Redaction - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: /* Document Redaction */HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://en.wikipedia.org → https://en.wikipedia.org

2018-09-26T19:29:43Z

Document Redaction: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://en.wikipedia.org → https://en.wikipedia.org

Dataclarifier: section on Document Redaction, with Wikipedia link - added Category:Government

2017-08-16T14:17:07Z

section on Document Redaction, with Wikipedia link - added Category:Government

Dataclarifier: corr link -- spelling here did not link to already established Conservapedia article

2017-01-01T15:40:04Z

corr link -- spelling here did not link to already established Conservapedia article

DavidB4-bot: /* References */clean up & uniformity

2016-07-12T06:33:55Z

References: clean up & uniformity

Dataclarifier: added link to article Historical-critical method (Higher criticism)

2016-03-17T14:04:11Z

added link to article Historical-critical method (Higher criticism)

Dataclarifier: New article: pasted and revised text from Wikipedia article "Redaction"

2016-03-17T13:59:59Z

New article: pasted and revised text from Wikipedia article "Redaction"

New page

''This article is edited and revised from [[Wikipedia]].''

'''Redaction''' is a form of [[editing]] in which multiple source texts are combined (''redacted'') and altered slightly to make a single document, and often a method of collecting a series of writings on a similar theme and creating a definitive and coherent work.

Occasionally, persons performing the redaction (the redactors) add brief elements of their own. The reasons are varied and can include addition of elements to adjust the underlying conclusions of the text to suit the redactor's opinion, adding bridging elements to integrate disparate stories.

Sometimes the source texts are interlaced, particularly when discussing closely related details, things, or people. This is common when source texts contain alternative versions of the same story, and slight alterations are often made in this circumstance, simply to make the texts appear to agree, and thus the resulting redacted text appears to be coherent. Such a situation is proposed by the [[documentary hypothesis]], which proposes that multiple redactions occurred during the creation of the [[Torah]], often combining together texts which have different political attitudes and aims; another example is the [[Talmud]].

Redactional processes are documented in numerous disciplines, including ancient literary works and [[Hermeneutics|biblical studies]]. Much has been written on the role of redaction in creating meaning for texts in various formats.<ref>For example, in the field of biblical studies, see John Barton, ''Anchor Bible Dictionary'', vol. 5: 644–647; or Odil Hannes Steck, ''Old Testament Exegesis'', 2nd edition (Atlanta: Scholars Press), 74–93.</ref>

See also [[

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

[[category:literature]]

[[category:Bible]]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Redaction is simply the process of removing text or images from a document. This process is sometimes called document sanitization. Governments and businesses use document redaction services to remove private information that might be used for identity theft from electronic documents when they are published.
-See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanitation_(classified_information) Sanitation (classified information) - Wikipedia]
+See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanitation_(classified_information) Sanitation (classified information) - Wikipedia]
 == References ==

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 See also [[Historical-critical method (Higher criticism)]]
 == References ==
@@ Line 17: / Line 23: @@
 [[Category:Bible]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Occasionally, persons performing the redaction (the redactors) add brief elements of their own. The reasons are varied and can include addition of elements to adjust the underlying conclusions of the text to suit the redactor's opinion, adding bridging elements to integrate disparate stories.
-Sometimes the source texts are interlaced, particularly when discussing closely related details, things, or people. This is common when source texts contain alternative versions of the same story, and slight alterations are often made in this circumstance, simply to make the texts appear to agree, and thus the resulting redacted text appears to be coherent. Such a situation is proposed by the [[documentary hypothesis]], which proposes that multiple redactions occurred during the creation of the [[Torah]], often combining together texts which have different political attitudes and aims; another example is the [[Talmud]].
+Sometimes the source texts are interlaced, particularly when discussing closely related details, things, or people. This is common when source texts contain alternative versions of the same story, and slight alterations are often made in this circumstance, simply to make the texts appear to agree, and thus the resulting redacted text appears to be coherent. Such a situation is proposed by the [[Documentary Hypothesis|documentary hypothesis]], which proposes that multiple redactions occurred during the creation of the [[Torah]], often combining together texts which have different political attitudes and aims; another example is the [[Talmud]].
 Redactional processes are documented in numerous disciplines, including ancient literary works and [[Hermeneutics|biblical studies]]. Much has been written on the role of redaction in creating meaning for texts in various formats.<ref>For example, in the field of biblical studies, see John Barton, ''Anchor Bible Dictionary'', vol. 5: 644–647; or Odil Hannes Steck, ''Old Testament Exegesis'', 2nd edition (Atlanta: Scholars Press), 74–93.</ref>

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 {{Reflist}}
-[[category:literature]]
+[[Category:Literature]]
-[[category:Bible]]
+[[Category:Bible]]