Talk:Gender differences - Revision history

CogitoErgoSum: /* ="The problem with"... */

2008-08-05T15:25:03Z

‎="The problem with"...

CogitoErgoSum: /* ="The problem with"... */

2008-08-05T15:24:33Z

‎="The problem with"...

Wandering at 16:23, August 4, 2008

2008-08-04T16:23:46Z

CogitoErgoSum at 14:23, August 4, 2008

2008-08-04T14:23:01Z

RogerDailey: radical?

2007-10-14T15:29:25Z

radical?

New page

Social engineering ... Radical Feminists? Aren't all feminists radical? They all question [[Woman#Women_in_the_Bible|God's order]]. [[User:RogerDailey|RogerDailey]] 11:29, 14 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, August 5, 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I removed the absurd blanket statement about "feminine character is better for young children". Children need BOTH parents, and neither one is "better" than the other.		I removed the absurd blanket statement about "feminine character is better for young children". Children need BOTH parents, and neither one is "better" than the other.

−	I also tried to balance perspectives on the egalitarianism-homosexuality connection that the original article was suggesting.	+	I also tried to balance perspectives on the egalitarianism-homosexuality connection that the original article was suggesting. [[User:CogitoErgoSum\|CogitoErgoSum]] 11:25, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, August 5, 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:

	...reads flatly like an essay. Furthermore, I can't see any way it can be rewritten to be encyclopedic. Unless reasonable defense is given, I will be removing it. [[User:Wandering\|Wandering]] 12:23, 4 August 2008 (EDT)		...reads flatly like an essay. Furthermore, I can't see any way it can be rewritten to be encyclopedic. Unless reasonable defense is given, I will be removing it. [[User:Wandering\|Wandering]] 12:23, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	I removed the absurd blanket statement about "feminine character is better for young children". Children need BOTH parents, and neither one is "better" than the other.
		+
		+	I also tried to balance perspectives on the egalitarianism-homosexuality connection that the original article was suggesting.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, August 4, 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I will remove the tautology, and then we can discuss what to do about the rest. [[User:CogitoErgoSum\|CogitoErgoSum]] 10:23, 4 August 2008 (EDT)		I will remove the tautology, and then we can discuss what to do about the rest. [[User:CogitoErgoSum\|CogitoErgoSum]] 10:23, 4 August 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	=="The problem with"...=
		+
		+	This portion of the article:
		+
		+	<blockquote>The problem with the feminist view (or agenda) is that it assumes the truth of its own dogma. It simply asserts that gender differences are a [[social construct]], but without supplying any proof of this. Worse, they refuse to consider any evidence in favor of innate differences.</blockquote>
		+
		+	...reads flatly like an essay. Furthermore, I can't see any way it can be rewritten to be encyclopedic. Unless reasonable defense is given, I will be removing it. [[User:Wandering\|Wandering]] 12:23, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, August 4, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Social engineering ... Radical Feminists? Aren't all feminists radical? They all question [[Woman#Women_in_the_Bible\|God's order]]. [[User:RogerDailey\|RogerDailey]] 11:29, 14 October 2007 (EDT)		Social engineering ... Radical Feminists? Aren't all feminists radical? They all question [[Woman#Women_in_the_Bible\|God's order]]. [[User:RogerDailey\|RogerDailey]] 11:29, 14 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	This page is a total violation of Conservapedia Commandment 5, "No personal opinion."
		+
		+	Besides, the statement "Men are more masculine, and women are more feminine" is a tautology because masculine means "like men", and feminine means "like women". Therefore it is saying, "Men are more like men, and women are more like women." It's redundant.
		+
		+	Furthermore, there are some absurd generalizations in the text of the page.
		+
		+	I will remove the tautology, and then we can discuss what to do about the rest. [[User:CogitoErgoSum\|CogitoErgoSum]] 10:23, 4 August 2008 (EDT)