Conservative logic - Revision history

MayGodBless at 17:01, April 15, 2024

2024-04-15T17:01:08Z

Aschlafly: Reverted edits by EJParker (talk) to last revision by DouglasA

2015-12-24T16:49:42Z

Reverted edits by EJParker (talk) to last revision by DouglasA

Can't load revision 1188722

at 16:47, December 24, 2015

2015-12-24T16:47:11Z

Can't load revision 1188718

DouglasA: template

2010-03-27T04:40:57Z

template

JeffT: rmv liberal vandalism. someone please escort jhampton off the site.

2010-02-16T16:51:52Z

rmv liberal vandalism. someone please escort jhampton off the site.

JHampton at 16:48, February 16, 2010

2010-02-16T16:48:57Z

JHampton at 16:41, February 16, 2010

2010-02-16T16:41:07Z

JHampton at 16:40, February 16, 2010

2010-02-16T16:40:08Z

Benp: Adding the Bible

2010-01-23T21:53:47Z

Adding the Bible

DerekE: Undo revision 728608 by IrvingW (Talk) Vandalism

2009-12-10T03:19:45Z

Undo revision 728608 by IrvingW (Talk) Vandalism

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Examples of logic leading to conservative values:
-. No civilization has ever been demonstrated to be successful or stable without [[faith]].  Therefore, claims that [[atheism]] are beneficial to society are illogical and lack evidence.  Furthermore, examples of the ways in which faith is beneficial to society are easily found.  Thus, it is logical to conclude that faith is beneficial and vital to a stable society.
+# No civilization has ever been demonstrated to be successful or stable without [[faith]].  Therefore, claims that [[atheism]] are beneficial to society are illogical and lack evidence.  Furthermore, examples of the ways in which faith is beneficial to society are easily found.  Thus, it is logical to conclude that faith is beneficial and vital to a stable society.
+#Traditional family values encapsulate a great many eminently logical concepts, including [[division of labor]] and specialization.  Numerous studies have shown that full-time parenting is of substantial benefit.  Furthermore, a cursory examination of the data available will show a strong correlation between the increase in two-income families and the increase in reported psychological problems among children.  Conservatives logically recognize the great value of the role played by a stay-at-home mother; liberals dismiss the importance, and thus belittle those who choose to accept this critical responsibility.
-. Traditional family values encapsulate a great many eminently logical concepts, including [[division of labor]] and specialization.  Numerous studies have shown that full-time parenting is of substantial benefit.  Furthermore, a cursory examination of the data available will show a strong correlation between the increase in two-income families and the increase in reported psychological problems among children.  Conservatives logically recognize the great value of the role played by a stay-at-home mother; liberals dismiss the importance, and thus belittle those who choose to accept this critical responsibility.
+#Conservatives recognize that freedom comes at a price, and that that price is not always pleasant.  Liberals employ those same freedoms to criticize others for paying the necessary price.
+#Conservatives reject "solutions" that won't actually solve anything and are designed largely to assuage guilt.  For example, conservatives oppose emissions standards if those standards are going to be ignored by other major industrial powers, recognizing that such standards would only serve to put American manufacturers at a disadvantage.
-. Conservatives recognize that freedom comes at a price, and that that price is not always pleasant.  Liberals employ those same freedoms to criticize others for paying the necessary price.
+#Conservatives recognize that massive, centralized government is illogical, as it leads to inefficient "One size fits all" solutions that fail to take local conditions into account.
+#Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.
 {{Conservatism}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:40, March 27, 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	6. Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.		6. Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.
		+
		+	{{Conservatism}}

	==References==		==References==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, February 16, 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	6. Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.		6. Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.
−
−	7. If a conservative is the current president, then anyone who disagrees with him is un-American and a [[terrorist]] sympathizer. However, if a [[liberal]] or [[moderate]] is the current president, disagreeing with him is a form of patriotic dissent.

	==References==		==References==

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 . Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.
-. Conservatives say that if a conservative is the current president, then anyone who disagrees with him is "un-American" and a [[terrorist]] sympathizer. However, if a [[liberal]] or [[moderate]] is the current president, disagreeing with him is a form of patriotic dissent.
+. If a conservative is the current president, then anyone who disagrees with him is un-American and a [[terrorist]] sympathizer. However, if a [[liberal]] or [[moderate]] is the current president, disagreeing with him is a form of patriotic dissent.
 ==References==

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 . Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.
-. Conservatives say that if a conservative is the current president, then anyone who disagrees with him is "un-American" and a [[terrorist]] sympathizer. However, if a liberal or moderate is the current president, disagreeing with him is a form of patriotic dissent.
+. Conservatives say that if a conservative is the current president, then anyone who disagrees with him is "un-American" and a [[terrorist]] sympathizer. However, if a [[liberal]] or [[moderate]] is the current president, disagreeing with him is a form of patriotic dissent.
 ==References==

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, February 16, 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	6. Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.		6. Conservatives comprehend the fundamental logic of the [[Bible]] as a unified, coherent work, rather than frantically quoting individual, out-of-context passages in an attempt to disprove its validity.
		+
		+	7. Conservatives say that if a conservative is the current president, then anyone who disagrees with him is "un-American" and a [[terrorist]] sympathizer. However, if a liberal or moderate is the current president, disagreeing with him is a form of patriotic dissent.

	==References==		==References==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 . Conservatives recognize that massive, centralized government is illogical, as it leads to inefficient "One size fits all" solutions that fail to take local conditions into account.
-. Conservatives do not, however, recognize when they create a personal reality for themselves and discount the views or arguments of anyone else. For proof, see [[Liberal Logic]].
 ==References==