U.S. History Textbook Project - Revision history

DavidB4-bot: clean up & uniformity

2016-06-27T23:44:16Z

clean up & uniformity

Aschlafly: add link to survey of textbooks

2008-10-22T21:56:19Z

add link to survey of textbooks

Human: People's history comment

2008-08-16T23:15:03Z

People's history comment

BrianCo: Undo revision 500359 by Jdanngeology (Talk)sarcasm

2008-08-16T21:32:33Z

Undo revision 500359 by Jdanngeology (Talk)sarcasm

Jdanngeology at 21:30, August 16, 2008

2008-08-16T21:30:13Z

Aschlafly: /* Analysis of Available Textbooks */ A Beka Book

2008-08-10T16:43:00Z

Analysis of Available Textbooks: A Beka Book

Aschlafly: learn better without a textbook?

2008-08-10T15:06:13Z

learn better without a textbook?

Aschlafly: /* Analysis of Available Textbooks */ REA?

2008-08-10T15:04:59Z

Analysis of Available Textbooks: REA?

Aschlafly: /* Analysis of Available Textbooks */ Paul Johnson's txt

2008-08-10T14:44:57Z

Analysis of Available Textbooks: Paul Johnson's txt

Aschlafly: /* Analysis of Available Textbooks */ more comments

2008-08-10T14:34:46Z

Analysis of Available Textbooks: more comments

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 : This text is considered better than most, but still "Essentially a Propaganda Tract" according to Dr. John Fonte of the [[Hudson Institute]].  He cites numerous instances of false propaganda pushed by this text.<ref>http://www.textbookleague.org/101path.htm</ref>
-*Paul Johnson, ''A History of the American People''. (Harper Perennial, 1999). Oriented more toward social history more than the "great man" approach, this 1100-page text tells the story of the United States as much from the viewpoints of the everyday men and women who built the country as it does from the perspectives of generals and politicians. While the author's love of his subject--and country--is evident, this does not keep him from honestly and critically dealing with those moments in American history when the country's actions and policies did not match up with its visions of liberty and equality; moreover, he shows how the American people have typically worked to ensure that those visions ultimately triumph. (unsigned)
+*Paul Johnson, ''A History of the American People''. (Harper Perennial, 1999). Oriented more toward social history more than the "great man" approach, this 1100-page text tells the story of the United States as much from the viewpoints of the everyday men and women who built the country as it does from the perspectives of generals and politicians. While the author's love of his subject—and country—is evident, this does not keep him from honestly and critically dealing with those moments in American history when the country's actions and policies did not match up with its visions of liberty and equality; moreover, he shows how the American people have typically worked to ensure that those visions ultimately triumph. (unsigned)
 ** Paul Johnson is [[British]] and his history texts tend to be gossipy and a bit out of step with American ways.  For example, in 1100 pages about American culture he failed to mention the national pastime of baseball once.  His book spends less than a page discussing the [[Mormon Church]] in a cartoonish manner.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:21, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 * United States History, Heritage of Freedom (2005), from A Beka Book, written from a Christian perspective and hopefully would not contain the false information or and bias in liberal texts.  The recommendation is that is well-organized and easy to read.  It is listed at the 11th grade level, and is reasonably priced at $24.  I have not examined it.  Does anyone else know?  It has no reviews on amazon.com and its availability is poor there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:42, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
-* The Princeton Review - "Cracking the AP U.S. History Exam."  This was praised by one homeschooler who took this exam, and the text does have an index and a useful listing of key events and terms.  But [[liberal]] bias permits this book.  It smears [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[supply-side economics]], repeating epithets that it was "voodoo economics" and "trick down" economics.  The book claims that "[a]t first" it had "little effect" and later "results were mixed."  It never tells the student how tremendously successful "[[Reaganomics]]" was.  Other signs of bias:  capitulation to the [[gender police]] by replacing "strawman" with "straw dog," and unjustified claims of people migrating to America 20,000 to 40,000 years ago (p. 63).  The book incorrectly explains the motivation for the [[Salem Witch Trials]].  The book has inappropriate, liberal-type editorializing comments inserted by the authors, such as "(How the monarchy came to sell the rights to land that it clearly did not own is just the kind of interesting question that this review will not be covering.  Sorry, but it is not on the AP!)" (p. 64).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
+* The Princeton Review - "Cracking the AP U.S. History Exam."  This was praised by one homeschooler who took this exam, and the text does have an index and a useful listing of key events and terms.  But [[liberal]] bias permits this book.  It smears [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[supply-side economics]], repeating epithets that it was "voodoo economics" and "trick down" economics.  The book claims that "[a]t first" it had "little effect" and later "results were mixed."  It never tells the student how tremendously successful "[[Reaganomics]]" was.  Other signs of bias:  capitulation to the [[gender police]] by replacing "strawman" with "straw dog," and unjustified claims of people migrating to America 20,000 to 40,000 years ago (p.&nbsp;63).  The book incorrectly explains the motivation for the [[Salem Witch Trials]].  The book has inappropriate, liberal-type editorializing comments inserted by the authors, such as "(How the monarchy came to sell the rights to land that it clearly did not own is just the kind of interesting question that this review will not be covering.  Sorry, but it is not on the AP!)" (p.&nbsp;64).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
 * AP United States History (REA) - The Best Test Prep for the AP Exam: 7th Edition - Excellent reviews on amazon.com.  REA books tend to be less biased than the other prep books.  Also consider REA's different books prepping for the SAT II and CLEP.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:04, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 <references/>
-[[category:Homeschool Curriculum]]
+[[Category:Homeschool Curriculum]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, October 22, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We need a basic college-level textbook, or advanced high-school textbook, in [[United States]] history that is free from liberal bias and adequate to prepare students for [[AP]], [[CLEP]], or [[SAT II]] exams.		We need a basic college-level textbook, or advanced high-school textbook, in [[United States]] history that is free from liberal bias and adequate to prepare students for [[AP]], [[CLEP]], or [[SAT II]] exams.
		+
		+	A good survey of commonly used textbooks is available [http://ushistory.wikispaces.com/G8500+Textbooks+Paper here].

