<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=WilsonSmith</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=WilsonSmith"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/WilsonSmith"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T13:16:44Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Conservapedia&amp;diff=340706</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Conservapedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Conservapedia&amp;diff=340706"/>
		<updated>2007-11-21T23:29:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WilsonSmith: You are missing the point!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm confused - where's the evidence of a rampant wave of homosexual-centric deceit?  --[[User:Favre4Pope|Favre4Pope]] 17:56, 21 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article states that we've listed the 25 worst Supreme Court decisions, and the role deceit played in them.  I just checked out that article, and I'm not really sure the role of deceit was mentioned in them.  --[[User:Favre4Pope|Favre4Pope]] 18:02, 21 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are missing the point, this is our [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Conservapedia&amp;amp;diff=340573&amp;amp;oldid=340566 main achievement]. Why we aren't proud of it I don't know. [[User:WilsonSmith|WilsonSmith]] 18:29, 21 November 2007 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WilsonSmith</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>