Talk:Dollar (U.S.) - Revision history

HelpJazz: /* The section titled 'The Design' */

2008-01-08T19:48:18Z

‎The section titled 'The Design'

Danq: /* The section titled 'The Design' */ Me either.

2008-01-08T19:40:34Z

‎The section titled 'The Design': Me either.

Leopeo: The section titled 'The Design'

2008-01-08T19:29:42Z

The section titled 'The Design'

HenryS at 05:02, July 31, 2007

2007-07-31T05:02:55Z

Porthos at 04:59, July 31, 2007

2007-07-31T04:59:52Z

Porthos at 13:55, July 30, 2007

2007-07-30T13:55:35Z

Porthos at 13:32, July 30, 2007

2007-07-30T13:32:59Z

Philip J. Rayment: /* Proposal for moving to United States Dollar */ ...(although not the name you suggested)

2007-07-07T07:58:59Z

‎Proposal for moving to United States Dollar: ...(although not the name you suggested)

Philip J. Rayment: Moved

2007-07-07T07:58:08Z

Moved

Philip J. Rayment: Talk:Dollar moved to Talk:Dollar (U.S.): Not a general article

2007-07-07T07:56:57Z

Talk:Dollar moved to Talk:Dollar (U.S.): Not a general article

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, January 8, 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:

	* Me either. Perhaps we should take it out? -[[User:RedBlade7\|danq]] 14:40, 8 January 2008 (EST)		* Me either. Perhaps we should take it out? -[[User:RedBlade7\|danq]] 14:40, 8 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	:It's leftover from some weird conspiracy stuff that was in the original article which has since been taken out. It no longer makes sense to keep it in there. [[User:HelpJazz\|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz\|Jazz]] 14:48, 8 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, January 8, 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Maybe I'm not the smartest guy, but I don't understand a word of that paragraph. Maybe a rewording? --[[User:Leopeo\|Leopeo]] 14:29, 8 January 2008 (EST)		Maybe I'm not the smartest guy, but I don't understand a word of that paragraph. Maybe a rewording? --[[User:Leopeo\|Leopeo]] 14:29, 8 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	* Me either. Perhaps we should take it out? -[[User:RedBlade7\|danq]] 14:40, 8 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, January 8, 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Having heard no objection to my judgment that the citation in question is faulty, I will delete the faulty citation and the information produced by said citation at noon tomorrow (31 July 2007) unless I am told otherwise by a sysop. Now is your time!--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 00:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)		Having heard no objection to my judgment that the citation in question is faulty, I will delete the faulty citation and the information produced by said citation at noon tomorrow (31 July 2007) unless I am told otherwise by a sysop. Now is your time!--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 00:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
	:Go ahead and remove it. It is false. [[User:Bohdan\|Bohdan]] 01:02, 31 July 2007 (EDT)		:Go ahead and remove it. It is false. [[User:Bohdan\|Bohdan]] 01:02, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== The section titled 'The Design' ==
		+
		+	Maybe I'm not the smartest guy, but I don't understand a word of that paragraph. Maybe a rewording? --[[User:Leopeo\|Leopeo]] 14:29, 8 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, July 31, 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Having heard no objection to my judgment that the citation in question is faulty, I will delete the faulty citation and the information produced by said citation at noon tomorrow (31 July 2007) unless I am told otherwise by a sysop. Now is your time!--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 00:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)		Having heard no objection to my judgment that the citation in question is faulty, I will delete the faulty citation and the information produced by said citation at noon tomorrow (31 July 2007) unless I am told otherwise by a sysop. Now is your time!--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 00:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
		+	:Go ahead and remove it. It is false. [[User:Bohdan\|Bohdan]] 01:02, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, July 31, 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:After reading even more of that site, it is really nothing more than paranoid conspiracy-theorist nonsense. It really doesn't have a place as an encyclopedic source. --[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 09:55, 30 July 2007 (EDT)		:After reading even more of that site, it is really nothing more than paranoid conspiracy-theorist nonsense. It really doesn't have a place as an encyclopedic source. --[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 09:55, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	Having heard no objection to my judgment that the citation in question is faulty, I will delete the faulty citation and the information produced by said citation at noon tomorrow (31 July 2007) unless I am told otherwise by a sysop. Now is your time!--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 00:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, July 30, 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I suggest that the source and the information it is used to reference be removed, unless a more accurate source can be found to provide said information.--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 09:32, 30 July 2007 (EDT)		I suggest that the source and the information it is used to reference be removed, unless a more accurate source can be found to provide said information.--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 09:32, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:After reading even more of that site, it is really nothing more than paranoid conspiracy-theorist nonsense. It really doesn't have a place as an encyclopedic source. --[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 09:55, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, July 30, 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Other countries use the name "dollar" for their local monetary unit. This article should be moved to reflect its specific focus on the United States Dollar. --[[User:Draper\|Draper]] 20:06, 6 July 2007 (EDT)		Other countries use the name "dollar" for their local monetary unit. This article should be moved to reflect its specific focus on the United States Dollar. --[[User:Draper\|Draper]] 20:06, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
	:Done (although not to the name you suggested) and thanks for the suggestion. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:58, 7 July 2007 (EDT)		:Done (although not to the name you suggested) and thanks for the suggestion. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:58, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Citation is Wrong==
		+	The citation used as a reference for the Masonic imagery on the dollar bill contains at least two flat-out inaccuracies (or lies, if the writer knew they were inaccurate). First, it claims that the Latin phrase "Annuit Coeptis" means "Announcing the Birth Of," which it does NOT. It means "He (God) has approved our undertaking."
		+
		+	Also, it states that "Novus Ordo Seclorum" means "New World Order". It does NOT. "New World Order" would be "Novus Ordo Mundi". "Novus Ordo Seclorum" means "New Order for the Ages"
		+
		+	I suggest that the source and the information it is used to reference be removed, unless a more accurate source can be found to provide said information.--[[User:Porthos\|Porthos]] 09:32, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:58, July 7, 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Other countries use the name "dollar" for their local monetary unit. This article should be moved to reflect its specific focus on the United States Dollar. --[[User:Draper\|Draper]] 20:06, 6 July 2007 (EDT)		Other countries use the name "dollar" for their local monetary unit. This article should be moved to reflect its specific focus on the United States Dollar. --[[User:Draper\|Draper]] 20:06, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
−	:Done, and thanks for the suggestion. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:58, 7 July 2007 (EDT)	+	:Done (although not to the name you suggested) and thanks for the suggestion. [[User:Philip J. Rayment\|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:58, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:56, July 7, 2007
(No difference)