<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Zebedatious</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Zebedatious"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Zebedatious"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T00:38:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dick_Cheney&amp;diff=216965</id>
		<title>Talk:Dick Cheney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dick_Cheney&amp;diff=216965"/>
		<updated>2007-07-03T17:06:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zebedatious: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|DanH}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling==&lt;br /&gt;
There are several spelling errors on the page. Several links direct to the wrong article. Can this be fixed before he leaves office?&lt;br /&gt;
-_-[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:03, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't we use his REAL first name, to avoid obscenity? --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 21:07, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean the article name: I think it goes by what he's best known as, just like [[Bill Clinton]] is not at [[William Jefferson Clinton]] (it had been moved there briefly, but then got moved back). --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:16, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you serious?  His first name is obscene?  Get real.[[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whenever this article gets unprotected, it should be put under [[:Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]].  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 21:25, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what's the deal with the protection?  That's lame -- are the party leaders to remain untouched by the editing of the masses?  Surely they can take it. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:47, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And speaking of the article, someone just edited and left it a mess -- look at the fifth section, unhelpfully entitled &amp;quot;S:&amp;quot; (after bouncing back and forth between &amp;quot;Accidents:&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;S:&amp;quot; a couple of times. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 00:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daughters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cut from article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mary is a controversial figure, as she is a lesbian, who has a daughter with her same-sex partner. This is direct contrast with the views of a large number of the Bush Administration's supporters, who are opposed to homosexuality on religious and moral grounds. Mr. Cheney believes same-sex marriage and other laws relating to homosexuality should be decided at State Level. [http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/24/cheney.samesex/2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is she controversial? Or do Cheney opponents want to use her as a pawn in a political battle?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we judged by what our children or other relatives are (or do)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He's a republican vice-president. His party is against [[same-sex marriage|gay marriage]], deleting this reference eliminates depth of the man. (He, personally, doesn't care one way or the other on gay marriage, IIRC.) BTW, I don't think anybody used Mary although they may have sought to try but I think ''she'' put a stop to any sorts of moves years ago. [[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|TALK]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pic==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:rcheney.jpg|right|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mary Cheney ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though it has been widely used in an attempt to discredit Cheney, the fact that his daughter is living a homosexual lifestyle remains just that, a fact. To the effect that this personal matter likely affects Cheney's ideas about &amp;quot;gay marriage&amp;quot; is both public knowledge and instructive to who he is politically. I think in the interest of avoiding the pitfalls of wiki, one of which is leaving out facts which aren't convienent to the liberal mindset, we should strive to be inclusive with the truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Broken link ==&lt;br /&gt;
The cite for Cheney's education (#1 I think) is linked incorrectly...should be http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/.  A sysop should fix this as the page is locked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:24, 13 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Picture==&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone put a picture of Cheney on the actual article, please? --[[User:Additioner]] 16:51, 15 April 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the picture --[[User:Additioner]] 13:29, 16 April 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No problem!  Sorry, I didn't remember the picture you put here!  If you'd like, I will switch them.  --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 23:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might want to add a rule from the Americans for Gun Safety Foundation regarding hunting safety, to whit:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When hunting with companions, determine ahead of time the &amp;quot;zone of fire&amp;quot; or area within which each hunter will track and fire should game appear.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://w3.agsfoundation.com/safety/r_hunting.html#zones&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What's about Dick's other lives?==&lt;br /&gt;
Nobody knows anything about Dick's involvement in Bechtel and Haliburton - and nowadays projects going through Afghanistan? The oil pipeline from the Caspian Sea to Pakistan through south Afghanistan is not relevant enough? Mr. Cheney was one of the leaders of this project. Nobody knows...&lt;br /&gt;
Should be time to open the books, to see behind the official stories...&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Turbo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:None of this liberal backwash has been proven true (although Haliburton's plans for this natural gas pipeline existed as early as 1983). Please post such trash on Wikipedia. We have no use for factual evidence on this site.[[User:J2xl|J2xl]] 20:41, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Category==&lt;br /&gt;
Might want to add this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[category:United States]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to the article. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Whole Story?==&lt;br /&gt;
These pages I assume are intended to allow folks to add contributions.  A man who served in the upper echelons of government should have more than 2 paragraphs.  In my humble opinion you should stomach the failings of such a figure in order to have a complete and accurate picture.  What you have here is a third grade summary, of quite possibly the most influential conservative in the world.  Unfortunately, it may be the very nature of conservatives to not collaborate that may lead this site's demise.  Grow a pair and best wishes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A lot of pages here should have more than 2 paragraphs - especially if those new paragraphs include objective information, as opposed to radical, fringe opinion. Several recent reverts in the Recent Changes link come to mind... [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 12:17, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I see little or no reason why the Wikipedia version can't be used.  What exactly is fringe or radical about the Cheney stub there?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zebedatious</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dick_Cheney&amp;diff=216877</id>
