Talk:Rugby (sport) - Revision history

ScottDG: /* Rugby (sport) */

2011-10-09T21:32:58Z

‎Rugby (sport)

KhalidM: /* Rugby (sport) */

2011-10-09T21:27:07Z

‎Rugby (sport)

ScottDG: /* Rugby (sport) */ new section

2011-10-09T21:12:49Z

‎Rugby (sport): new section

Ed Poor: Talk:Rugby (Sport) moved to Talk:Rugby (sport): use lower-case except for proper nouns like book titles

2008-11-29T13:06:34Z

Talk:Rugby (Sport) moved to Talk:Rugby (sport): use lower-case except for proper nouns like book titles

JimP: /* Rugby union */

2008-11-24T22:22:32Z

‎Rugby union

AlanE at 22:19, November 24, 2008

2008-11-24T22:19:53Z

DamianJohn at 19:51, July 14, 2008

2008-07-14T19:51:06Z

DamianJohn at 19:59, July 13, 2008

2008-07-13T19:59:07Z

Ajkgordon: Rugby union

2007-10-12T15:24:05Z

Rugby union

New page

== Rugby union ==

The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, October 9, 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	As opposed to Rugby (what?). Should we habe articles like Baseball (sport), Chess (game) or Saxophone (musical instrument), too? [[User:ScottDG\|ScottDG]] 17:12, 9 October 2011 (EDT)		As opposed to Rugby (what?). Should we habe articles like Baseball (sport), Chess (game) or Saxophone (musical instrument), too? [[User:ScottDG\|ScottDG]] 17:12, 9 October 2011 (EDT)
	:As opposed to the town of Rugby, I imagine - a large town in Warwickshire (England). [[User:KhalidM\|KhalidM]] 17:27, 9 October 2011 (EDT)		:As opposed to the town of Rugby, I imagine - a large town in Warwickshire (England). [[User:KhalidM\|KhalidM]] 17:27, 9 October 2011 (EDT)
		+	::Ah. Never heard of it. Cheerfully withdrawn, akhii....[[User:ScottDG\|ScottDG]] 17:32, 9 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, October 9, 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:

	As opposed to Rugby (what?). Should we habe articles like Baseball (sport), Chess (game) or Saxophone (musical instrument), too? [[User:ScottDG\|ScottDG]] 17:12, 9 October 2011 (EDT)		As opposed to Rugby (what?). Should we habe articles like Baseball (sport), Chess (game) or Saxophone (musical instrument), too? [[User:ScottDG\|ScottDG]] 17:12, 9 October 2011 (EDT)
		+	:As opposed to the town of Rugby, I imagine - a large town in Warwickshire (England). [[User:KhalidM\|KhalidM]] 17:27, 9 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, October 9, 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::::That's Ok. For some reason there's a page for "rugby (sport)", rugby union, and rugby league. I don't really understand why! [[User:JimP\|JimP]] 17:22, 24 November 2008 (EST)		::::That's Ok. For some reason there's a page for "rugby (sport)", rugby union, and rugby league. I don't really understand why! [[User:JimP\|JimP]] 17:22, 24 November 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	== Rugby (sport) ==
		+
		+	As opposed to Rugby (what?). Should we habe articles like Baseball (sport), Chess (game) or Saxophone (musical instrument), too? [[User:ScottDG\|ScottDG]] 17:12, 9 October 2011 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, November 24, 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)		::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
	:::Sorry about that. (Why are they on the same page anyway?) [[User:AlanE\|AlanE]] 17:19, 24 November 2008 (EST)		:::Sorry about that. (Why are they on the same page anyway?) [[User:AlanE\|AlanE]] 17:19, 24 November 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	::::That's Ok. For some reason there's a page for "rugby (sport)", rugby union, and rugby league. I don't really understand why! [[User:JimP\|JimP]] 17:22, 24 November 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, November 24, 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)		:I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
	::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)		::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
		+	:::Sorry about that. (Why are they on the same page anyway?) [[User:AlanE\|AlanE]] 17:19, 24 November 2008 (EST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:06, November 29, 2008
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:51, July 14, 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon\|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)		The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon\|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
	:I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)		:I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)
		+	::I am going to forge ahead regardless of what others say. Hopefully my work is appreciated.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:51, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, July 13, 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon\|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)		The rugby union link just re-directs to Rugby while there is an article on rugby league. Does anyone know if there was an article on rugby union perhaps under a different name that has been orphaned? Otherwise I'll create one. [[User:Ajkgordon\|Ajkgordon]] 11:24, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
		+	:I plan on doing some work on this article now, a nice uncontroversial article I know a lot about. However I will make the article about rugby union and another one on rugby league. It is understandable perhaps that a primarily US website would lump the two sports together but its rather silly also.--[[User:DamianJohn\|DamianJohn]] 15:59, 13 July 2008 (EDT)