Right to Privacy - Revision history

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ do

2021-01-22T23:04:25Z

Privacy is obsolete: do

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ add ref

2021-01-22T21:35:08Z

Privacy is obsolete: add ref

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ privacy is HARMFUL in 2021 A.D.

2021-01-22T21:33:11Z

Privacy is obsolete: privacy is HARMFUL in 2021 A.D.

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ ref

2021-01-22T21:31:06Z

Privacy is obsolete: ref

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ wikify

2021-01-22T21:28:43Z

Privacy is obsolete: wikify

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ obs

2021-01-22T21:07:40Z

Privacy is obsolete: obs

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ pdf

2021-01-22T21:07:08Z

Privacy is obsolete: pdf

Amorrow: /* Privacy is obsolete */ gone

2021-01-22T21:05:09Z

Privacy is obsolete: gone

Amorrow: /* Statutory Law */ privacy is gone, gone, gone!!!!

2021-01-22T21:01:46Z

Statutory Law: privacy is gone, gone, gone!!!!

DavidB4-bot: /* Further reading */HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.amazon.com → https://www.amazon.com (3)

2019-04-09T20:29:23Z

Further reading: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.amazon.com → https://www.amazon.com (3)

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ==Privacy is obsolete==
-Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref><ref>http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/panelists/2010/03/privacy-is-old-fashioned.html</ref><ref>https://www.quora.com/Is-the-concept-of-privacy-outdated-and-irrelevant</ref>
+Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful. The reader is invited to examine [[Citizendium]] where the editors of that wiki are encouraged to have a username of their legal name, just as any professional [[reporter]] of almost any sort of information would do.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref><ref>http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/panelists/2010/03/privacy-is-old-fashioned.html</ref><ref>https://www.quora.com/Is-the-concept-of-privacy-outdated-and-irrelevant</ref>
 ==References==

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ==Privacy is obsolete==
-Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref><ref>http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/panelists/2010/03/privacy-is-old-fashioned.html</ref>
+Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref><ref>http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/panelists/2010/03/privacy-is-old-fashioned.html</ref><ref>https://www.quora.com/Is-the-concept-of-privacy-outdated-and-irrelevant</ref>
 ==References==

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ==Privacy is obsolete==
-Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref>
+Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref><ref>http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/panelists/2010/03/privacy-is-old-fashioned.html</ref>
 ==References==

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ==Privacy is obsolete==
-Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]].<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref>
+Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]] and even harmful.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref><ref>https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/</ref>
 ==References==

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 ==Privacy is obsolete==
-Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is obsolete.<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref>
+Technology leaders assert that the very notion of data privacy in 2021 A.D. is [[obsolete]].<ref>https://www.nfinit.com/is-data-privacy-old-fashioned-concept/</ref><ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/why-do-we-care-so-much-about-privacy</ref><ref>https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/07/privacy-seems-20th-century-aberration-but-worth-mourning</ref><ref>https://cdn.harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/vol126_cohen.pdf</ref>
 ==References==

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 ==Statutory Law==
 Various US statutory laws directly or incidentally affect privacy rights, notably the The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA),<ref>https://it.ojp.gov/PrivacyLiberty/authorities/statutes/1285</ref> the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA),<ref>https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/privacy-and-security/gramm-leach-bliley-act</ref><ref name=glba_ltr>http://www.skoozeme.com/privacy/glba_letter.html</ref> also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999,  The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FRCA),<ref>https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-is-the-fair-credit-reporting-act.html</ref> and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996).<ref>https://searchhealthit.techtarget.com/definition/HIPAA</ref>
 ==References==

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ==Further reading==
-* [[Boston T. Party]], [[One Nation, Under Surveillance]], [[Wyoming]]: [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], (2009), [http://www.amazon.com/Nation-Under-Surveillance-Privacy-Watchful/dp/1888766115 [[Amazon.com]] excerpts]
+* [[Boston T. Party]], [[One Nation, Under Surveillance]], [[Wyoming]]: [[American Redoubt]] [[Javelin Press]], (2009), [https://www.amazon.com/Nation-Under-Surveillance-Privacy-Watchful/dp/1888766115 [[Amazon.com]] excerpts]
 * DeCew, Judith. "Privacy" ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (2006) [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/privacy/ online edition]
-* Johnson, John W. ''Griswold V. Connecticut: Birth Control And The Constitutional Right Of Privacy'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Griswold-V-Connecticut-Constitutional-Landmark/dp/0700613781 excerpt and text search]
+* Johnson, John W. ''Griswold V. Connecticut: Birth Control And The Constitutional Right Of Privacy'' (2005) [https://www.amazon.com/Griswold-V-Connecticut-Constitutional-Landmark/dp/0700613781 excerpt and text search]
-* Posner, Richard ''The Economics of Justice'' (1981), part 3 pp 231–50 on privacy. [http://www.amazon.com/Economics-Justice-Honorable-Richard-Posner/dp/0674235266/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1250122931&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
+* Posner, Richard ''The Economics of Justice'' (1981), part 3 pp 231–50 on privacy. [https://www.amazon.com/Economics-Justice-Honorable-Richard-Posner/dp/0674235266/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1250122931&sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]
 * Scheppele, Kim Lane. ''Legal Secrets: Equality and Efficiency in the Common Law'' (1988)
 * Smith, Janet E. ''The Right to Privacy'' (Bioethics & Culture) (2008), 105pp; introduction by [[Robert H. Bork]]; conservative analysis