks until they became certified by federal reviewers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Abandonment of gold standard, 1933: gold reserves no longer backed currency; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), 1933: employed young men to perform unskilled work in rural areas; under Army supervision; separate program for Native Americans&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA), 1933: effort to modernize very poor region (most of Tennessee), centered on dams that generated electricity on the [[Tennessee River]]; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA), 1933: raised farm prices by cutting total farm output of major crops (and hogs)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA), 1933: industries set up codes to reduce unfair competition, raise wages and prices; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), 1933: built large public works projects; used private contractors (did not directly hire unemployed) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] (FDIC) / [[Glass-Steagall Act]]: insures deposits in banks in order to restore public confidence in banks; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Securities Act of 1933]], created the SEC, 1933: codified standards for sale and purchase of stock, required risk of investments to be accurately disclosed; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Civil Works Administration]]  (CWA), 1933-34: provided temporary jobs to millions of unemployed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Indian Reorganization Act]], 1934 moved away from assimilation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Social Security (United States)|Social Security Act]] (SSA), 1935: provided financial assistance to: elderly, handicapped, paid for by employee and employer payroll contributions; required years contributions, so first payouts were 1942; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA), 1935: a national labor program for 2+ million unemployed; created useful construction work for unskilled men; also sewing projects for women and arts projects for unemployed artists, musicians and writers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Labor Relations Act]] (NLRA) / Wagner Act, 1935: set up National Labor Relations Board to supervise labor-management relations; In 1930s it strongly favored [[trade union|labor union]]s. Modified by the [[Taft-Hartley Act]] (1947); still exists &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Judicial Reorganization Bill, 1937: gave President power to appoint a new Supreme Court judge for every judge 70 years or older; failed to pass Congress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fair Labor Standards Act]] ([http://www.finduslaw.com/fair_labor_standards_act_flsa_29_u_s_code_chapter_8 29 U.S. Code Chapter 8]), 1938: established a maximum normal work week of 40 hours, and a minimum pay of 40 cents/hour; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the detailed guide at [[New Deal Bibliography]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alter, Jonathan. ''The Defining Moment: FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope'' (2006), popular account&lt;br /&gt;
* Badger, Anthony J. ''The New Deal: The Depression Years, 1933-1940.'' (2002) good general survey from British perspective&lt;br /&gt;
* Best, Gary Dean. ''The Critical Press and the New Deal: The Press Versus Presidential Power, 1933-1938'' (1993) looks at conservative papers and magazines [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-critical-press-and-the-new-deal-the-press-versus-presidential-power-1933-1938-by-gary-dean-best.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chafe, William H. ''The Achievement of American Liberalism: The New Deal and Its Legacies.'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99839056 online edition], liberal peaise&lt;br /&gt;
* Conkin, Paul K. ''The New Deal.'' (1967), a brief New Left critique.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dubofsky, Melvyn, ed. ''The New Deal: Conflicting Interpretations and Shifting Perspectives.'' (1992), reader&lt;br /&gt;
* Eden, Robert, ed. ''New Deal and Its Legacy: Critique and Reappraisal'' (1989), essays by conservative scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* Graham, Otis L. and Meghan Robinson Wander, eds. ''Franklin D. Roosevelt: His Life and Times.'' (1985). A very useful encyclopedic reference.&lt;br /&gt;
* Himmelberg, Robert F. ''The Great Depression and the New Deal'' (2001) 185 pp. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101548706 online edition], reader&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, David M. ''Freedom From Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945.'' (1999), the best scholarly overview; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=52284041 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Kirkendall, Richard S. . &amp;quot;The New Deal As Watershed: The Recent Literature,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 54, No. 4. (Mar., 1968), pp. 839-852. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196803%2954%3A4%3C839%3ATNDAWT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F in JSTOR], historiography&lt;br /&gt;
* Leuchtenberg, William E. ''Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932-1940''. (1963). The  standard scholarly history.&lt;br /&gt;
* McElvaine Robert S. ''The Great Depression'' 2nd ed (1993), social history, by a liberal&lt;br /&gt;
* McJimsey, George. ''The Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt'', (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
* Milkis, Sidney M. and Jerome M. Mileur, eds. ''The New Deal and the Triumph of Liberalism'' (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitchell, Broadus. ''Depression Decade: From New Era through New Deal, 1929-1941'' (1964), overview of economic history [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=98065455 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Moley, Raymond. ''After Seven Years'' (1939), conservative memoir by ex-Brain Truster [http://www.questia.com/library/book/after-seven-years-by-raymond-moley.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Powell, Jim ''FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression'' (2003) sharp attack from the right&lt;br /&gt;
* Shlaes, Amity. ''The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression'' (2007), 480pp, popular conservative attack&lt;br /&gt;
* Sitkoff, Harvard. ed. ''Fifty Years Later: The New Deal Evaluated.'' (1984).  A friendly liberal evaluation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newdeal.feri.org/ New Deal Network] massive collection of photos and primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nisk.k12.ny.us/fdr/ FDR cartoon archive] hundreds of editorial cartoons from all political points of view (copyright has expired)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.digitalbookindex.com/_SEARCH/search010histus20-30sdepressiona.asp online full-text primary sources]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Great Depression]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Deal&amp;diff=700035</id>
		<title>New Deal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Deal&amp;diff=700035"/>
		<updated>2009-09-13T00:20:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: New Deal=Socialist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Deal''' was the name coined by President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]], for otherwise disjointed [[Socialism|socialist]] programs he conducted throughout the [[Great Depression]], especially from 1933-36. His program had three aspects: Relief, Recovery and Reform. It sought to provide immediate Relief for the millions of unemployed in the [[Great Depression]]. It was intended to promote Recovery of the economy to normal standards--a goal he did not fully achieve. It involved a series of Reforms, especially in the financial system and labor relations. The basic issue was how to deal with the severely damaged economy --and great social misery--caused by three years of the [[Great Depression]].  Conservatives endorsed parts of the '''First New Deal''' (the 1933 programs)  and rejected the more radical '''Second New Deal''' (the 1934-35 programs).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was popular among voters leading to the formation of the [[New Deal Coalition]], which made the Democrats the majority party during the [[Fifth Party System]] into the 1960s. However a [[Conservative Coalition]] took control of Congress in 1937 and  blocked nearly all additional programs; during the war years (1941-45) the conservatives successfully rolled back many of the relief efforts on the grounds they were no longer needed since full employment was achieved.  The &amp;quot;reforms&amp;quot; that regulated the economy were mostly dropped in the deregulation era (1974-87), except for oversight of Wall Street buy the [[SEC]], which conservatives approved because it increased investor confidence.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Deal Coalition]] dominated national politics until it split apart in the 1960s. Ever since it has been the holy grail of liberals seeking to restore their former glory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the New Deal did not fully solve the economic catastrophe that was on the verge of destroying the US economy in early 1933, it achieved many of its objectives and the period of 1933-37 saw some sectors return to economic growth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Broker State==&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal created the &amp;quot;Broker State&amp;quot;, where different interest groups compete in the national market. The government became a mediator between those interest groups, giving power to those who has enough political and economic power to demand it. One of the limitations of this Broker States was that minority groups were often ignored since they did not have political power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic planning==&lt;br /&gt;
As the Depression set in, terms like “[[planned economy]]” and “national planning” became the watchwords of the day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1468 ''FDR: The Man, the Leader, the Legacy''], Ralph Raico, Future of Freedom Foundation, April 1, 2001. Retreived from The Independent Institute.org 06/17/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They had been used by theoriticians for years and popularized by best-selling writers like George Soule and Stuart Chase, who lauded the Soviet Gosplan (central planning), asking plaintively, “Why should the Russians have all the fun of remaking a world?” One prominent [[Brain Trust]]ers was [[Rexford Guy Tugwell]]. Tugwell was a follower of the school of thought known as &amp;quot;Institutional Economics&amp;quot;. His official position was assistant secretary of agriculture, that is, second in command to [[Henry A. Wallace]], but his influence extended far beyond that. Tugwell had traveled to the Soviet Union in 1927 and observed through scientific economic planning the Soviets were able to “carry out their industrial operations with a completely thought-out program.” “The future,” he announced, “is becoming visible in Russia.”  Tugwell scorned the [[free market]] as anarchical, an uncoordinated muddle of hopelessly conflicting aims and purposes. It would have to be replaced by national planning, or technocracy, another shibboleth of the day, implying rule by the technical experts and managers, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Burnham, ''The Managerial Revolution'', (1966).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; like himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==First and Second New Deals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians distinguish between the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; of 1933, which had something for almost every group, and the &amp;quot;Second New Deal&amp;quot; (1935–36), which introduced class conflict, especially between business and labor unions.   The First New Deal (1933-34) included many &amp;quot;alphabet agencies&amp;quot;, notably ([[AAA]], [[CCC]], [[FERA]], CWA, [[FHA]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.fha.com/fha_loans.cfm Federal Housing Administration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[FDIC]]&amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.fdic.gov/ FDIC - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[NRA]], [[PWA]], [[TVA]], [[SEC]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml SEC - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Second New Deal, started in 1934-35 included the [[WPA]], a giant relief agency, and Social Security&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  See [http://www.ssa.gov/history/history.html SSA - Social Security History]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, as well as the [[NLRA]] or &amp;quot;Wagner Act&amp;quot; that promoted rapid growth of labor unions. The opponents of the New Deal, complaining of the cost and the shift of power to Washington, stopped its expansion by 1937, and abolished many of its programs by 1943. The Supreme Court ruled several programs unconstitutional (some parts of them were soon replaced, except for the NRA). The main New Deal programs still in existence today are Social Security the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] (FDIC) and the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] (SEC) which regulates Wall Street.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Other major programs that still exist under their original names include the, the [[Federal Housing Administration]] (FHA)[http://www.fha.com/fha_loans.cfm Federal Housing Administration]and the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA)[http://www.tva.gov/abouttva/history.htm TVA]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign policy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see [[World Economic Conference of 1933]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In foreign policy the New Deal pursued isolationism, set in motion by Roosevelt's &amp;quot;bombshell message&amp;quot; to the [[World Economic Conference of 1933]] which ended efforts to stabilize  international exchange rates. Roosevelt--acting against the advice of his top aides--feared that cooperation with major nations would limit his abilities to manipulate the money supply and end the [[deflation]] that was a crippling element of the depression.  The major nations were appalled.  Nazi Germany, which promoted autarchy, rejoiced for it gained a free hand to expand its economic power across the globe.  A series of Neutrality Laws (see [[Neutrality Act]]) were passed that prohibited American business from selling munitions to nations at war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a peculiar affinity between the New Deal and the European dictatorships that on occasion extended even to [[fascism]] and [[national socialism]]  Early on, FDR referred to [[Benito Mussolini]] as “the admirable Italian gentlemen,” stating to his ambassador in Rome, “I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.&amp;quot;  Mussolini, in turn, was flattered by what he saw as the New Deal’s copying of his own corporate state, in the [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA) and other early measures.  Even [[Hitler]] had kind words at first for Roosevelt’s “dynamic” leadership, stating that “I have sympathy with President Roosevelt because he marches straight to his objective over Congress, over lobbies, over stubborn bureaucracies.”   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What linked the New Deal to the regimes in Italy and Germany, as well as in Soviet Russia, was their fellowship in the wave of [[collectivism]] that was sweeping the world. In an essay published in 1933, [[John Maynard Keynes]] observed this trend, and expressed his sympathy with the “variety of politico-economic experiments” under way in the continental dictatorships as well as in the United States. All of them, he gloated, were turning their backs on the old, discredited [[laissez-faire]] and embracing national planning in one form or another.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was a kinder, gentler form of the collectivism.  In all of the national planning schemes, government gained power at the expense of the people, with the leaders seeking to impose a philosophy of life that subordinated the individual to the needs of the community—as defined by the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt and the State Department promoted a &amp;quot;Good Neighbor&amp;quot; policy toward Latin America, which meant that the U.S. would no longer try to prevent or overthrow dictatorships or governments ruinous to the people. An immediate result was the takeover of [[Cuba]] by a military dictatorship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally realizing the dangers posed by the Nazis, Roosevelt reversed course in 1938 and sought to repeal the neutrality laws.  However not all the New Dealers went along with FDR; many remained isolationist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relief, Recovery, and Reform==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal had three components: direct relief, economic recovery, and financial reform; these were also called the 'Three Rs'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Relief'' was the immediate effort to help the one-third of the population that was hardest hit by the depression.  Roosevelt expanded Hoover's [[Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA) work relief program, and added the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), and (starting in 1935) the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA).  In 1935 the social security and unemployment insurance programs were added.  Separate programs were set up for relief in rural America, such as the [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA) and [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA).  These work relief programs have been praised by most economists in retrospect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Parker 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[Milton Friedman]] who after taking a graduate degree in economics was employed by the WPA to analyze family budgets and studied the hardships of families said that, at the time, he and his wife &amp;quot;regarded [these job-creation programs] appropriate responses to the critical situation&amp;quot; but not &amp;quot;the price- and wage-fixing measures of the National Recovery Administration and the Agricultural Adjustment Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Friedman, ''Two Lucky People''  (1998) p. 59.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Recovery'' was the effort in numerous programs to restore the economy to normal health.  By most economic indicators this was achieved by 1937--except for unemployment, which remained stubbornly high until World War II began.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Reform'' was based on the assumption that the depression was caused by the inherent instability of the market and that government intervention was necessary to rationalize and stabilize the economy, and to balance the interests of farmers, business and labor. It included the [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA, 1933) (which ended in 1935), regulation of Wall Street ([[SEC]], 1934), the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) farm programs (1933 and 1938), insurance of bank deposits ([[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] 1933) and the [[Wagner Act]] (1935)encouraging workers to organize into labor unions.  Despite urgings by some New Dealers, there was no major anti-trust program.  Roosevelt rejected the opportunity to take over banks and railroads. He did not support state ownership of factories, and only one major program, the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (1933), involved government ownership of the means of production.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Recovery Act (NRA) and the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA) were  plans to take the whole industrial and agricultural life of the country under the wing of the government, organize it into vast farm and [[industrial cartel]]s, as they were called in Germany, [[corporative]]s as they were called in Italy, and operate business and the farms under plans made and carried out under the supervision of government. This is the complete negation of [[classical liberalism]]. It is, in fact, the essence of [[fascism]]. Fascism goes one step further and insists this cannot be done by a [[democracy|democratic]] government; that it can be done successfully only under a [[totalitarian]] regime. At the time fascism was not defined as [[anti-Semitism]]. It was a word used to describe the political system of Italian Premier [[Benito Mussolini]]. Roosevelt adopted the Italian model merely because at the moment it seemed politically expedient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1934, the Supreme Court began declaring significant parts of the New Deal unconstitutional.  The programs were quickly fixed to pass muster, but in 1937 Roosevelt stunned the nation by a surprise proposal to pack the Supreme Court by adding five new justices. The proposal failed and Roosevelt permanently alienated many conservative Democrats; however the Supreme Court started upholding New Deal laws. Justices then started retiring, allowing Roosevelt to select a majority of the Court. By 1942, the Supreme Court had almost completely abandoned its &amp;quot;judicial activism&amp;quot; of striking down congressional laws. The Supreme Court ruled in ''[[Wickard v. Filburn]]'' that the [[Commerce Clause]] covered almost all such regulation allowing the necessary expansion of federal power to make the New Deal &amp;quot;constitutional&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two old words now took on new meaning. &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; no longer referred to [[classical liberalism]] but now meant a supporter of the New Deal; conservative meant upholding the Constitution.  Whether the New Deal was successful is usually approached not as a historical problem, but as a current debate whether the New Deal should be a model for government today, complicated by its conflicting goals of promising something for nothing for everyone. Liberals  continue to battle conservatives.  The term &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; is also used to describe the [[New Deal Coalition]] that Roosevelt created to support his programs, including the Democratic party, big city machines, labor unions, Catholic and Jewish minorities, African Americans, farmers, and most Southern whites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Origins of the New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 29th of October, 1929, the flight of capital from the over valued U.S. stock market set off a downward spiral in employment and growth in every part of the globe known as the [[Great Depression]]. Although statistics were not kept it was later estimated unemployment in the U.S. increased from 4% to 25% between 1929 and 1933 while manufacturing output plunged by approximately a third. Gross private domestic investment, which includes construction and inventories, shrank from $16.2 billion to $1.4 billion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1958 constant dollars.  Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, ''Federal Reserve Bulletin'',  June 1973, p. A68.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prices everywhere fell, making the burden of the repayments of debts much harder.  Heavy industry, mining, lumbering and agriculture were hard hit.  The impact was much less severe in white collar and service sectors, but every city and state was hit hard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon accepting the 1932 [[U.S. Democratic Party, history|Democratic]] nomination for president, Roosevelt promised &amp;quot;a new deal for the American people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The phrase came from the title of popular writer Stuart Chase's book ''A New Deal'' published earlier in 1932. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt entered office with no single ideology or plan for dealing with the depression. He was willing to try anything, and, indeed, in the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; (1933-34) virtually every organized group (except the Socialists and Communists) gained much of what they demanded. This &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; thus was self-contradictory, pragmatic, and experimental. Government spending propelled the economy to recover from the deep pit of 1932, and started heading upward again until 1937, when the over emphasis on consumption of capital resources plunged the economy into the [[Recession of 1937]] and sent unemployment back to 1934 levels. Whether the New Deal was responsible for the recovery, or whether it even slowed the recovery, is a subject of debate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal drew from many different sources over the previous half-century.  Some New Dealers, led by [[Thurman Arnold]], went back to the anti-monopoly tradition in the Democratic party that stretched back a century.  Monopoly was bad for America, [[Louis Brandeis]] kept insisting, because it produced waste and inefficiency. However, the anti-monopoly group never had a major impact on New Deal policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the Wilson administration, other New Dealers, such as [[Hugh Samuel Johnson|Hugh Johnson]] of the [[National Recovery Administration|NRA]], were shaped by efforts to mobilize the economy for [[World War I]],  They brought ideas and experience from the government controls and spending of 1917-18. And from the policy experiments of the 1920s, New Dealers picked up ideas from efforts to harmonize the economy by creating cooperative relationships among its constituent elements. Roosevelt brought together a so-called &amp;quot;[[Brain Trust]]&amp;quot; of academic advisers to assist in his recovery efforts. They sought to introduce extensive government intervention in the form of spending and regulation instead of allowing self-correcting mechanisms to run its course. New Dealers such as Donald Richberg, as the replacement head of the NRA, said &amp;quot;A nationally [[planned economy]] is the only salvation of our present situation and the only hope for the future.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leuchtenburg p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian Clarence B. Carson says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this remove in time from the early days of the New Deal, it is difficult to recapture, even in imagination, the heady enthusiasm among a goodly number of intellectuals for a government planned economy. So far as can now be told, they believed that a bright new day was dawning, that national planning would result in an organically integrated economy in which everyone would joyfully work for the common good, and that American society would be freed at last from those antagonisms arising, as General Hugh Johnson put it, from “the murderous doctrine of savage and wolfish individualism, looking to dog-eat-dog and devil take the hindmost.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carson, Clarence B. [http://www.libertyhaven.com/theoreticalorphilosophicalissues/economichistory/relicsdeal.shtml ''The Relics of Intervention'' part 4. ''New Deal Collective Planning'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Newdealstamp.png|thumb|280px|1998 US stamp celebrates alphabet agencies of New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal faced some very vocal [[American conservatism|conservative]] opposition. The first organized opposition in 1934 came from the [[American Liberty League]] led by Democrats such as 1924 and 1928 presidential candidates [[John W. Davis]] and [[Al Smith]]. There was also  a large loose grouping of opponents of the New Deal who have come to be known as the [[Old Right (United States)|Old Right]] which included politicians, intellectuals, writers, and newspaper editors of various philosophical persuasions including [[classical liberals]], conservatives, Democrats and Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===World Comparisons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain was unable to adopt major programs to stop its depression.  That led to collapse of the Labour government and replacement in 1931 by a National coalition (predominantly Conservative). There was no equivalent &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; government intervention in Britain, which allowing self correcting market mechanism to operate, brought about a higher level of sustained employment and recovered more quickly from the Depression. In Canada, Conservative Prime Minister [[R. B. Bennett]] pushed for a program similar to the New Deal but failed to get it enacted and was defeated for reelection by the Liberals under [[William Mackenzie King]]. In New Zealand a series of economic and social policies similar to the New Deal were adopted after the election of the first Labour Government in 1935 [http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/H/HistoryEconomic/LabourPolicy/en].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Nazi Germany]], economic recovery was pursued through wage controls, suppression of unions, and big government spending programs on [[Autobahn|infrastructure]] and public works; as in the United States, large-scale armament spending came later in the 1930s. In [[Mussolini]]'s Italy, the economic controls of his corporate state were tightened.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The First Hundred Days==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FDR0415.JPG|framed|Roosevelt's energetic public personality--&amp;quot;the only thing we have to fear is fear itself,&amp;quot; and his &amp;quot;[[fireside chats]]&amp;quot; helped restore confidence.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having won a decisive victory in 1932, and with his party having decisively swept Congressional elections across the nation, Roosevelt entered office with unprecedented political capital. Many Congressmen had their favorite projects, like the TVA plan of Senator [[George Norris]], which the administration adopted and treated as its own.  Finally there were numerous Hoover plans that he could not get passed but were ready to go, such as the emergency banking laws. Americans of all political persuasions were demanding immediate action, and Roosevelt responded with a series of new programs in the “first hundred days” of the administration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The &amp;quot;Bank Holiday&amp;quot; and the Emergency Banking Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt hurled the blame at businessmen and bankers with religious rhetoric: &amp;quot;Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men....The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The failure of Credit Anstalt, a large commercial bank in Austria in 1931, brought a new wave of financial panic to Wall Street. By March 4, all banks in the country were virtually closed by their governors, and Roosevelt kept them all closed until he could pass new legislation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; for details see &amp;quot;Bottom&amp;quot; in ''Time Magazine'' (March 13, 1933) online at [http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,745289,00.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On March 9, Roosevelt sent to Congress the [[Emergency Banking Act]], drafted in large part by Hoover's administration; the act was passed and signed into law the same day. It provided for a system of reopening sound banks under Treasury supervision, with federal loans available if needed.  Three-quarters of the banks in the [[Federal Reserve System]] reopened within the next three days. Billions of dollars in &amp;quot;hoarded&amp;quot; currency and gold flowed back into them within a month, thus stabilizing the banking system. All was normal by April. During all of 1933, 4,004 small local banks were permanently closed and were merged into larger banks.  (Their depositors eventually received 85 cents on the dollar of their deposits.)  Congress created the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] in June, which insured deposits for up to $5,000, although Roosevelt opposed it support was overwhelming.  The establishment of the FDIC virtually ended the era of &amp;quot;runs&amp;quot; on banks.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Banking Act of 1935 removed the Secretary of the Treasury from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and established the [[Federal Open Market Committee]] to control market operations of the the Federal Reserve, the buying and selling of Government securities the Federal Reserve System.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic growth===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy hit rock bottom in March 1933 and now it started to expand.  As historian Broadus Mitchell notes, &amp;quot;Most indexes worsened until the summer of 1932, which may be called the low point of the depression economically and psychologically.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mitchell p 404.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Economic indicators show the economy reached nadir in the first days of March, then began a steady, sharp upward recovery. Thus the Federal Reserve Index of Industrial Production hit its lowest point of 52.8 in July 1932 (with 1935-39 = 100) and was practically unchanged at 54.3 in March 1933; however by July 1933, it reached 85.5, a dramatic rebound of 57% in four months. Growth was steady and strong until 1937 but job creation continued to lag. By 1941personal consumption expenditures - despite population increase - were virtually unchanged since 1929, reflecting a general impoverishment of the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Personal consumption expenditures in the aggregate for 1929 were 77.2 billion, 45.8 billion in 1933, and 80.6 billion in 1941.  Measured in constant 1958 dollars. Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, ''Federal Reserve Bulletin'',  June 1973, p. A68.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US-jobs2040.JPG|thumb|450px|Chart 2: total employment in US, excluding farms and WPA]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Economy Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Economy Act]], drafted by Budget Director [[Lewis Douglas]] was passed on March 20, 1933. The act proposed to balance the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; (non-emergency) federal budget by cutting the salaries of government employees and cutting pensions to veterans by 40 percent. It saved $500 million a year and reassured deficit hawks such as Douglas that the new president was fiscally conservative.  Roosevelt argued there were two budgets: the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; federal budget, which he balanced, and the &amp;quot;emergency budget,&amp;quot; which was needed to defeat the depression.  It was imbalanced on a temporary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was ran on a platform of balancing the budget, but in office found himself running spending deficits to fund the numerous programs he created. Douglas, however, rejecting the distinction between a regular and emergency budget, resigned in 1934, and became an outspoken critic of the New Deal. Roosevelt strenuously opposed the [[Bonus Bill]] that would give World War I veterans a cash bonus.  Finally, Congress passed it over his veto in 1936, and the Treasury distributed $1.5 billion in cash to 4 million of bonus welfare benefits to veterans just before the 1936 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These blank check appropriations led to the subservience of Congress and the rise of bureaucracy. Under the Constitution, Congress alone can write laws. The executive branch only enforces the law. But Congress now began to pass laws that created large bureaus empowered to make [[regulation]]s or directives with a wide range of authority. Under these laws the executive bureau became a quasi-legislative body authorized by Congress to make regulations which had the effect of law. This practice grew until Washington was filled with a [[New Deal agencies|vast array of bureaus]] that were making laws, enforcing them and actually interpreting them through [[administrative law court]]s set up within the bureaus, abolishing on a large scale the [[separation of powers]] between executive, legislative and judicial processes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least until [[John F. Kennedy]] in 1960, New Dealers never fully recognized the [[Keynesian  economics|Keynesian]] argument for government spending as a vehicle for recovery. Most economists of the era, along with [[Henry Morgenthau, Jr.|Henry Morgenthau]] of the Treasury Department,  rejected Keynesian solutions and favored balanced budgets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minimum wage===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after his election FDR forced the Congress to scrap minimum wage and maximum hour legislation which the Senate had already passed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 2, Ch. 3., [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Three___The_Forgotten_De.htm ''The Forgotten Deprssion''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Farm Programs ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was keenly interested in farm issues, and emphasized that true prosperity would not return until farming was prosperous.  Many different programs were directed at farmers. The first hundred days produced a federal program to protect commercial farmers from the uncertainties of the depression through subsidies and production controls. This program began with the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]], creating the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA), which Congress passed in May 1933.  The Act reflected the demands of leaders of major farm organizations, especially the Farm Bureau, and reflected debates among Roosevelt's farm advisers such as [[Henry A. Wallace]], [[Rexford Tugwell]], and [[George Peek]]. The AAA implemented a provision for crop reductions known as the &amp;quot;domestic allotment&amp;quot; system of the act. Under this system producers of corn, cotton, dairy products, hogs, rice, tobacco, and wheat would decide on production limits for their crops. The AAA would then pay land owners subsidies for leaving some of their land idle with funds provided by a new tax on food processing. Farm prices were to be subsidized up to the point of parity.  Some crops were ordered to be destroyed and some livestock slaughtered to raise the prices farmers received. The idea was that the less produced, the higher the price, and the farmer would benefit.   Farm incomes increased significantly in the first three years of the New Deal. A Gallup Poll revealed that a majority of the American public opposed the AAA; conservatives complained that price fixing was dangerously distorting the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The milk program was especially problematic--and indeed still is in the 21st century, with state governments having a major role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main farm program was the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] or AAA, enacted in 1933.  The government rented land from farmers to take it out of production, therby hoping the reduce the surpluses that caused such low prices.  By 1936 conditions had dramatically improved in agriculture. Although the holy grail of 100% parity was not reached until 1943, incomes were much higher rising from $4.7 billion in 1932 to $8.7 billion in 1936. The heavy burden of debt that had soured the 1920s was mostly paid off or refinanced.  The chimerical vision of escaping to the rich cities no longer enthralled the farm youth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main causes of the return to prosperity include the overall improved national economy, the severe draught of 1934 that reduced output and caused prices to rise.  The AAA payments to farmers were a help.  The acreage reduction program had little effect except in cotton and tobacco. In other crops the farmers improved their efficiency on the remaining acreage and output stayed level. In cotton and tobacco, however, prices were much higher and since the great majority of Southerners lived in rural areas and depended on these crops, the New Deal was very well regarded.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Benedict, ''Farm Policies,'' p 353&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AAA established an important and long-lasting federal role in the planning on the entire agricultural sector of the economy, with support from liberals and conservatives alike.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1936, the Supreme Court declared the AAA to be [[Constitutionality|unconstitutional]], stating that &amp;quot;a statutory plan to regulate and control agricultural production, is a matter beyond the powers delegated to the federal government...&amp;quot; The AAA was replaced by a similar program that did win Court approval, and was endorsed by the both parties in the 1936 election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal regulation of agricultural production has been modified many times since then, but together with large subsidies it is still in effect in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tenant farmers and sharecroppers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, henry Wallace and many New Dealers were highly sympathetic to the marginal farmers who lived on the land in severe poverty, especially in the South.  Major programs addressed to their needs included the [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA), the [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA), the [[Rural Electrification Administration]] (REA), the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA) and rural welfare projects sponsored by the WPA, NYA, Forest Service and CCC, including school lunches, building new schools, opening roads in remote areas, reforestation, and purchase of marginal lands to enlarge national forests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relief ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The administration launched a series of relief measures and welfare agencies to give meaningful jobs to the unemployed, especially unskilled laborers. The largest programs were the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), the [[Civil Works Administration]] (CWA), the [[Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA), the [[National Youth Administration]] (NYA), and above all, the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA).  The WPA employed a maximum of 3.3 million in November 1938.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Nancy Rose' Put to Work.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, even at this level of WPA employment, unemployment (counting WPA as employment) was still 12.5% in 1938 according to figures from Micheal Darby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Darby, Michael R.''Three and a half million U.S. Employees have been mislaid: or, an Explanation of Unemployment, 1934-1941.'' Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 1 (1976): 1-16.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All these emergency programs were terminated in 1942-43, when unemployment had vanished due to World War II related employment offers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wpa1.JPG|thumb|275px|WPA employed 2 to 3 million unemployed at unskilled labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933 the administration launched the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]], a project involving dam construction planning on an unprecedented scale in order to curb flooding, generate electricity, and modernize the very poor farms in the [[Tennessee Valley]] region of the [[US South|Southern United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Repeal of prohibition===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a measure that garnered substantial popular support, Roosevelt, in his first days of office, moved to put to rest one of the most divisive cultural issues of the 1920s.  He supported and signed a bill to legalize the manufacture and sale of beer, an interim measure pending the repeal of [[Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Prohibition]], for which a constitutional amendment (the Twenty-first) was already in process.  The amendment was ratified later in 1933. Prohibition had been a rather unpopular amendment and led to bootlegging, the illegal manufacture (or importation) and sale of liquor within the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communists in 1930s===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was infiltrated with [[Communists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy]] wrote in its final report, &amp;quot;The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Hollywood.&amp;quot; [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa6.