Complementarianism - Revision history

Mr. Nationalist at 04:34, August 7, 2021

2021-08-07T04:34:37Z

Quidam65 at 02:39, January 30, 2021

2021-01-30T02:39:18Z

Conservative: /* See also */

2020-10-07T00:07:28Z

‎See also

1990'sguy at 00:19, September 9, 2019

2019-09-09T00:19:47Z

Gerald Howe: Grammatical error "evidences from the Bible" changed to "holds based on Biblical evidence that"

2019-09-08T23:48:17Z

Grammatical error "evidences from the Bible" changed to "holds based on Biblical evidence that"

Gerald Howe: correction: double verb "distance reject" changed to grammatically-correct "distance themselves from"

2019-09-08T23:46:55Z

correction: double verb "distance reject" changed to grammatically-correct "distance themselves from"

DavidB4-bot: /* Historical position */HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com (2)

2018-09-26T14:55:29Z

‎Historical position: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com (2)

Dataclarifier: /* Official affirmations */ linked discernment

2018-01-14T16:02:24Z

‎Official affirmations: linked discernment

DavidB4-bot: clean up

2016-08-08T05:27:59Z

clean up

DavidB4-bot: /* Historical position */Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: is is → is

2016-07-14T18:29:28Z

‎Historical position: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: is is → is

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Modern Complementarianism sometimes emphasizes more the great viability of female ministry than historical expressions of the doctrine of male headship.
-In contrast to Complementarianism is the more modern position termed "Christian" [[egalitarianism]], which, among other things,  seeks to use the essential spiritual equality which all believers enjoy (Gal. 3:28) to negate positional/functional distinctions between men and women. While some egalitarians profess to hold the Bible as the wholly inspired word of God (for example, [[Pentecostal]] and [[charismatic]] churches have historically been open to female pastors and leaders, arguing that there were numerous female leaders in the Old Testament as well as in the Book of Acts), others tend to rely on a much less literal approach in interpreting key verses. Primary arguments typically used by egalitarianism are also used by many pro[[homosexual]] polemicists in regards to [[homosexuality and biblical interpretation]],<ref>http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html#Corinthians</ref> though more conservative egalitarians distance themselves from homosexuality.<ref>[[homosexuality]]. [http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-8-No-2/Egalitarianism-and-Homosexuality  David W. Jones, ''Egalitarianism and Homosexuality: Connected or Autonomous Ideologies?'']</ref>
+In contrast to Complementarianism is the more modern position termed "Christian" [[egalitarianism]], which, among other things,  seeks to use the essential spiritual equality which all believers enjoy (Gal. 3:28) to negate positional/functional distinctions between men and women. While some egalitarians profess to hold the Bible as the wholly inspired word of God (for example, [[Pentecostal]] and [[charismatic]] churches have historically been open to female pastors and leaders, arguing that there were numerous female leaders in the Old Testament as well as in the Book of Acts), others tend to rely on a much less literal approach in interpreting key verses. Primary arguments typically used by egalitarianism are also used by many pro-[[homosexual]] polemicists in regards to [[homosexuality and biblical interpretation]],<ref>http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html#Corinthians</ref> though more conservative egalitarians distance themselves from homosexuality.<ref>[[homosexuality]]. [http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-8-No-2/Egalitarianism-and-Homosexuality  David W. Jones, ''Egalitarianism and Homosexuality: Connected or Autonomous Ideologies?'']</ref>
 Southern Baptist theological [[Albert Mohler]] states,
 <blockquote>
   The arguments used in support of the ordination of women require the dismissal or "reinterpretation" of specific biblical texts which disallow women in the teaching office. The same is true of arguments for the ordination of divorced persons--and for homosexuals.<ref>http://www.albertmohler.com/2003/08/05/women-preachers-divorce-and-a-gay-bishop-whats-the-link</ref>
 </blockquote>
-−
 ==Primary Biblical texts==

