https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AObjectivity 2026-11-04T05:02:45Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Objectivity&diff=936277&oldid=prev 2011-11-11T20:58:20Z

<p></p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left diff-editfont-monospace" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 20:58, November 11, 2011</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I think that empirical data is not the issue. You can be subjective, simply by selecting which empirical data you choose to consult or present. To me objectivity is the attempt (albeit flawed) to examine an event or an object from all those different perspectives which appear to represent a coherent and conventionally accepted standpoint, and are relevant to the topic under consideration. We might view this as 'triangulation', to ensure that our viewpoint is not biased, one-sided etc.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I think that empirical data is not the issue. You can be subjective, simply by selecting which empirical data you choose to consult or present. To me objectivity is the attempt (albeit flawed) to examine an event or an object from all those different perspectives which appear to represent a coherent and conventionally accepted standpoint, and are relevant to the topic under consideration. We might view this as 'triangulation', to ensure that our viewpoint is not biased, one-sided etc.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 08:52, 17 April 2007 (EDT)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>--[[User:Felix|Felix]] 08:52, 17 April 2007 (EDT)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The best way to be objective is to proportion different subjective viewpoints based on their validity after critical examination that disregards human constructs such as emotion. For example, this Wiki isn't objective in the slightest, because it proportions almost no opinion to anyone who is: Not a fundamental Christian; not a republican; not against Pro-Choice; etc.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Valuables https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Objectivity&diff=112709&oldid=prev 2007-04-17T12:52:16Z

<p>New page: I think that empirical data is not the issue. You can be subjective, simply by selecting which empirical data you choose to consult or present. To me objectivity is the attempt (albeit fla...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>I think that empirical data is not the issue. You can be subjective, simply by selecting which empirical data you choose to consult or present. To me objectivity is the attempt (albeit flawed) to examine an event or an object from all those different perspectives which appear to represent a coherent and conventionally accepted standpoint, and are relevant to the topic under consideration. We might view this as 'triangulation', to ensure that our viewpoint is not biased, one-sided etc.<br /> --[[User:Felix|Felix]] 08:52, 17 April 2007 (EDT)</div>

Felix