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 6. The Experience of The Bomb]; the report also included, &amp;quot;At this distance it is difficult to conceive the intensity of Communist conviction in the 1930s....Looking back, however, we see more clearly the dilemma ... By 1950... the United States Government possessed information which the American public desperately needed to know: proof that there had been a serious attack on American security by the [[Soviet Union]], with considerable assistance from what was, indeed, an “enemy within.” The fact that we knew this was now known to, or sufficiently surmised by, the Soviet authorities. Only the American public was denied this information. [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa7.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 7. The Cold War]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Harold Ware]] was a [[Communist Party USA]] (CPUSA) official in the AAA and founded the [[Ware group]]. The group consisted of young lawyers and economists, had about 75 members in 1934 and was divided into about eight cells. The AAA was later found [[unconstitutional]], but by that time the Communist operatives had established jobs in government employment. [[Alger Hiss]], [[Lee Pressman]], [[John Abt]], [[Charles Kramer]], [[Nathan Witt]], [[Henry Collins]], [[George Silverman]], [[Marion Bachrach]], [[John Herrmann]], [[Nathaniel Weyl]], [[Donald Hiss]] and [[Victor Perlo]] were all members.  [[Harry Dexter White]], who was involved in the most auspicious policy [[subversion (political)|subversion]] as Director of the Division of Monetary Research in the [[Treasury Department]], was also affiliated with the group. The Ware group was the CPUSA's covert arm at this time.  Each of these agents not only provided classified documents to Soviet intelligence, but was involved in political influence operations as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1934, a Congressional Investigation was held to examine statements by Dr. [[William A. Wirt]], who headed the U.S. [[Department of Education|Office of Education]]. Dr. Wirt had attended a dinner party with several Brain Trusters at the home of his secretary, [[Alice Barrows]].  Barrows began working for the Office of Education in 1919 and was secretly a member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) which advocated the violent overthrow of the United States Constitution.  Several of the Brain Trusters present at the dinner revealed to Wirt they were CPUSA members. Wirt testified, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery, they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce.  By propaganda, they would destroy institutions making long term capital loans—and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier, he must also follow his money with control and management. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hearings, House Select Committee To Investigate Certain Statements of Dr. William Wirt, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session, April 10 and 17, 1934. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Dr Wirt faces the cameras and tells all'', Literary Digest v. 117 (April 21 1934) p. 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster053.pdf Volume 53 June 1946], p. 78 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside government, the far left was  exerting considerable influence in the labor movement (it dominated the new [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]]), and was building a network of membership organizations. Thus the [[American League Against War and Fascism]] was formed in 1933 and, in 1937, became the American League for Peace and Democracy.  There followed the [[American Youth Congress]], 1934; League of American Writers, 1935; National Negro Congress, 1936; and the American Congress for Democracy and Intellectual Freedom, 1939.  All had significant Stalinist connections, and fought furious battles with the anti-Communist left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leuchtenburg (1963) 281-3; Irving Howe, Lewis A. Coser, and Julius Jacobson, ''The American Communist Party: a critical history, 1919-1957'' (1957); James R. Barrett, ''William Z. Foster and the Tragedy of American Radicalism'' (2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Puerto Rico===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A separate set of programs operated in [[Puerto Rico]], headed by the Puerto Rico Reconstruction Administration.  It promoted [[land reform]] and helped small farms; it set up farm cooperatives, promoted crop diversification, and helped local industry. The Puerto Rico Reconstruction Administration was directed by [[Ernest Gruening]] from 1935 to 1937.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reform: (NIRA)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Business, labor, and government cooperation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides programs for immediate 'relief' the New Deal embarked quickly on an agenda of long-term 'reform' aimed at avoiding another depression. The New Dealers responded to demands to inflate the currency by a variety of means. Another group of reformers sought to build consumer and farmer co-ops as a counterweight to big business.  The consumer co-ops did not take off, but the [[Rural Electrification Administration]] used co-ops to bring electricity to rural areas. (As of 2007, many still operate.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt realized that these initial actions were nothing but short term solutions, and that more comprehensive government programs would be necessary. In the roughly three years between the Great Crash and Roosevelt's First Hundred Days, the industrial economy had been suffering from a vicious cycle of [[deflation (economics)|deflation]]. Since 1931, the [[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]], then and now the voice of the nation's organized business, had been urging the Hoover administration to adopt an anti-deflationary scheme that would permit trade associations to cooperate in stabilizing prices within their industries. While existing antitrust laws clearly forbade such practices, organized business found a receptive ear in the Roosevelt administration.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration, packed with reformers aspiring to forge all elements of society into a cooperative unit (a reaction to the worldwide specter of business-labor &amp;quot;class struggle&amp;quot;), was fairly amenable to the idea of cooperation among producers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration insisted that business would have to ensure that the incomes of workers would rise along with their prices.  The product of all these impulses and pressures was the [[National Industrial Recovery Act]] (NIRA) which was passed by  Congress in June 1933. The NIRA established the [[National Planning Board]], also called the National Resources Planning Board (NRPB), to assist in planning the economy by providing recommendations and information. Fredric A. Delano was appointed head of the NRPB.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NIRA guaranteed to workers the right of collective bargaining and helped spur some union organizing activity, but much faster growth of union membership came after the 1935 Wagner Act. The NIRA established the [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA), which attempted to stabilize prices and wages through cooperative &amp;quot;code authorities&amp;quot; involving government, business, and labor. The NRA included a multitude of regulations imposing the pricing and production standards for all sorts of goods and services. Some ridiculed it as the &amp;quot;National Run Around.&amp;quot;  Most economists were dubious because it was based on fixing prices to reduce competition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Parker&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian Jim Power, in ''FDR's Folly'' says that the above-market wage rates dictated by the NRA made it more expensive for employers to hire people, and therefore unnecessarily maintained high unemployment and prolonged the Depression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To prime the pump and cut unemployment, the NIRA created the [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), a major program of public works. From 1933 to 1939 PWA spent $6 billion with private companies to build 34,500 projects, many of them quite large.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The NRA &amp;quot;Blue Eagle&amp;quot; campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Blue-nra.jpg|thumb|300px}left|NRA &amp;quot;Blue Eagle&amp;quot; stamps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the center of the NIRA was the National Recovery Administration (NRA), headed by former General [[Hugh Samuel Johnson]]. Johnson called on every business establishment in the nation to accept a stopgap &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot;: a minimum wage of between 20 and 40 cents an hour, a maximum workweek of 35 to 40 hours, and the abolition of child labor. Johnson and Roosevelt contended that the &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot; would raise consumer purchasing power and increase employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To mobilize political support for the NRA, and the administrations &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot;, Johnson launched the &amp;quot;NRA [[Blue Eagle]]&amp;quot; publicity campaign to boost his bargaining strength to negotiate the codes with business and labor. The NRA negotiated specific sets of codes with leaders of the nation's major industries; the most important provisions were anti-deflationary floors below which no company would lower prices or wages, and agreements on maintaining employment and production. In a remarkably short time, the NRA won agreements from almost every major industry in the nation. Six months after the NRA went into effect industrial production dropped 25 percent. Donald Richberg, who soon replaced Johnson as the head of the NRA said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no choice presented to American business between intelligently planned and uncontrolled industrial operations and a return to the gold-plated anarchy that masqueraded as &amp;quot;rugged individualism.&amp;quot;...Unless industry is sufficiently socialized by its private owners and managers so that great essential industries are operated under public obligation appropriate to the public interest in them, the advance of political control over private industry is inevitable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur Meier&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schlesinger, Jr. ''The Coming of the New Deal,'' (1957), p. 115&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time it ended in May 1935, industrial production was 22% higher than in May 1933. On May 27 1935, the NRA was found to be unconstitutional by a unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of [[Schechter v. United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; On that same day, the Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Frazier-Lemke Act that put a moratorium on farm mortgages.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US-mfg20-40.jpg|thumb|400px|Chart 3: employment in manufacturing 1920-1940, in millions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employment in private sector factories recovered to the level of the late 1920s by 1937 (see chart 2), but did not grow much bigger until the war came; during the war manufacturing employment leaped from 11 million in 1940 to 18 million in 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Second New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second New Deal Enacted 1935===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the spring of 1935, responding to the setbacks in the Court, a new skepticism in Congress, and the growing popular clamor for more dramatic action, the administration proposed or endorsed several important new initiatives. Historians refer to them as the &amp;quot;Second New Deal&amp;quot; and note that it was more radical, more pro-labor and anti-business than the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; of 1933-34. The [[National Labor Relations Act]], also known as the '''Wagner Act''', revived and strengthened the protections of collective bargaining contained in the original (and now unconstitutional) NIRA. The result was a tremendous growth of membership in the labor unions comprising the [[American Federation of Labor]]. Labor thus became a major component of the New Deal political coalition.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt nationalized unemployment relief through the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA), headed by close friend [[Harry Hopkins]].  It created hundreds of thousands of low-skilled blue collar jobs for unemployed men (and some for unemployed women and white collar workers).  Applicants for WPA jobs did not have to be Democrats, but their foremen quickly explained that Roosevelt created their paychecks and that conservative Republicans wanted to abolish the program.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[NYA|National Youth Administration]] was the semi-autonomous WPA program for youth. Its Texas director, [[Lyndon Baines Johnson]], later used the NYA as a model for some of his [[Great Society]] programs in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the very long run, the most important program of 1935, and perhaps the New Deal as a whole, was the [[Social Security Act]], which established a system of retirement pensions for people in the industrial sector (not including farmers or household workers) and unemployment insurance, as well as welfare benefits for poor families and the handicapped. It established the framework for the U.S. welfare system. Roosevelt insisted that it should be funded by payroll taxes rather than from the general fund; he said, &amp;quot;We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.&amp;quot;  With the [[Unified budget Act]] &amp;lt;-source-&amp;gt; the Social Security Trust Fund was used to fiance the Vietnam War and Great Society programs.  The original payroll witholding was 1% of the workers gross income, with Roosevelt pledging it would never exceed 3%. Today it 6.2% and 12.4% for self-employed workers - one sixth of a workers lifetime earnings when Medicare is factored in.  The withholding is on the first dollar of income with no deductions or exemptions allowed to offset contributions, and a worker was no claim or control over the assets in his account.  If a worker dies before retirement, his estate has no claim on his lifetime contributions.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Social Security remains by far the single largest program driving the growth of [[National Debt]]; since it is value of [[labor]] that is withheld, the more people [[emjployment|employed]], the higher wages are paid. the more hours worked including overtime, all is added to the national debt as a promise by the federal government repay at some future date.  And given that it is labor driving the creation of federal debt, the national debt cannot be paid down by labor.  This is refered to as the &amp;quot;structrual flaw&amp;quot; in the original Social Securioty Act.  Further, FDR's assertion that &amp;quot;no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program&amp;quot; would not withstand a Constitutional challenge.  In American people are born free, and no politician can the pledge that some future Congress elected by free citizens can refuse to honor the promises to pay seniors given that benefits are paid out from current workers earnings on a &amp;quot;pay as you go&amp;quot; basis, and are not held in a trust fund. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
One of the last New Deal agencies was the [[United States Housing Authority]], created in 1937 with some Republican support to abolish slums.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Defeat: Court Packing and Executive Reorganization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, however, emboldened by the triumphs of his first term, set out in 1937 to consolidate authority within the government in ways that provoked powerful opposition. Early in the year, he asked Congress to [[Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937|expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court]] so as to allow him to appoint members sympathetic to his ideas and hence tip the ideological balance of the Court.  This proposal provoked a storm of protest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In one sense, however, it succeeded; Justice [[Owen Josephus Roberts|Owen Roberts]], switched positions and began voting to uphold New Deal measures, effectively creating a liberal majority in ''[[West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish]]'' and ''[[National Labor Relations Board v. Jones &amp;amp; Laughlin Steel Corporation]]'' thus departing from the ''[[Lochner v. New York]]'' era and giving the government more power in questions of economic policies. Journalists called this change &amp;quot;[[the switch in time that saved nine]].&amp;quot; Recent scholars have noted that since the vote in Parrish took place several months before the court-packing plan was announced, other factors, like evolving jurisprudence, must have contributed to the Court's swing.  The opinions handed down in Spring 1937, favorable to the government, also contributed to the downfall of the plan. In any case, the &amp;quot;court packing plan,&amp;quot; as it was known, did lasting political damage to Roosevelt and was finally rejected by Congress in July.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At about the same time, the administration proposed a plan to reorganize the executive branch in ways that would significantly increase the president's control over the bureaucracy. Like the Court-packing plan, executive reorganization garnered opposition from those who feared a &amp;quot;Roosevelt dictatorship&amp;quot; and it failed in Congress; a watered-down version of the bill finally won passage in 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Attacks Right and Left ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the left denounce Roosevelt for rescuing capitalism when the opportunity was at hand to nationalize banking, railroads and other industries.[Conkin] Liberal historians argue that Roosevelt restored hope and self-respect to tens of millions of desperate people, built labor unions, upgraded the national infrastructure and saved capitalism in his first term when he could have destroyed it and easily nationalized the banks and the railroads. [Sitkoff]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the right complain that he enlarged the powers of the federal government, built up labor unions, slowed long-term economic growth, and weakened the business community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|A 1936 cartoon shows the GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the left have denounced the New Deal as a conservative phenomenon that let slip the opportunity to radically reform capitalism. Since the 1960s, &amp;quot;[[New Left]]&amp;quot; historians have been among the New Deal's harsh critics. (''For a list of relevant works, see the list of suggested readings appearing toward the bottom of the article.'') Barton J. Bernstein, in a 1968 essay, compiled a chronicle of missed opportunities and inadequate responses to problems. The New Deal may have saved capitalism from itself, Bernstein charged, but it had failed to help&amp;amp;mdash;and in many cases actually harmed&amp;amp;mdash;those groups most in need of assistance. Paul K. Conkin in ''The New Deal'' (1967) similarly chastised the government of the 1930s for its policies toward marginal farmers, for its failure to institute sufficiently progressive tax reform, and its excessive generosity toward select business interests. [[Howard Zinn]], in 1966, criticized the New Deal for working actively to actually preserve the worst evils of capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1970s research on the New Deal has been less interested in the question of whether the New Deal was a &amp;quot;conservative,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;revolutionary&amp;quot; phenomenon than in the question of constraints within which it was operating. Political sociologist [[Theda Skocpol]], in an influential series of articles, has emphasized the issue of &amp;quot;state capacity&amp;quot; as an often-crippling constraint. Ambitious reform ideas often failed, she argued because of the absence of a government bureaucracy with significant strength and expertise to administer them. Other more recent works have stressed the political constraints that the New Deal encountered. Both in Congress and among certain segments of the population conservative inhibitions about government remained strong; thus some scholars have stressed that the New Deal was not just a product of its liberal backers, but also a product of the pressures of its conservative opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Role: balance labor, business and farming==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the dismal record in aiding marginal farmers and African Americans, among others--  contrasted with its often frequent generosity toward certain business interests--the New Deal was to elevate and strengthen new interest groups so as to allow them to compete more effectively for the interests by having the federal government evolve into an arbitrator in competition among all elements and classes of society, acting as a force that could mediate when necessary to help some groups and limit the power of others. By the end of the 1930s, business found itself competing for influence with an increasingly powerful labor movement, one that was engaged in mass mobilization and sometimes militant action; with an organized agricultural economy, and occasionally with aroused consumers. The New Deal accomplished this by creating a series of state institutions that greatly, and permanently, expanded the role of the federal government in American life. The government was now committed to providing at least minimal assistance to the poor and unemployed; to protecting the rights of labor unions; to stabilizing the banking system; to building low-income housing; to regulating financial markets; to subsidizing agricultural production; and to doing many other things that had not previously been federal responsibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, perhaps the strongest legacy of the New Deal, in other words, was to make the federal government a protector of interest groups and a supervisor of competition among them. As a result of the New Deal, political and economic life became politically more competitive than before, with workers, farmers, consumers, and others now able to press their demands upon the government in ways that in the past had been available only to the corporate world. Hence the frequent description of the government the New Deal created as the &amp;quot;broker state,&amp;quot; a state brokering the competing claims of numerous groups.  If there was more political competition, there was less market competition. Farmers were not allowed to sell for less than the official price. The transportation industry (especially airlines, trucking and railroads) was tightly regulated so that every firm had a guaranteed market and management and labor had high profits and high wages, all at the cost of high prices and much inefficiency.  Quotas in the oil industry were fixed by the [[Railroad Commission of Texas]] with the federal [[Tom Connally|Connally]] Hot Oil Act of 1935&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Handbook of Texas Online: [http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/CC/mlc3.html Connally Hot Oil Act of 1935]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; guaranteeing that illegal &amp;quot;hot oil&amp;quot; would not be sold.   To the New Dealers, the free market meant &amp;quot;cut-throat competition&amp;quot; and they considered that evil.  Not until the 1970s and 1980s would most of the New Deal regulations be relaxed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, it did not transform American capitalism in any genuinely radical way. Except in the field of labor relations, corporate power remained nearly as free from government regulation in 1939 as it had been in 1933, but that changed dramatically during the war, as Washington took control over wage rates, prices, and allocation of raw materials, and sent military officers into munitions plants. All the relief programs were closed down during the war, but one major program survived--Social Security--to become the liberal hallmark of the New Deal into the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==African Americans==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal set up numerous agencies to help impoverished farmers, but in the long run they had to move to the cities to become better off.  Many leading New Dealers, including [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], [[Harold L. Ickes]], [[Aubrey Williams]] and [[Harry Hopkins]] worked hard to ensure Blacks received at least 10% of welfare assistance payments.  Economic uplift was one thing but political revolution was another: the New Deal did not try to undercut segregation or change the second class political status of Blacks in the South. Roosevelt did appoint an unprecedented number of African Americans to second-level positions in his administration that collectively were called the Black Cabinet, perhaps due to the influence of Eleanor Roosevelt, a vocal advocate of easing discrimination. Roosevelt and Hopkins worked with big city mayors to welcome Black political organizations that made the transition from the GOP to the Democratic party in 1934-36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WPA, NYA, and CCC relief programs allocated 10% of their budgets to blacks (who comprised about 10% of the total population, and 20% of the poor). They operated separate all-black units with the same pay and conditions as white units. The African American community responded favorably, so that by 1936 the majority who voted (usually in the North) were voting Democratic. This was a sharp realignment from 1932, when most African Americans preferred the Republican ticket. The New Deal thus established a political alliance between African Americans and the Democratic Party that survives into the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal historians argue the New Deal laid the ground work for black breakthroughs during World War II, the civil rights movement and the [[Great Society]] of the 1960s.  Militant African Americans insist that the Civil Rights movement owed everything to black activists, and very little to the New Deal.  Note that the New Deal was especially beneficial to white ethnic minorities, who responded with 80-90% of their votes for Roosevelt's reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The recession of 1937 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Newdealcartoon.GIF|thumb|left|250px| Some conservatives, like this cartoonist, argued that the New Deal was all package and little content. Others charged it went much too far. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration was under assault during FDR's second term, which presided over a new dip in the Great Depression in the fall of 1937 that continued through most of 1938. Production declined sharply, as did profits and employment. The Government's own statistics were showing that 23.8% of the Workforce was either unemployed, or underemployed. The term for the human suffering at the hands of [[government planners]] was &amp;quot;wastage.&amp;quot; According to the Brain Trusters own statistics, of &amp;quot;100 Per Cent Manpower,&amp;quot; 23.8 were &amp;quot;Per Cent Wastage.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Population and the Pattern of Unemployment, 1930-1937'', Rupert B. Vance and Nadia Danilevski, The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Jan., 1940), pp. 27-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After four years of &amp;quot;government solutions,&amp;quot; contemporaneous reports were stating &amp;quot;much of the unemployment in 1937 was due to a decrease in the number of jobs available.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Population and the Pattern of Unemployment, 1930-1937'', Vance and Danilevski.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynesian economists speculated that this was a result of a premature effort to curb government spending and balance the budget, while conservatives said it was caused by attacks on business and by the huge strikes caused by the organizing activities of the [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]] and the [[American Federation of Labor]] (AFL).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt rejected the advice of Morgenthau to cut spending, and decided big business was trying to ruin the New Deal by causing another depression that voters would react against by voting Republican. It was a &amp;quot;capital strike&amp;quot; said Roosevelt, and he ordered the FBI to look for a criminal conspiracy (they found none).  Roosevelt moved left and unleashed a rhetorical campaign against monopoly power, which was cast as the cause of the new crisis. Ickes attacked automaker Henry Ford, steelmaker Tom Girdler, and the super rich &amp;quot;Sixty Families&amp;quot; who supposedly comprised &amp;quot;the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States.&amp;quot; Left unchecked, Ickes warned, they would create &amp;quot;big-business Fascist America -- an enslaved America.&amp;quot; The president appointed Robert Jackson as the aggressive new director of the antitrust division of the Justice Department, but this effort lost its effectiveness once World War II began and big business was urgently needed to produce war supplies. [Kennedy p 352]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the administration's other response to the 1937 deepening of the Great Depression had more tangible results. Ignoring the vitriolic pleas of the Treasury Department and responding to the urgings of the converts to Keynesian economics and others in his administration, Roosevelt embarked on an antidote to the depression, reluctantly abandoning his efforts to balance the budget and launching a $5 billion spending program in the spring of 1938, an effort to increase mass purchasing power. The New Deal had in fact engaged in deficit spending since 1933, but it was apologetic about it. The debt did NOT rise as a proportion of GDP, but did rise in terms of dollars. Now they had a theory to justify what they were doing.  Roosevelt explained his program in a fireside chat in which he explained it was up to the government to &amp;quot;create an economic upturn&amp;quot; by making &amp;quot;additions to the purchasing power of the nation.&amp;quot; He was opposed by [[Fiscal Conservatism|fiscal conservatives]] who thought all government spending was inefficient and generated corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Business-oriented observers explained the recession and recovery in very different terms from the Keynesians.  They argued that the New Deal had been very hostile to business expansion in 1935-37, had encouraged massive strikes which had a negative impact on major industries such as automobiles, and had threatened massive anti-trust legal attacks on big corporations.  All those threats diminished sharply after 1938.  For example, the antitrust efforts fizzled out without major cases. The CIO and AFL unions started battling each other more than corporations, and tax policy became more favorable to long-term growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1937 - 1943 Depression was longer in duration than the 1929 - 1932 crash, the result of massive government intrusion into the private economy which stunted growth.  Manufacturing demand stimulated by WWII led to the 1943-1949 recovery, where finally, in 1949, the New York Stock Exchange recovered to the level it had been at 1929.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many New Deal reforms were unpopular and criticized.  In 1948 President [[Harry Truman]] ran on a reformed New Deal platform called the [[Fair Deal]], which was regarded largely as an admission the New Deal had not been fair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==World War II and the end of the New Deal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prosperity had returned by 1938 for most people--but not for the bottom third, who remained plagued by structural unemployment. The impact of war mobilization and massive war spending doubled the GNP.  Businessmen ignored the mounting national debt and heavy new taxes, redoubling their efforts for greater output as an expression of patriotism.  Patriotism drove most people to voluntarily work overtime and give up leisure activities to make money after so many hard years. Patriotism meant that people accepted rationing and price controls for the first time.  &amp;quot;Cost-plus&amp;quot; pricing in munitions contracts guaranteed that businesses would make a profit no matter how many mediocre workers they employed, no matter how inefficient the techniques they used.  The demand was for a vast quantity of war supplies as soon as possible, regardless of cost.  Business hired every person in sight, even driving sound trucks up and down city streets begging people to apply for jobs. New workers were needed to replace the 12 million working-age men serving in the military.  These events magnified the role of the federal government in the national economy. In 1929, federal expenditures accounted for only 3% of [[GNP]]. Between 1933 and 1939, federal expenditure tripled, and Roosevelt's critics charged that he was turning America into a [[socialism|socialist]] state. However, spending on the New Deal was far smaller than on the war effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first peacetime year of 1946, federal spending still amounted to $62 billion, or 30% of GNP. Wartime spending and other measures were able to provide an enormous output. Between 1939 and 1944, the peak of wartime production, the nation's total output almost doubled. This, along with the conscription and removal of soldiers, meant that civilian unemployment plummeted&amp;amp;mdash;from 14% in 1940 to less than 2% in 1943 as the labor force grew by ten million.  Millions of farmers left marginal operations, students quit school, and housewives returned to the labor force.  The war economy was not run on the basis of free enterprise, but was the result of government/business cooperation, with government bankrolling business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major result of the full employment at high wages was a sharp, permanent decrease in the level of income inequality.  The gap between rich and poor narrowed dramatically in the area of nutrition, because food rationing and price controls guaranteed a reasonably priced diet to everyone.  Large families that had been poverty-stricken in the 1930s had four or five or more workers, and shot to the top one-third income bracket.  Overtime made for huge paychecks in the munitions factories; white collar workers were fully employed too, but they did not receive overtime and their salary scale was no longer much higher than the blue collar wage scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economist Robert Higgs (1987), argues that the War did not end the Great Depression. Rather, a return to normality after the war, as the government relaxed wage controls, price controls, capital controls, reduced tariffs and other trade barriers, and eliminated the rationing of goods and the relaxing of Federal control over American industries, ended it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conflicting interpretation of the New Deal economic policies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Depression Statistics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Econ30s.jpg|thumb|400px|major economic indicators, 1929-52]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic indicators show the American economy reached nadir in summer 1932 to February 1933, then began recovering until the Roosevelt recession of 1937-1938. Thus the Federal Reserve [[Industrial Production Index]] hit its low of 52.8 on [[1932-07-01]] and was practically unchanged at 54.3 on [[1933-03-01]]; however by [[1933-07-01]], it reached 85.5 (with 1935-39 = 100, and for comparison 2005 = 1,342).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/INDPRO.txt Industrial Production Index]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Roosevelt's twelve years in office the economy had an 8.5% compound annual growth of GDP,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Historical Statistics of the United States'' (1976) series F31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the highest growth rate in the history of any industrial country,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Angus Maddison, ''The World Economy: Historical Statistics'' (OECD 2003); Japan is close, see p 174&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however, recovery was slow --by 1939 GDP per adult was still 27% below trend.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Cole&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cole, Harold L and Ohanian, Lee E. [http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/seminars/02-03/02-21.pdf ''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis''], 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   And, throughout the New Deal the median joblessness rate was 17.2 percent and never went below 14 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GDP20-40.JPG|thumb|350px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |Table 1: Statistics&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Income and Product Accounts [http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/GDPreal.htm Real GDP and GNP]; Mitchell 446, 449, 451; [http://home.att.net/~rdavis2/cpi_m2.html Consumer Price Index AND M2 Money Supply: 1800-2003]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;9%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1929&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1931&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1933&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;5%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1937&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1938&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;3%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1940&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Real Gross National Product (GNP) (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|101.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 84.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 68.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|103.9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|96.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|113.0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Consumer Price Index (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|122.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|108.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 92.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|102.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 99.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|100.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Index of Industrial Production (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|109&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Money Supply M2 ($ billions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|46.6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|42.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|32.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|45.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|49.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|55.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Exports ($ billions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|5.24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|2.42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|1.67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|3.35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|3.18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|4.02&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Unemployment (% of civilian work force)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 3.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|16.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|25.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|13.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|16.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|13.9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) in 1929 dollars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) 1935-39 = 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining exports===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1932 to 1935 the volume of imports of crude foodstuffs increased 41% and of manufactured foodstuffs 49%. The volume of Agricultural exports from the United States declined. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Publications of United States Department of Commerce.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table gives the volume of imports in 1932 and 1935 for important agricultural products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Agricultural Imports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Before Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''3 years into 'relief' efforts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Commodity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! 1932 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! 1935&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Wheat &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 27,439,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Corn &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 344,000 bu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 43,242,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Oats &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 59,000 bu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 10,107,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Barley &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| None &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4,840,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Rye &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| None &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 9,643,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Rice &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 19,074,000 lb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 53,457,000 lb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Barley malt &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 52,533,000 lb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 320,6 23,000 lb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Hay &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 13,858 tons &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 67,171 tons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quantities of individual commodities exported declined as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Agricultural Exports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Declines 3 years into&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Commodity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! New Dealism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Cotton&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 33%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unmanufactured tobacco &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Wheat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 99%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Flour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 491%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Meat products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 19%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Lard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 82% &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the summer of 1933 New Dealers paid farmers under the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) to plow up 10,500,000 acres of growing cotton, or 25% of the total acreage.  The Bankhead Cotton Act of 1934 set a limit OF 10,000,000 bales of cotton to be marketed by farmers from the 1934 - 1935 crop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the fall of 1933, the AAA destroyed 6,200,000 pigs and 220,000 mother sows were slaughtered in the AAA's effort to raise prices at a cost of over $30,000,000. The total live weight of the pigs and sows slaughtered was 443,69.7,348 pounds. Of this only 97,064,159 pounds of food products were obtained-the rest was converted into inedible grease or fertilizer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relief Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 3: Families on Relief 1936-41:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prolonged/Worsened the Depression===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 1995 survey of economic historians and economists asked &amp;quot;Taken as a whole, government policies of the New Deal served to lengthen and deepen the Great Depression.&amp;quot;  Of the economists 27% agreed and 51% disagreed. Of the economic historians, only 6% agreed and 74% disagreed. (the rest were in the partly agree/disagree group).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://eh.net/lists/archives/eh.res/feb-1997/0010.