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Modern Complementarianism sometimes emphasizes more the great viability of female ministry than historical expressions of the doctrine of male headship.
-In contrast to Complementarianism is the more modern position termed "Christian" [[Egalitarianism]], which, among other things,  seeks to use the essential spiritual equality which all believers enjoy (Gal. 3:28) to negate positional/functional distinctions between men and women. While some egalitarians profess to hold the Bible as the wholly inspired word of God, they tend to rely on a much less literal approach in interpreting key verses. Primary arguments typically used by egalitarianism are also used by many pro[[homosexual]] polemicists in regards to [[homosexuality and biblical interpretation]],<ref>http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html#Corinthians</ref> though more conservative egalitarians distance themselves from homosexuality.<ref>[[homosexuality]]. [http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-8-No-2/Egalitarianism-and-Homosexuality  David W. Jones, ''Egalitarianism and Homosexuality: Connected or Autonomous Ideologies?'']</ref>
+In contrast to Complementarianism is the more modern position termed "Christian" [[egalitarianism]], which, among other things,  seeks to use the essential spiritual equality which all believers enjoy (Gal. 3:28) to negate positional/functional distinctions between men and women. While some egalitarians profess to hold the Bible as the wholly inspired word of God (for example, [[Pentecostal]] and [[charismatic]] churches have historically been open to female pastors and leaders, arguing that there were numerous female leaders in the Old Testament as well as in the Book of Acts), others tend to rely on a much less literal approach in interpreting key verses. Primary arguments typically used by egalitarianism are also used by many pro[[homosexual]] polemicists in regards to [[homosexuality and biblical interpretation]],<ref>http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html#Corinthians</ref> though more conservative egalitarians distance themselves from homosexuality.<ref>[[homosexuality]]. [http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-8-No-2/Egalitarianism-and-Homosexuality  David W. Jones, ''Egalitarianism and Homosexuality: Connected or Autonomous Ideologies?'']</ref>
 Southern Baptist theological [[Albert Mohler]] states,

@@ Line 144: / Line 144: @@
 ==See  also==
 *[[Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood]]
 == References ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Complementarianism''' is the traditional theological position which holds based on [[Bible|Biblical]] evidence that [[God]] created [[male]] and [[female]] uniquely compatible and complementary, and which opposite genders alone can be joined in marriage. (Gen. 2:18-24) In addition, they understand that while both genders were made by God in His image and likeness, (Gen. 1:26-27) and their complementary nature manifests interdependence, yet in so doing God has established the man as the head of the women. This hierarchical order is patterned after the relationship between the Father and Son, which is explicitly declared in 1 Corinthians 11:3:
+'''Complementarianism''' is the traditional theological position which holds, based on [[Bible|Biblical]] evidence, that [[God]] created [[male]] and [[female]] uniquely compatible and complementary, and which opposite genders alone can be joined in marriage. (Gen. 2:18-24) In addition, they understand that while both genders were made by God in His image and likeness, (Gen. 1:26-27) and their complementary nature manifests interdependence, yet in so doing God has established the man as the head of the women. This hierarchical order is patterned after the relationship between the Father and Son, which is explicitly declared in 1 Corinthians 11:3:
 {{Cquote|But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.}}
@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 </blockquote>
-Nineteenth century Christian historian [[Philip Schaff]] records the teaching of early church fathers of the third and fourth century, stating in regards to 1 Cor. 14: 34,35,
+Nineteenth-century Christian historian [[Philip Schaff]] records the teaching of early church fathers of the third and fourth century, stating in regards to 1 Cor. 14: 34,35,
 <blockquote>
 We do not permit our “women to teach in the Church, but only to pray and hear those that teach; for our Master and Lord, Jesus Himself, when He sent us the twelve to make disciples of the people and of the nations, did nowhere send out women to preach,..<ref>Schaff, ANF07: ''ANF07: Fathers of the Third and Fourth Centuries: Lactantius, Venantius, Asterius, Victorinus, Dionysius, Apostolic Teaching and Constitutions, Homily</ref>
@@ Line 110: / Line 110: @@
 </blockquote>
-Likewise Presbyterian theologian and Bible commentator [[Albert Barnes (theologian)|Albert Barnes]] (1798 –1 870) stated,
+Likewise, Presbyterian theologian and Bible commentator [[Albert Barnes (theologian)|Albert Barnes]] (1798 –1 870) stated,
 <blockquote>
@@ Line 120: / Line 120: @@
 [[Matthew Henry]] (1662 – 1714) in his extensive commentary, entertains allowing “praying, and uttering hymns inspired” by women, as such “were not teaching”.<ref>http://www.searchgodsword.org/com/mhc-com/view.cgi?book=1co&chapter=014</ref>
-Nineteenth century Congregationalist A. Hastings Boss, D.D., writing in 1870 in the ''Bibliotheca sacra and theological review'', found no sanctioned “instance in the Bible of a woman's speaking in public”, in that of Miriam, Deborah, Huldah, Anna, and stated that
+Nineteenth-century Congregationalist A. Hastings Boss, D.D., writing in 1870 in the ''Bibliotheca sacra and theological review'', found no sanctioned “instance in the Bible of a woman's speaking in public”, in that of Miriam, Deborah, Huldah, Anna, and stated that
 <blockquote>
 If these prophetesses had each been called to public speaking, they would have been exceptions to the general rule, in striking contrast with the conduct of all other women under the law. Certainly no rule could have been or can now be founded upon these exceptional cases.
@@ Line 146: / Line 146: @@
 == References ==
- {{reflist|2}}
+{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}
 ==External links==
@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 * [https://www.cbmw.org/wp-content/uploads/articles_pdf/ware_bruce/positionsummaries.pdf ''Summaries of the Egalitarian and Complementarian Positions on the Role of Women in the Home and in Christian Ministry'']
 * [https://www.cbmw.org/slaves-women-and-homosexuals-by-william-j-webb-review-by-wayne-grudem/ ''Slaves, Women and Homosexuals,''  - review by Wayne Grudem]
 * [http://www.monergism.com/monthly_focus/complimentarianism_vs_egalitar.php Complementarianism vs. Egalitarianism sources]
 [[Category:Christianity]]
 [[Category:Bible]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, September 8, 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Complementarianism''' is the traditional theological position which ~~evidences from the~~ [[Bible]] that [[God]] created [[male]] and [[female]] uniquely compatible and complementary, and which opposite genders alone can be joined in marriage. (Gen. 2:18-24) In addition, they understand that while both genders were made by God in His image and likeness, (Gen. 1:26-27) and their complementary nature manifests interdependence, yet in so doing God has established the man as the head of the women. This hierarchical order is patterned after the relationship between the Father and Son, which is explicitly declared in 1 Corinthians 11:3:	+	'''Complementarianism''' is the traditional theological position which holds based on [[Bible\|Biblical]] evidence that [[God]] created [[male]] and [[female]] uniquely compatible and complementary, and which opposite genders alone can be joined in marriage. (Gen. 2:18-24) In addition, they understand that while both genders were made by God in His image and likeness, (Gen. 1:26-27) and their complementary nature manifests interdependence, yet in so doing God has established the man as the head of the women. This hierarchical order is patterned after the relationship between the Father and Son, which is explicitly declared in 1 Corinthians 11:3:
	{{Cquote\|But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.}}		{{Cquote\|But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.}}

