Power Line - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: /* top */Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup, typos fixed: award winning → award-winning

2017-04-21T19:39:18Z

top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup, typos fixed: award winning → award-winning

DavidB4-bot: clean up & uniformity

2016-07-12T06:27:09Z

clean up & uniformity

TheAmericanRedoubt at 08:25, December 6, 2014

2014-12-06T08:25:10Z

EdBot: Category:Conservative Media

2008-04-17T22:46:39Z

Category:Conservative Media

Tash at 12:50, September 18, 2007

2007-09-18T12:50:52Z

Tash at 12:49, September 18, 2007

2007-09-18T12:49:56Z

Aschlafly: Reverted edits by Jesusdiedendofstory (Talk); changed back to last version by Tash

2007-09-18T04:32:19Z

Reverted edits by Jesusdiedendofstory (Talk); changed back to last version by Tash

Jesusdiedendofstory: Removing all content from page

2007-09-18T04:31:37Z

Removing all content from page

Tash: edits

2007-08-30T01:56:28Z

edits

Tash at 02:49, August 28, 2007

2007-08-28T02:49:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, April 21, 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Power Line''' is a popular and award winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof.<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref> Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”.<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>	+	'''Power Line''' is a popular and award-winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof.<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref> Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”.<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>

	It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now infamously known as [[Dan Rather\|“Rathergate”]].<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>		It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now infamously known as [[Dan Rather\|“Rathergate”]].<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Power Line''' is a popular and award winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref>. Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
+'''Power Line''' is a popular and award winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof.<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref> Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”.<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>
-It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now infamously known as [[Dan Rather| “Rathergate”]]<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>.
+It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now infamously known as [[Dan Rather|“Rathergate”]].<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>
-The site receives an estimated average of 51,000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
+The site receives an estimated average of 51,000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day.<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>
-In 2004, [[Time Magazine]] named Power Line the ''Blog of the Year''<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
+In 2004, [[Time Magazine]] named Power Line the ''Blog of the Year''.<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>
-==See Also==
+==See also==
 * [[Conservative blogs]]
-==External Links==
+==External links==
 *[http://powerlineblog.com/ Official Website]
 *[http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php Founders Biography]
 ==References==
-<small><references/></small>
+{{Reflist}}
 [[Category:Websites]]
 [[Category:Blogs]]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 In 2004, [[Time Magazine]] named Power Line the ''Blog of the Year''<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
 ==External Links==
@@ Line 13: / Line 16: @@
 ==References==
 <small><references/></small>
-[[Category:Conservative Media]]
+[[Category:Websites]]
-[[Category: Websites]]
+[[Category:Blogs]]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ==References==
 <small><references/></small>
-[[Category: Conservative media]]
+[[Category:Conservative Media]]
 [[Category: Websites]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Power Line''' is a popular and award winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref>. Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
-It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now known infamously known as [[Dan Rather| “Rathergate”]]<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>.
+It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now infamously known as [[Dan Rather| “Rathergate”]]<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>.
 The site receives an estimated average of 51,000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:32, September 18, 2007
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	'''Power Line''' is a popular and award winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref>. Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.

	+	It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave [[AWOL]] during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now known infamously known as [[Dan Rather\| “Rathergate”]]<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>.
	+
	+	The site receives an estimated average of 51,000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
	+
	+	In 2004, [[Time Magazine]] named Power Line the ''Blog of the Year''<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
	+
	+	==External Links==
	+	*[http://powerlineblog.com/ Official Website]
	+	*[http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php Founders Biography]
	+
	+	==References==
	+	<small><references/></small>
	+	[[Category: Conservative media]]
	+	[[Category: Websites]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, September 18, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Power Line''' is a popular and award winning [[conservative]] [[blog]]. The website was founded by two [[Minneapolis]] based lawyers John Hineraker and Scott Johnson and [[Washington, D.C.]] based lawyer Paul Mirengoof<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php</ref>. Power Lines founders stated that the blog was created to counter [[mainstream media]] “obscurity”<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.

−	It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and [[CBS News]] documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave [[AWOL]] during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now known infamously known as [[Dan Rather\| “Rathergate”]]<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>.
−
−	The site receives an estimated average of 51,000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
−
−	~~In 2004, [[Time Magazine]] named Power Line the ''Blog of the Year''<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.~~
−
−	~~==External Links==~~
−	*[http://powerlineblog.com/ Official Website]
−	*[http://www.powerlineblog.com/aboutus.php Founders Biography]
−
−	~~==References==~~
−	~~<small><references/></small>~~
−	~~[[Category: Conservative media]]~~
−	~~[[Category: Websites]]~~

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 It rose to national public attention in September 2004, when it questioned the validity of the [[60 Minutes]] and CBS News documents that claimed that [[George W. Bush]] had gone Absent Without Official Leave [[AWOL]] during his years in the military. The documents were later shown to be forged and the controversy is now known infamously known as [[Dan Rather| “Rathergate”]]<ref>http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/007760.php</ref>.
-The site receives an estimated average of 51, 000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
+The site receives an estimated average of 51,000 visitors a day<ref>http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s15rocketman</ref>., and received over half million visits on election day<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.
 In 2004, [[Time Magazine]] named Power Line the ''Blog of the Year''<ref>http://www.time.com/time/press_releases/article/0,8599,1009851,00.html</ref>.