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minority view is represented by Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian who conclude that the &amp;quot;New Deal labor and industrial policies did not lift the economy out of the Depression as President Roosevelt and his economic planners had hoped,&amp;quot; but that the &amp;quot;New Deal policies are an important contributing factor to the persistence of the Great Depression.&amp;quot; They conclude that the New Deal &amp;quot;cartelization policies are a key factor behind the weak recovery.&amp;quot; They say that the &amp;quot;abandonment of these policies coincided with the strong economic recovery of the 1940s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cole, Harold L and Ohanian, Lee E. [http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/seminars/02-03/02-21.pdf ''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis''], 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lowell E. Gallaway and Richard K. Vedder conclude that the &amp;quot;Great Depression was very significantly prolonged in both its duration and its magnitude by the impact of New Deal programs.&amp;quot; They argue that without Social Security, work relief, unemployment insurance, and especially without the labor unions, business would have hired more workers and the unemployment rate would have been lower. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gallaway, Lowell E. and Vedder, Richard K. ''Out of Work: Unemployment and Government in Twentieth-Century America'', New York University Press; Updated edition (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Few economists or economic historians have agreed with these speculations. The New Deal years 1933-36 (or indeed the FDR years 1933-45) showed the highest growth rates in the history of the American economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unemployment continues===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darby counts WPA workers as employed; Lebergott as unemployed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: ''Historical Statistics US'' (1976)  series D-86; Smiley 1983&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Smiley, Gene, &amp;quot;Recent Unemployment Rate Estimates for the 1920s and 1930s,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History,'' June 1983, 43, 487-93.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal tried public works, farm subsidies and other devices to reduce unemployment, but FDR never completely gave up trying to balance the budget.  Unemployment remained high throughout the New Deal years; business simply would not hire more people, especially the low skilled and supposedly &amp;quot;untrainable&amp;quot; men who had been unemployed for years and lost any job skill they once had. [[Keynesian]]s later argued that by spending vastly more money--using [[fiscal policy]]--the government could provide the needed stimulus through the &amp;quot;multiplier&amp;quot; effect.  Critics of Keynesianism said that would just take money out of the private sector, causing a negative multiplier effect there. However, no economist has written a full-scale Keynesian analysis of the depression, so it is difficult to evaluate how that model would work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unemployment peaked in 1933, at 24.9%, and by 1941 unemployment had subsided to 9.9%, which was near the 1930 level of 8.9%.  [http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cm20030124ar03p1.htm] Unemployment increased 163% over the average of what it had been in 1930 by the third year of the New Deal. By contrast, recovery was well underway in Great Britain, with an increase of only 1.1%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years more influential among economists has been the monetarist interpretation of [[Milton Friedman]], which did include a full-scale monetary history of what he calls the &amp;quot;Great Contraction.&amp;quot;  Friedman concentrated on the failures before 1933, and in his memoirs said the relief programs were an appropriate response. From 1935 to 1943, Friedman was himself a Keynesian who was (1941-43) an official spokesman for the New Deal before Congress; he did not at that time criticize any New Deal or Federal Reserve policies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from building up labor unions, the New Deal did not substantially alter the distribution of power within American [[capitalism]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes visited to the White House in 1934 to urge President Roosevelt to do more deficit spending. Roosevelt complained to Labor Secretary [[Frances Perkins]], &amp;quot;He left a whole rigmarole of figures--he must be a mathematician rather than a political economist.&amp;quot;  That is, Keynes had an abstract theory but no useful suggestions about what to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|380px|right|Although Hopkins denied saying &amp;quot;Spend-Spend-Spend; Tax-Tax-Tax; Elect-Elect-Elect,&amp;quot; conservative critics thought it fit the New Deal very well]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TABLE BORDER=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TH colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Table 2: Unemployment (% labor force)&amp;lt;/TH&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;Year&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Lebergott&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Darby&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1933&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,24.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      24.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,20.6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      20.6&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1934&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,21.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      21.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,16&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      16.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1935&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,20.1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      20.1&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1936&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,16.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      16.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1937&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.3&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.1&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1938&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,19&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      19.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,12.5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      12.5&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1939&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,17.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      17.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,11.3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      11.3&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1940&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.6&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.5&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1941&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      8.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1942&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,4.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      4.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,4.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      4.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1943&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1944&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1945&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/TABLE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fiscal Conservatism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatism was a key component of the New Deal, as Zelizer (2000) demonstrates.  It was supported by Wall Street and local investors and most of the business community;  mainstream academic economists believed in it, as apparently did the majority of the public. Conservative southern Democrats, who favored balanced budgets and opposed new taxes, controlled Congress and its major committees.  Even liberal Democrats at the time regarded balanced budgets as essential to economic stability in the long run, although they were more willing to accept short-term deficits.  Public opinion polls consistently showed public opposition to deficits and debt.  Throughout his terms, Roosevelt recruited fiscal conservatives to serve in his administration, most notably [[Lewis Douglas]] the Director of Budget from 1933 to 1934, and [[Henry Morgenthau Jr.]], Secretary of the Treasury from 1934 to 1945.  They defined policy in terms of budgetary cost and tax burdens rather than needs, rights, obligations, or political benefits.  Personally the president embraced their fiscal conservatism.  Politically, he realized that fiscal conservatism enjoyed a strong wide base of support among voters, leading Democrats, and businessmen.   On the other hand there was enormous pressure to act–and spending money on high visibility programs attracted Roosevelt, especially if it tied millions of voters to him, as did the WPA.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas proved too inflexible, and quit in 1934.  Morgenthau made it his highest priority to stay close to Roosevelt, no matter what.  Douglas' position, like many of the [[Old Right]] was grounded in a basic distrust of politicians and the deeply ingrained fear that government spending always involved a degree of patronage and corruption that offended his Progressive sense of efficiency.  The Economy Act of 1933, passed early in the Hundred Days, was Douglas' great achievement. It  reduced federal expenditures by $500 million, to be achieved by reducing veterans’ payments and federal salaries.  Douglas cut government spending through executive orders that cut the military budget by $125 million, $75 million from the Post Office, $12 million from Commerce, $75 million from government salaries, and $100 million from staff layoffs.  As Freidel concludes, &amp;quot;The economy program was not a minor aberration of the spring of 1933, or a hypocritical concession to delighted conservatives. Rather it was an integral part of Roosevelt's overall New Deal.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freidel 1990, p. 96&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Revenues were so low that borrowing was necessary (only the richest 3% paid any income tax before 1942.)  Douglas therefore hated the relief programs, which he said reduced business confidence, threatened the government’s future credit, and had the &amp;quot;destructive psychological effects of making mendicants of self-respecting American citizens.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zelizer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt was pulled toward greater spending by Hopkins and Ickes, and as the 1936 election approached he decided to gain votes by attacking big business.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Debt29-50.jpg|thumb|400px|left|National Debt as a percentage of GNP climbs from 20% to 40% as Hoover begins relief efforts with the [[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]] and levels off during the New Deal; soars during WW2  from ''Historical Statistics US'' (1976)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Morgenthau shifted with FDR, but at all times tried to inject fiscal responsibility; he deeply believed in balanced budgets, stable currency, reduction of the national debt, and the need for more private investment .  The Wagner Act met Morgenthau’s requirement because it strengthened the party’s political base and involved no new spending.  In contrast to Douglas, Morgenthau accepted Roosevelt’s  double budget as legitimate–that is a balanced regular budget, and an “emergency” budget for agencies, like the WPA, PWA and CCC, that would be temporary until full recovery was at hand.  He fought against the veterans’ bonus until Congress finally overrode Roosevelt’s veto and gave out $2.2 billion in 1936.   His biggest success was the new Social Security program; he managed to reverse the proposals to fund it from general revenue and insisted it be funded by new taxes on employees.  It was Morgenthau who insisted on excluding farm workers and domestic servants from Social Security because workers outside industry would not be paying their way.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zelizer 2000; Savage 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deficits held relatively constant throught the 1930s at about 40% of the GDP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Economists at the time used GNP (gross national product) and today they prefer GDP (gross domestic product). For the US, GNP and GDP are almost the same.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Claims the New Deal adopted or resembled Fascist economic models===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;fascism&amp;quot; in the 21st century has very strong connotations of mass murder and death camps, however, in the 1930s it meant the [[planned economy]] and [[corporativism]] exemplified by the economic plans of Benito Mussolini in Italy. And, comparisons have been made between the economic systems of Fascist Italy and the New Deal programs. Communists, classical liberals, conservatives, and [[Herbert Hoover]] used the term fascism in that manner at that time. Likewise, modern-day [[paleoconservatives]] argue that the New Deal was a major milestone in the rise of America's [[managerial state]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journalist [[John T. Flynn]], a former socialist, in his 1944 book ''As We Go Marching'', said that &amp;quot;the New Dealers...began to flirt with the alluring pastime of reconstructing the capitalist system...and in the process of this new career they began to fashion doctrines that turned out to be the principles of fascism.&amp;quot;  Former President Herbert Hoover argued that some (but not all) New Deal programs were &amp;quot;fascist,&amp;quot; and that there was a presidential dictatorship. [''Memoirs'' 3:420]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Among the early Roosevelt fascist measures was the National Industry Recovery Act (NRA) of June 16, 1933 .... These ideas were first suggested by Gerald Swope (of the General Electric Company)....[and] the United States Chamber of Commerce. During the campaign of 1932, Henry I. Harriman, president of that body, urged that I agree to support these proposals, informing me that Mr. Roosevelt had agreed to do so. I tried to show him that this stuff was pure fascism; that it was a remaking of Mussolini's &amp;quot;corporate state&amp;quot; and refused to agree to any of it. He informed me that in view of my attitude, the business world would support Roosevelt with money and influence. That for the most part proved true.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever Hoover was told, Roosevelt had ''not'' agreed to any such plan. In 1934, Roosevelt himself warned his &amp;quot;fireside chat&amp;quot; radio audiences against linguistic confusion. Some people, he said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
will try to give you new and strange names for what we are doing. Sometimes they will call it 'Fascism,' sometimes 'Communism,' sometimes 'Regimentation,' sometimes 'Socialism.' But, in so doing, they are trying to make very complex and theoretical something that is really very simple and very practical. . . . Plausible self-seekers and theoretical die-hards will tell you of the loss of individual liberty. Answer this question out of the facts of your own life. Have you lost any of your rights or liberty or constitutional freedom of action and choice?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy 1999, p 246.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1934 Roosevelt defended a more powerful national government as he believed was necessary to control the economy, by quoting conservative Republican Elihu Root: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tremendous power of organization [Root had said] has combined great aggregations of capital in enormous industrial establishments . . . so great in the mass that each individual concerned in them is quite helpless by himself. . . . The old reliance upon the free action of individual wills appears quite inadequate. . . . The intervention of that organized control we call government seems necessary. . . . Men may differ as to the particular form of governmental activity with respect to industry or business, but nearly all are agreed that private enterprise in times such as these cannot be left without assistance and without reasonable safeguards lest it destroy not only itself but also our process of civilization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy 1999, p 246.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One historian remarks, &amp;quot;What Fascist corporatism and the New Deal had in common was a certain amount of state intervention in the economy. Beyond that, the only figure who seemed to look on Fascist corporatism as a kind of model was [[Hugh Samuel Johnson|Hugh Johnson]], FDR's head of the National Recovery Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanley Payne, ''History of Fascism'' (1995) p 230.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson strenuously denied any association with Mussolini, saying the NRA &amp;quot;is being organized almost as you would organize a business. I want to avoid any Mussolini appearance -- the President calls this Act industrial self-government.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hugh S. Johnson, ''The Blue Eagle, from Egg to Earth'' (1935), p 223&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Donald Richberg after a series of scandals replaced General Hugh Johnson as head of NRA and speaking before a Senate committee said &amp;quot;A nationally [[planned economy]] is the only salvation of our present situation and the only hope for the future.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leuchtenburg p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historians such as Hawley (1966) have examined the origins of the NRA in detail, claiming the main inspiration came from Senators [[Hugo Black]] and [[Robert F. Wagner]] and from American business leaders such as the Chamber of Commerce. The main model was Woodrow Wilson's [[War Industries Board]], in which Johnson had been involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Art and music==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Works Progress Administration]] subsidized artists, musicians, painters and writers on relief with a group of projects called [[Federal One]].  While the WPA program was by the most widespread, it was preceded by three programs administered by the [[United States Department of the Treasury|US Treasury]] which hired commercial artists at usual commissions to add murals and sculptures to federal buildings. The first of these efforts was the [[Public Works of Art Project]], organized by Edward Bruce, an American businessman and artist.  The [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA) and [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA) had major photography programs.  The New Deal arts programs emphasized regionalism, socialist realism, class conflict, proletarian interpretations, and audience participation. The unstoppable collective powers of common man, contrasted to the failure of individualism], was a favorite theme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mathews 1975&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FSA photography project is most responsible for creating the image of the Depression in the USA. Many of the images appeared in popular magazines. The photographers were under instruction from Washington as to what overall impression the New Deal wanted to give out. Director [[Roy Stryker]]'s agenda focused on his faith in [[social engineering]], the poor conditions among cotton tenant farmers, and the very poor conditions among migrant farm workers; above all he was committed to social reform through New Deal intervention in people's lives. Stryker demanded photographs that &amp;quot;related people to the land and vice versa&amp;quot; because these photographs reinforced the RA's position that poverty could be controlled by &amp;quot;changing land practices.&amp;quot; Though Stryker did not dictate to his photographers how they should compose the shots, he did send them lists of desirable themes, e.g., &amp;quot;church&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;court day&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;barns&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Cara A. Finnegan. ''Picturing Poverty: Print Culture and FSA Photographs'' (Smithsonian Books, 2003) pp 43-44 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  New Deal era films such as ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' ridiculed so-called &amp;quot;great men&amp;quot;, while class warfare appeared in numerous movies, such as ''[[Meet John Doe]]'' and ''[[The Grapes of Wrath]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast there was also a smaller but influential stream of anti-New Deal art.  Thus [[Gutzon Borglum]]'s sculptures on [[Mount Rushmore]] emphasized great men in history (his designs had the approval of [[Calvin Coolidge]]).  [[Gertrude Stein]] and [[Ernest Hemingway]] disliked the New Deal and celebrated the organic autonomy of perfected written work in opposition to the New Deal trope of writing as performative labor.  The [[Southern Agrarians]] celebrated a premodern regionalism and opposed the TVA as a modernizing, disruptive force.  Under Chief Justice [[Charles Evans Hughes]], the Supreme Court built one of the most architecturally striking buildings; its classical lines and small size contrasted sharply with the gargantuan modernistic federal buildings in Washington.  Hollywood managed to synthesize both streams, as in [[Busby Berkeley]]'s ''Gold Digger'' musicals, where the storylines exalt individual autonomy while the spectacular musical numbers show abstract populations of interchangeable dancers securely contained within patterns beyond their control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Szalay 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The legacies of the New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDR-LBJ.png|thumb|left|220px|The New Deal was the inspiration for [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s  [[Great Society]] in 1960s. Johnson (on right) headed the Texas NYA and was elected to Congress in 1938.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some economists argue that although the New Deal did not end the depression, all in all it helped to prevent the economy from decaying further by increasing the regulatory functions of the federal government in ways that helped stabilize previous trouble areas of the economy: the stock market, the banking system, and others. Others argue that it worsened the depression. All analysts agree the New Deal produced a new political coalition that sustained the Democratic Party as the majority party in national politics for more than a generation after its own end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's 12 years in office saw a dramatic increase in the power of the federal government as a whole. Roosevelt also established the presidency as the preeminent center of authority within the federal government. By creating a large array of agencies protecting various groups of citizens&amp;amp;mdash;workers, farmers, and others&amp;amp;mdash;who suffered from the crisis, enabling them to challenge the powers of the corporations, the Roosevelt administration generated a set of political ideas&amp;amp;mdash;known to later generations as New Deal liberalism&amp;amp;mdash;that remained a source of inspiration and controversy for decades and that helped shape the next great experiment in liberal reform, the [[Great Society]] of the 1960s.  The wartime [[FEPC]] executive orders that forbade job discrimination against African Americans, women and ethnic groups was a major breakthrough that brought better jobs and pay to millions of minority Americans. Historians usually treat FEPC as part of the war effort and not part of the New Deal itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; as Political Metaphor===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1933 politicians and pundits have often called for a &amp;quot;new deal&amp;quot; regarding this or that political object.  That is, they demand a completely new, large-scale approach to a project. As Arthur A. Ekirch Jr. (1971) has shown, the New Deal stimulated utopianism in American political and social thought on a wide range of issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada, Conservative Prime Minister [[Richard B. Bennett]] in 1935 proposed a &amp;quot;new deal&amp;quot; of regulation , taxation, and social insurance that was a copy of the American program; Bennett's proposals were not enacted and he was defeated for reelection in October 1935. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the rise of the use of U.S. political phraseology in Britain, the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] Government has termed some of its employment programs 'New Deal'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brain trust==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt gathered around himself informal advisors, mostly university professors, dubbed by the media the [[Brain Trust]]. A key advisor was [[Raymond Moley]], who by 1936 broke with Roosevelt and provided the most important conservative critique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main programs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Recovery Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933 Italian Premier [[Benito Mussolini]] was a towering figure. Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,774563-4,00.html Axis (1936-1943)], ''[[TIME magazine]]'', Sep. 20, 1943,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  President of Columbia University and [[Nobel Prize for Peace]], said of [[fascism]], it is as a “form of government of the very first order of excellence”; and found it “safe to predict that just as [[Oliver Cromwell|Cromwell]] made modern England, so Mussolini would make modern Italy.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/wright/1943/10/italy.htm What To Do With Italy?], John G. Wright, From Fourth International, Vol.4 No.10, October 1943, pp.308-311.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chariman [[Sol Bloom]] of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U. S. House of Representives, suggested Mussolini was a great man and had something the [[United States]] government might well look to for imitation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John T. Flynn, ''As We Go Marching'', Doubleday, 1944, p. 70.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What they liked particularly was his [[corporative]] system. Mussolini organized each trade or industrial group or professional group into a state supervised trade association. Mussolini called it a corporative. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmre.org/GeneSmileypresentation.pdf The New Deal and Corporatism], Prof. Emeritus Gene Smiley, Marquette University, Presented at the Committee for Monetary Research and Education,October 19, 2006,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These corporatives operated under state supervision and provided economic planning of production, quality, prices, distribution, labor standards, etc.  The National Recovery Act, or NRA as it came to be called, provided that a corporative system in America for each industry should be organized into a federally supervised trade association. It was not called a corporative. It was called a [[Code Authority]]. In [[Nazi]] Germany such government run planning authorities built on the Italian model were called [[industrial cartel]]s. This was the same as fascism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/hbzfrm.htm ''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 1, Ch. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These code authorities could regulate production, quantities, qualities, prices, distribution methods, etc., under the supervision of the NRA that had the effect of ending the downward spiral of deflation and falling prices, but which risked the long-term effect of stifling innovation and favoring big business over small.  Anti­-trust laws forbade such organizations. Roosevelt had denounced Hoover for not enforcing these laws sufficiently. Now Roosevelt suspended the anti-trust laws and compelled men to combine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NRA Act provided an appropriation of $3,300,000,000 which the President was given to be spent at his own discretion. He had a sum of money equal to what the government spent in the prvious ten years outside of discretionary spending. Roosevelt decided how it should be spent and where. If a congressman or senator needed an appropriation for his district, instead of introducing a bill in Congress, he went to Roosevelt to ask for it. All over the country, states, cities, counties, business organizations, institutions of all sorts wanted projects of all kinds. Instead of going to Congress they went to the President. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1935 the Supreme Court said the NRA's procedures were unconstitutional, and it was never revived.  In the twenty-three months that NRA was on the Statute books, the average number of workers involved in strikes and lockouts and the number of days of idleness and lost productivity per month resulting were approximately four times as large as during the six months before NRA. After NRA was declared unconstitutional, both the number of workers involved in industrial disputes and the number of days lost declined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt asked [[Clarence Darrow]] to head up a national recovery review board.  The Darrow Committee's report stated, &amp;quot;We have here a body not only perfectly equipped to exercise monopolistic control, but endowed with extraordinary powers incompatible with the ideals heretofore entertained in a free country. . . In proportion as the authority of government sanctions regulation by industrial combinations, the inevitable tendency is toward monopoly with the elimination of the small business .&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Special and Supplementary Reports of Darrow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Committee, appointed by the President, released May 20, 1934. [http://robsrealnews.com/revisedNEWDEAL8.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Richberg, former Counsel and later Administrator of NRA admitted candidly, &amp;quot;Yet step by step through the diabolical logic of events the NRA became the apparent exponent and protector of 'price fixing' - that hateful objective of that most hated ogre, a big business monopoly.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Donald R. Richberg, ''The Rainbow'', (1936), pg. 31.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civilian Conservation Corps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of FDR’s favorites was the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), a relatively small program designed to keep unemployed young men out of trouble while giving them food and clothing and discipline, and their families some cash.  Roosevelt described work camps as a means for getting youth &amp;quot;off the city street corners.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young men were enrolled as amateur forest rangers, marsh-drainers, and the like, on projects designed to improve the countryside. The recruits were given room and board, clothing, and a dollar a day (they kept $5 a month, and the parents received the other $25). More than two and half million of them passed through the camps of the Civilian Conservation Corps, until the program was abolished in 1942, when the men were needed for the draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CCC was highly popular among Americans, both liberals and conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973, John A. Garraty published an important article on the CCC in the ''American Historical Review'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The New Deal, National Socialism, and the Great Depression'', John A. Garraty, American Historical Review, Vol. 78, October 1973. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Garraty was Gouverneur Morris Professor of American history at Columbia and later general editor of the ''American National Biography''. Yet, while an admirer of FDR, Garraty was compelled to note the striking similarities between the CCC and parallel programs set up by the [[Nazi]]s for German youth. Both were essentially designed to keep young men out of the labor market. Roosevelt described work camps as a means for getting youth “off the city street corners,” [[Hitler]] as a way of keeping them from “rotting helplessly in the streets.” In both countries much was made of the beneficial social results of mixing thousands of young people from different walks of life in the camps. . . . Furthermore, both were organized on semi-military lines with the subsidiary purposes of improving the physical fitness of potential soldiers and stimulating public commitment to national service in an emergency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Garraty listed many other similarities between the New Deal and [[National Socialism]]. Like Roosevelt, Hitler prided himself on being a “pragmatist” in economic affairs, trying out one panacea after another. Through a multitude of new agencies and mountains of new regulations, both in [[Germany]] and America, owners and managers of enterprises found their freedom to make decisions sharply curtailed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis encouraged working-class mobility, through vocational training, the democratizing youth camps, and a myriad of youth organizations. They usually favored workers as against employers in industrial disputes and, in another parallel to the New Deal, supported higher agricultural prices. Both FDR and Hitler “tended to romanticize rural life and the virtues of an agricultural existence“ and harbored dreams of the rural resettlement of urban populations, which proved disappointing. Characteristically for the collectivist movements of the time, “enormous [[propaganda]] campaigns” were mounted in the United States, Germany, and [[Italy]] (as well as in Russia) to fire up enthusiasm for the government’s programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is no wonder, then, as Professor Garraty writes, that “during the first years of the New Deal the German press praised [Roosevelt] and the New Deal to the skies. . . . Early New Deal policies seemed to the Nazis essentially like their own and the role of Roosevelt not very different from the [[Führer]]’s.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Woman Child.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Mother of seven children without food, California, ca. February 1936. ''[http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/128_migm.html Farm Security Administration Collection], Library of Congress'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Works Progress Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Works Progress Administration ([[WPA]]) operated 1935-43 and was the largest and most controversial of the relief programs. Until now relief had been a local responsibility, although both Hoover and FDR had provided federal funding.  Now the national government took full control; conservatives charged it was done to build a vast national political machine for Roosevelt.  TheWPA had a larger size and budget($5 billion at first) than previous efforts such as FERA and CWA. [[Harry Hopkins]], a liberal close to FDR, was the director. The WPA was responsible for the building and renovation of over 100,000 public buildings and the construction of 600 airports, more than 500,000 miles of roads, and over 100,000 bridges. The WPA was also well known for its flexibility. It employed not only construction workers but also artists and authors as well as operating separate sewing projects for women. The [[NYA|National Youth Administration]] (NYA) was a unit of the WPA for young men and women (in contrast to its rival the CCC, which only enrolled young men).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===No training===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major failing of the New Deal, and especially the CCC and WPA, was the deliberate decision not to provide job training. The reason was that liberals (and especially labor unions) thought there were already too many unemployed skilled workers and there was no need for more.  In retrospect this was one of the major failings of the New Deal, and was reversed in World War II, when the government subsidized job training on a very large scale in industry and the military.  Ever since 1996 the consensus has been that job training is an essential part of any program designed to help the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! United States &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Great Britain &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unemployment (1930 average)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4,770,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 1,993,951&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unemployment February 1936&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 12,550,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 2,016,578 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Percent increase'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 163 % &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Federation of Labor.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;League of Natione, ''Bulletin of&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Ordeal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable New Deal programs== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Newdealstamp.png|thumb|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal had countless programs, labeled an &amp;quot;alphabet soup&amp;quot; by its detractors. Among the New Deal acts were the following, most of them passed within the first 100 days of FDR's administration. Most were abolished around 1943, others remain in operation in 2009:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]] a Hoover agency expanded under [[Jesse Holman Jones]] to make large loans to big business.  Ended in 1954.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FERA|Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA). ERA, a Hoover loan program to states for relief; replaced by FERA in 1933 to give grants to states to operate relief projects for the unskilled; replaced by WPA in 1935. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bank Holiday, 1933: closed all banks until they became certified by federal reviewers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Abandonment of gold standard, 1933: gold reserves no longer backed currency; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), 1933: employed young men to perform unskilled work in rural areas; under Army supervision; separate program for Native Americans&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA), 1933: effort to modernize very poor region (most of Tennessee), centered on dams that generated electricity on the [[Tennessee River]]; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA), 1933: raised farm prices by cutting total farm output of major crops (and hogs)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA), 1933: industries set up codes to reduce unfair competition, raise wages and prices; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), 1933: built large public works projects; used private contractors (did not directly hire unemployed) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] (FDIC) / [[Glass-Steagall Act]]: insures deposits in banks in order to restore public confidence in banks; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Securities Act of 1933]], created the SEC, 1933: codified standards for sale and purchase of stock, required risk of investments to be accurately disclosed; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Civil Works Administration]]  (CWA), 1933-34: provided temporary jobs to millions of unemployed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Indian Reorganization Act]], 1934 moved away from assimilation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Social Security (United States)|Social Security Act]] (SSA), 1935: provided financial assistance to: elderly, handicapped, paid for by employee and employer payroll contributions; required years contributions, so first payouts were 1942; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA), 1935: a national labor program for 2+ million unemployed; created useful construction work for unskilled men; also sewing projects for women and arts projects for unemployed artists, musicians and writers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Labor Relations Act]] (NLRA) / Wagner Act, 1935: set up National Labor Relations Board to supervise labor-management relations; In 1930s it strongly favored [[trade union|labor union]]s. Modified by the [[Taft-Hartley Act]] (1947); still exists &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Judicial Reorganization Bill, 1937: gave President power to appoint a new Supreme Court judge for every judge 70 years or older; failed to pass Congress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fair Labor Standards Act]] ([http://www.finduslaw.com/fair_labor_standards_act_flsa_29_u_s_code_chapter_8 29 U.S. Code Chapter 8]), 1938: established a maximum normal work week of 40 hours, and a minimum pay of 40 cents/hour; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the detailed guide at [[New Deal Bibliography]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Alter, Jonathan. ''The Defining Moment: FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope'' (2006), popular account&lt;br /&gt;
* Badger, Anthony J. ''The New Deal: The Depression Years, 1933-1940.'' (2002) good general survey from British perspective&lt;br /&gt;
* Best, Gary Dean. ''The Critical Press and the New Deal: The Press Versus Presidential Power, 1933-1938'' (1993) looks at conservative papers and magazines [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-critical-press-and-the-new-deal-the-press-versus-presidential-power-1933-1938-by-gary-dean-best.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chafe, William H. ''The Achievement of American Liberalism: The New Deal and Its Legacies.'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99839056 online edition], liberal peaise&lt;br /&gt;
* Conkin, Paul K. ''The New Deal.'' (1967), a brief New Left critique.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dubofsky, Melvyn, ed. ''The New Deal: Conflicting Interpretations and Shifting Perspectives.'' (1992), reader&lt;br /&gt;
* Eden, Robert, ed. ''New Deal and Its Legacy: Critique and Reappraisal'' (1989), essays by conservative scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* Graham, Otis L. and Meghan Robinson Wander, eds. ''Franklin D. Roosevelt: His Life and Times.'' (1985). A very useful encyclopedic reference.&lt;br /&gt;
* Himmelberg, Robert F. ''The Great Depression and the New Deal'' (2001) 185 pp. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101548706 online edition], reader&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, David M. ''Freedom From Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945.'' (1999), the best scholarly overview; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=52284041 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Kirkendall, Richard S. . &amp;quot;The New Deal As Watershed: The Recent Literature,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 54, No. 4. (Mar., 1968), pp. 839-852. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196803%2954%3A4%3C839%3ATNDAWT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F in JSTOR], historiography&lt;br /&gt;
* Leuchtenberg, William E. ''Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932-1940''. (1963). The  standard scholarly history.&lt;br /&gt;
* McElvaine Robert S. ''The Great Depression'' 2nd ed (1993), social history, by a liberal&lt;br /&gt;
* McJimsey, George. ''The Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt'', (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
* Milkis, Sidney M. and Jerome M. Mileur, eds. ''The New Deal and the Triumph of Liberalism'' (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitchell, Broadus. ''Depression Decade: From New Era through New Deal, 1929-1941'' (1964), overview of economic history [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=98065455 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Moley, Raymond. ''After Seven Years'' (1939), conservative memoir by ex-Brain Truster [http://www.questia.com/library/book/after-seven-years-by-raymond-moley.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Powell, Jim ''FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression'' (2003) sharp attack from the right&lt;br /&gt;
* Shlaes, Amity. ''The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression'' (2007), 480pp, popular conservative attack&lt;br /&gt;
