Talk:MIT OpenCourseWare - Revision history

Aschlafly: I'll guess you'll have to name-call somewhere else now. Do yourself a favor and open your mind, and rethink the liberal ideology that caused you to resort to such a crass insult.

2010-02-01T01:13:41Z

I'll guess you'll have to name-call somewhere else now. Do yourself a favor and open your mind, and rethink the liberal ideology that caused you to resort to such a crass insult.

AlexWD: /* Coates v. Keynes. */

2010-01-31T23:18:32Z

Coates v. Keynes.

AlexWD: /* Coates v. Keynes. */ new section

2010-01-31T23:18:15Z

Coates v. Keynes.: new section

AlexWD: /* For a liberal course on economics... */

2010-01-31T23:11:09Z

For a liberal course on economics...

AlexWD: /* syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, */

2010-01-31T23:05:50Z

syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories,

Aschlafly: /* For a liberal course on economics... */ I count at least 4 citations in the reading assignments for 12-452 Spring 2007.

2010-01-31T22:15:07Z

For a liberal course on economics...: I count at least 4 citations in the reading assignments for 12-452 Spring 2007.

Aschlafly: /* syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, */ Market failure, government, taxes, etc.

2010-01-31T22:12:30Z

syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories,: Market failure, government, taxes, etc.

AlexWD: /* For a liberal course on economics... */

2010-01-31T22:06:18Z

For a liberal course on economics...

AlexWD: /* syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, */ new section

2010-01-31T21:56:34Z

syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories,: new section

Aschlafly: No, not in a course on microeconomics. Check out MIT's course on macroeconomics and I'm sure it worships Keynes.

2010-01-31T21:56:31Z

No, not in a course on microeconomics. Check out MIT's course on macroeconomics and I'm sure it worships Keynes.

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 :Market failure, government, taxes, etc.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)
 :::Those aren't principals or theories, those are THINGS THAT EXIST IN REALITY. Theories would be IDEAS about those objective phenomena. What are you, simple or something? 18:05, 31 January 2010 (EST)
 == Coates v. Keynes. ==
 [http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=*&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Coase&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 Coase, 62 mentionw on the MIT Open Course website] Versus [http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=*&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Keynes&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 Keynes 55 mentions on the MIT Open Course website]. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 18:18, 31 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, January 31, 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	== Coates v. Keynes. ==		== Coates v. Keynes. ==

−	[http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Coase&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 ~~coase~~, 62 ~~mentionsw~~ on the MIT Open Course website] Versus [http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Keynes&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 Keynes 55 mentions on the MIT Open Course website]. [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 18:18, 31 January 2010 (EST)	+	[http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Coase&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 Coase, 62 mentionw on the MIT Open Course website] Versus [http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Keynes&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 Keynes 55 mentions on the MIT Open Course website]. [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 18:18, 31 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, January 31, 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	:Market failure, government, taxes, etc.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)		:Market failure, government, taxes, etc.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)
	:::Those aren't principals or theories, those are THINGS THAT EXIST IN REALITY. Theories would be IDEAS about those objective phenomena. What are you, simple or something? 18:05, 31 January 2010 (EST)		:::Those aren't principals or theories, those are THINGS THAT EXIST IN REALITY. Theories would be IDEAS about those objective phenomena. What are you, simple or something? 18:05, 31 January 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	== Coates v. Keynes. ==
		+
		+	[http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Coase&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 coase, 62 mentionsw on the MIT Open Course website] Versus [http://search.mit.edu/search?site=ocw&client=mit&getfields=&output=xml_no_dtd&proxystylesheet=http%3A%2F%2Focw.mit.edu%2FOcwWeb%2Fsearch%2Fgoogle-ocw.xsl&proxyreload=1&as_dt=i&oe=utf-8&departmentName=web&courseName=&q=Keynes&btnG.x=0&btnG.y=0 Keynes 55 mentions on the MIT Open Course website]. [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 18:18, 31 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, January 31, 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:::I count at least 4 citations in the reading assignments for 12-452 Spring 2007.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:15, 31 January 2010 (EST)		:::I count at least 4 citations in the reading assignments for 12-452 Spring 2007.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:15, 31 January 2010 (EST)
		+	Yeah well, apples and oranges. The course you're picking on for not having enough Coase is "14.01 Principles of Microeconomics." 14-452 (not 12, as you wrote), is a course on Macroeconomic Theory--and quite obviously at a more advanced and in-depth level. [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 18:11, 31 January 2010 (EST)

	== syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, ==		== syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, January 31, 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:Market failure, government, taxes, etc.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)		:Market failure, government, taxes, etc.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)
		+	:::Those aren't principals or theories, those are THINGS THAT EXIST IN REALITY. Theories would be IDEAS about those objective phenomena. What are you, simple or something? 18:05, 31 January 2010 (EST)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 : No, not in a course on [[microeconomics]].  Check out MIT's course on [[macroeconomics]] and I'm sure it worships Keynes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)
 ::[http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Economics/14-02Fall-2004/CourseHome/index.htm Wrong]. He's not mentioned in the lecture notes at all, at least in the most recent macro survey.. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 17:06, 31 January 2010 (EST)
 == syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, January 31, 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Which ones? [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)		Which ones? [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	:Market failure, government, taxes, etc.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 17:12, 31 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, January 31, 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: No, not in a course on [[microeconomics]]. Check out MIT's course on [[macroeconomics]] and I'm sure it worships Keynes.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)		: No, not in a course on [[microeconomics]]. Check out MIT's course on [[macroeconomics]] and I'm sure it worships Keynes.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	== syllabus does repeatedly mention liberal theories, ==
		+
		+	Which ones? [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, January 31, 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:

	...you'd figure they'd mention Keynes at least once They don't. [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 16:53, 31 January 2010 (EST)		...you'd figure they'd mention Keynes at least once They don't. [[User:AlexWD\|AlexWD]] 16:53, 31 January 2010 (EST)
		+
		+	: No, not in a course on [[microeconomics]]. Check out MIT's course on [[macroeconomics]] and I'm sure it worships Keynes.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Andy Schlafly]] 16:56, 31 January 2010 (EST)