@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 </blockquote>
-Boss also concluded that Gal. 3:28 is not applicable to the issue of women speaking in the assemblies, due to it having to do with salvation, not positions in service, “that salvation by faith is the same to all mankind, whatever be their race, condition, or sex, though natural distinctions still exist in full force.” He did not, however, see any restrictions on women singing, and also allowed for women teaching out of necessity, if competent men were not to be had. Boss, ''The silence of women in the churches —objections considered,''<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=8VsQAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA740&dq=%22silence+in+the+churches%22&output=html_text] Article viii; Bibliotheca sacra and theological review, Volume 27, pp. 739-763</ref>
+Boss also concluded that Gal. 3:28 is not applicable to the issue of women speaking in the assemblies, due to it having to do with salvation, not positions in service, “that salvation by faith is the same to all mankind, whatever be their race, condition, or sex, though natural distinctions still exist in full force.” He did not, however, see any restrictions on women singing, and also allowed for women teaching out of necessity, if competent men were not to be had. Boss, ''The silence of women in the churches —objections considered,''<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=8VsQAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA740&dq=%22silence+in+the+churches%22&output=html_text] Article viii; Bibliotheca sacra and theological review, Volume 27, pp. 739-763</ref>
 The Presbyterian quarterly, April, 1889, in examining both 1 Cor. 14:34,35 and 1 Tim. 11-15, stated,
 <blockquote>
-As early as the year 1832, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in this country, in a pastoral letter to the churches in reference to dangers to be avoided in revivals, calls attention to a tendency then just beginning to appear, and uses this strong language (Baird, Digest, p. 220), "Meetings of pious women by themselves for conversation and prayer, whenever they can conveniently be held, we entirely approve. But let not the inspired prohibitions of the great apostle of the Gentiles, as found in his Epistles to the Corinthians and to Timothy, be violated. To teach and exhort, or to lead in prayer in public and promiscuous assemblies, is clearly forbidden to women in the holy oracles.".<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=nUYUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA165&dq=%22silence+in+the+churches%22&lr=&output=html_text “Women in the church,” The Presbyterian quarterly], Volume 3, NO. 8.- April, 1889. pp. 166-179</ref>
+As early as the year 1832, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in this country, in a pastoral letter to the churches in reference to dangers to be avoided in revivals, calls attention to a tendency then just beginning to appear, and uses this strong language (Baird, Digest, p. 220), "Meetings of pious women by themselves for conversation and prayer, whenever they can conveniently be held, we entirely approve. But let not the inspired prohibitions of the great apostle of the Gentiles, as found in his Epistles to the Corinthians and to Timothy, be violated. To teach and exhort, or to lead in prayer in public and promiscuous assemblies, is clearly forbidden to women in the holy oracles.".<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=nUYUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA165&dq=%22silence+in+the+churches%22&lr=&output=html_text “Women in the church,” The Presbyterian quarterly], Volume 3, NO. 8.- April, 1889. pp. 166-179</ref>
 </blockquote>