* Sitkoff, Harvard. ed. ''Fifty Years Later: The New Deal Evaluated.'' (1984).  A friendly liberal evaluation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newdeal.feri.org/ New Deal Network] massive collection of photos and primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nisk.k12.ny.us/fdr/ FDR cartoon archive] hundreds of editorial cartoons from all political points of view (copyright has expired)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.digitalbookindex.com/_SEARCH/search010histus20-30sdepressiona.asp online full-text primary sources]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Great Depression]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Deal&amp;diff=700030</id>
		<title>New Deal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Deal&amp;diff=700030"/>
		<updated>2009-09-13T00:15:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: Undo revision 700028 by RJJensen (Talk) Remove liberal obfuscation. Socialism is as socialism does&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''New Deal''' was the name coined by President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], a [[Democratic Party|Democrat]], for otherwise disjointed [[Socialism|socialist]] programs he conducted throughout the [[Great Depression]], especially from 1933-36. His program had three aspects: Relief, Recovery and Reform. It sought to provide immediate Relief for the millions of unemployed in the [[Great Depression]]. It was intended to promote Recovery of the economy to normal standards--a goal he did not fully achieve. It involved a series of Reforms, especially in the financial system and labor relations. The basic issue was how to deal with the severely damaged economy --and great social misery--caused by three years of the [[Great Depression]].  Conservatives endorsed parts of the '''First New Deal''' (the 1933 programs)  and rejected the more radical '''Second New Deal''' (the 1934-35 programs).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was popular among voters leading to the formation of the [[New Deal Coalition]], which made the Democrats the majority party during the [[Fifth Party System]] into the 1960s. However a conservative coalition that formed in 1937-38 blocked most additional programs after 1937, and during the war years (1941-45) rolled back many of the relief efforts on the grounds they were no longer needed since full employment was achieved.  The &amp;quot;reforms&amp;quot; that regulated the economy were mostly dropped in the deregulation era (1974-87), except for oversight of Wall Street, which conservatives approved because it increased investor confidence.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Deal Coalition]] dominated national politics until it split apart in the 1960s. Ever since it has been the holy grail of liberals seeking to restore their former glory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the New Deal did not fully solve the economic catastrophe that was on the verge of destroying the US economy in early 1933, it achieved many of its objectives and the period of 1933-37 saw some sectors return to economic growth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Broker State==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal created the &amp;quot;Broker State&amp;quot;, where different interest groups compete in the national market. The government became a mediator between those interest groups, giving power to those who has enough political and economic power to demand it. One of the limitations of this Broker States was that minority groups were often ignored since they did not have political power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic planning==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the Depression set in, terms like “[[planned economy]]” and “national planning” became the watchwords of the day. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1468 ''FDR: The Man, the Leader, the Legacy''], Ralph Raico, Future of Freedom Foundation, April 1, 2001. Retreived from The Independent Institute.org 06/17/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They had been used by theoriticians for years and popularized by best-selling writers like George Soule and Stuart Chase, who lauded the Soviet Gosplan (central planning), asking plaintively, “Why should the Russians have all the fun of remaking a world?” The most prominent of the [[Brain Trust]]ers and the man often considered the chief ideologist of the “first New Deal” (roughly, 1933–34), was [[Rexford Guy Tugwell]]. Tugwell was a follower of the school of thought known as Institutional Economics, founded by the eccentric writer on economics, [[Thorstein Veblen]]. His official position was assistant secretary of agriculture, that is, second in command to [[Henry A. Wallace]], but his influence extended far beyond that. Tugwell had traveled to the Soviet Union in 1927 and observed through scientific economic planning the Soviets were able to “carry out their industrial operations with a completely thought-out program.” “The future,” he announced, “is becoming visible in Russia.”  Tugwell scorned the [[free market]] as anarchical, an uncoordinated muddle of hopelessly conflicting aims and purposes. It would have to be replaced by national planning, or technocracy, another shibboleth of the day, implying rule by the technical experts and managers, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Managerial Revolution'', James Burnham, Indiana University Press, Bloomingham 1966.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; like himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==First and Second New Deals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians distinguish between the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; of 1933, which had something for almost every group, and the &amp;quot;Second New Deal&amp;quot; (1935–36), which introduced class conflict, especially between business and labor unions.   The First New Deal (1933-34) included many &amp;quot;alphabet agencies&amp;quot;, notably ([[AAA]], [[CCC]], [[FERA]], CWA, [[FHA]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;see [http://www.fha.com/fha_loans.cfm Federal Housing Administration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[FDIC]]&amp;lt;Ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.fdic.gov/ FDIC - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[NRA]], [[PWA]], [[TVA]], [[SEC]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml SEC - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Second New Deal, started in 1934-35 included the [[WPA]], a giant relief agency, and Social Security&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  See [http://www.ssa.gov/history/history.html SSA - Social Security History]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, as well as the [[NLRA]] or &amp;quot;Wagner Act&amp;quot; that promoted rapid growth of labor unions. The opponents of the New Deal, complaining of the cost and the shift of power to Washington, stopped its expansion by 1937, and abolished many of its programs by 1943. The Supreme Court ruled several programs unconstitutional (some parts of them were soon replaced, except for the NRA). The main New Deal programs still in existence today are Social Security the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] (FDIC) and the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] (SEC) which regulates Wall Street.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Other major programs that still exist under their original names include the, the [[Federal Housing Administration]] (FHA)[http://www.fha.com/fha_loans.cfm Federal Housing Administration]and the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA)[http://www.tva.gov/abouttva/history.htm TVA]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign policy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see [[World Economic Conference of 1933]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In foreign policy the New Deal pursued isolationism, set in motion by Roosevelt's &amp;quot;bombshell message&amp;quot; to the [[World Economic Conference of 1933]] which ended efforts to stabilize  international exchange rates. Roosevelt--acting against the advice of his top aides--feared that cooperation with major nations would limit his abilities to manipulate the money supply and end the [[deflation]] that was a crippling element of the depression.  The major nations were appalled.  Nazi Germany, which promoted autarchy, rejoiced for it gained a free hand to expand its economic power across the globe.  A series of Neutrality Laws (see [[Neutrality Act]]) were passed that prohibited American business from selling munitions to nations at war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a peculiar affinity between the New Deal and the European dictatorships that on occasion extended even to [[fascism]] and [[national socialism]]  Early on, FDR referred to [[Benito Mussolini]] as “the admirable Italian gentlemen,” stating to his ambassador in Rome, “I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished.&amp;quot;  Mussolini, in turn, was flattered by what he saw as the New Deal’s copying of his own corporate state, in the [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA) and other early measures.  Even [[Hitler]] had kind words at first for Roosevelt’s “dynamic” leadership, stating that “I have sympathy with President Roosevelt because he marches straight to his objective over Congress, over lobbies, over stubborn bureaucracies.”   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What linked the New Deal to the regimes in Italy and Germany, as well as in Soviet Russia, was their fellowship in the wave of [[collectivism]] that was sweeping the world. In an essay published in 1933, [[John Maynard Keynes]] observed this trend, and expressed his sympathy with the “variety of politico-economic experiments” under way in the continental dictatorships as well as in the United States. All of them, he gloated, were turning their backs on the old, discredited [[laissez-faire]] and embracing national planning in one form or another.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was a kinder, gentler form of the collectivism.  In all of the national planning schemes, government gained power at the expense of the people, with the leaders seeking to impose a philosophy of life that subordinated the individual to the needs of the community—as defined by the state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt and the State Department promoted a &amp;quot;Good Neighbor&amp;quot; policy toward Latin America, which meant that the U.S. would no longer try to prevent or overthrow dictatorships or governments ruinous to the people. An immediate result was the takeover of [[Cuba]] by a military dictatorship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally realizing the dangers posed by the Nazis, Roosevelt reversed course in 1938 and sought to repeal the neutrality laws.  However not all the New Dealers went along with FDR; many remained isolationist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relief, Recovery, and Reform==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal had three components: direct relief, economic recovery, and financial reform; these were also called the 'Three Rs'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Relief'' was the immediate effort to help the one-third of the population that was hardest hit by the depression.  Roosevelt expanded Hoover's [[Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA) work relief program, and added the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), and (starting in 1935) the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA).  In 1935 the social security and unemployment insurance programs were added.  Separate programs were set up for relief in rural America, such as the [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA) and [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA).  These work relief programs have been praised by most economists in retrospect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Parker 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[Milton Friedman]] who after taking a graduate degree in economics was employed by the WPA to analyze family budgets and studied the hardships of families said that, at the time, he and his wife &amp;quot;regarded [these job-creation programs] appropriate responses to the critical situation&amp;quot; but not &amp;quot;the price- and wage-fixing measures of the National Recovery Administration and the Agricultural Adjustment Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Friedman, ''Two Lucky People''  (1998) p. 59.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Recovery'' was the effort in numerous programs to restore the economy to normal health.  By most economic indicators this was achieved by 1937--except for unemployment, which remained stubbornly high until World War II began.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Reform'' was based on the assumption that the depression was caused by the inherent instability of the market and that government intervention was necessary to rationalize and stabilize the economy, and to balance the interests of farmers, business and labor. It included the [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA, 1933) (which ended in 1935), regulation of Wall Street ([[SEC]], 1934), the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) farm programs (1933 and 1938), insurance of bank deposits ([[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] 1933) and the [[Wagner Act]] (1935)encouraging workers to organize into labor unions.  Despite urgings by some New Dealers, there was no major anti-trust program.  Roosevelt rejected the opportunity to take over banks and railroads. He did not support state ownership of factories, and only one major program, the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (1933), involved government ownership of the means of production.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Recovery Act (NRA) and the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA) were  plans to take the whole industrial and agricultural life of the country under the wing of the government, organize it into vast farm and [[industrial cartel]]s, as they were called in Germany, [[corporative]]s as they were called in Italy, and operate business and the farms under plans made and carried out under the supervision of government. This is the complete negation of [[classical liberalism]]. It is, in fact, the essence of [[fascism]]. Fascism goes one step further and insists this cannot be done by a [[democracy|democratic]] government; that it can be done successfully only under a [[totalitarian]] regime. At the time fascism was not defined as [[anti-Semitism]]. It was a word used to describe the political system of Italian Premier [[Benito Mussolini]]. Roosevelt adopted the Italian model merely because at the moment it seemed politically expedient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1934, the Supreme Court began declaring significant parts of the New Deal unconstitutional.  The programs were quickly fixed to pass muster, but in 1937 Roosevelt stunned the nation by a surprise proposal to pack the Supreme Court by adding five new justices. The proposal failed and Roosevelt permanently alienated many conservative Democrats; however the Supreme Court started upholding New Deal laws. Justices then started retiring, allowing Roosevelt to select a majority of the Court. By 1942, the Supreme Court had almost completely abandoned its &amp;quot;judicial activism&amp;quot; of striking down congressional laws. The Supreme Court ruled in ''[[Wickard v. Filburn]]'' that the [[Commerce Clause]] covered almost all such regulation allowing the necessary expansion of federal power to make the New Deal &amp;quot;constitutional&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two old words now took on new meaning. &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; no longer referred to [[classical liberalism]] but now meant a supporter of the New Deal; conservative meant upholding the Constitution.  Whether the New Deal was successful is usually approached not as a historical problem, but as a current debate whether the New Deal should be a model for government today, complicated by its conflicting goals of promising something for nothing for everyone. Liberals  continue to battle conservatives.  The term &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; is also used to describe the [[New Deal Coalition]] that Roosevelt created to support his programs, including the Democratic party, big city machines, labor unions, Catholic and Jewish minorities, African Americans, farmers, and most Southern whites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Origins of the New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 29th of October, 1929, the flight of capital from the over valued U.S. stock market set off a downward spiral in employment and growth in every part of the globe known as the [[Great Depression]]. Although statistics were not kept it was later estimated unemployment in the U.S. increased from 4% to 25% between 1929 and 1933 while manufacturing output plunged by approximately a third. Gross private domestic investment, which includes construction and inventories, shrank from $16.2 billion to $1.4 billion. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1958 constant dollars.  Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, ''Federal Reserve Bulletin'',  June 1973, p. A68.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prices everywhere fell, making the burden of the repayments of debts much harder.  Heavy industry, mining, lumbering and agriculture were hard hit.  The impact was much less severe in white collar and service sectors, but every city and state was hit hard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon accepting the 1932 [[U.S. Democratic Party, history|Democratic]] nomination for president, Roosevelt promised &amp;quot;a new deal for the American people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The phrase came from the title of popular writer Stuart Chase's book ''A New Deal'' published earlier in 1932. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt entered office with no single ideology or plan for dealing with the depression. He was willing to try anything, and, indeed, in the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; (1933-34) virtually every organized group (except the Socialists and Communists) gained much of what they demanded. This &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; thus was self-contradictory, pragmatic, and experimental. Government spending propelled the economy to recover from the deep pit of 1932, and started heading upward again until 1937, when the over emphasis on consumption of capital resources plunged the economy into the [[Recession of 1937]] and sent unemployment back to 1934 levels. Whether the New Deal was responsible for the recovery, or whether it even slowed the recovery, is a subject of debate. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal drew from many different sources over the previous half-century.  Some New Dealers, led by [[Thurman Arnold]], went back to the anti-monopoly tradition in the Democratic party that stretched back a century.  Monopoly was bad for America, [[Louis Brandeis]] kept insisting, because it produced waste and inefficiency. However, the anti-monopoly group never had a major impact on New Deal policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the Wilson administration, other New Dealers, such as [[Hugh Samuel Johnson|Hugh Johnson]] of the [[National Recovery Administration|NRA]], were shaped by efforts to mobilize the economy for [[World War I]],  They brought ideas and experience from the government controls and spending of 1917-18. And from the policy experiments of the 1920s, New Dealers picked up ideas from efforts to harmonize the economy by creating cooperative relationships among its constituent elements. Roosevelt brought together a so-called &amp;quot;[[Brain Trust]]&amp;quot; of academic advisers to assist in his recovery efforts. They sought to introduce extensive government intervention in the form of spending and regulation instead of allowing self-correcting mechanisms to run its course. New Dealers such as Donald Richberg, as the replacement head of the NRA, said &amp;quot;A nationally [[planned economy]] is the only salvation of our present situation and the only hope for the future.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leuchtenburg p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian Clarence B. Carson says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this remove in time from the early days of the New Deal, it is difficult to recapture, even in imagination, the heady enthusiasm among a goodly number of intellectuals for a government planned economy. So far as can now be told, they believed that a bright new day was dawning, that national planning would result in an organically integrated economy in which everyone would joyfully work for the common good, and that American society would be freed at last from those antagonisms arising, as General Hugh Johnson put it, from “the murderous doctrine of savage and wolfish individualism, looking to dog-eat-dog and devil take the hindmost.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carson, Clarence B. [http://www.libertyhaven.com/theoreticalorphilosophicalissues/economichistory/relicsdeal.shtml ''The Relics of Intervention'' part 4. ''New Deal Collective Planning'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Newdealstamp.png|thumb|280px|1998 US stamp celebrates alphabet agencies of New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal faced some very vocal [[American conservatism|conservative]] opposition. The first organized opposition in 1934 came from the [[American Liberty League]] led by Democrats such as 1924 and 1928 presidential candidates [[John W. Davis]] and [[Al Smith]]. There was also  a large loose grouping of opponents of the New Deal who have come to be known as the [[Old Right (United States)|Old Right]] which included politicians, intellectuals, writers, and newspaper editors of various philosophical persuasions including [[classical liberals]], conservatives, Democrats and Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===World Comparisons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain was unable to adopt major programs to stop its depression.  That led to collapse of the Labour government and replacement in 1931 by a National coalition (predominantly Conservative). There was no equivalent &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; government intervention in Britain, which allowing self correcting market mechanism to operate, brought about a higher level of sustained employment and recovered more quickly from the Depression. In Canada, Conservative Prime Minister [[R. B. Bennett]] pushed for a program similar to the New Deal but failed to get it enacted and was defeated for reelection by the Liberals under [[William Mackenzie King]]. In New Zealand a series of economic and social policies similar to the New Deal were adopted after the election of the first Labour Government in 1935 [http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/H/HistoryEconomic/LabourPolicy/en].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Nazi Germany]], economic recovery was pursued through wage controls, suppression of unions, and big government spending programs on [[Autobahn|infrastructure]] and public works; as in the United States, large-scale armament spending came later in the 1930s. In [[Mussolini]]'s Italy, the economic controls of his corporate state were tightened.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The First Hundred Days==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FDR0415.JPG|framed|Roosevelt's energetic public personality--&amp;quot;the only thing we have to fear is fear itself,&amp;quot; and his &amp;quot;[[fireside chats]]&amp;quot; helped restore confidence.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having won a decisive victory in 1932, and with his party having decisively swept Congressional elections across the nation, Roosevelt entered office with unprecedented political capital. Many Congressmen had their favorite projects, like the TVA plan of Senator [[George Norris]], which the administration adopted and treated as its own.  Finally there were numerous Hoover plans that he could not get passed but were ready to go, such as the emergency banking laws. Americans of all political persuasions were demanding immediate action, and Roosevelt responded with a series of new programs in the “first hundred days” of the administration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The &amp;quot;Bank Holiday&amp;quot; and the Emergency Banking Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt hurled the blame at businessmen and bankers with religious rhetoric: &amp;quot;Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men....The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The failure of Credit Anstalt, a large commercial bank in Austria in 1931, brought a new wave of financial panic to Wall Street. By March 4, all banks in the country were virtually closed by their governors, and Roosevelt kept them all closed until he could pass new legislation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; for details see &amp;quot;Bottom&amp;quot; in ''Time Magazine'' (March 13, 1933) online at [http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,745289,00.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  On March 9, Roosevelt sent to Congress the [[Emergency Banking Act]], drafted in large part by Hoover's administration; the act was passed and signed into law the same day. It provided for a system of reopening sound banks under Treasury supervision, with federal loans available if needed.  Three-quarters of the banks in the [[Federal Reserve System]] reopened within the next three days. Billions of dollars in &amp;quot;hoarded&amp;quot; currency and gold flowed back into them within a month, thus stabilizing the banking system. All was normal by April. During all of 1933, 4,004 small local banks were permanently closed and were merged into larger banks.  (Their depositors eventually received 85 cents on the dollar of their deposits.)  Congress created the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] in June, which insured deposits for up to $5,000, although Roosevelt opposed it support was overwhelming.  The establishment of the FDIC virtually ended the era of &amp;quot;runs&amp;quot; on banks.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Banking Act of 1935 removed the Secretary of the Treasury from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and established the [[Federal Open Market Committee]] to control market operations of the the Federal Reserve, the buying and selling of Government securities the Federal Reserve System.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic growth===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy hit rock bottom in March 1933 and now it started to expand.  As historian Broadus Mitchell notes, &amp;quot;Most indexes worsened until the summer of 1932, which may be called the low point of the depression economically and psychologically.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mitchell p 404.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Economic indicators show the economy reached nadir in the first days of March, then began a steady, sharp upward recovery. Thus the Federal Reserve Index of Industrial Production hit its lowest point of 52.8 in July 1932 (with 1935-39 = 100) and was practically unchanged at 54.3 in March 1933; however by July 1933, it reached 85.5, a dramatic rebound of 57% in four months. Growth was steady and strong until 1937 but job creation continued to lag. By 1941personal consumption expenditures - despite population increase - were virtually unchanged since 1929, reflecting a general impoverishment of the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Personal consumption expenditures in the aggregate for 1929 were 77.2 billion, 45.8 billion in 1933, and 80.6 billion in 1941.  Measured in constant 1958 dollars. Source: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, ''Federal Reserve Bulletin'',  June 1973, p. A68.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US-jobs2040.JPG|thumb|450px|Chart 2: total employment in US, excluding farms and WPA]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Economy Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Economy Act]], drafted by Budget Director [[Lewis Douglas]] was passed on March 20, 1933. The act proposed to balance the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; (non-emergency) federal budget by cutting the salaries of government employees and cutting pensions to veterans by 40 percent. It saved $500 million a year and reassured deficit hawks such as Douglas that the new president was fiscally conservative.  Roosevelt argued there were two budgets: the &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; federal budget, which he balanced, and the &amp;quot;emergency budget,&amp;quot; which was needed to defeat the depression.  It was imbalanced on a temporary basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was ran on a platform of balancing the budget, but in office found himself running spending deficits to fund the numerous programs he created. Douglas, however, rejecting the distinction between a regular and emergency budget, resigned in 1934, and became an outspoken critic of the New Deal. Roosevelt strenuously opposed the [[Bonus Bill]] that would give World War I veterans a cash bonus.  Finally, Congress passed it over his veto in 1936, and the Treasury distributed $1.5 billion in cash to 4 million of bonus welfare benefits to veterans just before the 1936 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These blank check appropriations led to the subservience of Congress and the rise of bureaucracy. Under the Constitution, Congress alone can write laws. The executive branch only enforces the law. But Congress now began to pass laws that created large bureaus empowered to make [[regulation]]s or directives with a wide range of authority. Under these laws the executive bureau became a quasi-legislative body authorized by Congress to make regulations which had the effect of law. This practice grew until Washington was filled with a [[New Deal agencies|vast array of bureaus]] that were making laws, enforcing them and actually interpreting them through [[administrative law court]]s set up within the bureaus, abolishing on a large scale the [[separation of powers]] between executive, legislative and judicial processes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least until [[John F. Kennedy]] in 1960, New Dealers never fully recognized the [[Keynesian  economics|Keynesian]] argument for government spending as a vehicle for recovery. Most economists of the era, along with [[Henry Morgenthau, Jr.|Henry Morgenthau]] of the Treasury Department,  rejected Keynesian solutions and favored balanced budgets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minimum wage===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after his election FDR forced the Congress to scrap minimum wage and maximum hour legislation which the Senate had already passed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 2, Ch. 3., [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Three___The_Forgotten_De.htm ''The Forgotten Deprssion''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Farm Programs ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt was keenly interested in farm issues, and emphasized that true prosperity would not return until farming was prosperous.  Many different programs were directed at farmers. The first hundred days produced a federal program to protect commercial farmers from the uncertainties of the depression through subsidies and production controls. This program began with the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]], creating the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA), which Congress passed in May 1933.  The Act reflected the demands of leaders of major farm organizations, especially the Farm Bureau, and reflected debates among Roosevelt's farm advisers such as [[Henry A. Wallace]], [[Rexford Tugwell]], and [[George Peek]]. The AAA implemented a provision for crop reductions known as the &amp;quot;domestic allotment&amp;quot; system of the act. Under this system producers of corn, cotton, dairy products, hogs, rice, tobacco, and wheat would decide on production limits for their crops. The AAA would then pay land owners subsidies for leaving some of their land idle with funds provided by a new tax on food processing. Farm prices were to be subsidized up to the point of parity.  Some crops were ordered to be destroyed and some livestock slaughtered to raise the prices farmers received. The idea was that the less produced, the higher the price, and the farmer would benefit.   Farm incomes increased significantly in the first three years of the New Deal. A Gallup Poll revealed that a majority of the American public opposed the AAA; conservatives complained that price fixing was dangerously distorting the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The milk program was especially problematic--and indeed still is in the 21st century, with state governments having a major role.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main farm program was the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] or AAA, enacted in 1933.  The government rented land from farmers to take it out of production, therby hoping the reduce the surpluses that caused such low prices.  By 1936 conditions had dramatically improved in agriculture. Although the holy grail of 100% parity was not reached until 1943, incomes were much higher rising from $4.7 billion in 1932 to $8.7 billion in 1936. The heavy burden of debt that had soured the 1920s was mostly paid off or refinanced.  The chimerical vision of escaping to the rich cities no longer enthralled the farm youth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main causes of the return to prosperity include the overall improved national economy, the severe draught of 1934 that reduced output and caused prices to rise.  The AAA payments to farmers were a help.  The acreage reduction program had little effect except in cotton and tobacco. In other crops the farmers improved their efficiency on the remaining acreage and output stayed level. In cotton and tobacco, however, prices were much higher and since the great majority of Southerners lived in rural areas and depended on these crops, the New Deal was very well regarded.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Benedict, ''Farm Policies,'' p 353&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AAA established an important and long-lasting federal role in the planning on the entire agricultural sector of the economy, with support from liberals and conservatives alike.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1936, the Supreme Court declared the AAA to be [[Constitutionality|unconstitutional]], stating that &amp;quot;a statutory plan to regulate and control agricultural production, is a matter beyond the powers delegated to the federal government...&amp;quot; The AAA was replaced by a similar program that did win Court approval, and was endorsed by the both parties in the 1936 election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Federal regulation of agricultural production has been modified many times since then, but together with large subsidies it is still in effect in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tenant farmers and sharecroppers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, henry Wallace and many New Dealers were highly sympathetic to the marginal farmers who lived on the land in severe poverty, especially in the South.  Major programs addressed to their needs included the [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA), the [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA), the [[Rural Electrification Administration]] (REA), the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA) and rural welfare projects sponsored by the WPA, NYA, Forest Service and CCC, including school lunches, building new schools, opening roads in remote areas, reforestation, and purchase of marginal lands to enlarge national forests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relief ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The administration launched a series of relief measures and welfare agencies to give meaningful jobs to the unemployed, especially unskilled laborers. The largest programs were the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), the [[Civil Works Administration]] (CWA), the [[Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA), the [[National Youth Administration]] (NYA), and above all, the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA).  The WPA employed a maximum of 3.3 million in November 1938.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Nancy Rose' Put to Work.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, even at this level of WPA employment, unemployment (counting WPA as employment) was still 12.5% in 1938 according to figures from Micheal Darby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Darby, Michael R.''Three and a half million U.S. Employees have been mislaid: or, an Explanation of Unemployment, 1934-1941.'' Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 1 (1976): 1-16.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All these emergency programs were terminated in 1942-43, when unemployment had vanished due to World War II related employment offers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wpa1.JPG|thumb|275px|WPA employed 2 to 3 million unemployed at unskilled labor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933 the administration launched the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]], a project involving dam construction planning on an unprecedented scale in order to curb flooding, generate electricity, and modernize the very poor farms in the [[Tennessee Valley]] region of the [[US South|Southern United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Repeal of prohibition===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a measure that garnered substantial popular support, Roosevelt, in his first days of office, moved to put to rest one of the most divisive cultural issues of the 1920s.  He supported and signed a bill to legalize the manufacture and sale of beer, an interim measure pending the repeal of [[Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Prohibition]], for which a constitutional amendment (the Twenty-first) was already in process.  The amendment was ratified later in 1933. Prohibition had been a rather unpopular amendment and led to bootlegging, the illegal manufacture (or importation) and sale of liquor within the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communists in 1930s===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was infiltrated with [[Communists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy]] wrote in its final report, &amp;quot;The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Hollywood.&amp;quot; [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa6.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 6. The Experience of The Bomb]; the report also included, &amp;quot;At this distance it is difficult to conceive the intensity of Communist conviction in the 1930s....Looking back, however, we see more clearly the dilemma ... By 1950... the United States Government possessed information which the American public desperately needed to know: proof that there had been a serious attack on American security by the [[Soviet Union]], with considerable assistance from what was, indeed, an “enemy within.” The fact that we knew this was now known to, or sufficiently surmised by, the Soviet authorities. Only the American public was denied this information. [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa7.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 7. The Cold War]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Harold Ware]] was a [[Communist Party USA]] (CPUSA) official in the AAA and founded the [[Ware group]]. The group consisted of young lawyers and economists, had about 75 members in 1934 and was divided into about eight cells. The AAA was later found [[unconstitutional]], but by that time the Communist operatives had established jobs in government employment. [[Alger Hiss]], [[Lee Pressman]], [[John Abt]], [[Charles Kramer]], [[Nathan Witt]], [[Henry Collins]], [[George Silverman]], [[Marion Bachrach]], [[John Herrmann]], [[Nathaniel Weyl]], [[Donald Hiss]] and [[Victor Perlo]] were all members.  [[Harry Dexter White]], who was involved in the most auspicious policy [[subversion (political)|subversion]] as Director of the Division of Monetary Research in the [[Treasury Department]], was also affiliated with the group. The Ware group was the CPUSA's covert arm at this time.  Each of these agents not only provided classified documents to Soviet intelligence, but was involved in political influence operations as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1934, a Congressional Investigation was held to examine statements by Dr. [[William A. Wirt]], who headed the U.S. [[Department of Education|Office of Education]]. Dr. Wirt had attended a dinner party with several Brain Trusters at the home of his secretary, [[Alice Barrows]].  Barrows began working for the Office of Education in 1919 and was secretly a member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) which advocated the violent overthrow of the United States Constitution.  Several of the Brain Trusters present at the dinner revealed to Wirt they were CPUSA members. Wirt testified, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery, they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce.  By propaganda, they would destroy institutions making long term capital loans—and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier, he must also follow his money with control and management. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hearings, House Select Committee To Investigate Certain Statements of Dr. William Wirt, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session, April 10 and 17, 1934. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Dr Wirt faces the cameras and tells all'', Literary Digest v. 117 (April 21 1934) p. 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster053.pdf Volume 53 June 1946], p. 78 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside government, the far left was  exerting considerable influence in the labor movement (it dominated the new [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]]), and was building a network of membership organizations. Thus the [[American League Against War and Fascism]] was formed in 1933 and, in 1937, became the American League for Peace and Democracy.  There followed the [[American Youth Congress]], 1934; League of American Writers, 1935; National Negro Congress, 1936; and the American Congress for Democracy and Intellectual Freedom, 1939.  All had significant Stalinist connections, and fought furious battles with the anti-Communist left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leuchtenburg (1963) 281-3; Irving Howe, Lewis A. Coser, and Julius Jacobson, ''The American Communist Party: a critical history, 1919-1957'' (1957); James R. Barrett, ''William Z. Foster and the Tragedy of American Radicalism'' (2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Puerto Rico===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A separate set of programs operated in [[Puerto Rico]], headed by the Puerto Rico Reconstruction Administration.  It promoted [[land reform]] and helped small farms; it set up farm cooperatives, promoted crop diversification, and helped local industry. The Puerto Rico Reconstruction Administration was directed by [[Ernest Gruening]] from 1935 to 1937.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reform: (NIRA)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Business, labor, and government cooperation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides programs for immediate 'relief' the New Deal embarked quickly on an agenda of long-term 'reform' aimed at avoiding another depression. The New Dealers responded to demands to inflate the currency by a variety of means. Another group of reformers sought to build consumer and farmer co-ops as a counterweight to big business.  The consumer co-ops did not take off, but the [[Rural Electrification Administration]] used co-ops to bring electricity to rural areas. (As of 2007, many still operate.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt realized that these initial actions were nothing but short term solutions, and that more comprehensive government programs would be necessary. In the roughly three years between the Great Crash and Roosevelt's First Hundred Days, the industrial economy had been suffering from a vicious cycle of [[deflation (economics)|deflation]]. Since 1931, the [[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]], then and now the voice of the nation's organized business, had been urging the Hoover administration to adopt an anti-deflationary scheme that would permit trade associations to cooperate in stabilizing prices within their industries. While existing antitrust laws clearly forbade such practices, organized business found a receptive ear in the Roosevelt administration.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration, packed with reformers aspiring to forge all elements of society into a cooperative unit (a reaction to the worldwide specter of business-labor &amp;quot;class struggle&amp;quot;), was fairly amenable to the idea of cooperation among producers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration insisted that business would have to ensure that the incomes of workers would rise along with their prices.  