Talk:Censorship - Revision history

Jackin the box: /* Criticism of atheism */ new section

2022-05-02T15:04:10Z

‎Criticism of atheism: new section

Jackin the box: /* Communist v. Russian */ What editing war???

2022-04-07T19:43:14Z

‎Communist v. Russian: What editing war???

RobSmith: /* Communist v. Russian= */

2022-04-07T18:52:56Z

‎Communist v. Russian=

RobSmith: /* examples of censorship */

2022-04-07T18:52:35Z

‎examples of censorship

The99Percent: Forgot to sign

2021-05-21T00:41:50Z

Forgot to sign

The99Percent at 00:39, May 21, 2021

2021-05-21T00:39:27Z

RobSmith: /* examples of censorship */

2021-05-21T00:31:11Z

‎examples of censorship

The99Percent at 23:38, May 20, 2021

2021-05-20T23:38:20Z

RobSmith: /* examples of censorship */

2021-05-20T23:20:52Z

‎examples of censorship

The99Percent: Talk

2021-05-20T23:03:48Z

Talk

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, May 2, 2022
Line 123:		Line 123:
	The recent edit war totally misses the context; CNN and MSNBC for example, is not "Russian disinformation'. CNN and MSNBC spread communist misinformation about Russia. 14:52, April 7, 2022 (EDT)		The recent edit war totally misses the context; CNN and MSNBC for example, is not "Russian disinformation'. CNN and MSNBC spread communist misinformation about Russia. 14:52, April 7, 2022 (EDT)
	:Please explain the reason for your reverts in future, before making bogus edit warring claims. The other items were reasonable surely? Calling liberal media "communist" is on par with calling conservatives fascists. Russia was totalItalian and remains so, that is why Putin and Xi Jinping are more important than Trump or Biden!		:Please explain the reason for your reverts in future, before making bogus edit warring claims. The other items were reasonable surely? Calling liberal media "communist" is on par with calling conservatives fascists. Russia was totalItalian and remains so, that is why Putin and Xi Jinping are more important than Trump or Biden!
		+
		+	== Criticism of atheism ==
		+
		+	This statement "Wikipedia has no articles about the ills of atheism", isn't exactly true, as there is the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism "Criticism of atheism"]. --[[User:Jackin the box\|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box\|talk]]) 11:04, May 2, 2022 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, April 7, 2022
Line 122:		Line 122:
	==Communist v. Russian==		==Communist v. Russian==
	The recent edit war totally misses the context; CNN and MSNBC for example, is not "Russian disinformation'. CNN and MSNBC spread communist misinformation about Russia. 14:52, April 7, 2022 (EDT)		The recent edit war totally misses the context; CNN and MSNBC for example, is not "Russian disinformation'. CNN and MSNBC spread communist misinformation about Russia. 14:52, April 7, 2022 (EDT)
		+	:Please explain the reason for your reverts in future, before making bogus edit warring claims. The other items were reasonable surely? Calling liberal media "communist" is on par with calling conservatives fascists. Russia was totalItalian and remains so, that is why Putin and Xi Jinping are more important than Trump or Biden!

@@ Line 120: / Line 120: @@
 ::::::::::::Well, they do: The Philippines. The MSM there is largely conservative, and the social media apps there regulary target liberals for blocking. Your rebuttal? [[User:The99Percent|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent|talk]]) 20:41, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
-==Communist v. Russian===
+==Communist v. Russian==
 The recent edit war totally misses the context; CNN and MSNBC for example, is not "Russian disinformation'. CNN and MSNBC spread communist misinformation about Russia. 14:52, April 7, 2022 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, April 7, 2022
Line 119:		Line 119:
	::::::::::hmm, well if conservatives controlled any mainstream media apparatus you might have an argument there. [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		::::::::::hmm, well if conservatives controlled any mainstream media apparatus you might have an argument there. [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
	::::::::::::Well, they do: The Philippines. The MSM there is largely conservative, and the social media apps there regulary target liberals for blocking. Your rebuttal? [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 20:41, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		::::::::::::Well, they do: The Philippines. The MSM there is largely conservative, and the social media apps there regulary target liberals for blocking. Your rebuttal? [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 20:41, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Communist v. Russian===
		+	The recent edit war totally misses the context; CNN and MSNBC for example, is not "Russian disinformation'. CNN and MSNBC spread communist misinformation about Russia. 14:52, April 7, 2022 (EDT)

