Counterexamples to Relativity - Revision history

Aschlafly: punctuation

2026-10-06T19:47:34Z

punctuation

RoadtoEmmaus2: Remove unwanted space before period preceding reference

2026-09-16T02:24:48Z

Remove unwanted space before period preceding reference

RoadtoEmmaus2: Remove unwanted space before period preceding reference

2026-09-16T02:15:55Z

Remove unwanted space before period preceding reference

RoadtoEmmaus2: copy-edit further improvements

2026-09-16T01:43:39Z

copy-edit further improvements

RoadtoEmmaus2: further minor edits

2026-09-16T00:47:55Z

further minor edits

RoadtoEmmaus2: more copy-edit improvements

2026-09-16T00:13:20Z

more copy-edit improvements

RoadtoEmmaus2: further copy-edit improvements

2026-09-16T00:08:59Z

further copy-edit improvements

Show changes

RoadtoEmmaus2: Copy-edit improvements

2026-09-15T23:40:11Z

Copy-edit improvements

Show changes

Aschlafly: further copy-edit improvements

2026-09-08T16:01:25Z

further copy-edit improvements

RoadtoEmmaus2: Copy-edit improvements

2026-09-08T15:57:45Z

Copy-edit improvements

Show changes

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 -->
-The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note">''See, e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World."  See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood:
+The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note"> ''See, e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World."  See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood:
 #The '''''acceleration''''' in the expansion of the [[universe]] disproves relativity, and never-seen "[[dark energy]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory; data released in April 2019 shows that the universe is expanding more rapidly than the theory allows.<ref>https://www.livescience.com/65332-hubble-wrong-speed.html</ref>
 #If space were curved as the [[theory of relativity]] asserts, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be virtually '''''precisely flat''''', but it is. "Somewhat surprisingly, current observational data favours the delicately balanced flat over both the open and closed models."<ref>https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/f/Friedmann-Lemaitre+Universe</ref>
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 #The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.<ref>[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]</ref>
 #The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html ("A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, and would undermine much of traditional physics. But some physicists believe it would elegantly explain puzzling cosmological phenomena such as the nearly uniform temperature of the universe.")</ref>
-#"According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous", but observations instead show "inexplicable static" greater than "all artificial sources of" possible background noise.<ref>[https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Cool-Astronomy/2010/1025/Is-the-universe-a-big-hologram-This-device-could-find-out. Hunt for gravitational waves discovers unexpected data instead].</ref>
+#"According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous," but observations instead show "inexplicable static" greater than "all artificial sources of" possible background noise.<ref>[https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Cool-Astronomy/2010/1025/Is-the-universe-a-big-hologram-This-device-could-find-out. Hunt for gravitational waves discovers unexpected data instead].</ref>
 #"The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel."<ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space</ref>
 #The theory predicts [[wormholes]] just as it predicts [[black holes]], but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.<ref>http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v61/i13/p1446_1 .  The popular science press promotes black holes to a far greater extent than wormholes.</ref>