	Or do students learn better without a textbook?		Or do students learn better without a textbook?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, August 16, 2008
Line 25:		Line 25:

	* How about Howard Zinn's ''A People's History of the United States''? It is easily one of the best and most readable US history texts--[[User:Mantle\|Mantle]] 19:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)		* How about Howard Zinn's ''A People's History of the United States''? It is easily one of the best and most readable US history texts--[[User:Mantle\|Mantle]] 19:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
		+	**While I would recommend reading some of it as an example of extreme left-wing populist propaganda, I don't think it would prepare a student for the tests in question. [[User:Human\|Human]] 19:15, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

	* United States History, Heritage of Freedom (2005), from A Beka Book, written from a Christian perspective and hopefully would not contain the false information or and bias in liberal texts. The recommendation is that is well-organized and easy to read. It is listed at the 11th grade level, and is reasonably priced at $24. I have not examined it. Does anyone else know? It has no reviews on amazon.com and its availability is poor there.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 18:42, 9 August 2008 (EDT)		* United States History, Heritage of Freedom (2005), from A Beka Book, written from a Christian perspective and hopefully would not contain the false information or and bias in liberal texts. The recommendation is that is well-organized and easy to read. It is listed at the 11th grade level, and is reasonably priced at $24. I have not examined it. Does anyone else know? It has no reviews on amazon.com and its availability is poor there.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 18:42, 9 August 2008 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 We need a basic college-level textbook, or advanced high-school textbook, in [[United States]] history that is free from liberal bias and adequate to prepare students for [[AP]], [[CLEP]], or [[SAT II]] exams.
-Or do students learn better without a textbook? Well whatever they do learn will probably be a biased anti liberal bull excrement, with the world being the same age as the domestication of the dog!
+Or do students learn better without a textbook?
 == Analysis of Available Textbooks ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 We need a basic college-level textbook, or advanced high-school textbook, in [[United States]] history that is free from liberal bias and adequate to prepare students for [[AP]], [[CLEP]], or [[SAT II]] exams.
-Or do students learn better without a textbook?
+Or do students learn better without a textbook? Well whatever they do learn will probably be a biased anti liberal bull excrement, with the world being the same age as the domestication of the dog!
 == Analysis of Available Textbooks ==

