User:CPanel - Revision history

TK at 13:26, October 20, 2007

2007-10-20T13:26:36Z

Jallen at 16:23, May 18, 2007

2007-05-18T16:23:46Z

Jallen: Protected "User:CPanel" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

2007-05-18T16:23:34Z

Protected "User:CPanel" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]

Conservative at 22:38, April 9, 2007

2007-04-09T22:38:32Z

Palmd001 at 22:38, April 9, 2007

2007-04-09T22:38:17Z

Palmd001 at 22:38, April 9, 2007

2007-04-09T22:38:04Z

Conservative at 22:37, April 9, 2007

2007-04-09T22:37:23Z

Palmd001: /* Regarding a concise definition */

2007-04-09T22:36:31Z

Regarding a concise definition

Conservative: /* Regarding a concise definition */

2007-04-09T22:33:24Z

Regarding a concise definition

Conservative at 22:32, April 9, 2007

2007-04-09T22:32:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, October 20, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel~~. Please submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them~~.	+	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, May 18, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please ~~Submit~~ any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.	+	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, April 9, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.		This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.
−
−	~~==References==~~
−	~~<references/>~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel.  Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.
 ==References==
 <references/>

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
-The above is actually non-sensical. No scientist equates natural selection with evolution.  Natural selection is ''one'' of the processes that drives evolution, hence the need for a well written summary of the scientific aspect of the article.  I cannot really participate in the Creationist part, as I am no expert, and it needs to be well written by one of the many experts here.  Please feel free to refer to [[Basic Theory of Evolution]].  Thanks for your time.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
+The above is actually non-sensical. No scientist equates natural selection with evolution.  Natural selection is ''one'' of the processes that drives evolution, hence the need for a well written summary of the scientific aspect of the article.  I cannot really participate in the Creationist part, as I am no expert, and it needs to be well written by one of the many experts here.  Please feel free to refer to [[Basic Evolutionary Theory]].  Thanks for your time.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
 ==References==
 <references/>

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:23, May 18, 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, April 9, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.		This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.

−	~~==Regarding a concise definition ==~~
−
−	I am glad to hear that the panel came to a decision on this matter. I have a question though and '''it is probably based on the panel seeing a prior version of the article and not the current article. '''
−
−
−	~~'''Here is what a panel spokesperson wrote:'''~~
−
−	"We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution." [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Theory_of_evolution]
−
−
−	~~'''Here is what the article states now:'''~~
−
−	Today advocates of evolution no longer adhere to "natural selection" as the definition of evolution, but rather define it simply as any "change over time" in the genetic composition of a population....
−
−
−	Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines evolution as a "theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations." <ref>http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/evolution</ref>.....
−
−	Evolutionist [[Theodosius Dobzhansky]] wrote: "The process of [[mutation]] is the only known source of the new materials of genetic variability, and hence of evolution." <ref>http://www.nwcreation.net/geneticquotes.html</ref> Evolutionists believe that the processes of natural selection and mutation created every species of life that we see on earth today after [[Origin of life\|life first came about on earth]]. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp</ref> Creationist scientists believe that mutations and natural selection would not cause [[macroevolution]]. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/mutations.asp</ref><ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/mutations01.asp</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3831</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/selection.asp</ref>
−
−
−
−	~~'''MY SUMMATION STATEMENT TO THE PANEL:'''~~
−
−	I think the above current version gives a concise and adequate explanation of the theory of evolution and Aschlafly concurrs. I am hoping that the panel agrees and that they based their statement above based on a prior version they read.
−
−	~~[[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 18:32, 9 April 2007 (EDT)conservative~~

	The above is actually non-sensical. No scientist equates natural selection with evolution. Natural selection is ''one'' of the processes that drives evolution, hence the need for a well written summary of the scientific aspect of the article. I cannot really participate in the Creationist part, as I am no expert, and it needs to be well written by one of the many experts here. Please feel free to refer to [[Basic Theory of Evolution]]. Thanks for your time.--[[User:palmd001\|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001\|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)		The above is actually non-sensical. No scientist equates natural selection with evolution. Natural selection is ''one'' of the processes that drives evolution, hence the need for a well written summary of the scientific aspect of the article. I cannot really participate in the Creationist part, as I am no expert, and it needs to be well written by one of the many experts here. Please feel free to refer to [[Basic Theory of Evolution]]. Thanks for your time.--[[User:palmd001\|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001\|talk]]</sup> 18:36, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, April 9, 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:


−	'''Here is what a panel ~~spokespersson~~ wrote:'''	+	'''Here is what a panel spokesperson wrote:'''

	"We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution." [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Theory_of_evolution]		"We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution." [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Theory_of_evolution]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, April 9, 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.		This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have on our [[User talk:CPanel\|talk page]] and we will work to resolve them.
		+
		+	==Regarding a concise definition ==
		+
		+	I am glad to hear that the panel came to a decision on this matter. I have a question though and '''it is probably based on the panel seeing a prior version of the article and not the current article. '''
		+
		+
		+	'''Here is what a panel spokespersson wrote:'''
		+
		+	"We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution." [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Theory_of_evolution]
		+
		+
		+	'''Here is what the article states now:'''
		+
		+	Today advocates of evolution no longer adhere to "natural selection" as the definition of evolution, but rather define it simply as any "change over time" in the genetic composition of a population....
		+
		+
		+	Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines evolution as a "theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations." <ref>http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/evolution</ref>.....
		+
		+	Evolutionist [[Theodosius Dobzhansky]] wrote: "The process of [[mutation]] is the only known source of the new materials of genetic variability, and hence of evolution." <ref>http://www.nwcreation.net/geneticquotes.html</ref> Evolutionists believe that the processes of natural selection and mutation created every species of life that we see on earth today after [[Origin of life\|life first came about on earth]]. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp</ref> Creationist scientists believe that mutations and natural selection would not cause [[macroevolution]]. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/mutations.asp</ref><ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/mutations01.asp</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3831</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/selection.asp</ref>
		+
		+
		+
		+	'''MY SUMMATION STATEMENT TO THE PANEL:'''
		+
		+	I think the above current version gives a concise and adequate explanation of the theory of evolution and Aschlafly concurrs. I am hoping that the panel agrees and that they based their statement above based on a prior version they read.
		+
		+	[[User:Conservative\|Conservative]] 18:32, 9 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
		+
		+	==References==
		+	<references/>