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note">''See, e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World."  See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood:
 #The '''''acceleration''''' in the expansion of the [[universe]] disproves relativity, and never-seen "[[dark energy]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory; data released in April 2019 shows that the universe is expanding more rapidly than the theory allows.<ref>https://www.livescience.com/65332-hubble-wrong-speed.html</ref>
-#If space were curved as the [[theory of relativity]] asserts, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be virtually '''''precisely flat''''', but it is. "Somewhat surprisingly, current observational data favours the delicately balanced flat over both the open and closed models." <ref>https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/f/Friedmann-Lemaitre+Universe</ref>
+#If space were curved as the [[theory of relativity]] asserts, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be virtually '''''precisely flat''''', but it is. "Somewhat surprisingly, current observational data favours the delicately balanced flat over both the open and closed models."<ref>https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/f/Friedmann-Lemaitre+Universe</ref>
 #The [[Pioneer anomaly|''Pioneer'' anomaly]]: ''NASA'''s Pioneer 10 & 11 spacecraft slowed as they exited the [[solar system]], which is the opposite of expectations; [[atheistic science]] eventually invented unpersuasive explanations.
-#The [[Sun]] is a '''''perfect''''' sphere - "the solar flattening is ... too small to agree with that predicted from its surface rotation." <ref>http://www.tgdaily.com/space-features/65491-why-is-the-sun-so-round</ref>
+#The [[Sun]] is a '''''perfect''''' sphere - "the solar flattening is ... too small to agree with that predicted from its surface rotation."<ref>http://www.tgdaily.com/space-features/65491-why-is-the-sun-so-round</ref>
 #Computer simulations based on the theory of relativity '''''predict far more''''' [[black holes]] than are observed.<ref group="note">"The ratio of the mass of black holes in galaxy centers to the rest of the matter in galaxies is larger in the simulations than in the real universe." Emspak, Jesse (November 28, 2012). [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=biggest-black-hole-blast-ever "Biggest black hole blast ever could solve cosmological mystery."] ''Space.com'' website.  Reprinted at ''Scientific American'' website.</ref> Indeed, it is doubtful whether black holes even exist, and at least one observation disproved the prediction.<ref>Lemonick, Michael D. (November 6, 2014). [http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141106-space-g2-black-hole-science/?google_editors_picks=true "Black hole fails to destroy mystery cosmic cloud."] ''National Geographic'' website.</ref>
 #"[[Quasar]]s are disappearing" contrary to the [[theory of relativity]], and astronomers simply "stopped looking" after finding more than ten examples of rapidly changing quasars that confound the theory with respect to black holes.<ref>Templeton, Graham (November 30, 2015). [http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/218636-quasars-are-disappearing-and-astronomers-arent-sure-why "Quasars are disappearing and astronomers aren't sure why."] ''ExtremeTech'' website.</ref>
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 "I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional [[Atheism|atheist]] whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being." - [[Albert Einstein]]<ref name="Isaacson390">Isaacson, Walter (2008). [https://books.google.com/books?id=cdxWNE7NY6QC&pg=PT390 ''Einstein: His Life and Universe''] (New York: Simon and Schuster), p. 390.  Retrieved from GoogleBooks archive on February 19, 2015.</ref>]]
 #The speed of light in a vacuum is slower than expected—less than ''c''—based on new data from a 25-year-old [[supernova]].<ref>[http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/184879-einsteinian-error-the-25-year-old-supernova-that-could-change-the-speed-of-light-forever Einsteinian error: The 25-year-old supernova that could change the speed of light forever]</ref>
-#"Celestial signals defy [[Albert Einstein]]. Strange signals picked up from black holes and distant supernovae suggest there's more to space-time than Einstein believed." <ref>[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22129500.700-breaking-relativity-celestial-signals-defy-einstein.html ''New Scientist'' (Jan. 2, 2014)]</ref>
+#"Celestial signals defy [[Albert Einstein]]. Strange signals picked up from black holes and distant supernovae suggest there's more to space-time than Einstein believed."<ref>[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22129500.700-breaking-relativity-celestial-signals-defy-einstein.html ''New Scientist'' (Jan. 2, 2014)]</ref>
-#A physics article published in 2014 states that "general relativity, which describes gravity at low energies precisely, break[s] down at high energies." <ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.3720</ref>
+#A physics article published in 2014 states that "general relativity, which describes gravity at low energies precisely, break[s] down at high energies."<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.3720</ref>
-#Subatomic particles with mass have a speed observed to be as fast as the speed of light ("we are 100% sure that the speed of light is the speed of [[neutrinos]]"<ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17364682</ref>), which contradicts relativity because the [[Lorentz factor]] is then infinite.<ref>http://www.hindustantimes.com/Roll-over-Einstein-Law-of-physics-challenged/Article1-749189.aspx - note that a similar observation of faster-than-light speeds was also made in 2007 (with a larger margin of error).</ref> ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/18/us-science-neutrinos-light-idUSTRE7AH0T720111118</ref> Neutrinos were observed to travel at the speed of light by an independent experiment also: "Their neutrinos traveled at precisely the speed of light, not faster or slower." <ref>http://junkscience.com/2012/03/21/no-you-still-cant-go-faster-than-light/</ref>
+#Subatomic particles with mass have a speed observed to be as fast as the speed of light ("we are 100% sure that the speed of light is the speed of [[neutrinos]]"<ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17364682</ref>), which contradicts relativity because the [[Lorentz factor]] is then infinite.<ref>http://www.hindustantimes.com/Roll-over-Einstein-Law-of-physics-challenged/Article1-749189.aspx - note that a similar observation of faster-than-light speeds was also made in 2007 (with a larger margin of error).</ref> ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/18/us-science-neutrinos-light-idUSTRE7AH0T720111118</ref> Neutrinos were observed to travel at the speed of light by an independent experiment also: "Their neutrinos traveled at precisely the speed of light, not faster or slower."<ref>http://junkscience.com/2012/03/21/no-you-still-cant-go-faster-than-light/</ref>