@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
 *   7. In all of life Christ is the supreme authority and guide for men and women, so that no earthly submission-domestic, religious, or civil-ever implies a mandate to follow a human authority into sin (Dan 3:10-18; Acts 4:19-20, 5:27-29; 1 Pet 3:1-2).
-*   8. In both men and women a heartfelt sense of call to ministry should never be used to set aside Biblical criteria for particular ministries (1 Tim 2:11-15, 3:1-13; Tit 1:5-9). Rather, Biblical teaching should remain the authority for testing our subjective discernment of God's will.<ref>http://www.cbmw.org/Resources/Articles/The-Danvers-Statement</ref>
+*   8. In both men and women a heartfelt sense of call to ministry should never be used to set aside Biblical criteria for particular ministries (1 Tim 2:11-15, 3:1-13; Tit 1:5-9). Rather, Biblical teaching should remain the authority for testing our subjective [[discernment]] of God's will.<ref>http://www.cbmw.org/Resources/Articles/The-Danvers-Statement</ref>
 ==Contrasted with [[liberalism]]==

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 * 1. “The order: Adam was created first, then Eve (note the sequence in Genesis 2:7 and Genesis 2:18-23).” (p.&nbsp;30)
-* 2. “The representation: Adam, not Eve, had a special role in representing the human race.” Eve sinned first, but Scripture says we fell in Adam- 1 Corinthians 15:22, 45-49).
+* 2. “The representation: Adam, not Eve, had a special role in representing the human race.” Eve sinned first, but Scripture says we fell in Adam (1 Corinthians 15:22, 45-49).
 * 3. “The naming of the woman: When God made the first woman and ‘brought her to the man,’” (p. 31) Adam named her- Genesis 2:23. Naming is a function of authority- See God’s naming creation Genesis 1:5-2:20.

@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 ==Historical position==
-It is is well evidenced that the traditional position was that which is now called Complementarianism.<ref>http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/1Cor.11+14.html#Commentaries</ref>  In no place in the Scriptures is it established that women were priests in Israel or pastors of a New Testament church. Later, notable ancient authorities upheld the traditional position of male headship in church and home. [[Protestant]] churches likewise have historically upheld the traditional position from the time of the [[Reformation]], though later some exceptions would begin to be seen among certain Pentecostal churches. Female pastoral ordination began to be most prevalent within churches in [[liberal Christianity]].
+It is well evidenced that the traditional position was that which is now called Complementarianism.<ref>http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/1Cor.11+14.html#Commentaries</ref>  In no place in the Scriptures is it established that women were priests in Israel or pastors of a New Testament church. Later, notable ancient authorities upheld the traditional position of male headship in church and home. [[Protestant]] churches likewise have historically upheld the traditional position from the time of the [[Reformation]], though later some exceptions would begin to be seen among certain Pentecostal churches. Female pastoral ordination began to be most prevalent within churches in [[liberal Christianity]].
 [[Origen]] (AD 185-254) stated that,