Inference to the Best Explanation - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: /* top */HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com

2018-09-26T17:37:44Z

‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com

Dataclarifier: corr typo omission of word "the" belonging to "idea", and of the letter "x" in "explanation"

2018-03-23T16:32:10Z

corr typo omission of word "the" belonging to "idea", and of the letter "x" in "explanation"

DavidB4-bot: /* top */Spelling, grammar, and general fixes, typos fixed: ulimately → ultimately

2016-06-24T15:07:17Z

‎top: Spelling, grammar, and general fixes, typos fixed: ulimately → ultimately

DavidB4-bot: /* top */Spelling, grammar, and general fixes

2016-06-24T14:19:07Z

‎top: Spelling, grammar, and general fixes

AK: creating the page

2015-06-06T08:41:35Z

creating the page

New page

'''Inference to the Best Explanation''' (IBE) is scientific device of logical reasoning residing on idea that entities, conditions, or processes that have the capability or so called ''causal powers'' to produce the evidence in question constitute better explanations of that evidence than those that are not.<ref name="Signature"/> The method of IBE does not attempt to answer the question ''Why this?'' but the question ''Why this rather than that?''<ref name="Lipton"/>

Especially in [[historical science|historical sciences]], the process of determining the best eplanation necessarily involves generating a list of possible hypotheses. Then, to infer the ''best'' explanation necessarily implies the need to examine and compare competing explanations. None of evidences ulimately prove that the hypothesis is absolutely correct but they provide support for it and place it in contention as a possible best explanation.<ref name="Signature">{{Cite book
| author = Meyer, Stephen C.
| title = Signature in the Cell
| chapter =
| publisher = HarperOne
| location= New York
| year= 2008
| isbn = 978-0-06-147279-2
| pages = 154-159, 327
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC
| quote= }}</ref>

A modern classic in the [[philosophy of science]] devoted to ''Inference to the Best Explanation'' is a homonymous book by Peter Lipton which was published in 1991.<ref name="Lipton">{{cite web |title=PETER LIPTON:Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edition (Review)|author=L. Farmakis, S. Hartmann|publisher=Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, University of Notre Dame |url=http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24796/ |accessdate=6 Juni 2015}}</ref> He i.a. noted that where more than one causial explanation is available, scientists use a comparative method of evaluation and a process of elimination to evaluate competing possible causal hypotheses.<ref name="Signature"/> Lipton characterizes IBE as inference to the ''loveliest'' explanation, not inference to the ''likeliest'' explanation.<ref name="Lipton"/>

==Examples==
*The destruction of a building can be explained both by earthquake and a bomb. In the absence of other evidence, the presence of the shrapnel at the scene would lead [[forensic science|forensic scientists]] to conclusion that the bomb is the best explanation for given pattern of destruction.<ref name="Signature"/>

==References==
<references/>

[[Category:Methodology of Science]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Inference to the Best Explanation''' (IBE) is scientific device of logical reasoning residing on idea that entities, conditions, or processes that have the capability or so called ''causal powers'' to produce the evidence in question constitute better explanations of that evidence than those that are not.<ref name="Signature"/> The method of IBE does not attempt to answer the question ''Why this?'' but the question ''Why this rather than that?''<ref name="Lipton"/>
+'''Inference to the Best Explanation''' (IBE) is scientific device of logical reasoning residing on the idea that entities, conditions, or processes that have the capability or so called ''causal powers'' to produce the evidence in question constitute better explanations of that evidence than those that are not.<ref name="Signature"/> The method of IBE does not attempt to answer the question ''Why this?'' but the question ''Why this rather than that?''<ref name="Lipton"/>
-Especially in [[historical science]]s, the process of determining the best eplanation necessarily involves generating a list of possible hypotheses. Then, to infer the ''best'' explanation necessarily implies the need to examine and compare competing explanations. None of evidences ultimately prove that the hypothesis is absolutely correct but they provide support for it and place it in contention as a possible best explanation.<ref name="Signature">{{Cite book
+Especially in [[historical science]]s, the process of determining the best explanation necessarily involves generating a list of possible hypotheses. Then, to infer the ''best'' explanation necessarily implies the need to examine and compare competing explanations. None of evidences ultimately prove that the hypothesis is absolutely correct but they provide support for it and place it in contention as a possible best explanation.<ref name="Signature">{{Cite book
 | author = Meyer, Stephen C.
 | title = Signature in the Cell

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 | isbn = 978-0-06-147279-2
 | pages = 154–159, 327
-| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC
+| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=RUGKBdKawDUC
 | quote= }}</ref>