Talk:Gospel of John - Revision history

Deborah at 20:59, September 1, 2008

2008-09-01T20:59:27Z

Learn together at 07:18, March 22, 2008

2008-03-22T07:18:53Z

Learn together: == Last Edit ==

2008-03-22T07:18:35Z

== Last Edit ==

Philip J. Rayment: Talk:The Gospel of John moved to Talk:Gospel of John: Consistency with other gospels

2007-07-16T14:23:43Z

Talk:The Gospel of John moved to Talk:Gospel of John: Consistency with other gospels

Rob Pommer at 13:07, April 12, 2007

2007-04-12T13:07:18Z

Dpbsmith: Agree, accepted ''without question'' is just wrong

2007-04-12T09:57:37Z

Agree, accepted ''without question'' is just wrong

Jtl: New page: In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for ins...

2007-04-12T09:11:26Z

New page: In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for ins...

New page

In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for instance [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html|this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_according_to_John#Authorship|this]. Even if the Apostle John is the author, there are people who don't accept that and/or question it. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 05:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, September 1, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{Wikiproject Religion}}
	In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for instance [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html\|this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_according_to_John#Authorship\|this]. Even if the Apostle John is the author, there are people who don't accept that and/or question it. --[[User:Jtl\|Jtl]] 05:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for instance [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html\|this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_according_to_John#Authorship\|this]. Even if the Apostle John is the author, there are people who don't accept that and/or question it. --[[User:Jtl\|Jtl]] 05:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, March 22, 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Yes, please do feel free to edit away! [[User:Rob Pommer\| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer\|talk]]</sub> 09:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		:Yes, please do feel free to edit away! [[User:Rob Pommer\| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer\|talk]]</sub> 09:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

−	== == Last Edit == ==	+	== Last Edit ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, March 22, 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Yes, please do feel free to edit away! [[User:Rob Pommer\| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer\|talk]]</sub> 09:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		:Yes, please do feel free to edit away! [[User:Rob Pommer\| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer\|talk]]</sub> 09:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== == Last Edit == ==
		+
		+
		+	Hello Kuli,
		+
		+	Could you please explain your last edit? I'm not familiar with the change that takes place based on the extra syntax. Thanks. [[User:Learn together\|Learn together]] 03:18, 22 March 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, April 12, 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	*I agree, and have added a cited source to that effect. Accepted ''without question'' is just wrong. [[User:Dpbsmith\|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*I agree, and have added a cited source to that effect. Accepted ''without question'' is just wrong. [[User:Dpbsmith\|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I was going for "concise" so I left out some...scholarly stuff that was/is better off left in; but given the aire of the place lately I also did not want to be seen as "questioning" the authenticity of the Bible.
		+
		+	:Yes, please do feel free to edit away! [[User:Rob Pommer\| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer\|talk]]</sub> 09:07, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, April 12, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for instance [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html\|this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_according_to_John#Authorship\|this]. Even if the Apostle John is the author, there are people who don't accept that and/or question it. --[[User:Jtl\|Jtl]] 05:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		In "The Apostle John is accepted without question as the author of the Fourth Gospel.", who does the accepting? It isn't "everybody" as even the most cursory search will show; see for instance [http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/john.html\|this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_according_to_John#Authorship\|this]. Even if the Apostle John is the author, there are people who don't accept that and/or question it. --[[User:Jtl\|Jtl]] 05:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	*I agree, and have added a cited source to that effect. Accepted ''without question'' is just wrong. [[User:Dpbsmith\|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:23, July 16, 2007
(No difference)