		<title>Talk:Dick Cheney</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Dick_Cheney&amp;diff=216877"/>
		<updated>2007-07-03T16:12:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zebedatious: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|DanH}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Spelling==&lt;br /&gt;
There are several spelling errors on the page. Several links direct to the wrong article. Can this be fixed before he leaves office?&lt;br /&gt;
-_-[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:03, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can't we use his REAL first name, to avoid obscenity? --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 21:07, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you mean the article name: I think it goes by what he's best known as, just like [[Bill Clinton]] is not at [[William Jefferson Clinton]] (it had been moved there briefly, but then got moved back). --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:16, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you serious?  His first name is obscene?  Get real.[[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whenever this article gets unprotected, it should be put under [[:Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]].  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 21:25, 18 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And what's the deal with the protection?  That's lame -- are the party leaders to remain untouched by the editing of the masses?  Surely they can take it. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:47, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And speaking of the article, someone just edited and left it a mess -- look at the fifth section, unhelpfully entitled &amp;quot;S:&amp;quot; (after bouncing back and forth between &amp;quot;Accidents:&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;S:&amp;quot; a couple of times. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 00:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Daughters==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cut from article:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Mary is a controversial figure, as she is a lesbian, who has a daughter with her same-sex partner. This is direct contrast with the views of a large number of the Bush Administration's supporters, who are opposed to homosexuality on religious and moral grounds. Mr. Cheney believes same-sex marriage and other laws relating to homosexuality should be decided at State Level. [http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/24/cheney.samesex/2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is she controversial? Or do Cheney opponents want to use her as a pawn in a political battle?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are we judged by what our children or other relatives are (or do)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He's a republican vice-president. His party is against [[same-sex marriage|gay marriage]], deleting this reference eliminates depth of the man. (He, personally, doesn't care one way or the other on gay marriage, IIRC.) BTW, I don't think anybody used Mary although they may have sought to try but I think ''she'' put a stop to any sorts of moves years ago. [[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|TALK]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pic==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:rcheney.jpg|right|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mary Cheney ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though it has been widely used in an attempt to discredit Cheney, the fact that his daughter is living a homosexual lifestyle remains just that, a fact. To the effect that this personal matter likely affects Cheney's ideas about &amp;quot;gay marriage&amp;quot; is both public knowledge and instructive to who he is politically. I think in the interest of avoiding the pitfalls of wiki, one of which is leaving out facts which aren't convienent to the liberal mindset, we should strive to be inclusive with the truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Broken link ==&lt;br /&gt;
The cite for Cheney's education (#1 I think) is linked incorrectly...should be http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/.  A sysop should fix this as the page is locked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:24, 13 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Picture==&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone put a picture of Cheney on the actual article, please? --[[User:Additioner]] 16:51, 15 April 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the picture --[[User:Additioner]] 13:29, 16 April 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No problem!  Sorry, I didn't remember the picture you put here!  If you'd like, I will switch them.  --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 23:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We might want to add a rule from the Americans for Gun Safety Foundation regarding hunting safety, to whit:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;When hunting with companions, determine ahead of time the &amp;quot;zone of fire&amp;quot; or area within which each hunter will track and fire should game appear.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://w3.agsfoundation.com/safety/r_hunting.html#zones&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What's about Dicks other live==&lt;br /&gt;
Nobody knows nothing about Dicks involving in Bechtel and Haliburton and nowadays such projects through afghanistan. Oil pipeline from Caspian See to Pakistan through south afghanistan is not relevant enough? Dick was the boss of this project. Nobody knows...&lt;br /&gt;
Should be time, to open the books, to see behind the official stories?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Turbo]]&lt;br /&gt;
:None of this liberal backwash has been proven true. Please post such trash on Wikipedia. [[User:J2xl|J2xl]] 20:41, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Category==&lt;br /&gt;
Might want to add this: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[category:United States]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to the article. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Whole Story?==&lt;br /&gt;
These pages I assume are intended to allow folks to add contributions.  A man who served in the upper echelons of government should have more than 2 paragraphs.  In my humble opinion you should stomach the failings of such a figure in order to have a complete and accurate picture.  What you have here is a third grade summary, of quite possibly the most influential conservative in the world.  Unfortunately, it may be the very nature of conservatives to not collaborate that may lead this site's demise.  Grow a pair and best wishes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zebedatious</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>