The product of all these impulses and pressures was the [[National Industrial Recovery Act]] (NIRA) which was passed by  Congress in June 1933. The NIRA established the [[National Planning Board]], also called the National Resources Planning Board (NRPB), to assist in planning the economy by providing recommendations and information. Fredric A. Delano was appointed head of the NRPB.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NIRA guaranteed to workers the right of collective bargaining and helped spur some union organizing activity, but much faster growth of union membership came after the 1935 Wagner Act. The NIRA established the [[National Recovery Administration]] (NRA), which attempted to stabilize prices and wages through cooperative &amp;quot;code authorities&amp;quot; involving government, business, and labor. The NRA included a multitude of regulations imposing the pricing and production standards for all sorts of goods and services. Some ridiculed it as the &amp;quot;National Run Around.&amp;quot;  Most economists were dubious because it was based on fixing prices to reduce competition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Parker&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historian Jim Power, in ''FDR's Folly'' says that the above-market wage rates dictated by the NRA made it more expensive for employers to hire people, and therefore unnecessarily maintained high unemployment and prolonged the Depression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To prime the pump and cut unemployment, the NIRA created the [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), a major program of public works. From 1933 to 1939 PWA spent $6 billion with private companies to build 34,500 projects, many of them quite large.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The NRA &amp;quot;Blue Eagle&amp;quot; campaign===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Blue-nra.jpg|thumb|300px}left|NRA &amp;quot;Blue Eagle&amp;quot; stamps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the center of the NIRA was the National Recovery Administration (NRA), headed by former General [[Hugh Samuel Johnson]]. Johnson called on every business establishment in the nation to accept a stopgap &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot;: a minimum wage of between 20 and 40 cents an hour, a maximum workweek of 35 to 40 hours, and the abolition of child labor. Johnson and Roosevelt contended that the &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot; would raise consumer purchasing power and increase employment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To mobilize political support for the NRA, and the administrations &amp;quot;blanket code&amp;quot;, Johnson launched the &amp;quot;NRA [[Blue Eagle]]&amp;quot; publicity campaign to boost his bargaining strength to negotiate the codes with business and labor. The NRA negotiated specific sets of codes with leaders of the nation's major industries; the most important provisions were anti-deflationary floors below which no company would lower prices or wages, and agreements on maintaining employment and production. In a remarkably short time, the NRA won agreements from almost every major industry in the nation. Six months after the NRA went into effect industrial production dropped 25 percent. Donald Richberg, who soon replaced Johnson as the head of the NRA said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no choice presented to American business between intelligently planned and uncontrolled industrial operations and a return to the gold-plated anarchy that masqueraded as &amp;quot;rugged individualism.&amp;quot;...Unless industry is sufficiently socialized by its private owners and managers so that great essential industries are operated under public obligation appropriate to the public interest in them, the advance of political control over private industry is inevitable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthur Meier&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schlesinger, Jr. ''The Coming of the New Deal,'' (1957), p. 115&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time it ended in May 1935, industrial production was 22% higher than in May 1933. On May 27 1935, the NRA was found to be unconstitutional by a unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of [[Schechter v. United States]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; On that same day, the Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Frazier-Lemke Act that put a moratorium on farm mortgages.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:US-mfg20-40.jpg|thumb|400px|Chart 3: employment in manufacturing 1920-1940, in millions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employment in private sector factories recovered to the level of the late 1920s by 1937 (see chart 2), but did not grow much bigger until the war came; during the war manufacturing employment leaped from 11 million in 1940 to 18 million in 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Second New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second New Deal Enacted 1935===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the spring of 1935, responding to the setbacks in the Court, a new skepticism in Congress, and the growing popular clamor for more dramatic action, the administration proposed or endorsed several important new initiatives. Historians refer to them as the &amp;quot;Second New Deal&amp;quot; and note that it was more radical, more pro-labor and anti-business than the &amp;quot;First New Deal&amp;quot; of 1933-34. The [[National Labor Relations Act]], also known as the '''Wagner Act''', revived and strengthened the protections of collective bargaining contained in the original (and now unconstitutional) NIRA. The result was a tremendous growth of membership in the labor unions comprising the [[American Federation of Labor]]. Labor thus became a major component of the New Deal political coalition.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt nationalized unemployment relief through the [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA), headed by close friend [[Harry Hopkins]].  It created hundreds of thousands of low-skilled blue collar jobs for unemployed men (and some for unemployed women and white collar workers).  Applicants for WPA jobs did not have to be Democrats, but their foremen quickly explained that Roosevelt created their paychecks and that conservative Republicans wanted to abolish the program.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[NYA|National Youth Administration]] was the semi-autonomous WPA program for youth. Its Texas director, [[Lyndon Baines Johnson]], later used the NYA as a model for some of his [[Great Society]] programs in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the very long run, the most important program of 1935, and perhaps the New Deal as a whole, was the [[Social Security Act]], which established a system of retirement pensions for people in the industrial sector (not including farmers or household workers) and unemployment insurance, as well as welfare benefits for poor families and the handicapped. It established the framework for the U.S. welfare system. Roosevelt insisted that it should be funded by payroll taxes rather than from the general fund; he said, &amp;quot;We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and political right to collect their pensions and unemployment benefits. With those taxes in there, no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program.&amp;quot;  With the [[Unified Budget Act]] &amp;lt;--source--&amp;gt; the Social Security Trust Fund was used to fiance the Vietnam War and Great Society programs.  The original payroll witholding was 1% of the workers gross income, with Roosevelt pledging it would never exceed 3%. Today it 6.2% and 12.4% for self-employed workers - one sixth of a workers lifetime earnings when Medicare is factored in.  The withholding is on the first dollar of income with no deductions or exemptions allowed to offset contributions, and a worker was no claim or control over the assets in his account.  If a worker dies before retirement, his estate has no claim on his lifetime contributions.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Social Security remains by far the single largest program driving the growth of [[National Debt]]; since it is value of [[labor]] that is withheld, the more people [[emjployment|employed]], the higher wages are paid. the more hours worked including overtime, all is added to the national debt as a promise by the federal government repay at some future date.  And given that it is labor driving the creation of federal debt, the national debt cannot be paid down by labor.  This is refered to as the &amp;quot;structrual flaw&amp;quot; in the original Social Securioty Act.  Further, FDR's assertion that &amp;quot;no damn politician can ever scrap my social security program&amp;quot; would not withstand a Constitutional challenge.  In American people are born free, and no politician can the pledge that some future Congress elected by free citizens can refuse to honor the promises to pay seniors given that benefits are paid out from current workers earnings on a &amp;quot;pay as you go&amp;quot; basis, and are not held in a trust fund. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
One of the last New Deal agencies was the [[United States Housing Authority]], created in 1937 with some Republican support to abolish slums.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Defeat: Court Packing and Executive Reorganization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt, however, emboldened by the triumphs of his first term, set out in 1937 to consolidate authority within the government in ways that provoked powerful opposition. Early in the year, he asked Congress to [[Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937|expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court]] so as to allow him to appoint members sympathetic to his ideas and hence tip the ideological balance of the Court.  This proposal provoked a storm of protest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In one sense, however, it succeeded; Justice [[Owen Josephus Roberts|Owen Roberts]], switched positions and began voting to uphold New Deal measures, effectively creating a liberal majority in ''[[West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish]]'' and ''[[National Labor Relations Board v. Jones &amp;amp; Laughlin Steel Corporation]]'' thus departing from the ''[[Lochner v. New York]]'' era and giving the government more power in questions of economic policies. Journalists called this change &amp;quot;[[the switch in time that saved nine]].&amp;quot; Recent scholars have noted that since the vote in Parrish took place several months before the court-packing plan was announced, other factors, like evolving jurisprudence, must have contributed to the Court's swing.  The opinions handed down in Spring 1937, favorable to the government, also contributed to the downfall of the plan. In any case, the &amp;quot;court packing plan,&amp;quot; as it was known, did lasting political damage to Roosevelt and was finally rejected by Congress in July.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At about the same time, the administration proposed a plan to reorganize the executive branch in ways that would significantly increase the president's control over the bureaucracy. Like the Court-packing plan, executive reorganization garnered opposition from those who feared a &amp;quot;Roosevelt dictatorship&amp;quot; and it failed in Congress; a watered-down version of the bill finally won passage in 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Attacks Right and Left ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the left denounce Roosevelt for rescuing capitalism when the opportunity was at hand to nationalize banking, railroads and other industries.[Conkin] Liberal historians argue that Roosevelt restored hope and self-respect to tens of millions of desperate people, built labor unions, upgraded the national infrastructure and saved capitalism in his first term when he could have destroyed it and easily nationalized the banks and the railroads. [Sitkoff]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the right complain that he enlarged the powers of the federal government, built up labor unions, slowed long-term economic growth, and weakened the business community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|A 1936 cartoon shows the GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historians on the left have denounced the New Deal as a conservative phenomenon that let slip the opportunity to radically reform capitalism. Since the 1960s, &amp;quot;[[New Left]]&amp;quot; historians have been among the New Deal's harsh critics. (''For a list of relevant works, see the list of suggested readings appearing toward the bottom of the article.'') Barton J. Bernstein, in a 1968 essay, compiled a chronicle of missed opportunities and inadequate responses to problems. The New Deal may have saved capitalism from itself, Bernstein charged, but it had failed to help&amp;amp;mdash;and in many cases actually harmed&amp;amp;mdash;those groups most in need of assistance. Paul K. Conkin in ''The New Deal'' (1967) similarly chastised the government of the 1930s for its policies toward marginal farmers, for its failure to institute sufficiently progressive tax reform, and its excessive generosity toward select business interests. [[Howard Zinn]], in 1966, criticized the New Deal for working actively to actually preserve the worst evils of capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1970s research on the New Deal has been less interested in the question of whether the New Deal was a &amp;quot;conservative,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;revolutionary&amp;quot; phenomenon than in the question of constraints within which it was operating. Political sociologist [[Theda Skocpol]], in an influential series of articles, has emphasized the issue of &amp;quot;state capacity&amp;quot; as an often-crippling constraint. Ambitious reform ideas often failed, she argued because of the absence of a government bureaucracy with significant strength and expertise to administer them. Other more recent works have stressed the political constraints that the New Deal encountered. Both in Congress and among certain segments of the population conservative inhibitions about government remained strong; thus some scholars have stressed that the New Deal was not just a product of its liberal backers, but also a product of the pressures of its conservative opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government Role: balance labor, business and farming==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the dismal record in aiding marginal farmers and African Americans, among others--  contrasted with its often frequent generosity toward certain business interests--the New Deal was to elevate and strengthen new interest groups so as to allow them to compete more effectively for the interests by having the federal government evolve into an arbitrator in competition among all elements and classes of society, acting as a force that could mediate when necessary to help some groups and limit the power of others. By the end of the 1930s, business found itself competing for influence with an increasingly powerful labor movement, one that was engaged in mass mobilization and sometimes militant action; with an organized agricultural economy, and occasionally with aroused consumers. The New Deal accomplished this by creating a series of state institutions that greatly, and permanently, expanded the role of the federal government in American life. The government was now committed to providing at least minimal assistance to the poor and unemployed; to protecting the rights of labor unions; to stabilizing the banking system; to building low-income housing; to regulating financial markets; to subsidizing agricultural production; and to doing many other things that had not previously been federal responsibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, perhaps the strongest legacy of the New Deal, in other words, was to make the federal government a protector of interest groups and a supervisor of competition among them. As a result of the New Deal, political and economic life became politically more competitive than before, with workers, farmers, consumers, and others now able to press their demands upon the government in ways that in the past had been available only to the corporate world. Hence the frequent description of the government the New Deal created as the &amp;quot;broker state,&amp;quot; a state brokering the competing claims of numerous groups.  If there was more political competition, there was less market competition. Farmers were not allowed to sell for less than the official price. The transportation industry (especially airlines, trucking and railroads) was tightly regulated so that every firm had a guaranteed market and management and labor had high profits and high wages, all at the cost of high prices and much inefficiency.  Quotas in the oil industry were fixed by the [[Railroad Commission of Texas]] with the federal [[Tom Connally|Connally]] Hot Oil Act of 1935&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Handbook of Texas Online: [http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/CC/mlc3.html Connally Hot Oil Act of 1935]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; guaranteeing that illegal &amp;quot;hot oil&amp;quot; would not be sold.   To the New Dealers, the free market meant &amp;quot;cut-throat competition&amp;quot; and they considered that evil.  Not until the 1970s and 1980s would most of the New Deal regulations be relaxed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, it did not transform American capitalism in any genuinely radical way. Except in the field of labor relations, corporate power remained nearly as free from government regulation in 1939 as it had been in 1933, but that changed dramatically during the war, as Washington took control over wage rates, prices, and allocation of raw materials, and sent military officers into munitions plants. All the relief programs were closed down during the war, but one major program survived--Social Security--to become the liberal hallmark of the New Deal into the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==African Americans==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal set up numerous agencies to help impoverished farmers, but in the long run they had to move to the cities to become better off.  Many leading New Dealers, including [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], [[Harold L. Ickes]], [[Aubrey Williams]] and [[Harry Hopkins]] worked hard to ensure Blacks received at least 10% of welfare assistance payments.  Economic uplift was one thing but political revolution was another: the New Deal did not try to undercut segregation or change the second class political status of Blacks in the South. Roosevelt did appoint an unprecedented number of African Americans to second-level positions in his administration that collectively were called the Black Cabinet, perhaps due to the influence of Eleanor Roosevelt, a vocal advocate of easing discrimination. Roosevelt and Hopkins worked with big city mayors to welcome Black political organizations that made the transition from the GOP to the Democratic party in 1934-36.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WPA, NYA, and CCC relief programs allocated 10% of their budgets to blacks (who comprised about 10% of the total population, and 20% of the poor). They operated separate all-black units with the same pay and conditions as white units. The African American community responded favorably, so that by 1936 the majority who voted (usually in the North) were voting Democratic. This was a sharp realignment from 1932, when most African Americans preferred the Republican ticket. The New Deal thus established a political alliance between African Americans and the Democratic Party that survives into the 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal historians argue the New Deal laid the ground work for black breakthroughs during World War II, the civil rights movement and the [[Great Society]] of the 1960s.  Militant African Americans insist that the Civil Rights movement owed everything to black activists, and very little to the New Deal.  Note that the New Deal was especially beneficial to white ethnic minorities, who responded with 80-90% of their votes for Roosevelt's reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The recession of 1937 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Newdealcartoon.GIF|thumb|left|250px| Some conservatives, like this cartoonist, argued that the New Deal was all package and little content. Others charged it went much too far. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roosevelt administration was under assault during FDR's second term, which presided over a new dip in the Great Depression in the fall of 1937 that continued through most of 1938. Production declined sharply, as did profits and employment. The Government's own statistics were showing that 23.8% of the Workforce was either unemployed, or underemployed. The term for the human suffering at the hands of [[government planners]] was &amp;quot;wastage.&amp;quot; According to the Brain Trusters own statistics, of &amp;quot;100 Per Cent Manpower,&amp;quot; 23.8 were &amp;quot;Per Cent Wastage.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Population and the Pattern of Unemployment, 1930-1937'', Rupert B. Vance and Nadia Danilevski, The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Jan., 1940), pp. 27-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After four years of &amp;quot;government solutions,&amp;quot; contemporaneous reports were stating &amp;quot;much of the unemployment in 1937 was due to a decrease in the number of jobs available.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Population and the Pattern of Unemployment, 1930-1937'', Vance and Danilevski.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynesian economists speculated that this was a result of a premature effort to curb government spending and balance the budget, while conservatives said it was caused by attacks on business and by the huge strikes caused by the organizing activities of the [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]] and the [[American Federation of Labor]] (AFL).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt rejected the advice of Morgenthau to cut spending, and decided big business was trying to ruin the New Deal by causing another depression that voters would react against by voting Republican. It was a &amp;quot;capital strike&amp;quot; said Roosevelt, and he ordered the FBI to look for a criminal conspiracy (they found none).  Roosevelt moved left and unleashed a rhetorical campaign against monopoly power, which was cast as the cause of the new crisis. Ickes attacked automaker Henry Ford, steelmaker Tom Girdler, and the super rich &amp;quot;Sixty Families&amp;quot; who supposedly comprised &amp;quot;the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States.&amp;quot; Left unchecked, Ickes warned, they would create &amp;quot;big-business Fascist America -- an enslaved America.&amp;quot; The president appointed Robert Jackson as the aggressive new director of the antitrust division of the Justice Department, but this effort lost its effectiveness once World War II began and big business was urgently needed to produce war supplies. [Kennedy p 352]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the administration's other response to the 1937 deepening of the Great Depression had more tangible results. Ignoring the vitriolic pleas of the Treasury Department and responding to the urgings of the converts to Keynesian economics and others in his administration, Roosevelt embarked on an antidote to the depression, reluctantly abandoning his efforts to balance the budget and launching a $5 billion spending program in the spring of 1938, an effort to increase mass purchasing power. The New Deal had in fact engaged in deficit spending since 1933, but it was apologetic about it. The debt did NOT rise as a proportion of GDP, but did rise in terms of dollars. Now they had a theory to justify what they were doing.  Roosevelt explained his program in a fireside chat in which he explained it was up to the government to &amp;quot;create an economic upturn&amp;quot; by making &amp;quot;additions to the purchasing power of the nation.&amp;quot; He was opposed by [[Fiscal Conservatism|fiscal conservatives]] who thought all government spending was inefficient and generated corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Business-oriented observers explained the recession and recovery in very different terms from the Keynesians.  They argued that the New Deal had been very hostile to business expansion in 1935-37, had encouraged massive strikes which had a negative impact on major industries such as automobiles, and had threatened massive anti-trust legal attacks on big corporations.  All those threats diminished sharply after 1938.  For example, the antitrust efforts fizzled out without major cases. The CIO and AFL unions started battling each other more than corporations, and tax policy became more favorable to long-term growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1937 - 1943 Depression was longer in duration than the 1929 - 1932 crash, the result of massive government intrusion into the private economy which stunted growth.  Manufacturing demand stimulated by WWII led to the 1943-1949 recovery, where finally, in 1949, the New York Stock Exchange recovered to the level it had been at 1929.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many New Deal reforms were unpopular and criticized.  In 1948 President [[Harry Truman]] ran on a reformed New Deal platform called the [[Fair Deal]], which was regarded largely as an admission the New Deal had not been fair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==World War II and the end of the New Deal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prosperity had returned by 1938 for most people--but not for the bottom third, who remained plagued by structural unemployment. The impact of war mobilization and massive war spending doubled the GNP.  Businessmen ignored the mounting national debt and heavy new taxes, redoubling their efforts for greater output as an expression of patriotism.  Patriotism drove most people to voluntarily work overtime and give up leisure activities to make money after so many hard years. Patriotism meant that people accepted rationing and price controls for the first time.  &amp;quot;Cost-plus&amp;quot; pricing in munitions contracts guaranteed that businesses would make a profit no matter how many mediocre workers they employed, no matter how inefficient the techniques they used.  The demand was for a vast quantity of war supplies as soon as possible, regardless of cost.  Business hired every person in sight, even driving sound trucks up and down city streets begging people to apply for jobs. New workers were needed to replace the 12 million working-age men serving in the military.  These events magnified the role of the federal government in the national economy. In 1929, federal expenditures accounted for only 3% of [[GNP]]. Between 1933 and 1939, federal expenditure tripled, and Roosevelt's critics charged that he was turning America into a [[socialism|socialist]] state. However, spending on the New Deal was far smaller than on the war effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first peacetime year of 1946, federal spending still amounted to $62 billion, or 30% of GNP. Wartime spending and other measures were able to provide an enormous output. Between 1939 and 1944, the peak of wartime production, the nation's total output almost doubled. This, along with the conscription and removal of soldiers, meant that civilian unemployment plummeted&amp;amp;mdash;from 14% in 1940 to less than 2% in 1943 as the labor force grew by ten million.  Millions of farmers left marginal operations, students quit school, and housewives returned to the labor force.  The war economy was not run on the basis of free enterprise, but was the result of government/business cooperation, with government bankrolling business.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major result of the full employment at high wages was a sharp, permanent decrease in the level of income inequality.  The gap between rich and poor narrowed dramatically in the area of nutrition, because food rationing and price controls guaranteed a reasonably priced diet to everyone.  Large families that had been poverty-stricken in the 1930s had four or five or more workers, and shot to the top one-third income bracket.  Overtime made for huge paychecks in the munitions factories; white collar workers were fully employed too, but they did not receive overtime and their salary scale was no longer much higher than the blue collar wage scale.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economist Robert Higgs (1987), argues that the War did not end the Great Depression. Rather, a return to normality after the war, as the government relaxed wage controls, price controls, capital controls, reduced tariffs and other trade barriers, and eliminated the rationing of goods and the relaxing of Federal control over American industries, ended it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conflicting interpretation of the New Deal economic policies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Depression Statistics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Econ30s.jpg|thumb|400px|major economic indicators, 1929-52]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic indicators show the American economy reached nadir in summer 1932 to February 1933, then began recovering until the Roosevelt recession of 1937-1938. Thus the Federal Reserve [[Industrial Production Index]] hit its low of 52.8 on [[1932-07-01]] and was practically unchanged at 54.3 on [[1933-03-01]]; however by [[1933-07-01]], it reached 85.5 (with 1935-39 = 100, and for comparison 2005 = 1,342).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/INDPRO.txt Industrial Production Index]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Roosevelt's twelve years in office the economy had an 8.5% compound annual growth of GDP,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Historical Statistics of the United States'' (1976) series F31&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the highest growth rate in the history of any industrial country,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Angus Maddison, ''The World Economy: Historical Statistics'' (OECD 2003); Japan is close, see p 174&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however, recovery was slow --by 1939 GDP per adult was still 27% below trend.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Cole&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cole, Harold L and Ohanian, Lee E. [http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/seminars/02-03/02-21.pdf ''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis''], 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   And, throughout the New Deal the median joblessness rate was 17.2 percent and never went below 14 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GDP20-40.JPG|thumb|350px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |Table 1: Statistics&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Dept of Commerce, National Income and Product Accounts [http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/GDPreal.htm Real GDP and GNP]; Mitchell 446, 449, 451; [http://home.att.net/~rdavis2/cpi_m2.html Consumer Price Index AND M2 Money Supply: 1800-2003]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;9%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1929&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1931&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1933&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;5%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1937&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;6%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1938&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;3%&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background:#eeeeee;&amp;quot; |1940&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Real Gross National Product (GNP) (1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|101.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 84.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 68.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|103.9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|96.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|113.0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Consumer Price Index (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|122.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|108.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 92.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|102.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 99.4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|100.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Index of Industrial Production (2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|109&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 75&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 69&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|112&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 89&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|126&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Money Supply M2 ($ billions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|46.6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|42.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|32.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|45.7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|49.3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|55.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Exports ($ billions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|5.24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|2.42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|1.67&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|3.35&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|3.18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|4.02&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|Unemployment (% of civilian work force)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;| 3.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|16.1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|25.2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|13.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|16.5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|13.9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) in 1929 dollars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) 1935-39 = 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining exports===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1932 to 1935 the volume of imports of crude foodstuffs increased 41% and of manufactured foodstuffs 49%. The volume of Agricultural exports from the United States declined. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Publications of United States Department of Commerce.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table gives the volume of imports in 1932 and 1935 for important agricultural products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Agricultural Imports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Before Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''3 years into 'relief' efforts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Commodity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! 1932 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! 1935&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Wheat &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 27,439,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Corn &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 344,000 bu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 43,242,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Oats &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 59,000 bu. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 10,107,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Barley &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| None &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4,840,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Rye &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| None &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 9,643,000 bu.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Rice &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 19,074,000 lb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 53,457,000 lb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Barley malt &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 52,533,000 lb. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 320,6 23,000 lb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Hay &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 13,858 tons &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 67,171 tons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quantities of individual commodities exported declined as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Agricultural Exports&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|''Declines 3 years into&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Commodity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! New Dealism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Cotton&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 33%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unmanufactured tobacco &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Wheat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 99%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Flour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 491%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Meat products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 19%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Lard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 82% &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the summer of 1933 New Dealers paid farmers under the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) to plow up 10,500,000 acres of growing cotton, or 25% of the total acreage.  The Bankhead Cotton Act of 1934 set a limit OF 10,000,000 bales of cotton to be marketed by farmers from the 1934 - 1935 crop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the fall of 1933, the AAA destroyed 6,200,000 pigs and 220,000 mother sows were slaughtered in the AAA's effort to raise prices at a cost of over $30,000,000. The total live weight of the pigs and sows slaughtered was 443,69.7,348 pounds. Of this only 97,064,159 pounds of food products were obtained-the rest was converted into inedible grease or fertilizer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relief Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 3: Families on Relief 1936-41:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prolonged/Worsened the Depression===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 1995 survey of economic historians and economists asked &amp;quot;Taken as a whole, government policies of the New Deal served to lengthen and deepen the Great Depression.&amp;quot;  Of the economists 27% agreed and 51% disagreed. Of the economic historians, only 6% agreed and 74% disagreed. (the rest were in the partly agree/disagree group).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://eh.net/lists/archives/eh.res/feb-1997/0010.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minority view is represented by Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian who conclude that the &amp;quot;New Deal labor and industrial policies did not lift the economy out of the Depression as President Roosevelt and his economic planners had hoped,&amp;quot; but that the &amp;quot;New Deal policies are an important contributing factor to the persistence of the Great Depression.&amp;quot; They conclude that the New Deal &amp;quot;cartelization policies are a key factor behind the weak recovery.&amp;quot; They say that the &amp;quot;abandonment of these policies coincided with the strong economic recovery of the 1940s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cole, Harold L and Ohanian, Lee E. [http://www.economics.hawaii.edu/research/seminars/02-03/02-21.pdf ''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis''], 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lowell E. Gallaway and Richard K. Vedder conclude that the &amp;quot;Great Depression was very significantly prolonged in both its duration and its magnitude by the impact of New Deal programs.&amp;quot; They argue that without Social Security, work relief, unemployment insurance, and especially without the labor unions, business would have hired more workers and the unemployment rate would have been lower. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gallaway, Lowell E. and Vedder, Richard K. ''Out of Work: Unemployment and Government in Twentieth-Century America'', New York University Press; Updated edition (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Few economists or economic historians have agreed with these speculations. The New Deal years 1933-36 (or indeed the FDR years 1933-45) showed the highest growth rates in the history of the American economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unemployment continues===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darby counts WPA workers as employed; Lebergott as unemployed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
