Liberal Fables - Revision history

GregG: wl to remove from deadend pages, also list formatting

2013-04-23T22:44:55Z

wl to remove from deadend pages, also list formatting

CPalmer: cat

2011-10-12T12:30:07Z

cat

Benp at 17:02, August 24, 2011

2011-08-24T17:02:39Z

Benp at 16:19, August 24, 2011

2011-08-24T16:19:04Z

Benp: A start--needs to be substantially expanded.

2011-08-24T16:17:40Z

A start--needs to be substantially expanded.

New page

A great many of the "facts" people accept without question aren't facts at all. At best, they're gross oversimplifications that ignore context and nuance; at worst, they're outright fabrications. Liberals seem particularly prone towards uncritically accepting such fables. Among the most commonly-promulgated liberal fables are:

1. '''There's a universal scientific consensus that supports liberal beliefs.''' Liberals constantly invoke the "scientific consensus" on issues ranging from evolution to climate change to education. In actuality, scientists in any field tend to hold a plethora of different views, and there are many scientists who disagree with the liberal orthodoxy on such issues.

2. '''Conservatives are ignorant and credulous.''' In truth, studies have found that liberals and independents tend towards lower knowledge of current events and politics. According to one study, "Republicans and Democrats are equally likely to be represented in the high-knowledge group. But significantly fewer Republicans (26%) than Democrats (31%) fall into the third of the public that knows the least." <ref>http://people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/</ref> Other studies have reached similar conclusions.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-A great many of the "facts" people accept without question aren't facts at all.  At best, they're gross oversimplifications that ignore context and nuance; at worst, they're outright fabrications.  Liberals seem particularly prone towards uncritically accepting such fables.
+A great many of the "facts" people accept without question aren't facts at all.  At best, they're gross oversimplifications that ignore context and nuance; at worst, they're outright fabrications.  [[Liberal]]s seem particularly prone towards uncritically accepting such fables.
 Liberal fables are subtly different from liberal falsehoods.  While liberals will frequently lie to promote their goals, liberal fables are falsehoods that they actually believe are factual.  Thus, they represent a case of profound self-deception.
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Among the most commonly-promulgated liberal fables are:
-. '''There's a universal scientific consensus that supports liberal beliefs.'''  Liberals constantly invoke the "scientific consensus" on issues ranging from evolution to climate change to education.  In actuality, scientists in any field tend to hold a plethora of different views, and there are many scientists who disagree with the liberal orthodoxy on such issues.
+#'''There's a universal scientific consensus that supports liberal beliefs.'''  Liberals constantly invoke the "scientific consensus" on issues ranging from evolution to climate change to education.  In actuality, scientists in any field tend to hold a plethora of different views, and there are many scientists who disagree with the liberal orthodoxy on such issues.
+#'''Conservatives are ignorant and credulous.'''  In truth, studies have found that liberals and independents tend towards lower knowledge of current events and politics.   According to one study, "Republicans and Democrats are equally likely to be represented in the high-knowledge group. But significantly fewer Republicans (26%) than Democrats (31%) fall into the third of the public that knows the least."  <ref>http://people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/</ref>  Other studies have reached similar conclusions.
-. '''Conservatives are ignorant and credulous.'''  In truth, studies have found that liberals and independents tend towards lower knowledge of current events and politics.   According to one study, "Republicans and Democrats are equally likely to be represented in the high-knowledge group. But significantly fewer Republicans (26%) than Democrats (31%) fall into the third of the public that knows the least."  <ref>http://people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/</ref>  Other studies have reached similar conclusions.
+#'''Liberalism brought about great strides in civil rights.'''  In truth, the driving forces behind the civil rights movement were conservative and Christian.  Many of the key figures, including [[Martin Luther King]], were ministers.
-−
-. '''Liberalism brought about great strides in civil rights.'''  In truth, the driving forces behind the civil rights movement were conservative and Christian.  Many of the key figures, including Martin Luther King, were ministers.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, October 12, 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==References==		==References==
	<references/>		<references/>
		+	[[Category:Liberalism]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, August 24, 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:

	2. '''Conservatives are ignorant and credulous.''' In truth, studies have found that liberals and independents tend towards lower knowledge of current events and politics. According to one study, "Republicans and Democrats are equally likely to be represented in the high-knowledge group. But significantly fewer Republicans (26%) than Democrats (31%) fall into the third of the public that knows the least." <ref>http://people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/</ref> Other studies have reached similar conclusions.		2. '''Conservatives are ignorant and credulous.''' In truth, studies have found that liberals and independents tend towards lower knowledge of current events and politics. According to one study, "Republicans and Democrats are equally likely to be represented in the high-knowledge group. But significantly fewer Republicans (26%) than Democrats (31%) fall into the third of the public that knows the least." <ref>http://people-press.org/2007/04/15/public-knowledge-of-current-affairs-little-changed-by-news-and-information-revolutions/</ref> Other studies have reached similar conclusions.
		+
		+	3. '''Liberalism brought about great strides in civil rights.''' In truth, the driving forces behind the civil rights movement were conservative and Christian. Many of the key figures, including Martin Luther King, were ministers.
		+