-#Anomalies in the locations of spacecraft that have flown by [[Earth]] ("flybys"). During the gravity assists from Earth, both the ''Galileo'' spacecraft and the ''Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous'' (''NEAR'') spacecraft experienced a change in velocity different than that predicted by General Relativity.<ref>http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/19088/1/98-0296.pdf</ref> <ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23410705/</ref>
+#Anomalies in the locations of spacecraft that have flown by [[Earth]] ("flybys"). During the gravity assists from Earth, both the ''Galileo'' spacecraft and the ''Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous'' (''NEAR'') spacecraft experienced a change in velocity different than that predicted by General Relativity.<ref>http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/19088/1/98-0296.pdf</ref><ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23410705/</ref>
-#[[Spiral galaxies]] confound relativity, and unseen, nonexistent "[[dark matter]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1873</ref> "Dark matter mysteriously missing around sun.  Theories say neighborhood should be filled with it, but new study shows otherwise." <ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47101905</ref>
+#[[Spiral galaxies]] confound relativity, and unseen, nonexistent "[[dark matter]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1873</ref> "Dark matter mysteriously missing around sun.  Theories say neighborhood should be filled with it, but new study shows otherwise."<ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47101905</ref>
 #Increasingly precise measurements of the advance of the [[perihelion]] of [[Mercury]] show a shift greater than predicted by relativity, well beyond the margin of error.<ref group="note">Even [[liberal]] Wikipedia, which promotes relativity, admits that relativity's total predicted precession of Mercury's perihelion is 575.31, while the observed data is contrary to the prediction: 574.10±0.65. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity#Perihelion_precession_of_Mercury]  Also, in a complicated or contrived series of calculations that most physics majors cannot duplicate even after learning them, the theory of general relativity's fundamental formula, <math>G_{\mu\nu} = 8 \pi K T_{\mu\nu}\,</math>, was conformed to match Mercury's then-observed precession of 5600.0 arc-seconds per century. Subsequently, however, more sophisticated technology has measured a different value of this precession (5599.7 arc-seconds per century, with a margin of error of only 0.01), and leading promoters of relativity (such as Professor Clifford Will) have omitted this in listing tests confirming relativity.</ref>
 #Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravitational waves predicted by the theory, no direct observation of [[gravity]] [[wave]]s has occurred.<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3781</ref> ''Sound like [[global warming]]?'' Then, in classic [[liberal claptrap]], the liberal media claimed that gravitational waves were discovered when, in fact, no such direct observation was made.
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 #The failure to discover [[gravitons]], despite spending hundreds of millions in taxpayer money on the search. While these tax dollars were not necessarily "wasted", the lack of results indicates that scientists need to revisit their hypothesis.
 #Newly observed data reveal that the fine-structure constant, α (alpha), actually varies throughout the universe, demonstrating that all inertial frames of reference do '''not''' experience identical laws of physics as claimed by relativity.<ref group="note">For a report on the data, see a paper submitted in 2010 by John Webb and Julian King of the University of New South Wales, Australia, to the ''Physical Review Letters''.</ref>
-#The double star "W13" weighs "40 times as much as the sun—more than enough to form a [[black hole]].  So why is it not a black hole? The only explanation [a leading scientist] can think of ... does not make astrophysical sense." <ref>https://www.economist.com/node/17035953</ref>
+#The double star "W13" weighs "40 times as much as the sun—more than enough to form a [[black hole]].  So why is it not a black hole? The only explanation [a leading scientist] can think of ... does not make astrophysical sense."<ref>https://www.economist.com/node/17035953</ref>
 #The inability of the theory to lead to other insights, contrary to every verified theory of physics.
 #The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.<ref>[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]</ref>
 #The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html ("A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, and would undermine much of traditional physics. But some physicists believe it would elegantly explain puzzling cosmological phenomena such as the nearly uniform temperature of the universe.")</ref>
 #"According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous", but observations instead show "inexplicable static" greater than "all artificial sources of" possible background noise.<ref>[https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Cool-Astronomy/2010/1025/Is-the-universe-a-big-hologram-This-device-could-find-out. Hunt for gravitational waves discovers unexpected data instead].</ref>
-#"The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel." <ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space</ref>
+#"The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel."<ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space</ref>
 #The theory predicts [[wormholes]] just as it predicts [[black holes]], but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.<ref>http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v61/i13/p1446_1 .  The popular science press promotes black holes to a far greater extent than wormholes.</ref>
 #The theory predicts the natural formation of highly ordered (and thus low entropy) black holes despite the increase in [[entropy]] required by the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]].<ref group="note">Contrived explanations have been suggested for this dilemma, such as Stephen Hawking proposing that the entropy of matter in a black hole is somehow stored in the surface area of its event horizon to be released back into its surroundings as the black hole decays by radiation, known as "Hawking radiation."</ref>