@@ Line 118: / Line 118: @@
 :::::::::That's not what I said. I am only saying that there are conservatives censoring liberals, and liberals censoring conservatives. We should at least mention that, then give our counterarguments to it. I'm not saying we should libwash the page, just mention the counterargument, conservative censorship, and rebut it. That's it. [[User:The99Percent|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent|talk]]) 19:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
 ::::::::::hmm, well if conservatives controlled any mainstream media apparatus you might have an argument there. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
-::::::::::::Well, they do: The Philippines. The MSM there is largely conservative, and the social media apps there regulary target liberals for blocking. Your rebuttal?
+::::::::::::Well, they do: The Philippines. The MSM there is largely conservative, and the social media apps there regulary target liberals for blocking. Your rebuttal? [[User:The99Percent|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent|talk]]) 20:41, 20 May 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, May 21, 2021
Line 118:		Line 118:
	:::::::::That's not what I said. I am only saying that there are conservatives censoring liberals, and liberals censoring conservatives. We should at least mention that, then give our counterarguments to it. I'm not saying we should libwash the page, just mention the counterargument, conservative censorship, and rebut it. That's it. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		:::::::::That's not what I said. I am only saying that there are conservatives censoring liberals, and liberals censoring conservatives. We should at least mention that, then give our counterarguments to it. I'm not saying we should libwash the page, just mention the counterargument, conservative censorship, and rebut it. That's it. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
	::::::::::hmm, well if conservatives controlled any mainstream media apparatus you might have an argument there. [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		::::::::::hmm, well if conservatives controlled any mainstream media apparatus you might have an argument there. [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
		+	::::::::::::Well, they do: The Philippines. The MSM there is largely conservative, and the social media apps there regulary target liberals for blocking. Your rebuttal?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, May 21, 2021
Line 117:		Line 117:
	:::::::Isn't that what censorship is, pushing an agenda? So if people were to censor criticism of censorship, are they pushing an agenda? [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:20, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		:::::::Isn't that what censorship is, pushing an agenda? So if people were to censor criticism of censorship, are they pushing an agenda? [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:20, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
	:::::::::That's not what I said. I am only saying that there are conservatives censoring liberals, and liberals censoring conservatives. We should at least mention that, then give our counterarguments to it. I'm not saying we should libwash the page, just mention the counterargument, conservative censorship, and rebut it. That's it. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		:::::::::That's not what I said. I am only saying that there are conservatives censoring liberals, and liberals censoring conservatives. We should at least mention that, then give our counterarguments to it. I'm not saying we should libwash the page, just mention the counterargument, conservative censorship, and rebut it. That's it. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
		+	::::::::::hmm, well if conservatives controlled any mainstream media apparatus you might have an argument there. [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 20:31, 20 May 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, May 20, 2021
Line 116:		Line 116:
	::::::Even still, I don't think it is necessarily fair to only include liberal examples of censorship, without showing libertarian or conservative examples. I mean, only liberals censor people? In all of Earth? Do not take this the wrong way, obviously, liberals are censorship fanatics, but this seems like an agenda push. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		::::::Even still, I don't think it is necessarily fair to only include liberal examples of censorship, without showing libertarian or conservative examples. I mean, only liberals censor people? In all of Earth? Do not take this the wrong way, obviously, liberals are censorship fanatics, but this seems like an agenda push. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
	:::::::Isn't that what censorship is, pushing an agenda? So if people were to censor criticism of censorship, are they pushing an agenda? [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:20, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		:::::::Isn't that what censorship is, pushing an agenda? So if people were to censor criticism of censorship, are they pushing an agenda? [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:20, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
		+	:::::::::That's not what I said. I am only saying that there are conservatives censoring liberals, and liberals censoring conservatives. We should at least mention that, then give our counterarguments to it. I'm not saying we should libwash the page, just mention the counterargument, conservative censorship, and rebut it. That's it. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:38, 20 May 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, May 20, 2021
Line 115:		Line 115:
	::::An individual specific case is not evidence. There is widespread, public evidence of liberalism being forced on students. [[User:NickP\|NickP]] 19:36, 5 December 2011 (EST)		::::An individual specific case is not evidence. There is widespread, public evidence of liberalism being forced on students. [[User:NickP\|NickP]] 19:36, 5 December 2011 (EST)
	::::::Even still, I don't think it is necessarily fair to only include liberal examples of censorship, without showing libertarian or conservative examples. I mean, only liberals censor people? In all of Earth? Do not take this the wrong way, obviously, liberals are censorship fanatics, but this seems like an agenda push. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2021 (EDT)		::::::Even still, I don't think it is necessarily fair to only include liberal examples of censorship, without showing libertarian or conservative examples. I mean, only liberals censor people? In all of Earth? Do not take this the wrong way, obviously, liberals are censorship fanatics, but this seems like an agenda push. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2021 (EDT)
		+	:::::::Isn't that what censorship is, pushing an agenda? So if people were to censor criticism of censorship, are they pushing an agenda? [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 19:20, 20 May 2021 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, May 20, 2021
Line 114:		Line 114:
	:::If no one responds I will take it as a yes. --[[User:AlexanderSz\|AlexanderSz]] 19:28, 5 December 2011 (EST)		:::If no one responds I will take it as a yes. --[[User:AlexanderSz\|AlexanderSz]] 19:28, 5 December 2011 (EST)
	::::An individual specific case is not evidence. There is widespread, public evidence of liberalism being forced on students. [[User:NickP\|NickP]] 19:36, 5 December 2011 (EST)		::::An individual specific case is not evidence. There is widespread, public evidence of liberalism being forced on students. [[User:NickP\|NickP]] 19:36, 5 December 2011 (EST)
		+	::::::Even still, I don't think it is necessarily fair to only include liberal examples of censorship, without showing libertarian or conservative examples. I mean, only liberals censor people? In all of Earth? Do not take this the wrong way, obviously, liberals are censorship fanatics, but this seems like an agenda push. [[User:The99Percent\|The99Percent]] ([[User talk:The99Percent\|talk]]) 19:03, 20 May 2021 (EDT)