Help talk:How To Create a Conservapedia Account - Revision history

DanielJackson: /* Make the username policy more clear */ new section

2014-12-06T15:46:41Z

Make the username policy more clear: new section

Alien at 22:22, November 1, 2007

2007-11-01T22:22:07Z

Alien at 22:21, November 1, 2007

2007-11-01T22:21:20Z

Alien at 22:19, November 1, 2007

2007-11-01T22:19:56Z

Ed Poor: I might be getting impatient because it's getting late, but ...

2007-04-19T06:05:46Z

I might be getting impatient because it's getting late, but ...

New page

I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, December 6, 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?Alien		I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?Alien
		+
		+	== Make the username policy more clear ==
		+
		+	I think it should be made clear that the username '''must''' include your real name, as opposed to ''recommending'' your real name; perhaps there could be a help page on Conservapedia's username policy. A few users have been blocked for violating an otherwise nonexistent policy (and also advised to create an account with a real name even though their account creation is disabled for two years). A clear username policy would probably be beneficial for Conservapedia. -- [[User:DanielJackson\|DanielJackson]] 10:46, 6 December 2014 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, November 1, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)		I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

−	I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?~~http://www.conservapedia.com/User:~~Alien~~/sig 18:21, 1 November 2007 (EDT)~~	+	I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?Alien

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, November 1, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)		I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

−	I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Alien/sig 18:19, 1 November 2007 (EDT)	+	I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Alien/sig 18:21, 1 November 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, November 1, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)		I propose that a new user's first 10 or 20 edits be regarded as a sort of application or portfolio. We can then decide whether to accept them as a volunteer. Or in the case of vandals, saboteurs and time-waster, reject them. --[[User:Ed Poor\|Ed Poor]] 02:05, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	I can not see the link at the bottom-left I assumed that you meant in the little box on the left with Main Page at the top was I mistaken?http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Alien/sig 18:19, 1 November 2007 (EDT)