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 #Despite a century of wasting billions of dollars in work on the theory, "No one knows how to solve completely the equations of general relativity that describe gravity; they are simply beyond current understanding."<ref>[http://www.mathunion.org/o/General/Prizes/2006/TaoENG.pdf Statement in awarding the coveted Fields Medal]</ref>
 #Experiments in electromagnetic induction contradict relativity: "Einstein’s Relativity ... can not explain the experiment in graph 2, in which moving magnetic field has not produced electric field."<ref>http://www.wbabin.net/weuro/qingping1.pdf</ref><ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504223</ref>
-#Relativity breaks down if a [[solenoid]] is traveling at or near the speed of light .<ref>http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3244279</ref>
+#Relativity breaks down if a [[solenoid]] is traveling at or near the speed of light.<ref>http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3244279</ref>
-#The [[Pauli Exclusion principle]] states that no two electrons in a closed system can exist in the same quantum state, and if one electron changes, all others must compensate. As the universe is a closed system, when one electron changes state, so must all others, even if they are thousands of light years apart .<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/life-and-physics/2012/feb/28/1.</ref>
+#The [[Pauli Exclusion principle]] states that no two electrons in a closed system can exist in the same quantum state, and if one electron changes, all others must compensate. As the universe is a closed system, when one electron changes state, so must all others, even if they are thousands of light years apart.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/life-and-physics/2012/feb/28/1.</ref>
-#The 2014 findings of gravitational waves are actually just dust .<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26248-ripples-from-dawn-of-creation-vanish-in-a-puff-of-dust.html</ref>
+#The 2014 findings of gravitational waves are actually just dust.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26248-ripples-from-dawn-of-creation-vanish-in-a-puff-of-dust.html</ref>
 #The theory of relativity violates [[Occam's razor]] by requiring multiple new, implausible assumptions, including an invariant speed of light, denial of [[action at a distance]], denial of basic, well-proven principles of [[quantum mechanics]], and insistence that all places in the universe be equivalent to each other.
 #The theory of relativity has discontinuities whereby the limit of a physical quantity as a variable (such as mass or velocity) approaches a fixed value, but it is not the same as the physical quantity at that fixed value. For example, the limit of momentum as mass approaches 0 and velocity approaches the speed of light is not equal to the momentum of (massless) light.
-#Discontinuities in General Relativity are well-recognized .<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01654285</ref>
+#Discontinuities in General Relativity are well-recognized.<ref>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01654285</ref>
 ''For a discussion of rebuttals to these counterarguments, see [[Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity]].''