source: ''Historical Statistics US'' (1976)  series D-86; Smiley 1983&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Smiley, Gene, &amp;quot;Recent Unemployment Rate Estimates for the 1920s and 1930s,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History,'' June 1983, 43, 487-93.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal tried public works, farm subsidies and other devices to reduce unemployment, but FDR never completely gave up trying to balance the budget.  Unemployment remained high throughout the New Deal years; business simply would not hire more people, especially the low skilled and supposedly &amp;quot;untrainable&amp;quot; men who had been unemployed for years and lost any job skill they once had. [[Keynesian]]s later argued that by spending vastly more money--using [[fiscal policy]]--the government could provide the needed stimulus through the &amp;quot;multiplier&amp;quot; effect.  Critics of Keynesianism said that would just take money out of the private sector, causing a negative multiplier effect there. However, no economist has written a full-scale Keynesian analysis of the depression, so it is difficult to evaluate how that model would work.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unemployment peaked in 1933, at 24.9%, and by 1941 unemployment had subsided to 9.9%, which was near the 1930 level of 8.9%.  [http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cm20030124ar03p1.htm] Unemployment increased 163% over the average of what it had been in 1930 by the third year of the New Deal. By contrast, recovery was well underway in Great Britain, with an increase of only 1.1%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years more influential among economists has been the monetarist interpretation of [[Milton Friedman]], which did include a full-scale monetary history of what he calls the &amp;quot;Great Contraction.&amp;quot;  Friedman concentrated on the failures before 1933, and in his memoirs said the relief programs were an appropriate response. From 1935 to 1943, Friedman was himself a Keynesian who was (1941-43) an official spokesman for the New Deal before Congress; he did not at that time criticize any New Deal or Federal Reserve policies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from building up labor unions, the New Deal did not substantially alter the distribution of power within American [[capitalism]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keynes visited to the White House in 1934 to urge President Roosevelt to do more deficit spending. Roosevelt complained to Labor Secretary [[Frances Perkins]], &amp;quot;He left a whole rigmarole of figures--he must be a mathematician rather than a political economist.&amp;quot;  That is, Keynes had an abstract theory but no useful suggestions about what to do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|380px|right|Although Hopkins denied saying &amp;quot;Spend-Spend-Spend; Tax-Tax-Tax; Elect-Elect-Elect,&amp;quot; conservative critics thought it fit the New Deal very well]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TABLE BORDER=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TH colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Table 2: Unemployment (% labor force)&amp;lt;/TH&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;Year&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      &amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Lebergott&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      Darby&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1933&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,24.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      24.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,20.6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      20.6&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1934&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,21.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      21.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,16&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      16.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1935&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,20.1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      20.1&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1936&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,16.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      16.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1937&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.3&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.1&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1938&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,19&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      19.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,12.5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      12.5&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1939&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,17.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      17.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,11.3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      11.3&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1940&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,14.6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      14.6&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.5&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1941&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,9.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      9.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      8.0&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1942&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,4.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      4.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,4.7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      4.7&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1943&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1944&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.2&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;TR&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1945&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt;&amp;lt;TD QP::NUMFORMAT:=&amp;quot;97,-1,1.9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      1.9&amp;lt;/TD&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/TR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/TABLE&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fiscal Conservatism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatism was a key component of the New Deal, as Zelizer (2000) demonstrates.  It was supported by Wall Street and local investors and most of the business community;  mainstream academic economists believed in it, as apparently did the majority of the public. Conservative southern Democrats, who favored balanced budgets and opposed new taxes, controlled Congress and its major committees.  Even liberal Democrats at the time regarded balanced budgets as essential to economic stability in the long run, although they were more willing to accept short-term deficits.  Public opinion polls consistently showed public opposition to deficits and debt.  Throughout his terms, Roosevelt recruited fiscal conservatives to serve in his administration, most notably [[Lewis Douglas]] the Director of Budget from 1933 to 1934, and [[Henry Morgenthau Jr.]], Secretary of the Treasury from 1934 to 1945.  They defined policy in terms of budgetary cost and tax burdens rather than needs, rights, obligations, or political benefits.  Personally the president embraced their fiscal conservatism.  Politically, he realized that fiscal conservatism enjoyed a strong wide base of support among voters, leading Democrats, and businessmen.   On the other hand there was enormous pressure to act–and spending money on high visibility programs attracted Roosevelt, especially if it tied millions of voters to him, as did the WPA.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas proved too inflexible, and quit in 1934.  Morgenthau made it his highest priority to stay close to Roosevelt, no matter what.  Douglas' position, like many of the [[Old Right]] was grounded in a basic distrust of politicians and the deeply ingrained fear that government spending always involved a degree of patronage and corruption that offended his Progressive sense of efficiency.  The Economy Act of 1933, passed early in the Hundred Days, was Douglas' great achievement. It  reduced federal expenditures by $500 million, to be achieved by reducing veterans’ payments and federal salaries.  Douglas cut government spending through executive orders that cut the military budget by $125 million, $75 million from the Post Office, $12 million from Commerce, $75 million from government salaries, and $100 million from staff layoffs.  As Freidel concludes, &amp;quot;The economy program was not a minor aberration of the spring of 1933, or a hypocritical concession to delighted conservatives. Rather it was an integral part of Roosevelt's overall New Deal.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freidel 1990, p. 96&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Revenues were so low that borrowing was necessary (only the richest 3% paid any income tax before 1942.)  Douglas therefore hated the relief programs, which he said reduced business confidence, threatened the government’s future credit, and had the &amp;quot;destructive psychological effects of making mendicants of self-respecting American citizens.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zelizer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt was pulled toward greater spending by Hopkins and Ickes, and as the 1936 election approached he decided to gain votes by attacking big business.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Debt29-50.jpg|thumb|400px|left|National Debt as a percentage of GNP climbs from 20% to 40% as Hoover begins relief efforts with the [[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]] and levels off during the New Deal; soars during WW2  from ''Historical Statistics US'' (1976)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Morgenthau shifted with FDR, but at all times tried to inject fiscal responsibility; he deeply believed in balanced budgets, stable currency, reduction of the national debt, and the need for more private investment .  The Wagner Act met Morgenthau’s requirement because it strengthened the party’s political base and involved no new spending.  In contrast to Douglas, Morgenthau accepted Roosevelt’s  double budget as legitimate–that is a balanced regular budget, and an “emergency” budget for agencies, like the WPA, PWA and CCC, that would be temporary until full recovery was at hand.  He fought against the veterans’ bonus until Congress finally overrode Roosevelt’s veto and gave out $2.2 billion in 1936.   His biggest success was the new Social Security program; he managed to reverse the proposals to fund it from general revenue and insisted it be funded by new taxes on employees.  It was Morgenthau who insisted on excluding farm workers and domestic servants from Social Security because workers outside industry would not be paying their way.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zelizer 2000; Savage 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deficits held relatively constant throught the 1930s at about 40% of the GDP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Economists at the time used GNP (gross national product) and today they prefer GDP (gross domestic product). For the US, GNP and GDP are almost the same.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Claims the New Deal adopted or resembled Fascist economic models===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;fascism&amp;quot; in the 21st century has very strong connotations of mass murder and death camps, however, in the 1930s it meant the [[planned economy]] and [[corporativism]] exemplified by the economic plans of Benito Mussolini in Italy. And, comparisons have been made between the economic systems of Fascist Italy and the New Deal programs. Communists, classical liberals, conservatives, and [[Herbert Hoover]] used the term fascism in that manner at that time. Likewise, modern-day [[paleoconservatives]] argue that the New Deal was a major milestone in the rise of America's [[managerial state]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journalist [[John T. Flynn]], a former socialist, in his 1944 book ''As We Go Marching'', said that &amp;quot;the New Dealers...began to flirt with the alluring pastime of reconstructing the capitalist system...and in the process of this new career they began to fashion doctrines that turned out to be the principles of fascism.&amp;quot;  Former President Herbert Hoover argued that some (but not all) New Deal programs were &amp;quot;fascist,&amp;quot; and that there was a presidential dictatorship. [''Memoirs'' 3:420]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Among the early Roosevelt fascist measures was the National Industry Recovery Act (NRA) of June 16, 1933 .... These ideas were first suggested by Gerald Swope (of the General Electric Company)....[and] the United States Chamber of Commerce. During the campaign of 1932, Henry I. Harriman, president of that body, urged that I agree to support these proposals, informing me that Mr. Roosevelt had agreed to do so. I tried to show him that this stuff was pure fascism; that it was a remaking of Mussolini's &amp;quot;corporate state&amp;quot; and refused to agree to any of it. He informed me that in view of my attitude, the business world would support Roosevelt with money and influence. That for the most part proved true.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever Hoover was told, Roosevelt had ''not'' agreed to any such plan. In 1934, Roosevelt himself warned his &amp;quot;fireside chat&amp;quot; radio audiences against linguistic confusion. Some people, he said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
will try to give you new and strange names for what we are doing. Sometimes they will call it 'Fascism,' sometimes 'Communism,' sometimes 'Regimentation,' sometimes 'Socialism.' But, in so doing, they are trying to make very complex and theoretical something that is really very simple and very practical. . . . Plausible self-seekers and theoretical die-hards will tell you of the loss of individual liberty. Answer this question out of the facts of your own life. Have you lost any of your rights or liberty or constitutional freedom of action and choice?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy 1999, p 246.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1934 Roosevelt defended a more powerful national government as he believed was necessary to control the economy, by quoting conservative Republican Elihu Root: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tremendous power of organization [Root had said] has combined great aggregations of capital in enormous industrial establishments . . . so great in the mass that each individual concerned in them is quite helpless by himself. . . . The old reliance upon the free action of individual wills appears quite inadequate. . . . The intervention of that organized control we call government seems necessary. . . . Men may differ as to the particular form of governmental activity with respect to industry or business, but nearly all are agreed that private enterprise in times such as these cannot be left without assistance and without reasonable safeguards lest it destroy not only itself but also our process of civilization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy 1999, p 246.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One historian remarks, &amp;quot;What Fascist corporatism and the New Deal had in common was a certain amount of state intervention in the economy. Beyond that, the only figure who seemed to look on Fascist corporatism as a kind of model was [[Hugh Samuel Johnson|Hugh Johnson]], FDR's head of the National Recovery Administration.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanley Payne, ''History of Fascism'' (1995) p 230.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson strenuously denied any association with Mussolini, saying the NRA &amp;quot;is being organized almost as you would organize a business. I want to avoid any Mussolini appearance -- the President calls this Act industrial self-government.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hugh S. Johnson, ''The Blue Eagle, from Egg to Earth'' (1935), p 223&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Donald Richberg after a series of scandals replaced General Hugh Johnson as head of NRA and speaking before a Senate committee said &amp;quot;A nationally [[planned economy]] is the only salvation of our present situation and the only hope for the future.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leuchtenburg p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Historians such as Hawley (1966) have examined the origins of the NRA in detail, claiming the main inspiration came from Senators [[Hugo Black]] and [[Robert F. Wagner]] and from American business leaders such as the Chamber of Commerce. The main model was Woodrow Wilson's [[War Industries Board]], in which Johnson had been involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Art and music==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Works Progress Administration]] subsidized artists, musicians, painters and writers on relief with a group of projects called [[Federal One]].  While the WPA program was by the most widespread, it was preceded by three programs administered by the [[United States Department of the Treasury|US Treasury]] which hired commercial artists at usual commissions to add murals and sculptures to federal buildings. The first of these efforts was the [[Public Works of Art Project]], organized by Edward Bruce, an American businessman and artist.  The [[Resettlement Administration]] (RA) and [[Farm Security Administration]] (FSA) had major photography programs.  The New Deal arts programs emphasized regionalism, socialist realism, class conflict, proletarian interpretations, and audience participation. The unstoppable collective powers of common man, contrasted to the failure of individualism], was a favorite theme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mathews 1975&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FSA photography project is most responsible for creating the image of the Depression in the USA. Many of the images appeared in popular magazines. The photographers were under instruction from Washington as to what overall impression the New Deal wanted to give out. Director [[Roy Stryker]]'s agenda focused on his faith in [[social engineering]], the poor conditions among cotton tenant farmers, and the very poor conditions among migrant farm workers; above all he was committed to social reform through New Deal intervention in people's lives. Stryker demanded photographs that &amp;quot;related people to the land and vice versa&amp;quot; because these photographs reinforced the RA's position that poverty could be controlled by &amp;quot;changing land practices.&amp;quot; Though Stryker did not dictate to his photographers how they should compose the shots, he did send them lists of desirable themes, e.g., &amp;quot;church&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;court day&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;barns&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Cara A. Finnegan. ''Picturing Poverty: Print Culture and FSA Photographs'' (Smithsonian Books, 2003) pp 43-44 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  New Deal era films such as ''[[Citizen Kane]]'' ridiculed so-called &amp;quot;great men&amp;quot;, while class warfare appeared in numerous movies, such as ''[[Meet John Doe]]'' and ''[[The Grapes of Wrath]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast there was also a smaller but influential stream of anti-New Deal art.  Thus [[Gutzon Borglum]]'s sculptures on [[Mount Rushmore]] emphasized great men in history (his designs had the approval of [[Calvin Coolidge]]).  [[Gertrude Stein]] and [[Ernest Hemingway]] disliked the New Deal and celebrated the organic autonomy of perfected written work in opposition to the New Deal trope of writing as performative labor.  The [[Southern Agrarians]] celebrated a premodern regionalism and opposed the TVA as a modernizing, disruptive force.  Under Chief Justice [[Charles Evans Hughes]], the Supreme Court built one of the most architecturally striking buildings; its classical lines and small size contrasted sharply with the gargantuan modernistic federal buildings in Washington.  Hollywood managed to synthesize both streams, as in [[Busby Berkeley]]'s ''Gold Digger'' musicals, where the storylines exalt individual autonomy while the spectacular musical numbers show abstract populations of interchangeable dancers securely contained within patterns beyond their control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Szalay 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The legacies of the New Deal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDR-LBJ.png|thumb|left|220px|The New Deal was the inspiration for [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s  [[Great Society]] in 1960s. Johnson (on right) headed the Texas NYA and was elected to Congress in 1938.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some economists argue that although the New Deal did not end the depression, all in all it helped to prevent the economy from decaying further by increasing the regulatory functions of the federal government in ways that helped stabilize previous trouble areas of the economy: the stock market, the banking system, and others. Others argue that it worsened the depression. All analysts agree the New Deal produced a new political coalition that sustained the Democratic Party as the majority party in national politics for more than a generation after its own end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's 12 years in office saw a dramatic increase in the power of the federal government as a whole. Roosevelt also established the presidency as the preeminent center of authority within the federal government. By creating a large array of agencies protecting various groups of citizens&amp;amp;mdash;workers, farmers, and others&amp;amp;mdash;who suffered from the crisis, enabling them to challenge the powers of the corporations, the Roosevelt administration generated a set of political ideas&amp;amp;mdash;known to later generations as New Deal liberalism&amp;amp;mdash;that remained a source of inspiration and controversy for decades and that helped shape the next great experiment in liberal reform, the [[Great Society]] of the 1960s.  The wartime [[FEPC]] executive orders that forbade job discrimination against African Americans, women and ethnic groups was a major breakthrough that brought better jobs and pay to millions of minority Americans. Historians usually treat FEPC as part of the war effort and not part of the New Deal itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; as Political Metaphor===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1933 politicians and pundits have often called for a &amp;quot;new deal&amp;quot; regarding this or that political object.  That is, they demand a completely new, large-scale approach to a project. As Arthur A. Ekirch Jr. (1971) has shown, the New Deal stimulated utopianism in American political and social thought on a wide range of issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada, Conservative Prime Minister [[Richard B. Bennett]] in 1935 proposed a &amp;quot;new deal&amp;quot; of regulation , taxation, and social insurance that was a copy of the American program; Bennett's proposals were not enacted and he was defeated for reelection in October 1935. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the rise of the use of U.S. political phraseology in Britain, the [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] Government has termed some of its employment programs 'New Deal'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brain trust==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt gathered around himself informal advisors, mostly university professors, dubbed by the media the [[Brain Trust]]. A key advisor was [[Raymond Moley]], who by 1936 broke with Roosevelt and provided the most important conservative critique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Main programs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Recovery Act===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933 Italian Premier [[Benito Mussolini]] was a towering figure. Dr. Nicholas Murray Butler, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,774563-4,00.html Axis (1936-1943)], ''[[TIME magazine]]'', Sep. 20, 1943,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  President of Columbia University and [[Nobel Prize for Peace]], said of [[fascism]], it is as a “form of government of the very first order of excellence”; and found it “safe to predict that just as [[Oliver Cromwell|Cromwell]] made modern England, so Mussolini would make modern Italy.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/wright/1943/10/italy.htm What To Do With Italy?], John G. Wright, From Fourth International, Vol.4 No.10, October 1943, pp.308-311.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chariman [[Sol Bloom]] of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U. S. House of Representives, suggested Mussolini was a great man and had something the [[United States]] government might well look to for imitation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John T. Flynn, ''As We Go Marching'', Doubleday, 1944, p. 70.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What they liked particularly was his [[corporative]] system. Mussolini organized each trade or industrial group or professional group into a state supervised trade association. Mussolini called it a corporative. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmre.org/GeneSmileypresentation.pdf The New Deal and Corporatism], Prof. Emeritus Gene Smiley, Marquette University, Presented at the Committee for Monetary Research and Education,October 19, 2006,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These corporatives operated under state supervision and provided economic planning of production, quality, prices, distribution, labor standards, etc.  The National Recovery Act, or NRA as it came to be called, provided that a corporative system in America for each industry should be organized into a federally supervised trade association. It was not called a corporative. It was called a [[Code Authority]]. In [[Nazi]] Germany such government run planning authorities built on the Italian model were called [[industrial cartel]]s. This was the same as fascism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/hbzfrm.htm ''The Roosevelt Myth''], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 1, Ch. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These code authorities could regulate production, quantities, qualities, prices, distribution methods, etc., under the supervision of the NRA that had the effect of ending the downward spiral of deflation and falling prices, but which risked the long-term effect of stifling innovation and favoring big business over small.  Anti­-trust laws forbade such organizations. Roosevelt had denounced Hoover for not enforcing these laws sufficiently. Now Roosevelt suspended the anti-trust laws and compelled men to combine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The NRA Act provided an appropriation of $3,300,000,000 which the President was given to be spent at his own discretion. He had a sum of money equal to what the government spent in the prvious ten years outside of discretionary spending. Roosevelt decided how it should be spent and where. If a congressman or senator needed an appropriation for his district, instead of introducing a bill in Congress, he went to Roosevelt to ask for it. All over the country, states, cities, counties, business organizations, institutions of all sorts wanted projects of all kinds. Instead of going to Congress they went to the President. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1935 the Supreme Court said the NRA's procedures were unconstitutional, and it was never revived.  In the twenty-three months that NRA was on the Statute books, the average number of workers involved in strikes and lockouts and the number of days of idleness and lost productivity per month resulting were approximately four times as large as during the six months before NRA. After NRA was declared unconstitutional, both the number of workers involved in industrial disputes and the number of days lost declined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt asked [[Clarence Darrow]] to head up a national recovery review board.  The Darrow Committee's report stated, &amp;quot;We have here a body not only perfectly equipped to exercise monopolistic control, but endowed with extraordinary powers incompatible with the ideals heretofore entertained in a free country. . . In proportion as the authority of government sanctions regulation by industrial combinations, the inevitable tendency is toward monopoly with the elimination of the small business .&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Special and Supplementary Reports of Darrow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Committee, appointed by the President, released May 20, 1934. [http://robsrealnews.com/revisedNEWDEAL8.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Richberg, former Counsel and later Administrator of NRA admitted candidly, &amp;quot;Yet step by step through the diabolical logic of events the NRA became the apparent exponent and protector of 'price fixing' - that hateful objective of that most hated ogre, a big business monopoly.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Donald R. Richberg, ''The Rainbow'', (1936), pg. 31.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civilian Conservation Corps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of FDR’s favorites was the [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), a relatively small program designed to keep unemployed young men out of trouble while giving them food and clothing and discipline, and their families some cash.  Roosevelt described work camps as a means for getting youth &amp;quot;off the city street corners.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young men were enrolled as amateur forest rangers, marsh-drainers, and the like, on projects designed to improve the countryside. The recruits were given room and board, clothing, and a dollar a day (they kept $5 a month, and the parents received the other $25). More than two and half million of them passed through the camps of the Civilian Conservation Corps, until the program was abolished in 1942, when the men were needed for the draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CCC was highly popular among Americans, both liberals and conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973, John A. Garraty published an important article on the CCC in the ''American Historical Review'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The New Deal, National Socialism, and the Great Depression'', John A. Garraty, American Historical Review, Vol. 78, October 1973. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Garraty was Gouverneur Morris Professor of American history at Columbia and later general editor of the ''American National Biography''. Yet, while an admirer of FDR, Garraty was compelled to note the striking similarities between the CCC and parallel programs set up by the [[Nazi]]s for German youth. Both were essentially designed to keep young men out of the labor market. Roosevelt described work camps as a means for getting youth “off the city street corners,” [[Hitler]] as a way of keeping them from “rotting helplessly in the streets.” In both countries much was made of the beneficial social results of mixing thousands of young people from different walks of life in the camps. . . . Furthermore, both were organized on semi-military lines with the subsidiary purposes of improving the physical fitness of potential soldiers and stimulating public commitment to national service in an emergency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Garraty listed many other similarities between the New Deal and [[National Socialism]]. Like Roosevelt, Hitler prided himself on being a “pragmatist” in economic affairs, trying out one panacea after another. Through a multitude of new agencies and mountains of new regulations, both in [[Germany]] and America, owners and managers of enterprises found their freedom to make decisions sharply curtailed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis encouraged working-class mobility, through vocational training, the democratizing youth camps, and a myriad of youth organizations. They usually favored workers as against employers in industrial disputes and, in another parallel to the New Deal, supported higher agricultural prices. Both FDR and Hitler “tended to romanticize rural life and the virtues of an agricultural existence“ and harbored dreams of the rural resettlement of urban populations, which proved disappointing. Characteristically for the collectivist movements of the time, “enormous [[propaganda]] campaigns” were mounted in the United States, Germany, and [[Italy]] (as well as in Russia) to fire up enthusiasm for the government’s programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is no wonder, then, as Professor Garraty writes, that “during the first years of the New Deal the German press praised [Roosevelt] and the New Deal to the skies. . . . Early New Deal policies seemed to the Nazis essentially like their own and the role of Roosevelt not very different from the [[Führer]]’s.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Woman Child.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Mother of seven children without food, California, ca. February 1936. ''[http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/128_migm.html Farm Security Administration Collection], Library of Congress'']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Works Progress Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Works Progress Administration ([[WPA]]) operated 1935-43 and was the largest and most controversial of the relief programs. Until now relief had been a local responsibility, although both Hoover and FDR had provided federal funding.  Now the national government took full control; conservatives charged it was done to build a vast national political machine for Roosevelt.  TheWPA had a larger size and budget($5 billion at first) than previous efforts such as FERA and CWA. [[Harry Hopkins]], a liberal close to FDR, was the director. The WPA was responsible for the building and renovation of over 100,000 public buildings and the construction of 600 airports, more than 500,000 miles of roads, and over 100,000 bridges. The WPA was also well known for its flexibility. It employed not only construction workers but also artists and authors as well as operating separate sewing projects for women. The [[NYA|National Youth Administration]] (NYA) was a unit of the WPA for young men and women (in contrast to its rival the CCC, which only enrolled young men).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===No training===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major failing of the New Deal, and especially the CCC and WPA, was the deliberate decision not to provide job training. The reason was that liberals (and especially labor unions) thought there were already too many unemployed skilled workers and there was no need for more.  In retrospect this was one of the major failings of the New Deal, and was reversed in World War II, when the government subsidized job training on a very large scale in industry and the military.  Ever since 1996 the consensus has been that job training is an essential part of any program designed to help the poor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! United States &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
! Great Britain &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unemployment (1930 average)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 4,770,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 1,993,951&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| Unemployment February 1936&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 12,550,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 2,016,578 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Percent increase'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 163 % &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Federation of Labor.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.1% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;League of Natione, ''Bulletin of&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Statistics''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Ordeal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable New Deal programs== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Newdealstamp.png|thumb|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal had countless programs, labeled an &amp;quot;alphabet soup&amp;quot; by its detractors. Among the New Deal acts were the following, most of them passed within the first 100 days of FDR's administration. Most were abolished around 1943, others remain in operation in 2009:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]] a Hoover agency expanded under [[Jesse Holman Jones]] to make large loans to big business.  Ended in 1954.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FERA|Federal Emergency Relief Administration]] (FERA). ERA, a Hoover loan program to states for relief; replaced by FERA in 1933 to give grants to states to operate relief projects for the unskilled; replaced by WPA in 1935. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bank Holiday, 1933: closed all banks until they became certified by federal reviewers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Abandonment of gold standard, 1933: gold reserves no longer backed currency; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Civilian Conservation Corps]] (CCC), 1933: employed young men to perform unskilled work in rural areas; under Army supervision; separate program for Native Americans&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA), 1933: effort to modernize very poor region (most of Tennessee), centered on dams that generated electricity on the [[Tennessee River]]; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA), 1933: raised farm prices by cutting total farm output of major crops (and hogs)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA), 1933: industries set up codes to reduce unfair competition, raise wages and prices; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Public Works Administration]] (PWA), 1933: built large public works projects; used private contractors (did not directly hire unemployed) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]] (FDIC) / [[Glass-Steagall Act]]: insures deposits in banks in order to restore public confidence in banks; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Securities Act of 1933]], created the SEC, 1933: codified standards for sale and purchase of stock, required risk of investments to be accurately disclosed; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Civil Works Administration]]  (CWA), 1933-34: provided temporary jobs to millions of unemployed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Indian Reorganization Act]], 1934 moved away from assimilation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Social Security (United States)|Social Security Act]] (SSA), 1935: provided financial assistance to: elderly, handicapped, paid for by employee and employer payroll contributions; required years contributions, so first payouts were 1942; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Works Progress Administration]] (WPA), 1935: a national labor program for 2+ million unemployed; created useful construction work for unskilled men; also sewing projects for women and arts projects for unemployed artists, musicians and writers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Labor Relations Act]] (NLRA) / Wagner Act, 1935: set up National Labor Relations Board to supervise labor-management relations; In 1930s it strongly favored [[trade union|labor union]]s. Modified by the [[Taft-Hartley Act]] (1947); still exists &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Judicial Reorganization Bill, 1937: gave President power to appoint a new Supreme Court judge for every judge 70 years or older; failed to pass Congress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fair Labor Standards Act]] ([http://www.finduslaw.com/fair_labor_standards_act_flsa_29_u_s_code_chapter_8 29 U.S. Code Chapter 8]), 1938: established a maximum normal work week of 40 hours, and a minimum pay of 40 cents/hour; still exists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the detailed guide at [[New Deal Bibliography]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Alter, Jonathan. ''The Defining Moment: FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope'' (2006), popular account&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Badger, Anthony J. ''The New Deal: The Depression Years, 1933-1940.'' (2002) general survey from British perspective&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Best, Gary Dean. ''The Critical Press and the New Deal: The Press Versus Presidential Power, 1933-1938'' (1993) looks at conservative papers and magazines [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-critical-press-and-the-new-deal-the-press-versus-presidential-power-1933-1938-by-gary-dean-best.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Chafe, William H. ''The Achievement of American Liberalism: The New Deal and Its Legacies.'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=99839056 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conkin, Paul K. ''The New Deal.'' (1967), a brief New Left critique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dubofsky, Melvyn, ed. ''The New Deal: Conflicting Interpretations and Shifting Perspectives.'' (1992), reader&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Eden, Robert, ed. ''New Deal and Its Legacy: Critique and Reappraisal'' (1989), essays by conservative scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Graham, Otis L. and Meghan Robinson Wander, eds. ''Franklin D. Roosevelt: His Life and Times.'' (1985). An encyclopedic reference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Himmelberg, Robert F. ''The Great Depression and the New Deal'' (2001) 185 pp. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=101548706 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, David M. ''Freedom From Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945.'' (1999), major survey by leading scholar online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kirkendall, Richard S. . &amp;quot;The New Deal As Watershed: The Recent Literature,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 54, No. 4. (Mar., 1968), pp. 839-852. [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723%28196803%2954%3A4%3C839%3ATNDAWT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F in JSTOR], historiography&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Leuchtenberg, William E. ''Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932-1940''. (1963). The  standard interpretive history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* McElvaine Robert S. ''The Great Depression'' 2nd ed (1993), social history&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* McJimsey, George. ''The Presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt'', 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Milkis, Sidney M. and Jerome M. Mileur, eds. ''The New Deal and the Triumph of Liberalism'' (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitchell, Broadus. ''Depression Decade: From New Era through New Deal, 1929-1941'' (1964), overview of economic history [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=98065455 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moley, Raymond. ''After Seven Years'' (1939), conservative memoir by ex-Brain Truster [http://www.questia.com/library/book/after-seven-years-by-raymond-moley.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Powell, Jim ''FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression'' (2003) sharp attack from the right&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shlaes, Amity. ''The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression'' (2007), 480pp, popular&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sitkoff, Harvard. ed. ''Fifty Years Later: The New Deal Evaluated.'' (1984).  A friendly liberal evaluation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newdeal.feri.org/ New Deal Network] massive collection of photos and primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nisk.k12.ny.us/fdr/ FDR cartoon archive] hundreds of editorial cartoons (copyright has expired)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.digitalbookindex.com/_SEARCH/search010histus20-30sdepressiona.asp online full-text primary sources]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Great Depression]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jim_DeMint&amp;diff=700021</id>
		<title>Jim DeMint</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jim_DeMint&amp;diff=700021"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T23:51:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: copyediting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; {{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Jim DeMint&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Jim DeMint.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Debbie DeMint&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Presbyterian&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=South Carolina&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2005 – Present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Ernest Hollings&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/representative&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=South Carolina&lt;br /&gt;
	|district=4th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 6, 1999 – January 3, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Bob Inglis&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Bob Inglis&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Jim DeMint''', born September 2, 1951 (age {{age|1951|9|2}}), was elected on November 2, 2004 as [[South Carolina|South Carolina’s]] 55th [[United States|U.S.]] [[Senator]]. An outspoken [[conservative]], he is an emerging leader in the [[Republican Party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education== &lt;br /&gt;
DeMint was born and raised in Greenville, [[South Carolina]], he earned his Bachelor's degree from the University of [[Tennessee]] and received his Master's degree from Clemson University. He owned a market research firm in Greenville, the DeMint Group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Biography.Home&amp;amp;Biography_id=8b5cf6a0-3ead-436a-92cd-40e85e712f74 Short Biography]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate== &lt;br /&gt;
DeMint has dedicated his life in public service to defending the values that have made America great -- individual liberty, free markets and faith. He currently serves on the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the Foreign Relations Committee and the Joint Economic Committee. DeMint has worked with former President [[George W. Bush]] to pass tax relief measures, and he cast important votes to end the marriage penalty, repeal the [[death tax]], and increase the amount of money workers can contribute to retirement savings plans. In March of 2007, DeMint was ranked by National Journal as the most conservative United States Senator in their conservative/liberal rankings. In the [[2008 Presidential election]], he endorsed Republican [[Mitt Romney]]. Demint has been a leading conservative critic of [[President Obama]]'s policies, saying about his [[health care]] plan: &amp;quot;The last time the President made grand promises and demanded passage of a bill before it could be reviewed, we ended up with the colossal stimulus failure and [[unemployment]] near 10 percent&amp;quot;, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&amp;amp;PressRelease_id=99867a17-09e2-6f21-b777-8f3d2bac8879&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; referring to the economic stimulus package.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009, Senator DeMint authored the book &amp;quot;Saving Freedom: We Can Stop America's Slide into Socialism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
==2010 reelection==&lt;br /&gt;
