Secular Science - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: /* References */clean up

2016-06-23T21:01:12Z

References: clean up

Conservative: /* See also */

2016-03-25T22:54:02Z

JoeyJ at 13:55, March 10, 2016

2016-03-10T13:55:22Z

DanielPulido at 05:54, March 19, 2010

2010-03-19T05:54:43Z

Brendanw at 15:56, October 31, 2008

2008-10-31T15:56:45Z

Philip J. Rayment: update target name

2007-07-27T03:15:31Z

update target name

Auld Nick: Materialism

2007-05-10T10:51:18Z

Materialism

Conservative: unsupported materialism

2007-05-07T00:30:13Z

unsupported materialism

Middle Man at 18:40, May 5, 2007

2007-05-05T18:40:51Z

Middle Man at 17:39, May 5, 2007

2007-05-05T17:39:24Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==References==
 <references/>
-[[category:science]]
+[[Category:Science]]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==See also==
 *[[Atheistic science]]
 ==References==
 <references/>
 [[category:science]]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]], so science and theology were essentially the same field. After the Middle Ages, the increasingly [[Atheism|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of [[Materialism|materialist]] secular science in which scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation. This rejection of faith and revelation and the paradigm shift towards the modern evidence-based secular science involving methodological naturalism correlated with a rapid acceleration in scientific discovery that is responsible for the shift from alchemy to chemistry and from astrology to astronomy and developed our comparatively vast knowledge base about that natural word.<ref>Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science, 1300–1800, p. viii</ref>
 ==References==
 <references/>
 [[category:science]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{merge with|Natural science}}
-Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]] so science and theology were essentially the same thing. After the Middle Ages the increasingly [[Atheism|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of [[Materialism|materialist]] secular science where scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation. This rejection of faith and revelation and the paradigm shift towards the modern evidence based secular science involving methodological naturalism correlated with a rapid acceleration in scientific discovery that is responsible for the shift from alchemy to chemistry and from astrology to astronomy and developed our comparatively vast knowledge base about that natural word.<ref>Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science, 1300–1800, p. viii</ref>
+Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]], so science and theology were essentially the same field. After the Middle Ages, the increasingly [[Atheism|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of [[Materialism|materialist]] secular science in which scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation. This rejection of faith and revelation and the paradigm shift towards the modern evidence-based secular science involving methodological naturalism correlated with a rapid acceleration in scientific discovery that is responsible for the shift from alchemy to chemistry and from astrology to astronomy and developed our comparatively vast knowledge base about that natural word.<ref>Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science, 1300–1800, p. viii</ref>
 ==References==
 <references/>
 [[category:science]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{merge with|Natural science}}
-Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]] so science and theology were essentially the same thing. After the Middle Ages the increasingly [[Atheism|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of [[Materialism|materialist]] secular science where scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation.
+Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]] so science and theology were essentially the same thing. After the Middle Ages the increasingly [[Atheism|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of [[Materialism|materialist]] secular science where scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation. This rejection of faith and revelation and the paradigm shift towards the modern evidence based secular science involving methodological naturalism correlated with a rapid acceleration in scientific discovery that is responsible for the shift from alchemy to chemistry and from astrology to astronomy and developed our comparatively vast knowledge base about that natural word.<ref>Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science, 1300–1800, p. viii</ref>
 ==References==
 <references/>
 [[category:science]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, May 10, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{merge\|Physical science}}		{{merge\|Physical science}}

−	Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]] so science and theology were essentially the same thing. After the Middle Ages the increasingly [[Atheism\|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of secular science where scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation.	+	Until the end of the Middle Ages there was no distinction between [[theology]] and [[science]]. Knowledge was deduced from self-evident principles received from [[God]] so science and theology were essentially the same thing. After the Middle Ages the increasingly [[Atheism\|atheistic]] rejection of God by scientists<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref> led to the creation of [[Materialism\|materialist]] secular science where scientists will continue to search for a natural explanation for a phenomenon based on the expectation that they will find one, instead of settling on a supernatural explanation.