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 #Relativity requires that anything traveling at the [[speed of light]] must have mass zero, so it must have [[momentum]] zero. But the laws of [[electrodynamics]] require that light have nonzero momentum.
 #Unlike most well-tested fundamental physical theories, the theory of relativity violates conditions of a conservative field. Path independence, for example, is lacking under the theory of relativity, as in the "twin paradox" whereby the age of each twin under the theory is dependent on the path he traveled.<ref group="note">In defense of the theory, it is noted that it mandates conservation of the matter-stress-energy tensor (the only way to get ''real'' conservation, since matter and energy are interchangeable.)  This follows from the "contracted Bianchi identity." [http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node14.html]  Also, the curl of the "gravitational field vector" is exactly zero in the absence of moving sources, due to symmetries of [[Riemann]]'s tensor.  It follows, from [[Stokes' Theorem]], that the gravitational field is conservative and has a potential function.  Energy is conserved.</ref>
-#The Ehrenfest Paradox: Consider a spinning hoop, where the [[tangent]] is [[velocity]] near the speed of light. In this case, the circumference (<math>2 \pi R</math>) is length-contracted. However, since <math>R</math> is always perpendicular to the motion, it is not contracted. This leads to an apparent paradox: does the radius of the accelerating hoop equal <math>R</math>, or is it less than <math>R</math>?
+#The Ehrenfest Paradox: Consider a spinning hoop, where the [[tangent]]ial [[velocity]] is near the speed of light. In this case, the circumference (<math>2 \pi R</math>) is length-contracted. However, since <math>R</math> is always perpendicular to the motion, it is not contracted. This leads to an apparent paradox: does the radius of the accelerating hoop equal <math>R</math>, or is it less than <math>R</math>?
 #Based on relativity, Einstein predicted in 1905 that clocks at the Earth's equator would be slower than clocks at the North Pole, due to different velocities; in fact, all clocks at sea level measure time at the same rate, and Relativists made new assumptions about the Earth's shape to justify this contradiction of the theory; they also make the implausible claim that relativistic effects from gravitation precisely offset the effects from differences in velocity.<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v227/n5255/abs/227270a0.html</ref>
 #The Twin Paradox: Consider twins who are separated with one traveling at a very high speed such that his "clock" (age) slows down, so that when he returns he has a younger age than the twin; this violates relativity because ''both'' twins should expect the other to be younger, if motion is relative. Einstein himself admitted that this contradicts relativity.<ref group="note">Einstein attempted to explain the paradox based on the acceleration that one twin uniquely undergoes, but the length of travel can simply be extended such that any effect from acceleration would be ''de minimis''.</ref>
-#Based on relativity, Einstein claimed in 1909 that the [[aether (science)|aether]] does not exist, but in order to make subatomic physics work right, theorists had to introduce the aether-like concept of the Higgs field, which fills all of space and breaks symmetries.#[[Minkowski space]] is predicated on the idea of four-dimensional vectors of which one component is [[time]]. However, one of the properties of a [[vector space]] is that every vector has an inverse. Time (formally: movement forward in time) cannot be a vector because it has no inverse.
+#Based on relativity, Einstein claimed in 1909 that the [[aether (science)|aether]] does not exist, but in order to make subatomic physics work right, theorists had to introduce the aether-like concept of the Higgs field, which fills all of space and breaks symmetries.
 #In [[Genesis (ch.1)|Genesis 1:6-8]], we are told that one of God's first creations was a firmament in the heavens. This likely refers to the creation of the luminiferous [[aether]].
 #It is impossible to perform an experiment to determine whether Einstein's theory of relativity is correct, or the older Lorentz aether theory is correct. Believing one over the other is a matter of [[faith]].