DeMint's outspoken opposition to President Obama’s health care plans made him a polarizing figure nationally, but at home it has strengthened his reelection bid. Voters show growing discomfort with the Democratic agenda; big-name Democratic potential challengers have kept silent, realizing DeMint's base of support is strong and growing. &amp;quot;I think we have to acknowledge, it’s going to be a tough race for any Democrat,&amp;quot; confessed Joe Erwin, former state Democratic chair and one of two party recruits to pass on the race. Erwin said DeMint’s status as &amp;quot;a poster child&amp;quot; for anti-Obama factions means &amp;quot;It’s essentially going to be a nationalized election....National money would flow in here in bucketfuls if there is a serious enough opponent that looks like he or she would give DeMint a real competitive battle.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While DeMint’s ideological stand — including his famous comment that Obama’s failure to pass a health care overhaul could be his &amp;quot;Waterloo&amp;quot; — have hurt him somewhat among businessmen and moderates, they have solidified his conservative base so that his reelection appears safe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==9/12 March On Washington==&lt;br /&gt;
DeMint attended the September 12th, 2009 TEA party organized in Washington D.C. He spoke at the rally saying he'd had enough of &amp;quot;Alice in Wonderland&amp;quot; politicians promising more programs at the risk of financial disaster. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/12/tea-party-express-arrives-march-washington-protest-government-spending/ Tea Party Express Takes Washington By Storm, Fox News, September 12, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Home.Home U.S. Senator Jim DeMint - Official Site at www.senate.gov]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jim DeMint: A conservative’s [[conservative]]. [[Michelle Malkin]] article: [http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/09/jim-demint-a-conservatives-conservative/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: DeMint, Jim}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: 111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fiscal Conservatives]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700017</id>
		<title>Atlantic Charter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700017"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T23:14:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* Inter-Allied conference */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Atlantic Charter''' was an August 14, 1941 manifesto by the U.S. and Britain for postwar peace calling for 8 goals, especially [[free trade]] and self-determination of nations.  Territorial gains from the war were renounced; it opposed territorial changes that &amp;quot;do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned&amp;quot;; respected the right of all people to choose their form of government; sought the restoration of sovereignty to those nations that had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of it&amp;quot;; sought free access for all nations to trade and raw materials and freedom of movement on the oceans; sought international cooperation (without mention of anything like the defunct League of Nations); called for higher living standards and freedom from fear and want; sought disarmament after the war; and promised to destroy Nazi tyranny. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] and British Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] met in Newfoundland at the ''Atlantic Conference'' August 9-12, 1941, in order to set long-term peace goals. They called for the destruction of Nazi tyranny (Germany  had just declared war against the [[Soviet Union]]) but did not call for [[regime change]]. They also called on Japan to withdraw from Indochina. Britain at the time was at war with Germany; the U.S. was at peace, but was heavily engaged in supplying war materials and money to Britain and the Soviet Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inter-Allied conference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 24, 1941, a month after the Atlantic Charter was proclaimed, an inter-allied meeting was held in St. James Palace in London.  Mr. Maisky, the Soviet Ambassador to Great Britain, said : &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The Soviet was and is guided in its foreign policy by the principle of the self-determination of nations. Accordingly the Soviet defends the right of every nation to the independence and territorial integrity of its country and its right to establish such a social order as it deems opportune and necessary for the promotion of its economic and cultural prosperity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', Flynn, 1948, Book 3, Chapter 9, Section 2, [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=/PDFsml_AD/The_Roosevelt_Myth-John_T_Flynn-1948-444pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=276&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 ''Roosevelt's Great Design and Casablanca'']. pg. 343] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Soviet Union]] soon endorsed the Atlantic Charter.  This was two years and one week after the Soviet Union violated the territorial integrity of Poland and the [[Baltic states]] under the [[Communazi pact]], less than two years after the Soviet Union's expulsion from the [[League of Nations]] for violating the territorial integrity of [[Finland]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1939/391214a.html League of Nations Expulsion of the USSR], League of Nations, ''Official Journal'' December 14, 1939, p. 506 (Council Resolution); p. 540 (Assembly Resolution.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and seven years after the Soviet invasion of the Chinese province of [[Sinkiang]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://home.comcast.net/~markconrad/Sinkiang.htm#_ednref9 From “Yellow Russia” to the East Turkestan Republic], By Pavel Aptekar.  From Aleksandr Kiyan’s Russian-language website devoted to the Red Army of Workers and Peasants, 1918-1945 (home page at http:// rkka.ru), specifically the article [http://rkka.ru/oper/sinc/sinc.htm  ''Ot Zheltorossii do Vostochno-Turkestanskoi respuliki,''].  See also [http://www.worldstatesmen.org/China.html#PRC Kiangsi Soviet Republic], 1 Dec 1931 - 15 Oct 1934.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alliance was indeed formed four months later, after Pearl Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leaders in exile of the Baltic States who were attacked by the Soviet Union interpreted the Atlantic Charter as a guaranty of the restoration of their independence&lt;br /&gt;
after the war. Nationalists in the British colonies in Africa and Asia used the terms of the Atlantic Charter, which promised to restore sovereignty and self-government to those who had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of them,&amp;quot; to pressure the British government on the question of decolonization when the war ended. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officially the original &amp;quot;Atlantic Charter&amp;quot; was really just a press release; it was not a [[treaty]] which would require [[Senate]] approval, nor was it signed by anyone.  The vague policies it formulated echoed the [[Fourteen Points]] issued by [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1918, and evolved into the [[United Nations]] Charter in 1945. However, there was no mention of an international organization in 1941. Even so, isolationists denounced it as too favorable to Britain, and darkly warned that there probably were secret commitments made.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt obtained assurances from the British that they had made no secret commitments to anyone, and would not make any without consulting Roosevelt first.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There were no secret commitments.  Public opinion in America was generally favorable, but British public opinion was disappointed that the Americans would continue to stay out of the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Brinkley, Douglas, and David R. Facey-Crowther, eds. ''The Atlantic Charter'' (1994), articles by scholars. [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312089309 excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dobson, Alan P. &amp;quot;Economic Diplomacy at the Atlantic Conference.&amp;quot; ''Review Of International Studies'' 1984 10(2): 143-163. &lt;br /&gt;
* Langer, William L. and S. Everett Gleason. ''The Undeclared War: 1940-41'' (1953), pp 663-92; semi-official U.S. history&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Theodore A. ''The First Summit: Roosevelt and Churchill at Placentia Bay, 1941'' (1991) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diplomacy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700015</id>
		<title>Atlantic Charter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700015"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T23:12:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: superfluous &amp;quot;and,&amp;quot; typo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Atlantic Charter''' was an August 14, 1941 manifesto by the U.S. and Britain for postwar peace calling for 8 goals, especially [[free trade]] and self-determination of nations.  Territorial gains from the war were renounced; it opposed territorial changes that &amp;quot;do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned&amp;quot;; respected the right of all people to choose their form of government; sought the restoration of sovereignty to those nations that had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of it&amp;quot;; sought free access for all nations to trade and raw materials and freedom of movement on the oceans; sought international cooperation (without mention of anything like the defunct League of Nations); called for higher living standards and freedom from fear and want; sought disarmament after the war; and promised to destroy Nazi tyranny. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] and British Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] met in Newfoundland at the ''Atlantic Conference'' August 9-12, 1941, in order to set long-term peace goals. They called for the destruction of Nazi tyranny (Germany  had just declared war against the [[Soviet Union]]) but did not call for [[regime change]]. They also called on Japan to withdraw from Indochina. Britain at the time was at war with Germany; the U.S. was at peace, but was heavily engaged in supplying war materials and money to Britain and the Soviet Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inter-Allied conference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 24, 1941, a month after the Atlantic Charter was proclaimed, an inter-allied meeting was held in St. James Palace in London.  Mr. Maisky, the Soviet Ambassador to Great Britain, said : &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The Soviet was and is guided in its foreign policy by the principle of the self-determination of nations. Accordingly the Soviet defends the right of every nation to the independence and territorial integrity of its country and its right to establish such a social order as it deems opportune and necessary for the promotion of its economic and cultural prosperity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', Flynn, 1948, Book 3, Chapter 9, Section 2, [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=/PDFsml_AD/The_Roosevelt_Myth-John_T_Flynn-1948-444pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=276&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 ''Roosevelt's Great Design and Casablanca'']. pg. 343] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Soviet Union]] soon endorsed the Atlantic Charter.  This was two years and one week after the Soviet Union violated the territorial integrity of Poland and the [[Baltic states]] under the [[Communazi pact]], less than two years after the Soviet Union's expulsion from the [[League of Nations]] for violating the territorial integrity of [[Finland]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1939/391214a.html League of Nations Expulsion of the USSR], League of Nations, ''Official Journal'' December 14, 1939, p. 506 (Council Resolution); p. 540 (Assembly Resolution.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and seven years after the Soviet invasion of the Chinese province of [[Sinkiang]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://home.comcast.net/~markconrad/Sinkiang.htm#_ednref9 From “Yellow Russia” to the East Turkestan Republic], By Pavel Aptekar.  From Aleksandr Kiyan’s Russian-language website devoted to the Red Army of Workers and Peasants, 1918-1945 (home page at http:// rkka.ru), specifically the article [http://rkka.ru/oper/sinc/sinc.htm  ''Ot Zheltorossii do Vostochno-Turkestanskoi respuliki,''].  See also [http://www.worldstatesmen.org/China.html#PRC Kiangsi Soviet Republic], 1 Dec 1931 - 15 Oct 1934.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alliance was indeed formed four months later, after Pearl Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leaders in exile of the Baltic States who were attacked by the Soviet Union interpreted the Atlantic Charter as a guaranty of the restoration of their independence&lt;br /&gt;
after the war. Nationalists in the British colonies in Africa and Asia used the terms of the Atlantic Charter, which promised to restore sovereignty and self-government to those who had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of them,&amp;quot; to pressure the British government when the war ended. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officially the original &amp;quot;Atlantic Charter&amp;quot; was really just a press release; it was not a [[Treaty]] which would requiring [[Senate]] approval, nor was it signed by anyone.  The vague policies it formulated echoed the [[Fourteen Points]] issued by [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1918, and evolved into the United Nations Charter in 1945. However, there was no mention of an international organization in 1941. Even so isolationists denounced it as too favorable to Britain, and darkly warned that there probably were secret commitments made.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt obtained assurances from the British that they had made no secret commitments to anyone, and would not make any without consulting Roosevelt first.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There were no secret commitments.  Public opinion in America was generally favorable, but British public opinion was disappointed that the Americans would continue to stay out of the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Brinkley, Douglas, and David R. Facey-Crowther, eds. ''The Atlantic Charter'' (1994), articles by scholars. [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312089309 excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dobson, Alan P. &amp;quot;Economic Diplomacy at the Atlantic Conference.&amp;quot; ''Review Of International Studies'' 1984 10(2): 143-163. &lt;br /&gt;
* Langer, William L. and S. Everett Gleason. ''The Undeclared War: 1940-41'' (1953), pp 663-92; semi-official U.S. history&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Theodore A. ''The First Summit: Roosevelt and Churchill at Placentia Bay, 1941'' (1991) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diplomacy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700014</id>
		<title>Atlantic Charter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700014"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T23:11:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: Parallel w/previous sentence--&amp;quot;They&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;It&amp;quot; clash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Atlantic Charter''' was an August 14, 1941 manifesto by the U.S. and Britain for postwar peace calling for 8 goals, especially [[free trade]] and self-determination of nations.  Territorial gains from the war were renounced; it opposed territorial changes that &amp;quot;do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned&amp;quot;; respected the right of all people to choose their form of government; sought the restoration of sovereignty to those nations that had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of it&amp;quot;; sought free access for all nations to trade and raw materials and freedom of movement on the oceans; sought international cooperation (without mention of anything like the defunct League of Nations); called for higher living standards and freedom from fear and want; sought disarmament after the war; and promised to destroy Nazi tyranny. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] and British Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] met in Newfoundland at the ''Atlantic Conference'' August 9-12, 1941, in order to set long-term peace goals. They called for the destruction of Nazi tyranny (Germany  had just declared war against the [[Soviet Union]]) but did not call for [[regime change]]. They also called on Japan to withdraw from Indochina. Britain at the time was at war with Germany; the U.S. was at peace, but was heavily engaged in supplying war materials and money to Britain and the Soviet Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inter-Allied conference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 24, 1941, a month after the Atlantic Charter was proclaimed, an inter-allied meeting was held in St. James Palace in London.  Mr. Maisky, the Soviet Ambassador to Great Britain, said : &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The Soviet was and is guided in its foreign policy by the principle of the self-determination of nations. Accordingly the Soviet defends the right of every nation to the independence and territorial integrity of its country and its right to establish such a social order as it deems opportune and necessary for the promotion of its economic and cultural prosperity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', Flynn, 1948, Book 3, Chapter 9, Section 2, [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=/PDFsml_AD/The_Roosevelt_Myth-John_T_Flynn-1948-444pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=276&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 ''Roosevelt's Great Design and Casablanca'']. pg. 343] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Soviet Union]] soon endorsed the Atlantic Charter.  This was two years and one week after the Soviet Union violated the territorial integrity of Poland and the [[Baltic states]] under the [[Communazi pact]], and less than two years after the Soviet Union's expulsion from the [[League of Nations]] for violating the territorial integity of [[Finland]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1939/391214a.html League of Nations Expulsion of the USSR], League of Nations, ''Official Journal'' December 14, 1939, p. 506 (Council Resolution); p. 540 (Assembly Resolution.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and seven years after the Soviet invasion of the Chinese province of [[Sinkiang]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://home.comcast.net/~markconrad/Sinkiang.htm#_ednref9 From “Yellow Russia” to the East Turkestan Republic], By Pavel Aptekar.  From Aleksandr Kiyan’s Russian-language website devoted to the Red Army of Workers and Peasants, 1918-1945 (home page at http:// rkka.ru), specifically the article [http://rkka.ru/oper/sinc/sinc.htm  ''Ot Zheltorossii do Vostochno-Turkestanskoi respuliki,''].  See also [http://www.worldstatesmen.org/China.html#PRC Kiangsi Soviet Republic], 1 Dec 1931 - 15 Oct 1934.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alliance was indeed formed four months later, after Pearl Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leaders in exile of the Baltic States who were attacked by the Soviet Union interpreted the Atlantic Charter as a guaranty of the restoration of their independence&lt;br /&gt;
after the war. Nationalists in the British colonies in Africa and Asia used the terms of the Atlantic Charter, which promised to restore sovereignty and self-government to those who had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of them,&amp;quot; to pressure the British government when the war ended. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officially the original &amp;quot;Atlantic Charter&amp;quot; was really just a press release; it was not a [[Treaty]] which would requiring [[Senate]] approval, nor was it signed by anyone.  The vague policies it formulated echoed the [[Fourteen Points]] issued by [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1918, and evolved into the United Nations Charter in 1945. However, there was no mention of an international organization in 1941. Even so isolationists denounced it as too favorable to Britain, and darkly warned that there probably were secret commitments made.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt obtained assurances from the British that they had made no secret commitments to anyone, and would not make any without consulting Roosevelt first.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There were no secret commitments.  Public opinion in America was generally favorable, but British public opinion was disappointed that the Americans would continue to stay out of the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Brinkley, Douglas, and David R. Facey-Crowther, eds. ''The Atlantic Charter'' (1994), articles by scholars. [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312089309 excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dobson, Alan P. &amp;quot;Economic Diplomacy at the Atlantic Conference.&amp;quot; ''Review Of International Studies'' 1984 10(2): 143-163. &lt;br /&gt;
* Langer, William L. and S. Everett Gleason. ''The Undeclared War: 1940-41'' (1953), pp 663-92; semi-official U.S. history&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Theodore A. ''The First Summit: Roosevelt and Churchill at Placentia Bay, 1941'' (1991) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diplomacy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700012</id>
		<title>Atlantic Charter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atlantic_Charter&amp;diff=700012"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T23:09:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &amp;quot;tyranny&amp;quot; doesn't really have agency--it was the Nazis/Germany who invaded the USSR&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Atlantic Charter''' was an August 14, 1941 manifesto by the U.S. and Britain for postwar peace calling for 8 goals, especially [[free trade]] and self-determination of nations.  Territorial gains from the war were renounced; it opposed territorial changes that &amp;quot;do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned&amp;quot;; respected the right of all people to choose their form of government; sought the restoration of sovereignty to those nations that had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of it&amp;quot;; sought free access for all nations to trade and raw materials and freedom of movement on the oceans; sought international cooperation (without mention of anything like the defunct League of Nations); called for higher living standards and freedom from fear and want; sought disarmament after the war; and promised to destroy Nazi tyranny. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] and British Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] met in Newfoundland at the ''Atlantic Conference'' August 9-12, 1941, in order to set long-term peace goals. They called for the destruction of Nazi tyranny (Germany  had just declared war against the [[Soviet Union]]) but did not call for [[regime change]]. It called on Japan to withdraw from Indochina. Britain at the time was at war with Germany; the U.S. was at peace, but was heavily engaged in supplying war materials and money to Britain and the Soviet Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inter-Allied conference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 24, 1941, a month after the Atlantic Charter was proclaimed, an inter-allied meeting was held in St. James Palace in London.  Mr. Maisky, the Soviet Ambassador to Great Britain, said : &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The Soviet was and is guided in its foreign policy by the principle of the self-determination of nations. Accordingly the Soviet defends the right of every nation to the independence and territorial integrity of its country and its right to establish such a social order as it deems opportune and necessary for the promotion of its economic and cultural prosperity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', Flynn, 1948, Book 3, Chapter 9, Section 2, [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=/PDFsml_AD/The_Roosevelt_Myth-John_T_Flynn-1948-444pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=276&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 ''Roosevelt's Great Design and Casablanca'']. pg. 343] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Soviet Union]] soon endorsed the Atlantic Charter.  This was two years and one week after the Soviet Union violated the territorial integrity of Poland and the [[Baltic states]] under the [[Communazi pact]], and less than two years after the Soviet Union's expulsion from the [[League of Nations]] for violating the territorial integity of [[Finland]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1939/391214a.html League of Nations Expulsion of the USSR], League of Nations, ''Official Journal'' December 14, 1939, p. 506 (Council Resolution); p. 540 (Assembly Resolution.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and seven years after the Soviet invasion of the Chinese province of [[Sinkiang]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://home.comcast.net/~markconrad/Sinkiang.htm#_ednref9 From “Yellow Russia” to the East Turkestan Republic], By Pavel Aptekar.  From Aleksandr Kiyan’s Russian-language website devoted to the Red Army of Workers and Peasants, 1918-1945 (home page at http:// rkka.ru), specifically the article [http://rkka.ru/oper/sinc/sinc.htm  ''Ot Zheltorossii do Vostochno-Turkestanskoi respuliki,''].  See also [http://www.worldstatesmen.org/China.html#PRC Kiangsi Soviet Republic], 1 Dec 1931 - 15 Oct 1934.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The alliance was indeed formed four months later, after Pearl Harbor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leaders in exile of the Baltic States who were attacked by the Soviet Union interpreted the Atlantic Charter as a guaranty of the restoration of their independence&lt;br /&gt;
after the war. Nationalists in the British colonies in Africa and Asia used the terms of the Atlantic Charter, which promised to restore sovereignty and self-government to those who had been &amp;quot;forcibly deprived of them,&amp;quot; to pressure the British government when the war ended. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officially the original &amp;quot;Atlantic Charter&amp;quot; was really just a press release; it was not a [[Treaty]] which would requiring [[Senate]] approval, nor was it signed by anyone.  The vague policies it formulated echoed the [[Fourteen Points]] issued by [[Woodrow Wilson]] in 1918, and evolved into the United Nations Charter in 1945. However, there was no mention of an international organization in 1941. Even so isolationists denounced it as too favorable to Britain, and darkly warned that there probably were secret commitments made.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt obtained assurances from the British that they had made no secret commitments to anyone, and would not make any without consulting Roosevelt first.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There were no secret commitments.  Public opinion in America was generally favorable, but British public opinion was disappointed that the Americans would continue to stay out of the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Brinkley, Douglas, and David R. Facey-Crowther, eds. ''The Atlantic Charter'' (1994), articles by scholars. [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0312089309 excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dobson, Alan P. &amp;quot;Economic Diplomacy at the Atlantic Conference.&amp;quot; ''Review Of International Studies'' 1984 10(2): 143-163. &lt;br /&gt;
* Langer, William L. and S. Everett Gleason. ''The Undeclared War: 1940-41'' (1953), pp 663-92; semi-official U.S. history&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilson, Theodore A. ''The First Summit: Roosevelt and Churchill at Placentia Bay, 1941'' (1991) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diplomacy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:JacobI&amp;diff=699954</id>
		<title>User talk:JacobI</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:JacobI&amp;diff=699954"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T20:21:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: /* RE: &amp;quot;Did you think you could slip by, Carl McKinney?&amp;quot; */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''This user has made 100 edits'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:00, 6 September 2009 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Game ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Haha I just lost the game!!--[[User:IScott|IScott]] 00:03, 6 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, I had forgotten about it until you just mentioned it. &amp;amp;#42;goes to bed a loser of The Game&amp;amp;#42; -=- [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:06, 6 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
:Haha! you make me sound terrible in your &amp;quot;religious background&amp;quot; thing. xD I probably was. lol [[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]] 20:57, 10 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I didn't mean to convey you in such a way. You helped me realize some other things to.&lt;br /&gt;
::Almost all break-ups are &amp;quot;terrible&amp;quot;, but that doesn't make the people &amp;quot;terrible&amp;quot;. I was tired and being bitter when I wrote that. ...that's a poor excuse for writing those things too. Sorry. [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:36, 10 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Haha, that's ok, I probably was terrible. I can't remember but I remember being quite a mean person. I probably still am, who knows. Lol. Sounds like you've grown to be a much better person these years. Not that you were a bad one in the first place. [[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]] 00:33, 11 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I sure hope you're joking about that comment you made about yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's not that you were a terrible person, I think it's cause our personalities were too different for stuff to work out properly. Someone was more clued in about that and decided to tell you that before things got too out of hand. At least, that's what I tell myself. :P [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:41, 11 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The french on your main page burns my eyes. D-: Je ne comprehend pas cela... {{unsigned|PhyllisS}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I put it back to English, so you can understand what I was trying to say. Dx [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:48, 11 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Oh, that would be &amp;quot;Je ne sais plus faire parler ou écrire en français.&amp;quot; I think. Well, that translates to &amp;quot;I no longer know how to speak or write French&amp;quot;, anyway. Don't know about the &amp;quot;proper&amp;quot; adjective... because &amp;quot;propre&amp;quot; in French has all these weird things, like if you say &amp;quot;mon propre chambre&amp;quot; it means &amp;quot;my own room&amp;quot;... or something. [[User:PhyllisS|PhyllisS]] 18:25, 11 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::It's okay. You're better at French than I am. :D&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I had no idea you were into Aerospace Engineering and inventing -- I always figured you would end up doing Electrical Engineering. [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:54, 11 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Reversion==&lt;br /&gt;
You reverted my edit on the [[Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil]]. Please provide justification. Thanks. --[[User:EMC|EMC]] 00:41, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:My justification is that your edit to [[Christianity]] was outlandish. Meaning, no good can come of your stay here. [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:42, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please provide justification on the basis of my edit and tell me what the inaccuracy was. --[[User:EMC|EMC]] 00:45, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::(EC) Citrus-bearing fruit..? I've only ever seen it as an apple tree in so many depictions. Also, God is incapable of sin because He is perfect, and lying is a sin. Adam and Eve did eventually die. Or did you not read that far into the Bible? [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:47, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Citrus fruits are not outlandish and your in'''sin'''uation that they are is unacceptable. Citrus fruits are a creation of god, and thus they are perfect and beautiful. Furthermore: Genesis 2:17 &amp;quot;But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it;''' for in the day that thou eatest thereof''' thou shalt surely die.&amp;quot; 3:4-5 &amp;quot;And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die. For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.&amp;quot; The serpent tells the truth. God doesn't say &amp;quot;eat of it and you'll surely die after nine hundred years of populating the plant.&amp;quot; God gives the clear indication that if they were to eat of the tree, they'd die thereof. --[[User:EMC|EMC]] 00:57, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You're making the assumption that He meant instaneously. If they never ate of the Fruit, then they would live on forever, just as the purpose of Heaven serves. [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:04, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::EMC is gone thanks for the heads up!  [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:11, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No problem, thanks for doing what I can't do. ...No one likes a troll. :D [[User:JacobI|JacobI]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JacobI|Φιχινγ Θινγσ]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:15, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RE: &amp;quot;Did you think you could slip by, Carl McKinney?&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did YOU think you could slip by, Kektklik? [[User:Wayne|Wayne]] 16:21, 12 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=699942</id>
		<title>Sarah Palin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=699942"/>
		<updated>2009-09-12T18:58:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: As BenP said on talk page, this bit seemed out-of-sequence: moving to a more suitable location.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Sarah Palin&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Sarah Palin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Todd Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 4, 2006-July 26, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Frank Murkowski]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Sean Parnell]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sarah Louise Heath Palin''' (pronounced pay'-lynn) (born February 11, 1964) served as the [[conservative]] [[Republican Party|Republican]] [[Governor]] of [[Alaska]] from 2006 through 2009. She is the youngest person to hold this office as well as the first woman to do so in the state's history. On July 3, 2009 Palin announced that she will resign as Governor of Alaska. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/palin_not_running/2009/07/03/231789.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Executive power was transferred to [[Lieutenant Governor]] [[Sean Parnell]]. &lt;br /&gt;
Palin was Senator [[John McCain]]'s Vice Presidential running mate in the [[2008 Presidential Election]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/palins_vp_selection_speech.html Acceptance Speech by Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and the first woman to appear on a Republican Presidential ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She brought a [[populism|populist]] image and a record of cutting wasteful spending and reforming government to McCain's ticket.  In the summer of 2007, she was the most popular governor in America, after cutting 13% of [[Alaska]]'s budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/851orcjq.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She is strongly [[pro-life]] and a prominent spokesperson for [[special needs]] children.  She favors more competition in health care, and pushed for abolishing the [[certificate of need]] regulations that interfere with opening new medical clinics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090403253.html?referrer=emailarticle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Married for 20 years, Sarah Palin's husband is a member of the United Steelworkers Union and her eldest son (of five children) is in the [[United States Army]], scheduled to go to Iraq.  In an appearance on August 30, 2008 in Washington, Pennsylvania, she was greeted by a surprisingly large crowd as she promoted the new McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She earned her Journalism degree from the University of [[Idaho]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/palin/story/516085.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and worked in the media and the utility industry before beginning her public service 14 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sarah Palin Todd Trig.jpg|thumb|right|In this April 23, 2008 file photo, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband, Todd Palin, hold their baby boy Trig in Anchorage, Alaska. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Photo courtesy of Newsmax.com'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Palin arrived in Alaska with her family in 1964, when her parents came to teach school in Skagway.  Palin attended Wasilla High School where her extracurricular activities included captaining the basketball team  which went on to win the state championship &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after graduating in 1982. She went on to college, after attending several institutions she received a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism from the University of Idaho in 1987. Over the course of her 44 years in Alaska she has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla. To earn money for college, Palin entered beauty pageants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is married to [[Todd Palin]], part Yupik [[Eskimo]], who is a lifelong Alaskan, works at a non-management union job in the oil industry, and also as a commercial salmon fisherman.  He is a four-time champion of the Iron Dog, the world's longest snowmobile race. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin is a [[Labor union | union]] member, a [[moose]] hunter and holds a membership in the [[NRA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/29/mccain-to-name-running-mate-on-friday/ McCain Names Alaska Gov. Palin as Running Mate] Fox News, August 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Todd and Sarah have five children together: Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has been widely praised among conservatives for acting on her [[pro-life]] beliefs in the case of her youngest son, Trig, who was diagnosed with [[Down syndrome]] in the fourth month of her pregnancy. After researching the condition, she and her husband agreed to continue to pregnancy:&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;[My husband Todd said,] we shouldn't be asking 'Why us?' We should be saying 'Well, why not us?' We've both been very vocal about being pro life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential. I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/gov-sarah-palin.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29242 Canadian Doctors 'Fear' Sarah Palin's Choice May Start a Trend] Catholic Online, Septmeber 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trig was born on April 18, 2008, four months before his mother was announced as the vice-presidential candidate.  Palin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;This new person in your life can help everyone put things in perspective and bind us together, and get everyone focused on what really matters ... Those who love him will think less about self and focus less on what the world tells [us] is 'normal' or 'perfect.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's a sign of the times to be able to do this,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can think of so many male candidates who watched a families grow while they were in office.  There is no reason to believe a woman can't do it with a growing family. My baby will not be at all or in any sense neglected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alaska governor balances newborn's needs, official duties [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-10-4082128881_x.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's older son, Track, serves in the U.S. Army, and was deployed to [[Iraq War|Iraq]] in September 2008. Palin says, &amp;quot;I'm proud of him but I worry.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was five months pregnant. After having been given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child.  Palin stated &amp;quot;We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_daughter Palin says 17-year-old daughter is pregnant]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bristol has since gone on to promote abstinence as a realistic choice for teenagers, stating, &amp;quot;[A]bstinence is the only way you can effectively, 100% foolproof way you can prevent pregnancy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5025.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin Family..jpg|thumb|left|Palin family members at the announcement of Palin's vice presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol, and Trig.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin was elected to two terms on the Wasilla City Council, and then two terms as the Mayor / Manager of Alaska's fastest growing community (Population: 5400 in 2000)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wasilla.areaconnect.com/statistics.htm Wasilla Population and Demographics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. During her time as mayor, Palin hired a Washington lobbying firm to help secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, otherwise known as earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-31-palin-bridge_N.htm Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ms. Palin's leadership qualities were recognized when she was elected as President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors.  In 2002, she ran for Lieutenant Governor, but came in second in a four-way race.  Later that year, when [[Frank Murkowski]] resigned his [[Senate]] seat to become [[governor]], she interviewed for the opening.  Instead, Murkowski appointed his daughter to the seat.  From there, she went on to run for governor and won, becoming the first female governor of Alaska and its youngest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, then-Governor Mukowski appointed Palin to serve as Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska's [[non-renewable energy|non-renewable]] resources: [[oil]] and [[gasoline|gas]].  She resigned in 2004 as a protest over the &amp;quot;lack of ethics&amp;quot; of fellow panelists who had ignored her complaints of legal violations and conflicts of interest. In a similar vein, Palin took a great political risk by revealing that Randy Reudrich, chairman of the state Republican party, was doing political business on state time. She did this to fulfil a [[conflict of interest]] statement that required her to report such things; to omit the revelation would have been dishonest. But it turned out that this action endeared her to the people of Alaska.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help cultivate influence and political clout in the state, Palin served from 2003 - June, 2005 as one of three directors of the &amp;quot;Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.&amp;quot;, a 527 group that raised funds from corporate donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html#more Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Ted Stevens's 527 Group]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The stated purpose of the group is, &amp;quot;To increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/527/ted_stevens_excellence_in_public_service_inc.asp Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She ran for Governor in 2006 on a clean government platform, and accomplished a political rarity in defeating the incumbent Governor [[Frank Murkowski]] in his own Republican primary.  Palin went on to defeat former Governor [[Tony Knowles]] in the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has also served on the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She was named one of Alaska's &amp;quot;Top 40 Under 40&amp;quot;, Alaska's Public Works &amp;quot;Person of the Year&amp;quot;, and was recently inducted into the Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society at Alaska Pacific University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has served on numerous boards and commissions throughout the State, and stays active as a marathon runner, sports team mom, hockey manager and school volunteer.   A lifetime member of the [[NRA]], she enjoys hunting, fishing, and Alaska history. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php Alaska Governor Sarah Palin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Resignation===&lt;br /&gt;
