Talk:Essay:Conservapedia Awards - Revision history

Karajou: Reverted edits by Hendrik (Talk) to last version by DinsdaleP

2010-02-28T16:36:54Z

Reverted edits by Hendrik (Talk) to last version by DinsdaleP

Hendrik: /* this article deserves attention */ new section

2010-02-28T16:25:01Z

‎this article deserves attention: new section

DinsdaleP: /* Prior winners */

2008-12-10T13:43:02Z

‎Prior winners

QWest: /* Great Idea */

2008-12-07T18:37:23Z

‎Great Idea

Aschlafly: Reverted edits by JimN (Talk) to last version by DinsdaleP

2008-12-05T20:23:36Z

Reverted edits by JimN (Talk) to last version by DinsdaleP

JimN: LDS question?

2008-12-05T20:21:13Z

LDS question?

DinsdaleP: /* Great Idea */

2008-05-21T13:10:04Z

‎Great Idea

Aschlafly: /* Great Idea */ reply

2008-05-21T01:45:57Z

‎Great Idea: reply

MRain: /* Reasons For Nomination */

2008-05-20T19:47:03Z

‎Reasons For Nomination

DanielB: /* Makers of wiki */

2008-05-19T01:15:14Z

‎Makers of wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, February 28, 2010
Line 118:		Line 118:
	Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)		Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)
	:This was only proposed in 2008, so I don't believe that there has been any formal or official presentation of an award from Conservapedia as yet. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 08:43, 10 December 2008 (EST)		:This was only proposed in 2008, so I don't believe that there has been any formal or official presentation of an award from Conservapedia as yet. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 08:43, 10 December 2008 (EST)
−
−	~~== this article deserves attention ==~~
−
−	~~I nominate Karen Dior. --[[User:Hendrik\|Hendrik]] 11:25, 28 February 2010 (EST)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, February 28, 2010
Line 118:		Line 118:
	Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)		Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)
	:This was only proposed in 2008, so I don't believe that there has been any formal or official presentation of an award from Conservapedia as yet. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 08:43, 10 December 2008 (EST)		:This was only proposed in 2008, so I don't believe that there has been any formal or official presentation of an award from Conservapedia as yet. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 08:43, 10 December 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	== this article deserves attention ==
		+
		+	I nominate Karen Dior. --[[User:Hendrik\|Hendrik]] 11:25, 28 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, December 10, 2008
Line 117:		Line 117:

	Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)		Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)
		+	:This was only proposed in 2008, so I don't believe that there has been any formal or official presentation of an award from Conservapedia as yet. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 08:43, 10 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, December 7, 2008
Line 113:		Line 113:

	::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)		::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Prior winners ==
		+
		+	Who has won this award in years past? I think we should include a list of winners on the article page. [[User:QWest\|QWest]] 13:37, 7 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, December 5, 2008
Line 113:		Line 113:

	::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)		::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
−
−	~~==Church of LDS?==~~
−
−	Should we really be recommending the Church of LDS for an award? I'm deeply suspicious of these anti-Christian fakers, and resent their continuous campaign to be seen as "reasonable Christians". Lord's sakes -they believe in false Prophets! Could anything be less in line with the Commandments? I'm not sure what this site's 'line' is on the LDS - I know many evangelicals detest the Mormons, and yet others side with them for vaguely similar value sets - but most good Christians view their beliefs as a sham, and an insult to Jesus Christ Our Lord. [[User:JimN\|JimN]] 15:21, 5 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, December 5, 2008
Line 113:		Line 113:

	::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)		::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Church of LDS?==
		+
		+	Should we really be recommending the Church of LDS for an award? I'm deeply suspicious of these anti-Christian fakers, and resent their continuous campaign to be seen as "reasonable Christians". Lord's sakes -they believe in false Prophets! Could anything be less in line with the Commandments? I'm not sure what this site's 'line' is on the LDS - I know many evangelicals detest the Mormons, and yet others side with them for vaguely similar value sets - but most good Christians view their beliefs as a sham, and an insult to Jesus Christ Our Lord. [[User:JimN\|JimN]] 15:21, 5 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, May 21, 2008
Line 111:		Line 111:

	: Good thoughts, but part of being conservative is not to worship fame. So I don't think the degree of being "well known" is a factor.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 21:45, 20 May 2008 (EDT)		: Good thoughts, but part of being conservative is not to worship fame. So I don't think the degree of being "well known" is a factor.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 21:45, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Agreed. Fame shouldn't rule out a candidate, of course, but one of the values an award can have is to bring recognition to individuals who have earned it in quieter, low-key ways while making no less of a difference in the world. There's also value in raising the awareness of groups or causes that would have much more support if people only knew about them. --[[User:DinsdaleP\|DinsdaleP]] 09:10, 21 May 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, May 21, 2008
Line 109:		Line 109:

	--[[User:MRain\|MRain]] 15:47, 20 May 2008 (EDT)		--[[User:MRain\|MRain]] 15:47, 20 May 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	: Good thoughts, but part of being conservative is not to worship fame. So I don't think the degree of being "well known" is a factor.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 21:45, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, May 20, 2008
Line 96:		Line 96:

	I'm adding small specifics to some nominees, since some seem to be nominated for being something anyone can be. For example, Vice President Cheney being a true patriot. Anyone can be a true patriot... so I'd like to add better examples of nomination for better understanding. [[User:LardoBolger\|LardoBolger]] 14:51, 18 May 2008 (EDT)		I'm adding small specifics to some nominees, since some seem to be nominated for being something anyone can be. For example, Vice President Cheney being a true patriot. Anyone can be a true patriot... so I'd like to add better examples of nomination for better understanding. [[User:LardoBolger\|LardoBolger]] 14:51, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Great Idea ==
		+	I think this is a brilliant idea. Whoever thought of the awards needs to be congratulated. I have some thoughts.
		+
		+	1. The name : I believe the best name is "Conservapedia award for ....". This will also promote the encyclopedia as a brand.
		+
		+	2. Of the many in the list, only Mrs. Schlafly and Mrs. Thatcher can be considered worthy of such an award. Many others are not that well known.
		+
		+	3. May be there should be a ceremony as well to honour the winner.
		+
		+	don't ridicule me... just some thoughts.
		+
		+	--[[User:MRain\|MRain]] 15:47, 20 May 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, May 19, 2008
Line 49:		Line 49:

	:::::::I was done anyway. :) [[User:Jinxmchue\|Jinxmchue]] 00:08, 15 May 2008 (EDT)		:::::::I was done anyway. :) [[User:Jinxmchue\|Jinxmchue]] 00:08, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	Nice job nominating Ward Cunningham he might be as proud of his "Values Award" as he is [http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3648131 that work lead to Wikipedia]. [[User:DanielB\|DanielB]] 21:15, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

	==Phyllis Schlafly==		==Phyllis Schlafly==