Abortion breast cancer studies - Revision history

Aschlafly: /* External links */ update link

2025-07-04T05:13:58Z

‎External links: update link

DavidB4-bot: /* top */Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: an an → an

2016-07-12T16:09:07Z

‎top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: an an → an

DavidB4-bot: clean up & uniformity

2016-07-12T03:15:48Z

clean up & uniformity

Jpatt: template

2010-08-04T05:32:35Z

template

Jpatt: Ext. Link section: Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

2010-08-04T05:31:42Z

Ext. Link section: Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer

Aschlafly at 23:07, June 8, 2008

2008-06-08T23:07:36Z

HoiPolloi: rv vandal

2008-06-08T23:02:54Z

rv vandal

AynRandroid: with love from ebaums

2008-06-08T23:02:53Z

with love from ebaums

NathanG at 23:58, March 31, 2008

2008-03-31T23:58:57Z

Blinkadyblink at 03:34, March 31, 2008

2008-03-31T03:34:14Z

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 <references/>
 == External links==
-* [http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/index/ Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer]
+* [https://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/article/abc-summary Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer]
 [[Category:Abortion]]
 {{Abortion}}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause [[lung cancer]], the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
-* include in the study many women who had an an [[abortion]] but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm from abortion<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
+* include in the study many women who had an abortion but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm from abortion<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
 * exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 * downplay, and omit from the conclusion and abstract, significant medical harms found in the study among post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 * in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>[[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]]</ref>
 * use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref>
-* falsely classify breast cancer victims as non-abortive by using an abortion registry, but including 10,000 women too old to be in the registry<ref>the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm]</ref>
+* falsely classify breast cancer victims as non-abortive by using an abortion registry, but including 10,000 women too old to be in the registry<ref>[http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm the Melbye study]</ref>
 * use a questionnaire that mixes abortions, which cause cancer, with miscarriages, which typically do not, but referring to both as "abortion"<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref>
 * in an analysis of studies, include studies that never met the quality standards for peer review.<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis</ref>
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 == References ==
 <references/>
-== External Links==
+== External links==
 * [http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/index/ Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer]
-[[category:abortion]]
+[[Category:Abortion]]
 {{Abortion}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, August 4, 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:

	[[category:abortion]]		[[category:abortion]]
		+	{{Abortion}}

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 == References ==
 <references/>
 [[category:abortion]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, June 8, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS~~	+	Childbirth reduces a woman's risk of [[breast cancer]], and when a pregnant woman chooses [[abortion]] instead she thus increases her risk. This increased risk has been proven by the vast majority of studies, many predating the politicization of abortion, and by animal studies.
		+
		+	Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause [[lung cancer]], the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]]. These tricks include:
		+
		+	* include in the study many women who had an an [[abortion]] but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm from abortion<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
		+	* exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
		+	* downplay, and omit from the conclusion and abstract, significant medical harms found in the study among post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
		+	* be silent when newspapers predictably exaggerate and misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
		+	* in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>[[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]]</ref>
		+	* use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref>
		+	* falsely classify breast cancer victims as non-abortive by using an abortion registry, but including 10,000 women too old to be in the registry<ref>the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm]</ref>
		+	* use a questionnaire that mixes abortions, which cause cancer, with miscarriages, which typically do not, but referring to both as "abortion"<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref>
		+	* in an analysis of studies, include studies that never met the quality standards for peer review.<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis</ref>
		+
		+	== References ==
		+	<references/>
		+
		+	[[category:abortion]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, June 8, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~LOL INTERNET~~	+	WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS WITH LOVE FROM EBAUMS

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Childbirth reduces a woman's risk of breast cancer, and when a pregnant woman chooses [[abortion]] instead she increases her risk.  This increased risk has been proven by the vast majority of studies, many predating the politicization of abortion, and by animal studies.
+Childbirth reduces a woman's risk of [[breast cancer]], and when a pregnant woman chooses [[abortion]] instead she thus increases her risk.  This increased risk has been proven by the vast majority of studies, many predating the politicization of abortion, and by animal studies.
-Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
+Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause [[lung cancer]], the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
 * include in the study many women who had an an [[abortion]] but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm from abortion<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>