In July of 2009, Governor Palin shocked Alaska and the nation with her announcement that she would not seek a second term, and would resign her office effective July 26, 2009. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her own words:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''Some say things changed for me on August 29th last year – the day John McCain tapped me to be his running-mate – ''I say others changed''.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me speak to that for a minute. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political operatives descended on Alaska last August, digging for dirt. The ethics law I championed became their weapon of choice. Over the past nine months I've been accused of all sorts of frivolous ethics violations – such as holding a fish in a photograph, wearing a jacket with a logo on it, and answering reporters’ questions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every one – all 15 of the ethics complaints have been dismissed. We’ve won! But it hasn't been cheap - the State has wasted thousands of hours of your time and shelled out some two million of your dollars to respond to “opposition research” – that’s money not going to fund teachers or troopers – or safer roads. And this political absurdity, the “politics of personal destruction” … Todd and I are looking at more than half a million dollars in legal bills in order to set the record straight. And what about the people who offer up these silly accusations? It doesn’t cost them a dime so they’re not going to stop draining public resources – spending other peoples’ money in their game. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s pretty insane – my staff and I spend most of our day dealing with this instead of progressing our state now. I know I promised no more “politics as usual,” but this isn’t what anyone had in mind for Alaska. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I have learned one thing: life is about choices! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And one chooses how to react to circumstances. You can choose to engage in things that tear down, or build up. I choose to work very hard on a path for fruitfulness and productivity. I choose not to tear down and waste precious time; but to build up this state and our country, and her industrious, generous, patriotic, free people! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life is too short to compromise time and resources... it may be tempting and more comfortable to just keep your head down, plod along, and appease those who demand: &amp;quot;Sit down and shut up&amp;quot;, but that's the worthless, easy path; that's a quitter's way out. And a problem in our country today is apathy. It would be apathetic to just hunker down and “go with the flow”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nah, only dead fish &amp;quot;go with the flow&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. Productive, fulfilled people determine where to put their efforts, choosing to wisely utilize precious time... to build up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And there is such a need to build up and fight for our state and our country. I choose to fight for it! And I'll work hard for others who still believe in free enterprise and smaller government; strong national security for our country and support for our troops; energy independence; and for those who will protect freedom and equality and life... I'll work for and campaign for those proud to be American, and those who are inspired by our ideals and won't deride them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will support others who seek to serve, in or out of office, for the right reasons, and I don't care what party they're in or no party at all. Inside Alaska – or Outside Alaska. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I won’t do it from the Governor’s desk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I've never believed that I, nor anyone else, needs a title to do this - to make a difference... to help people. So I choose, for my State and my family, more &amp;quot;freedom&amp;quot; to progress, all the way around... so that Alaska may progress... I will not seek re-election as Governor.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so as I thought about this announcement that I wouldn’t run for re-election and what it means for Alaska, I thought about how much fun some governors have as lame ducks… travel around the state, to the Lower 48 (maybe), overseas on international trade – as so many politicians do. And then I thought – that’s what’s wrong – many just accept that lame duck status, hit the road, draw the paycheck, and “milk it”. I’m not putting Alaska through that – I promised efficiencies and effectiveness! That’s not how I am wired. I am not wired to operate under the same old “politics as usual.” I promised that four years ago – and I meant it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''It’s not what is best for Alaska.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I am determined to take the right path for Alaska even though it is unconventional and not so comfortable.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''With this announcement that I am not seeking re-election… I’ve determined it’s best to transfer the authority of governor to Lieutenant Governor Parnell; and I am willing to do so, so that this administration – with its positive agenda, its accomplishments, and its successful road to an incredible future – can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My choice is to take a stand and effect change – not hit our heads against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time, on another scale, and actually make a difference for our priorities – and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me go back to a comfortable analogy for me – sports… basketball. I use it because you’re naïve if you don’t see the national full-court press picking away right now: A good point guard drives through a full court press, protecting the ball, keeping her eye on the basket… and she knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can win. And I’m doing that – keeping our eye on the ball that represents sound priorities – smaller government, energy independence, national security, freedom! And I know when it’s time to pass the ball – for victory. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have given my reasons candidly and truthfully… and my last day won’t be for another few weeks so the transition will be very smooth. In fact, we will look to swear Sean in – in Fairbanks at the conclusion of our Governor’s picnics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do not want to disappoint anyone with my decision; all I can ask is that you trust me with this decision – but it’s no more “politics as usual”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Alaskans don’t mind wasting public dollars and state time. '''I do. I cannot stand here as your Governor and allow millions upon millions of our dollars go to waste just so I can hold the title of Governor. And my children won’t allow it either.''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php  Executive Column: Palin's resignation announcement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy and Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A strong supporter of harnessing [[oil]] and natural [[gas]] resources, Palin presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) in March 2007, which would be the new legal vehicle for building a natural gas pipeline from the state's North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/aug/29/palin-alaska-gasline-inducement-act-nears-completi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It received bipartisan support and was signed into law by Governor Palin in June. In August of 2008 she signed legislation giving state authority to award TransCanada Corp a license to build and operate a multibillion-dollar pipeline to ship natural gas from the North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2e84b1e8-9a4a-4558-ad05-21b517c50fae&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As Governor, Palin created a new subcabinet that will develop policies to reduce greenhouse gases and help the state adapt to [[climate change]]. She supports oil production in ANWR, connecting it with national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, over the objections of oil companies, Palin worked with the Alaska state legislature to approve a major increase in taxes on the oil industry. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008103325_alaskatax07.html Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The state then gave Alaskans a $1200 check to pay for increased gas prices, using the increased revenues from the tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/ Palin backed Alaskan windfalls-profit tax]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also announced on May 21, 2008 that the state would challenge a recent listing of [[polar bears]] as a threatened species as she and other Alaska elected officials feared such a listing would cripple oil and gas development in prime polar bear habitat off the state's northern and northwestern coasts.  Palin's belief is that there is not enough evidence to support a listing, asserting that polar bears are well-managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Govp_2008stos_large.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gov. Sarah Palin delivering her 2008 State of the State address]] At first, Palin supported the Gravina Island Bridge Project, otherwise known as the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;quot;.  In September 2006, during a stop in [[Ketchikan]] as part of her gubernatorial campaign, Palin stated, &amp;quot;OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere,&amp;quot; Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. &amp;quot;I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html Palin touts stance on 'Bridge to Nowhere']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The $398 million bridge would have connected Ketchikan, on Revillagigedo Island in southern southeast Alaska, to its airport on nearby Gravina island.  The Anchorage Daily News also quoted her in an October, 2006 article as saying yes, she would continue state funding for the bridge because she wanted swift action on infrastructure projects. &amp;quot;The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist,&amp;quot; she said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere;_ylt=Am.NkRx1mLWk9A34FLhn8IADW7oF Critics: Palin used 'Bridge to Nowhere' for gain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin announced her opposition to the project in a 2007 press release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has stated her opposition arose because of the excessive amount of pork-barrel spending in the project, and that she would not fund the $329 million that was short for the budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/22/alaska.bridge.ap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This reversal cost her the support of prominent Alaskan Republicans like Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, who said, &amp;quot;You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it&amp;quot;.  Palin instead said that the best option would be to upgrade the ferry system.  However, the money that was retained from the earmark was not used for the ferry system, but was spent building a road on Gravina Island that links to the site of the canceled bridge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901 Palin &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; line angers many Alaskans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent Alaskan politicians criticized Palin for not &amp;quot;giving back&amp;quot; money earmarked for the project.  These critics included her Republican campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, who stated that &amp;quot;She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, state governments do not &amp;quot;give back&amp;quot; money in the manner proposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three times during Palin's time as mayor, earmark funding for projects in Wasilla were noted in [[John McCain]]'s list of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; spending in 2001 and 2002. McCain's list of spending approved without normal budget scrutiny identified a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in the city and a $1 million earmark for an emergency communications center while $450,000 was set aside for an agricultural processing facility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,6145252.story McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin, of course, as mayor of a small town had no ability to put these items in a Congressional bill, but her town did benefit from earmarked spending given to Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foreign Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ftwainwright_govp_05s.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Governor Sarah Palin visits Strykers at Fort Wainwright, where she is briefed on how the troops are trained and what the training grounds provide.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Palin is Commander in Chief of the Alaska Army [[National Guard]]. In 2007 she visited troops in [[Germany]] and [[Kuwait]].  According to Major General Craig E. Campbell, the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard who commands the roughly 3,800 state militia members, the Alaskan governor is not in the site's chain of command and has no authority over its operations.  He told the Associated Press on August 31st that he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. He went on to state that the entire operation is under federal control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/31/ap/politics/main4401854.shtml GOP Cites Palin's Skill, But How Relevant Is It?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her first major interview, with ABC's [[Charlie Gibson]], Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the &amp;quot;[[Bush Doctrine]]&amp;quot;. Palin responded, &amp;quot;In what respect, Charlie?&amp;quot; Gibson followed, &amp;quot;What do you interpret it to be?&amp;quot; Palin answered with another question, &amp;quot;His world view?&amp;quot; Gibson still refused to answer directly but instead stated it was the doctrine Bush had proposed in September of 2002, before the Iraq war. Palin gave a response concerning Bush's attempt to eradicate Islamic extremism. Gibson then explained that the Bush doctrine refers to the right of anticipatory defense, a right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpJsQch9uZo Asked about the Bush Doctrine...Palin is Clueless]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What Gibson did not point out is that he himself once gave a definition of the &amp;quot;Bush doctrine&amp;quot; (a concept made up by the press that has no clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislature Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
In August of 2008, the [[Alaska]] state legislature began an investigation of Palin and her staff for potential abuse of power in regards to a firing of Commissioner of Public Safety Walter Monegan.  Legally, Palin could dismiss Monegan at any time as he serves at the pleasure of the governor. Monegan was dismissed from his position in July of 2008, which Palin's political opponents claim was due to Monegan's refusal to fire trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's former brother-in-law who had a history of complaints including tasering his 10 year old stepson.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168861.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin says she released Monegan due to differences on budgeting. In an interview Monegan said that he was never told specifically by Sarah Palin to fire the state trooper Mike Wooten.  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has denied the charges and, as is customary, the State of Alaska has hired a lawyer to represent her office in the investigation. August 25th, the Legislative Council voted 12-0 to hire Hollis French as the investigator. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=59d_1220063478 Investigation into Governor Sarah Palin's abuse of powers] CBS 11, August 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 and the House Judiciary Committee voted 7-0. The State's attorney released this statement:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cvn_palin_troopergate Palin hires attorney for Troopergate investigation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The governor of every state gets legal counsel and this attorney is part of a weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges.  This legal defense is neither new nor uncommon nor at all political. It is a matter of her job and is not recent and it is not related to her selection on the McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The McCain campaign came out with a picture that includes three lead state Democratic legislators investigating the Branchflower probe, known as ‘Troopergate'. The photo shows the three of them at [[Obama]] headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska in July. The McCain campaign said the whole investigation is politically tainted and compromised. Republican Rep. John Coghill of North Pole called on managing investigator, legislator French to step down from the probe, saying he no longer had confidence in his objectivity. &amp;quot;These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed,” Coghill wrote in a letter calling for French’s replacement. “The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078644/posts McCain Camp has pictures of &amp;quot;troopergate&amp;quot; investigators at Obama Headquarters] FreeRepublic.com, September 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democratic State Senator Kim Elton, head of the legislative council overseeing the investigation, said the decisions made by Sen. Hollis French &amp;quot;have been appropriate, bipartisan ... and unchallenged&amp;quot; and that French has called the comments he made last week &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/08/palin.investigation/ Head of Palin trooper probe will stay, lawmaker says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lawyer Thomas Van Flein called the investigation &amp;quot;unlawful and unconstitutional&amp;quot; and said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he is a friend of the fired commissioner. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/522488.html Palin's attorney calls investigator biased] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investigation issued its report for the Alaska State Legislative Council on October 10, 2008, concluding that Monegan's refusal to fire the trooper was not the sole reason he was dismissed, but was likely a contributing factor.  The author of the report, Stephen Branchflower, focused on two questions of the inquiry:  did Palin fire Walt Monegan improperly, and was the firing solely because of his refusal to fire her ex brother-in-law. &amp;quot;Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Based on this, Branchflower claims that &amp;quot;I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/DOWNLOAD.pdf Page 8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the second question the report focused on, Branchflower wrote, &amp;quot;I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote. The second finding of the report reads: &amp;quot;In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.&amp;quot;  Branchflower also dismissed the Palins' assertions that they were afraid of Wooten because of threats they said he made. &amp;quot;Such claims of fear were not bona fide and were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10692757?source=most_viewed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;A preemptive response to this report was issued by the McCain/Palin campaign on October 9th, in which the campaign's own investigation concluded that Palin &amp;quot;acted within her proper and lawful authority in the reassignment of Walt Monegan&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end the &amp;quot;October Surprise&amp;quot; predicted by the head of the commission came to pass.  Although the commission was asked not to release its findings until after the election to avoid political posturing, they refused to do so.  Apart from tarring and feathering Palin, the report made no recommendations for any further inquiries or punishment, as it was understood that there was no case to do so.  No direct reports of Sarah Palin abusing her power were ever produced or asking for the official to be fired were ever produced, but that didn't stop the report from drawing its conclusions based upon conjecture without evidence.  Indeed, after the hoopla over the report subsided, the state personnel board released its finding that exonnerated her of any wrongdoing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_el_pr/palin_troopergate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice Presidential Candidate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mccainpalin.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Sarah Palin vice presidential announcement, 08/29/08.]] On August 29, 2008, Palin was announced to be the Vice Presidential nominee for Republican Senator John McCain &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/sarah_palin_vp/2008/08/29/126138.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The selection was a surprise, as those in the media were expecting [[Minnesota]] Governor [[Tim Pawlenty]] or former [[Massachusetts]]'s Governor [[Mitt Romney]].  Palin adds youth and executive experience to the ticket. She is the second female Vice Presidential candidate of a major party in U.S. history and the first one on a Republican ticket.  The first was [[Geraldine Ferraro]], who the Democratic Party put on the ticket under [[Walter Mondale]] in 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's speech before the Republican convention on Wednesday, September 3rd was watched by over 40 million people.  She had as many people turn in to see her as watched Obama's acceptance speech on the final day of the Democratic convention.  Palin has also been attacked by the press on a level not seen since [[Dan Quayle]], although she ultimately handled it much better.  &lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat Responses===&lt;br /&gt;
In a possible problem for the Democratic ticket, a majority of people believed that the press was trying to hurt Palin&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/story/rasmussen/20080904/pl_rasmussen/palinmedia20080904;_ylt=AqErk__wZIKdoVvqUXdr44Nh24cA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that type of unwarranted attack could have backfired into more support for the McCain/Palin ticket especially with unaffiliated voters believing the press is purposely attacking Palin by a 49% to 32% margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats had advised the Obama campaign to ignore Palin, fearing that emphasis on her inexperience will backfire against Obama himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/capital/2008/09/05/tips-for-obama-ignore-palin-dis-mccain  Matt Coopoer, &amp;quot;Tips for Obama: Ignore Palin, Dis McCain,&amp;quot; Sept. 5, 2008, ''Conde-Nast Portfoloio.com'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She participated in a debate with the Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on October 2, 2008, ending up being declared the winner by most credible news sources that are not  influenced by liberal bias. Palin &amp;quot;kept Joe Biden on the defensive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ended up dominating [the debate]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14234.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Barack Obama said of the McCain/Palin ticket's similar policies, &amp;quot;...You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_lipstick_mccain/2008/09/09/129274.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given the fact that she's stated &amp;quot;The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull (is) lipstick&amp;quot; and the fact that only a female candidate would wear lipstick, the McCain camp released a web ad implying that the comment was targeting Governor Palin. The ad featured video clips of Gov. Palin convention speech, Obama's remarks at the campaign event, and a clip of Katie Couric commenting on pervasive sexism in the campaign. After extensive discussion in the news media, the ad was removed from McCain's website and other video sites following a copyright claim by CBS news. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/CBS_takes_down_McCain_webad_suggests_its_misleading.html?showall]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin is a lightning rod to the established [[liberal]] women's movement. She, like many high profile conservative females, have taken much abuse from the left. Palin has been forced to set up a legal defense fund to help pay for fees related to an onslaught of ethic complaints, which are always frivolous. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18738 Palin blasts Obama administration: Government wants to &amp;quot;control the people&amp;quot;] CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Because she is retiring from being governor of Alaska, the anti-American liberals pat themselves on the back in glee. Liberals don't understand yet, probably never will, that she is ''the'' typical conservative that the majority of Americans identify with. Her principles and her outlook on Americanism is a model for all future leaders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin said of the people who have filed the complaints:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Those are the folks who want to tell me, they want to tell you, to sit down and shut up. We will not do that. I just can't, because I love my state. I love my country.'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on Ticket===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the run-up to the Vice-Presidential debate on October 2, 2008, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center attempted to measure the degree to which Palin impacted the GOP ticket positively or negatively in September.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/456/obama-regains-lead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The survey compared the answers to two identical questions about her qualifications and overall favorable/unfavorable rating between polls taken in early and late September.  The results show that public opinion of Palin has fallen significantly since the Republican convention, particularly in the public's opinion of her qualification to be Vice President.  Faced with a barrage of negative press attacks after her nomination, some prominent Republicans like [[Mitt Romney]] believe that the isolation of Palin from the media in September was a mistake, and are calling for an increase in unscripted encounters with the press and public to counter that perception.  According to Romney, &amp;quot;Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake.  I think they’d be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/30/doubts-about-palin-grow-even-among-conservatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Exit polling from the election itself had the final say on the matter of her impact on the ticket.  For those who considered her nomination on the ticket to be unimportant, 57% voted for Obama.  For those who considered her nomination to be important, 53% voted for Obama, thereby showing a positive overall impact on the ticket.  Considering that exit polling tilts Democratic, the actual impact may have been greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Future political prospects==&lt;br /&gt;
It is suspected that Palin may spend the next four years building a base for a 2012 run for the Republican nomination against Barack Obama.  Given her personal charisma and Reagan-esque connection with average, conservative Americans, she may be able to pull off a resounding victory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.capitalcityweekly.com/stories/120308/new_363163237.shtml Sarah Palin hits Republican talking points while stumping in Georgia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Conservative groups have speculated possible running mates, including [[Michelle Bachmann]] and [[Sean Hannity]].  Others suspect she may again seek nomination as the Vice-presidential candidate,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SarahPAC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 27, 2009 Palin formed the political action committee (PAC) SarahPAC. The organization supports &amp;quot;energy independence and reform&amp;quot; and will endorse candidates who &amp;quot;share Governor Palin’s ideas and goals.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=azCCxotgdG1E&amp;amp;refer=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin filled out a policy questionnaire for the Eagle Forum Alaska during her 2006 gubernatorial race.  One question asked, &amp;quot;Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?&amp;quot;  Palin responded, &amp;quot;Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.&amp;quot;  Yet [[public schools]] still resist teaching abstinence and instead promote sexual behavior by teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question asked, &amp;quot;Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?&amp;quot;  Palin replied, &amp;quot;Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the founding fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many liberals ignorant of the history of &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an &amp;quot;idiot&amp;quot; for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and George Washington's phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; was added to it in June 1954.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, the origin of the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; is the General Orders of [[George Washington]] on July 2 and 9, 1776: &amp;quot;The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army&amp;quot; (July 2); &amp;quot;the peace and safety of the Country now depends, under God, solely on the success of our arms&amp;quot; (July 9).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  George Washington was indeed a [[Founding Father]], and the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the [[Declaration of Independence]] and later writings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also believes that students need to learn of the controversy surrounding the [[Theory of evolution|Theory of evolution]], and that discussing Creationism should not be banned from schools.  During the 2006 campaign for the Alaskan Governorship, Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, &amp;quot;Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She later clarified her position by stating &amp;quot;I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&amp;quot;  She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.  As of September 2008 she has kept that pledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an example of liberal mockery, the [[Huffington Post]] attempted to make light of Sarah Palin's creationist beliefs, highlighting the creationary belief that [[dinosaur|dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; SNL likewise did a skit in which they had her refer to the Museum of Natural History as &amp;quot;that evolution museum&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Church Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin was baptized as a Roman Catholic and, at age 12, she was rebaptized in the Wasilla Assembly of God church.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccainveepbio30-2008aug30,0,2159346.story&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Palin has risen quickly from PTA to VP pick&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Decker, Cathleen and Michael Finnegan,&lt;br /&gt;
|work=Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
|date=August 30, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
| last = Gorsk| first = Eric&lt;br /&gt;
| url = http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g4-w_DCWffagBaQb8Il9a0R2hkPAD92SL7E00&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Evangelicals energized by McCain-Palin ticket&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher =Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
| date = 2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
| accessdate = 2008-08-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin attends the Wasilla Bible Church&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |first=David |last=Pepper |title=Regarding Governor Palin: A Letter from Pastor David Pepper |url=http://churchontherockak.org/Regarding-Sarah-Palin.html |publisher=Church on the Rock |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, an independent congregation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wasillabible.org/faq.htm |title=Wasilla Bible Church FAQ |accessdate=2008-09-05 |work= |publisher= |date= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;miller&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lisa Miller and Amanda Coyne. &amp;quot;[http://www.newsweek.com/id/156679 A Visit to Palin's Church: Scripture and discretion on the program in Wasilla].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. Sept. 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when at home and the Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau as governor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Statement Concerning Sarah Palin |url=http://www.jccalaska.com/images/10000/3000/582JU/user/palin.htm |publisher=Juneau Christian Center |date=2008-09-03 |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether or not people say that they like Sarah Palin, they gravitate to see her.  She earned the highest TV ratings at the Republican convention when she spoke, even surpassing McCain's acceptance speech, and matched Obama's acceptance speech when he was in front of a Greek temple with a stadium of people.  As a Vice Presidential candidate, that was unprecedented.  Likewise her Vice Presidential debate with Joe Biden had more viewers than any of the three debates between McCain and Obama.  Finally, her brief appearance on Saturday Night Live gave the show its highest ratings in 14 years, and was actually the third highest ranked show for the week based on the number of people who tuned in originally to watch her, 17 million, even though it ran at midnight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/20/ustelevision-tvratings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin.JPG|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska - Governor Sarah Palin Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=864bb9006da3f010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD National Governor's Association - Alaska Governor Sarah Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=27200 Project Vote Smart - Governor Sarah H. Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm Sarah Palin On the issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://parentingfreedom.com/2008/09/03/sarah-palin-mother-and-first-female-vice-president-pictures-children-parenting/ Sarah Palin: Mother and First Female Vice President], ''Parenting Freedom'', September 03, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://churchformen.blogspot.com/2008/09/people-around-world-are-asking-who-is.html Sarah Palin, a friend of mine]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDE3MmE5MDVmMGM1YjQ2NmVhMjJkN2I2ZTcxMzhlNjU=&amp;amp;w=MA== I Still Hate You, Sarah Palin] National Review Online&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Palin, Sarah}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Mayors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Doonesbury&amp;diff=699483</id>
		<title>Doonesbury</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Doonesbury&amp;diff=699483"/>
		<updated>2009-09-11T01:24:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Doonesbury''''' is a comic strip created by Garry Trudeau and distributed by Universal Press Syndicate. Highly political in nature, the strip definitely leans to the [[left]] but has, throughout its thirty-five year history, criticized politicians across the spectrum, from [[Richard Nixon]] and [[George Bush]] to [[Jimmy Carter]] and [[Bill Clinton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Doonesbury'' uses hilarity to ease the harsh blows in politics and has won the [[Pulitzer Prize]] for political cartooning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trudeau is particularly interested in the soldiers that are currently fighting in [[Iraq]], and the strip generated a great deal of controversy when B.D., one of the main characters, lost a leg at [[Fallujah]]. ''Doonesbury'' went on to chronicle B.D.'s recovery process, and the strip's portrayal of the challenges faced by wounded veterans earned Trudeau - a strong critic of the politicians who started the war - The [[United States Army]]'s Commander's Award for Public Service.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every [[Memorial Day]], Trudeau uses two or three Sunday comics to list the names of all the U.S. troops who have died in [[Iraq]] or [[Afghanistan]] the previous year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.doonesbury.com Doonesbury]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comic Strips]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hunter_S._Thompson&amp;diff=699482</id>
		<title>Hunter S. Thompson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hunter_S._Thompson&amp;diff=699482"/>
		<updated>2009-09-11T01:22:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Hunter Stockton Thompson'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Louis Proyect called him a &amp;quot;conveyor of conventional liberal thought.&amp;quot; [http://www.counterpunch.org/proyect02232005.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was a self-described &amp;quot;Gonzo&amp;quot; journalist whose writing was based on the notion that truth is stranger than any fiction. His work consciously blurred the line between the real and the imaginary.  In ''[[Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas]]'', he described his writing as &amp;quot;A savage journey into the heart of the American Dream.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much of his writing in ''Rolling Stone'' magazine dealt with contemporary politics; Thompson had an active intolerance for almost all politicians across the spectrum, with the exception of [[Democrat]] [[George McGovern]]. His open hatred for [[Richard Nixon]] was especially pronounced despite the fact that he interviewed [[Richard Nixon]] and discussed football with him at length.  He compiled his dispatches for ''Rolling Stone'' magazine during the 1972 campaign into the book, ''Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail '72''. He became close friends with Rolling Stone editor Jann Wenner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thompson once ran for sheriff of Pitkin County, [[Colorado]] on a platform that advocated the legalization of illegal [[drugs]] and wishing to keep big business out of Aspen (which he proposed to rename 'Fat City') and his home town of Woody Creek. His political movement was dubbed 'Freak Power,' as Thompson was calling on the marginalized sections of society to be his main support base.  Both major parties tried to keep Thompson out of office although Thompson lost by a small margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thompson was the inspiration for the character of Duke in the [[Pulitzer Prize]]-winning comic strip ''[[Doonesbury]]'', and was portrayed by [[Johnny Depp]] in a film version of ''[[Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some have expressed the belief that Thompson attracted attention in the drug culture because he was as a person what many people wanted to be -- a rebel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thompson, a lifelong gun enthusiast, committed [[suicide]] by by a self-inflicted gunshot wound in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
He is survived by his son Juan Thompson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Thompson, Hunter S}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists|Thompson, Hunter S]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Authors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rolling_Stone&amp;diff=699476</id>
		<title>Rolling Stone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rolling_Stone&amp;diff=699476"/>
		<updated>2009-09-11T01:20:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Rolling Stone''''' is a bi-weekly magazine that primarily publishes stories about the music industry, but it also reports on more serious topics with a [[liberal bias]]. Founded in [[San Francisco]] in 1967, the magazine has undergone changes in focus and image ever since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its reporting on politics is considered by [[conservative]]s to be extraordinarily one-sided. In its list of the ten worst congressmen, nine out of ten were [[Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12054520/the_10_worst_congressmen/print&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional examples of ''Rolling Stone'' work include:&lt;br /&gt;
*a cover mocking President [[George W. Bush]] with a dunce cap in the corner with an inside article by a professor claiming that Bush has a &amp;quot;combination of impotence, laziness and ineptitude for the job&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*an article by a Kennedy insisting that Bush stole the election of 2004,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/10586714/was_the_2004_election_stolen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which the former President [[Bill Clinton]] then described as &amp;quot;compelling&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*a pre-election article in 2004 urging voters to cast their ballots for [[John Kerry]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The magazine has employed a number of notable corespondents, including the liberal, drug-abusing, and Anti-Christian [[Hunter S. Thompson]], and the [[libertarian]], Christian, drug-abusing [[P.J.O'Rourke]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Al Gore]] and [[Bill Clinton]] continue to be featured frequently in ''Rolling Stone''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Magazines]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=False_messiah&amp;diff=699474</id>
		<title>False messiah</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=False_messiah&amp;diff=699474"/>
		<updated>2009-09-11T01:17:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Obama messiah.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Cover of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' Magazine, one of many published &amp;quot;halo-effect&amp;quot; photos of Barack Obama during 2008 emphasizing the claims of &amp;quot;messiahship&amp;quot; held by many.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''False messiah''' is a term from the [[Bible]] describing a person who either unintededly or willfully pretends to be the real Messiah, or behaves in a manner which would suggest to many that he is the Messiah, often ending in disaster.  Altough religious in origin, the title has been given to many secular leaders past and present, among them [[Benito Mussolini]], [[Adolf Hitler]], [[Kim Jong Il]], and most recently, [[Barack Obama]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biblical origins==&lt;br /&gt;
In Matthew 24, Jesus is describing to his disciples the conditions of the last days of earth prior to his return, and a notable feature of this time is the appearence of many false messiahs who lead many astray:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Behold, I have told you before.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.&amp;quot;  (Matthew 24:23-26, King James Version)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Eschatology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Amritsar_Massacre&amp;diff=699473</id>
		<title>Amritsar Massacre</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Amritsar_Massacre&amp;diff=699473"/>
		<updated>2009-09-11T01:16:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Wayne: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''The Amritsar Massacre''' occurred in 1919 in [[Amritsar]], [[India]].  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amritsar.com/Jallian%20Wala%20Bagh.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The local colonial commander, Brigadier General Reginald Dyer, had previously issued an order that all Indians passing through a particular street (where an English woman had been assaulted a few months prior) do so by crawling on all fours.  A crowd of over 5000 had gathered to protest this oppression.  Dyer ordered his troops to fire on the peaceably assembled crowd; about 1650 rounds were fired, killing almost 400 and wounding about 1500. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Indians were outraged and demanded independence from Britain.  A memorial to the victims, called the Flame of Liberty, was inaugurated in 1961. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:India]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Wayne</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>