Government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: /* top */HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.heritage.org/ → https://www.heritage.org/

2019-04-02T12:19:38Z

‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.heritage.org/ → https://www.heritage.org/

JoeyJ at 19:56, August 28, 2014

2014-08-28T19:56:17Z

Fnarrow: dead end page links/merge suggestions

2013-04-20T17:20:44Z

dead end page links/merge suggestions

CPalmer: cat

2011-12-20T13:52:00Z

cat

Ed Poor: Created page with ""... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence tha..."

2011-12-17T16:49:40Z

Created page with ""... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence tha..."

New page

"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:19, April 2, 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology\|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [~~http~~://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]	+	"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology\|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]
	[[Category:Environmentalism]]		[[Category:Environmentalism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, August 28, 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~{{merge\|greenhouse gas}}{{merge\|Cap and Trade}}~~"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology\|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]	+	"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology\|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]
	[[Category:Environmentalism]]		[[Category:Environmentalism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, April 20, 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]	+	{{merge\|greenhouse gas}}{{merge\|Cap and Trade}}"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology\|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]
	[[Category:Environmentalism]]		[[Category:Environmentalism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, December 20, 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]		"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16]
		+	[[Category:Environmentalism]]