Talk:Public schools in the United States - Revision history

RobSmith: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T15:28:35Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

Conservative: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T14:11:10Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

Conservative: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T13:35:55Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

Conservative: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T13:35:33Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

Conservative: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T13:34:39Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

Conservative: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T13:17:49Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

Conservative: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T13:13:16Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

ChenXiansheng: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */

2023-05-25T10:14:53Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?

ChenXiansheng: /* What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? */ new section

2023-05-25T10:14:21Z

‎What's so bad about homosexual students in schools?: new section

Conservative: /* Sources? */

2018-04-17T22:54:28Z

‎Sources?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, May 25, 2023
Line 371:		Line 371:
	:Lastly, the above facts don't care about leftists/liberals feelings! [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:06, May 25, 2023 (EDT)		:Lastly, the above facts don't care about leftists/liberals feelings! [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:06, May 25, 2023 (EDT)
	::By the way, the USA and its various states would benefit by having a voucher system that would allow parents to send their children to religious schools. And those schools should be allowed to mention all the negative effects of homosexuality. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:17, May 25, 2023 (EDT)		::By the way, the USA and its various states would benefit by having a voucher system that would allow parents to send their children to religious schools. And those schools should be allowed to mention all the negative effects of homosexuality. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:17, May 25, 2023 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Leftists don't allow [[God]] [[free speech]]: ''For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret.'' That's my complaint. [[User:RobSmith\|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith\|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 11:28, May 25, 2023 (EDT)

@@ Line 364: / Line 364: @@
 == What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==
 Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? That part of the article seems pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)
 :Free speech is the bedrock of the United States constitutional republic and is guaranteed by the [[First Amendment|First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution]] as is freedom of the press and freedom of petition, assembly and religion. The Bible is definitively against homosexuality and indicates that it is a damnable sin (See: [[Homosexuality and the Bible]] and [[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]]).

@@ Line 364: / Line 364: @@
 == What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==
-[[File:Constitutional rights vs. liberal feelings.png|right|thumnbnail|200px|right|Conservapedia's rights, which are guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. don't end where leftists'/liberals' feelings begin.
+[[File:Constitutional rights vs. liberal feelings.png|right|thumnbnail|200px|Conservapedia's rights, which are guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. don't end where leftists'/liberals' feelings begin.
 <br />
 <br />

@@ Line 364: / Line 364: @@
 == What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==
-[[File:Constitutional rights vs. liberal feelings.png|thumnbnail|200px|right|Conservapedia's rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution don't end where leftists/liberals feelings begin.
+[[File:Constitutional rights vs. liberal feelings.png|right|thumnbnail|200px|right|Conservapedia's rights, which are guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. don't end where leftists'/liberals' feelings begin.
 <br />
 <br />

@@ Line 364: / Line 364: @@
 == What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==
+[[File:Constitutional rights vs. liberal feelings.png|thumnbnail|200px|right|Conservapedia's rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution don't end where leftists/liberals feelings begin.
 Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? That part of the article seems pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)
 :Free speech is the bedrock of the United States constitutional republic and is guaranteed by the [[First Amendment|First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution]] as is freedom of the press and freedom of petition, assembly and religion. The Bible is definitively against homosexuality and indicates that it is a damnable sin (See: [[Homosexuality and the Bible]] and [[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]]).

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, May 25, 2023
Line 371:		Line 371:

	:Lastly, the above facts don't care about leftists/liberals feelings! [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:06, May 25, 2023 (EDT)		:Lastly, the above facts don't care about leftists/liberals feelings! [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:06, May 25, 2023 (EDT)
		+	::By the way, the USA and its various states would benefit by having a voucher system that would allow parents to send their children to religious schools. And those schools should be allowed to mention all the negative effects of homosexuality. [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:17, May 25, 2023 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, May 25, 2023
Line 366:		Line 366:

	Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? That part of the article seems pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng\|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng\|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)		Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? That part of the article seems pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng\|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng\|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)
		+	:Free speech is the bedrock of the United States constitutional republic and is guaranteed by the [[First Amendment\|First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution]] as is freedom of the press and freedom of petition, assembly and religion. The Bible is definitively against homosexuality and indicates that it is a damnable sin (See: [[Homosexuality and the Bible]] and [[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]]).
		+
		+	:Furthermore, just because leftists/liberals hate religious/social conservatives' views on homosexuality (such as [[homosexuality and choice\|homosexuality is a bad choice]] and [[Overcoming homosexuality\|that homosexuality can be overcome]]) and also hate it when these conservatives mention all the [[Homosexuality and health\|negative health effects of homosexuality]] and negative social effects of homosexuality such as below replacement levels of fertility (which puts additional strain on a nation's pension systems) and increased violence (See: [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence]] and [[Homosexuality and Murders]]), it does not make those views hateful.
		+
		+	:Lastly, the above facts don't care about leftists/liberals feelings! [[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 09:06, May 25, 2023 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, May 25, 2023
Line 365:		Line 365:
	== What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==		== What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==

−	Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? ~~Seems~~ pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng\|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng\|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)	+	Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? That part of the article seems pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng\|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng\|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, May 25, 2023
Line 362:		Line 362:
	These are just suggestions, but looking at articles like this and their sources in order to make reasoned arguments seems more aligned with Conservapedia’s guidelines, and could help lend credence to Conservapedia as a whole. Best, [[User:Robert-Anderson\|Robert-Anderson]]		These are just suggestions, but looking at articles like this and their sources in order to make reasoned arguments seems more aligned with Conservapedia’s guidelines, and could help lend credence to Conservapedia as a whole. Best, [[User:Robert-Anderson\|Robert-Anderson]]
	:[http://www.bbc.com/news/stories-43700153 ‘I was a teacher for 17 years, but I couldn’t read or write’][[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 18:54, 17 April 2018 (EDT)		:[http://www.bbc.com/news/stories-43700153 ‘I was a teacher for 17 years, but I couldn’t read or write’][[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 18:54, 17 April 2018 (EDT)
		+
		+	== What's so bad about homosexual students in schools? ==
		+
		+	Surely you can accept people of different sexual orientations? Seems pretty discriminating to me. [[User:ChenXiansheng\|ChenXiansheng]] ([[User talk:ChenXiansheng\|talk]]) 06:14, May 25, 2023 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, April 17, 2018
Line 361:		Line 361:
	To provide the whole truth, this article needs to be expanded to highlight important aspects of public education. A section with statistics to highlight how public schools fail low-income and minority students, the unequal allocation of resources, and comparing the schools of the United States with other countries seems needed. Similarly, this article doesn’t mention segregation. This is a really important part of public education history, one that reflects very poorly on the system. Addressing the less-than-illustrious history of public schools demonstrates their failings almost more than the statistics.		To provide the whole truth, this article needs to be expanded to highlight important aspects of public education. A section with statistics to highlight how public schools fail low-income and minority students, the unequal allocation of resources, and comparing the schools of the United States with other countries seems needed. Similarly, this article doesn’t mention segregation. This is a really important part of public education history, one that reflects very poorly on the system. Addressing the less-than-illustrious history of public schools demonstrates their failings almost more than the statistics.
	These are just suggestions, but looking at articles like this and their sources in order to make reasoned arguments seems more aligned with Conservapedia’s guidelines, and could help lend credence to Conservapedia as a whole. Best, [[User:Robert-Anderson\|Robert-Anderson]]		These are just suggestions, but looking at articles like this and their sources in order to make reasoned arguments seems more aligned with Conservapedia’s guidelines, and could help lend credence to Conservapedia as a whole. Best, [[User:Robert-Anderson\|Robert-Anderson]]
		+	:[http://www.bbc.com/news/stories-43700153 ‘I was a teacher for 17 years, but I couldn’t read or write’][[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative\|talk]]) 18:54, 17 April 2018 (EDT)