View source for Talk:Bundren v. Parriott

==Subcategory==
Andy, Do you really want this article to be in both categories: Circuit Cases and Tenth Circuit? Shouldn't it just be in the subcategory (Tenth Circuit)? 
If you agree, I can fix the categories on the other Circuit Cases articles. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 13:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

: I think we do want both, because "Circuit Cases" is much broader than "Tenth Circuit" and it is helpful to be able trace both categories easily and independently, without sub-nesting.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:00, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

::Ok, I wanted to check before I started making unnecessary changes. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 14:03, 12 April 2008 (EDT)