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 * How about Howard Zinn's ''A People's History of the United States''? It is easily one of the best and most readable US history texts--[[User:Mantle|Mantle]] 19:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
-* United States History, Heritage of Freedom from ABEKA, written from a Christian perspective and hopefully would not contain the false information or and bias in liberal texts.  The recommendation is that is well-organized and easy to read.  It is listed at the 11th grade level, and is reasonably priced at $24.  I have not examined it.  Does anyone else know?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:42, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
+* United States History, Heritage of Freedom (2005), from A Beka Book, written from a Christian perspective and hopefully would not contain the false information or and bias in liberal texts.  The recommendation is that is well-organized and easy to read.  It is listed at the 11th grade level, and is reasonably priced at $24.  I have not examined it.  Does anyone else know?  It has no reviews on amazon.com and its availability is poor there.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:42, 9 August 2008 (EDT)
 * The Princeton Review - "Cracking the AP U.S. History Exam."  This was praised by one homeschooler who took this exam, and the text does have an index and a useful listing of key events and terms.  But [[liberal]] bias permits this book.  It smears [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[supply-side economics]], repeating epithets that it was "voodoo economics" and "trick down" economics.  The book claims that "[a]t first" it had "little effect" and later "results were mixed."  It never tells the student how tremendously successful "[[Reaganomics]]" was.  Other signs of bias:  capitulation to the [[gender police]] by replacing "strawman" with "straw dog," and unjustified claims of people migrating to America 20,000 to 40,000 years ago (p. 63).  The book incorrectly explains the motivation for the [[Salem Witch Trials]].  The book has inappropriate, liberal-type editorializing comments inserted by the authors, such as "(How the monarchy came to sell the rights to land that it clearly did not own is just the kind of interesting question that this review will not be covering.  Sorry, but it is not on the AP!)" (p. 64).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, August 10, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	We need a basic college-level textbook, or advanced high-school textbook, in [[United States]] history that is free from liberal bias and adequate to prepare students for [[AP]], [[CLEP]], or [[SAT II]] exams.		We need a basic college-level textbook, or advanced high-school textbook, in [[United States]] history that is free from liberal bias and adequate to prepare students for [[AP]], [[CLEP]], or [[SAT II]] exams.
		+
		+	Or do students learn better without a textbook?

	== Analysis of Available Textbooks ==		== Analysis of Available Textbooks ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, August 10, 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:

	* The Princeton Review - "Cracking the AP U.S. History Exam." This was praised by one homeschooler who took this exam, and the text does have an index and a useful listing of key events and terms. But [[liberal]] bias permits this book. It smears [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[supply-side economics]], repeating epithets that it was "voodoo economics" and "trick down" economics. The book claims that "[a]t first" it had "little effect" and later "results were mixed." It never tells the student how tremendously successful "[[Reaganomics]]" was. Other signs of bias: capitulation to the [[gender police]] by replacing "strawman" with "straw dog," and unjustified claims of people migrating to America 20,000 to 40,000 years ago (p. 63). The book incorrectly explains the motivation for the [[Salem Witch Trials]]. The book has inappropriate, liberal-type editorializing comments inserted by the authors, such as "(How the monarchy came to sell the rights to land that it clearly did not own is just the kind of interesting question that this review will not be covering. Sorry, but it is not on the AP!)" (p. 64).--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 10 August 2008 (EDT)		* The Princeton Review - "Cracking the AP U.S. History Exam." This was praised by one homeschooler who took this exam, and the text does have an index and a useful listing of key events and terms. But [[liberal]] bias permits this book. It smears [[Ronald Reagan]]'s [[supply-side economics]], repeating epithets that it was "voodoo economics" and "trick down" economics. The book claims that "[a]t first" it had "little effect" and later "results were mixed." It never tells the student how tremendously successful "[[Reaganomics]]" was. Other signs of bias: capitulation to the [[gender police]] by replacing "strawman" with "straw dog," and unjustified claims of people migrating to America 20,000 to 40,000 years ago (p. 63). The book incorrectly explains the motivation for the [[Salem Witch Trials]]. The book has inappropriate, liberal-type editorializing comments inserted by the authors, such as "(How the monarchy came to sell the rights to land that it clearly did not own is just the kind of interesting question that this review will not be covering. Sorry, but it is not on the AP!)" (p. 64).--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 10:19, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
		+
		+	* AP United States History (REA) - The Best Test Prep for the AP Exam: 7th Edition - Excellent reviews on amazon.com. REA books tend to be less biased than the other prep books. Also consider REA's different books prepping for the SAT II and CLEP.--[[User:Aschlafly\|Aschlafly]] 11:04, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

	== References ==		== References ==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *Paul Johnson, ''A History of the American People''. (Harper Perennial, 1999). Oriented more toward social history more than the "great man" approach, this 1100-page text tells the story of the United States as much from the viewpoints of the everyday men and women who built the country as it does from the perspectives of generals and politicians. While the author's love of his subject--and country--is evident, this does not keep him from honestly and critically dealing with those moments in American history when the country's actions and policies did not match up with its visions of liberty and equality; moreover, he shows how the American people have typically worked to ensure that those visions ultimately triumph. (unsigned)
-** Paul Johnson is [[British]] and his history texts tend to be gossipy and a bit out of step with American ways.  For example, in 1100 pages about American culture he failed to mention the national pastime of baseball once.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:21, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
+** Paul Johnson is [[British]] and his history texts tend to be gossipy and a bit out of step with American ways.  For example, in 1100 pages about American culture he failed to mention the national pastime of baseball once.  His book spends less than a page discussing the [[Mormon Church]] in a cartoonish manner.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:21, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
 *  George Tindall and David Shi, ''America: A Narrative History''Seventh ed. New York: Norton, 2006, is one of the best college-level text.