<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Essay%3ABias_of_Science</id>
		<title>Essay:Bias of Science - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Essay%3ABias_of_Science"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-18T21:14:44Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;diff=1344024&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>DavidB4: sort</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;diff=1344024&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-05-18T18:36:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;sort&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 18:36, May 18, 2017&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to any of the four fundamental forces of nature.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to any of the four fundamental forces of nature.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;{{DEFAULTSORT:Bias of Science}}&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DavidB4</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;diff=1328151&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aschlafly: a start</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;diff=1328151&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-04-03T03:54:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;a start&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
				&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
				&lt;tr style='vertical-align: top;'&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 03:54, April 3, 2017&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to &lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;one &lt;/del&gt;of the four fundamental forces of nature.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable.&amp;#160; Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to &lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;any &lt;/ins&gt;of the four fundamental forces of nature.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aschlafly</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;diff=1328150&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aschlafly: Physics fully recognizes the truth of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, despite its lack of any connection to one of the four fundamental forces of nature.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Bias_of_Science&amp;diff=1328150&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-04-03T03:53:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Physics fully recognizes the truth of the &lt;a href=&quot;/Second_Law_of_Thermodynamics&quot; title=&quot;Second Law of Thermodynamics&quot;&gt;Second Law of Thermodynamics&lt;/a&gt;, despite its lack of any connection to one of the four fundamental forces of nature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Science has an inherent bias towards what is quantifiable and repeatable.  The assertion in physics, for example, that there are only four fundamental forces in nature, is incomplete because it is limited to that which is quantifiable and repeatable.  Physics fully recognizes the truth of the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]], despite its lack of any connection to one of the four fundamental forces of nature.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aschlafly</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>