Australopithecus - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: /* top */HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.youtube.com → https://www.youtube.com (4)

2018-09-26T13:39:10Z

top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.youtube.com → https://www.youtube.com (4)

DavidB4-bot: /* top */Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: present day → present-day

2016-06-24T23:44:09Z

top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: present day → present-day

DavidB4-bot: /* top */clean up

2016-06-24T23:01:08Z

top: clean up

JoeyJ at 13:34, March 17, 2016

2016-03-17T13:34:39Z

JackFerner at 05:28, April 6, 2012

2012-04-06T05:28:32Z

Nashhinton at 00:32, June 24, 2011

2011-06-24T00:32:50Z

Nashhinton at 00:22, June 24, 2011

2011-06-24T00:22:36Z

Nashhinton at 00:21, June 24, 2011

2011-06-24T00:21:54Z

Nashhinton at 00:18, June 24, 2011

2011-06-24T00:18:10Z

Nashhinton: Adding more detail. adding links

2011-06-24T00:16:50Z

Adding more detail. adding links

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref> If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.
-It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is a lack of substantial evidence for [[macroevolution]]ary change regarding this species.
+It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is a lack of substantial evidence for [[macroevolution]]ary change regarding this species.
 Two of the Australopithecii would have been taken in [[Noah's Ark]]. Australopithecus had five sub-species: A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. anamensis, A. bahrelghazali and A. garhi.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, June 24, 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Australopithecus''' is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present day human beings. [[Anthropologists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.	+	'''Australopithecus''' is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present-day human beings. [[Anthropologists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.

	It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref> If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.		It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref> If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Australopithecus''' is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present day human beings. [[Anthropologists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.
-It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref>. If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.
+It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref> If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.
-It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is a lack of substantial evidence for [[macroevolution|macroevolutionary]] change regarding this species.
+It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is a lack of substantial evidence for [[macroevolution]]ary change regarding this species.
 Two of the Australopithecii would have been taken in [[Noah's Ark]]. Australopithecus had five sub-species: A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. anamensis, A. bahrelghazali and A. garhi.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Australopithecus is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present day human beings. [[Anthropologists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.
+'''Australopithecus''' is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present day human beings. [[Anthropologists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.
 It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref>. If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Two of the Australopithecii would have been taken in [[Noah's Ark]]. Australopithecus had five sub-species: A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. anamensis, A. bahrelghazali and A. garhi.
-[[Category:Animals]]
+{{Human evolution}}
 ==References==
 <references/>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Australopithecus is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present day human beings. [[Evolutionists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.
+Australopithecus is a kind of extinct apes which evolutionists believe to be the ancestors of present day human beings. [[Anthropologists]] believe that they walked upright and used tools- yet this is widely viewed as an incorrect assumption among [[creationists]] and the [[intelligent design]] advocates.
-It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref>
+It's clearly obvious that even chimpanzees and gorillas use tools, so the proof is lacking for evolutionary change.<ref>http://www.livescience.com/4354-chimps-learned-tool-long-human.html</ref> The bipedal walking is ambiguously theorized by evolutionists to prove that this creature evolved into humans, yet many gorillas and other primates occasionally walk upright. The knuckle bones for the species is curved, thus denoting a case of knuckle walking, which is common among other primates.<ref>http://creationwiki.org/Australopithecine</ref>. If Australopithecus was an obligate biped, however, it is likely that it and other early hominins would retain features associated with knuckle walking as they made the transition from obligatory knuckle walking to obligatory bipedalism.
 It is also interesting to note that the skull of the Australopithecus is eerily similar to that of a chimpanzee's skull, possibly demonstrating that the Australopithecus is actually a distinct specimen of a chimpanzee.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvg9aNTtv_4&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ci9iduDNJk&feature=channel_video_title</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw6ZiDbineE&feature=relmfu</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d66lf2b-glM&feature=relmfu</ref> Therefore, there is a lack of substantial evidence for [[macroevolution|macroevolutionary]] change regarding this species.