Liberal Inability To Abstract - Revision history

Aschlafly at 02:17, March 16, 2010

2010-03-16T02:17:18Z

Aschlafly: Moore or other liberals may be fully aware of the flaw in an argument, but might make the argument anyway in the hopes of appealing to dimwitted liberals.

2010-03-16T02:16:48Z

Moore or other liberals may be fully aware of the flaw in an argument, but might make the argument anyway in the hopes of appealing to dimwitted liberals.

Aschlafly: |liberal censorship | disliking an idea is not a justification for censoring it

2010-03-16T02:12:36Z

|liberal censorship | disliking an idea is not a justification for censoring it

Aschlafly: social vices: harm can be caused without materialism by destroying the mind, and that "victimless" crimes do have victims

2010-02-14T23:31:03Z

social vices: harm can be caused without materialism by destroying the mind, and that "victimless" crimes do have victims

Aschlafly: added "opportunity cost" per talk page, perhaps it can used more effectively in this entry

2010-02-13T22:07:04Z

added "opportunity cost" per talk page, perhaps it can used more effectively in this entry

TK: Protected "Liberal Inability To Abstract": Template protection policy ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

2010-02-12T01:27:25Z

Protected "Liberal Inability To Abstract": Template protection policy ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))

DouglasA: cat

2010-02-12T01:11:34Z

cat

DouglasA: template

2010-02-12T01:11:00Z

template

Aschlafly: When a liberal denies the existence of something that is unseen, it can be helpful to inquire if it is possible that the five senses are limited and cannot experience all that exists.

2010-02-12T00:52:57Z

When a liberal denies the existence of something that is unseen, it can be helpful to inquire if it is possible that the five senses are limited and cannot experience all that exists.

Aschlafly: formatting improved

2010-02-12T00:39:30Z

formatting improved

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 A '''Liberal Inability To Abstract''' underlies common [[liberal]] beliefs, particularly among those who have difficulties with certain abstractions.
-Liberals like [[Michael Moore]] can be heard making arguments apparently designed to appeal to people who have difficulties grasping the abstract flaws.  Moore or other liberals may be fully aware of the flaw in an argument, but might make the argument anyway in the hopes of appealing to dimwitted liberals.
+Liberals like [[Michael Moore]] can be heard making arguments apparently designed to appeal to people who have difficulties grasping the abstract flaws.  Moore or other liberals may be fully aware of the flaw in an argument, but might make the argument anyway in the hope of appealing to dimwitted liberals.
 Here is a list of flawed liberal beliefs based on the increasingly levels of abstraction needed to debunk them:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 A '''Liberal Inability To Abstract''' underlies common [[liberal]] beliefs, particularly among those who have difficulties with certain abstractions.
-Liberals like [[Michael Moore]] can be heard making arguments apparently designed to appeal to people who have difficulties grasping the abstract flaws.
+Liberals like [[Michael Moore]] can be heard making arguments apparently designed to appeal to people who have difficulties grasping the abstract flaws.  Moore or other liberals may be fully aware of the flaw in an argument, but might make the argument anyway in the hopes of appealing to dimwitted liberals.
 Here is a list of flawed liberal beliefs based on the increasingly levels of abstraction needed to debunk them:

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 |social vices
 |harm can be caused without [[materialism]] by destroying the mind, and that "victimless" crimes do have victims
 |-
 |2

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 |Socialism
 |need to recognize the [[invisible hand]]: unseen market forces work best
 |-
 |2

@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 |marriage
 |unseen harm in legitimizing alternative arrangements as traditional marriage
 |-
 |}

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:27, February 12, 2010
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, February 12, 2010
Line 54:		Line 54:

	{{Liberalism}}		{{Liberalism}}
		+	[[Category:Liberal Traits]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:11, February 12, 2010
Line 52:		Line 52:

	Is there any logical difficulty to experiencing Hell once the five senses stop working?		Is there any logical difficulty to experiencing Hell once the five senses stop working?
		+
		+	{{Liberalism}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, February 12, 2010
Line 46:		Line 46:

	When discussing one of the above issues with a liberal, '''first consider whether the liberal is capable of understanding the abstraction'''. If not, then your main challenge may be in explaining the abstraction as clearly as possible.		When discussing one of the above issues with a liberal, '''first consider whether the liberal is capable of understanding the abstraction'''. If not, then your main challenge may be in explaining the abstraction as clearly as possible.
		+
		+	When a liberal denies the existence of something that is unseen, it can be helpful to inquire if it is possible that the five senses are limited and cannot experience all that exists. Once he admits the truth of that statement, then he can begin the process of abstraction to learn the truth and see the flaws in many liberal arguments designed for those who are unwilling or unable to abstract.
		+
		+	== Example: Hell ==
		+
		+	Is there any logical difficulty to experiencing Hell once the five senses stop working?

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 |-
-!Abstraction Required (1-low, 10-high)
+!Abstraction Required <br>(1-low, 10-high)
 !Issue
 !Abstraction Needed To See Truth
@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 |}
-When discussing with a liberal about one of the above issues, first consider whether the liberal is capable of understanding the abstraction.  If not, then your main challenge may be in explaining the abstraction as clearly as possible.
+When discussing one of the above issues with a liberal, '''first consider whether the liberal is capable of understanding the abstraction'''.  If not, then your main challenge may be in explaining the abstraction as clearly as possible.