Essay:Quantifying Perfection - Revision history

DavidB4: /* See also */Default Sort

2017-03-27T19:18:08Z

DavidB4: categorize

2016-06-14T18:47:58Z

categorize

: Undo revision 1174028 by Sensational (talk)

2015-10-04T20:38:43Z

Undo revision 1174028 by Sensational (talk)

Sensational: Replaced content with "Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope."

2015-10-04T20:37:01Z

Replaced content with "Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope."

Aschlafly: One approach is to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole. But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection.

2015-10-04T17:01:58Z

One approach is to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole. But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection.

Aschlafly: Aschlafly moved page Essay: Quantifying Perfection to Essay:Quantifying Perfection: remove extra space in title

2015-09-27T00:37:09Z

Aschlafly moved page Essay: Quantifying Perfection to Essay:Quantifying Perfection: remove extra space in title

Aschlafly: What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?

2015-09-27T00:34:41Z

What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?

New page

'''Perfection''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily. In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection. In logical thought it as substantial importance also. But how should one quantify it?

== Quantifying Perfection in Golf ==

What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?

== See also ==
*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, March 27, 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Category:Essays‏‎]]		[[Category:Essays‏‎]]
		+	{{DEFAULTSORT:Quantifying Perfection}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, June 14, 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== See also ==		== See also ==
	*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]		*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Essays‏‎]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, October 4, 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Whatever Andrew Schlafly says~~ it is. ~~He's the new pope~~.	+	'''[[Perfection]]''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily. In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection. In logical thought it as substantial importance also. But how should one quantify it?
		+
		+	== Quantifying Perfection in Golf ==
		+
		+	What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?
		+
		+	One approach is to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole. But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection.
		+
		+	== Quantifying Perfection in Football ==
		+
		+	What would be a perfect game played by a team in football?
		+	== See also ==
		+	*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, October 4, 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''[[Perfection]]''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily. In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection. In logical thought it ~~as substantial importance also. But how should one quantify it?~~	+	Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope.
−
−	~~== Quantifying Perfection in Golf ==~~
−
−	What would be a "perfect" round of golf? Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance. How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?
−
−	~~One approach~~ is ~~to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole~~. ~~But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection~~.
−
−	~~== Quantifying Perfection in Football ==~~
−
−	~~What would be a perfect game played by a team in football?~~
−	~~== See also ==~~
−	*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Perfection''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily.  In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection.  In logical thought it as substantial importance also.  But how should one quantify it?
+'''[[Perfection]]''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily.  In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection.  In logical thought it as substantial importance also.  But how should one quantify it?
 == Quantifying Perfection in Golf ==
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 What would be a "perfect" round of golf?  Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance.  How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?
 == See also ==
 *[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:37, September 27, 2015
(No difference)