Prior Restraint - Revision history

Aschlafly: improved

2022-09-26T19:55:17Z

improved

DavidB4-bot: /* top */clean up

2016-06-23T20:38:45Z

top: clean up

WesleyS: link to de-orphan

2009-02-20T22:11:45Z

link to de-orphan

NathanG: sp

2008-05-04T16:42:39Z

RSchlafly: An exceptional case that allowed prior was ''USA v The Progressive''

2007-08-26T01:05:43Z

An exceptional case that allowed prior was ''USA v The Progressive''

Aschlafly: moved cat

2007-08-25T19:32:17Z

moved cat

TK: Prior restraint moved to Prior Restraint

2007-08-18T19:36:41Z

Prior restraint moved to Prior Restraint

Aschlafly: cases added

2007-08-16T03:03:17Z

cases added

Colest: New page: '''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is often found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [...

2007-06-28T20:59:16Z

New page: '''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is often found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [...

New page

'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is often found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].

[[category:Law]]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 575, 577, 96 L. Ed. 2d 500, 107 S. Ct. 2568 (1987) (regulation prohibiting "all 'First Amendment activities'" substantially overbroad).
-An exceptional case that allowed prior was ''USA v The Progressive''. It delayed publication of a magazine article on H-bomb secrets for six months in 1979.
+An exceptional case that allowed a prior restraint was ''USA v The Progressive''. It delayed publication of a magazine article on H-bomb secrets for six months in 1979.
+== Equity ==
 [[Category:Law]]
 [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 An exceptional case that allowed prior was ''USA v The Progressive''. It delayed publication of a magazine article on H-bomb secrets for six months in 1979.
-[[category:Law]]
+[[Category:Law]]
-[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The leading precedents against prior restraints are:
-*Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 559, 49 L. Ed. 2d 683, 96 S. Ct. 2791 (1976) ("Prior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights");
+*[[Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart]], 427 U.S. 539, 559, 49 L. Ed. 2d 683, 96 S. Ct. 2791 (1976) ("Prior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights");
 *Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376, 390, 37 L. Ed. 2d 669, 93 S. Ct. 2553 (1973) (a prior restraint should not "sweep" any "more broadly than necessary").
 *Carroll v. President and Comm'rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 183-184, 21 L. Ed. 2d 325, 89 S. Ct. 347 (1968) (An "order" issued in "the area of First Amendment rights" must be "precise" and narrowly "tailored" to achieve the "pin-pointed objective" of the "needs of the case");

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, May 4, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term ~~refering~~ to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is nearly always found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].	+	'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term referring to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is nearly always found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].

	The leading precedents against prior restraints are:		The leading precedents against prior restraints are:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication.  Prior restraint is often found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].
+'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication.  Prior restraint is nearly always found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].
 The leading precedents against prior restraints are:
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 *Carroll v. President and Comm'rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 183-184, 21 L. Ed. 2d 325, 89 S. Ct. 347 (1968) (An "order" issued in "the area of First Amendment rights" must be "precise" and narrowly "tailored" to achieve the "pin-pointed objective" of the "needs of the case");
 *Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 575, 577, 96 L. Ed. 2d 500, 107 S. Ct. 2568 (1987) (regulation prohibiting "all 'First Amendment activities'" substantially overbroad).
 [[category:Law]]
 [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, August 25, 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	[[category:Law]]		[[category:Law]]
−	[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]]	+	[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:36, August 18, 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, August 16, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is often found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].		'''Prior restraint''' is a legal term refering to the prevention or restriction of speech prior to publication. Prior restraint is often found to be unconstitutional, as it violates the [[First Amendment]] rights of [[freedom of speech]] and [[freedom of the press]].
		+
		+	The leading precedents against prior restraints are:
		+
		+	*Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 559, 49 L. Ed. 2d 683, 96 S. Ct. 2791 (1976) ("Prior restraints on speech and publication are the most serious and the least tolerable infringement on First Amendment rights");
		+	*Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376, 390, 37 L. Ed. 2d 669, 93 S. Ct. 2553 (1973) (a prior restraint should not "sweep" any "more broadly than necessary").
		+	*Carroll v. President and Comm'rs of Princess Anne, 393 U.S. 175, 183-184, 21 L. Ed. 2d 325, 89 S. Ct. 347 (1968) (An "order" issued in "the area of First Amendment rights" must be "precise" and narrowly "tailored" to achieve the "pin-pointed objective" of the "needs of the case");
		+	*Board of Airport Comm'rs of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 575, 577, 96 L. Ed. 2d 500, 107 S. Ct. 2568 (1987) (regulation prohibiting "all 'First Amendment activities'" substantially overbroad).

	[[category:Law]]		[[category:Law]]
		+	[[category:US Supreme Court Cases]]