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 -->
-The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note">See, ''e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World."  See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood:
+The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note">''See, e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World."  See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood:
 #The '''''acceleration''''' in the expansion of the [[universe]] disproves relativity, and never-seen "[[dark energy]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory; data released in April 2019 shows that the universe is expanding more rapidly than the theory allows.<ref>https://www.livescience.com/65332-hubble-wrong-speed.html</ref>
 #If space were curved as the [[theory of relativity]] asserts, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be virtually '''''precisely flat''''', but it is. "Somewhat surprisingly, current observational data favours the delicately balanced flat over both the open and closed models." <ref>https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/f/Friedmann-Lemaitre+Universe</ref>
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 #"Celestial signals defy [[Albert Einstein]]. Strange signals picked up from black holes and distant supernovae suggest there's more to space-time than Einstein believed." <ref>[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22129500.700-breaking-relativity-celestial-signals-defy-einstein.html ''New Scientist'' (Jan. 2, 2014)]</ref>
 #A physics article published in 2014 states that "general relativity, which describes gravity at low energies precisely, break[s] down at high energies." <ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.3720</ref>
-#Subatomic particles with mass have a speed observed to be as fast as the speed of light ("we are 100% sure that the speed of light is the speed of [[neutrinos]]"),<ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17364682</ref> which contradicts relativity because the [[Lorentz factor]] is then infinite.<ref>http://www.hindustantimes.com/Roll-over-Einstein-Law-of-physics-challenged/Article1-749189.aspx - note that a similar observation of faster-than-light speeds was also made in 2007 (with a larger margin of error).</ref> ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/18/us-science-neutrinos-light-idUSTRE7AH0T720111118</ref> Neutrinos were observed to travel at the speed of light by an independent experiment also: "Their neutrinos traveled at precisely the speed of light, not faster or slower." <ref>http://junkscience.com/2012/03/21/no-you-still-cant-go-faster-than-light/</ref>
+#Subatomic particles with mass have a speed observed to be as fast as the speed of light ("we are 100% sure that the speed of light is the speed of [[neutrinos]]"<ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17364682</ref>), which contradicts relativity because the [[Lorentz factor]] is then infinite.<ref>http://www.hindustantimes.com/Roll-over-Einstein-Law-of-physics-challenged/Article1-749189.aspx - note that a similar observation of faster-than-light speeds was also made in 2007 (with a larger margin of error).</ref> ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/18/us-science-neutrinos-light-idUSTRE7AH0T720111118</ref> Neutrinos were observed to travel at the speed of light by an independent experiment also: "Their neutrinos traveled at precisely the speed of light, not faster or slower." <ref>http://junkscience.com/2012/03/21/no-you-still-cant-go-faster-than-light/</ref>
 #Anomalies in the locations of spacecraft that have flown by [[Earth]] ("flybys"). During the gravity assists from Earth, both the ''Galileo'' spacecraft and the ''Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous'' (''NEAR'') spacecraft experienced a change in velocity different than that predicted by General Relativity.<ref>http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/bitstream/2014/19088/1/98-0296.pdf</ref> <ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23410705/</ref>
 #[[Spiral galaxies]] confound relativity, and unseen, nonexistent "[[dark matter]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.<ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.1873</ref> "Dark matter mysteriously missing around sun.  Theories say neighborhood should be filled with it, but new study shows otherwise." <ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47101905</ref>